Zoledronic acid is superior to pamidronate in the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy: a pooled analysis of two randomized, controlled clinical trials

Optimizing bisphosphonate therapy in patients with breast cancer on endocrine therapy

Deterioration of bone health is a major concern during progression and treatment of patients with breast cancer, especially in postmenopausal women. Disease- and treatment-associated skeletal-related events include fractures, spinal compression, bone pain, and hypercalcemia of malignancy. Bisphosphonates, which inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption, are important new agents in the management of skeletal-related events, and their impact on breast cancer-related bone metastases and on bone loss during long-term estrogen deprivation therapies such as aromatase inhibitors is reviewed. Intravenous pamidronate has become the standard bisphosphonate to reduce or delay skeletal complications of advanced breast cancer bone metastases, but the more potent agent, zoledronic acid, appears to be at least as effective. Another agent, ibandronate, is also active but has not been investigated in comparison with the other intravenous bisphosphonates. Zoledronic acid is the most convenient to administer, requiring only a short infusion. The effects of bisphosphonates on bone health in women with early breast cancer are also being investigated. A single yearly infusion of zoledronic acid has been shown to significantly increase bone mineral density in osteoporotic postmenopausal women and to reduce biochemical markers of bone turnover. The possibility of such treatment-reversing aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss during adjuvant therapy of breast cancer is being evaluated in a trial of letrozole, with zoledronic acid added initially or after the onset of bone loss or fracture.

Short-Term Intermittent Intravenous Clodronate in the Prevention of Bone Loss Related to Chemotherapy-Induced Ovarian Failure

Chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure causes rapid bone loss in premenopausal women with early breast cancer. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of intravenous intermittent clodronate during adjuvant chemotherapy in prevention of this rapid bone loss. 45 premenopausal women with early stage breast cancer were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, all women were randomly allocated to receive either seven cycles of intravenous clodronate infusions (1500 mg each) parallel to the chemotherapy or no further therapy. The mean bone loss in the lumbar spine at 6 months was -0.5% in the clodronate group and -1.4% in the control group (p = 0.22) and, at 12 months, -3.9% and -3.6%, respectively (p = 0.62). Type I collagen metabolite PINP levels at six months were significantly lower in the clodronate group than in the control group: 22.6 microg/l (range 15.7-55.8 microg/l) and 44.0 microg/l (range 12.5-91.9 microg/l), respectively (p = 0.0001). At 12 months, no difference between the PINP levels in clodronate and control groups were seen. In conclusion, in this small study a short-term intermittent intravenous clodronate treatment did not seem to prevent clinically significantly the bone loss related to chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure in premenopausal women with early stage breast cancer, even though a significant reduction of a biochemical marker of bone turnover (PINP) was seen during the therapy.

Systematic review of bisphosphonates for hypercalcaemia of malignancy

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates are the treatment of choice for hypercalcaemia of malignancy (HCM) but there is no consensus regarding which drug or dose should be given. We designed a systematic review to investigate the efficacy of bisphosphonates in the treatment of HCM.

METHODS

We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by searching electronic databases, scanning of reference lists, and consultation with experts and pharmaceutical companies. Foreign papers were translated. Inclusion criteria were RCTs, confirmed malignant disease and measurement of serum calcium (ionized or corrected for albumin) postrehydration. The primary outcome was number of patients achieving normocalcaemia. Secondary outcomes were time to normocalcaemia, time to relapse and toxicity.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven papers and two abstracts, using intravenous bisphosphonates, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Data from 26 studies were used in analyses. Due to the heterogeneity of studies, meta-analysis could not be performed. Pamidronate was more effective than placebo, mithramycin, etidronate (7.5 mg/kg) and low-dose clodronate (600 mg), but equal to higher dose clodronate (1500 mg). Clodronate and etidronate were superior to placebo; incadronate was superior to elcatonin; gallium nitrate was superior to etidronate. No difference was seen between alendronate and clodronate. Three dose finding studies showed no difference between 30-90 mg of pamidronate, but one well designed study showed increasing efficacy with increasing dose. Studies using increasing doses of ibandronate (0.6-4 mg), alendronate (2.5-15 mg), and incadronate (2.5-10mg), showed a dose response. Duration of administration of pamidronate did not affect efficacy (six studies).

CONCLUSION

Bisphosphonates normalize calcium in >70% patients with minimal side effects. Aminobisphosphonates are most effective at maintaining normocalcaemia and should be given in high dose irrespective of baseline serum calcium.

Hypercalcemia of malignancy

Less than 25 years ago tumor-induced hypercalcemia was often a lethal complication of cancer. Nowadays, it can be treated easily and successfully in at least 90% of cases by volume repletion in addition to the use of bisphosphonates that are potent anti-osteoclastic compounds. The standard therapy consists of the administration of 90 mg pamidronate or, more recently, 4 mg zoledronic acid, a more efficient bisphosphonate. When available, another alternative bisphosphonate is ibandronate. Recurrent hypercalcemia is nevertheless difficult to control and antibodies against parathyroid hormone-related protein could be useful for that matter in selected patients who are not in the terminal stage of their disease. Prevention of tumor-induced hypercalcemia is one of the objectives of long-term therapy with bisphosphonates in patients with tumor bone disease. The use of bisphosphonates in placebo-controlled trials has shown that the incidence of hypercalcemic episodes is reduced by more than one half.

