Oral contraceptives and breast cancer. In vitro effect of contraceptive steroids on human mammary cell growth

The WHO claims estrogens are 'carcinogenic': is this true?

Estrogens are in the list of carcinogenic chemicals from the World Health Organization (WHO). However, estrogens require additional factors such as stromal factors or progestogens to increase the ratio of proliferation/apoptosis for initiation of replication errors and consequent mutations to occur. These mutations require at least 5-10 years to develop into clinically detectable cancer, whereby this review is focused on breast cancer. The US National Cancer Institute highlighted a second mechanism of carcinogenicity: certain estrogen metabolites are capable of inducing DNA damage, even in low concentration. They can be assessed in the tissue and circulation. However, those deleterious reactions require excessive unrestricted oxidative cell stress, for example in industrial areas with heavy pollution. We have shown that this can be avoided using transdermal instead of oral estradiol treatment, especially important in smokers. The spectrum of metabolites is also influenced by other exogenous factors such as nutrition, physical activity and certain diseases. Reduction of breast cancer risk as demonstrated in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) was explained by pro-apoptotic estrogen effects working after a certain 'time gap'. In addition, certain estrogen metabolites are carcinoprotective, if no genetic polymorphisms would impair their beneficial activities. Thus, since additional factors are required for both main pathways of carcinogenicity and because estrogens can even have carcinoprotective effects, we cannot agree with the statement from the WHO.

Types of oral contraceptives and breast cancer survival among women enrolled in Medicaid: A competing-risk model

INTRODUCTION

Oral contraceptive pills have been implicated in the pathophysiology of breast cancer. Although many studies have examined the relationship between combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and breast cancer, there is a paucity of literature that discusses progestin-only oral contraceptives (POCs) and breast cancer. The purpose of this investigation is to examine potential associations between different types of oral contraceptives and breast cancer mortality in the South Carolina Medicaid population among different racial/ethnic groups.

METHODS

Subjects included 4816 women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2000 and 2013. Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated to determine time-to-mortality rates among users of oral contraceptives. Competing-risks models and Cox multivariate survival models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of breast cancer and other-cause mortality, as well as all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

POCs were associated with a significantly decreased risk of breast cancer mortality (HR: 0.07; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.52) and a non-significant increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.52, 2.07). COCs increased the risk of breast cancer mortality (HR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.14, 2.28) and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.30, 2.57).

CONCLUSION

Use of POCs may be associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer mortality. Due to the small sample size of POC users in the current study, additional research is needed to confirm these findings.

Risk of breast cancer during hormone replacement therapy: mechanisms

Regarding estrogen replacement therapy, two main mechanisms have to be considered for it to be discussed as a potential carcinogen in the breast, and also considering the World Health Organization definition of estrogens and estrogen/progestogen combinations as “carcinogenic”: (i) the proliferative/apoptotic effects on already pre-existing estrogen-sensitive cancer cells and (ii) the production of possible genotoxic estrogen metabolites. By addition of the progestogen component, as is usual in non-hysterectomized women, both mechanisms can lead to an increased risk compared to estrogenonly therapy. The detailed mechanisms underlying the development of the benign breast epithelial cell into clinically relevant breast cancer cells are very complicated. Based on these mechanisms, the following simplified summary of the main steps explains that: (i) an increased risk cannot be excluded, (ii) especially when estrogens are combined with progestogens, but (iii) there are differences between the preparations used in therapy; (iv) the risk seems to be very rare, needing very special cellular and extracellular conditions, (v) and could even be decreased in special situations of estrogen therapy. It is concluded that when critically reviewed, an increased risk of breast cancer during hormone replacement therapy cannot be excluded in very rare cases. Definitive mechanistic evidence for a possible causal relationship with carcinogenesis still remains open.

