Randomized phase III study of cisplatin plus irinotecan versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel, cisplatin plus gemcitabine, and cisplatin plus vinorelbine for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Four-Arm Cooperative Study in Japan

Re-challenge chemotherapy for relapsed non-small-cell lung cancer

There has been no report about re-challenge chemotherapy (RC) consisting of the same regimen as first-line chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of RC as second-line chemotherapy in patients with relapsed NSCLC. We conducted a retrospective review of 28 consecutive NSCLC patients who were treated with RC and compared their clinical outcomes with those of 38 consecutive NSCLC patients who were treated with docetaxel (DOC) at our hospital between July 1992 and December 2003. The RC group consisted of 21 men and 7 women, with a median age of 62 years (range, 42-76 years). Most first-line regimens were platinum-based and the median administered course was 3 (range, 2-7). All patients had responded to the first-line chemotherapy and had performance status (PS) 1 at relapse. The median interval from the end of first-line chemotherapy to relapse was 5.0 months (range, 1.6-36.1 months). The overall response rate of RC was 29%. The median survival time from the beginning of RC was 17.0 months and the 1-year survival rate was 60%. RC led to a significantly better overall survival rate than DOC (p=0.0342). RC could be an active second-line regimen in patients with relapsed NSCLC who responded to first-line chemotherapy.

S-1: a new oral fluoropyrimidine in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

S-1 (also known as TS-1; Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Tokyo, Japan) is a new oral fluoropyrimidine formulation that combines tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), and potassium oxonate in a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1. Single-agent S-1 has demonstrated marked activity against non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as well as a broad array of other solid tumors, including gastric, colorectal, breast, cervical, and pancreatic cancers. This comprehensive review summarizes the results of previous clinical studies and describes ongoing clinical trials of S-1 in advanced NSCLC. S-1 combined with platinum compounds, irinotecan, and gemcitabine has produced promising results in terms of feasibility, safety, and effectiveness. Available data have stimulated further research, including phase III trials for the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Treatment results including more than third-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Recently, third-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was accepted as a reasonable therapeutic option in patients with a favorable performance status. In practice, however, palliative chemotherapy has been performed for patients with a favorable performance status, even after third-line chemotherapy. Although multiple cycles of palliative chemotherapy were performed for these patients, there are little data of observation for courses of treatment from first-line to the last chemotherapy. We reviewed the courses of treatment for 82 patients with advanced NSCLC that had been admitted for platinum-based chemotherapy as a first-line treatment. Additional cycles of palliative chemotherapy were provided as monotherapy, based on the attending physician's decision considering patient performance status and toxicity after disease progression for previous chemotherapy. The median number of chemotherapy lines and cycles were 2 and 7, respectively, from first-line to the last chemotherapy. The median overall survival was 24 months in the response group of first-line chemotherapy, compared to 15 months for the entire study group. In the response group, the median number of chemotherapy cycles was 15 and patients received a median of 3 lines of chemotherapy. A total of 33 patients were candidate third-line chemotherapy or more. The median survival was 23 months for patients treated with more than third-line chemotherapy, compared to 7 months for patients treated with less than second-line chemotherapy. We conclude that long-standing chemotherapy is not beneficial to all NSCLC patients. However, patients with a favorable response to first-line chemotherapy tend to receive a higher number and more cycles of chemotherapy than the non-response group. Furthermore, multi-line chemotherapy appears to increase survival in the response group. Further studies will be needed to confirm these results.

Phase I study of TLR9 agonist PF-3512676 in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

This phase I, open-label study investigated the Toll-like receptor 9 agonist, PF-3512676, in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in Japanese patients with advanced, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients (n = 12) with treatment-naive stage IIIB or IV NSCLC received single-agent PF-3512676 subcutaneously once during the first 7 days (monotherapy phase) in three escalating dose levels (0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mg/kg) followed by a combination phase during which patients received 0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg PF-3512676 subcutaneously on days 8 and 15 of each 3-week cycle of carboplatin (area under the curve, 6 mg x min/mL) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)). Safety and pharmacokinetics of PF-3512676 were assessed during monotherapy and combination therapy phases. PF-3512676 was tolerable as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC. Most common treatment-related, non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) throughout the study were injection-site reactions (n = 12, 100%) and flu-like symptoms (n = 11, 91.7%) that were each grade 1 or 2 in all but one patient. All patients experienced neutropenia and leukopenia (>or=grade 3 in 11 [91.7%] and seven [58.3%] patients, respectively). One patient in dose level 2 had a dose-limiting toxicity: grade 3 rash and grade 3 increase in gamma-glutamyltransferase during combination therapy. Mean PF-3512676 half-life ranged from 4.8 to 21.6 h (longer with higher doses). Four (33%) patients had objective responses (one complete response, three partial responses), and seven (58%) patients achieved stable disease. PF-3512676 as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy had an acceptable safety profile in Japanese patients with treatment-naive NSCLC.

Cost effectiveness of evidence-based treatment guidelines for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer in the community setting

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Level I Pathways, a program designed to ensure the delivery of evidence-based care, among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated in the outpatient community setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included patients with NSCLC initiating a chemotherapy regimen between July 1, 2006, and December 31, 2007, at eight practices in the US Oncology network. Patients were characterized with respect to age, sex, stage, performance status, and line of therapy and were classified by whether they were treated according to Level I Pathways guidelines. Twelve-month cost of care and overall survival were compared between patients treated on Pathway and off Pathway. A net monetary benefit approach and corresponding cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Level I Pathways.

RESULTS

Overall, outpatient costs were 35% lower for on-Pathway versus off-Pathway patients (average 12-month cost, $18,042 v $27,737, respectively). Costs remained significantly less for patients treated on Pathway versus off Pathway in the adjuvant and first-line settings, whereas no difference in overall cost was observed in patients in the second-line setting. No difference in overall survival was observed overall or by line of therapy. In the net monetary benefit analysis, after adjusting for potential confounders, we found that treating patients on Pathway was cost effective across a plausible range of willingness-to-pay thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study suggest that treating patients according to evidence-based guidelines is a cost-effective strategy for delivering care to those with NSCLC.

