Randomized trial of denosumab in patients receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors for nonmetastatic breast cancer

Advances in management of bone disease in breast cancer

Breast cancer is the commonest malignancy diagnosed in women. Although there have been huge advances in treatment in recent years leading to excellent outlooks for many women, a significant number of patients are developing bone complications. This is often due to metastatic bone disease, which occurs in approximately 70% of women with advanced breast cancer. Additionally, accelerated bone loss and associated complications such as fractures may be a consequence of adjuvant treatment. Whatever the cause, cancer-induced bone disease can have potentially devastating clinical consequences for the patient, and results in a considerable economic burden to the health care provider. This review addresses the causes and sequelae of bone disease in both early and advanced breast cancer. The evidence for preserving bone health, both with traditional treatments such as bisphosphonates and newer agents, including antibody therapy is reviewed, with recommendations for current practice. Finally, we discuss the emerging potential role of bone-targeting therapies in preventing the development of metastatic disease.

RANKL-Targeted Therapies: The Next Frontier in the Treatment of Male Osteoporosis

Male osteoporosis is an increasingly recognized problem in aging men. A common cause of male osteoporosis is hypogonadism. Thousands of men with prostate cancer are treated with androgen deprivation therapy, a treatment that dramatically reduces serum testosterone and causes severe hypogonadism. Men treated with androgen deprivation therapy experience a decline in bone mineral density and have an increased rate of fracture. This paper describes prostate cancer survivors as a model of hypogonadal osteoporosis and discusses the use of RANKL-targeted therapies in osteoporosis. Denosumab, the only RANKL-targeted therapy currently available, increases bone mineral density and decreases fracture rate in men with prostate cancer. Denosumab is also associated with delayed time to first skeletal-related event and an increase in bone metastasis-free survival in these men. It is reasonable to investigate the use of RANKL-targeted therapy in male osteoporosis in the general population.

Understanding and optimizing bone health in breast cancer

Bone is the preferred site of metastasis for breast cancer, and presence of skeletal lesions is associated with significant morbidity and poor prognosis. Skeletal-related effects such as pain, pathologic fractures, spinal compression, and hypercalcemia are frequent consequences of skeletal lesions of breast cancer that have debilitating effects on the patients' quality of life. In addition to direct cancer effects on the skeleton, therapies commonly used to treat patients with breast cancer such as chemotherapy and aromatase inhibitors (AI) result in cancer therapy-induced bone loss (CTIBL) which is associated with increased risk of skeletal complications such as fractures. Bisphosphonates are a class of antiresorptive drugs that are now firmly established as the cornerstone of the management of skeletal-related events due to breast cancer. Other novel bone-targeting agents such as the anti-receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) monoclonal antibody denosumab are also showing promising activity in the treatment of bone metastasis secondary to breast cancer. Moreover, recent provocative evidence suggests that bisphosphonates might also exhibit antitumor activity via direct and indirect mechanisms. The goal of this review is to summarize the pathophysiology of osteolytic bone lesions secondary to breast cancer, provide clinical evidence of currently available bone-targeted drugs in the treatment of bone metastasis and CTIBL, and explore the antitumor activity of current bone-targeted agents in patients with breast cancer.

Randomized trial of adjuvant zoledronic acid in postmenopausal women with high-risk breast cancer

PURPOSE

We present the results of a randomized multicenter clinical trial of adjuvant zoledronic acid (ZA) in postmenopausal women with high-risk breast cancer. The primary objective was change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and femoral neck at 1 year. Secondary objectives included change in calcaneal BMD, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Postmenopausal women with stage II/III breast cancer diagnosed up to 5 years previous were eligible and randomized to either observation or ZA 4 mg intravenous every 3 months. Bone mineral density testing was performed at 0, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight women were enrolled (36 ZA and 32 observation). The population was a median of 2 years from diagnosis and the majority received tamoxifen during the study. There was a significant difference in the mean change from baseline to 1 year follow-up for lumbar spine (increased by 4.28% ± 0.62%; P = .01), total femur (increased by 1.9% ± 0.4%; P = .03), trochanter (increased by 2.97% ± 0.69%; P = .03), and calcaneal BMD (increased by 2% ± 0.57%; P = .01) in favor of the ZA arm. No significant difference in the mean change for the femoral neck was seen. No significant differences in DFS or OS were observed.

CONCLUSION

Zoledronic acid significantly improved the BMD at multiple skeletal sites in postmenopausal women largely on tamoxifen. No new safety signals were noted. There were insufficient events to comment on DFS or OS.

Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind study

PURPOSE

This randomized study compared denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor κ B (RANK) ligand, with zoledronic acid in delaying or preventing skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with breast cancer with bone metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive either subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg and intravenous placebo (n = 1,026) or intravenous zoledronic acid 4 mg adjusted for creatinine clearance and subcutaneous placebo (n = 1,020) every 4 weeks. All patients were strongly recommended to take daily calcium and vitamin D supplements. The primary end point was time to first on-study SRE (defined as pathologic fracture, radiation or surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression).

RESULTS

Denosumab was superior to zoledronic acid in delaying time to first on-study SRE (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.95; P = .01 superiority) and time to first and subsequent (multiple) on-study SREs (rate ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.89; P = .001). Reduction in bone turnover markers was greater with denosumab. Overall survival, disease progression, and rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were similar between groups. An excess of renal AEs and acute-phase reactions occurred with zoledronic acid; hypocalcemia occurred more frequently with denosumab. Osteonecrosis of the jaw occurred infrequently (2.0%, denosumab; 1.4%, zoledronic acid; P = .39).

CONCLUSION

Denosumab was superior to zoledronic acid in delaying or preventing SREs in patients with breast cancer metastatic to bone and was generally well tolerated. With the convenience of a subcutaneous injection and no requirement for renal monitoring, denosumab represents a potential treatment option for patients with bone metastases.

Optimizing clinical benefits of bisphosphonates in cancer patients with bone metastases

Malignant bone disease is common in patients with advanced solid tumors or multiple myeloma. Bisphosphonates have been found to be important treatments for bone metastases. A positive benefit-risk ratio for bisphosphonates has been established, and ongoing clinical trials will determine whether individualized therapy is possible.

Bisphosphonates are important treatments for bone metastases. Considerations for optimizing the clinical benefits of bisphosphonates include efficacy, compliance, and safety. Several bisphosphonates are approved for clinical use; however, few have demonstrated broad efficacy in the oncology setting and been compared directly in clinical trials. Among patients with bone metastases from breast cancer, the efficacy of approved bisphosphonates was evaluated in a Cochrane review, showing a reduction in the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs) ranging from 8% to 41% compared with placebo. Between-trial comparisons are confounded by inconsistencies in trial design, SRE definition, and endpoint selection. Zoledronic acid has demonstrated clinical benefits beyond those of pamidronate in a head-to-head trial that included patients with breast cancer or multiple myeloma. Compliance and adherence also have effects on treatment efficacy. In a comparison study, the adherence rates with oral bisphosphonates were found to be significantly lower compared with those of intravenous bisphosphonates. The safety profiles of oral and intravenous bisphosphonates differ. Oral bisphosphonates are associated with gastrointestinal side effects, whereas intravenous bisphosphonates have dose- and infusion rate–dependent effects on renal function. Osteonecrosis of the jaw is an uncommon but serious event in patients receiving monthly intravenous bisphosphonates or denosumab. The incidence of this event can be reduced with careful oral hygiene. A positive benefit-risk ratio for bisphosphonates has been established, and ongoing clinical trials will determine whether individualized therapy is possible.

Have we overestimated the benefit of human(ized) antibodies?

The infusion of animal-derived antibodies has been known for some time to trigger the generation of antibodies directed at the foreign protein as well as adverse events including cytokine release syndrome. These immunological phenomena drove the development of humanized and fully human monoclonal antibodies. The ability to generate human(ized) antibodies has been both a blessing and a curse. While incremental gains in the clinical efficacy and safety for some agents have been realized, a positive effect has not been observed for all human(ized) antibodies. Many human(ized) antibodies trigger the development of anti-drug antibody responses and infusion reactions. The current belief that antibodies need to be human(ized) to have enhanced therapeutic utility may slow the development of novel animal-derived monoclonal antibody therapeutics for use in clinical indications. In the case of murine antibodies, greater than 20% induce tolerable/negligible immunogenicity, suggesting that in these cases humanization may not offer significant gains in therapeutic utility. Furthermore, humanization of some murine antibodies may reduce their clinical effectiveness. The available data suggest that the utility of human(ized) antibodies needs to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, taking a cost-benefit approach, taking both biochemical characteristics and the targeted therapeutic indication into account.

Adjuvant Bisphosphonate Therapy in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients

Adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy is increasingly used in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. This is based on level-one evidence that bisphosphonates, particularly zoledronic acid, can effectively prevent cancer treatment-induced bone loss in breast cancer patients receiving estradiol-lowering endocrine therapies such as aromatase inhibitors. Furthermore, emerging data from large clinical trials suggest that additional anticancer benefits can be derived due to a positive impact on the bone marrow microenvironment.

