351
|
PET biomarkers and probes for treatment response assessment in glioblastoma: a work in progress. Clin Transl Imaging 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-019-00329-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
352
|
Reardon DA, Weller M. Pseudoprogression: fact or wishful thinking in neuro-oncology? Lancet Oncol 2019; 19:1561-1563. [PMID: 30507413 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30654-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David A Reardon
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215-5450, USA.
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
353
|
Koenig JL, Shi S, Sborov K, Gensheimer MF, Li G, Nagpal S, Chang SD, Gibbs IC, Soltys SG, Pollom EL. Adverse Radiation Effect and Disease Control in Patients Undergoing Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Brain Metastases. World Neurosurg 2019; 126:e1399-e1411. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Revised: 03/10/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
354
|
Brown MP, Ebert LM, Gargett T. Clinical chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy: a new and promising treatment modality for glioblastoma. Clin Transl Immunology 2019; 8:e1050. [PMID: 31139410 PMCID: PMC6526894 DOI: 10.1002/cti2.1050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is now approved in the United States and Europe as a standard treatment for relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. It has also been approved recently by the Therapeutic Goods Administration in Australia and may soon be publicly reimbursed. This advance has accentuated scientific, clinical and commercial interest in adapting this exciting technology for the treatment of solid cancers where it is widely recognised that the challenges of overcoming a hostile tumor microenvironment are most acute. Indeed, CAR-T cell technology may be of the greatest value for those cancers that lack pre-existing immunity because they are immunologically 'cold', or have a low somatic tumor mutation load, or both. These cancers are generally not amenable to therapeutic immune checkpoint blockade, but CAR-T cell therapy may be effective because it provides an abundant supply of autologous tumor-specific T cells. This is achieved by using genetic engineering to re-direct autologous T-cell cytotoxicity towards a tumor-associated antigen, bypassing endogenous T-cell requirements for antigen processing, MHC-dependent antigen presentation and co-stimulation. One of the most challenging solid cancers is glioblastoma, which has among the least permissive immunological milieu of any cancer, and which is almost always fatal. Here, we argue that CAR-T cell technology may counter some glioblastoma defences and provide a beachhead for furthering our eventual therapeutic aims of restoring effective antitumor immunity. Although clinical investigation of CAR-T cell therapy for glioblastoma is at an early stage, we discuss three recently published studies, which feature significant differences in target antigen, CAR-T cell phenotype, route of administration and tumor response. We discuss the lessons, which may be learned from these studies and which may guide further progress in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Brown
- Translational Oncology Laboratory Centre for Cancer Biology University of South Australia and SA Pathology Adelaide SA Australia.,Cancer Clinical Trials Unit Royal Adelaide Hospital Adelaide SA Australia.,School of Medicine University of Adelaide Adelaide SA Australia
| | - Lisa M Ebert
- Translational Oncology Laboratory Centre for Cancer Biology University of South Australia and SA Pathology Adelaide SA Australia
| | - Tessa Gargett
- Translational Oncology Laboratory Centre for Cancer Biology University of South Australia and SA Pathology Adelaide SA Australia
| |
Collapse
|
355
|
Nivolumab in the Treatment of Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Single Institutional Experience. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2019; 41:e235-e241. [PMID: 30681550 DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000001339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Successful use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in a variety of cancers has generated interest in using this approach in pediatric brain tumors. We performed a retrospective review of 10 consecutive children (6 boys, 4 girls; ages, 2 to 17 y), with recurrent or refractory pediatric brain tumors (5 high-grade glioma, 1 low-grade glioma, pineoblastoma, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, and CNS embryonal tumor, NOS) treated at Rady Children's Hospital San Diego from 2015 to 2017 with the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 wk). Eight of 10 patients received prior chemotherapy and 9 radiation therapy. Nine patients had radiographic disease progression (median, 2.5 doses). Median time to progression was 5.5 weeks (1.6 to 24 wk). Three patients (2 with high-grade glioma, 1 with CNS embryonal tumor NOS) showed a partial response to treatment at the primary tumor site and 2 of 3 had progression of metastatic disease. Grade 2 toxicities were observed without dose limiting side effects. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) was low to intermediate (median, 1.3; range, 0 to 6.3). Median survival for PD-L1 positive patients was 13.7 weeks versus 4.2 weeks for PD-L1 negative patients (ρ=0.08) nivolumab was well tolerated in our series of pediatric recurrent brain tumors with some transient partial responses in patients with positive PD-L1 expression and higher TMB. Our findings suggest that the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in pediatric brain tumor patients should be limited to those with elevated PD-L1 expression and TMB.
Collapse
|
356
|
Ahmad H, Fadul CE, Schiff D, Purow B. Checkpoint inhibitor failure in hypermutated and mismatch repair-mutated recurrent high-grade gliomas. Neurooncol Pract 2019; 6:424-427. [PMID: 31832212 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npz016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Recurrent high-grade gliomas in adults remain a deadly cancer with median survival of less than 1 year. In the absence of effective agents, immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has been adopted as a potentially beneficial next step for recurrences with hypermutated or mismatch repair-mutated phenotypes. The rationale for their use, however, is based on case reports and studies with other types of cancer. Methods We reviewed 4 cases of hypermutated or mismatch repair-mutated recurrent high-grade gliomas treated with checkpoint inhibitors. Results All cases had recurrent high-grade glioma that harbored either a hypermutated phenotype and/or a mismatch repair mutation. Treatment with checkpoint inhibitor therapy resulted in no significant response. Conclusions In our experience, hypermutated or mismatch repair-mutated high-grade gliomas in adults do not respond to checkpoint inhibitors alone. This lack of efficacy is in agreement with underwhelming results of clinical trials examining checkpoint inhibitors in high-grade gliomas. The case reports of responders have been in pediatric patients with glioma and are likely a different subtype altogether.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haroon Ahmad
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
| | - Camilo E Fadul
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
| | - David Schiff
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
| | - Benjamin Purow
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
| |
Collapse
|
357
|
Kickingereder P, Isensee F, Tursunova I, Petersen J, Neuberger U, Bonekamp D, Brugnara G, Schell M, Kessler T, Foltyn M, Harting I, Sahm F, Prager M, Nowosielski M, Wick A, Nolden M, Radbruch A, Debus J, Schlemmer HP, Heiland S, Platten M, von Deimling A, van den Bent MJ, Gorlia T, Wick W, Bendszus M, Maier-Hein KH. Automated quantitative tumour response assessment of MRI in neuro-oncology with artificial neural networks: a multicentre, retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20:728-740. [PMID: 30952559 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30098-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 237] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Revised: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria and requirements for a uniform protocol have been introduced to standardise assessment of MRI scans in both clinical trials and clinical practice. However, these criteria mainly rely on manual two-dimensional measurements of contrast-enhancing (CE) target lesions and thus restrict both reliability and accurate assessment of tumour burden and treatment response. We aimed to develop a framework relying on artificial neural networks (ANNs) for fully automated quantitative analysis of MRI in neuro-oncology to overcome the inherent limitations of manual assessment of tumour burden. METHODS In this retrospective study, we compiled a single-institution dataset of MRI data from patients with brain tumours being treated at Heidelberg University Hospital (Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg training dataset) to develop and train an ANN for automated identification and volumetric segmentation of CE tumours and non-enhancing T2-signal abnormalities (NEs) on MRI. Independent testing and large-scale application of the ANN for tumour segmentation was done in a single-institution longitudinal testing dataset from the Heidelberg University Hospital and in a multi-institutional longitudinal testing dataset from the prospective randomised phase 2 and 3 European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-26101 trial (NCT01290939), acquired at 38 institutions across Europe. In both longitudinal datasets, spatial and temporal tumour volume dynamics were automatically quantified to calculate time to progression, which was compared with time to progression determined by RANO, both in terms of reliability and as a surrogate endpoint for predicting overall survival. We integrated this approach for fully automated quantitative analysis of MRI in neuro-oncology within an application-ready software infrastructure and applied it in a simulated clinical environment of patients with brain tumours from the Heidelberg University Hospital (Heidelberg simulation dataset). FINDINGS For training of the ANN, MRI data were collected from 455 patients with brain tumours (one MRI per patient) being treated at Heidelberg hospital between July 29, 2009, and March 17, 2017 (Heidelberg training dataset). For independent testing of the ANN, an independent longitudinal dataset of 40 patients, with data from 239 MRI scans, was collected at Heidelberg University Hospital in parallel with the training dataset (Heidelberg test dataset), and 2034 MRI scans from 532 patients at 34 institutions collected between Oct 26, 2011, and Dec 3, 2015, in the EORTC-26101 study were of sufficient quality to be included in the EORTC-26101 test dataset. The ANN yielded excellent performance for accurate detection and segmentation of CE tumours and NE volumes in both longitudinal test datasets (median DICE coefficient for CE tumours 0·89 [95% CI 0·86-0·90], and for NEs 0·93 [0·92-0·94] in the Heidelberg test dataset; CE tumours 0·91 [0·90-0·92], NEs 0·93 [0·93-0·94] in the EORTC-26101 test dataset). Time to progression from quantitative ANN-based assessment of tumour response was a significantly better surrogate endpoint than central RANO assessment for predicting overall survival in the EORTC-26101 test dataset (hazard ratios ANN 2·59 [95% CI 1·86-3·60] vs central RANO 2·07 [1·46-2·92]; p<0·0001) and also yielded a 36% margin over RANO (p<0·0001) when comparing reliability values (ie, agreement in the quantitative volumetrically defined time to progression [based on radiologist ground truth vs automated assessment with ANN] of 87% [266 of 306 with sufficient data] compared with 51% [155 of 306] with local vs independent central RANO assessment). In the Heidelberg simulation dataset, which comprised 466 patients with brain tumours, with 595 MRI scans obtained between April 27, and Sept 17, 2018, automated on-demand processing of MRI scans and quantitative tumour response assessment within the simulated clinical environment required 10 min of computation time (average per scan). INTERPRETATION Overall, we found that ANN enabled objective and automated assessment of tumour response in neuro-oncology at high throughput and could ultimately serve as a blueprint for the application of ANN in radiology to improve clinical decision making. Future research should focus on prospective validation within clinical trials and application for automated high-throughput imaging biomarker discovery and extension to other diseases. FUNDING Medical Faculty Heidelberg Postdoc-Program, Else Kröner-Fresenius Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fabian Isensee
- Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Irada Tursunova
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Petersen
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulf Neuberger
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Bonekamp
- Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gianluca Brugnara
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marianne Schell
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Kessler
- Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martha Foltyn
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Inga Harting
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Sahm
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marcel Prager
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martha Nowosielski
- Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Antje Wick
- Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marco Nolden
- Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Radbruch
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Sabine Heiland
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Platten
- Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurology, Mannheim Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Andreas von Deimling
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Thierry Gorlia
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Bendszus
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus H Maier-Hein
- Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
358
|
Colip C, Oztek MA, Lo S, Yuh W, Fink J. Updates in the Neuoroimaging and WHO Classification of Primary CNS Gliomas: A Review of Current Terminology, Diagnosis, and Clinical Relevance From a Radiologic Prospective. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 28:73-84. [PMID: 31022050 DOI: 10.1097/rmr.0000000000000195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
As new advances in the genomics and imaging of CNS tumors continues to evolve, a standardized system for classification is increasingly essential to diagnosis and management. The molecular markers introduced in the 2016 WHO classification of CNS tumors bring both practical and conceptual advances to the characterization of gliomas, strengthening the prognostic and predictive value of terminology while shedding light on the underlying mechanisms that drive biologic behavior. The purpose of this article is to provide a succinct overview of primary intracranial gliomas from a neuroradiologic prospective and according to the 5th edition WHO classification that was revised in 2016. An update of the molecular markers pertinent to defining the major lineages of brain gliomas will be provided, followed by discussion of the terminology, grading and imaging features associated with individual entities. Neuroradiologists should be aware of the key genomic and radiomic features of common brain gliomas, and familiar with an integrated approach to their diagnosis and grading.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Colip
- University of Washington Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA
| | - Murat Alp Oztek
- University of Washington Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA
| | - Simon Lo
- University of Washington Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Seattle, WA
| | - Willam Yuh
- University of Washington Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA
| | - James Fink
- University of Washington Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
359
|
Cloughesy TF, Mochizuki AY, Orpilla JR, Hugo W, Lee AH, Davidson TB, Wang AC, Ellingson BM, Rytlewski JA, Sanders CM, Kawaguchi ES, Du L, Li G, Yong WH, Gaffey SC, Cohen AL, Mellinghoff IK, Lee EQ, Reardon DA, O'Brien BJ, Butowski NA, Nghiemphu PL, Clarke JL, Arrillaga-Romany IC, Colman H, Kaley TJ, de Groot JF, Liau LM, Wen PY, Prins RM. Neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy promotes a survival benefit with intratumoral and systemic immune responses in recurrent glioblastoma. Nat Med 2019; 25:477-486. [PMID: 30742122 PMCID: PMC6408961 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0337-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 840] [Impact Index Per Article: 168.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults and is associated with poor survival. The Ivy Foundation Early Phase Clinical Trials Consortium conducted a randomized, multi-institution clinical trial to evaluate immune responses and survival following neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab in 35 patients with recurrent, surgically resectable glioblastoma. Patients who were randomized to receive neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, with continued adjuvant therapy following surgery, had significantly extended overall survival compared to patients that were randomized to receive adjuvant, post-surgical programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade alone. Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade was associated with upregulation of T cell- and interferon-γ-related gene expression, but downregulation of cell-cycle-related gene expression within the tumor, which was not seen in patients that received adjuvant therapy alone. Focal induction of programmed death-ligand 1 in the tumor microenvironment, enhanced clonal expansion of T cells, decreased PD-1 expression on peripheral blood T cells and a decreasing monocytic population was observed more frequently in the neoadjuvant group than in patients treated only in the adjuvant setting. These findings suggest that the neoadjuvant administration of PD-1 blockade enhances both the local and systemic antitumor immune response and may represent a more efficacious approach to the treatment of this uniformly lethal brain tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy F Cloughesy
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Medical and Molecular Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Aaron Y Mochizuki
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joey R Orpilla
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Willy Hugo
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alexander H Lee
- Department of Medical and Molecular Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tom B Davidson
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anthony C Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Eric S Kawaguchi
- Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lin Du
- Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gang Li
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - William H Yong
- Department of Pathology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sarah C Gaffey
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adam L Cohen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ingo K Mellinghoff
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eudocia Q Lee
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David A Reardon
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Barbara J O'Brien
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nicholas A Butowski
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Phioanh L Nghiemphu
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer L Clarke
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Howard Colman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Thomas J Kaley
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - John F de Groot
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Linda M Liau
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert M Prins
- Department of Medical and Molecular Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
360
|
Chukwueke UN, Wen PY. Use of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria in clinical trials and clinical practice. CNS Oncol 2019; 8:CNS28. [PMID: 30806082 PMCID: PMC6499019 DOI: 10.2217/cns-2018-0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ugonma N Chukwueke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
361
|
Rajani KR, Carlstrom LP, Parney IF, Johnson AJ, Warrington AE, Burns TC. Harnessing Radiation Biology to Augment Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma. Front Oncol 2019; 8:656. [PMID: 30854331 PMCID: PMC6395389 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common adult primary brain tumor and carries a dismal prognosis. Radiation is a standard first-line therapy, typically deployed following maximal safe surgical debulking, when possible, in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. For other systemic cancers, standard of care is being transformed by immunotherapies, including checkpoint-blocking antibodies targeting CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1, with potential for long-term remission. Ongoing studies are evaluating the role of immunotherapies for GBM. Despite dramatic responses in some cases, randomized trials to date have not met primary outcomes. Challenges have been attributed in part to the immunologically "cold" nature of glioblastoma relative to other malignancies successfully treated with immunotherapy. Radiation may serve as a mechanism to improve tumor immunogenicity. In this review, we critically evaluate current evidence regarding radiation as a synergistic facilitator of immunotherapies through modulation of both the innate and adaptive immune milieu. Although current preclinical data encourage efforts to harness synergistic biology between radiation and immunotherapy, several practical and scientific challenges remain. Moreover, insights from radiation biology may unveil additional novel opportunities to help mobilize immunity against GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karishma R. Rajani
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Lucas P. Carlstrom
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Ian F. Parney
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Aaron J. Johnson
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | - Terry C. Burns
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
362
|
McGranahan T, Therkelsen KE, Ahmad S, Nagpal S. Current State of Immunotherapy for Treatment of Glioblastoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2019; 20:24. [PMID: 30790064 PMCID: PMC6394457 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-019-0619-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 191] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT At this time, there are no FDA-approved immune therapies for glioblastoma (GBM) despite many unique therapies currently in clinical trials. GBM is a highly immunosuppressive tumor and there are limitations to a safe immune response in the central nervous system. To date, there have been several failures of phase 3 immune therapy clinical trials in GBM. These trials have targeted single components of an antitumor immune response. Learning from these failures, the future of immunotherapy for GBM appears most hopeful for combination of immune therapies to overcome the profound immunosuppression of this disease. Understanding biomarkers for appropriate patient selection as well as tumor progression are necessary for implementation of immunotherapy for GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tresa McGranahan
- Department of Neurology, UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
| | | | - Sarah Ahmad
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Seema Nagpal
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
363
|
Kikuchi R, Ueda R, Saito K, Shibao S, Nagashima H, Tamura R, Morimoto Y, Sasaki H, Noji S, Kawakami Y, Yoshida K, Toda M. A Pilot Study of Vaccine Therapy with Multiple Glioma Oncoantigen/Glioma Angiogenesis-Associated Antigen Peptides for Patients with Recurrent/Progressive High-Grade Glioma. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8020263. [PMID: 30791546 PMCID: PMC6406695 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8020263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
High-grade gliomas (HGGs) carry a dismal prognosis despite current treatments. We previously confirmed the safety and immunogenicity of a vaccine treatment targeting tumor angiogenesis with synthetic peptides, for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) epitopes in recurrent HGG patients. In this study, we evaluated a novel vaccine therapy targeting not only tumor vasculature but also tumor cells, using multiple glioma oncoantigen (GOA)/glioma angiogenesis-associated antigen (GAAA) peptides in HLA-A2402+ recurrent/progressive HGG patients. The vaccine included peptide epitopes from four GOAs (LY6K, DEPDC1, KIF20A, and FOXM1) and two GAAAs (VEGFR1 and VEGFR2). Ten patients received subcutaneous vaccinations. The primary endpoint was the safety of the treatment. T-lymphocyte responses against GOA/GAAA epitopes and treatment response were evaluated secondarily. The treatment was well tolerated without any severe systemic adverse events. The vaccinations induced immunoreactivity to at least three vaccine-targeted GOA/GAAA in all six evaluable patients. The median overall survival time in all patients was 9.2 months. Five achieved progression-free status lasting at least six months. Two recurrent glioblastoma patients demonstrated stable disease. One patient with anaplastic oligoastrocytoma achieved complete response nine months after the vaccination. Taken together, this regimen was well tolerated and induced robust GOA/GAAA-specific T-lymphocyte responses in recurrent/progressive HGG patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryogo Kikuchi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hiratsuka City Hospital, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa 254-0019, Japan.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8587, Japan.
| | - Ryo Ueda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8587, Japan.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kawasaki Municipal Hospital, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 210-0013, Japan.
| | - Katsuya Saito
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital, Ashikaga, Tochigi 326-0843, Japan.
| | - Shunsuke Shibao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital, Ashikaga, Tochigi 326-0843, Japan.
| | - Hideaki Nagashima
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8587, Japan.
| | - Ryota Tamura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8587, Japan.
| | - Yukina Morimoto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8587, Japan.
| | - Hikaru Sasaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8587, Japan.
| | - Shinobu Noji
- Division of Cellular Signaling, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjku, Tokyo 160-8587, Japan.
