Antitumor Activity in Melanoma and Anti-Self Responses in a Phase I Trial With the Anti-Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte–Associated Antigen 4 Monoclonal Antibody CP-675,206

Immunologic and clinical effects of antibody blockade of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 in previously vaccinated cancer patients

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) functions as a negative regulator of endogenous and vaccine-induced antitumor immunity. The administration of fully human anti-CTLA-4 blocking monoclonal antibodies to advanced-cancer patients increases immune-mediated tumor destruction in some subjects. Nonetheless, patients that respond also frequently manifest serious inflammatory pathologies, raising the possibility that the therapeutic and toxic effects of CTLA-4 blockade might be linked. Here we show that periodic infusions of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies after vaccination with irradiated, autologous tumor cells engineered to secrete GM-CSF (GVAX) generate clinically meaningful antitumor immunity without grade 3 or 4 toxicity in a majority of metastatic melanoma patients. The application of this sequential immunotherapy to advanced ovarian carcinoma patients also revealed that tumor destruction and severe inflammatory pathology could be dissociated, although further refinements are required to increase clinical responses and to minimize toxicity in this population. The extent of therapy-induced tumor necrosis was linearly related to the natural logarithm of the ratio of intratumoral CD8(+) effector T cells to FoxP3(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) in posttreatment biopsies. Together, these findings help clarify the immunologic and clinical effects of CTLA-4 antibody blockade in previously vaccinated patients and raise the possibility that selective targeting of antitumor Tregs may constitute a complementary strategy for combination therapy.

Comparative methodologies of regulatory T cell depletion in a murine melanoma model

There has been recent interest in the depletion of regulatory T cells (Tregs) as part of a multi-faceted approach to the immunotherapy of melanoma patients. This is in part due recent findings that convincingly show that Tregs are an integral part of regulating and even suppressing an immune response to growing tumor cells. We therefore compared three methods of Treg depletion and/or elimination, utilizing low dose cyclophosphamide (CY), a specific antibody directed against the IL-2 receptor found on Tregs (PC61) and the use of denileukin diftitox (DD), which is a fusion protein designed to have a direct cytocidal action on cells which express the IL-2 receptor. We show that CY administration resulted in the highest reduction in Tregs among the three reagents. However, the reduction in Tregs with CY was also associated with the concomitant reduction of CD8(+) T cells and a lack of tumor antigen priming. Utilization of DD resulted in a >50% Treg cell reduction without parallel cytocidal effects upon other T cell subsets but did not enhance anti-tumor immunity against B16 melanoma. Lastly, the PC61 showed a moderate reduction of Tregs that lasted longer than the other reagents, without a reduction in the total number of CD8(+) T cells. Furthermore, PC61 treatment did not abrogate tumor antigen-specific immunity elicited by dendritic cells (DC). We therefore conclude that PC61 administration was the most effective method of reducing Tregs in a murine melanoma model in addition to providing evidence of a synergistic effect when combined with DC-based immunotherapy.

The Italian Network for Tumor Biotherapy (NIBIT): getting together to push the field forward

As for a consolidated tradition, the 5^th annual meeting of the Italian Network for Cancer Biotherapy took place in the Certosa of Pontignano, a Tuscan monastery, on September 20–22, 2007. The congress gathered more than 40 Italian leading groups representing academia, biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry. Aim of the meeting was to share new advances in cancer bio-immunotherapy and to promote their swift translation from pre-clinical research to clinical applications. Several topics were covered including: a) molecular and cellular mechanisms of tumor escape; b) therapeutic antibodies and recombinant constructs; c) clinical trials up-date and new programs; d) National Cooperative Networks and their potential interactions; e) old and new times in cancer immunology, an "amarcord". Here, we report the main issues discussed during the meeting.

TLR ligand suppression or enhancement of Treg cells? A double-edged sword in immunity to tumours

Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists are potent activators of innate immune responses, activating dendritic cell (DC) maturation and inflammatory cytokine secretion by innate immune cells and as a consequence they promote adaptive immune response when coadministered with foreign antigens. There is also some evidence from mouse models that TLR ligands can help to break tolerance to self-antigens and promote immune responses to tumour antigens. Therefore, they have been exploited as adjuvants for tumour vaccines or as immunotherapeutics against cancer. Clinical evaluation of TLR agonists has resulted in a licensed immunotherapeutic for basal cell carcinoma, but there have also been disappointing results from clinical trials, with one pharmaceutical company recently halting its clinical programme. A major obstacle to the development of any active immunotherapeutic approach to cancer is the immunosuppressive environment of the growing tumour, including the induction of tolerogenic DCs and regulatory T (Treg) cells, which suppress the development of protective effector T-cell responses. This can be compounded by the use of TLR ligands as immunotherapeutics. A problem with TLR agonists that has not been fully appreciated is that they can generate suppressive as well as inflammatory responses in innate immune cells and can promote the induction of regulatory as well as effector T cells. This is part of a normal mechanism for limiting collateral damage during infection or sterile inflammation, but can constrain their ability to induce protective antitumour immunity, especially in the immune suppressed environment of the tumour. Alternatively, manipulating the TLR-activated innate immune responses to selectively blocking immunosuppressive arm, as well as that induced by the tumour, may hold the key to enhancing their efficacy as tumour immunotherapeutics and as adjuvants for cancer vaccines.

Targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4): a novel strategy for the treatment of melanoma and other malignancies

Cancer immunotherapy centers on modulating the host's tumor-directed immune response. One promising approach involves augmentation of cell-mediated immunity by interrupting T-cell pathways responsible for immune down-regulation or tolerance. The discovery of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and its role as a key negative regulator for T cells has prompted efforts to target this signaling molecule to improve cancer therapy. Activation, or 'priming', of naive T cells in response to tumor-cell invasion comprises a dual-signaling mechanism. Signal 1 requires tumor-associated antigen recognition by the T-cell receptor, while signal 2 occurs through binding of CD80 or CD86 (B7.1 of 2) on the antigen presenting cell (APC) with CD28 on the T cell. Importantly, there is a final step responsible for naturally occurring immune regulation; this occurs in response to competitive binding of CD80/CD86 on the APC by CTLA-4 on the T cell. This 'immune checkpoint' interrupts signal 2 and inhibits the activated T cell. Targeting CTLA-4 as an anticancer strategy: Following proof-of-concept studies in animals, fully human anti-CTLA-4 antibodies were developed and 2 are undergoing clinical evaluation. Ipilimumab and tremelimumab have shown promising antitumor activity, initially in patients with advanced melanoma. Class-specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were common and mostly transient and/or manageable. These events are thought to be mechanism-of-action-related, indicating immune tolerance is broken; this relation may also explain the association between irAEs and response seen in several trials. Interruption of immune inhibitory pathways via CTLA-4 blockade appears to be a promising strategy for cancer immunotherapy.

Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4 antibody) causes regression of metastatic renal cell cancer associated with enteritis and hypophysitis

The inhibitory receptor CTLA4 has a key role in peripheral tolerance of T cells for both normal and tumor-associated antigens. Murine experiments suggested that blockade of CTLA4 might have antitumor activity and a clinical experience with the blocking antibody ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma did show durable tumor regressions in some patients. Therefore, a phase II study of ipilimumab was conducted in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer with a primary end point of response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Two sequential cohorts received either 3 mg/kg followed by 1 mg/kg or all doses at 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (with no intention of comparing cohort response rates). Major toxicities were enteritis and endocrine deficiencies of presumed autoimmune origin. One of 21 patients receiving the lower dose had a partial response. Five of 40 patients at the higher dose had partial responses (95% confidence interval for cohort response rate 4% to 27%) and responses were seen in patients who had previously not responded to IL-2. Thirty-three percent of patients experienced a grade III or IV immune-mediated toxicity. There was a highly significant association between autoimmune events (AEs) and tumor regression (response rate=30% with AE, 0% without AE). CTLA4 blockade with ipilimumab induces cancer regression in some patients with metastatic clear cell renal cancer, even if they have not responded to other immunotherapies. These regressions are highly associated with other immune-mediated events of presumed autoimmune origin by mechanisms as yet undefined.

Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4 antibody) causes regression of metastatic renal cell cancer associated with enteritis and hypophysitis

The inhibitory receptor CTLA4 has a key role in peripheral tolerance of T cells for both normal and tumor-associated antigens. Murine experiments suggested that blockade of CTLA4 might have antitumor activity and a clinical experience with the blocking antibody ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma did show durable tumor regressions in some patients. Therefore, a phase II study of ipilimumab was conducted in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer with a primary end point of response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Two sequential cohorts received either 3 mg/kg followed by 1 mg/kg or all doses at 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (with no intention of comparing cohort response rates). Major toxicities were enteritis and endocrine deficiencies of presumed autoimmune origin. One of 21 patients receiving the lower dose had a partial response. Five of 40 patients at the higher dose had partial responses (95% confidence interval for cohort response rate 4% to 27%) and responses were seen in patients who had previously not responded to IL-2. Thirty-three percent of patients experienced a grade III or IV immune-mediated toxicity. There was a highly significant association between autoimmune events (AEs) and tumor regression (response rate=30% with AE, 0% without AE). CTLA4 blockade with ipilimumab induces cancer regression in some patients with metastatic clear cell renal cancer, even if they have not responded to other immunotherapies. These regressions are highly associated with other immune-mediated events of presumed autoimmune origin by mechanisms as yet undefined.

