Postsurgical adjuvant therapy for melanoma. Evaluation of a 3-year randomized trial with recombinant interferon-alpha after 3 and 5 years of follow-up

Antiviral Responses in Cancer: Boosting Antitumor Immunity Through Activation of Interferon Pathway in the Tumor Microenvironment

In recent years, it became apparent that cancers either associated with viral infections or aberrantly expressing endogenous retroviral elements (EREs) are more immunogenic, exhibiting an intense intra-tumor immune cell infiltration characterized by a robust cytolytic apparatus. On the other hand, epigenetic regulation of EREs is crucial to maintain steady-state conditions and cell homeostasis. In line with this, epigenetic disruptions within steady-state cells can lead to cancer development and trigger the release of EREs into the cytoplasmic compartment. As such, detection of viral molecules by intracellular innate immune sensors leads to the production of type I and type III interferons that act to induce an antiviral state, thus restraining viral replication. This knowledge has recently gained momentum due to the possibility of triggering intratumoral activation of interferon responses, which could be used as an adjuvant to elicit strong anti-tumor immune responses that ultimately lead to a cascade of cytokine production. Accordingly, several therapeutic approaches are currently being tested using this rationale to improve responses to cancer immunotherapies. In this review, we discuss the immune mechanisms operating in viral infections, show evidence that exogenous viruses and endogenous retroviruses in cancer may enhance tumor immunogenicity, dissect the epigenetic control of EREs, and point to interferon pathway activation in the tumor milieu as a promising molecular predictive marker and immunotherapy target. Finally, we briefly discuss current strategies to modulate these responses within tumor tissues, including the clinical use of innate immune receptor agonists and DNA demethylating agents.

Updates in the evidence-based management of cutaneous melanoma

Treatment of cutaneous melanoma is changing with significant developments over the past several years that promise to reshape the field of melanoma surgical oncology. Modifications to the staging system based on analysis of a large international dataset, the timing and extent of regional lymphadenectomy, the emergence of effective systemic therapies in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting, and the role of adjuvant radiation are all undergoing a data-driven evolution. Surgeon engagement in multidisciplinary decision making remains an essential component of contemporary management for patients across all stages of melanoma and demands specific involvement of head and neck surgical oncologists.

Systemic adjuvant therapy for adult patients at high risk for recurrent melanoma: A systematic review

Cutaneous melanoma is typically treated with wide local excision and, when appropriate, a sentinel node biopsy. Many patients are cured with this approach but for patients who have cancers with high risk features there is a significant risk of local and distant relapse and death. Interferon-based adjuvant therapy was recommended in the past but had modest results with significant toxicity. Recently, new therapies (immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies) have been found to be effective in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma and many of these therapies have been evaluated and found to be effective in the adjuvant treatment of high risk patients with melanoma. This systematic review of adjuvant therapies for cutaneous and mucosal melanoma was conducted for Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) as the basis of a clinical practice guideline to address the question of whether patients with completely resected melanoma should be considered for adjuvant systemic therapy and which adjuvant therapy should be used.

Challenges and Opportunities of Neoadjuvant Treatment in Locally Advanced Melanoma

Locally advanced and metastatic melanoma have historically had poor survival outcomes. Long-term follow-up of both targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors has confirmed the survival benefit of these agents in stage IV melanoma, and recent studies have now demonstrated relapse-free survival benefits from these targeted and immunotherapeutic agents in the adjuvant setting. Neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced melanoma, including in-transit disease, is now under investigation. Clinical trials have shown early promising results using either combination targeted therapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Neoadjuvant treatment may improve surgical morbidity, but balancing treatment efficacy and toxicity has already been challenging in the use of combination immune checkpoint inhibitors preoperatively. While improvement in relapse-free survival has been noted, additional follow-up of patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment will be necessary to report on long-term outcomes. Neoadjuvant treatment also provides additional translational research opportunities to determine predictive biomarkers for targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Evidence of early resistance to treatment may also lead to novel combination therapies to explore in future clinical trials. While neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced melanoma has exciting potential, more investigation is necessary to determine efficacious regimens with manageable toxicities.

