201
|
Ware MA, Martel MO, Jovey R, Lynch ME, Singer J. A prospective observational study of problematic oral cannabinoid use. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2018; 235:409-417. [PMID: 29250737 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-017-4811-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite evidence supporting the benefits of cannabinoids for symptom control across a wide range of medical conditions, concerns have been raised regarding the potential misuse and/or problematic use of cannabinoids (CBs). OBJECTIVE The first objective of this study was to examine the incidence of problematic prescription cannabinoid use (PPCBU) over a 12-month period among patients initiating cannabinoid therapy. The second objective was to examine the factors associated with PPCBU. A total of 265 patients who were prescribed oral cannabinoid therapy as part of usual medical practice were enrolled into this prospective observational study. Patients first completed a series of baseline questionnaires assessing demographic, clinical, and substance use variables. Three measures designed to assess PPCBU were then administered at 3, 6, and 12 months after initiation of cannabinoid therapy. RESULTS At each of the follow-up assessment time points, a significantly greater number of patients scored below (vs above) cutoff scores on the three main PPCBU outcomes (all p's < .001). At any follow-up time point, a maximum of roughly 25% of patients demonstrated PPCBU. Heightened odds of PPCBU were observed among patients with a history of psychiatric problems, tobacco smokers, and recreational cannabis users (all p's < .05). Results indicated that past-year substance abuse, assessed using the DAST-20, was the strongest predictor of PPCBU (p < .005). CONCLUSION Findings from the present study could have implications for clinicians considering the use of cannabinoids for the management of patients with medical conditions. Although results indicated that the majority of patients included in this study did not reach cutoff scores on the three main PPCBU outcomes, our findings suggest that PPCBU should be routinely assessed and monitored over the course of cannabinoid therapy, particularly among patients with a history of psychiatric or substance use problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Ware
- Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. .,Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. .,Alan Edwards Pain Management Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada. .,Montreal General Hospital, A5.140, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4, Canada.
| | - Marc O Martel
- Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.,Alan Edwards Pain Management Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.,Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Roman Jovey
- CPM Centres for Pain Management, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mary E Lynch
- Department of Anesthesia, Pain Medicine, and Perioperative Care, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Joel Singer
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
202
|
Episode accumulation associated with hastened recurrence and delayed recovery in bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord 2018; 227:657-664. [PMID: 29174739 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2017] [Revised: 10/03/2017] [Accepted: 11/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Assess episode accumulation (≥ 10 prior mood episodes) associations with demographic/baseline clinical characteristics and mood episode recurrence/recovery in bipolar disorder (BD). METHODS Stanford BD Clinic outpatients enrolled during 2000-2011 were assessed with Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD (STEP-BD) Affective Disorders Evaluation. Among recovered and syndromal mood episode patients, we assessed episode accumulation associations with demographic/baseline clinical characteristics and with recurrence/recovery (by Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, with mediators assessed with Cox Proportional Hazard Ratio (HR) analyses). RESULTS Among all 450 BD outpatients, almost twice as many had versus lacked episode accumulation (65.8% versus 34.2%), which was less common among 92 recovered versus 193 syndromal mood episode patients (51.1% versus 69.9%). Among recovered patients, episode accumulation was associated with 14/18 (77.7%) demographic/other baseline clinical characteristics, and hastened mood episode recurrence. Among syndromal mood episode patients, episode accumulation was associated with 13/18 (72.2%) demographic/other baseline clinical characteristics, and delayed mood episode recovery. LIMITATIONS American tertiary BD clinic referral sample. CONCLUSION Studies are needed to confirm episode accumulation is associated with hastened mood episode recurrence and delayed mood episode recovery in BD, and to further explore its' associations with hastened mood elevation recurrence and delayed recovery from depressive and mood elevation episodes, considered separately.
Collapse
|
203
|
Lambert M, Schöttle D, Sengutta M, Ruppelt F, Rohenkohl A, Luedecke D, Nawara LA, Galling B, Falk AL, Wittmann L, Niehaus V, Sarikaya G, Handwerk U, Rothländer W, Rietschel L, Gagern C, Lange B, Meigel-Schleiff C, Naber D, Schulte-Markwort M, Krüger H, Unger HP, Sippel S, Ott S, Romer G, Daubmann A, Wegscheider K, Correll CU, Schimmelmann BG, Bock T, Gallinat J, Karow A. Early detection and integrated care for adolescents and young adults with severe psychotic disorders: rationales and design of the Integrated Care in Early Psychosis Study (ACCESS III). Early Interv Psychiatry 2018; 12:96-106. [PMID: 27618789 DOI: 10.1111/eip.12361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2016] [Revised: 05/25/2016] [Accepted: 06/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
AIM The Integrated Care in Early Psychosis (ACCESS III) Study examined the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a combined intervention consisting of strategies to improve early detection and quality of care (integrated care including therapeutic assertive community treatment) in adolescents and young adults in the early phase of a severe psychotic disorder from 2011 to 2014. METHODS This is a prospective, single-centre, 1-year cohort study comparing an intervention condition (early detection plus integrated care, n = 120) to the historical control condition (standard care, SC, n = 105) for adolescents and young adults aged 12-29 years suffering from a severe, early-phase psychotic disorder (i.e. within 2 years of treatment). RESULTS Primary outcome is the rate of combined symptomatic (i.e. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) criteria) and functional (i.e. Global Assessment of Functioning scale (GAF) ≥ 60 points criterion) remission over at least 6 months at study endpoint. Secondary outcome comprises the comparison of the reduction in the duration of untreated psychosis within the 4-year study duration between integrated care and SC, course of psychopathology, functioning, quality of life, satisfaction with care, cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in comparison to a historical control group. CONCLUSION To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study assessing the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a combined intervention consisting of early detection strategies and strategies to improve quality of care in both adolescents and young adults with early-phase psychosis. The results will be published in 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Lambert
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Schöttle
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mary Sengutta
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Friederike Ruppelt
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anja Rohenkohl
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Luedecke
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luise Antonia Nawara
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Britta Galling
- Psychiatry Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York, USA
| | - Anne-Lena Falk
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Linus Wittmann
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Vivien Niehaus
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gizem Sarikaya
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ute Handwerk
- Community Psychiatric Center Eimsbüttel (GPZE), Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Liz Rietschel
- University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Charlotte Gagern
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Lange
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christina Meigel-Schleiff
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dieter Naber
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Schulte-Markwort
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Helmut Krüger
- Community Psychiatric Center Eimsbüttel (GPZE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Unger
- Center for Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sven Sippel
- Center for Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sabine Ott
- Center for Mental Health, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Asklepios Hospital Harburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Georg Romer
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Muenster, Münster, Germany
| | - Anne Daubmann
- Institute for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Karl Wegscheider
- Institute for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Benno G Schimmelmann
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
- University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Bock
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Gallinat
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anne Karow
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
204
|
Calabrese JR, Sanchez R, Jin N, Amatniek J, Cox K, Johnson B, Perry P, Hertel P, Such P, McQuade RD, Nyilas M, Carson WH. Symptoms and functioning with aripiprazole once-monthly injection as maintenance treatment for bipolar I disorder. J Affect Disord 2018; 227:649-656. [PMID: 29174738 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2017] [Revised: 10/16/2017] [Accepted: 10/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effects of maintenance treatment with aripiprazole once-monthly 400mg (AOM 400) on symptoms and functioning were assessed in adults with bipolar I disorder (BP-I) after a manic episode. METHODS Patients were stabilized on oral aripiprazole, cross-titrated to AOM 400, then randomized in a 52-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, withdrawal phase. Prespecified secondary outcomes are reported: time to hospitalization for mood episode, Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar scale, Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST), and Brief Quality of Life in Bipolar Disorder questionnaire. Time to hospitalization for mood episode was analyzed using log-rank test and changes from baseline using mixed model for repeated measures or analysis of covariance. RESULTS AOM 400 significantly increased time to hospitalization for any mood episode versus placebo (P=0.0002). YMRS total scores decreased with oral aripiprazole; improvements were maintained with AOM 400. After randomization, YMRS scores changed little with AOM 400 but worsened with placebo (P=0.0016), and MADRS scores, already low at trial initiation, did not differ between groups. FAST score improvements were maintained with AOM 400 but not placebo (P=0.0287). LIMITATIONS Results are generalizable to patients with BP-I stabilized on aripiprazole following a manic episode. CONCLUSIONS Patients with BP-I experiencing an acute manic episode exhibited symptomatic and functional improvements during stabilization with oral aripiprazole and AOM 400 that were maintained with continued AOM 400 treatment but not placebo. AOM 400 is the first once-monthly long-acting injectable antipsychotic to demonstrate efficacy in maintenance treatment of the manic phase of BP-I.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Raymond Sanchez
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Na Jin
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Joan Amatniek
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Kevin Cox
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Brian Johnson
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Pamela Perry
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | | | - Robert D McQuade
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Margaretta Nyilas
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - William H Carson
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
205
|
Cavicchioli FL, Maes M, Roomruangwong C, Bonifacio KL, Barbosa DS, Anderson G, Vargas HO, Nunes SOV. Associations between severity of anxiety and clinical and biological features of major affective disorders. Psychiatry Res 2018; 260:17-23. [PMID: 29156296 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2017] [Revised: 10/25/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Patients with major affective disorders (MAFD) with comorbid anxiety show a greater functional impairment than those without anxiety. The aim of this study is to delineate the associations between severity of anxiety in MAFD, namely bipolar disorder (BD) and major depression (MDD), and MAFD characteristics and serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels. Recruited were 82 participants with anxiety disoders and 83 without anxiety disoders, including 101 MAFD patients and 51 healthy controls. We used the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) to measure severity of anxiety and made the diagnoses of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), panic disorder (PD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and phobias. The HAM-A score is significantly predicted by higher number of depressive episodes, GAD and phobias, childhood trauma, tobacco use disorder, metabolic syndrome and lowered HDL-cholesterol. Increased HAM-A scores are, independently from severity of depression, associated with lowered quality of life, increased disabilities and suicidal ideation. Lithium treatment significantly lowers HAM-A scores. It is concluded that severity of anxiety significantly worsens the phenomenology of MAFD. Therefore, treatments of MAFD should target increased severity of anxiety and its risk factors including low HDL-cholesterol, metabolic syndrome, childhood trauma and tobacco use disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael Maes
- Health Sciences Graduation Program, Health Sciences Center, State University of Londrina, Brazil; Department of Psychiatry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; Impact Strategic Research Center, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
| | | | | | - Decio Sabbatini Barbosa
- Health Sciences Graduation Program, Health Sciences Center, State University of Londrina, Brazil
| | | | - Heber Odebrecht Vargas
- Health Sciences Graduation Program, Health Sciences Center, State University of Londrina, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
206
|
Continuous circular cycling as a predictor of treatment response in bipolar disorders: a comprehensive review of the current literature. CNS Spectr 2018; 23:24-28. [PMID: 28294084 DOI: 10.1017/s1092852917000189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Evidence from the literature suggests that, on average, 27% of patients with a bipolar disorder (BD) experience a continuous cycling course (CCC) and that this subgroup differs significantly from patients with a noncontinuous cycling course (N-CCC) with respect to sociodemographic characteristics and clinical presentation. The aim of the present paper is to review the studies that evaluated short- and long-term treatment responses in BD patients with CCC. The retrieved studies indicate that CCC is a significant predictor of poor response to long-term treatment with lithium (the odds of a response in the CCC group were 57% less than in the N-CCC group; p<0.01), as well as to polytherapies including lithium and/or an antiepileptic augmented, when necessary, with an antipsychotic and/or antidepressant. The percentage of patients without new episodes during follow-up was significantly lower in the CCC group compared with the N-CCC group (15.4 vs. 37.6% , p<0.01). Compared with patients in the N-CCC group, members of the CCC group had a poorer response and lower remission rates after 12-week antidepressant treatments for a major depressive episode (82.3 vs. 50%, p =0.002; 69.6 vs. 40.9%, p=0.013). These findings, underlining that CCC is a predictor of poor response to short- and long-term treatment in BD, should be interpreted considering the limitations of the reviewed studies (the small sample sizes, the small number of trials and their observational nature, the lack of randomization or placebo controls, and the unblinded nature of the outcomes). Clinical trials and observational studies with larger samples are warranted to confirm the conclusions of our review.
Collapse
|
207
|
Plasminogen replacement therapy for the treatment of children and adults with congenital plasminogen deficiency. Blood 2018; 131:1301-1310. [PMID: 29321155 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-09-806729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Accepted: 01/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Congenital plasminogen deficiency is caused by mutations in PLG, the gene coding for production of the zymogen plasminogen, and is an ultrarare disorder associated with abnormal accumulation or growth of fibrin-rich pseudomembranous lesions on mucous membranes. Left untreated, these lesions may impair organ function and impact quality of life. Plasminogen replacement therapy should provide an effective treatment of the manifestations of congenital plasminogen deficiency. An open-label phase 2/3 study of human Glu-plasminogen administered IV at 6.6 mg/kg every 2 to 4 days in 15 patients with congenital plasminogen deficiency is ongoing. Reported here are data on 14 patients who completed at least 12 weeks of treatment. The primary end point was an increase in trough plasminogen activity levels by at least an absolute 10% above baseline. The secondary end point was clinical success, defined as ≥50% improvement in lesion number/size or functionality impact from baseline. All patients achieved at least an absolute 10% increase in trough plasminogen activity above baseline. Clinical success was observed in all patients with clinically visible (conjunctiva and gingiva), nonvisible (nasopharynx, bronchus, colon, kidney, cervix, and vagina), and wound-healing manifestations of the disease. Therapeutic effects were rapid, as all but 2 lesions resolved or improved after 4 weeks of treatment. Human Glu-plasminogen was well tolerated in both children and adults. This study provides critical first evidence of the clinical utility of ongoing replacement therapy with human Glu-plasminogen for the treatment of children and adults with congenital plasminogen deficiency. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02690714.
