201
|
Tempero MA, Pelzer U, O'Reilly EM, Winter J, Oh DY, Li CP, Tortora G, Chang HM, Lopez CD, Bekaii-Saab T, Ko AH, Santoro A, Park JO, Noel MS, Frassineti GL, Shan YS, Dean A, Riess H, Van Cutsem E, Berlin J, Philip P, Moore M, Goldstein D, Tabernero J, Li M, Ferrara S, Le Bruchec Y, Zhang G, Lu B, Biankin AV, Reni M. Adjuvant nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Results From a Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol 2022; 41:2007-2019. [PMID: 36521097 PMCID: PMC10082313 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This randomized, open-label trial compared the efficacy and safety of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine with those of gemcitabine for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01964430 ). METHODS We assigned 866 treatment-naive patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) + gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) or gemcitabine alone to one 30-40 infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of six 28-day cycles. The primary end point was independently assessed disease-free survival (DFS). Additional end points included investigator-assessed DFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Two hundred eighty-seven of 432 patients and 310 of 434 patients completed nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine and gemcitabine treatment, respectively. At primary data cutoff (December 31, 2018; median follow-up, 38.5 [interquartile range [IQR], 33.8-43 months), the median independently assessed DFS was 19.4 ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) versus 18.8 months (gemcitabine; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.729 to 1.063; P = .18). The median investigator-assessed DFS was 16.6 (IQR, 8.4-47.0) and 13.7 (IQR, 8.3-44.1) months, respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.694 to 0.965; P = .02). The median OS (427 events; 68% mature) was 40.5 (IQR, 20.7 to not reached) and 36.2 (IQR, 17.7-53.3) months, respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.680 to 0.996; P = .045). At a 16-month follow-up (cutoff, April 3, 2020; median follow-up, 51.4 months [IQR, 47.0-57.0]), the median OS (511 events; 81% mature) was 41.8 ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) versus 37.7 months (gemcitabine; HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.687 to 0.973; P = .0232). At the 5-year follow-up (cutoff, April 9, 2021; median follow-up, 63.2 months [IQR, 60.1-68.7]), the median OS (555 events; 88% mature) was 41.8 versus 37.7 months, respectively (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.678 to 0.947; P = .0091). Eighty-six percent ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) and 68% (gemcitabine) of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Two patients per study arm died of treatment-emergent adverse events. CONCLUSION The primary end point (independently assessed DFS) was not met despite favorable OS seen with nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret A. Tempero
- University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Uwe Pelzer
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Jordan Winter
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Do-Youn Oh
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Integrated Major in Innovative Medical Science, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chung-Pin Li
- Division of Clinical Skills Training, Department of Medical Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Verona, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Heung-Moon Chang
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Charles D. Lopez
- Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR
| | | | - Andrew H. Ko
- University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Armando Santoro
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Joon Oh Park
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Marcus S. Noel
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Cancer Center, Washington, DC
| | - Giovanni Luca Frassineti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Yan-Shen Shan
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Andrew Dean
- Department of Medical Oncology, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Hanno Riess
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eric Van Cutsem
- University Hospitals Gasthuisberg/Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Philip Philip
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
- Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
| | - Malcolm Moore
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Goldstein
- Nelune Cancer Center, Prince of Wales Hospital, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Josep Tabernero
- Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), IOB-Quiron, UVic-UCC, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Stefano Ferrara
- Celgene Research SLU, a Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Boudry, Switzerland
| | - Yvan Le Bruchec
- Celgene Research SLU, a Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Boudry, Switzerland
| | | | - Brian Lu
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - Andrew V. Biankin
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Center, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- West of Scotland Pancreatic Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michele Reni
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Vita e Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
202
|
Rouette J, McDonald EG, Schuster T, Brophy JM, Azoulay L. Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11:e026789. [PMID: 36515246 PMCID: PMC9798809 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.122.026789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Recent studies have reported that dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (dCCBs) may increase the risk of pancreatic cancer, but these studies had methodological limitations. We thus aimed to determine whether dCCBs are associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer compared with thiazide diuretics, a clinically relevant comparator. Methods and Results We conducted a new user, active comparator, population-based cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. We identified new users of dCCBs and new users of thiazide diuretics between 1990 and 2018, with follow-up until 2019. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for pancreatic cancer, comparing dCCBs with thiazide diuretics. Models were weighted using standardized morbidity ratio weights based on calendar time-specific propensity scores. We also conducted secondary analyses by cumulative duration of use, time since initiation, and individual drugs and assessed for the presence of effect modification by age, sex, smoking status, body mass index, history of chronic pancreatitis, and diabetes. The cohort included 344 480 initiators of dCCBs and 357 968 initiators of thiazide diuretics, generating 3 360 745 person-years of follow-up. After a median follow-up of 4.5 years, the weighted incidence rate per 100 000 person-years was 37.2 (95% CI, 34.1-40.4) for dCCBs and 39.4 (95% CI, 36.1-42.9) for thiazide diuretics. Overall, dCCBs were not associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer (weighted HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.80-1.09). Similar results were observed in secondary analyses. Conclusions In this large, population-based cohort study, dCCBs were not associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer compared with thiazide diuretics. These findings provide reassurance regarding the long-term pancreatic cancer safety of these drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Rouette
- Centre for Clinical EpidemiologyLady Davis Institute, Jewish General HospitalMontrealCanada,Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational HealthMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
| | - Emily G. McDonald
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of MedicineMcGill University Health CentreMontrealCanada,Division of Experimental MedicineMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
| | - Tibor Schuster
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational HealthMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada,Department of Family MedicineMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
| | - James M. Brophy
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational HealthMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada,Division of Clinical EpidemiologyMcGill University Health Centre–Research InstituteMontrealCanada,Department of MedicineMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
| | - Laurent Azoulay
- Centre for Clinical EpidemiologyLady Davis Institute, Jewish General HospitalMontrealCanada,Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational HealthMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada,Gerald Bronfman Department of OncologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
| |
Collapse
|
203
|
Impact of Sarcopenia on Patients with Localized Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Receiving FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine as Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246179. [PMID: 36551662 PMCID: PMC9777189 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Despite its toxicity, modified FOLFIRINOX is the main chemotherapy for localized, operable pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Sarcopenia is known as a factor in lower overall survival (OS). The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of sarcopenia on OS in patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who received modified FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with operated PDAC who received gemcitabine-based (GEM group) or oxaliplatin-based (OXA group) adjuvant chemotherapy between 2008 and 2021 were retrospectively included. Sarcopenia was estimated on a baseline computed tomography (CT) examination using the skeletal muscular index (SMI). The primary evaluation criterion was OS. Secondary evaluation criteria were disease-free survival (DFS) and toxicity. Results: Seventy patients treated with gemcitabine-based (n = 49) and oxaliplatin-based (n = 21) chemotherapy were included, with a total of fifteen sarcopenic patients (eight in the GEM group and seven in the OXA group). The median OS was shorter in sarcopenic patients (25 months) compared to non-sarcopenic patients (158 months) (p = 0.01). A longer OS was observed in GEM non-sarcopenic patients (158 months) compared to OXA sarcopenic patients (14.4 months) (p < 0.01). The median OS was 157.7 months in the GEM group vs. 34.1 months in the OXA group (p = 0.13). No differences in median DFS were found between the GEM group and OXA group. More toxicity events were observed in the OXA group (50%) than in the GEM group (10%), including vomiting (p = 0.02), mucositis (p = 0.01) and neuropathy (p = 0.01). Conclusion: Sarcopenia is associated with a worse prognosis in patients with localized operated PDAC whatever the delivered adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
204
|
Archibugi L, Ponz de Leon Pisani R, Petrone MC, Balzano G, Falconi M, Doglioni C, Capurso G, Arcidiacono PG. Needle-Tract Seeding of Pancreatic Cancer after EUS-FNA: A Systematic Review of Case Reports and Discussion of Management. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246130. [PMID: 36551615 PMCID: PMC9777256 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Needle-tract seeding (NTS) has been sporadically reported as complication of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-guided aspiration (FNA) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the evidence of its treatment and outcome is sparse. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of EUS-FNA NTS cases of PDAC and analyzed their management and outcome. Up to September 2022, the search query retrieved forty-five cases plus an unpublished case from our center, for a total of forty-six; 43.6% were male, with a mean age of 68.6 years. Thirty-four patients (87.1%) underwent an initial surgical resection, with only 44.1% and 5.9% undergoing adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, respectively, and 5.9% undergoing both. The NTS nodule was mostly located in the posterior gastric wall, developing at a median of 19 months after primary resection; 82.4% underwent surgical resection of the seeding, while for 17.6%, palliative chemotherapy treatment. Follow-up after NTS diagnosis and treatment was reported for only twenty-three patients: when NTS was treated with surgery, the median overall survival was 26.5 months compared to 15.5 if treated with radio/chemotherapy. NTS after EUS-FNA of PDAC occurs late and might be treated aggressively with good results. Interestingly, only a low number of patients developing NTS underwent chemotherapy for the primary cancer, suggesting its possible protective role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Livia Archibugi
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Ruggero Ponz de Leon Pisani
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Petrone
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Gianpaolo Balzano
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Doglioni
- Pathology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Capurso
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
205
|
Huang JC, Pan B, Wang HX, Chen Q, He Q, Lyu SC. Prognostic Value of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Carcinoma Followed by Pancreatectomy with Portal Vein Resection and Reconstruction with Venous Allograft. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11247380. [PMID: 36555996 PMCID: PMC9787949 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11247380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) represents one of the current research hotspots in the field of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of NAC in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) followed by pancreatectomy with portal vein (PV) resection and reconstruction with venous allograft (VAG). METHODS Medical records of patients with BPRC who underwent pancreatectomy with concomitant PV resection and reconstruction with VAG between April 2013 and March 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Outcomes of patients with and without NAC (NAC, Group 1 vs. non-NAC, Group 2) were compared with focus on R0 resection rates, morbidity, and survival. RESULTS Of the 77 patients with pancreatectomy, PV resection and reconstruction with VAG were identified. Overall survival (OS) rates of 0.5-, 1-, and 2-year were 80.5%, 59.7%, and 31.2%, respectively (median survival time, MST, 14 months). Of these, 24 patients (Group 1) underwent operation following received NAC, and the remaining 53 patients did not (Group 2). The R0 resection rate of vascular margin was 100% vs. 84.9% (p = 0.04), respectively. Morbidity of post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) was 0% vs. 17.8% (p = 0.07), respectively. The OS of 0.5-, 1- and 2-year and MST of 2 groups were 83.3%, 66.7%, 41.7%, 16 months, and 79.2%, 55.6%, 26.4%, 13 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) serum level and postoperative chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors in patients with BRPC after surgery. CONCLUSION NAC might improve the R0 resection rate and POPF in patients with BRPC who underwent pancreatectomy with concomitant PV resection and reconstruction with VAG. Survival benefit exists in patients with BRPC who received NAC before pancreatectomy. Postoperative chemotherapy also had a favorable effect on OS of BRPC patients. Elevated CA 19-9 serum level is associated with poor prognosis, even after NAC-combining operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Qiang He
- Correspondence: (Q.H.); (S.-C.L.); Tel.: +86-010-85231504 (Q.H.); +86-010-85231504 (S.-C.L.)
| | - Shao-Cheng Lyu
- Correspondence: (Q.H.); (S.-C.L.); Tel.: +86-010-85231504 (Q.H.); +86-010-85231504 (S.-C.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
206
|
Akhuba L, Tigai Z, Shek D. Where Do We Stand with Immunotherapy for Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Synopsis of Clinical Outcomes. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10123196. [PMID: 36551952 PMCID: PMC9775646 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Revised: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is the seventh leading cause of cancer-related mortality in both sexes across the globe. It is associated with extremely poor prognosis and remains a critical burden worldwide due to its low survival rates. Histologically, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) accounts for 80% of all pancreatic cancers; the majority of which are diagnosed at advanced stages, which makes them ineligible for curative surgery. Conventional chemotherapy provides a five-year overall survival rate of less than 8% forcing scientists and clinicians to search for better treatment strategies. Recent discoveries in cancer immunology have resulted in the incorporation of immunotherapeutic strategies for cancer treatment. Particularly, immune-checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive cell therapies and cancer vaccines have already shifted guidelines for some malignancies, although their efficacy in PDAC has yet to be elucidated. In this review, we summarize the existing clinical data on immunotherapy clinical outcomes in patients with advanced or metastatic PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liia Akhuba
- Blacktown Mt Druitt Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2148, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2150, Australia
| | - Zhanna Tigai
- Accreditation Centre, RUDN University, Moscow 117198, Russia
| | - Dmitrii Shek
- Blacktown Mt Druitt Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2148, Australia
- Blacktown Clinical School, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2148, Australia
- Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-412-03-55-33
| |
Collapse
|
207
|
Correlation between ADC Histogram-Derived Metrics and the Time to Metastases in Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246050. [PMID: 36551536 PMCID: PMC9775993 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 12/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: A non-invasive method to improve the prognostic stratification would be clinically beneficial in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of this study was to correlate conventional magnetic resonance (MR) features and the metrics derived from the histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, with the risk and the time to metastases (TTM) after surgery in patients with PDAC. Methods: pre-operative MR examinations of 120 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were grouped according to the presence (M+) or absence (M−) of metastases during follow-up. Conventional MR features and histogram-derived metrics were compared between M+ and M− patients using the Fisher’s or Mann−Whitney tests; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for the features that showed a significant difference between groups. A Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the features with a significant effect on the TTM, and Kaplan−Meier curves were constructed for significant features. Results: 68.3% patients developed metastases over a mean follow-up time of 29 months (range, 3−54 months). ADC skewness and kurtosis were significantly higher in M+ than in M− patients (p < 0.001). Skewness had a significant effect on the risk of metastases (hazard ratio—HR = 5.22, p < 0.001). Patients with an ADC skewness ≥0.23 had a significantly shorter TTM than those with a skewness <0.22 (11.7 vs. 30.8 months, p < 0.001). Conclusions: pre-operative histogram analysis of ADC maps provides parameters correlated to the metastatic potential of PDAC. Higher ADC skewness seems to be associated with a significantly shorter TTM in patients with resectable PDAC.