| | - Yutaka Kawakami
- Division of Cellular Signaling, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjku, Tokyo 160-8587, Japan.
| | - Kazunari Yoshida
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8587, Japan.
| | - Masahiro Toda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8587, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
364
|
Murphy M, Dowling A, Thien C, Priest E, Morgan Murray D, Kesari S. A feasibility study of the Nativis Voyager ® device in patients with recurrent glioblastoma in Australia. CNS Oncol 2019; 8:CNS31. [PMID: 30727742 PMCID: PMC6499017 DOI: 10.2217/cns-2018-0017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: Evaluation of the Nativis Voyager®, an investigational medical device, as monotherapy for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). Materials & methods: A total of 15 patients with rGBM were treated with one of two Voyager ultra-low radio frequency energy cognates: A1A or A2HU. Safety and clinical utility were assessed every 2–4 months. Results: Median overall survival was 8.04 months in the A1A arm and 6.89 months in the A2HU arm. No serious adverse events associated with Voyager were reported. No clinically relevant trends were noted in clinical laboratory parameters or physical exams. Conclusion: The data suggest that the Voyager is safe and feasible for the treatment of rGBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Murphy
- Department of Neurosurgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia.,Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Anthony Dowling
- Department of Oncology, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia.,Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Christopher Thien
- Department of Neurosurgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia
| | - Emma Priest
- Department of Neurosurgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia
| | - Donna Morgan Murray
- Nativis, Inc., Department of Clinical and Regulatory Affairs, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Santosh Kesari
- John Wayne Cancer Institute & Pacific Neuroscience Institute, Department of Translational Neurooncology and Neurotherapeutics, Santa Monica, CA, 90404, USA
| |
Collapse
|
365
|
Mandel JJ, Yust-Katz S, Patel AJ, Cachia D, Liu D, Park M, Yuan Y, Kent TA, de Groot JF. Inability of positive phase II clinical trials of investigational treatments to subsequently predict positive phase III clinical trials in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2019; 20:113-122. [PMID: 29016865 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults, but effective therapies are lacking. With the scarcity of positive phase III trials, which are increasing in cost, we examined the ability of positive phase II trials to predict statistically significant improvement in clinical outcomes of phase III trials. Methods A PubMed search was conducted to identify phase III clinical trials performed in the past 25 years for patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma. Trials were excluded if they did not examine an investigational chemotherapy or agent, if they were stopped early owing to toxicity, if they lacked prior phase II studies, or if a prior phase II study was negative. Results Seven phase III clinical trials in newly diagnosed glioblastoma and 4 phase III clinical trials in recurrent glioblastoma met the inclusion criteria. Only 1 (9%) phase III study documented an improvement in overall survival and changed the standard of care. Conclusion The high failure rate of phase III trials demonstrates the urgent need to increase the reliability of phase II trials of treatments for glioblastoma. Strategies such as the use of adaptive trial designs, Bayesian statistics, biomarkers, volumetric imaging, and mathematical modeling warrant testing. Additionally, it is critical to increase our expectations of phase II trials so that positive findings increase the probability that a phase III trial will be successful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob J Mandel
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Shlomit Yust-Katz
- Rabin Medical Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Akash J Patel
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David Cachia
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Neurosurgery, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Diane Liu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Biostatistics, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Minjeong Park
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Biostatistics, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ying Yuan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Biostatistics, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Thomas A Kent
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - John F de Groot
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Neuro-Oncology, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
366
|
Johanns TM, Miller CA, Liu CJ, Perrin RJ, Bender D, Kobayashi DK, Campian JL, Chicoine MR, Dacey RG, Huang J, Fritsch EF, Gillanders WE, Artyomov MN, Mardis ER, Schreiber RD, Dunn GP. Detection of neoantigen-specific T cells following a personalized vaccine in a patient with glioblastoma. Oncoimmunology 2019; 8:e1561106. [PMID: 30906654 PMCID: PMC6422384 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2018.1561106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Revised: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Neoantigens represent promising targets for personalized cancer vaccine strategies. However, the feasibility of this approach in lower mutational burden tumors like glioblastoma (GBM) remains unknown. We have previously reported the use of an immunogenomics pipeline to identify candidate neoantigens in preclinical models of GBM. Here, we report the application of the same immunogenomics pipeline to identify candidate neoantigens and guide screening for neoantigen-specific T cell responses in a patient with GBM treated with a personalized synthetic long peptide vaccine following autologous tumor lysate DC vaccination. Following vaccination, reactivity to three HLA class I- and five HLA class II-restricted candidate neoantigens were detected by IFN-γ ELISPOT in peripheral blood. A similar pattern of reactivity was observed among isolated post-treatment tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Genomic analysis of pre- and post-treatment GBM reflected clonal remodeling. These data demonstrate the feasibility and translational potential of a therapeutic neoantigen-based vaccine approach in patients with primary CNS tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanner M Johanns
- Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Andrew M. and Jane M. Bursky Center for Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Christopher A Miller
- The McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Connor J Liu
- Andrew M. and Jane M. Bursky Center for Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Richard J Perrin
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Diane Bender
- Andrew M. and Jane M. Bursky Center for Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Dale K Kobayashi
- Andrew M. and Jane M. Bursky Center for Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jian L Campian
- Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Michael R Chicoine
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ralph G Dacey
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jiayi Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - William E Gillanders
- Andrew M. and Jane M. Bursky Center for Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Department of Surgery, Section of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Maxim N Artyomov
- Andrew M. and Jane M. Bursky Center for Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Elaine R Mardis
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital and The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Robert D Schreiber
- Andrew M. and Jane M. Bursky Center for Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Gavin P Dunn
- Andrew M. and Jane M. Bursky Center for Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
367
|
Chuntova P, Downey KM, Hegde B, Almeida ND, Okada H. Genetically Engineered T-Cells for Malignant Glioma: Overcoming the Barriers to Effective Immunotherapy. Front Immunol 2019; 9:3062. [PMID: 30740109 PMCID: PMC6357938 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant gliomas carry a dismal prognosis. Conventional treatment using chemo- and radiotherapy has limited efficacy with adverse events. Therapy with genetically engineered T-cells, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells, may represent a promising approach to improve patient outcomes owing to their potential ability to attack highly infiltrative tumors in a tumor-specific manner and possible persistence of the adaptive immune response. However, the unique anatomical features of the brain and susceptibility of this organ to irreversible tissue damage have made immunotherapy especially challenging in the setting of glioma. With safety concerns in mind, multiple teams have initiated clinical trials using CAR T-cells in glioma patients. The valuable lessons learnt from those trials highlight critical areas for further improvement: tackling the issues of the antigen presentation and T-cell homing in the brain, immunosuppression in the glioma microenvironment, antigen heterogeneity and off-tumor toxicity, and the adaptation of existing clinical therapies to reflect the intricacies of immune response in the brain. This review summarizes the up-to-date clinical outcomes of CAR T-cell clinical trials in glioma patients and examines the most pressing hurdles limiting the efficacy of these therapies. Furthermore, this review uses these hurdles as a framework upon which to evaluate cutting-edge pre-clinical strategies aiming to overcome those barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavlina Chuntova
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Kira M Downey
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Bindu Hegde
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Neil D Almeida
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.,George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Hideho Okada
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.,The Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.,Cancer Immunotherapy Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
368
|
Rudie JD, Rauschecker AM, Bryan RN, Davatzikos C, Mohan S. Emerging Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Neuro-Oncology. Radiology 2019; 290:607-618. [PMID: 30667332 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018181928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Due to the exponential growth of computational algorithms, artificial intelligence (AI) methods are poised to improve the precision of diagnostic and therapeutic methods in medicine. The field of radiomics in neuro-oncology has been and will likely continue to be at the forefront of this revolution. A variety of AI methods applied to conventional and advanced neuro-oncology MRI data can already delineate infiltrating margins of diffuse gliomas, differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression, and predict recurrence and survival better than methods used in daily clinical practice. Radiogenomics will also advance our understanding of cancer biology, allowing noninvasive sampling of the molecular environment with high spatial resolution and providing a systems-level understanding of underlying heterogeneous cellular and molecular processes. By providing in vivo markers of spatial and molecular heterogeneity, these AI-based radiomic and radiogenomic tools have the potential to stratify patients into more precise initial diagnostic and therapeutic pathways and enable better dynamic treatment monitoring in this era of personalized medicine. Although substantial challenges remain, radiologic practice is set to change considerably as AI technology is further developed and validated for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey D Rudie
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (J.D.R., C.D., S.M.); Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (A.M.R.); and Department of Diagnostic Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (R.N.B.)
| | - Andreas M Rauschecker
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (J.D.R., C.D., S.M.); Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (A.M.R.); and Department of Diagnostic Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (R.N.B.)
| | - R Nick Bryan
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (J.D.R., C.D., S.M.); Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (A.M.R.); and Department of Diagnostic Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (R.N.B.)
