International Union of Pharmacology. XXXVI. Current status of the nomenclature for receptors for corticotropin-releasing factor and their ligands

Listening to mutant mice: a spotlight on the role of CRF/CRF receptor systems in affective disorders

Genetically engineered mice were originally generated to delineate the role of a specific gene product in behavioral or neuroendocrine phenotypes, rather than to produce classic animal models of depression. To learn more about the neurobiological mechanisms underlying a clinical condition such as depression, it has proven worthwhile to investigate changes in behaviors characteristic of depressed humans, such as anxiety, regardless of whether or not these alterations may also occur in other disorders besides depression. The majority of patients with mood and anxiety disorders have measurable shifts in their stress hormone regulation as reflected by elevated secretion of central and peripheral stress hormones or by altered hormonal responses to neuroendocrine challenge tests. In recent years, these alterations have been increasingly translated into testable hypotheses addressing the pathogenesis of illness. Refined molecular technologies and the creation of genetically engineered mice have allowed to specifically target individual genes involved in regulation of corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) system elements (e.g. CRF and CRF-related peptides, their receptors, binding protein). Studies performed in such mice have complemented and extended our knowledge. The cumulative evidence makes a strong case implicating dysfunction of these systems in the pathogenesis of depression and leads us beyond the monoaminergic synapse in search of eagerly anticipated strategies to discover and develop better therapies for depression.

Characterization of the human corticotropin-releasing factor2(a) receptor promoter: regulation by glucocorticoids and the cyclic adenosine 5'-monophosphate pathway

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) is a neurotransmitter and hormone believed to integrate responses to stress. Evidence suggests central CRF systems are overactive in some individuals suffering from depression and anxiety disorders. CRF receptor antagonism blocks stress-induced endocrine, autonomic, and behavioral effects in animal models, and studies have implicated the CRF2 receptor in anxiety-related behaviors. Greater understanding of the regulation of CRF2 expression may facilitate understanding mechanisms underlying anxiety. The present studies are the first to characterize the transcriptional regulation of the human CRF2(a), the predominant CRF2 isoform in brain. Four kilobase pairs of sequence immediately upstream of the first exon of CRF2(a) represented our full-length promoter region. Sequentially smaller fragments of the CRF2(a) promoter region were generated by PCR and cloned upstream of a luciferase reporter gene. Expression was monitored from these constructs within Chinese hamster ovary-K1 cells and within rat aortic A7R5 cells that express CRF2. Glucocorticoid treatment decreased expression and elevating intracellular cAMP increased expression from the human CRF2(a) promoter. The regions of the CRF2(a) promoter that regulate the inducible expression were determined, and the functional cAMP response element and glucocorticoid response element cis-regulatory elements within these regions were identified using a combination of site-directed mutagenesis and EMSAs. Given the possibility of species-specific differences in gene expression, interpretation of gene expression studies from rat and mouse model systems is difficult. Examination of expression from the human CRF2(a) promoter will provide insight into these model systems and may translate more readily to the development of therapeutics to treat human psychiatric illness.

Clinical endocrinology and metabolism. Receptors for gut peptides

Most gut peptides exert their effects through G protein-coupled receptors, a family of about 700 membrane proteins, 87 of which are presently known to have peptide ligands. Three additional gut peptide receptors are not G protein-coupled receptors but regulate intracellular cyclic GMP accumulation. The aim of this review is to illustrate how the sequencing of the human genome and other recent advances in genomics has contributed to our understanding of the role of peptides and their receptors in gastrointestinal function. Recent discoveries include the identification of receptors for the peptides motilin and neuromedin U, and new physiological ligands for the PTH2 receptor, the CRF(2) receptor and the growth hormone secretagogue receptor. Knockout mice lacking specific peptide receptors or their ligands provide informative animal models in which to determine the functions of the numerous peptide-receptor systems in the gut and to predict which of them may be the most fruitful for drug development. Some peptide-receptor signalling systems may be more important in disease states than they are in normal physiology. For example, substance P, galanin, bradykinin and opioids play important roles in visceral pain and inflammation. Other peptides may have developmental roles: for example, disruption of endothelin-3 signalling prevents the normal development of the enteric nervous system and contributes to the pathogenesis of Hirschsprung disease.