Human monoclonal antibodies from transgenic mice

Since the 1986 regulatory approval of muromonomab-CD3, a mouse monoclonal antibody (MAb) directed against the T cell CD3epsilon antigen, MAbs have become an increasingly important class of therapeutic compounds in a variety of disease areas ranging from cancer and autoimmune indications to infectious and cardiac diseases. However, the pathway to the present acceptance of therapeutic MAbs within the pharmaceutical industry has not been smooth. A major hurdle for antibody therapeutics has been the inherent immunogenicity of the most readily available MAbs, those derived from rodents. A variety of technologies have been successfully employed to engineer MAbs with reduced immunogenicity. Implementation of these antibody engineering technologies involves in vitro optimization of lead molecules to generate a clinical candidate. An alternative technology, involving the engineering of strains of mice to produce human instead of mouse antibodies, has been emerging and evolving for the past two decades. Now, with the 2006 US regulatory approval of panitumumab, a fully human antibody directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor, transgenic mice expressing human antibody repertoires join chimerization, CDR grafting, and phage display technologies, as a commercially validated antibody drug discovery platform. With dozens of additional transgenic mouse-derived human MAbs now in clinical development, this new drug discovery platform appears to be firmly established within the pharmaceutical industry.

Immunosuppressive mechanisms in human tumors: why we still cannot cure cancer

Tumor cells often evoke specific immune responses that, however, fail to eliminate all the tumor cells. The development of cancer immunotherapies is, therefore, mostly focused on the generation of large numbers of activated anti-tumor effector cells by vaccination or adoptive T cell transfer. These developments are built on an ever-extended list of identified tumor-associated antigens and corresponding T cell epitopes, and a steady flow of reports from proof-of-principle animal model experiments demonstrating cure from disease by immune interventions. However, the promises have not translated into clinical successes for cancer patients. Even where tumor regression or complete responses were achieved there is usually relapse of the disease. Increasing numbers of reports over recent years highlight potential immunosuppressive mechanisms that act in tumors and systemically in cancer patients to block effective anti-tumor immune responses. They account in large parts for the failures of cancer immunotherapy and need to be overcome before progress can be expected. We review here the current state of the research on immunosuppressive networks in human cancer.

The B7 family and cancer therapy: costimulation and coinhibition

The activation and development of an adaptive immune response is initiated by the engagement of a T-cell antigen receptor by an antigenic peptide-MHC complex. The outcome of this engagement is determined by both positive and negative signals, costimulation and coinhibition, generated mainly by the interaction between the B7 family and their receptor CD28 family. The importance of costimulation and coinhibition of T cells in controlling immune responses is exploited by tumors as immune evasion pathways. Absence of the expression of costimulatory B7 molecules renders tumors invisible to the immune system, whereas enhanced expression of inhibitory B7 molecules protects them from effective T cell destruction. Therefore, the manipulation of these pathways is crucial for developing effective tumor immunotherapy. Translation of our basic knowledge of costimulation and coinhibition into early clinical trials has shown considerable promise.

The role of the CTLA4 blockade in the treatment of malignant melanoma

Metastatic melanoma remains a disease with few effective treatments. The anti-tumor immune response has long been felt to be important in the prognosis of melanoma, and much work has focused on harnessing the immune system to fight this disease. Tumor-specific vaccines, immunomodulatory cytokines and non-specific immunostimulants (such as Bacille Calmette Guerin/BCG) have all been investigated. A new strategy has been identified involving cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA4). This molecule is expressed on the surface of activated T-lymphocytes and exerts a suppressive effect on the induction of immune responses after interaction between T-cell receptor (TCR) and human lymphocyte antigen (HLA) molecules on the antigen-presenting cell (APC). Work in animal models demonstrated that antibody-mediated blockade of this target could lead to anti-tumor responses. Two fully human monoclonal antibodies, ipilimumab (MDX-010) and tremelimumab (CP-675, 206; formerly known as ticilimumab), are in clinical development. Both have demonstrated hints of clinical activity in metastatic melanoma. Both also have a toxicity profile consistent with their mechanism of action, involving inactivation of a normal immunosuppressive homeostatic mechanism: development of auto-immune breakthrough events (IBE). These include inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), uveitis, dermatitis, arthritis, and others. Generally, these events have been easily managed by cessation of therapy and intravenous or topical steroid therapy and supportive care in most patients, although colectomy had been required in several severe cases and there have been several deaths. Interestingly, patients who develop IBE seem to have the greatest likelihood of clinical benefit, but it is unclear whether clinical benefit and IBE are dissociable events. Other than IBE, no other pharmacodynamic measure has been able to predict response, although certain autoimmune antibody titers may have promise in this regard. Further research will confirm the clinical benefit of these agents alone and in combination with other agents, further define the safety profile and protocols for toxicity management, and identify pharmacodynamic parameters predicting clinical benefit and toxicity.

