1
|
Bolick NL, Geller AC. Epidemiology and Screening for Melanoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2024; 38:889-906. [PMID: 38908959 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2024.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/24/2024]
Abstract
Melanoma is the most commonly fatal type of skin cancer, and it is an important and growing public health problem in the United States and worldwide. Fortunately, incidence rates are decreasing in young people, stabilizing in middle-aged people, and increasing in older individuals. Herein, the authors further describe trends in melanoma incidence and mortality, review the literature on risk factors, and provide an up-to-date assessment of population-wide screening and new technology being utilized in melanoma screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole L Bolick
- Department of Dermatology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, MSC08 4720 1 UNM, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
| | - Alan C Geller
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Kresge Building, Room 718, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kostaki M, Plaka M, Befon A, Dessinioti C, Kypraiou K, Chardalia V, Christofidou E, Polydorou D, Stratigos A. Simultaneous melanomas in the setting of multiple primary melanomas. Melanoma Res 2024; 34:198-201. [PMID: 38224405 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
It is estimated that about 1-13% of melanoma patients will develop multiple primary melanomas. Although the occurrence of subsequent tumors has been described during the last few years, the development of simultaneous melanomas has not yet been extensively studied. We reviewed our registries to identify patients with multiple primary melanomas. We studied epidemiological, clinical, and histological characteristics of patients who were diagnosed with simultaneous melanomas and compared them with those of patients who developed non-synchronous multiple primary melanomas. As simultaneous were defined subsequent melanomas that were diagnosed either at the same visit or within a time-period of maximum of 1 month. Between 2000 and 2020, 2500 patients were diagnosed with melanoma at Andreas Syggros Hospital. 86 (3.4%) patients presented multiple primary melanomas and among them, 35 (40.7%) developed simultaneous melanomas. Patients with simultaneous melanomas developed more frequently more than 2 tumors. First tumors of patients with non-synchronous melanomas were significantly thicker than second tumors while those of patients with simultaneous melanomas did not differ significantly. Slight differences in the tumor localization, staging and histologic type were observed between the two groups. However significant differences were ascertained between first and second tumors in both groups. Simultaneous melanomas occupy an important proportion of multiple primary melanomas, affecting a non-negligible number of patients. Slight differences between simultaneous and non-synchronous multiple primary melanomas seem to define a distinct subcategory of multiple primary melanomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Kostaki
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Microsurgery, Burns and Melanoma Reference Center, General Hospital of Athens G.Gennimatas
| | - Michaela Plaka
- First Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Medical School of Athens University, Andreas Syggros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Aggeliki Befon
- First Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Medical School of Athens University, Andreas Syggros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Clio Dessinioti
- First Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Medical School of Athens University, Andreas Syggros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Katerina Kypraiou
- First Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Medical School of Athens University, Andreas Syggros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Vasiliki Chardalia
- First Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Medical School of Athens University, Andreas Syggros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Eleftheria Christofidou
- First Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Medical School of Athens University, Andreas Syggros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Doris Polydorou
- First Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Medical School of Athens University, Andreas Syggros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Stratigos
- First Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Medical School of Athens University, Andreas Syggros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Smith J, Cust AE, Lo SN. Risk factors for subsequent primary melanoma in patients with previous melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol 2024; 190:174-183. [PMID: 37562043 DOI: 10.1093/bjd/ljad275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared with the general population, people with a previous melanoma are at increased risk of developing another primary melanoma. Understanding the risk factors associated with multiple primary melanomas can inform patient education and tailored surveillance. OBJECTIVES To examine the risk factors for subsequent primary melanoma in people with a previous melanoma, by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available data. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase and MEDLINE. Studies that reported a risk estimate or raw frequencies and conducted between 1982 and August 2022 were included. Adjusted risk estimates were prioritized over univariable risk estimates. PRISMA reporting guidelines were followed. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted to derive pooled estimates. Quality assessment was conducted by two researchers using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. GRADE was used to rate the certainty and quality of the evidence. RESULTS Data from 27 studies involving 413 181 participants were pooled and analysed. Risk factors assessed included age and sex, environmental, lifestyle, phenotypic, genetic and histopathological factors, and there was wide variation in how they were categorized and analysed. Independent risk factors identified from pooled analyses included male sex [hazard ratio (HR) 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40-1.53], increasing age per 10 years (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.14-1.24), light skin colour (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.23-1.70), family history [odds ratio (OR) 1.79, 95% CI 1.25-2.56], CDKN2A mutation (OR 5.29, 95% CI 2.70-10.37), a high or moderate naevus count [OR 2.63 (95% CI 1.61-4.30) and OR 1.64 (95% CI 1.07-2.51), respectively], one or more atypical naevi (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.52-5.97), first lesions occurring on the head or neck, lentigo maligna subtype (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.15-1.17), other subtype (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.27) and inadequate sun protection (HR 1.85, 95% CI 0.98-3.50). Based on the GRADE criteria, there was high to very low confidence in the pooled effect estimates. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis identified several consistent, independent risk factors for the development of subsequent primary melanoma. These findings will help stratify the risk of subsequent melanoma, tailor skin-check schedules and inform patient education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet Smith
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
- Melanoma Institute Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health
| | - Anne E Cust
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
- Melanoma Institute Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vírseda-González D, Lázaro-Ochaita P, Ribas Despuig G, Avilés-Izquierdo JA. Melanocortin 1 receptor variants and their association with phenotypic characteristics and sporadic multiple primary melanomas in a cohort of 402 Spanish subjects. Exp Dermatol 2023; 32:678-683. [PMID: 36602233 DOI: 10.1111/exd.14739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 12/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
The melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) gene is considered to be a major determinant of the risk of melanoma. The role of MC1R polymorphisms as predisposing factors for the development of a second primary melanoma is not well established. The present study analyses the characteristics from subjects with certain MC1R variants without any other genetic predisposition, as well as the risk of second primary melanoma associated with these variants. We performed a prospective longitudinal single-centre study based on follow-up information of 402 patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma. MC1R gene was sequenced in all subjects. High-risk variants were defined as those previously associated with melanoma (V60L, V92M, I155T, R160W, R163Q and D294H). 253 (63%) patients had at least one predisposing variant. These individuals had higher proportion of red/blonde hair, multiple primary melanomas and first melanoma diagnosis under the age of 60. Second primary melanomas were detected in 28 (3.8%) subjects. Having more than 25 melanocytic nevi was associated significantly to the development of second primary melanomas. A higher proportion of individuals carrying at least one predisposing MC1R variant develop a second melanoma, although statistical significance was not reached. Therefore, some MC1R polymorphisms might determine clinical and histological differences between patients with cutaneous melanoma and may represent a risk factor for second primary melanoma, although more studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pablo Lázaro-Ochaita
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gloria Ribas Despuig
- Grupo de Investigación en Imagen Médica (GIBI230), Hospital Universitario y Politécnico de La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Olsen CM, Pandeya N, Dusingize JC, Neale RE, MacGregor S, Law MH, Whiteman DC. Risk Factors Associated With First and Second Primary Melanomas in a High-Incidence Population. JAMA Dermatol 2023; 159:37-46. [PMID: 36416830 PMCID: PMC9685542 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.4975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Importance An increasing number of people develop more than 1 primary melanoma, yet to date, no population-based prospective cohort studies have reported on risk factors for developing first vs second primary melanomas. Objective To compare the clinical characteristics of first and second melanomas and then to estimate the relative risks of developing 1 vs multiple melanomas associated with demographic, phenotypic, sun exposure, and genetic factors. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based prospective cohort study included men and women aged 40 to 69 years recruited in 2011 and followed up until December 2018 in Queensland, Australia. Data analysis was performed from February to July 2022. Exposures Self-reported information about demographic, phenotypic, and sun exposure measures captured using a survey completed at baseline, and polygenic risk score for melanoma. Main Outcomes and Measures Incident first or second primary melanoma diagnosis, and histologic and clinical characteristics thereof. The Wei-Lin-Weissfeld model for recurrent events was used to estimate the association of each factor with the risks of first and second primary melanoma. Results A total of 38 845 patients (mean [SD] age at baseline, 56.1 [8.2] years; 17 775 men and 21 070 women) were included in the study. During a median follow-up period of 7.4 years, 1212 (3.1%) participants had a single primary melanoma diagnosis, and 245 (0.6%) had a second primary melanoma diagnosis. Second melanomas were more likely than