Interferon alpha for the adjuvant treatment of cutaneous melanoma

BACKGROUND

Interferon alpha is the only agent approved for the postoperative adjuvant treatment of high-risk cutaneous melanoma. However, the survival advantage associated with this treatment is unclear, especially in terms of overall survival. Thus, adjuvant interferon is not universally considered a gold standard treatment by all oncologists.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the disease-free survival and overall survival effects of interferon alpha as adjuvant treatment for people with high-risk cutaneous melanoma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases up to August 2012: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library (2012, issue 8), MEDLINE (from 2005), EMBASE (from 2010), AMED (from 1985), and LILACS (from 1982). We also searched trials databases in 2011, and proceedings of the ASCO annual meeting from 2000 to 2011. We checked the reference lists of selected articles for further references to relevant trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing interferon alpha to observation (or any other treatment) for the postoperative (adjuvant) treatment of patients with high-risk skin melanoma, that is, people with regional lymph node metastasis (American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM (tumour, lymph node, metastasis) stage III) undergoing radical lymph node dissection, or people without nodal disease but with primary tumour thickness greater than 1 mm (AJCC TNM stage II).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors extracted data, and a third author independently verified the extracted data. The main outcome measure was the hazard ratio (HR), which is the ratio of the risk of the event occurring in the treatment arm (adjuvant interferon) compared to the control arm (no adjuvant interferon). The survival data were either entered directly into Review Manager (RevMan) or extrapolated from Kaplan-Meier plots and then entered into RevMan. Based on the presence of between-study heterogeneity, we applied a fixed-effect or random-effects model for calculating the pooled estimates of treatment efficacy.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighteen RCTs enrolling a total of 10,499 participants were eligible for the review. The results from 17 of 18 of these RCTs, published between 1995 and 2011, were suitable for meta-analysis and allowed us to quantify the therapeutic efficacy of interferon in terms of disease-free survival (17 trials) and overall survival (15 trials). Adjuvant interferon was associated with significantly improved disease-free survival (HR (hazard ratio) = 0.83; 95% CI (confidence interval) 0.78 to 0.87, P value < 0.00001) and overall survival (HR = 0.91; 95% CI 0.85 to 0.97; P value = 0.003). We detected no significant between-study heterogeneity (disease-free survival: I² statistic = 16%, Q-test P value = 0.27; overall survival: I² statistic = 6%; Q-test P value = 0.38).Considering that the 5-year overall survival rate for TNM stage II-III cutaneous melanoma is 60%, the number needed to treat (NNT) is 35 participants (95% CI = 21 to 108 participants) in order to prevent 1 death. The results of subgroup analysis failed to answer the question of whether some treatment features (i.e. dosage, duration) might have an impact on interferon efficacy or whether some participant subgroups (i.e. with or without lymph node positivity) might benefit differently from interferon adjuvant treatment.Grade 3 and 4 toxicity was observed in a minority of participants: In some trials, no-one had fever or fatigue of Grade 3 severity, but in other trials, up to 8% had fever and up to 23% had fatigue of Grade 3 severity. Less than 1% of participants had fever and fatigue of Grade 4 severity. Although it impaired quality of life, toxicity disappeared after treatment discontinuation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis support the therapeutic efficacy of adjuvant interferon alpha for the treatment of people with high-risk (AJCC TNM stage II-III) cutaneous melanoma in terms of both disease-free survival and, though to a lower extent, overall survival. Interferon is also valid as a reference treatment in RCTs investigating new therapeutic agents for the adjuvant treatment of this participant population. Further investigation is required to select people who are most likely to benefit from this treatment.

Cancer immunotherapy

Cancer immunotherapy consists of approaches that modify the host immune system, and/or the utilization of components of the immune system, as cancer treatment. During the past 25 years, 17 immunologic products have received regulatory approval based on anticancer activity as single agents and/or in combination with chemotherapy. These include the nonspecific immune stimulants BCG and levamisole; the cytokines interferon-α and interleukin-2; the monoclonal antibodies rituximab, ofatumumab, alemtuzumab, trastuzumab, bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab; the radiolabeled antibodies Y-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan and I-131 tositumomab; the immunotoxins denileukin diftitox and gemtuzumab ozogamicin; nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplants with donor lymphocyte infusions; and the anti-prostate cancer cell-based therapy sipuleucel-T. All but two of these products are still regularly used to treat various B- and T-cell malignancies, and numerous solid tumors, including breast, lung, colorectal, prostate, melanoma, kidney, glioblastoma, bladder, and head and neck. Positive randomized trials have recently been reported for idiotype vaccines in lymphoma and a peptide vaccine in melanoma. The anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody ipilumumab, which blocks regulatory T-cells, is expected to receive regulatory approval in the near future, based on a randomized trial in melanoma. As the fourth modality of cancer treatment, biotherapy/immunotherapy is an increasingly important component of the anticancer armamentarium.

Interferon alpha adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Based on previous meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the use of interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) in the adjuvant setting improves disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with high-risk cutaneous melanoma. However, RCTs have yielded conflicting data on the effect of IFN-alpha on overall survival (OS).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effect of IFN-alpha on DFS and OS in patients with high-risk cutaneous melanoma. The systematic review was performed by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cancerlit, Cochrane, ISI Web of Science, and ASCO databases. The meta-analysis was performed using time-to-event data from which hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of DFS and OS were estimated. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses to investigate the effect of dose and treatment duration were also performed. Statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 14 RCTs, published between 1990 and 2008, and involved 8122 patients, of which 4362 patients were allocated to the IFN-alpha arm. IFN-alpha alone was compared with observation in 12 of the 14 trials, and 17 comparisons (IFN-alpha vs comparator) were generated in total. IFN-alpha treatment was associated with a statistically significant improvement in DFS in 10 of the 17 comparisons (HR for disease recurrence = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.77 to 0.87; P < .001) and improved OS in four of the 14 comparisons (HR for death = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.83 to 0.96; P = .002). No between-study heterogeneity in either DFS or OS was observed. No optimal IFN-alpha dose and/or treatment duration or a subset of patients more responsive to adjuvant therapy was identified using subgroup analysis and meta-regression.