Osteoporosis: New-Generation Drugs

A new understanding in the pathophysiology of bone led to the development of a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against RANK ligand (RANKL). Denosumab inhibits the interaction of RANKL with its receptor RANK, thereby suppressing osteoclast differentiation, function and survival. In this respect, denosumab mimics osteoprotegerin, the endogenous antagonist of RANKL. Recently, denosumab has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) and treatment-induced bone loss in breast and prostate cancer patients undergoing hormone ablation. Oncologic indications affecting bone are promising, but still under clinical evaluation. In clinical trials for PMO, denosumab has shown significant increases in bone mineral density (BMD) at various skeletal sites, decreases in bone turnover markers, and reductions in fracture risk. In head-tohead studies, denosumab proved to be superior to alendronate with regard to the increase in BMD. Considering clinical trial data, the risk-benefit profile of denosumab seems to be favorable since the rates of adverse events, serious adverse events, infections, malignancies and deaths were not higher compared to the control arms. In PMO, denosumab is applied subcutaneously as a 60-mg dose twice yearly. This administration scheme and route might have a high acceptance by patients and physicians.

Breast Cancer: Rank Ligand Inhibition

Breast cancer and bone health are closely linked. Early menopause induced by gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues or chemotherapy as well as aromatase inhibitors reduce oestrogen levels, thereby causing cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL). Furthermore, bone metastases are commonly found in advanced disease. Current treatment options for bone lesions comprise systemic anti-tumour therapy, irradiation, surgery and bisphosphonates. The main mechanism of osteolysis, osteoclast activation, is induced by the RANK ligand and suppressed by osteoprotegerin (OPG). A human antibody targeting the RANK ligand, denosumab, had superior activity compared to OPG and was therefore further developed in the clinical setting. This article reviews clinical data on denosumab. Data were obtained by searching the Medline database and abstracts from the ASCO annual meeting, ASCO breast meeting, ECCO, ESMO, and the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. Clinical trials have demonstrated that denosumab reduces markers of bone turnover, and suggest equal efficacy to bisphosphonates in reducing the rate of skeletal-related events. While overall fewer side effects were observed, a numerically increased rate of osteonecrosis of the jaw was reported. Denosumab was well tolerated, and clinical activity was similar to bisphosphonates in metastatic disease. Trials of denosumab in the prevention of CTIBL are ongoing.

Drug-induced osteoporosis: mechanisms and clinical implications

Drug-induced osteoporosis is common and has a significant impact on the prognosis of patients suffering from chronic debilitating diseases. Glucocorticoids are the drugs causing osteoporotic fractures most frequently, but osteoporosis with fractures is observed also in women treated with aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer, in men receiving anti-androgen therapy for prostate cancer, in postmenopausal women treated with high doses of thyroxine, and in men and women treated with thiazolinediones for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Bone loss with fractures also occurs in patients treated with drugs targeting the immune system, such as calcineurin inhibitors, antiretroviral drugs, selective inhibitors of serotonin reuptake, anticonvulsants, loop diuretics, heparin, oral anticoagulants, and proton pump inhibitors.

Bone health in nonmetastatic prostate cancer: what's the big deal?

Since 2000, the medical community has become increasingly aware of bone health in men with prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-mainly because of new therapies that have been shown to reduce bone loss and associated fractures in this patient population. The threat of bone complications has become even more concerning in the prostate-specific antigen era, because ADT is initiated earlier (with biochemical recurrence after local treatment) and maintained longer before the appearance of metastatic disease. The present review examines the relevance of bone health in nonmetastatic prostate cancer, with a discussion of the new treatment modalities available.

Denosumab

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive 5 to 6 well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are targeted to Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committees. Subscribers also receive monthly 1-page summary monographs on agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing inservices. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation/medication use evaluation (DUE/MUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are sent in print and are also available online. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of a facility. Subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service also receive access to a pharmacy bulletin board, The Formulary Information Exchange (The F.I.X.). All topics pertinent to clinical and hospital pharmacy are discussed on The F.I.X.

Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. For more information about The Formulary Monograph Service or The F.I.X., call The Formulary at 800-322-4349. The October 2010 monograph topics are on dapagliflozin, glyco-pyrrolate oral solution, alcaftadine 0.25% ophthalmic solution, fidaxomicin, and cladribine tablets. The DUE/MUE is on memantine.

Safety considerations for use of bone-targeted agents in patients with cancer

Bisphosphonates were the first bone-directed therapies used to treat skeletal complications resulting from malignant bone disease. Reducing the incidence of skeletal complications has significantly improved patient quality of life. Intravenous bisphosphonates also have been evaluated as an adjunct treatment to minimize bone loss from cancer therapy. In these settings, there is a suggested improvement in cancer-associated outcomes, in addition to their bone-protective benefits. Denosumab is a fully human antibody to the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand. Recently reported data suggest that denosumab is efficacious in decreasing skeletal-related events, but the long-term safety of denosumab remains to be determined. The available data for the approved intravenous bisphosphonates, including zoledronic acid, as well as for other investigational bone-directed therapies is reviewed, with a focus on the incidence and management of treatment-associated side effects.