Overcoming viral escape with vaccines that generate and display antigen diversity in vivo

Background

Viral diversity is a key problem for the design of effective and universal vaccines. Virtually, a vaccine candidate including most of the diversity for a given epitope would force the virus to create escape mutants above the viability threshold or with a high fitness cost.

Presentation of the hypothesis

Therefore, I hypothesize that priming the immune system with polyvalent vaccines where each single vehicle generates and displays multiple antigen variants in vivo, will elicit a broad and long-lasting immune response able to avoid viral escape.

Testing the hypothesis

To this purpose, I propose the use of yeasts that carry virus-like particles designed to pack the antigen-coding RNA inside and replicate it via RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. This would produce diversity in vivo limited to the target of interest and without killing the vaccine vehicle.

Implications of the hypothesis

This approach is in contrast with peptide cocktails synthesized in vitro and polyvalent strategies where every cell or vector displays a single or definite number of mutants; but similarly to all them, it should be able to overcome original antigenic sin, avoid major histocompatibility complex restriction, and elicit broad cross-reactive immune responses. Here I discuss additional advantages such as minimal global antagonism or those derived from using a yeast vehicle, and potential drawbacks like autoimmunity. Diversity generated by this method could be monitored both genotypically and phenotypically, and therefore selected or discarded before use if needed.

Present role and future potential of type I interferons in adjuvant therapy of high-risk operable melanoma

Few molecular therapeutic approaches have been so rigorously investigated in relation to the pathophysiology and outcome of human diseases as type I interferons. Historically, IFNs were discovered after the phenomenon of 'interference' was first described by Isaacs and Lindenmann in 1957, and for years IFNs (IFNalpha) were considered as potential "antiviral penicillins" until the broader spectrum of effects upon normal cell physiology, the natural and adaptive immune systems, and tumor growth and proliferation were described. Interferon beta (IFNbeta) was the second human gene after insulin to be cloned, and it codes for the first cytokine used to treat human malignancies. Despite the progress in understanding and treating cancer over the last 25 years, IFN alpha (IFNalpha) remains the most commonly used biologically active cytokine in the treatment of solid tumors, and for some like melanoma, the only successful agent. In this review we discuss the role of type I interferons in the pathophysiology and treatment of melanoma, with emphasis on the 22 years of work conducted at the University of Pittsburgh. We discuss potential mechanisms that partially explain the clinical benefit, and set the groundwork for building upon, the design of more effective treatments for this disease.

Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte–Associated Antigen-4: Fig. 1

Previously, the development of immune-based therapies has primarily focused on vaccines and cytokines, yielding benefit in a small percentage of patients. Recent advances in our understanding of the function of costimulatory molecules have revitalized enthusiasm in the development of immune therapies for cancer. This family of proteins possesses properties involved in both lymphocyte activation and immune-inhibitory functions. The costimulatory molecule with the greatest translation into the clinic thus far is CTL-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4). CTLA-4 engagement leads to T-cell inhibition by two principle mechanisms. The first involves competitive binding with CD28 for B7 on the antigen-presenting cell. The second is direct intracellular inhibitory signals mediated by the CTLA-4 cytoplasmic tail. Numerous clinical trials testing the blockade of CTLA-4 signaling with fully human monoclonal antibodies have treated a variety of cancers, with the most experience in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Significant antitumor activity as well as potential autoimmune-related toxicities have been observed. Further clinical investigation with CTLA-4 blockade, planned clinical trials testing manipulation of other costimulatory molecules, and continued improvement in understanding of costimulatory pathways present a new era of immune therapies for cancer patients.

Anti-CTLA4 Antibody Clinical Trials in Melanoma

The cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) is a main negative regulator of the immune system, which inhibits the costimulatory signaling for T cells. Preclinical studies demonstrated that antibodies against CTLA4 induced regression of some murine tumors. Two CTLA4 blocking monoclonal antibodies have entered clinical development and are currently in pivotal clinical trial testing. Ipilimumab (formerly MDX010) is an IgG1 and tremelimumab (formerly CP-675,206 and transiently ticilimumab), is an IgG2, both being fully human monoclonal antibodies. Across several early clinical trials, including dose escalation, single dose, multi-dose, and in combination with a variety of other immune stimulants like peptide vaccines or interleukin-2, objective tumor responses in patients with metastatic melanoma have been observed in the in the range of 5 to 20%. A key feature is that some of these responses are extremely long-lived responses, lasting years. The early clinical testing also demonstrated that these CTLA4 blocking antibodies can lead to significant toxicities, most with an inflammatory or immune mediated mechanism of action. These include colitis and skin rash as the most common toxicities, and a variety of autoimmune and inflammatory processes against multiple organs. Some of these toxicities require immune suppressive therapy and may lead to permanent damage in occasional patients. In conclusion, two monoclonal antibodies blocking CTLA4 have demonstrated ability to break tolerance to self-tissues and result in long lasting objective cancer regressions, and have moved onto late stages of clinical development.

