351
|
Chen TT. Conditionally active T cell engagers for the treatment of solid tumors: rationale and clinical development. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2022; 22:955-963. [PMID: 35857922 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2022.2098674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION T cell engagers are a class of bispecific molecules that induce highly potent T cell-dependent cytotoxicity by bringing T cell activating receptors into proximity with cancer-associated cell surface antigens. However, because of their high potency, there is a greater risk of on-target/off-tumor toxicity owing to normal tissues having tumor antigen expression even at low levels. To reduce these adverse events, the dysregulated activity of proteases within the tumor microenvironment has recently been explored to create inert prodrugs that become conditionally active engagers after their cleavage by these enzymes. AREAS COVERED T-cell engagers that have been introduced for clinical use, and their respective successes and failures are reviewed. The unique challenges of these bispecific molecules for treating solid tumors and prior technologies used to exploit the proteolytic tumor microenvironment to create better-tolerated prodrugs and how that experience has led to the current series of conditionally active T-cell engagers, are discussed. EXPERT OPINION Methods for modulating the serum half-life of both inert and activated T cell engagers could have important ramifications in how they infiltrate tumors and prevent toxicity. Alternative features of the tumor microenvironment can also be leveraged in the development of conditional T cell engagers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Timothy Chen
- Maverick Therapeutics, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc
| |
Collapse
|
352
|
Saint-Ghislain M, Derrien AC, Geoffrois L, Gastaud L, Lesimple T, Negrier S, Penel N, Kurtz JE, Le Corre Y, Dutriaux C, Gardrat S, Barnhill R, Matet A, Cassoux N, Houy A, Ramtohul T, Servois V, Mariani P, Piperno-Neumann S, Stern MH, Rodrigues M. MBD4 deficiency is predictive of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic uveal melanoma patients. Eur J Cancer 2022; 173:105-112. [PMID: 35863105 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.06.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND MBD4 mutations have been reported in uveal melanomas, acute myeloid leukemias, colorectal adenocarcinomas, gliomas, and spiradenocarcinomas and cause a hypermutated phenotype. Although metastatic uveal melanomas (mUM) are usually resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), the first reported MBD4-mutated (MBD4m) patient responded to ICI, suggesting that MBD4 mutation may predict response to ICI. METHODS Retrospective cohort of mUM patients treated with ICI. MBD4 was sequenced in a subset of these patients. RESULTS Three hundred mUM patients were included. Median follow-up was 17.3 months. Ten patients with an objective response and 20 cases with stable disease for >12 months were observed, corresponding to an objective response rate of 3.3% and a clinical benefit (i.e., responder patients and stable disease) rate of 10%. Of the 131 tumors sequenced for MBD4, five (3.8%) were mutated. MBD4 mutation was associated with a better objective response rate as three out of five MBD4m versus 4% of MBD4 wild-type patients responded (p < 0.001). Of these five responders, three presented progressive disease at 2.8, 13.9, and 22.3 months. Median PFS was 4.0 months in MBD4 wild-type and 22.3 months in MBD4m patients (HR = 0.22; p = 0.01). Median OS in MBD4def patients was unreached as compared to 16.6 months in MBD4pro (HR = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.02-0.86; log-rank p-test = 0.04; Fig. 2e). CONCLUSIONS In mUM patients, MBD4 mutation is highly predictive for the response, PFS, and overall survival benefit to ICI. MBD4 could be a tissue-agnostic biomarker and should be sequenced in mUM, and other tumor types where MBD4 mutations are reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilde Saint-Ghislain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France; INSERM U830, DNA Repair and Uveal Melanoma (D.R.U.M.), Equipe Labellisée Par La Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| | - Anne-Céline Derrien
- INSERM U830, DNA Repair and Uveal Melanoma (D.R.U.M.), Equipe Labellisée Par La Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| | - Lionnel Geoffrois
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine - Alexis Vautrin Cancer, Nancy, France.
| | - Lauris Gastaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, 06000 Nice, France.
| | - Thierry Lesimple
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.
| | | | - Nicolas Penel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille University, Lille, France.
| | - Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Yannick Le Corre
- Department of Dermatology, Angers University Hospital, UNAM, France.
| | - Caroline Dutriaux
- Dermatology Department, CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Saint André, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Sophie Gardrat
- Department of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| | - Raymond Barnhill
- Department of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France; Faculty of Medicine, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Alexandre Matet
- Department of Ocular Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France; Université de Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Nathalie Cassoux
- Department of Ocular Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France; Université de Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Alexandre Houy
- INSERM U830, DNA Repair and Uveal Melanoma (D.R.U.M.), Equipe Labellisée Par La Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| | - Toulsie Ramtohul
- Department of Radiology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| | - Vincent Servois
- Department of Radiology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| | - Pascale Mariani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| | | | - Marc-Henri Stern
- INSERM U830, DNA Repair and Uveal Melanoma (D.R.U.M.), Equipe Labellisée Par La Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France; Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| | - Manuel Rodrigues
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France; INSERM U830, DNA Repair and Uveal Melanoma (D.R.U.M.), Equipe Labellisée Par La Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
353
|
Leyvraz S, Konietschke F, Peuker C, Schütte M, Kessler T, Ochsenreither S, Ditzhaus M, Sprünken ED, Dörpholz G, Lamping M, Rieke DT, Klinghammer K, Burock S, Ulrich C, Poch G, Schäfer R, Klauschen F, Joussen A, Yaspo ML, Keilholz U. Biomarker-driven therapies for metastatic uveal melanoma: A prospective precision oncology feasibility study. Eur J Cancer 2022; 169:146-155. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
354
|
Chan PY, Phillips MM, Ellis S, Johnston A, Feng X, Arora A, Hay G, Cohen VML, Sagoo MS, Bomalaski JS, Sheaff MT, Szlosarek PW. A Phase 1 study of ADI-PEG20 (pegargiminase) combined with cisplatin and pemetrexed in ASS1-negative metastatic uveal melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 2022; 35:461-470. [PMID: 35466524 PMCID: PMC9322321 DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.13042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) is a devastating disease with few treatment options. We evaluated the safety, tolerability and preliminary activity of arginine depletion using pegylated arginine deiminase (ADI‐PEG20; pegargiminase) combined with pemetrexed (Pem) and cisplatin (Cis) chemotherapy in a phase 1 dose‐expansion study of patients with argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS1)‐deficient metastatic UM. Eligible patients received up to six cycles of Pem (500 mg/m2) and Cis (75 mg/m2) every 3 weeks plus weekly intramuscular ADI (36 mg/m2), followed by maintenance ADI until progression (NCT02029690). Ten of fourteen ASS1‐deficient patients with UM liver metastases and a median of one line of prior immunotherapy received ADIPemCis. Only one ≥ grade 3 adverse event of febrile neutropenia was reported. Seven patients had stable disease with a median progression‐free survival of 3.0 months (range, 1.3–8.1) and a median overall survival of 11.5 months (range, 3.2–36.9). Despite anti‐ADI‐PEG20 antibody emergence, plasma arginine concentrations remained suppressed by 18 weeks with a reciprocal increase in plasma citrulline. Tumour rebiopsies at progression revealed ASS1 re‐expression as an escape mechanism. ADIPemCis was well tolerated with modest disease stabilisation in metastatic UM. Further investigation of arginine deprivation is indicated in UM including combinations with immune checkpoint blockade and additional anti‐metabolite strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pui Ying Chan
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.,Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Melissa M Phillips
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Stephen Ellis
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Xiaoxing Feng
- Polaris Pharmaceuticals Inc, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Amit Arora
- Department of Ocular Oncology, Moorfields Eye Hospital, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gordon Hay
- Department of Ocular Oncology, Moorfields Eye Hospital, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Victoria M L Cohen
- Department of Ocular Oncology, Moorfields Eye Hospital, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mandeep S Sagoo
- Department of Ocular Oncology, Moorfields Eye Hospital, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology at Moorfields Eye Hospital and University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| | | | - Michael T Sheaff
- Department of Histopathology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Peter W Szlosarek
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.,Centre for Cancer Biomarkers and Biotherapeutics, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
355
|
Garbe C, Amaral T, Peris K, Hauschild A, Arenberger P, Basset-Seguin N, Bastholt L, Bataille V, Del Marmol V, Dréno B, Fargnoli MC, Forsea AM, Grob JJ, Hoeller C, Kaufmann R, Kelleners-Smeets N, Lallas A, Lebbé C, Lytvynenko B, Malvehy J, Moreno-Ramirez D, Nathan P, Pellacani G, Saiag P, Stratigos AJ, Van Akkooi ACJ, Vieira R, Zalaudek I, Lorigan P. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 2: Treatment - Update 2022. Eur J Cancer 2022; 170:256-284. [PMID: 35623961 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
A unique collaboration of multidisciplinary experts from the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed to make recommendations on cutaneous melanoma diagnosis and treatment, based on the systematic literature reviews and the experts' experience. Cutaneous melanomas are excised with one to 2-cm safety margins. Sentinel lymph node dissection shall be performed as a staging procedure in patients with tumor thickness ≥1.0 mm or ≥0.8 mm with additional histological risk factors, although there is as yet no clear survival benefit for this approach. Therapeutic decisions in stage III/IV patients should be primarily made by an interdisciplinary oncology team ("tumor board"). Adjuvant therapies can be proposed in stage III/completely resected stage IV patients and are primarily anti-PD-1, independent of mutational status, or alternatively dabrafenib plus trametinib for BRAF mutant patients. In distant metastases (stage IV), either resected or not, systemic treatment is always indicated. For first-line treatment particularly in BRAF wild-type patients, immunotherapy with PD-1 antibodies alone or in combination with CTLA-4 antibodies shall be considered. In stage IV melanoma with a BRAF-V600 E/K mutation, first-line therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors can be offered as an alternative to immunotherapy. In patients with primary resistance to immunotherapy and harboring a BRAF-V600 E/K mutation, this therapy shall be offered as second-line therapy. Systemic therapy in stage III/IV melanoma is a rapidly changing landscape, and it is likely that these recommendations may change in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claus Garbe
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Teresa Amaral
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ketty Peris
- Institute of Dermatology, Università Cattolica, Rome, Italy; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Petr Arenberger
- Department of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Nicole Basset-Seguin
- Université Paris Cite, AP-HP, Department of Dermatology INSERM U 976 Hôpital, Saint Louis Paris France
| | - Lars Bastholt
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Veronique Bataille
- Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
| | - Veronique Del Marmol
- Department of Dermatology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Brigitte Dréno
- Dermatology Department, CHU Nantes, CIC 1413, CRCINA, University Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Maria C Fargnoli
- Dermatology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Ana-Maria Forsea
- Dermatology Department, Elias University Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania
| | | | | | - Roland Kaufmann
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Aimilios Lallas
- First Department of Dermatology, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Celeste Lebbé
- Université Paris Cite, AP-HP, Department of Dermatology INSERM U 976 Hôpital, Saint Louis Paris France
| | - Bodhan Lytvynenko
- Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kiev, Ukraine
| | - Josep Malvehy
- Melanoma Unit, Department of Dermatology, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Moreno-Ramirez
- Medical-&-Surgical Dermatology Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Paul Nathan
- Mount-Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood United Kingdom
| | | | - Philippe Saiag
- University Department of Dermatology, Université de Versailles-Saint Quentin en Yvelines, APHP, Boulogne, France
| | - Alexander J Stratigos
- First Department of Dermatology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Andreas Sygros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexander C J Van Akkooi
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, and Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ricardo Vieira
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Iris Zalaudek
- Dermatology Clinic, Maggiore Hospital, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
356
|
Ramtohul T, Cohen A, Rodrigues M, Piperno-Neumann S, Cabel L, Cassoux N, Lumbroso-Le Rouic L, Malaise D, Gardrat S, Pierron G, Mariani P, Servois V. Tumour growth rate improves tumour assessment and first-line systemic treatment decision-making for immunotherapy in patients with liver metastatic uveal melanoma. Br J Cancer 2022; 127:258-267. [PMID: 35347325 PMCID: PMC9296460 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01793-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The RECIST-based response variably matches the clinical benefit of systemic therapies for liver metastatic uveal melanoma (LMUM). The aims were to determine whether the tumour growth rate (TGR) can help predict the survival in patients with LMUM and to provide information for the management of first-line systemic treatment. METHODS This retrospective study included 147 (training: n = 110, validation: n = 37) patients with LMUM treated with first-line systemic treatment between 2010 and 2021. Two TGR-derived parameters were calculated, TGR0 and TGR3m. Multivariate Cox analyses identified independent predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS TGR3m was a strong independent prognostic factor of PFS and OS (p < 0.001). The RECIST-based response was no longer significant in the OS analyses. Only immunotherapy regimens correlated with higher OS (HR = 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.5; p < 0.001) in the low-TGR3m (≤50%/m) subgroup. These findings were confirmed in the validation cohort. TGR0, disease-free interval (DFI), and the sum of target lesions at baseline were predictive factors of low TGR3m. DISCUSSION The use of TGR3m would improve tumour assessment by identifying patients who would benefit from first-line immunotherapy regimens despite PD. TGR0, DFI and the sum of target lesions were correlated with TGR3m, which can support first-line treatment decision-making for immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toulsie Ramtohul
- Department of Radiology, Institut Curie, Paris, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| | - Axel Cohen
- Department of Radiology, Institut Curie, Paris, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Manuel Rodrigues
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris and St. Cloud, Paris, France
- INSERM U830, DNA Repair and Uveal Melanoma (D.R.U.M.), Paris, France
| | - Sophie Piperno-Neumann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris and St. Cloud, Paris, France
| | - Luc Cabel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris and St. Cloud, Paris, France
| | - Nathalie Cassoux
- Department of Ocular Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- UMR 144 CNRS, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Denis Malaise
- Department of Ocular Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- INSERM U1288, PSL Research University, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie, 91400, Orsay, France
| | - Sophie Gardrat
- INSERM U830, DNA Repair and Uveal Melanoma (D.R.U.M.), Paris, France
- Department of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Gaëlle Pierron
- Somatic Genetic Unit, Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
| | - Pascale Mariani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Vincent Servois
- Department of Radiology, Institut Curie, Paris, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
357
|
Solnik M, Paduszyńska N, Czarnecka AM, Synoradzki KJ, Yousef YA, Chorągiewicz T, Rejdak R, Toro MD, Zweifel S, Dyndor K, Fiedorowicz M. Imaging of Uveal Melanoma—Current Standard and Methods in Development. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133147. [PMID: 35804919 PMCID: PMC9265106 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Uveal melanoma is the most prevalent intraocular tumor in adults, derived from melanocytes; the liver is the most common site of its metastases. Due to troublesome tumor localization, different imaging techniques are utilized in diagnostics, i.e., fundus imaging (FI), ultrasonography (US), optical coherence tomography (OCT), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), or fundus autofluorescence (FAF). Specialists eagerly use these techniques, but sometimes the precision and quality of the obtained images are imperfect, raising diagnostic doubts and prompting the search for new ones. In addition to analyzing the currently utilized methods, this review also introduces experimental techniques that may be adapted to clinical practice in the future. Moreover, we raise the topic and present a perspective for personalized medicine in uveal melanoma treatment. Abstract Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults, characterized by an insidious onset and poor prognosis strongly associated with tumor size and the presence of distant metastases, most commonly in the liver. Contrary to most tumor identification, a biopsy followed by a pathological exam is used only in certain cases. Therefore, an early and noninvasive diagnosis is essential to enhance patients’ chances for early treatment. We reviewed imaging modalities currently used in the diagnostics of uveal melanoma, including fundus imaging, ultrasonography (US), optical coherence tomography (OCT), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), as well as positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The principle of imaging techniques is briefly explained, along with their role in the diagnostic process and a summary of their advantages and limitations. Further, the experimental data and the advancements in imaging modalities are explained. We describe UM imaging innovations, show their current usage and development, and explain the possibilities of utilizing such modalities to diagnose uveal melanoma in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Małgorzata Solnik
- Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (N.P.)