first melanomas to be in situ; for invasive tumors, second melanomas were more likely to be thin (ie, ≤1 mm) than first melanomas. Having many moles at age 21 years (self-reported using visual scoring tool) was more strongly associated with second (hazard ratio [HR], 6.36; 95% CI, 3.77-10.75) than first primary melanoma (HR, 3.46; 95% CI, 2.72-4.40) (P value for difference between the HRs = .01). A high genetic predisposition (ie, polygenic risk score in tertile 3) was also more strongly associated with second (HR, 3.28; 95% CI, 2.06-5.23) than first melanoma (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.71-2.49; P = .03). Second melanomas were more strongly associated with a history of multiple skin cancer excisions (HR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.80-3.83) than first melanomas (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.61-2.16; P = .05). For all other phenotypic characteristics and sun exposure measures, similarly elevated associations with first vs second melanomas were observed. Conclusions and Relevance Findings of this cohort study suggest that within the general population, the presence of many nevi and having a high genetic predisposition to melanoma were associated with the highest risks of developing second primary melanomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine M. Olsen
- Departments of Population Health and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Queensland, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nirmala Pandeya
- Departments of Population Health and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Queensland, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jean Claude Dusingize
- Departments of Population Health and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rachel E. Neale
- Departments of Population Health and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Queensland, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
| | - Stuart MacGregor
- Departments of Population Health and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Queensland, Australia
| | - Matthew H. Law
- Departments of Population Health and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Queensland, Australia
- Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia
- School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
| | - David C. Whiteman
- Departments of Population Health and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Queensland, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Farabi B, Bostanci S, Akay BN, Caliskan D, Atak MF. Comparison of phenotypic features in patients with single vs multiple primary cutaneous melanomas: a prospective single-center study. Int J Dermatol 2022; 62:66-72. [PMID: 36254676 DOI: 10.1111/ijd.16432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is sparse data regarding total body nevus count (TBNC), nevus count in specific locations, phenotypic factors, anthropometric indices, sunburn, and the relation to multiple primary cutaneous melanomas (MPCM) development. We aim to compare these variables in a cohort of patients diagnosed with single primary melanoma (SPM) and MPCM with histologic diagnoses of melanoma in situ, superficial spreading, and nodular melanoma in our clinic. METHODS Prospective observational studies for the evaluation of nevus counts in biopsy-proven melanoma patients from 2017 to 2020 at Ankara University were conducted. Age, gender, family history of melanoma, increased sun exposure, nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSC), height, sunburn history, TBNC, and nevi count in specific anatomical locations were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS A total number of 156 patients consisting of 22 MPCM and 134 SPM were included. Mean TBNC for SPM vs MPCM patients were 96.87 (SD ± 124.71) vs 247.00 (SD ± 261.58), respectively (P < 0.0001). TBNC was correlated to the left arm, trunk, lower extremity, and head and neck nevus counts but not with the right arm nevus count. Multiple regression analysis showed that having more than 10 nevi on the head and neck area is associated with MPCM (OR, 3.882 [95% CI, 1.084-13.899]). TBNC and nevus count in specific locations were found to be significantly higher in MPCM. CONCLUSION The risk of MPCM was associated with having ≥10 nevi on the head and neck.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Banu Farabi
- Dermatology Department, New York Medical College, Metropolitan Hospital Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Seher Bostanci
- Dermatology Department, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bengu Nisa Akay
- Dermatology Department, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Deniz Caliskan
- Public Health Department, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Fatih Atak
- Dermatology Department, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wiener AA, Schumacher JR, Racz JM, Weber SM, Xu YG, Neuman HB. Incidence of Second Primary Melanoma in Cutaneous Melanoma Survivors. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:5925-5932. [PMID: 35505144 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11725-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cutaneous melanoma survivors are at increased risk of a second primary melanoma. Valid estimates facilitate counseling on recommended surveillance after a melanoma diagnosis. However, most estimates of 5- and 10-year incidences of second melanomas are from older cohorts and/or single institutions. This study aimed to determine the 5- and 10-year incidences of second primary cutaneous melanomas in survivors of cutaneous melanoma. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify cases of non-metastatic, first cutaneous melanoma diagnosed between 1998 and 2012 (follow-up through December 2017). Eligible survivors were 18 years old or older who underwent surgery as a treatment component. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate 5- and 10-year incidences of a second melanoma, excluding new diagnoses within 3 months after the initial diagnosis. Patients were censored at second melanoma diagnosis, death, or 10-years, whichever was first. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with a second cutaneous melanoma diagnosis. RESULTS The study cohort comprised 152,811 patients. The incidence of second primary melanoma was 3.9% at 5 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-4.0%) and 6.7% at 10 years (95% CI, 6.6-6.9%). Older age, male sex, and regional disease were associated with increased risk of a second primary melanoma diagnosis. CONCLUSION Melanoma survivors are at risk of a second primary melanoma, making routine skin surveillance part of recommended follow-up evaluation. A higher incidence of second melanoma with older age and regional disease at presentation is possibly explained by increased health care use providing more diagnostic opportunities, whereas male sex may represent an inherent risk factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyssa A Wiener
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jessica R Schumacher
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jennifer M Racz
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sharon M Weber
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Yaohui G Xu
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Heather B Neuman
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Palacios-Diaz RD, de Unamuno-Bustos B, Abril-Pérez C, Pozuelo-Ruiz M, Sánchez-Arraez J, Torres-Navarro I, Botella-Estrada R. Multiple Primary Melanomas: Retrospective Review in a Tertiary Care Hospital. J Clin Med 2022; 11:2355. [PMID: 35566480 PMCID: PMC9105033 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple primary melanomas (MPM) refer to the occurrence of more than one synchronous or metachronous melanoma in the same individual. The aim of this study was to identify the frequency of MPM and describe the clinical and histopathologic characteristics of patients with MPM. An observational single-center retrospective study was designed based on a cohort of melanoma patients followed in a tertiary care hospital. Fifty-eight (8.9%) patients developed MPM. Most patients were men (65.5%) and the median age at the time of diagnosis of the first melanoma was 71 years old. The median time of diagnosis of the second melanoma from the first melanoma was 10.9 months, and 77.6% of second melanomas were diagnosed within the first 5 years. In total, 29 (50%) and 28 (48.3%) first and second melanomas were located in the trunk, respectively. Concordance of anatomic site between primary and subsequent melanoma was found in 46.6% of the patients. Proportion of in situ melanomas was increasingly higher in subsequent melanomas (from 36.21% of first melanomas to 100% of fifth melanomas). An increasing rate of melanomas with histological regression was observed within subsequent melanomas (from 60.3% of first melanomas to 80% of third melanomas). Our results support the importance of careful long-term follow-up with total body examination in melanoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodolfo David Palacios-Diaz
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (R.D.P.-D.); (C.A.-P.); (M.P.-R.); (J.S.-A.); (I.T.-N.); (R.B.-E.)
| | - Blanca de Unamuno-Bustos
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (R.D.P.-D.); (C.A.-P.); (M.P.-R.); (J.S.-A.); (I.T.-N.); (R.B.-E.)
| | - Carlos Abril-Pérez
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (R.D.P.-D.); (C.A.-P.); (M.P.-R.); (J.S.-A.); (I.T.-N.); (R.B.-E.)
| | - Mónica Pozuelo-Ruiz
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (R.D.P.-D.); (C.A.-P.); (M.P.-R.); (J.S.-A.); (I.T.-N.); (R.B.-E.)
| | - Javier Sánchez-Arraez
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (R.D.P.-D.); (C.A.-P.); (M.P.-R.); (J.S.-A.); (I.T.-N.); (R.B.-E.)
| | - Ignacio Torres-Navarro
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (R.D.P.-D.); (C.A.-P.); (M.P.-R.); (J.S.-A.); (I.T.-N.); (R.B.-E.)
| | - Rafael Botella-Estrada
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (R.D.P.-D.); (C.A.-P.); (M.P.-R.); (J.S.-A.); (I.T.-N.); (R.B.-E.)
- Department of Medicine, Universitat de València, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Takabe P, Siiskonen H, Rönkä A, Kainulainen K, Pasonen-Seppänen S. The Impact of Hyaluronan on Tumor Progression in Cutaneous Melanoma. Front Oncol 2022; 11:811434. [PMID: 35127523 PMCID: PMC8813769 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.811434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of cutaneous melanoma is rapidly increasing worldwide. Cutaneous melanoma is an aggressive type of skin cancer, which originates from malignant transformation of pigment producing melanocytes. The main risk factor for melanoma is ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and thus it often arises from highly sun-exposed skin areas and is characterized by a high mutational burden. In addition to melanoma-associated mutations such as BRAF, NRAS, PTEN and cell cycle regulators, the expansion of melanoma is affected by the extracellular matrix surrounding the tumor together with immune cells. In the early phases of the disease, hyaluronan is the major matrix component in cutaneous melanoma microenvironment. It is a high-molecular weight polysaccharide involved in several physiological and pathological processes. Hyaluronan is involved in the inflammatory reactions associated with UV radiation but its role in melanomagenesis is still unclear. Although abundant hyaluronan surrounds epidermal and dermal cells in normal skin and benign nevi, its content is further elevated in dysplastic lesions and local tumors. At this stage hyaluronan matrix may act as a protective barrier against melanoma progression, or alternatively against immune cell attack. While in advanced melanoma, the content of hyaluronan decreases due to altered synthesis and degradation, and this correlates with poor prognosis. This review focuses on hyaluronan matrix in cutaneous melanoma and how the changes in hyaluronan metabolism affect the progression of melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piia Takabe