Randomized phase III trial of platinum-doublet chemotherapy followed by gefitinib compared with continued platinum-doublet chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a west Japan thoracic oncology group trial (WJTOG0203)

PURPOSE Gefitinib is a small molecule inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. We conducted a phase III trial to evaluate whether gefitinib improves survival as sequential therapy after platinum-doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced stage (IIIB/IV) NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1, and adequate organ function were randomly assigned to either platinum-doublet chemotherapy up to six cycles (arm A) or platinum-doublet chemotherapy for three cycles followed by gefitinib 250 mg orally once daily, until disease progression (arm B). Patients were stratified by disease stage, sex, histology, and chemotherapy regimens. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points included progression-free survival, tumor response, safety, and quality of life. Results Between March 2003 and May 2005, 604 patients were randomly assigned. There was a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival in arm B (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.80; P < .001); however, overall survival results did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.03; P = .11). In an exploratory subset analysis of overall survival by histologic group, patients in arm B with adenocarcinoma did significantly better than patients in arm A with adenocarcinoma (n = 467; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.98; P = .03). CONCLUSION This trial failed to meet the primary end point of OS in patients with NSCLC. The exploratory subset analyses demonstrate a possible survival prolongation for sequential therapy of gefitinib, especially for patients with adenocarcinoma.

Advances in target therapy for lung cancer

Recent progress in molecular biology has shown that cancer cells acquire common phenotypes such as self-sufficiency of growth signals, resistance to anti-proliferative and apoptotic signals through the accumulation of genetic and epigenetic changes. Recently developed anticancer drugs target these molecular mechanisms and good results have been reported for various cancer types. In lung cancer, tyrosine kinase inhibitors specific for the epidermal growth factor receptor such as gefitinib and erlotinib have changed clinical practice dramatically. About half of the Japanese patients with lung cancers harbor an activating mutation of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene and they are very sensitive to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Progression-free survival of such patients is approximately 10 months when treated with gefitinib, whereas the survival for those treated with platinum doublet therapy is approximately 6 months. Target therapies against echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion protein or a mutated ERBB2 (v-ERB-B avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homologue 2) present in approximately 5% and approximately 3% of the Japanese patients with adenocarcinomas, respectively, are currently under development. Addition of an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody, cetuximab, or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, bevacizumab, to platinum doublet therapy significantly but modestly prolonged the survival in recent clinical trials. However, clinical development of small molecule multi-kinase inhibitors including those targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, such as vandetanib, sunitinib and sorafenib, has not been very successful. Through these collaborations among clinicians, basic researchers and pharmaceutical companies, it should be possible to individualize lung cancer treatment to turn this fatal disease into a chronic disorder and, eventually, to cure it.

Hepatocyte growth factor reduces susceptibility to an irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor in EGFR-T790M mutant lung cancer

PURPOSE

The secondary T790M mutation in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is the most frequent cause of acquired resistance to the reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI), gefitinib and erlotinib, in lung cancer. Irreversible EGFR-TKIs are expected to overcome the reversible EGFR-TKI resistance of lung cancer harboring T790M mutation in EGFR. However, it is clear that resistance may also develop to this class of inhibitors. We showed previously that hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) induced gefitinib resistance of lung cancer harboring EGFR-activating mutations. Here, we investigated whether HGF induced resistance to the irreversible EGFR-TKI, CL-387,785, in lung cancer cells (H1975) harboring both L858R activating mutation and T790M secondary mutation in EGFR.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

CL-387,785 sensitivity and signal transduction in H1975 cells were examined in the presence or absence of HGF or HGF-producing fibroblasts with or without HGF-MET inhibitors.

RESULTS

HGF reduced susceptibility to CL-387,785 in H1975 cells. Western blotting and small interfering RNA analyses indicated that HGF-induced hyposensitivity was mediated by the MET/phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway independent of EGFR, ErbB2, ErbB3, and ErbB4. Hyposensitivity of H1975 cells to CL-387,785 was also induced by coculture with high-level HGF-producing lung fibroblasts. The hyposensitivity was abrogated by treatment with anti-HGF neutralizing antibody, HGF antagonist NK4, or MET-TKI.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed HGF-mediated hyposensitivity as a novel mechanism of resistance to irreversible EGFR-TKIs. It will be clinically valuable to investigate the involvement of HGF-MET-mediated signaling in de novo and acquired resistance to irreversible EGFR-TKIs in lung cancer harboring T790M mutation in EGFR.

First-line systemic treatment of advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer in Asia: consensus statement from the Asian Oncology Summit 2009

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an increasing global challenge, especially in low-income countries. Most guidelines for the management of advanced-stage NSCLC have limited effect in countries with resource constraints. Following a systematic literature search, we present an overview of the management of advanced-stage NSCLC in the first-line setting, discuss resources required for systemic therapy, and provide treatment recommendations stratified to four resources levels. Treatment guidelines appropriate for different resource levels offer a realistic approach to management of advanced-stage NSCLC, by recognising the limitations of a particular health-care system. Although there are many barriers to cancer control in low-resource countries, these can be overcome by using measures that are culturally appropriate, economically feasible, and evidence-based. Initiatives include strategic planning, tobacco control, training of health-care workers, access to therapeutic agents, acquisition of information, public education, and alliances with established institutions and international organisations.

Histologic considerations for individualized systemic therapy approaches for the management of non-small cell lung cancer

Over the past 5 to 10 years, we have reached a treatment plateau using standard platinum-based doublets in an unselected population of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent studies have focused on improving patient outcomes with new chemotherapeutic or targeted agents, as well as on individualizing therapy on the basis of patient characteristics such as tumor histology and biomarker analysis. This article summarizes recent data on histologic response determinants to chemotherapy and targeted therapy, with particular attention to the importance of standardized tissue collection, handling, storage, and analysis techniques, in order to best apply the results of tumor analysis to patient-care decisions. Such decisions are related to both improving patient safety and optimizing efficacy with standard chemotherapy as well as newer targeted therapy agents. This entails a change from a generalized approach in treating patients with NSCLC to an individualized strategy based on tumor histology.

