Structural evidence for ligand specificity in the binding domain of the human androgen receptor. Implications for pathogenic gene mutations

Sumoylation of the progesterone receptor and of the steroid receptor coactivator SRC-1

SUMO-1 (small ubiquitin-like modifier) conjugation regulates the subcellular localization, stability, and activity of a variety of proteins. We show here that SUMO-1 overexpression markedly enhances progesterone receptor (PR)-mediated gene transcription. PR undergoes a sumoylation at lysine 388 located in its N-terminal domain. However, sumoylation of the receptor is not responsible for enhanced transcription because substitution of its target lysine did not abolish the effect of SUMO-1 and even converted the receptor into a slightly more active transactivator. Furthermore estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha)-driven transcription is also enhanced by SUMO-1 overexpression contrasting with the absence of sumoylation of this receptor. We thus analyzed SUMO-1 conjugation to the steroid receptor coactivator SRC-1. We showed that this protein contains two major sites of conjugation at Lys-732 and Lys-774. Sumoylation was shown to increase PR-SRC-1 interaction and to prolong SRC-1 retention in the nucleus. It did not prevent SRC-1 ubiquitinylation and did not exert a clear effect on the stability of the protein. Overexpression of SUMO-1 enhanced PR-mediated gene transcription even in the presence of non-sumoylated mutants of SRC-1. This observation suggests that among the many protein partners involved in steroid hormone-mediated gene regulation several are probably targets of SUMO-1 modification.

Mutation of the androgen receptor at amino acid 708 (Gly-->Ala) abolishes partial agonist activity of steroidal antiandrogens

Mutation of a single amino acid in the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the human androgen receptor (hAR) can induce functional abnormalities in androgen binding, stabilization of active conformation, or interaction with coactivators. The Gly708Ala and Gly708Val substitutions are associated with partial and complete androgen insensitivity syndromes, respectively. In this work, we introduced Ala, Val, and aromatic Phe mutations at position 708 on helix H3 of the hAR-LBD and tested the functional and structural consequences on hAR activity in the presence of steroidal or nonsteroidal agonists and antagonists. The residues involved in the specific recognition of these androgen ligands were identified and analyzed in the light of in vitro biological experiments and the 3D hAR-LBD structure. Our study demonstrated that the Gly708Ala mutation influenced the agonist versus antagonist activity of the ligands and confirmed the crucial role of this residue within the ligand-binding pocket (LBP) in the modulation of androgen agonists. The Gly708Ala mutation transformed the antiandrogen cyproterone acetate (CPA), a partial agonist, into a pure antiandrogen, and the pure nonsteroidal antiandrogen hydroxyflutamide in a partial agonist. From the docking studies, we suggest that CPA acts on AR through the novel mechanism called "passive antagonism".

The binding mode of progesterone to its receptor deduced from molecular dynamics simulations

An unambiguous understanding of the binding mode of human progesterone to its receptor still eludes experimental search. According to the X-ray structure of the ligand-binding domain, only one (O3) of the two keto groups at the ligand ends (O3 and O20) should play a role. This result is in conflict with chemical intuition and the results of site-directed mutagenesis experiments. Herein, we report classical molecular dynamics simulations that reveal the dynamic nature of the binding in solution, elucidate the reasons why X-ray studies failed to determine the role of O20, and clarify the effects of the mutations. The predictive power of the force field is ensured by the consistent introduction of a first-principles representation of the ligand.

Electrostatic modulation in steroid receptor recruitment of LXXLL and FXXLF motifs

Coactivator recruitment by activation function 2 (AF2) in the steroid receptor ligand binding domain takes place through binding of an LXXLL amphipathic alpha-helical motif at the AF2 hydrophobic surface. The androgen receptor (AR) and certain AR coregulators are distinguished by an FXXLF motif that interacts selectively with the AR AF2 site. Here we show that LXXLL and FXXLF motif interactions with steroid receptors are modulated by oppositely charged residues flanking the motifs and charge clusters bordering AF2 in the ligand binding domain. An increased number of charged residues flanking AF2 in the ligand binding domain complement the two previously characterized charge clamp residues in coactivator recruitment. The data suggest a model whereby coactivator recruitment to the receptor AF2 surface is initiated by complementary charge interactions that reflect a reversal of the acidic activation domain-coactivator interaction model.

R726L androgen receptor mutation is uncommon in prostate cancer families in the united states

BACKGROUND

A mutation in the androgen receptor (AR) gene, namely AR R726L, was described in 2% of Finnish men with sporadic or familial prostate cancer and was associated with an approximately sixfold increased risk of prostate cancer. We set out to determine the incidence of this mutation in a sample of men with either early-onset and/or familial prostate cancer in the United States.

METHODS

Five hundred forty-eight men with prostate cancer from 411 unrelated families participating in the University of Michigan Prostate Cancer Genetics Project (PCGP) were studied. Allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridization was used to detect the presence of the AR R726L mutation in germline DNA.

RESULTS

None of the 548 prostate cancer patients studied, including 513 White, 29 African American, 3 Asian, and 3 Hispanic men, were found to carry the AR R726L allele. Therefore, the prevalence of this allele is significantly less than that observed among Finnish men with prostate cancer (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The AR R726L allele does not account for a significant proportion of early-onset and/or familial prostate cancer in the United States.

Beta-catenin binds to the activation function 2 region of the androgen receptor and modulates the effects of the N-terminal domain and TIF2 on ligand-dependent transcription

Beta-catenin is a multifunctional molecule that is activated by signaling through WNT receptors. beta-Catenin can also enhance the transcriptional activity of some steroid hormone receptors such as the androgen receptor and retinoic acid receptor alpha. Androgens can affect nuclear translocation of beta-catenin and influence its subcellular distribution. Using mammalian two-hybrid binding assays, analysis of reporter gene transcription, and coimmunoprecipitation, we now show that beta-catenin binds to the androgen receptor ligand-binding domain (LBD) and modulates the transcriptional effects of TIF2 and the androgen receptor N-terminal domain (NTD). In functional assays, beta-catenin bound to androgen receptor only in the presence of ligand agonists, not antagonists. Beta-catenin binding to the androgen receptor LBD was independent of and cooperative with the androgen receptor NTD and the p160 coactivator TIF2, both of which bind to the activation function 2 (AF-2) region of the androgen receptor. Different mutations of androgen receptor helix 3 amino acids disrupted binding of androgen receptor NTD and beta-catenin. beta-Catenin, androgen receptor NTD, and TIF2 binding to the androgen receptor LBD were affected similarly by a subset of helix 12 mutations, but disruption of two sites on helix 12 affected only binding of beta-catenin and not of TIF2 or the androgen receptor NTD. Mutational disruption of each of five LXXLL peptide motifs in the beta-catenin armadillo repeats did not disrupt either binding to androgen receptor or transcriptional coactivation. ICAT, an inhibitor of T-cell factor 4 (TCF-4), and E-cadherin binding to beta-catenin also blocked binding of the androgen receptor LBD. We also demonstrated cross talk between the WNT and androgen receptor signaling pathways because excess androgen receptor could interfere with WNT signaling and excess TCF-4 inhibited the interaction of beta-catenin and androgen receptor. Taken together, the data show that beta-catenin can bind to the androgen receptor LBD and modulate the effects of the androgen receptor NTD and TIF2 on transcription.