CONCLUSION

In patients with high-risk cutaneous melanoma, IFN-alpha adjuvant treatment showed statistically significant improvement in both DFS and OS.

Recombinant interferon alpha-2b and coenzyme Q10 as a postsurgical adjuvant therapy for melanoma: a 3-year trial with recombinant interferon-alpha and 5-year follow-up

Early surgical intervention remains the most successful therapy for melanoma. Despite better outcomes observed in soft tissue and lymph node metastases, the results of pharmacological therapies are still disappointing. Currently, there is no standard adjuvant therapy for melanoma. Low concentrations of coenzyme Q10 have been demonstrated in melanoma cell lines and in sera of melanoma patients. These data and the results of clinical trials of patients with other advanced cancers prompted this study of the long-term administration of an optimized dose of recombinant interferon alpha-2b and coenzyme Q10 to patients with stage I and II melanoma. A 3-year trial envisaging uninterrupted treatment with low-dose recombinant interferon alpha-2b (9 000 000 000 IU weekly) administered twice daily and coenzyme Q10 (400 mg/day) was conducted in patients with stage I and II melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria 2002) and surgically removed lesions. Treatment efficacy was evaluated as incidence of recurrences at 5 years. All patients completed the treatment and the follow-up. Significantly different rates of disease progression were observed in the interferon+coenzyme Q10 and the interferon group for both stages. No patient withdrew from the study owing to side effects. Long-term administration of an optimized dose of recombinant interferon alpha-2b in combination with coenzyme Q10 seemed to induce significantly decreased rates of recurrence and had negligible adverse effects. A survival study could not be undertaken owing to the small patient sample and the short duration of follow-up.

Malignant melanoma in the 21st century, part 2: staging, prognosis, and treatment

Critical to the clinical management of a patient with malignant melanoma is an understanding of its natural history. As with most malignant disorders, prognosis is highly dependent on the clinical stage (extent of tumor burden) at the time of diagnosis. The patient's clinical stage at diagnosis dictates selection of therapy. We review the state of the art in melanoma staging, prognosis, and therapy. Substantial progress has been made in this regard during the past 2 decades. This progress is primarily reflected in the development of sentinel lymph node biopsies as a means of reducing the morbidity associated with regional lymph node dissection, increased understanding of the role of neoangiogenesis in the natural history of melanoma and its potential as a treatment target, and emergence of innovative multimodal therapeutic strategies, resulting in significant objective response rates in a disease commonly believed to be drug resistant. Although much work remains to be done to improve the survival of patients with melanoma, clinically meaningful results seem within reach.

Solitary pulmonary metastasis from primary melanoma of the oesophagus 5 years after resection of the primary tumor

Background

Primary malignant melanoma of the oesophagus (PMME) is an uncommon tumor. PMME has an aggressive biological behavior, similar to melanomas developed elsewhere in the body. Most patients die from distant metastases, and the overall 5 year survival rate is approximately 4%.

Case presentation

We report a rare case of a solitary pulmonary metastasis found 5 years after curative resection of primary esophageal melanoma. No other sites of metastatic disease were identified. Video-assisted lung wedge resection of the lung nodule was carried out successfully.

Conclusion

This supports the concept that patients with primary melanoma of the oesophagus treated should be carefully followed up.

Low plasma coenzyme Q10 levels as an independent prognostic factor for melanoma progression

BACKGROUND

Abnormally low plasma levels of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) have been found in patients with cancer of the breast, lung, or pancreas.

OBJECTIVE

A prospective study of patients with melanoma was conducted to assess the usefulness of CoQ10 plasma levels in predicting the risk of metastasis and the duration of the metastasis-free interval.

METHODS

Between January 1997 and August 2004, plasma CoQ10 levels were measured with high-performance liquid chromatography in 117 consecutive melanoma patients without clinical or instrumental evidence of metastasis according to American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria and in 125 matched volunteers without clinically suspect pigmented lesions. Patients taking CoQ10 or cholesterol-lowering medications and those with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus were excluded from the study. Multiple statistical methods were used to evaluate differences between patients and control subjects and between patients who did (32.5%) and did not (67.5%) develop metastases during follow-up.

RESULTS

CoQ10 levels were significantly lower in patients than in control subjects (t test: P < .0001) and in patients who developed metastases than in the metastasis-free subgroup (t test: P < .0001). Logistic regression analysis indicated that plasma CoQ10 levels were a significant predictor of metastasis (P = .0013). The odds ratio for metastatic disease in patients with CoQ10 levels that were less than 0.6 mg/L (the low-end value of the range measured in a normal population) was 7.9, and the metastasis-free interval was almost double in patients with CoQ10 levels 0.6 mg/L or higher (Kaplan-Meier analysis: P < .001).

LIMITATIONS

A study with a larger sample, which is currently being recruited, and a longer follow-up will doubtlessly increase the statistical power and enable survival statistics to be obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of our findings suggests that baseline plasma CoQ10 levels are a powerful and independent prognostic factor that can be used to estimate the risk for melanoma progression.

