Cannabinoids modulate synaptic strength and plasticity at glutamatergic synapses of rat prefrontal cortex pyramidal neurons

The therapeutic potential of the cannabinoids in neuroprotection

After thousands of years of interest the last few decades have seen a huge increase in our knowledge of the cannabinoids and their mode of action. Their potential as medical therapeutics has long been known. However, very real concerns over their safety and efficacy have lead to caution and suspicion when applying the legislature of modern medicine to these compounds. The ability of this diverse family of compounds to modulate neurotransmission and act as anti-inflammatory and antioxidative agents has prompted researchers to investigate their potential as neuroprotective agents. Indeed, various cannabinoids rescue dying neurones in experimental forms of acute neuronal injury, such as cerebral ischaemia and traumatic brain injury. Cannabinoids also provide symptomatic relief in experimental models of chronic neurodegenerative diseases, such as multiple sclerosis and Huntington's disease. This preclinical evidence has provided the impetus for the launch of a number of clinical trials in various conditions of neurodegeneration and neuronal injury using compounds derived from the cannabis plant. Our understanding of cannabinoid neurobiology, however, must improve if we are to effectively exploit this system and take advantage of the numerous characteristics that make this group of compounds potential neuroprotective agents.

Acute neuronal injury, excitotoxicity, and the endocannabinoid system

The endocannabinoid system is a valuable target for drug discovery, because it is involved in the regulation of many cellular and physiological functions. The endocannabinoid system constitutes the endogenous lipids anandamide, 2-arachidonoylglycerol and noladin ether, and the cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors as well as the proteins for their inactivation. It is thought that (endo)cannabinoid-based drugs may potentially be useful to reduce the effects of neurodegeneration. This paper reviews recent developments in the endocannabinoid system and its involvement in neuroprotection. Exogenous (endo)cannabinoids have been shown to exert neuroprotection in a variety of in vitro and in vivo models of neuronal injury via different mechanisms, such as prevention of excitotoxicity by CB1-mediated inhibition of glutamatergic transmission, reduction of calcium influx, and subsequent inhibition of deleterious cascades, TNF-alpha formation, and anti-oxidant activity. It has been suggested that the release of endogenous endocannabinoids during neuronal injury might be a protective response. However, several observations indicate that the role of the endocannabinoid system as a general endogenous protection system is questionable. The data are critically reviewed and possible explanations are given.

Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol decreases extracellular GABA and increases extracellular glutamate and dopamine levels in the rat prefrontal cortex: an in vivo microdialysis study

Cannabinoid modulation of prefrontal cortex and hippocampus neuronal functioning has been correlated to the disruptive action of marijuana on memory tasks. This study investigates the effects of delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta(9)-THC) on dopamine, glutamate and GABA levels in vivo by brain microdialysis in the prefrontal cortex. Delta(9)-THC (1 mg/kg, i.v.) significantly increased extracellular dopamine and glutamate levels and decreased GABA levels. These effects were prevented by the cannabinoid antagonist SR141716A (1 mg/kg, i.v.), which per se was ineffective. These results suggest that delta(9)-THC disrupt the normal interplay between neurotransmitters in this area and may bear relevance in understanding neuronal mechanisms underlying cannabinoid-induced cognitive deficits.

Memory impairment following combined exposure to delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol and ethanol in rats

Cannabis derivatives and alcohol are widely co-abused, particularly among adolescents. Since both ethanol and cannabinoids are known to impair learning and memory, the present study investigated in rats the effects of combined exposure to ethanol and delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in a memory task, the object recognition test. The results of the present study provide evidence that ethanol, voluntarily ingested in alcohol-preferring rats, and THC, given by intraperitoneal injection, have a synergic action to impair object recognition, when a 15-min interval was adopted between the sample phase and the choice phase of the test. Neither voluntary ethanol ingestion nor 2 or 5 mg/kg of THC were able per se to modify object recognition in these experimental conditions, but when voluntary ethanol ingestion was combined with administration of these doses of THC object recognition was markedly impaired. THC impaired object recognition only at the dose of 10 mg/kg, when its administration was not combined with that of ethanol. The selective cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist SR 141716A (N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1(2, 4-dichloro-phenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole carboxamide.HCl) at the dose of 1 mg/kg reversed the amnesic effect of THC, 10 mg/kg, suggesting that the effect is mediated by this receptor subtype. The synergism of ethanol and THC was not detected when an inter-trial interval of 1 min was adopted. The present findings are in keeping with the notion that Cannabis derivatives impair memory processes and provide evidence for a synergic action of THC and ethanol, thus emphasizing the risks consequent to their co-administration.