Collapse
|
208
|
Prefrontal activation during a working memory task differs between patients with unipolar and bipolar depression: A preliminary exploratory study. J Affect Disord 2018; 225:64-70. [PMID: 28797920 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2017] [Revised: 07/12/2017] [Accepted: 07/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To identify bipolar disorder during the initial stages of a depressive episode has always been a great clinical challenge. Patterns of functional brain activity may underlie the differences in the neural mechanisms of bipolar depression (BD) and unipolar depression (UD). This study aimed to investigate the differences in neural activity between BD and UD patients during executive task. METHODS We performed a 52-channel near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) scan in 39 patients with BD, 35 patients with UD, and 36 healthy controls (HCs). The relative concentration changes in oxygenated hemoglobin ([oxy-Hb]) and deoxygenated hemoglobin ([deoxy-Hb]) during a 1-back working memory task were measured for each channel. Clinical characteristics including current mood were evaluated within one week prior to NIRS examination. RESULTS Compared to HCs, BD (CH34: Z = -2.354, P = 0.019) and UD patients (CH18: Z = -2.358, P = 0.018; CH30: Z = -2.174, P = 0.030; CH34: Z = -1.990, P = 0.047) showed reduced activation of [oxy-Hb] in the inferior prefrontal region. Compared to patients with UD, patients with BD showed less decreased [oxy-Hb] changes in the left frontopolar cortex (FPC) (CH18: Z = -2.366, P = 0.018), left pars opercularis and pars triangularis (POPE/PTRI) regions (Broca's area) (CH30: Z = -2.333, P = 0.020). No correlation existed between clinical characteristics and NIRS measurements. LIMITATIONS The effect of medication could not be excluded, and behavioral data was not systematically collected. CONCLUSION The results from this preliminary exploratory study suggest distinct prefrontal activation patterns underlie BD and UD, especially in the left frontopolar region and Broca's area. The NIRS-based prefrontal activation measurement may serve as a potential marker to aid in differentiating bipolar from unipolar depression.
Collapse
|
209
|
Hegerl U, Mergl R, Sander C, Dietzel J, Bitter I, Demyttenaere K, Gusmão R, González-Pinto A, Zorrilla I, Alocén AG, Sola VP, Vieta E, Juckel G, Zimmermann US, Bauer M, Sienaert P, Quintão S, Edel MA, Bolyos C, Ayuso-Mateos JL, López-García P, Kluge M. A multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of methylphenidate in the initial treatment of acute mania (MEMAP study). Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2018; 28:185-194. [PMID: 29174864 DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2017.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2017] [Revised: 09/19/2017] [Accepted: 11/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Based on many clinical and preclinical findings the 'vigilance regulation model of mania' postulates that an unstable regulation of wakefulness is a pathogenetic factor in both mania and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and induces hyperactivity and sensation seeking as an autoregulatory attempt to stabilize wakefulness. Accordingly, stimulant medications with their vigilance stabilizing properties could have rapid antimanic effects similar to their beneficial effects in ADHD. The MEMAP study - a multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled and randomized clinical trial (RCT) - assessed the antimanic efficacy and safety of a 2.5-day treatment with methylphenidate (20-40mg/day). Of 157 screened patients with acute mania, 42 were randomly assigned to receive 20-40mg per day of methylphenidate in one or two applications, or placebo. The primary outcome was the change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) sum scores from baseline to day 2.5 in the methylphenidate group compared to the placebo group. A group sequential design was chosen to justify early RCT termination based on efficacy or futility at an interim analysis after inclusion of 40 patients. In the interim analysis, the change from baseline in the YMRS total score at day 2.5 was not significantly different between both groups (F(1,37)=0.23; p=0.64). Thus, futility was declared for methylphenidate and the RCT was stopped. In summary, although methylphenidate was well tolerated and safe in the full analysis set, it failed to show efficacy in the treatment of acute mania. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov (URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; registration number: NCT01541605).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrich Hegerl
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Roland Mergl
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christian Sander
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jens Dietzel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Istvan Bitter
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | - Ricardo Gusmão
- Departamento de Psiquiatria, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal; ISPUP, Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana González-Pinto
- Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Santiago Apostol, Vitoria, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental. CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Iñaki Zorrilla
- Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Santiago Apostol, Vitoria, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental. CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Adriana García Alocén
- Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Santiago Apostol, Vitoria, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental. CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Victor Perez Sola
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental. CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain; Department of Psychiatry, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduard Vieta
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental. CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain; Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Georg Juckel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Ulrich S Zimmermann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Bauer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Sónia Quintão
- Departamento de Psiquiatria, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal; ISPUP, Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Marc-Andreas Edel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Csilla Bolyos
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Jose Luis Ayuso-Mateos
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental. CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain; Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Pilar López-García
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental. CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain; Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Michael Kluge
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
210
|
Marino P, Schulberg HC, Gildengers AG, Mulsant BH, Sajatovic M, Gyulai L, Aljurdi RK, Evans LD, Banerjee S, Gur RC, Young RC. Assessing bipolar disorder in the older adult: the GERI-BD toolbox. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2018; 33:e150-e157. [PMID: 28543407 PMCID: PMC6093209 DOI: 10.1002/gps.4738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2016] [Accepted: 04/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The evidence base regarding characteristics of older adults with bipolar disorder (BD) remains limited. The NIH-funded multicenter study Acute Pharmacotherapy of Late-Life Mania (GERI-BD) assessed various clinical domains before and during mood stabilizer treatment in older adults participating in a 9-week, double-blind randomized controlled trial. We describe the rationale for selecting these instruments. METHODS Domains and instruments were selected on the basis of the study design and the participants. The investigators' experience in clinical trials involving young adults with BD or older adults with major depressive disorder, along with open studies of older adults with BD, contributed to the selection process. RESULTS We identified domains and selected instruments that could be used to assess the participants given their diagnostic, treatment history, and medical and mood state characteristics. They were also intended to measure tolerability and efficacy and permit examination of potential moderating and mediating factors. CONCLUSIONS Decisions regarding the assessment domains to be included in the clinical trial highlight the challenges facing researchers studying drug treatments for older adults with BD, or more generally, mood disorders. We suggest that the domains and instruments selected by GERI-BD investigators constitute a "toolbox" that can be customized for other investigators. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ruben C Gur
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
211
|
Clark SR, Schubert KO, Olagunju AT, Lyrtzis EA, Baune BT. Cognitive and Functional Assessment of Psychosis Stratification Study (CoFAPSS): Rationale, Design, and Characteristics. Front Psychiatry 2018; 9:662. [PMID: 30559688 PMCID: PMC6287598 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Prediction of treatment response and illness trajectory in psychotic disorders including schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and psychotic depression is difficult due to heterogeneity in presentation and outcome. Consequently, patients may receive prolonged ineffective treatments leading to functional decline, illness chronicity, and iatrogenic physical illness. One approach to addressing these problems is to stratify patients based on historical, clinical, and biological signatures. Such an approach has the potential to improve categorization resulting in better understanding of underlying mechanisms and earlier evidence-based treatment with reduced side effect burden. To investigate these multimodal signatures we developed the Cognitive and Functional Assessment of Psychosis Stratification Study (CoFAPSS) employing a prospective study design and a healthy control group comparison. The main aim of this study is to investigate cognitive, and biological "genomics" markers of psychotic illnesses that can be integrated with clinical data to improve prediction of risk and define functional trajectories. We also aim to identify biological "genomic" signatures underpinning variation in treatment response and adverse medical outcomes. The study commenced in June 2016, including patients with primary diagnosis of psychotic disorders including schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and psychotic depression according to DSM-5 criteria. The assessment covers a wide range of participant history (life stressors, trauma, and family history), cognitive dimensions (social perception, memory and learning, attention, executive function, and general cognition), measures to assess psychosocial function and quality of life, psychotic symptom severity, clinical course of illness, and parameters for adverse medical outcome. Blood is collected for comprehensive genomic discovery analyses of biological (genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and cell-biologic) markers. The CoFAPSS is a novel approach that integrates clinical, cognitive and biological "genomic" markers to clarify clinico-pathological basis of risk, functional trajectories, disease stratification, treatment response, and adverse medical outcome. The CoFAPSS team welcomes collaborations with both national and international investigators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott R Clark
- Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - K Oliver Schubert
- Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Andrew T Olagunju
- Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Ellen Alexandra Lyrtzis
- Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Bernhard T Baune
- Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
212
|
Findling RL, Earley W, Suppes T, Patel M, Wu X, Chang CT, McIntyre RS. Post hoc analyses of asenapine treatment in pediatric patients with bipolar I disorder: efficacy related to mixed or manic episode, stage of illness, and body weight. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2018; 14:1941-1952. [PMID: 30122926 PMCID: PMC6080865 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s165743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient characteristics and disease progression may affect response to pharmacologic intervention in bipolar I disorder. Asenapine is approved for acute treatment of manic/mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder in patients 10-17 years old. Post hoc analyses assessed asenapine efficacy in pediatric patients by current manic or mixed episode, number of lifetime episodes, and baseline body mass index (BMI). PATIENTS AND METHODS Data were obtained from a 3-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial of asenapine 2.5, 5.0, or 10.0 mg twice daily (BID) in male or female patients (10-17 years) with bipolar I disorder (NCT01244815). Patients were stratified by current episode type (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition - defined mixed/manic), number of lifetime episodes (<3, 3-5, >5), and baseline BMI tertile. Changes from baseline to day 21 in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score and Clinical Global Impressions Scale for use in Bipolar Illness (CGI-BP) were assessed in asenapine subgroups vs placebo. RESULTS In patients with mixed episodes, differences in YMRS and CGI-BP scores were statistically significant for each asenapine dose vs placebo (P<0.001) at day 21; in patients with manic episodes, significant differences vs placebo were seen in all groups (P<0.05) except 2.5 mg BID on the YMRS. In patients with <3 previous mixed/manic episodes, significant differences in YMRS and CGI-BP scores were observed for all asenapine doses vs placebo (P<0.05). In patients with 3-5 or >5 previous episodes, asenapine 10 mg BID was significantly different than placebo (P<0.05) on both scales; differences vs placebo varied for lower doses. Baseline body weight or BMI did not appear to influence the efficacy of asenapine. CONCLUSION Asenapine was effective in the treatment of pediatric patients with bipolar I disorder. Efficacy did not appear to be influenced by the type of current episode, stage of disease progression, or baseline body weight/BMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Findling
- Johns Hopkins University and the Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA,
| | | | - Trisha Suppes
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
213
|
Sleep disturbance may impact treatment outcome in bipolar disorder: A preliminary investigation in the context of a large comparative effectiveness trial. J Affect Disord 2018; 225:563-568. [PMID: 28881294 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2017] [Revised: 05/25/2017] [Accepted: 08/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bipolar patients experience sleep disturbances during and between mood episodes. Yet the impact of sleep on treatment with different medications has not been fully explored. The purpose of this paper is to explore the potential impact of poor sleep at baseline on outcomes in a randomized effectiveness trial of quetiapine and lithium. METHODS The Bipolar CHOICE study was a 6-month, parallel group, multisite randomized controlled trial. Participants with bipolar disorder (N = 482; 59% female and age 18-70 years) received quetiapine or lithium. Patients were allowed to also receive adjunctive personalized treatments, which were guideline-informed, empirically-based medications added to treatment as needed. Medication changes were recorded as necessary clinical adjustments (NCA). Fisher's exact tests, mixed-regression models, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to assess demographic and clinical characteristics as well as whether sleep disturbance would predict outcomes. RESULTS 63% of patients had baseline sleep disturbance. Individuals with sleep disturbance had worse bipolar illness severity, greater severity of depression, mania, anxiety, irritability, and psychosis, were less likely to have sustained response (17% vs. 29%; adjusted RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.38-0.78, p = 0.0006) and had more NCAs (median 0.71 vs. 0.59, p = 0.03). LIMITATIONS Our findings were limited by how we defined sleep disturbance, and by how severity of sleep disturbance was assessed with one item with a non-sleep specific measure. CONCLUSIONS Baseline sleep disturbance was associated with more severe bipolar symptoms and worse 6-month outcomes. Further research is warranted on improving sleep in bipolar disorder, especially the role of psychosocial interventions.