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (J.D.R., C.D., S.M.); Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (A.M.R.); and Department of Diagnostic Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (R.N.B.)
| | - Suyash Mohan
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (J.D.R., C.D., S.M.); Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (A.M.R.); and Department of Diagnostic Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (R.N.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
369
|
Young JS, Dayani F, Morshed RA, Okada H, Aghi MK. Immunotherapy for High Grade Gliomas: A Clinical Update and Practical Considerations for Neurosurgeons. World Neurosurg 2019; 124:397-409. [PMID: 30677574 PMCID: PMC6642850 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2018] [Revised: 12/26/2018] [Accepted: 12/28/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
The current standard of care for patients with high grade gliomas includes surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiation; but even still the majority of patients experience disease progression and succumb to their illness within a few years of diagnosis. Immunotherapy, which stimulates an anti-tumor immune response, has been revolutionary in the treatment of some hematological and solid malignancies, generating substantial excitement for its potential for patients with glioblastoma. The most commonly used immunotherapies include dendritic cell and peptide vaccines, checkpoint inhibitors, and adoptive T cell therapy. However, to date, the preclinical success of these approaches against high-grade glioma models has not been replicated in human clinical trials. Moreover, the complex response to these biologically active treatments can complicate management decisions, and the neurosurgical oncology community needs to be actively involved in and up to date on the use of these agents in high grade glioma patients. In this review, we discuss the challenges immunotherapy faces for high grade gliomas, the completed and ongoing clinical trials for the major immunotherapies, and the nuances in management for patients being actively treated with one of these agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob S Young
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Fara Dayani
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Ramin A Morshed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Hideho Okada
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Manish K Aghi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
370
|
Nishino M, Hatabu H, Hodi FS. Imaging of Cancer Immunotherapy: Current Approaches and Future Directions. Radiology 2019; 290:9-22. [PMID: 30457485 PMCID: PMC6312436 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018181349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Revised: 08/09/2018] [Accepted: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy using immune-checkpoint inhibitors has emerged as an effective treatment option for a variety of advanced cancers in the past decade. Because of the distinct mechanisms of immunotherapy that activate the host immunity to treat cancers, unconventional immune-related phenomena are encountered in terms of tumor response and progression, as well as drug toxicity. Imaging plays an important role in objectively characterizing immune-related tumor responses and progression and in detecting and monitoring immune-related adverse events. Moreover, emerging data suggest a promise for molecular imaging that can visualize the specific target molecules involved in immune-checkpoint pathways. In this article, the background and current status of cancer immunotherapy are summarized, and the current methods for imaging evaluations of immune-related responses and toxicities are reviewed along with their limitations and pitfalls. Emerging approaches with molecular imaging are also discussed as a future direction to address unmet needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mizuki Nishino
- From the Departments of Radiology (M.N., H.H.), Medical Oncology (F.S.H.), and Medicine (F.S.H.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Hiroto Hatabu
- From the Departments of Radiology (M.N., H.H.), Medical Oncology (F.S.H.), and Medicine (F.S.H.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215
| | - F. Stephen Hodi
- From the Departments of Radiology (M.N., H.H.), Medical Oncology (F.S.H.), and Medicine (F.S.H.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215
| |
Collapse
|
371
|
Lukas RV, Juhász C, Wainwright DA, James CD, Kennedy E, Stupp R, Lesniak MS. Imaging tryptophan uptake with positron emission tomography in glioblastoma patients treated with indoximod. J Neurooncol 2019; 141:111-120. [PMID: 30415456 PMCID: PMC6414051 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-03013-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2018] [Accepted: 09/13/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent and aggressive primary tumor of the central nervous system, accounting for over 50% of all primary malignant gliomas arising in the adult brain. Even after surgical resection, adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy, as well as tumor-treating fields, the median survival is only 15-20 months. We have identified a pathogenic mechanism that contributes to the tumor-induced immunosuppression in the form of increased indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) expression; an enzyme that metabolizes the essential amino acid, tryptophan (Trp), into kynurenine (Kyn). However, real-time measurements of IDO1 activity has yet to become mainstream in clinical protocols for assessing IDO1 activity in GBM patients. METHODS Pre-treatment and on-treatment α-[11C]-methyl-L-Trp (AMT) positron emission tomography (PET) with co-registered MRI was performed on patients with recurrent GBM treated with the IDO1 pathway inhibitor indoximod (D1-MT) and TMZ. RESULTS Regional intratumoral variability of AMT within enhancing and non-enhancing tumor was noted at baseline. On treatment imaging revealed decreased regional uptake suggesting IDO1 pathway modulation with treatment. CONCLUSIONS Here, we have validated the ability to use PET of the Trp probe, AMT, for use in visualizing and quantifying intratumoral Trp uptake in GBM patients treated with an IDO1 pathway inhibitor. These data serve as rationale to utilize AMT-PET imaging in the future evaluation of GBM patients treated with IDO1 enzyme inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rimas V Lukas
- Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, 710 N. Lake Shore Drive, Abbott Hall 1114, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
- Lurie Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA.
- Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA.
| | - Csaba Juhász
- Neurology, and Neurosurgery, Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA
| | - Derek A Wainwright
- Department of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
- Lurie Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
- Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | - Charles David James
- Department of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
- Lurie Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
- Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | | | - Roger Stupp
- Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, 710 N. Lake Shore Drive, Abbott Hall 1114, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
- Lurie Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
- Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | - Maciej S Lesniak
- Department of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
- Lurie Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
- Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| |
Collapse
|
372
|
van Dijken BR, van Laar PJ, Smits M, Dankbaar JW, Enting RH, van der Hoorn A. Perfusion MRI in treatment evaluation of glioblastomas: Clinical relevance of current and future techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 49:11-22. [PMID: 30561164 PMCID: PMC6590309 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment evaluation of patients with glioblastomas is important to aid in clinical decisions. Conventional MRI with contrast is currently the standard method, but unable to differentiate tumor progression from treatment-related effects. Pseudoprogression appears as new enhancement, and thus mimics tumor progression on conventional MRI. Contrarily, a decrease in enhancement or edema on conventional MRI during antiangiogenic treatment can be due to pseudoresponse and is not necessarily reflective of a favorable outcome. Neovascularization is a hallmark of tumor progression but not for posttherapeutic effects. Perfusion-weighted MRI provides a plethora of additional parameters that can help to identify this neovascularization. This review shows that perfusion MRI aids to identify tumor progression, pseudoprogression, and pseudoresponse. The review provides an overview of the most applicable perfusion MRI methods and their limitations. Finally, future developments and remaining challenges of perfusion MRI in treatment evaluation in neuro-oncology are discussed. Level of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 4 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:11-22.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart R.J. van Dijken
- Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center (MIC)University Medical Center GroningenGroningenthe Netherlands
| | - Peter Jan van Laar
- Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center (MIC)University Medical Center GroningenGroningenthe Netherlands
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Jan Willem Dankbaar
- Department of RadiologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Roelien H. Enting
- Department of NeurologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenthe Netherlands
| | - Anouk van der Hoorn
- Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center (MIC)University Medical Center GroningenGroningenthe Netherlands
- Brain Tumour Imaging Group, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical NeurosciencesUniversity of Cambridge and Addenbrooke's HospitalCambridgeUK
| |
Collapse
|
373
|
Keskin DB, Anandappa AJ, Sun J, Tirosh I, Mathewson ND, Li S, Oliveira G, Giobbie-Hurder A, Felt K, Gjini E, Shukla SA, Hu Z, Li L, Le PM, Allesøe RL, Richman AR, Kowalczyk MS, Abdelrahman S, Geduldig JE, Charbonneau S, Pelton K, Iorgulescu JB, Elagina L, Zhang W, Olive O, McCluskey C, Olsen LR, Stevens J, Lane WJ, Salazar AM, Daley H, Wen PY, Chiocca EA, Harden M, Lennon NJ, Gabriel S, Getz G, Lander ES, Regev A, Ritz J, Neuberg D, Rodig SJ, Ligon KL, Suvà ML, Wucherpfennig KW, Hacohen N, Fritsch EF, Livak KJ, Ott PA, Wu CJ, Reardon DA. Neoantigen vaccine generates intratumoral T cell responses in phase Ib glioblastoma trial. Nature 2019; 565:234-239. [PMID: 30568305 PMCID: PMC6546179 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0792-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 847] [Impact Index Per Article: 169.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Neoantigens, which are derived from tumour-specific protein-coding mutations, are exempt from central tolerance, can generate robust immune responses1,2 and can function as bona fide antigens that facilitate tumour rejection3. Here we demonstrate that a strategy that uses multi-epitope, personalized neoantigen vaccination, which has previously been tested in patients with high-risk melanoma4-6, is feasible for tumours such as glioblastoma, which typically have a relatively low mutation load1,7 and an immunologically 'cold' tumour microenvironment8. We used personalized neoantigen-targeting vaccines to immunize patients newly diagnosed with glioblastoma following surgical resection and conventional radiotherapy in a phase I/Ib study. Patients who did not receive dexamethasone-a highly potent corticosteroid that is frequently prescribed to treat cerebral oedema in patients with glioblastoma-generated circulating polyfunctional neoantigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses that were enriched in a memory phenotype and showed an increase in the number of tumour-infiltrating T cells. Using single-cell T cell receptor analysis, we provide evidence that neoantigen-specific T cells from the peripheral blood can migrate into an intracranial glioblastoma tumour. Neoantigen-targeting vaccines thus have the potential to favourably alter the immune milieu of glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derin B Keskin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Translational Immunogenomics Laboratory, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Annabelle J Anandappa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jing Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Itay Tirosh
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Nathan D Mathewson
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shuqiang Li
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Translational Immunogenomics Laboratory, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Giacomo Oliveira
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anita Giobbie-Hurder
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kristen Felt
- Center for Immuno-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Evisa Gjini
- Center for Immuno-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sachet A Shukla
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Translational Immunogenomics Laboratory, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Zhuting Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Letitia Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Phuong M Le
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rosa L Allesøe
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Bio- and Health Informatics, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Alyssa R Richman
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Sara Abdelrahman
- Center for Immuno-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jack E Geduldig
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Charbonneau
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kristine Pelton
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - J Bryan Iorgulescu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Wandi Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Oriol Olive
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christine McCluskey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lars R Olsen
- Department of Bio- and Health Informatics, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Jonathan Stevens
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William J Lane
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Heather Daley
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - E Antonio Chiocca
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maegan Harden
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Gad Getz
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eric S Lander
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Aviv Regev
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Jerome Ritz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Donna Neuberg
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Scott J Rodig
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Immuno-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Keith L Ligon
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mario L Suvà
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kai W Wucherpfennig
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nir Hacohen
