Effect of host, tumor, diagnostic, and treatment variables on outcomes in a large cohort with Merkel cell carcinoma

Changes in Merkel cell oncoprotein antibodies after radiation therapy in curatively treated Merkel cell carcinoma and association with recurrence

BACKGROUND

Serum antibodies to the Merkel oncoprotein (AMERK) are detectable in approximately 50% of patients with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) and can be used to monitor for recurrence. The objective of this study was to characterize AMERK levels in patients receiving curative-intent radiation therapy (RT) for MCC and identify associations between AMERK and recurrence.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with MCC who had baseline AMERK measurements before they received curative-intent RT from 2010 to 2020. Event-free survival (EFS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. The cumulative incidence of MCC-related recurrence (CIMR) was analyzed with death as a competing risk and the Gray test.

RESULTS

The authors identified 88 patients who had baseline AMERK measurements, including 52 (59%) with detectable levels. AMERK positivity was associated with younger median age (67.8 vs. 72.0 years; p = .02) and tumor site (p = 0.02), with lower rates for those who had disease in the head/neck region (17.3% vs. 44.4%). EFS (71.3% vs. 60.4%; p = .30) and CIMR (24.4% vs. 39.6%; p = .23) were more favorable in AMERK-positive patients. Two patients had recurrences in the RT field, and both were AMERK-negative at baseline. The median time to AMERK nadir after RT was 11.2 months; and, in a 6-month post-RT landmark analysis, the proportion of patients who were AMERK-positive who became negative or who had levels that decreased by ≥50% were not associated with EFS (87.1% vs. 85.0%; p = .90) or CIMR (12.9% vs. 15.0%; p = .62).

CONCLUSIONS

Positive AMERK baseline levels were correlated with younger age at MCC diagnosis and nonhead and neck tumor location, possibly related to the distribution of viral etiology. A specific post-RT AMERK decline correlating with EFS could not be identified.

The Role of Radiation, Immunotherapy, and Chemotherapy in the Management of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cutaneous Malignancies

INTRODUCTION

Skin cancer impacts a significant proportion of the population. While surgical management is often the mainstay of treatment, advanced or metastatic cutaneous malignancies require additional local and/or systemic therapies.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed studying the use of radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous malignancies.

RESULTS

A summary of the present literature on the management of locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous malignancies is presented across cutaneous head and neck basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma. The addition of multidisciplinary therapies to resection is often associated with improved outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The management of cutaneous head and neck malignancies requires an approach integrating multiple specialties, to optimize outcomes and minimize toxicities.

The Role of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in the Management of Merkel Cell Carcinoma with Clinically Detected Regional Lymph Node Metastasis

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy is emerging as a promising option for certain locally advanced and metastatic cutaneous malignancies. However, the role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NIO) in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) with clinically detected regional lymph node metastasis (CDRLNM) has not been fully elucidated.

METHODS

For this study, MCC patients with CDRLNM who underwent surgical excision were selected from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Those who received NIO were propensity-matched with those who did not, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of the 1809 selected patients, 356 (19.7%) received NIO followed by wide excision (n = 352, 98.9%) or amputation (n = 4, 1.1%). The rate of complete pathologic response for the primary tumor (ypT0) was 45.2%. Only 223 patents (63.4%) also underwent lymph node dissection (LND). The complete pathologic nodal response (ypN0) rate for these patients was 17.9%. A pathologic complete response of both the primary tumor and the nodal basin (ypT0 ypN0) was seen in 16 of the 223 patients who underwent both primary tumor surgery and LND. Subsequently, 151 pairs were matched between the NIO and no-NIO groups (including only patients with LND). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significant OS improvement with NIO (median not reached vs. 35.0 ± 8.0 months; p = 0.025). The 5-year OS was 57% in the NIO group versus 44% in no-NIO group (p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

The study suggests that NIO in MCC with CDRLNM provides improved OS in addition to promising rates of primary complete response, which could change the profile of surgical resection. This supports ongoing clinical trials exploring the use of NIO in MCC.

Merkel-cell carcinoma: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

•This ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline provides key recommendations for managing Merkel-cell carcinoma (MCC). •Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the multidisciplinary group of experts’ collective opinion. •The guideline covers clinical and pathological diagnosis, staging and risk assessment, treatment and follow-up. •Algorithms for the management of locoregional and inoperable/metastatic disease are provided. •A multidisciplinary team with a high level of expertise in MCC should diagnose and make decisions about therapy.

Moderne Diagnostik und Therapie des Merkelzellkarzinoms

Das Merkelzellkarzinom (MCC) ist ein seltener, aggressiver Hauttumor mit epithelialer und neuroendokriner Differenzierung, dessen Inzidenz in den letzten Jahrzehnten deutlich zugenommen hat. Risikofaktoren sind fortgeschrittenes Lebensalter, heller Hauttyp, UV‐Exposition und Immunsuppression. Pathogenetisch wird ein durch das Merkelzell‐Polyomavirus (MCPyV) hervorgerufener Typ von einem UV‐induzierten Typ mit hoher Tumormutationslast unterschieden.

Klinisch präsentiert sich das MCC als meist schmerzloser, schnell wachsender, rötlich‐violetter Tumor mit glänzender Oberfläche, der bevorzugt im Kopf‐Hals‐Bereich und an den distalen Extremitäten lokalisiert ist. Eine sichere Diagnose kann nur anhand histologischer und immunhistochemischer Merkmale gestellt werden. Bei Erstdiagnose weisen 20%–26% der Patienten lokoregionäre Metastasen und 8%–14% Fernmetastasen auf, weshalb eine Ausbreitungsdiagnostik unabdingbar ist. Bei fehlenden klinischen Hinweisen auf Metastasen wird eine Sentinel‐Lymphknotenbiopsie empfohlen.

Wesentliche Säulen der Therapie sind die Operation, die adjuvante oder palliative Strahlentherapie und in fortgeschrittenen inoperablen Stadien die medikamentöse Tumortherapie. Die Einführung von Immuncheckpoint‐Inhibitoren führte zu einem Paradigmenwechsel, da sich hiermit ein wesentlich langfristigeres Ansprechen und bessere Überlebensraten als mit Chemotherapie erreichen lassen. Zur Therapie des metastasierten MCC ist in Deutschland der PD‐L1‐Inhibitor Avelumab zugelassen, aber auch die PD‐1‐Antikörper Pembrolizumab und Nivolumab werden mit Erfolg eingesetzt. Adjuvante und neoadjuvante Therapiekonzepte, Immunkombinationstherapien und zielgerichtete Therapien als Monotherapie oder in Kombination mit Immuncheckpoint‐Inhibitoren befinden sich in klinischer Prüfung.