Future directions of bone-targeted therapy for metastatic breast cancer

Bone is the most common metastatic site for breast cancer, and bone metastases can cause pain as well as risk of pathological fractures. Emerging treatments for metastatic bone disease have arisen from advances in our understanding of the unique cellular and molecular mechanisms that contribute to bone metastasis. The interaction between tumor cells and the bone microenvironment results in a 'vicious cycle' that increases both bone destruction and tumor burden. The tumor secretes factors, such as parathyroid hormone-related peptide, that stimulate osteoclastogenesis. Similarly, the bone stroma produces growth factors, such as transforming growth factor β, that promote tumor growth in bone. Therapeutic targeting of these microenvironmental factors is under intensive investigation. Other attractive therapeutic targets include signaling molecules, such as receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand, Src kinase, and cathepsin K, all of which regulate osteoclast function, and chemokine receptor 4, which is involved in the homing of tumor cells to bone. In this Review, we describe the progress and future directions of novel bone-targeted therapies that may reduce or prevent destructive bone metastasis from breast cancer. Novel modalities for predicting and monitoring treatment response will also be described.

Emerging drugs for the management of cancer treatment induced bone loss

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

We focus our attention on data on the efficacy of currently available and emerging drugs for the management of cancer treatment induced bone loss (CTIBL) found in a PubMed research from 1997 till today.

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

One of the most common and severe safety issues of the antihormonal therapy in both sexes is the CTIBL and the related fragility fractures. In postmenopausal women with estrogenic receptor positive breast cancer, the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are the standard therapy. Observational retrospective studies have found that AIs treated patients had a high rate of bone loss and fracture risk (RR 1.3). Also in men with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy, the increase in bone turnover and the consequent bone loss are very rapid and sustained significantly increasing the fracture risk.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The aim of our review is to provide the current evidences for the management of bone loss and fracture risk in this subpopulation.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

The very high rate of bone loss and the high incidence of fractures indicate that cancer patients at risk of CTIBL need to be carefully monitored and stratified for fracture risk. Although there is a strong evidence of efficacy in prevention of bone loss and reduction of fracture risk for many drugs approved for postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) and male osteoporosis, for CTIBL there are actually no drugs approved for this indication.

Challenges in clinical patient management

The use of endocrine therapy in breast cancer represents one of the earliest molecular targeting strategies used in cancer treatment. Tamoxifen, a selective estrogen-receptor (ER) modulator, has been the standard of care for women with receptor-positive breast cancer for the last 30 years. Tamoxifen suppresses the estrogen-dependent growth of breast cancer cells by specifically targeting the ER. Because of estrogenic effects, tamoxifen does not increase the risk of osteoporosis, but it can lead to endometrial cancer and thromboembolism. The third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) exert their tumor antiproliferative action by targeting an enzyme critical for estrogen biosynthesis. The AIs thus have a different mechanism of action than tamoxifen, and a different safety profile. The majority of adverse events (AEs) related to the AIs are mild to moderate. Most of these AEs are common to menopause and are predictable and manageable. This review looks at AI-associated side effects and current clinical management strategies, with a particular emphasis on managing bone health. Compliance with long-term therapy, strategies to improve adherence, and considerations in elderly patients with hormone-responsive breast cancer are also discussed.

An antibody against RANKL for the treatment of osteoporosis, inflammatory and malignant bone diseases

Over the years, the importance of receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL) in bone physiology and pathophysiology has been thoroughly documented. Denosumab, also known as AMG 162, is a fully human monoclonal antibody against RANKL which is being studied in the treatment of metabolic, inflammatory, and malignant bone diseases. The purpose of this review is to analyze the potential role of denosumab in osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, bone metastases and multiple myeloma.

Current, new and future treatments of osteoporosis

Osteoporosis as a common chronic disease is challenging human health. Although different therapeutic options are routinely used for prevention/treatment of osteoporosis, their side effects and benefits are under question. Increasing our knowledge about signaling pathways in bone and osteocytes as well as osteoblasts and osteoclasts will help us in designing new therapeutic modalities for osteoporosis. In the present study, all new therapeutic measures of osteoporosis have been reviewed. For this purpose, search engines like Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar were searched and all relevant articles were found. The study was limited to the year 1998-2010. Bisphosphonates are the cornerstone of osteoporosis treatment, but there are not enough relevant studies that investigated their equivalencies in comparison with each other or the other medications. Therefore, medication selection is empirical and subjective. Furthermore, no eminent study has compared certain combinations. There are new hopes for treatment of osteoporosis, which are more specific with less harm. Our results show that new and emerging therapies are more potent and target specified which more individualize osteoporosis treatment; however, more investigations on their safety and efficacy in comparison with current medications are highly recommended.