Hypercalcemia of malignancy: Part II

Oncology nurses are responsible for the ongoing assessment of hypercalcemia, including reviewing laboratory findings as well as evaluating patient symptomatology. Abnormal serum creatinine, calcium, electrolytes, magnesium, and phosphate levels and symptoms such as constipation, lethargy, and weakness may alert clinicians to problems with this oncologic emergency. Resolution of hypercalcemia is highly successful when appropriately monitored and treated and leads to a better quality of life and improved patient outcomes.

Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and other solid tumors: a randomized, Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The authors previously reported the efficacy of a dose of 4 mg of zoledronic acid in reducing skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases secondary to lung carcinoma and other solid tumors (except carcinomas of the breast and prostate). In the current study, they update these results and report the long-term efficacy and safety of 21 months of treatment with zoledronic acid in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

METHODS

A total of 773 patients were randomized to receive zoledronic acid (4 mg or 8 mg) or placebo via a 15-minute infusion every 3 weeks for 21 months. The 8-mg dose later was reduced to 4 mg (8/4-mg group). The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of patients at 21 months with >/= 1 skeletal-related event (SRE) (pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation therapy to bone, or surgery to bone). Secondary analyses (time to first SRE, annual incidence of SREs, and multiple-event analysis) included hypercalcemia of malignancy.

RESULTS

Fewer patients treated with zoledronic acid developed at least 1 SRE at 21 months compared with patients treated with placebo (39% of those treated at the 4-mg dose [P =0.127] and 36% of those treated at the 8/4-mg dose [P = 0.023], compared with 46% of those treated with placebo). Furthermore, 4 mg of zoledronic acid significantly delayed the median time to first SRE (236 days with 4 mg vs. 155 days with placebo; P = 0.009) and significantly reduced the annual incidence of SREs (1.74 per year with the 4-mg dose vs. 2.71 per year with placebo; P = 0.012). Moreover, the 4-mg dose of zoledronic acid was found to reduce the risk of developing a skeletal event by 31% (hazard ratio of 0.693; P = 0.003). Zoledronic acid was found to be well tolerated with long-term use; the most commonly reported adverse events in all treatment groups included bone pain and the transient, acute-phase reactions of nausea, anemia, and emesis.

CONCLUSIONS

To the authors' knowledge, zoledronic acid is the first bisphosphonate to demonstrate long-term safety and efficacy in this patient population.

Managing cancer-related skeletal events with bisphosphonates

Bone metastases cause considerable morbidity. This article discusses the benefits of bisphosphonates, which are now well established in the treatment of skeletal complications across a wide range of tumour types.

Safety and Convenience of a 15‐Minute Infusion of Zoledronic Acid

Skeletal morbidity, including hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM), places a severe burden on patients with advanced cancers. Bisphosphonates effectively correct HCM and reduce skeletal morbidity in patients with bone metastases. However, with the widespread use of bisphosphonates, the safety and convenience of therapy are emerging concerns. The delivery of effective doses of early bisphosphonates required a lengthy 24-hour i.v. infusion protocol because of renal tolerability issues. The introduction of more potent bisphosphonates with superior tolerability profiles has allowed therapy to be safely delivered via shorter i.v. infusions. Intravenous therapy with etidronate, clodronate, pamidronate, ibandronate, and zoledronic acid has been used to treat HCM and skeletal complications in cancer patients. Of these therapies, zoledronic acid (which can be safely administered via a 15-minute i.v. infusion) is the most convenient and effective and has demonstrated an excellent safety profile with long-term use. Zoledronic acid has also received the broadest regulatory approval of any bisphosphonate and can be used to treat HCM or bone lesions secondary to multiple myeloma and a wide variety of solid tumors, including breast, prostate, and lung cancers. In addition to the patient preference for shorter infusion times, the 15-minute i.v. infusion protocol of zoledronic acid can provide benefits for infusion centers by potentially increasing patient throughput.

Beneficial Effect of Etidronate Therapy in Immobilized Hip Fracture Patients[Retracted]

OBJECTIVES

Hip fracture is among the most common causes of acute immobilization in elderly patients leading to increased bone resorption, and elderly patients with hip fracture are at high risk for a subsequent hip fracture.

DESIGN

In this double-blind, randomized, prospective study, 80 female patients who were immobilized because of a hip fracture were divided into two groups. The etidronate group received oral administration of 200 mg/day etidronate for 2 wks starting 1 day after the surgery. Then, after a 9-wk intermission, etidronate administration was resumed for 2 wks. The placebo group received placebo in a similar manner.

RESULTS

At baseline, both groups had high serum concentrations of ionized calcium, high urinary deoxypyridinoline (D-Pyr) concentrations, and decreased calcitriol concentrations, suggesting immobilization-induced hypercalcemia and inhibition of renal synthesis of calcitriol. After treatment, serum calcitriol concentrations increased in the etidronate and placebo groups. The etidronate group had significant decreases in serum ionized calcium and urinary D-Pyr, and the placebo group had higher serum calcium and urinary D-Pyr concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Etidronate therapy inhibits bone resorption and improves calcium balance, and such therapy may prevent bone loss and reduce the risk of subsequent hip fracture.

Metastatic bone disease and tumour-induced hypercalcaemia: treatment options

Metastatic bone disease in malignancy is responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality. Problems include debilitating bone pain and skeletal-related events (SREs), including tumour-induced hypercalcaemia. This article provides an overview of the different approaches to managing bone disease in malignancy with particular focus on the role of bisphosphonates. The three generations of bisphosphonates are discussed in relation to their role in treating bone pain and hypercalcaemia, and also in terms of their potential for being used in a prophylactic way to prevent or delay SREs.

Nonsustained effect of short-term bisphosphonate therapy on bone turnover three years after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

We recently showed that two doses of 4 mg of zoledronic acid (ZOL) ameliorated the bone loss and improved bone histology within the first six months after kidney transplantation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether this early short-term intervention exhibited a sustained bone-sparing effect.