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 Roentgen Str., 02-781 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Natalia Paduszyńska
- Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (N.P.)
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 Roentgen Str., 02-781 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Anna M. Czarnecka
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 Roentgen Str., 02-781 Warsaw, Poland;
- Department of Experimental Pharmacology, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, 5 Pawinskiego Str., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Kamil J. Synoradzki
- Department of Experimental Pharmacology, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, 5 Pawinskiego Str., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
- Small Animal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Laboratory, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, 5 Pawinskiego Str., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland;
- Correspondence:
| | - Yacoub A. Yousef
- Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), King Hussein Cancer Centre, Amman 11941, Jordan;
| | - Tomasz Chorągiewicz
- Department of General and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Medical University of Lublin, Chmielna 1, 20-079 Lublin, Poland; (T.C.); (R.R.); (M.D.T.)
| | - Robert Rejdak
- Department of General and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Medical University of Lublin, Chmielna 1, 20-079 Lublin, Poland; (T.C.); (R.R.); (M.D.T.)
| | - Mario Damiano Toro
- Department of General and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Medical University of Lublin, Chmielna 1, 20-079 Lublin, Poland; (T.C.); (R.R.); (M.D.T.)
- Eye Clinic, Public Health Department, Federico II University, via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Sandrine Zweifel
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
| | - Katarzyna Dyndor
- Department of Radiography, Medical University of Lublin, 8 Jaczewskiego Str., 20-090 Lublin, Poland;
| | - Michał Fiedorowicz
- Small Animal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Laboratory, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, 5 Pawinskiego Str., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland;
| |
Collapse
|
358
|
Recent Advances and Challenges in Uveal Melanoma Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133094. [PMID: 35804863 PMCID: PMC9264803 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Although it can be controlled locally, half of the patients still develop metastases. To date, there have been no standard therapeutic strategies for the prevention or treatment of metastases. Existing therapies, such as chemotherapy and targeted therapies, induce only minimal responses. This review focuses on newly published research on immunotherapy. We highlight expanding treatments and their clinical outcomes, as well as propose promising new treatments and feasible checkpoints. Based on these findings, we provide innovative insights into feasible strategies for the treatment of patients with uveal melanoma. Abstract Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Compared to cutaneous melanoma (CM), which mainly harbors BRAF or NRAS mutations, UM predominantly harbors GNAQ or GNA11 mutations. Although primary UM can be controlled locally, approximately 50% of patients still develop metastases. To date, there have been no standard therapeutic strategies for the prevention or treatment of metastases. Unfortunately, chemotherapy and targeted therapies only induce minimal responses in patients with metastatic UM, with a median survival time of only 4–5 months after metastasis detection. Immunotherapy agents, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, have achieved pioneering outcomes in CM but have shown limited effects in UM. Researchers have explored several feasible checkpoints to identify options for future therapies. Cancer vaccines have shown little in the way of therapeutic benefit in patients with UM, and there are few ongoing trials providing favorable evidence, but adoptive cell transfer-related therapies seem promising and deserve further investigation. More recently, the immune-mobilizing monoclonal T-cell receptor against the cancer molecule tebentafusp showed impressive antitumor effects. Meanwhile, oncolytic viruses and small molecule inhibitors have also gained ground. This review highlights recent progress in burgeoning treatments and provides innovative insights on feasible strategies for the treatment of UM.
Collapse
|
359
|
Farhoumand LS, Fiorentzis M, Kraemer MM, Sak A, Stuschke M, Rassaf T, Hendgen-Cotta U, Bechrakis NE, Berchner-Pfannschmidt U. The Adrenergic Receptor Antagonist Carvedilol Elicits Anti-Tumor Responses in Uveal Melanoma 3D Tumor Spheroids and May Serve as Co-Adjuvant Therapy with Radiation. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133097. [PMID: 35804869 PMCID: PMC9264933 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular tumor in adults. Despite local tumor control, no effective therapy has been found to prevent metastasis, resulting in a high mortality rate. In the present study, we evaluated the anti-tumor potential of non-selective ß-blockers in 3D tumor spheroids grown from UM cell lines. Of the various ß-blockers tested, carvedilol and its enantiomers were most potent in decreasing the viability of Mel270 spheroids. Carvedilol at a concentration of 10–50 µM significantly elicited cytotoxicity and induced apoptosis in spheroid cells. In result, carvedilol inhibited tumor spheroid growth and compactness, and furthermore prevented the long-term survival and repopulation of spreading spheroid cells. The drug sensitivity of the different spheroids grown from Mel270, 92-1, UPMD2, or UPMM3 cell lines was dependent on 3D morphology rather than on high-risk cytogenetic profile or adrenergic receptor expression levels. In fact, the monosomy-3-containing UPMM3 cell line was most responsive to carvedilol treatment compared to the other cell lines. The concurrent treatment of UPMM3 spheroids with carvedilol and 5 or 10 Gy irradiation revealed additive cytotoxic effects that provided tumor control. Collectively, our data demonstrate the anti-tumor properties of carvedilol and its enantiomers, which may serve as candidates for the co-adjuvant therapy of UM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina S. Farhoumand
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (L.S.F.); (M.F.); (M.M.K.); (N.E.B.)
| | - Miltiadis Fiorentzis
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (L.S.F.); (M.F.); (M.M.K.); (N.E.B.)
| | - Miriam M. Kraemer
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (L.S.F.); (M.F.); (M.M.K.); (N.E.B.)
| | - Ali Sak
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.S.); (M.S.)
| | - Martin Stuschke
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.S.); (M.S.)
| | - Tienush Rassaf
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (T.R.); (U.H.-C.)
| | - Ulrike Hendgen-Cotta
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (T.R.); (U.H.-C.)
| | - Nikolaos E. Bechrakis
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (L.S.F.); (M.F.); (M.M.K.); (N.E.B.)