Collapse
|
208
|
Dardare J, Witz A, Betz M, Francois A, Meras M, Lamy L, Lambert A, Grandemange S, Husson M, Rouyer M, Demange J, Merlin JL, Harlé A, Gilson P. DDB2 represses epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and sensitizes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells to chemotherapy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1052163. [PMID: 36568213 PMCID: PMC9773984 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1052163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Damage specific DNA binding protein 2 (DDB2) is an UV-indiced DNA damage recognition factor and regulator of cancer development and progression. DDB2 has dual roles in several cancers, either as an oncogene or as a tumor suppressor gene, depending on cancer localization. Here, we investigated the unresolved role of DDB2 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods The expression level of DDB2 in pancreatic cancer tissues and its correlation with patient survival were evaluated using publicly available data. Two PDAC cell models with CRISPR-modified DDB2 expression were developed: DDB2 was repressed in DDB2-high T3M4 cells (T3M4 DDB2-low) while DDB2 was overexpressed in DDB2-low Capan-2 cells (Capan-2 DDB2-high). Immunofluorescence and qPCR assays were used to investigate epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in these models. Migration and invasion properties of the cells were also determined using wound healing and transwell assays. Sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin, irinotecan and gemcitabine were finally investigated by crystal violet assays. Results DDB2 expression level was reduced in PDAC tissues compared to normal ones and DDB2-low levels were correlated to shorter disease-free survival in PDAC patients. DDB2 overexpression increased expression of E-cadherin epithelial marker, and decreased levels of N-cadherin mesenchymal marker. Conversely, we observed opposite effects in DDB2 repression and enhanced transcription of SNAIL, ZEB1, and TWIST EMT transcription factors (EMT-TFs). Study of migration and invasion revealed that these properties were negatively correlated with DDB2 expression in both cell models. DDB2 overexpression sensitized cells to 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and gemcitabine. Conclusion Our study highlights the potential tumor suppressive effects of DDB2 on PDAC progression. DDB2 could thus represent a promising therapeutic target or biomarker for defining prognosis and predicting chemotherapy response in patients with PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Dardare
- Université de Lorraine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7039 Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy (CRAN), Nancy, France,Service de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France,*Correspondence: Julie Dardare,
| | - Andréa Witz
- Université de Lorraine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7039 Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy (CRAN), Nancy, France,Service de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | - Margaux Betz
- Université de Lorraine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7039 Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy (CRAN), Nancy, France,Service de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | - Aurélie Francois
- Université de Lorraine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7039 Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy (CRAN), Nancy, France,Service de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | - Morgane Meras
- Service de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | - Laureline Lamy
- Université de Lorraine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7039 Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy (CRAN), Nancy, France,Service de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | - Aurélien Lambert
- Service de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | - Stéphanie Grandemange
- Université de Lorraine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7039 Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy (CRAN), Nancy, France
| | - Marie Husson
- Service de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | - Marie Rouyer
- Service de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | - Jessica Demange
- Service de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | - Jean-Louis Merlin
- Université de Lorraine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7039 Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy (CRAN), Nancy, France,Service de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | - Alexandre Harlé
- Université de Lorraine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7039 Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy (CRAN), Nancy, France,Service de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | - Pauline Gilson
- Université de Lorraine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7039 Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy (CRAN), Nancy, France,Service de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
209
|
Shubin AV, Kazakov AD, Zagainov EV. SURGICAL TREATMENT AS AN INCREASE IN THE SURVIVAL OF PATIENTS WITH LIVER OLIGOMETASTASIS OF DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PANCREAS. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA. REVIEW. SURGICAL PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.38181/2223-2427-2022-4-48-60] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The work is based on the analysis of the literature data on the problems of treating patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, identifying a group of patients with more favorable treatment prognosis. The objectives of this review are to study diagnostic criteria, to determine the optimal algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with oligometastatic pancreatic disease. According to the Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN) in the world, in 2020 the incidence of pancreatic cancer among men and women was about 7.2 and 5.0 per 100 thousand, with a mortality rate of 6.7 and 4.6 %, respectively [1]. At the same time, in most cases, the disease is diagnosed at stage IIIIV, so the results of treatment remain unsatisfactory, 2/3 of patients die within 1 year after the diagnosis is made. The "gold standard" for the treatment of this group of patients today is only systemic antitumor therapy according to the FOLFRINOX regimen, in which the average overall survival is about 11.1 months. Thanks to the development of ideas about the mechanisms of tumor progression, the improvement of diagnostic methods and antitumor treatment, the concept of oligometastatic disease has appeared and is being actively studied. According to the current theory, this group of patients with stage IV tumors can potentially have a better prognosis. The analysis of modern domestic and foreign literature is carried out. According to scientific studies, careful selection and implementation of combined treatment can significantly increase the survival rate of this group of patients. Based on numerous studies, some authors have proposed optimal algorithms for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with oligometastatic pancreatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. V. Shubin
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Military Medical Academy. CM. Kirov
| | - A. D. Kazakov
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Military Medical Academy. CM. Kirov
| | - E. V. Zagainov
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Military Medical Academy. CM. Kirov
| |
Collapse
|
210
|
Yoo HK, Patel N, Joo S, Amin S, Hughes R, Chawla R. Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review. Cancer Manag Res 2022; 14:3383-3403. [PMID: 36510575 PMCID: PMC9738117 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s376261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPaC) has a poor prognosis and available treatments provide only moderate improvements in survival. Preserving or improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is therefore an important treatment outcome for patients with mPaC. This systematic review identified HRQoL data in patients with mPaC before and after treatment, compared these with data from the general population, and reported the effects of different mPaC treatments on HRQoL. Methods Searches were performed in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library from January 2008 to May 2021, and the articles identified were screened for HRQoL data in patients with mPaC. Abstracts from relevant congresses were also manually searched. Publications included were randomized controlled trials and observational studies written in English that reported HRQoL data for adult patients with non-resectable mPaC who were on or off treatment. Results Thirty relevant publications were identified and HRQoL scores were collected. Overall, baseline mean scores from the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), 5-dimension EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) for newly diagnosed and previously treated patients with mPaC were worse than those of the general population. Baseline scores were generally better for previously treated patients than for newly diagnosed patients, indicating that mPaC treatments preserve or improve HRQoL. Identified publications also reported changes in HRQoL following first- or subsequent-line chemotherapy. When reported, 10 studies found improvements in overall HRQoL compared with baseline scores, four reported no changes in overall HRQoL after treatment, and six found deteriorations in overall HRQoL. Conclusion Patients with mPaC had worse HRQoL than the general population. Available anti-cancer therapies can improve or preserve HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Kyoo Yoo
- Health Economics & Payer Evidence AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK,Correspondence: Hyun Kyoo Yoo, Global Value, Access and Pricing, Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, City House, 130 Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 1RE, UK, Email
| | - Nikunj Patel
- Oncology Business Unit, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | - Seongjung Joo
- MRL, Center for Observational & Real-World Evidence (CORE), Oncology, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a Subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA
| | - Suvina Amin
- Oncology Business Unit, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
211
|
González-Borja I, Viúdez A, Alors-Pérez E, Goñi S, Amat I, Ghanem I, Pazo-Cid R, Feliu J, Alonso L, López C, Arrazubi V, Gallego J, Pérez-Sanz J, Hernández-García I, Vera R, Castaño JP, Fernández-Irigoyen J. Cytokines and Lymphoid Populations as Potential Biomarkers in Locally and Borderline Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235993. [PMID: 36497475 PMCID: PMC9739487 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite its relative low incidence, PDAC is one of the most aggressive and lethal types of cancer, being currently the seventh leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with a 5-year survival rate of 10.8%. Taking into consideration the necessity to improve the prognosis of these patients, this research has been focused on the discovery of new biomarkers. For this purpose, patients with BL and resectable disease were recruited. Serum cytokines and growth factors were monitored at different time points using protein arrays. Immune cell populations were determined by flow cytometry in peripheral blood as well as by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in tumor tissues. Several cytokines were found to be differentially expressed between the study subgroups. In the BL disease setting, two different scores were proven to be independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) (based on IL-10, MDC, MIF, and eotaxin-3) and OS (based on eotaxin-3, NT-3, FGF-9, and IP10). In the same context, CA19-9 was found to play a role as independent prognostic factor for OS. Eotaxin-3 and MDC cytokines for PFS, and eotaxin-3, NT-3, and CKβ8-1 for OS, were shown to be predictive biomarkers for nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine regimen. Similarly, oncostatin, BDNF, and IP10 cytokines were proven to act as predictive biomarkers regarding PFS, for FOLFIRINOX regimen. In the resectable cohort, RANTES, TIMP-1, FGF-4, and IL-10 individually differentiated patients according to their cancer-associated survival. Regarding immune cell populations, baseline high levels of circulating B lymphocytes were related to a significantly longer OS, while these levels significantly decreased as progression occurred. Similarly, baseline high levels of helper lymphocytes (CD4+), low levels of cytotoxic lymphocytes (CD8+), and a high CD4/CD8 ratio, were related to a significantly longer PFS. Finally, high levels of CD4+ and CD8+ intratumoural infiltration was associated with significantly longer PFS. In conclusion, in this study we were able to identify several prognostic and predictive biomarker candidates in patients diagnosed of resectable or BL PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iranzu González-Borja
- OncobionaTras Lab, Navarrabiomed, Navarra University Hospital, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), 31006 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Antonio Viúdez
- OncobionaTras Lab, Navarrabiomed, Navarra University Hospital, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), 31006 Pamplona, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Navarra University Hospital, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
- Correspondence:
| | - Emilia Alors-Pérez
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
- Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain
- Reina Sofía University Hospital, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, (CIBERobn), 14004 Córdoba, Spain
| | - Saioa Goñi
- OncobionaTras Lab, Navarrabiomed, Navarra University Hospital, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), 31006 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Irene Amat
- Pathology Department, Navarra University Hospital, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ismael Ghanem
- Medical Oncology Department, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Roberto Pazo-Cid
- Medical Oncology Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Jaime Feliu
- Medical Oncology Department, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Alonso
- Pathology Department, Navarra University Hospital, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Carlos López
- Medical Oncology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Virginia Arrazubi
- Medical Oncology Department, Navarra University Hospital, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Javier Gallego
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, 03203 Elche, Spain
| | - Jairo Pérez-Sanz
- OncobionaTras Lab, Navarrabiomed, Navarra University Hospital, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), 31006 Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Ruth Vera
- Medical Oncology Department, Navarra University Hospital, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Justo P Castaño
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
- Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain
- Reina Sofía University Hospital, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, (CIBERobn), 14004 Córdoba, Spain
| | - Joaquín Fernández-Irigoyen
- Clinical Neuroproteomics Unit, Navarrabiomed, Proteored-ISCIII, Proteomics Unit, Navarrabiomed, Navarra University Hospital, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
212
|
Role of Up-Regulated Transmembrane Channel-Like Protein 5 in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 68:1894-1912. [PMID: 36459296 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07771-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) is a malignant tumor responsible for a heavy disease burden. Previously, only one pan-cancer study of Transmembrane channel-like protein 5 (TMC5) showed that TMC5 was highly expressed in PAAD, but the results lacked comprehensive verification, and the mechanism of TMC5 in PAAD was still unclear. METHODS For exploring the expression and clinical value of TMC5 in PAAD better, we adopted a comprehensive evaluation method, using internal immunohistochemistry (IHC) data combined with microarray and RNA-sequencing data collected from public databases. The single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data were exploited to explore the TMC5 expression in cell populations and intercellular communication. The potential mechanism of TMC5 in PAAD was analyzed from the aspects of immune infiltration, transcriptional regulation, function and pathway enrichment. RESULTS Our IHC data includes 148 PAAD samples and 19 non-PAAD samples, along with the available microarray and RNA-sequencing data (1166 PAAD samples, 704 non-PAAD samples). The comprehensive evaluation results showed that TMC5 was evidently up-regulated in PAAD (SMD = 1.17). Further analysis showed that TMC5 was over-expressed in cancerous epithelial cells. Furthermore, TMC5 was up-regulated in more advanced tumor T and N stages. Interestingly, we found that STAT3 as an immune marker of Th17 cells was not only positively correlated with TMC5 and up-regulated in PAAD tissues, but also the major predicted TMC5 transcription regulator. Moreover, STAT3 was involved in cancer pathway of PAAD. CONCLUSION Up-regulated TMC5 indicates advanced tumor stage in PAAD patients, and its role in promoting PAAD development may be regulated by STAT3.
