Social and economic burden of mood disorders

Healthcare resource utilization in bipolar depression compared with unipolar depression: results of a United States population-based study

INTRODUCTION

This study examined healthcare utilization in the past year by subjects who screened positive for bipolar versus unipolar depression.

METHOD

A self-administered survey was completed in 2002 by a United States population-based sample. Respondents were categorized into one of three subgroups: bipolar depressed screen positive (BP DEP+, n=394); unipolar depressed screen positive (UP DEP+, n=794); and control subjects (n=1,612).

RESULTS

For depressive symptoms in the past year, BP DEP+ respondents were significantly more likely than UP DEP+ respondents to report a healthcare visit to a number of diverse care providers. In analyses controlled for demographics and depression severity, the differences in psychiatric hospitalization, psychologist/counselor outpatient visit, substance abuse/social services visit, and number of emergency room visits remained significant between BP DEP+ and UP DEP+ respondents.

CONCLUSION

Subjects with self-reported bipolar depression sought care more often from a number of diverse healthcare resources than subjects with self-reported unipolar depression. These findings underscore the morbidity associated with bipolar depression.

Association of corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor1 gene SNP and haplotype with major depression

The dysregulation of the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis system is one of the major neuroendocrine abnormalities in major depression (MD). Many pieces of evidence supported that corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) play a role in the pathophysiology of major depression. In this article, whether genetic variations in the corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor1 (CRHR1) gene might be associated with increased susceptibility to major depression was studied by using a gene-based association analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Three SNPs were identified in CRHR1 gene and genotyped in the samples of patients diagnosed with major depression and matched controls. We observed significant allele (P=0.0008) and genotype (P=0.0002) association with rs242939, and the haplotype defined by alleles G-G-T for the represent rs1876828, rs242939 and rs242941 was significantly over-represented in major depression patients compared to controls. These results support the idea that the CRHR1 gene is likely to be involved in the genetic vulnerability for major depression.

Multi-target strategies for the improved treatment of depressive states: Conceptual foundations and neuronal substrates, drug discovery and therapeutic application

Major depression is a debilitating and recurrent disorder with a substantial lifetime risk and a high social cost. Depressed patients generally display co-morbid symptoms, and depression frequently accompanies other serious disorders. Currently available drugs display limited efficacy and a pronounced delay to onset of action, and all provoke distressing side effects. Cloning of the human genome has fuelled expectations that symptomatic treatment may soon become more rapid and effective, and that depressive states may ultimately be "prevented" or "cured". In pursuing these objectives, in particular for genome-derived, non-monoaminergic targets, "specificity" of drug actions is often emphasized. That is, priority is afforded to agents that interact exclusively with a single site hypothesized as critically involved in the pathogenesis and/or control of depression. Certain highly selective drugs may prove effective, and they remain indispensable in the experimental (and clinical) evaluation of the significance of novel mechanisms. However, by analogy to other multifactorial disorders, "multi-target" agents may be better adapted to the improved treatment of depressive states. Support for this contention is garnered from a broad palette of observations, ranging from mechanisms of action of adjunctive drug combinations and electroconvulsive therapy to "network theory" analysis of the etiology and management of depressive states. The review also outlines opportunities to be exploited, and challenges to be addressed, in the discovery and characterization of drugs recognizing multiple targets. Finally, a diversity of multi-target strategies is proposed for the more efficacious and rapid control of core and co-morbid symptoms of depression, together with improved tolerance relative to currently available agents.

Quality of life and psychopathology: investigations into their relationship

OBJECTIVE

Quality of life (QOL) has become a topic of growing interest in medical and psychiatric practice in general, and in research in particular. Although the body of knowledge about the complex relationship between QOL and psychiatric disorders is growing, understanding this relationship still remains difficult. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to get more and new insights into this relationship. It was hypothesized that QOL would be negatively related to the presence as well as the severity of psychopathology.

METHOD

A random sample of Dutch adult psychiatric outpatients (n=410) completed the World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment instrument, abbreviated version (WHOQOL-Bref). In addition, DSM-IV axis I and II diagnoses were obtained. Comparisons were made between scores of the psychiatric outpatients, diagnostic subgroups within this population, and the scores of a general population.

RESULTS

Compared with the general population, psychiatric outpatients scored significantly worse on all aspects of QOL. Within the group of outpatients, participants with DSM-IV diagnoses had worse scores than those without. Participants with comorbidity had the worst QOL.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that QOL scores are negatively related to both the presence and the severity of psychopathology, and that the presence of a personality disorder plays a role in subjectively experienced QOL.