Biological and clinical basis for molecular studies of interferons

The cytokine family of interferons (IFNs) has multiple functions, including antiviral, anti-tumor, and immunomodulatory effects and regulation of cell differentiation. The multiple functions of the IFN system are thought to be an innate defense against microbes and foreign substances. The IFN system consists first of cells that produce IFNs in response to viral infection or other foreign stimuli and second of cells that establish the antiviral state in response to IFNs. This process of innate immunity involves multiple signaling mechanisms and activation of various host genes. Viruses have evolved to develop mechanisms that circumvent this system. IFNs have also been used clinically in the treatment of viral diseases. Improved treatments will be possible with better understanding of the IFN system and its interactions with viral factors. In addition, IFNs have direct and indirect effects on tumor cell proliferation, effector leukocytes and on apoptosis and have been used in the treatment of some cancers. Improved knowledge of how IFNs affect tumors and the mechanism that lead to a lack of response to IFNs would help the development of better IFN treatments for malignancies.

Interferon Alpha as Adjuvant Postsurgical Treatment of Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The literature on the benefit of alpha-interferon (IFN-alpha) as adjuvant postsurgical treatment of melanoma reports discordant results.

OBJECTIVE

With the published data so far, we performed a meta-analysis in order to evaluate the effect of IFN-alpha on the relapse rate (RR) and the overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Published randomised trials were identified by Medline search. Stage IV melanoma was not considered.

RESULTS

Nine published studies were included, with a total of 2,880 patients. Both the per protocol and the intention-to-treat analysis show that IFN-alpha significantly decreased the RR (OR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.64-0.86). Subgroup analyses show that, for all stages, high and low doses decreased the RR (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.54-0.92, and OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.63-0.91, respectively). No difference has been evidenced on OS.

CONCLUSIONS

High and low doses of IFN-alpha significantly decrease the RR, but the OS does not seem to be improved.

Pros and Cons of Adjuvant Interferon in the Treatment of Melanoma

Should interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) be considered the standard of care for the adjuvant therapy of high-risk malignant melanoma? For 2003, it was estimated that 51,400 cases of invasive melanoma would be diagnosed. The risk of recurrence after surgery is reported to be approximately 60% for patients with thick primary lesions (T4N0M0, American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] stage IIB) and 75% for patients with regional nodal metastases (T1-4N1M0, AJCC stage III). The observation that melanoma is susceptible to attack by the host's immune system has resulted in the testing of a remarkably broad spectrum of immunotherapies in the adjuvant setting. Many of these approaches failed to demonstrate a significant clinical impact, until the use of adjuvant IFN-alpha. Conflicting data from several large, randomized clinical trials resulted in a rapid rise and then decline in the use of IFN-alpha in the adjuvant setting. This roller coaster has left many clinicians still hesitant to strongly recommend it, and the use of adjuvant IFN-alpha in high-risk melanoma remains controversial. This manuscript reviews the leading arguments for and against its routine use and addresses questions regarding its role in the management of high-risk malignant melanoma.

Does adjuvant interferon-alpha for high-risk melanoma provide a worthwhile benefit? A meta-analysis of the randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Several randomised trials have compared interferon-alpha with control as adjuvant therapy for high-risk malignant melanoma. The results of the individual trials have been either inconclusive or even apparently conflicting. To assess all the available evidence we performed a meta-analysis of these trials.

METHODS

Standard methods for quantitative meta-analysis based on published data were used. Endpoints evaluated were recurrence-free survival and overall survival. A subgroup analysis by dose of interferon-alpha was performed.

FINDINGS

Twelve trials, comprising 14 comparisons of interferon-alpha with control, with results available were identified. Recurrence-free survival was improved with interferon-alpha: hazard ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.77 to 0.90, p=0.000003. The benefit on overall survival was less clear (0.93, 0.85 to 1.02, p=0.1) and the confidence interval is compatible both with no benefit and with a moderate, but clinically worthwhile, benefit. There was some evidence of a dose response relationship with a significant trend for the benefit of interferon-alpha to increase with increasing dose for recurrence-free survival (test for trend: p=0.02) but not for overall survival (trend: p=0.8).

INTERPRETATION

This meta-analysis provides the most reliable synthesis of the data currently available. Adjuvant interferon-alpha produces clear reductions in recurrence of high-risk melanoma, with some evidence of an effect of dose of interferon-alpha, but it is unclear whether this translates into a worthwhile survival benefit or not. Additional and more mature data are needed to resolve these issues and an individual patient data meta-analysis should be performed.

Melanoma: adjuvant therapy and other treatment options

Melanoma, diagnosed and treated at its earliest stages, can be successfully cured by surgery alone. However, when metastatic beyond the regional nodes, it is almost uniformly deadly. Adjuvant therapy targeted toward the treatment of microscopic residual disease after surgical resection is the subject of intense scientific investigation because this is the stage at which it is possible to have the greatest impact on disease-free and overall survival. However, standard therapies commonly used for other solid tumors have had disappointing results in the treatment of melanoma in the adjuvant setting. These disappointing results have led researchers and clinicians to work to develop innovative treatment strategies for this disease, most of which center on the use of immunotherapy. The realm of cancer immunotherapy is broad and rapidly expanding; it encompasses strategies using immunomodulating agents, such as interferon and interleukin-2, in addition to a wide range of novel vaccination strategies for the induction of active antitumor immune responses. Although clinical trials continue to be conducted to sort out the safety and efficacy of a myriad of new treatment modalities and novel combinations of the old and the new, data indicate that high-dose interferon-alfa-2b should be offered to appropriately selected intermediate- and high-risk patients with melanoma not involved in an experimental protocol.