Cell-type specific calcium signaling by corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 (CRF1) and 2a (CRF2(a)) receptors: phospholipase C-mediated responses in human embryonic kidney 293 but not SK-N-MC neuroblastoma cells

The human corticotropin-releasing factor (hCRF) receptors CRF1 and CRF2(a) couple to the Gs protein. It has been postulated that CRF receptors may also signal through phospholipase C (PLC). To test this hypothesis, binding and signaling properties were determined for both receptor subtypes stably expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) and human SK-N-MC neuroblastoma cells. CRF receptors were highly expressed and strongly coupled to Gs in HEK293 and SK-N-MC cells. However, when the calcium mobilization pathway was investigated, marked differences were observed. In SK-N-MC cells, neither CRF receptor stimulated calcium mobilization in the fluorometric imaging plate reader (FLIPR) assay, whereas activation of orexin type 1 and 2 receptors stably expressed in SK-N-MC cells revealed robust calcium responses. In contrast, intracellular calcium was strongly mobilized by agonist stimulation of hCRF1 and hCRF2(a) receptors in HEK293 cells. In HEK293 cells, potency rank orders for calcium and cAMP responses were identical for both receptors, despite a rightward shift of the dose-response curves. Complete inhibition of calcium signaling of both hCRF1 and hCRF2(a) receptors was observed in the presence of the PLC inhibitor U-73,122 whereas ryanodine, an inhibitor of calcium release channels and the protein kinase A inhibitor Rp-cAMPS were ineffective. Finally, CRF agonists produced a small but significant stimulation of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) accumulation in hCRF1-and hCRF2(a)-transfected HEK293 cells. These data clearly show that phospholipase C-mediated signaling of CRF receptors is dependent upon the cellular background and that in HEK293 cells human CRF receptors robustly respond in the FLIPR format.

Modulation of dendritic differentiation by corticotropin-releasing factor in the developing hippocampus

The interplay of environmental and genetic factors in the developmental organization of the hippocampus has not been fully elucidated. The neuropeptide corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) is released from hippocampal interneurons by environmental signals, including stress, to increase synaptic efficacy. In the early postnatal hippocampus, we have previously characterized a transient population of CRF-expressing Cajal-Retzius-like cells. Here we queried whether this stress-activated neuromodulator influences connectivity in the developing hippocampal network. Using mice deficient in the principal hippocampal CRF receptor [CRF(1)(-/-)] and organotypic cultures grown in the presence of synthetic CRF, or CRF receptor antagonists, we found robust effects of CRF on dendritic differentiation in hippocampal neurons. In CRF(1)(-/-) mice, the dendritic trees of hippocampal principal cells were exuberant, an effect that was induced in normal hippocampi in vitro by the presence of CRF(1) antagonists. In both cases, total dendritic length and dendritic branching were significantly increased. In contrast, exogenous synthetic CRF blunted the dendritic growth in hippocampal organotypic cultures. Taken together, these findings suggest that endogenous CRF, if released excessively by previous early postnatal stress, might influence neuronal connectivity and thus function of the immature hippocampus.

Anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like profile of a new CRF1 receptor antagonist, R278995/CRA0450

1-[8-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-methylquinolin-4-yl]-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-4-carboxamide benzenesulfonate (R278995/CRA0450) is a newly synthesized corticotropin-releasing factor subtype 1 (CRF(1)) receptor antagonist. In the present study, in vitro and in vivo pharmacological profiles of R278995/CRA0450 were investigated. R278995/CRA0450 showed high affinity for recombinant and native CRF(1) receptors without having affinity for the CRF(2) receptor. R278995/CRA0450 attenuated CRF-induced cyclic AMP formation in AtT-20 cells and CRF-induced forepaw treading in gerbils, indicating that R278995/CRA0450 is an antagonist of the CRF(1) receptor. In addition to CRF(1) receptor antagonism, R278995/CRA0450 showed high affinity for the sigma(1) receptor, and attenuated (+)-SKF10,047-induced head-weaving behavior, suggesting sigma(1) receptor antagonism. R278995/CRA0450 showed dose-dependent in vivo occupancy when assessed by ex vivo receptor binding, indicating good brain penetration. R278995/CRA0450 did not alter spontaneous anxiety when tested in the rat elevated plus maze (up to 3 mg/kg, p.o.) or lick suppression test (up to 10 mg/kg, i.p.). However, potent anxiolytic-like properties were observed in rats subjected to swim stress prior to testing on the elevated plus-maze, indicating activity primarily in tests taxing stress-induced anxiety. R278995/CRA0450 was inactive in mouse tail suspension, rat forced swim and rat differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate 72-s (DRL72), while it showed dose-dependent antidepressant-like effects in the rat learned helplessness paradigm and the olfactory bulbectomy model, demonstrating activity in a subset of animal models of depression associated with subchronic stress exposure. No or only mild effects were seen in tests of locomotor activity, motor coordination and sedation. These results indicate that R278995/CRA0450 is an orally active CRF(1) and sigma(1) receptor antagonist with potent anxiolytic-like and antidepressant-like activities.