Costs of physical and mental comorbidities among employees: a comparison of those with and without bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cost and utilization of health care services for various comorbid conditions among employees with bipolar disorder (BPD) and two other population cohorts: employees without BPD and employees with other mental disorders (OMD).

METHODS

Retrospective database analysis on a 2-year study period, from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2002 using adjudicated health insurance medical claims on more than 230 000 employees plus their eligible dependents. Study comparisons were performed among employees with BPD (cohort BPD), employees without BPD (cohort NBD), and employees with OMD (cohort OMD). Outcome measures included the cost and utilization of health services for various comorbid conditions as defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); using 261 specific categories (SCs) and the 17 Major Diagnostic Categories (MDCs).

RESULTS

Employees in cohort BPD (n = 761) had greater average annual medical and prescription drug costs than the two other employee cohorts. Costs for cohort BPD were significantly greater (p <or= 0.05) than for cohort NBD (n = 229 145) for six of the 17 MDCs, including the categories of mental disorders (2036 dollars vs. 65 dollars), injury and poisoning (544 dollars vs. 162 dollars), musculoskeletal/connective tissue (607 dollars vs. 315 dollars), other conditions (274 dollars vs. 134 dollars), respiratory system (217 dollars vs. 104 dollars), and nervous system/sensory organs (225 dollars vs. 119 dollars). Similarly, comparisons across AHRQ's 261 SCs found the annual medical costs associated with BPD were greater in 137 (52%) of the 261 categories. Differences between cohort BPD and cohort OMD (n = 26 776) were significant (p <or= 0.05) in three MDCs, with BPD 3.4 times greater than OMD in the mental disorders category: 2036 dollars vs. 596 dollars, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Employees with BPD have greater cost and utilization of services due to various mental and physical comorbidities than either employees without BPD or employees with OMD. The findings are consistent with current literature concerning the comorbidities associated with BPD, and suggest that further longitudinal and observational investigation is necessary to attempt to improve diagnosis and treatment of not only BPD, but also associated targeted diseases commonly found in employees with BPD.

The WHO Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (WHOQOL-100)

This study scrutinizes the ability of the WHO quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL-100) to discriminate (1) between psychiatric outpatients and the general population, and (2) between subgroups of psychiatric outpatients. A sample of Dutch adult psychiatric outpatients (N = 410) completed the WHOQOL-100. In addition, DSM-IV Axis-I and Axis-II diagnoses were obtained. Compared with the general population, psychiatric outpatients scored significantly lower on all aspects of self-reported quality of life (QOL). Within the group of outpatients, participants with DSM-IV diagnoses had lower scores than those without. Participants with diagnoses on both Axis-I and Axis-II of DSM-IV (comorbidity) had the lowest self-reported QOL. It is concluded that in psychiatric outpatients, outcome scores of self-reported QOL were negatively related to presence and degree of psychopathology. The WHOQOL-100 has good discriminant ability for psychiatric outpatients.

How Much Does Quality Mental Health Care Profit Employers?

OBJECTIVE

Employers provide most American mental health benefits and are increasingly cost conscious. However, commonplace anxiety and depressive disorders have enormous economic and workplace performance costs.

METHODS

We performed multiple literature searches on several areas of pertinent research (and on key articles) covering the past 5 years.

RESULTS

Substantial research exists about anxiety and depression costs, such as performance and productivity, absenteeism, presenteeism, disability, physical disability exacerbation, mental health treatment, increased medical care costs, exacerbating of physical illness, and studies of mental health care limitations and cost-offset. Research addressing the potential value of higher quality mental health care is limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Commonplace anxiety and depressive disorders are costly in the workplace. Employers and researchers remain largely unaware of the value of quality care and psychiatric skills. Effective solutions involve the increased use of psychiatric skills and appropriate treatment.

Comorbidity of major depression and migraine--a Canadian population-based study

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of major depressive episodes (MDEs) in patients with migraine and to compare the strength of association with that of other long-term medical conditions.

METHODS

This study used a large-scale probability sample (over 130,000 sample) from the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS), a cross-sectional survey conducted by Statistics Canada. The CCHS screened for a broad set of medical conditions. Major depression was evaluated with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short Form for Major Depression, and the diagnosis of migraine was self-reported. The annual prevalence of major depression was calculated in the general population, in subjects with migraine, and in those with chronic conditions other than migraine.

RESULTS

The prevalence of major depression in subjects reporting migraine was higher than that in the general population or in subjects with other chronic medical conditions (17.6%, compared with 7.4% and 7.8%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a strong association between major depression and migraine. The migraine-MDE association may account for a large fraction of the chronic condition-MDE association. The association between migraines and MDE differs from that of other chronic conditions, as the association persists into older age groups.