Exploiting Regulatory T-cell Populations for the Immunotherapy of Cancer

Tumor escape from the immune system hampers effective immunotherapy for cancer. Recent evidence indicates that in cancer patients the altered activities of 2 innatelike ("natural") immunoregulatory T-cell populations could prevent the establishment of effective antitumor immune responses. These are CD4+ CD25+ (natural) regulatory T cells and invariant natural killer T cells, which normally play critical roles in orchestrating immune responses to self and nonself. Therapeutic modulation of these regulatory T-cell populations is clinically feasible and will potentially allow the induction of effective antitumor immune responses when combined with currently available immunotherapeutic strategies.

Update on anti-CTLA-4 antibodies in clinical trials

Breaking immune tolerance against tumor self-antigens is presently an area of intense research in the design of cancer therapies. One possible method to enhance immune system activation against tumor antigens is by blocking the inhibitory co-stimulatory signals mediated by cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4, (CTLA-4) expressed on activated T cells. The fully human monoclonal antibodies that are directed against human CTLA-4, ipilimumab (Medarex/Bristol-Myers Squibb) and CP-675,206 (Pfizer/Abgenix, now Amgen), have demonstrated activity against metastatic melanoma, hormone refractory prostate cancer and other malignancies. They have also uncovered unusual immune-related adverse events manifesting as self-limiting inflammatory reactions of the bowel, skin and pituitary. This article reviews preclinical development and data generated from Phase I, II and III studies with regard to the end points reported and immune-related adverse events.

Toxicity as a result of immunostimulation by biologics

The immune system has evolved highly effective mechanisms of surveillance and defense against foreign pathogens, and is also thought to act in surveillance and suppression of cancer. Thus, a predominant goal of immune system-based therapies is to normalize or enhance the host immune response in the areas of infectious disease and oncology. This review considers general approaches used for therapeutic immunostimulation, alterations in immune response mechanisms that occur with these treatments and the syndromes that commonly arise as a result of these changes. Because nonclinical studies of these therapies are conducted in animal models as the basis for predicting potential human toxicities, this review also considers the value of nonclinical testing to predict human toxicity.

CD200 expression on tumor cells suppresses antitumor immunity: new approaches to cancer immunotherapy

Although the immune system is capable of mounting a response against many cancers, that response is insufficient for tumor eradication in most patients due to factors in the tumor microenvironment that defeat tumor immunity. We previously identified the immune-suppressive molecule CD200 as up-regulated on primary B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) cells and demonstrated negative immune regulation by B-CLL and other tumor cells overexpressing CD200 in vitro. In this study we developed a novel animal model that incorporates human immune cells and human tumor cells to address the effects of CD200 overexpression on tumor cells in vivo and to assess the effect of targeting Abs in the presence of human immune cells. Although human mononuclear cells prevented tumor growth when tumor cells did not express CD200, tumor-expressed CD200 inhibited the ability of lymphocytes to eradicate tumor cells. Anti-CD200 Ab administration to mice bearing CD200-expressing tumors resulted in nearly complete tumor growth inhibition even in the context of established receptor-ligand interactions. Evaluation of an anti-CD200 Ab with abrogated effector function provided evidence that blocking of the receptor-ligand interaction was sufficient for control of CD200-mediated immune modulation and tumor growth inhibition in this model. Our data indicate that CD200 expression by tumor cells suppresses antitumor responses and suggest that anti-CD200 treatment might be therapeutically beneficial for treating CD200-expressing cancers.

Improving T cell therapy for cancer

Adoptive transfer of antigen-specific T lymphocytes is a powerful therapy for the treatment of opportunistic disease and some virus-associated malignancies such as Epstein-Barr virus-positive post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. However, this strategy has been less successful in patients with nonviral cancers owing to their many and varied immune evasion mechanisms. These mechanisms include downregulation of target antigens and antigen-presenting machinery, secretion of inhibitory cytokines, and recruitment of regulatory immune cells to the tumor site. With increased understanding of the tumor microenvironment and the behavior and persistence of ex vivo-manipulated, adoptively transferred T cells, two novel approaches for increasing the efficacy of T cell therapy have been proposed. The first involves genetic modification of tumor-specific T cells to improve their biological function, for example by augmenting their ability to recognize tumor cells or their resistance to tumor-mediated immunosuppression. The second requires modifications to the host environment to improve the homeostatic expansion of infused T cells or to eliminate inhibitory T cell subsets. In this review, we discuss current, promising strategies to improve adoptive T cell therapy for the treatment of cancer.