Collapse
|
214
|
Stepanova E, Grant B, Findling RL. Asenapine Treatment in Pediatric Patients with Bipolar I Disorder or Schizophrenia: A Review. Paediatr Drugs 2018; 20:121-134. [PMID: 29170943 PMCID: PMC5856894 DOI: 10.1007/s40272-017-0274-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Asenapine, administered as a twice-daily (BID) sublingual tablet, is approved in the US as monotherapy for the acute treatment of manic and mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder in children and adolescents aged 10-17 years based on the positive results of one 3-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study; the recommended dose is 2.5-10 mg BID. Although asenapine has been studied in pediatric patients with schizophrenia, it is not approved for this indication. Asenapine is not approved for pediatric use in bipolar I disorder or schizophrenia in other major markets. To inform clinicians treating psychiatric disorders in pediatric patients, we have summarized the neuropharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical trial experience, and clinical use of asenapine in pediatric patients. After rapid absorption through the oral mucosa, the pharmacokinetic profile of asenapine in pediatric patients is similar to that which is observed in adult patients, indicating that the recommended adult dosage does not need to be adjusted for pediatric use. Intake of food and water should be avoided for 10 min after administration. In clinical trials, asenapine was generally safe and well tolerated in pediatric patients with bipolar I disorder and schizophrenia. Serious adverse effects were generally related to worsening of the underlying psychiatric disorder. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in both indications were sedation and somnolence. Like some other second-generation antipsychotic agents, weight gain and changes in some metabolic parameters were noted; oral effects (e.g., oral hypoesthesia, dysgeusia, paresthesia) related to sublingual administration did not typically result in treatment discontinuation and were generally transient. Extrapyramidal symptom TEAEs occurred in ≥5% of asenapine-treated patients in the acute and long-term studies in bipolar I disorder and schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Stepanova
- The Johns Hopkins University and the Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA. .,Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins Children's Center, 1800 Orleans St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Bradley Grant
- The Johns Hopkins University and the Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Robert L. Findling
- The Johns Hopkins University and the Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD USA
| |
Collapse
|
215
|
Silva RDAD, Mograbi DC, Camelo EVM, Santana CMT, Landeira-Fernandez J, Cheniaux E. Clinical correlates of loss of insight in bipolar depression. TRENDS IN PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY 2017; 39:264-269. [PMID: 29267509 DOI: 10.1590/2237-6089-2017-0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2017] [Accepted: 05/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Affective state may influence insight, especially regarding mania. Nevertheless, studies have so far suggested that depression seems not to significantly impair insight. To the best of our knowledge, this study pioneers the evaluation of how insight variations in bipolar depression correlate with clinical variables. METHOD A group of 165 bipolar patients, 52 of whom had depressive episodes according to DSM-5 criteria, were followed during a year. All patients underwent clinical assessment, and insight was evaluated through the Insight Scale for Affective Disorders (ISAD). Repeated-measures ANOVA was calculated comparing scores on the four ISAD factors (insight into symptoms, the condition itself, self-esteem and social relationships) in order to investigate differences in insight according to different objects. Correlational analysis explored which clinical symptoms were linked to reduced insight. RESULTS Worse total insight correlated with suicide attempt/ideation and fewer subsyndromal manic symptoms such as mood elevation, increased energy and sexual interest. Worse self-esteem insight was associated with not only suicide ideation/attempt but also with activity reduction and psychomotor retardation. Worse symptom insight also correlated with psychomotor retardation. Better insight into having an affective disorder was associated with more intense hypochondria symptoms. Finally, worse insight into having an illness was associated with psychotic episodes. CONCLUSION Our study found that symptoms other than psychosis - suicide ideation, psychomotor retardation and reduction of activity and work - correlate with insight impairment in bipolar depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael de Assis da Silva
- Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Instituto de Psiquiatria - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Daniel C Mograbi
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Evelyn V M Camelo
- Instituto de Psiquiatria - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Cristina M T Santana
- Instituto de Psiquiatria - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | | | - Elie Cheniaux
- Instituto de Psiquiatria - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
216
|
Daglas R, Allott K, Yücel M, Henry LP, Macneil CA, Hasty MK, Berk M, Cotton SM. Cognitive functioning following stabilisation from first episode mania. Int J Bipolar Disord 2017; 5:39. [PMID: 29250705 PMCID: PMC6155457 DOI: 10.1186/s40345-017-0108-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Accepted: 10/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to examine cognitive functioning in people following first-episode mania relative to a demographically similar healthy control group. Methods Forty-one patients, who had recently stabilised from a first manic episode, and twenty-one healthy controls, were compared in an extensive cognitive assessment. Results First-episode mania participants had significantly lower Full-Scale IQ (FSIQ) relative to healthy controls; however, this finding could be driven by premorbid differences in intellectual functioning. There were no significant differences between groups in Verbal IQ (VIQ) and Performance IQ (PIQ). First-episode mania participants performed significantly poorer than healthy controls in processing speed, verbal learning and memory, working memory, and cognitive flexibility with medium-to-large effects. There were no group differences in other measures of cognition. Conclusions Participants following first-episode mania have poorer global intelligence than healthy controls, and have cognitive difficulties in some, but not all areas of cognitive functioning. This highlights the importance of early intervention and cognitive assessment in the early course of the disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rothanthi Daglas
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Kelly Allott
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Murat Yücel
- Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, School of Psychological Sciences & Monash Biomedical Imaging Facility, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Lisa P Henry
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Craig A Macneil
- Orygen Youth Health-Clinical Program, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, 3052, Australia
| | - Melissa K Hasty
- Orygen Youth Health-Clinical Program, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, 3052, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.,IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, PO Box 281, Geelong, 3220, Australia.,Barwon Health and the Geelong Clinic, Swanston Centre, PO Box 281, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.,Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, Kenneth Myer Building, Royal Parade, Parkville, Australia
| | - Sue M Cotton
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia. .,Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
217
|
Aboraya A, Leucht S, Nasrallah HA, Samara M, Haro JM, Elshazly A, Zangeneh M. A novel approach to measuring response and remission in schizophrenia in clinical trials. Schizophr Res 2017; 190:123-128. [PMID: 28314680 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2016] [Revised: 03/02/2017] [Accepted: 03/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmaceutical companies conduct clinical trials to show the efficacy and safety of new medications for the treatment of schizophrenia. After the new medications are marketed, clinicians treating patients with schizophrenia discover that a considerable number of patients do not respond to these new medications. The goals of the review are to examine the methodology and design of recent antipsychotic clinical trials, identify common flaws, and propose guidelines to fix the flaws and improve the quality of future clinical trials of antipsychotic medications. METHODS A review of recent antipsychotic clinical trials was conducted using a PubMed search. Ten recent trials published in the past four years were reviewed and their methods analyzed and critiqued. RESULTS The authors identified six major methodological flaws that may explain the suboptimal response in many patients after a drug is approved. Most of the flaws are related to eligibility criteria, the misuse of the Positive and Negative Syndromes Scale (PANSS) and the lack of consensus on how to define remission, response and exacerbation in schizophrenia. Proposed guidelines for a more rigorous use of the PANSS are presented and recommendations are proposed for using uniform criteria for remission, response and exacerbation in schizophrenia. CONCLUSIONS The authors recommend using standardized diagnostic interviews to screen patients for eligibility criteria and using the PANSS according to the author's recommendations and the proposed guidelines. Uniform criteria to define remission, response and exacerbation are recommended for clinical trials examining the efficacy and safety of antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Aboraya
- Chief of Psychiatry, William R. Sharpe, Jr. Hospital. Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine. Adjunct faculty, School of Public Health, West Virginia University (WVU), USA.
| | - Stefan Leucht
- Dept. of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Germany Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Henry A Nasrallah
- The Sydney Souers Professor and Chairman Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience Saint Louis University School of Medicine St. Louis MO, USA
| | - Myrto Samara
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Josep Maria Haro
- Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu Dr. Antoni Pujadas, 42 08830 - Sant Boi de Llobregat Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ahmed Elshazly
- Atlanticare Regional Medical Center 1925 Pacific Ave Atlantic City, NJ, USA
| | - Masood Zangeneh
- Editor-in-Chief, International Journal of Mental Health & Addiction Consultant, Kuwait Center for Autism, Kuwait
| |
Collapse
|
218
|
Durgam S, Earley W, Lu K, Németh G, Laszlovszky I, Volk S, Litman RE. Global improvement with cariprazine in the treatment of bipolar I disorder and schizophrenia: A pooled post hoc analysis. Int J Clin Pract 2017; 71:e13037. [PMID: 29119668 PMCID: PMC5765496 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.13037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2017] [Accepted: 10/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Global rating scale measures are useful for assessing the clinical relevance of patient change. Cariprazine, a dopamine D3 and D2 receptor partial agonist, is FDA-approved for the adult treatment of acute manic/mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder and schizophrenia. Post hoc evaluations of Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) scores from the cariprazine pivotal trials in both indications were conducted. METHODS Data from 3 bipolar mania and 3 schizophrenia trials were pooled by indication (bipolar disorder = 1033; schizophrenia = 1466). Cariprazine- and placebo-treated patients were categorised by baseline CGI-S scores; the proportion of patients who improved from more severe categories at baseline to less severe categories at end-point was evaluated using a logistic regression model. Correlations between Young Mania Rating Scale and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score changes and category shifts were also evaluated. RESULTS In both disease states, more cariprazine- than placebo-treated patients had improved CGI-S scores at end-point; more placebo-treated patients had worse end-point scores. More cariprazine- vs placebo-treated patients shifted from the extremely/severely ill to mildly ill/better category (bipolar disorder = 55% vs 36%, odds ratio [OR] = 2.1; P = .09; schizophrenia = 42% vs 18%, OR = 3.4, P<.01). ORs was statistically significant in favour of cariprazine in shifts from marked and moderate illness to borderline/normal in both indications (P < .05). Correlations between rating scale improvement and category shift were greatest in patients with extreme/severe baseline illness for bipolar disorder (-0.853) and schizophrenia (-0.677). CONCLUSIONS Post hoc analyses showed that more cariprazine- than placebo-treated patients with bipolar mania or schizophrenia had statistically significant and clinically meaningful CGI-S improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Stephen Volk
- Medical DirectorApostle Clinical TrialsLong BeachCAUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
219
|
Köhler-Forsberg O, Madsen T, Behrendt-Møller I, Sylvia L, Bowden CL, Gao K, Bobo WV, Trivedi MH, Calabrese JR, Thase M, Shelton RC, McInnis M, Tohen M, Ketter TA, Friedman ES, Deckersbach T, McElroy SL, Reilly-Harrington NA, Nierenberg AA. Trajectories of suicidal ideation over 6 months among 482 outpatients with bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord 2017; 223:146-152. [PMID: 28755622 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2017] [Revised: 07/14/2017] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Suicidal ideation occurs frequently among individuals with bipolar disorder; however, its course and persistence over time remains unclear. We aimed to investigate 6-months trajectories of suicidal ideation among adults with bipolar disorder. METHODS The Bipolar CHOICE study randomized 482 outpatients with bipolar disorder to 6 months of lithium- or quetiapine-based treatment including other psychotropic medications as clinically indicated. Participants were asked at 9 visits about suicidal ideation using the Concise Health Risk Tracking scale. We performed latent Growth Mixture Modelling analysis to empirically identify trajectories of suicidal ideation. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were applied to estimate associations between trajectories and potential predictors. RESULTS We identified four distinct trajectories. The Moderate-Stable group represented 11.1% and was characterized by constant suicidal ideation. The Moderate-Unstable group included 2.9% with persistent thoughts about suicide with a more fluctuating course. The third (Persistent-low, 20.8%) and fourth group (Persistent-very-low, 65.1%) were characterized by low levels of suicidal ideation. Higher depression scores and previous suicide attempts (non-significant trend) predicted membership of the Moderate-Stable group, whereas randomized treatment did not. LIMITATIONS No specific treatments against suicidal ideation were included and suicidal thoughts may persist for several years. CONCLUSION More than one in ten adult outpatients with bipolar disorder had moderately increased suicidal ideation throughout 6 months of pharmacotherapy. The identified predictors may help clinicians to identify those with additional need for treatment against suicidal thoughts and future studies need to investigate whether targeted treatment (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) may improve the course of persistent suicidal ideation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ole Köhler-Forsberg
- Psychosis Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Risskov, Denmark; Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Trine Madsen
- Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ida Behrendt-Møller
- Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Louisa Sylvia
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Charles L Bowden
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Keming Gao
- Department of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - William V Bobo
- Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Joseph R Calabrese
- Department of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Michael Thase
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Richard C Shelton
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Melvin McInnis
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mauricio Tohen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of New Mexico Health Science Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Terence A Ketter
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Edward S Friedman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Thilo Deckersbach
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan L McElroy
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH and Lindner Center of HOPE, Mason, OH, USA
| | - Noreen A Reilly-Harrington
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew A Nierenberg
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
220
|
Ahn SW, Baek JH, Yang SY, Kim Y, Cho Y, Choi Y, Lee K, Park T, Hong KS. Long-term response to mood stabilizer treatment and its clinical correlates in patients with bipolar disorders: a retrospective observational study. Int J Bipolar Disord 2017; 5:24. [PMID: 28480482 PMCID: PMC5502006 DOI: 10.1186/s40345-017-0093-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2016] [Accepted: 04/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy and utility of long-term prophylactic treatment in patients with bipolar disorders (BDs) have not been fully explored. This study aims to estimate the long-term clinical response of patients with BDs to mood stabilizer treatment and to identify the clinical factors associated with that response. METHODS The study subjects consisted of 80 patients with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder who had been receiving treatment with lithium and/or valproate for more than 2 years at a single bipolar disorder clinic. The long-term response to the best treatment option based on treatment algorithms was evaluated using the Alda scale. Clinical characteristics were evaluated on a lifetime basis. Patients were classified into two response groups based on frequentist mixture analysis using the total Alda scale score. RESULTS Thirty-four percent of the patients were good responders, with a total Alda score of 5 or higher. The treatment response rate did not differ between the lithium and valproate groups, but lithium and valproate combination therapy was associated with poorer response. The number of previous mixed episodes was associated with a worse response (p = 0.026). Of individual symptoms, delusions during manic episodes (p = 0.008) and increased appetite (p = 0.035) during depressive episodes were more common in moderate/poor responders than in good responders. Co-morbid anxiety disorders were more frequently observed in the moderate/poor response group (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS Psychotic, mixed, and atypical features of BDs were found to be correlated with long-term treatment outcomes. Lithium and valproate showed similar efficacy but moderate/poor responders preferred to use polypharmacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Woo Ahn
- Department of Psychiatry, Sunkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Baek
- Department of Psychiatry, Sunkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - So-Yung Yang
- Department of Psychiatry, Sunkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yongkang Kim
- Department of Statistics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Youngah Cho
- Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Yujin Choi
- Center for Clinical Research, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kounseok Lee
- Department of Psychiatry, St. Andrew’s Hospital, Icheon-si, Republic of Korea
| | - Taesung Park
- Department of Statistics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Sue Hong
- Department of Psychiatry, Sunkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
221
|
Dell’Osso B, Shah S, Do D, Yuen LD, Hooshmand F, Wang PW, Miller S, Ketter TA. American tertiary clinic-referred bipolar II disorder versus bipolar I disorder associated with hastened depressive recurrence. Int J Bipolar Disord 2017; 5:2. [PMID: 28124233 PMCID: PMC5267582 DOI: 10.1186/s40345-017-0072-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2016] [Accepted: 01/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic, frequently comorbid condition characterized by high rates of mood episode recurrence and suicidality. Little is known about prospective longitudinal characterization of BD type II (BD II) versus type I (BD I) in relation to time to depressive recurrence and recovery from major depressive episode. We therefore assessed times to depressive recurrence/recovery in tertiary clinic-referred BD II versus I patients. METHODS Outpatients referred to Stanford BD Clinic during 2000-2011 were assessed with Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD (STEP-BD) Affective Disorders Evaluation and with Clinical Monitoring Form during up to 2 years of naturalistic treatment. Prevalence and clinical correlates of bipolar subtype in recovered (euthymic ≥8 weeks) and depressed patients were assessed. Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed the relationships between bipolar subtype and longitudinal depressive severity, and Cox proportional hazard analyses assessed the potential mediators. RESULTS BD II versus BD I was less common among 105 recovered (39.0 vs. 61.0%, p = 0.03) and more common among 153 depressed (61.4 vs. 38.6%, p = 0.006) patients. Among recovered patients, BD II was associated with 6/25 (24.0%) baseline unfavorable illness characteristics/mood symptoms/psychotropics and hastened depressive recurrence (p = 0.015). Among depressed patients, BD II was associated with 8/25 (33.0%) baseline unfavorable illness characteristics/mood symptoms/psychotropics, but only non-significantly associated with delayed depressive recovery. CONCLUSIONS BD II versus BD I was significantly associated with current depression and hastened depressive recurrence, but only non-significantly associated with delayed depressive recovery. Research on bipolar subtype relationships with depressive recurrence/recovery is warranted to enhance clinical management of BD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernardo Dell’Osso
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Milan, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Saloni Shah
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Dennis Do
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Laura D. Yuen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Farnaz Hooshmand
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Po W. Wang
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Shefali Miller