Interdomain interactions in the mineralocorticoid receptor

The potential for interaction between the N-terminal domain and the C-terminal region (hinge and ligand-binding domain) of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) was examined using the mammalian-2-hybrid assay. The MR C-terminal region was fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain (GAL4-MRC). To examine if the AF-2 is involved in the interaction, as has been reported for other steroid hormone receptors, it was inactivated by point mutation (E962A). The N-terminal domain was fused to the VP16 transactivation domain (VP16-MRNT). In the mammalian-2-hybrid assay both GAL4-MRC and GAL4-MRC(E962A) interact with VP16-MRNT in an aldosterone-dependent manner. The GAL4-MRC(E962A) construct was used in subsequent experiments to examine the AF-2-independent N/C-interaction. The MR antagonist spironolactone inhibits the aldosterone-mediated association of the two domains. GAL4-MRC(E962A) interacts weakly with the GR or AR N-terminal domains in the presence of aldosterone. No dimerization between GAL4-MRC(E962A) and VP16-MRC is observed. Interestingly, cortisol produces a much weaker N/C-interaction than aldosterone, and it is possible that the N/C-interaction may contribute to observed functional differences in the MR bound to the two ligands.

Isolation and characterization of androgen receptor mutant, AR(M749L), with hypersensitivity to 17-beta estradiol treatment

Estrogens, primarily 17beta-estradiol (E(2)), may play important roles in male physiology via the androgen receptor (AR). It has already been shown that E(2) modulates AR function in LNCaP prostate cancer cells and xenograft CWR22 prostate cancer tissues. Using a molecular model of E(2) bound-AR-ligand binding domain (LBD) and employing site-directed mutagenesis strategies, we screened several AR mutants that were mutated at E(2)-AR contact sites. We found a mutation at amino acid 749, AR(M749L), which confers AR hypersensitivity to E(2). The reporter assays demonstrate that E(2) can function, like androgen, to induce AR(M749L) transactivation. This E(2)-induced AR mutant transactivation is a direct effect of the AR(M749L), because the transactivation was blocked by antiandrogens. The hypersensitivity of AR(M749L) to E(2) is not due to increased affinity of AR(M749L) for E(2), rather it may be due to the existence of the proper conformation necessary to maintain E(2) binding to the AR-LBD long enough to result in E(2)-induced transactivation. AR(M749L) transactivation can be further enhanced in the presence of AR coregulators, such as ARA70 and SRC-1. Therefore, amino acid 749 may represent an important site within the AR-LBD that is involved in interaction with E(2) that, when mutated, allows E(2) induction of AR transactivation.

2.1 A crystal structure of human PXR in complex with the St. John's wort compound hyperforin

The nuclear xenobiotic receptor PXR is activated by a wide variety of clinically used drugs and serves as a master regulator of drug metabolism and excretion gene expression in mammals. St. John's wort is used widely in Europe and the United States to treat depression. This unregulated herbal remedy leads to dangerous drug-drug interactions, however, in patients taking oral contraceptives, antivirals, or immunosuppressants. Such interactions are caused by the activation of the human PXR by hyperforin, the psychoactive agent in St. John's wort. In this study, we show that hyperforin induces the expression of numerous drug metabolism and excretion genes in primary human hepatocytes. We present the 2.1 A crystal structure of hyperforin in complex with the ligand binding domain of human PXR. Hyperforin induces conformational changes in PXR's ligand binding pocket relative to structures of human PXR elucidated previously and increases the size of the pocket by 250 A(3). We find that the mutation of individual aromatic residues within the ligand binding cavity changes PXR's response to particular ligands. Taken together, these results demonstrate that PXR employs structural flexibility to expand the chemical space it samples and that the mutation of specific residues within the ligand binding pocket of PXR tunes the receptor's response to ligands.

Regulation of androgen receptor activity by the nuclear receptor corepressor SMRT

Androgen receptor (AR) is a hormone-regulated transcription factor that mediates a wide array of biological processes including sexual differentiation, spermatogenesis, and prostate cancer progression. The transcriptional activity of AR and other members of the nuclear receptor superfamily are modulated by coregulatory proteins. In this study, we have investigated the regulation of AR transcriptional activity by the silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid hormone receptors (SMRT). We found that AR possesses an intrinsic transcriptional repression activity, and AR interacts directly with SMRT. One interacting surface on AR is mapped to the ligand-binding domain, and the presence of a DNA binding/hinge region enhances this interaction. The binding surface on SMRT is mapped to the C-terminal ID2 region, and mutation in the ID2 corepressor motif inhibits the interaction. Overexpression of SMRT inhibits dihydrotestosterone-dependent transactivation by AR and further suppresses the antiandrogen flutamide-mediated inhibition of AR activity. We provide evidence to suggest that the mechanisms of SMRT-mediated inhibition of AR activity involves inhibition of AR N/C interaction and competition with the p160 coactivator. Our data establish a significant role of SMRT in modulating AR transcriptional activity.

Key structural features of nonsteroidal ligands for binding and activation of the androgen receptor

The purposes of the present studies were to examine the androgen receptor (AR) binding ability and in vitro functional activity of multiple series of nonsteroidal compounds derived from known antiandrogen pharmacophores and to investigate the structure-activity relationships (SARs) of these nonsteroidal compounds. The AR binding properties of sixty-five nonsteroidal compounds were assessed by a radioligand competitive binding assay with the use of cytosolic AR prepared from rat prostates. The AR agonist and antagonist activities of high-affinity ligands were determined by the ability of the ligand to regulate AR-mediated transcriptional activation in cultured CV-1 cells, using a cotransfection assay. Nonsteroidal compounds with diverse structural features demonstrated a wide range of binding affinity for the AR. Ten compounds, mainly from the bicalutamide-related series, showed a binding affinity superior to the structural pharmacophore from which they were derived. Several SARs regarding nonsteroidal AR binding were revealed from the binding data, including stereoisomeric conformation, steric effect, and electronic effect. The functional activity of high-affinity ligands ranged from antagonist to full agonist for the AR. Several structural features were found to be determinative of agonist and antagonist activities. The nonsteroidal AR agonists identified from the present studies provided a pool of candidates for further development of selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) for androgen therapy. Also, these studies uncovered or confirmed numerous important SARs governing AR binding and functional properties by nonsteroidal molecules, which would be valuable in the future structural optimization of SARMs.