Progestins in the menopause in healthy women and breast cancer patients

At present, more than 200 progestin compounds are synthetized, but their biological effects are different: this is function of their structure, receptor affinity, metabolic transformations, the target tissues considered, dose. The action of progestins in breast cancer is controversial; some studies indicate an increase in breast cancer incidence, others show no differences, and yet others indicate a decrease. Many studies agree that treatment with progestins plus estrogens at a low dose and during a limited period (less than 5 years) can have beneficial effects in peri- and post-menopausal women. It was demonstrated that various progestins (e.g. nomegestrol acetate, medrogestone, promegestone), as well as tibolone and its metabolites, can block the enzymes involved in estradiol bioformation (sulfatase, 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase) in breast cancer. Progesterone is converted into various metabolic products: in normal breast tissue the transformation is mainly to 4-ene derivatives, whereas in the tumor tissue 5alpha-pregane derivatives are predominant. Aromatase activity is the last step in the formation of estrogens by the conversion of androgens. In recent studies it was shown that 20alpha-dihydroprogesterone, a metabolite found mainly in normal breast tissue and having anti-proliferative properties, can act as an anti-aromatase agent. The data suggest the possible utilization of this compound in breast cancer prevention. In conclusion, in order to clarify and better understand the response of progestins in breast cancer (incidence and mortality), as well as in hormone replacement therapy or in endocrine dysfunction, new clinical trials are necessary using other progestins in function of the dose and period of treatment.

Estrogen sulfotransferases in breast and endometrial cancers

Estrogen sulfotransferase is significantly more active in the normal breast cell (e.g., Human 7) than in the cancer cell (e.g., MCF-7). The data suggest that in breast cancer sulfoconjugated activity is carried out by another enzyme, the SULT1A, which acts at high concentration of the substrates. In breast cancer cells sulfotransferase (SULT) activity can be stimulated by various progestins: medrogestone, promegestone, and nomegestrol acetate, as well as by tibolone and its metabolites. SULT activities can also be controlled by other substances including phytoestrogens, celecoxib, flavonoids (e.g., quercetin, resveratrol), and isoflavones. SULT expression was localized in breast cancer cells, which can be stimulated by promegestone and correlated with the increase of the enzyme activity. The estrogen sulfotransferase (SULT1E1), which acts at nanomolar concentration of estradiol, can inactivate most of this hormone present in the normal breast; however, in the breast cancer cells, the sulfotransferase denoted as SULT1A1 is mainly present, and this acts at micromolar concentrations of E(2). A correlation was postulated among breast cancer cell proliferation, the effect of various progestins, and sulfotransferase stimulation. In conclusion, it is suggested that factors involved in the stimulation of the estrogen sulfotransferases could provide new possibilities for the treatment of patients with hormone-dependent breast and endometrial cancers.

The World Health Organization defines hormone replacement therapy as carcinogenic: is this plausible?

In June 2005 the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified combined hormone contraception and menopausal therapy as carcinogenic in humans. The IARC's function is to identify potential carcinogens associated with nutrition, environment and pharmaceutical products. They do not produce risk-benefit analyses for any country or population. Their conclusions are highly controversial in that no proof is presented for a causal relationship of estrogens with reproductive cancer, be it plausibility according to mechanisms of action or experimental evidence in an animal model. Equating natural compounds like estradiol with defined carcinogens like asbestos, tobacco smoke as well as indispensable drugs such as aspirin and tamoxifen is of no substantial clinical relevance. Thus, there are no new reasons to change current management principles with combination hormone contraception and therapy.

IARC monographs program on carcinogenicity of combined hormonal contraceptives and menopausal therapy

The World Health Organization International Agency for Research and Cancer (IARC), in June 2005, has classified combination hormone contraception and menopausal therapy as carcinogenic in humans. The IARC's distinction is to identify potential carcinogens associated with nutrition, environment and pharmaceutical products. They do not produce risk-benefit analyses for any country or population. Their conclusions are highly controversial in that no proof is presented for a causal relation of estrogens with reproductive cancer, be it plausibility according to mechanisms of action or experimental evidence in the animal model. Equating natural compounds like estradiol with defined carcinogens like asbestos, tobacco smoke as well as indispensable drugs such as aspirin and tamoxifen is of no substantial clinical relevance. Thus, there are no new reasons to change current management principles with combination hormone contraception and therapy.

Recent insight on the control of enzymes involved in estrogen formation and transformation in human breast cancer