| | - Utta Berchner-Pfannschmidt
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (L.S.F.); (M.F.); (M.M.K.); (N.E.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-201-723-6028
| |
Collapse
|
360
|
Gill V, Herrspiegel C, Sabazade S, Fili M, Bergman L, Damato B, Seregard S, Stålhammar G. Trends in Uveal Melanoma Presentation and Survival During Five Decades: A Nationwide Survey of 3898 Swedish Patients. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:926034. [PMID: 35721086 PMCID: PMC9200980 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.926034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In contrast to most other cancers, uveal melanoma (UM) is characterized by an absence of major improvements in patient survival during the last several decades. In this study, we examine changes in incidence rates, patient age and tumor size at diagnosis, treatment practices and survival for patients diagnosed in Sweden during the period 1960-2010. Methods All patients diagnosed with posterior UM between January 1st, 1960, and December 31st, 2009, in Sweden, were included (n = 3898). Trends in incidence, primary treatment modality, patient age and tumor size were analyzed. Disease-specific survival was plotted in Kaplan-Meier curves and the cumulative incidence of UM-related mortality was evaluated in competing risk analysis. Results Crude (6.5-11.6 cases/million/year) and age-standardized incidence rates (5.6-9.6 cases/million/year) varied between individual years during the study period, but both had a stable linear trend overall (p ≥ 0.12). Gradually, plaque brachytherapy with ruthenium-106 replaced enucleation as the most common primary treatment. The mean patient age at diagnosis increased from 59.8 years in 1960 to 66.0 in 2009. Conversely, the mean tumor size became gradually smaller during the period. In linear regression, the basal diameter and tumor apical thickness decreased with a slope coefficient of -0.03 mm (p = 0.012) and -0.05 mm (p = 1.2 × 10-5) per year after 1960, respectively. Patients diagnosed after 1990 had significantly better disease-specific survival than patients diagnosed before 1990 (p = 2.0 × 10-17). Similarly, the cumulative incidence of UM-related mortality was highest for patients diagnosed 1960-1969 and 1970-1979, with slightly lower incidences for patients diagnosed 1980-1989 and even lower for those diagnosed after 1990 (p = 7.1 × 10-13). The incidence of mortality from other causes than UM did not differ between periods (p = 0.16). Conclusion In the period from 1960-2010, crude and age-standardized incidence rates of UM have remained stable in Sweden. Several other aspects have changed: Plaque brachytherapy with ruthenium-106 has replaced enucleation as the most common primary treatment modality; patients have become older and their tumors smaller at the time of diagnosis; and their survival has improved. This might indicate a beneficial survival effect of earlier diagnosis and treatment, but the potential influence from lead-time bias should be taken into consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viktor Gill
- Department of Pathology, Västmanland Hospital Västerås, Västerås, Sweden.,Division of Eye and Vision, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christina Herrspiegel
- Division of Eye and Vision, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Shiva Sabazade
- Division of Eye and Vision, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria Fili
- St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Bertil Damato
- St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Ocular Oncology Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.,Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Stefan Seregard
- Division of Eye and Vision, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gustav Stålhammar
- Division of Eye and Vision, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
361
|
Zhang R, Chen X, Chen S, Tang J, Chen F, Lin Y, Reinach PS, Yan X, Tu L, Duan H, Qu J, Hou Q. Inhibition of CD146 lessens uveal melanoma progression through reducing angiogenesis and vasculogenic mimicry. Cell Oncol (Dordr) 2022; 45:557-572. [PMID: 35716258 DOI: 10.1007/s13402-022-00682-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Anti-angiogenesis drug therapy is ineffective in treating uveal melanoma since it only targets angiogenesis leaving vasculogenic mimicry aside. There is no effective clinical strategy targeting vasculogenic mimicry, yet. We show here that CD146 is a novel target to inhibit uveal melanoma progression since it regulates both uveal melanoma angiogenesis and vasculogenic mimicry activity. METHODS CD146 inhibition was achieved with its specific siRNAs or antibody AA98. Tube formation and migration of primary human retinal microvascular endothelial cells and tube-like structure formation, migration, invasion of uveal melanoma cells were evaluated after CD146 inhibition. The underlying mechanisms were investigated by Western blot and immunofluorescence. Finally, uveal melanoma cells were injected subretinally into the eyes of nude mice and AA98 was administrated. Tumor size was revealed by H&E staining, and angiogenesis and vasculogenic mimicry were evaluated with CD31-PAS staining. RESULTS CD146 inhibition induced declines in tube formation and migration of primary human retinal microvascular endothelial cells and tube-like structure formation of uveal melanoma cells. CD146 mediated VEGFR/AKT/p38/NF-κB and FAK/VE-cadherin signal cascades were partially responsible for these biological effects. CD146 blockade by siRNA or AA98 also resulted in inhibition of migration and invasion as well as EMT process of uveal melanoma cells. The physiological relevance of such declines was confirmed by showing that AA98 treatment markedly suppressed the tumor growth, angiogenesis and vasculogenic mimicry induced by implantation of uveal melanoma cells into the eyes of nude mice. CONCLUSIONS CD146 is a novel mediator of both angiogenesis and vasculogenic mimicry in uveal melanoma. Its antibody AA98 has the potency to be developed as a new antibody drug for treating uveal melanoma. Our results warrant further assessment of CD146 as a potential target to improve therapeutic management of uveal melanoma in a clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronghan Zhang
- School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325037, Zhejiang, China.,State Key Laboratory of Optometry, Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325037, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiaogang Chen
- School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325037, Zhejiang, China.,State Key Laboratory of Optometry, Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325037, Zhejiang, China
| | - Shengwen Chen
- School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325037, Zhejiang, China.,State Key Laboratory of Optometry, Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325037, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jiajia Tang
- School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325037, Zhejiang, China.,State Key Laboratory of Optometry, Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325037, Zhejiang, China
| | - Feng Chen
- School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325037, Zhejiang, China.,State Key Laboratory of Optometry, Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325037, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yong Lin
- School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325037, Zhejiang, China.,State Key Laboratory of Optometry, Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325037, Zhejiang, China
| | - Peter Sol Reinach
- School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325037, Zhejiang, China.,State Key Laboratory of Optometry, Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325037, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiyun Yan
- Key Laboratory of Protein and Peptide Pharmaceutical, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.,College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.,Joint Laboratory of Nanozymes in Zhengzhou University, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China
| | - LiLi Tu
- School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325037, Zhejiang, China.,State Key Laboratory of Optometry, Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325037, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hongxia Duan
- Key Laboratory of Protein and Peptide Pharmaceutical, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
| | - Jia Qu
- School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325037, Zhejiang, China. .,State Key Laboratory of Optometry, Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325037, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Qiang Hou
- School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325037, Zhejiang, China. .,State Key Laboratory of Optometry, Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325037, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
362
|
Wang H, Zhao S, Liu Y, Sun F, Huang X, Wu T. Sclerostin Suppression Facilitates Uveal Melanoma Progression Through Activating Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Via Binding to Membrane Receptors LRP5/LRP6. Front Oncol 2022; 12:898047. [PMID: 35785219 PMCID: PMC9248439 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.898047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most frequent primary eye cancer in adults with a 50% mortality rate. Characterizing the fundamental signaling pathways that drive UM is of importance for the development of targeted therapy. This study aims to probe the impact of sclerostin (SOST) on malignant progression of UM and regulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Methods Epithelial-type (n=20) and spindle-type (n=16) UM tissues were collected for immunohistochemical staining of SOST, Wnt-1, and β-catenin expressions. SOST was silenced in three UM cell lines (primary spindle-type OCM-1 cells, metastatic epithelial Mum-2B cells, and metastatic spindle-type Mum-2C cells) through transfecting specific siRNA. RT-qPCR and Western blot were presented for examining the levels of SOST, and markers in Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Flow cytometry, MTT, EdU, transwell, and tube formation assays were conducted, respectively. By implanting BALB/c nude murine models in situ, the function of SOST on tumor growth was investigated, followed by immunofluorescence double staining of SOST and LRP5/6. Results Low SOST expression as well as high Wnt-1 and β-catenin expressions were found in epithelial-type (high malignancy) than spindle-type (low malignancy) UM tissues. Silencing SOST activated the markers in Wnt/β-catenin signaling as well as accelerated cell cycle progression, migration, invasion, angiogenesis, and reduced apoptosis in UM cells. In situ tumor formation in murine eyes showed that SOST knockdown promoted tumor growth. Moreover, SOST interacted with LRP5/LRP6. Conclusion SOST silencing may facilitate the malignant progression of UM cells through activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Mechanistically, SOST may exert this function by interacting with LRP5/LRP6 membrane receptors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanqing Wang
- Department of Orbital Disease and Oculoplastic Surgery, Sichuan Eye Hospital, Aier Eye Hospital Group, Chengdu, China
- Department of Orbital Disease and Oculoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Sidi Zhao
- Department of Orbital Disease and Oculoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Research and Development Department, Microsensor Labs, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Fengyuan Sun
- Department of Orbital Disease and Oculoplastic Surgery, Sichuan Eye Hospital, Aier Eye Hospital Group, Chengdu, China
- Department of Orbital Disease and Oculoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiaoming Huang
- Department of Orbital Disease and Oculoplastic Surgery, Sichuan Eye Hospital, Aier Eye Hospital Group, Chengdu, China
- Department of Orbital Disease and Oculoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China
- *Correspondence: Tong Wu, ; Xiaoming Huang,
| | - Tong Wu
- Department of Orbital Disease and Oculoplastic Surgery, Sichuan Eye Hospital, Aier Eye Hospital Group, Chengdu, China
- Department of Orbital Disease and Oculoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China
- *Correspondence: Tong Wu, ; Xiaoming Huang,
| |
Collapse
|
363
|
Carvajal RD, Nathan P, Sacco JJ, Orloff M, Hernandez-Aya LF, Yang J, Luke JJ, Butler MO, Stanhope S, Collins L, McAlpine C, Holland C, Abdullah SE, Sato T. Phase I Study of Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Tebentafusp Using a Step-Up Dosing Regimen and Expansion in Patients With Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1939-1948. [PMID: 35254876 PMCID: PMC9177239 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This phase I study aimed to define the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of tebentafusp, a first-in-class T-cell receptor/anti-CD3 bispecific protein, using a three-week step-up dosing regimen, and to assess its safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary clinical activity in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). METHODS In this open-label, international, phase I/II study, HLA-A*02 or HLA-A*02:01+ patients with mUM received tebentafusp 20 μg once in week 1 and 30 μg once in week 2. Dose escalation (starting at 54 μg) began at week 3 in a standard 3 + 3 design to define RP2D. Expansion-phase patients were treated at the RP2D (20-30-68 μg). Blood and tumor samples were collected for pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics assessment, and treatment efficacy was evaluated for all patients with baseline efficacy data as of December 2017. RESULTS Between March 2016 and December 2017, 42 eligible patients who failed a median of two previous treatments were enrolled: 19 in the dose escalation cohort and 23 in an initial dose expansion cohort. Of the dose levels investigated, 68 μg was identified as the RP2D. Most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events regardless of attribution were pyrexia (91%), rash (83%), pruritus (83%), nausea (74%), fatigue (71%), and chills (69%). Toxicity attenuated following the first three doses. The overall response rate was 11.9% (95% CI, 4.0 to 25.6). With a median follow-up of 32.4 months, median overall survival was 25.5 months (range, 0.89-31.1 months) and 1-year overall survival rate was 67%. Treatment was associated with increased tumor T-cell infiltration and transient increases in serum inflammatory mediators. CONCLUSION Using a step-up dosing regimen of tebentafusp allowed a 36% increase in the RP2D compared with weekly fixed dosing, with a manageable side-effect profile and a signal of efficacy in mUM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard D. Carvajal
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Paul Nathan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph J. Sacco
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Bebington, United Kingdom
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Marlana Orloff
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Jessica Yang
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Jason J. Luke
- University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- UPMC/University of Pittsburgh Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Takami Sato
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
364
|
Seth R, Messersmith H, Funchain P. Systemic Therapy for Melanoma: ASCO Guideline Rapid Recommendation Update. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:2375-2377. [PMID: 35658488 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
ASCO Rapid Recommendations Updates highlight revisions to select ASCO guideline recommendations as a response to the emergence of new and practice-changing data. The rapid updates are supported by an evidence review and follow the guideline development processes outlined in the ASCO Guideline Methodology Manual. The goal of these articles is to disseminate updated recommendations, in a timely manner, to better inform health practitioners and the public on the best available cancer care options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Seth
- SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
365
|
Olivier T, Prasad V. Tebentafusp in first-line melanoma trials: An outperforming outlier. Transl Oncol 2022; 20:101408. [PMID: 35364557 PMCID: PMC8968051 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma is distinct from other melanomas. Tebentafusp provided an overall survival benefit in HLA-A*02:01-positive patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. With discrepancy between overall survival and progression-free survival, the result is an outlier in melanoma trials. Confirmatory trials are needed for this compound.