Targeted therapies in early-stage breast cancer: achievements and promises

One of the most impressive changes in the therapeutic landscape of breast cancer in the past decade has been the advent of targeted therapies for specific subtypes. This article discusses the meaning of targeted therapy and examines the genomic basis for targeted therapy as it has emerged over the past decade. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapy, the principle example of targeted therapy to enter the adjuvant arena in the past decade, is described in depth. Novel targeted therapies under development, many currently being examined in the adjuvant setting, are also explored, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy, poly (ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition for triple-negative breast cancers, and agents targeting site-specific metastasis to the bone (receptor activator of NF-kB [RANK] ligand inhibition). Chemotherapy, the epitome of nonspecific anticancer therapy, is in the process of becoming targeted therapy as understanding of breast cancer biology improves.

Managing cancer treatment-induced bone loss and osteoporosis in patients with breast or prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To discuss trends in breast and prostate cancer prevalence and survival; risk factors for bone loss, osteoporosis, and fractures and the approach to risk assessment in patients with these malignancies; established and investigational drug therapies for managing cancer treatment-induced bone loss and osteoporosis; and the role of health-system pharmacists in promoting bone health in patients with breast or prostate cancer.

SUMMARY

Breast cancer and prostate cancer are common, deadly diseases, but many survivors are alive today because of improvements in early detection and treatment over the past 10-15 years. Cancer chemotherapy, corticosteroids, hormone-ablation therapy, and other common risk factors place patients with breast or prostate cancer at high risk for bone loss, osteoporosis, and fractures. Most patients with breast or prostate cancer should undergo assessment of risk for bone loss and osteoporosis that involves a bone-related history and physical examination, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning, and the FRAX fracture risk assessment tool from the World Health Organization. A recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network task force report on bone health in cancer care provides recommendations for considering the use of pharmacologic therapy on the basis of the results of this assessment. Bisphosphonates are useful for slowing or preventing bone loss associated with hormone-ablation therapy in women with breast cancer and men with prostate cancer, although fracture data are limited in women and not available in men. The usefulness of other therapies (selective estrogen receptor modulators, teriparatide, calcitonin salmon, and estrogens) is limited by adverse effects, a lack of experience with the drugs in these patient populations, or both. Various drug therapies are in development for managing cancer treatment-induced bone loss and osteoporosis. The agent closest to approval by the Food and Drug Administration, denosumab, has been shown to improve bone mineral density in women and men receiving hormone-ablation therapy for breast or prostate cancer, but additional data are needed to dispel safety concerns that could limit the use of this drug in these patient populations. Health-system pharmacists play an important role in screening patients with a history of breast or prostate cancer for bone loss or osteoporosis, making drug therapy recommendations to address the problem, and counseling patients on modifiable risk factors for osteoporosis and proper use of drug therapies to improve bone health.

CONCLUSION

Health-system pharmacists can improve the detection and management of cancer treatment-induced bone loss and osteoporosis in patients receiving systemic therapy for breast or prostate cancer.

Approach to the patient with secondary osteoporosis

Secondary osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass with microarchitectural alterations in bone leading to fragility fractures in the presence of an underlying disease or medication. Scenarios that are highly suspicious for secondary osteoporosis include fragility fractures in younger men or premenopausal women, very low bone mineral density (BMD) values, and fractures despite anti-osteoporotic therapy. An open-minded approach with a detailed history and physical examination combined with first-line laboratory tests are aimed at identifying clinical risk factors for fractures, osteoporosis-inducing drugs, and underlying endocrine, gastrointestinal, hematologic, or rheumatic diseases, which then need to be confirmed by specific and/or more invasive tests. BMD should be assessed with bone densitometry at the hip and spine. Lateral X-rays of the thoracic and lumbar spine should be performed to identify or exclude prevalent vertebral fractures which may be clinically silent. Management of secondary osteoporosis includes treatment of the underlying disease, modification of medications known to affect the skeleton, and specific anti-osteoporotic therapy. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation should be initiated with doses that result in normocalcemia and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations of at least 30 ng/ml. Oral and i.v. bisphosphonates are effective and safe drugs for most forms of secondary osteoporosis. Severe osteoporosis may require the use of teriparatide.