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Edward F Fritsch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Neon Therapeutics Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Kenneth J Livak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Translational Immunogenomics Laboratory, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patrick A Ott
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Catherine J Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David A Reardon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
374
|
Yu FF, Rapalino O. Treated Gliomas. Neuroradiology 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-44549-8.00015-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
375
|
Lehrer EJ, Peterson J, Brown PD, Sheehan JP, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Zaorsky NG, Trifiletti DM. Treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery and immune checkpoint inhibitors: An international meta-analysis of individual patient data. Radiother Oncol 2019; 130:104-112. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2018] [Revised: 08/25/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
376
|
Law I, Albert NL, Arbizu J, Boellaard R, Drzezga A, Galldiks N, la Fougère C, Langen KJ, Lopci E, Lowe V, McConathy J, Quick HH, Sattler B, Schuster DM, Tonn JC, Weller M. Joint EANM/EANO/RANO practice guidelines/SNMMI procedure standards for imaging of gliomas using PET with radiolabelled amino acids and [ 18F]FDG: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 46:540-557. [PMID: 30519867 PMCID: PMC6351513 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4207-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 322] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
These joint practice guidelines, or procedure standards, were developed collaboratively by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), the European Association of Neurooncology (EANO), and the working group for Response Assessment in Neurooncology with PET (PET-RANO). Brain PET imaging is being increasingly used to supplement MRI in the clinical management of glioma. The aim of these standards/guidelines is to assist nuclear medicine practitioners in recommending, performing, interpreting and reporting the results of brain PET imaging in patients with glioma to achieve a high-quality imaging standard for PET using FDG and the radiolabelled amino acids MET, FET and FDOPA. This will help promote the appropriate use of PET imaging and contribute to evidence-based medicine that may improve the diagnostic impact of this technique in neurooncological practice. The present document replaces a former version of the guidelines published in 2006 (Vander Borght et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 33:1374–80, 2006), and supplements a recent evidence-based recommendation by the PET-RANO working group and EANO on the clinical use of PET imaging in patients with glioma (Albert et al. Neuro Oncol. 18:1199–208, 2016). The information provided should be taken in the context of local conditions and regulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 9, Blegdamsvej, 2100-DK, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Javier Arbizu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Forschungszentrum Julich, Julich, Germany
| | - Christian la Fougère
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Forschungszentrum Julich, Julich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Egesta Lopci
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Val Lowe
- Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jonathan McConathy
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Harald H Quick
- High-Field and Hybrid MR Imaging, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Sattler
- Department for Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - David M Schuster
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jörg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
377
|
DeRenzo C, Krenciute G, Gottschalk S. The Landscape of CAR T Cells Beyond Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia for Pediatric Solid Tumors. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2018; 38:830-837. [PMID: 30231350 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_200773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Adoptive cell therapy with genetically modified T cells holds the promise to improve outcomes for children with recurrent/refractory solid tumors and has the potential to reduce treatment complications for all patients. Although T cells that express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) specific for CD19 have had remarkable success for B-cell-derived malignancies, which has led to their approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, CAR T cells have been less effective for solid tumors and brain tumors. Lack of efficacy is most likely multifactorial, but heterogeneous antigen expression; limited migration of T cells to tumor sites; and the immunosuppressive, hostile tumor microenvironment have emerged as major roadblocks that must be addressed. In this review, we summarize the clinical experience with CAR T-cell therapy for pediatric solid tumors, including brain tumors. In addition, we review strategies that have been and are being developed to enhance their antitumor activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher DeRenzo
- From the Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Giedre Krenciute
- From the Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Stephen Gottschalk
- From the Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| |
Collapse
|
378
|
Camidge DR, Lee EQ, Lin NU, Margolin K, Ahluwalia MS, Bendszus M, Chang SM, Dancey J, de Vries EGE, Harris GJ, Hodi FS, Lassman AB, Macdonald DR, Peereboom DM, Schiff D, Soffietti R, van den Bent MJ, Wefel JS, Wen PY. Clinical trial design for systemic agents in patients with brain metastases from solid tumours: a guideline by the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases working group. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:e20-e32. [PMID: 29304358 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30693-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2017] [Revised: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 08/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Patients with active CNS disease are often excluded from clinical trials, and data regarding the CNS efficacy of systemic agents are usually obtained late in the drug development process or not at all. In this guideline from the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) working group, we provide detailed recommendations on when patients with brain metastases from solid tumours should be included or excluded in clinical trials of systemic agents. We also discuss the limitations of retrospective studies in determining the CNS efficacy of systemic drugs. Inclusion of patients with brain metastases early on in the clinical development of a drug or a regimen is needed to generate appropriate CNS efficacy or non-efficacy signals. We consider how to optimally incorporate or exclude such patients in systemic therapy trials depending on the likelihood of CNS activity of the agent by considering three scenarios: drugs that are considered very unlikely to have CNS antitumour activity or efficacy; drugs that are considered very likely to have CNS activity or efficacy; and drugs with minimal baseline information on CNS activity or efficacy. We also address trial design issues unique to patients with brain metastases, including the selection of appropriate CNS endpoints in systemic therapy trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Ross Camidge
- Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Eudocia Q Lee
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kim Margolin
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Solid Tumor Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Martin Bendszus
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Janet Dancey
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Elisabeth G E de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Gordon J Harris
- Department of Radiology, 3D Imaging Lab, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - F Stephen Hodi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew B Lassman
- Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, NY, USA
| | - David R Macdonald
- Department of Oncology and Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - David M Peereboom
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Solid Tumor Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David Schiff
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Ricardo Soffietti
- Department of Neurology/Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Jeffrey S Wefel
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
379
|
Irradiation to Improve the Response to Immunotherapeutic Agents in Glioblastomas. Adv Radiat Oncol 2018; 4:268-282. [PMID: 31011672 PMCID: PMC6460102 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Glioblastoma (GBM) remains an incurable disease despite extensive treatment with surgical resection, irradiation, and temozolomide. In line with many other forms of aggressive cancers, GBM is currently under consideration as a target for immunotherapy. However, GBM tends to be nonimmunogenic and exhibits a microenvironment with few or no effector T cells, a relatively low nonsynonymous somatic mutational load, and a low predicted neoantigen burden. GBM also exploits a multitude of immunosuppressive strategies. Methods and Materials A number of immunotherapeutic approaches have been tested with disappointing results. A rationale exists to combine immunotherapy and radiation therapy, which can induce an immunogenic form of cell death with T-cell activation and tumor infiltration. Results Various immunotherapy agents, including immune checkpoint modulators, transforming growth factor beta receptor inhibitors, and indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase inhibitors, have been evaluated with irradiation in preclinical GBM models, with promising results, and are being further tested in clinical trials. Conclusions This review aims to present the basic rationale behind this emerging complementary therapeutic approach in GBM, appraise the current preclinical and clinical data, and discuss the future challenges in improving the antitumor immune response.
Collapse
|
380
|
Choi BD, Maus MV, June CH, Sampson JH. Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma: Adoptive T-cell Strategies. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 25:2042-2048. [PMID: 30446589 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-1625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Revised: 10/16/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a devastating disease with an extremely poor prognosis. Immunotherapy via adoptive cell transfer (ACT), especially with T cells engineered to express chimeric antigen receptors (CAR), represents a particularly promising approach. Despite the recent success of CAR T cells for blood cancers, the question remains whether this powerful anticancer therapy will ultimately work for brain tumors, and whether the primary immunologic challenges in this disease, which include antigenic heterogeneity, immune suppression, and T-cell exhaustion, can be adequately addressed. Here, we contextualize these concepts by reviewing recent developments in ACT for GBM, with a special focus on pioneering clinical trials of CAR T-cell therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan D Choi
- Cellular Immunotherapy Program, Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marcela V Maus
- Cellular Immunotherapy Program, Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Carl H June
- Center for Cellular Immunotherapies and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John H Sampson
- Duke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University Medical Center and Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. .,Departments of Neurosurgery, Pathology, and Biomedical Engineering, Duke University Medical Center and Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
381
|
Johnson DR, Guerin JB, Ruff MW, Fang S, Hunt CH, Morris JM, Pearse Morris P, Kaufmann TJ. Glioma response assessment: Classic pitfalls, novel confounders, and emerging imaging tools. Br J Radiol 2018; 92:20180730. [PMID: 30412421 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Neuroimaging plays a pivotal role in the care of patients with infiltrating gliomas, in whom imaging changes are often the first indications of tumor response or progression. Unfortunately, evaluation of glioma response is often not straightforward, even for experienced radiologists. Post-surgical or radiation-related changes may mimic the appearance of disease progression, while medications such as corticosteroids and antiangiogenic agents may mimic tumor response without truly arresting tumor growth or improving patient survival. Immunotherapy response can result in inflammatory changes which manifest as progressively increasing tumor enhancement and edema over months. Many of these pitfalls can be minimized or avoided altogether by the use of modern brain tumor response criteria, while others will require new imaging tools before they can be fully addressed. Advanced MRI methods and novel positron emission tomography (PET) agents are proving important for this purpose, and their role will undoubtedly continue to grow in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michael W Ruff
- 2 Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN , US
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
382
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Immune checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly being used to treat melanoma brain metastases. One potential complication of immune checkpoint inhibitors is a phenomenon called pseudoprogression, in which a tumor transiently increases in size due to lymphocyte infiltration. This article reviews the characteristics of pseudoprogression and their clinical implications. RECENT FINDINGS Pseudoprogression can be challenging to differentiate from true progression noted clinically or radiographically, thereby complicating management decisions and potentially confusing patients and their families. The transient tumor enlargement can also cause symptoms that mimic true tumor progression. Because the use of immunotherapy on melanoma brain metastases is a relatively new treatment paradigm, there is limited evidence to guide clinical decision-making and prognostication related to pseudoprogression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sunandana Chandra
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 645 N Michigan Ave, Suite 1006, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
383
|
Abdulla DSY, Scheffler M, Brandes V, Ruge M, Kunze S, Merkelbach-Bruse S, Nogova L, Michels S, Fischer R, Riedel R, Büttner R, Persigehl T, Grau S, Galldiks N, Drzezga A, Kobe C, Wolf J. Monitoring Treatment Response to Erlotinib in EGFR-mutated Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases Using Serial O-(2-[ 18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET. Clin Lung Cancer 2018; 20:e148-e151. [PMID: 30528316 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2018] [Revised: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Diana S Y Abdulla
- Lung Cancer Group Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology Köln, Bonn, Germany; Network Genomic Medicine (NGM) Lung Cancer, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Scheffler