METHODS

A homogenous group of 20 de novo renal transplant recipients were equally randomized to two infusions of 4 mg of ZOL or placebo at two weeks and three months after engraftment. Patients were followed up for three years by sequential determination of bone densitometry and specific biochemical markers.

RESULTS

From month six to three years after transplantation, both treatment groups exhibited an improvement of bone mineralization. Femoral neck bone mineral density z-scores increased statistically significantly from -1.3 (2.6) to -0.2 (3.6) in the placebo group and from -1.6 (2.9) to -1.2 (1.9) in the ZOL group (median, range). Biochemical parameters of osteoblast activity such as osteocalcin and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase did not increase significantly in both groups. Osteoprotegerin, a marker of osteoclast inhibition, was significantly elevated over the first six months in the ZOL group, but decreased to similar levels, as in the placebo group, over the next two and a half years. Other markers of osteoclast activity such as c-telopeptide of type 1 collagen, calcitonin, and intact parathyroid hormone were not different between six months and three years in either group.

CONCLUSION

The early bone-sparing effect of short-term ZOL therapy confers no sustained benefit versus placebo at three year post-transplantation.

The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid, increases mineralisation of human bone-derived cells in vitro

Previous studies have attributed the increase in bone mass observed following bisphophonate (BP) therapy to their effects on bone-resorbing osteoclasts (OCs). However, recent evidence suggests that BPs can also act directly on bone forming osteoblasts (OBs) to increase their anabolic activity. Using an established model of in vitro OB differentiation, we found that the potent nitrogen-containing BP, zoledronic acid (ZOL), may enhance the bone forming potential of human adult OB-like cells in vitro by inducing their differentiation. ZOL dose dependently induced both cytostasis and cell death in OB-like cells at concentrations of 0.5 microM or greater. Cells expressing high levels of the osteoprogenitor antigen, STRO-1, exhibited a greater proliferative potential than STRO-1negative/dim cells, and were more susceptible to the cytostatic and apoptotic effects of ZOL. ZOL was also found to promote bone cell differentiation, as evidenced by an increase in the number of cells exhibiting a more differentiated (STRO-1(-)/AP+ and STRO-1(-)/AP-) phenotype. Analysis of gene expression, using semi-quantitative RT-PCR, demonstrated that ZOL treatment resulted in a significant upregulation of osteocalcin (OCN) and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) gene expression. Furthermore, in vitro mineralisation studies revealed that ZOL enhanced mineralised matrix formation at concentrations between 5 and 25 microM. These results show that, in addition to its direct effects on OCs, ZOL also directly affects the proliferation and differentiation of human OB-like cells in vitro and may enhance bone formation in vivo.

The development of supportive-care agents for patients with cancer

As the population ages, a dramatic increase in the number of cases of cancer is expected and the need for supportive-care agents, those used to ameliorate some of the side effects of cancer or its treatment, becomes more urgent. At present, supportive-care products are available and new agents are being developed with novel mechanisms of action or modifications of existing agents that improve performance. Because of the urgent need for such products, efficient development is required to deliver useful products to patients as rapidly as possible. This chapter uses actual examples to illustrate the stages of drug development, phase I through phase 3.

Advanced breast cancer: an update and controversies on diagnosis and therapy

This review on advanced breast cancer considered important differences in the actual definition of this condition. Advanced breast cancer includes locally advanced, locoregionally recurrent and metastatic disease, which have different diagnosis, prognosis and therapy; their actual definitions are relatively uncertain. Differently from the common opinion that metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a very severe incurable disease, recently it has been reported that a small but not irrelevant fraction of MBC patients can be cured or remain in long-term survival with complete remission. The type of metastases of the population studied in these reports was analysed and the authors hypothesised that the particularly high DFS reported mainly was attributable to the high proportion of patients with locoregional metastases only. Furthermore, the options and associations of the drug therapy available for treatment of advanced breast cancer have been reviewed.

Combined Analysis of Two Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Studies of Pamidronate Disodium for the Palliation of Bone Pain in Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Purpose: Bone metastases occur in approximately 80% of patients with advanced prostate cancer. Pain is common in these patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of an intravenous bisphosphonate, pamidronate disodium, on pain control in metastatic prostate cancer patients.

Patients and Methods: Two multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials were conducted in patients with bone pain due to metastatic prostate cancer, with disease progression after first-line hormonal therapy. Intravenous pamidronate disodium (90 mg) or placebo was administered every 3 weeks for 27 weeks. Efficacy was measured via self-reported pain score (Brief Pain Inventory), analgesic use, the proportion of patients with a skeletal-related event (SRE; defined as pathologic fracture, radiation or surgery to bone, spinal cord compression, or hypercalcemia), and a pilot quantitative measurement of mobility. Laboratory evaluations included serum prostate-specific antigen, interleukin-6, bone alkaline phosphatase, and urinary bone resorption markers.

Results: Results of the two trials were pooled. There were no sustained significant differences between the pamidronate and placebo groups in self-reported pain measurements, analgesic use, proportion of patients with an SRE, or mobility at week 9 or 27. Urinary bone resorption markers were suppressed in the pamidronate group compared with placebo.

Conclusion: Pamidronate disodium failed to demonstrate a significant overall treatment benefit compared with placebo in palliation of bone pain or reduction of SREs. Evaluation of more potent bisphosphonates in patients with prostate cancer is warranted.