Uveal melanoma is distinct from other melanomas. In the advanced and metastatic stages, little to no improvement have been seen over time. Tebentafusp is a novel mechanism of action bispecific gp100 peptide-HLA-directed CD3 T-cell engager fusion protein (“-fusp”). Tebentafusp was granted full approval on January 25th 2022 in the setting of HLA-A*02:01-positive adult patients with unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma. The approval was based on the overall survival advantage of tebentafusp over physician's choice therapy, in previously untreated uveal melanoma patients, based on the IMCgp100-202 trial. While we welcome positive results for this unmet need, three issues are raised by the trial. First, the control arm was restricted, precluding important options. Second, post-progression treatment was provided to a smaller fraction of patients than in real-life, which raises the question of whether overall survival was negatively impacted by limited care after the trial ended. Finally, the discrepancy between overall survival and progression-free survival benefit is an outlier in the context of previous melanoma trials. While it is clear that tebentafusp has an important role to play in this tumor type, the exact line is not yet well known. Confirmatory trials are needed for this compound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothée Olivier
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, 4 Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil Street, Geneva 1205, Switzerland; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, 2nd Fl, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
| | - Vinay Prasad
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, 2nd Fl, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| |
Collapse
|
366
|
Meijer N, de Bruyn DP, de Klein A, Paridaens D, Verdijk RM, Berendschot TTM, Brosens E, Jager MJ, Kiliç E. High C-Reactive Protein Levels Are Related to Better Survival in Patients with Uveal Melanoma. OPHTHALMOLOGY SCIENCE 2022; 2:100117. [PMID: 36249686 PMCID: PMC9560527 DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2022.100117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To determine whether peripheral blood leukocyte numbers and serum markers of inflammation can be used to predict which patients with primary uveal melanoma will develop metastasis. Design Retrospective study. Participants Medical records of patients with uveal melanoma (UM) who received treatment for primary UM between February 1992 and December 2020 at the Erasmus University Medical Center (Rotterdam, The Netherlands) and the Rotterdam Eye Hospital (Rotterdam, The Netherlands) were reviewed. Methods Inclusion criteria were the presence of a melanoma of the choroid or ciliary body and the availability of data from peripheral blood samples taken before treatment of the melanoma. Data including patient demographics, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels; erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); number of leukocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes; and histopathologic findings were obtained from medical records. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) were calculated. Main Outcome Measures Metastasis-free survival. Results Of the 807 patients with UM, serum and leukocyte data were available for 183 of them at the time of primary tumor treatment. In the total group, no correlation was found between ESR before treatment; the number of leukocytes; percentages of neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes; or NLR or LMR values and any of the clinical characteristics or metastasis-free survival. Among patients who underwent enucleation, those with negative BAP1 findings showed significantly lower numbers of leukocytes (P < 0.05). In the entire cohort, a significant association was found between high CRP levels and longer metastasis-free survival (MFS; P = 0.049). Conclusions The total blood leukocyte number was related to loss of BAP1 staining in patients who underwent enucleation, with lower leukocyte counts correlating with absent BAP1 staining. Higher CRP levels were associated with a longer MFS in the entire cohort. Neither the NLR nor the LMR is a good predictor for metastasis developing in patients with UM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikki Meijer
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Ophthalmology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Daniël P. de Bruyn
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annelies de Klein
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dion Paridaens
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Ocular Oncology, Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert M. Verdijk
- Department of Ocular Oncology, Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tos T.J. M. Berendschot
- Department of Ophthalmology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Erwin Brosens
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martine J. Jager
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: Martine J. Jager, MD, PhD, Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, P. O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Emine Kiliç
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
367
|
Kraehenbuehl L, Holland A, Armstrong E, O’Shea S, Mangarin L, Chekalil S, Johnston A, Bomalaski JS, Erinjeri JP, Barker CA, Francis JH, Wolchok JD, Merghoub T, Shoushtari AN. Pilot Trial of Arginine Deprivation Plus Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112638. [PMID: 35681616 PMCID: PMC9179243 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Uveal melanoma is a rare subtype of malignant melanoma. It is known to rapidly metastasize, with the liver being the most frequently affected organ. Due to differences from melanoma arising in the skin, such as a lower number of mutations, it responds poorly to immune checkpoint blockade, a treatment approach reinvigorating the patient’s immune system to eliminate the cancer. We here investigated the safety and tolerability of a new combination treatment consisting of two established immunotherapy medications (ipilimumab and nivolumab) with the addition of an experimental arginine depleting medication, pegylated arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG 20), which is thought to make uveal melanoma more amenable to immunotherapy. This novel treatment approach was found to be safe and well-tolerated but did not improve the clinical outcome beyond the expected limited efficacy of approved immunotherapy alone. Abstract Metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) remains challenging to treat, with objective response rates to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) being much lower than in primary cutaneous melanoma (CM). Besides a lower mutational burden, the overall immune-excluded tumor microenvironment of UM might contribute to the poor response rate. We therefore aimed at targeting deficiency in argininosuccinate synthase 1, which is a key metabolic feature of UM. This study aims at investigating the safety and tolerability of a triple combination consisting of ipilimumab and nivolumab immunotherapy and the metabolic therapy, ADI-PEG 20. Nine patients were enrolled in this pilot study. The combination therapy was safe and tolerable with an absence of immune-related adverse events (irAE) of special interest, but with four of nine patients experiencing a CTCAE grade 3 AE. No objective responses were observed. All except one patient developed anti-drug antibodies (ADA) within a month of the treatment initiation and therefore did not maintain arginine depletion. Further, an IFNg-dependent inflammatory signature was observed in metastatic lesions in patients pre-treated with ICB compared with patients with no pretreatment. Multiplex immunohistochemistry demonstrated variable presence of tumor infiltrating CD8 lymphocytes and PD-L1 expression at the baseline in metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Kraehenbuehl
- Ludwig Collaborative and Swim Across America Laboratory, Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, NY 10065, USA; (L.K.); (A.H.); (L.M.); (S.C.); (J.D.W.); (T.M.)
| | - Aliya Holland
- Ludwig Collaborative and Swim Across America Laboratory, Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, NY 10065, USA; (L.K.); (A.H.); (L.M.); (S.C.); (J.D.W.); (T.M.)
| | - Emma Armstrong
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.A.); (S.O.)
| | - Sirinya O’Shea
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.A.); (S.O.)
| | - Levi Mangarin
- Ludwig Collaborative and Swim Across America Laboratory, Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, NY 10065, USA; (L.K.); (A.H.); (L.M.); (S.C.); (J.D.W.); (T.M.)
| | - Sara Chekalil
- Ludwig Collaborative and Swim Across America Laboratory, Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, NY 10065, USA; (L.K.); (A.H.); (L.M.); (S.C.); (J.D.W.); (T.M.)
| | - Amanda Johnston
- Polaris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, CA 92121, USA; (A.J.); (J.S.B.)
| | - John S. Bomalaski
- Polaris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, CA 92121, USA; (A.J.); (J.S.B.)
| | - Joseph P. Erinjeri
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Christopher A. Barker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Jasmine H. Francis
- Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Jedd D. Wolchok
- Ludwig Collaborative and Swim Across America Laboratory, Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, NY 10065, USA; (L.K.); (A.H.); (L.M.); (S.C.); (J.D.W.); (T.M.)
- Weill Cornell Medical College; New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Taha Merghoub
- Ludwig Collaborative and Swim Across America Laboratory, Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, NY 10065, USA; (L.K.); (A.H.); (L.M.); (S.C.); (J.D.W.); (T.M.)
- Weill Cornell Medical College; New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Alexander N. Shoushtari
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.A.); (S.O.)
- Weill Cornell Medical College; New York, NY 10065, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-646-888-4161
| |
Collapse
|
368
|
Ascierto PA, Warner AB, Blank C, Caracò C, Demaria S, Gershenwald JE, Khushalani NI, Long GV, Luke JJ, Mehnert JM, Robert C, Rutkowski P, Tawbi HA, Osman I, Puzanov I. The "Great Debate" at Melanoma Bridge 2021, December 2nd-4th, 2021. J Transl Med 2022; 20:200. [PMID: 35538491 PMCID: PMC9087170 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-022-03406-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
The Great Debate session at the 2021 Melanoma Bridge virtual congress (December 2-4) featured counterpoint views from experts on seven important issues in melanoma. The debates considered the use of adoptive cell therapy versus use of bispecific antibodies, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitors versus immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting, whether the use of corticosteroids for the management of side effects have an impact on outcomes, the choice of programmed death (PD)-1 combination therapy with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen (CTLA)-4 or lymphocyte-activation gene (LAG)-3, whether radiation is needed for brain metastases, when lymphadenectomy should be integrated into the treatment plan and then the last debate, telemedicine versus face-to-face. As with previous Bridge congresses, the debates were assigned by meeting Chairs and positions taken by experts during the debates may not have necessarily reflected their respective personal view. Audiences voted both before and after each debate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo A Ascierto
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
| | | | | | - Corrado Caracò
- Division of Surgery of Melanoma and Skin Cancer, Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione Pascale" IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jason J Luke
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, UPMC) Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Janice M Mehnert
- Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Caroline Robert
- Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy Et Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Hussein A Tawbi
- Melanoma Medical Oncology, Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, MD Anderson Brain Metastasis Clinic, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Iman Osman
- New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Igor Puzanov
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
369
|
Bendall ML, Francis JH, Shoushtari AN, Nixon DF. Specific human endogenous retroviruses predict metastatic potential in uveal melanoma. JCI Insight 2022; 7:e147172. [PMID: 35349481 PMCID: PMC9090245 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.147172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is a unique disease in that patients with primary UM are well stratified based on their risk of developing metastasis, yet there are limited effective treatments once metastases occur. There is an urgent need to better understand the distinct molecular pathogenesis of UM and the characteristics of patients at high risk for metastasis to identify neoantigenic targets that can be used in immunotherapy and to develop novel therapeutic strategies that may effectively target this lethal transition. An important and overlooked area of molecular pathogenesis and neoantigenic targets in UM comes from human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs). We investigated the HERV expression landscape in primary UM and found that tumors were stratified into 4 HERV-based subsets that provide clear delineation of risk outcome and support subtypes identified by other molecular indicators. Specific HERV loci are associated with the risk of uveal melanoma metastasis and may offer mechanistic insights into this process, including dysregulation of HERVs on chromosomes 3 and 8. A HERV signature composed of 17 loci was sufficient to classify tumors according to subtype with greater than 95% accuracy, including at least 1 intergenic HERV with coding potential (HERVE_Xp11.23) that could represent a potential HERV E target for immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew L. Bendall
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Alexander N. Shoushtari
- Melanoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Douglas F. Nixon
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
370
|
Pham JP, Star P, Ardolino L, Smith A, Joshua AM. A review of the cutaneous toxicities of tebentafusp-Featuring two cases involving superficial bullous reactions. Australas J Dermatol 2022; 63:e279-e282. [PMID: 35510367 DOI: 10.1111/ajd.13866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- James P Pham
- St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.,St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Phoebe Star
- St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Luke Ardolino
- St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.,St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Annika Smith
- St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Melanoma Institute of Australia, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anthony M Joshua
- St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.,St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.,Melanoma Institute of Australia, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
371
|
Lodde GC, Jansen P, Möller I, Sucker A, Hassel JC, Forschner A, Eckardt J, Meier F, Reinhardt L, Kähler KC, Ziemer M, Schlaak M, Rahimi F, Schatton K, Meiss F, Gutzmer R, Pföhler C, Terheyden P, Schilling B, Sachse M, Heppt MV, Sindrilaru A, Leiter U, Zaremba A, Thielmann CM, Ugurel S, Zimmer L, Hadaschik E, Bechrakis NE, Schadendorf D, Westekemper H, Livingstone E, Griewank KG. Genetic characterization of advanced conjunctival melanoma and response to systemic treatment. Eur J Cancer 2022; 166:60-72. [PMID: 35279471 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conjunctival melanoma is a rare type of ocular melanoma, which is prone to local recurrence and metastasis and can lead to patient death. Novel therapeutic strategies have revolutionized cutaneous melanoma management. The efficacy of these therapies in conjunctival melanoma, however, has not been evaluated in larger patient cohorts. METHODS In this multi-center retrospective cohort study with additional screening of the ADOREG database, data were collected from 34 patients with metastatic conjunctival melanoma who received targeted therapy (TT) (BRAF ± MEK inhibitors) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) (anti-PD-1 ± anti-CTLA4). In 15 cases, tissue was available for targeted next-generation-sequencing (611 genes) and RNA sequencing. Driver mutations, tumor mutational burden, copy number variations and inflammatory/IFNγ gene expression signatures were determined. RESULTS Genetic characterization identified frequent BRAF (46.7%, 7/15), NRAS (26.7%, 4/15), NF1 (20%, 3/15), and TERT promoter (46.7%, 7/15) mutations. UV associated C>T and CC>TT mutations were common. Median follow-up time after start of first TT or ICI therapy was 13.2 months. In 26 patients receiving first-line ICI, estimated one-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 42.0%, PFS and overall survival (OS) 6.2 and 18.0 months, respectively. First-line TT was given to 8 patients, estimated one-year PFS rate was 54.7%, median PFS and OS 12.6 and 29.1 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support the role of UV irradiation in conjunctival melanoma and the genetic similarity with cutaneous melanoma. Conjunctival melanoma patients with advanced disease benefit from both targeted therapies (BRAF ± MEK inhibitors) and immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg C Lodde
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Philipp Jansen
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Inga Möller
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Antje Sucker
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Jessica C Hassel
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Andrea Forschner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Julia Eckardt
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU), Dresden, Germany.
| | - Lydia Reinhardt
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU), Dresden, Germany.
| | - Katharina C Kähler
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
| | - Mirjana Ziemer
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Max Schlaak
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Berlin, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany.
| | - Farnaz Rahimi
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany.
| | - Kerstin Schatton
- Heinrich-Heine-University, Medical Faculty, Department of Dermatology, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Frank Meiss
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany;University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology, Allergology and Phlebology, University Hospital Mühlenkreiskliniken Minden, Minden, Germany.
| | - Claudia Pföhler
- Saarland University Medical School, Department of Dermatology and Skin Cancer Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
| | - Patrick Terheyden
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
| | - Bastian Schilling
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
| | - Michael Sachse
- Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Phlebology, Klinikum Bremerhaven Reinkenheide, Germany.
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-7 Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Anca Sindrilaru
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany.