Collapse
|
213
|
Cui J, Jiao F, Li Q, Wang Z, Fu D, Liang J, Liang H, Xia T, Zhang T, Zhang Y, Dai G, Zhang Z, Wang J, Bai Y, Bai Y, Bi F, Chen D, Cao D, Chen J, Fang W, Gao Y, Guo J, Hao J, Hua H, Huang X, Liu W, Liu X, Li D, Li J, Li E, Li Z, Pan H, Shen L, Sun Y, Tao M, Wang C, Wang F, Xiong J, Zhang T, Zhang X, Zhan X, Zheng L, Ren G, Zhang T, Zhou J, Ma Q, Qin S, Hao C, Wang L. Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER CENTER 2022; 2:205-215. [PMID: 39036552 PMCID: PMC11256594 DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2022.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in both developed and developing countries. The incidence of pancreatic cancer in China accounts for about a quater of the global incidence, and the epidemiological characteristics and therapeutic strategies differ due to social, economic, cultural, environmental, and public health factors. Non-domestic guidelines do not reflect the clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment patterns of Chinese patients. Thus, in 2018, the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) organized a panel of senior experts from all sub-specialties within the field of pancreatic oncology to compile the Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer. The guidelines were made based on both the Western and Eastern clinical evidence and updated every one or two years. The experts made consensus judgments and classified evidence-based recommendations into various grades according to the regional differences, the accessibility of diagnostic and treatment resources, and health economic indexes in China. Here we present the latest version of the guidelines, which covers the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of pancreatic cancer. The guidelines might standardize the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer in China and will encourage oncologists to design and conduct more clinical trials about pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiujie Cui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Jiao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qi Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Deliang Fu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Pancreatic Disease Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Oncology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Houjie Liang
- Department of Oncology and Southwest Cancer Center, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Tingyi Xia
- Beijing Huaxia Jingfang Cancer Radiotherapy Center, Former Air Force General Hospital and PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yang Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Guanghai Dai
- Department of Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhihong Zhang
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Imaging, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongrui Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuxian Bai
- Oncology Department of Internal Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Feng Bi
- Department of Medical Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Donghui Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Dan Cao
- Department of Medical Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Weijia Fang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yong Gao
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianwei Guo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Jihui Hao
- Department of Pancreatic Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Haiqing Hua
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Theater Command General Hospital, Qinhuai Medical District, Nanjing, China
| | - Xinyu Huang
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenchao Liu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xian, China
| | - Xiufeng Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Theater Command General Hospital, Qinhuai Medical District, Nanjing, China
| | - Da Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ji Li
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Pancreatic Disease Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Enxiao Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zhiwei Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Hongming Pan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lin Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yongwei Sun
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Tao
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Chengfeng Wang
- State Key Lab of Molecular Oncology & Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fenghua Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianping Xiong
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Taiping Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xuebin Zhang
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xianbao Zhan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changhai Hospital of Shanghai, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Leizhen Zheng
- Department of Oncology, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated To Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Gang Ren
- Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tingting Zhang
- Oncology Department of Internal Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Qingyong Ma
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Shukui Qin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Theater Command General Hospital, Qinhuai Medical District, Nanjing, China
| | - Chunyi Hao
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Liwei Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
214
|
Kindler HL, Hammel P, Reni M, Van Cutsem E, Macarulla T, Hall MJ, Park JO, Hochhauser D, Arnold D, Oh DY, Reinacher-Schick A, Tortora G, Algül H, O'Reilly EM, Bordia S, McGuinness D, Cui K, Locker GY, Golan T. Overall Survival Results From the POLO Trial: A Phase III Study of Active Maintenance Olaparib Versus Placebo for Germline BRCA-Mutated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:3929-3939. [PMID: 35834777 PMCID: PMC10476841 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The phase III POLO study demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit for active olaparib maintenance therapy versus placebo for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and a germline BRCA mutation. Here, we report the final analysis of overall survival (OS) and other secondary end points. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with a deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA mutation whose disease had not progressed after ≥ 16 weeks of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 3:2 to active maintenance olaparib (300 mg twice daily) or placebo. The primary end point was PFS; secondary end points included OS, time to second disease progression or death, time to first and second subsequent cancer therapies or death, time to discontinuation of study treatment or death, and safety and tolerability. RESULTS In total, 154 patients were randomly assigned (olaparib, n = 92; placebo, n = 62). No statistically significant OS benefit was observed (median 19.0 v 19.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.22; P = .3487). Kaplan-Meier OS curves separated at approximately 24 months, and the estimated 3-year survival after random assignment was 33.9% versus 17.8%, respectively. Median time to first subsequent cancer therapy or death (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.66; P < .0001), time to second subsequent cancer therapy or death (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.89; P = .0111), and time to discontinuation of study treatment or death (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.63; P < .0001) significantly favored olaparib. The HR for second disease progression or death favored olaparib without reaching statistical significance (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.02; P = .0613). Olaparib was well tolerated with no new safety signals. CONCLUSION Although no statistically significant OS benefit was observed, the HR numerically favored olaparib, which also conferred clinically meaningful benefits including increased time off chemotherapy and long-term survival in a subset of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pascal Hammel
- Paul Brousse Hospital (AP-HP), University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Michele Reni
- IRCCS Ospedale, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita e Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Eric Van Cutsem
- University Hospitals Gasthuisberg and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Teresa Macarulla
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Joon Oh Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Dirk Arnold
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Do-Youn Oh
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Fondazione Policlinico A Gemelli IRCCS and Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Hana Algül
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich TUM, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Talia Golan
- The Oncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center at Tel-Hashomer, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
215
|
Kong X, Feng M, Wu L, He Y, Mao H, Gu Z. Biodegradable gemcitabine-loaded microdevice with sustained local drug delivery and improved tumor recurrence inhibition abilities for postoperative pancreatic tumor treatment. Drug Deliv 2022; 29:1595-1607. [PMID: 35612309 PMCID: PMC9176693 DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2022.2075984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
At present, the 10-year survival rate of patients with pancreatic cancer is still less than 4%, mainly due to the high cancer recurrence rate caused by incomplete surgery and lack of effective postoperative adjuvant treatment. Systemic chemotherapy remains the only choice for patients after surgery; however, it is accompanied by off-target effects and server systemic toxicity. Herein, we proposed a biodegradable microdevice for local sustained drug delivery and postoperative pancreatic cancer treatment as an alternative and safe option. Biodegradable poly(l-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (P(L)LGA) was developed as the matrix material, gemcitabine hydrochloride (GEM·HCl) was chosen as the therapeutic drug and polyethylene glycol (PEG) was employed as the drug release-controlled regulator. Through adjusting the amount and molecular weight of PEG, the controllable degradation of matrix and the sustained release of GEM·HCl were obtained, thus overcoming the unstable drug release properties of traditional microdevices. The drug release mechanism of microdevice and the regulating action of PEG were studied in detail. More importantly, in the treatment of the postoperative recurrence model of subcutaneous pancreatic tumor in mice, the microdevice showed effective inhibition of postoperative in situ recurrences of pancreatic tumors with excellent biosafety and minimum systemic toxicity. The microdevice developed in this study provides an option for postoperative adjuvant pancreatic treatment, and greatly broadens the application prospects of traditional chemotherapy drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangming Kong
- College of Materials Science and Engineering, Research Institute for Biomaterials, Tech Institute for Advanced Materials, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, PR China
| | - Miao Feng
- College of Materials Science and Engineering, Research Institute for Biomaterials, Tech Institute for Advanced Materials, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, PR China
| | - Lihuang Wu
- College of Materials Science and Engineering, Research Institute for Biomaterials, Tech Institute for Advanced Materials, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, PR China
| | - Yiyan He
- College of Materials Science and Engineering, Research Institute for Biomaterials, Tech Institute for Advanced Materials, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, PR China
- NJTech-BARTY Joint Research Center for Innovative Medical Technology, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, PR China
- Suqian Advanced Materials Industry Technology Innovation Center of Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, PR China
| | - Hongli Mao
- College of Materials Science and Engineering, Research Institute for Biomaterials, Tech Institute for Advanced Materials, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, PR China
- NJTech-BARTY Joint Research Center for Innovative Medical Technology, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, PR China
- Suqian Advanced Materials Industry Technology Innovation Center of Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, PR China
| | - Zhongwei Gu
- College of Materials Science and Engineering, Research Institute for Biomaterials, Tech Institute for Advanced Materials, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, PR China
- NJTech-BARTY Joint Research Center for Innovative Medical Technology, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, PR China
- Suqian Advanced Materials Industry Technology Innovation Center of Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
216
|
Sillesen M, Hansen CP, Dencker EE, Burgdorf SK, Krohn PS, Stender MT, Fristrup CW, Storkholm JH. Long-Term Outcomes of Venous Resections in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients: A Nationwide Cohort Study. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2022; 3:e219. [PMID: 37600295 PMCID: PMC10406038 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