Physiological roles of urocortins, human homologues of fish urotensin I, and their receptors

Urocortin 1, a human homologue of fish urotensin I, together with its related-compounds (urocortins 2 and 3), comprises a distinct family of stress peptides. Urocortin 1 has a high affinity for both corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) type 1 receptor (CRF1) and CRF type 2 receptor (CRF2), and urocortins 2 and 3 have a high affinity for CRF2, while CRF has a low affinity for CRF2 and a high affinity for CRF1. These differences of the binding affinity with receptors make the biological actions of these peptides. Besides the binding affinity with receptors, the limited overlap of the distribution of CRF and urocortins may also contribute to the differences of physiological roles of each peptide. Urocortins show 'stress-coping' responses such as anxiolysis and dearousal in the brain. In the periphery, recent studies show the potent effects of urocortins on the cardiovascular and immune systems. In this review article, we take a look over the series of peptides included in this family, especially in terms of the versatility of biological actions, along with the various characters of the receptors.

Urocortins and the regulation of gastrointestinal motor function and visceral pain

Urocortin (Ucn) 1, 2 and 3 are corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)-related peptides recently characterized in mammals. Urocortin 1 binds with high affinity to CRF type 1 (CRF1) and type 2 (CRF2) receptors while Ucn 2 and Ucn 3 are selective CRF2 ligands. They also have a distinct pattern of distribution, both in the brain and the gastrointestinal tract, compatible with a role mediating, with CRF, the response to stress. In rats and mice, Ucn 1 injected centrally or peripherally inhibited gastric emptying and stimulated colonic propulsive motor function, mimicking the effects of stress or exogenous CRF. Centrally administered Ucn 2 inhibited gastric emptying with similar potency as CRF, while Ucn 1 and Ucn 3 were less potent. However, after peripheral administration, Ucn 1 and Ucn 2 were more potent than CRF. In mice, centrally administered Ucn 1 and 2 stimulated colonic motility with lower potency than CRF, and Ucn 3 was inactive. Studies with selective CRF1 and CRF2 antagonists demonstrated that the gastric-inhibitory and colonic-stimulatory effects of exogenously administered Ucns are mediated through CRF2 and CRF1 receptors, respectively. In addition, Ucn 2 showed visceral anti-nociceptive activity associated with the selective activation of CRF2 receptors. These observations suggest that, acting centrally and peripherally, Ucns might play a significant role in the modulation of gastrointestinal motor and pain responses during stress and stress-related pathophysiological conditions.

CRF2 receptors are highly expressed in the human cardiovascular system and their cognate ligands urocortins 2 and 3 are potent vasodilators