- Lung Cancer Group Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology Köln, Bonn, Germany; Network Genomic Medicine (NGM) Lung Cancer, Cologne, Germany
| | - Vanessa Brandes
- Lung Cancer Group Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology Köln, Bonn, Germany; Network Genomic Medicine (NGM) Lung Cancer, Cologne, Germany
| | - Maximilian Ruge
- Center for Integrated Oncology Köln, Bonn, Germany; Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sabine Kunze
- Center for Integrated Oncology Köln, Bonn, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse
- Center for Integrated Oncology Köln, Bonn, Germany; Network Genomic Medicine (NGM) Lung Cancer, Cologne, Germany; Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lucia Nogova
- Lung Cancer Group Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology Köln, Bonn, Germany; Network Genomic Medicine (NGM) Lung Cancer, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sebastian Michels
- Lung Cancer Group Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology Köln, Bonn, Germany; Network Genomic Medicine (NGM) Lung Cancer, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rieke Fischer
- Lung Cancer Group Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology Köln, Bonn, Germany; Network Genomic Medicine (NGM) Lung Cancer, Cologne, Germany
| | - Richard Riedel
- Lung Cancer Group Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology Köln, Bonn, Germany; Network Genomic Medicine (NGM) Lung Cancer, Cologne, Germany
| | - Reinhard Büttner
- Center for Integrated Oncology Köln, Bonn, Germany; Network Genomic Medicine (NGM) Lung Cancer, Cologne, Germany; Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thorsten Persigehl
- Center for Integrated Oncology Köln, Bonn, Germany; Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefan Grau
- Center for Integrated Oncology Köln, Bonn, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Center for Integrated Oncology Köln, Bonn, Germany; Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- Center for Integrated Oncology Köln, Bonn, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Center for Integrated Oncology Köln, Bonn, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jürgen Wolf
- Lung Cancer Group Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology Köln, Bonn, Germany; Network Genomic Medicine (NGM) Lung Cancer, Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
384
|
Tawbi HA, Boutros C, Kok D, Robert C, McArthur G. New Era in the Management of Melanoma Brain Metastases. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2018; 38:741-750. [PMID: 30231345 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_200819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The remarkable advances in the systemic therapy of metastatic melanoma have now extended the 1-year overall survival rate from 25% to nearing 85%. Systemic treatment in the form of BRAF-targeted therapy and immunotherapy is slowly but surely proving its efficacy in the treatment of metatstatic brain metastases (MBM). Single-agent BRAF inhibitors provide an intracranial response rate of 25% to 40%, whereas the combination of BRAFi/MEKi leads to responses in up to 58%. However, the durability of responses induced by BRAFi/MEKi seems to be even shorter than in extracranial disease. On the other hand, single-agent ipilimumab provides comparable clinical benefit in MBMs as it does in extracranial metastases. Single-agent PD-1 anitbodies induce response rates of approximately 20%, and those responses appear durable. Similarly the combination of CTLA-4+ PD-1 antibodies induces durable responses at an impressive rate of 55% and is safe to administer. Although the local treatment approaches with radiation and surgery remain important and are critically needed in the management of MBM, systemic therapy offers a new dimension that can augment the impact of those therapies and come at a potentially lower cost of neurocognitive impairment. Considerations for combining those modalities are direly needed, in addition to considering novel systemic combinations that target mechanisms specific to MBM. In this report, we will discuss the underlying biology of melanoma brain metastases, the clinical outcomes from recent clinical trials of targeted and immunotherapy, and their impact on clinical practice in the context of existing local therapeutic modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hussein A Tawbi
- From The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris, France; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Celine Boutros
- From The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris, France; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David Kok
- From The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris, France; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Caroline Robert
- From The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris, France; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Grant McArthur
- From The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris, France; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
385
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the indications for convection-enhanced delivery in the treatment of glioblastoma, highlighting candidates for the delivery method, mechanics of drug delivery, and management of acute and long-term complications. DATA SOURCES A conceptual framework drawn from published literature as well as author's expert experiences. CONCLUSION Convection-enhanced delivery is an established method of delivering new therapies to patients with glioblastoma. Management of both acute and long-term complications is often drug dependent. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Nurses should be able to recognize and manage potential complications during the infusion of agents delivered via convection-enhanced delivery. Post-infusion symptoms may worsen because of immunologic responses related to the drug and management should be directed toward symptom relief and support without interference on the immunologic response.
Collapse
|
386
|
Buerki RA, Chheda ZS, Okada H. Immunotherapy of Primary Brain Tumors: Facts and Hopes. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24:5198-5205. [PMID: 29871908 PMCID: PMC6214775 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-2769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2018] [Revised: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The field of cancer immunotherapy has made exciting progress for some cancer types in recent years. However, recent failures of late-phase clinical trials evaluating checkpoint blockade in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) represent continued challenges for brain cancer immunotherapy. This is likely due to multiple factors including but not limited to marked genetic and antigenic heterogeneity, relatively low mutational loads, and paucity of GBM-infiltrating T cells. We review recent and ongoing studies targeting the checkpoint molecules as monotherapy or in combination with other modalities, and discuss the mechanisms underlying the unresponsiveness of GBM to single-modality immunotherapy approaches. We also discuss other novel immunotherapy approaches that may promote T-cell responses and overcome the "cold tumor" status of GBM, including oncolytic viruses and adoptive T-cell therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 24(21); 5198-205. ©2018 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin A Buerki
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Zinal S Chheda
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Hideho Okada
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
- The Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, California
- Cancer Immunotherapy Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
387
|
Marabelle A, Andtbacka R, Harrington K, Melero I, Leidner R, de Baere T, Robert C, Ascierto PA, Baurain JF, Imperiale M, Rahimian S, Tersago D, Klumper E, Hendriks M, Kumar R, Stern M, Öhrling K, Massacesi C, Tchakov I, Tse A, Douillard JY, Tabernero J, Haanen J, Brody J. Starting the fight in the tumor: expert recommendations for the development of human intratumoral immunotherapy (HIT-IT). Ann Oncol 2018; 29:2163-2174. [PMID: 30295695 PMCID: PMC6290929 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 138] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
A European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)-sponsored expert meeting was held in Paris on 8 March 2018 which comprised 11 experts from academia, 11 experts from the pharmaceutical industry and 2 clinicians who were representatives of ESMO. The focus of the meeting was exclusively on the intratumoral injection/delivery of immunostimulatory agents with the aim of harmonizing the standard terms and methodologies used in the reporting of human intratumoral immunotherapy (HIT-IT) clinical trials to ensure quality assurance and avoid a blurring of the data reported from different studies. The goal was to provide a reference document, endorsed by the panel members that could provide guidance to clinical investigators, pharmaceutical companies, ethics committees, independent review boards, patient advocates and the regulatory authorities and promote an increase in the number and quality of HIT-IT clinical trials in the future. Particular emphasis was placed not only on the development of precise definitions to facilitate a better understanding between investigators but also on the importance of systematic serial biopsies as a driver for translational research and the need for the recording and reporting of data, to facilitate a better understanding of the key processes involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Marabelle
- Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
| | - R Andtbacka
- Surgical Oncology Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - K Harrington
- The Royal Marsden/The Institute of Cancer Research, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Centre, London, UK
| | - I Melero
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra and CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - R Leidner
- Providence Cancer Center, Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Portland, USA
| | - T de Baere
- Department of Image Guided Therapy, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif
| | - C Robert
- Department of Dermatology, Institute Gustave-Roussy, Paris, France
| | - P A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - J-F Baurain
- King Albert II Cancer Institute, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - D Tersago
- Clinical Development, Bioncotech Therapeutics, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - M Hendriks
- Aduro Biotech, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - R Kumar
- MedImmune, LLC, Gaithersburg, USA
| | | | | | - C Massacesi
- Global Product Development Oncology, Pfizer, USA
| | | | - A Tse
- Oncology Early Development, Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, USA
| | | | - J Tabernero
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Haanen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Brody
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
388
|
Yao Y, Luo F, Tang C, Chen D, Qin Z, Hua W, Xu M, Zhong P, Yu S, Chen D, Ding X, Zhang Y, Zheng X, Yang J, Qian J, Deng Y, Hoon DSB, Hu J, Chu Y, Zhou L. Molecular subgroups and B7-H4 expression levels predict responses to dendritic cell vaccines in glioblastoma: an exploratory randomized phase II clinical trial. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2018; 67:1777-1788. [PMID: 30159779 PMCID: PMC11028057 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-018-2232-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccination is a promising approach for active-specific immunotherapy, but is currently of limited efficacy. The safety and effectiveness of a DC vaccine (DCV) loaded with glioblastoma stem cell-like (GSC) antigens was assessed in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial, 43 GBM patients were randomized after surgery at a 1:1 ratio to receive either DCV (n = 22) or normal saline placebo (n = 21). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analysed. Participants were stratified into different molecular subgroups based on the mutation (MT) status of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1/2) and telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT). Plasma cytokine levels, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte numbers and immune co-inhibitory molecules PD-L1 and B7-H4 were also assessed. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that DCV treatment significantly prolonged OS (p = 0.02) after adjusting for IDH1 and TERT promoter MT and B7-H4 expression, primary vs recurrent GBM. Among IDH1wild type (WT) TERTMT patients, DCV treatment significantly prolonged OS (p < 0.01) and PFS (p = 0.03) and increased plasma levels of cytokines CCL22 and IFN-γ compared with placebo. Patients with low B7-H4 expression showed significantly prolonged OS (p = 0.02) after DCV treatment. Therefore, IDH1WTTERTMT and low B7-H4 expression identified subgroups of GBM patients more responsive to GSC DCV-based specific active-immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Yao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
- Neurosurgical Immunology Laboratory of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Feifei Luo
- Biotherapy Research Center of Fudan University and Department of Digestive Diseases, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Chao Tang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
- Neurosurgical Immunology Laboratory of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Dikang Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
- Neurosurgical Immunology Laboratory of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Zhiyong Qin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
- Neurosurgical Immunology Laboratory of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Wei Hua
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Ming Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Ping Zhong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Shuangquan Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
- Neurosurgical Immunology Laboratory of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Di Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
- Neurosurgical Immunology Laboratory of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Xiaojie Ding
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
- Neurosurgical Immunology Laboratory of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Yi Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Xiujuan Zheng
- Department of Immunology and Biotherapy Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Jiao Yang
- Department of Immunology and Biotherapy Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Jiawen Qian
- Department of Immunology and Biotherapy Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yuting Deng
- Department of Immunology and Biotherapy Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Dave S B Hoon
- Department of Translational Molecular Medicine, John Wayne Cancer Institute (JWCI), Pacific Neuroscience Institute, Saint John's Health Center, Providence Health Systems, Santa Monica, CA, 90404, USA
| | - Jian Hu
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Yiwei Chu
- Department of Immunology and Biotherapy Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Liangfu Zhou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China.
