1
|
Fabi A, Cortesi L, Duranti S, Cordisco EL, Di Leone A, Terribile D, Paris I, de Belvis AG, Orlandi A, Marazzi F, Muratore M, Garganese G, Fuso P, Paoletti F, Dell'Aquila R, Minucci A, Scambia G, Franceschini G, Masetti R, Genuardi M. Multigenic panels in breast cancer: Clinical utility and management of patients with pathogenic variants other than BRCA1/2. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 201:104431. [PMID: 38977141 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Multigene panels can analyze high and moderate/intermediate penetrance genes that predispose to breast cancer (BC), providing an opportunity to identify at-risk individuals within affected families. However, considering the complexity of different pathogenic variants and correlated clinical manifestations, a multidisciplinary team is needed to effectively manage BC. A classification of pathogenic variants included in multigene panels was presented in this narrative review to evaluate their clinical utility in BC. Clinical management was discussed for each category and focused on BC, including available evidence regarding the multidisciplinary and integrated management of patients with BC. The integration of both genetic testing and counseling is required for customized decisions in therapeutic strategies and preventative initiatives, as well as for a defined multidisciplinary approach, considering the continuous evolution of guidelines and research in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Fabi
- Precision Medicine Unit in Senology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Modena Hospital University, Modena Italy (Cortesi)
| | - Simona Duranti
- Scientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Emanuela Lucci Cordisco
- Section of Genomic Medicine, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Medical Genetics Unit, Department of Laboratory and Infectious Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alba Di Leone
- Breast Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Terribile
- Breast Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ida Paris
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Giulio de Belvis
- Value Lab, Faculty of Economics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Critical Pathways and Outcomes Evaluation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Armando Orlandi
- Unit of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Marazzi
- UOC Oncological Radiotherapy, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiation Oncology and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Margherita Muratore
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori"
| | - Giorgia Garganese
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Fuso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Filippo Paoletti
- Critical Pathways and Outcomes Evaluation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Rossella Dell'Aquila
- Critical Pathways and Outcomes Evaluation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Minucci
- Genomics Core Facility, Gemelli Science and Technology Park (GSTeP), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Franceschini
- Breast Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Masetti
- Breast Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Genuardi
- Section of Genomic Medicine, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Medical Genetics Unit, Department of Laboratory and Infectious Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang Y, Gao F, Ren L, Ren N, Pan J, Xu Q. Functions and mechanisms of RNA m 6A regulators in breast cancer (Review). Int J Oncol 2024; 65:86. [PMID: 39054967 PMCID: PMC11299767 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2024.5674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is a major malignant tumor in females and the incidence rate of BC has increased worldwide in recent years. N6‑methyladenosine (m6A) is a methylation modification that occurs extensively in eukaryotic RNA. The abnormal expression of m6A and related regulatory proteins can activate or inhibit certain signal pathways or oncogenes, thus affecting the proliferation, metastasis and prognosis of BC. Numerous studies have shown that m6A regulator disorder exists in BC, and this disorder can be reversed. Therefore, m6A is predicted as a potential therapeutic target for BC. However, the molecular mechanism of m6A RNA methylation regulating the occurrence and development of BC has not been comprehensively elucidated. In this review article, the functions of various m6A regulators and the specific mechanisms of certain regulators of the progress of BC were summarized. Furthermore, the dual role of RNA methylation in tumor progression was discussed, concluding that RNA methylation can not only lead to tumorigenesis but at times give rise to inhibition of tumor formation. In addition, further comprehensive analysis on mechanisms of m6A regulators in BC is conducive to screening effective potential targets and formulating targeted treatment strategies, which will provide new methods for the prevention and treatment of BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yibei Yang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Key Laboratory of Clinical Cancer Pharmacology and Toxicology Research of Zhejiang Province, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Cancer Center, Westlake University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310006, P.R. China
- Fourth Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310051, P.R. China
| | - Feng Gao
- Department of Urology, Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310000, P.R. China
| | - Lanqi Ren
- Fourth Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310051, P.R. China
| | - Ning Ren
- Fourth Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310051, P.R. China
| | - Junjie Pan
- Fourth Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310051, P.R. China
| | - Qiaoping Xu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Key Laboratory of Clinical Cancer Pharmacology and Toxicology Research of Zhejiang Province, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Cancer Center, Westlake University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310006, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Qiu L, Li R, Wang Y, Lu Z, Tu Z, Liu H. PTEN inhibition enhances sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor by suppressing the MRE11-RAD50-NBN complex. Br J Cancer 2024; 131:577-588. [PMID: 38866962 PMCID: PMC11300449 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02749-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) can effectively treat ovarian cancer patients with defective homologous recombination (HR). Loss or dysfunction of PTEN, a typical tumour suppressor, impairs double-strand break (DSB) repair. Hence, we explored the possibility of inhibiting PTEN to induce HR deficiency (HRD) for PARPi application. METHODS Functional studies using PTEN inhibitor VO-OHpic and PARPi olaparib were performed to explore the molecular mechanisms in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS In this study, the combination of VO-OHpic with olaparib exhibited synergistic inhibitory effects on ovarian cancer cells was demonstrated. Furthermore, VO-OHpic was shown to enhance DSBs by reducing nuclear expression of PTEN and inhibiting HR repair through the modulation of MRE11-RAD50-NBN (MRN) complex, critical for DSB repair. TCGA and GTEx analysis revealed a strong correlation between PTEN and MRN in ovarian cancer. Mechanistic studies indicated that VO-OHpic reduced expression of MRN, likely by decreasing PTEN/E2F1-mediated transcription. Moreover, PTEN-knockdown inhibited expression of MRN, increased sensitivities to olaparib, and induced DSBs. In vivo experiments showed that the combination of VO-OHpic with olaparib exhibited enhanced inhibitory effects on tumour growth. CONCLUSIONS Collectively, this study highlights the potential of PTEN inhibitors in combination therapy with PARPis to create HRD for HRD-negative ovarian cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lipeng Qiu
- School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ruyan Li
- School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, Jiangsu, China
- School of Health Medicine, Nantong Institute of Technology, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yue Wang
- School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ziwen Lu
- School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, Jiangsu, China
| | - Zhigang Tu
- School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, Jiangsu, China.
| | - Hanqing Liu
- School of Pharmacy, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moss E, Taylor A, Andreou A, Ang C, Arora R, Attygalle A, Banerjee S, Bowen R, Buckley L, Burbos N, Coleridge S, Edmondson R, El-Bahrawy M, Fotopoulou C, Frost J, Ganesan R, George A, Hanna L, Kaur B, Manchanda R, Maxwell H, Michael A, Miles T, Newton C, Nicum S, Ratnavelu N, Ryan N, Sundar S, Vroobel K, Walther A, Wong J, Morrison J. British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS) ovarian, tubal and primary peritoneal cancer guidelines: Recommendations for practice update 2024. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 300:69-123. [PMID: 39002401 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Moss
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| | | | - Adrian Andreou
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - Christine Ang
- Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Gateshead, UK
| | - Rupali Arora
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University College London NHS Trust, 60 Whitfield Street, London W1T 4E, UK
| | | | | | - Rebecca Bowen
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - Lynn Buckley
- Beverley Counselling & Psychotherapy, 114 Holme Church Lane, Beverley, East Yorkshire HU17 0PY, UK
| | - Nikos Burbos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK
| | | | - Richard Edmondson
- Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester and University of Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Mona El-Bahrawy
- Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK
| | | | - Jonathan Frost
- Gynaecological Oncology, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath, Bath BA1 3NG, UK; University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Raji Ganesan
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK
| | | | - Louise Hanna
- Department of Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Whitchurch, Cardiff CF14 2TL, UK
| | - Baljeet Kaur
- North West London Pathology (NWLP), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London and Barts Health NHS Trust, UK
| | - Hillary Maxwell
- Dorset County Hospital, Williams Avenue, Dorchester, Dorset DT1 2JY, UK
| | - Agnieszka Michael
- Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford GU2 7XX and University of Surrey, School of Biosciences, GU2 7WG, UK
| | - Tracey Miles
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - Claire Newton
- Gynaecology Oncology Department, St Michael's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS1 3NU, UK
| | - Shibani Nicum
- Department of Oncology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | | | - Neil Ryan
- The Centre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Regeneration and Repair (IRR), 4-5 Little France Drive, Edinburgh BioQuarter City, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK
| | - Sudha Sundar
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham and Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK
| | - Katherine Vroobel
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Marsden Foundation NHS Trust, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Axel Walther
- Bristol Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Jason Wong
- Department of Histopathology, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich Hospital, Heath Road, Ipswich IP4 5PD, UK
| | - Jo Morrison
- University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, GRACE Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton TA1 5DA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Silverstein J, Wright F, Stanfield D, Chien AJ, Wong JM, Park JW, Blanco A, Van Loon K, Atreya CE. Synchronous or metachronous breast and colorectal cancers in younger-than-average-age patients: a case series. Oncologist 2024:oyae114. [PMID: 38856325 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of breast and colorectal cancer (CRC) in younger-than-average-age patients is rising and poorly understood. This is the largest study on patients with both cancers who are less than 60 years old and aims to characterize demographic, clinicopathologic, and genetic features and describe therapeutic dilemmas and management strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective medical records review of patients at the University of California San Francisco with both primary breast and CRC before age 60. RESULTS Fifty-one patients were identified; 41 had detailed medical records. Median age of diagnosis with breast cancer was 43 (range 27-59) and CRC was 50 (28-59). Most were Caucasian (38, 74.5%) and never smokers (23, 56.1%); about half were current alcohol consumers (20, 48.8%) and about one-third had sedentary jobs (14, 34.1%). Average BMI was 25.8 (range: 14-49), and 30% were overweight or obese. Breast was the first cancer diagnosed in 36 patients (70.6%) and 44 (86.3%) had a metachronous CRC diagnosis. Breast cancer was early stage (0-2) in 32 (78.0%) patients whereas CRC was split between early stage (1-2) in 14 (34.1%) and later stage (3-4) in 19 (46.2%). Ten patients (24.3%) had a known germline mutation, although 23 (56.1%) had a family history of cancer in a first-degree relative. CONCLUSION Younger patients with both breast and CRC are a unique cohort, often without known risk factors. Alcohol consumption and sedentary jobs were the most common risk factors, and about one-quarter had a known genetic predisposition. Comanagement of both cancers requires individualized, multidisciplinary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordyn Silverstein
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
| | - Francis Wright
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
| | - Dalila Stanfield
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
| | - Amy Jo Chien
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
| | - Jasmine M Wong
- Department of Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
| | - John W Park
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
| | - Amie Blanco
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, UCSF, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
| | - Katherine Van Loon
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
| | - Chloe E Atreya
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Murugasamy S, Appaji L, Kumar A, Kumar N, Kaushik PS, Reddy M, Ravichandran N, Rupakumar T, Thumallapalli A, Aruna Kumari BS. Tale of a synchronous primary malignancy of brain and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in a child. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2024; 71:e30895. [PMID: 38265227 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sathya Murugasamy
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Lingegowda Appaji
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Arun Kumar
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Nuthan Kumar
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Prakruthi S Kaushik
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Mohana Reddy
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Nikila Ravichandran
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Thirumala Rupakumar
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Avinash Thumallapalli
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Bangegadde S Aruna Kumari
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alonso N, Menao S, Lastra R, Arruebo M, Bueso MP, Pérez E, Murillo ML, Álvarez M, Alonso A, Rebollar S, Cruellas M, Arribas D, Ramos M, Isla D, Galano-Frutos JJ, García-Cebollada H, Sancho J, Andrés R. Association between missense variants of uncertain significance in the CHEK2 gene and hereditary breast cancer: a cosegregation and bioinformatics analysis. Front Genet 2024; 14:1274108. [PMID: 38476463 PMCID: PMC10927753 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1274108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Inherited mutations in the CHEK2 gene have been associated with an increased lifetime risk of developing breast cancer (BC). We aim to identify in the study population the prevalence of mutations in the CHEK2 gene in diagnosed BC patients, evaluate the phenotypic characteristics of the tumor and family history, and predict the deleteriousness of the variants of uncertain significance (VUS). A genetic study was performed, from May 2016 to April 2020, in 396 patients diagnosed with BC at the University Hospital Lozano Blesa of Zaragoza, Spain. Patients with a genetic variant in the CHEK2 gene were selected for the study. We performed a descriptive analysis of the clinical variables, a bibliographic review of the variants, and a cosegregation study when possible. Moreover, an in-depth bioinformatics analysis of CHEK2 VUS was carried out. We identified nine genetic variants in the CHEK2 gene in 10 patients (two pathogenic variants and seven VUS). This supposes a prevalence of 0.75% and 1.77%, respectively. In all cases, there was a family history of BC in first- and/or second-degree relatives. We carried out a cosegregation study in two families, being positive in one of them. The bioinformatics analyses predicted the pathogenicity of six of the VUS. In conclusion, CHEK2 mutations have been associated with an increased risk for BC. This risk is well-established for foundation variants. However, the risk assessment for other variants is unclear. The incorporation of bioinformatics analysis provided supporting evidence of the pathogenicity of VUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Alonso