Modern diagnostics and treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer with epithelial and neuroendocrine differentiation, the incidence of which has increased substantially during the last decades. Risk factors include advanced age, fair skin type, UV exposure, and immunosuppression. Pathogenetically, a type caused by the Merkel cell polyomavirus is distinguished from a UV-induced type with a high tumor mutational burden. Clinically, MCC presents as a mostly painless, rapidly growing, reddish-violet tumor with a shiny surface, which is preferentially localized in the head-neck region and at the distal extremities. A reliable diagnosis can only be made based on histological and immunohistochemical features. At initial diagnosis, 20-26% of patients show locoregional metastases and 8-14% distant metastases, making staging examinations indispensable. If there is no clinical evidence of metastases, a sentinel lymph node biopsy is recommended. Essential columns of therapy are surgery, adjuvant or palliative radiotherapy and, in advanced inoperable stages, medicamentous tumor therapy. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has led to a paradigm shift, as they provide a considerably longer duration of response and better survival rates than chemotherapy. The PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab is approved for treatment of metastatic MCC in Germany, but the PD-1 antibodies pembrolizumab and nivolumab are also used with success. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment concepts, immune combination therapies and targeted therapies as monotherapy or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors are in the clinical trial phase.

Lymph Node Metastases from Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer of the Head and Neck

Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) represents the most common malignancy in the world, comprising exceedingly common lesions such as basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and rare lesions such as Merkel cell carcinoma. Risk factors are widely recognized and include ultraviolet (UV) light exposure, radiation exposure, immunosuppression, and many others. As a whole, survival and functional outcomes are favorable, but each histopathological subtype of NMSC behaves differently. Treatment regimens for the primary site usually include wide surgical excision and neck dissection in cases of clinically involved metastatic lymph nodes. The elective management of draining nodal basins, however, is a contested topic. Nearly all subtypes, excluding BCC, have a significant risk of lymphatic metastases, and have been studied with regard to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and elective neck dissection. To date, no studies have definitively established a true single standard of care, as exists for melanoma, for any of the NMSCs. As a result, the authors have sought to summarize the current literature and identify indications and management options for the management of the cervical lymphatics for each major subtype of NMSC. Further research remains critically necessary in order to develop complete treatment algorithms.

Avelumab for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma-A multicenter real-world experience in Israel

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy of the skin, affecting predominantly the fair-skinned older population exposed to high levels of ultraviolet light. Immune suppression is considered a significant risk factor. With the recent advances in the field of immunotherapy, the treatment paradigm for advanced MCC, traditionally based on chemotherapy, has largely shifted to anti-PD-L1 and PD-1 agents such as avelumab and pembrolizumab, respectively. However, real-world data remain sparse. The aim of this study was to assess real-world evidence of the effectiveness of avelumab in a diverse group of patients with MCC in Israel.

METHODS

The electronic databases of five university hospitals in Israel were searched for all consecutive patients with MCC treated with at least one dose of avelumab in 2018-2022. Data on baseline, disease-related, treatment-related, and outcome parameters were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The cohort included 62 patients of whom 22% were immune-suppressed. The overall response rate to avelumab was 59%. The median progression-free survival was 8.1 months, and the median overall survival, 23.5 months, with no differences between immune-competent and immune-suppressed patients. Treatment was well tolerated; any-grade toxicity developed in 34% of patients, and grade 3-4 toxicity, in 14%.

CONCLUSIONS

Avelumab was found to be effective and safe for the treatment of advanced MCC in a diverse group of patients, including some with immune suppression. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the optimal sequence and duration of treatment and to assess the potential role of avelumab for earlier stages of MCC.

An update on Merkel cell carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare cancer of the skin characterized by a neuroendocrine phenotype and an aggressive clinical behavior. It frequently originates in sun-exposed body areas, and its incidence has steadily increased in the last three decades. Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) and ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure are the main causative agents of MCC, and distinct molecular features have been documented in virus-positive and virus-negative malignancies. Surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment for localized tumors, but even when integrated with adjuvant radiotherapy is able to definitively cure only a fraction of MCC patients. While characterized by a high objective response rate, chemotherapy is associated with a short-lasting benefit of approximately 3 months. On the other hand, immune checkpoint inhibitors including avelumab and pembrolizumab have demonstrated durable antitumor activity in patients with stage IV MCC, and investigations on their use in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting are currently underway. Addressing the needs of those patients who do not persistently benefit from immunotherapy is currently one of the most compelling unmet needs in the field, and multiple clinical trials of new tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), therapeutic vaccines, immunocytokines as well as innovative forms of adoptive cellular immunotherapies are under clinical scrutiny at present.

Clinicopathological features, MCPyV status and outcomes of Merkel cell carcinoma in solid-organ transplant recipients: a retrospective, multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

The proportion of Merkel cell carcinomas (MCCs) in solid-organ transplant recipients (SOTR) harbouring Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) is unknown, as are factors affecting their outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To describe clinicopathological features of MCC in SOTR, investigate the tumoral MCPyV-status and identify factors associated with tumour outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective, international, cohort-study. MCPyV-status was investigated by immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

A total of 30 SOTR and 44 consecutive immunocompetent patients with MCC were enrolled. SOTR were younger at diagnosis (69 vs. 78 years, P < 0.001). Thirty-three percent of SOTR MCCs were MCPyV-positive vs. 91% of immunocompetent MCCs (P = 0.001). Solid-organ transplantation was associated with an increased cumulative incidence of progression (SHR: 3.35 [1.57-7.14], P = 0.002), MCC-specific mortality (SHR: 2.55 [1.07-6.06], P = 0.034) and overall mortality (HR: 3.26 [1.54-6.9], P = 0.002). MCPyV-positivity and switching to an mTOR inhibitor (mTORi) after MCC diagnosis were associated with an increased incidence of progression (SHR: 4.3 [1.5-13], P = 0.008 and SHR: 3.6 [1.1-12], P = 0.032 respectively) in SOTR.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design and heterogeneity of SOTR cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

MCPyV appears to play a less prominent role in the aetiopathogenesis of MCC in SOTR. SOTR have a worse prognosis than their immunocompetent counterparts and switching to an mTORi after the diagnosis of MCC does not improve progression.

An Unusual Presentation of Merkel Cell Carcinoma in the Setting of Immunosuppression on TNF-Alpha Inhibitor Therapy

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare but deadly skin cancer, observed classically in the sun-damaged skin of older, white males. The cancer is characterized by rapid growth as well as high morbidity and mortality. In this article, we detail an atypical presentation of MCC in an African-American patient being treated with prednisone, methotrexate, and adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis. Initially presenting as a subcutaneous nodule, the tumor in our patient was misdiagnosed first as an abscess and treated accordingly. Only after the subcutaneous mass failed to resolve with antibiotics as well as repeated incision and drainage was a biopsy performed, which yielded the final diagnosis. In the text, we detail the patient's symptomatology as well as steps that eventually lead to diagnostic confirmation. Our case demonstrates the importance of heightened clinical suspicion for MCC in immunosuppressed patients with unexplained subcutaneous nodules. Prompt diagnosis is crucial for positive outcomes; therefore, we aim to provide information that may aid in identification of MCC tumors in future patients. With the increasing use of biologic agents such as adalimumab to treat rheumatic disease, the literature is demonstrating an increasing incidence of previously "rare" malignancies such as MCC. It is crucial for physicians to convey these risks when initiating a patient on chronic immunosuppressive therapy and to provide routine surveillance for MCC and other complications.

An Internally Validated Prognostic Risk-Score Model for Disease-Specific Survival in Clinical Stage I and II Merkel Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare cutaneous malignancy for which factors predictive of disease-specific survival (DSS) are poorly defined.