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Terence A. Ketter
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
222
|
Cheniaux E, Silva RDAD, Santana CM, Filgueiras A. Changes in energy and motor activity: core symptoms of bipolar mania and depression? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 40:233-237. [PMID: 29160338 PMCID: PMC6899406 DOI: 10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2017] [Accepted: 06/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate how well symptom rating scales differentiate bipolar disorder (BD) episode types. METHODS One hundred and six patients with BD were followed for 13 years. At each visit, the following clinical scales were administered: Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) and Clinical Global Impressions scale for use in bipolar illness (CGI-BP). To perform a comparison between the affective states of BP, three time points in each patient's follow-up period were chosen for evaluation: the most severe manic episode, the most severe depressive episode, and the euthymic period with least symptoms. Canonical discriminant analyses (CDA) were performed to identify which symptoms best discriminated episodes. RESULTS CDA revealed HAM-D was worse than YMRS and CGI-BP to discriminate mood states. The items evaluating increased motor activity in YMRS (2, increased motor activity/energy) and HAM-D (9, agitation) were the best to distinguish mania, depression, and euthymia. In contrast, HAM-D item 8 (retardation) and the HAM-D and YMRS items related to mood symptoms were less important and precise. CONCLUSION Higher levels of energy or activity should be considered a core symptom of mania. However, our results do not confirm the association between a decrease in energy or activity and depression. HAM-D probably does not assess motor activity adequately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elie Cheniaux
- Instituto de Psiquiatria (IPUB), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Rafael de A da Silva
- Instituto de Psiquiatria (IPUB), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Cristina M Santana
- Instituto de Psiquiatria (IPUB), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Alberto Filgueiras
- Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
223
|
Suppes T, Eberhard J, Lemming O, Young AH, McIntyre RS. Anxiety, irritability, and agitation as indicators of bipolar mania with depressive symptoms: a post hoc analysis of two clinical trials. Int J Bipolar Disord 2017; 5:36. [PMID: 29105003 PMCID: PMC5673059 DOI: 10.1186/s40345-017-0103-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2017] [Accepted: 09/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Symptoms of anxiety, irritability, and agitation (AIA) are prevalent among patients with bipolar I disorder (BD-I) mania with depressive symptoms, and could potentially be used to aid physicians in the identification of this more severe form of BD-I. Using data from two clinical trials, the aims of this post hoc analysis were to describe the phenomenology of bipolar mania in terms of AIA and depressive symptoms, and to evaluate the influence of these symptoms on the likelihood of remission during treatment. Methods Patients with a BD-I manic or mixed episode (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV criteria) were randomised to 3 weeks of double-blind treatment with asenapine, placebo, or olanzapine (active comparator). Anxiety was defined as a score of ≥3 on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale ‘anxiety’ item, irritability as a score of ≥4 on the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) ‘irritability’ item, and agitation as a score of ≥3 on the YMRS ‘increased motor activity–energy’ item. Depressive symptoms were defined as a score of ≥1 on three or more individual Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) items, or a MADRS Total score of ≥20. Results A total of 960 patients with BD-I were analysed, 665 with a manic episode and 295 with a mixed episode. At baseline, 61.4% had anxiety, 62.4% had irritability, 76.4% had agitation, and 34.0% had all three AIA symptoms (‘severe AIA’); 47.3% had three or more depressive symptoms, and 13.5% had a MADRS total score of ≥20. Anxiety, irritability, and severe AIA (but not agitation) were statistically significantly more common in patients with depressive symptoms. Patients with anxiety or severe AIA at baseline were statistically significantly less likely to achieve remission (YMRS total <12). In general, remission rates were higher with asenapine and olanzapine than with placebo, irrespective of baseline AIA or depressive symptoms. Conclusions Assessment of AIA symptoms in bipolar mania could enable physicians to identify patients with more severe depressive symptoms, allowing for appropriate intervention. Assessment and monitoring of AIA may help physicians to predict which patients may be harder to treat and at risk for self-harm. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00159744, NCT00159796. Registered 8 September 2005 (retrospectively registered)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trisha Suppes
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Jonas Eberhard
- H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Allan H Young
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK
| | - Roger S McIntyre
- Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
224
|
de Assis da Silva R, Mograbi DC, Camelo EVM, Peixoto U, Santana CMT, Landeira-Fernandez J, Morris RG, Cheniaux E. The influence of current mood state, number of previous affective episodes and predominant polarity on insight in bipolar disorder. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract 2017; 21:266-270. [PMID: 28554235 DOI: 10.1080/13651501.2017.1324991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although many studies have explored the effect of current affective episodes on insight into bipolar disorder, the potential interaction between current mood state and previous affective episodes has not been consistently investigated. OBJECTIVE To explore the influence of dominant polarity, number of previous affective episodes and current affective state on insight in bipolar disorder patients in euthymia or mania. METHODS A total of 101 patients with bipolar disorder were recruited for the study, including 58 patients in euthymia (30 with no defined predominant polarity and 28 with manic predominant polarity) and 43 in mania (26 with no defined predominant polarity and 17 with manic predominant polarity). Patients underwent a clinical assessment and insight was evaluated through the Insight Scale for Affective Disorders. RESULTS Bipolar disorder patients in mania had worse insight than those in euthymia, with no effect of dominant polarity. In addition, positive psychotic symptoms showed a significant effect on insight and its inclusion as a covariate eliminated differences related to mood state. Finally, the number of previous manic or depressive episodes did not correlate with insight level. CONCLUSIONS Mania is a predictor of loss of insight into bipolar disorder. However, it is possible that its contribution is linked to the more frequent presence of psychotic symptoms in this state. Dominant polarity and number/type of previous affective episodes have a limited impact on insight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael de Assis da Silva
- a Setor de Perícia em Saúde, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO) , Rio de Janeiro , Brazil.,b Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ) , Rio de Janeiro , Brazil
| | - Daniel C Mograbi
- c Departament of Psychology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) , Rio de Janeiro , Brazil.,d Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London , UK
| | | | - Ursula Peixoto
- b Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ) , Rio de Janeiro , Brazil
| | - Cristina Maria Teixeira Santana
- b Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ) , Rio de Janeiro , Brazil.,c Departament of Psychology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) , Rio de Janeiro , Brazil
| | - Jesus Landeira-Fernandez
- c Departament of Psychology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) , Rio de Janeiro , Brazil
| | | | - Elie Cheniaux
- b Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ) , Rio de Janeiro , Brazil.,e Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade do Estado Do Rio de Janeiro (FCM/UERJ) , Rio de Janeiro , Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
225
|
Kafantaris V, Spritzer L, Doshi V, Saito E, Szeszko PR. Changes in white matter microstructure predict lithium response in adolescents with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2017; 19:587-594. [PMID: 28992395 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2017] [Accepted: 07/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate whether response to lithium treatment in pediatric bipolar disorder can be predicted by changes in white matter microstructure in key cortico-limbic tracts involved in emotion regulation. METHODS Eighteen clinically referred lithium-naive patients (mean age 15.5 years) were administered clinical rating scales and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) examinations at baseline and following 4 weeks of lithium treatment. Clinical ratings were repeated following 8 weeks of treatment. Patients with Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) ratings of 1 ("very much improved") or 2 ("much improved") were classified as responders. Ten healthy volunteers received baseline and follow-up DTI examinations. Using the ENIGMA pipeline, we investigated the relationship between changes in fractional anisotropy (FA) in the cingulum hippocampus (CGH) and clinical response to lithium. RESULTS Patients demonstrated significantly lower FA compared to healthy volunteers in the left and right CGH white matter at baseline. Following 4 weeks of lithium treatment, FA in the left CGH increased in patients, but no significant changes in FA were observed among the untreated healthy volunteers. Lithium responders had a significantly greater increase in FA compared to non-responders. Moreover, baseline (pre-treatment) FA in the left CGH white matter significantly predicted week 8 overall CGI severity score, with post hoc analyses indicating that these effects were evident for both severity of depression and mania. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that response to lithium treatment in pediatric bipolar disorder is associated with normalization of white matter microstructure in regions associated with emotion processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian Kafantaris
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital of Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.,Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY, USA.,Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience of The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research of Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Linda Spritzer
- Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience of The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research of Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Vishal Doshi
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital of Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.,Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | - Ema Saito
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital of Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.,Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | - Philip R Szeszko
- James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.,The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
226
|
Wageck AR, Torres FS, Gama CS, Martins DS, Scotton E, Reckziegel R, Costanzi M, Rosa RG, Kapczinski F, Kunz M. Cardiovascular risk and bipolar disorder: factors associated with a positive coronary calcium score in patients with bipolar disorder type 1. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 40:163-168. [PMID: 28977070 PMCID: PMC6900769 DOI: 10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2017] [Accepted: 06/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Objective: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in patients with bipolar disorder. The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors associated with positive coronary calcium score (CCS) in individuals with bipolar disorder type 1. Methods: Patients from the Bipolar Disorder Program at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil, underwent computed tomography scanning for calcium score measurement. Clinical and sociodemographic variables were compared between patients according to their CCS status: negative (CCS = 0) or positive (CCS > 0). Poisson regression analysis was used to examine the association of CCS with number of psychiatric hospitalizations. Results: Out of 41 patients evaluated, only 10 had a positive CCS. Individuals in the CCS-positive group were older (55.2±4.2 vs. 43.1±10.0 years; p = 0.001) and had more psychiatric hospitalizations (4.7±3.0 vs. 2.6±2.5; p = 0.04) when compared with CCS- negative subjects. The number of previous psychiatric hospitalizations correlated positively with CCS (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Age and number of psychiatric hospitalizations were significantly associated with higher CCS, which might be a potential method for diagnosis and stratification of cardiovascular disease in bipolar patients. There is a need for increased awareness of risk assessment in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aline R Wageck
- Programa de Transtorno Bipolar, Laboratório de Psiquiatria Molecular, Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.,Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psiquiatria e Ciências do Comportamento, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Felipe S Torres
- Serviço de Radiologia, HCPA, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.,Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Cardiovasculares, Faculdade de Medicina, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Clarissa S Gama
- Programa de Transtorno Bipolar, Laboratório de Psiquiatria Molecular, Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.,Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psiquiatria e Ciências do Comportamento, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Dayane S Martins
- Programa de Transtorno Bipolar, Laboratório de Psiquiatria Molecular, Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Ellen Scotton
- Programa de Transtorno Bipolar, Laboratório de Psiquiatria Molecular, Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Ramiro Reckziegel
- Programa de Transtorno Bipolar, Laboratório de Psiquiatria Molecular, Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Monise Costanzi
- Programa de Transtorno Bipolar, Laboratório de Psiquiatria Molecular, Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.,Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psiquiatria e Ciências do Comportamento, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Regis G Rosa
- Departamento de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Moinhos de Vento e Hospital Mãe de Deus, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Flávio Kapczinski
- Programa de Transtorno Bipolar, Laboratório de Psiquiatria Molecular, Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Maurício Kunz
- Programa de Transtorno Bipolar, Laboratório de Psiquiatria Molecular, Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.,Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psiquiatria e Ciências do Comportamento, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
227
|
Pakpour AH, Modabbernia A, Lin CY, Saffari M, Ahmadzad Asl M, Webb TL. Promoting medication adherence among patients with bipolar disorder: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of a multifaceted intervention. Psychol Med 2017; 47:2528-2539. [PMID: 28446253 DOI: 10.1017/s003329171700109x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The present research aimed to investigate the efficacy of a multifaceted intervention that included motivational interviewing (MI) and psychoeducation in improving medication adherence (MA) among patients with bipolar disorder (BD). METHOD A multicenter, cluster randomized, observer-blind, controlled, parallel-group trial was conducted in ten academic centers in Iran. Patients with BD were randomly assigned to the experimental group (EXP; n = 136) or the usual care group (UC; n = 134). The EXP group received five sessions of MI and psychoeducation together with their family members. The primary outcome measure was changes in scores on the Medication Adherence Rating Scale from baseline to 6 months post-intervention. Other outcome measures included serum levels of mood stabilizers, clinical symptoms, quality of life, as well as measures of intention, beliefs about medicine, perceived behavioral control, automaticity, action and coping planning, and adverse reactions. RESULTS Medication adherence improved over time in both groups, but patients in the EXP group improved more (baseline score: 6.03; score at the sixth month: 9.55) than patients in the UC group (baseline score: 6.17; score at the sixth month: 6.67). In addition, patients in the EXP group showed greater improvement than patients in the UC group in almost all secondary outcomes 6 months following the intervention. CONCLUSIONS Multifaceted interventions that include motivational-interviewing and psychoeducation can significantly improve MA and clinical and functional outcomes in patients with BD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER The trial was registered with theClinicalTrials.gov database (NCT02241863) https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02241863.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A H Pakpour
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center,Qazvin University of Medical Sciences,Qazvin,Iran
| | - A Modabbernia
- Department of Psychiatry,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai,New York, NY,USA
| | - C-Y Lin
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health & Social Sciences,The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,Hung Hom,Hong Kong
| | - M Saffari
- Health Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences,Tehran,Iran
| | - M Ahmadzad Asl
- Mental Health Research Center,School of Medicine,Department of Psychiatry,Iran University of Medical Sciences,Tehran,IR Iran
| | - T L Webb
- Department of Psychology,The University of Sheffield,Sheffield,UK
| |
Collapse
|
228
|
Garriga M, Solé E, González-Pinto A, Selva-Vera G, Arranz B, Amann BL, Saiz-Ruiz J, Pérez-Blanco J, Vieta E. Efficacy of quetiapine XR vs. placebo as concomitant treatment to mood stabilizers in the control of subthreshold symptoms of bipolar disorder: Results from a pilot, randomized controlled trial. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2017; 27:959-969. [PMID: 28882405 DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2017.08.429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2017] [Revised: 07/13/2017] [Accepted: 08/20/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) do not always achieve full remission between episodes. Subthreshold symptoms (depressive, manic or mixed) represent a major cause of relapse and disability in these patients. Immediate release (IR) and extended release (XR) formulations of quetiapine are both indicated for short and long-term treatment of BD. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of quetiapine XR vs placebo in subthreshold symptomatology when added to previous mood stabilizer treatment. A pilot phase IIIB, multicentre, prospective, placebo controlled, randomized, double blinded study of 12 weeks follow-up was performed (NCT01197846). Patients were randomized to quetiapine XR 300mg or placebo once daily. The primary outcome was the mean change between quetiapine XR and placebo from baseline to study endpoint (week 6) in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Quetiapine XR 300mg (n=16) significantly improved depressive subthreshold symptoms compared with placebo (n=16) after 6 weeks (P=0.021). Early response (reduction of at least the 20% of the MADRS total score) and remission rate (reduction in MADRS total score <8 and YMRS<8) did not show differences between groups. Quetiapine XR did not show superiority vs placebo when evaluating subthreshold manic symptoms, instead it was superior when evaluating functioning (GAF score) in BD type I patients (P=0.005). The most common adverse events were somnolence (9.1%), increased appetite, dry mouth and dizziness (6.8%). Quetiapine XR 300mg once daily was significantly more effective than placebo in depressive subthreshold symptoms. Adverse events were consistent with the known side effects of quetiapine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Garriga
- Bipolar Disorders Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Eva Solé
- Bipolar Disorders Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Ana González-Pinto
- BioAraba Research Institute, OSI Araba, Department of Psychiatry, Araba University Hospital, CIBERSAM, University of the Basque Country (EHU/UPV), Vitoria, Spain
| | - Gabriel Selva-Vera
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Valencia. Hospital Clínico Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERSAM, Valencia, Spain
| | - Belén Arranz
- Department of Psychiatry, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, CIBERSAM, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Benedikt L Amann
- Institut de Neuropsiquiatria i Addiccions, Hospital del Mar, Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Research Unit Centro Fórum, CIBERSAM, Department of Psiquiatry, Autonomous University Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jerónimo Saiz-Ruiz
- Hospital Ramón y Cajal. University of Alcalá. CIBERSAM, IRYCIS. University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Eduard Vieta
- Bipolar Disorders Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
229
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mixed mood states in bipolar disorder are difficult to treat and when present indicate worse illness trajectories. Several medications are US Food and Drug Administration approved to treat mixed episodes; however, the clinical trials have been short term and rarely reported depression response. METHODS We conducted a 5-month open-label trial examining the tolerability and efficacy of iloperidone for bipolar disorder mixed episodes. RESULTS Mania and depression scores significantly improved over the course of the study for study completers (ie, 60%-68% improvement for manic symptoms and 41%-49% for depression symptoms). Improvements were observed early in the trial and after adjusting for concomitant medication effects. The average daily dose in completers was 15 mg. Thirty-nine percent (12/31) of the eligible sample discontinued early because of adverse effects. The adverse events most commonly associated with withdrawal were increased heart rate/palpitations (n = 5 of 12) and urinary incontinence/intense urge to urinate (n = 3 of 12). CONCLUSIONS In a subset of patients, iloperidone provides relief for classic manic, depression, and irritability symptoms associated with mixed episodes in a long-term trial. Adverse effect profiles are likely to be a major factor contributing to individualized medication use.