A novel point mutation of the androgen receptor (F804L) in an Egyptian newborn with complete androgen insensitivity associated with congenital glaucoma and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis

Androgen-insensitivity syndrome (AIS) is a major cause of male pseudohermaphroditism (MPH). Although AIS is usually reported as a monogenic disease resulting from androgen receptor (AR) mutations, on rare occasions it has been observed as part of a multiple congenital anomaly syndrome. We report here a patient who was the first newborn girl of an unrelated couple. Shortly after birth, the diagnoses of congenital glaucoma and pyloric stenosis were made. A detailed history of the father's family revealed that nine members presented glaucoma before 40 years of age. Clinical and ultrasound evaluation showed two inguinal testes, with female external genitalia and no Mullerian derivatives. The patient had a 46,XY karyotype, good testicular response to gonadotrophin stimulation and a remarkably high T : dihydrotestosterone ratio. Sequencing of the five exons of the 5alpha-reductase type 2 gene (SRD5A2) was normal. Conversely, a de novo point mutation was found in exon 6 of the AR gene, resulting in an F804L substitution, which has never been described previously. To our knowledge, the association of complete AIS, congenital glaucoma and pyloric stenosis has also never been reported previously.

Structure-function relationships of vitamin D including ligand recognition by the vitamin D receptor

First, the general structure and function of nuclear receptors (NRs) are described briefly to help our understanding of the mechanism of action of vitamin D mediated by the vitamin D receptor (VDR), a member of the NRs. Then we discuss the structure-function relationship (SFR) of vitamin D on the basis of ligand structures and the interaction of the ligand with the VDR. The SFR of vitamin D side chain analogs is discussed extensively in terms of our active space group concept, which was derived from conformational analyses of the side chains of vitamin D analogs and from studies with conformationally restricted 22-methyl-1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) isomers. The mobile area of the side chain of vitamin D can be grouped into five regions (E, G, EA, EG, and F), and the SFR has been analyzed in terms of these spatial regions. The SFR of ligand/VDR interaction is discussed on the basis of the crystal structure of VDR-LBD(delta 165-215), docking of various vitamin D ligands into the ligand binding pocket (LBP) of the VDR, and functional analysis of amino acids lining the LBP. Finally, we discuss total SFR, combining the results of the two approaches, and future aspects of structure-based design of vitamin D analogs.

Antiandrogens: selective androgen receptor modulators

Antiandrogens can efficiently block androgen receptor (AR) mediated gene expression, and are therefore useful tools in the treatment of androgen dependent prostate cancer. Antiandrogens are either complete or partial inhibitors of AR activity, depending on the nature of the compound. As compared to androgens, antiandrogens induce a different AR conformation, thereby influencing the recruitment of co-regulators (coactivators and corepressors). This ligand-selective modulation of AR activity is affected by an AR mutation (Thr877Ala substitution) found in prostate cancer. In contrast to the wild-type AR, the mutant AR conformation induced by cyproterone acetate (CPA) and hydroxyflutamide (OHF) is comparable to that induced by androgens. As a consequence, this might affect recruitment of co-regulators, thereby allowing CPA and OHF to act as strong agonists on the mutant AR.

Molecular action of androgens

The androgen receptor (AR), which mediates androgen action in the cell, belongs to the superfamily of nuclear receptors, a large group of transcription factors. Recent studies have described how the AR acts on specific target genes. The receptor's specificity of action depends on its regulation at different levels: expression in the cells, ligand binding and DNA-specific sequence recognition by structurally conserved domains and regulation by transcriptional factors in an integrated response. We propose, here, an overview of recent works on the molecular regulation of androgen-dependent genes by AR.

11beta-hydroxyprogesterone acts as a mineralocorticoid agonist in stimulating Na+ absorption in mammalian principal cortical collecting duct cells

The binding of mineralocorticoid hormones to the mineralocorticoid receptor is the first step in a cascade of events leading to the stimulation of Na(+) reabsorption by renal cortical collecting duct (CCD) principal cells. The agonist properties of mineralocorticoid hormones are linked to contacts between their 21-hydroxyl group and Asn770, a residue of the ligand-binding domain of the human mineralocorticoid receptor (hMR). Here, we investigate whether the presence of a hydroxyl group at position 11, 17, or 20 could also alter the activity of progesterone (P), a mineralocorticoid antagonist without the 21-hydroxyl group. Both 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP) and 20 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone (20OHP) antagonized the aldosterone-induced trans-activation activity (IC(50): 17OHP, 10(-7) M; 20OHP, 10(-8) M) of the hMR transiently expressed in COS-7 cells lacking steroid receptors. In cultured mouse mpkCCD(cl4) principal cells, 17OHP and 20OHP also prevented the aldosterone-stimulated amiloride-sensitive component of the short-circuit current (Ams I(sc)), reflecting Na(+) absorption mediated by the epithelial Na(+) channel (ENaC). In contrast, 11 beta-hydroxyprogesterone (11OHP) activated the transiently expressed hMR in COS-7 cells in a dose-dependent manner (ED(50): 10(-8) M) and, like aldosterone, stimulated Ams I(sc) in mpkCCD(cl4) cells. Docking 11OHP within the hMR-ligand-binding domain homology model revealed that the agonist activity of 11OHP is caused by contacts between its 11 beta-hydroxyl group and Asn770. Furthermore, 11OHP was unable to activate the mutant hMR/N770A, in which Ala is substituted for Asn at position 770. These findings demonstrate that in the absence of the 21-hydroxyl group, the 11 beta-hydroxyl group can produce the contact with the hMR-Asn770 required for the hMR activation leading to stimulated Na(+) absorption.

Structural basis of ICF-causing mutations in the methyltransferase domain of DNMT3B

Mutations in the gene encoding for a de novo methyltransferase, DNMT3B, lead to an autosomal recessive Immunodeficiency, Centromeric instability and Facial anomalies (ICF) syndrome. To analyse the protein structure and consequences of ICF-causing mutations, we modelled the structure of the DNMT3B methyltransferase domain based on Haemophilus haemolyticus protein in complex with the cofactor AdoMet and the target DNA sequence. The structural model has a two-subdomain fold where the DNA-binding region is situated between the subdomains on a surface cleft having positive electrostatic potential. The smaller subdomains of the methyltransferases differ in length and sequences and therefore only the target recognition domain loop was modelled to show the location of an ICF-causing mutation. Based on the model, the DNMT3B recognizes the GC sequence and flips the cytosine from the double-stranded DNA to the catalytic pocket. The amino acids in the cofactor and target cytosine binding sites and also the electrostatic properties of the binding pockets are conserved. In addition, a registry of all known ICF-causing mutations, DNMT3Bbase, was constructed. The structural principles of the pathogenic mutations based on the modelled structure and the analysis of chi angle rotation changes of mutated side chains are discussed.

