Occupational Sitting Time, Leisure Physical Activity, and All-Cause and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality

Sitting less and moving more: the impact of physical activity on mortality in the population of Spain

BACKGROUND

Sitting time (ST) constitutes a significant aspect of sedentary behavior, and its worldwide escalation raises concerns regarding public health. International guidelines recommend limiting sedentary time and replacing it with physical activity (PA) to reduce the risk of diseases and mortality. This study examines the impact of replacing ST with PA on all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cancer mortality in a representative cohort of the population of Spain.

METHODS

We included 30 955 participants aged 15-69 years from two National Health Surveys performed in 2011 and 2017. Data were linked to mortality records as of December 2022. Data on ST, light PA (LPA), and moderate-vigorous PA (MVPA) were collected as part of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire at baseline. Isotemporal substitution analysis from Poisson regression models was used to estimate the relative risk ratio (RR) of replacing ST with LPA or MVPA.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 5.7 years, 957 deaths were reported. The replacement of 1 h per week of ST with 1 h per week of MVPA was significantly associated with a lower risk of all-cause (3.3%), CVD (6.7%), and cancer mortality (3.1%). Similarly, replacing 1 h per week of ST with 1 h per week of LPA was significantly associated with a lower risk of all-cause (1.6%) and cancer mortality (2.1%). Finally, substituting 1 h per week of LPA with 1 h per week of MVPA was significantly associated with a 7.6% lower risk of CVD mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Substituting one hour per week of ST with an equivalent amount of PA was associated with a lower risk of all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality.

Excessive occupational sitting increases risk of cardiovascular events among working individuals with type 1 diabetes in the prospective Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study

BACKGROUND

Sedentary behavior, such as excessive sitting, increases risk of cardiovascular disease and premature mortality in the general population, but this has not been assessed in type 1 diabetes. Occupational sitting is increasingly ubiquitous and often constitutes the largest portion of daily sitting time. Our aim was to identify clinical factors associated with excessive occupational sitting in type 1 diabetes and, in a prospective setting, to explore its association with cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality, independent of leisure-time physical activity.

METHODS

An observational follow-up study of 1,704 individuals (mean age 38.9 ± 10.1 years) from the Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study. Excessive occupational sitting, defined as ≥ 6 h of daily workplace sitting, was assessed using a validated self-report questionnaire. Data on cardiovascular events and mortality were retrieved from national registries. Multivariable logistic regression identified independently associated factors, while Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used for prospective analyses.

RESULTS

Factors independently and positively associated with excessive occupational sitting included a high occupational category [OR 6.53, 95% CI (4.09‒10.40)] and older age [1.02 (1.00‒1.03)], whereas negatively associated factors included current smoking [0.68 (0.50‒0.92)], moderate albuminuria [0.55 (0.38‒0.80)], and high leisure-time physical activity [0.52 (0.36‒0.74)]. During a median follow-up of 12.5 (6.5-16.4) years, 163 individuals (9.6%) suffered cardiovascular events, and during a median follow-up of 13.7 (9.4-16.6) years, 108 (6.3%) deaths occurred. Excessive occupational sitting increased cardiovascular event risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1.55 [95% CI 1.10‒2.18]) after adjustment for confounders and other covariates. Furthermore, in a stratified multivariable analysis among current smokers, excessive occupational sitting increased the risk of all-cause mortality (2.06 [1.02‒4.20]).

CONCLUSIONS

Excessive occupational sitting is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in individuals with type 1 diabetes. This association persists regardless of leisure-time physical activity, after adjusting for independently associated variables identified in our cross-sectional analyses. These findings underscore the need to update physical activity guidelines to better address sedentary behavior and improve outcomes for individuals with type 1 diabetes. Targeting occupational sitting should be considered a key focus for interventions aimed at reducing overall sedentary time.

Does sedentary time and physical activity predict chronic back pain and morphological brain changes? A UK biobank cohort study in 33,402 participants

BACKGROUND

The relationship between sedentary time, physical activity, and chronic back pain remains unclear. The study aims to investigate whether sedentary time and physical activity predict chronic back pain and morphological brain changes.

METHODS

This cohort study recruited adults aged 37-73 years enrolled between 2006 and 2010, with follow-up until 2014. The total cohort comprised 33,402 participants (mean age: 54.53). Data were collected on daily sedentary time, physical activity, lifestyle factors, and health outcomes.