Collapse
|
230
|
Verdolini N, Perugi G, Samalin L, Murru A, Angst J, Azorin JM, Bowden CL, Mosolov S, Young AH, Barbuti M, Guiso G, Popovic D, Vieta E, Pacchiarotti I. Aggressiveness in depression: a neglected symptom possibly associated with bipolarity and mixed features. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2017; 136:362-372. [PMID: 28741646 DOI: 10.1111/acps.12777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate aggressiveness during a major depressive episode (MDE) and its relationship with bipolar disorder (BD) in a post hoc analysis of the BRIDGE-II-MIX study. METHOD A total of 2811 individuals were enrolled in this multicenter cross-sectional study. MDE patients with (MDE-A, n = 399) and without aggressiveness (MDE-N, n = 2412) were compared through chi-square test or Student's t-test. A stepwise backward logistic regression model was performed. RESULTS MDE-A group was more frequently associated with BD (P < 0.001), while aggressiveness was negatively correlated with unipolar depression (P < 0.001). At the logistic regression, aggressiveness was associated with the age at first depressive episode (P < 0.001); the severity of mania (P = 0.03); the diagnosis of BD (P = 0.001); comorbid borderline personality disorder (BPD) (P < 0.001) but not substance abuse (P = 0.63); no current psychiatric treatment (P < 0.001); psychotic symptoms (P = 0.007); the marked social/occupational impairment (P = 0.002). The variable most significantly associated with aggressiveness was the presence of DSM-5 mixed features (P < 0.001, OR = 3.815). After the exclusion of BPD, the variable of lifetime suicide attempts became significant (P = 0.013, OR = 1.405). CONCLUSION Aggressiveness seems to be significantly associated with bipolar spectrum disorders, independently from BPD and substance abuse. Aggressiveness should be considered as a diagnostic criterion for the mixed features specifier and a target of tailored treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Verdolini
- Bipolar Disorders Unit, Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Division of Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - G Perugi
- Department of Experimental and Clinic Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - L Samalin
- Bipolar Disorders Unit, Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Department of Psychiatry, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, University of Auvergne, EA 7280, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,Fondation FondaMental, Hôpital Albert Chenevier, Pôle de Psychiatrie, Créteil, France
| | - A Murru
- Bipolar Disorders Unit, Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - J Angst
- Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - J-M Azorin
- AP HM, Psychiatric Pole, Sainte Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - C L Bowden
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - S Mosolov
- Department for Therapy of Mental Disorders, Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry, Moscow, Russia
| | - A H Young
- Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - M Barbuti
- Bipolar Disorders Unit, Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Department of Experimental and Clinic Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - G Guiso
- Bipolar Disorders Unit, Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari and Psychiatric Clinic, University Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - D Popovic
- Bipolar Disorders Unit, Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Psychiatry B, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - E Vieta
- Bipolar Disorders Unit, Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - I Pacchiarotti
- Bipolar Disorders Unit, Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
231
|
Shah S, Kim JP, Park DY, Kim H, Yuen LD, Do D, Dell'Osso B, Hooshmand F, Miller S, Wang PW, Ketter TA. Lifetime anxiety disorder and current anxiety symptoms associated with hastened depressive recurrence in bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord 2017; 219:165-171. [PMID: 28558363 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2016] [Revised: 03/28/2017] [Accepted: 05/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To assess differential relationships between lifetime anxiety disorder/current anxiety symptoms and longitudinal depressive severity in bipolar disorder (BD). METHODS Stanford BD Clinic outpatients enrolled during 2000-2011 were assessed with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD (STEP-BD) Affective Disorders Evaluation and followed with the STEP-BD Clinical Monitoring Form while receiving naturalistic treatment for up to two years. Baseline unfavorable illness characteristics/current mood symptoms and times to depressive recurrence/recovery were compared in patients with versus without lifetime anxiety disorder/current anxiety symptoms. RESULTS Among 105 currently recovered patients, lifetime anxiety disorder was significantly associated with 10/27 (37.0%) demographic/other unfavorable illness characteristics/current mood symptoms/current psychotropics, hastened depressive recurrence (driven by earlier onset age), and a significantly (> two-fold) higher Kaplan-Meier estimated depressive recurrence rate, whereas current anxiety symptoms were significantly associated with 10/27 (37.0%) demographic/other unfavorable illness characteristics/current mood symptoms/current psychotropics and hastened depressive recurrence (driven by lifetime anxiety disorder), but only a numerically higher Kaplan-Meier estimated depressive recurrence rate. In contrast, among 153 currently depressed patients, lifetime anxiety disorder/current anxiety symptoms were not significantly associated with time to depressive recovery or depressive recovery rate. LIMITATIONS American tertiary BD clinic referral sample, open naturalistic treatment. CONCLUSIONS Research is needed regarding differential relationships between lifetime anxiety disorder and current anxiety symptoms and hastened/delayed depressive recurrence/recovery - specifically whether lifetime anxiety disorder versus current anxiety symptoms has marginally more robust association with hastened depressive recurrence, and whether both have marginally more robust associations with hastened depressive recurrence versus delayed depressive recovery, and related clinical implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saloni Shah
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jane P Kim
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Dong Yeon Park
- Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyun Kim
- Department of Psychiatry, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Laura D Yuen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Dennis Do
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Bernardo Dell'Osso
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Milan; Fondazione IRCCS Ca'Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Farnaz Hooshmand
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Shefali Miller
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Po W Wang
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Terence A Ketter
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
232
|
Conus P, Cotton S, Schimmelmann BG, McGorry PD, Lambert M. Rates and predictors of 18-months remission in an epidemiological cohort of 661 patients with first-episode psychosis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2017; 52:1089-1099. [PMID: 28477070 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-017-1388-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2016] [Accepted: 05/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Most first episode psychosis (FEP) outcome studies are based on patient samples enrolled through an informed consent procedure, which may induce important biases. Our aim was to study the 18-month outcome of FEP in an epidemiological sample of patients treated at the Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre (EPPIC). METHODS The files of 661 FEP patients treated for up to 18 months between 1998 and 2000 were assessed. Symptomatic remission was defined as receiving a score ≤3 on the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scales, and functional remission as concurrent fulfillment of occupation/employment and independent living. Predictors were analyzed using stepwise logistic regression models. RESULTS At endpoint, 63% of FEP patients had reached symptomatic remission and 44% functional remission. Duration of untreated psychosis, baseline symptom intensity, time in service and decrease or remission of substance use, predicted both symptomatic and functional outcome. A history of suicide attempt or non-adherence to medication was linked to lower likelihood to reach symptomatic remission while pre-morbid GAF and employment at baseline were linked to functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS The development of early intervention strategies should be pursued, in order both to provide treatment before symptoms reach a high intensity and to maintain social integration. Specific strategies need to promote engagement, facilitate adherence to medication and to create a framework where key issues such as substance abuse co-morbidity can be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Conus
- Treatment and Early Intervention in Psychosis Program (TIPP), Département de Psychiatrie CHUV, Université de Lausanne, Clinique de Cery, 1008, Prilly, Switzerland. .,Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville Victoria, Melbourne, 3052, Australia.
| | - Sue Cotton
- Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville Victoria, Melbourne, 3052, Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health University of Melbourne, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville Victoria, Melbourne, 3052, Australia
| | - Benno G Schimmelmann
- Department of Child- and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Psychosis Early Detection and Intervention Centre (PEDIC), Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Patrick D McGorry
- Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville Victoria, Melbourne, 3052, Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health University of Melbourne, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville Victoria, Melbourne, 3052, Australia
| | - Martin Lambert
- Psychosis Early Detection and Intervention Centre (PEDIC), Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
233
|
Social and academic premorbid adjustment domains predict different functional outcomes among youth with first episode mania. J Affect Disord 2017; 219:133-140. [PMID: 28550765 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2017] [Revised: 04/21/2017] [Accepted: 05/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Premorbid characteristics may help predict the highly variable functional and illness outcomes of young people with early stage Bipolar Disorder (BD). We sought to examine the relationships between premorbid adjustment and short to medium-term outcomes after a first treated episode of mania. METHODS We examined the baseline and 18-month follow-up characteristics of 117 participants with first episode of mania, treated at two tertiary early intervention services in Melbourne, Australia. The baseline demographic, family history, diagnoses, comorbidity and clinical features were determined using unstructured questionnaires and structured diagnostic interviews. Premorbid adjustment was determined using the Premorbid Adjustment Scale (PAS), the components of which were identified using a principal component analysis. Eighteen-month follow-up outcome measures included the Clinical Global Impressions scale, Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale and the Heinrichs' Quality of Life Scale (QLS). Correlations and linear regressions were utilised to examine the relationships between component scores and outcomes, while controlling for baseline and follow-up confounders. RESULTS The social adjustment component of the PAS correlated with the interpersonal relations (rs = -0.46, p<0.001) domain of QLS while the academic adjustment component of the PAS correlated with the vocational functioning domain of QLS (rs =-0.39, p = 0.004). Premorbid adjustment did not predict illness severity or objective functioning. LIMITATIONS Lack of information on cognition, personality factors and prodromal symptoms limited the assessment of their impact on outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Impairments in domains of premorbid adjustment may be early markers of persistent difficulties in social and vocational functioning and may benefit from targeted interventions.