A novel androgen receptor mutant, A748T, exhibits hormone concentration-dependent defects in nuclear accumulation and activity despite normal hormone-binding affinity

Functional analysis of androgen receptor (AR) gene mutations isolated from prostate cancer has led to the identification of residues that play important roles in the structure and function of the receptor. Here we report the characteristics of a novel AR mutation A748T located in helix 5 of the ligand-binding domain, which was identified in metastatic prostate cancer. Despite a normal hormone-binding affinity, A748T causes hormone concentration-dependent defects in nuclear accumulation and transcriptional activation. Moreover, when equivalent amounts of DNA are transfected, the mutant is expressed at much lower levels than the wild-type AR (ARWT). Treatment with geldanamycin to disrupt receptor-heat shock protein complexes rapidly decreases the levels of ARWT but not A748T, suggesting that the lower expression and rapid degradation rate of A748T is due to weaker interactions with heat shock proteins. Further analysis revealed that hormone dissociates from A748T five times faster than from ARWT. Loss of the ability to form stable amino/carboxyl-terminal interactions causes accelerated dissociation rates in some AR mutants. However, A748T exhibits normal amino/carboxyl-terminal interactions at high hormone concentrations, suggesting that the mutation alters interactions with ligand. Consistent with this conclusion, our structural model predicts that A748T disrupts crucial contact points with ligand, thereby altering the conformation of the ligand-binding domain.

Anabolic steroids, testosterone-precursors and virilizing androgens induce distinct activation profiles of androgen responsive promoter constructs

Different androgens, e.g. virilizing androgens such as testosterone and its precursors as well as synthetic anabolic steroids, respectively, induce diverse biological effects. The molecular basis for this variety in biological actions, however, is not well understood. We hypothesized that this variability of actions may be due to steroid-specific target gene expression profiles following androgen receptor (AR)-activation. Therefore, we investigated androgen receptor dependent transactivation of three structurally different androgen responsive promoter constructs ((ARE)(2)TATA-luc, MMTV-luc, GRE-OCT-luc) in co-transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-cells as an artificial model simulating different natural target genes. Three virilizing androgens (dihydrotestosterone, testosterone, methyltrienolone), three anabolic steroids (oxandrolone, stanozolol, nandrolone) and two testosterone-precursors of gonadal and adrenal origin (dehydroepiandrosterone, androstenedione) were used as ligands (0.001-100 nM). All steroids proved to be potent activators of the AR. Remarkably, anabolic steroids and testosterone-precursors showed characteristic promoter activation profiles distinct from virilizing androgens with significantly lower (ARE)(2)TATA-luc activation. Hierarchical clustering based on similarity of activation profiles lead to a dendrogram with two major branches: first virilizing androgens, and second anabolics/testosterone-precursors. We conclude that steroid-specific differences in gene transcription profiles due to androgen receptor activation could contribute to differences in biological actions of androgens.

Pattern of somatic androgen receptor gene mutations in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Progression to hormone-refractory growth of prostate cancer has been suggested to be mediated by androgen receptor (AR) gene alterations. We analyzed AR for mutations and amplifications in 21 locally recurrent prostate carcinomas treated with orchiectomy, estrogens, or a combination of orchiectomy and estramustine phosphate using fluorescence in situ hybridization, single-strand conformation polymorphism, and DNA sequence analyses. Amplification was observed in 4 of 16 (25%) and amino acid changing mutations was observed in 7 of 21 (33%) of the tumors, respectively. Two (50%) tumors with AR amplification also had missense mutation of the gene. Four of five (80%) cancers that were treated with a combination of orchiectomy and estramustine phosphate had a mutation clustered at codons 514 to 533 in the N-terminal domain of AR. In functional studies, these mutations did not render AR more sensitive to testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, androstenedione, or beta-estradiol. Tumors treated by orchiectomy had mutations predominantly in the ligand-binding domain. In summary, we found molecular alterations of AR in more than half of the prostate carcinomas that recurred locally. Some tumors developed both aberrations, possibly enhancing the cancer cell to respond efficiently to low levels of androgens. Furthermore, localization of point mutations in AR seems to be influenced by the type of treatment.

The roles of androgen receptors and androgen-binding proteins in nongenomic androgen actions

The biological activity of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone is thought to occur predominantly through binding to the androgen receptor (AR), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily that functions as a ligand-activated transcription factor. However, androgens have also been reported to induce the rapid activation of kinase-signaling cascades and modulate intracellular calcium levels. These effects are considered to be nongenomic because they occur in cell types that lack a functional AR, in the presence of inhibitors of transcription and translation, or are observed to occur too rapidly to involve changes in gene transcription. Such nongenomic effects of androgens may occur through AR functioning in the cytoplasm to induce the MAPK signal cascade. In addition, androgens may function through the sex hormone binding globulin receptor and possibly a distinct G protein-coupled receptor to activate second messenger signaling mechanisms. The physiological effect of nongenomic androgen action has yet to be determined. However, it may ultimately contribute to regulation of transcription factor activity, including mediation of the transcriptional activity of AR.

Influence of the structural diversity of data sets on the statistical quality of three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) models: predicting the estrogenic activity of xenoestrogens

Federal legislation has resulted in the two-tiered in vitro and in vivo screening of some 80 000 structurally diverse chemicals for possible endocrine disrupting effects. To maximize efficiency and minimize expense, prioritization of these chemicals with respect to their estrogenic disrupting potential prior to this time-consuming and labor-intensive screening process is essential. Computer-based quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models, such as those obtained using comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA), have been demonstrated as useful for risk assessment in this application. In general, however, CoMFA models to predict estrogenicity have been developed from data sets with limited structural diversity. In this study, we constructed CoMFA models based on biological data for a structurally diverse set of compounds spanning eight chemical families. We also compared two standard alignment schemes employed in CoMFA, namely, atom-fit and flexible field-fit, with respect to the predictive capabilities of their respective models for structurally diverse data sets. The present analysis indicates that flexible field-fit alignment fares better than atom-fit alignment as the structural diversity of the data set increases. Values of log(RP), where RP = relative potency, predicted by the final flexible field-fit CoMFA models are in good agreement with the corresponding experimental values. These models should be effective for predicting the endocrine disrupting potential of existing chemicals as well as prospective and newly prepared chemicals before they enter the environment.