Markers of bone remodeling and skeletal morbidity in patients with solid tumors metastatic to the skeleton receiving the biphosphonate zoledronic acid

The molecular triad, which includes the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), its receptor RANK, and the endogenous soluble RANKL decoy receptor osteoprotegerin (OPG), has emerged as an important determinant of bone metabolism. We aimed to evaluate the effect of treatment with the biphosphonate zoledronic acid (ZA) on biochemical markers of bone remodeling and to detect possible correlations of markerlevel changes with skeletal morbidity and clinical outcomes in patients with solid tumors and osseous metastases. The following serum markers were measured at the onset of skeletal metastases and after 6 months of treatment with ZA (4 mg intravenously monthly) in 70 patients with breast (n = 30), lung (n = 18), or prostate (n = 22) cancer: RANKL, OPG, C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (TRACP-5b), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (bALP), and osteopontin (OPN). Logistic regression models were applied to assess the correlation between marker-level changes and skeletal related events (SRE, primary endpoint), recurrence or progression, and death. Within a median follow-up of 32 months, 34 patients (48.6%) presented with at least 1 SRE and 48 patients (68.6%) relapsed. The RANKL/OPG ratio was upregulated in patients with breast and lung cancer, and it tended to decline after treatment with ZA, whereas prostate cancer patients presented with profound elevation of OPG only that persisted after treatment. CTX levels were significantly reduced after treatment in the whole study population (P = 0.003). None of the markers was able to predict skeletal morbidity or clinical outcomes independently of well-established prognostic clinical parameters.

Denosumab--an emerging treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Osteoporosis is a common skeletal disease that is associated with an imbalance in bone remodeling. Denosumab is an investigational fully human monoclonal antibody to receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL), a cytokine member of the TNF family that is the principal mediator of osteoclastic bone resorption.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

The efficacy and safety of denosumab in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis is evaluated by reviewing the published literature and presentations at scientific meetings through 2009.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

This review focuses on the data on fracture risk reduction and safety endpoints of denosumab in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, denosumab (60 mg by subcutaneous injection every 6 months) increased bone mineral density, reduced bone turnover markers, and reduced the risk of vertebral, hip and non-vertebral fractures. Denosumab was well tolerated with a safety profile generally similar to placebo. It is a promising emerging drug for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Novel targeted therapies for prostate cancer

This article reviews the concepts and rationale behind targeted agents that are currently in clinical testing for patients with castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Advances in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying prostate cancer progression has translated into a variety of treatment approaches. Agents targeting androgen receptor activation and local steroidogenesis, angiogenesis, apoptosis, chaperone proteins, the insulinlike growth factor pathway, RANK ligand, endothelin receptors, and Src family kinases are entering, or have recently completed, accrual to phase III trials for patients with CRPC. There has also been interest generated by data from early-phase studies evaluating multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors, agents effecting signal transduction pathways, and novel cytotoxics.

Bone health and prostate cancer

Bone metastases are a substantial burden to men with advanced prostate cancer as they often cause pain and can cause fractures and spinal cord compression. Osteoblasts and osteoclasts are both pathologically activated in the setting of prostate cancer bone metastases. As osteoclast activation is associated with disease progression, skeletal complications and death, osteoclast-targeted therapies are a rational approach to disease management. Zoledronic acid is standard of care for castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases as it reduces the risk for skeletal-related events. Additional trials are needed to better define the ideal dose, frequency and duration of zoledronic acid therapy. No bisphosphonate has yet been shown to prevent bone metastases or to benefit men with androgen-sensitive disease. Denosumab is an experimental osteoclast-targeted monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand. Two ongoing phase III trials are expected to define its efficacy in preventing bone metastases and disease-related skeletal events in men with prostate cancer. Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer is associated with osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Several bisphosphonates have been shown to improve bone mineral density in men receiving ADT. Two recent phase III trials have shown that denosumab and toremifene reduce the incidence of fragility fractures in these men. The World Health Organization has developed a fracture risk assessment model (FRAX) for the general population to guide the selection of patients who may benefit from pharmacotherapy. In the absence of a prostate cancer-specific algorithm, we advocate the use of FRAX for men receiving ADT.

Effects of denosumab in patients with bone metastases with and without previous bisphosphonate exposure

Bone metastases place patients at increased risk of skeletal-related events (SREs), including pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, severe pain requiring radiotherapy or surgery, and hypercalcemia, because of increased osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, decreases bone resorption by inhibiting RANKL, which mediates osteoclast activity. We compared the effects of denosumab in two phase 2 studies in patients with bone metastases naive to intravenous bisphosphonate therapy (IV BP; n = 255) and those with elevated levels of the bone resorption marker urinary N-telopeptide (uNTX) despite ongoing IV BP treatment (n = 111). Patients were randomized to receive IV BP every 4 weeks or subcutaneous denosumab every 4 weeks (30/120/180 mg) or every 12 weeks (60/180 mg). Patients treated with denosumab experienced a rapid and sustained reduction in bone turnover regardless of prior IV BP exposure. After 25 weeks, the median uNTX reduction was 75% (IV BP-naive) and 80% (prior IV BP) after denosumab treatment and 71% (IV BP-naive) and 56% (prior IV BP) in the IV BP arms. Denosumab patients with prior IV BP exposure had marked suppression of the osteoclast marker TRAP-5b (median reduction: denosumab 73%, IV BP 11%). SRE incidence was low across both studies. In patients previously treated with BPs, the rate of first on-study SRE was lower in the denosumab groups (8%) than the IV BP group (17%). Denosumab appeared to be well tolerated in both studies. Denosumab suppresses bone resorption markers independently of prior BP treatment, even in patients who appear to respond poorly to BPs.