Zoledronic acid: A new parenteral bisphosphonate

BACKGROUND

Inhibition of bone resorption using bisphosphonates is an important step in palliation of complications of advanced cancer, such as hypercalcemia and metastatic bone disease.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this article was to describe the pharmacologic properties of zoledronic acid (zoledronate) and discuss findings from preclinical and clinical studies of its use in skeletal disorders.

METHODS

Relevant English-language literature was identified using the terms zoledronic acid, zoledronate, Zometa, and 118072-93-8 through searches of MEDLINE (1966-June 2003) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-June 2003), and abstract proceedings from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (1997-2002).

RESULTS

Zoledronic acid is a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate that inhibits bone resorption. It is indicated for the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy and for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma or documented metastasis from solid tumors, in conjunction with standard antineoplastic therapy. The recommended dosage is 4 mg via IV over >or= 15 minutes every 3 or 4 weeks. Compared with pamidronate 90 mg, zoledronic acid 4 and 8 mg provided a higher complete response rate for hypercalcemia of malignancy by day 10 (88.4% and 86.7% vs 69.7%; P = 0.002 and P = 0.015) and longer duration of action (median time to relapse, 30 and 40 days vs 17 days; P = 0.001 and P = 0.007). In patients with breast cancer or multiple myeloma, zoledronic acid was as effective as pamidronate in delaying time to a first skeletal-related event (373 days vs 363 days). In patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer and bone metastases, zoledronic acid 4 mg reduced the proportion of patients who experienced a skeletal-related event (33% vs 44% with placebo; P = 0.021) or a skeletal fracture (13% vs 22% with placebo; P = 0.015). In patients with bone metastases from solid tumors, zoledronic acid delayed the median time to a first skeletal-related event (230 days vs 163 days with placebo; P = 0.023). Common adverse events include fever, nausea, constipation, fatigue, and bone pain.

CONCLUSION

Zoledronic acid is an effective and generally well-tolerated treatment for hypercalcemia of malignancy and skeletal complications of metastatic bone disease.

Fever After Zoledronic Acid Administration Is Due to Increase in TNF-αand IL-6

The most common adverse event typically associated with bisphosphonate therapy is transient fever. The aim of this study was to define the role of the main cytokines of the acute-phase reaction interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) involved in the pathogenesis of zoledronic acid-induced fever. Eighteen consecutive cancer patients with bone metastases were treated, for the first time, with a single dose of 4 mg zoledronic acid infusion. They were prospectively evaluated for circulating TNF-alpha, interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), and IL-6 levels at different times, just before and 1, 2, 7, and 21 days after diphosphonate infusion. Clinical and standard laboratory parameters were recorded at the same time points. TNF-alpha circulating levels increased significantly 1 and 2 days after zoledronic acid infusion (respectively, p = 0.002 and p < 0.001) and then decreased to levels similar to the basal levels. IL-6 levels increased significantly 1 day after the infusion (p = 0.007), returning to values similar to the median basal values 2 days after zoledronic acid administration. Moreover, in patients who experienced fever, the TNF-alpha and IL-6 increases were higher than in patients without fever. No statistically significant differences in IFN-gamma were identified at different time points in patients with and without fever. Our results show that zoledronic acid induces transient TNF-alpha and IL-6 increases and that these increases are higher in patients who have developed fever, suggesting that these cytokines could be responsible for fever pathogenesis. The sharp reduction in serum calcium levels observed in patients with fever may be related to zoledronic acid pharmacokinetic modifications.

Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid compared with pamidronate disodium in the treatment of skeletal complications in patients with advanced multiple myeloma or breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The goal of the current study was to compare the long-term (25-month) safety and efficacy of zoledronic acid with pamidronate in patients with bone lesions secondary to advanced breast carcinoma or multiple myeloma.

METHODS

Patients (n = 1648) were randomized to receive 4 mg or 8 mg (reduced to 4 mg) zoledronic acid as a 15-minute infusion or to receive 90 mg pamidronate as a 2-hour infusion every 3-4 weeks for 24 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with at least 1 skeletal-related event (SRE), defined as pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation therapy, or surgery to bone. Secondary analyses included time to first SRE, skeletal morbidity rate, and multiple-event analysis. Hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM) was included as an SRE in some secondary analyses.

RESULTS

After 25 months of follow-up, zoledronic acid reduced the overall proportion of patients with an SRE and reduced the skeletal morbidity rate similar to pamidronate. Compared with pamidronate, zoledronic acid (4 mg) reduced the overall risk of developing skeletal complications (including HCM) by an additional 16% (P = 0.030). In patients with breast carcinoma, zoledronic acid (4 mg) was significantly more effective than pamidronate, reducing the risk of SREs by an additional 20% (P = 0.025) compared with pamidronate and by an additional 30% in patients receiving hormonal therapy (P = 0.009). Zoledronic acid (4 mg) and pamidronate were tolerated equally well. The most common adverse events included bone pain, nausea, and fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term follow-up data confirm that zoledronic acid was more effective than pamidronate in reducing the risk of skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases from breast carcinoma and was of similar efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.

Zoledronic acid delays the onset of skeletal-related events and progression of skeletal disease in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in patients with bone metastases secondary to renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

METHODS

A retrospective subset analysis of patients with RCC enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study of zoledronic acid was performed. Patients were randomized to receive zoledronic acid (4 or 8 mg as a 15-minute infusion) or placebo with concomitant antineoplastic therapy every 3 weeks for 9 months. The primary efficacy analysis was the proportion of patients with one or more skeletal-related events (SREs), which were defined as pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation therapy, or surgery to bone. Secondary analyses included time to first SRE, skeletal morbidity rate (events per year), disease progression, and multiple event analysis.

