1
|
Doi T, Ishikawa T, Sakakida T, Itani J, Sone D, Morita R, Kataoka S, Miyake H, Seko Y, Yamaguchi K, Moriguchi M, Sogame Y, Konishi H, Murashima K, Iwasaku M, Takayama K, Itoh Y. Real-world genome profiling in Japanese patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma focusing on HRD implications. Cancer Sci 2024. [PMID: 39315592 DOI: 10.1111/cas.16329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2024] [Revised: 08/13/2024] [Accepted: 08/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) poses significant challenges due to its high mortality, making it a critical area of research. This retrospective observational study aimed to analyze real-world data from comprehensive genome profiling (CGP) of Japanese patients with PDAC, mainly focusing on differences in gene detection rates among panels and the implications for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status. This study enrolled 2568 patients with PDAC who had undergone CGP between June 2019 and December 2021 using data from the nationwide Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database. Two types of CGP assays (tissue and liquid biopsies) were compared and a higher detection rate of genetic abnormalities in tissue specimens was revealed. HRD-related gene alterations were detected in 23% of patients, with BRCA1/2 mutations accounting for 0.9% and 2.9% of patients, respectively. Treatment outcome analysis indicated that patients with BRCA1/2 mutations had a longer time to treatment discontinuation with FOLFIRINOX than gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy (9.3 vs. 5.6 months, p = 0.028). However, no significant differences were observed in the treatment response among the other HRD-related genes. Logistic regression analysis identified younger age and family history of breast, prostate, and ovarian cancers as predictive factors for HRD-related gene alterations. Despite the lack of progression-free survival data and the inability to discriminate between germline and somatic mutations, this study provides valuable insights into the clinical implications of CGP in Japanese patients with PDAC. Further research is warranted to optimize panel selection and elucidate the efficacy of platinum-based therapies depending on the HRD status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshifumi Doi
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Cancer Genome Medical Center, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takeshi Ishikawa
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Cancer Genome Medical Center, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tomoki Sakakida
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Cancer Genome Medical Center, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Junichiro Itani
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Cancer Genome Medical Center, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Daiki Sone
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Cancer Genome Medical Center, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ryuichi Morita
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Cancer Genome Medical Center, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Seita Kataoka
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hayato Miyake
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuya Seko
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kanji Yamaguchi
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Michihisa Moriguchi
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshio Sogame
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Konishi
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kyoko Murashima
- Cancer Genome Medical Center, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masahiro Iwasaku
- Cancer Genome Medical Center, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Koichi Takayama
- Cancer Genome Medical Center, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshito Itoh
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Triner D, Graf RP, Madison RW, Gjoerup O, Tukachinsky H, Ross JS, Quintanilha JCF, Li G, Cheng HH, Pritchard CC, Zurita AJ, Qin Q, Zhang T, Agarwal N, Reichert ZR, Mateo J, Cieslik M, Morgan TM. Durable benefit from poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in metastatic prostate cancer in routine practice: biomarker associations and implications for optimal clinical next-generation sequencing testing. ESMO Open 2024; 9:103684. [PMID: 39255537 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2024] [Revised: 07/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Controlled trials have consistently demonstrated the efficacy of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and BRCA1 or BRCA2 alterations (BRCAalt). However, the reported efficacy of PARPi for alterations in other homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes is less consistent. We sought to evaluate the routine practice effectiveness of PARPi between and within these groups. DESIGN Patient-level data from a deidentified nationwide (USA-based) cancer clinico-genomic database between January 2011 and September 2023 were extracted. Patients with mCRPC and comprehensive genomic profiling by liquid biopsy [circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)] or tissue (tumor) biopsy and who received single-agent PARPi were included and grouped by BRCAalt, ATMalt, other HRR, or no HRR. We further subcategorized BRCAalt into homozygous loss (BRCAloss) and all other deleterious BRCAalt (otherBRCAalt). RESULTS A total of 445 patients met inclusion criteria: 214 with tumor and 231 with ctDNA. BRCAalt had more favorable outcomes to PARPi compared with ATM, other HRR, and no HRR groups. Within the BRCAalt subgroup, compared with other BRCAalt, BRCAloss had a more favorable time to next treatment (median 9 versus 19.4 months, P = 0.005), time to treatment discontinuation (median 8 versus 14 months, P = 0.006), and routine practice overall survival (median 14.7 versus 19.4 months, P = 0.016). Tumor BRCAloss prevalence (3.1%) was similar to ctDNA prevalence in liquid biopsy specimens with high tumor fraction (>20%). BRCAloss was not detected in orthogonal germline testing. CONCLUSIONS PARPi routine practice effectiveness between groups mirrors prospective trials. Within the BRCAalt group, BRCAloss had the best outcomes. Unless the ctDNA tumor fraction is very high, somatic tissue testing (archival or metastatic) should be prioritized to identify patients who may benefit most from PARPi. When tissue testing is not clinically feasible, sufficient ctDNA tumor fraction levels for detection are enriched at clinical timepoints associated with tumor progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Triner
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - R P Graf
- Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, USA
| | | | | | | | - J S Ross
- Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, USA; Department of Pathology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, USA; Department of Urology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, USA; Department of Medicine (Oncology), Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, USA
| | | | - G Li
- Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, USA
| | - H H Cheng
- University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, USA
| | - C C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - A J Zurita
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Q Qin
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - T Zhang
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - N Agarwal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Z R Reichert
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - J Mateo
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron University Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Cieslik
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - T M Morgan
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sudo K, Nakamura Y, Ueno M, Furukawa M, Mizuno N, Kawamoto Y, Okano N, Umemoto K, Asagi A, Ozaka M, Ohtsubo K, Shimizu S, Matsuhashi N, Itoh S, Matsumoto T, Satoh T, Okuyama H, Goto M, Hasegawa H, Yamamoto Y, Odegaard JI, Bando H, Yoshino T, Ikeda M, Morizane C. Clinical utility of BRCA and ATM mutation status in circulating tumour DNA for treatment selection in advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 2024:10.1038/s41416-024-02834-0. [PMID: 39198618 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02834-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identification of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) remains a challenge in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). We investigated the utility of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) profiling in the assessment of BRCA1/2 and ATM mutation status and treatment selection in APC. METHODS We analysed clinical and ctDNA data of 702 patients with APC enroled in GOZILA, a ctDNA profiling study using Guardant360. RESULTS Inactivating BRCA1/2 and ATM mutations were detected in 4.8% (putative germline, 3.7%) and 4.4% (putative germline, 0.9%) of patients, respectively. Objective response (63.2% vs. 16.2%) and PFS (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.93) on platinum-containing chemotherapy were significantly better in patients with putative germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA) mutation than those without. In contrast, putative gBRCA mutation had no impact on the efficacy of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. In 2 patients treated with platinum-containing therapy, putative BRCA2 reversion mutations were detected. Three of seven patients with somatic BRCA mutations responded to platinum-containing therapy, while only one of four with putative germline ATM mutations did. One-third of somatic ATM mutations were in genomic loci associated with clonal haematopoiesis. CONCLUSION Comprehensive ctDNA profiling provides clinically relevant information regarding HRD status. It can be a practical, convenient option for HRD screening in APC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kentaro Sudo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
- Translational Research Support Office, Department for the Promotion of Drug and Diagnostic Development, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
| | - Makoto Ueno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Masayuki Furukawa
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Nobumasa Mizuno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Kawamoto
- Division of Cancer Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Naohiro Okano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Mitaka, Japan
| | - Kumiko Umemoto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Akinori Asagi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Masato Ozaka
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koushiro Ohtsubo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Satoshi Shimizu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Nobuhisa Matsuhashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery and Pediatric Surgery, Gifu University, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
- Center for One Medicine Innovative Translational Research (COMIT), Gifu University, Gifu, Japan
| | - Shinji Itoh
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Toshihiko Matsumoto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Taroh Satoh
- Center for Cancer Genomics and Precision Medicine, Osaka University Hospital, Suita, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okuyama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kagawa University Hospital, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Masahiro Goto
- Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroko Hasegawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, NHO, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
| | | | - Hideaki Bando
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
- Translational Research Support Office, Department for the Promotion of Drug and Diagnostic Development, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Takayuki Yoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Masafumi Ikeda
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Chigusa Morizane
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
De Laere B, Crippa A, Discacciati A, Larsson B, Persson M, Johansson S, D'hondt S, Bergström R, Chellappa V, Mayrhofer M, Banijamali M, Kotsalaynen A, Schelstraete C, Vanwelkenhuyzen JP, Hjälm-Eriksson M, Pettersson L, Ullén A, Lumen N, Enblad G, Thellenberg Karlsson C, Jänes E, Sandzén J, Schatteman P, Nyre Vigmostad M, Olsson M, Ghysel C, Sautois B, De Roock W, Van Bruwaene S, Anden M, Verbiene I, De Maeseneer D, Everaert E, Darras J, Aksnessether BY, Luyten D, Strijbos M, Mortezavi A, Oldenburg J, Ost P, Eklund M, Grönberg H, Lindberg J. Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors and taxanes in metastatic prostate cancer: an outcome-adaptive randomized platform trial. Nat Med 2024:10.1038/s41591-024-03204-2. [PMID: 39164518 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03204-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024]
Abstract
ProBio is the first outcome-adaptive platform trial in prostate cancer utilizing a Bayesian framework to evaluate efficacy within predefined biomarker signatures across systemic treatments. Prospective circulating tumor DNA and germline DNA analysis was performed in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer before randomization to androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs), taxanes or a physician's choice control arm. The primary endpoint was the time to no longer clinically benefitting (NLCB). Secondary endpoints included overall survival and (serious) adverse events. Upon reaching the time to NLCB, patients could be re-randomized. The primary endpoint was met after 218 randomizations. ARPIs demonstrated ~50% longer time to NLCB compared to taxanes (median, 11.1 versus 6.9 months) and the physician's choice arm (median, 11.1 versus 7.4 months) in the biomarker-unselected or 'all' patient population. ARPIs demonstrated longer overall survival (median, 38.7 versus 21.7 and 21.8 months for taxanes and physician's choice, respectively). Biomarker signature findings suggest that the largest increase in time to NLCB was observed in AR (single-nucleotide variant/genomic structural rearrangement)-negative and TP53 wild-type patients and TMPRSS2-ERG fusion-positive patients, whereas no difference between ARPIs and taxanes was observed in TP53-altered patients. In summary, ARPIs outperform taxanes and physician's choice treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with detectable circulating tumor DNA. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03903835 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bram De Laere
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Alessio Crippa
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Andrea Discacciati
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Berit Larsson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria Persson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Susanne Johansson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sanne D'hondt
- Health, Innovation and Research Institute (Clinical Trial Unit), University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Rebecka Bergström
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Venkatesh Chellappa
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Markus Mayrhofer
- National Bioinformatics Infrastructure Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Mahsan Banijamali
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anastasijia Kotsalaynen
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Jan Pieter Vanwelkenhuyzen
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Linn Pettersson
- Department of Oncology, Länssjukhuset Ryhov, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Anders Ullén
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Gunilla Enblad
- Department of Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Elin Jänes
- Department of Oncology, Sundsvalls sjukhus, Sundsvall, Sweden
| | - Johan Sandzén
- Department of Oncology, Centralsjukhuset Karlstad, Karlstad, Sweden
| | - Peter Schatteman
- Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
| | | | - Martha Olsson
- Department of Oncology, Centrallasarettet Växjö, Växjö, Sweden
| | | | - Brieuc Sautois
- Department of Oncology, CHU de Liège - site Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium
| | - Wendy De Roock
- Department of Oncology, Ziekenhuis Oost- Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | | | - Mats Anden
- Department of Oncology, Länssjukhuset i Kalmar, Kalmar, Sweden
| | | | | | - Els Everaert
- Department of Oncology, Vitaz campus Sint-Niklaas Lodewijk, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium
| | - Jochen Darras
- Department of Urology, AZ Damiaan, Oostende, Belgium
| | | | - Daisy Luyten
- Department of Oncology, Virga Jessa, Hasselt, Belgium
| | | | - Ashkan Mortezavi
- Department of Urology, Universitätsspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Jan Oldenburg
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Nordbyhagen, Norway
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GZA Sint-Augustinus, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Martin Eklund
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henrik Grönberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Prostatacancer Centrum, Capio S:t Görans Sjukhus, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Johan Lindberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fallah J, Xu J, Joeng HK, Weinstock C, Heiss BL, Maguire WF, Gao X, Cheng J, Chang E, Agrawal S, Fiero MH, Pazdur R, Kluetz PG, Amiri-Kordestani L, Suzman DL. False-Positive Circulating Tumor DNA Results Do Not Explain Lack of Efficacy for PARP Inhibitors in Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Harboring ATM and CHEK2 Mutations. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2400354. [PMID: 39208375 PMCID: PMC11371381 DOI: 10.1200/po.24.00354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Revised: 07/31/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
False-positive ctDNA results do not explain lack of efficacy for PARPi in patients with ATMm and CHEK2m CRPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaleh Fallah
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Jianjin Xu
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Hee-Koung Joeng
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Chana Weinstock
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Brian L Heiss
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - William F Maguire
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Xin Gao
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Joyce Cheng
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Elaine Chang
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Sundeep Agrawal
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Mallorie H Fiero
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Richard Pazdur
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
- Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Paul G Kluetz
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
- Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Laleh Amiri-Kordestani
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
- Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Daniel L Suzman
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Trevisi E, Sessa C, Colombo I. Clinical relevance of circulating tumor DNA in ovarian cancer: current issues and future opportunities. EXPLORATION OF TARGETED ANTI-TUMOR THERAPY 2024; 5:627-640. [PMID: 38966171 PMCID: PMC11220313 DOI: 10.37349/etat.2024.00239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy worldwide. Due to the lack of effective screening and early detection strategies, many patients with OC are diagnosed with advanced disease, where treatment is rarely curative. Moreover, OC is characterized by high intratumor heterogeneity, which represents a major barrier to the development of effective treatments. Conventional tumor biopsy and blood-based biomarkers, such as cancer antigen 125 (CA125), have different limitations. Liquid biopsy has recently emerged as an attractive and promising area of investigation in oncology, due to its minimally invasive, safe, comprehensive, and real-time dynamic nature. Preliminary evidence suggests a potential role of liquid biopsy to refine OC management, by improving screening, early diagnosis, assessment of response to treatment, detection, and profiling of drug resistance. The current knowledge and the potential clinical value of liquid biopsy in OC is discussed in this review to provide an overview of the clinical settings in which its use might support and improve diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Trevisi
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Cristiana Sessa
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Ilaria Colombo
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Murciano-Goroff YR, Uppal M, Chen M, Harada G, Schram AM. Basket Trials: Past, Present, and Future. ANNUAL REVIEW OF CANCER BIOLOGY 2024; 8:59-80. [PMID: 38938274 PMCID: PMC11210107 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-061421-012927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