METHODS

Patients from six centers (2005-2020) with clinical stage I-II MCC who underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy were included. Factors associated with DSS were identified using competing-risks regression analysis. Risk-score modeling was established using competing-risks regression on a training dataset and internally validated by point assignment to variables.

RESULTS

Of 604 patients, 474 (78.5%) and 128 (21.2%) patients had clinical stage I and II disease, respectively, and 189 (31.3%) had SLN metastases. The 5-year DSS rate was 81.8% with a median follow-up of 31 months. Prognostic factors associated with worse DSS included increasing age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.03, p = 0.046), male sex (HR 3.21, p = 0.021), immune compromise (HR 2.46, p = 0.013), presence of microsatellites (HR 2.65, p = 0.041), and regional nodal involvement (1 node: HR 2.48, p = 0.039; ≥2 nodes: HR 2.95, p = 0.026). An internally validated, risk-score model incorporating all of these factors was developed with good performance (AUC 0.738). Patients with ≤ 4.00 and > 4.00 points had 5-year DSS rates of 89.4% and 67.2%, respectively. Five-year DSS for pathologic stage I/II patients with > 4.00 points (n = 49) was 79.8% and for pathologic stage III patients with ≤ 4.00 points (n = 62) was 90.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

A risk-score model, including patient and tumor factors, based on DSS improves prognostic assessment of patients with clinically localized MCC. This may inform surveillance strategies and patient selection for adjuvant therapy trials.

Diagnosis and treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline - Update 2022

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare skin cancer, accounting for less than 1% of all cutaneous malignancies. It is found predominantly in white populations and risk factors include advanced age, ultraviolet exposure, male sex, immunosuppression, such as AIDS/HIV infection, haematological malignancies or solid organ transplantation, and Merkel cell polyomavirus infection. MCC is an aggressive tumour with 26% of cases presenting lymph node involvement at diagnosis and 8% with distant metastases. Five-year overall survival rates range between 48% and 63%. Two subsets of MCC have been characterised with distinct molecular pathogenetic pathways: ultraviolet-induced MCC versus virus-positive MCC, which carries a better prognosis. In both subtypes, there are alterations in the retinoblastoma protein and p53 gene structure and function. MCC typically manifests as a red nodule or plaque with fast growth, most commonly on sun exposed areas. Histopathology (small-cell neuroendocrine appearance) and immunohistochemistry (CK20 positivity and TTF-1 negativity) confirm the diagnosis. The current staging systems are the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for international Cancer control 8th edition. Baseline whole body imaging is encouraged to rule out regional and distant metastasis. For localised MCC, first-line treatment is surgical excision with postoperative margin assessment followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). Sentinel lymph node biopsy is recommended in all patients with MCC without clinically detectable lymph nodes or distant metastasis. Adjuvant RT alone, eventually combined with complete lymph nodes dissection is proposed in case of micrometastatic nodal involvement. In case of macroscopic nodal involvement, the standard of care is complete lymph nodes dissection potentially followed by post-operative RT. Immunotherapy with anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies should be offered as first-line systemic treatment in advanced MCC. Chemotherapy can be used when patients fail to respond or are intolerant for anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy or clinical trials.

Characterization of clinical outcomes after shorter course hypofractionated and standard-course radiotherapy for stage I-III curatively-treated Merkel cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Limited data exists regarding the efficacy of curative hypofractionated radiotherapy (hypo-RT) regimens compared to conventionally-fractionated radiotherapy (conv-RT) for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 241 patients diagnosed with non-metastatic MCC from 2005-2021 and who received RT at Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center. The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of in-field locoregional relapse using Gray's test with competing risks of death and isolated out-of-field recurrence. Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and MCC-specific survival using log-rank tests, and risk factors of recurrence using Cox-proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

There were 50 (20.6%) and 193 (79.4%) courses of hypo-RT and conv-RT, respectively. The hypo-RT cohort was older (≥73 years at diagnosis: 78.0% vs. 41.5%, p<0.01), and received a lower equivalent total RT dose in 2 Gy per fraction (<50 Gy: 58.0% vs. 5.2%, p<0.01). Median follow-up was 65.1 months (range: 1.2-194.5) for conv-RT and 25.0 months (range: 1.6-131.3) for hypo-RT cohorts. Two-year cumulative incidence of in-field locoregional relapse was low in both groups (1.1% conv-RT vs. 4.1% hypo-RT, p=0.114). While two-year OS was lower for the hypo-RT group (62.6% vs. 84.4%, p=0.0008), two-year MCC-specific survival was similar (84.7 vs. 86.6%, p=0.743). On multivariable analysis, immunosuppression, clinical stage III disease, and lymphovascular invasion were associated with any-recurrence when controlling for sex, age, and hypo-RT.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

There was no difference in cumulative incidence of in-field locoregional relapse or MCC-specific survival between hypo-RT and conv-RT. Prospective studies are needed to confirm hypo-RT as an efficacious treatment option for MCC.

Recurrence and Mortality Risk of Merkel Cell Carcinoma by Cancer Stage and Time From Diagnosis

IMPORTANCE

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) often behaves aggressively; however, disease-recurrence data are not captured in national databases, and it is unclear what proportion of patients with MCC experience a recurrence (estimates vary from 27%-77%). Stage-specific recurrence data that includes time from diagnosis would provide more precise prognostic information and contribute to risk-appropriate clinical surveillance.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate risk of stage-specific MCC recurrence and mortality over time since diagnosis.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This prospective cohort study included 618 patients with MCC who were prospectively enrolled in a Seattle-based data repository between 2003 and 2019. Of these patients, 223 experienced a recurrence of MCC. Data analysis was performed July 2019 to November 2021.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Stage-specific recurrence and survival, as well as cumulative incidence and Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS

Among the 618 patients included in the analysis (median [range] age, 69 [11-98] years; 227 [37%] female), the 5-year recurrence rate for MCC was 40%. Risk of recurrence in the first year was high (11% for patients with pathologic stage I, 33% for pathologic stage IIA/IIB, 30% for pathologic stage IIIA, 45% for pathologic stage IIIB, and 58% for pathologic stage IV), with 95% of recurrences occurring within the first 3 years. Median follow-up among living patients was 4.3 years. Beyond stage, 4 factors were associated with increased recurrence risk in univariable analyses: immunosuppression (hazard ratio [HR], 2.4; 95% CI, 1.7-3.3; P < .001), male sex (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.5; P < .001), known primary lesion among patients with clinically detectable nodal disease (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-4.0; P = .001), and older age (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.3; P = .06 for each 10-year increase). Among 187 deaths in the cohort, 121 (65%) were due to MCC. The MCC-specific survival rate was strongly stage dependent (95% at 5 years for patients with pathologic stage I vs 41% for pathologic stage IV). Among patients presenting with stage I to II MCC, a local recurrence (17 arising within/adjacent to the primary tumor scar) did not appreciably diminish survival compared with patients who had no recurrence (85% vs 88% MCC-specific survival at 5 years).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, the MCC recurrence rate (approximately 40%) was notably different than that reported for invasive melanoma (approximately 19%), squamous cell carcinoma (approximately 5%-9%), or basal cell carcinoma (approximately 1%-2%) following definitive therapy. Because more than 90% of MCC recurrences arise within 3 years, it is appropriate to adjust surveillance intensity accordingly. Stage- and time-specific recurrence data can assist in appropriately focusing surveillance resources on patients and time intervals in which recurrence risk is highest.