American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline update on chemotherapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer

The purpose of this article is to provide updated recommendations for the treatment of patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. A literature search identified relevant randomized trials published since 2002. The scope of the guideline was narrowed to chemotherapy and biologic therapy. An Update Committee reviewed the literature and made updated recommendations. One hundred sixty-two publications met the inclusion criteria. Recommendations were based on treatment strategies that improve overall survival. Treatments that improve only progression-free survival prompted scrutiny of toxicity and quality of life. For first-line therapy in patients with performance status of 0 or 1, a platinum-based two-drug combination of cytotoxic drugs is recommended. Nonplatinum cytotoxic doublets are acceptable for patients with contraindications to platinum therapy. For patients with performance status of 2, a single cytotoxic drug is sufficient. Stop first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy at disease progression or after four cycles in patients who are not responding to treatment. Stop two-drug cytotoxic chemotherapy at six cycles even in patients who are responding to therapy. The first-line use of gefitinib may be recommended for patients with known epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation; for negative or unknown EGFR mutation status, cytotoxic chemotherapy is preferred. Bevacizumab is recommended with carboplatin-paclitaxel, except for patients with certain clinical characteristics. Cetuximab is recommended with cisplatin-vinorelbine for patients with EGFR-positive tumors by immunohistochemistry. Docetaxel, erlotinib, gefitinib, or pemetrexed is recommended as second-line therapy. Erlotinib is recommended as third-line therapy for patients who have not received prior erlotinib or gefitinib. Data are insufficient to recommend the routine third-line use of cytotoxic drugs. Data are insufficient to recommend routine use of molecular markers to select chemotherapy.

Crosstalk to stromal fibroblasts induces resistance of lung cancer to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors

PURPOSE

Lung cancers with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations show good clinical response to gefitinib and erlotinib, selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) to EGFR, but these tumors invariably develop drug resistance. Host stromal cells have been found to have a considerable effect on the behavior of cancer cells. Little is known, however, about the role of host cells on the sensitivity of cancer cells to receptor TKIs. We have therefore assessed the effect of crosstalk between stromal cells and lung cancer cells harboring EGFR mutations on susceptibility to EGFR-TKIs.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We evaluated the gefitinib sensitivity of lung cancer cells with EGFR-activating mutations, PC-9 and HCC827, when cocultured with fibroblasts and coinjected into severe combined immunodeficient mice. We also examined the effect of lung cancer cells to fibroblast recruitment.

RESULTS

Both human fibroblast cell lines and primary cultured fibroblasts produced various levels of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). Lung cancer cells markedly recruited fibroblasts. The lung cancer cells became resistant to EGFR-TKIs when cocultured in vitro with HGF-producing fibroblasts and coinjected into severe combined immunodeficient mice. Importantly, combined use of gefitinib plus anti-HGF antibody or the HGF antagonist, NK4, successfully overcame the fibroblast-induced EGFR-TKI resistance both in vitro and in vivo. Colocalization of fibroblasts and HGF was detected in both xenograft tumors in mouse model and lung cancer patient specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that crosstalk to stromal fibroblasts plays a critical role in lung cancer resistance to EGFR-TKIs and may be an ideal therapeutic target in lung cancer with EGFR-activating mutations.

Randomized phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel combined with carboplatin versus standard paclitaxel combined with carboplatin for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The optimal platinum doublet regimen in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still uncertain. We conducted a randomized phase II study to compare the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel combined with carboplatin with those of the standard schedule.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Elderly patients (age > or =70 years) with advanced NSCLC were randomly assigned to either the weekly arm {70 mg/m(2) paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 and carboplatin [area under the curve (AUC) = 6] on day 1} or the standard arm [200 mg/m(2) paclitaxel and carboplatin (AUC = 6) on day 1]. The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients were enrolled. The ORR and median progression-free survival were 55% and 6.0 months for the weekly arm and 53% and 5.6 months for the standard arm. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy were observed in 41% and 0% of the patients in the weekly arm and in 88% and 25% in the standard arm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first randomized study that compares the platinum doublet designed specifically for the elderly. Regarding the safety, the weekly regimen was less toxic than the standard regimen and seems to be preferable for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

Feasibility study for biweekly administration of cisplatin plus gemcitabine as adjuvant-chemotherapy for completely resected non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of biweekly administration of cisplatin and gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single-arm, single-institutional study. Patients with completely resected NSCLC (p-Stages IB-IIIA) with no previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy were eligible. Simon's optimal two-stage design was applied. Both cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)) and gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) were given on days 1 and 15, every 28 days. The primary endpoint of this study was the feasibility of this combination in the four cycles of treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (19 lobectomies and 1 pneumonectomy) were enrolled in this study. Nine (45%) of patients had grade 3/4 neutropenia, and 6 (30%) had grade 3/4 anemia. Severe non-hematologic toxicities were uncommon in this series. No treatment-related death was encountered. Thirteen (65%) patients completed the planned 4 cycles of chemotherapy. The median intensity was 24 (range 21-25) mg/(m(2) week) with an average of 24.0 (21-25) mg/(m(2) week) cisplatin and 483 (range 412-500) mg/(m(2) week) with an average of 481.0 (412-500) mg/(m(2) week) gemcitabine. The median relative dose intensity of cisplatin was 100 (range 25-100) % with an average of 87.4 (25-100) % and that of gemcitabine was 100 (range 25-100) % with an average of 86.8 (25-100) %.

CONCLUSION

This regimen is feasible in the treatment of patients with completely resected NSCLC. A multicenter phase III trial is warranted to assess the efficacy of this regimen at promoting survival and preventing recurrence.

