Assessment of Sex Disparities in Nonacceptance of Statin Therapy and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels Among Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk

Prevalence of Tendon Rupture and Tendinopathies Among Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Derived From United States Administrative Claims Data

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of tendon rupture and tendinopathies (TRT) has not been determined in a large population of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We investigated TRT prevalence among patients with ASCVD and in the general population, using data from the Symphony Health Integrated Dataverse, a large US medical and pharmacy claims database.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study included patients aged ≥ 19 years from the claims database during the identification period (January 2019 to December 2020) and 12 months of continuous enrollment. The primary outcome was evidence of TRT in the 12 months following the index date (first ASCVD diagnosis in the ASCVD cohort; first claim in the claims database in the overall population). Diagnostic codes (ICD-10 and/or CPT) were used to define ASCVD and TRT diagnosis.

RESULTS

The ASCVD cohort and overall population included 5,589,273 and 61,715,843 patients, respectively. In the ASCVD cohort, use of medications with a potential or known association with TRT was identified in 67.9% (statins), 17.7% (corticosteroids), and 16.7% (fluoroquinolones) of patients. Bempedoic acid use was reported in 1556 (< 0.1%) patients. TRT prevalence during 12-month follow-up was 3.4% (ASCVD cohort) and 1.9% (overall population). Among patients with ASCVD, 83.5% experienced TRT in only one region of the body. Factors most associated with TRT in the ASCVD cohort were increasing age, most notably in those aged 45-‍64 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.07-2.32), obesity (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.50-1.53), and rheumatoid arthritis (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.45-1.79). Use of statins or bempedoic acid was not associated with increased TRT risk.

CONCLUSION

Patients with ASCVD may have greater risk of TRT than the general population, which may be driven by an increased prevalence of comorbidities and use of medications with a potential or known association with TRT.

Achievement of LDL-C <55 mg/dL among US adults: Findings from the cvMOBIUS2 registry

BACKGROUND

Reflecting clinical trial data showing improved outcomes with lower LDL-C levels, guidelines across the globe are increasingly recommending a goal of LDL-C <55 mg/dL in persons with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). What proportion of patients with ASCVD are already meeting those goals in the US remains understudied.

METHODS

Using electronic health record data from 8 large US health systems, we evaluated lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), LDL-C levels, and factors associated with an LDL-C <55 mg/dL in persons with ASCVD treated between 1/1/2021-12/31/2021. Multivariable modeling was used to evaluate factors associated with achievement of an LDL-C <55 mg/dL.

RESULTS

Among 167,899 eligible patients, 22.6% (38,016) had an LDL-C <55 mg/dL. While 76.1% of individuals overall were on a statin, only 38.2% were on a high-intensity statin, 5.9% were on ezetimibe, and 1.7% were on a PCSK9i monoclonal antibody (mAb). Factors associated with lower likelihood of achieving an LDL-C <55 mg/dL included: younger age (odds ratio [OR] 0.91 per 10y), female sex (OR 0.69), Black race (OR 0.76), and noncoronary artery disease forms of ASCVD including peripheral artery disease (OR 0.72) and cerebrovascular disease (OR 0.85), while high-intensity statin use was associated with increased odds of LDL-C <55 mg/dL (OR 1.55). Combination therapy (statin+ezetimibe or statin+PCSK9i mAb) was rare (4.4% and 0.5%, respectively) and was associated with higher odds of an LDL-C <55 mg/dL (OR 1.39 and 3.13, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Less than a quarter of US patients with ASCVD in community practice are already achieving an LDL-C <55 mg/dL. Marked increases in utilization of both high intensity statins and combination therapy with non-statin therapy will be needed to achieve LDL-C levels <55 mg/dL at the population level in secondary prevention.

Closing the sex gap in cardiovascular mortality by achieving both horizontal and vertical equity

Addressing sex differences and disparities in coronary heart disease (CHD) involves achieving both horizontal and vertical equity in healthcare. Horizontal equity in the context of CHD means that both men and women with comparable health statuses should have equal access to diagnosis, treatment, and management of CHD. To achieve this, it is crucial to promote awareness among the general public about the signs and symptoms of CHD in both sexes, so that both women and men may seek timely medical attention. Women often face inequity in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Current guidelines do not differ based on sex, but their applications based on gender do differ. Vertical equity means tailoring healthcare to allow equitable care for all. Steps towards achieving this include developing treatment protocols and guidelines that consider the unique aspects of CHD in women. It also requires implementing guidelines equally, when there is not sex difference rather than inequities in application of guideline directed care.