Cannabinoids depress inhibitory synaptic inputs received by layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons of the neocortex

Using whole cell voltage-clamp recordings we investigated the effects of a synthetic cannabinoid (WIN55,212-2) on inhibitory inputs received by layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons in slices of the mouse auditory cortex. Activation of the type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1R) with WIN55,212-2 reliably reduced the amplitude of GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents evoked by extracellular stimulation within layer 2/3. The suppression of this inhibition was blocked and reversed by the highly selective CB1R antagonist AM251, confirming a CB1R-mediated inhibition. Pairing evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) at short interstimulus intervals while applying WIN55,212-2 resulted in an increase in paired-pulse facilitation suggesting that the probability of GABA release was reduced. A presynaptic site of cannabinoid action was verified by an observed decrease in the frequency with no change in the amplitude or kinetics of action potential-independent postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs). When Cd(2+) was added or Ca(2+) was omitted from the recording solution, the remaining fraction of Ca(2+)-independent mIPSCs did not respond to WIN55,212-2. These data suggest that cannabinoids are capable of suppressing the inhibition of neocortical pyramidal neurons by depressing Ca(2+)-dependent GABA release from local interneurons.

Pre- and postsynaptic localizations of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor in the dorsal horn of the rat spinal cord

Several lines of evidence show that endogenous and exogenous cannabinoids modulate pain transmission at the spinal level through specific cannabinoid-1 (CB1) receptors. Since anatomical data concerning spinal CB1 receptors are rather contradictory, we studied the cellular and subcellular localizations of the CB1 receptors by immunocytochemistry. Results show a dual pre- and postsynaptic localization of CB1 receptors. Presynaptic receptors are evidenced by the labeling of (1) heterogeneous dorsal root ganglion neurons and (2) axons of Lissauer's tract. Postsynaptic receptors are shown by the labeling of numerous interneurons in the outer part of lamina II. Double immunolabelings show that lamina II outer CB1 neurons, probably islet cells, may also contain GABA or nitric oxide synthase. Numerous CB1-containing neurons in lamina X are also immunostained with anti-nitric oxide synthase (NOS) antibody. Under the electron microscope, CB1 immunoreactivity is exclusively localized postsynaptically in both somatic and dendritic compartments. The absence of labeling on primary afferent axon terminals is discussed and compared to the absence of labeling on terminals or vesicle-containing dendrites of islet cells, where a presynaptic localization was expected according to data of the literature.

Endogenous cannabinoids mediate long-term synaptic depression in the nucleus accumbens

Do endocannabinoids (eCBs) participate in long-term synaptic plasticity in the brain? Using pharmacological approaches and genetically altered mice, we show that stimulation of prelimbic cortex afferents at naturally occurring frequencies causes a long-term depression of nucleus accumbens glutamatergic synapses mediated by eCB release and presynaptic CB1 receptors. Translation of glutamate synaptic transmission into eCB retrograde signaling involved metabotropic glutamate receptors and postsynaptic intracellular Ca(2+) stores. These findings unveil the role of the eCB system in activity-dependent long-term synaptic plasticity and identify a mechanism by which marijuana can alter synaptic functions in the endogenous brain reward system.

Postsynaptic endocannabinoid release is critical to long-term depression in the striatum

The striatum functions critically in movement control and habit formation. The development and function of cortical input to the striatum are thought to be regulated by activity-dependent plasticity of corticostriatal glutamatergic synapses. Here we show that the induction of a form of striatal synaptic plasticity, long-term depression (LTD), is dependent on activation of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor. LTD was facilitated by blocking cellular endocannabinoid uptake, and postsynaptic loading of anandamide (AEA) produced presynaptic depression. The endocannabinoid necessary for striatal LTD is thus likely to be released postsynaptically as a retrograde messenger. These findings demonstrate a new role for endocannabinoids in the induction of long-term synaptic plasticity in a circuit necessary for habit formation and motor control.