The emergence of resistance to targeted cancer therapeutics

Drug resistance has always been a concern in cancer treatment, often blamed on the genetic complexity and instability of tumor cells. While studies of cancer cell lines have implicated an array of potential mechanisms, it has been difficult to translate these insights into clinically meaningful improvements in cancer treatment. The successful deployment of molecularly targeted therapeutics in some cancers has led to widespread optimism that this approach will become broadly applicable. Despite their early promise in the clinic, the novel therapeutics are often plagued with the age old problem of acquired drug resistance. Progress in understanding why certain patients respond and why some develop resistance can be made rapidly through studies of the drug target in tumor tissue from patient. One important lesson is that many cancers, even in the most advanced stages, continue to rely on a limited number of critical oncogenic signals for maintenance of the malignant phenotype. This article reviews the mechanisms of drug resistance to a variety of cancer therapeutics and provides an approach for how measures of drug target activity can be incorporated into clinical trial design.

Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 is a transcription factor that constitutively binds fatty acids

The 2.7 A X-ray crystal structure of the HNF4gamma ligand binding domain (LBD) revealed the presence of a fatty acid within the pocket, with the AF2 helix in a conformation characteristic of a transcriptionally active nuclear receptor. GC/MS and NMR analysis of chloroform/methanol extracts from purified HNF4alpha and HNF4gamma LBDs identified mixtures of saturated and cis-monounsaturated C14-18 fatty acids. The purified HNF4 LBDs interacted with nuclear receptor coactivators, and both HNF4 subtypes show high constitutive activity in transient transfection assays, which was reduced by mutations designed to interfere with fatty acid binding. The endogenous fatty acids did not readily exchange with radiolabeled palmitic acid, and all attempts to displace them without denaturing the protein failed. Our results suggest that the HNF4s may be transcription factors that are constitutively bound to fatty acids.

Insights from a three-dimensional model into ligand binding to constitutive active receptor

Two orphan nuclear receptors, constitutive active (or androstane) receptor (CAR) and pregnane X receptor (PXR), are among the most important mediators of ligand-activated transcriptional induction of liver microsomal cytochrome P450 drug-metabolizing enzymes. CAR and PXR belong to the same NR1I receptor subfamily and show high sequence homology to each other. The vitamin D receptor (VDR) also belongs to the NR1I subfamily and has the second highest homology to CAR in the ligand binding domain. A 3D model of the ligand binding domain of human CAR (hCAR) was constructed based on the available X-ray structures of human PXR (hPXR) and VDR (hVDR). The model shows that the size of the ligand binding cavities of hCAR and hPXR are similar, but larger than that of hVDR. hPXR's capability of binding to extremely large ligands, such as rifampicin, implies that its binding cavity may be able to expand further through the flexibility of a surface loop. In contrast, hCAR does not have this loop so that its cavity cannot expand, suggesting that hCAR would not bind to the largest hPXR ligands. Docking calculations of selected ligands to hCAR, based on the structural model, are consistent with previously reported receptor binding data. The results from this study indicate that structural modeling will be a useful tool for understanding ligand binding to hCAR and for design of drugs free of hCAR-mediated enzyme induction.

Homology modelling of the ligand binding domain of mineralocorticoid receptor: close structural kinship with glucocorticoid receptor ligand binding domain and their similar binding mode with DOC (de-oxy corticosterone)

Mineralocorticoids play a major role in regulating sodium and potassium homeostasis and also contribute to the control of blood pressure and in some physiological disorders. The physiological effects of this class of corticosteroids are mediated by ligand-induced nuclear transcription factor, the mineralocorticoid receptor(MR) / glucocorticoid receptor(GR), a member of the steroid / nuclear receptor superfamily. Although the MR interacts with both glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids, the GR interacts specifically with glucocorticoids. The three dimensional structure of progesterone complexed to its receptor revealed in X-ray diffraction method is utilised to develop a homology model of human mineralocorticoid receptor ligand binding domain (hMR LBD) in a similar fashion as mouse GR LBD was developed previously. The secondary structure of hMR LBD contains eleven helices, eight turns and four sheets. This receptor contains a long helix, H9, with thirty four residues. The 12-residue C-terminal extension (residues 973-984) of hMR LBD, which is essential for hormone binding, is tightly fixed in position by an antiparallel b-sheet interaction. The three dimensional model reveals two polar sites located at the extremities of the elongated hydrophobic ligand-binding pocket (LBP). De-oxy corticosterone (DOC) is docked to the LBs of both hMR LBD and mGR LBD. The difference accessible surface area (DASA) study revealed the interaction zones of both the receptors in complex with DOC. Observations relating to the native and complex proteins revealed a close structural kinship between hMR LBD and mGR LBD.

Broadened ligand responsiveness of androgen receptor mutants obtained by random amino acid substitution of H874 and mutation hot spot T877 in prostate cancer

In a subset of endocrine therapy-resistant prostate cancers, amino acid substitutions H874Y, T877A and T877S, which broaden ligand specificity of the ligand binding domain (LBD) of the androgen receptor (AR), have been detected. To increase our knowledge of the role of amino acid substitutions at these specific positions in prostate cancer, codons 874 and 877 were subjected to random mutagenesis. AR mutants were screened in a yeast readout system for responsiveness to 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone, progesterone and dehydroepiandrosterone. At position 874, only the histidine to tyrosine substitution could broaden AR ligand specificity. At position 877, 4 ligand specificity broadening substitutions were found: T877A, T877S, T877C and T877G. The latter 2 were not found in prostate cancer. The AR mutants were tested in mammalian (Hep3B) cells for responsiveness to 13 different ligands. All mutants displayed their own ligand specificity spectrum. Importantly, AR(H874Y) and AR(T877A) could be activated by cortisol. According to the 3-dimensional structure of the AR LBD, T877 interacts directly with the 17 beta-hydroxyl group of androgens. All amino acid substitutions identified at position 877 had smaller side chains than the threonine in the wild-type receptor, indicating that increased space in the ligand binding pocket is important in broadened ligand specificity. Because H874 does not interact directly with the ligand, its substitution by a tyrosine is expected to change the ligand binding pocket conformation indirectly. For T877C and T877G substitutions, 2-point mutations are required, and for H874Y, T877A and T877S substitutions, only a 1-point mutation is sufficient. This most likely explains that the latter 3 have been found in prostate cancer.

Crystal structure of the glucocorticoid receptor ligand binding domain reveals a novel mode of receptor dimerization and coactivator recognition

Transcriptional regulation by the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is mediated by hormone binding, receptor dimerization, and coactivator recruitment. Here, we report the crystal structure of the human GR ligand binding domain (LBD) bound to dexamethasone and a coactivator motif derived from the transcriptional intermediary factor 2. Despite structural similarity to other steroid receptors, the GR LBD adopts a surprising dimer configuration involving formation of an intermolecular beta sheet. Functional studies demonstrate that the novel dimer interface is important for GR-mediated activation. The structure also reveals an additional charge clamp that determines the binding selectivity of a coactivator and a distinct ligand binding pocket that explains its selectivity for endogenous steroid hormones. These results establish a framework for understanding the roles of protein-hormone and protein-protein interactions in GR signaling pathways.