Large-scale tumor molecular profiling has revealed that diverse cancer histologies are driven by common pathways with unifying biomarkers that can be exploited therapeutically. Disease-agnostic basket trials have been increasingly utilized to test biomarker-driven therapies across cancer types. These trials have led to drug approvals and improved the lives of patients while simultaneously advancing our understanding of cancer biology. This review focuses on the practicalities of implementing basket trials, with an emphasis on molecularly targeted trials. We examine the biologic subtleties of genomic biomarker and patient selection, discuss previous successes in drug development facilitated by basket trials, describe certain novel targets and drugs, and emphasize practical considerations for participant recruitment and study design. This review also highlights strategies for aiding patient access to basket trials. As basket trials become more common, steps to ensure equitable implementation of these studies will be critical for molecularly targeted drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Manik Uppal
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Monica Chen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Guilherme Harada
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alison M Schram
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Arends CM, Kopp K, Hablesreiter R, Estrada N, Christen F, Moll UM, Zeillinger R, Schmitt WD, Sehouli J, Kulbe H, Fleischmann M, Ray-Coquard I, Zeimet A, Raspagliesi F, Zamagni C, Vergote I, Lorusso D, Concin N, Bullinger L, Braicu EI, Damm F. Dynamics of clonal hematopoiesis under DNA-damaging treatment in patients with ovarian cancer. Leukemia 2024; 38:1378-1389. [PMID: 38637689 PMCID: PMC11147769 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02253-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2024] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) driven by mutations in the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway is frequent in patients with cancer and is associated with a higher risk of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MNs). Here, we analyzed 423 serial whole blood and plasma samples from 103 patients with relapsed high-grade ovarian cancer receiving carboplatin, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) and heat shock protein 90 inhibitor (HSP90i) treatment within the phase II EUDARIO trial using error-corrected sequencing of 72 genes. DDR-driven CH was detected in 35% of patients and was associated with longer duration of prior PARPi treatment. TP53- and PPM1D-mutated clones exhibited substantially higher clonal expansion rates than DNMT3A- or TET2-mutated clones during treatment. Expansion of DDR clones correlated with HSP90i exposure across the three study arms and was partially abrogated by the presence of germline mutations related to homologous recombination deficiency. Single-cell DNA sequencing of selected samples revealed clonal exclusivity of DDR mutations, and identified DDR-mutated clones as the origin of t-MN in two investigated cases. Together, these results provide unique insights into the architecture and the preferential selection of DDR-mutated hematopoietic clones under intense DNA-damaging treatment. Specifically, PARPi and HSP90i therapies pose an independent risk for the expansion of DDR-CH in a dose-dependent manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Maximilian Arends
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klara Kopp
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Raphael Hablesreiter
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Natalia Estrada
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Friederike Christen
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ute Martha Moll
- Department of Pathology, Stony Brook University Cancer Center, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA
| | - Robert Zeillinger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Molecular Oncology Group, Comprehensive Cancer Center-Gynaecologic Cancer Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Daniel Schmitt
- Department of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynaecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
- North Eastern German Society for Gynecological Cancer. Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hagen Kulbe
- Department of Gynaecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
- North Eastern German Society for Gynecological Cancer. Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maximilian Fleischmann
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Abteilung Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Centre Anticancereux Léon Bérard, University Claude Bernard Lyon, GINECO Group, Lyon, France
| | - Alain Zeimet
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austrian AGO, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Claudio Zamagni
- Division of Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Belgium and Luxembourg Gynaecological Oncology Group (BGOG), Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Nicole Concin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austrian AGO, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Lars Bullinger
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elena Ioana Braicu
- Department of Gynaecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
- North Eastern German Society for Gynecological Cancer. Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frederik Damm
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fazekas T, Széles ÁD, Teutsch B, Csizmarik A, Vékony B, Kói T, Ács N, Hegyi P, Hadaschik B, Nyirády P, Szarvas T. Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors Have Comparable Efficacy with Platinum Chemotherapy in Patients with BRCA-positive Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:365-375. [PMID: 37722977 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Testing for mutations in Breast Cancer Gene 1/2 (BRCA) has emerged as a novel decision-making tool for clinicians. Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harboring pathogenic BRCA mutations can benefit from poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) and platinum treatments, whereas the impact of the mutation on sensitivity to cabazitaxel and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-ligand therapy is currently unknown. OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of PARPi, platinum, cabazitaxel, and PSMA-ligand therapies in BRCA-positive mCRPC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Databases were queried in February 2022. We performed data synthesis by using both proportional and individual patient data. For prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (≥50% decrease from baseline [PSA50]) evaluation, we pooled event rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival analyses with individual patient data were performed with the mixed-effect Cox proportional hazard model and single-arm random-effect analysis, providing pooled medians. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We included 23 eligible studies with 901 BRCA-positive mCRPC patients. PSA50 response rates for PARPi and platinum were 69% (CI: 53-82%), and 74% (CI: 49-90%), respectively. Analyses of OS data showed no difference between PARPi and platinum treatments (hazard ratio: 0.86; CI: 0.49-1.52; p = 0.6). The single-arm OS and PFS analyses revealed similarities among different PARPis; pooled PFS and OS medians were 9.7 mo (CI: 8.1-12.5) and 17.4 mo (CI: 12.7-20.1), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our data revealed that different PARPis were similarly effective in terms of PFS and OS. Moreover, we found that PARPi and platinum therapy were comparable in terms of PSA50 response rate and OS, highlighting that platinum is a valid treatment option for BRCA-positive mCRPC patients. However, prospective interventional studies comparing these agents are essential to provide a higher level of evidence. PATIENT SUMMARY In this report, we found that different poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors had similar efficacy, and platinum was a valid treatment option in BRCA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamás Fazekas
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ádám D Széles
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Brigitta Teutsch
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Anita Csizmarik
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Bálint Vékony
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tamás Kói
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Stochastics, Institute of Mathematics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Nándor Ács
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Hegyi
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Institute of Pancreatic Diseases, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Boris Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Péter Nyirády
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tibor Szarvas
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Baboudjian M, Peyrottes A, Dariane C, Fromont G, Denis JA, Fiard G, Kassab D, Ladoire S, Lehmann-Che J, Ploussard G, Rouprêt M, Barthélémy P, Roubaud G, Lamy PJ. Circulating Biomarkers Predictive of Treatment Response in Patients with Hormone-sensitive or Castration-resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00132-9. [PMID: 38824003 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) harbors genomic alterations that may predict targeted therapy efficacy. These alterations can be identified not only in tissue but also directly in biologic fluids (ie, liquid biopsies), mainly blood. Liquid biopsies may represent a safer and less invasive alternative for monitoring patients treated for mPCa. Current research focuses on the description and validation of novel predictive biomarkers to improve precision medicine in mPCa. Our aim was to systematically review the current evidence on liquid biopsy biomarkers for predicting treatment response in mPCa. METHODS We systematically searched Medline, Web of Science, and evidence-based websites for publications on circulating biomarkers in mPCa between March 2013 and February 2024 for review. Endpoints were: prediction of overall survival, biochemical or radiographic progression-free survival after treatment (chemotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors [ARPIs], immunotherapy, or PARP inhibitors [PARPIs]). For each biomarker, the level of evidence (LOE) for clinical validity was attributed: LOE IA and IB, high level of evidence; LOE IIB and IIC, intermediate level; and LOE IIIC and LOE IV-VD, weak level. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS The predictive value of each biomarker for the response to several therapies was evaluated in both metastatic hormone-sensitive (mHSPC) and castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In patients with mCRPC, BRCA1/2 or ATM mutations predicted response to ARPIs (LOE IB) and PARPIs (LOE IIB), while AR-V7 transcripts or AR-V7 protein levels in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) predicted response to ARPIs and taxanes (LOE IB). CTC quantification predicted response to cabazitaxel, abiraterone, and radium-223 (LOE IIB), while TP53 alterations predicted response to 177Lu prostate-specific membrane antigen radioligand treatment (LOE IIB). AR copy number in circulating tumor DNA before the first treatment line and before subsequent lines predicted response to docetaxel, cabazitaxel, and ARPIs (LOE IIB). In mHSPC, DNA damage in lymphocytes was predictive of the response to radium-223 (LOE IIB). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS BRCA1/2, ATM, and AR alterations detected in liquid biopsies may help clinicians in management of patients with mPCa. The other circulating biomarkers did not reach the LOE required for routine clinical use and should be validated in prospective independent studies. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed studies assessing the value of biomarkers in blood or urine for management of metastatic prostate cancer. The evidence indicates that some biomarkers could help in selecting patients eligible for specific treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Baboudjian
- Department of Urology, North Academic Hospital, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - Arthur Peyrottes
- Service d'Urologie et de Transplantation Rénale, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Charles Dariane
- Department of Urology, European Hospital Georges-Pompidou, University Paris Cité, Paris, France; UMR-S1151, CNRS UMR-S8253 Institut Necker Enfants Malades, Paris, France
| | - Gaëlle Fromont
- INSERM UMR1069, Nutrition Croissance et Cancer, University of Tours, Tours, France; Department of Pathology, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Jérôme Alexandre Denis
- INSERM UMR_S938, CRSA, Biologie et Thérapeutiques du Cancer, Saint-Antoine University Hospital, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; Service de Biochimie Endocrinienne et Oncologique, Oncobiologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Gaëlle Fiard
- Department of Urology, CHU Grenoble Alpes, University of Grenoble Alpes CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Sylvain Ladoire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Platform of Transfer in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, Dijon, France; INSERM U1231, Dijon, France
| | - Jacqueline Lehmann-Che
- INSERM U976, Immunologie Humaine, Pathophysiologie, Immunothérapie, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; UF Oncologie Moléculaire, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France; Department of Urology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Faculty of Medicine, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Barthélémy
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | - Guilhem Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Pierre-Jean Lamy
- Biopathologie et Génétique des Cancers, Institut Médical d'Analyse Génomique, Imagenome, Inovie, Montpellier, France; Unité de Recherche Clinique, Clinique Beausoleil, Montpellier, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pilié PG, Giuliani V, Wang WL, McGrail DJ, Bristow CA, Ngoi NY, Kyewalabye K, Wani KM, Le H, Campbell E, Sanchez NS, Yang D, Gheeya JS, Goswamy RV, Holla V, Shaw KR, Meric-Bernstam F, Liu CY, Ma X, Feng N, Machado AA, Bardenhagen JP, Vellano CP, Marszalek JR, Rajendra E, Piscitello D, Johnson TI, Likhatcheva M, Elinati E, Majithiya J, Neves J, Grinkevich V, Ranzani M, Luzarraga MR, Boursier M, Armstrong L, Geo L, Lillo G, Tse WY, Lazar AJ, Kopetz SE, Geck Do MK, Lively S, Johnson MG, Robinson HM, Smith GC, Carroll CL, Di Francesco ME, Jones P, Heffernan TP, Yap TA. Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated Loss-of-Function Displays Variant and Tissue-Specific Differences across Tumor Types. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:2121-2139. [PMID: 38416404 PMCID: PMC11094420 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-1763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Mutations in the ATM gene are common in multiple cancers, but clinical studies of therapies targeting ATM-aberrant cancers have yielded mixed results. Refinement of ATM loss of function (LOF) as a predictive biomarker of response is urgently needed. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We present the first disclosure and preclinical development of a novel, selective ATR inhibitor, ART0380, and test its antitumor activity in multiple preclinical cancer models. To refine ATM LOF as a predictive biomarker, we performed a comprehensive pan-cancer analysis of ATM variants in patient tumors and then assessed the ATM variant-to-protein relationship. Finally, we assessed a novel ATM LOF biomarker approach in retrospective clinical data sets of patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy or ATR inhibition. RESULTS ART0380 had potent, selective antitumor activity in a range of preclinical cancer models with differing degrees of ATM LOF. Pan-cancer analysis identified 10,609 ATM variants in 8,587 patient tumors. Cancer lineage-specific differences were seen in the prevalence of deleterious (Tier 1) versus unknown/benign (Tier 2) variants, selective pressure for loss of heterozygosity, and concordance between a deleterious variant and ATM loss of protein (LOP). A novel ATM LOF biomarker approach that accounts for variant classification, relationship to ATM LOP, and tissue-specific penetrance significantly enriched for patients who benefited from platinum-based chemotherapy or ATR inhibition. CONCLUSIONS These data help to better define ATM LOF across tumor types in order to optimize patient selection and improve molecularly targeted therapeutic approaches for patients with ATM LOF cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick G. Pilié
- Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Virginia Giuliani
- TRACTION (Translational Research to Advance Therapeutics and Innovation in Oncology), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Daniel J. McGrail
- Center for Immunotherapy and Precision Immuno-Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Christopher A. Bristow
- TRACTION (Translational Research to Advance Therapeutics and Innovation in Oncology), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Natalie Y.L. Ngoi
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Keith Kyewalabye
- Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Khalida M. Wani
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hung Le
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Erick Campbell
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Nora S. Sanchez
- Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Dong Yang
- Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jinesh S. Gheeya
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Vijaykumar Holla
- Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kenna Rael Shaw
- Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chiu-Yi Liu
- TRACTION (Translational Research to Advance Therapeutics and Innovation in Oncology), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - XiaoYan Ma
- TRACTION (Translational Research to Advance Therapeutics and Innovation in Oncology), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ningping Feng
- TRACTION (Translational Research to Advance Therapeutics and Innovation in Oncology), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Annette A. Machado
- TRACTION (Translational Research to Advance Therapeutics and Innovation in Oncology), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer P. Bardenhagen
- Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christopher P. Vellano
- TRACTION (Translational Research to Advance Therapeutics and Innovation in Oncology), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Joseph R. Marszalek
- TRACTION (Translational Research to Advance Therapeutics and Innovation in Oncology), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Eeson Rajendra
- Artios Pharma, the Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Desiree Piscitello
- Artios Pharma, the Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy I. Johnson
- Artios Pharma, the Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Likhatcheva
- Artios Pharma, the Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Elias Elinati
- Artios Pharma, the Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jayesh Majithiya
- Artios Pharma, the Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Joana Neves
- Artios Pharma, the Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Vera Grinkevich
- Artios Pharma, the Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Marco Ranzani
- Artios Pharma, the Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Marina Roy Luzarraga
- Artios Pharma, the Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Marie Boursier
- Artios Pharma, the Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy Armstrong
- Artios Pharma, the Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Lerin Geo
- Artios Pharma, the Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Giorgia Lillo
- Artios Pharma, the Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Wai Yiu Tse
- Artios Pharma, the Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander J. Lazar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Scott E. Kopetz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mary K. Geck Do
- Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sarah Lively
- ChemPartner Corporation, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Helen M.R. Robinson
- Artios Pharma, the Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Graeme C.M. Smith
- Artios Pharma, the Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher L. Carroll
- Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - M. Emilia Di Francesco
- Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Philip Jones
- Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Timothy P. Heffernan
- TRACTION (Translational Research to Advance Therapeutics and Innovation in Oncology), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Timothy A. Yap
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fallah J, Xu J, Weinstock C, Gao X, Heiss BL, Maguire WF, Chang E, Agrawal S, Tang S, Amiri-Kordestani L, Pazdur R, Kluetz PG, Suzman DL. Efficacy of Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors by Individual Genes in Homologous Recombination Repair Gene-Mutated Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A US Food and Drug Administration Pooled Analysis. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1687-1698. [PMID: 38484203 PMCID: PMC11095872 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We performed a pooled analysis of multiple trials of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) to investigate the efficacy of PARPi in each individual homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutated (m) gene. PATIENTS AND METHODS We pooled patient-level data from trials of PARPi in mCRPC that reported mutation status in individual HRR genes. Any HRR gene with available data across all the randomized trials of PARPi in first-line mCRPC was selected. The hazard ratios (HRs; 95% CI) for radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS; by blinded independent review) and overall survival (OS) of a PARPi plus an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) relative to placebo plus an ARPI in the pool of three randomized trials in first-line mCRPC were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS In ATMm (N = 268), rPFS HR was 1.05 (0.74 to 1.49) and OS HR was 1.18 (0.82 to 1.71). In BRCA1m (N = 64), rPFS HR was 0.51 (0.23 to 1.1) and OS HR was 0.74 (0.34 to 1.61). In BRCA2m (N = 422), rPFS HR was 0.31 (0.23 to 0.42) and OS HR was 0.66 (0.49 to 0.89). In CDK12m (N = 164), rPFS HR was 0.50 (0.32 to 0.80) and OS HR was 0.63 (0.39 to 0.99). In CHEK2m (N = 172), rPFS HR was 1.06 (0.67 to 1.66) and OS HR was 1.53 (0.95 to 2.46). In PALB2m (N = 41) rPFS HR was 0.52 (0.23 to 1.17) and OS HR was 0.78 (0.34 to 1.8). CONCLUSION In this pooled analysis, benefit from PARPi appeared greatest for patients with BRCA1m, BRCA2m, CDK12m, and PALB2m. Given limitations of this exploratory analysis, the apparent lack of benefit from PARPi in patients with CHEK2m or ATMm should be further explored in future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaleh Fallah