RESULTS

In this subset of 74 patients with RCC, zoledronic acid (4 mg) was found to significantly reduce the proportion of patients with an SRE (37% vs. 74% for placebo; P = 0.015). Similarly, zoledronic acid significantly reduced the mean skeletal morbidity rate (2.68 vs. 3.38 for placebo; P = 0.014) and extended the time to the first event (median not reached vs. 72 days for placebo; P = 0.006). A multiple event analysis demonstrated that the risk of developing an SRE was reduced by 61% compared with placebo (hazard ratio of 0.394; P = 0.008). The median time to progression of bone lesions was significantly longer for patients who were treated with zoledronic acid (P = 0.014 vs. placebo). Zoledronic acid appeared to be well tolerated; the most common adverse events in all treatment groups included bone pain, nausea, anemia, and emesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Zoledronic acid (4 mg as a 15-minute infusion) demonstrated significant clinical benefit in patients with bone metastases from RCC, suggesting that further investigation of zoledronic acid in this patient population is warranted.

The use of zoledronic acid in the management of metastatic bone disease and hypercalcaemia

Zoledronic acid is a potent, third generation, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, licensed for the management of skeletal metastases and hypercalcaemia of malignancy, both of which cause considerable morbidity. In the preclinical setting, zoledronic acid has demonstrated superior potency regarding inhibition of osteolysis and reduction of hypercalcaemia as compared with other bisphosphonates. Clinical trials have indicated that zoledronic acid is superior to pamidronate in suppressing osteolysis and in reducing hypercalcaemia of malignancy. Its main mechanism of action is induction of osteoclast apoptosis through inhibition of the mevalonate pathway. Zoledronic acid has also demonstrated direct anti-tumour activity both in vitro and in animal models, suggesting it may be of benefit in preventing the formation of bone metastases. Clinical trials are in progress, assessing the benefit of zoledronic acid in the adjuvant setting in both breast and prostate cancer.

Zoledronic acid versus placebo in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with lung cancer and other solid tumors: a phase III, double-blind, randomized trial--the Zoledronic Acid Lung Cancer and Other Solid Tumors Study Group

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in patients with bone metastases secondary to solid tumors other than breast or prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive zoledronic acid (4 or 8 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks for 9 months, with concomitant antineoplastic therapy. The 8-mg dose was reduced to 4 mg (8/4-mg group). The primary efficacy analysis was proportion of patients with at least one skeletal-related event (SRE), defined as pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation therapy to bone, and surgery to bone. Secondary analyses (time to first SRE, skeletal morbidity rate, and multiple event analysis) counted hypercalcemia as an SRE.

RESULTS

Among 773 patients with bone metastases from lung cancer or other solid tumors, the proportion with an SRE was reduced in both zoledronic acid groups compared with the placebo group (38% for 4 mg and 35% for 8/4 mg zoledronic acid v 44% for the placebo group; P =.127 and P =.023 for 4-mg and 8/4-mg groups, respectively). Additionally, 4 mg zoledronic acid significantly increased time to first event (median, 230 v 163 days for placebo; P =.023), an important end point in this poor-prognosis population, and significantly reduced the risk of developing skeletal events by multiple event analysis (hazard ratio = 0.732; P =.017). Zoledronic acid was well tolerated; the most common adverse events in all treatment groups included bone pain, nausea, anemia, and vomiting.

CONCLUSION

Zoledronic acid (4 mg infused over 15 minutes) is the first bisphosphonate to reduce skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors other than breast and prostate cancer.

Proven efficacy of zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer and other malignancies

Many advanced cancers, particularly breast cancer and prostate cancer, metastasize to the bone, resulting in painful lesions and skeletal complications. Intravenous bisphosphonate therapy is an important component of palliative care for patients with bone metastases, and pamidronate has been the standard of care for patients with breast cancer and multiple myeloma since 1996. However, zoledronic acid is the first bisphosphonate shown to significantly reduce skeletal morbidity in patients with a wide range of primary tumor types. Zoledronic acid has demonstrated efficacy in the management of hypercalcemia and metastatic bone disease. In phase III studies involving more than 3000 patients with multiple myeloma, breast cancer, prostate cancer, lung cancer, and other cancers, 4 mg zoledronic acid demonstrated consistent efficacy across a range of clinical end-points, and was safe and well tolerated when infused over 15 min. Based on these studies, zoledronic acid appears to be active in patients with bone metastases irrespective of tumor type, and should be considered as the standard of care for the treatment of bone metastases.

Metastatic prostate cancer: complications and treatment

Despite highly successful treatments for localized prostate cancer, approximately 35% to 40% of men will eventually experience a detectable rise in serum prostate specific antigen. A portion of these men will go on to experience clinically expressed extracapsular disease, with as many as two-thirds having evidence of bone involvement. Diagnosis of skeletal involvement involves serum markers of disease progression and radiological evaluation. Skeletal-related events are numerous and include bone pain, spinal cord compression, vertebral collapse, and pathological fractures. Current treatments for advanced prostate cancer include individual or combined hormonal therapies, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgical treatments, and most recently, antiresorptive medications.