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Hanna Siiskonen
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Aino Rönkä
- Department of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Kirsi Kainulainen
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Sanna Pasonen-Seppänen
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- *Correspondence: Sanna Pasonen-Seppänen,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li FW, Luo SK. Identification and Construction of a Predictive Immune-Related lncRNA Signature Model for Melanoma. Int J Gen Med 2021; 14:9227-9235. [PMID: 34880662 PMCID: PMC8647169 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s340025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The occurrence and development mechanisms of melanoma are related to immunity and lncRNAs. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically explore immune-related lncRNA profiles to help improve the prognosis of melanoma. Methods We integrated immune-related lncRNAs and the basic clinical information of melanoma patients in the TCGA dataset. Immune-associated lncRNAs were selected by differential expression screening and enriched for analysis. After univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, a new prognostic indicator based on immune-associated lncRNAs was established. Results Overall, differentially expressed immune-related lncRNAs were significantly associated with clinical outcomes in patients with melanoma. A prognostic model was then established based on 14 immune-associated lncRNAs (LRRC8C-DT, AC021188.1, MALINC1, CCR5AS, EIF2AK3-DT, AC022306.2, AC242842.1, AL034376.1, AL662844.4, AC009065.3, AC099811.3, AC125807.2, SPINT1-AS1 and AC009495.2). Melanoma patients in the high-risk group had worse overall survival than those in the low-risk group. The AUC of the risk score was 0.786. Conclusion This study identified several clinically significant immune-related lncRNAs and established a relevant prognostic model, which provided a molecular analysis of immunity in melanoma and potential prognostic lncRNAs for melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang-Wei Li
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, 510317, People's Republic of China
| | - Sheng-Kang Luo
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, 510317, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Guitera P, Menzies SW, Coates E, Azzi A, Fernandez-Penas P, Lilleyman A, Badcock C, Schmid H, Watts CG, Collgros H, Liu R, van Kemenade C, Mann GJ, Cust AE. Efficiency of Detecting New Primary Melanoma Among Individuals Treated in a High-risk Clinic for Skin Surveillance. JAMA Dermatol 2021; 157:521-530. [PMID: 33729464 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.5651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Importance A previous single-center study observed fewer excisions, lower health care costs, thinner melanomas, and better quality of life when surveillance of high-risk patients was conducted in a melanoma dermatology clinic with a structured surveillance protocol involving full-body examinations every 6 months aided by total-body photography (TBP) and sequential digital dermoscopy imaging (SDDI). Objective To examine longer-term sustainability and expansion of the surveillance program to numerous practices, including a primary care skin cancer clinic setting. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective cohort study recruited 593 participants assessed from 2012 to 2018 as having very high risk of melanoma, with a median of 2.9 years of follow-up (interquartile range, 1.9-3.3 years), from 4 melanoma high-risk clinics (3 dermatology clinics and 1 primary care skin cancer clinic) in New South Wales, Australia. Data analyses were conducted from February to September 2020. Exposures Six-month full-body examination with the aid of TBP and SDDI. For equivocal lesions, the clinician performed SDDI at 3 or 6 months. Main Outcomes and Measures All suspect monitored or excised lesions were recorded, and pathology reports obtained. Outcomes included the incidence and characteristics of new lesions and the association of diagnostic aids with rates of new melanoma detection. Results Among 593 participants, 340 (57.3%) were men, and the median age at baseline was 58 years (interquartile range, 47-66 years). There were 1513 lesions excised during follow-up, including 171 primary melanomas. The overall benign to malignant excision ratio, including keratinocyte carcinomas, was 0.8:1.0; the benign melanocytic to melanoma excision ratio was 2.4:1.0; and the melanoma in situ to invasive melanoma ratio was 2.2:1.0. The excision ratios were similar across the 4 centers. The risk of developing a new melanoma was 9.0% annually in the first 2 years and increased with time, particularly for those with multiple primary melanomas. The thicker melanomas (>1-mm Breslow thickness; 7 of 171 melanomas [4.1%]) were mostly desmoplastic or nodular (4 of 7), self-detected (2 of 7), or clinician detected without the aid of TBP (3 of 7). Overall, new melanomas were most likely to be detected by a clinician with the aid of TBP (54 of 171 [31.6%]) followed by digital dermoscopy monitoring (50 of 171 [29.2%]). Conclusions and Relevance The structured surveillance program for high-risk patients may be implemented at a larger scale given the present cohort study findings suggesting the sustainability and replication of results in numerous settings, including a primary care skin cancer clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascale Guitera
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Scott W Menzies
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Elliot Coates
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Anthony Azzi
- Newcastle Skin Check, Newcastle, Australia.,School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Pablo Fernandez-Penas