To investigate whether pancreatic resections (PR) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with worse survival when resection of the superior mesenteric vein/portal vein (SMV/PV) is required. Background PR for PDAC with resection of the superior mesenteric vein/portal vein (SMV/PV, PR+V resection) may be associated with inferior overall survival (OS) compared with PR without the need for SMV/PV resection (PR-V). We hypothesized that PR+V results in lower OS compared with PR-V. Method Retrospective study using data from the nationwide Danish Pancreatic Cancer Database from 2011 to 2020. Data on patients who underwent PR for PDAC were extracted. A group of PR patients found nonresectable on exploratory laparotomy (EXP) was also included. OS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for confounders (age, sex, R-resection level, chemotherapy, comorbidities, histology T and N classification, procedure subtype as well as tumor distance to the SMV/PV). Results Overall, 2403 patients were identified. Six hundred two underwent exploration only (EXP group), whereas 412 underwent pancreatic resection with (PR+V group) and 1389 (PR-V) without SMV/PV resection. Five-year OS for the PR+V group was lower (20% vs 30%) compared with PR-V, although multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling could not associate PR+V status with OS (Hazard ratio 1.11, P = 0.408). Conclusion When correcting for confounders, PR+V was not associated with lower OS compared with PR-V.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Sillesen
- From the Department of Organ Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
- Center for Surgical Translation and Artificial Intelligence Research (CSTAR), Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Carsten Palnæs Hansen
- From the Department of Organ Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Emilie Even Dencker
- From the Department of Organ Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
- Center for Surgical Translation and Artificial Intelligence Research (CSTAR), Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Stefan Kobbelgaard Burgdorf
- From the Department of Organ Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Paul Suno Krohn
- From the Department of Organ Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | | | | | - Jan Henrik Storkholm
- From the Department of Organ Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Imperial College NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
217
|
Taboada AGM, Lominchar PL, Martínez MF, García-Alfonso P, Martin AM, Asencio JM. Neoadjuvant therapy impact in early pancreatic cancer: "bioborderline" vs. "non-bioborderline". Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2022; 26:363-374. [PMID: 36372553 PMCID: PMC9721251 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.22-023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims To analyze the results of the neoadjuvant treatment of patients in our center with early pancreatic cancer. Methods Eighty-four patients with early pancreatic cancer (I-II) were included, of which 59 were considered "bioborderline" (carbohydrate antigen [CA] 19-9 > 37 U/L), and 25 were considered "non-bioborderline" (CA19-9 < 37 U/L). The R0 resection rate, presence of negative nodes, survival, and recurrence rates were analyzed in two groups, the NEO group (neoadjuvant + surgery) and the non-NEO group (upfront surgery). Results A 28.6% pathologic complete response was observed in the NEO group of the whole sample. The residual R0 was 85.7%, and nodes were negative in 78.6% of the patients in the NEO group of bioborderline patients. All non-bioborderline patients treated with neoadjuvant were R0, and no affected nodes were observed in any of them. The median overall survival (OS) in patients with elevated CA19-9 levels in the NEO group was 31.4 months vs. 13.1 months in the non-NEO (log-rank test p = 0.006), with a 62% relative reduction in the mortality rate (hazard ratio = 0.38, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-0.79; p = 0.008). The median OS in patients with normal CA19-9 levels in the NEO group was 65.9 months vs. 16.2 months in the non-NEO group, without statistically significant differences between the two but with a trend toward significance (log-rank test p = 0.08). Conclusions A neoadjuvant strategy seemed to improve local control and the survival of patients with early pancreatic cancer, both those with elevated CA19-9 and normal marker levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvaro Gregorio Morales Taboada
- Transplant and Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain,Corresponding author: Alvaro Gregorio Morales Taboada, MD Transplant and Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Complutense University of Madrid, C. del Dr. Esquerdo Street, 46, Madrid 28007, Spain Tel: +34-644679334, Fax: + 34-914269080, E-mail: ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1479-6607
| | - Pablo Lozano Lominchar
- Transplant and Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Fernández Martínez
- Transplant and Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pilar García-Alfonso
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrés Muñoz Martin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Manuel Asencio
- Transplant and Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
218
|
Videmark AN, Christensen IJ, Feltoft CL, Villadsen M, Borg FH, Jørgensen BM, Bojesen SE, Kistorp C, Ugleholdt R, Johansen JS. Combined plasma C‐reactive protein, interleukin 6 and
YKL
‐40 for detection of cancer and prognosis in patients with serious nonspecific symptoms and signs of cancer. Cancer Med 2022; 12:6675-6688. [PMID: 36440611 PMCID: PMC10067028 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND METHODS Inflammation is a hallmark of cancer and its progression. Plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and YKL-40 reflect inflammation, and are elevated in patients with cancer. This study investigated whether plasma CRP, IL-6 and YKL-40 had diagnostic value in 753 patients referred with nonspecific signs and symptoms of cancer to a diagnostic outpatient clinic. RESULTS In total, 111 patients were diagnosed with cancer within 3 months and 30 after 3 months. CRP, IL-6 and YKL-40 were elevated in 44%, 60% and 45% of the cancer patients, and in 15%, 33% and 25% of the patients without cancer. Elevated levels of all three markers were associated with risk of cancer within 3 months: CRP (odds ratio (OR) 4.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.86-6.81), IL-6 (OR = 2.89, 1.91-4.37) and YKL-40 (OR = 2.42, 1.59-3.66). Multivariate explorative analyses showed that increasing values were associated with the risk of getting a cancer diagnosis (continuous scale: CRP (OR = 1.28, 1.12-1.47), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (OR = 1.61, 1.41-1.98), CA19-9 (OR = 1.15, 1.03-1.29), age (OR = 1.29, 1.02-1.63); dichotomized values: CRP (OR = 2.54, 1.39-4.66), CEA (OR = 4.22, 2.13-8.34), age (OR = 1.42, 1.13-1.80)). CRP had the highest diagnostic value (area under the curve = 0.69). Combined high CRP, IL-6 and YKL-40 was associated with short overall survival (HR = 3.8, 95% CI 2.5-5.9, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION In conclusion, plasma CRP, IL-6 and YKL-40 alone or combined cannot be used to identify patients with cancer, but high levels were associated with poor prognosis. CRP may be useful to indicate whether further diagnostic evaluation is needed when patients present with nonspecific signs and symptoms of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex N. Videmark
- Department of Medicine Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Herlev and Gentofte Herlev Denmark
| | - Ib J. Christensen
- Department of Gastroenterology Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Amager and Hvidovre Hvidovre Denmark
| | - Claus L. Feltoft
- Department of Medicine Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Herlev and Gentofte Herlev Denmark
| | - Mette Villadsen
- Department of Medicine Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Herlev and Gentofte Herlev Denmark
| | - Frederikke H. Borg
- Department of Medicine Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Herlev and Gentofte Herlev Denmark
| | - Barbara M. Jørgensen
- Department of Medicine Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Herlev and Gentofte Herlev Denmark
| | - Stig E. Bojesen
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Herlev and Gentofte Herlev Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Caroline Kistorp
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Department of Endocrinology Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Randi Ugleholdt
- Department of Medicine Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Herlev and Gentofte Herlev Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Julia S. Johansen
- Department of Medicine Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Herlev and Gentofte Herlev Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Department of Oncology Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Herlev and Gentofte Herlev Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
219
|
Furuse J, Ueno M, Ikeda M, Okusaka T, Teng Z, Furuya M, Ioka T. Liposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and leucovorin after gemcitabine-based therapy in Japanese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: additional safety analysis of a randomized phase 2 trial. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2022; 53:130-137. [PMID: 36412114 PMCID: PMC9885735 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyac177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) was recently authorized in Japan for unresectable pancreatic cancer after disease progression following chemotherapy. Physicians now consider certain aspects of nal-IRI safety profile as slightly different from conventional irinotecan. This report aims to explore additional aspects of the nal-IRI safety in Japanese phase 2 study. METHODS We analyzed the incidence, time to first onset, and time to resolution for adverse events that require special attention and other selected toxicities in the nal-IRI combination group (n = 46). RESULTS Leukopenia/neutropenia (76.1%/71.7%), diarrhea (58.7%) and hepatic dysfunction (41.3%) were the most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events, with a median time to onset of 21.0 days (range: 8, 97), 9.0 days (1, 61) and 22.0 days (2, 325), respectively, and a median time to resolution of 8.0 days (95% confidence intervals: 8, 9), 4.0 days (4, 8) and 40.0 days (9, -), respectively. Eight patients experienced Grade ≥ 3 diarrhea and their symptoms were well controlled by dose modification except one patient who had drug withdrawal. The median time to resolution for Grade ≥ 3 and Grade ≤ 2 diarrhea was 17.5 days (95% confidence intervals: 1, 31) and 4 days (3, 7), respectively. Anorexia occurred in 28/46 patients (60.9%) with a median time to onset of 4.0 days (range: 2, 132) and a median time to resolution of 12.0 days (95% confidence intervals: 6, 26). CONCLUSIONS We explored safety profile of nal-IRI combination regimen recognized as effective and tolerable treatment for Japanese unresectable pancreatic cancer patients. Although the treatment-emergent adverse events occurred were controllable, patients with prolonged toxicities should be closely managed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junji Furuse
- For reprints and all correspondence: Junji Furuse, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 241-8515, Japan, E-mail:
| | - Makoto Ueno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Masafumi Ikeda
- Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Takuji Okusaka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Zhaoyang Teng
- Biometrics Department, Servier Pharmaceuticals, Boston MA, USA
| | - Momoko Furuya
- Medical Affairs Department, Nihon Servier CO., LTD., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ioka
- Oncology Center, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Ube, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
220
|
Hofmann FO, Miksch RC, Weniger M, Keck T, Anthuber M, Witzigmann H, Nuessler NC, Reissfelder C, Köninger J, Ghadimi M, Bartsch DK, Hartwig W, Angele MK, D’Haese JG, Werner J. Outcomes and risks in palliative pancreatic surgery: an analysis of the German StuDoQ|Pancreas registry. BMC Surg 2022; 22:389. [PMID: 36368993 PMCID: PMC9652845 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01833-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Non-resectability is common in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) due to local invasion or distant metastases. Then, biliary or gastroenteric bypasses or both are often established despite associated morbidity and mortality. The current study explores outcomes after palliative bypass surgery in patients with non-resectable PDAC. Methods From the prospectively maintained German StuDoQ|Pancreas registry, all patients with histopathologically confirmed PDAC who underwent non-resective pancreatic surgery between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively identified, and the influence of the surgical procedure on morbidity and mortality was analyzed. Results Of 389 included patients, 127 (32.6%) underwent explorative surgery only, and a biliary, gastroenteric or double bypass was established in 92 (23.7%), 65 (16.7%) and 105 (27.0%). After exploration only, patients had a significantly shorter stay in the intensive care unit (mean 0.5 days [SD 1.7] vs. 1.9 [3.6], 2.0 [2.8] or 2.1 [2.8]; P < 0.0001) and in the hospital (median 7 days [IQR 4–11] vs. 12 [10–18], 12 [8–19] or 12 [9–17]; P < 0.0001), and complications occurred less frequently (22/127 [17.3%] vs. 37/92 [40.2%], 29/65 [44.6%] or 48/105 [45.7%]; P < 0.0001). In multivariable logistic regression, biliary stents were associated with less major (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) complications (OR 0.49 [95% CI 0.25–0.96], P = 0.037), whereas—compared to exploration only—biliary, gastroenteric, and double bypass were associated with more major complications (OR 3.58 [1.48–8.64], P = 0.005; 3.50 [1.39–8.81], P = 0.008; 4.96 [2.15–11.43], P < 0.001). Conclusions In patients with non-resectable PDAC, biliary, gastroenteric or double bypass surgery is associated with relevant morbidity and mortality. Although surgical palliation is indicated if interventional alternatives are inapplicable, or life expectancy is high, less invasive options should be considered. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-022-01833-3.