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital San Pedro, Logroño, Spain
| | - Sebastián Menao
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Biochemistry Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Rodrigo Lastra
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - María Arruebo
- Biochemistry Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - María P. Bueso
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Esther Pérez
- Breast Unit, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - M. Laura Murillo
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - María Álvarez
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Alba Alonso
- Biochemistry Department, University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
| | - Soraya Rebollar
- Biochemistry Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Mara Cruellas
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Valld’Hebron, and Valld’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Dolores Arribas
- General Surgery Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Mónica Ramos
- Biochemistry Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Dolores Isla
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Juan José Galano-Frutos
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular and Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
- Biocomputation and Complex Systems Physics Institute (BIFI), Joint Units BIFI-IQFR (CSIC) and GBs-CSIC, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Helena García-Cebollada
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular and Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
- Biocomputation and Complex Systems Physics Institute (BIFI), Joint Units BIFI-IQFR (CSIC) and GBs-CSIC, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Javier Sancho
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular and Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
- Biocomputation and Complex Systems Physics Institute (BIFI), Joint Units BIFI-IQFR (CSIC) and GBs-CSIC, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Raquel Andrés
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barili V, Ambrosini E, Bortesi B, Minari R, De Sensi E, Cannizzaro IR, Taiani A, Michiara M, Sikokis A, Boggiani D, Tommasi C, Serra O, Bonatti F, Adorni A, Luberto A, Caggiati P, Martorana D, Uliana V, Percesepe A, Musolino A, Pellegrino B. Genetic Basis of Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Approaches and Lessons Learnt from Three Decades of Inherited Predisposition Testing. Genes (Basel) 2024; 15:219. [PMID: 38397209 PMCID: PMC10888198 DOI: 10.3390/genes15020219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Germline variants occurring in BRCA1 and BRCA2 give rise to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome, predisposing to breast, ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers marked by elevated incidences of genomic aberrations that correspond to poor prognoses. These genes are in fact involved in genetic integrity, particularly in the process of homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair, a high-fidelity repair system for mending DNA double-strand breaks. In addition to its implication in HBOC pathogenesis, the impairment of HR has become a prime target for therapeutic intervention utilizing poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. In the present review, we introduce the molecular roles of HR orchestrated by BRCA1 and BRCA2 within the framework of sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. We examine the genetic architecture underneath breast and ovarian cancer ranging from high- and mid- to low-penetrant predisposing genes and taking into account both germline and somatic variations. Finally, we consider higher levels of complexity of the genomic landscape such as polygenic risk scores and other approaches aiming to optimize therapeutic and preventive strategies for breast and ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Barili
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Enrico Ambrosini
- Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Beatrice Bortesi
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Roberta Minari
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Erika De Sensi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | | | - Antonietta Taiani
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Maria Michiara
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Angelica Sikokis
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Daniela Boggiani
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Chiara Tommasi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Olga Serra
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Francesco Bonatti
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Alessia Adorni
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Anita Luberto
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | | | - Davide Martorana
- Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Vera Uliana
- Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Antonio Percesepe
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Antonino Musolino
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Benedetta Pellegrino
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Keske A, Weisman P, Ospina-Romero M, Raut P, Smith-Simmer K, Zakas AL, Flynn C, Xu J. Breast cancers in monoallelic MUTYH germline mutation carriers have clinicopathological features overlapping with those in BRCA1 germline mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 204:151-158. [PMID: 38062336 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07173-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast cancer patients referred to genetic counseling often undergo genetic testing with broad panels that include both breast cancer susceptibility genes as well as genes more specific for extramammary sites. As a result, patients are often incidentally found to have germline mutations in genes that are not necessarily related to breast cancer risk. One such gene is MUTYH. To understand the role MUTYH may play in breast cancer, the clinicopathological features of patients with monoallelic MUTYH germline mutation and breast cancer were examined. METHODS The clinicopathological characteristics of the breast cancers from patients with monoallelic MUTYH mutation were compared to breast cancer patients with other germline mutations in known breast cancer susceptibility genes, including ATM, BRCA1/2, CHEK2, and PALB2. The breast cancer patients who received genetic counseling but tested negative for the aforementioned gene mutations were used as a control group. RESULTS Histologic characteristics of the breast cancers arising in monoallelic MUTYH mutation carriers had significantly larger tumor size, higher tumor grade, and more high-risk biomarker profiles (i.e., Her2-positive and triple-negative) than breast cancer patients with susceptibility genes, except for BRCA1. MUTYH mutation carriers also showed a trend of more frequent intratumoral divergency in terms of tumor grade and biomarker profiles. CONCLUSION Although germline monoallelic MUTYH mutation is not thought to confer a meaningfully increased risk of breast cancer development, it may contribute to pathological aggressiveness and diversity of breast cancers when they sporadically arise in MUTYH carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aysenur Keske
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
| | - Paul Weisman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Monica Ospina-Romero
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Prachi Raut
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Kelcy Smith-Simmer
- Master of Genetic Counselor Studies, Academic Affairs, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
- Oncology Genetics, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, UW Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Anna L Zakas
- Master of Genetic Counselor Studies, Academic Affairs, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
- Oncology Genetics, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, UW Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Christopher Flynn
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jin Xu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tuncer SB, Celik B, Erciyas SK, Erdogan OS, Gültaslar BK, Odemis DA, Avsar M, Sen F, Saip PM, Yazici H. Germline mutational variants of Turkish ovarian cancer patients suspected of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) by next-generation sequencing. Pathol Res Pract 2024; 254:155075. [PMID: 38219492 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2023.155075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) syndrome is characterized by an increased risk of developing breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) due to inherited genetic mutations. Understanding the genetic variants associated with HBOC is crucial for identifying individuals at high risk and implementing appropriate preventive measures. The study included 630 Turkish OC patients with confirmed diagnostic criteria of The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) concerning HBOC. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples, and targeted Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed. Bioinformatics analysis and variant interpretation were conducted to identify pathogenic variants (PVs). Our analysis revealed a spectrum of germline pathogenic variants associated with HBOC in Turkish OC patients. Notably, several pathogenic variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, and other DNA repair genes were identified. Specifically, we observed germline PVs in 130 individuals, accounting for 20.63% of the total cohort. 76 distinct PVs in genes, BRCA1 (40 PVs), BRCA2 (29 PVs), ATM (1 PV), CHEK2 (2 PVs), ERCC2 (1 PV), MUTYH (1 PV), RAD51C (1 PV), and TP53 (1PV) and also, two different PVs (i.e., c.135-2 A>G p.? in BRCA1 and c.6466_6469delTCTC in BRCA2) were detected in a 34-year-old OC patient. In conclusion, our study contributes to a better understanding of the genetic variants underlying HBOC in Turkish OC patients. These findings provide valuable insights into the genetic architecture of HBOC in the Turkish population and shed light on the potential contribution of specific germline PVs to the increased risk of OC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seref Bugra Tuncer
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
| | - Betul Celik
- Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Department of Molecular Biology, Erzincan, Türkiye
| | - Seda Kilic Erciyas
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Ozge Sukruoglu Erdogan
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Busra Kurt Gültaslar
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Demet Akdeniz Odemis
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Mukaddes Avsar
- Health Services Vocational of Higher Education, T.C. Istanbul Aydın University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Fatma Sen
- Clinic of Medical Oncology, Avrasya Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Pınar Mualla Saip
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Hulya Yazici
- Istanbul Arel University, Arel Medical Faculty, Department of Medical Biology and Genetics, Istanbul, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schwartz CJ, Khorsandi N, Blanco A, Mukhtar RA, Chen YY, Krings G. Clinicopathologic and genetic analysis of invasive breast carcinomas in women with germline CHEK2 variants. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 204:171-179. [PMID: 38091153 PMCID: PMC10806021 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07176-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Germline pathogenic variants in checkpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2) are associated with a moderately increased risk of breast cancer (BC). The spectrum of clinicopathologic features and genetics of these tumors has not been fully established. METHODS We characterized the histopathologic and clinicopathologic features of 44 CHEK2-associated BCs from 35 women, and assessed responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A subset of cases (n = 23) was additionally analyzed using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS). RESULTS Most (94%, 33/35) patients were heterozygous carriers for germline CHEK2 variants, and 40% had the c.1100delC allele. Two patients were homozygous, and five had additional germline pathogenic variants in ATM (2), PALB2 (1), RAD50 (1), or MUTYH (1). CHEK2-associated BCs occurred in younger women (median age 45 years, range 25-75) and were often multifocal (20%) or bilateral (11%). Most (86%, 38/44) were invasive ductal carcinomas of no special type (IDC-NST). Almost all (95%, 41/43) BCs were ER + (79% ER + HER2-, 16% ER + HER2 + , 5% ER-HER2 +), and most (69%) were luminal B. Nottingham grade, proliferation index, and results of multiparametric molecular testing were heterogeneous. Biallelic CHEK2 alteration with loss of heterozygosity was identified in most BCs (57%, 13/23) by NGS. Additional recurrent alterations included GATA3 (26%), PIK3CA (226%), CCND1 (22%), FGFR1 (22%), ERBB2 (17%), ZNF703 (17%), TP53 (9%), and PPM1D (9%), among others. Responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were variable, but few patients (21%, 3/14) achieved pathologic complete response. Most patients (85%) were without evidence of disease at time of study (n = 34). Five patients (15%) developed distant metastasis, and one (3%) died (mean follow-up 50 months). CONCLUSION Almost all CHEK2-associated BCs were ER + IDC-NST, with most classified as luminal B with or without HER2 overexpression. NGS supported the luminal-like phenotype and confirmed CHEK2 as an oncogenic driver in the majority of cases. Responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were variable but mostly incomplete.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Schwartz
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1825 4th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
| | - Nikka Khorsandi
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1825 4th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Amie Blanco
- Department of Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Yunn-Yi Chen
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1825 4th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Gregor Krings
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1825 4th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Valentini V, Bucalo A, Conti G, Celli L, Porzio V, Capalbo C, Silvestri V, Ottini L. Gender-Specific Genetic Predisposition to Breast Cancer: BRCA Genes and Beyond. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:579. [PMID: 38339330 PMCID: PMC10854694 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Among neoplastic diseases, breast cancer (BC) is one of the most influenced by gender. Despite common misconceptions associating BC as a women-only disease, BC can also occur in men. Additionally, transgender individuals may also experience BC. Genetic risk factors play a relevant role in BC predisposition, with important implications in precision prevention and treatment. The genetic architecture of BC susceptibility is similar in women and men, with high-, moderate-, and low-penetrance risk variants; however, some sex-specific features have emerged. Inherited high-penetrance pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are the strongest BC genetic risk factor. BRCA1 and BRCA2 PVs are more commonly associated with increased risk of female and male BC, respectively. Notably, BRCA-associated BCs are characterized by sex-specific pathologic features. Recently, next-generation sequencing technologies have helped to provide more insights on the role of moderate-penetrance BC risk variants, particularly in PALB2, CHEK2, and ATM genes, while international collaborative genome-wide association studies have contributed evidence on common low-penetrance BC risk variants, on their combined effect in polygenic models, and on their role as risk modulators in BRCA1/2 PV carriers. Overall, all these studies suggested that the genetic basis of male BC, although similar, may differ from female BC. Evaluating the genetic component of male BC as a distinct entity from female BC is the first step to improve both personalized risk assessment and therapeutic choices of patients of both sexes in order to reach gender equality in BC care. In this review, we summarize the latest research in the field of BC genetic predisposition with a particular focus on similarities and differences in male and female BC, and we also discuss the implications, challenges, and open issues that surround the establishment of a gender-oriented clinical management for BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia Valentini
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (V.V.); (A.B.); (G.C.); (L.C.); (V.P.); (C.C.); (V.S.)
| | - Agostino Bucalo
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (V.V.); (A.B.); (G.C.); (L.C.); (V.P.); (C.C.); (V.S.)
| | - Giulia Conti
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (V.V.); (A.B.); (G.C.); (L.C.); (V.P.); (C.C.); (V.S.)
| | - Ludovica Celli
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (V.V.); (A.B.); (G.C.); (L.C.); (V.P.); (C.C.); (V.S.)
| | - Virginia Porzio
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (V.V.); (A.B.); (G.C.); (L.C.); (V.P.); (C.C.); (V.S.)
| | - Carlo Capalbo
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (V.V.); (A.B.); (G.C.); (L.C.); (V.P.); (C.C.); (V.S.)
- Medical Oncology Unit, Sant’Andrea University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Silvestri
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (V.V.); (A.B.); (G.C.); (L.C.); (V.P.); (C.C.); (V.S.)