Collapse
|
234
|
Gershon A, Do D, Satyanarayana S, Shah S, Yuen LD, Hooshmand F, Miller S, Wang PW, Ketter TA. Abnormal sleep duration associated with hastened depressive recurrence in bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord 2017; 218:374-379. [PMID: 28500982 PMCID: PMC6389505 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2016] [Revised: 03/31/2017] [Accepted: 05/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abnormal sleep duration (ASD, <6 or ≥9h) is common in bipolar disorder (BD), and often persists beyond acute mood episodes. Few longitudinal studies have examined the ASD's impact upon BD illness course. The current study examined the longitudinal impact of ASD upon bipolar depressive recurrence/recovery. METHODS Outpatients referred to the Stanford BD Clinic during 2000-2011 were assessed with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD (STEP-BD) Affective Disorders Evaluation at baseline, and with the Clinical Monitoring Form at monthly follow-ups for up to two years of naturalistic treatment. Prevalence and clinical correlates of ASD in 93 recovered (euthymic ≥8 weeks) and 153 depressed BD patients were assessed. Kaplan-Meier analyses (Log-Rank tests) assessed relationships between baseline ASD and longitudinal depressive severity, with Cox Proportional Hazard analyses assessing potential mediators. RESULTS ASD was only half as common among recovered versus depressed BD outpatients, but was significantly associated with hastened depressive recurrence (Log-Rank p=0.007), mediated by lifetime anxiety disorder and attenuated by lifetime history of psychosis, and had only a non-significant tendency towards association with delayed depressive recovery (Log-Rank p=0.07). In both recovered and depressed BD outpatients, baseline ASD did not have significant association with any baseline BD illness characteristic. LIMITATIONS Self-reported sleep duration. Limited generalizability beyond our predominately white, female, educated, insured American BD specialty clinic sample. CONCLUSIONS Baseline ASD among recovered BD patients may be a risk marker for hastened depressive recurrence, suggesting it could be an important therapeutic target between mood episodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Terence A. Ketter
- Correspondence to: 401 Quarry Road, Room 2124, Stanford, CA 94305-5723, United States., (T.A. Ketter)
| |
Collapse
|
235
|
Balzafiore DR, Rasgon NL, Yuen LD, Shah S, Kim H, Goffin KC, Miller S, Wang PW, Ketter TA. Lifetime eating disorder comorbidity associated with delayed depressive recovery in bipolar disorder. Int J Bipolar Disord 2017; 5:25. [PMID: 28480483 PMCID: PMC5554118 DOI: 10.1186/s40345-017-0094-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although eating disorders (EDs) are common in bipolar disorder (BD), little is known regarding their longitudinal consequences. We assessed prevalence, clinical correlates, and longitudinal depressive severity in BD patients with vs. without EDs. Methods Outpatients referred to Stanford University BD Clinic during 2000–2011 were assessed with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD (STEP-BD) affective disorders evaluation, and while receiving naturalistic treatment for up to 2 years, were monitored with the STEP-BD clinical monitoring form. Patients with vs. without lifetime EDs were compared with respect to prevalence, demographic and unfavorable illness characteristics/current mood symptoms and psychotropic use, and longitudinal depressive severity. Results Among 503 BD outpatients, 76 (15.1%) had lifetime EDs, which were associated with female gender, and higher rates of lifetime comorbid anxiety, alcohol/substance use, and personality disorders, childhood BD onset, episode accumulation (≥10 prior mood episodes), prior suicide attempt, current syndromal/subsyndromal depression, sadness, anxiety, and antidepressant use, and earlier BD onset age, and greater current overall BD severity. Among currently depressed patients, 29 with compared to 124 without lifetime EDs had significantly delayed depressive recovery. In contrast, among currently recovered (euthymic ≥8 weeks) patients, 10 with compared to 95 without lifetime EDs had only non-significantly hastened depressive recurrence. Limitations Primarily Caucasian, insured, suburban, American specialty clinic-referred sample limits generalizability. Small number of recovered patients with EDs limited statistical power to detect relationships between EDs and depressive recurrence. Conclusions Further studies are warranted to explore the degree to which EDs impact longitudinal depressive illness burden in BD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle R Balzafiore
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Room 2124, Stanford, CA, 94305-5723, USA.,Pacific Graduate School of Professional Psychology, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Natalie L Rasgon
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Room 2124, Stanford, CA, 94305-5723, USA
| | - Laura D Yuen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Room 2124, Stanford, CA, 94305-5723, USA
| | - Saloni Shah
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Room 2124, Stanford, CA, 94305-5723, USA
| | - Hyun Kim
- Department of Psychiatry, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Kathryn C Goffin
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Room 2124, Stanford, CA, 94305-5723, USA
| | - Shefali Miller
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Room 2124, Stanford, CA, 94305-5723, USA
| | - Po W Wang
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Room 2124, Stanford, CA, 94305-5723, USA
| | - Terence A Ketter
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Room 2124, Stanford, CA, 94305-5723, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
236
|
Caldieraro MA, Sylvia LG, Dufour S, Walsh S, Janos J, Rabideau DJ, Kamali M, McInnis MG, Bobo WV, Friedman ES, Gao K, Tohen M, Reilly-Harrington NA, Ketter TA, Calabrese JR, McElroy SL, Thase ME, Shelton RC, Bowden CL, Kocsis JH, Deckersbach T, Nierenberg AA. Clinical correlates of acute bipolar depressive episode with psychosis. J Affect Disord 2017; 217:29-33. [PMID: 28365478 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.03.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2016] [Revised: 01/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychotic bipolar depressive episodes remain remarkably understudied despite being common and having a significant impact on bipolar disorder. The aim of this study is to identify the characteristics of depressed bipolar patients with current psychosis compared to those without psychosis. METHODS We used baseline data of a comparative effectiveness study of lithium and quetiapine for bipolar disorder (the Bipolar CHOICE study) to compare demographic, clinical, and functioning variables between those with and without psychotic symptoms. Of the 482 participants, 303 (62.9%) were eligible for the present study by meeting DSM-IV criteria for an acute bipolar depressive episode. Univariate analyses were conducted first, and then included in a model controlling for symptom severity. RESULTS The sample was composed mostly of women (60.7%) and the mean age was 39.5±12.1 years. Psychosis was present in 10.6% (n=32) of the depressed patients. Psychotic patients had less education, lower income, and were more frequently single and unemployed. Psychosis was also associated with a more severe depressive episode, higher suicidality, more comorbid conditions and worse functioning. Most group differences disappeared when controlling for depression severity. LIMITATIONS Only outpatients were included and the presence of psychosis in previous episodes was not assessed. CONCLUSION Psychosis during bipolar depressive episodes is present even in an outpatient sample. Psychotic, depressed patients have worse illness outcomes, but future research is necessary to confirm if these outcomes are only associated with the severity of the disorder or if some of them are independent of it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Antonio Caldieraro
- Serviço de Psiquiatria, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Louisa G Sylvia
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven Dufour
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Samantha Walsh
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jessica Janos
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dustin J Rabideau
- Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Masoud Kamali
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melvin G McInnis
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - William V Bobo
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Keming Gao
- Mood Disorders Program, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mauricio Tohen
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Noreen A Reilly-Harrington
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Terence A Ketter
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Joseph R Calabrese
- Mood Disorders Program, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Susan L McElroy
- Lindner Center of HOPE, Mason, OH, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Michael E Thase
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Charles L Bowden
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - James H Kocsis
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Thilo Deckersbach
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew A Nierenberg
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
237
|
Asenapine for the treatment of adults with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia: results from a randomized, double-blind, fixed-dose, placebo-controlled trial with olanzapine as an active control. CNS Spectr 2017; 22:333-341. [PMID: 27821210 DOI: 10.1017/s1092852916000377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate the efficacy and safety of asenapine 2.5 mg twice daily (bid; n=97) or 5 mg bid (n=113) versus placebo (n=101) in adults with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. METHODS Adults with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) schizophrenia diagnosis were randomized to asenapine 2.5 mg bid, 5 mg bid, placebo, or olanzapine 15 mg once daily. The primary objective was to test superiority of asenapine versus placebo as measured by the change from baseline to day 42 in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. The key safety objective was to evaluate weight change in asenapine versus olanzapine at day 42. RESULTS The primary efficacy endpoint was met; the difference in least squares mean change from baseline to day 42 in PANSS total score between asenapine 5 mg bid and placebo was -5.5 points (unadjusted 95% CI: -10.1, -1.0; multiplicity adjusted P=0.0356). Neither asenapine 2.5 mg bid nor olanzapine 15mg were superior to placebo. Both asenapine groups demonstrated significantly less weight gain than olanzapine at day 42. Significantly higher incidences of oral hypoesthesia and dysgeusia (combined) for asenapine 2.5 mg bid (5.2% vs 0.0%; P=0.0217) and 5 mg bid (7.1% vs 0.0%; P=0.0033) were observed versus placebo. There were no significant differences between asenapine and placebo for insomnia, extrapyramidal symptoms, akathisia, dizziness, or combination of somnolence/sedation/hypersomnia. CONCLUSION This study supports previous efficacy and safety findings of asenapine; asenapine 5 mg bid is the lowest effective dose in adults with schizophrenia. Asenapine was associated with significantly less weight gain than olanzapine at day 42.
Collapse
|
238
|
Gao K, Ganocy SJ, Conroy C, Brownrigg B, Serrano MB, Calabrese JR. A placebo controlled study of quetiapine-XR in bipolar depression accompanied by generalized anxiety with and without a recent history of alcohol and cannabis use. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2017; 234:2233-2244. [PMID: 28536866 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-017-4642-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to compare treatment response in bipolar I or II depression and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) with and without recent alcohol and/or cannabis use disorder (ALC/CAN) to quetiapine-XR (extended release) or placebo. METHODS A randomized, double-blind, 8-week study of quetiapine-XR versus placebo in patients with bipolar I or II depression and GAD with or without a recent ALC/CAN was used to compare changes in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR-16), Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Disorder-Severity (CGI-BP-S), and Timeline Follow Back within and between groups. RESULTS In the quetiapine-XR group, patients with a recent ALC/CAN (n = 22) had significant decreases in QIDS-SR-16 (-9.6 ± 1.6 vs. -3.7 ± 1.7) and CGI-BP-S (-1.6 ± 0.4 vs. -0.8 ± 0.03) than those without a recent ALC/CAN (n = 24). In the placebo group, both patients with a recent ALC/CAN (n = 23) and those without (n = 21) had similar reductions in these measures. The reduction of QIDS-SR-16 scores in patients with a recent ALC/CAN was also significantly different from that of their counterparts in the placebo group. Patients who received quetiapine-XR had larger decreases in the number of drinking days/week (p = 0.17) and number of cannabis joints/week (p = 0.09) compared to those who received placebo. CONCLUSION Quetiapine-XR was superior to placebo in reducing QIDS-SR-16 total score in patients with a recent ALC/CAN. Patients taking quetiapine-XR used less alcohol and cannabis than patients on placebo, suggesting that quetiapine-XR may be of use in patients with bipolar disorder accompanied by GAD and other comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keming Gao
- Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 10524 Euclid Avenue, 12th Floor, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
| | - Stephen J Ganocy
- Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 10524 Euclid Avenue, 12th Floor, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Carla Conroy
- Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 10524 Euclid Avenue, 12th Floor, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Brittany Brownrigg
- Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 10524 Euclid Avenue, 12th Floor, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Mary Beth Serrano
- Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 10524 Euclid Avenue, 12th Floor, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Joseph R Calabrese
- Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 10524 Euclid Avenue, 12th Floor, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
239
|
Tohen M, Gold AK, Sylvia LG, Montana RE, McElroy SL, Thase ME, Rabideau DJ, Nierenberg AA, Reilly-Harrington NA, Friedman ES, Shelton RC, Bowden CL, Singh V, Deckersbach T, Ketter TA, Calabrese JR, Bobo WV, McInnis MG. Bipolar mixed features - Results from the comparative effectiveness for bipolar disorder (Bipolar CHOICE) study. J Affect Disord 2017; 217:183-189. [PMID: 28411507 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.03.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2016] [Revised: 02/09/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND DSM-5 changed the criteria from DSM-IV for mixed features in mood disorder episodes to include non-overlapping symptoms of depression and hypomania/mania. It is unknown if, by changing these criteria, the same group would qualify for mixed features. We assessed how those meeting DSM-5 criteria for mixed features compare to those meeting DSM-IV criteria. METHODS We analyzed data from 482 adult bipolar patients in Bipolar CHOICE, a randomized comparative effectiveness trial. Bipolar diagnoses were confirmed through the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Presence and severity of mood symptoms were collected with the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Scale (BISS) and linked to DSM-5 and DSM-IV mixed features criteria. Baseline demographics and clinical variables were compared between mood episode groups using ANOVA for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. RESULTS At baseline, the frequency of DSM-IV mixed episodes diagnoses obtained with the MINI was 17% and with the BISS was 20%. Using DSM-5 criteria, 9% of participants met criteria for hypomania/mania with mixed features and 12% met criteria for a depressive episode with mixed features. Symptom severity was also associated with increased mixed features with a high rate of mixed features in patients with mania/hypomania (63.8%) relative to those with depression (8.0%). LIMITATIONS Data on mixed features were collected at baseline only and thus do not reflect potential patterns in mixed features within this sample across the study duration. CONCLUSIONS The DSM-5 narrower, non-overlapping definition of mixed episodes resulted in fewer patients who met mixed criteria compared to DSM-IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauricio Tohen
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico, Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| | - Alexandra K Gold
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Louisa G Sylvia
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rebecca E Montana
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan L McElroy
- Lindner Center of HOPE, Mason, OH, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Michael E Thase
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Dustin J Rabideau
- Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew A Nierenberg
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Noreen A Reilly-Harrington
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Richard C Shelton
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Charles L Bowden
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Vivek Singh
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Thilo Deckersbach
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Terence A Ketter
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Joseph R Calabrese
- Bipolar Disorders Research Center, University Hospital's Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - William V Bobo
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Melvin G McInnis
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
240
|
Lambert M, Schöttle D, Ruppelt F, Rohenkohl A, Sengutta M, Luedecke D, Nawara LA, Galling B, Falk AL, Wittmann L, Niehaus V, Sarikaya G, Rietschel L, Gagern C, Schulte-Markwort M, Unger HP, Ott S, Romer G, Daubmann A, Wegscheider K, Correll CU, Schimmelmann BG, Wiedemann K, Bock T, Gallinat J, Karow A. Early detection and integrated care for adolescents and young adults with psychotic disorders: the ACCESS III study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2017; 136:188-200. [PMID: 28589683 DOI: 10.1111/acps.12762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to investigate whether a combined intervention composed of early detection plus integrated care (EDIC) enhances outcomes in patients with early psychosis compared to standard care (SC). METHODS ACCESS III is a prospective non-randomized historical control design 1-year study examining the efficacy of EDIC (n = 120) vs. SC (n = 105) in patients aged 12-29 years. Primary outcome was the rate of ≥6 months combined symptomatic and functional remission. Additional outcomes comprised the reduction of DUP and course of psychopathology, functioning, quality of life, and satisfaction with care. RESULTS In observed cases, 48.9% in the EDIC and 15.2% in the SC group reached the primary endpoint. Remission was predicted by EDIC (OR = 6.8, CI: 3.15-14.53, P < 0.001); younger age predicted non-remission (OR = 1.1, CI: 1.01-1.19, P = 0.038). Linear regressions indicated a reduction of DUP in EDIC (P < 0.001), but not in SC (P = 0.41). MMRMs showed significantly larger improvements in PANSS positive (P < 0.001) and GAF (P < 0.01) scores in EDIC vs. SC, and in EDIC over time in CGI-Severity (P < 0.001) and numerically in Q-LES-Q-18 (P = 0.052). CONCLUSIONS EDIC lead to significantly higher proportions of patients achieving combined remission. Moderating variables included a reduction of DUP and EDIC, offering psychotherapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lambert
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - D Schöttle
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - F Ruppelt
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - A Rohenkohl
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - M Sengutta
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - D Luedecke
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, UKE, Hamburg, Germany
| | - L A Nawara
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - B Galling
- The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Glen Oaks, NY, USA
| | - A-L Falk
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - L Wittmann
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - V Niehaus
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - G Sarikaya
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - L Rietschel
- University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - C Gagern
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - M Schulte-Markwort
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, UKE, Hamburg, Germany
| | - H-P Unger
- Center for Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Asklepios Hospital Harburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - S Ott
- Center for Mental Health, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Asklepios Hospital Harburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - G Romer
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Muenster, Münster, Germany
| | - A Daubmann
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, UKE, Hamburg, Germany
| | - K Wegscheider
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, UKE, Hamburg, Germany
| | - C U Correll
- The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Glen Oaks, NY, USA
| | - B G Schimmelmann
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, UKE, Hamburg, Germany.,University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - K Wiedemann
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - T Bock
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - J Gallinat
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - A Karow
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, UKE, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
241
|
Non-Suicidal Self-Injury in Pediatric Bipolar Disorder: Clinical Correlates and Impact on Psychosocial Treatment Outcomes. JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY 2017; 46:857-870. [DOI: 10.1007/s10802-017-0331-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
242
|