Therapeutic inertia in treatment of older adults with type II diabetes at high risk for hypoglycemia

Patients 80 years or older with HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) treated with multiple daily insulin injections had low rates of rapid-acting insulin deprescription and initiation of diabetes medications with lower risk of hypoglycemia. Further investigation is needed to elucidate factors contributing to potentially inappropriately aggressive treatment of these patients.

Patient versus physician preferences for lipid-lowering drug therapy: A discrete choice experiment

BACKGROUND

The emergence of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors offered dyslipidemia patients an alternative to statins for lipid-lowering treatment. Understanding patient and physician preferences for lipid-lowering drugs may promote shared decision-making and improve treatment outcomes.

METHODS

This study utilized an online discrete choice experiment (DCE) to assess the relative importance (RI) of six attributes related to lipid-lowering drugs, including frequency of administration, mode of administration, reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, risk of myopathy, risk of liver damage, and out-of-pocket monthly cost. Respondents were recruited from dyslipidemia patients and cardiovascular physicians in China. A mixed logit model and latent class analysis were employed to estimate the preference coefficient, marginal willingness to pay (mWTP), and RI of attributes. Ethical approval has been obtained for this study.

RESULTS

A total of 708 patients and 507 physicians participated in the survey. Patients prioritized the 'risk of liver damage' (RI = 23.6%) with 'mode of administration' (RI = 19.2%) and 'frequency of administration' (RI = 18.8%) following closely. Contrarily, physicians prioritized the 'reduction of LDL-C level' (RI = 33.5%), followed by 'risk of liver damage' (RI = 26.0%) and 'risk of myopathy' (RI = 16.1%). Patients placed a higher value on 'frequency of administration' (p < .001) and 'mode of administration' (p < .001) compared to physicians, while physicians valued 'reduction of LDL-C level' (p < .001) and 'risk of myopathy' (p = .012) more than patients. Physicians exhibited higher mWTP than patients for all attributes except frequency and mode of administration. The LCA revealed three distinct patient classes: focus on oral administration, focus on hepatic safety and frequency and focus on hepatic safety and cost. Likewise, three physician classes were identified: frequency-insensitive, efficacy-focused and safety-focused.

CONCLUSIONS

The preferences for lipid-lowering drug therapy differed between patients and physicians in China. Physicians should take into account patients' preferences and provide personalized treatment when they formulate lipid-lowering treatment plans.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patients participated in the questionnaire design process. They engaged in a focus group discussion to determine attributes and levels and also participated in a pilot survey to assess the comprehensibility of the questionnaires. Additionally, patients were involved in the DCE survey to express their preferences. The findings of patient preference for lipid-lowering drug therapy will promote shared decision-making and optimize the treatment regimen.

Cardiovascular Imaging in Women

Multimodality cardiovascular imaging is a cornerstone diagnostic tool in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of cardiovascular diseases, whether those involving the coronary tree, myocardial, or pericardial diseases in general and particularly in women. This manuscript aims to shed some light and summarize the very features of cardiovascular disease in women, explore their unique characteristics and discuss the role of cardiovascular imaging in ischemic heart disease and cardiomyopathies. The role of four imaging modalities will be discussed including nuclear medicine, echocardiography, noninvasive coronary angiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance.

Influenza vaccination and use of lipid lowering therapies in adults with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: An analysis of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)

BACKGROUND

Influenza vaccination and lipid lowering therapy (LLT) are evidence-based interventions with substantial benefit for individuals with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, levels of influenza immunization and LLT use are low, possibly due to pervasive fear-based misinformation uniquely targeting vaccines and LLT. Whether being unvaccinated for influenza predicts lower utilization of LLT is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

We tested the hypothesis that American adults with ASCVD who are unvaccinated for influenza have lower use of LLT even after accounting for traditional factors associated with underuse of preventive therapies.

METHODS

We pooled 2017, 2019, and 2021 survey data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), and selected respondents aged 40 to 75 years with self-reported ASCVD. We used logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders to examine the association between influenza vaccination and self-reported LLT use. We performed a sensitivity analysis with multiple imputation to account for missing data. All analyses accounted for complex survey weighting.