Phase II trial of weekly gemcitabine and split-dose cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Cisplatin is widely used for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. However, it can cause unpleasant side effects and also requires prolonged hydration. We conducted a Phase II study of weekly gemcitabine and split-dose cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in order to reduce toxicity and shorten the time taken by administration. Our aims were to determine the response rate, toxicity and survival time with this regimen in patients with Stage IIIB/IV disease.

METHODS

Previously untreated patients with Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were given gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) and split-dose cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 at 3-week intervals for four cycles. Gemcitabine was administered over the course of 30 min, and cisplatin was over the course of 60 min on the same days on an outpatient basis.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were enrolled, and all of them were assessable for response and toxicity. None had a complete response and 17 had a partial response (37.8%), for an overall response rate of 37.8% (95% confidence interval, 25.1-52.4%). The survival rate was 56.5% at 1 year and 38.9% at 2 years, with a median survival time of 15.7 months. Leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia were the most common toxic reactions, with Grade > or = 3 reactions occurring at rates of 35%, 51%, 31% and 13%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly gemcitabine and split-dose cisplatin is active and well tolerated in patients with Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, administered on an outpatient basis without requiring prolonged hydration or hospitalization.

A phase II study of cisplatin and irinotecan as induction chemotherapy followed by accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy with daily low-dose carboplatin in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: JCOG 9510

OBJECTIVE

It is important to find optimal regimens of cisplatin (CDDP)-based third-generation chemotherapy and radiotherapy for patients with unresectable Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This Phase II study was designed to determine the toxicity and efficacy of two courses of chemotherapy (CDDP 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 and irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) followed by accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy/40 fractions in 4 weeks) combined with daily carboplatin (CBDCA) administration. CBDCA was administered at a target area under the plasma level-time curve of 0.4 x (24 h creatinine clearance + 25), according to Calvert's formula.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were enrolled in the study. The patients' median age was 63 years (range 40-74 years) and included 22 males and 4 females. Seven patients were Stage IIIA and 19 were Stage IIIB. Twenty had a performance status (PS) of 1 versus six with a PS of 0. There was one treatment-related death due to sepsis and pneumonia associated with Grade 4 neutropenia and diarrhea during chemotherapy. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and diarrhea were observed in 14 and 5 patients, respectively. Toxicity of the radiotherapy was mild. There were 0 complete response and 13 partial responses, giving a response rate of 50.0%. Median survival time and 2-year survival were 16.4 months and 21.5%, respectively. This study was designed with Simon's two-stage design, and the response rate did not meet the criteria to proceed to the second stage and the study was terminated early.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen might be inactive for patients with unresectable Stage III NSCLC.

Shortcomings of current therapies for non-small-cell lung cancer: unmet medical needs

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major global health problem and is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Current treatment involves nonspecific, nonselective cytotoxic chemotherapy, which results in only a modest increase in survival and causes significant toxicity to the patient. Targeted agents are initially effective in certain small subpopulations of patients, but eventually nearly all patients become resistant to further treatment. The limitations in efficacy and safety associated with available treatments for NSCLC underscore the need for novel agents with improved efficacy and safety profiles. This review discusses the limitations of currently recommended therapies for patients with advanced NSCLC and discusses new agents in clinical development for this disease.

A landmark point analysis with cytotoxic agents for advanced NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

As a result of recent publications, we hypothesized that period of 8 weeks after initiation of treatment is a useful landmark point for cytotoxic agents for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To test this hypothesis, we conducted landmark analyses with clinical trials employing cytotoxic agents. Our goal was to assess the proper design of clinical trials with cytotoxic agents for NSCLC for maximizing patients' benefit.

METHODS

We conducted landmark analyses of a phase II study of pemetrexed in locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and a phase III study of Four-Arm Cooperative Study for advanced NSCLC. A total of 806 patients who received chemotherapy (pemetrexed, cisplatin and irinotecan, paclitaxel and carboplatin, cisplatin and gemcitabine, cisplatin and vinorelbine) were included in this assessment.

RESULTS

Tumor-shrinkage rate at 8 weeks was significantly associated with longer survival in the study with pemetrexed (p = 0.043), whereas tumor-shrinkage rate at 4 weeks did not correlated with survival (p = 0.139). Similarly, using the Four-Arm Cooperative Study data, the optimal landmark point was 8 weeks (p = 0.002), not 4 weeks (p = 0.190).

CONCLUSION

The landmark point for NSCLC was 8 weeks with all cytotoxic agents in our analysis when the therapy was given as a frontline or subsequent therapy. Our result suggests the concept of a disease-specific landmark point, which may lead to a change of phase II/III clinical study design to evaluate cytotoxic agents and clinical investigators, and their sponsors may consider an early look to assess the efficacy of cytotoxic agents for NSCLC.

Reasons for response differences seen in the V15-32, INTEREST and IPASS trials

The first phase III study to assess the effect of gefitinib and docetaxel on the survival of Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who received previous treatment with platinum doublets, the V15-32 trial, did not establish noninferiority of gefitinib over docetaxel in terms of the effect on overall survival, despite the results showing a twofold higher response rate to gefitinib. The overall survival favored docetaxel for the first 18 months and gefitinib thereafter. The INTEREST trial, which compared docetaxel and gefitinib, demonstrated noninferiority of gefitinib, and the survival curves were completely superimposed. In this trial, patients had been recruited from 24 countries from Europe, Asia, and North and South America. Results of the IPASS trial showed superior progression-free survival for gefitinib compared with the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line treatment in Asian patients who were nonsmokers and had adenocarcinoma histology. In this Review, we discuss the reasons for the differences in the effects of molecular-targeted drugs and cytotoxic antineoplastic agents observed in these trials. We also highlight the magnitude of the antitumor activity of these two different categories of drugs, and discuss how this could affect future clinical trial design and analysis.