Rationale for the use of bisphosphonates in osteoblastic and osteolytic bone lesions

Various primary malignancies develop bone metastases, and the resultant skeletal complications cause significant morbidity/mortality in advanced cancer patients. Bone lesions associated with metastases are traditionally classified radiologically as either osteolytic or osteoblastic, and both types of lesions are associated with elevated levels of specific bone resorption markers. Some common aspects in the pathophysiology of bone lesions have prompted speculation that treatments for osteolytic metastases might also be effective for predominantly osteoblastic metastases, such as in prostate cancer. Potent osteoclast activity inhibitors, bisphosphonates have been successful in the treatment of osteolytic tumor bone disease. Zoledronic acid is the first bisphosphonate shown to have a direct clinical benefit in the treatment of osteoblastic bone metastases, reducing the number and rate of skeletal events in prostate cancer patients with metastatic bone disease. Moreover, the shorter, more convenient infusion time and similar safety profile of 4 mg zoledronic acid compared with 90 mg pamidronate presently make zoledronic acid the preferred therapy for treatment of bone metastases in patients with all types of advanced malignancy.

Induction of cell death of human osteogenic sarcoma cells by zoledronic acid resembles anoikis

The aim of this study was to investigate the cytotoxic activity of the third-generation nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (ZOL) as a single agent, and in combination with clinically relevant anticancer drugs, in a panel of human osteogenic sarcoma cell lines (HOS, BTK-143, MG-63, SJSA-1, G-292, and SAOS2). We found that ZOL, when used alone, reduced cell number in a dose- and time-dependent manner, due either to cell cycle arrest in S-phase or to the induction of apoptosis. In the sensitive HOS, BTK-143, and G-292 cell lines, genomic DNA fragmentation and morphological changes characteristic of apoptosis were evident, and cells became nonadherent. Induction of apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells by ZOL was associated with caspase activation. However, coaddition of the broad-spectrum caspase inhibitors, z-VAD-fmk, Boc-D-fmk, or the caspase-3-specific inhibitor z-DEVD fmk, failed to protect these cells from ZOL-induced apoptosis. Our data support a ZOL-specific induction of cell apoptosis that involves cell detachment (anoikis), and in which caspase activation occurs secondarily to, and is redundant as a mediator of cell death. The addition of geranylgeraniol, an intermediate of the mevalonate pathway, suppressed the ZOL-induced apoptosis, suggesting that the cytotoxic effects of ZOL in osteosarcoma cells were mediated by the mevalonate pathway. While treatment of osteosarcoma cells with the chemotherapeutic agents doxorubicin or etoposide decreased cell viability, combination of these agents with ZOL did not significantly augment apoptosis in any of the cell lines tested. These observations suggest that ZOL has direct effects on the proliferation and survival of osteosarcoma cells in vitro, which has implications for future therapy of osteosarcoma.

Advances in supportive care of patients with cancer and bone metastases: nursing implications of zoledronic acid

The knowledge and training of nursing staff is essential for the safety and comfort of patients receiving i.v. therapies. The use of i.v. bisphosphonates as an adjunct to standard antineoplastic therapies in patients with advanced cancer is becoming widespread. Zoledronic acid and pamidronate (Zometa and Aredia, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ) are nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. Pamidronate has been the standard of care for patients with osteolytic bone lesions from breast cancer or multiple myeloma. However, zoledronic acid, which has demonstrated increased potency and a broad clinical utility, is emerging as the new standard of care. In addition to treating hypercalcemia of malignancy, zoledronic acid is approved for treating patients with bone metastases (osteolytic or osteoblastic) from a wide range of solid tumors, including breast, prostate, and lung cancers, or osteolytic bone lesions from multiple myeloma. Zoledronic acid (4 mg via a 15-minute infusion) has a safety profile comparable with pamidronate (90 mg via a two-hour infusion) and has demonstrated comparable or superior efficacy to that of pamidronate in every patient population tested. The shorter infusion time of zoledronic acid compared with that of pamidronate may provide added convenience, but safety guidelines should be followed for all i.v. bisphosphonate therapies. These guidelines and nursing care of patients receiving i.v. bisphosphonates are reviewed.

Bisphosphonates: expanded roles in the treatment of patients with cancer

Bisphosphonates are important inhibitors of osteoclastic bone resorption seen in patients with bone metastases associated with malignancy. Bisphosphonates are used in the treatment of patients with bone metastases and have been shown to reduce skeletal-related events and symptoms, contributing to improved patient outcomes and quality of life. These agents first were approved in the treatment of patients with osteoporosis and have been used for the past two decades in this role. Because bisphosphonates inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, the bone remodeling cycle slows down and an increase in bone mineral density occurs. These agents are useful in treatment for both hypercalcemia and pain, although they have not definitively shown improvement in survival time. Considerable interest exists in the use of bisphosphonates for prevention of bone metastases and their potential antitumor activity. These drugs are well tolerated and have minimal side effects, but they are not inexpensive. This article discusses the role of bisphosphonates in patients with cancer and future directions for further research.

Treatment of multiple myeloma

Conventional chemotherapies are no longer the only treatment in multiple myelomatosis. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous transplantation are not curative but do increase relapse-free survival time in young patients. Thalidomide is efficacious in refractory and relapsing myeloma and its evaluation is going on. Curative and preventive treatments of skeletal events, infections and anemia improve quality of life. All together, these strategies imply therapeutic knowledge and choices but allow an about 5-year-long median survival time in modern studies. Treatment options for myeloma now include, not only conventional chemotherapy regimens, but also novel symptomatic drugs and strategies that increase survival and/or quality of life, although they fail to provide a cure. In parallel with this expansion of the treatment armamentarium, physicians must acquire the knowledge needed to select the best treatment for the individual patient. After reviewing the rationale, effectiveness, and safety of each of these treatments, we will discuss the indications that we believe are legitimate.