1. Systemic infusions of urocortin 1 produce a decrease in mean arterial pressure. This effect may be mediated by a direct action on novel corticotropin-releasing factor type 2 (CRF(2)) receptors predicted to be expressed in blood vessels and the heart. Our objectives were to determine the presence of CRF(2) receptors in the human cardiovascular system using the selective radioligand [(125)I]antisauvagine 30. We also investigated the potential functional roles of novel CRF(2) ligands in the regulation of vascular tone in human arteries in vitro. 2. Radioligand binding techniques were used to characterise the CRF(2) receptor. [(125)I]antisauvagine 30 bound specifically, saturably, reversibly and with high affinity to CRF(2) receptors in human left ventricle (K(D) 0.21+/-0.03 nm, B(MAX) 0.80+/-0.18 fmol mg(-1) protein), and no change in receptor density or affinity was observed in the dilated cardiomyopathy group. 3. Autoradiographical studies revealed highly localised binding of [(125)I]antisauvagine 30 to intramyocardial blood vessels. Binding sites were also detected in the myocardium and in the medial layer of internal mammary arteries. 4. In endothelium-denuded human internal mammary artery in vitro, all peptides tested produced a potent and sustained vasodilator response reversing endothelin-1-induced constrictions (10 nm) (urocortin 1: pD(2) 8.39+/-0.32, E(MAX) 46+/-7.7%; urocortin 2: pD(2) 8.27+/-0.17, E(MAX) 60+/-8.5%; urocortin 3: pD(2) 8.61+/-0.25, E(MAX) 61+/-7.2%; CRF: pD(2) 8.28+/-0.27, E(MAX): 40+/-10%). 5. We have demonstrated the presence of CRF(2) receptors in the human cardiovascular system and a direct, endothelium-independent vasodilator action of urocortins 2 and 3, which may counter-balance the centrally mediated pressor effects of CRF and urocortin 1.

Regional hemodynamic actions of selective corticotropin-releasing factor type 2 receptor ligands in conscious rats

In conscious male Sprague-Dawley rats, we compared regional hemodynamic actions of the selective corticotropin-releasing factor type 2 (CRF(2)) receptor ligands human and mouse urocortin 2 (hUCN2 and mUCN2, respectively) with those of CRF. Bolus i.v. doses of 3 and 30 pmol kg(-1) hUCN2, mUCN2, or CRF had no significant hemodynamic actions, but at doses of 300 and 3000 pmol kg(-1), all three peptides caused dose-dependent tachycardia and hypotension, with rapid-onset, short-duration, mesenteric vasodilatation and slower-onset, more prolonged hindquarters vasodilatation but little or no change in renal vascular conductance. Pretreatment with the nonselective CRF receptor antagonist astressin or the selective CRF(2) receptor antagonist antisauvagine 30 abolished all the cardiovascular actions of all three peptides. Indomethacin had no effect on responses to hUCN2, and there was no evidence for any involvement of nitric oxide (NO) in the vasodilator actions of hUCN2. There was no evidence that recruitment of angiotensin- and endothelin-mediated vasoconstrictor mechanisms counteracted the vascular actions of hUCN2. The results indicate that the hemodynamic effects of i.v. hUCN2, mUCN2, and CRF depend on activation of CRF(2) receptors and do not involve NO or prostanoids.

Corticotropin-releasing factor and Urocortin I modulate excitatory glutamatergic synaptic transmission

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)-related peptides serve as hormones and neuromodulators of the stress response and play a role in affective disorders. These peptides are known to alter complex behaviors and neuronal properties, but their receptor-mediated effects at CNS synapses are not well described. Here we show that excitatory glutamatergic transmission is modulated by two endogenous CRF-related peptide ligands, corticotropin-releasing factor [CRF rat/human (r/h)] and Urocortin I (Ucn I), within the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) and the lateral septum mediolateral nucleus (LSMLN). These limbic nuclei are reciprocally innervated, are involved in stress and affective disorders, and have high densities of the CRF receptors CRF1 and CRF2. Activation of these receptors exerts diametrically opposed actions on glutamatergic transmission in these nuclei. In the CeA, CRF(r/h) depressed excitatory glutamatergic transmission through a CRF1-mediated postsynaptic action, whereas Ucn I facilitated synaptic responses through presynaptic and postsynaptic CRF2-mediated mechanisms. Conversely, in the LSMLN, CRF caused a CRF1-mediated facilitation of glutamatergic transmission via postsynaptic mechanisms, whereas Ucn I depressed EPSCs by postsynaptic and presynaptic CRF2-mediated actions. Furthermore, antagonists of these receptors also affected glutamatergic neurotransmission, indicating that endogenous ligands tonically modulated synoptic activity at these synapses. These data show that CRF receptors in CeA and LSMLN synapses exert and maintain a significant synaptic tone and thereby regulate excitatory glutamatergic transmission. The results also suggest that CRF receptors may provide novel targets in affective disorders and stress.