Japanese-US common-arm analysis of paclitaxel plus carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a model for assessing population-related pharmacogenomics

PURPOSE To explore whether population-related pharmacogenomics contribute to differences in patient outcomes between clinical trials performed in Japan and the United States, given similar study designs, eligibility criteria, staging, and treatment regimens. METHODS We prospectively designed and conducted three phase III trials (Four-Arm Cooperative Study, LC00-03, and S0003) in advanced-stage, non-small-cell lung cancer, each with a common arm of paclitaxel plus carboplatin. Genomic DNA was collected from patients in LC00-03 and S0003 who received paclitaxel (225 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve, 6). Genotypic variants of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2C8, NR1I2-206, ABCB1, ERCC1, and ERCC2 were analyzed by pyrosequencing or by PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism. Results were assessed by Cox model for survival and by logistic regression for response and toxicity. Results Clinical results were similar in the two Japanese trials, and were significantly different from the US trial, for survival, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and anemia. There was a significant difference between Japanese and US patients in genotypic distribution for CYP3A4*1B (P = .01), CYP3A5*3C (P = .03), ERCC1 118 (P < .0001), ERCC2 K751Q (P < .001), and CYP2C8 R139K (P = .01). Genotypic associations were observed between CYP3A4*1B for progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.94; P = .04) and ERCC2 K751Q for response (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.83; P = .02). For grade 4 neutropenia, the HR for ABCB1 3425C-->T was 1.84 (95% CI, 0.77 to 4.48; P = .19). CONCLUSION Differences in allelic distribution for genes involved in paclitaxel disposition or DNA repair were observed between Japanese and US patients. In an exploratory analysis, genotype-related associations with patient outcomes were observed for CYP3A4*1B and ERCC2 K751Q. This common-arm approach facilitates the prospective study of population-related pharmacogenomics in which ethnic differences in antineoplastic drug disposition are anticipated.

Gefitinib in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Most patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with advanced disease and their long-term prognosis remains poor, even after platinum-based chemotherapy. EGF receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapies, such as gefitinib, have been subject to comprehensive clinical development. Several Phase II and III trials have evaluated the clinical efficacy of gefitinib as monotherapy in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC, as well as both monotherapy and combined with chemotherapy in chemo-naive patients. A Phase III trial in heavily pretreated advanced NSCLC patients, 90% of whom were refractory, demonstrated some improvement in survival with gefitinib compared with placebo; however, the difference was not statistically significant in the overall population. A second large Phase III trial in patients with pretreated advanced NSCLC (INTEREST) demonstrated the noninferiority of gefitinib in comparison with docetaxel for overall survival together with an improved quality of life and tolerability profiles. As a result, gefitinib is expected to have a large impact in the management of pretreated patients with NSCLC.

First-line treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the emerging role of the histologic subtype

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. During the past quarter of a century, there have been definite steps forward in understanding the biology of this disease. However, progress in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been more elusive and has not been associated with a realistic probability of long-term survival. For this disease, platinum-based chemotherapy is currently the standard treatment. Numerous studies have compared various platinum doublets and have concluded that all such combinations are comparable in their clinical efficacy. Moreover, several trials evaluating different chemotherapy regimens in NSCLC have failed to document a difference based on histology. Recent evidence suggests that histology represents an important variable in the decision making. This review will discuss this new evidence in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC, focusing on different possible therapeutic approaches according to histologic subtype.

Phase II study of docetaxel and carboplatin in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Mainly single-agent chemotherapy has been considered as standard treatment for elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Docetaxel monotherapy is regarded as a standard treatment for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, and recent subset analyses have suggested that platinum-based chemotherapy can be safely used in the elderly. This phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel and carboplatin in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in this study had stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with measurable disease, no prior chemotherapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and were 70 years or older. Treatment consisted of docetaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m(2) and carboplatin at area under the curve of 5 mg/ml/min on day 1 every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

From October 2003 to April 2006, 30 patients were enrolled. One complete response and 13 partial responses were observed, for an overall response rate of 46.7% (95% confidence interval: 28.8-64.6%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival periods were 4.4 months and 9.9 months, respectively. One-year survival rate was 43.3%. Major grade 3 and 4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia (86.7%), leucopenia (80.0%) and febrile neutropenia (16.7%). Major grade 3 nonhematological toxicities were anorexia (30.0%) and diarrhea (13.3%). There were no grade 4 nonhematological toxicities or treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel combined with carboplatin was an active treatment with manageable toxicity for the treatment of elderly patients with chemotherapy-naive NSCLC.

Dose-escalating and pharmacokinetic study of a weekly combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer: JCOG 9910-DI

OBJECTIVE

Combined paclitaxel and carboplatin is a standard regimen for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although an every-3-week schedule is common, weekly paclitaxel is clinically effective for various cancers. A Phase I clinical trial was conducted to determine maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) for weekly combined paclitaxel and carboplatin, and to evaluate anti-tumor response, toxicity and pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in patients with inoperable NSCLC.

METHODS

Twenty patients with inoperable NSCLC received weekly carboplatin at area under the curve (AUC) = 2 mg/ml min and paclitaxel. Paclitaxel was escalated if MTD was not reached. Three patients each were entered at levels 1 and 2 (level 1, paclitaxel 50 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC = 2 mg/ml min; level 2, 60/2), six at level 3 (70/2), five at level 4 (80/2) and three at level 5 (90/2).

RESULTS

One patient had grade 4 (G4) neutropenia at level 2, one had G3 hepatic toxicity at level 3 and one had G3 cardiac toxicity at level 4. MTD was not reached for all dose levels. Response rate (RR) was 35% (7/20) and median survival was 11.1 months. Severe neutropenia (G3 and G4) was seen in seven patients associated with greater AUC, peak concentration (C(max)) and the duration of plasma concentration >50 ng/ml of paclitaxel.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly combined paclitaxel (up to 90 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC = 2 mg/ml min) was well tolerated. A higher dose intensity of paclitaxel can be given, and RR and survival are not less than the every-3-week protocol. The weekly regimen is an alternative for untreated inoperable NSCLC patients.