- Neurosurgical Immunology Laboratory of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China.
| |
Collapse
|
389
|
Kline C, Liu SJ, Duriseti S, Banerjee A, Nicolaides T, Raber S, Gupta N, Haas-Kogan D, Braunstein S, Mueller S. Reirradiation and PD-1 inhibition with nivolumab for the treatment of recurrent diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: a single-institution experience. J Neurooncol 2018; 140:629-638. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2991-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
390
|
Cuoco JA, Benko MJ, Busch CM, Rogers CM, Prickett JT, Marvin EA. Vaccine-Based Immunotherapeutics for the Treatment of Glioblastoma: Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. World Neurosurg 2018; 120:302-315. [PMID: 30196171 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Revised: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive neoplasm with an extremely poor prognosis. Despite maximal gross resection and chemoradiotherapy, these grade IV astrocytomas consistently recur. Glioblastoma cells exhibit numerous pathogenic mechanisms to decrease tumor immunogenicity while promoting gliomagenesis, which manifests clinically as a median survival of less than 2 years and few long-term survivors. Recent clinical trials of vaccine-based immunotherapeutics against glioblastoma have demonstrated encouraging results in prolonging progression-free survival and overall survival. Several vaccine-based treatments have been trialed, such as peptide and heat-shock proteins, dendritic cell-based vaccines, and viral-based immunotherapy. In this literature review, we discuss the immunobiology of glioblastoma, significant current and completed vaccine-based immunotherapy clinical trials, and broad clinical challenges and future directions of glioblastoma vaccine-based immunotherapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua A Cuoco
- New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Glen Head, New York, USA.
| | - Michael J Benko
- Carilion Clinic, Section of Neurosurgery, Roanoke, Virginia, USA; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, USA; Virginia Tech School of Neuroscience, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA; Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - Christopher M Busch
- Carilion Clinic, Section of Neurosurgery, Roanoke, Virginia, USA; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, USA; Virginia Tech School of Neuroscience, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA; Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - Cara M Rogers
- Carilion Clinic, Section of Neurosurgery, Roanoke, Virginia, USA; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, USA; Virginia Tech School of Neuroscience, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA; Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - Joshua T Prickett
- Carilion Clinic, Section of Neurosurgery, Roanoke, Virginia, USA; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, USA; Virginia Tech School of Neuroscience, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA; Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - Eric A Marvin
- Carilion Clinic, Section of Neurosurgery, Roanoke, Virginia, USA; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, USA; Virginia Tech School of Neuroscience, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA; Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
391
|
Eijgelaar RS, Bruynzeel AME, Lagerwaard FJ, Müller DMJ, Teunissen FR, Barkhof F, van Herk M, De Witt Hamer PC, Witte MG. Earliest radiological progression in glioblastoma by multidisciplinary consensus review. J Neurooncol 2018; 139:591-598. [PMID: 29777418 PMCID: PMC6132963 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2896-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Detection of glioblastoma progression is important for clinical decision-making on cessation or initiation of therapy, for enrollment in clinical trials, and for response measurement in time and location. The RANO-criteria are considered standard for the timing of progression. To evaluate local treatment, we aim to find the most accurate progression location. We determined the differences in progression free survival (PFS) and in tumor volumes at progression (Vprog) by three definitions of progression. METHODS In a consecutive cohort of 73 patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma between 1/1/2012 and 31/12/2013, progression was established according to three definitions. We determined (1) earliest radiological progression (ERP) by retrospective multidisciplinary consensus review using all available imaging and follow-up, (2) clinical practice progression (CPP) from multidisciplinary tumor board conclusions, and (3) progression by the RANO-criteria. RESULTS ERP was established in 63 (86%), CPP in 64 (88%), RANO progression in 42 (58%). Of the 63 patients who had died, 37 (59%) did with prior RANO-progression, compared to 57 (90%) for both ERP and CPP. The median overall survival was 15.3 months. The median PFS was 8.8 months for ERP, 9.5 months for CPP, and 11.8 months for RANO. The PFS by ERP was shorter than CPP (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.84, p = 0.004) and RANO-progression (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.19-0.43, p < 0.001). The Vprog were significantly smaller for ERP (median 8.8 mL), than for CPP (17 mL) and RANO (22 mL). CONCLUSION PFS and Vprog vary considerably between progression definitions. Earliest radiological progression by retrospective consensus review should be considered to accurately localize progression and to address confounding of lead time bias in clinical trial enrollment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roelant S Eijgelaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna M E Bruynzeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank J Lagerwaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Domenique M J Müller
- Neurosurgical Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Freek R Teunissen
- Neurosurgical Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marcel van Herk
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester and Christie NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Philip C De Witt Hamer
- Neurosurgical Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix G Witte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
392
|
Hansen ED, Wang X, Case AA, Puzanov I, Smith T. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Toxicity Review for the Palliative Care Clinician. J Pain Symptom Manage 2018; 56:460-472. [PMID: 29792979 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2018] [Revised: 05/15/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have opened an exciting chapter in the treatment of patients with advanced cancer. For the palliative care clinician, however, ICIs present several new challenges, including new ways to define treatment success, as well as treatment-related toxicities that differ in nature and timing from traditional chemotherapy. In this article, we review the mechanism of action of ICIs, as well as selected published data supporting the efficacy of ICIs in patients with advanced cancer. In addition, we summarize existing data of ICI toxicity prevalence, patterns of severity, and timing of onset. Finally, we briefly review key principles from published guidelines on the management of ICI toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric D Hansen
- Department of Supportive Care, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.
| | - Xiao Wang
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Amy A Case
- Department of Supportive Care, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Igor Puzanov
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Tom Smith
- Palliative Medicine Program, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
393
|
Bota DA, Chung J, Dandekar M, Carrillo JA, Kong XT, Fu BD, Hsu FP, Schönthal AH, Hofman FM, Chen TC, Zidovetzki R, Pretto C, Strik A, Schijns VE, Stathopoulos A. Phase II study of ERC1671 plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab plus placebo in recurrent glioblastoma: interim results and correlations with CD4 + T-lymphocyte counts. CNS Oncol 2018; 7:CNS22. [PMID: 30157683 PMCID: PMC6200061 DOI: 10.2217/cns-2018-0009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: ERC1671 is an allogeneic/autologous therapeutic glioblastoma (GBM) vaccine – composed of whole, inactivated tumor cells mixed with tumor cell lysates derived from the patient and three GBM donors. Methods: In this double-blinded, randomized, Phase II study bevacizumab-naive patients with recurrent GBM were randomized to receive either ERC1671 in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Leukine® or sargramostim) and cyclophosphamide plus bevacizumab, or placebo plus bevacizumab. Interim results: Median overall survival (OS) of patients treated with ERC1671 plus bevacizumab was 12 months. In the placebo plus bevacizumab group, median OS was 7.5 months. The maximal CD4+ T-lymphocyte count correlated with OS in the ERC1671 but not in the placebo group. Conclusion: The addition of ERC1671/GM-CSF/cyclophosphamide to bevacizumab resulted in a clinically meaningful survival benefit with minimal additional toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela A Bota
- Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92868, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92868, USA.,Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92868, USA
| | - Jinah Chung
- Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92868, USA
| | - Manisha Dandekar
- Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92868, USA
| | - Jose A Carrillo
- Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92868, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92868, USA.,Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92868, USA
| | - Xiao-Tang Kong
- Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92868, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92868, USA.,Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92868, USA
| | - Beverly D Fu
- Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92868, USA.,Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92868, USA
| | - Frank Pk Hsu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92868, USA.,Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92868, USA
| | - Axel H Schönthal
- Department of Molecular Microbiology & Immunology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Florence M Hofman
- Department of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Thomas C Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Raphael Zidovetzki
- Cell Biology & Neuroscience, University of California, Riverside, CA 92507, USA
| | - Chrystel Pretto
- Epitopoietic Research Corporation, Gembloux, 5032 Isnes, Belgium
| | - Ankie Strik
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.,Epitopoietic Research Corporation, Gembloux, 5032 Isnes, Belgium
| | - Virgil Ejc Schijns
- Epitopoietic Research Corporation, Gembloux, 5032 Isnes, Belgium.,Cell Biology & Immunology Group, Wageningen University, 6708 Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Apostolos Stathopoulos
- Epitopoietic Research Corporation, Gembloux, 5032 Isnes, Belgium.,Cell Biology & Immunology Group, Wageningen University, 6708 Wageningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurosurgery, Euroclinics Hospital, 151 21 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
394
|