Treatment of Locally Advanced Merkel Cell Carcinoma-A Multi-Center Study

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer with a high risk of recurrence and poor prognosis. The treatment of locally advanced disease involves surgery and radiotherapy. To analyze real-life treatment patterns and clinical outcomes, we conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 161 MCC patients treated with curative intent in four oncological centers in Poland. The median age at diagnosis was 72 years (30-94); 49.7% were male. Lymph node (LN) involvement at diagnosis was found in 26.9% of patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was performed in 36.5% of patients (positive in 10.5%), and 51.9% of patients received perioperative treatment. The relapse rate was 38.3%. With the median follow-up of 2.3 years, the median disease-free survival (DFS) was not reached, and the 1-year rate was 65%. The negative independent risk factors for DFS were male gender, metastases in LN at diagnosis, no SLNB in patients without clinical nodal metastases, and no perioperative radiotherapy. The estimated median overall survival (OS) was 6.9 years (95% CI 4.64-9.15). The negative independent risk factors for OS were male gender, age above 70, metastases in LN at diagnosis, and no SLNB in patients without clinical nodal metastases. Our results confirm that the MCC treatment should be conducted in an experienced multidisciplinary team; however, the outcomes are still unsatisfactory.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Changing Practice Patterns and Impact on Recurrence-Free and Overall Survival at a Single Institution and Nationally

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin. Our report describes the evolution of management and characteristics associated with recurrence, disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) in the treatment of MCC.

METHODS

A single institution retrospective review of MCC and SEER data to determine factors associated with RFS, DSS, and OS using a multivariable Cox regression on inverse-probability weighted cohorts.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-nine patients were identified with a median age of 75. Of these, 96% were Caucasian and 60% male. Fifty-eight out of 159 (36%) of all patients were deceased with 21/58 (36%) dead from MCC with a median follow-up of 3.1 years. Institutionally, trends over time demonstrated an increased use of immunotherapy with a concomitant decrease in chemotherapy and decreased use of radiotherapy alone. Institutionally and nationally, there has been increased surgical nodal staging. Institutionally, factors associated with shorter DSS included advanced age, active cigarette smoker (p = 0.002), cT2 disease (p = 0.007), and MCC with unknown primary (p < 0.001). Institutionally, factors associated with shorter OS included ages ≥ 75 years (p < 0.001), an immunocompromised state (p < 0.001), truncal primary site (p = 0.002), and cT2 disease (HR 9.59, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Changing practice patterns in MCC management have been driven by the adoption of immunotherapy. Our study highlights that competing risks of mortality in MCC patients likely prevents OS from being an accurate surrogate outcome measure to understand factors associated with DSS.

A web-based predictive model for overall survival of patients with cutaneous Merkel cell carcinoma: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma with a high mortality rate, so it is necessary to create models to predict overall survival of MCC. We developed an easy-to-use web-based calculator to predict the OS of MCC patients based on the nomogram.

METHODS

MCC patients between 2004 and 2015 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and randomly assigned to training and validation cohorts. Patients between 2016-2017 serve as the external validation cohort. Relevant risk factors were identified by univariate and multivariate COX hazards regression methods and combined to produce nomograms. The concordance index (C-index), area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve, and calibration plots have demonstrated the predictive power of the nomograms. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to measure nomograms in clinical practice. Patients were divided into three groups according to the scores of the nomogram.

RESULTS

A total of 3480 patients were randomly assigned to the training group and validation group in this study. Meaningful prognostic factors were applied to the establishment of nomograms. The C-index for OS was 0.725 (95% CI: 0.706-0.741) in the training cohort and 0.710 (95% CI: 0.683-0.737) in the validation cohort. In the external validation cohort, C-index was 0.763 (95% CI: 0.734-0.792). The C-index of training cohort, validation cohort and external validation cohort for CSS were 0.743 (95% CI:0.725-0.761), 0.739(95%CI:0.712-0.766) and 0.774 (95%CI:0.735-0.813), respectively. The AUC and calibration plots of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates showed that the nomogram had good predictive power. DCA demonstrated that the nomogram constructed in this study could provide a clinical net benefit. Our calculator demonstrated excellent predictive capabilities for better risk grouping of MCC patients.

CONCLUSION

We created novel nomograms of prognostic factors for MCC, which more accurately and comprehensively predicted 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS/CSS in MCC patients. We established a calculator which can easily and quickly calculate the risk grouping of MCC patients by inputting clinically relevant characteristics. This can help clinicians identify high-risk patients as early as possible, carry out personalized treatment, follow-up, and monitoring, and improve the survival rate of MCC patients.

Merkel cell carcinoma in the setting of hematologic disease is associated with unique features and potential pitfalls

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare but aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin, often associated with polyomavirus and ultra-violet light exposure. Immunosuppression is associated with increased risk of development of MCC, including that associated with hematolymphoid disorders such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). We sought to determine whether MCC arising in patients with hematologic disorders showed unique features. Searching archived material at three institutions, we identified 13 patients with MCC and at least one hematologic malignancy and 41 patients with MCC with no reported hematologic malignancy. CLL/SLL was the most common hematologic disorder in this setting (9/13 cases). Clinical history, variation in morphologic appearance, unusual site distribution and concern for progression of underlying hematologic disease all contributed to potential diagnostic challenges. Overlapping marker expression between MCC and hematologic neoplasms created potential diagnostic pitfalls (e.g. CD138, Pax5, TdT, Bcl2, CD56, and CD117). In addition, we newly identify expression of CD5 and LEF-1 in a subset of MCC, including in patients with CLL/SLL. MCC in patients with hematologic malignancy were more common in men (92% versus 59%, p < 0.05) and showed an unusual site predilection to non-sun exposed sites (3/13 on the buttocks) with none presenting on the face or scalp. By contrast, face or scalp lesions were common in MCC without an associated hematologic malignancy (17/41, p < 0.05). Our findings reaffirm the need for skin surveillance in the setting of immune deficiency and for vigilance to identify unusual presentations of MCC in patients with or without hematologic disorders.

Immune activity in Merkel cell carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is widely known as a highly malignant skin cancer. The pathogenesis of MCC, however, remains mysterious due to the extremely small number of cases and its prevalence in the elderly. Despite its high‐grade malignancy, spontaneous regression occurs with some frequency. The immune activity of the tumor underlies this peculiar behavior. In recent years, immune checkpoint blockade therapies, including the anti‐programmed death ligand 1 antibody, have provided successful results. These therapies, however, are ineffective in approximately half the patients with advanced MCC and few treatments are available for those patients. In this review, we summarize the increasing body of evidence relating to the immune activity of MCC and immunological biomarkers. The interesting and sometimes peculiar behavior of MCC, such as their spontaneous regression, is largely due to their high immunosensitivity. Understanding the tumor immunokinetics of MCC should provide critical insight for understanding cancer immunotherapy. Here, we introduce a new classification for MCC according to its immune activity. Combined application of programmed death ligand 1 (a prognostic factor and predictor of the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in various cancers) with glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase (a new promising biomarker for MCC) may enable classification of MCC based on its immune status. Whether the new classification can be used to predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade therapies remains to be evaluated in future studies, but the classification may facilitate future treatment selection.