Cisplatin-vinorelbine chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer is safe and well tolerated: results of a retrospective Hungarian clinical data analysis

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of cisplatin-vinorelbine chemotherapy (CT) in NSCLC is well established. In this retrospective data analysis, haematological safety and tolerability, furthermore the effects of cisplatin-vinorelbine combination on patients' quality of life (QoL) are examined by reviewing the clinical data of NSCLC patients in a retrospective manner.

RESEARCH DESIGN/METHODS

All patients (n = 25) received the following regimen: cisplatin (80 mg/m(2) on day 1 by i.v. infusion) and vinorelbine (30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 by i.v. infusion; 21-day cycles; patients received four cycles of CT). Haematological laboratory and QoL data on day 1 of all cycles were collected. Quality of life was assessed by reviewing the data of patients' charts considering physical limitation, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation, social activities, fever, appetite and weight loss. The absence of problems was scored as 0, moderate complaints as 1 and serious deterioration as 2.

RESULTS

The QoL data showed no significant deterioration in the analysed symptoms of patients during the four cycles of cisplatin-vinorelbine CT (total QoL score was 3.0 +/- 1.4 points before treatment versus 3.6 +/- 0.5 on day 1 of the last cycle, p > 0.05). Haemoglobin values were 118.4 +/- 12.3 g/l before CT and 109.0 +/- 11.3 g/l on day 1 of last cycle of CT (p > 0.05). The mean number of platelets in the beginning and in the end was 256 +/- 123(*)10(12)/l and 217 +/- 119(*)10(12)/l, respectively (p < 0.05). White blood cell count was 8.36 +/- 3.21(*)10(9)/l, absolute granulocyte count 5.95 +/- 5.81(*)10(9)/l before the treatment, and these data were 4.50 +/- 1.96(*)10(9)/l and 2.15 +/- 1.21(*)10(9)/l, respectively, on day 1 of last cycle of CT (both p < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Cisplatin-vinorelbine CT is a safe and well-tolerated chemotherapeutic option of NSCLC.

Survival without toxicity for cisplatin plus pemetrexed versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine in chemonaïve patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a risk-benefit analysis of a large phase III study

BACKGROUND

In a large phase III study, cisplatin and pemetrexed had non-inferior efficacy and better tolerability compared with cisplatin and gemcitabine in chemonaïve patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The current analysis characterised the clinical benefit (i.e. survival) relative to clinical risk (i.e. drug-related toxicity) of the doublets.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1669 patients (of 1725 randomised) received 500 mg/m(2) pemetrexed IV followed by 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin IV on day 1 or gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin on day 1, administered every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles. Survival without toxicity (i.e. clinical benefit to risk) was defined as the time from randomisation to the first occurrence of any grade 3 or 4 drug-related toxicity or death, and was analysed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox methods.

RESULTS

In the overall patient population, survival without grade 3 or 4 drug-related toxicity was significantly longer for patients treated with cisplatin and pemetrexed versus cisplatin and gemcitabine (HR=0.70; P<0.001), as was survival without grade 4 drug-related toxicity (HR=0.83; P<0.001). For patients with non-squamous NSCLC, survival without toxicity with cisplatin and pemetrexed was superior to cisplatin and gemcitabine for grade 3 or 4 drug-related toxicity (HR=0.64; P<0.001) and for grade 4 drug-related toxicity (HR=0.77; P<0.001), whereas no treatment-arm difference was observed in the squamous subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with non-squamous NSCLC treated with front-line cisplatin and pemetrexed have superior survival without toxicity (i.e. clinical benefit-to-risk profile) compared with patients treated with cisplatin and gemcitabine.

Circulating endothelial cells in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel

INTRODUCTION

Circulating endothelial cells (CECs) increase in cancer patients and play an important role in tumor neovascularization.

METHODS

This study was designed to investigate the role of CEC as a marker for predicting the effectiveness of a carboplatin plus paclitaxel based first line chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

RESULTS

The CEC count in 4 ml of peripheral blood before starting chemotherapy (baseline value) was significantly higher in NSCLC patients, ranging from 32 to 4501/4 ml (n = 31, mean +/- SD = 595 +/- 832), than in healthy volunteers (n = 53, 46.2 +/- 86.3). We did not detect a significant correlation between the CEC count and estimated tumor volume. CECs were significantly decreased by chemotherapy as compared with pretreatment values (175.6 +/- 24 and 173.0 +/- 24, day +8, +22, respectively). We investigated the correlation between baseline CEC and the clinical effectiveness of chemotherapy. CEC values are significantly higher in patients with clinical benefit (partial response and stable disease, 516 +/- 458, 870.8 +/- 1215, respectively) than in progressive disease patients (211 +/- 150). Furthermore, a statistically significant decrease in CECs, on day 22, was observed only in patients with partial response. Patients who had a baseline CEC count greater than 400/4 ml showed a longer progression-free survival (>400, 271 days [range: 181-361] versus <400, 34 [range: 81-186], p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

CEC is suggested to be a promising predictive marker of the clinical efficacy of the CBDCA plus paclitaxel regimen in patients with NSCLC.

Phase I study of amrubicin and vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Combination chemotherapy comprising amrubicin and vinorelbine as a second-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been fully evaluated. To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD), the present phase I study examined patients with advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

The subjects were nine patients with histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, prior platinum-based first-line chemotherapy, and measurable or evaluable lesions. Treatment consisted of five dose levels, with amrubicin 35-45 mg/m2 administered as a 5-min intravenous infusion on days 1-3 and vinorelbine 15-25 mg/m2 given as a 1-h intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

All patients had received carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen in two of six patients (febrile neutropenia and deep vein thrombosis ) at level 1, allowing us to conduct level 2. At level 2, all three patients experienced DLT (leucopenia > or =4 days in one patient; febrile neutropenia in three patients; and infection in two patients), and this level was determined as the MTD. Subsequently, level 1 (amrubicin 35 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 15 mg/m2) was defined as the RD. Responses in the nine patients included a partial response in one patient and stable disease in four patients.