Activation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase suppresses the presynaptic cannabinoid inhibition of glutamatergic transmission at corticostriatal synapses

In a previous study, we showed that type 1 cannabinoid (CB(1)) receptor activation substantially depresses the corticostriatal glutamatergic transmission onto striatal neurons in the brain slice preparation. We now report that the adenylyl cyclase activator forskolin and cAMP analog (S)-p-8-(4-chlorophenythil) adenosine-3',5'-monophosphorothioate (Sp-8-CPT-cAMPS) strongly suppressed the synaptic depression induced by cannabimimetic aminoalkylindole, WIN 55,212-2. Application of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) inhibitor KT5720 alone had no consistent effect on basal synaptic transmission but the synaptic enhancement elicited by forskolin was blocked. In addition, pretreatment of striatal slices with either KT5720 or another PKA inhibitor, H89, completely abolished the attenuation by forskolin on WIN 55,212-2-induced synaptic depression. The effect of forskolin on CB(1) receptor function was still observed in a low Ca(2+) bathing solution, suggesting that the forskolin's action is not attributable to its ability to saturate the presynaptic transmitter release processes. The possibility that forskolin acted by increasing CB(1) receptor phosphorylation was confirmed by demonstrating that the serine-phosphorylated component with CB(1) receptors was significantly increased after forskolin treatment. This forskolin effect was markedly attenuated in the presence of KT5720. Moreover, the activation of beta-adrenergic receptors by isoproterenol mimics forskolin to elicit a PKA-dependent inhibition of CB(1) receptor function. Together, these observations indicate that the presynaptic inhibitory action of CB(1) receptors at corticostriatal synapses could be negatively regulated by cAMP/PKA-mediated receptor phosphorylation. This effect of PKA may play a functional role in fine-tuning glutamatergic transmission at corticostriatal synapses.

Cannabinoid receptors and their ligands

There are at least two types of cannabinoid receptors, CB(1) and CB(2), both coupled to G proteins. CB(1) receptors exist primarily on central and peripheral neurons, one of their functions being to modulate neurotransmitter release. CB(2) receptors are present mainly on immune cells. Their roles are proving more difficult to establish but seem to include the modulation of cytokine release. Endogenous agonists for cannabinoid receptors (endocannabinoids) have also been discovered, the most important being arachidonoyl ethanolamide (anandamide), 2-arachidonoyl glycerol and 2-arachidonyl glyceryl ether. Other endocannabinoids and cannabinoid receptor types may also exist. Although anandamide can act through CB(1) and CB(2) receptors, it is also a vanilloid receptor agonist and some of its metabolites may possess yet other important modes of action. The discovery of the system of cannabinoid receptors and endocannabinoids that constitutes the "endocannabinoid system" has prompted the development of CB(1)- and CB(2)-selective agonists and antagonists/inverse agonists. CB(1)/CB(2) agonists are already used clinically, as anti-emetics or to stimulate appetite. Potential therapeutic uses of cannabinoid receptor agonists include the management of multiple sclerosis/spinal cord injury, pain, inflammatory disorders, glaucoma, bronchial asthma, vasodilation that accompanies advanced cirrhosis, and cancer. Following their release onto cannabinoid receptors, endocannabinoids are removed from the extracellular space by membrane transport and then degraded by intracellular enzymic hydrolysis. Inhibitors of both these processes have been developed. Such inhibitors have therapeutic potential as animal data suggest that released endocannabinoids mediate reductions both in inflammatory pain and in the spasticity and tremor of multiple sclerosis. So too have CB(1) receptor antagonists, for example for the suppression of appetite and the management of cognitive dysfunction or schizophrenia.