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Anne Zaremba
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Carl M Thielmann
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Selma Ugurel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Lisa Zimmer
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Eva Hadaschik
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | | | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Partner Site Essen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | - Elisabeth Livingstone
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Klaus G Griewank
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
372
|
Kennedy LB, Salama AKS. A Marathon Not a Sprint: Improving Outcomes for Patients With Metastatic Melanoma in 2022 and Beyond. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:353-354. [PMID: 35196070 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - April K S Salama
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
373
|
Switzer B, Puzanov I, Skitzki JJ, Hamad L, Ernstoff MS. Managing Metastatic Melanoma in 2022: A Clinical Review. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:335-351. [PMID: 35133862 PMCID: PMC9810138 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma remains the most lethal of the primary cutaneous neoplasms, and although the incidence of primary melanoma continues to rise, the mortality from metastatic disease remains unchanged, in part through advances in treatment. Major developments in immunomodulatory and targeted therapies have provided robust improvements in response and survival trends that have transformed the clinical management of patients with metastatic melanoma. Additional advances in immunologic and cancer cell biology have contributed to further optimization in (1) risk stratification, (2) prognostication, (3) treatment, (4) toxicity management, and (5) surveillance approaches for patients with an advanced melanoma diagnosis. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the historical and future advances regarding the translational and clinical implications of advanced melanoma and share multidisciplinary recommendations to aid clinicians in the navigation of current treatment approaches for a variety of patient cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Switzer
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Igor Puzanov
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Joseph J. Skitzki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Lamya Hamad
- Department of Pharmacy, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Marc S. Ernstoff
- ImmunoOncology Branch, Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD,Marc S. Ernstoff, MD, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850; e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
374
|
Lu Y, Yuan X, Wang M, He Z, Li H, Wang J, Li Q. Gut microbiota influence immunotherapy responses: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. J Hematol Oncol 2022; 15:47. [PMID: 35488243 PMCID: PMC9052532 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-022-01273-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 72.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The gut microbiota have long been recognized to play a key role in human health and disease. Currently, several lines of evidence from preclinical to clinical research have gradually established that the gut microbiota can modulate antitumor immunity and affect the efficacy of cancer immunotherapies, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Deciphering the underlying mechanisms reveals that the gut microbiota reprogram the immunity of the tumor microenvironment (TME) by engaging innate and/or adaptive immune cells. Notably, one of the primary modes by which the gut microbiota modulate antitumor immunity is by means of metabolites, which are small molecules that could spread from their initial location of the gut and impact local and systemic antitumor immune response to promote ICI efficiency. Mechanistic exploration provides novel insights for developing rational microbiota-based therapeutic strategies by manipulating gut microbiota, such as fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), probiotics, engineered microbiomes, and specific microbial metabolites, to augment the efficacy of ICI and advance the age utilization of microbiota precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuting Lu
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Xiangliang Yuan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Miao Wang
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Zhihao He
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Hongzhong Li
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Epigenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, China
| | - Ji Wang
- National Institute of TCM Constitution and Preventive Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
| | - Qin Li
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
| |
Collapse
|
375
|
Rola AC, Kalirai H, Taktak AFG, Eleuteri A, Krishna Y, Hussain R, Heimann H, Coupland SE. A Retrospective Analysis of 10 Years of Liver Surveillance Undertaken in Uveal Melanoma Patients Treated at the Supraregional "Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre", UK. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092187. [PMID: 35565316 PMCID: PMC9102800 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Around 45% of patients with uveal melanoma (UM) develop liver metastases on average 3 years after diagnosis of the primary tumour. After clinical detection of metastases, median patient survival is approximately one year. Early identification of metastases through liver surveillance is important so that targeted treatment can benefit affected patients, aiming to prolong their survival. The aim of our retrospective study was to investigate and correlate the characteristics of UM patients diagnosed and treated at a UK supraregional referral center, the Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre (LOOC), and who were included in the Centre’s liver screening programs for screening for liver metastases. “Real-world” data on the frequency of liver screening in patients after diagnosis and treatment of primary UM are lacking. Through the liver screening program, we found that metastases were detected in 37% of the 615 UM patients studied. A new output based on the prognostic indices of the Liverpool Uveal Melanoma Prognosticator Online version 3 (LUMPO3) model was fitted to the dataset of these patients and accurately estimated the time of onset of metastases. Abstract Purpose: To determine liver screening frequency and modality in UM patients following primary treatment, and the characteristics of detected metastases. Methods: A 10-year retrospective study of 615 UM patients undergoing liver surveillance in Liverpool. Information was collected from liver scan reports of these patients. Results: Of 615 UM patients analyzed, there were 337 men (55%) and 278 women (45%). Median age at primary treatment was 61 years (range, 22–94). At study end, median follow-up was 5.1 years, with 375 patients (61%) alive and 240 deceased (39%). Of the deceased patients, 187 (78%) died due to metastatic UM; 24 (10%) deaths were due to other causes; and 29 (12%) patients died of unknown conditions. In total, 3854 liver scans were performed in the 615 UM patients, with a median of 6.2 scans per patient (range, 1–40). Liver MRI was most frequently performed (62.8%). In total, 229 (37%) UM patients developed metastases during the study period: 150 were detected via liver surveillance and 79 were observed post-mortem. Conclusions: Metastatic UM onset is related to the size and genetic profiles of the primary UM, and can be predicted using the model LUMPO3. Regular liver surveillance allowed for timely detection of metastases, and through metastasectomy can lead to prolongation of life in some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alda Cunha Rola
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of System Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, 6 West Derby Street, William Henry Duncan Building, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK; (A.C.R.); (H.K.); (A.F.G.T.); (A.E.); (Y.K.); (R.H.); (H.H.)
| | - Helen Kalirai
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of System Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, 6 West Derby Street, William Henry Duncan Building, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK; (A.C.R.); (H.K.); (A.F.G.T.); (A.E.); (Y.K.); (R.H.); (H.H.)
- Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Department of Cellular Pathology, Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK
| | - Azzam F. G. Taktak
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of System Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, 6 West Derby Street, William Henry Duncan Building, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK; (A.C.R.); (H.K.); (A.F.G.T.); (A.E.); (Y.K.); (R.H.); (H.H.)
- Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK
| | - Antonio Eleuteri
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of System Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, 6 West Derby Street, William Henry Duncan Building, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK; (A.C.R.); (H.K.); (A.F.G.T.); (A.E.); (Y.K.); (R.H.); (H.H.)
- Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK
| | - Yamini Krishna
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of System Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, 6 West Derby Street, William Henry Duncan Building, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK; (A.C.R.); (H.K.); (A.F.G.T.); (A.E.); (Y.K.); (R.H.); (H.H.)
- Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Department of Cellular Pathology, Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK
| | - Rumana Hussain
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of System Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, 6 West Derby Street, William Henry Duncan Building, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK; (A.C.R.); (H.K.); (A.F.G.T.); (A.E.); (Y.K.); (R.H.); (H.H.)
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK
| | - Heinrich Heimann
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of System Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, 6 West Derby Street, William Henry Duncan Building, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK; (A.C.R.); (H.K.); (A.F.G.T.); (A.E.); (Y.K.); (R.H.); (H.H.)
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK
| | - Sarah E. Coupland
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of System Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, 6 West Derby Street, William Henry Duncan Building, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK; (A.C.R.); (H.K.); (A.F.G.T.); (A.E.); (Y.K.); (R.H.); (H.H.)
- Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Department of Cellular Pathology, Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +44-0151-794-9104
| |
Collapse
|
376
|
Persson ML, Douglas AM, Alvaro F, Faridi P, Larsen MR, Alonso MM, Vitanza NA, Dun MD. The intrinsic and microenvironmental features of diffuse midline glioma; implications for the development of effective immunotherapeutic treatment strategies. Neuro Oncol 2022; 24:1408-1422. [PMID: 35481923 PMCID: PMC9435509 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Diffuse midline glioma (DMG), including those of the brainstem (diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma), are pediatric tumors of the central nervous system (CNS). Recognized as the most lethal of all childhood cancers, palliative radiotherapy remains the only proven treatment option, however, even for those that respond, survival is only temporarily extended. DMG harbor an immunologically “cold” tumor microenvironment (TME) with few infiltrating immune cells. The mechanisms underpinning the cold TME are not well understood. Low expression levels of immune checkpoint proteins, including PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4, are recurring features of DMG and likely contribute to the lack of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The unique epigenetic signatures (including stem cell-like methylation patterns), a low tumor mutational burden, and recurring somatic mutations (H3K27M, TP53, ACVR1, MYC, and PIK3CA), possibly play a role in the reduced efficacy of traditional immunotherapies. Therefore, to circumvent the lack of efficacy thus far seen for the use of ICIs, adoptive cell transfer (including chimeric antigen receptor T cells) and the use of oncolytic viruses, are currently being evaluated for the treatment of DMG. It remains an absolute imperative that we improve our understanding of DMG’s intrinsic and TME features if patients are to realize the potential benefits offered by these sophisticated treatments. Herein, we summarize the limitations of immunotherapeutic approaches, highlight the emerging safety and clinical efficacy shown for sophisticated cell-based therapies, as well as the evolving knowledge underpinning the DMG-immune axis, to guide the development of immunotherapies that we hope will improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mika L Persson
- Cancer Signalling Research Group, School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Precision Medicine Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Alicia M Douglas
- Cancer Signalling Research Group, School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Precision Medicine Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Frank Alvaro
- Cancer Signalling Research Group, School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Precision Medicine Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.,John Hunter Children's Hospital, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Pouya Faridi
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Martin R Larsen
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Protein Research Group, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Marta M Alonso
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Program in Solid Tumors and Biomarkers, Foundation for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Nicholas A Vitanza
- The Ben Towne Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.,Division of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, Bone Marrow Transplant, and Cellular Therapy, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Matthew D Dun
- Cancer Signalling Research Group, School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Precision Medicine Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
377
|
Rurik JG, Epstein JA. Uniting Disciplines to Develop Therapeutics: Targeted mRNA Lipid Nanoparticles Reprogram the Immune System In Vivo to Treat Heart Disease. DNA Cell Biol 2022; 41:539-543. [PMID: 35446147 DOI: 10.1089/dna.2022.0171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The burgeoning field of immunomedicine is primed to expand beyond oncology (Aghajanian et al., 2022). Over the past several decades, many cell-based therapies have been proposed, developed, and deployed in the clinic. The recent explosion of targeted cell therapies has primarily been aimed at oncological malignancies. In parallel, cardiology researchers have been investigating the various cell types that contribute to heart diseases, especially those responsible for tissue fibrosis and myocardial dysfunction. Our laboratory proposed in 2019 to unite these two disciplines: could a targeted cell therapy be used to ameliorate cardiac fibrosis (Aghajanian et al., 2019). Although preliminary results were encouraging, the genetic engineering approach used to manufacture immune cells would result in persistent cytolytic T cell if directly translated to humans. This would pose a safety concern since activated fibroblasts are essential cells in the setting of acute injury. Therefore, we developed a novel technology to deliver modified RNA to T cells in vivo, resulting in a transient antiactivated fibroblast therapeutic (Rurik et al., 2022). Although active for only a few days, these cells were sufficient to significantly improve cardiac function in a murine model of cardiac fibrosis. These results pave the way for low-cost and scalable, and dose-able and immune therapy for fibrotic disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel G Rurik
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Penn Cardiovascular Institute, and Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jonathan A Epstein
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Penn Cardiovascular Institute, and Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
378
|