Randomized controlled trial of zoledronic acid to prevent bone loss in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer

PURPOSE

A multicenter double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled clinical trial was performed to assess the effect of zoledronic acid, a potent new bisphosphonate, on bone mineral density during androgen deprivation therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Men with M0 (no distant metastases) prostate cancer beginning androgen deprivation therapy were randomly assigned to receive 4 mg. zoledronic acid or placebo intravenously every 3 months for 1 year. The primary efficacy variable was the percent change from baseline to 1 year in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine as measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

A total of 106 men were enrolled in the trial. Mean bone mineral density in the lumbar spine increased by 5.6% in men receiving zoledronic acid and decreased by 2.2% in those given placebo (mean difference 7.8%, 95% confidence interval 5.6%-10.0%, p <0.001). Mean bone mineral density of the femoral neck, trochanter and total hip also increased in the zoledronic acid group and decreased in the placebo group. Zoledronic acid was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Zoledronic acid increases bone mineral density in the hip and spine during androgen deprivation therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

Pharmacotherapy of multiple myeloma: an economic perspective

Since new treatments have recently been proposed for patients with multiple myeloma, the aim of this article is to review the main innovations in this therapeutic area and to examine the cost-effectiveness ratio. Innovative approaches include autologous transplantation and thalidomide, which are both utilised as induction or salvage treatments. According to a randomised trial conducted in 1996, the survival after autologous transplantation seems to be better than that following standard therapy; however, this result has not been confirmed by a recent study. Thalidomide has been found to be effective for relapsed or refractory myeloma and, more recently, also as induction therapy. Preliminary cost-effectiveness assessments about autologous transplantation and thalidomide have given promising results; yet one regulatory problem with thalidomide is that, both in Europe and in the US, the drug has not yet been approved for this indication.

Bone metastases in breast cancer

Patients with advanced breast cancer who develop bone metastases suffer from long-term skeletal morbidity. Complications of bone metastases include pain, pathologic fractures, and spinal cord compression, which have a significant impact on the quality of life of patients. Treatment options for patients with bone metastases include surgery, radiation, and analgesics to reduce bone pain and to prevent or repair fractures. Intravenous bisphosphonates can delay the onset of bone metastasis and reduce the percentage of patients who experience skeletal complications of bone metastasis, thus reducing skeletal morbidity. For the past 6 years, pamidronate disodium (90 mg administered by 2-hour intravenous infusion) has been the treatment of choice for the prevention of skeletal complications of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. However, a more potent bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid (4 mg administered by 15-minute intravenous infusion), was approved for use and has improved efficacy in patients with bone metastases. Because of the increased efficacy and more convenient infusion time, zoledronic acid may become the new standard of care for the treatment and prevention of skeletal complications secondary to bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Phase III clinical trials have shown that patients with an existing skeletal complication are more likely to develop subsequent complications compared with patients who have not experienced a complication. Therefore, zoledronic acid therapy should be initiated when the patient is diagnosed with bone metastasis.

Zoledronic acid (Zometa) use in bone disease

Zoledronic acid (Zometa) is the most recent addition to the clinically available bisphosphonates. Clinical benefits in metabolic, as well as cancer-related bone disease have been observed. In addition to its profound antiosteoclast effects, it has demonstrated anticancer effects in preclinical models. Zoledronic acid has been evaluated in randomized, double-blind clinical trials of osteoporosis, Paget's disease of bone, and metastatic, osteolytic and osteoblastic bone disease. Antiosteoclast activity has been demonstrated by reductions in the bone breakdown products N-telopeptide, C-telopeptide and deoxypyridinoline. Bone mineral density, measured by dual energy x-ray absorptometry, is increased with administration of zoledronic acid in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Clinical benefit in cancer includes improvement in bone pain, reductions in skeletal events and delay in time-to-first-skeletal-events. These zoledronic acid treatment benefits have been demonstrated in patients with multiple myeloma, breast, prostate and lung cancer, and other solid tumors.

Treatment of tumor-induced hypercalcemia: a solved problem?

Less than 25 years ago, tumor-induced hypercalcemia was often a lethal complication of cancer. Nowadays, it can be successfully and easily treated in at least 90% of the cases by rehydration and potent antiosteoclastic bisphosphonates. The standard therapy consists of the administration of 90 mg of pamidronate (Aredia Dry Powder) or more recently, 4 mg of zoledronic acid (Zometa)], which is even more efficient, at least in patients without bone metastases. Recurrent hypercalcemia is nevertheless difficult to control and antibodies against parathyroid-hormone-related protein may prove to be a useful treatment.

Zoledronic acid to prevent bone loss in the first 6 months after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates can prevent bone mineral density loss after renal transplantation, but their effect on trabecular mineralization and bone morphology, two key factors of bone stability, remains unknown.

METHODS

In a 6-month, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 20 kidney transplant recipients received either 4 mg zoledronic acid or placebo twice within 3 months after engraftment. At transplantation and after 6 months, mean trabecular calcium concentration and trabecular morphometry were measured in bone biopsies. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the femoral neck and the lumbar spine were evaluated by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and serum biochemical markers of bone metabolism were determined monthly.

RESULTS

Trabecular calcium content increased significantly in the zoledronic acid group, but remained unchanged in the placebo group. BMD at femoral neck showed no change in the zoledronic acid group, but decreased in the placebo group. BMD of the lumbar spine was increased in the zoledronic acid group without change in the placebo group. High-turnover bone disease resolved similarly in both groups, as evidenced by a significant decrease of eroded bone surface, osteoclast and osteoblast surface. Serologic markers of bone formation and resorption were significantly lower in zoledronic acid-treated patients throughout the study. Kidney transplant function was stable after zoledronic acid therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that administration of zoledronic acid improves the calcium content of cancellous bone after kidney transplantation. The beneficial effect of bisphosphonate therapy is further evidenced by an increase of lumbar spine BMD, and stabilization of femur BMD.