CONCLUSION

As second-line therapy, the RD of the combination of amrubicin and vinorelbine is 35 mg/m2 and 15 mg/m2, respectively. Further study should proceed to clarify the efficacy of this regimen.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who declined to participate in randomised clinical chemotherapy trials

There are inadequate data on the outcomes of patients who declined to participate in randomised clinical trials as compared with those of participants. We retrospectively reviewed the patient characteristics and treatment outcomes of both participants and non-participants in the two randomised trials for chemotherapy-naive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Trial 1 compared four platinum-based combination regimens. Trial 2 compared two sequences of carboplatin plus paclitaxel and gefitinib therapies. Nineteen of 119 (16%) and 153 (37%) patients declined to participate in Trials 1 and 2, respectively. Among the background patient characteristics, the only variable associated with trial participation or declining was the patients' attending physicians (P<0.001). Important differences were not observed in the clinical outcomes between participants and non-participants, for whom the response rates were 30.6 vs 34.2% and the median survival times were 489 vs 461 days, respectively. The hazard ratio for overall survival, adjusted for other confounding variables, was 0.965 (95% confidence interval: 0.73–1.28). In conclusion, there was no evidence to suggest any difference in the characteristics and clinical outcomes between participants and non-participants. Trial designs and the doctor–patient relationship may have an impact on the patient accrual to randomised trials.

Patient attitudes towards chemotherapy and survival: a prospective observational study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

This multicenter, non-interventional, prospective, observational study aimed to determine whether patients' attitude to chemotherapy is an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are treated with gemcitabine-platinum. Chemonaive patients (n=1895) with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy were treated with a combination of gemcitabine plus cisplatin/carboplatin and followed for a maximum of 18 months. Patients' attitude to treatment was measured on a 5-point scale and responses were used to assign patients to one of the three need categories: A, maximum extension of survival with the acceptance of high toxicity (60.0% of patients); B, maximum extension of survival only if coupled with normal lifestyle (26.1%); C, relief of symptoms (13.8%). Median survival varied significantly among the need categories (A=13.00 months, B=15.70 months, C=15.33 months; log-rank test P=0.0415). Patient attitude to treatment (need categories) was not a significant prognostic factor for survival after adjusting for known prognostic factors (P=0.0503). After adjusting for baseline differences, patients in this study had a significantly lower risk of death than patients in three randomized trials (hazard ratio 0.879; 95% confidence interval: 0.775, 0.998; P=0.0458). In conclusion, in this observational study, patient attitude to chemotherapy was not an independent prognostic factor of survival.

Gefitinib for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer

Gefitinib is an orally bioavailable, EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor and was the first targeted drug to be approved for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Identification of objective tumor regressions with gefitinib in NSCLC patients has resulted in intense, worldwide clinical and basic research directed toward finding the optimal use of gefitinib in NSCLC. A recent large international Phase III study (IRESSA NSCLC Trial Evaluating Response and Survival Against Taxotere [INTEREST]) comparing gefitinib and docetaxel in unselected pretreated patients showed equivalent survival with better tolerability and quality of life. In addition, a Phase III study (WJTOG0203) evaluating gefitinib as sequential therapy after platinum-doublet chemotherapy showed the improved progression-free survival time. Furthermore, a large-scale randomized study (IRESSA Pan-Asia study [IPASS]) comparing gefitinib monotherapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel for previously untreated patients with adenocarcinoma who were never- or light-smokers showed an improved progression-free survival time in the gefitinib arm. A smaller Phase III study of pretreated Japanese patients (V-15-32) also demonstrated no difference in overall survival compared with docetaxel, with a statistically greater overall response rate. Somatic mutations in the EGFR gene, the target of gefitinib, were associated with dramatic and durable regressions in patients with NSCLC. Currently, investigators are trying to determine the optimal approach to select patients for treatment with gefitinib. This article aims to briefly summarize the profile of gefitinib, EGFR mutations, landmark trials with gefitinib and, also, ongoing trials that may herald an era of individualized therapy in at least some NSCLC patients.

Cisplatin versus carboplatin in NSCLC: is there one "best" answer?

Platinum-based chemotherapeutic doublets have produced significant survival benefits for patients with non-small cell lung cancer of all disease stages. The optimal combination of chemotherapy has been the subject of much investigation, and the ideal platinum agent the subject of ongoing and heated debate. For patients with resected disease, all evidence of survival advantage rests with cisplatin, and the only clinical trial to evaluate carboplatin-based therapy failed to show a survival benefit. In the setting of locally advanced lung cancer, no comparative data exist, and even randomized phase III trials are largely lacking. Cisplatin-based doublets provide the most consistent evidence of superior survival when coupled with definitive thoracic radiation. Meta-analyses of palliative chemotherapy indicate consistent survival advantages with cisplatin-based therapy over carboplatin; however, the relative advantage is small. Cisplatin carries a higher toxicity profile, including nausea, vomiting, neuropathy, renal insufficiency, and alopecia in comparison to carboplatin. When the goal of therapy is curative, the survival benefits with cisplatin are in most circumstances worth the increased toxicities. When the goal of therapy is palliation, the relative price of toxicity needs to be weighed on the basis of the individual patient in an effort to maximize quality of life.