Malignant melanoma: current state of primary and adjuvant treatment

Metastatic malignant melanoma remains a highly lethal disease with an incidence that continues to rise. Management of melanoma includes definitive local, regional and distant control. There is substantial prospective and retrospective data to base the extent of both primary as well as adjuvant therapy. The results of these trials have on occasion been at odds. A critical assessment of the available information pertaining to the adjuvant treatment of cutaneous melanoma is needed. This review provides a critical assessment of the current data that is available to guide both primary resection as well as adjuvant therapy. To date, current trials have shown little promise with nonspecific immunostimulants and cytotoxic chemotherapy. In contrast, dose interferon-alpha2b has been shown to improve relapse-free survival and likely improves melanoma-specific survival as well. Based on the available data, interferon-alpha2b remains the adjuvant therapy of choice for high-risk patients treated outside clinical trials, and the appropriate control arm for clinical trials evaluating new or modified adjuvant regimens.

Low-Dose Adjuvant Interferon for Stage III Malignant Melanoma

The role of interferon as adjuvant therapy in stage HI melanoma has recently been questioned. Prospective randomized studies have shown conflicting results regarding the efficacy of adjuvant treatment. The purpose of this study was to examine the use of low-dose adjuvant interferon α2-b (IFN) in stage III melanoma patients treated at a single institution. This study was a retrospective analysis of 60 stage III melanoma cases from Wake Forest University treated between 1983 and 1998. Cases were identified via the tumor registry. All patients underwent standard lymphadenectomy after diagnosis. After recovery from surgery patients were offered low-dose IFN (3 million units subcutaneous TIW for 1 month and then 6 million units subcutaneous TIW for 11 months) as adjuvant therapy for stage HI melanoma. The patients were followed up jointly by medical and surgical oncology. There were 39 male and 21 female patients with mean age of 60.0 (range 37–89) years. The average number of positive nodes was 3.6 (median = 1) for the treated group and 1.8 (median = 1) for those untreated ( P = 0.71). The average tumor thickness was similar between groups: 4.71 versus 4.88 mm for the IFN and observation groups respectively. The IFN group (N = 25) that received low-dose treatment had a median survival of 7.9 years with a 5-year survival rate of 69 per cent. The 35 cases that did not receive interferon had a median survival of 6.5 years and a 5-year survival rate of 52 per cent. These survival rates were not significantly different ( P = 0.91). The median disease-free survival for patients who did not receive IFN treatment was 2.4 years and 1.4 years for the treated group ( P = 0.19). The data show that there was similar survival for those who did and did not receive the low-dose IFN treatment. Although only large prospective trials can conclusively exclude a small survival time this experience suggests that there is no significant survival advantage to low-dose adjuvant IFN therapy for stage HI melanoma patients. Hopefully upcoming cooperative group trials will clarify the potential value of adjuvant IFN in this setting. However, although the toxicity of this regimen was mild we suggest that low-dose adjuvant IFN for stage HI melanoma should not be utilized outside the setting of a clinical trial.

Interferon alfa therapy for malignant melanoma: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

No standard systemic adjuvant therapy has been proven to increase overall survival in melanoma patients. The effect of interferon alfa (IFNalpha) as a single agent or in combination has been widely explored in clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to assess the benefit of IFNalpha therapy in malignant melanoma.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing regimens with or without IFNalpha adjuvant therapy in melanoma patients. We assessed the effect of IFNalpha therapy on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), melanoma recurrences, and toxicity. The quality of each trial was systematically evaluated.

RESULTS

Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of IFNalpha therapy in melanoma patients were identified. Eight were published and one was unpublished. Eight trials comprising 3,178 patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Quality assessment scores ranged from 22 to 71, with a mean score of 55.4 (95% confidence interval, 53.8 to 57.0). For OS, only one trial reported a statistically significant benefit for IFNalpha, but our analysis did not confirm it. Two trials reported statistically significant benefit in DFS for the patients treated with IFNalpha, but our analysis confirmed it in only one trial. There was a wide clinical heterogeneity between included trials, making meta-analysis inappropriate.

CONCLUSION

In our review, results from included RCTs demonstrated no clear benefit of IFNalpha therapy on OS in melanoma patients. A large RCT is required to answer whether a full regimen of IFNalpha therapy is effective and to identify the subgroups of patients who might benefit from IFNalpha treatment.

[Primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus]

The primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus is a rare tumor. The study aim was to report two cases, one treated by esophagectomy without thoracotomy and the other one by Lewis-Santy type esophagectomy. Both patients had recurrence. One died at the 24th month with liver metastases. The other one who had a cervical invaded lymph node, treated by radio-chemotherapy, is actually in complete remission 9 years after the diagnosis.