Dunlop BW, Gray J, Rapaport MH. Transdiagnostic Clinical Global Impression Scoring for Routine Clinical Settings. Behav Sci (Basel) 2017; 7:E40. [PMID: 28653978 PMCID: PMC5618048 DOI: 10.3390/bs7030040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2017] [Revised: 06/05/2017] [Accepted: 06/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Although there is great interest in the improving the ability to track patients' change over time in routine clinical care settings, no standardized transdiagnostic measure is currently available for busy clinicians to apply. The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scales are simple measures widely used as outcomes in psychiatric clinical trials. However, the CGI suffers from poorly defined scoring anchors. Efforts to improve the anchors by enhancing the anchor descriptions have proven useful but are limited by being disease-specific, thereby acting as a barrier to the routine clinical adoption of the CGI. To inform the development of more broadly applicable CGI scoring anchors, we surveyed 24 clinical trial investigators, asking them to rank-order seven elements that inform their CGI-Severity (CGI-S) scoring. Symptom severity emerged as the most important element in determining CGI-S scores; the functional status of the patient emerged as a second element. Less importance was given to self-report symptom scores, staff observations, or side effects. Relative rankings of the elements' importance did not differ by investigators' experience nor time usually spent with patients. We integrated these results with published illness-specific CGI anchors to develop the Transdiagnostic CGI (T-CGI), which employs standardized scoring anchors applicable across psychiatric illnesses. Pending validity and reliability evaluations, the T-CGI may prove well-suited for inclusion in routine clinical settings and for incorporation into electronic medical records as a simple and useful measure of treatment efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boadie W Dunlop
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 12 Executive Park Drive, 3rd Floor, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
| | - Jaclyn Gray
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 12 Executive Park Drive, 3rd Floor, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
| | - Mark H Rapaport
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 12 Executive Park Drive, 3rd Floor, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
243
|
Mei Bai Y, Li CT, Chen MH, Kuang Yang Y. Self-Reported Graphic Personal and Social Performance Scale (SRG-PSP) for measuring functionality in patients with bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord 2017; 215:256-262. [PMID: 28343053 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2016] [Revised: 01/07/2017] [Accepted: 02/13/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The self-reported graphic version of the Personal and Social Performance Scale (SRG-PSP) is the first graphic, self-reported rating scale that assesses functioning, and its reliability and validity have been documented in patients with schizophrenia. This study investigated the validity of SRG-PSP in patients with bipolar disorder (BD). METHODS Patients with BD were recruited from psychiatric outpatient clinics, and assessed with the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI)-Bipolar and CGI-Depression, the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS), the Global assessment of function (GAF), and the PSP. All participants completed the self-rating questionnaires: the SRG-PSP, the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), and the Sheehan disability Scale (SDS). RESULTS In total, 114 patients with BD were enrolled. The criterion-related validities between the SRG-PSP and the PSP were all significantly correlated with their counterparts. The global score of the SRG-PSP was significantly correlated with the scores of the YMRS, MADRS, PANSS, CGI-Depression, GAF, SF-36, and SDS. Three SRG-PSP domains (socially useful activities, personal and social relationships, and self-care) were negatively correlated with the scores of the MADRS, PANSS, CGI-depression, and SDS; and were positively correlated with the GAF, SF-36 scores. The disturbing and aggressive behavior domain was positively correlated with the scores of the YMRS, MADRS, PANSS, CGI-Bipolar, CGI-Depression, and SDS; and was negatively correlated with the GAF, SF-36 scores (all p<0.01). CONCLUSION The SRG-PSP is a validated self-reported scale for assessing functionality in patients with BD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya Mei Bai
- Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Cheng-Ta Li
- Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Mu-Hong Chen
- Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yen Kuang Yang
- Department of Psychiatry, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Psychiatry, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Dou-Liou Branch, Yunlin, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
244
|
Berk M, Daglas R, Dandash O, Yücel M, Henry L, Hallam K, Macneil C, Hasty M, Pantelis C, Murphy BP, Kader L, Damodaran S, Wong MTH, Conus P, Ratheesh A, McGorry PD, Cotton SM. Quetiapine v. lithium in the maintenance phase following a first episode of mania: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2017; 210:413-421. [PMID: 28254958 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.186833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2016] [Revised: 11/26/2016] [Accepted: 11/28/2016] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BackgroundLithium and quetiapine are considered standard maintenance agents for bipolar disorder yet it is unclear how their efficacy compares with each other.AimsTo investigate the differential effect of lithium and quetiapine on symptoms of depression, mania, general functioning, global illness severity and quality of life in patients with recently stabilised first-episode mania.MethodMaintenance trial of patients with first-episode mania stabilised on a combination of lithium and quetiapine, subsequently randomised to lithium or quetiapine monotherapy (up to 800 mg/day) and followed up for 1 year. (Trial registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry - ACTRN12607000639426.)ResultsIn total, 61 individuals were randomised. Within mixed-model repeated measures analyses, significant omnibus treatment × visit interactions were observed for measures of overall psychopathology, psychotic symptoms and functioning. Planned and post hoc comparisons further demonstrated the superiority of lithium treatment over quetiapine.ConclusionsIn people with first-episode mania treated with a combination of lithium and quetiapine, continuation treatment with lithium rather than quetiapine is superior in terms of mean levels of symptoms during a 1-year evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Berk
- Michael Berk, MBBCh, PhD, Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health and the Geelong Clinic; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, the Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Rothanthi Daglas, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Orwa Dandash, PhD, Murat Yücel, PhD, Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Lisa Henry, MPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Karen Hallam, PhD, Division of Psychology, School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Craig Macneil, DPsych, Melissa Hasty, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Christos Pantelis, MD, Hon MD (Athens), Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia; Brendan P. Murphy, FRCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Linda Kader, MD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Saji Damodaran, MD, Michael T. H. Wong, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Philippe Conus, MD, Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie CHUV, Université de Lausanne, Clinique de Cery, Prilly, Switzerland; Aswin Ratheesh, MD, Patrick D. McGorry, MD, PhD, Sue M. Cotton, PhD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rothanthi Daglas
- Michael Berk, MBBCh, PhD, Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health and the Geelong Clinic; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, the Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Rothanthi Daglas, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Orwa Dandash, PhD, Murat Yücel, PhD, Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Lisa Henry, MPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Karen Hallam, PhD, Division of Psychology, School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Craig Macneil, DPsych, Melissa Hasty, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Christos Pantelis, MD, Hon MD (Athens), Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia; Brendan P. Murphy, FRCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Linda Kader, MD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Saji Damodaran, MD, Michael T. H. Wong, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Philippe Conus, MD, Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie CHUV, Université de Lausanne, Clinique de Cery, Prilly, Switzerland; Aswin Ratheesh, MD, Patrick D. McGorry, MD, PhD, Sue M. Cotton, PhD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Orwa Dandash
- Michael Berk, MBBCh, PhD, Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health and the Geelong Clinic; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, the Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Rothanthi Daglas, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Orwa Dandash, PhD, Murat Yücel, PhD, Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Lisa Henry, MPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Karen Hallam, PhD, Division of Psychology, School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Craig Macneil, DPsych, Melissa Hasty, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Christos Pantelis, MD, Hon MD (Athens), Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia; Brendan P. Murphy, FRCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Linda Kader, MD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Saji Damodaran, MD, Michael T. H. Wong, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Philippe Conus, MD, Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie CHUV, Université de Lausanne, Clinique de Cery, Prilly, Switzerland; Aswin Ratheesh, MD, Patrick D. McGorry, MD, PhD, Sue M. Cotton, PhD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Murat Yücel
- Michael Berk, MBBCh, PhD, Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health and the Geelong Clinic; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, the Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Rothanthi Daglas, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Orwa Dandash, PhD, Murat Yücel, PhD, Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Lisa Henry, MPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Karen Hallam, PhD, Division of Psychology, School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Craig Macneil, DPsych, Melissa Hasty, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Christos Pantelis, MD, Hon MD (Athens), Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia; Brendan P. Murphy, FRCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Linda Kader, MD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Saji Damodaran, MD, Michael T. H. Wong, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Philippe Conus, MD, Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie CHUV, Université de Lausanne, Clinique de Cery, Prilly, Switzerland; Aswin Ratheesh, MD, Patrick D. McGorry, MD, PhD, Sue M. Cotton, PhD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa Henry
- Michael Berk, MBBCh, PhD, Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health and the Geelong Clinic; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, the Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Rothanthi Daglas, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Orwa Dandash, PhD, Murat Yücel, PhD, Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Lisa Henry, MPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Karen Hallam, PhD, Division of Psychology, School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Craig Macneil, DPsych, Melissa Hasty, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Christos Pantelis, MD, Hon MD (Athens), Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia; Brendan P. Murphy, FRCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Linda Kader, MD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Saji Damodaran, MD, Michael T. H. Wong, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Philippe Conus, MD, Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie CHUV, Université de Lausanne, Clinique de Cery, Prilly, Switzerland; Aswin Ratheesh, MD, Patrick D. McGorry, MD, PhD, Sue M. Cotton, PhD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karen Hallam
- Michael Berk, MBBCh, PhD, Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health and the Geelong Clinic; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, the Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Rothanthi Daglas, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Orwa Dandash, PhD, Murat Yücel, PhD, Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Lisa Henry, MPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Karen Hallam, PhD, Division of Psychology, School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Craig Macneil, DPsych, Melissa Hasty, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Christos Pantelis, MD, Hon MD (Athens), Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia; Brendan P. Murphy, FRCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Linda Kader, MD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Saji Damodaran, MD, Michael T. H. Wong, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Philippe Conus, MD, Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie CHUV, Université de Lausanne, Clinique de Cery, Prilly, Switzerland; Aswin Ratheesh, MD, Patrick D. McGorry, MD, PhD, Sue M. Cotton, PhD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Craig Macneil
- Michael Berk, MBBCh, PhD, Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health and the Geelong Clinic; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, the Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Rothanthi Daglas, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Orwa Dandash, PhD, Murat Yücel, PhD, Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Lisa Henry, MPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Karen Hallam, PhD, Division of Psychology, School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Craig Macneil, DPsych, Melissa Hasty, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Christos Pantelis, MD, Hon MD (Athens), Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia; Brendan P. Murphy, FRCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Linda Kader, MD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Saji Damodaran, MD, Michael T. H. Wong, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Philippe Conus, MD, Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie CHUV, Université de Lausanne, Clinique de Cery, Prilly, Switzerland; Aswin Ratheesh, MD, Patrick D. McGorry, MD, PhD, Sue M. Cotton, PhD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melissa Hasty
- Michael Berk, MBBCh, PhD, Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health and the Geelong Clinic; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, the Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Rothanthi Daglas, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Orwa Dandash, PhD, Murat Yücel, PhD, Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Lisa Henry, MPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Karen Hallam, PhD, Division of Psychology, School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Craig Macneil, DPsych, Melissa Hasty, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Christos Pantelis, MD, Hon MD (Athens), Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia; Brendan P. Murphy, FRCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Linda Kader, MD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Saji Damodaran, MD, Michael T. H. Wong, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Philippe Conus, MD, Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie CHUV, Université de Lausanne, Clinique de Cery, Prilly, Switzerland; Aswin Ratheesh, MD, Patrick D. McGorry, MD, PhD, Sue M. Cotton, PhD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christos Pantelis
- Michael Berk, MBBCh, PhD, Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health and the Geelong Clinic; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, the Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Rothanthi Daglas, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Orwa Dandash, PhD, Murat Yücel, PhD, Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Lisa Henry, MPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Karen Hallam, PhD, Division of Psychology, School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Craig Macneil, DPsych, Melissa Hasty, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Christos Pantelis, MD, Hon MD (Athens), Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia; Brendan P. Murphy, FRCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Linda Kader, MD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Saji Damodaran, MD, Michael T. H. Wong, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Philippe Conus, MD, Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie CHUV, Université de Lausanne, Clinique de Cery, Prilly, Switzerland; Aswin Ratheesh, MD, Patrick D. McGorry, MD, PhD, Sue M. Cotton, PhD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Brendan P Murphy
- Michael Berk, MBBCh, PhD, Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health and the Geelong Clinic; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, the Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Rothanthi Daglas, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Orwa Dandash, PhD, Murat Yücel, PhD, Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Lisa Henry, MPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Karen Hallam, PhD, Division of Psychology, School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Craig Macneil, DPsych, Melissa Hasty, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Christos Pantelis, MD, Hon MD (Athens), Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia; Brendan P. Murphy, FRCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Linda Kader, MD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Saji Damodaran, MD, Michael T. H. Wong, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Philippe Conus, MD, Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie CHUV, Université de Lausanne, Clinique de Cery, Prilly, Switzerland; Aswin Ratheesh, MD, Patrick D. McGorry, MD, PhD, Sue M. Cotton, PhD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Linda Kader
- Michael Berk, MBBCh, PhD, Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health and the Geelong Clinic; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, the Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Rothanthi Daglas, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Orwa Dandash, PhD, Murat Yücel, PhD, Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Lisa Henry, MPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Karen Hallam, PhD, Division of Psychology, School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Craig Macneil, DPsych, Melissa Hasty, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Christos Pantelis, MD, Hon MD (Athens), Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia; Brendan P. Murphy, FRCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Linda Kader, MD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Saji Damodaran, MD, Michael T. H. Wong, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Philippe Conus, MD, Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie CHUV, Université de Lausanne, Clinique de Cery, Prilly, Switzerland; Aswin Ratheesh, MD, Patrick D. McGorry, MD, PhD, Sue M. Cotton, PhD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Saji Damodaran
- Michael Berk, MBBCh, PhD, Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health and the Geelong Clinic; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, the Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Rothanthi Daglas, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Orwa Dandash, PhD, Murat Yücel, PhD, Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Lisa Henry, MPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Karen Hallam, PhD, Division of Psychology, School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Craig Macneil, DPsych, Melissa Hasty, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Christos Pantelis, MD, Hon MD (Athens), Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia; Brendan P. Murphy, FRCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Linda Kader, MD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Saji Damodaran, MD, Michael T. H. Wong, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Philippe Conus, MD, Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie CHUV, Université de Lausanne, Clinique de Cery, Prilly, Switzerland; Aswin Ratheesh, MD, Patrick D. McGorry, MD, PhD, Sue M. Cotton, PhD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael T H Wong
- Michael Berk, MBBCh, PhD, Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health and the Geelong Clinic; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, the Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Rothanthi Daglas, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Orwa Dandash, PhD, Murat Yücel, PhD, Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Lisa Henry, MPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Karen Hallam, PhD, Division of Psychology, School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Craig Macneil, DPsych, Melissa Hasty, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Christos Pantelis, MD, Hon MD (Athens), Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia; Brendan P. Murphy, FRCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Linda Kader, MD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Saji Damodaran, MD, Michael T. H. Wong, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Philippe Conus, MD, Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie CHUV, Université de Lausanne, Clinique de Cery, Prilly, Switzerland; Aswin Ratheesh, MD, Patrick D. McGorry, MD, PhD, Sue M. Cotton, PhD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Philippe Conus