Treatment of depression in the medically ill

Most studies on treatment methods in elderly depressive patients have included primarily patients in good physical health, excluding medical comorbidity, despite the fact that depression with medical comorbidity is the norm rather than the exception. In addition, depression is known to increase disability and mortality among the medically ill. This, therefore, becomes an extremely important issue. Although data are limited, the available evidence suggests that depression concomitant with medical illness can be treated. One or more of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have demonstrated potential usefulness in depressed patients with ischemic heart disease, diabetes, dementia, and Parkinson's disease and in patients after stroke and after myocardial infarction. Large-scale trials are needed to assess not only the safety and effectiveness of agents for the treatment of depression in comorbid illness, but also the effects of depression on the course of the medical illness itself.

Prevalence and burden of bipolar disorders in European countries

A literature search, supplemented by an expert survey and selected reanalyses of existing data from epidemiological studies was performed to determine the prevalence and associated burden of bipolar I and II disorder in EU countries. Only studies using established diagnostic instruments based on DSM-III-R or DSM-IV, or ICD-10 criteria were considered. Fourteen studies from a total of 10 countries were identified. The majority of studies reported 12-month estimates of approximately 1% (range 0.5-1.1%), with little evidence of a gender difference. The cumulative lifetime incidence (two prospective-longitudinal studies) is slightly higher (1.5-2%); and when the wider range of bipolar spectrum disorders is considered estimates increased to approximately 6%. Few studies have reported separate estimates for bipolar I and II disorders. Age of first onset of bipolar disorder is most frequently reported in late adolescence and early adulthood. A high degree of concurrent and sequential comorbidity with other mental disorders and physical illnesses is common. Most studies suggest equally high or even higher levels of impairments and disabilities of bipolar disorders as compared to major depression and schizophrenia. Few data are available on treatment and health care utilization.

Medical illness and response to treatment in primary care panic disorder

OBJECTIVE

Although studies have suggested that comorbid medical illness can affect the outcome of patients with depression, little is known about whether medical illness comorbidity affects treatment outcome in patients with anxiety.

METHOD

Primary care patients with panic disorder (n=232), participating in a randomized collaborative care intervention of CBT and pharmacology, were divided into those above (n=125) and below (n=107) the median for burden of chronic medical illness and assessed at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Subjects with a greater burden of medical illness were more psychiatrically ill at baseline, with greater anxiety symptom severity, greater disability and more psychiatric comorbidity. The intervention produced significant and similar increases in amount of evidence-based care, and reductions in clinical symptoms and disability that were comparable in the more and less medically ill groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The comparable response of individuals with more severe medical illness suggests that CBT and pharmacotherapy for panic disorder work equally well regardless of medical illness comorbidity. However, the more severe psychiatric illness both at baseline and follow-up in these same individuals suggest that treatment programs may need to be extended in time to optimize treatment outcome.

Common mental disorders and use of general health services: a review of the literature on population-based studies

OBJECTIVE

To review population-based studies on the association between common mental disorders and the use of general (non-mental) health care services.

METHOD

Literature search in Medline and PsychLit databases. Only studies with a prospective design and correction for somatic morbidity were included for review.

RESULTS

On the most general level of outcomes considered and in the majority of studies, mental disorders were associated with higher service use. This general tendency is not consistently reflected in the use of specific health care services, but is materialized in different patterns of out-patient and in-patient service utilization, which vary from study to study. Findings for the elderly were less clear-cut than for other age groups.

CONCLUSION

Mental disorders are related to higher general health care service use on a global, aggregated level. These associations are not specific for certain types of services.

Epidemiological and clinical aspects of bipolar disorders: controversies or a common need to redefine the aims and methodological aspects of surveys