Collapse
|
221
|
Pattarapuntakul T, Charoenrit T, Netinatsunton N, Yaowmaneerat T, Pitakteerabundit T, Ovartlarnporn B, Attasaranya S, Wong T, Chamroonkul N, Sripongpun P. Postoperative outcomes of resectable periampullary cancer accompanied by obstructive jaundice with and without preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1040508. [PMID: 36439422 PMCID: PMC9685337 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1040508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 08/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) is useful in resectable periampullary cancer with obstructive jaundice. Whether it is better than direct surgery (DS) in terms of postoperative complications and mortality is controversial. METHODS All cases of successful pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in patients with periampullary cancer with obstructive jaundice performed between January 2016 and January 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Endoscopic PBD was performed; data pertaining to serum bilirubin level, procedural technique, and duration before surgery were obtained. The incidence of postoperative complications and survival rate were compared between the PBD and DS group. RESULTS A total of 104 patients (PBD, n = 58; DS, n = 46) underwent curative PD. The mean age was 63.8 ± 10 years and 53 (51%) were male. Age, body mass index (BMI), sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, presence of comorbid disease, initial laboratory results, and pathological diagnoses were not significantly different between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative complications was 58.6% in the PBD group while 73.9% in the DS group (relative risk [RR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92, 1.73, p=0.155) and the difference was not significant except in bile leakage (RR 8.83, 95% CI 1.26, 61.79, p = 0.021) and intraoperative bleeding (RR 3.97, 95% CI 0.88, 17.85, p = 0.049) which were higher in the DS group. The one-year survival rate was slightly less in the DS group but the difference was not statistically significant. The independent predictors for death within 1-year were intraoperative bleeding and preoperative total bilirubin > 14.6 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS PBD in resectable malignant distal biliary obstruction showed no benefit in terms of 1-year survival over DS approach. But it demonstrated the benefit of lower risks of intraoperative bleeding, and bile leakage. Additionally, the level of pre-operative bilirubin level of over 14.6 mg/dL and having intraoperative bleeding were associated with a lower 1-year survival in such patients. Overall, PBD may be not necessary for all resectable periampullary cancer patients, but there might be a role in those with severely jaundice (>14.6 mg/dL), as it helps lower risk of intraoperative bleeding, and might lead to a better survival outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanawat Pattarapuntakul
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Tummarong Charoenrit
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Nisa Netinatsunton
- Nanthana-Kriangkrai Chotiwattanaphan (NKC) institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Thanapon Yaowmaneerat
- Nanthana-Kriangkrai Chotiwattanaphan (NKC) institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Thakerng Pitakteerabundit
- HepatoPancreatoBiliary surgery unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Bancha Ovartlarnporn
- Nanthana-Kriangkrai Chotiwattanaphan (NKC) institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Siriboon Attasaranya
- Nanthana-Kriangkrai Chotiwattanaphan (NKC) institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Thanawin Wong
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Naichaya Chamroonkul
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Pimsiri Sripongpun
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
222
|
Hashimoto A, Handa H, Hata S, Hashimoto S. Orchestration of mesenchymal plasticity and immune evasiveness via rewiring of the metabolic program in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1005566. [PMID: 36408139 PMCID: PMC9669439 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1005566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most fatal cancer in humans, due to its difficulty of early detection and its high metastatic ability. The occurrence of epithelial to mesenchymal transition in preinvasive pancreatic lesions has been implicated in the early dissemination, drug resistance, and cancer stemness of PDAC. PDAC cells also have a reprogrammed metabolism, regulated by driver mutation-mediated pathways, a desmoplastic tumor microenvironment (TME), and interactions with stromal cells, including pancreatic stellate cells, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and immune cells. Such metabolic reprogramming and its functional metabolites lead to enhanced mesenchymal plasticity, and creates an acidic and immunosuppressive TME, resulting in the augmentation of protumor immunity via cancer-associated inflammation. In this review, we summarize our recent understanding of how PDAC cells acquire and augment mesenchymal features via metabolic and immunological changes during tumor progression, and how mesenchymal malignancies induce metabolic network rewiring and facilitate an immune evasive TME. In addition, we also present our recent findings on the interesting relevance of the small G protein ADP-ribosylation factor 6-based signaling pathway driven by KRAS/TP53 mutations, inflammatory amplification signals mediated by the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin 6 and RNA-binding protein ARID5A on PDAC metabolic reprogramming and immune evasion, and finally discuss potential therapeutic strategies for the quasi-mesenchymal subtype of PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ari Hashimoto
- Department of Molecular Biology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
- *Correspondence: Ari Hashimoto, ; Shigeru Hashimoto,
| | - Haruka Handa
- Department of Molecular Biology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Soichiro Hata
- Department of Molecular Biology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Shigeru Hashimoto
- Division of Molecular Psychoimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
- *Correspondence: Ari Hashimoto, ; Shigeru Hashimoto,
| |
Collapse
|
223
|
van Gils L, Verbeek R, Wellerdieck N, Bollen T, van Leeuwen M, Schwartz M, Vleggaar F, Molenaar IQQ, van Santvoort H, van Hooft J, Verdonk R, Weusten B. Preoperative biliary drainage in severely jaundiced patients with pancreatic head cancer: A retrospective cohort study. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:1888-1897. [PMID: 35803831 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.05.1345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines recommend against preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) in patients with pancreatic head cancer if bilirubin levels are <250 μmol/l. However, patients with higher bilirubin levels undergo PBD, despite the lack of supporting evidence. This study aims to evaluate outcomes in patients with a bilirubin level ≥250 and < 250. METHODS Patients were identified from databases of 3 centers. Outcomes were compared in patients with a bilirubin level ≥250 versus <250 both at the time of diagnosis and directly prior to surgery. RESULTS 244 patients were included. PBD was performed in 64% (123/191) with bilirubin <250 at diagnosis and 91% (48/53) with bilirubin ≥250. PBD technical success (83% vs. 81%, p = 0.80) and PBD related complications (33% vs. 29%, p = 0.60) did not differ between these groups. Analyzing bilirubin levels ≥250 versus <250 directly prior to surgery, no differences in severe postoperative complications and mortality were found. CONCLUSIONS In patients with a pancreatic head cancer, PBD technical success and complications, and severe postoperative complications did not differ between patients with a bilirubin level ≥250 and < 250. Our study does not support a different approach regarding PBD in patients with severe jaundice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luuk van Gils
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Romy Verbeek
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, the Netherlands
| | - Nienke Wellerdieck
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas Bollen
- Department of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten van Leeuwen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Vleggaar
- Department of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - I Q Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Janine van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Robert Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
224
|
Farooqu W, Penninga L, Burgdorf SK, Krohn PS, Storkholm JH, Hansen CP. Relieving the bile ducts prior to pancreatoduodenectomy – A retrospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 84:104894. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
225
|
Conroy T, Castan F, Lopez A, Turpin A, Ben Abdelghani M, Wei AC, Mitry E, Biagi JJ, Evesque L, Artru P, Lecomte T, Assenat E, Bauguion L, Ychou M, Bouché O, Monard L, Lambert A, Hammel P. Five-Year Outcomes of FOLFIRINOX vs Gemcitabine as Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1571-1578. [PMID: 36048453 PMCID: PMC9437831 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.3829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Importance Early results at 3 years from the PRODIGE 24/Canadian Cancer Trials Group PA6 randomized clinical trial showed survival benefits with adjuvant treatment with modified FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; mature data are now available. Objective To report 5-year outcomes and explore prognostic factors for overall survival. Design, Setting, and Participants This open-label, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 77 hospitals in France and Canada and included patients aged 18 to 79 years with histologically confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had undergone complete macroscopic (R0/R1) resection within 3 to 12 weeks before randomization. Patients were included from April 16, 2012, through October 3, 2016. The cutoff date for this analysis was June 28, 2021. Interventions A total of 493 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive treatment with modified FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2 of body surface area; irinotecan, 150-180 mg/m2; leucovorin, 400 mg/m2; and fluorouracil, 2400 mg/m2, every 2 weeks) or gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks) as adjuvant therapy for 24 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, metastasis-free survival, and cancer-specific survival. Prognostic factors for overall survival were determined. Results Of the 493 patients, 216 (43.8%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 62.0 (8.9) years. At a median of 69.7 months' follow-up, 367 disease-free survival events were observed. In patients receiving chemotherapy with modified FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine, median disease-free survival was 21.4 months (95% CI, 17.5-26.7) vs 12.8 months (95% CI, 11.6-15.2) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.82; P < .001) and 5-year disease-free survival was 26.1% vs 19.0%; median overall survival was 53.5 months (95% CI, 43.5-58.4) vs 35.5 months (95% CI, 30.1-40.3) (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54-0.85; P = .001), and 5-year overall survival was 43.2% vs 31.4%; median metastasis-free survival was 29.4 months (95% CI, 21.4-40.1) vs 17.7 months (95% CI, 14.0-21.2) (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.80; P < .001); and median cancer-specific survival was 54.7 months (95% CI, 45.8-68.4) vs 36.3 months (95% CI, 30.5-43.9) (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51-0.82; P < .001). Multivariable analysis identified modified FOLFIRINOX, age, tumor grade, tumor staging, and larger-volume center as significant favorable prognostic factors for overall survival. Shorter relapse delay was an adverse prognostic factor. Conclusions and Relevance The final 5-year results from the PRODIGE 24/Canadian Cancer Trials Group PA6 randomized clinical trial indicate that adjuvant treatment with modified FOLFIRINOX yields significantly longer survival than gemcitabine in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Trial Registration EudraCT: 2011-002026-52; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01526135.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry Conroy
- Medical Oncology department, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France and Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, équipe MICS, Nancy, France
| | - Florence Castan
- Biometry Department, ICM Regional Cancer Institute of Montpellier, Montpellier, France and Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
| | - Anthony Lopez
- Hepatogastroenterology department, University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | - Anthony Turpin
- Medical Oncology Department, University hospital, Lille, France and University of Lille, Lille, France
| | | | - Alice C. Wei
- Surgery department, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emmanuel Mitry
- Medical Oncology department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | | | - Ludovic Evesque
- Medical oncology department, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Pascal Artru
- Hepatogastroenterology department, Hôpital Jean-Mermoz, Lyon, France
| | - Thierry Lecomte
- Hepatogastroenterology department, Hôpital Trousseau, Tours, France and INSERM UMR 6239, Tours University, Tours, France
| | - Eric Assenat
- Medical oncology department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Eloi, Montpellier, France
| | - Lucile Bauguion
- Hepatogastroenterology department, Centre Hospitalier Départemental Vendée, La Roche-sur-Yon, France
| | - Marc Ychou
- Oncology department, ICM Regional Cancer Institute of Montpellier, Montpellier, France and Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Digestive oncology department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Robert Debré, Reims, France
| | | | - Aurélien Lambert
- Medical Oncology department, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France and Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, équipe MICS, Nancy, France
| | - Pascal Hammel
- Digestive and Medical Oncology department, Hôpital Paul Brousse and University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
226
|
Malleo G, Maggino L, Qadan M, Marchegiani G, Ferrone CR, Paiella S, Luchini C, Mino-Kenudson M, Capelli P, Scarpa A, Lillemoe KD, Bassi C, Castillo CFD, Salvia R. Reassessment of the Optimal Number of Examined Lymph Nodes in Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2022; 276:e518-e526. [PMID: 33177357 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to reappraise the optimal number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA The well-established threshold of 15 ELNs in PD for PDAC is optimized for detecting 1 positive node (PLN) per the previous 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual. In the framework of the 8th edition, where at least 4 PLN are needed for an N2 diagnosis, this threshold may be inadequate for accurate staging. METHODS Patients who underwent upfront PD at 2 academic institutions between 2000 and 2016 were analyzed. The optimal ELN threshold was defined as the cut-point associated with a 95% probability of identifying at least 4 PLNs in N2 patients. The results were validated addressing the N-status distribution and stage migration. RESULTS Overall, 1218 patients were included. The median number of ELN was 26 (IQR 17-37). ELN was independently associated with N2-status (OR 1.27, P < 0.001). The estimated optimal threshold of ELN was 28. This cut-point enabled improved detection of N2 patients and stage III disease (58% vs 37%, P = 0.001). The median survival was 28.6 months. There was an improved survival in N0/N1 patients when ELN exceeded 28, suggesting a stage migration effect (47 vs 29 months, adjusted HR 0.649, P < 0.001). In N2 patients, this threshold was not associated with survival on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION Examining at least 28 LN in PD for PDAC ensures optimal staging through improved detection of N2/stage III disease. This may have relevant implications for benchmarking processes and quality implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Malleo
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Laura Maggino
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Motaz Qadan
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Cristina R Ferrone
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Salvatore Paiella
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Luchini
- Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Mari Mino-Kenudson
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Paola Capelli
- Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Aldo Scarpa
- Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
- ARC-Net Research Center, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Keith D Lillemoe
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Claudio Bassi
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Salvia
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
227
|
Paramythiotis D, Kyriakidis F, Karlafti E, Didangelos T, Oikonomou IM, Karakatsanis A, Poulios C, Chamalidou E, Vagionas A, Michalopoulos A. Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas: two case reports and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep 2022; 16:395. [DOI: 10.1186/s13256-022-03610-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Among the total reported cases of pancreatic duct adenocarcinomas, around 1–2.9% are adenosquamous carcinomas of the pancreas. Due to limited data, preoperative diagnosis is a great challenge for physicians, and it is usually set post-operational, based on the pathologist report. We operated on two cases of adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas, which we present alongside the operation and treatment planning.
Case report
A 69-year-old Caucasian female and a 63-year-old Caucasian male presented themselves with jaundice in our department. The abdomen computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans revealed lesions of the pancreas. A pancreas–duodenumectomy was performed in both patients, and the post-operational histology analysis revealed adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas head. The patients were discharged in good condition and received further chemotherapy treatment after surgery.
Conclusions
Two case reports of adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas are described here, which both underwent surgery resection. The limited available literature on this topic substantially limits the knowledge and guidance on treatment. A summarization of the available literature is attempted, alongside a description of possible fields of future research.