Surveillance of the eye and vision in clinical trials of CP-675,206 for metastatic melanoma

PURPOSE

To determine the ocular safety of CP-675,206 (Pfizer, New York, New York, USA), a fully human anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 monoclonal antibody in clinical trials of immunotherapy of metastatic melanoma.

DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized study of the eye and vision in phase I/II clinical trials of CP-675,206 in metastatic melanoma conducted at the University of California, Los Angeles.

METHODS

Patients with regional or distant metastatic melanoma were enrolled in phase I/II clinical trials evaluating the safety and antitumor efficacy of CP-675,206 alone or in combination with melanoma antigen peptide-pulsed dendritic cell vaccines. Ophthalmic evaluation was performed at the onset of CP-675,206 immunotherapy (baseline evaluation), two months or more after the onset of CP-675,206 immunotherapy (end-study evaluation), and at two- to three-month intervals thereafter in patients who continued to receive CP-675,206 immunotherapy (poststudy evaluation). Baseline and end-study evaluations included comprehensive ophthalmic examination, psychophysical and electrophysiologic visual function assessment, fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, and visual function assessment.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with metastatic melanoma arising from the skin, mucosa, eye, or unknown site were evaluated. Systemic toxicity attributed to CP-675,206 included dermatologic manifestations, diarrhea, and autoimmune hepatitis with panhypopituitarism. A subset of patients receiving CP-675,206 demonstrated antitumor efficacy with partial response or complete response of metastatic melanoma. Comparison of ophthalmic baseline with end-study evaluations in all 20 patients and limited-term poststudy evaluations showed no adverse effect of CP-675,206 immunotherapy on the eye or vision.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, CP-675,206 immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma did not adversely affect the eye or vision.

Immunotherapy of melanoma: a critical review of current concepts and future strategies

Advanced melanoma is a devastating disease with a very poor overall prognosis. There are only two agents that are approved by the FDA for use in patients with metastatic melanoma: dacarbazine and IL-2. Both agents have an overall response rate well below 20%, with only rare long-term responders noted. Metastatic melanoma is known to be one of the most resistant cancers to a plethora of treatment modalities, such as single-agent and combination chemotherapy, chemoimmunotherapy and immunotherapy with a host of immune stimulators. Indeed, researchers worldwide have recognized the lack of effective therapies and have refocused their efforts on developing novel and cutting-edge strategies of treatment. This is based on an improved understanding of the complex interactions that occur within the tumor microenvironment, and the central role that the host immune system plays in the surveillance of cancer. This review summarizes the recent results of novel immunotherapeutic regimens and focuses on cutting-edge modalities of treatment that encompass new lines of thinking in the war against cancer and, in particular, melanoma.

New approaches in metastatic melanoma: biological and molecular targeted therapies

Classical metastatic melanoma therapy is disappointing but important progress has been made in the understanding of melanoma biology. Genetic lesions and several intracellular signaling pathways that could serve as targets for novel therapy have been identified and a number of new agents are under evaluation. Promising tumor cell targets were identified in the cell membrane, cytoplasm and nucleus. New therapeutic approaches, besides monoclonal antibodies and vaccination, include an increasing number of small molecules that have been shown to interfere restrictively with intracellular signaling pathways in melanoma and decrease proliferation, survival, migration or invasion. Other agents can interfere with stromal components of melanoma, such as angiogenesis and components of the immune system.

Exploiting dendritic cells for active immunotherapy of cancer and chronic infections

Dendritic cells (DCs) are important antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that can prime naive T cells and control adaptive immune responses with respect to magnitude, memory and self-tolerance. Understanding the biology of these cells is central to the development of new generation immunotherapies for cancer and chronic infections. This review presents a brief overview of DC biology and of the preparation and use of DC-based vaccines.

Current topics in melanoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

New approaches to melanoma are emerging. This review summarizes developments over the past 12 months.

RECENT FINDINGS

Surgical, chemotherapeutic, immunologic and targeted therapies for melanoma are evolving. Sentinel lymph node sampling is now accepted as the standard of care for patients with intermediate thickness primary melanomas. Temozolomide continues to be widely used as part of combination therapy, and recent evidence suggests that a combination of temozolomide and interferon-alpha may be superior to temozolomide alone. Meanwhile, temozolomide and thalidomide carries unacceptable thrombosis risk. In the area of immunotherapy, anti-CTLA-4 continues to show promise, but special attention must be paid to gastrointestinal toxicity. Interferon-alpha, in addition, has shown efficacy in the neoadjuvant setting with inflammatory infiltrates demonstrated in tumors. A better understanding of the complex genetic regulation of melanoma cell growth is emerging and this is expected to lead to the development of novel targeted therapies.