Coactivation of an endogenous progesterone receptor by TIF2 in COS-7 cells

Transfection experiments, a powerful tool to study the function of steroid hormone receptors and their coregulators, are often performed in COS-7 cells, because of high transfection efficiencies and expression levels. Here we report on the presence in COS-7 cells of an endogenous steroid hormone receptor, which is highly responsive to progesterone and the synthetic steroids R1881 and ORG2058, but not to 5 alpha-DHT. A 10-fold excess of the progesterone antagonist RU486 abolishes the stimulation by progesterone, while cotransfection with the coactivator TIF2 increases its activity 6- to 7-fold. A comparison of the ligand specificity with transfected androgen or progesterone receptors indicates that the endogenous receptor is a progesterone receptor. Its presence is confirmed by steroid-binding experiments, RT-PCR and Northern blot analysis. Consequently, progesterone receptor function may be studied conveniently in COS-7 cells without cotransfection of receptor, but the endogenous receptor may interfere in studies of ligand specificity and coactivation of cotransfected receptors.

Molecular biology of the androgen receptor

Androgen receptor (AR) is a member of the steroid hormone receptor family of molecules. AR primarily is responsible for mediating the physiologic effects of androgens by binding to specific DNA sequences that influence transcription of androgen-responsive genes. The three-dimensional structure of the AR ligand-binding domain has shown it is similar to other steroid hormone receptors and that ligand binding alters the protein conformation to allow binding of coactivator molecules that amplify the hormone signal and mediate transcriptional initiation. However, AR also undergoes intramolecular interactions that regulate its interactions with coactivators and influence its activity. A large number of naturally occurring mutations of the human AR gene have provided important information about AR molecular structure and intermolecular interactions. AR is also a critical mediator of prostate cancer promotion, conferring growth signals to prostate cancer cells throughout the natural history of the disease. Late-stage prostate cancer, unresponsive to hormonal deprivation, sustains AR signaling through a diverse array of molecular strategies. Variations in the AR gene may also confer genetic predisposition to prostate cancer development and severity. Further understanding of AR action and new strategies to interfere with AR signaling hold promise for improving prostate cancer therapy.

Stabilization of androgen receptor protein is induced by agonist, not by antagonists

The action of nuclear receptor ligands in target tissues is specified mainly by the expression levels of their cognate nuclear receptors. The expression levels of these receptors are controlled through transcriptional and post-transcriptional events. Among post-transcriptional events, the effect of ligand on nuclear receptor protein turnover still remains largely unknown. Therefore, we studied the effects of agonist and antagonists on the turnover of the human androgen receptor (hAR) protein in stably transformed Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing exogenous hAR. Western blot analysis showed that the most potent androgen, dihydrotestosterone (DHT), stabilizes hAR with the induction of the transactivation function of hAR. However, this androgen-induced stabilization of hAR protein was abrogated by well-known androgen antagonists, hydroxyflutamide and bicalutamide (BIC), with inhibition of the transactivation function of hAR. Thus, the present study suggests that androgen antagonists exert their effects through, at least in part, abrogating the agonist-induced stabilization of hAR protein as well as blocking the ligand-induced transactivation function of hAR.

Conformational analysis of the androgen receptor amino-terminal domain involved in transactivation. Influence of structure-stabilizing solutes and protein-protein interactions

The androgen receptor (AR) is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Sequences within the large amino-terminal domain of the receptor have been shown to be important for transactivation and protein-protein interactions; however, little is known about the structure and folding of this region. In the present study we show that a 344-amino acid polypeptide representing the main determinants for transactivation has the propensity to form alpha-helical structure and that mutations which disrupt putative helical regions alter conformation. Folding of the AR was observed in the presence of the helix-stabilizing solvent trifluoroethanol and the natural osmolyte trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO). TMAO resulted in the movement of two tryptophan residues to a less solvent-exposed environment and the formation of secondary/tertiary structure resistant to protease cleavage. Critically, binding to the RAP74 subunit of the general transcription factor TFIIF resulted in extensive protease resistance, consistent with induced folding of the receptor transactivation domain. These data indicate that this region of the AR is structurally flexible and folds into a stable conformation upon interactions with a component of the general transcription machinery.

Protein inhibitors of activated STAT resemble scaffold attachment factors and function as interacting nuclear receptor coregulators

Protein inhibitor of activated STAT1 (PIAS1) functions as a nuclear receptor coregulator and is expressed in several cell types of human testis. However, the mechanism of PIAS1 coregulation is unknown. We report here that PIAS1 has characteristics of a scaffold attachment protein. PIAS1 localized in nuclei in a speckled pattern and bound A-T-rich double-stranded DNA, a function of scaffold attachment proteins in chromatin regions of active transcription. DNA binding was dependent on a 35-amino acid sequence conserved among members of the PIAS family and in scaffold attachment proteins. The PIAS family also bound the androgen receptor DNA binding domain, and binding required the second zinc finger of this domain. PIAS1 contained an intrinsic activation domain but had bi-directional effects on androgen receptor transactivation; lower expression levels inhibited and higher levels increased transactivation in CV1 cells. Other PIAS family members also had dose-dependent effects on transactivation, but they were in a direction opposite to those of PIAS1. When coexpressed with PIAS1, other PIAS family members counteracted PIAS1 coregulation of androgen receptor transactivation. The interaction of PIAS1 with other members of the PIAS family suggests a transcription coregulatory mechanism involving a multicomponent PIAS nuclear scaffold.

A glucocorticoid-responsive mutant androgen receptor exhibits unique ligand specificity: therapeutic implications for androgen-independent prostate cancer

The cortisol/cortisone-responsive AR (AR(ccr)) has two mutations (L701H and T877A) that were found in the MDA PCa human prostate cancer cell lines established from a castrated patient whose metastatic tumor exhibited androgen-independent growth. Cortisol and cortisone bind to the AR(ccr) with high affinity. In the present study, we characterized the structural determinants for ligand binding to the AR(ccr). Our data revealed that many of the C17, C19, and C21 circulating steroids, at concentrations that are found in vivo, functioned as effective activators of the AR(ccr) but had little or no activity via the wild-type AR or GRalpha. Among the synthetic glucocorticoids tested, dexamethasone activated both GRalpha and AR(ccr), whereas triamcinolone was selective for GRalpha. In MDA PCa 2b cells, growth and prostate-specific antigen production were stimulated by potent AR(ccr) agonists such as cortisol or 9alpha-fluorocortisol but not by triamcinolone (which did not bind to or activate the AR(ccr)). Of the potential antagonists tested, bicalutamide (casodex) and GR antagonist RU38486 showed inhibitory activity. We postulate that corticosteroids provide a growth advantage to prostate cancer cells harboring the promiscuous AR(ccr) in androgen-ablated patients and contribute to their transition to androgen-independence. We predict that triamcinolone, a commonly prescribed glucocorticoid, would be a successful therapeutic agent for men with this form of cancer, perhaps in conjunction with the antagonist casodex. We hypothesize that triamcinolone administration would inhibit the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, thus suppressing endogenous corticosteroids, which stimulate tumor growth. Triamcinolone, by itself, would not activate the AR(ccr) or promote tumor growth but would provide glucocorticoid activity essential for survival.