Collapse
|
228
|
Figueiredo Ferreira M, Garces-Duran R, Eisendrath P, Devière J, Deprez P, Monino L, Van Laethem JL, Borbath I. EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic/peripancreatic tumors and oligometastatic disease: an observational prospective multicenter study. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E1380-E1385. [PMID: 36262511 PMCID: PMC9576329 DOI: 10.1055/a-1922-4536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) is an emerging and minimally invasive technique that seems promising for treatment of focal pancreatic and peripancreatic lesions. Our aim was to prospectively evaluate the feasibility, safety, and technical and clinical success of pancreatic and extra-pancreatic EUS-RFA. Patients and methods We prospectively collected clinical and technical data for all patients who underwent EUS-RFA at two Belgian academic centers from June 2018 to February 2022. Feasibility, adverse events (AEs), and follow-up were also assessed. Results Twenty-nine patients were included, accounting for 35 lesions: 10 non-functioning neuroendocrine tumors (29 %), 13 pancreatic insulinomas (37 %), one adenocarcinoma (3 %), and 11 intra-pancreatic and extra-pancreatic metastatic lesions (31 %). Technical success was achieved in 100 % of cases, with a median of three power applications per lesion (interquartile range 2). The majority of patients (59 %) presented no collateral effects, three (10.3 %) developed non-severe acute pancreatitis, and four (14 %) had mild abdominal pain. At 6 months follow-up (n = 25), 36 % of patients showed radiological complete response, 16 % presented a significant partial response and 48 % showed < 50 % decrease in diameter. At 12 months (n = 20), 30 % showed complete necrosis and 15 % > 50 % decrease in diameter. Hypoglycemia related to insulinoma was immediately corrected in all 13 cases, with no recurrence during follow-up. Conclusions EUS-RFA is feasible, safe, and effective for treatment of pancreatic and peripancreatic tumors. Larger and longer multicenter prospective studies are warranted to establish its role in management of focal pancreatic lesions and oligometastatic disease. Symptomatic insulinoma currently represent the best indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Figueiredo Ferreira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Saint-Pierre University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Rodrigo Garces-Duran
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium
| | - Pierre Eisendrath
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Saint-Pierre University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Jacques Devière
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Pierre Deprez
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium
| | - Laurent Monino
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium
| | - Jean-Luc Van Laethem
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Ivan Borbath
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
229
|
Literature review of imaging, pathological diagnosis, and outcomes of metachronous lung and pancreatic metastasis of cecal cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20:341. [PMID: 36253824 PMCID: PMC9575218 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02797-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pancreatic metastasis from colorectal cancer is extremely rare. Here, we report a case of colorectal cancer with lung and pancreatic metastasis and analyze the histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) to generate a differential diagnosis and treatment of metastatic colon cancer. Case presentation AC1 A 78-year-old man was admitted because of a recently elevated carcinoembryonic antigen. This patient had undergone laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cecal cancer IIA (T3N0M0) 5 years before admission, and thoracoscopic left upper lung wedge resection for primary colon cancer lung metastasis 2 years before admission. At that time, the patient was thought to have pancreatic metastasis from colon cancer. He underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (combined with splenectomy). Postoperative pathology revealed colon cancer metastasis. We performed NGS on tumor samples at three loci and found colon cancer's most common oncogenic driver genes (KRAS, APC, and TP53). One month after surgery, the patient was given capecitabine for six cycles of chemotherapy. At present, no high adverse reactions have been reported. Discussion For patients with pancreatic space-occupying, such as a previous history of colorectal cancer, and recent carcinoembryonic antigen elevation, we should highly suspect pancreatic metastatic colorectal cancer. NGS is an essential auxiliary for identifying metastatic tumors. Surgery combined with postoperative chemotherapy is an effective treatment.
Collapse
|
230
|
Egea J, Salleron J, Gourgou S, Ayav A, Laurent V, Juzyna B, Harlé A, Conroy T, Lambert A. Development of a Clinical-Biological Model to Assess Tumor Progression in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of the PRODIGE4/ACCORD11 Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14205068. [PMID: 36291851 PMCID: PMC9599967 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The follow-up of pancreatic cancer (PC) is based on computed tomography (CT) assessment; however, there is no consensus on the use of clinical and biological criteria in tumor progression. We aimed to establish a clinical−biological model to highlight the progression of metastatic PC during first-line treatment. Methods: The patients treated with first-line chemotherapy in the phase 2/3 PRODIGE4/ACCORD11 clinical trial were evaluated retrospectively. Clinical and biological markers were evaluated at the time of CT scans and during treatment to determine tumor progression. Results: In total, 196 patients were analyzed, with 355 available tumor assessments. The clinical and biological factors associated with tumor progression in multivariate analysis included gemcitabine, global health status ≤ 33 (OR = 3.38, 95%CI [1.15; 9.91], p = 0.028), quality of life score between 34 and 66 (OR = 2.65, 95%CI [1.06; 6.59], p = 0.037), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ≥ 3 times the standard value without any increase in the CEA level from inclusion (OR = 2.22, 95%CI [1.01; 4.89], p = 0.048) and with an increase in the CEA level from inclusion (OR = 6.56, 95%CI [2.73; 15.78], p < 0.001), and an increase in the carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level from inclusion (OR = 2.59, 95%CI [1.25; 5.36], p = 0.016). Conclusions: The self-assessment of patients’ general health status alongside tumor markers is an interesting approach to the diagnosis of the tumor progression of metastatic pancreatic cancer patients during first-line treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Egea
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Julia Salleron
- Biostatistic Unit, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Sophie Gourgou
- Biometrics Unit, Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier Val d’Aurelle, Université de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Ahmet Ayav
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Valérie Laurent
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Béata Juzyna
- UNICANCER Research and Development Team, 75654 Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Harlé
- Department of Biopathology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Thierry Conroy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Aurélien Lambert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-(0)-3-83-59-85-64
| |
Collapse
|
231
|
Santucci J, Tacey M, Thomson B, Michael M, Wong R, Shapiro J, Jennens R, Clarke K, Pattison S, Burge M, Zielinski R, Nikfarjam M, Ananda S, Lipton L, Gibbs P, Lee B. Impact of first-line FOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel chemotherapy on survival in advanced pancreatic cancer: Evidence from the prospective international multicentre PURPLE pancreatic cancer registry. Eur J Cancer 2022; 174:102-112. [PMID: 35988408 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.06.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND First-line palliative chemotherapy regimens in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have not been compared in head-to-head phase III randomised controlled trials (RCT). Data on optimum first-line treatment and subsequent sequencing is lacking. OBJECTIVE To compare overall survival (OS) between first-line treatment regimens in a real-world population to determine if an optimal therapeutic sequence is associated with survival benefit. METHODS A retrospective analysis of prospectively collated data from the Australasian PURPLE pancreatic cancer registry was undertaken. FINDINGS From 2016 to 2020, of 1551 pancreatic cancer patients, 615 received palliative-intent chemotherapy. Patients with early-stage resected disease without recurrence (n = 369), radiotherapy alone (n = 43), received supportive care alone (n = 458) or had less than 3 months follow-up (n = 66) were excluded. Median OS was comparable between patients receiving first-line Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel (n = 376) and those receiving FOLFIRINOX (n = 73) (11.3 versus 12.3 months, P = 0.37), with 38% proceeding to second-line chemotherapy which was associated with longer mOS compared to first-line treatment alone (17.4 versus 8.2 months, P < 0.001). With second-line treatment following prior FOLFIRINOX (n = 29) or Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel (n = 101), mOS did not differ significantly (17.3 versus 15.9 months, P = 0.92), respectively, whilst median progression-free survival was longer with prior FOLFIRINOX (5.2 versus 2.9 months, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION There was no significant difference in overall survival between either first-line chemotherapy choice, despite patients receiving FOLFIRINOX being younger, fitter, and more likely to have localised disease. However, FOLFIRINOX was associated with delayed progression. In the absence of phase III RCT data, clinicians should be comfortable using either Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel or FOLFIRINOX as first-line therapy in advanced PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan Santucci
- Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia; The Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, VIC, Australia; University of Melbourne, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, VIC, Australia
| | - Mark Tacey
- The Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Health, VIC, Australia
| | - Benjamin Thomson
- University of Melbourne, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, VIC, Australia; The Department of Surgery, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Michael
- The Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia
| | - Rachel Wong
- The Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, VIC, Australia; The Department of Medical Oncology, Epworth Health, VIC, Australia; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Julia Shapiro
- The Department of Medicine, Alfred Hospital, VIC, Australia; Cabrini Haematology and Oncology Centre, Cabrini Health, VIC, Australia
| | - Ross Jennens
- The Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia; The Department of Medical Oncology, Epworth Health, VIC, Australia
| | - Kate Clarke
- The Department of Medical Oncology, Wellington Hospital, New Zealand
| | - Sharon Pattison
- The Department of Medical Oncology, Dunedin University Hospital, New Zealand
| | - Matthew Burge
- The Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, QLD, Australia
| | - Rob Zielinski
- The Department of Medical Oncology, Orange and Dubbo Base Hospitals, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Sumitra Ananda
- Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia; The Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia; The Department of Medical Oncology, Epworth Health, VIC, Australia; The Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, VIC, Australia
| | - Lara Lipton
- Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia; The Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia; The Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, VIC, Australia; Cabrini Haematology and Oncology Centre, Cabrini Health, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia; University of Melbourne, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, VIC, Australia; The Department of Surgery, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, VIC, Australia; The Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, VIC, Australia
| | - Belinda Lee
- Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia; University of Melbourne, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, VIC, Australia; The Department of Surgery, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, VIC, Australia; The Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia; The Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Health, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
232
|
Does same session EUS-guided tissue acquisition and ERCP increase the risk of pancreatitis in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction? HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:1634-1641. [PMID: 35562255 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) are increasingly performed in the same session in patients with malignant biliary obstruction. In this retrospective analysis, we investigated adverse events (AE) after same session ERCP and EUS-TA. METHODS Patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction who underwent EUS-TA and/or ERCP with self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement from January 2015 to April 2020 were included. Primary outcome was post-procedural pancreatitis (PPP). Secondary outcomes were other procedure-related AE. RESULTS We included 494 patients, of which 118 patients (24%) underwent same session EUS-TA+ERCP, 51 patients (10%) underwent separate session EUS-TA & ERCP, 90 patients (18%) ERCP-only and 235 patients (48%) EUS-TA only. PPP occurred in 22 patients (19%) after same session EUS-TA+ERCP and in 6 patients (12%) after separate EUS-TA & ERCP (p = 0.270). When adjusted for other known risk factors (i.e., difficult procedure), the difference in PPP remained non-significant (adjusted odds ratio 1.74 (95%-CI 0.65-4.67, p = 0.268). The incidence of other AE was similar, although the overall AE rate was significantly higher after same session EUS-TA+ERCP (36% vs. 20%, p = 0.030). CONCLUSION Same session EUS-TA+ERCP did not significantly increase the incidence of PPP, although overall AE were significantly higher. These data warrant further prospective studies.