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Dermatology, Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alister Lilleyman
- Newcastle Skin Check, Newcastle, Australia.,School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Caro Badcock
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Helen Schmid
- Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Caroline G Watts
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Helena Collgros
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rose Liu
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Dermatology, Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Graham J Mann
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,The John Curtin School of Medical Research, ANU College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Anne E Cust
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Karapetyan L, Yang X, Wang H, Sander CA, Moyer A, Wilson M, Karunamurthy A, Kirkwood JM. Indoor tanning exposure in association with multiple primary melanoma. Cancer 2021; 127:560-568. [PMID: 33170961 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with primary cutaneous melanoma are at increased risk for subsequent new primary melanomas. Indoor tanning is a recognized risk factor for melanoma. This study was aimed at determining the association between indoor tanning and the occurrence of multiple primary melanoma. METHODS This was a retrospective case-control study of cases with multiple primary melanoma and sex-matched controls with single primary melanoma retrieved at a 1:2 ratio from the Biological Sample and Nevus Bank of the Melanoma Center of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between multiple primary melanoma and risk factors. RESULTS In total, 330 patients (39.1% men) with a median age of 51 years were enrolled. Compared with patients who had a single primary melanoma, patients with multiple melanomas were younger at the diagnosis of their first primary melanoma and were more likely to be discovered at stage 0 or I and to have had indoor tanning exposure, a family history of melanoma, atypical moles, dysplastic nevi, and a Breslow thickness less than 1 mm. Compared with patients' first melanomas, subsequent melanomas were more likely to be thinner or in situ. The estimated probability of the locus for the second primary being the same as that for the first primary melanoma was 34%. In a multivariate analysis after adjustments for age, a family history of melanoma, the presence of atypical and dysplastic nevi, and recreational sun exposure, indoor tanning remained significantly associated with the occurrence of multiple primary melanoma (odds ratio, 2.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-7.08; P = .0356). CONCLUSIONS Indoor tanning is associated with an increased risk of second primary melanoma. Subsequent melanomas are more likely to be thin or in situ and to occur in different anatomic locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilit Karapetyan
- Department of Medicine, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Xi Yang
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Hong Wang
- Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Cindy A Sander
- Department of Medicine, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ashley Moyer
- Department of Medicine, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Melissa Wilson
- Department of Medicine, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - John M Kirkwood
- Department of Medicine, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Please add expansion for AL. Melanoma is the most common fatal type of skin cancer and is an important and growing public health problem in the United States, Australia, New Zealand, and Europe. The mortality rate in most of the world has been rising as well, albeit slower than that for incidence. Likely due to the availability of new treatments for stage 4 melanoma, mortality rates in the United States dropped 18% from 2013 to 2016. We further describe trends in melanoma incidence and mortality, review the literature on risk factors, and provide an up-to-date assessment of population-wide screening and some of the inherent concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole L Bolick
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Kresge Building Room 718, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, East Carolina University/Vidant Medical Center, 600 Moye Boulevard, MA-350, Greenville, NC 27834, USA
| | - Alan C Geller
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Kresge Building, Room 718, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cust AE, Badcock C, Smith J, Thomas NE, Haydu LE, Armstrong BK, Law MH, Thompson JF, Kanetsky PA, Begg CB, Shi Y, Kricker A, Orlow I, Sharma A, Yoo S, Leong SF, Berwick M, Ollila DW, Lo S. A risk prediction model for the development of subsequent primary melanoma in a population-based cohort. Br J Dermatol 2020; 182:1148-1157. [PMID: 31520533 PMCID: PMC7069770 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.18524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines for follow-up of patients with melanoma are based on limited evidence. OBJECTIVES To guide skin surveillance, we developed a risk prediction model for subsequent primary melanomas, using demographic, phenotypical, histopathological, sun exposure and genomic risk factors. METHODS Using Cox regression frailty models, we analysed data for 2613 primary melanomas from 1266 patients recruited to the population-based Genes, Environment and Melanoma study in New South Wales, Australia, with a median of 14 years' follow-up via the cancer registry. Discrimination and calibration were assessed. RESULTS The median time to diagnosis of a subsequent primary melanoma decreased with each new primary melanoma. The final model included 12 risk factors. Harrell's C-statistic was 0·73 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·68-0·77], 