- Michael Berk, MBBCh, PhD, Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health and the Geelong Clinic; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, the Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Rothanthi Daglas, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Orwa Dandash, PhD, Murat Yücel, PhD, Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Lisa Henry, MPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Karen Hallam, PhD, Division of Psychology, School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Craig Macneil, DPsych, Melissa Hasty, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Christos Pantelis, MD, Hon MD (Athens), Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia; Brendan P. Murphy, FRCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Linda Kader, MD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Saji Damodaran, MD, Michael T. H. Wong, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Philippe Conus, MD, Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie CHUV, Université de Lausanne, Clinique de Cery, Prilly, Switzerland; Aswin Ratheesh, MD, Patrick D. McGorry, MD, PhD, Sue M. Cotton, PhD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Aswin Ratheesh
- Michael Berk, MBBCh, PhD, Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health and the Geelong Clinic; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, the Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Rothanthi Daglas, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Orwa Dandash, PhD, Murat Yücel, PhD, Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Lisa Henry, MPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Karen Hallam, PhD, Division of Psychology, School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Craig Macneil, DPsych, Melissa Hasty, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Christos Pantelis, MD, Hon MD (Athens), Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia; Brendan P. Murphy, FRCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Linda Kader, MD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Saji Damodaran, MD, Michael T. H. Wong, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Philippe Conus, MD, Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie CHUV, Université de Lausanne, Clinique de Cery, Prilly, Switzerland; Aswin Ratheesh, MD, Patrick D. McGorry, MD, PhD, Sue M. Cotton, PhD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Patrick D McGorry
- Michael Berk, MBBCh, PhD, Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health and the Geelong Clinic; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, the Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Rothanthi Daglas, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Orwa Dandash, PhD, Murat Yücel, PhD, Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Lisa Henry, MPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Karen Hallam, PhD, Division of Psychology, School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Craig Macneil, DPsych, Melissa Hasty, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Christos Pantelis, MD, Hon MD (Athens), Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia; Brendan P. Murphy, FRCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Linda Kader, MD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Saji Damodaran, MD, Michael T. H. Wong, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Philippe Conus, MD, Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie CHUV, Université de Lausanne, Clinique de Cery, Prilly, Switzerland; Aswin Ratheesh, MD, Patrick D. McGorry, MD, PhD, Sue M. Cotton, PhD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sue M Cotton
- Michael Berk, MBBCh, PhD, Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health and the Geelong Clinic; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, the Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Rothanthi Daglas, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Orwa Dandash, PhD, Murat Yücel, PhD, Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Lisa Henry, MPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Karen Hallam, PhD, Division of Psychology, School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Craig Macneil, DPsych, Melissa Hasty, DPsych, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Christos Pantelis, MD, Hon MD (Athens), Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia; Brendan P. Murphy, FRCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Linda Kader, MD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Saji Damodaran, MD, Michael T. H. Wong, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Philippe Conus, MD, Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie CHUV, Université de Lausanne, Clinique de Cery, Prilly, Switzerland; Aswin Ratheesh, MD, Patrick D. McGorry, MD, PhD, Sue M. Cotton, PhD, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
245
|
Weiser M, Levi L, Levine SZ, Bialer M, Shekh-Ahmad T, Matei V, Tiugan A, Cirjaliu D, Sava C, Sinita E, Zamora D, Davis JM. A randomized, double-blind, placebo- and risperidone-controlled study on valnoctamide for acute mania. Bipolar Disord 2017; 19:285-294. [PMID: 28605109 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2016] [Revised: 04/03/2017] [Accepted: 04/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Mood stabilizers administered for bipolar disorder during pregnancy, such as valproic acid, can increase the risk of congenital anomalies in offspring. Valnoctamide is a valproic acid derivative associated with a decreased risk for congenital abnormalities in animals. The present study evaluated the efficacy and safety of valnoctamide monotherapy, compared to placebo, in the treatment of patients in an acute manic episode. METHODS A 3-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo- and risperidone-controlled, parallel group trial was conducted on 173 patients in an acute manic episode. Patients were randomized to receive valnoctamide 1500 mg/d (n=71), risperidone 6 mg/d (n=32), or matching placebo (n=70). The primary outcome measure was the change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scores. RESULTS Valnoctamide did not differ significantly from placebo on any of the study endpoints (YMRS, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, and the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Bipolar Disorder [CGI-BP] scales; all P>.60). Mixed models for repeated measures showed that risperidone produced significantly more improvement than placebo in the overall bipolar disorder CGI-BP severity scale (P=.036), and the CGI-BP severity scale for mania (P=.021). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve revealed higher all-cause discontinuation rates (mainly due to lack of efficacy) in the valnoctamide group compared to the other study groups (P=.026). Patients with higher valnoctamide plasma levels had a numerically higher YMRS response, but this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Valnoctamide was well tolerated at 1500 mg/d but lacked efficacy in the treatment of symptoms in patients with acute mania. Possible differences between the biological mechanisms of action of valproic acid and valnoctamide are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Weiser
- Division of Psychiatry, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Linda Levi
- Division of Psychiatry, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Israel
| | - Stephen Z Levine
- Department of Community Mental Health, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Meir Bialer
- School of Pharmacy, Institute for Drug Research, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Tawfeeq Shekh-Ahmad
- School of Pharmacy, Institute for Drug Research, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Valentin Matei
- Spitalul Clinic de Psihiatrie Obregia, Bucarest, Romania
| | - Alexandru Tiugan
- Sp. Clinic de Urgenta Militar "Dr. Stefan Odoblegea", Craiova, Romania
| | - Diana Cirjaliu
- Spitalul Judetean Constanta, Clinica de Psihiatrie Palazu Mare, Costanta, Romania
| | - Cristinel Sava
- Spitalul Judetean de Urgente, Piatra Neamt, Neamt, Romania
| | - Eugenia Sinita
- Spitalul Clinic de Psihiatrie Chisinau, Republica Moldova, Chisinau, Moldova
| | - Daisy Zamora
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - John M Davis
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
246
|
ter Meulen WG, van Zaane J, Draisma S, Beekman AT, Kupka RW. Does the number of previous mood episodes moderate the relationship between alcohol use, smoking and mood in bipolar outpatients? BMC Psychiatry 2017; 17:185. [PMID: 28506220 PMCID: PMC5432990 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1341-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2016] [Accepted: 04/30/2017] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence suggests that alcohol use and smoking are negatively associated with mood in bipolar disorders (BD). It is unknown if this relationship is moderated by the number of previous mood episodes. Therefore, this paper aims to examine whether the number of previous mood episodes moderates the relationship between alcohol use and smoking, and mood. METHOD This study assessed the outcomes of 108 outpatients with BD I and II in a prospective observational cohort study. For 1 year, subjects daily registered mood symptoms and substance use with the prospective Life Chart Method. The relationship between the average daily consumption of alcohol and tobacco units in the whole year and mood were examined by multiple linear regression analyses. Number of previous mood episodes, grouped into its quartiles, was added as effect moderator. Outcome was the number of depressive, hypomanic and manic days in that year. RESULTS The number of depressive days in a year increased by 4% (adjusted β per unit tobacco = 1.040; 95% CI 1.003-1.079; p = 0.033) per unit increase in average daily tobacco consumption in that same year. Interaction analyses showed that in those subjects with less than 7 previous mood episodes, the number of manic and hypomanic days increased by 100.3% per unit increase in alcohol consumption (adjusted β per unit alcohol = 2.003; 95% CI 1.225-3.274; p = 0.006). In those with 7 to 13 previous mood episodes, the number of manic and hypomanic days decreased by 28.7% per unit increase in alcohol consumption (adjusted β per unit alcohol = 0.713; 95% CI 0.539-0.944; p = 0.019); and in subjects with 14 to 44 previous mood episodes, the number of manic and hypomanic days decreased by 7.2% per unit increase in tobacco consumption (adjusted β per unit tobacco = 0.928; 95% CI 0.871-0.989; p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS The number of previous mood episodes moderates the relationship between alcohol use and smoking and mood; and smoking is adversely associated with the number of depressive days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendela G. ter Meulen
- 0000 0004 0435 165Xgrid.16872.3aGGZ inGeest and Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, A.J. Ernststraat 1187, 1081 HL Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan van Zaane
- 0000 0004 0435 165Xgrid.16872.3aGGZ inGeest and Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, A.J. Ernststraat 1187, 1081 HL Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stasja Draisma
- 0000 0004 0435 165Xgrid.16872.3aGGZ inGeest and Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, A.J. Ernststraat 1187, 1081 HL Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aartjan T.F. Beekman
- 0000 0004 0435 165Xgrid.16872.3aGGZ inGeest and Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, A.J. Ernststraat 1187, 1081 HL Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ralph W. Kupka
- 0000 0004 0435 165Xgrid.16872.3aGGZ inGeest and Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, A.J. Ernststraat 1187, 1081 HL Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
247
|
Kumari S, Malik M, Florival C, Manalai P, Sonje S. An Assessment of Five (PANSS, SAPS, SANS, NSA-16, CGI-SCH) commonly used Symptoms Rating Scales in Schizophrenia and Comparison to Newer Scales (CAINS, BNSS). ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 8. [PMID: 29430333 PMCID: PMC5805140 DOI: 10.4172/2155-6105.1000324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Scales measuring positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia remain the primary mo Scales measuring positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia remain the primary mode of assessing and diagnosing schizophrenia by clinicians and researchers. The scales are mainly used to monitor the severity of positive and negative symptoms and track treatment response in schizophrenics. Although these scales are widely used, quality as well as general utility of each scale varies. The quality is determined by the validity and reliability of the scales. The utility of the scale is determined by the time of administration and the settings for which the scales can be administered in research or clinical settings. There are relatively fewer articles on the utility of newer scales like CAINS (Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms) and the BNSS (Brief Negative Symptom Scale) that compare them to the older scales PANSS (Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale), SAPS (Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms) SANS (the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms), NSA-16 (Negative Symptom Assessment-16) and CGI-SCH (Clinical Global Impression Schizophrenia. The older scales were developed more than 30 years ago. Since then, our understanding of negative symptoms has evolved and currently there are newer rating scales evaluating the validity of negative symptoms. The older scales do not incorporate the latest research on negative symptoms. CAINS and BNSS are attractive for both their reliability and their concise accessible format, however, a scale that is simpler, accessible, user-friendly, that incorporates a multidimensional model of schizophrenia, addresses the psychosocial and cognitive component has yet to be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suneeta Kumari
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Howard University Hospital, Washington DC, USA
| | - Mansoor Malik
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Howard University Hospital, Washington DC, USA
| | - Christina Florival
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Howard University Hospital, Washington DC, USA
| | - Partam Manalai
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Howard University Hospital, Washington DC, USA
| | - Snezana Sonje
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Howard University Hospital, Washington DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
248
|
Predictors of functional status at service entry and discharge among young people with first episode psychosis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2017; 52:575-585. [PMID: 28233045 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-017-1358-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2016] [Accepted: 01/23/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Most patients with first episode psychosis (FEP) are neither studying nor employed (have a poor functional status) when first accessing care. Knowledge of the characteristics of patients with poor functioning and the features influencing functional status over time may pave the way to better treatment. METHOD A medical file audit was used to collect data on premorbid, entry, treatment and 18-month outcome characteristics on 661 FEP patients who consecutively attended the Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre, Melbourne, Australia, between 1998 and 2000. Functional status was ascertained using the modified vocational status index and was rated at baseline (poor or good) and according to its evolution over the treatment period (stable good, stable poor, deteriorating or improved functional status). RESULTS 52.0% of patients had a poor functional status at service entry. They were more likely to be male with a non-affective psychosis. They also had lower levels of premorbid global functioning and education, and were more likely to have self-reported histories of learning disability, forensic issues, traumatic experiences and substance use. At service entry, they had more severe symptoms and poorer global functioning. 37% of these patients maintained a poor functional status at discharge, and 18% of those with a good functional status at service entry experienced a decline. CONCLUSIONS Although psychosocial interventions might assist a young person with FEP with working towards functional goals, for some, the impact of factors such as ongoing substance use and forensic issues on functional status needs to be addressed.
Collapse
|
249
|
Use of Lithium in Severe Acute Manic Episodes: Retrospective Prescription Practice From a Tertiary Inpatient Unit. J Psychiatr Pract 2017; 23:167-172. [PMID: 28492454 DOI: 10.1097/pra.0000000000000226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A retrospective chart review was performed to investigate the common preferences of clinicians for the pharmacological treatment of acute manic episodes, with particular regard to lithium use, and to assess the adherence of clinical practice to established guidelines. METHODS Cases of manic episodes in patients admitted to Bakirköy Mazhar Osman Mental Health and Neurological Diseases Education and Research Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Length of stay, medication data, serum levels, and adverse effects were evaluated for patients who received lithium therapy (N=98). RESULTS On the first day of lithium treatment, 81 patients received 900 to 1200 mg of lithium. In total, 44 patients were discharged with the same dose as that given on the first day of treatment. With the exception of 1 patient, the dose was increased by 300 to 600 mg in the remaining patients within the first 10 days on the basis of serum drug concentrations. The mean serum concentrations of lithium in the first week were 0.67±0.17 mEq/L in patients with no dose increase, and 0.51±0.15 mEq/L in patients who did receive a dose increase. In total, 94 patients received at least 1 antipsychotic medication in addition to lithium. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians attempted to maintain serum lithium levels above 0.60 mEq/L at the time of acute treatment initiation, consistent with established guidelines. Clinical practice in large inpatient settings may force clinicians to use lithium in combination with antipsychotics for the treatment of acute mania; the delayed action of lithium and the need for rapid stabilization may drive these practices.
Collapse
|
250
|
Berk L, Hallam KT, Venugopal K, Lewis AJ, Austin DW, Kulkarni J, Dodd S, de Castella A, Fitzgerald PB, Berk M. Impact of irritability: a 2-year observational study of outpatients with bipolar I or schizoaffective disorder. Bipolar Disord 2017; 19:184-197. [PMID: 28470892 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2014] [Accepted: 03/12/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many people experience irritability when manic, hypomanic, or depressed, yet its impact on illness severity and quality of life in bipolar and schizoaffective disorders is poorly understood. This study aimed to examine the relationship between irritability and symptom burden, functioning, quality of life, social support, suicidality, and overall illness severity in a naturalistic cohort of people with bipolar I or schizoaffective disorder. METHODS We used data from 239 adult outpatients with bipolar I or schizoaffective disorder in the Bipolar Comprehensive Outcomes Study (BCOS) - a non-interventional observational study with a 2-year follow-up period. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of participants with and without irritability were compared. A mixed-model repeated measures analysis was conducted to examine the longitudinal effect of irritability on clinical and quality-of-life variables over follow-up using significant baseline variables. RESULTS At baseline, 54% of participants were irritable. Baseline irritability was associated with illness severity, mania, depression, psychotic symptoms, suicidality, poor functioning, and quality of life, but not diagnosis (schizoaffective/bipolar disorder). Participants with irritability were less likely to have a partner and perceived less adequate social support. On average, over follow-up, those with irritability reported more symptoms, functional impairment, and suicidality. Furthermore, the effects of irritability could not be fully explained by illness severity. CONCLUSIONS Irritability was associated with more negative symptomatic, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes and suicidality. The identification, monitoring, and targeted treatment of irritability may be worth considering, to enhance health and wellbeing outcomes for adults with bipolar and schizoaffective disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lesley Berk
- Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Vic., Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Melbourne School of Global and Population Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - Karen T Hallam
- Department of Psychology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Department of Psychology, Victoria University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Kamalesh Venugopal
- South Australian Department for Health and Ageing, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Andrew James Lewis
- School of Psychology & Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.,Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA, Australia
| | - David W Austin
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Vic., Australia
| | - Jayashri Kulkarni
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre (MAPrc), Monash University Central Clinical School and The Alfred, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Seetal Dodd
- Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Vic., Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - Anthony de Castella
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre (MAPrc), Monash University Central Clinical School and The Alfred, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Paul B Fitzgerald
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre (MAPrc), Monash University Central Clinical School and The Alfred, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Vic., Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|