Collapse
|
233
|
Cura Daball P, Tröger H, Daum S. [Long-term response in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma - a case report and literature review]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2022; 60:1510-1516. [PMID: 34905798 DOI: 10.1055/a-1695-3528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer is still considered one of the most aggressive types of cancer and is associated with a very poor prognosis although there have been improvements in diagnostics and chemotherapy regimes in recent years. A cure can only be achieved through complete resection which is only possible when diagnosed at a very early stage, though this is rarely the case. We report on a patient with stage IV adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in which several therapeutically actionable mutations could be detected and discuss new options of targeted therapies. CASE REPORT A patient in his 50s was diagnosed with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. The patient showed an excellent response to platinum-based chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX. When a germline mutation in the BRCA-2 gene could be identified, he took part in the POLO-study receiving a maintenance therapy with the PARP-Inhibitor Olaparib. Due to a relapse, 2nd and 3rd line chemotherapy regimens were applied with Gemcitabine combined with Nab-Paclitaxel and later with Erlotinib. Although an activating mutation in the KRAS-gene could be detected as well, the patient rejected further experimental treatment. CONCLUSION Identifying predictive factors and specific targetable mutations in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer is needed to be able to apply more individual and specific therapies in order to improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Cura Daball
- Department of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hanno Tröger
- Medizinische Klinik 1, St Joseph Krankenhaus Berlin-Tempelhof, Berlin, Germany
| | - Severin Daum
- Department of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
234
|
Prejac J, Tomek Hamzić D, Librenjak N, Goršić I, Kekez D, Pleština S. The effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and gemcitabine monotherapy in first-line metastatic pancreatic cancer treatment: A real-world evidence. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e30566. [PMID: 36181099 PMCID: PMC9524920 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal malignancies with a rise in mortality rates. FOLFIRINOX and nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine demonstrated a survival benefit compared to gemcitabine alone. Both protocols are now considered the standard of first-line treatment with no significant difference between them, primarily based on observational studies. Although new therapeutic options have emerged recently, the prognosis remains poor. We conducted a retrospective single-center study on 139 patients treated for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) with gemcitabine monotherapy (Gem) or nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine (Nab-P/Gem) in the first line. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as well as the influence of patient and disease characteristics on outcomes. Nab-P/Gem resulted in OS of 13.87 months compared to 8.5 months in patients receiving Gem. The same trend was achieved in PFS, 5.37 versus 2.80 months, respectively, but without reaching statistical significance. Furthermore, the 6-month survival in the Nab-P/Gem group was also higher, 78.1% versus 47.8%. In terms of survival, the group of elderly patients, patients of poorer performance, with higher metastatic burden and liver involvement, benefited the most from combination therapy. In our analysis ECOG performance status (p.s.), previous primary tumor surgery, and liver involvement were found to be independent prognostic factors. The addition of nab-paclitaxel to gemcitabine resulted in a significant improvement in the OS of patients with mPDAC. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients with some unfavorable prognostic factors benefited the most.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juraj Prejac
- University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Department of Oncology, Zagreb, Croatia
- University of Zagreb, School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Dora Tomek Hamzić
- University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Department of Oncology, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Nikša Librenjak
- University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Department of Oncology, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Irma Goršić
- University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Department of Oncology, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Domina Kekez
- University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Department of Oncology, Zagreb, Croatia
- University of Zagreb, School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Stjepko Pleština
- University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Department of Oncology, Zagreb, Croatia
- University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
235
|
Borrebaeck CA, Mellby LD, King TC. Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. GASTROINTESTINAL CANCERS 2022:85-100. [PMID: 36343153 DOI: 10.36255/exon-publications-gastrointestinal-cancers-biomarkers-pancreatic-cancer] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
|
236
|
Feasibility and outcome of spleen and vessel preserving total pancreatectomy (SVPTP) in pancreatic malignancies - a retrospective cohort study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:3457-3465. [PMID: 36169725 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02690-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Total pancreatectomy (TP) is most commonly performed to avoid postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) in patients with high-risk pancreas or to achieve tumor-free resection margins. As part of TP, a simultaneous splenectomy is usually performed primarily for the reason of oncologic radicality. However, the benefit of a simultaneous splenectomy remains unclear. Likewise, the technical feasibility as well as the safety of spleen and vessel preserving total pancreatectomy in pancreatic malignancies has hardly been evaluated. Thus, the aims of the study were to evaluate the feasibility as well as the results of spleen and vessel preserving total pancreatectomy (SVPTP). MATERIAL AND METHODS Patient characteristics, technical feasibility, perioperative data, morbidity, and mortality as well as histopathological results after SVPTP, mainly for pancreatic malignancies, from patient cohorts of two European high-volume-centers for pancreatic surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Mortality was set as the primary outcome and morbidity (complications according to Clavien-Dindo) as the secondary outcome. RESULTS A SVPTP was performed in 92 patients, predominantly with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (78.3%). In all cases, the splenic vessels could be preserved. In 59 patients, the decision to total pancreatectomy was made intraoperatively. Among these, the most common reason for total pancreatectomy was risk of POPF (78%). The 30-day mortality was 2.2%. Major complications (≥ IIIb according to Clavien-Dindo) occurred in 18.5% within 30 postoperative days. There were no complications directly related to the spleen and vascular preservation procedure. A tumor-negative resection margin was achieved in 71.8%. CONCLUSION We could demonstrate the technical feasibility and safety of SVPTP even in patients mainly with pancreatic malignancies. In addition to potential immunologic and oncologic advantages, we believe a major benefit of this procedure is preservation of gastric venous outflow. We consider SVPTP to be indicated in patients at high risk for POPF, in patients with multilocular IPMN, and in cases for extended intrapancreatic cancers.
Collapse
|
237
|
Salamekh S, Gottumukkala S, Park C, Lin MH, Sanford NN. Radiotherapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Recent Developments and Advances on the Horizon. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2022; 36:995-1009. [PMID: 36154787 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Current indications for radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer vary by surgical resectability status of the tumor. Radiation is generally not used pre-operatively for resectable tumors, but may be given adjuvantly particularly in settings of a close or positive surgical margin. For borderline resectable tumors, pre-operative radiation has been shown to improve surgical parameters including lowering nodal positivity and positive margin rates. For locally advanced unresectable tumors, radiation can improve local control, give patients an interval off of chemotherapy and provide symptomatic relief. Multidisciplinary discussion is critical for choosing the best modality and sequencing of care for patients with pancreatic cancer. Prospective trials with appropriately chosen endpoints and meticulous radiotherapy quality assurance are needed to best define populations with pancreatic cancer most likely to benefit from radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer Salamekh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Sujana Gottumukkala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Chunjoo Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Mu-Han Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Nina N Sanford
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
238
|
de Jong E, Lemmers D, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, Bouwense S, Geurts S, Tjan-Heijnen V, Valkenburg-van Iersel L, Wilmink J, Besselink M, Abu Hilal M, de Vos-Geelen J. Oncologic management of ampullary cancer: International survey among surgical and medical oncologists. Surg Oncol 2022; 44:101841. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
239
|
Frassini S, Calabretto F, Granieri S, Fugazzola P, Viganò J, Fazzini N, Ansaloni L, Cobianchi L. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2022; 48:1911-1921. [PMID: 35688711 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer represents one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NIPEC), and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) has been proven with curative intent mainly for other tumors and there is a lack of consensus regarding possible benefits also in pancreatic cancer. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aim to provide an up-to-date overview of the effectiveness and safety of intraperitoneal treatments in the management of pancreatic cancer. METHODS A systematic review of articles was conducted according to PRISMA and AMSTAR-2 guidelines. 11 studies were included in the analysis. RESULTS We included in our analysis 212 patients subdivided in three groups: 64 in the HIPEC group (57 with prophylactic intent and 7 with curative intent), 55 in the PIPAC group and 93 in the NIPEC group. Primary outcomes were represented by survival rates; we evidenced at an observation time of three years a survival of 24% in the HIPEC group (25.5% in the prophylactic arm and 6.2% in the curative arm), 5.3% in the PIPAC group and 7.9% in the NIPEC group. CONCLUSIONS HIPEC could be considered as a promising technique for prophylaxis and treatment of peritoneal metastasis (PM) in case of borderline resectable and locally advanced disease. Increased survival rates emerged without additional morbidity when surgical resection and CRS are possible. In addition, our data about PIPAC and NIPEC as palliative treatment in unresectable disease seems to identify more favorable survival rates compared to literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Frassini
- University of Pavia, Corso Str. Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, Italy; Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Francesca Calabretto
- University of Pavia, Corso Str. Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, Italy; Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Stefano Granieri
- General Surgery Unit, ASST Vimercate, Via Santi Cosma e Damiano, 10, 20871, Vimercate, Italy.
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Jacopo Viganò
- Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Nicola Fazzini
- University of Pavia, Corso Str. Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, Italy; Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- University of Pavia, Corso Str. Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, Italy; Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Lorenzo Cobianchi
- University of Pavia, Corso Str. Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, Italy; Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
240
|
Perik TH, van Genugten EAJ, Aarntzen EHJG, Smit EJ, Huisman HJ, Hermans JJ. Quantitative CT perfusion imaging in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:3101-3117. [PMID: 34223961 PMCID: PMC9388409 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03190-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death with a 5-year survival rate of 10%. Quantitative CT perfusion (CTP) can provide additional diagnostic information compared to the limited accuracy of the current standard, contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). This systematic review evaluates CTP for diagnosis, grading, and treatment assessment of PDAC. The secondary goal is to provide an overview of scan protocols and perfusion models used for CTP in PDAC. The search strategy combined synonyms for 'CTP' and 'PDAC.' Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched from January 2000 to December 2020 for studies using CTP to evaluate PDAC. The risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. 607 abstracts were screened, of which 29 were selected for full-text eligibility. 21 studies were included in the final analysis with a total of 760 patients. All studies comparing PDAC with non-tumorous parenchyma found significant CTP-based differences in blood flow (BF) and blood volume (BV). Two studies found significant differences between pathological grades. Two other studies showed that BF could predict neoadjuvant treatment response. A wide variety in kinetic models and acquisition protocol was found among included studies. Quantitative CTP shows a potential benefit in PDAC diagnosis and can serve as a tool for pathological grading and treatment assessment; however, clinical evidence is still limited. To improve clinical use, standardized acquisition and reconstruction parameters are necessary for interchangeability of the perfusion parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T H Perik
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - E A J van Genugten
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - E H J G Aarntzen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - E J Smit
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - H J Huisman
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J J Hermans
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
241
|
Thomas AS, Kwon W, Horowitz DP, Bates SE, Fojo AT, Manji GA, Schreibman S, Schrope BA, Chabot JA, Kluger MD. Long-term follow-up experience with adjuvant therapy after irreversible electroporation of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:1442-1450. [PMID: 36048146 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Irreversible electroporation (IRE) expands the surgical options for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. This study evaluated for differences in survival stratified by type of IRE and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated by IRE (2012-2020) were retrospectively included. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared by type of IRE (in situ for local tumor control or IRE of potentially positive margins with resection) and by receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS Thirty-nine patients had IRE in situ, 61 had IRE for margin extension, and 19 received adjuvant chemotherapy. Most (97.00%) underwent induction chemotherapy. OS was 28.71 months (interquartile range [IQR] 19.17, 51.19) from diagnosis, with no difference by IRE type (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05 for margin extension [p = 0.85]) or adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 1.14 [p = 0.639]). RFS was 8.51 months (IQR 4.95, 20.17) with no difference by IRE type (HR 0.90 for margin extension [p = 0.694]) or adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.90 [p = 0.711]). CONCLUSION These findings suggest that adjuvant therapy may have limited benefit for patients treated with induction chemotherapy followed by local control with IRE for unresectable pancreatic cancer. Further study of the duration and timing of systemic therapy is warranted to maximize benefit and limit toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander S Thomas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - David P Horowitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical New York, New York, New York, USA
| | - Susan E Bates
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Antonio T Fojo
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gulam A Manji
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Stephen Schreibman
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Beth A Schrope
- Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - John A Chabot
- Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael D Kluger
- Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
242
|
Zwart ES, Yilmaz BS, Halimi A, Ahola R, Kurlinkus B, Laukkarinen J, Ceyhan GO. Venous resection for pancreatic cancer, a safe and feasible option? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreatology 2022; 22:803-809. [PMID: 35697587 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2022.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with suspected venous infiltration, a R0 resection is most of the time not possible without venous resection (VR). To investigate this special kind of patients, this meta-analysis was conducted to compare mortality, morbidity and long-term survival of pancreatic resections with (VR+) and without venous resection (VR-). METHODS A systematic search was performed in Embase, Pubmed and Web of Science. Studies which compared over twenty patients with VR + to VR-for PDAC with ≥1 year follow up were included. Articles including arterial resections were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed with the random effect Mantel-Haenszel test and inversed variance method. Individual patient data was compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS Following a review of 6403 papers by title and abstract and 166 by full text, a meta-analysis was conducted of 32 studies describing 2216 VR+ and 5380 VR-. There was significantly more post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (6.5% vs. 5.6%), R1 resections (36.7% vs. 28.6%), N1 resections (70.3% vs. 66.8%) and tumors were significantly larger (34.6 mm vs. 32.8 mm) in patients with VR+. Of all VR + patients, 64.6% had true pathological venous infiltration. The 90-day mortality, individual patient data for overall survival and pooled multivariate hazard ratio for overall survival were similar. CONCLUSION VR is a safe and feasible option in patients with pancreatic cancer and suspicion of venous involvement, since VR during pancreatic surgery has comparable overall survival and complication rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E S Zwart
- Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Netherlands Department of Surgery, the Netherlands
| | - B S Yilmaz
- Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - A Halimi
- Division of Surgery, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institute, Sweden; Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University Hospital, Sweden
| | - R Ahola
- Tampere University Hospital and Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - B Kurlinkus
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - J Laukkarinen
- Tampere University Hospital and Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - G O Ceyhan
- Department of General Surgery, HPB Unit, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
243
|
Schneider M, Labgaa I, Vrochides D, Zerbi A, Nappo G, Perinel J, Adham M, van Roessel S, Besselink M, Mieog JSD, Groen JV, Demartines N, Schäfer M, Joliat GR. External validation of three lymph node ratio-based nomograms predicting survival using an international cohort of patients with resected pancreatic head ductal adenocarcinoma. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2022; 48:2002-2007. [PMID: 35606276 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lymph node ratio (LNR) is an important prognostic factor of survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aimed to validate three LNR-based nomograms using an international cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive PDAC patients who underwent upfront pancreatoduodenectomy from six centers (Europe/USA) were collected (2000-2017). Patients with metastases, R2 resection, missing LNR data, and who died within 90 postoperative days were excluded. The updated Amsterdam nomogram, the nomogram by Pu et al., and the nomogram by Li et al. were selected. For the validation, calibration, discrimination capacity, and clinical utility were assessed. RESULTS After exclusion of 176 patients, 1'113 patients were included. Median overall survival (OS) of the cohort was 23 months (95% CI: 21-25). For the three nomograms, Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant OS diminution with increasing scores (p < 0.01). All nomograms showed good calibration (non-significant Hosmer-Lemeshow tests). For the Amsterdam nomogram, area under the ROC curve (AUROC) for 3-year OS was 0.64 and 0.67 for 5-year OS. Sensitivity and specificity for 3-year OS prediction were 65% and 59%. Regarding the nomogram by Pu et al., AUROC for 3- and 5-year OS were 0.66 and 0.70. Sensitivity and specificity for 3-year OS prediction were 68% and 53%. For the Li nomogram, AUROC for 3- and 5-year OS were 0.67 and 0.71, while sensitivity and specificity for 3-year OS prediction were 63% and 60%. CONCLUSION The three nomograms were validated using an international cohort. Those nomograms can be used in clinical practice to evaluate survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Schneider
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ismail Labgaa
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Dionisios Vrochides
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, USA
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Nappo
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Julie Perinel
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Digestive Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Mustapha Adham
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Stijn van Roessel
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jesse V Groen
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nicolas Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Markus Schäfer
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Gaëtan-Romain Joliat
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland; Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
244
|
de Jong EJM, van der Geest LG, Besselink MG, Bouwense SAW, Buijsen J, Dejong CHC, Koerkamp BG, Heij LR, de Hingh IHJT, Hoge C, Kazemier G, van Laarhoven HWM, de Meijer VE, Stommel MWJ, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Valkenburg-van Iersel LBJ, Wilmink JW, Geurts SME, de Vos-Geelen J. Treatment and overall survival of four types of non-metastatic periampullary cancer: nationwide population-based cohort study. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:1433-1442. [PMID: 35135724 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Periampullary adenocarcinoma consists of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), distal cholangiocarcinoma (DC), ampullary cancer (AC), and duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA). The aim of this study was to assess treatment modalities and overall survival by tumor origin. METHODS Patients diagnosed with non-metastatic periampullary cancer in 2012-2018 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. OS was studied with Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression analyses, stratified by origin. RESULTS Among the 8758 patients included, 68% had PDAC, 13% DC, 12% AC, and 7% DA. Resection was performed in 35% of PDAC, 56% of DC, 70% of AC, and 59% of DA. Neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy was administered in 22% of PDAC, 7% of DC, 7% of AC, and 12% of DA. Three-year OS was highest for AC (37%) and DA (34%), followed by DC (21%) and PDAC (11%). Adjuvant therapy was associated with improved OS among PDAC (HR = 0.62; 95% CI 0.55-0.69) and DC (HR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.48-0.98), but not AC (HR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.62-1.22) and DA (HR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.48-1.50). CONCLUSION This retrospective study identified considerable differences in treatment modalities and OS between the four periampullary cancer origins in daily clinical practice. An improved OS after adjuvant chemotherapy could not be demonstrated in patients with AC and DA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelien J M de Jong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Lydia G van der Geest
- Department of Research and Innovation, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), 3501 DB, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan A W Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Buijsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - C H C Dejong
- Department of Surgery, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Bas G Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Division of Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lara R Heij
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Surgery Aachen: Department of General, Gastrointestinal, Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, 52062, Germany; Institute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, 52062, Germany
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Chantal Hoge
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, 6202 AZ, the Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Liselot B J Valkenburg-van Iersel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra M E Geurts
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
245
|
Gorris M, van Huijgevoort NCM, Farina A, Brosens LAA, van Santvoort HC, Groot Koerkamp B, Bruno MJ, Besselink MG, van Hooft JE. Comparing Survival after Resection of Pancreatic Cancer with and without Pancreatic Cysts: Nationwide Registry-Based Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174228. [PMID: 36077765 PMCID: PMC9454588 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Outcome after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma associated with pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN-PDAC) might differ from PDAC not associated with PCN. This nationwide, registry-based study aimed to compare the overall survival (OS) in these patients. Methods: Data from consecutive patients after pancreatic resection for PDAC between 2013 and 2018 were matched with the corresponding pathology reports. Primary outcome was OS for PCN-PDAC and PDAC including 1-year and 5-year OS. Cox regression analysis was used to correct for prognostic factors (e.g., pT-stage, pN-stage, and vascular invasion). Results: In total, 1994 patients underwent resection for PDAC including 233 (12%) with PCN-PDAC. Median estimated OS was better in patients with PCN-PDAC (34.5 months [95%CI 25.6 to 43.5]) as compared to PDAC not associated with PCN (18.2 months [95%CI 17.3 to 19.2]; hazard ratio 0.53 [95%CI 0.44−0.63]; p < 0.001). The difference in OS remained after correction for prognostic factors (adjusted hazard ratio 1.58 [95%CI 1.32−1.90]; p < 0.001). Conclusions: This nationwide registry-based study showed that 12% of resected PDAC were PCN-associated. Patients with PCN-PDAC had better OS as compared to PDAC not associated with PCN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myrte Gorris
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, 1105 BK Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nadine C. M. van Huijgevoort
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, 1105 BK Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arantza Farina
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lodewijk A. A. Brosens
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J. Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E. van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
246
|
Development and Evaluation of a Peptide Heterodimeric Tracer Targeting CXCR4 and Integrin α vβ 3 for Pancreatic Cancer Imaging. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14091791. [PMID: 36145541 PMCID: PMC9503769 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14091791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Nowadays, pancreatic cancer is still a formidable disease to diagnose. The CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) and integrin αvβ3 play important roles in tumor development, progression, invasion, and metastasis, which are overexpressed in many types of human cancers. In this study, we developed a heterodimeric tracer 68Ga-yG5-RGD targeting both CXCR4 and integrin αvβ3, and evaluated its feasibility and utility in PET imaging of pancreatic cancer. The 68Ga-yG5-RGD could accumulate in CXCR4/integrin αvβ3 positive BxPC3 tumors in a high concentration and was much higher than that of 68Ga-yG5 (p < 0.001) and 68Ga-RGD (p < 0.001). No increased uptake of 68Ga-yG5-RGD was found in MX-1 tumors (CXCR4/integrin αvβ3, negative). In addition, the uptake of 68Ga-yG5-RGD in BxPC3 was significantly blocked by excess amounts of AMD3100 (an FDA-approved CXCR4 antagonist) and/or unlabeled RGD (p < 0.001), confirming its dual-receptor targeting properties. The ex vivo biodistribution and immunohistochemical results were consistent with the in vivo imaging results. The dual-receptor targeting strategy achieved improved tumor-targeting efficiency and prolonged tumor retention in BxPC3 tumors, suggesting 68Ga-yG5-RGD is a promising tracer for the noninvasive detection of tumors that express either CXCR4 or integrin αvβ3 or both, and therefore may have good prospects for clinical translation.
Collapse
|
247
|
Alshememry AK, Alsaleh NB, Alkhudair N, Alzhrani R, Alshamsan A. Recent nanotechnology advancements to treat multidrug-resistance pancreatic cancer: Pre-clinical and clinical overview. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:933457. [PMID: 36091785 PMCID: PMC9449524 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.933457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) remains one of the most lethal and incurable forms of cancer and has a poor prognosis. One of the significant therapeutic challenges in PC is multidrug resistance (MDR), a phenomenon in which cancer cells develop resistance toward administered therapy. Development of novel therapeutic platforms that could overcome MDR in PC is crucial for improving therapeutic outcomes. Nanotechnology is emerging as a promising tool to enhance drug efficacy and minimize off-target responses via passive and/or active targeting mechanisms. Over the past decade, tremendous efforts have been made to utilize nanocarriers capable of targeting PC cells while minimizing off-target effects. In this review article, we first give an overview of PC and the major molecular mechanisms of MDR, and then we discuss recent advancements in the development of nanocarriers used to overcome PC drug resistance. In doing so, we explore the developmental stages of this research in both pre-clinical and clinical settings. Lastly, we discuss current challenges and gaps in the literature as well as potential future directions in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah K. Alshememry
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Nanobiotechnology Unit, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nasser B. Alsaleh
- Nanobiotechnology Unit, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nora Alkhudair
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rami Alzhrani
- Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia
| | - Aws Alshamsan
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Nanobiotechnology Unit, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- *Correspondence: Aws Alshamsan,
| |
Collapse
|
248
|
Pellat A, Boutron I, Ravaud P. Availability of Results of Trials Studying Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma over the Past 10 Years. Oncologist 2022; 27:e849-e855. [PMID: 35983949 PMCID: PMC9632316 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal cancer with few therapeutic options. Availability of results is a crucial step in interventional research. Our aim was to evaluate results availability for trials in patients with PDAC and explore associated factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study and searched the ClinicalTrials.gov registry for trials evaluating PDAC management with a primary completion date between 1 January 2010 and 1 June 2020. Then, we searched for results submitted on ClinicalTrials.gov and/or published. Our primary outcome was the proportion of PDAC trials with available results: submitted on ClinicalTrials.gov (either publicly available or undergoing quality control check) and/or published in a full-text article. The association of predefined trial characteristics with results availability was assessed. RESULTS We identified 551 trials of which 386 (70%) had available results. The cumulative percentage of trials with available results was 21% (95% CI, 18-25%) at 12 months after the primary completion date, 44% (95% CI, 30-48%) at 24 months and 57% (95% CI, 53-61%) at 36 months. Applicable clinical trials, required to comply with the 2007 Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act 801 and its final rule on reporting of results on ClinicalTrials.gov, were more likely to have available results over time (HR 2.1 [95% CI 1.72-2.63], P < .001). Industry-funded, small sample size, and terminated trials were less likely to have available results. Other trial characteristics showed no association with results availability. CONCLUSION Our results highlight a waste in interventional research studying PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Pellat
- Corresponding author: Anna Pellat, MD, Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Unit, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques 75014, Paris, France. Tel: +33 689851724;
| | - Isabelle Boutron
- Université Pari Cité, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Inserm U1153, Paris, France,Centre d’Épidémiologie Clinique, Hôtel Dieu, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Ravaud
- Université Pari Cité, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Inserm U1153, Paris, France,Centre d’Épidémiologie Clinique, Hôtel Dieu, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
249
|
Hospital Surgical Volume Is Poorly Correlated With Delivery of Multimodal Treatment for Localized Pancreatic Cancer. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2022; 3:e197. [PMID: 36199487 PMCID: PMC9508964 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Using Donabedian’s quality of care model, this study assessed process (hospital multimodal treatment) and structure (hospital surgical case volume) measures to evaluate localized pancreatic cancer outcomes.
Collapse
|
250
|
Ma T, Bai X, Wei Q, Shui Y, Lao M, Chen W, Huang B, Que R, Gao S, Zhang Y, Chen W, Wang J, Liang T. Adjuvant therapy with gemcitabine and stereotactic body radiation therapy versus gemcitabine alone for resected stage II pancreatic cancer: a prospective, randomized, open-label, single center trial. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:865. [PMID: 35941566 PMCID: PMC9361660 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09974-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The role of adjuvant radiation in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of gemcitabine combined with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as adjuvant therapy for resected stage II PDAC. Methods In this single-center randomized controlled trial, patients with stage II PDAC that underwent margin-negative resection were randomly assigned to gemcitabine-alone adjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant SBRT followed by gemcitabine chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary endpoints included locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of adverse events. Results Forty patients were randomly assigned to treatment between Sep 1, 2015 and Mar 31, 2018. Of these, 38 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (20 in gemcitabine arm and 18 in gemcitabine plus SBRT arm). The median RFS and OS were 9.70, 28.0 months in the gemcitabine arm and 5.30, 15.0 months in the gemcitabine plus SBRT arm (RFS, P = 0.53; OS, P = 0.20), respectively. The median LRFS in both arms was unreached (P = 0.81). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were all comparable between the two arms. Evaluation of data from the enrolled patients indicated that the addition of adjuvant SBRT was not associated with either better local disease control or recurrence-free survival. Conclusions Adjuvant SBRT neither provided a survival benefit nor improved local disease control in resected stage II PDAC. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02461836. Registered 03/06/2015
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Ma
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 31003, China
| | - Xueli Bai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 31003, China
| | - Qichun Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yongjie Shui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Mengyi Lao
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 31003, China
| | - Wen Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 31003, China
| | - Bingfeng Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 31003, China
| | - Risheng Que
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 31003, China
| | - Shunliang Gao
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 31003, China
| | - Yun Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 31003, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 31003, China
| | - Ji Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 31003, China
| | - Tingbo Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 31003, China.
| |
Collapse
|