0·65 (95% CI 0·62-0·68) and 0·65 (95% CI 0·61-0·69) for predicting second, third and fourth primary melanomas, respectively. The risk of a subsequent primary melanoma was 4·75 times higher (95% CI 3·87-5·82) for the highest vs. the lowest quintile of the risk score. The mean absolute risk of a subsequent primary melanoma within 5 years was 8·0 ± SD 4.1% after the first primary melanoma, and 46·8 ± 15·0% after the second, but varied substantially by risk score. CONCLUSIONS The risk of developing a subsequent primary melanoma varies considerably between individuals and is particularly high for those with two or more primary melanomas. The risk prediction model and its associated nomograms enable estimation of the absolute risk of subsequent primary melanoma, on the basis of on an individual's risk factors, and can be used to tailor surveillance intensity, communicate risk and provide patient education. What's already known about this topic? Current guidelines for the frequency and length of follow-up to detect new primary melanomas in patients with one or more previous primary melanomas are based on limited evidence. People with one or more primary melanomas have, on average, a higher risk of developing another primary invasive melanoma, compared with the general population, but an accurate way of estimating individual risk is needed. What does this study add? We provide a comprehensive risk prediction model for subsequent primary melanomas, using data from 1266 participants with melanoma (2613 primary melanomas), over a median 14 years' follow-up. The model includes 12 risk factors comprising demographic, phenotypical, histopathological and genomic factors, and sun exposure. It enables estimation of the absolute risk of subsequent primary melanomas, and can be used to tailor surveillance intensity, communicate individual risk and provide patient education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A E Cust
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - C Badcock
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - J Smith
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - N E Thomas
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S.A
- Department of Dermatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S.A
| | - L E Haydu
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, U.S.A
| | - B K Armstrong
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - M H Law
- Statistical Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - J F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - P A Kanetsky
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, U.S.A
| | - C B Begg
- Department of Dermatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S.A
| | - Y Shi
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, U.S.A
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, U.S.A
| | - A Kricker
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - I Orlow
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, U.S.A
| | - A Sharma
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, U.S.A
| | - S Yoo
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, U.S.A
| | - S F Leong
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, U.S.A
| | - M Berwick
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, U.S.A
| | - D W Ollila
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S.A
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S.A
| | - S Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Campos C, Fragoso S, Luís R, Pinto F, Brito C, Esteves S, Pataco M, Santos S, Machado P, Vicente JB, Costa Rosa J, Cavaco BM, Moura C, Pojo M. High-Throughput Sequencing Identifies 3 Novel Susceptibility Genes for Hereditary Melanoma. Genes (Basel) 2020; 11:genes11040403. [PMID: 32276436 PMCID: PMC7230562 DOI: 10.3390/genes11040403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma is one of the most aggressive human cancers due to its high invasiveness. Germline mutations in high-risk melanoma susceptibility genes have been associated with development hereditary melanoma; however, most genetic culprits remain elusive. To unravel novel susceptibility genes for hereditary melanoma, we performed whole exome sequencing (WES) on eight patients with multiple primary melanomas, high number of nevi, and negative for high and intermediate-risk germline mutations. Thirteen new potentially pathogenic variants were identified after bioinformatics analysis and validation. CDH23, ARHGEF40, and BRD9 were identified as the most promising susceptibility genes in hereditary melanoma. In silico analysis of CDH23 and ARHGEF40 variants provided clues for altered protein structure and function associated with the identified mutations. Then, we also evaluated the clinical value of CDH23, ARHGEF40, and BRD9 expression in sporadic melanoma by using the TCGA dataset (n = 461). No differences were observed in BRD9 expression between melanoma and normal skin samples, nor with melanoma stage, whereas ARHGEF40 was found overexpressed, and CDH23 was downregulated and its loss was associated with worse survival. Altogether, these results reveal three novel genes with clinical relevance in hereditary and sporadic melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catarina Campos
- Unidade de Investigação em Patobiologia Molecular (UIPM) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Sofia Fragoso
- Unidade de Investigação em Patobiologia Molecular (UIPM) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Rafael Luís
- Unidade de Investigação em Patobiologia Molecular (UIPM) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Filipe Pinto
- i3S-Institute for Research and Innovation in Health, University of Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- IPATIMUP—Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias s/n, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
| | - Cheila Brito
- Unidade de Investigação em Patobiologia Molecular (UIPM) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Susana Esteves