Multimodal Strategy in Localized Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Where Are We and Where Are We Heading?

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine tumor of the skin whose incidence is rising. Multimodal treatment is crucial in the non-metastatic, potentially curable setting. However, the optimal management of patients with non-metastatic MCC is still unclear. In addition, novel insights into tumor biology and newly developed treatments (e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitors) that dramatically improved outcomes in the advanced setting are being investigated in earlier stages with promising results. Nevertheless, the combination of new strategies with consolidated ones needs to be clarified. We reviewed available evidence supporting the current treatment recommendations of localized MCC with a focus on potentially ground-breaking future strategies. Advantages and disadvantages of the different treatment modalities, including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy in the non-metastatic setting, are analyzed, as well as those of different treatment modalities (adjuvant as opposed to neoadjuvant). Lastly, we provide an outlook of remarkable ongoing studies and of promising agents and strategies in the treatment of patients with non-metastatic MCC.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Current State of Treatment and Future Directions

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, cutaneous neuroendocrine malignancy with increasing incidence. The skin of the head and neck is a common subsite for MCC with distinctions in management from other anatomic areas. Given the rapid pace of developments regarding MCC pathogenesis (Merkel cell polyoma virus (MCPyV)-positive or virus-negative, cell of origin), diagnosis, staging and treatment, and up to date recommendations are critical for optimizing outcomes. This review aims to summarize currently available literature for MCC of the head and neck. The authors reviewed current literature, including international guidelines regarding MCC pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, staging, and treatment. Subsequently recommendations were derived including the importance of baseline imaging, MCPyV serology testing, primary site surgery, nodal evaluation, radiotherapy, and the increasing role of immune modulating agents in MCC. MCPyV serology testing is increasingly important with potential distinctions in treatment response and surveillance between virus-positive and virus-negative MCC. Surgical management continues to balance optimizing local control with minimal morbidity. Similarly, radiotherapy continues to have importance in the adjuvant, definitive, and palliative setting for MCC of the head and neck. Immunotherapy has changed the paradigm for advanced MCC, with increasing work focusing on optimizing outcomes for non-responders and high-risk patients, including those with immunosuppression.

Tumor primary site as a prognostic factor for Merkel cell carcinoma disease-specific death

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) primary site has not been fully investigated as a potential prognostic factor.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence by tumor primary site of death due to MCC.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective analysis of the Survival, Epidemiology, and End Results database. MCC patients treated between 1973 and 2016 were grouped by tumor primary site and a competing risks analysis was performed to test the impact of primary site on disease-specific death. Cumulative incidence of Merkel cell carcinoma-specific mortality (CMMI) at 5 years was estimated for each primary site.

RESULTS

Of 9407 MCC patients identified, 6305 (67.0%) had localized disease, 2397 (25.5%) had regional metastasis, and 705 (7.5%) had distant metastasis. Tumor primary site was predictive of CMMI and varied by stage at diagnosis. Tumors involving the scalp/neck carried the highest CMMI among localized MCC (26.0%). Tumors involving the lip had the highest CMMI among MCC with regional metastasis (56.7%) and distant metastasis (82.1%).

LIMITATIONS

Tumor size data were missing for a large proportion of patients, precluding stratification by stage according to current American Joint Committee on Cancer guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Probability of MCC disease-specific death varies by primary site. The primary site of the tumor may be useful as a prognostic indicator for MCC.

Immune Status in Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Relationships With Clinical Factors and Independent Prognostic Value

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppression (IS) currently is not considered in staging for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). An analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) was performed to investigate immune status as an independent predictor of overall survival (OS) for patients with MCC and to describe the relationship between immune status and other prognostic factors.

METHODS

The NCDB was queried for patients with a diagnosis of MCC from 2010 to 2016 who had known immune status. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to define factors associated with OS. Secondary models were constructed to assess the association between IS etiology and OS. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to characterize relationships between immune status and other factors.

RESULTS

The 3-year OS was lower for the patients with IS (44.6%) than for the immunocompetent (IC) patients (68.7%; p < 0.0001). Immunosuppression was associated with increased adjusted mortality hazard (hazard ratio [HR], 2.36, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-2.75). The etiology of IS was associated with OS (p = 0.0015), and patients with solid-organ transplantation had the lowest 3-year OS (32.7%). Immunosuppression was associated with increased odds of greater nodal burden (odds ratio [OR], 1.70; 95% CI, 1.37-2.11) and lymphovascular invasion (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.23-2.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Immune status was independently prognostic for the OS of patients with localized MCC. The etiology of IS may be associated with differential survival outcomes. Multiple adverse prognostic factors were associated with increased likelihood of IS. Immune status, and potentially the etiology of IS, may be useful prognostic factors to consider for future MCC staging systems.

Clinical benefit of baseline imaging in Merkel cell carcinoma: Analysis of 584 patients

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) guidelines derive from melanoma and do not recommend baseline cross-sectional imaging for most patients. However, MCC is more likely to have metastasized at diagnosis than melanoma.

OBJECTIVE

To determine how often baseline imaging identifies clinically occult MCC in patients with newly diagnosed disease with and without palpable nodal involvement.

METHODS

Analysis of 584 patients with MCC with a cutaneous primary tumor, baseline imaging, no evident distant metastases, and sufficient staging data.

RESULTS

Among 492 patients with clinically uninvolved regional nodes, 13.2% had disease upstaged by imaging (8.9% in regional nodes, 4.3% in distant sites). Among 92 patients with clinically involved regional nodes, 10.8% had disease upstaged to distant metastatic disease. Large (>4 cm) and small (<1 cm) primary tumors were both frequently upstaged (29.4% and 7.8%, respectively). Patients who underwent positron emission tomography-computed tomography more often had disease upstaged (16.8% of 352), than those with computed tomography alone (6.9% of 231; P = .0006).

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective study.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with clinically node-negative disease, baseline imaging showed occult metastatic MCC at a higher rate than reported for melanoma (13.2% vs <1%). Although imaging is already recommended for patients with clinically node-positive MCC, these data suggest that baseline imaging is also indicated for patients with clinically node-negative MCC because upstaging is frequent and markedly alters management and prognosis.

Sex Differences in Overall Survival and the Effect of Radiotherapy in Merkel Cell Carcinoma-A Retrospective Analysis of a Swedish Cohort

Simple Summary

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive skin cancer which is believed to be partially caused by a virus or ultraviolet exposure. Most previous studies have shown that MCC is more common in men compared to women, virus associated MCC has a better prognosis and surgery followed by radiotherapy gives a better outcome. In this article, we explore these traits in a Swedish cohort of 113 patients and find that MCC is more common in women and female patients have a longer survival compared to male patients. In addition, we found that virus negative MCC has a worse outcome in male patients and radiotherapy after surgery gives a better outcome for patients who are treated with a curative dosage, irrespective of sex.