| | - Laura Ottini
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (V.V.); (A.B.); (G.C.); (L.C.); (V.P.); (C.C.); (V.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Osama MA, Chatterjee P, Kumar R, Saini G, Lal R, Biswas R. Synchronous Malignancies: Pathological Analysis of Three Patients, Each with Dual Malignancies. J Lab Physicians 2023; 15:608-612. [PMID: 37780870 PMCID: PMC10539060 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple primary malignancies are defined as two or more malignancies arising independently to each other in the same or different anatomical sites, while excluding the possibility of metastasis from the primary malignancy. Here, we present three cases, each with dual malignancies involving different anatomical locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Md Ali Osama
- Department of Pathology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India
| | - Priti Chatterjee
- Department of Pathology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India
| | - Rakesh Kumar
- Department of Pathology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India
| | - Gunjan Saini
- Department of Pathology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India
| | - Romesh Lal
- Department of Surgery, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India
| | - Ratna Biswas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hanson H, Astiazaran-Symonds E, Amendola LM, Balmaña J, Foulkes WD, James P, Klugman S, Ngeow J, Schmutzler R, Voian N, Wick MJ, Pal T, Tischkowitz M, Stewart DR. Management of individuals with germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in CHEK2: A clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med 2023; 25:100870. [PMID: 37490054 PMCID: PMC10623578 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although the role of CHEK2 germline pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition is well known, resources for managing CHEK2 heterozygotes in clinical practice are limited. METHODS An international workgroup developed guidance on clinical management of CHEK2 heterozygotes informed by peer-reviewed publications from PubMed. RESULTS Although CHEK2 is considered a moderate penetrance gene, cancer risks may be considered as a continuous variable, which are influenced by family history and other modifiers. Consequently, early cancer detection and prevention for CHEK2 heterozygotes should be guided by personalized risk estimates. Such estimates may result in both downgrading lifetime breast cancer risks to those similar to the general population or upgrading lifetime risk to a level at which CHEK2 heterozygotes are offered high-risk breast surveillance according to country-specific guidelines. Risk-reducing mastectomy should be guided by personalized risk estimates and shared decision making. Colorectal and prostate cancer surveillance should be considered based on assessment of family history. For CHEK2 heterozygotes who develop cancer, no specific targeted medical treatment is recommended at this time. CONCLUSION Systematic prospective data collection is needed to establish the spectrum of CHEK2-associated cancer risks and to determine yet-unanswered questions, such as the outcomes of surveillance, response to cancer treatment, and survival after cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Hanson
- Southwest Thames Regional Genetics Service, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Esteban Astiazaran-Symonds
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD; Department of Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | | | - Judith Balmaña
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - William D Foulkes
- Departments of Human Genetics, Oncology and Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Paul James
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Susan Klugman
- Division of Reproductive & Medical Genetics, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Joanne Ngeow
- Genomic Medicine, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore; Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nicoleta Voian
- Providence Genetic Risk Clinic, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR
| | - Myra J Wick
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Clinical Genomics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Tuya Pal
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Douglas R Stewart
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Toss A, Ponzoni O, Riccò B, Piombino C, Moscetti L, Combi F, Palma E, Papi S, Tenedini E, Tazzioli G, Dominici M, Cortesi L. Management of PALB2-associated breast cancer: A literature review and case report. Clin Case Rep 2023; 11:e7747. [PMID: 37621724 PMCID: PMC10444947 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.7747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Germline pathogenic variants (PV) of the PALB2 tumor suppressor gene are associated with an increased risk of breast, pancreatic, and ovarian cancer. In previous research, PALB2-associated breast cancer showed aggressive clinicopathological phenotypes, particularly triple-negative subtype, and higher mortality regardless of tumor stage, type of chemotherapy nor hormone receptor status. The identification of this germline alteration may have an impact on clinical management of breast cancer (BC) from the surgical approach to the systemic treatment choice. We herein report the case of a patient with a germline PV of PALB2, diagnosed with locally advanced PD-L1 positive triple-negative BC, who progressed after an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing regimen and then experienced a pathologic complete response after platinum-based chemotherapy. This case report hints a major role of the germline PALB2 alteration compared to the PD-L1 expression as cancer driver and gives us the opportunity to extensively review and discuss the available literature on the optimal management of PALB2-associated BC. Overall, our case report and review of the literature provide additional evidence that the germline analysis of PALB2 gene should be included in routine genetic testing for predictive purposes and to refine treatment algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Toss
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
- Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Ornella Ponzoni
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Beatrice Riccò
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Claudia Piombino
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Luca Moscetti
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Francesca Combi
- Unit of Breast Surgical OncologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, International Doctorate School in Clinical and Experimental MedicineUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Enza Palma
- Unit of Breast Surgical OncologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Simona Papi
- Unit of Breast Surgical OncologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Elena Tenedini
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Diagnostic Hematology and Clinical Genomics UnitAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Giovanni Tazzioli
- Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
- Unit of Breast Surgical OncologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Massimo Dominici
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
- Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Andersen LVB, Larsen MJ, Davies H, Degasperi A, Nielsen HR, Jensen LA, Kroeldrup L, Gerdes AM, Lænkholm AV, Kruse TA, Nik-Zainal S, Thomassen M. Non-BRCA1/BRCA2 high-risk familial breast cancers are not associated with a high prevalence of BRCAness. Breast Cancer Res 2023; 25:69. [PMID: 37316882 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01655-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Familial breast cancer is in most cases unexplained due to the lack of identifiable pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The somatic mutational landscape and in particular the extent of BRCA-like tumour features (BRCAness) in these familial breast cancers where germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations have not been identified is to a large extent unknown. METHODS We performed whole-genome sequencing on matched tumour and normal samples from high-risk non-BRCA1/BRCA2 breast cancer families to understand the germline and somatic mutational landscape and mutational signatures. We measured BRCAness using HRDetect. As a comparator, we also analysed samples from BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutation carriers. RESULTS We noted for non-BRCA1/BRCA2 tumours, only a small proportion displayed high HRDetect scores and were characterized by concomitant promoter hypermethylation or in one case a RAD51D splice variant previously reported as having unknown significance to potentially explain their BRCAness. Another small proportion showed no features of BRCAness but had mutationally active tumours. The remaining tumours lacked features of BRCAness and were mutationally quiescent. CONCLUSIONS A limited fraction of high-risk familial non-BRCA1/BRCA2 breast cancer patients is expected to benefit from treatment strategies against homologue repair deficient cancer cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars V B Andersen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Clinical Genome Center, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Martin J Larsen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Clinical Genome Center, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Helen Davies
- Hutchison Research Centre, Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0XZ, UK
- Academic Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Lv 6 Addenbrooke's Treatment Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Andrea Degasperi
- Hutchison Research Centre, Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0XZ, UK
- Academic Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Lv 6 Addenbrooke's Treatment Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | | | - Louise A Jensen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Clinical Genome Center, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Lone Kroeldrup
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anne-Marie Gerdes
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Torben A Kruse
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Clinical Genome Center, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Serena Nik-Zainal
- Hutchison Research Centre, Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0XZ, UK
- Academic Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Lv 6 Addenbrooke's Treatment Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- European Sperm Bank, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
- Clinical Genome Center, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schwartz ZP, Li AJ, Walsh CS, Rimel BJ, Alvarado MM, Lentz SE, Cass I. Patterns of care and outcomes of risk reducing surgery in women with pathogenic variants in non-BRCA and Lynch syndrome ovarian cancer susceptibility genes. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 173:1-7. [PMID: 37030072 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Guidelines recommend risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) for women with pathogenic variants of non-BRCA and Lynch syndrome-associated ovarian cancer susceptibility genes. Optimal timing and findings at the time of RRSO for these women remains unclear. We sought to characterize practice patterns and frequency of occult gynecologic cancers for these women at our two institutions. METHODS Women with germline ovarian cancer susceptibility gene pathogenic variants who underwent RRSO between 1/2000-9/2019 were reviewed in an IRB-approved study. All patients were asymptomatic with no suspicion for malignancy at time of RRSO. Clinico-pathologic characteristics were extracted from the medical records. RESULTS 26 Non-BRCA (9 BRIP1, 9 RAD51C, and 8 RAD51D) and 75 Lynch (36 MLH1, 18 MSH2, 21 MSH6) pathogenic variants carriers were identified. Median age at time of RRSO was 47. There were no occurrences of occult ovarian or fallopian tube cancer in either group. Two patients (3%) in the Lynch group had occult endometrial cancer. Median follow up was 18 and 35 months for non-BRCA and Lynch patients, respectively. No patient developed primary peritoneal cancer upon follow up. Post-surgical complications occurred in 9/101 (9%) of patients. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was rarely used despite reported post-menopausal symptoms in 6/25 (23%) and 7/75 (37%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS No occult ovarian or tubal cancers were observed in either group. No recurrent or primary gynecologic-related cancers occurred upon follow-up. Despite frequent menopausal symptoms, HRT use was rare. Both groups experienced surgical complications when hysterectomy and/or concurrent colon surgery was performed suggesting concurrent surgeries should only be performed when indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary P Schwartz
- Kaiser Permanente Panorama City Medical Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 13640 Roscoe Blvd., Panorama City, CA 91402, USA.
| | - Andrew J Li
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd., 7th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
| | - Christine S Walsh
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, 1665 Aurora Court, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| | - B J Rimel
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd., 7th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
| | - Monica M Alvarado
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California Regional Genetic Services, 393 E. Walnut St. 6 SW, Pasadena, CA 91188, USA.
| | - Scott E Lentz
- Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Gynecology Oncology Department, 4950 W., Sunset Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.
| | - Ilana Cass
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1 Medical, Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Epigenetic Regulation in Breast Cancer: Insights on Epidrugs. EPIGENOMES 2023; 7:epigenomes7010006. [PMID: 36810560 PMCID: PMC9953240 DOI: 10.3390/epigenomes7010006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a common cause of cancer-related death in women. Therefore, further studies are necessary for the comprehension of breast cancer and the revolution of breast cancer treatment. Cancer is a heterogeneous disease that results from epigenetic alterations in normal cells. Aberrant epigenetic regulation is strongly associated with the development of breast cancer. Current therapeutic approaches target epigenetic alterations rather than genetic mutations due to their reversibility. The formation and maintenance of epigenetic changes depend on specific enzymes, including DNA methyltransferases and histone deacetylases, which are promising targets for epigenetic-based therapy. Epidrugs target different epigenetic alterations, including DNA methylation, histone acetylation, and histone methylation, which can restore normal cellular memory in cancerous diseases. Epigenetic-targeted therapy using epidrugs has anti-tumor effects on malignancies, including breast cancer. This review focuses on the importance of epigenetic regulation and the clinical implications of epidrugs in breast cancer.
Collapse
|
19
|
Chevarin M, Alcantara D, Albuisson J, Collonge-Rame MA, Populaire C, Selmani Z, Baurand A, Sawka C, Bertolone G, Callier P, Duffourd Y, Jonveaux P, Bignon YJ, Coupier I, Cornelis F, Cordier C, Mozelle-Nivoix M, Rivière JB, Kuentz P, Thauvin C, Boidot R, Ghiringhelli F, O'Driscoll M, Faivre L, Nambot S. The "extreme phenotype approach" applied to male breast cancer allows the identification of rare variants of ATR as potential breast cancer susceptibility alleles. Oncotarget 2023; 14:111-125. [PMID: 36749285 PMCID: PMC9904323 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.28358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
In oncogenetics, some patients could be considered as "extreme phenotypes", such as those with very early onset presentation or multiple primary malignancies, unusually high numbers of cancers of the same spectrum or rare cancer types in the same parental branch. For these cases, a genetic predisposition is very likely, but classical candidate gene panel analyses often and frustratingly remains negative. In the framework of the EX2TRICAN project, exploring unresolved extreme cancer phenotypes, we applied exome sequencing on rare familial cases with male breast cancer, identifying a novel pathogenic variant of ATR (p.Leu1808*). ATR has already been suspected as being a predisposing gene to breast cancer in women. We next identified 3 additional ATR variants in a cohort of both male and female with early onset and familial breast cancers (c.7762-2A>C; c.2078+1G>A; c.1A>G). Further molecular and cellular investigations showed impacts on transcripts for variants affecting splicing sites and reduction of ATR expression and phosphorylation of the ATR substrate CHEK1. This work further demonstrates the interest of an extended genetic analysis such as exome sequencing to identify very rare variants that can play a role in cancer predisposition in extreme phenotype cancer cases unexplained by classical cancer gene panels testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Chevarin
- Inserm UMR 1231 GAD Génétique des Anomalies du Développement, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Unité Fonctionnelle Innovation diagnostique dans les maladies rares, laboratoire de génétique chromosomique et moléculaire, Plateau Technique de Biologie, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Diana Alcantara
- Human DNA Damage Response Disorders Group, University of Sussex, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Juliette Albuisson
- Service d’Oncogénétique, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
- Département de biologie et pathologie des tumeurs, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Céline Populaire
- Oncobiologie Génétique Bioinformatique, PCBio, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Zohair Selmani
- Oncobiologie Génétique Bioinformatique, PCBio, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Amandine Baurand
- Service d’Oncogénétique, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
- Centre de Génétique et Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Anomalies du Développement de l’Interrégion Est, Hôpital d’Enfants, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Caroline Sawka
- Centre de Génétique et Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Anomalies du Développement de l’Interrégion Est, Hôpital d’Enfants, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Geoffrey Bertolone
- Centre de Génétique et Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Anomalies du Développement de l’Interrégion Est, Hôpital d’Enfants, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Patrick Callier
- Inserm UMR 1231 GAD Génétique des Anomalies du Développement, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Unité Fonctionnelle Innovation diagnostique dans les maladies rares, laboratoire de génétique chromosomique et moléculaire, Plateau Technique de Biologie, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire Médecine Translationnelle et Anomalies du Développement (FHU TRANSLAD), CHU Dijon Bourgogne et Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Yannis Duffourd
- Inserm UMR 1231 GAD Génétique des Anomalies du Développement, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire Médecine Translationnelle et Anomalies du Développement (FHU TRANSLAD), CHU Dijon Bourgogne et Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Philippe Jonveaux
- Laboratoire de Génétique Médicale, INSERM U954, Hôpitaux de Brabois, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France
| | - Yves-Jean Bignon
- Laboratoire d’Oncologie Moléculaire, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | - François Cornelis
- Université Bordeaux, IMB, UMR 5251, Talence, France
- Service d’imagerie diagnostique et interventionnelle de l’adulte, Hôpital Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | - Jean-Baptiste Rivière
- Inserm UMR 1231 GAD Génétique des Anomalies du Développement, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Centre de Génétique et Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Anomalies du Développement de l’Interrégion Est, Hôpital d’Enfants, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire Médecine Translationnelle et Anomalies du Développement (FHU TRANSLAD), CHU Dijon Bourgogne et Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Paul Kuentz
- Inserm UMR 1231 GAD Génétique des Anomalies du Développement, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Oncobiologie Génétique Bioinformatique, PCBio, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France
- Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire Médecine Translationnelle et Anomalies du Développement (FHU TRANSLAD), CHU Dijon Bourgogne et Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Christel Thauvin
- Inserm UMR 1231 GAD Génétique des Anomalies du Développement, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Centre de Génétique et Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Anomalies du Développement de l’Interrégion Est, Hôpital d’Enfants, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Romain Boidot
- Département de biologie et pathologie des tumeurs, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - François Ghiringhelli
- Département d’oncologie médicale, INSERM LNC U1231, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Marc O'Driscoll
- Human DNA Damage Response Disorders Group, University of Sussex, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Laurence Faivre
- Inserm UMR 1231 GAD Génétique des Anomalies du Développement, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Service d’Oncogénétique, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
- Centre de Génétique et Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Anomalies du Développement de l’Interrégion Est, Hôpital d’Enfants, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire Médecine Translationnelle et Anomalies du Développement (FHU TRANSLAD), CHU Dijon Bourgogne et Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Sophie Nambot
- Inserm UMR 1231 GAD Génétique des Anomalies du Développement, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Service d’Oncogénétique, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
- Centre de Génétique et Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Anomalies du Développement de l’Interrégion Est, Hôpital d’Enfants, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire Médecine Translationnelle et Anomalies du Développement (FHU TRANSLAD), CHU Dijon Bourgogne et Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fierheller CT, Alenezi WM, Serruya C, Revil T, Amuzu S, Bedard K, Subramanian DN, Fewings E, Bruce JP, Prokopec S, Bouchard L, Provencher D, Foulkes WD, El Haffaf Z, Mes-Masson AM, Tischkowitz M, Campbell IG, Pugh TJ, Greenwood CMT, Ragoussis J, Tonin PN. Molecular Genetic Characteristics of FANCI, a Proposed New Ovarian Cancer Predisposing Gene. Genes (Basel) 2023; 14:genes14020277. [PMID: 36833203 PMCID: PMC9956348 DOI: 10.3390/genes14020277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
FANCI was recently identified as a new candidate ovarian cancer (OC)-predisposing gene from the genetic analysis of carriers of FANCI c.1813C>T; p.L605F in OC families. Here, we aimed to investigate the molecular genetic characteristics of FANCI, as they have not been described in the context of cancer. We first investigated the germline genetic landscape of two sisters with OC from the discovery FANCI c.1813C>T; p.L605F family (F1528) to re-affirm the plausibility of this candidate. As we did not find other conclusive candidates, we then performed a candidate gene approach to identify other candidate variants in genes involved in the FANCI protein interactome in OC families negative for pathogenic variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D, and FANCI, which identified four candidate variants. We then investigated FANCI in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) from FANCI c.1813C>T carriers and found evidence of loss of the wild-type allele in tumour DNA from some of these cases. The somatic genetic landscape of OC tumours from FANCI c.1813C>T carriers was investigated for mutations in selected genes, copy number alterations, and mutational signatures, which determined that the profiles of tumours from carriers were characteristic of features exhibited by HGSC cases. As other OC-predisposing genes such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 are known to increase the risk of other cancers including breast cancer, we investigated the carrier frequency of germline FANCI c.1813C>T in various cancer types and found overall more carriers among cancer cases compared to cancer-free controls (p = 0.007). In these different tumour types, we also identified a spectrum of somatic variants in FANCI that were not restricted to any specific region within the gene. Collectively, these findings expand on the characteristics described for OC cases carrying FANCI c.1813C>T; p.L605F and suggest the possible involvement of FANCI in other cancer types at the germline and/or somatic level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin T. Fierheller
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada
- Cancer Research Program, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Wejdan M. Alenezi
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada
- Cancer Research Program, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
- Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Taibah University, Medina 42353, Saudi Arabia
| | - Corinne Serruya
- Cancer Research Program, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Timothée Revil
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada
- McGill Genome Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Setor Amuzu
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada
- McGill Genome Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Karine Bedard
- Laboratoire de Diagnostic Moléculaire, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
- Département de Pathologie et Biologie Cellulaire, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Deepak N. Subramanian
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Eleanor Fewings
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
| | - Jeffrey P. Bruce
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Stephenie Prokopec
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Luigi Bouchard
- Department of Biochemistry and Functional Genomics, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada
- Department of Medical Biology, Centres Intégrés Universitaires de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean Hôpital Universitaire de Chicoutimi, Saguenay, QC G7H 7K9, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier l’Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada
| | - Diane Provencher
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal and Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - William D. Foulkes
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada
- Cancer Research Program, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 2M1, Canada
| | - Zaki El Haffaf
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal and Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
| | - Ian G. Campbell
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Trevor J. Pugh
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Celia M. T. Greenwood
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3T2, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1Y7, Canada
| | - Jiannis Ragoussis
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada
- McGill Genome Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Patricia N. Tonin
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada
- Cancer Research Program, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 2M1, Canada
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hendricks LAJ, Hoogerbrugge N, Mensenkamp AR, Brunet J, Lleuger-Pujol R, Høberg-Vetti H, Tveit Haavind M, Innella G, Turchetti D, Aretz S, Spier I, Tischkowitz M, Jahn A, Links TP, Olderode-Berends MJW, Blatnik A, Leter EM, Evans DG, Woodward ER, Steinke-Lange V, Anastasiadou VC, Colas C, Villy MC, Benusiglio PR, Gerasimenko A, Barili V, Branchaud M, Houdayer C, Tesi B, Yazicioglu MO, van der Post RS, Schuurs-Hoeijmakers JHM, Vos JR. Cancer risks by sex and variant type in PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:93-103. [PMID: 36171661 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome (PHTS) is a rare syndrome with a broad phenotypic spectrum, including increased risks of breast (BC, 67%-78% at age 60 years), endometrial (EC, 19%-28%), and thyroid cancer (TC, 6%-38%). Current risks are likely overestimated due to ascertainment bias. We aimed to provide more accurate and personalized cancer risks. METHODS This was a European, adult PHTS cohort study with data from medical files, registries, and/or questionnaires. Cancer risks and hazard ratios were assessed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses, and standardized incidence ratios were calculated. Bias correction consisted of excluding cancer index cases and incident case analyses. RESULTS A total of 455 patients were included, including 50.5% index cases, 372 with prospective follow-up (median 6 years, interquartile range = 3-10 years), and 159 of 281 females and 39 of 174 males with cancer. By age 60 years, PHTS-related cancer risk was higher in females (68.4% to 86.3%) than males (16.4% to 20.8%). Female BC risks ranged from 54.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 43.0% to 66.4%) to 75.8% (95% CI = 60.7% to 88.4%), with two- to threefold increased risks for PTEN truncating and approximately twofold for phosphatase domain variants. EC risks ranged from 6.4% (95% CI = 2.1% to 18.6%) to 22.1% (95% CI = 11.6% to 39.6%) and TC risks from 8.9% (95% CI = 5.1% to 15.3%) to 20.5% (95% CI = 11.3% to 35.4%). Colorectal cancer, renal cancer, and melanoma risks were each less than 10.0%. CONCLUSIONS Females have a different BC risk depending on their PTEN germline variant. PHTS patients are predominantly at risk of BC (females), EC, and TC. This should be the main focus of surveillance. These lower, more unbiased and personalized risks provide guidance for optimized cancer risk management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda A J Hendricks
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboudumc Expert Center for PHTS, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboudumc Expert Center for PHTS, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Arjen R Mensenkamp
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboudumc Expert Center for PHTS, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joan Brunet
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, ONCOBELL-IDIBELL-IDIBGI-IGTP, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Roser Lleuger-Pujol
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, ONCOBELL-IDIBELL-IDIBGI-IGTP, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hildegunn Høberg-Vetti
- Western Norway Familial Cancer Center, Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Marianne Tveit Haavind
- Western Norway Familial Cancer Center, Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Giovanni Innella
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Center for Studies on Hereditary Cancer, University of Bologna and Unit of Medical Genetics, IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Daniela Turchetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Center for Studies on Hereditary Cancer, University of Bologna and Unit of Medical Genetics, IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefan Aretz
- Institute of Human Genetics, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Center for Hereditary Tumor Syndromes, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Isabel Spier
- Institute of Human Genetics, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Center for Hereditary Tumor Syndromes, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Arne Jahn
- Institute for Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Hereditary Cancer Syndrome Center Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thera P Links
- Department of Endocrinology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Maran J W Olderode-Berends
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ana Blatnik
- Department of Clinical Cancer Genetics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Edward M Leter
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma R Woodward
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Verena Steinke-Lange
- Medical Genetics Center, Munich, Germany.,Arbeitsgruppe Erbliche Gastrointestinale Tumore, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV-Campus Innenstadt, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Violetta C Anastasiadou
- Karaiskakio Foundation, Nicosia Cyprus and Archbishop Makarios III Children's Hospital, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Chrystelle Colas
- Institut Curie, Service de Génétique, Paris, France.,Inserm U830, DNA Repair and Uveal Melanoma (D.R.U.M.), Equipe Labellisée Par la Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Paris, France
| | - Marie-Charlotte Villy
- Inserm U830, DNA Repair and Uveal Melanoma (D.R.U.M.), Equipe Labellisée Par la Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Paris, France
| | - Patrick R Benusiglio
- UF d'oncogénétique Clinique, Department de Génétique, Hôspital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Anna Gerasimenko
- UF d'oncogénétique Clinique, Department de Génétique, Hôspital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Valeria Barili
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Maud Branchaud
- Department of Genetics, Normandy Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245 and Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Claude Houdayer
- Department of Genetics, Normandy Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245 and Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Bianca Tesi
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Omer Yazicioglu
- Department of Endocrine Tumors and Sarcoma, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rachel S van der Post
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Janneke H M Schuurs-Hoeijmakers
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboudumc Expert Center for PHTS, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Janet R Vos
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboudumc Expert Center for PHTS, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wu M, Zhu C, Yang J, Cheng S, Yang X, Gu S, Xu S, Wu Y, Shen W, Huang S, Wang Y. Exploring prognostic indicators in the pathological images of ovarian cancer based on a deep survival network. Front Genet 2023; 13:1069673. [PMID: 36685892 PMCID: PMC9846244 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1069673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Tumor pathology can assess patient prognosis based on a morphological deviation of tumor tissue from normal. Digitizing whole slide images (WSIs) of tissue enables the use of deep learning (DL) techniques in pathology, which may shed light on prognostic indicators of cancers, and avoid biases introduced by human experience. Purpose: We aim to explore new prognostic indicators of ovarian cancer (OC) patients using the DL framework on WSIs, and provide a valuable approach for OC risk stratification. Methods: We obtained the TCGA-OV dataset from the NIH Genomic Data Commons Data Portal database. The preprocessing of the dataset was comprised of three stages: 1) The WSIs and corresponding clinical data were paired and filtered based on a unique patient ID; 2) a weakly-supervised CLAM WSI-analysis tool was exploited to segment regions of interest; 3) the pre-trained model ResNet50 on ImageNet was employed to extract feature tensors. We proposed an attention-based network to predict a hazard score for each case. Furthermore, all cases were divided into a high-risk score group and a low-risk one according to the median as the threshold value. The multi-omics data of OC patients were used to assess the potential applications of the risk score. Finally, a nomogram based on risk scores and age features was established. Results: A total of 90 WSIs were processed, extracted, and fed into the attention-based network. The mean value of the resulting C-index was 0.5789 (0.5096-0.6053), and the resulting p-value was 0.00845. Moreover, the risk score showed a better prediction ability in the HRD + subgroup. Conclusion: Our deep learning framework is a promising method for searching WSIs, and providing a valuable clinical means for prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meixuan Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chengguang Zhu
- MoE Key Lab of Artificial Intelligence, AI Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiani Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shanshan Cheng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaokang Yang
- MoE Key Lab of Artificial Intelligence, AI Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sijia Gu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shilin Xu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongsong Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Shen
- MoE Key Lab of Artificial Intelligence, AI Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China,*Correspondence: Yu Wang, ; Shan Huang, ; Wei Shen,
| | - Shan Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China,*Correspondence: Yu Wang, ; Shan Huang, ; Wei Shen,
| | - Yu Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China,*Correspondence: Yu Wang, ; Shan Huang, ; Wei Shen,
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Alenezi WM, Fierheller CT, Serruya C, Revil T, Oros KK, Subramanian DN, Bruce J, Spiegelman D, Pugh T, Campbell IG, Mes-Masson AM, Provencher D, Foulkes WD, Haffaf ZE, Rouleau G, Bouchard L, Greenwood CMT, Ragoussis J, Tonin PN. Genetic analyses of DNA repair pathway associated genes implicate new candidate cancer predisposing genes in ancestrally defined ovarian cancer cases. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1111191. [PMID: 36969007 PMCID: PMC10030840 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1111191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Not all familial ovarian cancer (OC) cases are explained by pathogenic germline variants in known risk genes. A candidate gene approach involving DNA repair pathway genes was applied to identify rare recurring pathogenic variants in familial OC cases not associated with known OC risk genes from a population exhibiting genetic drift. Whole exome sequencing (WES) data of 15 OC cases from 13 families tested negative for pathogenic variants in known OC risk genes were investigated for candidate variants in 468 DNA repair pathway genes. Filtering and prioritization criteria were applied to WES data to select top candidates for further analyses. Candidates were genotyped in ancestry defined study groups of 214 familial and 998 sporadic OC or breast cancer (BC) cases and 1025 population-matched controls and screened for additional carriers in 605 population-matched OC cases. The candidate genes were also analyzed in WES data from 937 familial or sporadic OC cases of diverse ancestries. Top candidate variants in ERCC5, EXO1, FANCC, NEIL1 and NTHL1 were identified in 5/13 (39%) OC families. Collectively, candidate variants were identified in 7/435 (1.6%) sporadic OC cases and 1/566 (0.2%) sporadic BC cases versus 1/1025 (0.1%) controls. Additional carriers were identified in 6/605 (0.9%) OC cases. Tumour DNA from ERCC5, NEIL1 and NTHL1 variant carriers exhibited loss of the wild-type allele. Carriers of various candidate variants in these genes were identified in 31/937 (3.3%) OC cases of diverse ancestries versus 0-0.004% in cancer-free controls. The strategy of applying a candidate gene approach in a population exhibiting genetic drift identified new candidate OC predisposition variants in DNA repair pathway genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wejdan M. Alenezi
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Taibah University, Medina, Saudi Arabia
| | - Caitlin T. Fierheller
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Corinne Serruya
- Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Timothée Revil
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- McGill Genome Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Kathleen K. Oros
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research of the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Deepak N. Subramanian
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Bruce
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dan Spiegelman
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Trevor Pugh
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ian G. Campbell
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Departement of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Diane Provencher
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - William D. Foulkes
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research of the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Zaki El Haffaf
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Service de Médecine Génique, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Guy Rouleau
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Luigi Bouchard