Early stage (I, II, III) melanoma

Metastatic melanoma beyond the regional nodes (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IV) is a highly lethal disease. Few affected individuals survive beyond 5 years despite aggressive treatment. Clearly, effective adjuvant therapies to prevent the development of stage IV disease in at-risk patients are worthwhile and acceptable to patients, even if they are associated with significant toxicities. Improvements in our understanding of the prognosis and staging of melanoma have allowed us to better categorize patients based on their risk of developing metastatic disease, permitting the development of logical strategies using adjuvant therapies with toxicity profiles that are appropriate based on the level of risk for recurrence. Adherence to the standards of care for the surgical management of melanoma patients with high-risk primary disease or regional disease will help optimize the benefit that can be derived from adjuvant therapy. Clinical trials remain critically important as we seek to improve the outcome for melanoma patients, but for high-risk melanoma patients outside the context of clinical trials, adjuvant therapy with high-dose interferon-alfa2b should be considered a standard treatment option.

Adjuvant interferon alpha 2b in high risk melanoma - the Scottish study

In 1989, the Scottish melanoma group initiated a randomized trial, comparing observation alone with 6 months' therapy with low dose interferon (given subcutaneously 3 MU day-1, twice weekly), for patients with primary melanomas of at least 3 mm Breslow thickness, or with evidence of regional node involvement. The trial was closed in 1993 with only 95 eligible patients randomized. There were no toxic deaths, and no patient failed to complete the treatment for reasons of toxicity. 6 months' treatment with low-dose interferon- resulted in a statistically significant improved disease-free survival for up to 24 months after randomization (P< 0.05). However, at a median follow-up of over 6 years, although there was an apparent improvement in disease-free survival (from 9 to 22 months), and overall survival (from 27 to 39 months), consistent with larger studies powered to detect such differences, these differences were not statistically significant. The data therefore suggest that 6 months of low-dose interferon is active, and confirm the importance of the large randomized studies, such as the UKCCCR AIM-High and EORTC trials, that seek to confirm a possible survival advantage for low or intermediate dose interferon.

The use of interferon alfa as adjuvant therapy for advanced cutaneous melanoma: the need for more evidence

Interferon alfa is rapidly gaining acceptance as the standard of care for patients with advanced but nonmetastatic cutaneous malignant melanoma. The randomized trials of interferons for melanoma are reviewed with attention to any survival benefits demonstrated by these studies. Because none of these studies are placebo controlled, questions regarding the placebo effects interferons may possess are addressed, as is an analogous clinical scenario in which interferons appeared to be beneficial in nonplacebo controlled trials but were shown to be ineffective in placebo-controlled trials. Moreover, given the significant toxicities and financial costs of interferons, the argument is advanced that interferon alfa should not become the standard of care for melanomas until the results of randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating the survival advantages of interferon alfa for melanoma become available.

Phase II study of second-line therapy with DTIC, BCNU, cisplatin and tamoxifen (Dartmouth regimen) chemotherapy in patients with malignant melanoma previously treated with dacarbazine

This study assessed response rates to combination dacarbazine (DTIC), BCNU (carmustine), cisplatin and tamoxifen (DBPT) chemotherapy in patients with progressive metastatic melanoma previously treated with DTIC, as an evaluation of DBPT as a second-line regimen, and as an indirect comparison of DBPT with DTIC. Thirty-five consecutive patients received DBPT. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 comprised 17 patients with progressive disease (PD) on DTIC + tamoxifen therapy who were switched directly to DBPT. Group 2 comprised 18 patients not immediately switched to DBPT and included patients who had either a partial response (PR; one patient) or developed stable disease (SD; four patients) with DTIC, or received adjuvant DTIC (nine patients). All except four patients had received tamoxifen at the time of initial DTIC treatment. Median times since stopping DTIC were 22 days (range 20-41) and 285 days (range 50-1,240) in Groups 1 and 2 respectively. In Group 1, one patient developed SD for 5 months and the remainder had PD. In Group 2, there were two PRs, four patients with SD (4, 5, 6, and 6 months), and 11 with PD. These results indicate that the DBPT regimen is not of value in melanoma primarily refractory to DTIC. There were responses in patients not directly switched from DTIC to DBPT, suggesting combination therapy may be of value in a small subgroup of melanoma patients.

Review of sentinel lymph node biopsy and systemic interferon for melanoma: promising but investigational modalities

BACKGROUND

There is conflicting data regarding the efficacy of systemic interferon as adjuvant therapy for high-risk cutaneous melanoma. Sentinel lymph node biopsy has recently gained acceptance in the surgical management of high-risk melanoma, despite a lack of data supporting its efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

To review the evidence concerning interferon and lymph node biopsy in the management of melanoma.

METHODS

A systematic review of all randomized, controlled trials involving adjuvant interferon and sentinel lymph node biopsy in management of melanoma is presented.

RESULTS

Current data regarding the efficacy of adjuvant interferon in the management of melanoma is conflicting. The conflicting results of studies involving both low-dose and high-dose systemic interferon for the adjuvant treatment of melanoma remain unresolved. There is no randomized, controlled data to support the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of melanoma, despite its widespread acceptance.

CONCLUSION

Sentinel lymph node biopsy and systemic interferon remain promising modalities in the management of melanoma, although there is no affinitive evidence to support their efficacy.