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Jianjin Xu
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Chana Weinstock
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Xin Gao
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Brian L. Heiss
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - William F. Maguire
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Elaine Chang
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Sundeep Agrawal
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Shenghui Tang
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Laleh Amiri-Kordestani
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
- Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Richard Pazdur
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
- Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Paul G. Kluetz
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
- Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Daniel L. Suzman
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Slootbeek PHJ, Tolmeijer SH, Mehra N, Schalken JA. Therapeutic biomarkers in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: does the state matter? Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2024; 61:178-204. [PMID: 37882463 DOI: 10.1080/10408363.2023.2266482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
The treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has been fundamentally transformed by our greater understanding of its complex biological mechanisms and its entrance into the era of precision oncology. A broad aim is to use the extreme heterogeneity of mCRPC by matching already approved or new targeted therapies to the correct tumor genotype. To achieve this, tumor DNA must be obtained, sequenced, and correctly interpreted, with individual aberrations explored for their druggability, taking into account the hierarchy of driving molecular pathways. Although tumor tissue sequencing is the gold standard, tumor tissue can be challenging to obtain, and a biopsy from one metastatic site or primary tumor may not provide an accurate representation of the current genetic underpinning. Sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) might catalyze precision oncology in mCRPC, as it enables real-time observation of genomic changes in tumors and allows for monitoring of treatment response and identification of resistance mechanisms. Moreover, ctDNA can be used to identify mutations that may not be detected in solitary metastatic lesions and can provide a more in-depth understanding of inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Finally, ctDNA abundance can serve as a prognostic biomarker in patients with mCRPC.The androgen receptor (AR)-axis is a well-established therapeutical target for prostate cancer, and through ctDNA sequencing, insights have been obtained in (temporal) resistance mechanisms that develop through castration resistance. New third-generation AR-axis inhibitors are being developed to overcome some of these resistance mechanisms. The druggability of defects in the DNA damage repair machinery has impacted the treatment landscape of mCRPC in recent years. For patients with deleterious gene aberrations in genes linked to homologous recombination, particularly BRCA1 or BRCA2, PARP inhibitors have shown efficacy compared to the standard of care armamentarium, but platinum-based chemotherapy may be equally effective. A hierarchy exists in genes associated with homologous recombination, where, besides the canonical genes in this pathway, not every other gene aberration predicts the same likelihood of response. Moreover, evidence is emerging on cross-resistance between therapies such as PARP inhibitors, platinum-based chemotherapy and even radioligand therapy that target this genotype. Mismatch repair-deficient patients can experience a beneficial response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Activation of other cellular signaling pathways such as PI3K, cell cycle, and MAPK have shown limited success with monotherapy, but there is potential in co-targeting these pathways with combination therapy, either already witnessed or anticipated. This review outlines precision medicine in mCRPC, zooming in on the role of ctDNA, to identify genomic biomarkers that may be used to tailor molecularly targeted therapies. The most common druggable pathways and outcomes of therapies matched to these pathways are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter H J Slootbeek
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherland
| | - Sofie H Tolmeijer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherland
| | - Niven Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherland
| | - Jack A Schalken
- Department of Experimental Urology, Research Institute of Medical Innovation, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Casolino R, Beer PA, Chakravarty D, Davis MB, Malapelle U, Mazzarella L, Normanno N, Pauli C, Subbiah V, Turnbull C, Westphalen CB, Biankin AV. Interpreting and integrating genomic tests results in clinical cancer care: Overview and practical guidance. CA Cancer J Clin 2024; 74:264-285. [PMID: 38174605 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
The last decade has seen rapid progress in the use of genomic tests, including gene panels, whole-exome sequencing, and whole-genome sequencing, in research and clinical cancer care. These advances have created expansive opportunities to characterize the molecular attributes of cancer, revealing a subset of cancer-associated aberrations called driver mutations. The identification of these driver mutations can unearth vulnerabilities of cancer cells to targeted therapeutics, which has led to the development and approval of novel diagnostics and personalized interventions in various malignancies. The applications of this modern approach, often referred to as precision oncology or precision cancer medicine, are already becoming a staple in cancer care and will expand exponentially over the coming years. Although genomic tests can lead to better outcomes by informing cancer risk, prognosis, and therapeutic selection, they remain underutilized in routine cancer care. A contributing factor is a lack of understanding of their clinical utility and the difficulty of results interpretation by the broad oncology community. Practical guidelines on how to interpret and integrate genomic information in the clinical setting, addressed to clinicians without expertise in cancer genomics, are currently limited. Building upon the genomic foundations of cancer and the concept of precision oncology, the authors have developed practical guidance to aid the interpretation of genomic test results that help inform clinical decision making for patients with cancer. They also discuss the challenges that prevent the wider implementation of precision oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaella Casolino
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Center, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Philip A Beer
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Center, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- Hull York Medical School, York, UK
| | | | - Melissa B Davis
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Umberto Malapelle
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Mazzarella
- Laboratory of Translational Oncology and Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Normanno
- Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Chantal Pauli
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, National Health Service (NHS) England, London, UK
- Cancer Genetics Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C Benedikt Westphalen
- Department of Medicine III, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU) Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, LMU Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, LMU Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrew V Biankin
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Center, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- West of Scotland Pancreatic Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ngoi NYL, Pilié PG, McGrail DJ, Zimmermann M, Schlacher K, Yap TA. Targeting ATR in patients with cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2024; 21:278-293. [PMID: 38378898 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-024-00863-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
Pharmacological inhibition of the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein serine/threonine kinase (ATR; also known as FRAP-related protein (FRP1)) has emerged as a promising strategy for cancer treatment that exploits synthetic lethal interactions with proteins involved in DNA damage repair, overcomes resistance to other therapies and enhances antitumour immunity. Multiple novel, potent ATR inhibitors are being tested in clinical trials using biomarker-directed approaches and involving patients across a broad range of solid cancer types; some of these inhibitors have now entered phase III trials. Further insight into the complex interactions of ATR with other DNA replication stress response pathway components and with the immune system is necessary in order to optimally harness the potential of ATR inhibitors in the clinic and achieve hypomorphic targeting of the various ATR functions. Furthermore, a deeper understanding of the diverse range of predictive biomarkers of response to ATR inhibitors and of the intraclass differences between these agents could help to refine trial design and patient selection strategies. Key challenges that remain in the clinical development of ATR inhibitors include the optimization of their therapeutic index and the development of rational combinations with these agents. In this Review, we detail the molecular mechanisms regulated by ATR and their clinical relevance, and discuss the challenges that must be addressed to extend the benefit of ATR inhibitors to a broad population of patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Y L Ngoi
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Patrick G Pilié
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel J McGrail
- Center for Immunotherapy and Precision Immuno-Oncology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Katharina Schlacher
- Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Timothy A Yap
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
- Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
- Khalifa Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Casadei C, Scarpi E, Conteduca V, Gurioli G, Cursano MC, Brighi N, Lolli C, Schepisi G, Basso U, Fornarini G, Bleve S, Farolfi A, Altavilla A, Burgio SL, Giunta EF, Gianni C, Filograna A, Ulivi P, Olmos D, Castro E, De Giorgi U. Inherited Mutations in DNA Damage Repair Genes in Italian Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Results from the Meet-URO 10 Study. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 61:44-51. [PMID: 38384439 PMCID: PMC10879937 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The prevalence of pathogenic germline mutations in DNA damage repair (gDDR) genes in the Italian population is unknown. Objective In this prospective multicenter cohort study, we evaluated the prevalence of gDDR alterations in the Italian population affected by metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) and analyzed the impact on response to therapy, survival, and time to castration resistance. Design setting and participants In an observational prospective trial, 300 consecutive Italian mPCa patients, enrolled in the Meet-Uro-10 trial from three academic Italian centers, were recruited between 2017 and 2019 and were screened for gDDR mutations in 107 genes. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The primary endpoint was to assess the prevalence of gDDR mutations in the Italian population of patients with mPCa. The secondary endpoints included the association of gDDR subgroups with metastatic onset, Gleason score, and time to castration resistance. Results and limitations We identified 297 valuable patients. Forty-six patients had a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant (15.5%, 95% confidence interval: 11.4-19.6): the more frequent was gBRCA2 found in nine cases (3%), followed by gATM in five cases (1.7%). In patients without mutations, longer median overall survival was observed with the sequence docetaxel-androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) than with the sequence ARSI-docetaxel (87.9 vs 42 mo, p = 0.0001). In a univariate analysis, the median time to castration resistance in gDDR mutated patients was 19.8 mo, versus 23.7 mo in no mutated patients (p = 0.024). There were no associations of gDDR subgroups with metastatic onset and Gleason score ≥8. In our cohort, variants of unknown significance in gDDR genes were found in 80 patients and might have a prognostic relevance. Conclusions The study reported the prevalence of gDDR in the Italian population. The presence of gBRCA2 mutations correlates with a shorter time to the onset of castration resistance disease. Patient summary The prevalence of gBRCA2 in the Italian population is 3%, which is similar to that in the Spanish population, identifying similarities between people of the Western Mediterranean area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Casadei
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Emanuela Scarpi
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | | | - Giorgia Gurioli
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | | | - Nicole Brighi
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Cristian Lolli
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Schepisi
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | | | | | - Sara Bleve
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Alberto Farolfi
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Amelia Altavilla
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Salvatore Luca Burgio
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | | | - Caterina Gianni
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Alessia Filograna
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Paola Ulivi
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - David Olmos
- Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Castro
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Vandekerkhove G, Giri VN, Halabi S, McNair C, Hamade K, Bitting RL, Wyatt AW. Toward Informed Selection and Interpretation of Clinical Genomic Tests in Prostate Cancer. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300654. [PMID: 38547422 PMCID: PMC10994438 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical genomic testing of patient germline, tumor tissue, or plasma cell-free DNA can enable a personalized approach to cancer management and treatment. In prostate cancer (PCa), broad genotyping tests are now widely used to identify germline and/or somatic alterations in BRCA2 and other DNA damage repair genes. Alterations in these genes can confer cancer sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, are linked with poor prognosis, and can have potential hereditary cancer implications for family members. However, there is huge variability in genomic tests and reporting standards, meaning that for successful implementation of testing in clinical practice, end users must carefully select the most appropriate test for a given patient and critically interpret the results. In this white paper, we outline key pre- and post-test considerations for choosing a genomic test and evaluating reported variants, specifically for patients with advanced PCa. Test choice must be based on clinical context and disease state, availability and suitability of tumor tissue, and the genes and regions that are covered by the test. We describe strategies to recognize false positives or negatives in test results, including frameworks to assess low tumor fraction, subclonal alterations, clonal hematopoiesis, and pathogenic versus nonpathogenic variants. We assume that improved understanding among health care professionals and researchers of the nuances associated with genomic testing will ultimately lead to optimal patient care and clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Vandekerkhove
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Veda N. Giri
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | | | | | - Alexander W. Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fonseca NM, Maurice-Dror C, Herberts C, Tu W, Fan W, Murtha AJ, Kollmannsberger C, Kwan EM, Parekh K, Schönlau E, Bernales CQ, Donnellan G, Ng SWS, Sumiyoshi T, Vergidis J, Noonan K, Finch DL, Zulfiqar M, Miller S, Parimi S, Lavoie JM, Hardy E, Soleimani M, Nappi L, Eigl BJ, Kollmannsberger C, Taavitsainen S, Nykter M, Tolmeijer SH, Boerrigter E, Mehra N, van Erp NP, De Laere B, Lindberg J, Grönberg H, Khalaf DJ, Annala M, Chi KN, Wyatt AW. Prediction of plasma ctDNA fraction and prognostic implications of liquid biopsy in advanced prostate cancer. Nat Commun 2024; 15:1828. [PMID: 38418825 PMCID: PMC10902374 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45475-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
No consensus strategies exist for prognosticating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Circulating tumor DNA fraction (ctDNA%) is increasingly reported by commercial and laboratory tests but its utility for risk stratification is unclear. Here, we intersect ctDNA%, treatment outcomes, and clinical characteristics across 738 plasma samples from 491 male mCRPC patients from two randomized multicentre phase II trials and a prospective province-wide blood biobanking program. ctDNA% correlates with serum and radiographic metrics of disease burden and is highest in patients with liver metastases. ctDNA% strongly predicts overall survival, progression-free survival, and treatment response independent of therapeutic context and outperformed established prognostic clinical factors. Recognizing that ctDNA-based biomarker genotyping is limited by low ctDNA% in some patients, we leverage the relationship between clinical prognostic factors and ctDNA% to develop a clinically-interpretable machine-learning tool that predicts whether a patient has sufficient ctDNA% for informative ctDNA genotyping (available online: https://www.ctDNA.org ). Our results affirm ctDNA% as an actionable tool for patient risk stratification and provide a practical framework for optimized biomarker testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolette M Fonseca
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Cameron Herberts
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Wilson Tu
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - William Fan
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Andrew J Murtha
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Edmond M Kwan
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences; Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Karan Parekh
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Elena Schönlau
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Cecily Q Bernales
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gráinne Donnellan
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sarah W S Ng
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Takayuki Sumiyoshi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Joanna Vergidis
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Krista Noonan
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Surrey, BC, Canada
| | - Daygen L Finch
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Kelowna, BC, Canada
| | | | - Stacy Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer, Prince George, BC, Canada
| | - Sunil Parimi
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Edward Hardy
- Tom McMurtry & Peter Baerg Cancer Centre, Vernon Jubilee Hospital, Vernon, BC, Canada
| | - Maryam Soleimani
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Lucia Nappi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Bernhard J Eigl
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Sinja Taavitsainen
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Matti Nykter
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Sofie H Tolmeijer
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Emmy Boerrigter
- Department of Pharmacy, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Niven Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nielka P van Erp
- Department of Pharmacy, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bram De Laere
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan Lindberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henrik Grönberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Daniel J Khalaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Matti Annala
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland.