Endocannabinoids in the central nervous system--an overview

Many aspects of the physiology and pharmacology of anandamide (arachidonoyl ethanol amide), the first endogenous cannabinoid ligand ("endocannabinoid") isolated from pig brain, have been studied since its discovery in 1992. Ethanol amides from other fatty acids have also been identified as endocannabinoids with similar in vivo and in vitro pharmacological properties. 2-Arachidonoyl glycerol and noladin ether (2-arachidonyl glyceryl ether), isolated in 1995 and 2001, respectively, so far, display pharmacological properties in the central nervous system, similar to those of anandamide. The endocannabinoids are widely distributed in brain, they are synthesized and released upon neuronal stimulation, undergo reuptake and are hydrolyzed intracellularly by fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH). For therapeutic purposes, inhibitors of FAAH may provide more specific cannabinoid activities than direct agonists, and several such molecules have already been developed. Pharmacological effects of the endocannabinoids are very similar, yet not identical, to those of the plant-derived and synthetic cannabinoid receptor ligands. In addition to pharmacokinetic explanations, direct or indirect interactions with other receptors have been considered to explain some of these differences, including activities at serotonin and GABA receptors. Binding affinities for other receptors such as the vanilloid receptor, have to be taken into account in order to fully understand endocannabinoid physiology. Moreover, possible interactions with receptors for the lysophosphatidic acids deserve attention in future studies. Endocannabinoids have been implicated in a variety of physiological functions. The areas of central activities include pain reduction, motor regulation, learning/memory, and reward. Finally, the role of the endocannabinoid system in appetite stimulation in the adult organism, and perhaps more importantly, its critical involvement in milk ingestion and survival of the newborn, may not only further our understanding of the physiology of food intake and growth, but may also find therapeutic applications in wasting disease and infant's "failure to thrive".

Modulation of transmitter release via presynaptic cannabinoid receptors

Cannabis (marijuana) is not only a frequently abused drug but also has the potential for the development of useful agents for the treatment of emesis, anorexia and multiple sclerosis. In this article, the effects of modulation of transmitter release by cannabinoids in both the CNS and the PNS of various species, including humans, will be discussed. Cannabinoids inhibit neurotransmitter release via specific presynaptic cannabinoid CB1 receptors. Studies using either the CB1 receptor antagonist and inverse agonist SR141716 or CB1-receptor-deficient mice suggest that numerous presynaptic cannabinoid receptors are tonically activated by endogenous cannabinoids and/or are constitutively active. CB1-receptor-mediated inhibition of transmitter release might explain, for example, reinforcing properties and memory impairment caused by cannabinoids.

Protective effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists against cocaine and other convulsant-induced toxic behavioural symptoms

Based on the previously reported co-localization and relationship between cannabinoid and dopamine receptors, the effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists against cocaine-induced toxic behavioural symptoms, including convulsive seizures, were examined in mice. The anticonvulsant effect of several cannabimimetics against seizures induced by other convulsants was also compared. The cannabinoid receptor agonists CP 55940 ((-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)-cyclohexanol) and WIN 55212-2 ((R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-naphthalenylmethanone), and the endogenous cannabinoid anandamide were co-administered intraperitoneally with cocaine (75 mg kg(-1)) or other convulsants such as bicuculline, methyl 6,7-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-beta-carboline-carboxylate (DMCM), L-glutamic acid and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA). CP 55940 (2.5 mg kg(-1)) and anandamide (15 mg kg(-1)) significantly antagonized cocaine-induced lethality, and CP 55940 and WIN 55212-2 (2.5 mg kg(-1)) significantly attenuated the severity of cocaine-induced convulsive seizures. Furthermore, ataxic hyperactivity, which was observed only in the cocaine-treated group of mice and could be evaluated by their activity counts, was also depressed in the groups of mice co-treated with each of the three cannabinoid agonists. However, none of these agonists protected against bicuculline- or DMCM-induced lethality or convulsive seizures. In contrast, all of the cannabinoid agonists, most notably anandamide, antagonized both L-glutamic acid (2 g kg(-1))- and NMDA (200 mg kg(-1))-induced convulsive seizures. These data support the previously reported close correlation between dopamine and cannabinoid receptors, and between cannabinoid agonists, especially anandamide, and glutamate (NMDA) receptors. Furthermore, these results suggest a potential therapeutic role for cannabinoid agonists against cocaine- and other-convulsant-induced toxicities.