- Department of Biochemistry and Functional Genomics, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Department of Medical Biology, Centres intégrés universitaires de santé et de services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean hôpital Universitaire de Chicoutimi, Saguenay, QC, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du Centre hospitalier l’Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Celia M. T. Greenwood
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research of the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jiannis Ragoussis
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- McGill Genome Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Patricia N. Tonin
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- *Correspondence: Patricia N. Tonin,
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Yao H, Li N, Yuan H. Clinical characteristics and survival analysis of Chinese ovarian cancer patients with RAD51D germline mutations. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1337. [PMID: 36544182 PMCID: PMC9768941 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10456-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to describe the behavior among Chinese ovarian cancer patients with RAD51D germline mutations at our institution. METHODS Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was conducted for the entire coding regions and exon/intron boundaries of the RAD51D genes in 781 Chinese ovarian cancer patients treated at our institution from January 1, 2015 to August 1, 2021. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes were assessed for ovarian cancer patients with RAD51D germline mutations. RESULTS RAD51D germline pathogenic mutations were detected in 1.7% (13/781) of patients in this cohort. RAD51D c. 270_271dup (p. Lys91fs) mutation was the most common mutation which was found in 7 patients (7/13, 53.1%). Patients median age at diagnosis was 58 years (range: 45-69 years). 46.2% (6/13) of them were diagnosed after 60 years. Only 1 patient (1/13, 7.7%) had a family history of ovarian or breast cancer. And 1 patient (1/13, 7.7%) had a personal history of breast cancer. The FIGO 2014 distribution by stage was: stage II in 1 patient (7.7%), stage III in 9 patients (69.2%) and stage IV in 3 patient (23.1%). 92.3% (12/13) patients had high-grade serous carcinoma. 2 patients (2/13, 15.4%) had a primary peritoneal cancer. The majority of patients in the entire cohort were reported to be platinum sensitive (92.3%, 12/13) with a platinum-free interval (PFI) of > 6 months. For patients who received PARPis for 2nd line maintenance treatment (n = 5), 2 patients discontinued PARPis treatment after 33.5 and 8.1 months of duration. Other 3 patients are still on therapy with a duration of 2.4, 13.8 and 30.1 months at the date of data cutoff. 1 patient received PARPi as salvage treatment with a duration of only 1.2 months. Nine patients (9/13, 69.2%) relapsed during follow up and all of them relapsed within 2 years after diagnosis, among which 88.9% (8/9) were classified as platinum-sensitive recurrence (PSR), and only 1 patient was classified as platinum-resistant recurrence (PRR). Median PFS for the entire cohort was 17.3 months. Median PFS for the PSR subgroup was 15.9 months. 2 patients died during follow-up. The OS of these 2 patients was 17.2 and 39.6 months. The 5-year OS rate was 67.5%. CONCLUSIONS RAD51D germline mutations are more frequent in Chinese ovarian cancer patients than other population. Few patients have a family history of ovarian or breast cancer, and personal history of breast cancer. Most patients are diagnosed after 50 years. The sensitivity to PARP inhibitors of patients with RAD51D germline mutations need a further analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongwen Yao
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Ning Li
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Hua Yuan
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fu H, Dong S, Li K. Study on promoting the regeneration of grafted fat by cell-assisted lipotransfer. Regen Ther 2022; 22:7-18. [PMID: 36582606 PMCID: PMC9762074 DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2022.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cell-assisted lipotransfer (CAL), a modified adipose-derived stromal/stem cells (ADSCs)-based approach for autologous fat grafting that is an ideal option for soft tissue augmentation, has many shortcomings in terms of retention and adverse effects. The objective of our study was to improve the treatment efficacy of CAL by adding fibroblasts. Methods ADSCs and fibroblasts were isolated from human adipose and dermal tissues, with fibroblasts identified by immunofluorescence and ADSCs identified by the multilineage differentiation method. We performed cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration, adipogenic, and hemangioendothelial differentiation experiments, qPCR and Western blotting analysis in co-cultures of fibroblasts and ADSCs. Subsequently, we conducted animal experiments with BALB/c nude mice. Masson's staining, immunofluorescence staining and ultrasound were used to analyze the occurrence of adverse reactions of the grafted fat, and CT and three-dimensional reconstruction were used to accurately evaluate the volume of the grafted fat. Results We found that the co-culture of fibroblasts and ADSCs promoted their mutual proliferation, adipogenic differentiation, hemangioendothelial differentiation and proliferation and migration of HUVECs. Fibroblasts inhibit the apoptosis of ADSCs. Moreover, in animal experiments, the autografted adipose group combined with ADSCs and fibroblasts had the least occurrence of oily cysts, and fat had the best form of survival. Conclusions We enhanced adipocyte regeneration and angiogenesis in ADSCs and fibroblast cells after adding fibroblasts to conventional CAL autologous fat grafts. In turn, the volume retention rate of the grafted fat is improved, and the adverse reactions are reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongtao Fu
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Shanshan Dong
- Department of Medicine, Hunan Cancer Hospital/the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, China
| | - Kun Li
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Affiliated Changsha Central Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, NO. 161 Shaoshan South Road, Changsha 410004, Hunan, China,Corresponding author. The Affiliated Changsha Central Hospital, 161 Shaoshan South Road, Changsha 410004, China.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lund Johansen E, Fribert Thusgaard C, Thomassen M, Eriksen Boonen S, Marie Jochumsen K. Germline Pathogenic Variants Associated with Ovarian Cancer: A Historical Overview. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2022; 44:101105. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
|
27
|
Graffeo R, Rana H, Conforti F, Bonanni B, Cardoso M, Paluch-Shimon S, Pagani O, Goldhirsch A, Partridge A, Lambertini M, Garber J. Moderate penetrance genes complicate genetic testing for breast cancer diagnosis: ATM, CHEK2, BARD1 and RAD51D. Breast 2022; 65:32-40. [PMID: 35772246 PMCID: PMC9253488 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer risk associated with germline likely pathogenic/pathogenic variants (PV) varies by gene, often by penetrance (high >50% or moderate 20–50%), and specific locus. Germline PVs in BRCA1 and BRCA2 play important roles in the development of breast and ovarian cancer in particular, as well as in other cancers such as pancreatic and prostate cancers and melanoma. Recent studies suggest that other cancer susceptibility genes, including ATM, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD51C and RAD51D confer differential risks of breast and other specific cancers. In the era of multigene panel testing, advances in next-generation sequencing technologies have notably reduced costs in the United States (US) and enabled sequencing of BRCA1/2 concomitantly with additional genes. The use of multigene-panel testing is beginning to expand in Europe as well. Further research into the clinical implications of variants in moderate penetrance genes, particularly in unaffected carriers, is needed for appropriate counselling and risk management with data-driven plans for surveillance and/or risk reduction. For individuals at high risk without any pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in cancer susceptibility genes or some carriers of pathogenic variants in moderate-risk genes such as ATM and CHEK2, polygenic risk scores offer promise to help stratify breast cancer risk and guide appropriate risk management options. Cancer patients whose tumours are driven by the loss of function of both copies of a predisposition gene may benefit from therapies targeting the biological alterations induced by the dysfunctional gene e.g. poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and other novel pathway agents in cancers with DNA repair deficiencies. A better understanding of mechanisms by which germline variants drive various malignancies may lead to improvements in both therapeutic and preventive management options. The interpretation of genetic testing results requires careful attention. ATM, CHEK2, RAD51D and BARD1 correlated with breast and other cancers risk. European and American guidelines discrepancies. Support European healthcare providers in interpreting and managing female carriers.
Collapse
|
28
|
Loveday C, Garrett A, Law P, Hanks S, Poyastro-Pearson E, Adlard JW, Barwell J, Berg J, Brady AF, Brewer C, Chapman C, Cook J, Davidson R, Donaldson A, Douglas F, Greenhalgh L, Henderson A, Izatt L, Kumar A, Lalloo F, Miedzybrodzka Z, Morrison PJ, Paterson J, Porteous M, Rogers MT, Walker L, Eccles D, Evans DG, Snape K, Hanson H, Houlston RS, Turnbull C. Analysis of rare disruptive germline mutations in 2,135 enriched BRCA-negative breast cancers excludes additional high-impact susceptibility genes. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:1318-1327. [PMID: 36122798 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.09.152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer has a significant heritable basis, of which approximately 60% remains unexplained. Testing for BRCA1/BRCA2 offers useful discrimination of breast cancer risk within families, and identification of additional breast cancer susceptibility genes could offer clinical utility. PATIENTS AND METHODS We included 2,135 invasive breast cancer cases recruited via the BOCS study, a retrospective UK study of familial breast cancer. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA female, BRCA-negative, white European ethnicity, and one of: i) breast cancer family history, ii) bilateral disease, iii) young age of onset (<30 years), iv) concomitant ovarian cancer. We undertook exome sequencing of cases and performed gene-level burden testing of rare damaging variants against those from 51,377 ethnicity-matched population controls from gnomAD. RESULTS 159/2135 (7.4%) cases had a qualifying variant in an established breast cancer susceptibility gene, with minimal evidence of signal in other cancer susceptibility genes. Known breast cancer susceptibility genes PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM were the only genes to retain statistical significance after correcting for multiple testing. Due to the enrichment of hereditary cases in the series, we had good power (>80%) to detect a gene of BRCA1-like risk (odds ratio = 10.6) down to a population minor allele frequency of 4.6 x 10-5 (1 in 10,799, less than one tenth that of BRCA1)and of PALB2-like risk (odds ratio = 5.0) down to a population minor allele frequency of 2.8 x 10-4 (1 in 1,779, less than half that of PALB2). Power was lower for identification of novel moderate penetrance genes (odds ratio = 2-3) like CHEK2 and ATM. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest case-control whole-exome analysis of enriched breast cancer published to date. Whilst additional breast cancer susceptibility genes likely exist, those of high penetrance are likely to be of very low mutational frequency. Contention exists regarding the clinical utility of such genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Loveday
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Garrett
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - P Law
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - S Hanks
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - E Poyastro-Pearson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - J W Adlard
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - J Barwell
- Leicestershire Genetics Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - J Berg
- Division of Medical Sciences, Human Genetics, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - A F Brady
- North West Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, London, UK
| | - C Brewer
- Peninsula Regional Genetics Service, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - C Chapman
- West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Cook
- Sheffield Regional Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - R Davidson
- West of Scotland Regional Genetics Service, Ferguson Smith Centre for Clinical Genetics, Glasgow, UK
| | - A Donaldson
- South Western Regional Genetics Service, University Hospitals of Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - F Douglas
- Northern Genetics Service, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - L Greenhalgh
- Cheshire and Merseyside Clinical Genetics Service, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Henderson
- Northern Genetics Service (Cumbria), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - L Izatt
- South East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Guy's and St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Kumar
- North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond St. Hospital, London, UK
| | - F Lalloo
- University Department of Medical Genetics & Regional Genetics Service, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Z Miedzybrodzka
- University of Aberdeen and North of Scotland Clinical Genetics Service, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - P J Morrison
- Belfast Health and Social Care (HSC) Trust & Department of Medical Genetics, Northern Ireland Regional Genetics Service, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - J Paterson
- East Anglian Regional Genetics Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - M Porteous
- South East of Scotland Clinical Genetics Service, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - M T Rogers
- All Wales Medical Genetics Service, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - L Walker
- Oxford Regional Genetics Service, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | -
- Individual collaborators and their affiliations are listed in the Appendix
| | - D Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - D G Evans
- University Department of Medical Genetics & Regional Genetics Service, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - K Snape
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.; South West Thames Regional Genetics Service, St. George's Hospital, London, UK
| | - H Hanson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.; South West Thames Regional Genetics Service, St. George's Hospital, London, UK
| | - R S Houlston
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - C Turnbull
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Association between Health Insurance Type and Genetic Testing and/or Counseling for Breast and Ovarian Cancer. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12081263. [PMID: 36013212 PMCID: PMC9409681 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12081263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
As genetic testing becomes increasingly incorporated into clinical practice to aid in both the diagnosis and risk assessment of genetic diseases, patients benefit from genetic counseling to support their understanding of test results either before and/or after genetic testing. Therefore, access to genetic testing and counseling is imperative for patient care. It is well established that health insurance coverage is a major determinant of access to health care in the United States as individuals without insurance are less likely to have a regular source of health care than their insured counterparts. Different health insurance plans and benefits also influence patients’ access to health care. Data on the association of health insurance and the uptake of genetic testing and/or counseling for cancer risk are limited. Using data from the National Health Interview Survey, we examined the uptake of genetic testing and/or counseling for breast/ovarian cancer risk by health insurance type. We found that only a small proportion of women undergo genetic testing and/or counseling for breast/ovarian cancer risk (2.3%), even among subgroups of women at risk due to family or personal history (6.5%). Women with health insurance were more likely to undergo genetic testing and/or counseling for breast/ovarian cancer risk, particularly those with military and private insurance plans, than those without health insurance after adjusting for various demographic, socioeconomic, and health risk covariates. Further investigations are needed to examine potential disparities in access and health inequities.
Collapse
|
30
|
Dumont M, Weber-Lassalle N, Joly-Beauparlant C, Ernst C, Droit A, Feng BJ, Dubois S, Collin-Deschesnes AC, Soucy P, Vallée M, Fournier F, Lemaçon A, Adank MA, Allen J, Altmüller J, Arnold N, Ausems MGEM, Berutti R, Bolla MK, Bull S, Carvalho S, Cornelissen S, Dufault MR, Dunning AM, Engel C, Gehrig A, Geurts-Giele WRR, Gieger C, Green J, Hackmann K, Helmy M, Hentschel J, Hogervorst FBL, Hollestelle A, Hooning MJ, Horváth J, Ikram MA, Kaulfuß S, Keeman R, Kuang D, Luccarini C, Maier W, Martens JWM, Niederacher D, Nürnberg P, Ott CE, Peters A, Pharoah PDP, Ramirez A, Ramser J, Riedel-Heller S, Schmidt G, Shah M, Scherer M, Stäbler A, Strom TM, Sutter C, Thiele H, van Asperen CJ, van der Kolk L, van der Luijt RB, Volk AE, Wagner M, Waisfisz Q, Wang Q, Wang-Gohrke S, Weber BHF, Devilee P, Tavtigian S, Bader GD, Meindl A, Goldgar DE, Andrulis IL, Schmutzler RK, Easton DF, Schmidt MK, Hahnen E, Simard J. Uncovering the Contribution of Moderate-Penetrance Susceptibility Genes to Breast Cancer by Whole-Exome Sequencing and Targeted Enrichment Sequencing of Candidate Genes in Women of European Ancestry. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143363. [PMID: 35884425 PMCID: PMC9317824 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Rare variants in at least 10 genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, and CHEK2, are associated with increased risk of breast cancer; however, these variants, in combination with common variants identified through genome-wide association studies, explain only a fraction of the familial aggregation of the disease. To identify further susceptibility genes, we performed a two-stage whole-exome sequencing study. In the discovery stage, samples from 1528 breast cancer cases enriched for breast cancer susceptibility and 3733 geographically matched unaffected controls were sequenced. Using five different filtering and gene prioritization strategies, 198 genes were selected for further validation. These genes, and a panel of 32 known or suspected breast cancer susceptibility genes, were assessed in a validation set of 6211 cases and 6019 controls for their association with risk of breast cancer overall, and by estrogen receptor (ER) disease subtypes, using gene burden tests applied to loss-of-function and rare missense variants. Twenty genes showed nominal evidence of association (p-value < 0.05) with either overall or subtype-specific breast cancer. Our study had the statistical power to detect susceptibility genes with effect sizes similar to ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2, however, it was underpowered to identify genes in which susceptibility variants are rarer or confer smaller effect sizes. Larger sample sizes would be required in order to identify such genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martine Dumont
- Genomics Center, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Quebec City, QC GIV 4G2, Canada; (M.D.); (C.J.-B.); (A.D.); (S.D.); (A.-C.C.-D.); (P.S.); (M.V.); (F.F.); (A.L.)
| | - Nana Weber-Lassalle
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.W.-L.); (C.E.); (R.K.S.); (E.H.)
| | - Charles Joly-Beauparlant
- Genomics Center, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Quebec City, QC GIV 4G2, Canada; (M.D.); (C.J.-B.); (A.D.); (S.D.); (A.-C.C.-D.); (P.S.); (M.V.); (F.F.); (A.L.)
| | - Corinna Ernst
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.W.-L.); (C.E.); (R.K.S.); (E.H.)
| | - Arnaud Droit
- Genomics Center, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Quebec City, QC GIV 4G2, Canada; (M.D.); (C.J.-B.); (A.D.); (S.D.); (A.-C.C.-D.); (P.S.); (M.V.); (F.F.); (A.L.)
| | - Bing-Jian Feng
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84103, USA; (B.-J.F.); (D.E.G.)
