Systemic Adverse Events Among Patients With Diabetes Treated With Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections

Bevacizumab for Retinopathy of Prematurity is Not Associated With Systemic Hypertension

PURPOSE

To evaluate for an association between systemic hypertension and intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treatment, due to a 2020 case report of a neonate with ROP developing systemic hypertension and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) after IVB and limited data on long-term safety of IVB.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using vital signs for 90 days, comparing IVB to laser treatment. The primary outcome was short-term hypertension, recorded for at least 3 consecutive days following treatment. As a secondary outcome, infants treated with IVB were also compared to infants with severe ROP who experienced spontaneous regression without treatment. Rates of long-term hypertension, based on chart diagnoses at discharge, were also reviewed. Neuroimaging was re-reviewed to evaluate for vasogenic edema consistent with PRES.

RESULTS

Overall, 137 infants with severe ROP were included, of whom 94 required treatment. There were no baseline differences in neonatal comorbidities comparing laser to IVB. There was no difference on unadjusted or adjusted logistic regression comparing odds of short-term hypertension after IVB to laser (adjusted odds ratio: 0.69, 095% CI: 0.25, 1.87). There was no significant difference in the rate of long-term hypertension diagnoses by treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of association between IVB and short-term systemic hypertension is reassuring. Further studies are warranted to confirm this. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 202X;XX(X):XXX-XXX.].

Similar Risk of Kidney Failure among Patients with Blinding Diseases Who Receive Ranibizumab, Aflibercept, and Bevacizumab: An Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics Network Study

PURPOSE

To characterize the incidence of kidney failure associated with intravitreal anti-VEGF exposure; and compare the risk of kidney failure in patients treated with ranibizumab, aflibercept, or bevacizumab.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study across 12 databases in the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) network.

SUBJECTS

Subjects aged ≥ 18 years with ≥ 3 monthly intravitreal anti-VEGF medications for a blinding disease (diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema, exudative age-related macular degeneration, or retinal vein occlusion).

METHODS

The standardized incidence proportions and rates of kidney failure while on treatment with anti-VEGF were calculated. For each comparison (e.g., aflibercept versus ranibizumab), patients from each group were matched 1:1 using propensity scores. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of kidney failure while on treatment. A random effects meta-analysis was performed to combine each database's hazard ratio (HR) estimate into a single network-wide estimate.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of kidney failure while on anti-VEGF treatment, and time from cohort entry to kidney failure.

RESULTS

Of the 6.1 million patients with blinding diseases, 37 189 who received ranibizumab, 39 447 aflibercept, and 163 611 bevacizumab were included; the total treatment exposure time was 161 724 person-years. The average standardized incidence proportion of kidney failure was 678 per 100 000 persons (range, 0-2389), and incidence rate 742 per 100 000 person-years (range, 0-2661). The meta-analysis HR of kidney failure comparing aflibercept with ranibizumab was 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-1.47; P = 0.45), ranibizumab with bevacizumab 0.95 (95% CI, 0.68-1.32; P = 0.62), and aflibercept with bevacizumab 0.95 (95% CI, 0.65-1.39; P = 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no substantially different relative risk of kidney failure between those who received ranibizumab, bevacizumab, or aflibercept. Practicing ophthalmologists and nephrologists should be aware of the risk of kidney failure among patients receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF medications and that there is little empirical evidence to preferentially choose among the specific intravitreal anti-VEGF agents.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Photocoagulation or sham laser in addition to conventional anti-VEGF therapy in macular edema associated with TelCaps due to diabetic macular edema or retinal vein occlusion (TalaDME): a study protocol for a multicentric, French, two-group, non-commercial, active-control, observer-masked, non-inferiority, randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Macular edema (ME) results from hyperpermeability of retinal vessels, leading to chronic extravasation of plasma components into the retina and hence potentially severe visual acuity loss. Current standard of care consists in using intravitreal injections (IVI), which results in a significant medical and economic burden. During diabetic retinopathy (DR) or retinal vein occlusion (RVO), it has recently been shown that focal vascular anomalies (capillary macro-aneurysms, also termed TelCaps) for telangiectatic capillaries may play a central role in the onset, early recurrence, and/or persistence of ME. Since targeted photocoagulation of TelCaps may improve vision, identification, and photocoagulation of TelCaps, it may represent a way to improve management of ME.

OBJECTIVE

The Targeted Laser in (Diabetic) Macular Edema (TalaDME) study aims to evaluate whether ICG-guided targeted laser (IGTL), in association with standard of care by IVI, allows reducing the number of injections during the first year of treatment compared with IVI only, while remaining non-inferior for visual acuity.

METHODS

TalaDME is a French, multicentric, two-arms, randomized, sham laser-controlled, double-masked trial evaluating the effect of photocoagulation of TelCaps combined to IVI in patients with ME associated with TelCaps. Patients with vision loss related to center involved ME secondary to RVO or DR and presenting TelCaps are eligible. Two hundred and seventy eyes of 270 patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to standard care, i.e., IVI of anti-VEGF solely (control group) or combined with IGTL therapy (experimental group). Stratification is done on the cause of ME (i.e., RVO versus diabetes). Anti-VEGF IVI are administered to both groups monthly for 3 months (loading dose) and then with a pro re nata regimen with a monthly follow-up for 12 months. The primary endpoint will be the number of IVI and the change in visual acuity from baseline to 12 months. Secondary endpoints will be the changes in central macular thickness, impact on quality of life, cost of treatment, and incremental cost-utility ratio in each groups.

KEY SAFETY

Rare but severe AE linked to the use of IVI and laser, and previously described, are expected. In the sham group, rescue laser photocoagulation may be administered by the unmasked investigator if deemed necessary at month 3.

DISCUSSION

The best management of ME associated with TelCaps is debated, and there have been no randomized study designed to answer this question. Given the fact that TelCaps may affect 30 to 60% of patients with chronic ME due to DR or RVO, a large number of patients could benefit from a specific management of TelCaps. TalaDME aims to establish the clinical and medico-economic benefits of additional targeted laser. The results of TalaDME may raise new recommendations for managing ME and impact healthcare costs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT: 2018-A00800-55/ NCT03751501. Registration date: Nov. 23, 2018.

Self-Assembling Peptides with Insulin-Like Growth Factor Mimicry

Growth factor (GF) mimicry involves recapitulating the signaling of larger molecules or cells. Although GF mimicry holds considerable promise in tissue engineering and drug design applications, difficulties in targeting the signaling molecule to the site of delivery and dissociation of mimicking peptides from their target receptors continue to limit its clinical application. To address these challenges, we utilized a self-assembling peptide (SAP) platform to generate synthetic insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-signaling, self-assembling GFs. Our peptide hydrogels are biocompatible and bind target IGF receptors in a dose-dependent fashion, activate proangiogenic signaling, and facilitate formation of angiogenic microtubules in vitro. Furthermore, infiltrated hydrogels are stable for weeks to months. We conclude that the enhanced targeting and long-term stability of our SAP/GF mimicry implants may improve the efficacy and safety of future GF mimic therapeutics.