Abstract

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive skin cancer where Merkel cell Polyomavirus (MCPyV) contributes to the pathogenesis. In an adjuvant setting, radiotherapy (RT) is believed to give a survival benefit. The prognostic impact of sex related to MCPyV-status and adjuvant RT were analyzed in patients referred to Karolinska University Hospital. Data were collected from 113 patients’ hospital records and MCPyV analyses were made in 54 patients (48%). We found a significantly better overall survival (OS) for women compared to men and a significant difference in OS in patients receiving adjuvant RT. Furthermore, we found that men with virus negative MCC have an increased risk for earlier death (HR 3.6). This indicates that MCPyV positive and negative MCC act as two different diseases, and it might be due to different mechanism in the immune response between male and female patients. This could have significance in tailoring treatment and follow-up in MCC patients in the future.

Patterns of Metastasis in Merkel Cell Carcinoma

Background

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a cutaneous neuroendocrine malignancy with a propensity for regional and distant spread. Because of the relative infrequency of this disease, the patterns of metastasis in MCC are understudied.

Methods

Patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (8th edition) stage I–IV MCC treated at our institution were identified (1/1/2008–2/28/2018). The first site of metastasis was classified as regional [regional lymph node (LN) basin, in-transit] or distant. Distant metastasis-free (DMFS) and MCC-specific (MSS) survival were estimated.

Results

Of 133 patients, 64 (48%) had stage I, 13 (10%) stage II, 48 (36%) stage III, and 8 (6%) stage IV disease at presentation. The median follow-up time in patients who remained alive was 36 (interquartile range 20–66) months. Regional or distant metastases developed in 78 (59%) patients. The first site was regional in 87%, including 73% with isolated LN involvement, and distant in 13%. Thirty-seven (28%) patients eventually developed distant disease, which most commonly involved the abdominal viscera (51%) and distant LNs (46%) first. The lung (0%) and brain (3%) were rarely the first distant sites. Stage III MCC at presentation was significantly associated with worse DMFS (hazard ratio 4.87, P = 0.001) and stage IV disease with worse MSS (hazard ratio 6.30, P = 0.002).

Conclusions

Regional LN metastasis is the most common first metastatic event in MCC, confirming the importance of nodal evaluation. Distant disease spread appears to have a predilection for certain sites. Understanding these patterns could help to guide surveillance strategies.

Immune status and the efficacy of radiotherapy on overall survival for patients with localized Merkel cell carcinoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressed (IS) patients with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) have worse outcomes compared to immunocompetent (IC) patients, and it is unclear if adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) is beneficial for these patients. We sought to determine the effect of immune status on adjuvant RT efficacy regarding overall survival (OS) for patients with localized MCC.

METHODS

This was an observational study of National Cancer Database (NCDB) identifying patients with stage I/II or III MCC with known immune status diagnosed from 2010 to 2014. The median follow-up time was 29 months. OS was described using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared for subgroups by immune status and adjuvant RT using log-rank tests, multivariable Cox regression and interaction effect testing.

RESULTS

A total of 2049 IC and 255 IS patients were included. Adjuvant RT was associated with decreased hazard of death for stage I/II MCC (HR 0.65, CI 0.54-0.78) adjusting for factors including immune status. Interaction effect testing did not demonstrate a significant difference in the effect of adjuvant RT on OS between IC and IS status in either stage I/II or III MCC (both P values > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational study, adjuvant RT was associated with decreased hazard of death for patients with stage I/II MCC regardless of immune status. Adjuvant RT should be considered for both IS and IC patients with localized MCC.

The Effect of Time to Postoperative Radiation Therapy on Survival in Resected Merkel Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Delays from surgery to adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT) are associated with poorer prognosis in multiple neoplasms. Presently, no data exist for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). The authors sought to assess the time interval from surgery to aRT and effect on outcomes in MCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for histologically confirmed nonmetastatic MCC status post resection and aRT diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 who received aRT within 24 weeks of surgery. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed univariate overall survival (OS); multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling assessed multivariate OS; χ and logistic regression assessed differences in baseline characteristics and predictors of delayed aRT.

RESULTS

Of 5952 patients meeting criteria, 13% commenced aRT within 4 weeks, 48% between 4 and 7 weeks, 23% between 8 and 11 weeks, 11% between 12 and 15 weeks, and 6% between 16 and 24 weeks. There were no differences in OS on the basis of the surgery-aRT interval (P=0.99). Predictors of worse OS on the multivariate analysis included advanced age, greater comorbidities, male sex, lower regional income, earlier year of diagnosis, more advanced tumor and nodal staging, positive margins, head and neck location, and treatment at community facilities (P<0.05 for all). Factors predictive of delayed aRT were identified. Subset analyses on these factors, such as receipt of chemotherapy or positive lymph nodes, did not demonstrate that the timing of aRT affected survival (P≥0.37).

CONCLUSION

This study of a contemporary national database revealed that delays from resection to aRT were not associated with survival in MCC, somewhat discordant from other malignancies such as squamous cell carcinoma.

Contemporary Topics in Radiation Medicine: Skin Cancer

Radiation plays an important role in the management of a variety of skin cancers. This article discusses the role of radiation in the treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, and B-cell lymphomas.

[Immune checkpoint inhibition in Merkel cell carcinoma]

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare but aggressive form of skin cancer in which Merkel cell polyomavirus infection and chronic exposure to ultraviolet radiation are key risk factors. Immune checkpoint inhibition has revolutionized the treatment of locally advanced, inoperable and metastatic MCC.

AIM

To outline the modern management of MCC based on advances in our understanding of MCC tumour biology and the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors, namely inhibitors of programmed cell death protein (PD)-1- and PD‑1 ligand 1 (PD-L1).

METHODS

A review of the scientific literature listed in PubMed.

RESULTS

First line therapy with the PD-L1 blocking antibody avelumab is associated with a response rate of 62%. In the second line setting, for example after chemotherapy, the response rate only reaches 33%. However, in patients who responded in the second line setting, 69% remained relapse free after 2 years. Treatment responses occurred on average after 6.1 weeks of therapy. First line treatment with pembrolizumab (anti-PD‑1 antibody) is associated with a 2-year survival rate of 69% and the median survival rate has not been reached. Whilst the various chemotherapy regimens are associated with similar response rates, these are typically short lived.

DISCUSSION

Checkpoint inhibition offers an effective treatment option for patients with MCC. Avelumab is currently licensed as a treatment for metastatic disease. Chemotherapy remains an option to reduce tumor load, or in the context of resistance and/or contraindications to immune checkpoint therapy. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant use of checkpoint inhibition in MCC may represent a future treatment strategy pending the results of on-going clinical trials.

Histogenesis of Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin. This neoplasia features aggressive behavior, resulting in a 5-year overall survival rate of 40%. In 2008, Feng et al. identified Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) integration into the host genome as the main event leading to MCC oncogenesis. However, despite identification of this crucial viral oncogenic trigger, the nature of the cell in which MCC oncogenesis occurs is actually unknown. In fact, several hypotheses have been proposed. Despite the large similarity in phenotype features between MCC tumor cells and physiological Merkel cells (MCs), a specialized subpopulation of the epidermis acting as mechanoreceptor of the skin, several points argue against the hypothesis that MCC derives directly from MCs. Alternatively, MCPyV integration could occur in another cell type and induce acquisition of an MC-like phenotype. Accordingly, an epithelial as well as a fibroblastic or B-cell origin of MCC has been proposed mainly based on phenotype similarities shared by MCC and these potential ancestries. The aim of this present review is to provide a comprehensive review of the current knowledge of the histogenesis of MCC.