| | - Kim N Chi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vasseur D, Arbab A, Giudici F, Marzac C, Michiels S, Tagliamento M, Bayle A, Smolenschi C, Sakkal M, Aldea M, Sassi H, Dall'Olio FG, Pata-Merci N, Cotteret S, Fiévet A, Auger N, Friboulet L, Facchinetti F, Géraud A, Ponce S, Hollebecque A, Besse B, Micol JB, Italiano A, Lacroix L, Rouleau E. Genomic landscape of liquid biopsy mutations in TP53 and DNA damage genes in cancer patients. NPJ Precis Oncol 2024; 8:51. [PMID: 38409229 PMCID: PMC10897416 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00544-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays based on plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are increasingly used for clinical trials inclusion. Their optimized limit of detection applied to a large number of genes leads to the identification of mutations not confirmed in tissue. It becomes essential to describe the characteristics and consequences of these liquid biopsy-only mutations. In the STING protocol (Gustave Roussy, NCT04932525), 542 patients with advanced solid cancer had cfDNA-based and tissue-based NGS analysis (performed by FoundationOne® Liquid CDx and FoundationOne CDx™, respectively). Mutations identified in the liquid biopsy but not in the paired tissue were considered as liquid biopsy-only mutations irrespective of their variant allelic frequency (VAF). Out of 542 patients, 281 (51.8%) harbored at least one liquid biopsy-only mutation. These patients were significantly older, and more heavily pretreated. Liquid biopsy-only mutations occurring in TP53, and in DDR genes (ATM, CHEK2, ATR, BRCA2, and BRCA1) accounted for 90.8% of all the mutations. The median VAF of these mutations was generally low (0.37% and 0.40% for TP53 and DDR genes respectively). The variant type repartition depended on the gene. Liquid biopsy-only mutations affected hotspot in TP53 codon 273, 125, 195, 176, 237 or 280 and ATM codon 2891 and 3008. In a subset of 37 patients, 75.0%, 53.5% and 83.3% of the liquid biopsy-only mutations occurring respectively in ATM, TP53, and CHEK2 were confirmed in the matching whole blood sample. Although liquid biopsy-only mutations makes the interpretation of liquid biopsy results more complex, they have distinct characteristics making them more easily identifiable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien Vasseur
- Medical Biology and Pathology Department, F-94805, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
- AMMICa UAR3655/US23, F-94805, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| | - Ahmadreza Arbab
- Medical Biology and Pathology Department, F-94805, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Fabiola Giudici
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Équipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Christophe Marzac
- Medical Biology and Pathology Department, F-94805, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Équipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
- Bureau de Biostatistique et d'Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Arnaud Bayle
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Équipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Cristina Smolenschi
- Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Madona Sakkal
- Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Hela Sassi
- Medical Biology and Pathology Department, F-94805, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - Sophie Cotteret
- Medical Biology and Pathology Department, F-94805, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Alice Fiévet
- Medical Biology and Pathology Department, F-94805, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Nathalie Auger
- Medical Biology and Pathology Department, F-94805, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Luc Friboulet
- Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Biomarqueurs prédictifs et nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques en oncologie, Villejuif, France
| | - Francesco Facchinetti
- Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Biomarqueurs prédictifs et nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques en oncologie, Villejuif, France
| | - Arthur Géraud
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Santiago Ponce
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Benjamin Besse
- Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Biomarqueurs prédictifs et nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques en oncologie, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Antoine Italiano
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Ludovic Lacroix
- Medical Biology and Pathology Department, F-94805, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- AMMICa UAR3655/US23, F-94805, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Etienne Rouleau
- Medical Biology and Pathology Department, F-94805, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- AMMICa UAR3655/US23, F-94805, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lee KS, Lee CK, Kwon SS, Kwon WS, Park S, Lee ST, Choi JR, Rha SY, Shin S. Clinical relevance of clonal hematopoiesis and its interference in cell-free DNA profiling of patients with gastric cancer. Clin Chem Lab Med 2024; 62:178-186. [PMID: 37435889 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is a condition in which healthy individuals have somatic mutations in hematopoietic stem cells. It has been reported with increased risk of hematologic malignancy and cardiovascular disease in the general population, but studies of Korean populations with comorbid disease entities are scarce. METHODS White blood cells (WBCs) from patients with gastric cancer (GC) (n=121) were analyzed using a DNA-based targeted (531 genes) panel with customized pipeline designed to detect single nucleotide variants and small indels with low-allele-frequency of ≥0.2 %. We defined significant CH variants as having variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥2 % among variants found in WBCs. Matched cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples were also analyzed with the same pipeline to investigate the false-positive results caused by WBC variants in cfDNA profiling. RESULTS Significant CH variants were detected in 29.8 % of patients and were associated with age and male sex. The number of CH variants was associated with a history of anti-cancer therapy and age. DNMT3A and TET2 were recurrently mutated. Overall survival rate of treatment-naïve patients with stage IV GC was higher in those with CH, but Cox regression showed no significant association after adjustment for age, sex, anti-cancer therapy, and smoking history. In addition, we analyzed the potential interference of WBC variants in plasma cell-free DNA testing, which has attracted interest as a complementary method for tissue biopsy. Results showed that 37.0 % (47/127) of plasma specimens harbored at least one WBC variant. VAFs of interfering WBC variants in the plasma and WBC were correlated, and WBC variants with VAF ≥4 % in WBC were frequently detected in plasma with the same VAF. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed the clinical impact of CH in Korean patients and suggests the potential for its interference in cfDNA tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kwang Seob Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Pharmacology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Choong-Kun Lee
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Song-dang Institute for Cancer Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Soon Sung Kwon
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo Sun Kwon
- Song-dang Institute for Cancer Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sejung Park
- Song-dang Institute for Cancer Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Tae Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Dxome, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Rak Choi
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Dxome, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Young Rha
- Dxome, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Song-dang Institute for Cancer Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Saeam Shin
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Morganti S, Gibson CJ, Jin Q, Santos K, Patel A, Wilson A, Merrill M, Vincuilla J, Stokes S, Lipsyc-Sharf M, Parker T, King TA, Mittendorf EA, Curigliano G, Hughes ME, Stover DG, Tolaney SM, Weeks LD, Tayob N, Lin NU, Garber JE, Miller PG, Parsons HA. Prevalence, Dynamics, and Prognostic Role of Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential in Patients With Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2301071. [PMID: 38190580 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is frequent in patients with solid tumors. Prospective data about CHIP prevalence at breast cancer diagnosis and its dynamic evolution under treatment selective pressure are limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed targeted error-corrected sequencing on 614 samples from 380 patients with breast cancer. We investigated the dynamics of CHIP on prospectively collected paired samples from patients with early breast cancer (eBC) receiving chemotherapy (CT) or endocrine therapy (ET). We assessed the correlation of CHIP with survival in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). We estimated the risk of progression to treatment-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) according to the clonal hematopoiesis risk score (CHRS). In exploratory analyses, we considered clonal hematopoiesis (CH) with variant allele fraction (VAF) ≥0.005. RESULTS CHIP was identified in 15% of patients before treatment. Few CHIP emerged after treatment, and the risk of developing new mutations was similar for patients receiving CT versus ET (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; P = .820). However, CT increased the risk of developing new CH with VAF ≥0.005 (OR, 3.45; P = .002). Five TP53-mutant CH with VAF ≥0.005 emerged among patients receiving CT. Most patients had low risk of t-MN according to the CHRS score. CHIP did not correlate with survival in mTNBC. CONCLUSION CHIP is frequent in patients with breast cancer. In this study, CT did not lead to emergence of new CHIP, and most patients had low risk of developing t-MN. This finding is reassuring, given long life expectancy of patients with eBC and the association of CHIP with morbidity and mortality. However, TP53-mutant CH with VAF ≥0.005 emerged with CT, which carries high risk of t-MN. Evolution of these small clones and their clinical significance warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Morganti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Christopher J Gibson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Qingchun Jin
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Katheryn Santos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Ashka Patel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Clinical Operations Department, Natera Inc, Austin, TX
| | - Alex Wilson
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Margaret Merrill
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Julie Vincuilla
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Marla Lipsyc-Sharf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Tonia Parker
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Tari A King
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Elizabeth A Mittendorf
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Melissa E Hughes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Daniel G Stover
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Sara M Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lachelle D Weeks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nabihah Tayob
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Judy E Garber
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Peter G Miller
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
- Center for Cancer Research and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Heather A Parsons
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tjota MY, Segal JP, Wang P. Clinical Utility and Benefits of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in Cancer. J Appl Lab Med 2024; 9:76-91. [PMID: 38167763 DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfad091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) with next-generation sequencing detects genetic alterations of hundreds of genes simultaneously and multiple molecular biomarkers with one test. In the personalized medicine era, CGP is increasingly used for cancer diagnosis, treatment selection, and prognosis prediction. CONTENT In this review, we summarize the benefits of CGP, clinical utility of CGP, and challenges of setting up CGP in the clinical laboratories. Besides the genetic alterations identified in the cancer-related genes, other biomarkers such as tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability, and homologous recombination deficiency are critical for initiating targeted therapy. Compared with conventional tests, CGP uses less specimen and shortens the turnaround time if multiple biomarkers need to be tested. RNA fusion assay and liquid biopsy are helpful additions to DNA-based CGP by detecting fusions/splicing variants and complementing tissue-based CGP findings, respectively. SUMMARY Many previous hurdles for implementing CGP in the clinical laboratories have been gradually alleviated such as the decrease in sequencing cost, availability of both open-source and commercial bioinformatics tools, and improved reimbursement. These changes have helped to make CGP available to a greater population of cancer patients for improving characterization of their tumors and expanding their eligibility for clinical trials. Additionally, sequencing results of the hundreds of genes on CGP panels could be further analyzed to better understand the biology of various cancers and identify new biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Yuwono Tjota
- Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
| | - Jeremy P Segal
- Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
| | - Peng Wang
- Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Iams WT, Mackay M, Ben-Shachar R, Drews J, Manghnani K, Hockenberry AJ, Cristofanilli M, Nimeiri H, Guinney J, Benson AB. Concurrent Tissue and Circulating Tumor DNA Molecular Profiling to Detect Guideline-Based Targeted Mutations in a Multicancer Cohort. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2351700. [PMID: 38252441 PMCID: PMC10804266 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.51700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Tissue-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) of solid tumors is the criterion standard for identifying somatic mutations that can be treated with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-recommended targeted therapies. Sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can also identify tumor-derived mutations, and there is increasing clinical evidence supporting ctDNA testing as a diagnostic tool. The clinical value of concurrent tissue and ctDNA profiling has not been formally assessed in a large, multicancer cohort from heterogeneous clinical settings. Objective To evaluate whether patients concurrently tested with both tissue and ctDNA NGS testing have a higher rate of detection of guideline-based targeted mutations compared with tissue testing alone. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study comprised 3209 patients who underwent sequencing between May 2020, and December 2022, within the deidentified, Tempus multimodal database, consisting of linked molecular and clinical data. Included patients had stage IV disease (non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, or colorectal cancer) with sufficient tissue and blood sample quantities for analysis. Exposures Received results from tissue and plasma ctDNA genomic profiling, with biopsies and blood draws occurring within 30 days of one another. Main Outcomes and Measures Detection rates of guideline-based variants found uniquely by ctDNA and tissue profiling. Results The cohort of 3209 patients (median age at diagnosis of stage IV disease, 65.3 years [2.5%-97.5% range, 43.3-83.3 years]) who underwent concurrent tissue and ctDNA testing included 1693 women (52.8%). Overall, 1448 patients (45.1%) had a guideline-based variant detected. Of these patients, 9.3% (135 of 1448) had variants uniquely detected by ctDNA profiling, and 24.2% (351 of 1448) had variants uniquely detected by solid-tissue testing. Although largely concordant with one another, differences in the identification of actionable variants by either assay varied according to cancer type, gene, variant, and ctDNA burden. Of 352 patients with breast cancer, 20.2% (71 of 352) with actionable variants had unique findings in ctDNA profiling results. Most of these unique, actionable variants (55.0% [55 of 100]) were found in ESR1, resulting in a 24.7% increase (23 of 93) in the identification of patients harboring an ESR1 mutation relative to tissue testing alone. Conclusions and Relevance This study suggests that unique actionable biomarkers are detected by both concurrent tissue and ctDNA testing, with higher ctDNA identification among patients with breast cancer. Integration of concurrent NGS testing into the routine management of advanced solid cancers may expand the delivery of molecularly guided therapy and improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wade T. Iams
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Massimo Cristofanilli
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center at Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
- NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Al B. Benson
- Department of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tsimberidou AM, Kahle M, Vo HH, Baysal MA, Johnson A, Meric-Bernstam F. Molecular tumour boards - current and future considerations for precision oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023; 20:843-863. [PMID: 37845306 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00824-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
Over the past 15 years, rapid progress has been made in developmental therapeutics, especially regarding the use of matched targeted therapies against specific oncogenic molecular alterations across cancer types. Molecular tumour boards (MTBs) are panels of expert physicians, scientists, health-care providers and patient advocates who review and interpret molecular-profiling results for individual patients with cancer and match each patient to available therapies, which can include investigational drugs. Interpretation of the molecular alterations found in each patient is a complicated task that requires an understanding of their contextual functional effects and their correlations with sensitivity or resistance to specific treatments. The criteria for determining the actionability of molecular alterations and selecting matched treatments are constantly evolving. Therefore, MTBs have an increasingly necessary role in optimizing the allocation of biomarker-directed therapies and the implementation of precision oncology. Ultimately, increased MTB availability, accessibility and performance are likely to improve patient care. The challenges faced by MTBs are increasing, owing to the plethora of identifiable molecular alterations and immune markers in tumours of individual patients and their evolving clinical significance as more and more data on patient outcomes and results from clinical trials become available. Beyond next-generation sequencing, broader biomarker analyses can provide useful information. However, greater funding, resources and expertise are needed to ensure the sustainability of MTBs and expand their outreach to underserved populations. Harmonization between practice and policy will be required to optimally implement precision oncology. Herein, we discuss the evolving role of MTBs and current and future considerations for their use in precision oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apostolia M Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Michael Kahle