Tang J, Gong Y, Ma X. Bispecific Antibodies Progression in Malignant Melanoma. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:837889. [PMID: 35401191 PMCID: PMC8984188 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.837889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The discovery of oncogenes and immune checkpoints has revolutionized the treatment of melanoma in the past 10 years. However, the current PD-L1 checkpoints lack specificity for tumors and target normal cells expressing PD-L1, thus reducing the efficacy on malignant melanoma and increasing the side effects. In addition, the treatment options for primary or secondary drug-resistant melanoma are limited. Bispecific antibodies bind tumor cells and immune cells by simultaneously targeting two antigens, enhancing the anti-tumor targeting effect and cytotoxicity and reducing drug-resistance in malignant melanoma, thus representing an emerging strategy to improve the clinical efficacy. This review focused on the treatment of malignant melanoma by bispecific antibodies and summarized the effective results of the experiments that have been conducted, also discussing the different aspects of these therapies. The role of the melanoma epitopes, immune cell activation, cell death and cytotoxicity induced by bispecific antibodies were evaluated in the clinical or preclinical stage, as these therapies appear to be the most suitable in the treatment of malignant melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Tang
- Department of Oncology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Youling Gong
- Department of Oncology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xuelei Ma
- Department of Oncology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
379
|
Steckler AM, Francis JH, Shoushtari AN, Abramson DH, Barker CA. Uveal melanoma metastatic at initial diagnosis: a case series. Melanoma Res 2022; 32:120-123. [PMID: 35152255 PMCID: PMC8901542 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Detectable metastasis at the time of initial diagnosis of uveal melanoma (UM) is rare. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes in patients with metastatic UM (MUM) at initial diagnosis. An institutional review board-approved retrospective case series analysis was performed in 21 patients that presented for management of MUM at initial diagnosis. Patient, tumor and treatment parameters were recorded, and ophthalmic symptoms, metastasis response and overall survival were assessed. Among 21 patients, median tumor diameter was 18 mm (range, 9.1-35 mm), with 76% classified as a Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) large size. Sites of metastasis included liver (95%), bone (29%) and lung (29%), among others, and were confirmed by biopsy in 95% of patients studied. Symptomatic primary tumors were present in 81%, causing pain (24%) or vision loss (57%). Primary tumor therapy (PTT) was provided upfront for 52% of patients with enucleation (24%) and brachytherapy (29%). Eye pain developed 3-6 months after diagnosis in four of 10 patients who did not receive upfront PTT, whereas it did not occur in any of the 11 patients who received upfront PTT (P = 0.04). PTT palliated pain in all cases. The median overall survival was 11.9 months (range, 2.5-21.1 months). Patients presenting with MUM at initial diagnosis have high-risk tumors and experience survival like patients who develop metastases metachronously. PTT is not associated with survival but may mitigate ophthalmic symptoms, especially in patients with large tumors at risk for causing symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexa M. Steckler
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Brachytherapy Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Jasmine H. Francis
- Department of Surgery (Ophthalmic Oncology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | - David H. Abramson
- Department of Surgery (Ophthalmic Oncology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Christopher A. Barker
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Brachytherapy Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
380
|
Abstract
Tebentafusp (tebentafusp-tebn; Kimmtrak®) is a first-in-class, bispecific gp100 peptide-HLA-A*02:01 directed T cell receptor (TCR) CD3 T cell engager being developed by Immunocore for the treatment of uveal melanoma and malignant melanoma. The TCR arm of tebentafusp binds to HLA-A*02:01-positive uveal melanoma cells and activates polyclonal T cells, through CD3, to release inflammatory cytokines and cytolytic proteins, resulting in the direct lysis of tumour cells. In January 2022, tebentafusp received its first approval in the USA for the treatment of HLA-A*02:01-positive adults with unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma, and in February 2022 received a Positive Opinion from the EU Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use for the treatment of uveal melanoma. Tebentafusp is under regulatory review for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma in the UK, Australia and Canada. Clinical studies of tebentafusp are underway for uveal melanoma and cutaneous melanoma in several countries worldwide. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of tebentafusp leading to this first approval for unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohita Dhillon
- Springer Nature, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, Auckland, 0754, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
381
|
Engineering the T cell receptor for fun and profit: Uncovering complex biology, interrogating the immune system, and targeting disease. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2022; 74:102358. [PMID: 35344834 DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 02/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
T cell receptors (TCRs) orchestrate cellular immunity by recognizing peptide antigens bound and presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins. Due to the TCR's central role in immunity and tight connection with human health, there has been significant interest in modulating TCR properties through protein engineering methods. Complicating these efforts is the complexity and vast diversity of TCR-peptide/MHC interfaces, the interdependency between TCR affinity, specificity, and cross-reactivity, and the sophisticated relationships between TCR binding properties and T cell function, many aspects of which are not well understood. Here we review TCR engineering, starting with a brief historical overview followed by discussions of more recent developments, including new efforts and opportunities to engineer TCR affinity, modulate specificity, and develop novel TCR-based constructs.
Collapse
|
382
|
Hassel JC, Berking C. Tebentafusp als neuartige Immuntherapie zeigt einen Überlebensvorteil beim metastasierten Uveamelanom und wird bereits in Deutschland eingesetzt. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2022; 20:381-383. [PMID: 35304951 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.14740_g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
383
|
Froning KJ, Sereno A, Huang F, Demarest SJ. Generalizable design parameters for soluble T cell receptor-based T cell engagers. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:jitc-2021-004281. [PMID: 35260435 PMCID: PMC8905924 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
While most biological and cellular immunotherapies recognize extracellular targets, T cell receptor (TCR) therapeutics are unique in their ability to recognize the much larger pool of intracellular antigens found on virus-infected or cancerous cells. Recombinant T cell receptor (rTCR)-based therapeutics are gaining momentum both preclinically and clinically highlighted by recent positive phase III human clinical trial results for a TCR/CD3 bifunctional protein in uveal melanoma. Unlike antibody-based T cell engagers whose molecular formats have been widely and extensively evaluated, little data exist describing the putative activities of varied bifunctional formats using rTCRs. Here we generate rTCR/anti-CD3 bifunctionals directed toward NY-ESO-1 or MAGE-A3 with a variety of molecular formats. We show that inducing strong redirected lysis activity against tumors displaying either NY-ESO-1 or MAGE-A3 is highly restricted to small, tandem binding formats with an rTCR/antiCD3 Fab demonstrating the highest potency, rTCR/anti-CD3 single chain variable domain fragment showing similar but consistently weaker potency, and IgG-like or IgG-Fc-containing molecules demonstrating poor activity. We believe this is a universal trait of rTCR bifunctionals, given the canonical TCR/human leukocyte antigen structural paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen J Froning
- Lilly Biotechnology Center, Eli Lilly and Company, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Arlene Sereno
- Lilly Biotechnology Center, Eli Lilly and Company, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Flora Huang
- Lilly Biotechnology Center, Eli Lilly and Company, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Stephen J Demarest
- Lilly Biotechnology Center, Eli Lilly and Company, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
384
|
Jones H, Kalirai H, Taktak A, Chen K, Coupland SE. Vascular Lakes in Uveal Melanoma and Their Association With Outcome. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2022; 11:32. [PMID: 35348598 PMCID: PMC8976925 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.3.32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Prognostic predictors in uveal melanoma (UM) consist of clinical, histomorphologic, and genetic features. Vascular lakes (VLs) are immature blood vessels within UM with unknown significance for metastatic risk. Methods A clinically well-phenotyped cohort of 136 hematoxylin and eosin–stained slides of UM enucleation specimens were retrospectively analyzed on scanned whole-slide images. These were annotated for VL in QuPath, assessing VL number and area. Using SPSS (V27.0), the Mann–Whitney U test and Cox regression were applied to evaluate whether there was any correlation between VL number and area within the tumor (VL-TA) compared with other prognostic parameters and patient survival times. Results UMs with monosomy 3 (M3) have significant differences in their VL numbers (P = 0.008) and VL-TA ratios (P = 0.002) compared with disomy 3-UM. Nuclear BAP1-negative (nBAP1–) UMs have significant differences in their VL-TA ratio (P = 0.002) compared to nBAP1+ UMs. Survival times of patients with UM with epithelioid-celled tumors varied depending on their VL-TA ratio (P = 0.057). Similarly, in M3-UM, significant differences in survival (P = 0.009) were seen in patients, depending on VL number. Finally, patients with UM with shorter overall survival showed significant differences in their tumor VL-TA ratios (P = 0.043) and the number of VLs present (P = 0.002) than patients with UM who had longer survival. Conclusions Our pilot data suggest that VL-TA is an additional poor prognostic parameter in UM. Translational Relevance Digital analysis of UM can be easily performed to assess various prognostic parameters. Our pilot study demonstrates that UM-VL could be combined with other parameters to determine metastatic risk of patients with UM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley Jones
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Molecular, Systems and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,Department of Engineering, Institute of Risk and Uncertainty, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Helen Kalirai
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Azzam Taktak
- Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ke Chen
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sarah E Coupland
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
385
|
Oh Omikron! HAUTNAH 2022. [PMCID: PMC8908757 DOI: 10.1007/s12326-022-00501-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
386
|
Devaux A, Baurain JF. Management of metastatic melanoma with new immunotherapy approaches beyond PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibitors. Curr Opin Oncol 2022; 34:123-130. [PMID: 35081051 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW If we may cure metastatic melanoma patients thanks to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), it is fair to say that around 2/3 of the patients present primary or secondary resistance to ICI. Therefore, progresses are needed and numerous new treatments are tested either alone or in combination with cytolytic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) or (PD)-1 blockade to overcome this resistance. In this review, we focused on new immunotherapeutic approaches studied in advanced melanoma previously treated by anti-PD-1 (Programmed cell Death 1 receptor) or anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. RECENT FINDINGS The different approaches have been classified based on 'the cancer immunity cycle'. These new strategies target either the T-cell priming and activation step, T-cell trafficking and tumor infiltration, or tumor antigen recognition by T-cell and tumor killing. SUMMARY Most of these novel strategies are based on mAbs targeting T-cell inhibitory or stimulatory coreceptors. The second main focus is based on modifying the tumor micro-environment. Combination strategies seem promising in few patients and suggest that a deeper understanding of the resistance in individual patients is mandatory to go further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alix Devaux
- Medical Oncology Department, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
387
|
Strobel SB, Machiraju D, Hassel JC. TCR-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1215. [PMID: 35267523 PMCID: PMC8909175 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) is one of the most rapidly progressing tumors, with a bad prognosis and no standard-of-care treatment. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer therapy and improved overall survival in patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma (mCM). However, this approach has been largely unimpressive, with no significant impact on the survival of mUM patients. Technical advances in immunotherapies have led to the development of novel T cell receptor (TCR)-based approaches to fight cancer. For the first time in over 50 years, compelling evidence demonstrates the power of TCR-based approaches for survival in mUM patients. Hence, this review summarizes novel TCR-based immunotherapeutic strategies currently in clinical studies for mUM treatment. We also discuss the potential combinational treatments to these strategies to maximize the clinical benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jessica C. Hassel
- Department of Dermatology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Code, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (S.B.S.); (D.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
388
|
Safety and Efficacy of Ipilimumab plus Nivolumab and Sequential Selective Internal Radiation Therapy in Hepatic and Extrahepatic Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051162. [PMID: 35267470 PMCID: PMC8909598 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Despite recent progress on the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM), prognosis remains dismal for the majority of patients. Directed liver therapies including selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) have been the pillar of hepatic metastases management. Independently, immune checkpoint blockade by combination of ipilimumab plus nivolumab has demonstrated a median survival slightly superior to 1 year. However, the benefit of sequential ipilimumab plus nivolumab immunotherapy and SIRT has not been elucidated. Abstract To assess the safety and efficacy of ipilimumab plus nivolumab around selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). We present a retrospective, single center study of 32 patients with mUM divided into two groups based on the treatment received between April 2013 and April 2021. The SIRT_IpiNivo cohort was treated with Yttrium-90 microspheres and ipilimumab plus nivolumab before or after the SIRT (n = 18). The SIRT cohort underwent SIRT but did not receive combined immunotherapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab (n = 14). Twelve patients (66.7%) of the SIRT_IpiNivo arm received SIRT as first-line treatment and six patients (33.3%) received ipilimumab plus nivolumab prior to SIRT. In the SIRT group, seven patients (50.0%) received single-agent immunotherapy. One patient treated with combined immunotherapy 68 months after the SIRT was included in this group. At the start of ipilimumab plus nivolumab, 94.4% (n = 17) presented hepatic metastases and 72.2% (n = 13) had extra liver disease. Eight patients (44.4%) of the SIRT_IpiNivo group experienced grade 3 or 4 immune related adverse events, mainly colitis and hepatitis. Median overall survival from the diagnosis of metastases was 49.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI); 24.1-not available (NA)) in the SIRT_IpiNivo group compared with 13.6 months (95% CI; 11.5-NA) in the SIRT group (log-rank p-value 0.027). The presence of extra liver metastases at the time of SIRT, largest liver lesion more than 8 cm (M1c) and liver tumor volume negatively impacted the survival. This real-world cohort suggests that a sequential treatment of ipilimumab plus nivolumab and SIRT is a well-tolerated therapeutic approach with promising survival rates.