A Report of 13 Cases of Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature

Background

There is limited data knowledge of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) in Turkey aside from a few case reports.

Objective

The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics, demographic features, therapeutic parameters, and outcome of primary cutaneous MCC cases from Turkey.

Methods

Digital medical records of the 13 MCC patients who were followed-up at a tertiary referral center were retrospectively analyzed. Clinic, demographic, tumor characteristics, and survival of the patients were retrieved.

Results

Most of our patients were elderly. Female predominance was noticed. The most common primary site of the tumors was the lower extremities. The overall survival was 42 months, 68% at first year, 68% at third years, and 29% at fifth years.

Conclusion

This is the first largest report from Turkish population with female predominance, and lower extremity tendency.

Diagnostic accuracy of a panel of immunohistochemical and molecular markers to distinguish Merkel cell carcinoma from other neuroendocrine carcinomas

Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin mostly induced by Merkel cell polyomavirus integration. Cytokeratin 20 (CK20) positivity is currently used to distinguish Merkel cell carcinomas from other neuroendocrine carcinomas. However, this distinction may be challenging in CK20-negative cases and in cases without a primary skin tumor. The objectives of this study were first to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of previously described markers for the diagnosis of Merkel cell carcinoma and second to validate these markers in the setting of difficult-to-diagnose Merkel cell carcinoma variants. In a preliminary set (n = 30), we assessed optimal immunohistochemical patterns (CK20, thyroid transcription factor 1 [TTF-1], atonal homolog 1 [ATOH1], neurofilament [NF], special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 [SATB2], paired box protein 5, terminal desoxynucleotidyl transferase, CD99, mucin 1, and Merkel cell polyomavirus-large T antigen) and Merkel cell polyomavirus load thresholds (real-time PCR). The diagnostic accuracy of each marker was then assessed in a validation set of 103 Merkel cell carcinomas (9 CK20-negative cases and 15 cases without a primary skin tumor) and 70 extracutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma cases. The most discriminant markers for a diagnosis of Merkel cell carcinoma were SATB2, NF expression, and Merkel cell polyomavirus DNA detection (positive likelihood ratios: 36.6, 44.4, and 28.2, respectively). Regarding Merkel cell carcinoma variants, cases without a primary skin tumor retained a similar immunohistochemical  profile and CK20-negative tumors displayed a different profile (decrease frequency of NF and SATB2 expression), but Merkel cell polyomavirus DNA remained detected (78% of cases by qPCR). Moreover, 8/9 (89%) CK20-negative Merkel cell carcinoma cases but only 3/61 (5%) CK20-negative extracutaneous neuroendocrine cases were positive for at least one of these markers. In conclusion, detection of SATB2 and NF expression and Merkel cell polyomavirus DNA helps distinguish between Merkel cell carcinoma classical and variant cases and extracutaneous neuroendocrine carcinomas.

Differential Outcomes Among Immunosuppressed Patients With Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Impact of Immunosuppression Type on Cancer-specific and Overall Survival

OBJECTIVES

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer with higher incidence among whites, elderly, and immunosuppressed patients. Although immunosuppressed MCC patients are at higher risk of recurrence and MCC-related death, it is unknown whether immunosuppression type is associated with differential outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 89 nonmetastatic MCC patients with a diagnosis of chronic immunosuppression. Immunosuppression was categorized as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (31% of cohort), other hematologic malignancies (18%), solid organ transplant (21%), autoimmune disease (21%), and human immunodeficiency virus acquired deficiency syndrome (8%). Progression-free survival (PFS) and MCC-specific survival (MSS) were estimated with the cumulative incidence function. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 52 months, 53 deaths occurred (42 from MCC, 7 unknown, and 4 non-MCC). Two-year PFS, MSS, and OS were 30%, 55%, and 52%, respectively. Human immunodeficiency virus/acquired deficiency syndrome and solid organ transplant patients were diagnosed with MCC at a younger age (median 55 and 59 y, respectively) and with more advanced stage disease compared with other immunosuppressed subgroups. PFS did not significantly differ among the 5 immunosuppression subgroups (P=0.30), but significant differences were observed in MSS and OS (both P=0.01). Controlling for potential confounders for OS, including age and stage, immunosuppression type was still significantly associated with risk of death (P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Among immunosuppressed MCC patients, recurrent MCC is the major cause of mortality. The risk of death from MCC differs among immunosuppression types, suggesting important biological differences in host-tumor immune interactions.

Treatment patterns, comorbidities, healthcare resource use, and associated costs by line of chemotherapy and level of comorbidity in patients with newly-diagnosed Merkel cell carcinoma in the United States

AIMS

To examine the characteristics of patients with newly-diagnosed Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), analyze their treatment patterns and comorbidities after diagnosis, and evaluate the economic burden on the MCC patient population in the US.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This observational, non-interventional cohort study identified patients with MCC that were newly-diagnosed between January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2014, and whose data were either in the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters (CCAE) or Medicare Supplemental and Coordination of Benefits databases. Standard descriptive statistics were used to describe patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and healthcare resource use (HRU) and cost.

RESULTS

Following MCC diagnosis, most patients in the study population (n = 2,177) received only surgery (34.5%) or surgery and radiotherapy without chemotherapy (22.0%), while 14.5% of patients received none of these treatments; 27.5% of patients received at least one line of chemotherapy as part of their treatment. Mean total healthcare costs per patient per year (PPPY), as well as mean inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy costs, were significantly greater for patients who received chemotherapy compared with those who received other or no treatments. Higher HRU and mean costs were associated with increasing patient comorbidity burden, ranging from $62,401 PPPY in Deyo Charlson Comorbidity Index level 1 to $109,690 in level ≥3.

LIMITATIONS

The study used claims databases that were limited to patients who are covered by large employer-sponsored insurance and/or Medicare and did not provide information regarding the rationale for treatment choice or resource use.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of treatment is a major factor in determining healthcare costs associated with MCC, with the highest costs in patients receiving chemotherapy. Patients with MCC often exhibit comorbidities, and both HRU and healthcare costs increase significantly with each comorbidity level.

Prognostic Factors in Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in 90 Patients

Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) is a rare but highly aggressive neuroendocrine neoplasm of the skin. This study aimed at describing characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of a series of consecutive cases of MCC patients, in order to contribute to the investigation of this rare malignancy and provide better patient care. This is a retrospective cohort study including all 90 patients diagnosed and/or treated for MCC between 1991 and 2018 at the Veneto Institute of Oncology in Padua (Italy). Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment, and immunohistochemical data were extracted from a prospectively collected local database. There were 68 primary (76%) and 22 non-primary (15 occult primary, three metastatic, four recurrence) tumors (24%). CK20 expression was associated with reduced overall (HR 2.92, 95% CI 1.04–8.16) and disease-specific (HR 4.62, 95% CI 1.31–16.28) survival. Immunomodulatory regimens for treatment of other comorbidities were associated with reduced disease-specific ((HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.06–4.36) and recurrence-free (HR 3.08, 95% CI 1.44–6.57) survival. Iatrogenic immunomodulation resulted as the main factor associated with impaired prognosis. Lack of CK20 expression was associated with better survival.