Data from surveys of large samples showed the lifetime prevalence rates of bipolar disorder around 1.5%. A main question is whether the low prevalence rates of bipolar disorders are not an artefact of the over-diagnosis of depression and under-diagnosis of bipolar-II.Analysis of the clinician's logical inferential diagnostic process, confirms that the patient does not represent the sole source of useful information because many patients do not experience hypomania as distress but rather as recovery from depression or as a period during which they felt truly well.Epidemiological data are derived from interviews carried out by lay staff which only reflect the patient's point of view.The clinical monitoring study carried out alongside the ESEMED project found for the diagnosis of mood disorders, a Kappa agreement (versus clinical interview) which ranged from 0.23 in Spain to 0.49 in France.If we consider exactly what a Kappa of 0.4 implies for a disorder with an "identified" prevalence rate of 2%, we discover that the prevalence rate may have been under-diagnosed approximately 1.5-fold, so 67% of cases may not have been identified and 50% of the identified cases may be false positives.It is legitimate to surmise that the prevalence reported by recent (extremely costly) epidemiological surveys may be doubtful.Which direction should epidemiology take in dealing with the serious matter of bipolar disorders?Recently, some community surveys were carried out in the USA using the Mood Disorder Questionnaire. In the ensuing debate, one side claimed that the instrument was scarcely accurate when used in the general population, gave rise to numerous false positives and that the high prevalence reported was therefore a mere artefact. The other side defended the results reported by the research studies, on the basis that "positive" cases were homogeneous with regard to the high level of subjective distress, low social functioning and employment and with the high recourse to health care structures.It is quite probable that the problem lies at the root of the matter, in the definition of the gold standard.In the present state of our knowledge on course and response to treatment, the current diagnostic thresholds applied for mixed states and hypomanic episodes seem to be unsatisfactory.It is inconceivable that the diagnostic gold standard should be determined only on the basis of a structured interview of patients alone. But unless there is clinical consensus on the diagnostic threshold for hypomania and mixed states, there can be no consensus on the findings of epidemiological research.

Getting closer to affective disorders: the role of CRH receptor systems

Depressive disorders are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Current antidepressant drugs targeting monoamine neurotransmitter systems have a delayed onset of action, and fewer than 50% of the patients attain complete remission after therapy with a single antidepressant. A large body of preclinical and clinical evidence points to a key role of the corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) receptor 1 subtype (CRHR1) in mediating CRH-elicited effects in anxiety, depressive disorders and stress-associated pathologies. Genetic modification of CRHR1 function in mice by the use of conventional and conditional knockout strategies enables further analysis of specific elements in the CRH circuitry. The recent characterisation of several selective small-molecule CRHR1 antagonists offers new possibilities for the treatment of anxiety and depression.

The epidemiology of mood disorders

This review provides an overview of the epidemiology, risk factors, and genetic epidemiology of mood disorders in adults and children. The magnitude and impact of mood disorders in the community outweighs that of most other chronic diseases. Although there is substantial knowledge regarding the sociodemographic risk factors for mood disorders, our understanding of the pathogenesis and classification still is evolving. Comorbidity of mood disorders with anxiety disorders and substance abuse has been documented widely. Whereas substance abuse and mood disorders seem to be independent etiologically, anxiety and mood disorders result from partially common etiologic factors. The results of family, twin, and adoption studies reveal that a positive family history is the most potent risk factor for mood disorders, particularly bipolar disorder. However, the specific factors that are transmitted in families still are unknown. The two areas that will inform future genetic research include phenomenologic studies that refine the validity of the current phenotypic classification of mood disorders, and application of study designs to elucidate specific factors that may explain the familial transmission of these disorders.

The career of the mentally ill: an integration of psychiatric, labeling/social construction, and lay perspectives

This paper provides a new way of conceptualizing the career of the mentally ill. Most persons who experience an episode of a serious mental disturbance lead a normal life, while a few persons lead lifetimes that revolve around their mental disorders. The processes leading to either result can only be understood by integrating the traditional labeling and psychiatric perspectives with lay understandings of the concepts of "mental illness" and "nervous breakdowns." A selection of key concepts from these perspectives leads to a better understanding of the different paths persons take as they move through the pre-patient, inpatient, and post-patient phases of the "career of the mentally ill." This perspective makes understandable a number of counterintuitive relationships. For example, it explains why most hospitalized mental patients (1) have a negative stereotype of the "mentally ill," (2) do not perceive themselves as "mentally ill, yet (3) perceive themselves as benefiting from treatment, and (4) do not progress into a career of secondary deviance.

Alcohol, wine and mental health: focus on dementia and stroke

The relative risks of coronary heart disease (CHD) and overall mortality are reduced by moderate consumption of alcoholic beverages, particularly wine, which has major implications for public health. It appears likely that this beneficial effect of alcohol will soon be extended to some mental disorders. Although data on psychosis and mood and anxiety disorders are currently lacking, it appears that the relative risks of developing ischaemic stroke and Alzheimer's or vascular dementia are also lowered by moderate alcohol consumption. Such findings are still tentative because of the inherent methodological problems involved in population-based epidemiological studies, and it is unclear whether the benefit can be ascribed to alcohol itself or to other constituents specific to wine such as polyphenols. Plausible biological mechanisms have been advanced for the protective effect of alcohol and wine against CHD, many of which will also play roles in their protective actions against cerebrovascular disease and dementia. The specific antioxidant properties of wine polyphenols may be particularly important in preventing Alzheimer's disease. Because of the substantially unpredictable risk of progression to problem drinking and alcohol abuse, the most sensible advice to the general public is that heavy drinkers should drink less or not at all, that abstainers should not be indiscriminately encouraged to begin drinking for health reasons, and that light to moderate drinkers need not change their drinking habits for health reasons, except in exceptional circumstances.