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA;
| | - Stéphane Dubois
- Genomics Center, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Quebec City, QC GIV 4G2, Canada; (M.D.); (C.J.-B.); (A.D.); (S.D.); (A.-C.C.-D.); (P.S.); (M.V.); (F.F.); (A.L.)
| | - Annie-Claude Collin-Deschesnes
- Genomics Center, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Quebec City, QC GIV 4G2, Canada; (M.D.); (C.J.-B.); (A.D.); (S.D.); (A.-C.C.-D.); (P.S.); (M.V.); (F.F.); (A.L.)
| | - Penny Soucy
- Genomics Center, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Quebec City, QC GIV 4G2, Canada; (M.D.); (C.J.-B.); (A.D.); (S.D.); (A.-C.C.-D.); (P.S.); (M.V.); (F.F.); (A.L.)
| | - Maxime Vallée
- Genomics Center, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Quebec City, QC GIV 4G2, Canada; (M.D.); (C.J.-B.); (A.D.); (S.D.); (A.-C.C.-D.); (P.S.); (M.V.); (F.F.); (A.L.)
| | - Frédéric Fournier
- Genomics Center, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Quebec City, QC GIV 4G2, Canada; (M.D.); (C.J.-B.); (A.D.); (S.D.); (A.-C.C.-D.); (P.S.); (M.V.); (F.F.); (A.L.)
| | - Audrey Lemaçon
- Genomics Center, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Quebec City, QC GIV 4G2, Canada; (M.D.); (C.J.-B.); (A.D.); (S.D.); (A.-C.C.-D.); (P.S.); (M.V.); (F.F.); (A.L.)
| | - Muriel A. Adank
- Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.A.A.); (F.B.L.H.); (L.v.d.K.)
| | - Jamie Allen
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (J.A.); (M.K.B.); (S.C.); (P.D.P.P.); (Q.W.); (D.F.E.)
| | - Janine Altmüller
- Cologne Center for Genomics (CCG), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany; (J.A.); (H.T.)
| | - Norbert Arnold
- Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany;
| | - Margreet G. E. M. Ausems
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Riccardo Berutti
- Institute of Human Genetics, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany; (R.B.); (T.M.S.)
| | - Manjeet K. Bolla
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (J.A.); (M.K.B.); (S.C.); (P.D.P.P.); (Q.W.); (D.F.E.)
| | - Shelley Bull
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada; (S.B.); (J.G.); (G.D.B.); (I.L.A.)
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
| | - Sara Carvalho
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (J.A.); (M.K.B.); (S.C.); (P.D.P.P.); (Q.W.); (D.F.E.)
| | - Sten Cornelissen
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.C.); (R.K.); (M.K.S.)
| | - Michael R. Dufault
- Precision Medicine and Computational Biology, Sanofi Genzyme, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA;
| | - Alison M. Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (A.M.D.); (C.L.); (M.S.)
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, 04107 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Andrea Gehrig
- Centre of Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Department of Medical Genetics, Institute of Human Genetics, University of Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany;
| | | | - Christian Gieger
- Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (C.G.); (A.P.)
- Research Unit Molecular Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Centre for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Jessica Green
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada; (S.B.); (J.G.); (G.D.B.); (I.L.A.)
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada;
| | - Karl Hackmann
- Institute for Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany;
| | - Mohamed Helmy
- The Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3E1, Canada;
- Bioinformatics Institute (BII), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore 138632, Singapore
- Department of Computer Science, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
| | - Julia Hentschel
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Frans B. L. Hogervorst
- Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.A.A.); (F.B.L.H.); (L.v.d.K.)
| | - Antoinette Hollestelle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (A.H.); (M.J.H.); (J.W.M.M.)
| | - Maartje J. Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (A.H.); (M.J.H.); (J.W.M.M.)
| | - Judit Horváth
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany;
| | - M. Arfan Ikram
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Silke Kaulfuß
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany;
| | - Renske Keeman
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.C.); (R.K.); (M.K.S.)
| | - Da Kuang
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada;
- The Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3E1, Canada;
| | - Craig Luccarini
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (A.M.D.); (C.L.); (M.S.)
| | - Wolfgang Maier
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany;
| | - John W. M. Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (A.H.); (M.J.H.); (J.W.M.M.)
| | - Dieter Niederacher
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;
| | - Peter Nürnberg
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Cologne Center for Genomics (CCG), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Claus-Eric Ott
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Human Genetics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Annette Peters
- Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (C.G.); (A.P.)
- Department of Epidemiology, Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80539 Munich, Germany
| | - Paul D. P. Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (J.A.); (M.K.B.); (S.C.); (P.D.P.P.); (Q.W.); (D.F.E.)
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (A.M.D.); (C.L.); (M.S.)
| | - Alfredo Ramirez
- Division for Neurogenetics and Molecular Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Juliane Ramser
- Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.R.); (A.M.)
| | - Steffi Riedel-Heller
- Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Gunnar Schmidt
- Institute of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany;
| | - Mitul Shah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (A.M.D.); (C.L.); (M.S.)
| | - Martin Scherer
- Department of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Antje Stäbler
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Tim M. Strom
- Institute of Human Genetics, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany; (R.B.); (T.M.S.)
| | - Christian Sutter
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Holger Thiele
- Cologne Center for Genomics (CCG), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany; (J.A.); (H.T.)
| | - Christi J. van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 Leiden, The Netherlands; (C.J.v.A.); (R.B.v.d.L.)
| | - Lizet van der Kolk
- Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.A.A.); (F.B.L.H.); (L.v.d.K.)
| | - Rob B. van der Luijt
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 Leiden, The Netherlands; (C.J.v.A.); (R.B.v.d.L.)
- Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center, 3584 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander E. Volk
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Michael Wagner
- Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany;
| | - Quinten Waisfisz
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Qin Wang
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (J.A.); (M.K.B.); (S.C.); (P.D.P.P.); (Q.W.); (D.F.E.)
| | - Shan Wang-Gohrke
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany;
| | - Bernhard H. F. Weber
- Institute of Human Genetics, Regensburg University, 93053 Regensburg, Germany;
- Institute of Clinical Human Genetics, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Pathology, Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 Leiden, The Netherlands;
| | - Sean Tavtigian
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA;
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| | - Gary D. Bader
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada; (S.B.); (J.G.); (G.D.B.); (I.L.A.)
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada;
- The Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3E1, Canada;
- Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3E1, Canada
- Princess Margaret Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 0A3, Canada
| | - Alfons Meindl
- Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.R.); (A.M.)
| | - David E. Goldgar
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84103, USA; (B.-J.F.); (D.E.G.)
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA;
| | - Irene L. Andrulis
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada; (S.B.); (J.G.); (G.D.B.); (I.L.A.)
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada;
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.W.-L.); (C.E.); (R.K.S.); (E.H.)
| | - Douglas F. Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (J.A.); (M.K.B.); (S.C.); (P.D.P.P.); (Q.W.); (D.F.E.)
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (A.M.D.); (C.L.); (M.S.)
| | - Marjanka K. Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.C.); (R.K.); (M.K.S.)
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.W.-L.); (C.E.); (R.K.S.); (E.H.)
| | - Jacques Simard
- Genomics Center, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Quebec City, QC GIV 4G2, Canada; (M.D.); (C.J.-B.); (A.D.); (S.D.); (A.-C.C.-D.); (P.S.); (M.V.); (F.F.); (A.L.)
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +418-654-2264
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ge S, Wang B, Wang Z, He J, Ma X. Common Multiple Primary Cancers Associated With Breast and Gynecologic Cancers and Their Risk Factors, Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prognosis: A Review. Front Oncol 2022; 12:840431. [PMID: 35756608 PMCID: PMC9213651 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.840431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The mammary gland is closely related to the female reproductive system in many aspects, affecting the whole gynecological system. Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in women and associated with considerable negative effects. Due to various factors including co-pathogenic genetic mutations, environment factors, lifestyle, behavioral factors, treatment regimens and in-creased survival of patients with BC, there is an increased probability of developing additional primary gynecologic cancers such as ovarian cancer (OC), endometrial cancer (EC), and cervical cancer (CC). More and more studies have been conducted in recent years. Multiple primary cancers (MPCs), also known as multiple primary malignancies, refers to two or more different primary cancers in the same patient occurring in the same or different organs or tissues. The pathogenesis of multiple primary cancers is complex and has a negative effect on the prognosis and survival of patients. This review discusses the common types of BC-associated MPCs, namely, BC associated with OC, BC associated with EC and BC associated with CC, as well as risk factors, pathogenesis, treatment, and prognosis of MPCs associated with breast and gynecologic cancers. It provides new intervention and treatment ideas for patients with BC-associated MPCs to improve quality of life and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuwen Ge
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.,Key Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine of Liaoning Province, Key Laboratory of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Higher Education of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China
| | - Bo Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.,Key Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine of Liaoning Province, Key Laboratory of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Higher Education of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China
| | - Zihao Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.,Key Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine of Liaoning Province, Key Laboratory of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Higher Education of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China
| | - Junjian He
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.,Key Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine of Liaoning Province, Key Laboratory of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Higher Education of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiaoxin Ma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.,Key Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine of Liaoning Province, Key Laboratory of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Higher Education of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rhiem K, Auber B, Briest S, Dikow N, Ditsch N, Dragicevic N, Grill S, Hahnen E, Horvath J, Jaeger B, Kast K, Kiechle M, Leinert E, Morlot S, Püsken M, Schäfer D, Schott S, Schroeder C, Siebers-Renelt U, Solbach C, Weber-Lassalle N, Witzel I, Zeder-Göß C, Schmutzler RK. Consensus Recommendations of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 17:199-207. [PMID: 35702495 PMCID: PMC9149395 DOI: 10.1159/000516376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC) has established a multigene panel (TruRisk®) for the analysis of risk genes for familial breast and ovarian cancer. SUMMARY An interdisciplinary team of experts from the GC-HBOC has evaluated the available data on risk modification in the presence of pathogenic mutations in these genes based on a structured literature search and through a formal consensus process. KEY MESSAGES The goal of this work is to better assess individual disease risk and, on this basis, to derive clinical recommendations for patient counseling and care at the centers of the GC-HBOC from the initial consultation prior to genetic testing to the use of individual risk-adapted preventive/therapeutic measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bernd Auber
- Department of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Susanne Briest
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Nicola Dikow
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Neda Dragicevic
- Institute of Human Genetics, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Sabine Grill
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Judit Horvath
- Institute for Human Genetics, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Bernadette Jaeger
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Karin Kast
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marion Kiechle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Elena Leinert
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Susanne Morlot
- Department of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Michael Püsken
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dieter Schäfer
- Institute for Human Genetics, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sarah Schott
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christopher Schroeder
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Christine Solbach
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nana Weber-Lassalle
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christine Zeder-Göß
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Glycosylation-Related Genes Predict the Prognosis and Immune Fraction of Ovarian Cancer Patients Based on Weighted Gene Coexpression Network Analysis (WGCNA) and Machine Learning. OXIDATIVE MEDICINE AND CELLULAR LONGEVITY 2022; 2022:3665617. [PMID: 35281472 PMCID: PMC8916863 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3665617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Ovarian cancer (OC) is a malignancy exhibiting high mortality in female tumors. Glycosylation is a posttranslational modification of proteins but research has failed to demonstrate a systematic link between glycosylation-related signatures and tumor environment of OC. Purpose This study is aimed at developing a novel model with glycosylation-related messenger RNAs (GRmRNAs) to predict the prognosis and immune function in OC patients. Methods The transcriptional profiles and clinical phenotypes of OC patients were collected from the Gene Expression Omnibus and The Cancer Genome Atlas databases. A weighted gene coexpression network analysis and machine learning were performed to find the optimal survival-related GRmRNAs. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO) and Cox regression were carried out to calculate the coefficients of each GRmRNA and compute the risk score of each patient as well as develop a prognostic model. A nomogram model was constructed, and several algorithms were used to investigate the relationship between risk subtypes and immune-infiltrating levels. Results A total of four signatures (ALG8, DCTN4, DCTN6, and UBB) were determined to calculate the risk scores, classifying patients into the high-and low-risk groups. High-risk patients exhibited significantly poorer survival outcomes, and the established nomogram model had a promising prediction for OC patients' prognosis. Tumor purity and tumor mutation burden were negatively correlated with risk scores. In addition, risk scores held statistical associations with pathway signatures such as Wnt, Hippo, and reactive oxygen species, and nonsynonymous mutation counts. Conclusion The currently established risk scores based on GRmRNAs can accurately predict the prognosis, the immune microenvironment, and the immunotherapeutic efficacy of OC patients.