Irinotecan and oxaliplatin combination as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We conducted a prospective phase II trial of IrOx in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with histologically or cytologically proven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), aged > or =18 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, at stage IIIB (pleural effusion)/IV or with recurrent disease not suitable for primary surgical treatment, with no palliative chemotherapy or radiotherapy to the chest or immunotherapy or biologic therapy, the presence of measurable disease by RECIST, and who had given signed written informed consent, were eligible. Treatment consisted of irinotecan 65 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients were enrolled in June and August 2007, the median age was 59 years (47-73). In total, 71 cycles were administered with a median of 4 cycles per patient (range, 1-6 cycles) and 18 patients were evaluable for treatment response. An independent review of tumor responses gave an overall response rate of 27.7% (CR: 0, PR: 5/18; 95% CI, 7-48.4%) by intent-to-treat analysis. The median overall survival of all patients was 14 months and the median time-to-progression was 4.2 months (95% CI, 1.959-6.441). The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were diarrhea (7% of all cycles) and neutropenia (5.6% of all cycles). Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in one patient and one patient died due to sepsis.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that IrOx combination therapy has moderate activity with a tolerable toxicity profile. However, it was not warranted to evaluate further this regimen as first-line treatment for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC using the current dosages and schedule.

A phase II trial of gefitinib monotherapy in chemotherapy-naïve patients of 75 years or older with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Gefitinib has shown modest activity in patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after platinum-based chemotherapy. However, the activity of gefitinib as first-line chemotherapy remains unclear, especially unknown in elderly patients. A multicenter phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib for elderly patients with chemotherapy-naïve NSCLC.

METHODS

Elderly chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC, ECOG PS of 0-2, and adequate organ functions received 250 mg/day of gefitinib. The primary objective of this study was to determine the objective response rate (RR). Secondary endpoints were tolerability, disease-related symptom using lung cancer subscale (LCS) in FACT-L, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We investigated mutation status of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in cases with available tumor samples.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were enrolled, of whom 49 were eligible. Median age (range) was 80 (75-90) years. Thirty-two patients were female (65%) and 40 patients had adenocarcinoma (82%). The objective RR was 25% (CI 95%, 13-39). Median survival time was 10 months (CI 95%, 7-20) and 1-year survival rate was 50%. The most frequent adverse events were skin disorders (76%). Fifteen patients (30%) experienced toxicities >/=grade 3. There were four patients with possible interstitial lung disease including two treatment-related deaths. Symptom improvement rate using LCS was 49% at 4 weeks of gefitinib therapy. Tumor samples from 17 patients were analyzed for EGFR mutation status. EGFR mutations were detected in tumor tissues from 7 patients, of which 5 had partial responses (71%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gefitinib monotherapy is effective and relatively well tolerated in chemotherapy-naïve elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. Gefitinib has potential as a first-line therapeutic option in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

Quality-of-life assessment in phase III clinical trials of gemcitabine in non-small-cell lung cancer

Health-related quality-of-life (QOL) endpoints in clinical trials provide decision makers with a more comprehensive picture of a specific treatment than activity-related endpoints alone. Such endpoints are increasingly being reported in cancer clinical trials. We reviewed phase III clinical trials that involved gemcitabine in the treatment of unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer. A systematic literature search was undertaken and 16 phase III clinical trials were found in which gemcitabine therapy was included in a treatment arm and QOL was an endpoint. Twelve of the 16 trials compared a gemcitabine-based treatment with a non-gemcitabine-based treatment. Not all data were reported in the trials, and the findings are mixed. However, a review of these 12 trials generally shows that gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy treatments had either no different or more favourable QOL outcomes than non-gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy treatments. Ten of the 16 trials that were reviewed had a primary endpoint or objective that was not QOL. Of these ten trials, only four concluded that one treatment arm could be therapeutically favoured over another in terms of the non-QOL primary endpoint. Two of the trials reported no difference in QOL and two reported that QOL favoured the arm that was therapeutically favoured. Many more trials will need to be conducted in order to conclude that gemcitabine-containing arms are associated with a more desirable QOL than non-gemcitabine-containing arms and that QOL necessarily favours the therapeutically favoured arm in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Bortezomib plus gemcitabine/carboplatin as first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II Southwest Oncology Group Study (S0339)

INTRODUCTION

Bortezomib is a small-molecule proteasome inhibitor with single-agent activity in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and synergy with gemcitabine in preclinical studies. This phase II study of bortezomib in combination with gemcitabine/carboplatin was conducted in chemotherapy-naive advanced NSCLC patients to assess efficacy and safety.

METHODS

Patients with selected stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, performance status 0-1, and no history of brain metastasis received up to six 21-day cycles of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m, days 1 and 8, carboplatin area under curve 5.0, day 1, and bortezomib 1.0 mg/m, days 1, 4, 8, and 11.

RESULTS

One-hundred-fourteen patients (52% adenocarcinoma, 85% stage IV) received a median of 3.6 treatment cycles. Median follow-up was >3 years. Median overall survival was 11 months; 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 47% and 19%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 5 months; 1-year progression-free survival rate was 7%. Response rate was 23%, and disease control rate (responses + stable disease) was 68%. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were thrombocytopenia (63%) and neutropenia (52%). One patient experienced febrile neutropenia. Grade 3/4 neuropathy occurred in 4%, and a further 6% experienced grade 2 sensory neuropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Bortezomib plus gemcitabine/carboplatin resulted in a notable survival benefit in patients with advanced NSCLC, with the anticipated primary toxicity of myelosuppression. Further studies designed to investigate the role of bortezomib in advanced NSCLC are warranted.

Hepatocyte growth factor induces gefitinib resistance of lung adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutations

Lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations responds favorably to the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib. However, 25% to 30% of patients with EGFR-activating mutations show intrinsic resistance, and the responders invariably acquire resistance to gefitinib. Here, we showed that hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), a ligand of MET oncoprotein, induces gefitinib resistance of lung adenocarcinoma cells with EGFR-activating mutations by restoring the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway via phosphorylation of MET, but not EGFR or ErbB3. Strong immunoreactivity for HGF in cancer cells was detected in lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring EGFR-activating mutations, but no T790M mutation or MET amplification, who showed intrinsic or acquired resistance to gefitinib. The findings indicate that HGF-mediated MET activation is a novel mechanism of gefitinib resistance in lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR-activating mutations. Therefore, inhibition of HGF-MET signaling may be a considerable strategy for more successful treatment with gefitinib.