Safety considerations in pharmacotherapy of bipolar disorder

Bipolar disorder is a chronic, frequently relapsing illness with a prevalence of 1.2% to 3.4% in the general population. It is associated with high disability, higher comorbidity due to medical illnesses, and significant social and economical consequences for patients, their families, and society. The episodic nature of this disease warrants rational use of medications and proper monitoring for adverse events. Various drug classes, such as mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, and antidepressants, are used for the acute and maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder. Each group of drugs is associated with wide array of adverse events and drug interactions, which are the main hurdles in treatment outcome and compliance. Common side effects seen with several agents, particularly antipsychotics, are somnolence, weight gain, extrapyramidal symptoms, dyslipidemia, type-2 diabetes, and hyperprolactinemia. Major drug interactions are seen with drugs such as carbamazepine, due to hepatic enzyme induction. Adverse effects such as somnolence are tolerability concerns and can be managed easily; others, such as diabetes mellitus, are safety concerns. It is prudent to have precise knowledge of the individual drug's side-effect profile, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics, to plan a treatment regimen. More research is needed to understand potential risks of various drugs and to devise and incorporate monitoring protocols in the treatment regimen.

Emerging experimental therapeutics for bipolar disorder: insights from the molecular and cellular actions of current mood stabilizers

Bipolar disorder afflicts approximately 1-3% of both men and women, and is coincident with major economic, societal, medical, and interpersonal consequences. Current mediations used for its treatment are associated with variable rates of efficacy and often intolerable side effects. While preclinical and clinical knowledge in the neurosciences has expanded at a tremendous rate, recent years have seen no major breakthroughs in the development of novel types of treatment for bipolar disorder. We review here approaches to develop novel treatments specifically for bipolar disorder. Deliberate (ie not by serendipity) treatments may come from one of two general mechanisms: (1) Understanding the mechanism of action of current medications and thereafter designing novel drugs that mimics these mechanism(s); (2) Basing medication development upon the hypothetical or proven underlying pathophysiology of bipolar disorder. In this review, we focus upon the first approach. Molecular and cellular targets of current mood stabilizers include lithium inhibitable enzymes where lithium competes for a magnesium binding site (inositol monophosphatase, inositol polyphosphate 1-phosphatase, glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3), fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase, bisphosphate nucleotidase, phosphoglucomutase), valproate inhibitable enzymes (succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase, succinate semialdehyde reductase, histone deacetylase), targets of carbamazepine (sodium channels, adenosine receptors, adenylate cyclase), and signaling pathways regulated by multiple drugs of different classes (phosphoinositol/protein kinase C, cyclic AMP, arachidonic acid, neurotrophic pathways). While the task of developing novel medications for bipolar disorder is truly daunting, we are hopeful that understanding the mechanism of action of current mood stabilizers will ultimately lead clinical trials with more specific medications and thus better treatments those who suffer from this devastating illness.

Valproate modulates TRH receptor, TRH and TRH-like peptide levels in rat brain

We have tested our hypothesis that alterations in the levels of TRH receptors, and the synthesis and release of tripeptide TRH, and other neurotropic TRH-like peptides mediate some of the mood stabilizing effects of valproate (Valp). We have directly compared the effect of 1 week of feeding two major mood stabilizers, Valp and lithium chloride (LiCl) on TRH binding in limbic and extra-limbic regions of male WKY rats. Valp increased TRH receptor levels in nucleus accumbens and frontal cortex. Li increased TRH receptor binding in amygdala, posterior cortex and cerebellum. The acute, chronic and withdrawal effects of Valp on brain levels of TRH (pGlu-His-Pro-NH2, His-TRH) and five other TRH-like peptides, Glu-TRH, Val-TRH, Tyr-TRH, Leu-TRH and Phe-TRH were measured by combined HPLC and RIA. Acute treatment increased TRH and TRH-like peptide levels within most brain regions, most strikingly in pyriform cortex. The fold increases (in parentheses) were: Val-TRH (58), Phe-TRH (54), Tyr-TRH (25), TRH (9), Glu-TRH (4) and Leu-TRH (3). We conclude that the mood stabilizing effects of Valp may be due, at least in part, to its ability to alter TRH and TRH-like peptide, and TRH receptor levels in the limbic system and other brain regions implicated in mood regulation and behavior.