RESULTS

Of 66,923 participants with ASCVD, 55% reported influenza vaccination in the last year and 76% reported using LLT. Being unvaccinated for influenza was associated with lower odds of LLT use (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.50, 0.58; P< .001). In a multivariable regression model adjusting for demographics and comorbidities, this association remained statistically significant (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.52, 0.64, P < .001). After additional adjustment for preventive care engagement, health care access, and use patterns of other cardiovascular medications this association persisted (aOR 0.66; 95% CI 0.60, 0.74; P < .001). There were no significant differences across subgroups, including those with and without hyperlipidemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Unvaccinated status for influenza was independently associated with 34% lower odds of LLT use among American adults with ASCVD after adjustment for traditional factors linked to underuse of preventive therapies. This finding identifies a population with excess modifiable ASCVD risk, and supports investigation into nontraditional mechanisms driving underuse of preventive therapies, including fear-based misinformation.

Differenze di genere e ipercolesterolemia: evidenze real-world dallo studio WECARE (Women Effective CArdiovascular Risk Evaluation)

Introduction:

The therapeutic control of LDL-cholesterol is essential in cardiovascular prevention, as recommended by the recent guidelines.

Objective:

To evaluate gender differences in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment pattern, treatment adherence and healthcare costs in patients on lipid-lowering therapy, stratified by cardiovascular risk in the Italian real clinical practice.

Methods:

An observational analysis was conducted on the administrative databases of healthcare institutions, covering about 6.1 million health-assisted subjects. After inclusion of all patients on lipid-lowering therapy between January 2017 and June 2020, the population was investigated in the period before the first prescription of a lipid-lowering drug and followed-up for at least 12 months. Clinical and demographic variables were compared after stratification by gender and by cardiovascular risk (very high/high/other risk). The main outcome measures were treatment adherence and direct healthcare costs during follow-up.

Results:

Of the 684,829 patients with high/very high cardiovascular risk, 337,394 were men and 347,435 women, aged on average 69.3 years and 72.1 years, respectively (p < 0.001). Men were characterised by a worse comorbidity profile. Regardless of cardiovascular risk, female subjects were associated with larger utilisation of low-potency statins and lower adherence (p < 0.001). The annual healthcare costs per patient during follow-up were higher in men than in women (p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

The results highlighted larger utilisation of low-potency statins, a lower adherence and a milder comorbidity profile in women, the latter feasibly explaining the reduced healthcare costs compared to men.

Clinical applications of polygenic risk score for coronary artery disease through the life course

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, highlighting the limitations of current primary and secondary prevention frameworks. In this review, we detail how the polygenic risk score for CAD can improve our current preventive and treatment frameworks across three clinical applications that span the life course: (i) identification and treatment of people at increased risk early in the life course prior to the onset of clinical risk factors, (ii) improving the precision around risk estimation in middle age, and (ii) guiding treatment decisions and enabling more efficient clinical trials even after the onset of CAD. We end by summarizing the efforts needed as we head towards more widespread use of polygenic risk score for CAD in clinical practice.

Impact of possible errors in natural language processing-derived data on downstream epidemiologic analysis

Objective

To assess the impact of potential errors in natural language processing (NLP) on the results of epidemiologic studies.

Materials and Methods

We utilized data from three outcomes research studies where the primary predictor variable was generated using NLP. For each of these studies, Monte Carlo simulations were applied to generate datasets simulating potential errors in NLP-derived variables. We subsequently fit the original regression models to these partially simulated datasets and compared the distribution of coefficient estimates to the original study results.

Results

Among the four models evaluated, the mean change in the point estimate of the relationship between the predictor variable and the outcome ranged from -21.9% to 4.12%. In three of the four models, significance of this relationship was not eliminated in a single of the 500 simulations, and in one model it was eliminated in 12% of simulations. Mean changes in the estimates for confounder variables ranged from 0.27% to 2.27% and significance of the relationship was eliminated between 0% and 9.25% of the time. No variables underwent a shift in the direction of its interpretation.

Discussion

Impact of simulated NLP errors on the results of epidemiologic studies was modest, with only small changes in effect estimates and no changes in the interpretation of the findings (direction and significance of association with the outcome) for either the NLP-generated variables or other variables in the models.

Conclusion

NLP errors are unlikely to affect the results of studies that use NLP as the source of data.

Addressing Cardiovascular Risk Across the Arc of a Woman's Life: Sex-Specific Prevention and Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in women in the United States of America. Despite this, women are underdiagnosed, less often receive preventive care, and are undertreated for CVD compared to men. There has been an increase in sex-specific risk factors and treatments over the past decade; however, sex-specific recommendations have not been included in the guidelines. We aim to highlight recent evidence behind the differential effect of traditional risk factors and underscore sex-specific risk factors with an intention to promote awareness, improve risk stratification, and early implementation of appropriate preventive therapies in women.