Cannabinoid receptor agonists inhibit depolarization-induced calcium influx in cerebellar granule neurons

Neuronal cannabinoid receptors (CB(1)) are coupled to inhibition of voltage-sensitive Ca(2+) channels (VSCCs) in several cell types. The purpose of these studies was to characterize the interaction between endogenous CB(1) receptors and VSCCs in cerebellar granule neurons (CGN). Ca(2+) transients were evoked by KCl-induced depolarization and imaged using fura-2. The CB(1) receptor agonists CP55940, Win 55212-2 and N-arachidonylethanolamine (anandamide) produced concentration-related decreases in peak amplitude of the Ca(2+) response and total Ca(2+) influx. Pre-treatment of CGN with pertussis toxin abolished agonist-mediated inhibition. The inhibitory effect of Win 55212-2 on Ca(2+) influx was additive with inhibition produced by omega-agatoxin IVA and nifedipine but not with omega-conotoxin GVIA, indicating that N-type VSCCs are the primary effector. Paradoxically, the CB(1) receptor antagonist, SR141716, also inhibited KCl-induced Ca(2+) influx into CGN in a concentration-related manner. SR141716 inhibition was pertussis toxin-insensitive and was not additive with the inhibition produced by Win 55212-2. Confocal imaging of CGN in primary culture demonstrate a high density of CB(1) receptor expression on CGN plasma membranes, including the neuritic processes. These data demonstrate that the CB(1) receptor is highly expressed by CGN and agonists serve as potent and efficacious inhibitory modulators of Ca(2+) influx through N-type VSCC.

Presynaptic inhibition caused by retrograde signal from metabotropic glutamate to cannabinoid receptors

We report a type of synaptic modulation that involves retrograde signaling from postsynaptic metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) to presynaptic cannabinoid receptors. Activation of mGluR subtype 1 (mGluR1) expressed in cerebellar Purkinje cells (PCs) reduced neurotransmitter release from excitatory climbing fibers. This required activation of G proteins but not Ca2+ elevation in postsynaptic PCs. This effect was occluded by a cannabinoid agonist and totally abolished by cannabinoid antagonists. Depolarization-induced Ca2+ transients in PCs also caused cannabinoid receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition. Thus, endocannabinoid production in PCs can be initiated by two distinct stimuli. Activation of mGluR1 by repetitive stimulation of parallel fibers, the other excitatory input to PCs, caused transient cannabinoid receptor-mediated depression of climbing fiber input. Our data highlight a signaling mechanism whereby activation of postsynaptic mGluR retrogradely influences presynaptic functions via endocannabinoid system.

Ultrastructural localization of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor in mu-opioid receptor patches of the rat Caudate putamen nucleus

Cannabinoids and opioids are widely consumed drugs of abuse that produce motor depression, in part via respective activation of the cannabinoid subtype 1 receptor (CB1R) and the mu-opioid receptor (muOR), in the striatal circuitry originating in the caudate putamen nucleus (CPN). Thus, the CB1R and muOR may show similar targeting in the CPN. To test this hypothesis, we examined the electron microscopic immunocytochemical labeling of CB1R and muOR in CPN patches of rat brain. Of the CB1R-labeled profiles, 34% (588) were dendrites, presumably arising from spiny as well as aspiny-type somata, which also contained CB1R immunoreactivity. In dendrites, CB1R often was localized to nonsynaptic and synaptic plasma membranes, particularly near asymmetric excitatory-type junctions. Almost one-half of the CB1R-labeled dendrites contained muOR immunoreactivity, whereas only 20% of all muOR-labeled dendrites expressed CB1R. Axons and axon terminals as well as abundant glial processes also showed plasmalemmal CB1R and were mainly without muOR immunoreactivity. Many CB1R-labeled axon terminals were small and without recognizable synaptic junctions, but a few also formed asymmetric, or more rarely symmetric, synapses. The CB1R-labeled glial processes were often perivascular or perisynaptic, surrounding asymmetric excitatory-type axospinous synapses. Our results show that in CPN patches CB1R and muOR are targeted strategically to some of the same postsynaptic neurons, which may account for certain similarities in motor function. Furthermore, they also provide evidence that CB1R may play a major role in the modulation of presynaptic transmitter release and glial functions that are unaffected in large part by opioids active at muOR in CPN.