- Khalifa Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Henry Hiep Vo
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mehmet A Baysal
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amber Johnson
- Khalifa Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ranghiero A, Frascarelli C, Cursano G, Pescia C, Ivanova M, Vacirca D, Rappa A, Taormina SV, Barberis M, Fusco N, Rocco EG, Venetis K. Circulating tumour DNA testing in metastatic breast cancer: Integration with tissue testing. Cytopathology 2023; 34:519-529. [PMID: 37640801 DOI: 10.1111/cyt.13295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer biomarker profiling predominantly relies on tissue testing (surgical and/or biopsy samples). However, the field of liquid biopsy, particularly the analysis of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), has witnessed remarkable progress and continues to evolve rapidly. The incorporation of ctDNA-based testing into clinical practice is creating new opportunities for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). ctDNA offers advantages over conventional tissue analyses, as it reflects tumour heterogeneity and enables multiple serial biopsies in a minimally invasive manner. Thus, it serves as a valuable complement to standard tumour tissues and, in certain instances, may even present a potential alternative approach. In the context of MBC, ctDNA testing proves highly informative in the detection of disease progression, monitoring treatment response, assessing actionable biomarkers, and identifying mechanisms of resistance. Nevertheless, ctDNA does exhibit inherent limitations, including its generally low abundance, necessitating timely blood samplings and rigorous management of the pre-analytical phase. The development of highly sensitive assays and robust bioinformatic tools has paved the way for reliable ctDNA analyses. The time has now come to establish how ctDNA and tissue analyses can be effectively integrated into the diagnostic workflow of MBC to provide patients with the most comprehensive and accurate profiling. In this manuscript, we comprehensively analyse the current methodologies employed in ctDNA analysis and explore the potential benefits arising from the integration of tissue and ctDNA testing for patients diagnosed with MBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Ranghiero
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Frascarelli
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Cursano
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Pescia
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- School of Pathology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Mariia Ivanova
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Vacirca
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Rappa
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Barberis
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Guerini Rocco
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sikosek T, Horos R, Trudzinski F, Jehn J, Frank M, Rajakumar T, Klotz LV, Mercaldo N, Kahraman M, Heuvelman M, Taha Y, Gerwing J, Skottke J, Daniel-Moreno A, Sanchez-Delgado M, Bender S, Rudolf C, Hinkfoth F, Tikk K, Schenz J, Weigand MA, Feindt P, Schumann C, Christopoulos P, Winter H, Kreuter M, Schneider MA, Muley T, Walterspacher S, Schuler M, Darwiche K, Taube C, Hegedus B, Rabe KF, Rieger-Christ K, Jacobsen FL, Aigner C, Reck M, Bankier AA, Sharma A, Steinkraus BR. Early Detection of Lung Cancer Using Small RNAs. J Thorac Oncol 2023; 18:1504-1523. [PMID: 37437883 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lung cancer remains the deadliest cancer in the world, and lung cancer survival is heavily dependent on tumor stage at the time of detection. Low-dose computed tomography screening can reduce mortality; however, annual screening is limited by low adherence in the United States of America and still not broadly implemented in Europe. As a result, less than 10% of lung cancers are detected through existing programs. Thus, there is a great need for additional screening tests, such as a blood test, that could be deployed in the primary care setting. METHODS We prospectively recruited 1384 individuals meeting the National Lung Screening Trial demographic eligibility criteria for lung cancer and collected stabilized whole blood to enable the pipetting-free collection of material, thus minimizing preanalytical noise. Ultra-deep small RNA sequencing (20 million reads per sample) was performed with the addition of a method to remove highly abundant erythroid RNAs, and thus open bandwidth for the detection of less abundant species originating from the plasma or the immune cellular compartment. We used 100 random data splits to train and evaluate an ensemble of logistic regression classifiers using small RNA expression of 943 individuals, discovered an 18-small RNA feature consensus signature (miLung), and validated this signature in an independent cohort (441 individuals). Blood cell sorting and tumor tissue sequencing were performed to deconvolve small RNAs into their source of origin. RESULTS We generated diagnostic models and report a median receiver-operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84-0.86) in the discovery cohort and generalized performance of 0.83 in the validation cohort. Diagnostic performance increased in a stage-dependent manner ranging from 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71-0.76) for stage I to 0.90 (95% CI: 0.89-0.90) for stage IV in the discovery cohort and from 0.76 to 0.86 in the validation cohort. We identified a tumor-shed, plasma-bound ribosomal RNA fragment of the L1 stalk as a dominant predictor of lung cancer. The fragment is decreased after surgery with curative intent. In additional experiments, results of dried blood spot collection and sequencing revealed that small RNA analysis could potentially be conducted through home sampling. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest the potential of a small RNA-based blood test as a viable alternative to low-dose computed tomography screening for early detection of smoking-associated lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Franziska Trudzinski
- Center for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Department of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julia Jehn
- Hummingbird Diagnostics GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Laura V Klotz
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nathaniel Mercaldo
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Yasser Taha
- Hummingbird Diagnostics GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kaja Tikk
- Hummingbird Diagnostics GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Judith Schenz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus A Weigand
- Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Feindt
- Klinik für Thoraxchirurgie, Clemenshospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Christian Schumann
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Thoraxonkologie, Schlaf- und Beatmungsmedizin, Klinikum Kempten und Klinik Immenstadt, Klinikverbund Allgäu, Kempten, Germany
| | - Petros Christopoulos
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hauke Winter
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Kreuter
- Mainz Center for Pulmonary Medicine, Departments of Pneumology, Mainz University Medical Center and of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Marienhaus Clinic Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Marc A Schneider
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany; Translational Research Unit, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Muley
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany; Translational Research Unit, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Walterspacher
- Lungenzentrum Bodensee, II. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany; Faculty of Health/School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Martin Schuler
- West German Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Kaid Darwiche
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Universitätsmedizin Essen - Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Taube
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Universitätsmedizin Essen - Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Germany
| | - Balazs Hegedus
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Medicine Essen, Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Germany
| | - Klaus F Rabe
- LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany; Department of Medicine, Christian Albrechts University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Kimberly Rieger-Christ
- Department of Translational Research, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
| | - Francine L Jacobsen
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Clemens Aigner
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Medicine Essen, Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Reck
- LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany
| | - Alexander A Bankier
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amita Sharma
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cimadamore A, Rescigno P, Conteduca V, Caliò A, Allegritti M, Calò V, Montagnani I, Lucianò R, Patruno M, Bracarda S. SIUrO best practice recommendations to optimize BRCA 1/2 gene testing from DNA extracted from bone biopsy in mCRPC patients (BRCA Optimal Bone Biopsy Procedure: BOP). Virchows Arch 2023; 483:579-589. [PMID: 37794204 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-023-03660-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
The main guidelines and recommendations for the implementation of the BRCA1/2 somatic test do not focus on the clinical application of predictive testing on bone metastases, a frequent condition in metastatic prostate cancer, by analyzing the critical issues encountered by laboratory practice. Our goal is to produce a document (protocol) deriving from a multidisciplinary team approach to obtain high quality nucleic acids from biopsy of bone metastases. This document aims to compose an operational check-list of three phases: the pre-analytical phase concerns tumor cellularity, tissue processing, sample preservation (blood/FFPE), fixation and staining, but above all the decalcification process, the most critical phase because of its key role in allowing the extraction of somatic DNA with a good yield and high quality. The analytical phase involves the preparation of the libraries that can be analyzed in various NGS genetic sequencing platforms and with various bioinformatics software for the interpretation of sequence variants. Finally, the post-analytical phase that allows to report the variants of the BRCA1/2 genes in a clear and usable way to the clinician who will use these data to manage cancer therapy with PARP Inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Cimadamore
- Institute of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Via Palladio 8, 33100, Udine, Italy.
| | - Pasquale Rescigno
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Vincenza Conteduca
- Unit of Medical Oncology and Biomolecular Therapy, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - Policlinico Riuniti, University of Foggia, 71122, Foggia, Italy
| | - Anna Caliò
- Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Largo L. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Allegritti
- Interventional radiology Unit, Azienda ospedaliera Santa Maria Terni, Viale Tristano di Joannuccio, 05100, Terni, Italy
| | - Valentina Calò
- Central Laboratory of Advanced Diagnosis and Biomedical Research, (CLADIBIOR) Policlinico Paolo Giaccone Hospital, University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Ilaria Montagnani
- Pathology Unit, USL Toscana Centro - Ospedale San Giuseppe, Empoli, Italy
| | - Roberta Lucianò
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Margherita Patruno
- Center for Study of Heredo-Familial Tumors - IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II,", Bari, Italy
| | - Sergio Bracarda
- Medical and Translational Oncology, Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Viale Tristano di Joannuccio, 05100, Terni, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bloom SI, Tucker JR, Machin DR, Abdeahad H, Adeyemo AO, Thomas TG, Bramwell RC, Lesniewski LA, Donato AJ. Reduction of double-strand DNA break repair exacerbates vascular aging. Aging (Albany NY) 2023; 15:9913-9947. [PMID: 37787989 PMCID: PMC10599741 DOI: 10.18632/aging.205066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
Advanced age is the greatest risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), the leading cause of death. Arterial function is impaired in advanced age which contributes to the development of CVD. One underexplored hypothesis is that DNA damage within arteries leads to this dysfunction, yet evidence demonstrating the incidence and physiological consequences of DNA damage in arteries, and in particular, in the microvasculature, in advanced age is limited. In the present study, we began by assessing the abundance of DNA damage in human and mouse lung microvascular endothelial cells and found that aging increases the percentage of cells with DNA damage. To explore the physiological consequences of increases in arterial DNA damage, we evaluated measures of endothelial function, microvascular and glycocalyx properties, and arterial stiffness in mice that were lacking or heterozygous for the double-strand DNA break repair protein ATM kinase. Surprisingly, in young mice, vascular function remained unchanged which led us to rationalize that perhaps aging is required to accumulate DNA damage. Indeed, in comparison to wild type littermate controls, mice heterozygous for ATM that were aged to ~18 mo (Old ATM +/-) displayed an accelerated vascular aging phenotype characterized by increases in arterial DNA damage, senescence signaling, and impairments in endothelium-dependent dilation due to elevated oxidative stress. Furthermore, old ATM +/- mice had reduced microvascular density and glycocalyx thickness as well as increased arterial stiffness. Collectively, these data demonstrate that DNA damage that accumulates in arteries in advanced age contributes to arterial dysfunction that is known to drive CVD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel I. Bloom
- Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA
| | - Jordan R. Tucker
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA
| | - Daniel R. Machin
- Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32304, USA
| | - Hossein Abdeahad
- Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA
| | - AdeLola O. Adeyemo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA
| | - Tyler G. Thomas
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA
| | - R. Colton Bramwell
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA
| | - Lisa A. Lesniewski
- Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veteran’s Affairs Medical Center-Salt Lake City, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA
- Nora Eccles Harrison Cardiovascular Research and Training Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA
| | - Anthony J. Donato
- Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veteran’s Affairs Medical Center-Salt Lake City, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA
- Nora Eccles Harrison Cardiovascular Research and Training Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Buttigieg MM, Rauh MJ. Clonal Hematopoiesis: Updates and Implications at the Solid Tumor-Immune Interface. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2300132. [PMID: 37343201 PMCID: PMC10309572 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent larger-scale studies of patients with cancer and longitudinal population cohorts have revealed how age-related expansions of mutant hematopoietic cells (clonal hematopoiesis [CH]) have differential associations with incident and prevalent cancers and their outcomes. Increasing recognition and deeper understanding of genetic subtypes of CH are yielding insights into the tumor-immune interface that may help to explain the heterogeneous impact of CH on tumorigenesis and treatment. Herein, we update the expanding influence of CH in precision oncology and propose important research and clinical questions to address to effectively manage and harness CH in oncology patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco M Buttigieg
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Michael J Rauh
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Patel L, Pritchard CC. Molecular testing of DNA damage response pathways in prostate cancer patients. Curr Opin Oncol 2023; 35:224-230. [PMID: 36966502 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Personalizing prostate cancer therapy requires germline and tumor molecular tests that predict who will respond to specific treatments and who may not. The review covers molecular testing of DNA damage response pathways, the first biomarker-driven precision target with clinical utility for treatment selection in patients with castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). RECENT FINDINGS Recurrent somatic and germline variants cause deficiency of the mismatch repair (MMR) or homologous recombination (HR) pathways in about a quarter of CRPC patients. In prospective clinical trials, patients with deleterious variants in the MMR pathway more frequently experience a therapeutic response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Similarly, somatic and germline events affecting HR predict response to poly(ADP) ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) therapy. Molecular testing of these pathways currently involves assaying for loss of function variants in individual genes and for the genome-wide consequences of repair deficiency. SUMMARY DNA damage response pathways are the first major area of molecular genetic testing in CRPC settings and offer insights into this new paradigm. Our hope is that eventually an arsenal of molecularly-guided therapies will be developed across many pathways to enable precision medicine options for most men with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lalit Patel
- Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Jang A, Lanka SM, Huang M, Casado CV, Caputo SA, Sweeney PL, Gupta K, Pocha O, Habibian N, Hawkins ME, Lieberman AD, Schwartz J, Jaeger EB, Miller PJ, Layton JL, Barata PC, Lewis BE, Ledet EM, Sartor O. Comparison of circulating tumor DNA between African American and Caucasian patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer post-abiraterone and/or enzalutamide. Prostate 2023. [PMID: 37113064 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND African American men are much more likely than Caucasian men to be diagnosed with and to die of prostate cancer. Genetic differences likely play a role. The cBioPortal database reveals that African American men with prostate cancer have higher rates of CDK12 somatic mutations compared to Caucasian men. However, this does not account for prior prostate cancer treatments, which are particularly important in the castrate-resistant setting. We aimed to compare somatic mutations based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) between African American and Caucasian men after exposure to abiraterone and/or enzalutamide. METHODS This single-institution retrospective study characterizes the somatic mutations detected on ctDNA for African American and Caucasian men with mCRPC who had progressed after abiraterone and/or enzalutamide from 2015 through 2022. We evaluated the gene mutations and types of mutations in this mCRPC cohort. RESULTS There were 50 African American and 200 Caucasian men with CRPC with available ctDNA data. African American men were younger at the time of diagnosis (p = 0.008) and development of castration resistance (p = 0.006). African American men were more likely than Caucasian men to have pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) mutations in CDK12 (12% vs. 1.5%; p = 0.003) and copy number amplifications and P/LP mutations in KIT (8.0% vs. 1.5%; p = 0.031). African American men were also significantly more likely to have frameshift mutations (28% vs. 14%; p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS Compared to Caucasian men, African American men with mCRPC after exposure to abiraterone and/or enzalutamide had a higher incidence of somatic CDK12 P/LP mutations and KIT amplifications and P/LP mutations based on ctDNA. African American men also had more frameshift mutations. We hypothesize that these findings have potential implications for tumor immunogenicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Jang