Novel non-steroidal/non-anilide type androgen antagonists with an isoxazolone moiety

3-Substituted (Z)-4-(4-N,N-dialkylaminophenylmethylene)-5(4H)-isoxazolones and related compounds were designed and prepared as candidates for structurally novel androgen antagonists. Several compounds showed potent anti-androgenic activity as assessed by nuclear androgen receptor binding assay and growth inhibition assay using androgen-dependent Shionogi carcinoma cells SC-3. They were approximately 10--220 times more potent than flutamide in these assay systems. They also showed anti-androgenic activity toward prostate tumor cell line LNCaP, which has an aberrant nuclear androgen receptor.

Androgen receptor acetylation governs trans activation and MEKK1-induced apoptosis without affecting in vitro sumoylation and trans-repression function

The androgen receptor (AR) is a nuclear hormone receptor superfamily member that conveys both trans repression and ligand-dependent trans-activation function. Activation of the AR by dihydrotestosterone (DHT) regulates diverse physiological functions including secondary sexual differentiation in the male and the induction of apoptosis by the JNK kinase, MEKK1. The AR is posttranslationally modified on lysine residues by acetylation and sumoylation. The histone acetylases p300 and P/CAF directly acetylate the AR in vitro at a conserved KLKK motif. To determine the functional properties governed by AR acetylation, point mutations of the KLKK motif that abrogated acetylation were engineered and examined in vitro and in vivo. The AR acetylation site point mutants showed wild-type trans repression of NF-kappa B, AP-1, and Sp1 activity; wild-type sumoylation in vitro; wild-type ligand binding; and ligand-induced conformational changes. However, acetylation-deficient AR mutants were selectively defective in DHT-induced trans activation of androgen-responsive reporter genes and coactivation by SRC1, Ubc9, TIP60, and p300. The AR acetylation site mutant showed 10-fold increased binding of the N-CoR corepressor compared with the AR wild type in the presence of ligand. Furthermore, histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) bound the AR both in vivo and in cultured cells and HDAC1 binding to the AR was disengaged in a DHT-dependent manner. MEKK1 induced AR-dependent apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. The AR acetylation mutant was defective in MEKK1-induced apoptosis, suggesting that the conserved AR acetylation site contributes to a pathway governing prostate cancer cellular survival. As AR lysine residue mutations that abrogate acetylation correlate with enhanced binding of the N-CoR repressor in cultured cells, the conserved AR motif may directly or indirectly regulate ligand-dependent corepressor disengagement and, thereby, ligand-dependent trans activation.

Androgen receptor (AR) coregulators: an overview

The biological action of androgens is mediated through the androgen receptor (AR). Androgen-bound AR functions as a transcription factor to regulate genes involved in an array of physiological processes, most notably male sexual differentiation and maturation, and the maintenance of spermatogenesis. The transcriptional activity of AR is affected by coregulators that influence a number of functional properties of AR, including ligand selectivity and DNA binding capacity. As the promoter of target genes, coregulators participate in DNA modification, either directly through modification of histones or indirectly by the recruitment of chromatin-modifying complexes, as well as functioning in the recruitment of the basal transcriptional machinery. Aberrant coregulator activity due to mutation or altered expression levels may be a contributing factor in the progression of diseases related to AR activity, such as prostate cancer. AR demonstrates distinct differences in its interaction with coregulators from other steroid receptors due to differences in the functional interaction between AR domains, possibly resulting in alterations in the dynamic interactions between coregulator complexes.

Structural basis for the glucocorticoid response in a mutant human androgen receptor (AR(ccr)) derived from an androgen-independent prostate cancer

The crystal structure of a mutant androgen receptor (AR) ligand-binding domain (LBD) in complex with the agonist 9alpha-fluorocortisol has been determined at 1.95 A resolution. This mutant AR contains two mutations (L701H and T877A) and was previously reported as a high-affinity cortisol/cortisone responsive AR (AR(ccr)) isolated from the androgen-independent human prostate cancer cell lines MDA PCa 2a and 2b (Zhao et al. Nature Med. 2000, 6, 703-6). The three-dimensional structure of the AR(ccr) LBD complexed with 9alpha-fluorocortisol shows the typical conformation of an agonist-bound nuclear receptor in which helix 12 is precisely positioned as a "lid" for the ligand-binding pocket. Binding of 9alpha-fluorocortisol to the AR(ccr) involves favorable hydrogen bond patterns on the C17 and C21 substituents of the ligand due to the mutations at 701 and 877 in the AR(ccr). Our studies provide the first structural explanation for the glucocorticoid activation of AR(ccr), which is important for the development of new therapeutic treatments for androgen-independent prostate cancer.

The FXXLF motif mediates androgen receptor-specific interactions with coregulators

The androgen receptor (AR) activation function 2 region of the ligand binding domain binds the LXXLL motifs of p160 coactivators weakly, engaging instead in an androgen-dependent, interdomain interaction with an FXXLF motif in the AR NH(2) terminus. Here we show that FXXLF motifs are present in previously reported AR coactivators ARA70/RFG, ARA55/Hic-5, and ARA54, which account for their selection in yeast two-hybrid screens. Mammalian two-hybrid assays, ligand dissociation rate studies, and glutathione S-transferase adsorption assays indicate androgen-dependent selective interactions of these FXXLF motifs with the AR ligand binding domain. Mutagenesis of residues within activation function 2 indicates distinct but overlapping binding sites where specificity depends on sequences within and flanking the FXXLF motif. Mutagenesis of the FXXLF motifs eliminated interaction with the ligand binding domain but only modestly reduced AR coactivation in transcription assays. The studies indicate that the FXXLF binding motif is specific for the AR and mediates interactions both within the AR and with coregulatory proteins.

Inhibition of androgen receptor (AR) function by the reproductive orphan nuclear receptor DAX-1

DAX-1 (NROB1) is an atypical member of the nuclear receptor family that is predominantly expressed in mammalian reproductive tissues. While a receptor function of DAX-1 remains enigmatic, previous work has indicated that DAX-1 inhibits the activity of the orphan receptor steroidogenic factor 1 and the estrogen receptors (ERs), presumably via direct occupation of the coactivator-binding surface and subsequent recruitment of additional corepressors. In vivo evidence points at a particular role of DAX-1 for the development and maintenance of male reproductive functions. In this study, we have identified the androgen receptor (AR) NR3C4 as a novel target for DAX-1. We show that DAX-1 potently inhibits ligand-dependent transcriptional activation as well as the interaction between the N- and C-terminal activation domains of AR. We provide evidence for direct interactions of the two receptors that involve the N-terminal repeat domain of DAX-1 and the C-terminal ligand-binding and activation domain of AR. Moreover, DAX-1, known to shuttle between the cytoplasm and the nucleus, is capable of relocalizing AR in both cellular compartments, suggesting that intracellular tethering is associated with DAX-1 inhibition. These results implicate novel inhibitory mechanisms of DAX-1 action with particular relevance for the modulation of androgen-dependent gene transcription in the male reproductive system.