CRF1 receptor signaling pathways are involved in stress-related alterations of colonic function and viscerosensitivity: implications for irritable bowel syndrome

1. The characterization of corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) and, more recently, the discovery of additional CRF-related ligands, urocortin 1, urocortin 2 and urocortin 3, the cloning of two distinct CRF receptor subtypes, 1 (CRF(1)) and 2 (CRF(2)), and the development of selective CRF receptor antagonists provided new insight to unravel the mechanisms of stress. Activation of brain CRF(1) receptor signaling pathways is implicated in stress-related endocrine response and the development of anxiety-like behaviors. 2. Compelling evidence in rodents showed also that both central and peripheral injection of CRF and urocortin 1 mimic acute stress-induced colonic response (stimulation of motility, transit, defecation, mucus and watery secretion, increased ionic permeability and occurrence of diarrhea) in rodents. Central CRF enhances colorectal distention-induced visceral pain in rats. Peripheral CRF reduced pain threshold to colonic distention and increased colonic motility in humans. 3. Nonselective CRF(1)/CRF(2) antagonists and selective CRF(1) antagonists inhibit exogenous (central or peripheral) CRF- and acute stress-induced activation of colonic myenteric neurons, stimulation of colonic motor function and visceral hyperalgesia while selective CRF(2) antagonists have no effect. None of the CRF antagonists influence basal or postprandial colonic function in nonstressed animals. 4. These findings implicate CRF(1) receptors in stress-related stimulation of colonic function and hypersensitivity to colorectal distention. Targeting CRF(1)-dependent pathways may have potential benefit against stress or anxiety-/depression-related functional bowel disorders.

Role of peripheral CRF signalling pathways in stress-related alterations of gut motility and mucosal function

Central corticotrophin releasing-factor (CRF) signalling pathways are involved in the endocrine, behavioural and visceral responses to stress. Recent studies indicate that peripheral CRF-related mechanisms also contribute to stress-induced changes in gut motility and intestinal mucosal function. Peripheral injection of CRF or urocortin inhibits gastric emptying and motility through interaction with CRF2 receptors and stimulates colonic transit, motility, Fos expression in myenteric neurones and defecation through activation of CRF1 receptors. With regard to intestinal epithelial cell function, intraperitoneal CRF increases ion secretion and mucosal permeability to macromolecules. The motility and mucosal changes induced by peripheral CRF mimic those induced by acute stress. In addition, CRF receptor antagonists given peripherally prevent acute restraint and water avoidance stress-induced delayed gastric emptying, stimulation of colonic motor function and mucosal permeability. Similarly, early trauma enhanced intestinal mucosal dysfunction to an acute stressor in adult rats and the response is prevented by peripheral injection of CRF antagonist. Chronic psychological stress results in reduced host defence and initiates intestinal inflammation through mast cell-dependent mechanisms. These findings provide convergent evidence that activation of peripheral CRF receptors and mast cells are important mechanisms involved in stress-related alterations of gut physiology.

Monkey corticotropin-releasing factor1 receptor: Complementary DNA cloning and pharmacological characterization

The full-length complementary DNA (cDNA) of monkey corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 (CRF1) receptor was isolated from a rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) amygdala cDNA library. The cloned monkey CRF1 receptor cDNA has 2,374 bp with an open reading frame encoding a 415-amino acid protein. The sequence of the monkey CRF1 receptor cDNA showed a high degree of sequence identity with other species of CRF1 receptors, and being 99.5% identical to human CRF1 receptors. When monkey CRF1 was expressed into COS-7 cells, high specific binding of [125I]-ovine CRF was observed. CRF and CRF-related peptides inhibited [125I]-ovine CRF binding in a concentration-dependent manner. IC50 values of ovine CRF, human/rat CRF, sauvagine and urotensin I were 23.5 +/- 7.4, 22.7 +/- 10.8, 27.5 +/- 12.3 and 14.2 +/- 7.0 nM, respectively. CRF1 receptor specific antagonists, such as CP-154,526, SC241 and CRA1000, also inhibited the [125I]-ovine CRF binding, with IC50 values of 3.9 +/- 0.4, 43.5 +/- 8.0 and 19.8 +/- 2.0 nM, respectively. GTP and its nonhydrolyzed analogue, GTPgammaS, reduced [125I]-ovine CRF binding, while ATP had a negligible effect, thereby indicating that the monkey CRF1 receptor belongs to a family of G-protein coupled receptors. CRF and its related peptides increased cyclic AMP formation concentration-dependently in COS-7 cells transiently expressing the monkey CRF1 receptor. Monkey CRF1 was expressed abundantly in the pituitary, cerebral cortex, hippocampus, amygdala and cerebellum. Thus the monkey CRF1 receptor and the human CRF1 receptor have similar molecular and pharmacological characteristics.