- Deming Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Sree M Lanka
- Deming Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Minqi Huang
- Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Crystal V Casado
- Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Sydney A Caputo
- Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Patrick L Sweeney
- Deming Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Kanika Gupta
- Deming Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Olivia Pocha
- Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | | | - Madeline E Hawkins
- Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Alexandra D Lieberman
- Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Jennifer Schwartz
- Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Ellen B Jaeger
- Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Patrick J Miller
- Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Jodi L Layton
- Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Pedro C Barata
- Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Brian E Lewis
- Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Elisa M Ledet
- Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Oliver Sartor
- Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Aldea M, Tagliamento M, Bayle A, Vasseur D, Vergé V, Marinello A, Danlos FX, Blanc-Durand F, Bernard E, Cerbone L, Mosele MF, Renneville A, Hadoux J, Loriot Y, Sakkal M, Vozy A, Sarkozy C, Smolenschi C, Nicotra C, Martin-Romano P, Boccon-Gibod C, Habza W, Lazarovici J, Ponce S, Hollebecque A, Marzac C, Lacroix L, Barlesi F, André F, Besse B, Rouleau E, Italiano A, Micol JB. Liquid Biopsies for Circulating Tumor DNA Detection May Reveal Occult Hematologic Malignancies in Patients With Solid Tumors. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2200583. [PMID: 36862966 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE High-risk clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is frequently incidentally found in patients with solid tumors undergoing plasma cell-free DNA sequencing. Here, we aimed to determine if the incidental detection of high-risk CH by liquid biopsy may reveal occult hematologic malignancies in patients with solid tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Adult patients with advanced solid cancers enrolled in the Gustave Roussy Cancer Profiling study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04932525) underwent at least one liquid biopsy (FoundationOne Liquid CDx). Molecular reports were discussed within the Gustave Roussy Molecular Tumor Board (MTB). Potential CH alterations were observed, and patients referred to hematology consultation in the case of pathogenic mutations in JAK2, MPL, or MYD88, irrespective of the variant allele frequency (VAF), or in DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1, IDH1, IDH2, SF3B1, or U2AF1 with VAF ≥ 10%, while also considering patient cancer-related prognosis. TP53 mutations were discussed case-by-case. RESULTS Between March and October 2021, 1,416 patients were included. One hundred ten patients (7.7%) carried at least one high-risk CH mutation: DNMT3A (n = 32), JAK2 (n = 28), TET2 (n = 19), ASXL1 (n = 18), SF3B1 (n = 5), IDH1 (n = 4), IDH2 (n = 3), MPL (n = 3), and U2AF1 (n = 2). The MTB advised for hematologic consultation in 45 patients. Overall, 9 patients of 18 actually addressed had confirmed hematologic malignancies that were occult in six patients: two patients had myelodysplastic syndrome, two essential thrombocythemia, one a marginal lymphoma, and one a Waldenström macroglobulinemia. The other three patients were already followed up in hematology. CONCLUSION The incidental findings of high-risk CH through liquid biopsy may trigger diagnostic hematologic tests and reveal an occult hematologic malignancy. Patients should have a multidisciplinary case-by-case evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihaela Aldea
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,University of Paris Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Marco Tagliamento
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Arnaud Bayle
- University of Paris Saclay, Paris, France.,Drug Development Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Damien Vasseur
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Véronique Vergé
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - François-Xavier Danlos
- University of Paris Saclay, Paris, France.,Drug Development Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Elsa Bernard
- Department of Hematology, Leukemia Interception Program, Personalized Cancer Prevention Center, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Luigi Cerbone
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Aline Renneville
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Julien Hadoux
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Drug Development Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Madona Sakkal
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Drug Development Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Aurore Vozy
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Clementine Sarkozy
- Department of Hematology, Leukemia Interception Program, Personalized Cancer Prevention Center, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Cristina Smolenschi
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Drug Development Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Claudio Nicotra
- Drug Development Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Clementine Boccon-Gibod
- Department of Hematology, Leukemia Interception Program, Personalized Cancer Prevention Center, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Wafikaamira Habza
- Department of Hematology, Leukemia Interception Program, Personalized Cancer Prevention Center, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Julien Lazarovici
- Department of Hematology, Leukemia Interception Program, Personalized Cancer Prevention Center, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Santiago Ponce
- Drug Development Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Christophe Marzac
- Drug Development Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Department of Hematology, Leukemia Interception Program, Personalized Cancer Prevention Center, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Ludovic Lacroix
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Fabrice Barlesi
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Aix Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | - Fabrice André
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,University of Paris Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Benjamin Besse
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,University of Paris Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Etienne Rouleau
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Antoine Italiano
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Aix Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Micol
- University of Paris Saclay, Paris, France.,Department of Hematology, Leukemia Interception Program, Personalized Cancer Prevention Center, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Matsubara N, de Bono J, Olmos D, Procopio G, Kawakami S, Ürün Y, van Alphen R, Flechon A, Carducci MA, Choi YD, Hotte SJ, Korbenfeld E, Kramer G, Agarwal N, Chi KN, Dearden S, Gresty C, Kang J, Poehlein C, Harrington EA, Hussain M. Olaparib Efficacy in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer and BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM Alterations Identified by Testing Circulating Tumor DNA. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:92-99. [PMID: 36318705 PMCID: PMC9811154 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-3577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The phase III PROfound study (NCT02987543) evaluated olaparib versus abiraterone or enzalutamide (control) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with tumor homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations. We present exploratory analyses on the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing as an additional method to identify patients with mCRPC with HRR gene alterations who may be eligible for olaparib treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS Plasma samples collected during screening in PROfound were retrospectively sequenced using the FoundationOne®Liquid CDx test for BRCA1, BRCA2 (BRCA), and ATM alterations in ctDNA. Only patients from Cohort A (BRCA/ATM alteration positive by tissue testing) were evaluated. We compared clinical outcomes, including radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) between the ctDNA subgroup and Cohort A. RESULTS Of the 181 (73.9%) Cohort A patients who gave consent for plasma sample ctDNA testing, 139 (76.8%) yielded a result and BRCA/ATM alterations were identified in 111 (79.9%). Of these, 73 patients received olaparib and 38 received control. Patients' baseline demographics and characteristics, and the prevalence of HRR alterations were comparable with the Cohort A intention-to-treat (ITT) population. rPFS was longer in the olaparib group versus control [median 7.4 vs. 3.5 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.21-0.53; nominal P < 0.0001], which is consistent with Cohort A ITT population (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.25-0.47). CONCLUSIONS When tumor tissue testing is not feasible or has failed, ctDNA testing may be a suitable alternative to identify patients with mCRPC carrying BRCA/ATM alterations who may benefit from olaparib treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuaki Matsubara
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
- Corresponding Author: Nobuaki Matsubara, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, 104-0045 Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan. Phone: 814-7133-1111; Fax: 814-7134-6922; E-mail:
| | - Johann de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Olmos
- Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Procopio
- Medical Oncology Dept, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Satoru Kawakami
- Department of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yüksel Ürün
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Robbert van Alphen
- Department of Oncology, Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Aude Flechon
- Cancérologie Médicale, Centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon Cedex, France
| | | | - Young Deuk Choi
- Department of Urology, Yonsei University Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of South Korea
| | | | | | | | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah (NCI-CCC), Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Kim N. Chi
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Maha Hussain
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Quinn Z, Leiby B, Sonpavde G, Choudhury AD, Sweeney C, Einstein D, Szmulewitz R, Sartor O, Knudsen K, Yang ESH, Kelly WK. Phase I Study of Niraparib in Combination with Radium-223 for the Treatment of Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:50-59. [PMID: 36321991 PMCID: PMC9812873 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-2526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify the safety of niraparib, a PARP inhibitor, in combination with Radium-223 for the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in men without known BRCA mutations. PATIENTS AND METHODS Men with progressive mCPRC following ≥1 line of androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapy and bone metastases but no documented BRCA-1 or BRCA-2 alterations or bulky visceral disease were included. Niraparib dose was escalated in combination with standard dosing of Radium-223 using a time-to-event continual reassessment method. The highest dose level with a DLT probability <20% was defined as MTD. Secondary endpoints included PSA change and progression-free survival. Exploratory analyses included assessing DNA mutations found in ctDNA as well as gene expression changes assessed in whole blood samples. RESULTS Thirty patients were treated with niraparib and radium-223: 13 patients received 100 mg, 12 received 200 mg, and 5 patients received 300 mg of niraparib. There were six DLT events: two (13%) for neutropenia, two (13%) for thrombocytopenia, whereas fatigue and nausea each occurred once (3%). Anemia (2/13%) and neutropenia (2/13%) were the most common grade 3 adverse events. For patients with prior chemotherapy exposure, the MTD was 100 mg, whereas the MTD for chemotherapy naïve patients was 200 mg. Whole blood gene expression of PAX5 and CD19 was higher in responders and ARG-1, IL2R, and FLT3 expression was higher in nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS Combining niraparib with Radium-223 in patients with mCRPC was safe; however, further studies incorporating biomarkers will better elucidate the role of combinations of PARP inhibitors with DNA damaging and other agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Quinn
- Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia PA
| | - Benjamin Leiby
- Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia PA
| | - Guru Sonpavde
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston MA
| | - Atish D Choudhury
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston MA
| | - Christopher Sweeney
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston MA
| | | | | | - Oliver Sartor
- Tulane University School of Medicine, Tulane Cancer Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Karen Knudsen
- Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia PA
| | - Eddy Shih-Hsin Yang
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL
| | - Wm. Kevin Kelly
- Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia PA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mateo J, Beltran H. Moving Precision Oncology for Advanced Prostate Cancer from Theory to Practice. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:110-113. [PMID: 35999168 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Revised: 06/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Genomic profiling represents the first clinical practice-ready tool for precision oncology in metastatic prostate cancer. Here we outline current testing considerations and gray zones regarding how best to apply genomic testing in the clinic. The lessons we learn today will continue to shape how we integrate evolving biology and future technologies into practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joaquin Mateo
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Solar Vasconcelos JP, Boutin M, Loree JM. Circulating tumor DNA in early-stage colon cancer: ready for prime time or needing refinement? Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359221143975. [PMID: 36570410 PMCID: PMC9772953 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221143975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Liquid biopsies are the detection of molecular information in fluids from patients with cancer. In colorectal cancer (CRC), the most promising liquid biopsy strategy is the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from plasma. In early-stage CRC, the potential for ctDNA to impact care stems from the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) to guide adjuvant therapy after curative intent treatment and in identifying recurrences during surveillance. As for any new diagnostic test, ctDNA assays must overcome pre-analytical and analytical challenges before clinical implementation. We will discuss important logistical and assay considerations that clinicians and patients should understand when assessing ctDNA assays. We will also delve into important concepts to aid in interpreting ctDNA results and potential incidental findings that may arise. Sequencing errors, germline variants, and clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) must be addressed to properly interpret results. CHIP is also an important consideration that impacts patient prognosis through association with cardiovascular and hematologic diseases. With this background in place, we next review the best available evidence for the use of ctDNA in early-stage colon cancer. Observational cohorts have established MRD after surgery as a significant prognostic factor for recurrence in stage II and III colon cancer. It also has the ability to anticipate clinical recurrence before standard investigations when used in surveillance. The first and only interventional randomized trial to date evaluating ctDNA is DYNAMIC. The study demonstrated the noninferiority of a MRD detection-guided approach in selecting patients with stage II colon cancer for adjuvant treatment. Notwithstanding the important results, there are still important questions to be answered before ctDNA enters prime time in the clinic. However, future appears bright and ongoing trials will help clarify how to best use this technology in early-stage colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Melina Boutin
- BC Cancer, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Tissue and liquid biopsy profiling reveal convergent tumor evolution and therapy evasion in breast cancer. Nat Commun 2022; 13:7495. [PMID: 36470901 PMCID: PMC9723105 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35245-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pathological and genomic profiling have transformed breast cancer care by matching patients to targeted treatments. However, tumors evolve and evade therapeutic interventions often through the acquisition of genomic mutations. Here we examine patients profiled with tissue (TBx) and liquid biopsy (LBx) as part of routine clinical care, to characterize the tumor evolutionary landscape and identify potential vulnerabilities in the relapsed setting. Real-world evidence demonstrates that LBx is utilized later in care and identifies associations with intervening therapy. While driver events are frequently shared, acquired LBx alterations are detected in a majority of patients, with the highest frequency in ER+ disease and in patients with longer biopsy intervals. Acquired mutations are often polyclonal and present at lower allelic fractions, suggesting multi-clonal convergent evolution. In addition to well-characterized resistance mutations (e.g., ESR1, NF1, RB1, ERBB2), we observe a diversity of rarer but potentially targetable mutations (e.g., PIK3CA, HRAS/NRAS/KRAS, FGFR1/2/3, BRAF) and fusions (e.g., FGFR1/2, ERBB2, RET), as well as BRCA1/2 reversions through a variety of mechanisms, including splice alterations and structural deletions. This study provides insights on treatment and selection-driven tumor evolution and identifies potential combinatorial treatment options in advanced breast cancer.