Androgen-selective gene regulation in the prostate

Androgens are essential for normal prostate growth and function but are also intimately associated with prostate cancer, an important cause of mortality in the ageing male population. The effects of androgens are mediated via a specific androgen receptor (AR) belonging to the nuclear receptor family and acting as a ligand-dependent transcription factor. The AR is built in a modular fashion and composed of a long N-terminal region with transactivation functions, a central DNA-binding domain, an intermediate hinge region and a C-terminal ligand-binding domain with additional transactivation functions. In its inactive form, the AR is complexed to heat-shock proteins, and mainly cytoplasmic. Following activation, the AR enters the nucleus, binds to its cognate DNA response elements as a homodimer and stimulates gene transcription. Various cofactors directly interact with the AR to modulate gene transcription. In addition, cross-talk between the AR and other signalling pathways has been proven for several prostate-expressed genes. Understanding the intricate networks underlying androgen-selective gene regulation represents a formidable challenge but might also offer the chance to identify new drug targets for the treatment of prostate carcinoma.

Formation of the androgen receptor transcription complex

Androgen receptor (AR) is required for sexual differentiation and is implicated in the development of prostate cancer. Here we describe distinct functions for cofactor proteins and gene regulatory elements in the assembly of AR-mediated transcription complexes. The formation of an activation complex involves AR, coactivators, and RNA polymerase II recruitment to both the enhancer and promoter, whereas the formation of a repression complex involves factors bound only at the promoter and not the enhancer. These results suggest a model for the functional coordination between the promoter and enhancer in which communication between these elements is established through shared coactivators in the AR transcription complex.

Polymorphisms and HNPCC: PMS2-MLH1 protein interactions diminished by single nucleotide polymorphisms

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is one of the most common autosomal dominant inherited diseases. Mutations in the human mismatch repair (MMR) proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS1, and PMS2 have been found to co-segregate with HNPCC. The MLH1 and MSH2 proteins have been demonstrated to interact with PMS1, PMS2, and MSH6 proteins. A previous study reported that missense mutations in specific regions of MLH1 can lead to defects in protein-protein interactions with PMS2. Here we report that three missense alterations previously identified as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in PMS2 (P511K, T597S, and M622I) cause defective protein-protein interactions with MLH1, even though the alterations are not in the previously reported interaction domain. These results suggest that an additional domain in PMS2 affects MLH1-PMS2 interaction. This study also demonstrates that SNPs can result in gene alterations that indeed have a functional effect on protein phenotype. Thus, these three SNPs may ultimately represent variants with an increased risk factor for tumorgenesis in HNPCC. This study is one of the first to use a functional assay to appraise the role of SNPs and suggests that traditional definitions of polymorphisms and mutations are in need of reconsideration.

Domain interactions between coregulator ARA(70) and the androgen receptor (AR)

The coregulator function of AR-associated protein 70 (ARA(70)) was investigated to further characterize its interaction with the AR. Using a yeast two-hybrid assay, androgen-dependent binding of ARA(70) deletion mutants to the AR ligand-binding domain (LBD) was strongest with ARA(70) amino acids 321-441 of the 614 amino acid ARA(70) protein. Mutations adjacent to or within an FxxLF motif in this 120-amino acid region abolished androgen-dependent binding to the AR-LBD both in yeast and in glutathione-S-transferase affinity matrix assays. Yeast one-hybrid assays revealed an intrinsic ARA(70) transcriptional activation domain within amino acids 296-441. In yeast assays the ARA(70) domains for transcriptional activation and for binding to the AR-LBD were inhibited by the C-terminal region of ARA(70). Full-length ARA(70) increased androgen-dependent AR transactivation in transient cotransfection assays using a mouse mammary tumor virus-luciferase reporter in CV1 cells. ARA(70) also increased constitutive transcriptional activity of an AR NH(2)-terminal-DNA binding domain fragment and bound this region in glutathione-S-transferase affinity matrix assays. Binding was independent of the ARA(70) FxxLF motif. The results identify an ARA(70) motif required for androgen-dependent interaction with the AR-LBD and demonstrate that ARA(70) can interact with the NH(2)-terminal and carboxyl-terminal regions of AR.

Role of cadmium in the regulation of AR gene expression and activity

Treatment of human prostate cancer cells, LNCaP, with cadmium stimulated cell growth. There was a 2.4-fold increase in the population of cells in the S + G(2)M phase by d 4 and a 2.7-fold increase in cell number by d 8. The metal decreased the concentration of AR protein and mRNA (80 and 60%, respectively) and increased the expression of prostate-specific antigen and the homeobox gene, NKX 3.1 (6-fold) that was blocked by an antiandrogen. In addition, cadmium activated the AR in mouse L cells containing an MMTV-luciferase reporter gene (4-fold increase) and in COS-1 cells transfected with wild-type AR and an MMTV-CAT reporter gene (7-fold increase). Cadmium also activated a chimeric receptor (GAL-AR) containing the hormone-binding domain of AR. The metal bound to AR with an equilibrium dissociation constant of 1.19 x 10(-10) M. Cadmium blocked the binding of androgen to the receptor but did not alter its affinity (dissociation constant = 2.8 x 10(-10) M), suggesting that the metal is an inhibitor of hormone binding. In castrated animals, a single, low, environmentally relevant dose of cadmium (20 microg/kg body weight) increased the wet weight of the prostate (1.97- to 3-fold) and the seminal vesicle complex (approximately 1.5-fold) and increased the expression of the androgen-regulated gene, probasin (27-fold). The in vivo effects were also blocked by an antiandrogen.

The genetics of male undermasculinization

A review of the genetics of male undermasculinization must encompass a description of the embryology of the genital system. The dimorphism of sex development consequent upon the formation of a testis and the subsequent secretion of hormones to impose a male phenotype is highlighted. Thus, an understanding of the causes of male undermasculinization (manifest as XY sex reversal, complete and partial) includes reviewing the genetic factors which control testis determination and the production and action of testicular hormones. The study of disorders of male sex development has contributed substantially to knowledge of normal male development before birth. This knowledge has been complimented in recent years by the use of targeted murine gene disruption experiments to study the sex phenotype, although murine and human phenotypes are not always concordant. The investigation of disorders associated with male undermasculinization of prenatal onset is described briefly to complete the review.