Presynaptic mechanisms underlying cannabinoid inhibition of excitatory synaptic transmission in rat striatal neurons

The striatum is a crucial site of action for the motor effects of cannabinoids (CBs). However, the electrophysiological consequences of activation of CB receptors on the striatal neurons have not been established. Here we report for the first time that the cannabimimetic aminoalkylindole WIN 55,212-2 and the endogenous cannabinoid anandamide substantially depress corticostriatal glutamatergic synaptic transmission onto striatal neurons in the brain slice preparation. The selective CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716 effectively reversed this inhibition. WIN 55,212-2 significantly increased the paired-pulse facilitation of synaptically evoked EPSCs, while having no effect on the sensitivity of postsynaptic neurons to [alpha]-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid. WIN 55,212-2 also reduced the frequency of spontaneous, action potential-dependent EPSCs (sEPSCs) without altering their amplitude distribution. Superfusion of WIN 55,212-2 elicited a membrane hyperpolarization accompanied by a decrease in input resistance. Both effects were blocked by intracellular caesium. In contrast, intracellular caesium failed to affect WIN 55,212-2-mediated synaptic inhibition. The WIN 55,212-2-mediated synaptic inhibition was blocked by the Gi/o protein inhibitor pertussis toxin (PTX), but not by the GABA(A) receptor antagonist bicuculline or GABA(B) receptor antagonist SCH 50911. Pretreatment with the N-type Ca2+ channel antagonist [omega]-conotoxin GVIA selectively abolished the WIN-55,212-2-mediated synaptic inhibition. These results suggest that cannabinoids depress the corticostriatal glutamatergic synaptic transmission through the activation of presynaptic CB1 receptors to inhibit N-type Ca2+ channel activity, which in turn reduces glutamate release. The presynaptic action of cannabinoids is mediated by a PTX-sensitive Gi/o protein-coupled signalling pathway.

Endogenous cannabinoids mediate retrograde signals from depolarized postsynaptic neurons to presynaptic terminals

Endogenous cannabinoids are considered to function as diffusible and short-lived modulators that may transmit signals retrogradely from postsynaptic to presynaptic neurons. To evaluate this possibility, we have made a paired whole-cell recording from cultured hippocampal neurons with inhibitory synaptic connections. In about 60% of pairs, a cannabinoid agonist greatly reduced the release of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA from presynaptic terminals. In most of such pairs but not in those insensitive to the agonist, depolarization of postsynaptic neurons and the resultant elevation of intracellular Ca2+ concentration caused transient suppression of inhibitory synaptic currents, which is mainly due to reduction of GABA release. This depolarization-induced suppression was completely blocked by selective cannabinoid antagonists. Our results reveal that endogenous cannabinoids mediate retrograde signals from depolarized postsynaptic neurons to presynaptic terminals to cause the reduction of transmitter release.

Localization and mechanisms of action of cannabinoid receptors at the glutamatergic synapses of the mouse nucleus accumbens

Despite the role of excitatory transmission to the nucleus accumbens (NAc) in the actions of most drugs of abuse, the presence and functions of cannabinoid receptors (CB1) on the glutamatergic cortical afferents to the NAc have never been explored. Here, immunohistochemistry has been used to show the localization of CB1 receptors on axonal terminals making contacts with the NAc GABAergic neurons. Electrophysiological techniques in the NAc slice preparation revealed that cannabimimetics [WIN 55,212,2 (WIN-2) and CP55940] strongly inhibit stimulus-evoked glutamate-mediated transmission. The inhibitory actions of WIN-2 were dose-dependent (EC(50) of 293 +/- 13 nm) and reversed by the selective CB1 antagonist SR 141716A. In agreement with a presynaptic localization of CB1 receptors, WIN-2 increased paired-pulse facilitation, decreased miniature EPSC (mEPSC) frequency, and had no effect on the mEPSCs amplitude. Perfusion with the adenylate cyclase activator forskolin enhanced glutamatergic transmission but did not alter presynaptic CB1 actions, suggesting that cannabinoids inhibit glutamate release independently from the cAMP-PKA cascade. CB1 did not reduce evoked transmitter release by inhibiting presynaptic voltage-dependent Ca(2+) currents through N-, L-, or P/Q-type Ca(2+) channels, because CB1 inhibition persisted in the presence of omega-Conotoxin-GVIA, nimodipine, or omega-Agatoxin-IVA. The K(+) channel blockers 4-aminopyridine (100 micrometer) and BaCl(2) (300 micrometer) each reduced by 40-50% the inhibitory actions of WIN-2, and their effects were additive. These data suggest that CB1 receptors are located on the cortical afferents to the nucleus and can reduce glutamate synaptic transmission within the NAc by modulating K(+) channels activity.