SUMMARY

Research is producing a more complete understanding of melanoma genetics and immune regulation. These are beginning to produce therapeutics that are impacting clinical practice.

Malignant melanoma in the 21st century, part 2: staging, prognosis, and treatment

Critical to the clinical management of a patient with malignant melanoma is an understanding of its natural history. As with most malignant disorders, prognosis is highly dependent on the clinical stage (extent of tumor burden) at the time of diagnosis. The patient's clinical stage at diagnosis dictates selection of therapy. We review the state of the art in melanoma staging, prognosis, and therapy. Substantial progress has been made in this regard during the past 2 decades. This progress is primarily reflected in the development of sentinel lymph node biopsies as a means of reducing the morbidity associated with regional lymph node dissection, increased understanding of the role of neoangiogenesis in the natural history of melanoma and its potential as a treatment target, and emergence of innovative multimodal therapeutic strategies, resulting in significant objective response rates in a disease commonly believed to be drug resistant. Although much work remains to be done to improve the survival of patients with melanoma, clinically meaningful results seem within reach.

Clinical activity and immune modulation in cancer patients treated with CP-870,893, a novel CD40 agonist monoclonal antibody

PURPOSE

The cell-surface molecule CD40 activates antigen-presenting cells and enhances immune responses. CD40 is also expressed by solid tumors, but its engagement results in apoptosis. CP-870,893, a fully human and selective CD40 agonist monoclonal antibody (mAb), was tested for safety in a phase I dose-escalation study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced solid tumors received single doses of CP-870,893 intravenously. The primary objective was to determine safety and the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives included assessment of immune modulation and tumor response.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients received CP-870,893 in doses from 0.01 to 0.3 mg/kg. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed in two of seven patients at the 0.3 mg/kg dose level (venous thromboembolism and grade 3 headache). MTD was estimated as 0.2 mg/kg. The most common adverse event was cytokine release syndrome (grade 1 to 2) which included chills, rigors, and fever. Transient laboratory abnormalities affecting lymphocytes, monocytes, platelets, D-dimer and liver function tests were observed 24 to 48 hours after infusion. Four patients with melanoma (14% of all patients and 27% of melanoma patients) had objective partial responses at restaging (day 43). CP-870,893 infusion resulted in transient depletion of CD19+ B cells in blood (93% depletion at the MTD for < 1 week). Among B cells remaining in blood, we found a dose-related upregulation of costimulatory molecules after treatment.

CONCLUSION

The CD40 agonist mAb CP-870,893 was well tolerated and biologically active, and was associated with antitumor activity. Further studies of repeated doses of CP-870,893 alone and in combination with other antineoplastic agents are warranted.

Chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma: time for a change?

Melanoma is a neoplasm with a rising incidence. Early-stage melanoma is curable, but advanced, metastatic melanoma almost uniformly is fatal, and patients with such advanced disease have a short median survival. Systemic therapy remains unsatisfactory, inducing complete durable responses in a small minority of patients. For the current review, the authors focused on the current role of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic melanoma and the future prospects for improvements for multiagent chemotherapy and chemotherapy combined with immunomodulatory and/or molecularly targeted agents. They discuss roles of single-agent chemotherapy, combination chemotherapy, combinations of chemotherapy with immunomodulatory or hormone agents, biochemotherapy, and combination chemotherapy with targeted therapies.

Melanoma immunology: past, present and future

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Metastatic melanoma is a disease for which no effective therapeutic options have been developed during the last 30 years with the possible exception of high dose interferon-alpha in the adjuvant setting of stage III patients. The immunotherapy approach was initiated decades ago using cell-based vaccines and adoptive immunotherapy with functionally ill-defined lymphocytes. This paper aims to evaluate the last three decades of research in melanoma immunotherapy and to provide insights in the future of this strategy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Thanks to the development of knowledge in basic and applied immunology, clinical studies of immunotherapy have been followed by trials based on molecular characterization of melanoma antigens and availability of ex-vivo assays allowing the quantitative assessment of the immune response against the given vaccine and against patient tumor cells. This second generation of immunotherapy trials, along with additional preclinical studies, while not yet resulting in a convincing clinical outcome, provided a wealth of data on immunogenicity of different melanoma antigens, mechanism of antigen presentation and factors that impair immune recognition of melanoma cells.

SUMMARY

We discuss how this information will be exploited for designing new and more successful clinical trials of both active and adoptive antigen-specific immunotherapy of metastatic melanoma patients.

Cancer vaccines and tumor dormancy: a long-term struggle between host antitumor immunity and persistent cancer cells?