Collapse
|
38
|
He W, Xiao Y, Yan S, Zhu Y, Ren S. Cell-free DNA in the management of prostate cancer: Current status and future prospective. Asian J Urol 2022. [PMID: 37538150 PMCID: PMC10394290 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective With the escalating prevalence of prostate cancer (PCa) in China, there is an urgent demand for novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Extensive investigations have been conducted on the clinical implementation of circulating free DNA (cfDNA) in PCa. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the present state of cfDNA as a biomarker for PCa and to examine its merits and obstacles for future clinical utilization. Methods Relevant peer-reviewed manuscripts on cfDNA as a PCa marker were evaluated by PubMed search (2010-2022) to evaluate the roles of cfDNA in PCa diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction, respectively. Results cfDNA is primarily released from cells undergoing necrosis and apoptosis, allowing for non-invasive insight into the genomic, transcriptomic, and epigenomic alterations within various PCa disease states. Next-generation sequencing, among other detection methods, enables the assessment of cfDNA abundance, mutation status, fragment characteristics, and epigenetic modifications. Multidimensional analysis based on cfDNA can facilitate early detection of PCa, risk stratification, and treatment monitoring. However, standardization of cfDNA detection methods is still required to expedite its clinical application. Conclusion cfDNA provides a non-invasive, rapid, and repeatable means of acquiring multidimensional information from PCa patients, which can aid in guiding clinical decisions and enhancing patient management. Overcoming the application barriers of cfDNA necessitates increased data sharing and international collaboration.
Collapse
|
39
|
Marshall CH, Gondek LP, Luo J, Antonarakis ES. Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential in Patients with Solid Tumor Malignancies. Cancer Res 2022; 82:4107-4113. [PMID: 36040522 PMCID: PMC9669303 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-22-0985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) refers to the expansion of cells of hematopoietic lineage that carry acquired somatic alterations associated with hematologic malignancies. The most commonly altered genes giving rise to CHIP are DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1. However, advanced sequencing technologies have resulted in highly sensitive detection of clonal hematopoiesis beyond these known driver genes. In practice, CHIP is commonly identified as an incidental finding in liquid and tissue biopsies of patients with solid tumors. CHIP can have broad clinical consequences, given its association with hematologic malignancies and nonmalignant diseases. CHIP can also interfere with next-generation DNA sequencing results, so clinicians should pay careful attention when these results are being used to guide therapy. Future research is needed to determine how solid tumor malignancies and their treatments alter the progression of CHIP, and in turn, how CHIP might be used to improve treatment selection and outcomes for patients with solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine H. Marshall
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Lukasz P. Gondek
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jun Luo
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kwan EM, Wyatt AW, Chi KN. Towards clinical implementation of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic prostate cancer: Opportunities for integration and pitfalls to interpretation. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1054497. [PMID: 36439451 PMCID: PMC9685669 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1054497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents short fragments of tumor-derived DNA released into the bloodstream primarily from cancer cells undergoing apoptosis. In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), characterizing genomic alterations in ctDNA identifies mutations, copy number alterations, and structural rearrangements with predictive and prognostic biomarker utility. These associations with clinical outcomes have resulted in ctDNA increasingly incorporated into routine clinical care. In this review, we summarize current and emerging applications for ctDNA analysis in metastatic prostate cancer, including outcome prediction, treatment selection, and characterization of treatment resistance. We also discuss potential pitfalls with interpreting ctDNA findings, namely false negatives arising from low tumor content and optimal assay design, including correction for clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and germline variants. Understanding the influence of these limitations on interpretation of ctDNA results is necessary to overcome barriers to clinical implementation. Nevertheless, as assay availability and technology continue to improve, recognizing both opportunities and shortcomings of ctDNA analysis will retain relevance with informing the implementation of precision-oncology initiatives for metastatic prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmond M. Kwan
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Alexander W. Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kim N. Chi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Arends CM, Damm F. [Clonal hematopoiesis and solid neoplasms]. INNERE MEDIZIN (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2022; 63:1133-1140. [PMID: 36149440 DOI: 10.1007/s00108-022-01404-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is a premalignant state of the hematopoietic system that frequently occurs in old age and is associated with an elevated cardiovascular risk and higher overall mortality. AIM The prevalence and clinical implications of CH in patients with solid neoplasms were examined. MATERIAL AND METHODS A review, summary and discussion of the recent literature was carried out. RESULTS CH occurs in 20-30% of patients with solid neoplasms. In the molecular diagnostics of tumor or cell-free DNA from plasma, CH mutations can be falsely interpreted as tumor mutations. CH and in particular mutations in the genes of the DNA damage repair machinery are associated with a higher risk of therapy-associated myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) following chemotherapy, radiotherapy and poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy. CONCLUSION CH is a frequent phenomenon in patients with solid neoplasms. It has high clinical relevance due to the associated risk of t‑MN. More research is needed for a better understanding of the role of CH in this patient collective and to derive evidence-based recommendations for action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Maximilian Arends
- Campus Virchow Klinikum, Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Frederik Damm
- Campus Virchow Klinikum, Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland. .,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Heidelberg, Deutschland. .,Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kanai M. Current Clinical Practice of Precision Medicine Using Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Tests in Biliary Tract Cancer in Japan. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:7272-7284. [PMID: 36290850 PMCID: PMC9599999 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29100573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
With the recent advances of next generation sequencing technologies, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests, which are designed to measure more than hundreds of cancer-related genes at a time, have now been widely introduced into daily clinical practice. For the patients whose tumor samples are not fit for tissue-based CGP tests, a blood-based CGP test (liquid biopsy) is available as an alternative option. Three CGP tests, "OncoGuide NCC™Oncopanel System (124 genes)", "FoundationOne®CDx (324 genes)", and "Founda-tionOne®CDx Liquid (324 genes)", are now reimbursed by public insurance in 233 hospitals designated for cancer genomic medicine in Japan. In biliary tract cancer, the prevalence of druggable variants is relatively higher compared to other cancer types and the European Society for Medical Oncology recommends routine use of CGP tests for advanced biliary tract cancer to guide treatment options. The latest National Cancer Center Network guideline lists eight druggable markers (NTRK fusion, MSI-H, TMB-H, BRAF V600E, FGFR2 fusions/rearrangement, IDH1 mutations, RET fusion, and HER2 overexpression) and matched therapies. In Japan, matched therapies for four markers (NTRK, MSI-H, TMB-H, and FGFR2) are reimbursed by public insurance (as of September 2022). The progress of genomic profiling technology will contribute to the improvement of the dismal clinical outcomes of this disease in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Kanai
- Department of Therapeutic Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Berchuck JE, Facchinetti F, DiToro DF, Baiev I, Majeed U, Reyes S, Chen C, Zhang K, Sharman R, Junior PLSU, Maurer J, Shroff RT, Pritchard CC, Wu MJ, Catenacci DVT, Javle M, Friboulet L, Hollebecque A, Bardeesy N, Zhu AX, Lennerz JK, Tan B, Borad M, Parikh AR, Kiedrowski LA, Kelley RK, Mody K, Juric D, Goyal L. The Clinical Landscape of Cell-Free DNA Alterations in 1,671 Patients with Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:1269-1283. [PMID: 36089135 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.09.150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted therapies have transformed clinical management of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis is an attractive approach for cancer genomic profiling that overcomes many limitations of traditional tissue-based analysis. We examined cfDNA as a tool to inform clinical management of patients with advanced BTC and generate novel insights into BTC tumor biology. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed next-generation sequencing data of 2,068 cfDNA samples from 1,671 patients with advanced BTC generated with Guardant360. We performed clinical annotation on a multi-institutional subset (n=225) to assess intra-patient cfDNA-tumor concordance and the association of cfDNA variant allele fraction (VAF) with clinical outcomes. RESULTS Genetic alterations were detected in cfDNA in 84% of patients, with targetable alterations detected in 44% of patients. FGFR2 fusions, IDH1 mutations, and BRAF V600E were clonal in majority of cases, affirming these targetable alterations as early driver events in BTC. Concordance between cfDNA and tissue for mutation detection was high for IDH1 mutations (87%) and BRAF V600E (100%), and low for FGFR2 fusions (18%). cfDNA analysis uncovered novel putative mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies, including mutation of the cysteine residue (FGFR2 C492F) to which covalent FGFR inhibitors bind. High pre-treatment cfDNA VAF associated with poor prognosis and shorter response to chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Finally, we report the frequency of promising targets in advanced BTC currently under investigation in other advanced solid tumors, including KRAS G12C (1.0%), KRAS G12D (5.1%), PIK3CA mutations (6.8%), and ERBB2 amplifications (4.9%). CONCLUSIONS These findings from the largest and most comprehensive study to date of cfDNA from patients with advanced BTC highlight the utility of cfDNA analysis in current management of this disease. Characterization of oncogenic drivers and mechanisms of therapeutic resistance in this study will inform drug development efforts to reduce mortality for patients with BTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob E Berchuck
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Francesco Facchinetti
- Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm U981, Biomarqueurs Prédictifs et Nouvelles Stratégies Thérapeutiques en Oncologie, Villejuif, France
| | - Daniel F DiToro
- Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Islam Baiev
- Department of Medicine, Mass General Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Umair Majeed
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | | | - Christopher Chen
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Karen Zhang
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Reya Sharman
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | | | - Jordan Maurer
- Department of Medicine, Mass General Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Rachna T Shroff
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Meng-Ju Wu
- Department of Medicine, Mass General Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Milind Javle
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Luc Friboulet
- Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm U981, Biomarqueurs Prédictifs et Nouvelles Stratégies Thérapeutiques en Oncologie, Villejuif, France
| | - Antoine Hollebecque
- Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm U981, Biomarqueurs Prédictifs et Nouvelles Stratégies Thérapeutiques en Oncologie, Villejuif, France
| | - Nabeel Bardeesy
- Department of Medicine, Mass General Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew X Zhu
- Jiahui International Cancer Center, Jihaui Health, Shanghai, China; I-Mab Biopharma, Shanghai, China
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Benjamin Tan
- Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Mitesh Borad
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Aparna R Parikh
- Department of Medicine, Mass General Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Robin Kate Kelley
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Kabir Mody
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Dejan Juric
- Department of Medicine, Mass General Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lipika Goyal
- Department of Medicine, Mass General Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Matsumoto T, Shiota M, Blas L, Eto M. Role of Olaparib in the Management of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Japanese Clinician's Perspective. Cancer Manag Res 2022; 14:2389-2397. [PMID: 35967752 PMCID: PMC9373991 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s326114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Several studies have identified various targetable genomic alterations in prostate cancer, which accumulate during carcinogenesis and cancer progression. Genomic alterations in genes involved in DNA damage repair by homologous recombination repair may predict increased sensitivity to poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. The Phase 3 PROfound trial has shown that treatment with the PARP inhibitor olaparib was associated with an improved radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival among patients with homologous recombination repair-deficient metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after the treatment with androgen receptor targeting therapy, especially in men with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. In Japan, olaparib was approved in December 2020 for the treatment of mCRPC with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. In addition, genetic tests to detect BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation to select patients who are likely to benefit from olaparib were also approved. This review summarizes the status of olaparib treatment for mCRPC, focusing on the situation in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masaki Shiota
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Leandro Blas
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Eto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Cresta Morgado P, Mateo J. Clinical implications of homologous recombination repair mutations in prostate cancer. Prostate 2022; 82 Suppl 1:S45-S59. [PMID: 35657156 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a disease with significant interpatient genomics, with a proportion of patients presenting mutations in key homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene aberrations, particularly in late-stage disease. A better understanding of the genomic landscape of prostate cancer and the prognostic and predictive value of HRR mutations could lead to more precise care for prostate cancer patients. BRCA1/2 mutations are associated with a more aggressive disease course and higher risk of developing lethal prostate cancer, but also identify patients who could benefit from directed therapeutic strategies with PARP inhibitors. Other HRR mutations are also frequent but their prognostic and predictive value for prostate cancer patients is less clear. Moreover, a proportion of these mutations are associated with inherited germline defects, being relevant for the patients' risk of second malignancies but also to inform their relatives' risk of cancer through cascade testing. In this manuscript, we review current knowledge of the prognostic and predictive value for different HHR alterations across the different prostate cancer disease states. Additionally, we assess the challenges to implement genomic testing in clinical practice for prostate cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Cresta Morgado
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Prostate Cancer Translational Research Group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joaquin Mateo
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Prostate Cancer Translational Research Group, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Mizuno K, Beltran H. Future directions for precision oncology in prostate cancer. Prostate 2022; 82 Suppl 1:S86-S96. [PMID: 35657153 PMCID: PMC9942493 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Clinical genomic testing is becoming routine in prostate cancer, as biomarker-driven therapies such as poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and anti-PD1 immunotherapy are now approved for select men with castration-resistant prostate cancer harboring alterations in DNA repair genes. Challenges for precision medicine in prostate cancer include an overall low prevalence of actionable genomic alterations and a still limited understanding of the impact of tumor heterogeneity and co-occurring alterations on treatment response and outcomes across diverse patient populations. Expanded tissue-based technologies such as whole-genome sequencing, transcriptome analysis, epigenetic analysis, and single-cell RNA sequencing have not yet entered the clinical realm and could potentially improve upon our understanding of how molecular features of tumors, intratumoral heterogeneity, and the tumor microenvironment impact therapy response and resistance. Blood-based technologies including cell-free DNA, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and extracellular vesicles (EVs) are less invasive molecular profiling resources that could also help capture intraindividual tumor heterogeneity and track dynamic changes that occur in the context of specific therapies. Furthermore, molecular imaging is an important biomarker tool within the framework of prostate cancer precision medicine with a capability to detect heterogeneity across metastases and potential therapeutic targets less invasively. Here, we review recent technological advances that may help promote the future implementation and value of precision oncology testing for patients with advanced prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kei Mizuno
