Acid secretion following portacaval shunting. Role of vagus, gastrin, intestinal phase, and histamine

Enterooxyntin release from isolated perfused canine jejunum

A humoral factor may mediate the intestinal phase of gastric acid secretion. An ex vivo perfused segment of canine jejunum maintained by an oxygenated asanguinous physiologic perfusate was used to test for release of an enterooxyntin (EO) in response to balloon distention at 30 mm Hg for 15 min. Gastric acid secretion in guinea pig fundic mucosa was determined indirectly by a quantitative cytochemical bioassay (CBA) of oxyntic cell hydroxyl ion production (HIP). An increase in the optical density (OD) caused by the cytochemical stain in the oxyntic cells reflects HIP, an index of acid secretion. Basal OD for segments with distention was 16.6 +/- 0.53 and for those without 15.5 +/- 0.68 (NS). Results are expressed as mean change of OD from basal (mean delta OD +/- SEM). (Table-see text) EO caused greater stimulation of HIP than gastrin or histamine. EO was heat stable. Trichloroacetic acid treatment decreased EO activity as did pronase digestion suggesting that EO is composed of one or more peptides.

CONCLUSION

EO, an acid secretagogue, is a humoral agent probably composed of one or more peptides and is released by small bowel distention. Mechanical distention of the small bowel may be an important mechanism for the perpetuation of gastric acid secretion. The ex vivo perfused jejunal segment in conjunction with the CBA are ideal tools with which to study mechanisms of release of EO and the mechanism of action of EO on the oxyntic cell.

The intestinal phase hormone

The existence of a stimulatory intestinal phase of gastric acid secretion has been suspected, but largely ignored, for many years. Recently, however, it has become clear that the intestinal phase plays an important role in acid production during digestion. The intestinal phase is of additional interest in relation to the profound gastric acid hypersecretion associated with portacaval shunt (PCS). Substantial evidence indicates that PCS-related gastric hypersecretion is due to unmasking of the intestinal phase by hepatic bypass of a humoral stimulant in portal blood that is normally degraded to a considerable extent by the liver. Studies in our laboratory during the past 12 years have provided strong physiologic evidence for humoral mediation of both the intestinal phase of gastric secretion and of PCS-related hypersecretion by a hormone that arises in the small intestine, particularly in the jejunum. Furthermore, our studies have demonstrated that this intestinal phase hormone (IPH) exists in humans as well as in dogs, rats, and pigs. Additionally, recent work by a number of investigators, as well as by our group, has provided convincing evidence that IPH is different from any of the known gastric stimulatory hormones. With these physiologic observations as a background, we have used a classical method for extracting acidic peptides to prepare a hog intestinal mucosa extract (HIME) that has all of the known physiologic properties of an IPH. Specifically, HIME contains a potent stimulant of gastric acid secretion that acts according to a linear dose-response relationship; that is not gastrin in any of its immunoassayable forms; that significantly augments the maximal acid secretory responses to pentagastrin, gastrin, CCK, and histamine; and that is substantially degraded by the liver, in contrast to gastrin and CCK. Efforts at isolating the gastric stimulatory substance in HIME suggest that it is a peptide of low molecular weight. Work directed at isolating IPH in pure form and identifying it is in progress.

Gastrin in portal and peripheral venous blood after feeding in man

The concentrations of immunoreactive gastrin in serum from portal and peripheral venous blood were determined in 10 patients with indwelling portal catheters before and after feeding. No significant differences were found between the gastrin concentrations in portal and peripheral serum. Gel filtration studies of serum did not reveal any differences between the gastrin components of portal and peripheral venous serum. Since neither the concentrations of immunoreactive gastrin nor the four gastrin components differed between portal and peripheral serum it is suggested that the liver is without effect on gastrin metabolism.