Tumor dormancy is a phenomenon characterized by the persistence of residual cancer cells for long periods in the host. Evidence has emerged that a balance exists between the immune response and dormant tumor cells. This review presents our current understanding of the immune relationship between host and dormant tumor cells and the mechanism developed by these cells to escape host antitumor immunity. Implications of this immune escape for cancer vaccine strategy are considered.

Update on therapy for melanoma: opportunities for patient selection and overcoming tumor resistance

The incidence of malignant melanoma is rising faster than any other malignancy. Although earlier stage patients can be cured with surgical resection with or without adjuvant therapy, a significant number of patients go on to develop disseminated disease. Currently, limited therapeutic options exist for patients with metastatic melanoma. Recent studies suggest that patient selection is feasible and may enable the restriction of treatment to those most likely to benefit. Additionally, several potential mechanisms of tumor resistance have been identified creating opportunities for circumventing them. This article will review current strategies for patient selection and overcoming therapeutic resistance. These strategies hold the promise of extending the clinical benefits of current therapies as well as facilitating the development of additional and more active treatments.

Immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies for cancer therapy

Increasing immune responses with immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed to immune-receptor molecules is a new and exciting strategy in cancer therapy. This expanding class of agents functions on crucial receptors, either antagonizing those that suppress immune responses or activating others that amplify immune responses. Complications such as autoimmunity and systemic inflammation are problematic side effects associated with these agents. However, promising synergy has been observed in preclinical models using combinations of immunostimulatory antibodies and other immunotherapy strategies or conventional cancer therapies. Importantly, mAbs of this type have now entered clinical trials with encouraging initial results.

Novel treatment strategies for malignant melanoma: a new beginning?

Malignant melanoma is one of the most common cancer types among the Caucasian population. While the prognosis is excellent for patients diagnosed at an early stage and treated by adequate surgery, unresectable or advanced metastatic diseases shrink the overall survival at 5 years dramatically to less than 10%. For disseminated malignant melanoma, the appropriate systemic medical treatment is still controversial. Fortunately, progress in the molecular biology and in the understanding of pathogenesis has been made recently and should in the near future translate into molecular-based therapeutic strategies. In this review, we briefly describe the status of current treatment strategies and existing standards for malignant melanoma. We will focus on the new and emerging compounds including recent developments of targeted therapy such as antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory drugs, Bcl-2 antisense therapy, raf kinase inhibitors, heat shock protein modulators, anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen (CTLA)-4 monoclonal antibody and finally PARP and proteasome inhibitors.

Overlapping human leukocyte antigen class I/II binding peptide vaccine for the treatment of patients with stage IV melanoma

BACKGROUND

MPS160 (GRAMLGTHTMEVTV) is a glycoprotein 100-derived melanoma peptide that contains overlapping human leukemic antigen A2-, DR53-, and DQw6-restricted T-cell epitopes. In preclinical testing, MPS160 demonstrated superior immunization and antitumor activity. In this report, the authors present the results from a clinical trial that evaluated the safety and immunologic efficacy of the MPS160 vaccine in patients with metastatic melanoma.

METHODS

Patients with stage IV melanoma were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms: 1) MPS160 in incomplete Freund adjuvant (Montanide ISA-51); 2) MPS160 in Montanide ISA-51 with 75 microg of granulocyte-macrophage-stimulating factor (GM-CSF); or 3) MPS160 in Montanide ISA-51 with 100 microg of GM-CSF. Vaccines were administered every 3 weeks until patients developed disease progression or severe toxicity. Patients were aged >or=18 years with metastatic melanoma and a good performance status. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy/nursing, brain metastases, and ongoing chemotherapy. Immunologic efficacy was ascertained by using tetramer and functional analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes.

RESULTS

None of the 28 patients exhibited objective tumor responses or severe toxicities. Four patients remained progression free for >or=100 days. Immunologic analysis was available for 21 patients. Laboratory data demonstrated 1) increased frequency of vaccine-specific, nonfunctional cytotoxic T lymphocytes in 10 patients; 2) no differences in immunization efficacy among the treatment arms; and 3) evidence of systemic cytokine/immune dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically, the MPS160 vaccine was ineffective. Phenotypic (tetramer) evidence of immunization was ineffective functionally and most likely was caused by global immune dysfunction, as illustrated by abnormal cytokine profiles in peripheral blood. In this report, the authors discuss possible implications of the current results on future cancer vaccine studies.

Vaccine-based approaches to squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Vaccine-based approaches for the treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck have achieved very limited success. Improvement in vaccine efficacy for both diseases control and survival is predicated on a careful analysis of the root causes for successes and failures to date. In this review, we analyse the utility and limitations of select protective and therapeutic vaccine strategies for tumour prevention and therapy. Based on this characterisation, we define potential directions which are meritorious of future study.