Collapse
|
389
|
de Bruyn DP, Beasley AB, Verdijk RM, van Poppelen NM, Paridaens D, de Keizer ROB, Naus NC, Gray ES, de Klein A, Brosens E, Kiliç E. Is Tissue Still the Issue? The Promise of Liquid Biopsy in Uveal Melanoma. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10020506. [PMID: 35203714 PMCID: PMC8962331 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10020506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is the second most frequent type of melanoma. Therapeutic options for UM favor minimally invasive techniques such as irradiation for vision preservation. As a consequence, no tumor material is obtained. Without available tissue, molecular analyses for gene expression, mutation or copy number analysis cannot be performed. Thus, proper patient stratification is impossible and patients’ uncertainty about their prognosis rises. Minimally invasive techniques have been studied for prognostication in UM. Blood-based biomarker analysis has become more common in recent years; however, no clinically standardized protocol exists. This review summarizes insights in biomarker analysis, addressing new insights in circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor DNA, extracellular vesicles, proteomics, and metabolomics. Additionally, medical imaging can play a significant role in staging, surveillance, and prognostication of UM and is addressed in this review. We propose that combining multiple minimally invasive modalities using tumor biomarkers should be the way forward and warrant more attention in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniël P. de Bruyn
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (D.P.d.B.); (N.M.v.P.); (D.P.); (N.C.N.)
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (A.d.K.); (E.B.)
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aaron B. Beasley
- Centre for Precision Health, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia; (A.B.B.); (E.S.G.)
| | - Robert M. Verdijk
- The Rotterdam Eye Hospital, 3011 BH Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (R.M.V.); (R.O.B.d.K.)
- Department of Pathology, Section Ophthalmic Pathology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Natasha M. van Poppelen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (D.P.d.B.); (N.M.v.P.); (D.P.); (N.C.N.)
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (A.d.K.); (E.B.)
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dion Paridaens
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (D.P.d.B.); (N.M.v.P.); (D.P.); (N.C.N.)
- The Rotterdam Eye Hospital, 3011 BH Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (R.M.V.); (R.O.B.d.K.)
| | | | - Nicole C. Naus
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (D.P.d.B.); (N.M.v.P.); (D.P.); (N.C.N.)
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elin S. Gray
- Centre for Precision Health, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia; (A.B.B.); (E.S.G.)
| | - Annelies de Klein
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (A.d.K.); (E.B.)
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erwin Brosens
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (A.d.K.); (E.B.)
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emine Kiliç
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (D.P.d.B.); (N.M.v.P.); (D.P.); (N.C.N.)
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-107030683
| |
Collapse
|
390
|
Schank TE, Hassel JC. Tebentafusp for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma. Future Oncol 2022; 18:1303-1311. [PMID: 35172589 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-1260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma is a rare disease; nevertheless, it is the most common primary intraocular malignancy among adults. Approximately half of affected patients will suffer from metastatic disease, mostly to the liver. No standard-of-care treatment exists for these patients. Median progression-free survival and overall survival for all types of treatment, including checkpoint inhibitors, have remained poor. However, the most recent phase III study results for tebentafusp, a member of a new-in-class molecule, are raising hopes for stage IV uveal melanoma patients. In this review, we examine the current literature, focusing on the most recent trial results for this new reagent. We evaluate the latest clinical results for tebentafusp and aim to shed light on its immunological strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timo E Schank
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | - Jessica C Hassel
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
391
|
Koch EAT, Schaft N, Kummer M, Berking C, Schuler G, Hasumi K, Dörrie J, Schuler-Thurner B. A One-Armed Phase I Dose Escalation Trial Design: Personalized Vaccination with IKKβ-Matured, RNA-Loaded Dendritic Cells for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. Front Immunol 2022; 13:785231. [PMID: 35185883 PMCID: PMC8854646 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.785231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is an orphan disease with a mortality of 80% within one year upon the development of metastatic disease. UM does hardly respond to chemotherapy and kinase inhibitors and is largely resistant to checkpoint inhibition. Hence, further therapy approaches are urgently needed. To improve clinical outcome, we designed a trial employing the 3rd generation personalized IKKβ-matured RNA-transfected dendritic cell (DC) vaccine which primes T cells and in addition activates NK cells. This ongoing phase I trial [NCT04335890 (www.clinicaltrials.gov), Eudract: 2018-004390-28 (www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu)] investigates patients with treatment-naive metastatic UM. Monocytes are isolated by leukapheresis, differentiated to immature DCs, matured with a cytokine cocktail, and activated via the NF-κB pathway by electroporation with RNA encoding a constitutively active mutant of IKKβ. Three types of antigen-RNA are co-electroporated: i) amplified mRNA of the tumor representing the whole transcriptome, ii) RNA encoding driver mutations identified by exome sequencing, and iii) overexpressed non-mutated tumor antigens detected by transcriptome sequencing. This highly personalized DC vaccine is applied by 9 intravenous infusions in a staggered schedule over one year. Parallel to the vaccination, standard therapy, usually an immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) as mono (anti-PD-1) or combined (anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD-1) regimen is initiated. The coordinated vaccine-induced immune response encompassing tumor-specific T cells and innate NK cells should synergize with ICB, perhaps resulting in measurable clinical responses in this resistant tumor entity. Primary outcome measures of this trial are safety, tolerability and toxicity; secondary outcome measures comprise overall survival and induction of antigen-specific T cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias A. T. Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Niels Schaft
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Erlangen, Germany
- *Correspondence: Niels Schaft,
| | - Mirko Kummer
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Gerold Schuler
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Jan Dörrie
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Beatrice Schuler-Thurner
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
392
|
Uveal Melanoma Cell Line Proliferation Is Inhibited by Ricolinostat, a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030782. [PMID: 35159049 PMCID: PMC8833954 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) is characterized by poor patient survival. Unfortunately, current treatment options demonstrate limited benefits. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of ACY-1215, a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi), to attenuate growth of primary ocular UM cell lines and, in particular, a liver MUM cell line in vitro and in vivo, and elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms. A significant (p = 0.0001) dose-dependent reduction in surviving clones of the primary ocular UM cells, Mel270, was observed upon treatment with increasing doses of ACY-1215. Treatment of OMM2.5 MUM cells with ACY-1215 resulted in a significant (p = 0.0001), dose-dependent reduction in cell survival and proliferation in vitro, and in vivo attenuation of primary OMM2.5 xenografts in zebrafish larvae. Furthermore, flow cytometry revealed that ACY-1215 significantly arrested the OMM2.5 cell cycle in S phase (p = 0.0001) following 24 h of treatment, and significant apoptosis was triggered in a time- and dose-dependent manner (p < 0.0001). Additionally, ACY-1215 treatment resulted in a significant reduction in OMM2.5 p-ERK expression levels. Through proteome profiling, the attenuation of the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) signaling pathway was linked to the observed anti-cancer effects of ACY-1215. In agreement, pharmacological inhibition of MITF signaling with ML329 significantly reduced OMM2.5 cell survival and viability in vitro (p = 0.0001) and reduced OMM2.5 cells in vivo (p = 0.0006). Our findings provide evidence that ACY-1215 and ML329 are efficacious against growth and survival of OMM2.5 MUM cells.
Collapse
|
393
|
Liu AW, Wei AZ, Maniar AB, Carvajal RD. Tebentafusp in Advanced Uveal Melanoma: Proof of Principal for the Efficacy of T-Cell Receptor Therapeutics and Bispecifics in Solid Tumors. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2022; 22:997-1004. [DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2022.2031970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
394
|
Koch EAT, Petzold A, Wessely A, Dippel E, Gesierich A, Gutzmer R, Hassel JC, Haferkamp S, Kähler KC, Knorr H, Kreuzberg N, Leiter U, Loquai C, Meier F, Meissner M, Mohr P, Pföhler C, Rahimi F, Schadendorf D, Schell B, Schlaak M, Terheyden P, Thoms KM, Schuler-Thurner B, Ugurel S, Ulrich J, Utikal J, Weichenthal M, Ziller F, Berking C, Heppt MV. Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Re-Induction following Resistance or Toxicity. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:518. [PMID: 35158786 PMCID: PMC8833453 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Re-induction with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) needs to be considered in many patients with uveal melanoma (UM) due to limited systemic treatment options. Here, we provide hitherto the first analysis of ICB re-induction in UM. A total of 177 patients with metastatic UM treated with ICB were included from German skin cancer centers and the German national skin cancer registry (ADOReg). To investigate the impact of ICB re-induction, two cohorts were compared: patients who received at least one ICB re-induction (cohort A, n = 52) versus those who received only one treatment line of ICB (cohort B, n = 125). In cohort A, a transient benefit of overall survival (OS) was observed at 6 and 12 months after the treatment start of ICB. There was no significant difference in OS between both groups (p = 0.1) with a median OS of 16.2 months (cohort A, 95% CI: 11.1-23.8) versus 9.4 months (cohort B, 95% CI: 6.1-14.9). Patients receiving re-induction of ICB (cohort A) had similar response rates compared to those receiving ICB once. Re-induction of ICB may yield a clinical benefit for a small subgroup of patients even after resistance or development of toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias A. T. Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (E.A.T.K.); (A.P.); (A.W.); (B.S.-T.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anne Petzold
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (E.A.T.K.); (A.P.); (A.W.); (B.S.-T.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anja Wessely
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (E.A.T.K.); (A.P.); (A.W.); (B.S.-T.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Edgar Dippel
- Department of Dermatology, Ludwigshafen Medical Center, 67059 Ludwigshafen, Germany;
| | - Anja Gesierich
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany;
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Skin Cancer Center Minden, Department of Dermatology, Mühlenkreiskliniken AöR, Ruhr University Bochum Campus Minden, 32423 Minden, Germany;
| | - Jessica C. Hassel
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Sebastian Haferkamp
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany;
| | - Katharina C. Kähler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (K.C.K.); (M.W.)
| | - Harald Knorr
- Department of Ophthalmology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
| | - Nicole Kreuzberg
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Skin Cancer Center, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Köln Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72056 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Carmen Loquai
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany;
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center, University Cancer Center Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases & Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307 Dresden, Germany;
| | - Markus Meissner
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| | - Peter Mohr
- Department of Dermatology, Elbeklinikum, 21614 Buxtehude, Germany;
| | - Claudia Pföhler
- Department of Dermatology, Saarland University Medical School, 66421 Homburg, Saar, Germany;
| | - Farnaz Rahimi
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Munich University Hospital (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.S.); (S.U.)
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Beatrice Schell
- Department of Dermatology, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, 07548 Gera, Germany;
| | - Max Schlaak
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Patrick Terheyden
- Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany;
| | - Kai-Martin Thoms
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany;
| | - Beatrice Schuler-Thurner
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (E.A.T.K.); (A.P.); (A.W.); (B.S.-T.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Selma Ugurel
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.S.); (S.U.)
| | - Jens Ulrich
- Department of Dermatology, Harzklinikum Dorothea Christiane Erxleben, 06484 Quedlinburg, Germany;
| | - Jochen Utikal
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany;
| | - Michael Weichenthal
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (K.C.K.); (M.W.)