Impact of aromatase inhibitors on bone health in breast cancer patients

Following the implementation of the third generation aromatase inhibitors in the treatment algorithms for early breast cancer, special attention has been given to the influence of these drugs on bone health. Due to their potent estrogen suppression, the aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole, as well as the aromatase inactivator exemestane, enhance bone loss in postmenopausal women reflected in decreasing levels of bone mineral density. Moreover, all major phase III trials involving aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting have reported increased fracture rates. All in all, there is no hard evidence to suggest major differences between the individual compounds concerning their side-effects on bone. The consequences of AI therapy on bone are in addition modified by a variety of factors like the BMD level prior to therapy, time since menopause, and vitamin D status. Strategies to avoid bone loss during AI therapy have shown promising results. Thus, bisphosphonates have been shown to prohibit bone loss during AI therapy if used upfront. Novel treatment strategies, like antibodies against RANKL have been developed and promising preliminary results have been published from early trials. Standardized guidelines to avoid or minimize bone loss during AI therapy have been developed, in most countries involving calcium and vitamin D supplementation, as well as BMD measurements to identify patient subgroups demanding bisphosphonate therapy.

Prevention of Aromatase Inhibitor–Induced Bone Loss Using Risedronate: The SABRE Trial

Purpose

To investigate the management of bone health in women with early breast cancer (EBC) who were scheduled to receive anastrozole.

Patients and Methods

Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive EBC were assigned to one of three strata by risk of fragility fracture. Patients with the highest risk (H) received anastrozole 1 mg/d plus risedronate 35 mg/wk orally. Patients with moderate-risk (M) were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to anastrozole and risedronate (A + R) or to anastrozole and placebo (A + P). Patients with lower-risk (L) received anastrozole (A) alone. Calcium and vitamin D were recommended for all patients. Lumbar spine and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) were assessed at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months.

Results

At 24 months, in the M group, treatment with A + R resulted in a significant increase in lumbar spine and total hip BMD compared with A + P treatment (2.2% v −1.8%; treatment ratio, 1.04; P < .0001; and 1.8% v −1.1%; treatment ratio, 1.03; P < .0001, respectively). In the H stratum, lumbar spine and total hip BMD increased significantly (3.0%; P = .0006; and 2.0%; P = .0104, respectively). Patients in the L stratum showed a significant decrease in lumbar spine BMD (−2.1%; P = .0109) and a numerical decrease in total hip BMD (−0.4%; P = .5988). Safety profiles for anastrozole and risedronate were similar to those already established.

Conclusion

In postmenopausal women at risk of fragility fracture who were receiving adjuvant anastrozole for EBC, the addition of risedronate at doses established for preventing and treating osteoporosis resulted in favorable effects in BMD during 24 months.

Hormonal deprivation therapy-induced osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with breast cancer

Aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy significantly increases the disease-free survival in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. AIs are potent inhibitors of oestradiol production. Large adjuvant trials showed that the third-generation AIs (i.e., anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane) are risk factors for an increased bone loss, and are associated with an increase in the risk of fractures in women with bone fragility. A comprehensive assessment of risk of fractures must be performed at the initiation of an AI therapy. Antiresorptive drugs (i.e., bisphosphonates and denosumab) are effective for bone loss prevention and treatment in these patients.

Aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia in early breast cancer: what do we know and how can we find out more?

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are a standard of care for the adjuvant treatment of hormone responsive early carcinoma of the breast as demonstrated in a number of large international phase III randomised trials. Arthralgia was a somewhat unexpected side effect of this class of agents and has proven to be potentially problematic in clinical practice. Although rates of up 35% have been reported in the randomised trials, the figure has been much higher in subsequent case series. There is concern that these symptoms are significant and may affect compliance and thus the overall efficacy of treatment. It is therefore extremely important that we evaluate this syndrome with a view to gaining more information regarding its clinical features and possible aetiological mechanism. The potential aetiological mechanisms and evidence for aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia (AIA) are reviewed in this article. Looking forward, it is now important that prospective clinical trials are well designed to evaluate this syndrome and potential therapeutic strategies to circumvent it. Radiological imaging and biochemical analyses may help our understanding of AIA and these are discussed.