AlHarbi M, Ali Mobark N, AlMubarak L, Aljelaify R, AlSaeed M, Almutairi A, Alqubaishi F, Hussain ME, Balbaid AAO, Said Marie A, AlSubaie L, AlShieban S, alTassan N, Ramkissoon SH, Abedalthagafi M. Durable Response to Nivolumab in a Pediatric Patient with Refractory Glioblastoma and Constitutional Biallelic Mismatch Repair Deficiency. Oncologist 2018; 23:1401-1406. [PMID: 30104292 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary brain tumors are a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in children. Glioblastoma (GBM) is a high-grade astrocytoma that occurs in both children and adults and is associated with a poor prognosis. Despite extensive study in recent years, the clinical management of these tumors has remained largely unchanged, consisting of surgical resection, conventional chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Although the etiology and genomic drivers in GBM are diverse, constitutional mismatch repair-deficiency (CMMRD) syndrome is a rare, recessively inherited disease with a predisposition to gliomagenesis. CMMRD results from biallelic mutations in one of the mismatch repair genes including mutL homolog 1 (MLH1), mutS homolog 2 (MSH2), mutS homolog 6 (MSH6), and post-meiotic segregation increased 2 (PMS2). In this report, we present the case of a 5-year-old female with GBM and CMMRD due to an MSH6 homozygous c.1883G>A mutation, who continues to experience an exceptional and durable response (9 months) to the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPI) nivolumab. Our patient presented with acute neurologic decline and increased intracranial pressure. Neuroimaging studies revealed a large left frontoparietal mass requiring neurosurgical decompression and resection. Histopathologic analyses resulted in a diagnosis of de novo GBM that was BRAF wild type and negative for programmed death-ligand 1 protein expression. She received standard-of-care treatment with surgery, radiation therapy, and temozolomide; however, the tumor recurred 3 months after the initial diagnosis. Molecular analyses of tumor and blood tissues revealed an MSH6 homozygous c.1883G>A mutation consistent with CMMRD. Given her CMMRD status, she was treated with nivolumab (3 mg/kg doses every 2 weeks for 36 weeks) and showed a 60% reduction in tumor size, improved clinical symptoms, and an ongoing durable response lasting 10 months to date. Our study highlights a durable response to the ICPI nivolumab in a pediatric patient with recurrent/refractory CMMRD-associated GBM. We show that incorporating genomic and/or molecular testing for CMMRD into routine pediatric oncology clinical care can identify a subset of patients likely to benefit from ICPI. KEY POINTS: Constitutional mismatch repair-deficiency (CMMRD) syndrome, alternatively known as biallelic mismatch repair deficiency syndrome, occurs in subset of pediatric cancer patients, including those with primary brain tumors.Patients from Arab and other developing countries are predicted to have higher incidence of CMMRD due to high prevalence of consanguinity.Integration of molecular and/or genomic testing into routine clinical care for pediatric cancer patients is important to identify patients with CMMRD syndrome.Patient with CMMRD-associated cancers may show increased responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors.To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report in the Arab world of a durable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in a pediatric glioblastoma patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Musa AlHarbi
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nahla Ali Mobark
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Latifa AlMubarak
- Genomics Research Department, Saudi Human Genome Project, King Fahad Medical City and King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rasha Aljelaify
- Genomics Research Department, Saudi Human Genome Project, King Fahad Medical City and King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mariam AlSaeed
- Genomics Research Department, Saudi Human Genome Project, King Fahad Medical City and King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Amal Almutairi
- Genomics Research Department, Saudi Human Genome Project, King Fahad Medical City and King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fatmah Alqubaishi
- Genomics Research Department, Saudi Human Genome Project, King Fahad Medical City and King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - M Emarat Hussain
- Radiology Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ali Abdullah O Balbaid
- Genomics Research Department, Saudi Human Genome Project, King Fahad Medical City and King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Amal Said Marie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Lamia AlSubaie
- Division of Genetics, Department of Pediatric, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saeed AlShieban
- Department of Pathology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affair, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nada alTassan
- Genetics Department, King Faisal Specialists Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Shakti H Ramkissoon
- Wake Forest Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Pathology, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA
| | - Malak Abedalthagafi
- Genomics Research Department, Saudi Human Genome Project, King Fahad Medical City and King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
395
|
A comprehensive review of the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in brain metastasis of renal cell carcinoma origin. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018; 130:60-69. [PMID: 30196913 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2018] [Revised: 07/15/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The contribution of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to brain metastases (BM) reaches 7-13%. These patients have limited survival with local control and targeted therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) revolutionized the treatment landscape of RCC but commonly excluded BM patients from their pivotal trials. The daily clinical practice often imposes the use of ICI in RCC patients with BM in view of the promising survival times and durations of response. Only small prospective trials have included BM patients but rarely reported on the efficacy or safety of ICI in this subgroup. The available data is limited to small retrospective and prospective series that have shown comparable efficacy to that of the pivotal trials. In this review, we will discuss the biological rationale and potential concerns for the use of ICI in BM RCC. Furthermore, we will summarize BM subgroup data from the prospective and retrospective series of ICI in RCC as well as the use of cranial radiation and ICI.
Collapse
|
396
|
Clinical activity and safety of atezolizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2018; 140:317-328. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2955-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
397
|
Berberich A, Hielscher T, Kickingereder P, Winkler F, Drüschler K, Riedemann L, Arzt M, Kessler T, Platten M, von Deimling A, Wick W, Sahm F, Bendszus M, Wick A. Nonmeasurable Speckled Contrast-Enhancing Lesions Appearing During Course of Disease Are Associated With IDH Mutation in High-Grade Astrocytoma Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:1472-1480. [PMID: 30071292 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.07.2004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Revised: 07/17/2018] [Accepted: 07/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Because treatment options at progression are limited for patients with glioma, accuracy in definition of progression is pivotal. Clinically asymptomatic, newly detected, nonmeasurable, speckled contrast-enhancing lesions (SCEs) without immediate relation to prior immune therapy or radiation therapy appear relatively frequently during the course of disease in patients with glioma and challenge the definition of progression based on Response Assessment in Neuro-oncology criteria. Therefore, data characterizing these SCEs are needed for recommendations of subsequent clinical management. MATERIALS AND METHODS Magnetic resonance imaging of 746 patients with glioma included in this study were retrospectively revised for appearance of newly detected SCEs during the course of disease. Associations with molecular and clinical baseline parameters and their prognostic impact were statistically analyzed, and frequency, natural course, and location of SCEs were described. RESULTS SCEs occurred more frequently in World Health Organization grade 2 and 3 astrocytoma and oligodendroglial tumors and were significantly associated with isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation in World Health Organization grade 3 astrocytoma and glioblastoma. SCEs mostly remained stable or dissolved in follow-up magnetic resonance imaging, even if no new treatment was initiated. SCEs were frequently located within the tumor or tumor-associated fluid-attenuated inversion recovery abnormalities, but distant appearance also occurred. In patients with glioblastoma, SCEs were associated with a favorable prognosis, which was also observed in the subgroup of patients with glioblastoma with isocitrate dehydrogenase wildtype status. CONCLUSIONS The data demonstrate a predominantly benign course of SCEs after their appearance and emphasize cautious definitions of progression and regular clinical and radiographic follow-up rather than premature initiation of new antitumor therapies until progression is confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Berberich
- Clinical Cooperation Unit, Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Hielscher
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Frank Winkler
- Clinical Cooperation Unit, Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Drüschler
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lars Riedemann
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marlene Arzt
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Kessler
- Clinical Cooperation Unit, Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Platten
- Clinical Cooperation Unit, Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Andreas von Deimling
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Clinical Cooperation Unit, Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Sahm
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Bendszus
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Antje Wick
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
398
|
Mandel JJ, Youssef M, Ludmir E, Yust-Katz S, Patel AJ, De Groot JF. Highlighting the need for reliable clinical trials in glioblastoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2018; 18:1031-1040. [PMID: 29973092 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1496824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Several recent phase III studies have attempted to improve the dismal survival seen in glioblastoma patients, with disappointing results despite prior promising phase II data. Areas covered: A literature review of prior phase II and phase III studied in glioblastoma was performed to help identify possible areas of concern. Numerous issues in previous phase II trials for glioblastoma were found that may have contributed to these discouraging outcomes and discordant results. Expert commentary: These concerns include the improper selection of therapeutics warranting investigation in a phase III trial, suboptimal design of phase II studies (often lacking a control arm), absence of molecular data, the use of imaging criteria as a surrogate endpoint, and a lack of pharmacodynamic testing. Hopefully, by recognizing prior phase II trial limitations that contributed to failed phase III trials, we can adapt quickly to improve our ability to accurately discover survival-prolonging treatments for glioblastoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob J Mandel
- a Department of Neurology , Baylor College of Medicine , Houston , Texas , USA
| | - Michael Youssef
- a Department of Neurology , Baylor College of Medicine , Houston , Texas , USA
| | - Ethan Ludmir
- b Department of Radiation Oncology , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , Texas , USA
| | - Shlomit Yust-Katz
- c Department of Neurosurgery , Rabin Medical Center , Petah Tikva , Israel
| | - Akash J Patel
- a Department of Neurology , Baylor College of Medicine , Houston , Texas , USA
| | - John F De Groot
- d Department of Neuro-Oncology , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , Texas , USA
| |
Collapse
|
399
|
Mrowczynski OD, Zacharia BE, Connor JR. Exosomes and their implications in central nervous system tumor biology. Prog Neurobiol 2018; 172:71-83. [PMID: 30003942 DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2018.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2017] [Revised: 05/04/2018] [Accepted: 06/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Exosomes are 20-100 nm cellular derived vesicles that upon discovery, were thought to be a form of cellular recycling of intracellular contents. More recently, these vesicles are under investigation for their purported significant roles in intercellular communication in both healthy and diseased states. Herein, we focus on the secretion of exosomes associated with glioblastoma, as most exosome studies on brain tumors have been performed in this tumor type. However, we included exosomes secreted from other forms of brain tumors for comparison as available. Exosomes contain intracellular content that can be transferred to other cells in the tumor or to cells of the immune system and endothelial cells. These recipient cells may subsequently take on oncogenic properties, including therapeutic resistance, cancer progression, and angiogenesis. Genetic components (DNA, RNA and miRNA) of the cell of origin may be included in the secreted exosomes. The presence of genetic material in the exosomes could serve as a biomarker for mutations in tumors, potentially leading to novel treatment strategies. In the last decade, exosomes have been identified as having a major impact on multiple aspects of medicine and tumor biology, and appear to be primed for a critical position in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver D Mrowczynski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, United States
| | - Brad E Zacharia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, United States
| | - James R Connor
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
400
|
Glitza Oliva I, Schvartsman G, Tawbi H. Advances in the systemic treatment of melanoma brain metastases. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:1509-1520. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
|