The use of zoledronic acid, a novel, highly potent bisphosphonate, for the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy

BACKGROUND

Hypercalcemia of malignancy is a serious complication of cancer that affects patients with and without bone metastases. A single infusion of pamidronate disodium, a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, effectively normalizes serum calcium in the majority of patients treated for up to 1 month. Zoledronic acid is a new-generation, heterocyclic nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate and the most potent inhibitor of bone resorption identified to date.

METHODS

The natural history, clinical presentation, and treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy are reviewed, with a focus on the mechanisms of action and relative efficacy and safety of bisphosphonate therapies.

RESULTS

The improved efficacy of zoledronic acid compared with pamidronate disodium has been demonstrated in a pooled analysis of two randomized clinical trials in patients with hypercalcemia of malignancy. In these trials, both zoledronic acid and pamidronate disodium were safe and well tolerated; however, zoledronic acid treatment resulted in a significantly higher number of complete responses, more rapid calcium normalization, and more durable responses compared with pamidronate disodium.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the superior efficacy and comparable safety profile of zoledronic acid compared with pamidronate disodium, zoledronic acid is likely to become the treatment of choice for hypercalcemia of malignancy.

Effectiveness and cost of bisphosphonate therapy in tumor bone disease

BACKGROUND

Tumor-induced osteolysis due to breast carcinoma and myeloma is responsible for a considerable morbidity that severely impairs patients'quality of life. Osteoclast-mediated bone resorption is reported to be increased markedly in patients with tumor bone disease and can be inhibited by bisphosphonate therapy.

METHODS

The incidence of skeletal complications and the effectiveness of bisphosphonate therapy in patients with breast carcinoma metastatic to bone or in those with myeloma were derived from large-scale, long-term, placebo-controlled trials with clodronate or pamidronate. To the authors' knowledge, there are few studies published to date evaluating the cost-effectiveness of bisphosphonate therapy, and the majority that do exist often are based on models and are applicable only to a particular health care system.

RESULTS

From the placebo groups of the above-mentioned trials, one can estimate that approximately 25-40% of the patients with breast carcinoma metastatic to bone will require radiotherapy for bone pain and approximately 17-50% will sustain incident vertebral fractures yearly. The incidence of complications is reported to be lower in myeloma patients. The prolonged administration of bisphosphonates reportedly can reduce the frequency of skeletal-related events by approximately 25-50%. Maximal efficacy appears to have been achieved with the current therapeutic schemes based on monthly intravenous infusions. Beneficial effects appear to be obtained more readily using the intravenous route rather than the oral route. The costs of bisphosphonate therapy appear to be higher than the cost savings from the prevention of skeletal-related events. The costs per quality of life-adjusted year have been estimated to be > $100,000, but more research is needed. Limited data suggest that zoledronic acid will not reduce treatment costs but the short infusion time will lead to substantial time savings for patients and for outpatient oncology facilities.

CONCLUSIONS

As is the case for many agents used in oncology, bisphosphonates remain a relatively expensive therapy. More studies are needed to evaluate their cost-effectiveness ratio correctly. A ceiling effect has been reached with current therapeutic schemes and tailoring therapy to the individual patient needs to be evaluated correctly to increase therapeutic effectiveness and improve quality of life further without increasing treatment costs.

What's new in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer?

Increased insight into the biology of prostate cancer and the emergence of new therapeutic strategies and chemotherapeutic agents has changed approaches in treating patients with advanced prostate cancer. After secondary hormonal manipulations, new approaches include: second-line hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy with granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) therapy, dendritic cell therapy, gene vaccination therapy, inhibition and/or blockade of growth factor receptors or growth factor receptor pathways, inhibition of neo-angiogenesis and inhibition of invasion and metastases.

Zoledronic acid is superior to pamidronate for the treatment of bone metastases in breast carcinoma patients with at least one osteolytic lesion

BACKGROUND

Treatment with zoledronic acid (Zol) was compared with a dose of 90 mg of pamidronate (Pam) in breast carcinoma (BC) patients with at least 1 osteolytic lesion based on data from a Phase III, randomized trial.

METHODS

Overall, 1130 patients with breast carcinoma who had all types of bone metastases (osteolytic, mixed, or osteoblastic by radiology) were randomized to receive treatment with either 4 mg of Zol or 8 mg of Zol as a 15-minute infusion or 90 mg of Pam as a 2-hour infusion every 3-4 weeks for 12 months. A skeletal-related event (SRE) was defined as a pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiotherapy, or surgery to bone.

RESULTS

Among all patients with BC, the proportion of those who had an SRE (primary endpoint) was comparable between treatment groups (43% of patients who received 4 mg of Zol vs. 45% of patients who received Pam). Among patients who had breast carcinoma with at least 1 osteolytic lesion (n = 528 patients), the proportion with an SRE was lower in the 4-mg Zol group compared with the Pam group (48% vs. 58%), but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.058). The time to first SRE was significantly longer in the 4-mg Zol group compared with the Pam group (median, 310 vs. 174 days; P = 0.013). Moreover, multiple-event analysis demonstrated significant further reductions in the risk of developing SREs over the reduction achieved with Pam (30% in the osteolytic subset [P = 0.010] and 20% for all patients with BC [P = 0.037]).

CONCLUSIONS

The current data indicate that treatment with 4 mg of Zol was more effective than 90 mg of Pam in reducing skeletal complications in a subset of patients with breast carcinoma who had at least 1 osteolytic lesion at study entry.