RANKL inhibition for the management of patients with benign metabolic bone disorders

The receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL) is a member of the TNF receptor superfamily, essential for osteoclastogenesis. It binds to its receptor activator of NF-kappaB on the surface of osteoclast precursors and enhances their differentiation, survival and fusion, while it activates mature osteoclasts and inhibits their apoptosis. The effects of RANKL are counteracted by osteoprotegerin (OPG), a neutralizing decoy receptor. Derangement of the balance in RANKL/OPG action is implicated in the pathophysiology of metabolic bone diseases, including osteoporosis. Current therapies used to prevent or treat metabolic bone diseases are thought to act, at least in part, through modification of the RANKL/OPG dipole. The idea of using a molecule that could specifically bind and neutralize RANKL to decrease bone resorption and subsequent bone loss is appealing. Recombinant OPG was initially tested. Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against RANKL, is a promising antiresorptive agent under investigation. It rapidly decreases bone turnover markers resulting in a significant increase in bone mineral density and reduction in fracture risk. However, because receptor activator of NF-kappaB activation by RANKL is also essential for T-cell growth and dendritic-cell function, inhibition of its action could simultaneously affect the immune system, leading to susceptibility in infections or malignancies.

RANKL inhibition: clinical implications for the management of patients with multiple myeloma and solid tumors with bone metastases

BACKGROUND

Receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL) binds to RANK on the surface of osteoclast precursors and enhances their differentiation, survival and fusion, activates mature osteoclasts and inhibits their apoptosis. Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is the decoy receptor of RANKL. Disruption of the RANK/RANKL/OPG axis is implicated in bone metastases.

OBJECTIVE/METHODS

A review of the role of RANKL signaling in bone development and the rationale for targeting RANKL in treatment of bone metastases and myeloma bone disease.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

In preclinical models of solid tumors and myeloma, RANKL inhibition reduced osteoclast numbers and subsequent bone resorption, prevented development of osteolytic lesions and decreased tumor burden. Preliminary clinical studies with denosumab, an anti-RANKL fully human monoclonal antibody, in patients with solid tumors with bone metastases and myeloma showed that targeting RANKL reduces osteoclastogenesis, bone resorption markers and skeletal-related events, supporting further study of this molecule and others with anti-RANKL activity.

Effects of denosumab on bone mineral density in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

In a recently completed 3-year, randomized, double-blind study, denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand, significantly increased bone mineral density and decreased new vertebral fractures in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. We conducted subgroup analyses to evaluate the relationships between subject characteristics and the effects of denosumab on bone mineral density at multiple skeletal sites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1,468 subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive 60 mg subcutaneous denosumab every 6 months or placebo for 36 months. In these analyses we evaluated the effects of denosumab on bone mineral density at the lumbar spine, total hip and distal 1/3 radius (substudy of 309 subjects) during 36 months in specific subgroups according to age, duration and type of prior androgen deprivation therapy, bone mineral density T score, weight, body mass index, bone turnover marker levels and prevalent vertebral fractures.

RESULTS

After 36 months denosumab significantly increased bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, total hip and distal 1/3 radius by 7.9%, 5.7% and 6.9%, respectively, compared with placebo (p <0.0001 for each comparison). Denosumab significantly increased bone mineral density to a degree similar to that observed in the overall analysis for every subgroup including older men as well as those with prevalent fractures, lower baseline bone mineral density, and higher serum C-telopeptide and tartrate-resistant alkaline phosphatase 5b. Mean increases in bone mineral density at each skeletal site were greatest for men with the highest levels of serum C-telopeptide and tartrate-resistant alkaline phosphatase 5b.

CONCLUSIONS

Denosumab significantly and consistently increased bone mineral density at all skeletal sites and in every subgroup, including men at greatest risk for bone loss and fractures.

Prostate cancer survivorship: prevention and treatment of the adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy

BACKGROUND

More than one-third of the estimated 2 million prostate cancer survivors in the United States receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). This population of mostly older men is medically vulnerable to a variety of treatment-associated adverse effects.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) causes loss of libido, vasomotor flushing, anemia, and fatigue. More recently, ADT has been shown to accelerate bone loss, increase fat mass, increase cholesterol and triglycerides, and decrease insulin sensitivity. Consistent with these adverse metabolic effects, ADT has also recently been associated with greater risks for fractures, diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

CONCLUSION

Primary care clinicians and patients should be aware of the potential benefits and harms of ADT. Screening and intervention to prevent treatment-related morbidity should be incorporated into the routine care of prostate cancer survivors. Evidence-based guidelines to prevent fractures, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease in prostate cancer survivors represent an important unmet need. We recommend the adapted use of established practice guidelines designed for the general population.