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Imai M, Nakamura Y, Sunami K, Kage H, Komine K, Koyama T, Amano T, Ennishi D, Kanai M, Kenmotsu H, Maeda T, Morita S, Sakai D, Bando H, Makiyama A, Suzuki T, Hirata M, Kohsaka S, Tsuchihara K, Naito Y, Yoshino T. Expert Panel Consensus Recommendations on the Use of Circulating Tumor DNA Assays for Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Cancer Sci 2022; 113:3646-3656. [PMID: 35876224 PMCID: PMC9633310 DOI: 10.1111/cas.15504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Comprehensive genomic profiling is increasingly used to facilitate precision oncology based on molecular stratification. In addition to conventional tissue comprehensive genomic profiling, comprehensive genomic profiling of circulating tumor DNA has become widely utilized in cancer care owing on its advantages, including less invasiveness, rapid turnaround time, and capturing heterogeneity. However, circulating tumor DNA comprehensive genomic profiling has some limitations, mainly false negatives due to low levels of plasma circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid and false positives caused by clonal hematopoiesis. Nevertheless, no guidelines and recommendations fully address these issues. Here, an expert panel committee involving representatives from 12 Designated Core Hospitals for Cancer Genomic Medicine in Japan was organized to develop expert consensus recommendations for the use of circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid‐based comprehensive genomic profiling. The aim was to generate guidelines for clinicians and allied healthcare professionals on the optimal use of the circulating tumor DNA assays in advanced solid tumors and to aid the design of future clinical trials that utilize and develop circulating tumor DNA assays to refine precision oncology. Fourteen clinical questions regarding circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid comprehensive genomic profiling including the timing of testing and considerations for interpreting results were established by searching and curating associated literatures, and corresponding recommendations were prepared based on the literature for each clinical question. Final consensus recommendations were developed by voting to determine the level of each recommendation by the Committee members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuho Imai
- Translational Research Support Section, National Cancer Center Hospital East.,Genomics Unit, Keio University School of Medicine
| | - Yoshiaki Nakamura
- Translational Research Support Section, National Cancer Center Hospital East.,Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East
| | - Kuniko Sunami
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital
| | - Hidenori Kage
- Department of Next-Generation Precision Medicine Development Laboratory, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
| | - Keigo Komine
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital
| | - Takafumi Koyama
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital
| | - Toraji Amano
- Clinical Research and Medical Innovation Center, Hokkaido University Hospital
| | - Daisuke Ennishi
- Center for Comprehensive Genomic Medicine, Okayama University Hospital
| | - Masashi Kanai
- Department of Therapeutic Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University
| | | | - Takahiro Maeda
- Division of Precision Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
| | - Sachi Morita
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Nagoya University Hospital
| | - Daisuke Sakai
- Center for Cancer Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Osaka University Hospital
| | - Hideaki Bando
- Translational Research Support Section, National Cancer Center Hospital East.,Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East
| | | | - Tatsuya Suzuki
- Department of Hematology, National Cancer Center Hospital
| | - Makoto Hirata
- Department of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital
| | - Shinji Kohsaka
- Division of Cellular Signaling, National Cancer Center Research Institute
| | - Katsuya Tsuchihara
- Division of Translational Informatics, Exploratory Oncology Research and Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Japan
| | - Yoichi Naito
- Department of General Internal medicine/Experimental Therapeutics/Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East
| | - Takayuki Yoshino
- Translational Research Support Section, National Cancer Center Hospital East.,Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Gillessen S, Armstrong A, Attard G, Beer TM, Beltran H, Bjartell A, Bossi A, Briganti A, Bristow RG, Bulbul M, Caffo O, Chi KN, Clarke CS, Clarke N, Davis ID, de Bono JS, Duran I, Eeles R, Efstathiou E, Efstathiou J, Ekeke ON, Evans CP, Fanti S, Feng FY, Fizazi K, Frydenberg M, George D, Gleave M, Halabi S, Heinrich D, Higano C, Hofman MS, Hussain M, James N, Jones R, Kanesvaran R, Khauli RB, Klotz L, Leibowitz R, Logothetis C, Maluf F, Millman R, Morgans AK, Morris MJ, Mottet N, Mrabti H, Murphy DG, Murthy V, Oh WK, Ost P, O'Sullivan JM, Padhani AR, Parker C, Poon DMC, Pritchard CC, Rabah DM, Rathkopf D, Reiter RE, Rubin M, Ryan CJ, Saad F, Sade JP, Sartor O, Scher HI, Shore N, Skoneczna I, Small E, Smith M, Soule H, Spratt DE, Sternberg CN, Suzuki H, Sweeney C, Sydes MR, Taplin ME, Tilki D, Tombal B, Türkeri L, Uemura H, Uemura H, van Oort I, Yamoah K, Ye D, Zapatero A, Omlin A. Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Report from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021. Eur Urol 2022; 82:115-141. [PMID: 35450732 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovations in treatments, imaging, and molecular characterisation in advanced prostate cancer have improved outcomes, but various areas of management still lack high-level evidence to inform clinical practice. The 2021 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) addressed some of these questions to supplement guidelines that are based on level 1 evidence. OBJECTIVE To present the voting results from APCCC 2021. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The experts identified three major areas of controversy related to management of advanced prostate cancer: newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), the use of prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands in diagnostics and therapy, and molecular characterisation of tissue and blood. A panel of 86 international prostate cancer experts developed the programme and the consensus questions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The panel voted publicly but anonymously on 107 pre-defined questions, which were developed by both voting and non-voting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The voting reflected the opinions of panellists and did not incorporate a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions received varying degrees of support from panellists, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results reported in the Supplementary material. CONCLUSIONS These voting results from a panel of experts in advanced prostate cancer can help clinicians and patients to navigate controversial areas of management for which high-level evidence is scant. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised according to patient characteristics, such as the extent and location of disease, prior treatment(s), comorbidities, patient preferences, and treatment recommendations, and should also incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence and logistic and economic constraints. Enrolment in clinical trials should be strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2021 once again identified salient questions that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials. PATIENT SUMMARY The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference is a forum for discussing current diagnosis and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. An expert panel votes on predefined questions focused on the most clinically relevant areas for treatment of advanced prostate cancer for which there are gaps in knowledge. The voting results provide a practical guide to help clinicians in discussing treatment options with patients as part of shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Universita della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland; University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Andrew Armstrong
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Gert Attard
- University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - Tomasz M Beer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Genitourinary Oncology, Prostate Brachytherapy Unit, Gustave Roussy, Paris, France
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Robert G Bristow
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Christie NHS Trust and CRUK Manchester Institute and Cancer Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Muhammad Bulbul
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Kim N Chi
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Caroline S Clarke
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK
| | - Noel Clarke
- The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester, UK
| | - Ian D Davis
- Monash University and Eastern Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Johann S de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Ros Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | | | - Jason Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Onyeanunam Ngozi Ekeke
- Department of Surgery, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
| | | | - Stefano Fanti
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Felix Y Feng
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Karim Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Prostate Cancer Research Program, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dan George
- Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Martin Gleave
- Urological Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel Heinrich
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Gjøvik, Norway
| | | | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Maha Hussain
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nick James
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Robert Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Raja B Khauli
- Department of Urology and the Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raya Leibowitz
- Oncology Institute, Shamir Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Chris Logothetis
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, David H. Koch Centre, MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Clinical Therapeutics, University of Athens Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Fernando Maluf
- Beneficiência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Departamento de Oncologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Alicia K Morgans
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael J Morris
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Hind Mrabti
- National Institute of Oncology, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - William K Oh
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, UK
| | - Chris Parker
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Darren M C Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Danny M Rabah
- The Cancer Research Chair, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dana Rathkopf
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rob E Reiter
- University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mark Rubin
- Bern Center for Precision Medicine and Department for Biomedical Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Charles J Ryan
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre Hospitalier de Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Juan P Sade
- Instituto Alexander Fleming, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Howard I Scher
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Iwona Skoneczna
- Rafal Masztak Grochowski Hospital and Maria Sklodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Eric Small
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Howard Soule
- Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Cora N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, Meyer Cancer Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Christopher Sweeney
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew R Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Levent Türkeri
- Department of Urology, M.A. Aydınlar Acıbadem University, Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hiroji Uemura
- Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hirotsugu Uemura
- Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Inge van Oort
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Aurelius Omlin
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Blood-based liquid biopsies for prostate cancer: clinical opportunities and challenges. Br J Cancer 2022; 127:1394-1402. [PMID: 35715640 PMCID: PMC9553885 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01881-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Liquid biopsy has been established as a powerful, minimally invasive, tool to detect clinically actionable aberrations across numerous cancer types in real-time. With the development of new therapeutic agents in prostate cancer (PC) including DNA repair targeted therapies, this is especially attractive. However, there is unclarity on how best to screen for PC, improve risk stratification and ultimately how to treat advanced disease. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop better biomarkers to help guide oncologists' decisions in these settings. Circulating tumour cells (CTCs), exosomes and cell-free DNA/RNA (cfDNA/cfRNA) analysis, including epigenetic features such as methylation, have all shown potential in prognostication, treatment response assessment and detection of emerging mechanisms of resistance. However, there are still challenges to overcome prior to implementing liquid biopsies in routine clinical practice such as preanalytical considerations including blood collection and storage, the cost of CTC isolation and enrichment, low-circulating tumour content as a limitation for genomic analysis and how to better interpret the sequencing data generated. In this review, we describe an overview of the up-to-date clinical opportunities in the management of PC through blood-based liquid biopsies and the next steps for its implementation in personalised treatment guidance.
Collapse
|
50
|
Vasseur D, Sassi H, Bayle A, Tagliamento M, Besse B, Marzac C, Arbab A, Auger N, Cotteret S, Aldea M, Blanc-Durand F, Géraud A, Gazzah A, Loriot Y, Hollebecque A, Martín-Romano P, Ngo-Camus M, Nicotra C, Ponce S, Sakkal M, Caron O, Smolenschi C, Micol JB, Italiano A, Rouleau E, Lacroix L. Next-Generation Sequencing on Circulating Tumor DNA in Advanced Solid Cancer: Swiss Army Knife for the Molecular Tumor Board? A Review of the Literature Focused on FDA Approved Test. Cells 2022; 11:cells11121901. [PMID: 35741030 PMCID: PMC9221453 DOI: 10.3390/cells11121901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
FDA-approved next-generation sequencing assays based on cell-free DNA offers new opportunities in a molecular-tumor-board context thanks to the noninvasiveness of liquid biopsy, the diversity of analyzed parameters and the short turnaround time. It gives the opportunity to study the heterogeneity of the tumor, to elucidate complex resistance mechanisms and to adapt treatment strategies. However, lowering the limit of detection and increasing the panels' size raise new questions in terms of detection of incidental germline alterations, occult malignancies and clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential mutations. In this review, after a technological discussion and description of the common problematics encountered, we establish recommendations in properly using these FDA-approved tests in a molecular-tumor-board context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien Vasseur
- Medical Biology and Pathology Department, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (H.S.); (C.M.); (A.A.); (N.A.); (S.C.); (E.R.); (L.L.)
- AMMICa UAR3655/US23, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Hela Sassi
- Medical Biology and Pathology Department, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (H.S.); (C.M.); (A.A.); (N.A.); (S.C.); (E.R.); (L.L.)
| | - Arnaud Bayle
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (A.B.); (A.G.); (P.M.-R.); (M.N.-C.); (C.N.); (S.P.); (A.I.)
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Équipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Marco Tagliamento
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (M.T.); (B.B.); (M.A.); (A.G.); (Y.L.); (A.H.); (O.C.)
| | - Benjamin Besse
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (M.T.); (B.B.); (M.A.); (A.G.); (Y.L.); (A.H.); (O.C.)
| | - Christophe Marzac
- Medical Biology and Pathology Department, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (H.S.); (C.M.); (A.A.); (N.A.); (S.C.); (E.R.); (L.L.)
| | - Ahmadreza Arbab
- Medical Biology and Pathology Department, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (H.S.); (C.M.); (A.A.); (N.A.); (S.C.); (E.R.); (L.L.)
| | - Nathalie Auger
- Medical Biology and Pathology Department, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (H.S.); (C.M.); (A.A.); (N.A.); (S.C.); (E.R.); (L.L.)
| | - Sophie Cotteret
- Medical Biology and Pathology Department, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (H.S.); (C.M.); (A.A.); (N.A.); (S.C.); (E.R.); (L.L.)
| | - Mihaela Aldea
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (M.T.); (B.B.); (M.A.); (A.G.); (Y.L.); (A.H.); (O.C.)
| | - Félix Blanc-Durand
- Gynecological Cancer Unit, Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France;
| | - Arthur Géraud
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (A.B.); (A.G.); (P.M.-R.); (M.N.-C.); (C.N.); (S.P.); (A.I.)
| | - Anas Gazzah
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (M.T.); (B.B.); (M.A.); (A.G.); (Y.L.); (A.H.); (O.C.)
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (M.T.); (B.B.); (M.A.); (A.G.); (Y.L.); (A.H.); (O.C.)
| | - Antoine Hollebecque
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (M.T.); (B.B.); (M.A.); (A.G.); (Y.L.); (A.H.); (O.C.)
| | - Patricia Martín-Romano
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (A.B.); (A.G.); (P.M.-R.); (M.N.-C.); (C.N.); (S.P.); (A.I.)
| | - Maud Ngo-Camus
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (A.B.); (A.G.); (P.M.-R.); (M.N.-C.); (C.N.); (S.P.); (A.I.)
| | - Claudio Nicotra
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (A.B.); (A.G.); (P.M.-R.); (M.N.-C.); (C.N.); (S.P.); (A.I.)
| | - Santiago Ponce
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (A.B.); (A.G.); (P.M.-R.); (M.N.-C.); (C.N.); (S.P.); (A.I.)
| | - Madona Sakkal
- Dermatology Unit, Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (M.S.); (C.S.)
| | - Olivier Caron
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (M.T.); (B.B.); (M.A.); (A.G.); (Y.L.); (A.H.); (O.C.)
| | - Cristina Smolenschi
- Dermatology Unit, Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (M.S.); (C.S.)
| | | | - Antoine Italiano
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (A.B.); (A.G.); (P.M.-R.); (M.N.-C.); (C.N.); (S.P.); (A.I.)
| | - Etienne Rouleau
- Medical Biology and Pathology Department, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (H.S.); (C.M.); (A.A.); (N.A.); (S.C.); (E.R.); (L.L.)
- AMMICa UAR3655/US23, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Ludovic Lacroix
- Medical Biology and Pathology Department, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France; (H.S.); (C.M.); (A.A.); (N.A.); (S.C.); (E.R.); (L.L.)
- AMMICa UAR3655/US23, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|