Corticotropin releasing hormone receptors: two decades later

Hypothalamic corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) regulates pituitary ACTH secretion and mediates behavioral and autonomic responses to stress, through interaction with type 1 plasma membrane receptors (CRHR1) located in pituitary corticotrophs and the brain. Although the CHRI are essential for ACTH responses to stress, their number in the pituitary gland does not correlate with corticotroph responsiveness, suggesting that activation of a small number of receptors is sufficient for maximum ACTH production. CRH binding and hybridization studies in adrenalectomized, glucocorticoid-treated or stressed rats revealed divergent changes in CRH receptors and CRH1 mRNA in the pituitary, with a reduction in receptor binding but normal or elevated expression of CHR1 mRNA levels. Western blot analysis of CRHR1 protein in pituitary membranes from adrenalectomized rats showed unchanged receptor mRNA levels and increased CRHR1 protein, despite binding down-regulation, suggesting that decreased binding is due to homologous desensitization, rather than reduced receptor synthesis. In contrast, decreased CRH binding following glucocorticoid administration is associated with a reduction in CRHR1 protein, suggesting inhibition of CRH1 mRNA translation. The regulation of CRHR1 translation may involve binding of cytosolic proteins, and a minicistron in the 5'-UTR of the CRHR1 mRNA. It is likely that post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms that permit rapid changes in CRH receptor activity are important for adaptation of corticotroph responsiveness to continuous changes in physiological demands.

Central CRF, urocortins and stress increase colonic transit via CRF1 receptors while activation of CRF2 receptors delays gastric transit in mice

Recently characterized selective agonists and developed antagonists for the corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) receptors are new tools to investigate stress-related functional changes. The influence of mammalian CRF and related peptides injected intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) on gastric and colonic motility, and the CRF receptor subtypes involved and their role in colonic response to stress were studied in conscious mice. The CRF(1)/CRF(2) agonists rat urocortin 1 (rUcn 1) and rat/human CRF (r/h CRF), the preferential CRF(1) agonist ovine CRF (oCRF), and the CRF(2) agonist mouse (m) Ucn 2, injected i.c.v. inhibited gastric emptying and stimulated distal colonic motor function (bead transit and defecation) while oCRF(9-33)OH (devoid of CRF receptor affinity) showed neither effects. mUcn 2 injected peripherally had no colonic effect. The selective CRF(2) antagonist astressin(2)-B (i.c.v.), at a 20 : 1 antagonist: agonist ratio, blocked i.c.v. r/hCRF and rUcn 1 induced inhibition of gastric transit and reduced that of mUcn 2, while the CRF(1) antagonist NBI-35965 had no effect. By contrast, the colonic motor stimulation induced by i.c.v. r/hCRF and rUcn 1 and 1h restraint stress were antagonized only by NBI-35965 while stimulation induced by mUcn 2 was equally blocked by both antagonists. None of the CRF antagonists injected i.c.v. alone influenced gut transit. These data establish in mice that brain CRF(1) receptors mediate the stimulation of colonic transit induced by central CRF, urocortins (1 and 2) and restraint stress, while CRF(2) receptors mediate the inhibitory actions of these peptides on gastric transit.