- Unidade de Investigação Clínica (UIC) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Margarida Pataco
- Unidade de Investigação em Patobiologia Molecular (UIPM) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Sidónia Santos
- Unidade de Investigação em Patobiologia Molecular (UIPM) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Patrícia Machado
- Unidade de Investigação em Patobiologia Molecular (UIPM) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - João B. Vicente
- Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Av. da República (EAN), 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
| | - Joaninha Costa Rosa
- Serviço de Anatomia Patológica do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
- NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campo dos Mártires da Pátria, 130, 1169-056 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Branca M. Cavaco
- Unidade de Investigação em Patobiologia Molecular (UIPM) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Cecília Moura
- Clínica de Risco Familiar do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
- Serviço de Dermatologia do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Marta Pojo
- Unidade de Investigação em Patobiologia Molecular (UIPM) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +351-21-722-9800 (ext. 1794)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
McMeniman EK, Duffy DL, Jagirdar K, Lee KJ, Peach E, McInerney-Leo AM, De'Ambrosis B, Rayner JE, Smithers BM, Soyer HP, Sturm RA. The interplay of sun damage and genetic risk in Australian multiple and single primary melanoma cases and controls. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:357-366. [PMID: 31794051 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.18777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Skin phenotype, host genotype and ultraviolet (UV) damage play a role in the development of melanoma. OBJECTIVES To ascertain whether the level of UV damage at the site of melanomas was associated with genetic polymorphisms. METHODS Deep phenotyping was performed on 1244 individuals; 281 with multiple primary melanomas (MPMs), 304 with single primary melanoma (SPM) and 659 convenience controls. Genotype data was generated using the Illumina CoreExome microarray platform, assaying over 500 000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. A subset of variants were combined to assess a polygenic risk score (PRS) for melanoma. RESULTS Most MPM cases were diagnosed in patients aged > 40 years, in sites with visible chronic UV damage. Women and those diagnosed at age ≤ 40 years were less likely to have perilesional UV damage. Patients with MPM had higher frequencies of MITF E318K, MC1R R-alleles and the ASIP risk haplotype. Individuals who had melanoma in a visibly UV-damaged site were more likely to carry MC1R rs75570604 [odds ratio (OR) 2·5], 9q31.2 rs10816595 (OR 1·4) and MTAP rs869329 (OR 1·4). These same alleles were more common in patients with MPM who were diagnosed at age ≤ 40 years. The mean PRS was significantly higher in MPM than in SPM and controls. Naevus count was comparable in early-onset MPM cases and those diagnosed at age > 40 years. CONCLUSIONS Our cohort demonstrated higher frequencies of previously reported alleles associated with melanoma. MPM melanomas more commonly occur in UV-damaged areas, and these individuals are more likely to carry MC1R red hair colour alleles. Awareness of the interplay of genetic vulnerability with UV damage can stratify risk and guide recommendations for melanoma screening. What's already known about this topic? Skin phenotype, host genotype and ultraviolet (UV) damage all play a role in melanoma development. One of the main risk factors is a personal history of melanoma; second and subsequent primary melanomas account for over 20% of all melanomas registered in Queensland. Multiple loci are associated with melanoma risk, including many low-penetrance loci, which may have a cumulatively significant risk. Population-wide screening programmes for melanoma are not yet economically viable. What does this study add? Patients diagnosed with melanoma at age ≤ 40 years were more likely than older patients to have melanomas in non-UV-damaged sites. Patients with multiple melanomas had higher frequencies of MITF E318K, MC1R R-alleles, and the ASIP extended risk haplotype than patients with single melanoma. CDKN2A, MC1R and MTAP variants were more frequent in patients who developed melanomas at a younger age, but also in those whose melanomas were all on visibly UV-damaged sites. What is the translational message? Incorporating these genetic findings into the known risk factors of skin phenotype and visible UV damage may allow for a more customized and economically feasible approach to early detection of melanoma, particularly in younger patients. Plain language summary available online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E K McMeniman
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Dermatology Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - D L Duffy
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - K Jagirdar
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - K J Lee
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - E Peach
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - A M McInerney-Leo
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - B De'Ambrosis
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Dermatology Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,South East Dermatology, Annerley Square, Annerley, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - J E Rayner
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - B M Smithers
- Queensland Melanoma Project, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - H P Soyer
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Dermatology Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - R A Sturm
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|