| | - Fabian Ziller
- Department of Dermatology, DRK Krankenhaus Rabenstein, 09117 Chemnitz, Germany;
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (E.A.T.K.); (A.P.); (A.W.); (B.S.-T.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V. Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (E.A.T.K.); (A.P.); (A.W.); (B.S.-T.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
395
|
Rantala ES, Hernberg MM, Piperno-Neumann S, Grossniklaus HE, Kivelä TT. Metastatic uveal melanoma: The final frontier. Prog Retin Eye Res 2022; 90:101041. [PMID: 34999237 DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Treatment of primary intraocular uveal melanoma has developed considerably, its driver genes are largely unraveled, and the ways to assess its risk for metastases are very precise, being based on an international staging system and genetic data. Unfortunately, the risk of distant metastases, which emerge in approximately one half of all patients, is unaltered. Metastases are the leading single cause of death after uveal melanoma is diagnosed, yet no consensus exists regarding surveillance, staging, and treatment of disseminated disease, and survival has not improved until recently. The final frontier in conquering uveal melanoma lies in solving these issues to cure metastatic disease. Most studies on metastatic uveal melanoma are small, uncontrolled, retrospective, and do not report staging. Meta-analyses confirm a median overall survival of 10-13 months, and a cure rate that approaches nil, although survival exceeding 5 years is possible, estimated 2% either with first-line treatment or with best supportive care. Hepatic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging as surveillance methods have a sensitivity of 95-100% and 83-100%, respectively, to detect metastases without radiation hazard according to prevailing evidence, but computed tomography is necessary for staging. No blood-based tests additional to liver function tests are generally accepted. Three validated staging systems predict, each in defined situations, overall survival after metastasis. Their essential components include measures of tumor burden, liver function, and performance status or metastasis free interval. Age and gender may additionally influence survival. Exceptional mutational events in metastases may make them susceptible to checkpoint inhibitors. In a large meta-analysis, surgical treatment was associated with 6 months longer median overall survival as compared to conventional chemotherapy and, recently, tebentafusp as first-line treatment at the first interim analysis of a randomized phase III trial likewise provided a 6 months longer median overall survival compared to investigator's choice, mostly pembrolizumab; these treatments currently apply to selected patients. Promoting dormancy of micrometastases, harmonizing surveillance protocols, promoting staging, identifying predictive factors, initiating controlled clinical trials, and standardizing reporting will be critical steppingstones in reaching the final frontier of curing metastatic uveal melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elina S Rantala
- Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4 C, PL 220, FI-00029, HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Micaela M Hernberg
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Paciuksenkatu 3, PL 180, FI-00029, HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
| | | | - Hans E Grossniklaus
- Section of Ocular Oncology, Emory Eye Center, 1365 Clifton Road B, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| | - Tero T Kivelä
- Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4 C, PL 220, FI-00029, HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
396
|
Carvajal RD, Butler MO, Shoushtari AN, Hassel JC, Ikeguchi A, Hernandez-Aya L, Nathan P, Hamid O, Piulats JM, Rioth M, Johnson DB, Luke JJ, Espinosa E, Leyvraz S, Collins L, Goodall HM, Ranade K, Holland C, Abdullah SE, Sacco JJ, Sato T. Clinical and molecular response to tebentafusp in previously treated patients with metastatic uveal melanoma: a phase 2 trial. Nat Med 2022; 28:2364-2373. [PMID: 36229663 PMCID: PMC9671803 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-02015-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
In patients with previously treated metastatic uveal melanoma, the historical 1 year overall survival rate is 37% with a median overall survival of 7.8 months. We conducted a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase 2 study of tebentafusp, a soluble T cell receptor bispecific (gp100×CD3), in 127 patients with treatment-refractory metastatic uveal melanoma (NCT02570308). The primary endpoint was the estimation of objective response rate based on RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours) v1.1. Secondary objectives included safety, overall survival, progression-free survival and disease control rate. All patients had at least one treatment-related adverse event, with rash (87%), pyrexia (80%) and pruritus (67%) being the most common. Toxicity was mostly mild to moderate in severity but was greatly reduced in incidence and intensity after the initial three doses. Despite a low overall response rate of 5% (95% CI: 2-10%), the 1 year overall survival rate was 62% (95% CI: 53-70%) with a median overall survival of 16.8 months (95% CI: 12.9-21.3), suggesting benefit beyond traditional radiographic-based response criteria. In an exploratory analysis, early on-treatment reduction in circulating tumour DNA was strongly associated with overall survival, even in patients with radiographic progression. Our findings indicate that tebentafusp has promising clinical activity with an acceptable safety profile in patients with previously treated metastatic uveal melanoma, and data suggesting ctDNA as an early indicator of clinical benefit from tebentafusp need confirmation in a randomized trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard D. Carvajal
- grid.21729.3f0000000419368729Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Marcus O. Butler
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada
| | - Alexander N. Shoushtari
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA ,grid.5386.8000000041936877XWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY USA
| | - Jessica C. Hassel
- grid.5253.10000 0001 0328 4908University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexandra Ikeguchi
- grid.266900.b0000 0004 0447 0018Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK USA
| | - Leonel Hernandez-Aya
- grid.4367.60000 0001 2355 7002Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO USA
| | - Paul Nathan
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre – East and North Herts NHS Trust, Northwood, Middlesex UK
| | - Omid Hamid
- grid.488730.0The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, a Cedars-Sinai Affiliate, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Josep M. Piulats
- grid.417656.7Institut Català d’Oncologia l’Hospitalet (Hospital Duran i Reynals), Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Matthew Rioth
- grid.430503.10000 0001 0703 675XUC Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO USA
| | - Douglas B. Johnson
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Jason J. Luke
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Enrique Espinosa
- grid.81821.320000 0000 8970 9163Hospital Universitario La Paz – CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Serge Leyvraz
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Laura Collins
- grid.450850.c0000 0004 0485 7917Immunocore, Abingdon-on-Thames, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Joseph J. Sacco
- Clatterbridge Cancer Center – NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, UK ,grid.10025.360000 0004 1936 8470University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Takami Sato
- grid.265008.90000 0001 2166 5843Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA USA
| |
Collapse
|
397
|
Dewald CLA, Warnke MM, Brüning R, Schneider MA, Wohlmuth P, Hinrichs JB, Saborowski A, Vogel A, Wacker FK. Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) with Melphalan in Liver-Dominant Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: The German Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010118. [PMID: 35008282 PMCID: PMC8749811 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) delivers high-dose melphalan to the liver while minimizing systemic toxicity via filtration of the venous hepatic blood. This two-center study aimed to examine the safety, response to therapy, and survival of patients with hepatic-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) treated with PHP. A total of 66 patients with liver-dominant metastasized uveal melanoma, treated with 145 PHP between April 2014 and May 2020, were retrospectively analyzed with regard to adverse events (AEs; CTCAE v5.0), response (overall response rate (ORR)), and disease control rate (DCR) according to RECIST1.1, as well as progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS). With an ORR of 59% and a DCR of 93.4%, the response was encouraging. After initial PHP, median hepatic PFS was 12.4 (confidence interval (CI) 4–18.4) months and median OS was 18.4 (CI 7–24.6) months. Hematologic toxicity was the most frequent AE (grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia after 24.8% of the procedures); less frequent was grade 3 or 4 hepatic toxicity (increased aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) after 7.6% and 6.9% of the interventions, respectively). Cardiovascular events included four cases of ischemic stroke (2.8%) and one patient with central pulmonary embolism (0.7%). In conclusion, PHP is a safe and effective salvage treatment for liver-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma. Serious AEs—though rare—demand careful patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia L. A. Dewald
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, 30623 Hannover, Germany; (J.B.H.); (F.K.W.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-511-532-3421
| | - Mia-Maria Warnke
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Asklepios Clinic Hamburg-Barmbek, 21033 Hamburg, Germany; (M.-M.W.); (R.B.); (M.A.S.)
| | - Roland Brüning
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Asklepios Clinic Hamburg-Barmbek, 21033 Hamburg, Germany; (M.-M.W.); (R.B.); (M.A.S.)
| | - Martin A. Schneider
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Asklepios Clinic Hamburg-Barmbek, 21033 Hamburg, Germany; (M.-M.W.); (R.B.); (M.A.S.)
| | - Peter Wohlmuth
- Biostatistics, ProResearch, Asklepios Hospital St. Georg, 20099 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Jan B. Hinrichs
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, 30623 Hannover, Germany; (J.B.H.); (F.K.W.)
| | - Anna Saborowski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, 30623 Hannover, Germany; (A.S.); (A.V.)
| | - Arndt Vogel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, 30623 Hannover, Germany; (A.S.); (A.V.)
| | - Frank K. Wacker
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, 30623 Hannover, Germany; (J.B.H.); (F.K.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
398
|
Prognostic Biomarkers in Uveal Melanoma: The Status Quo, Recent Advances and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010096. [PMID: 35008260 PMCID: PMC8749988 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Although rare, uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common cancer that develops inside adult eyes. The prognosis is poor, since 50% of patients will develop lethal metastases in the first decade, especially to the liver. Once metastases are detected, life expectancy is limited, given that the available treatments are mostly unsuccessful. Thus, there is a need to find methods that can accurately predict UM prognosis and also effective therapeutic strategies to treat this cancer. In this manuscript, we initially compile the current knowledge on epidemiological, clinical, pathological and molecular features of UM. Then, we cover the most relevant prognostic factors currently used for the evaluation and follow-up of UM patients. Afterwards, we highlight emerging molecular markers in UM published over the last three years. Finally, we discuss the problems preventing meaningful advances in the treatment and prognostication of UM patients, as well as forecast new roadblocks and paths of UM-related research. Abstract Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common malignant intraocular tumour in the adult population. It is a rare cancer with an incidence of nearly five cases per million inhabitants per year, which develops from the uncontrolled proliferation of melanocytes in the choroid (≈90%), ciliary body (≈6%) or iris (≈4%). Patients initially present either with symptoms like blurred vision or photopsia, or without symptoms, with the tumour being detected in routine eye exams. Over the course of the disease, metastases, which are initially dormant, develop in nearly 50% of patients, preferentially in the liver. Despite decades of intensive research, the only approach proven to mildly control disease spread are early treatments directed to ablate liver metastases, such as surgical excision or chemoembolization. However, most patients have a limited life expectancy once metastases are detected, since there are limited therapeutic approaches for the metastatic disease, including immunotherapy, which unlike in cutaneous melanoma, has been mostly ineffective for UM patients. Therefore, in order to offer the best care possible to these patients, there is an urgent need to find robust models that can accurately predict the prognosis of UM, as well as therapeutic strategies that effectively block and/or limit the spread of the metastatic disease. Here, we initially summarized the current knowledge about UM by compiling the most relevant epidemiological, clinical, pathological and molecular data. Then, we revisited the most important prognostic factors currently used for the evaluation and follow-up of primary UM cases. Afterwards, we addressed emerging prognostic biomarkers in UM, by comprehensively reviewing gene signatures, immunohistochemistry-based markers and proteomic markers resulting from research studies conducted over the past three years. Finally, we discussed the current hurdles in the field and anticipated the future challenges and novel avenues of research in UM.
Collapse
|
399
|
Combination of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Liver-Specific Therapies in Liver-Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Can We Thus Overcome Its High Resistance? Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13246390. [PMID: 34945010 PMCID: PMC8699813 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Uveal Melanoma (UM) is a rare disease; however, it is the most common primary intraocular malignant tumor in adults. Hematogenous metastasis, occurring in up to 50% of cases, mainly to the liver (90%), is associated with poor clinical course and treatment failure. In contrast to dramatic benefits of immunotherapy in many tumor entities, as seen in cutaneous melanoma, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) do not achieve comparable results in Metastatic UM (MUM). The aim of this study was to investigate whether the combination of ICI with liver-directed therapies provides a potential survival benefit for those affected. This retrospective, single-center study, including n = 45 patients with MUM, compared the effect of combining ICI with liver-directed therapy ("Cohort 1") with respect to standard therapies ("Cohort 2") on overall survival (OS). Our results revealed a significant survival difference between Cohort 1 (median OS 22.5 months) and Cohort 2 (median OS 11.4 months), indicating that this combination may enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy and thus provide a survival benefit. There is an urgent need for randomized, prospective trials addressing the combination of liver-directed therapies and various strategies of immunotherapy (such as ICI; IMCgp100; personalized vaccines) in order to establish regimens which finally improve the prognosis of patients with MUM.
Collapse
|
400
|
Wu Y, Yi M, Zhu S, Wang H, Wu K. Recent advances and challenges of bispecific antibodies in solid tumors. Exp Hematol Oncol 2021; 10:56. [PMID: 34922633 PMCID: PMC8684149 DOI: 10.1186/s40164-021-00250-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy has made remarkable progress in the past decade. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have acquired much attention as the next generation strategy of antibody-target cancer immunotherapy, which overwhelmingly focus on T cell recruitment and dual receptors blockade. So far, BsAb drugs have been proved clinically effective and approved for the treatment of hematologic malignancies, but no BsAb have been approved in solid tumors. Numerous designed BsAb drugs for solid tumors are now undergoing evaluation in clinical trials. In this review, we will introduce the formats of bispecific antibodies, and then update the latest preclinical studies and clinical trials in solid tumors of BsAbs targeting EpCAM, CEA, PMSA, ErbB family, and so on. Finally, we discuss the BsAb-related adverse effects and the alternative strategy for future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuze Wu
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Ming Yi
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Shuangli Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Haiyong Wang
- Beijing Anjianxi Medicinal Technology Co., Ltd., No.2 Cuiwei Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100036, China.
| | - Kongming Wu
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
| |
Collapse
|