Collapse
|
34
|
Liu YL, Breen K, Catchings A, Ranganathan M, Latham A, Goldfrank DJ, Grisham RN, Long Roche K, Frey MK, Chi DS, Abu-Rustum N, Aghajanian C, Offit K, Stadler ZK. Risk-Reducing Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy for Ovarian Cancer: A Review and Clinical Guide for Hereditary Predisposition Genes. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:201-209. [PMID: 34582274 PMCID: PMC8932494 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Pathogenic germline variants underlie up to 20% of ovarian cancer (OC) and are associated with varying degrees of risk for OC. For mutations in high-penetrance genes such as BRCA1/2, the role of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in cancer prevention is well-established and improves mortality. However, in moderate-penetrance genes where the degree of risk for OC is less precisely defined, the role of RRSO is more controversial. Although national guidelines have evolved to incorporate gene-specific recommendations, studies demonstrate significant variations in practice. Given this, our multidisciplinary group has reviewed the available literature on risk estimates for genes associated with OC, incorporated levels of evidence, and set thresholds for consideration of RRSO. We found that the benefit of RRSO is well-established for pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 as well as BRIP1 and RAD51C/D where the risk of OC is elevated beyond our threshold for RRSO. In PALB2, RRSO is particularly controversial as newer studies consistently demonstrate an increased risk of OC that is dependent on family history, making uniform recommendations challenging. Additionally, new guidelines for Lynch syndrome provide gene-specific risks, questioning the role of RRSO, and even hysterectomy, for MSH6 and PMS2 mutation carriers. Given these uncertainties, shared decision making should be used around RRSO with discussion of individual risk factors, family history, and adverse effects of surgery and premature menopause. Herein, we provide a clinical guide and counseling points.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying L. Liu
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY,Ying L. Liu, MD, MPH, Gynecologic Medical Oncology Clinical Genetics Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66th St, 1309 New York, NY 10065; e-mail:
| | - Kelsey Breen
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Amanda Catchings
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Megha Ranganathan
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Alicia Latham
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY,General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Deborah J. Goldfrank
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Rachel N. Grisham
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Melissa K. Frey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Dennis S. Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Nadeem Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Zsofia K. Stadler
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hongo H, Kosaka T, Nakamura K, Mikami S, Nishihara H, Oya M. A first Japanese case of intraductal cancer of the prostate with checkpoint kinase 2 mutation. Asian J Urol 2022; 9:480-482. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
36
|
El Jabbour T, Misyura M, Cowzer D, Zimmermann M, Rimkunas V, Marra A, Derakhshan F, Selenica P, Parilla M, Setton JS, Ceyhan-Birsoy O, Kemel Y, Catchings A, Ranganathan M, Ku GY, Janjigian YY, Zinda M, Koehler M, Stadler Z, Shia J, Reis-Filho JS, Mandelker D. ATM Germline Mutated Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinomas: Clinical Descriptors, Molecular Characteristics and Potential Therapeutic Implications. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:761-770. [PMID: 35078243 PMCID: PMC9086803 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is a rare cancer associated with poor prognosis. The genetic factors conferring predisposition to GEJ adenocarcinoma have yet to be identified. Methods We analyzed germline testing results from 23 381 cancer patients undergoing tumor-normal sequencing, of which 312 individuals had GEJ adenocarcinoma. Genomic profiles and clinico-pathologic features were analyzed for the GEJ adenocarcinomas. Silencing of ATM and ATR was performed using validated short-interfering RNA species in GEJ, esophageal, and gastric adenocarcinoma cell lines. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results Pathogenic or likely pathogenic ATM variants were identified in 18 of 312 patients (5.8%), and bi-allelic inactivation of ATM through loss of heterozygosity of the wild-type allele was detected in all (16 of 16) samples with sufficient tumor content. Germline ATM-mutated GEJ adenocarcinomas largely lacked somatic mutations in TP53, were more likely to harbor MDM2 amplification, and harbored statistically significantly fewer somatic single nucleotide variants (2.0 mutations/Mb vs 7.9 mutations/Mb; P < .001). A statistically significantly higher proportion of germline ATM-mutated than ATM–wild-type GEJ adenocarcinoma patients underwent a curative resection (10 [100%] vs 92 [86.8%], P = .04; Fisher’s exact test.), A synthetic lethal interaction between short-interfering RNA silencing of ATM and ATR was observed in the models analyzed. Conclusions Our results indicate that germline pathogenic variants in ATM drive oncogenesis in GEJ adenocarcinoma and might result in a distinct clinical phenotype. Given the high prevalence of germline ATM-mutated GEJ adenocarcinomas, genetic testing for individuals with GEJ adenocarcinomas may be considered to better inform prognostication, treatment decisions, and future cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony El Jabbour
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maksym Misyura
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Darren Cowzer
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Antonio Marra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fatemeh Derakhshan
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pier Selenica
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Megan Parilla
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeremy S Setton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yelena Kemel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amanda Catchings
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Megha Ranganathan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Geoffrey Y Ku
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yelena Y Janjigian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Zsofia Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jorge S Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Diana Mandelker
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Shi X, Li R, Zhai J, Chen AM, Huang K, Zheng Z, Chen Z, Dong X, Liu X, Lu D, Feng S, Diao D, Ren P, Liu Z, Morahan G, Cai K. The first comprehensive database of germline pathogenic variants in East Asian cancer patients. Database (Oxford) 2021; 2021:6487783. [PMID: 34964846 PMCID: PMC8730286 DOI: 10.1093/database/baab075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Pathogenic germline variants in cancer-associated genes are risk factors for cancer
predisposition. However, systematic mining and summarizing of cancer pathogenic or
likely pathogenic variants has not been performed for people of East Asian descent. This
study aimed to investigate publicly available data to identify germline variants in East
Asian cancer cohorts and compare them to variants in Caucasian cancer cohorts. Based on
the data we retrieved, we built a comprehensive database, named COGVIC (Catalog of
Germline Variants in Cancer). A total of 233 variants in the East Asian population were
identified. The majority (87%) of genes with cancer-associated variants were not shared
between the East Asian and Caucasian cohorts. This included pathogenic variants in
BRCA2. Our study summarized the prevalence of germline variants in
East Asian cancer cohorts and provides an easy-to-use online tool to explore germline
mutations related to cancer susceptibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoshun Shi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guang Zhou Avenue North, Guangzhou 510515, P. R. China.,Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre and Centre for Medical Research, The University of Western Australia, 6 Verdun St, Nedlands WA 6009, Australia
| | - Ruidong Li
- Genetics, Genomics, and Bioinformatics Program, University of California, 900 University Ave, Riverside, CA 92507, USA
| | - Jianxue Zhai
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guang Zhou Avenue North, Guangzhou 510515, P. R. China
| | - Allen Menglin Chen
- Guangzhou Mendel Genomics and Medical Technology Co., Ltd., 6/F, Bldg D, 188 Kaiyuan Ave, Guangzhou 510535, P. R. China
| | - Kailing Huang
- Guangzhou Mendel Genomics and Medical Technology Co., Ltd., 6/F, Bldg D, 188 Kaiyuan Ave, Guangzhou 510535, P. R. China
| | - Zhouxia Zheng
- Guangzhou Mendel Genomics and Medical Technology Co., Ltd., 6/F, Bldg D, 188 Kaiyuan Ave, Guangzhou 510535, P. R. China
| | - Zhuona Chen
- Guangzhou Mendel Genomics and Medical Technology Co., Ltd., 6/F, Bldg D, 188 Kaiyuan Ave, Guangzhou 510535, P. R. China
| | - Xiaoyin Dong
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guang Zhou Avenue North, Guangzhou 510515, P. R. China
| | - Xiguang Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guang Zhou Avenue North, Guangzhou 510515, P. R. China
| | - Di Lu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guang Zhou Avenue North, Guangzhou 510515, P. R. China
| | - Siyang Feng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guang Zhou Avenue North, Guangzhou 510515, P. R. China
| | - Dingwei Diao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guang Zhou Avenue North, Guangzhou 510515, P. R. China
| | - Pengfei Ren
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guang Zhou Avenue North, Guangzhou 510515, P. R. China
| | - Zhaoguo Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guang Zhou Avenue North, Guangzhou 510515, P. R. China
| | - Grant Morahan
- Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre and Centre for Medical Research, The University of Western Australia, 6 Verdun St, Nedlands WA 6009, Australia
| | - Kaican Cai
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guang Zhou Avenue North, Guangzhou 510515, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ultrasound-Targeted Microbubble Destruction-Mediated Inhibition of Livin Expression Accelerates Ovarian Cancer Cell Apoptosis. Genet Res (Camb) 2021; 2021:7624346. [PMID: 34949962 PMCID: PMC8677365 DOI: 10.1155/2021/7624346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD) technique has recently been developed as a nonviral delivery of gene therapy. This study aimed at investigating the survival and apoptosis of ovarian cancer cell line OVCA-433 by inhibiting Livin expression through ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction. Methods We synthesized a targeted microbubble agent for UTMD-mediated shRNA against Livin gene in human ovarian cancer OVCA-433 cells. Lipid microbubbles were conjugated with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (LHRHa) by an avidin-biotin linkage to target the ovarian cancer OVCA-433 cells expressing LHRH receptors. The microbubbles were mixed with the recombinant plasmid harboring shRNA-Livin. shRNA-Livin was transfected into OVCA-433 cells upon exposure to 1 MHz pulsed ultrasound beam (0.5 W/cm2) for 8 s. Cell survival was measured by the MTT assay, cell apoptosis by flow cytometry using annexin V/PI double staining, and cell ultrastructure by using the transmission electron microscope. The mRNA and protein expression levels of caspase-3 and caspase-8 were detected by RT-qPCR and western blotting. Results UTMD-mediated delivery of shRNA-Livin remarkably reduced the survival of OVCA-433 cells but promoted the apoptosis compared with shRNA-Livin alone, shRNA-Livin plus nontargeted microbubbles, and shRNA-Livin plus LHRHa-conjugated microbubbles containing shRNA-Livin with or without exposure to ultrasound pulses. It was also found that UTMD-mediated delivery of shRNA-Livin notably declined the mRNA and protein expression levels of caspase-3 and caspase-8 in OVCA-433 cells compared with shRNA-Livin alone, shRNA-Livin plus nontargeted microbubbles, and shRNA-Livin plus LHRHa-conjugated microbubbles containing shRNA-Livin with or without exposure to ultrasound pulses. Conclusion Our experiment verifies the hypothesis that ultrasound mediation of targeted microbubbles can enhance the transfection efficiency of shRNA-Livin in ovarian cancer cells.
Collapse
|
39
|
Population-based estimates of breast cancer risk for carriers of pathogenic variants identified by gene-panel testing. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7:153. [PMID: 34887416 PMCID: PMC8660783 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00360-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Population-based estimates of breast cancer risk for carriers of pathogenic variants identified by gene-panel testing are urgently required. Most prior research has been based on women selected for high-risk features and more data is needed to make inference about breast cancer risk for women unselected for family history, an important consideration of population screening. We tested 1464 women diagnosed with breast cancer and 862 age-matched controls participating in the Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS), and 6549 healthy, older Australian women enroled in the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study for rare germline variants using a 24-gene-panel. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression adjusted for age and other potential confounders. We identified pathogenic variants in 11.1% of the ABCFS cases, 3.7% of the ABCFS controls and 2.2% of the ASPREE (control) participants. The estimated breast cancer OR [95% confidence interval] was 5.3 [2.1–16.2] for BRCA1, 4.0 [1.9–9.1] for BRCA2, 3.4 [1.4–8.4] for ATM and 4.3 [1.0–17.0] for PALB2. Our findings provide a population-based perspective to gene-panel testing for breast cancer predisposition and opportunities to improve predictors for identifying women who carry pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes.
Collapse
|
40
|
An integrative pan-cancer analysis reveals the oncogenic role of mutS homolog 6 (MSH6) in human tumors. Aging (Albany NY) 2021; 13:25271-25290. [PMID: 34941572 PMCID: PMC8714153 DOI: 10.18632/aging.203745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
There are three most important mismatch repair genes in the mismatch repair system, MSH6 is one of them and it plays an essential role in DNA mismatch repair. Several emerging cell- or animal-based studies have verified that MSH6 mutations are closely linked to the occurrence, progression or metastasis of cancer, but there is still no practicable pan-cancer analysis. On account of the available datasets of the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) and Gene expression omnibus (GEO), a comprehensive analysis of the potential carcinogenic effects of the MSH6 gene was conducted in 33 human cancers. MSH6 was highly expressed in most cancers, and the high expression of MSH6 was associated with poor overall survival prognosis of patients with multiple cancers, such as adrenocortical carcinoma. MSH6 mutations occurred in most cancers and were closely related to the prognosis of cancer patients. Increased phosphorylation levels of S227 and S830 were noted in several tumors, including breast cancer and colon cancer. MSH6 expression was also observed to be correlated with cancer-associated fibroblasts and CD8+ T-cells infiltration levels in various cancer types, e. g. pancreatic adenocarcinoma or testicular germ cell tumors. Furthermore, pathway enrichment analysis demonstrated that the main biological activities of MSH6 were related to ATPase activity, mismatch repair, and DNA metabolism-related functions. Altogether, our pan-cancer research has suggested that the MSH6 expression level was closely related to the carcinogenesis and prognosis of certain tumors, which helps to know the effect of MSH6 in tumorigenesis from the point of view of clinical tumor samples.