Oral mucosal melanoma: epidemiology and pathobiology

The vast majority of healthy individuals have some form of melanocytic lesions with most having several cutaneous melanocytic nevocellular nevi. The incidence of cutaneous melanoma, despite improved prevention and early diagnosis of precursor melanocytic lesions, is on the increase with a projection that one in 75 persons born in the year 2000 will develop cutaneous melanoma in his/her lifetime. With cutaneous melanoma, the number, location and type of nevi, sun exposure and inability to tan, and presence or absence of dysplastic nevi affect transformation to a malignant process. Certain familial factors, syndromes, cytogenetic abnormalities, and mutations in tumor suppressor genes also influence tumor formation. In contrast, mucosal melanoma involving the oral cavity and head and neck regions is not as well understood or characterized. No doubt, this is due to the fact that this subtype of melanoma accounts for less than 1% of all cases. Mucosal melanomas tend to present at a higher stage, are more aggressive, and in a vertical growth phase of disease. A definitive precursor lesion for mucosal melanoma has not been identified; however, atypical melanocytic hyperplasia may represent a proliferative phase before overt tumorigenesis occurs. Melanoma-related antigens, growth factors, and proliferation markers have been identified in cutaneous melanoma, and allow for development of immunotherapy directed against melanoma-associated entities. It is currently possible to evaluate the cytogenetic make-up of precursor melanocytic lesions and frank melanoma, and the constitutional genetic background of individuals at risk for melanoma. No doubt, as concerted investigations of mucosal melanomas of the oral cavity and head and neck evolve, similar factors will be identified which will direct therapy and predict recurrence and survival. In the not too distant future, innovative retroviral transfection, antibodies against specific melanoma-associated factors, vaccination against melanoma, and gene therapy to repair cytogenetic abnormalities and tumor suppressor gene mutations may provide effective therapy and protection against melanomas.

Recent advances in melanoma staging and therapy

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in the staging and treatment of melanoma were reviewed.

METHODS

A literature-based review was performed.

RESULTS

The current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging system for melanoma has several drawbacks. Proposed changes in the staging system to take into account simplified tumor thickness categories, tumor ulceration, and the number (rather than size) of nodal metastases will allow stage groups with more uniform prognosis. The widespread application of sentinel lymph node biopsy for nodal staging allows accurate nodal staging with minimal morbidity. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is a very sensitive molecular staging test that may prove useful for identifying early metastatic disease. There is finally an effective adjuvant therapy for melanoma--interferon alfa-2b. Other adjuvant therapies, including melanoma vaccines, may provide effective and less toxic alternatives. New immunotherapy and gene therapy strategies are under investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Ongoing and future adjuvant therapy trials will benefit from improved melanoma staging by accrual of homogeneous groups of patients. New approaches for adjuvant therapy await completion of clinical trials. Innovative new therapies offer hope for patients with advanced disease.

Treatment of malignant melanoma

OBJECTIVE

To review the current treatments for cutaneous melanoma and discuss treatment approaches for each patient population.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE and IOWA database search from January 1990 to December 1998.

DATA EXTRACTION

Clinical trials and review articles were selected and classified to answer questions considered of clinical relevance.

RESULTS

Patients with stage I, II, and III melanoma should undergo excision after biopsy. In patients with stage IV melanoma, surgical excision of metastatic melanoma is not considered curative but can provide palliation and improve quality of life. Therapeutic lymph node dissection should be performed in patients with melanoma in stages III and IV once pathologic confirmation is obtained. Patients at high risk for recurrence or metastasis may also be considered for elective node dissection. Adjuvant therapy after surgery excision is not a standard of care in patients with stage I and IIa melanoma. In patients with stage IIb and III melanoma, the best results have been obtained with high doses of interferon alfa-2b, although toxicity is of concern. Isolated limb perfusion with melphalan adjuvant to surgery has demonstrated clinically significant benefit in patients with locally recurrent melanoma and in-transit metastases. Studies comparing efficacy and quality of life with this technique or with high doses of interferon alfa-2b are needed. The technique cannot be recommended for high-risk primary melanoma of an extremity with no clinical evidence of metastatic disease.

CONCLUSIONS

To date, dacarbazine still appears to be the treatment of first choice in metastatic melanoma, outside of a clinical trial. The combination of chemotherapy with interferon alfa-2b or interferon alfa-2a enhances toxicity without a significant survival advantage. Aldesleukin may be an alternative in selected patients when other treatments have failed, but the higher toxicity and cost must be considered.

Primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus: report of a case successfully treated with pre- and post-operative adjuvant hormone-chemotherapy

Primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus is a very rare and deadly disease, with a survival of 2.2% at 5 years and a median survival of about 10 months. The aggressive biological behavior of this disease and advanced stage at the time of diagnosis together with the lack of effective treatment have contributed to its poor prognosis. We present the case of a 45-year-old Japanese man diagnosed as having a primary melanoma of the esophagus by clinical evaluation and a histological examination of endoscopic biopsy specimens. A novel approach consisting of pre- and post-operative chemo-hormone therapy with dacarbazine, nimustine, cisplatin and tamoxifen in conjunction with radical esophagectomy accompanied by lymph node dissection was carried out. The tumor size was decreased to 70% by the pre-operative chemo-hormone therapy. During the post-operative 32 months of follow-up, no evidence of recurrence or metastatic disease has been found. Although this is only one case, the outcome observed suggests that the combination of pre- and post-operative chemo-hormone therapy and radical esophagectomy with lymph node dissection is a modality that can increase the possibility of curability or at least improve the survival of patients with primary melanoma of the esophagus.