Reversal of startle gating deficits in transgenic mice overexpressing corticotropin-releasing factor by antipsychotic drugs

Chronically elevated levels of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) in transgenic mice overexpressing CRF in the brain (CRF-OE) appear to be associated with alterations commonly associated with major depressive disorder, as well as with sensorimotor gating deficits commonly associated with schizophrenia. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that antipsychotics may be effective in normalizing prepulse inhibition (PPI) of acoustic startle in CRF-OE mice, which display impaired sensorimotor gating compared to wild-type (WT) mice. The typical antipsychotic haloperidol and atypical antipsychotic risperidone improved PPI in the CRF-OE mice, but were ineffective in WT mice. The atypical antipsychotic clozapine did not influence PPI in CRF-OE mice, but reduced gating in WT mice. This effect of clozapine in the CRF-OE mice may thus be regarded as a relative improvement, consistent with the observed effect of haloperidol and risperidone. As expected, the anxiolytic, nonantipsychotic chlordiazepoxide was devoid of any effect. All four compounds dose-dependently reduced the acoustic startle response irrespective of genotype. These results indicate that antipsychotic drugs are effective in improving startle gating deficits in the CRF-OE mice. Hence, the CRF-OE mouse model may represent an animal model for certain aspects of psychotic depression, and could be a valuable tool for research addressing the impact of chronically elevated levels of CRF on information processing.

Nibbling at CRF receptor control of feeding and gastrocolonic motility

Inadequate pharmacological tools, until recently, hindered the understanding of the roles of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor subtypes in appetite regulation and gastrocolonic motor function. Now, novel ligands that are selective for CRF(1) or CRF(2) receptors are helping to uncover the specific functions of CRF receptor subtypes. Central or peripheral CRF(2) receptor activation suppresses feeding independently of CRF(1) receptors. In the rat, central administration of CRF(2) receptor agonists promotes satiation without eliciting the malaise, behavioral arousal or anxiogenesis associated with CRF(1) receptor agonists. Conversely, central administration of CRF(1) receptor agonists elicits short-onset anorexia independently of CRF(2) receptor activation. With respect to gastrointestinal motor function, stress inhibits gastric motility through CRF(2) receptor-dependent central autonomic and peripheral myenteric systems. By contrast, stress stimulates colonic motility via CRF(1) receptor-dependent sacral parasympathetic and colonic myenteric mechanisms. These findings have important physiological implications and suggest targeted approaches for the pharmacotherapy of obesity and stress-related functional gastrointestinal and eating disorders.

The neurobiology and control of anxious states

Fear is an adaptive component of the acute "stress" response to potentially-dangerous (external and internal) stimuli which threaten to perturb homeostasis. However, when disproportional in intensity, chronic and/or irreversible, or not associated with any genuine risk, it may be symptomatic of a debilitating anxious state: for example, social phobia, panic attacks or generalized anxiety disorder. In view of the importance of guaranteeing an appropriate emotional response to aversive events, it is not surprising that a diversity of mechanisms are involved in the induction and inhibition of anxious states. Apart from conventional neurotransmitters, such as monoamines, gamma-amino-butyric acid (GABA) and glutamate, many other modulators have been implicated, including: adenosine, cannabinoids, numerous neuropeptides, hormones, neurotrophins, cytokines and several cellular mediators. Accordingly, though benzodiazepines (which reinforce transmission at GABA(A) receptors), serotonin (5-HT)(1A) receptor agonists and 5-HT reuptake inhibitors are currently the principle drugs employed in the management of anxiety disorders, there is considerable scope for the development of alternative therapies. In addition to cellular, anatomical and neurochemical strategies, behavioral models are indispensable for the characterization of anxious states and their modulation. Amongst diverse paradigms, conflict procedures--in which subjects experience opposing impulses of desire and fear--are of especial conceptual and therapeutic pertinence. For example, in the Vogel Conflict Test (VCT), the ability of drugs to release punishment-suppressed drinking behavior is evaluated. In reviewing the neurobiology of anxious states, the present article focuses in particular upon: the multifarious and complex roles of individual modulators, often as a function of the specific receptor type and neuronal substrate involved in their actions; novel targets for the management of anxiety disorders; the influence of neurotransmitters and other agents upon performance in the VCT; data acquired from complementary pharmacological and genetic strategies and, finally, several open questions likely to orientate future experimental- and clinical-research. In view of the recent proliferation of mechanisms implicated in the pathogenesis, modulation and, potentially, treatment of anxiety disorders, this is an opportune moment to survey their functional and pathophysiological significance, and to assess their influence upon performance in the VCT and other models of potential anxiolytic properties.