Collapse
|
41
|
Xu Y, Zheng J, Cai Z, Li W, Köhler J, Dai Y, Cheng X, Wu T, Zhang F, Wang H. Therapeutic Response-Based Reclassification of Multiple Tumor Subtypes Reveals Intrinsic Molecular Concordance of Therapy Across Histologically Disparate Cancers. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021; 9:773101. [PMID: 34869372 PMCID: PMC8632957 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.773101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancers that are histologically defined as the same type of cancer often need a distinct therapy based on underlying heterogeneity; likewise, histologically disparate cancers can require similar treatment approaches due to intrinsic similarities. A comprehensive analysis integrated with drug response data and molecular alterations, particularly to reveal therapeutic concordance mechanisms across histologically disparate tumor subtypes, has not yet been fully exploited. In this study, we integrated pharmacological, genomic, and transcriptomic profiling data provided from the Cancer Genome Project (CGP) in a systematic in silico investigation of the pharmacological subtypes of cancers and the intrinsic concordance of molecular mechanisms leading to similar therapeutic responses across histologically disparate tumor subtypes. We further developed a novel approach to redefine cell-to-cell similarity and drug-to-drug similarity from the therapeutic concordance, providing a new point of view to study cancer heterogeneity. This study demonstrates how pharmacological and omics data can be used to systematically classify cancers in terms of response to various compounds and provides us with a purely therapy-oriented perspective to view tumor classifications independent of histology subtypes. The knowledge of pharmacological subtypes of 367 drugs are available via our website (http://www.hywanglab.cn/dtdb/), providing the resources for precision medicine in the perspective of therapeutic response-based re-classification of tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Xu
- School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Zheng
- School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhaoqing Cai
- School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wang Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jens Köhler
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Yao Dai
- School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaojie Cheng
- School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tao Wu
- School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Fan Zhang
- School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Haiyun Wang
- School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Dahle Ommundsen RM, Strømsvik N, Hamang A. Assessing the relationship between patient preferences for recontact after BRCA1 or BRCA2 genetic testing and their monitoring coping style in a Norwegian sample. J Genet Couns 2021; 31:554-564. [PMID: 34716741 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Recontacting former patients regarding new genetic information is currently not standard care but might be implemented in the future. Little information is available on the implications of this practice from the point of view of former patients. The aim of this study was to investigate preferences for recontact when new genetic information becomes available among patients tested for BRCA pathogenic variants. We further wanted to investigate whether having a high or low information-seeking coping style (monitoring) impacts preferences. Preferences for recontact were assessed using a self-constructed questionnaire. The Threatening Medical Situations Inventory (TMSI) was used to measure monitoring coping style. The questionnaires were sent to 500 randomly selected patients who had previously been tested for BRCA pathogenic variants within the time frame 2001-2014 at one genetic clinic in Norway. We received 323 completed questionnaires. Most respondents wanted to be recontacted with advances in genetic medicine (81.1%) and to receive highly personalized updates. Genetic counselors/geneticists were believed to be most responsible for recontact. There was a significant relationship between being a high monitor and wanting recontact to learn about own cancer risk and receive ongoing support. Patients have a high interest in being recontacted. The findings indicated a tendency for high monitors to prefer more detailed and personalized information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randi Marlene Dahle Ommundsen
- Department of Medical Genetics, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Global Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Nina Strømsvik
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Medical Genetics, Northern Norway Familial Cancer Center, University Hospital of North-Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Anniken Hamang
- Department of Medical Genetics, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Witjes VM, van Bommel MHD, Ligtenberg MJL, Vos JR, Mourits MJE, Ausems MGEM, de Hullu JA, Bosse T, Hoogerbrugge N. Probability of detecting germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in histological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma. A meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 164:221-230. [PMID: 34702566 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Histology restricted genetic predisposition testing of ovarian carcinoma patients is a topic of debate as the prevalence of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) in various histological subtypes is ambiguous. Our primary aim was to investigate the proportion of germline BRCA1/2 PVs per histological subtype. Additionally, we evaluated (i) proportion of somatic BRCA1/2 PVs and (ii) proportion of germline PVs in other ovarian carcinoma risk genes. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were systematically searched and we included all studies reporting germline BRCA1/2 PVs per histological subtype. Pooled proportions were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis model. Subsets of studies were used for secondary analyses. RESULTS Twenty-eight studies were identified. The overall estimated proportion of germline BRCA1/2 PVs was 16.8% (95% CI 14.6 to 19.2). Presence differed substantially among patients with varying histological subtypes of OC; proportions being highest in high-grade serous (22.2%, 95% CI 19.6 to 25.0) and lowest in clear cell (3.0%, 95% CI 1.6 to 5.6) and mucinous (2.5%, 95% CI 0.6 to 9.6) carcinomas. Somatic BRCA1/2 PVs were present with total estimated proportion of 6.0% (95% CI 5.0 to 7.3), based on a smaller subset of studies. Germline PVs in BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D, PALB2, and ATM were present in approximately 3%, based on a subset of nine studies. CONCLUSION Germline BRCA1/2 PVs are most frequently identified in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma patients, but are also detected in patients having ovarian carcinomas of other histological subtypes. Limiting genetic predisposition testing to high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma patients will likely be insufficient to identify all patients with a germline PV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera M Witjes
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Majke H D van Bommel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Janet R Vos
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marian J E Mourits
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Department of Genetics, Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne A de Hullu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Chamseddine RS, Wang C, Yin K, Wang J, Singh P, Zhou J, Robson ME, Braun D, Hughes KS. Penetrance of male breast cancer susceptibility genes: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 191:31-38. [PMID: 34642874 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06413-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Several male breast cancer (MBC) susceptibility genes have been identified, but the MBC risk for individuals with a pathogenic variant in each of these genes (i.e., penetrance) remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting the penetrance of MBC susceptibility genes to better summarize current estimates of penetrance. METHODS A search query was developed to identify MBC-related papers indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE. A validated natural language processing method was applied to identify papers reporting penetrance estimates. These penetrance studies' bibliographies were reviewed to ensure comprehensiveness. We accessed the potential ascertainment bias for each enrolled study. RESULTS Fifteen penetrance studies were identified from 12,182 abstracts, covering five purported MBC susceptibility genes: ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2. Cohort (n = 6, 40%) and case-control (n = 5, 33%) studies were the two most common study designs, followed by family-based (n = 3, 20%), and a kin-cohort study (n = 1, 7%). Seven of the 15 studies (47%) adjusted for ascertainment adequately and therefore the MBC risks reported by these seven studies can be considered applicable to the general population. Based on these seven studies, we found pathogenic variants in ATM, BRCA2, CHEK2 c.1100delC, and PALB2 show an increased risk for MBC. The association between BRCA1 and MBC was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION This work supports the conclusion that pathogenic variants in ATM, BRCA2, CHEK2 c.1100delC, and PALB2 increase the risk of MBC, whereas pathogenic variants in BRCA1 may not be associated with increased MBC risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reem S Chamseddine
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Ar-Rayyan, Qatar
| | - Cathy Wang
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kanhua Yin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jin Wang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. .,Department of Breast Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, China.
| | - Preeti Singh
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jingan Zhou
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of General Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Mark E Robson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Danielle Braun
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kevin S Hughes
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Liang H, Lu T, Liu H, Tan L. The Relationships between HLA-A and HLA-B Genes and the Genetic Susceptibility to Breast Cancer in Guangxi. RUSS J GENET+ 2021. [DOI: 10.1134/s1022795421100069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
46
|
Chen Z, Guo X, Long J, Ping J, Li B, Fadden MK, Ahearn TU, Stram DO, Shu XO, Jia G, Figueroa J, Palmer JR, Sanderson M, Haiman CA, Blot WJ, Garcia-Closas M, Cai Q, Zheng W. Discovery of structural deletions in breast cancer predisposition genes using whole genome sequencing data from > 2000 women of African-ancestry. Hum Genet 2021; 140:1449-1457. [PMID: 34487234 PMCID: PMC9109261 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-021-02342-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Single germline nucleotide pathogenic variants have been identified in 12 breast cancer predisposition genes, but structural deletions in these genes remain poorly characterized. We conducted in-depth whole genome sequencing (WGS) in genomic DNA samples obtained from 1340 invasive breast cancer cases and 675 controls of African ancestry. We identified 25 deletions in the intragenic regions of ten established breast cancer predisposition genes based on a consensus call from six state-of-the-art SV callers. Overall, no significant case-control difference was found in the frequency of these deletions. However, 1.0% of cases and 0.3% of controls carried any of the eight putative protein-truncating rare deletions located in BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, TP53, NF1, RAD51D, RAD51C and CHEK2, resulting in an odds ratio (OR) of 3.29 (95% CI 0.74-30.16). We also identified a low-frequency deletion in NF1 associated with breast cancer risk (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.14-3.42). In addition, we detected 56 deletions, including six putative protein-truncating deletions, in suspected breast predisposition genes. This is the first large study to systematically search for structural deletions in breast cancer predisposition genes. Many of the deletions, particularly those resulting in protein truncations, are likely to be pathogenic. Results from this study, if confirmed in future large-scale studies, could have significant implications for genetic testing for this common cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhishan Chen
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, TN, 37203-1738, Nashville, USA
| | - Xingyi Guo
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, TN, 37203-1738, Nashville, USA
| | - Jirong Long
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, TN, 37203-1738, Nashville, USA
| | - Jie Ping
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, TN, 37203-1738, Nashville, USA
| | - Bingshan Li
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Mary Kay Fadden
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Thomas U Ahearn
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Daniel O Stram
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Xiao-Ou Shu
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, TN, 37203-1738, Nashville, USA
| | - Guochong Jia
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, TN, 37203-1738, Nashville, USA
| | - Jonine Figueroa
- Usher Institute and CRUK Edinburgh Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Julie R Palmer
- Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maureen Sanderson
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Christopher A Haiman
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - William J Blot
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, TN, 37203-1738, Nashville, USA
| | | | - Qiuyin Cai
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, TN, 37203-1738, Nashville, USA
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, TN, 37203-1738, Nashville, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Toh M, Ngeow J. Homologous Recombination Deficiency: Cancer Predispositions and Treatment Implications. Oncologist 2021; 26:e1526-e1537. [PMID: 34021944 PMCID: PMC8417864 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Homologous recombination (HR) is a highly accurate DNA repair mechanism. Several HR genes are established cancer susceptibility genes with clinically actionable pathogenic variants (PVs). Classically, BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline PVs are associated with significant breast and ovarian cancer risks. Patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 PVs display worse clinical outcomes but respond better to platinum-based chemotherapies and poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors, a trait termed "BRCAness." With the advent of whole-exome sequencing and multigene panels, PVs in other HR genes are increasingly identified among familial cancers. As such, several genes such as PALB2 are reclassified as cancer predisposition genes. But evidence for cancer risks remains unclear for many others. In this review, we will discuss cancer predispositions and treatment implications beyond BRCA1 and BRCA2, with a focus on 24 HR genes: 53BP1, ATM, ATR, ATRIP, BARD1, BLM, BRIP1, DMC1, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, RAD50, RAD51, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, RIF1, RMI1, RMI2, RPA1, TOP3A, TOPBP1, XRCC2, and XRCC3. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This review provides a comprehensive reference for readers to quickly identify potential cancer predisposing homologous recombination (HR) genes, and to generate research questions for genes with inconclusive evidence. This review also evaluates the "BRCAness" of each HR member. Clinicians can refer to these discussions to identify potential candidates for future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MingRen Toh
- Duke–National University of Singapore Medical SchoolSingapore
| | - Joanne Ngeow
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer CenterSingapore
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological UniversitySingapore
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Vaidyanathan A, Kaklamani V. Understanding the Clinical Implications of Low Penetrant Genes and Breast Cancer Risk. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2021; 22:85. [PMID: 34424438 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-021-00887-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Since the 2013 Supreme Court declaration, panel testing for hereditary cancer syndromes has evolved into the gold standard for oncology germline genetic testing. With the advent of next-generation sequencing, competitive pricing, and developing therapeutic options, panel testing is now well integrated into breast cancer management and surveillance. Although many established syndromes have well-defined cancer risks and management strategies, several breast cancer genes are currently classified as limited-evidence genes by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Follow-up for individuals with mutations in these genes is a point of contention due to conflicting information in the literature. The most recent NCCN guidelines have stratified management based on gene-specific cancer risks indicating that expanding data will allow for better recommendations as research progresses. The evolving management for these genes emphasizes the clinicians' need for evidence-based understanding of low penetrance breast cancer genes and their implications for patient care. This article reviews current literature for limited evidence genes, detailing cancer risks, association with triple-negative breast cancer, and recommendations for surveillance. A brief review of the challenges and future directions is outlined to discuss the evolving nature of cancer genetics and the exciting opportunities that can impact management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anusha Vaidyanathan
- UT Health Science Center San Antonio, 7979 Wurzbach Road, San Antonio, TX, 79229, USA.
| | - Virginia Kaklamani
- UT Health Science Center San Antonio, 7979 Wurzbach Road, San Antonio, TX, 79229, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Gene Panel Testing for Breast Cancer Reveals Differential Effect of Prior BRCA1/2 Probability. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13164154. [PMID: 34439310 PMCID: PMC8394249 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Whilst panel testing of an extended group of genes including BRCA1/2 is commonplace, these studies have not been subdivided by histiotype or by a priori BRCA1/2 probability. Patients with a breast cancer diagnosis undergoing extended panel testing were assessed for frequency of actionable variants in breast cancer genes other than BRCA1/2 by histiotype and Manchester score (MS) to reflect a priori BRCA1/2 likelihood. Rates were adjusted by prior testing for BRCA1/2 in an extended series. 95/1398 (6.3%) who underwent panel testing were found to be positive for actionable non-BRCA1/2 breast/ovarian cancer genes (ATM, BARD1, CDH1, CHEK2, PALB2, PTEN, RAD51C, RAD51D, TP53). As expected, PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM were predominant with 80-(5.3%). The highest rate occurred in Grade-3 ER+/HER2- breast cancers-(9.6%). Rates of non-BRCA actionable genes was fairly constant over all likelihoods of BRCA1/2 but adjusted rates were three times higher with MS < 9 (BRCA1/2 = 1.5%, other = 4.7%), but was only 1.6% compared to 79.3% with MS ≥ 40. Although rates of detection of non-BRCA actionable genes are relatively constant across BRCA1/2 likelihoods this disguises an overall adjusted low frequency in high-likelihood families which have been heavily pre-tested for BRCA1/2. Any loss of detection sensitivity for BRCA1/2 actionable variants in breast cancer panels should lead to bespoke BRCA1/2 testing being conducted first.
Collapse
|
50
|
Leveraging Genomics, Transcriptomics, and Epigenomics to Understand the Biology and Chemoresistance of Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13164029. [PMID: 34439181 PMCID: PMC8391219 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is a major cause of fatality due to a gynecological malignancy. This lethality is largely due to the unspecific clinical manifestations of ovarian cancer, which lead to late detection and to high resistance to conventional therapies based on platinum. In recent years, we have advanced our understanding of the mechanisms provoking tumor relapse, and the advent of so-called omics technologies has provided exceptional tools to evaluate molecular mechanisms leading to therapy resistance in ovarian cancer. Here, we review the contribution of genomics, transcriptomics, and epigenomics techniques to our knowledge about the biology and molecular features of ovarian cancers, with a focus on therapy resistance. The use of these technologies to identify molecular markers and mechanisms leading to chemoresistance in these tumors is discussed, as well as potential further applications.
Collapse
|