RECENT FINDINGS

Women are prescribed fewer antihypertensives and lipid-lowering agents and receive less cardiovascular care as compared to men. Additionally, pregnancy complications have been associated with increased cardiovascular mortality later in life. Findings from the ARIC study suggest that there is a perception of lower risk of cardiovascular disease in women. The SWEDEHEART study which investigated sex differences in treatment, noted a lower prescription of guideline-directed therapy in women. Women are less likely to be prescribed statin medications by their providers in both primary and secondary prevention as they are considered lower risk than men, while also being more likely to decline and discontinue treatment. A woman's abnormal response to pregnancy may serve as her first physiological stress test which can have implications on her future cardiovascular health. This was supported by the CHAMPs study noting a higher premature cardiovascular risk after maternal complications. Adverse pregnancy outcomes have been associated with a 1.5-4.0 fold increase in future cardiovascular events in multiple studies. In this review, we highlight the differences in traditional risk factors and their impact on women. Furthermore, we address the sex-specific risk factors and pregnancy-associated complications that increase the risk of CVD in women. Adherence to GDMT may have implications on overall mortality in women. An effort to improve early recognition of CVD risk with implementation of aggressive risk factor control and lifestyle modification should be emphasized. Future studies should specifically report on differences in outcomes between males and females. Increased awareness and knowledge on sex-specific risks and prevention are likely to lower the prevalence and improve outcomes of CVD in women.

Advanced Cardiac Imaging and Women's Chest Pain: A Question of Gender

Awareness of gender differences in cardiovascular disease (CVD) has increased: both the different impact of traditional cardiovascular risk factors on women and the existence of sex-specific risk factors have been demonstrated. Therefore, it is essential to recognize typical aspects of ischemic heart disease (IHD) in women, who usually show a lower prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) as a cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). It is also important to know how to recognize pathologies that can cause acute chest pain with a higher incidence in women, such as spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) and myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) gained a pivotal role in the context of cardiac emergencies. Thus, the aim of our review is to investigate the most frequent scenarios in women with acute chest pain and how advanced cardiac imaging can help in the management and diagnosis of ACS.

Disparities in Guideline-Recommended Statin Use for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease by Race, Ethnicity, and Gender : A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Analysis of Adults in the United States

BACKGROUND

Although statins are a class I recommendation for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and its complications, their use is suboptimal. Differential underuse may mediate disparities in cardiovascular health for systematically marginalized persons.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate disparities in statin use by race-ethnicity-gender and to determine whether these potential disparities are explained by medical appropriateness of therapy and structural factors.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis.

SETTING

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2015 to 2020.

PARTICIPANTS

Persons eligible for statin therapy based on 2013 and 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association blood cholesterol guidelines.

MEASUREMENTS

The independent variable was race-ethnicity-gender. The outcome of interest was use of a statin. Using the Institute of Medicine framework for examining unequal treatment, we calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) to estimate disparities in statin use adjusted for age, disease severity, access to health care, and socioeconomic status relative to non-Hispanic White men.

RESULTS

For primary prevention, we identified a lower prevalence of statin use that was not explained by measurable differences in disease severity or structural factors among non-Hispanic Black men (aPR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.88]) and non-Mexican Hispanic women (aPR, 0.74 [CI, 0.53 to 0.95]). For secondary prevention, we identified a lower prevalence of statin use that was not explained by measurable differences in disease severity or structural factors for non-Hispanic Black men (aPR, 0.81 [CI, 0.64 to 0.97]), other/multiracial men (aPR, 0.58 [CI, 0.20 to 0.97]), Mexican American women (aPR, 0.36 [CI, 0.10 to 0.61]), non-Mexican Hispanic women (aPR, 0.57 [CI, 0.33 to 0.82), non-Hispanic White women (aPR, 0.69 [CI, 0.56 to 0.83]), and non-Hispanic Black women (aPR, 0.75 [CI, 0.57 to 0.92]).

LIMITATION

Cross-sectional data; lack of geographic, language, or statin-dose data.

CONCLUSION

Statin use disparities for several race-ethnicity-gender groups are not explained by measurable differences in medical appropriateness of therapy, access to health care, and socioeconomic status. These residual disparities may be partially mediated by unobserved processes that contribute to health inequity, including bias, stereotyping, and mistrust.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institutes of Health.