RESULTS

After nearly 8-year follow-up, 3,006 individuals (9.00%) reported chronic back pain in total. Individuals with daily sedentary time exceeding 6 h had a 33% higher risk of chronic back pain compared to those with sedentary time of 2 h or less (RR, 1.33, 95%CI, 1.17-1.52). Sedentary time was also associated with decreased grey matter volume in several brain regions, including bilateral primary somatosensory cortex (S1), secondary somatosensory cortex, putamen, primary motor cortex (M1), insula, hippocampus, amygdala, as well as right supplementary motor area, left medial frontal cortex, and right anterior cingulate cortex (FDR-corrected p-value < 0.05). Compared to individuals who sat for more than 6 h with light physical activity, those engaging in moderate physical activity with sedentary time of 2 h or less (RR, 0.71, 95%CI, 0.52-0.99) exhibited a significant decrease in chronic back pain risk. In addition, replacing sedentary time with equivalent amount of physical activity also demonstrated a reduction in the risk of chronic back pain (RR, 0.87, 95%CI, 0.77-0.99) and increased the reginal grey matter volumes including the amygdala, insula, M1, putamen and S1.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged sedentary time is associated with heightened risks of chronic back pain and deterioration in brain health.

Assessment of cardiovascular risk and physical activity: the role of cardiac-specific biomarkers in the general population and athletes

The first part of this Inter-Society Document describes the mechanisms involved in the development of cardiovascular diseases, particularly arterial hypertension, in adults and the elderly. It will also examine how consistent physical exercise during adolescence and adulthood can help maintain blood pressure levels and prevent progression to symptomatic heart failure. The discussion will include experimental and clinical evidence on the use of specific exercise programs for preventing and controlling cardiovascular diseases in adults and the elderly. In the second part, the clinical relevance of cardiac-specific biomarkers in assessing cardiovascular risk in the general adult population will be examined, with a focus on individuals engaged in sports activities. This section will review recent studies that suggest a significant role of biomarkers in assessing cardiovascular risk, particularly the presence of cardiac damage, in athletes who participate in high-intensity sports. Finally, the document will discuss the potential of using cardiac-specific biomarkers to monitor the effectiveness of personalized physical activity programs (Adapted Physical Activity, APA). These programs are prescribed for specific situations, such as chronic diseases or physical disabilities, including cardiovascular diseases. The purposes of this Inter-Society Document are the following: 1) to discuss the close pathophysiological relationship between physical activity levels (ranging from sedentary behavior to competitive sports), age categories (from adolescence to elderly age), and the development of cardiovascular diseases; 2) to review in detail the experimental and clinical evidences supporting the role of cardiac biomarkers in identifying athletes and individuals of general population at higher cardiovascular risk; 3) to stimulate scientific societies and organizations to develop specific multicenter studies that may take into account the role of cardiac biomarkers in subjects who follow specific exercise programs in order to monitor their cardiovascular risk.

Incidence of new-onset hypertension before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a 7-year longitudinal cohort study in a large population

BACKGROUND

While the augmented incidence of diabetes after COVID-19 has been widely confirmed, controversial results are available on the risk of developing hypertension during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We designed a longitudinal cohort study to analyze a closed cohort followed up over a 7-year period, i.e., 3 years before and 3 years during the COVID-19 pandemic, and during 2023, when the pandemic was declared to be over. We analyzed medical records of more than 200,000 adults obtained from a cooperative of primary physicians from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2023. The main outcome was the new diagnosis of hypertension.

RESULTS

We evaluated 202,163 individuals in the pre-pandemic years and 190,743 in the pandemic years, totaling 206,857 when including 2023 data. The incidence rate of new hypertension was 2.11 (95% C.I. 2.08-2.15) per 100 person-years in the years 2017-2019, increasing to 5.20 (95% C.I. 5.14-5.26) in the period 2020-2022 (RR = 2.46), and to 6.76 (95% C.I. 6.64-6.88) in 2023. The marked difference in trends between the first and the two successive observation periods was substantiated by the fitted regression lines of two Poisson models conducted on the monthly log-incidence of hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

We detected a significant increase in new-onset hypertension during the COVID-19 pandemic, which at the end of the observation period affected ~ 20% of the studied cohort, a percentage higher than the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection within the same time frame. This observation suggests that increased attention to hypertension screening should not be limited to individuals who are aware of having contracted the infection but should be extended to the entire population.