[Managing cutaneous melanoma]

Cutaneous melanoma represents the main cause of death among skin cancers. Early diagnosis gives, for the time being, the only possibility for high rate of curative treatment. Diagnosis is based on pathological findings, and at primary tumor stage. Breslow thickness of the lesion is the best prognostic index. At local stage of the disease, treatment is precisely codified by international recommendations and consensus conferences. Follow-up after surgical treatment is also well codified. Treatment of lymph node invasion or metastatic disease is, on the other hand, less codified. Despite recent advances, especially in immunotherapy, treatment of advanced stages of melanoma remains difficult.

Malignant melanoma

The incidence of malignant melanoma is increasing at a rate greater than any other cancer occurring in humans. In this era of managed care, patients with a suspicious pigmented lesion may first present to their primary care physician for evaluation. Therefore it is mandatory that the primary care physician be capable of distinguishing between benign and malignant pigmented lesions, know how to evaluate such patients, and know when to refer patients with suspicious or malignant pigmented lesions. Surgical removal remains the mainstay of treatment for patients with melanoma. Thus, to increase the cure rate for melanoma, both the public and nondermatologists need to be educated regarding the prevention and early detection of melanoma. Only in this way can the diagnosis of melanoma be made early before deep invasion has occurred and the patient placed at risk for systemic spread. In recent years, the surgical management of melanoma has become more conservative and rational. Limb amputation, arbitrary 5-cm margins of excision, and elective lymph node dissections are no longer performed. The recommended margins of excision are now based on objective pathologic and clinical data and are more conservative, and the sentinel node biopsy is now used to determine which high-risk patients should undergo a formal lymph node dissection. Although encouraging results are being seen with immunotherapy protocols, to date the only adjunctive therapy shown to increase survival in patients at high risk for systemic spread is alpha-interferon. With this drug, the improved survival is modest at best; it is expensive and a minority of patients can tolerate it in the doses recommended. Although response rates of 20% are seen with chemotherapy in patients with disseminated disease, these responses are short-lived, and there is no associated increased survival. Except for lentigo maligna, radiation therapy, even when its delivery is modified, still is useful only as an adjunct to surgery or for palliation.

Pharmacodynamic aspects of peptide administration biological response modifiers

Cytokines, growth factors and other recombinant proteins have been one of the most rapidly growing areas of pharmaceuticals. Further, the development of these bio-engineered drugs is occurring at an astonishing pace with rapid preclinical and clinical development and licensing by regulatory agencies. In addition, the availability of the gene sequences and rational drug design technologies have resulted in a rapid development of engineered genes, proteins and peptidomimetics. In contrast to traditional pharmacophores, which are developed based on the identification of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), most recombinant proteins have abnormal biodistributions, and pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic attributes. Within this chapter, representative cytokines including interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), IFN-gamma and interleukin-2 are used to discuss the pharmacodynamic aspects of protein/peptide administration that are important in the development of these drugs. This includes the conceptual need for chronic immunoaugmentation for optimal therapeutic activity; the need to consider the pharmacokinetics of administration to optimize drug delivery and the nonlinear dose response relationship, which can result in a bell shaped dose response. Furthermore, these therapeutics have maximal potential in an adjuvant protocol and their development in combination with high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell rescue is discussed. The strategies for combination chemotherapy and immunotherapy, while holding great promise, require close attention to the pharmacodynamics of protein administration in order to impact on failure free and overall survival.

Polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry frequently detect occult melanoma cells in regional lymph nodes of melanoma patients

AIMS

To evaluate immunohistochemistry and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for melanoma associated antigens (MAA) in detecting occult melanoma cells in lymph nodes which were missed on routine pathology.

METHODS

Occult melanoma cells were sought in 436 lymph nodes from 32 patients with cutaneous melanoma of the lower extremities by immunohistochemistry using the melanoma specific antibody HMB-45. The detection sensitivity of routine histology, immunohistochemistry, and RT-PCR was also compared in 23 lymph node samples from six patients.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemistry showed that 15 of 24 patients (62.5%) who had no detectable metastasis by routine histology had at least one lymph node containing HMB-45 positive cells, mostly seen singly in the medullary sinus. No difference was found in known clinicopathological prognostic factors and recurrence rates between the two groups of patients with and without occult HMB-45 positive cells. RT-PCR analyses showed that the nested PCR for tyrosinase was more sensitive than a combination of single round PCR for five different MAA, including tyrosinase, MART-1/Melan A, Pmel-17, TRP-1, and TRP-2, detecting tyrosinase mRNA in six nodes which were negative by HMB-45 immunohistochemistry.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunohistochemistry + RT-PCR is more sensitive than routine histology in detecting occult melanoma cells in lymph nodes. The nested PCR for tyrosinase should be used in future studies investigating the prognostic significance of such lymph node micrometastases.