Effect of Patient Immune Status on the Efficacy of Radiation Therapy and Recurrence-Free Survival Among 805 Patients With Merkel Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Patients with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) with chronic immunosuppression (IS) have worse outcomes, but the mechanisms are not well understood. We hypothesized that these differences may be mediated in part by differential response to treatment, and we evaluated whether radiation therapy (RT) efficacy is altered among IS compared with immune-competent (IC) patients with MCC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Among 805 patients with MCC, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and patterns of first recurrence were compared between 89 IS and 716 IC patients with stage I to III MCC treated with curative intent. We used a Fine and Gray's competing risk multivariable analysis to estimate associations with RFS.

RESULTS

IS and IC patients with MCC had similar demographic and disease characteristics. Most (77% IC, 86% IS) were irradiated (median, 50.4 Gy IC, 50.3 Gy IS), although more IS patients were irradiated to the primary site (97% vs 81%). With a median follow-up of 54.4 months, IS patients had inferior RFS (2-year: 30% vs 57%; P < .0001) and higher rates of local recurrence as the first site of relapse (25% vs 12%; P = .0002). The association between RT and RFS differed by immune status (interaction P = .01). Although RT was associated with significantly improved RFS among IC patients (hazard ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.72), no difference in RFS was observed with RT among IS patients (hazard ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 0.70-3.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation therapy efficacy at current standard RT doses for MCC is impaired among immunosuppressed patients with MCC. Although a strong link between durability of RT response and immune function does not appear to be evident in most cancers, our results may reflect an especially dynamic interaction between immune status and RT efficacy in MCC.

Detection of the Merkel cell polyomavirus in the neuroendocrine component of combined Merkel cell carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin. The main etiological agent is Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV), detected in 80% of cases. About 5% of cases, called combined MCC, feature an admixture of neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine tumor cells. Reports of the presence or absence of MCPyV in combined MCC are conflicting, most favoring the absence, which suggests that combined MCC might have independent etiological factors and pathogenesis. These discrepancies might occur with the use of different virus identification assays, with different sensitivities. In this study, we aimed to determine the viral status of combined MCC by a multimodal approach. We histologically reviewed 128 cases of MCC and sub-classified them as "combined" or "conventional." Both groups were compared by clinical data (age, sex, site, American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] stage, immunosuppression, risk of recurrence, and death during follow-up) and immunochemical features (cytokeratin 20 and 7, thyroid transcription factor 1 [TTF1], p53, large T antigen [CM2B4], CD8 infiltrates). After a first calibration step with 12 conventional MCCs and 12 cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas as controls, all eight cases of combined MCC were investigated for MCPyV viral status by combining two independent molecular procedures. Furthermore, on multiplex genotyping assay, the samples were examined for the presence of other polyoma- and papillomaviruses. Combined MCC differed from conventional MCC in earlier AJCC stage, increased risk of recurrence and death, decreased CD8 infiltrates, more frequent TTF1 positivity (5/8), abnormal p53 expression (8/8), and frequent lack of large T antigen expression (7/8). With the molecular procedure, half of the combined MCC cases were positive for MCPyV in the neuroendocrine component. Beta papillomaviruses were detected in 5/8 combined MCC cases and 9/12 conventional MCC cases. In conclusion, the detection of MCPyV DNA in half of the combined MCC cases suggests similar routes of carcinogenesis for combined and conventional MCC.

PD-L1 inhibition with avelumab for metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer that lacks durable responses to traditional chemotherapy. Areas covered: After MCC was shown to be an immunogenic tumor, small trials revealed high objective response rates to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. The JAVELIN Merkel 200 (NCT02155647) trial tested the use of avelumab, a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody against PD-L1, in metastatic MCC. Avelumab recently became the first approved drug for metastatic MCC. Expert commentary: By conducting broad phase I studies assessing the safety of avelumab and a small phase II study demonstrating efficacy in this rare orphan tumor type, avelumab gained accelerated approval for the treatment of metastatic MCC. Additional studies are needed to determine how the antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) competent Fc region of avelumab contributes to disease control. Remaining questions: Longer follow-up will determine the durability of checkpoint blockade in controlling metastatic MCC. Additional studies will assess the utility and safety of adjuvant checkpoint blockade in patients with excised MCC. How to increase response rates by combining PD-1/PD-L1 blockade with other treatment approaches needs to be explored. In addition, treatment options for MCC patients who fail or do not respond to avelumab need to be identified.

Immunotherapy in Merkel cell carcinoma: role of Avelumab

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), a rare skin cancer, is associated with high mortality, especially in a metastatic setting. Though conventional chemotherapy with platinum and etoposide has had high response rates, many of the patients have had early relapse without any effective therapy thereafter. Recently, immune check point inhibitors have shown very good durable responses, leading to the approval of a programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor Avelumab for these patients. We briefly review the epidemiology and immune basis of the pathogenesis of MCC, which therefore explains the excellent response to check point inhibitors, and throw light on future directions of immunotherapy for this cancer.

Avelumab: a new standard for treating metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive skin cancer. Although MCC is chemosensitive, responses to traditional chemotherapeutic agents are not durable. Avelumab, a novel anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, recently became the first FDA-approved agent for the treatment of metastatic MCC and represents a new option to improve patient survival. Areas covered: This article presents an overview of MCC and summarizes the development of avelumab in the treatment of metastatic MCC. Preclinical studies, phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials, and the safety profile of avelumab are reviewed. Future perspectives and ongoing studies are also discussed. Expert commentary: Avelumab demonstrated rapid and durable responses and a manageable safety profile in the treatment of metastatic MCC. Patient outcomes are favorable when compared to historical responses to standard chemotherapy. Ongoing clinical trials will continue to characterize avelumab and its optimal use in MCC therapy.

Adjuvant radiation therapy improves patient survival in early-stage merkel cell carcinoma: A 15-year single-institution study

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine neoplasm of the skin. Growing evidence supports the benefit of postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for locoregional control, but whether it improves overall survival (OS) has been debated. Our objective was to compare the OS of MCC patients who received postoperative RT with those who received surgery alone.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Cases of MCC between 2001 and 2016 at the University of California, Los Angeles Health System were reviewed. We identified 87 unique cases of MCC. Among the patients, 74% were identified as male and 26% as female. The average age at diagnosis was 71.2 years. The median survival was 48.0 months. The OS of all the patients at 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years was 54%, 46%, and 26%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that stage, T stage, N stage, and M stage were significant determinants of OS. The inclusion of RT was not found to be a determinant; however, when restricting the analysis to early-stage MCC (stages I and II), postoperative adjuvant RT was associated with significantly improved OS. A Cox regression model confirmed that inclusion of RT was an independent prognosticator of OS even when controlled for overall stage and negative margin status. The small sample size and retrospective nature of this study limit its statistical power.

CONCLUSIONS

MCC is an aggressive tumor with a poor prognosis for survival especially in elderly patients. In this study, we found that RT during early-stage MCC improves OS. Prospective randomized control trials are necessary to validate the observed benefit for MCC patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 1862-1866, 2018.