The great majority of breast cancers are in their early stage hormone-dependent and it is well accepted that estradiol (E2) plays an important role in the genesis and evolution of this tumor. Human breast cancer tissues contain all the enzymes: estrone sulfatase, 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, aromatase involved in the last steps of E2 bioformation. Sulfotransferases which convert estrogens into the biologically inactive estrogen sulfates are also present in this tissue. Quantitative data show that the 'sulfatase pathway', which transforms estrogen sulfates into the bioactive unconjugated E2, is 100-500 times higher than the 'aromatase pathway', which converts androgens into estrogens. The treatment of breast cancer patients with anti-aromatases is largely developed with very positive results. However, the formation of E2 via the 'sulfatase pathway' is very important in the breast cancer tissue. In recent years it was found that antiestrogens (e.g. tamoxifen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen), various progestins (e.g. promegestone, nomegestrol acetate, medrogestone, dydrogesterone, norelgestromin), tibolone and its metabolites, as well as other steroidal (e.g. sulfamates) and non-steroidal compounds, are potent sulfatase inhibitors. In another series of studies, it was found that E2 itself has a strong anti-sulfatase action. This paradoxical effect of E2 adds a new biological response of this hormone and could be related to estrogen replacement therapy in which it was observed to have either no effect or to decrease breast cancer mortality in postmenopausal women. Interesting information is that high expression of steroid sulfatase mRNA predicts a poor prognosis in patients with +ER. These progestins, as well as tibolone, can also block the conversion of estrone to estradiol by the inhibition of the 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type I (17beta-HSD-1). High expressison of 17beta-HSD-1 can be an indicator of adverse prognosis in ER-positive patients. It was shown that nomegestrol acetate, medrogestone, promegestone or tibolone, could stimulate the sulfotransferase activity for the local production of estrogen sulfates. This is an important point in the physiopathology of this disease, as it is well known that estrogen sulfates are biologically inactive. A possible correlation between this stimulatory effect on sulfotransferase activity and breast cancer cell proliferation is presented. In agreement with all this information, we have proposed the concept of selective estrogen enzyme modulators (SEEM). In conclusion, the blockage in the formation of estradiol via sulfatase, or the stimulatory effect on sulfotransferase activity in combination with anti-aromatases can open interesting and new possibilities in clinical applications in breast cancer.

The selective estrogen enzyme modulators in breast cancer: a review

It is well established that increased exposure to estradiol (E(2)) is an important risk factor for the genesis and evolution of breast tumors, most of which (approximately 95-97%) in their early stage are estrogen-sensitive. However, two thirds of breast cancers occur during the postmenopausal period when the ovaries have ceased to be functional. Despite the low levels of circulating estrogens, the tissular concentrations of these hormones are significantly higher than those found in the plasma or in the area of the breast considered as normal tissue, suggesting a specific tumoral biosynthesis and accumulation of these hormones. Several factors could be implicated in this process, including higher uptake of steroids from plasma and local formation of the potent E(2) by the breast cancer tissue itself. This information extends the concept of 'intracrinology' where a hormone can have its biological response in the same organ where it is produced. There is substantial information that mammary cancer tissue contains all the enzymes responsible for the local biosynthesis of E(2) from circulating precursors. Two principal pathways are implicated in the last steps of E(2) formation in breast cancer tissues: the 'aromatase pathway' which transforms androgens into estrogens, and the 'sulfatase pathway' which converts estrone sulfate (E(1)S) into E(1) by the estrone-sulfatase. The final step of steroidogenesis is the conversion of the weak E(1) to the potent biologically active E(2) by the action of a reductive 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity (17beta-HSD-1). Quantitative evaluation indicates that in human breast tumor E(1)S 'via sulfatase' is a much more likely precursor for E(2) than is androgens 'via aromatase'. Human breast cancer tissue contains all the enzymes (estrone sulfatase, 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, aromatase) involved in the last steps of E(2) biosynthesis. This tissue also contains sulfotransferase for the formation of the biologically inactive estrogen sulfates. In recent years, it was demonstrated that various progestins (promegestone, nomegestrol acetate, medrogestone, dydrogesterone, norelgestromin), tibolone and its metabolites, as well as other steroidal (e.g. sulfamates) and non-steroidal compounds, are potent sulfatase inhibitors. Various progestins can also block 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activities. In other studies, it was shown that medrogestone, nomegestrol acetate, promegestone or tibolone can stimulate the sulfotransferase activity for the local production of estrogen sulfates. All these data, in addition to numerous agents which can block the aromatase action, lead to the new concept of 'Selective Estrogen Enzyme Modulators' (SEEM) which can largely apply to breast cancer tissue. The exploration of various progestins and other active agents in trials with breast cancer patients, showing an inhibitory effect on sulfatase and 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, or a stimulatory effect on sulfotransferase and consequently on the levels of tissular levels of E(2), will provide a new possibility in the treatment of this disease.

Progesterone effect on cell growth, ultrastructural aspect and estradiol receptors of normal human breast epithelial (HBE) cells in culture

The stimulating effect of estradiol (E2) on breast cell growth is well documented. However, the actions of progesterone (P) and its derivatives remain controversial. Additional information is therefore necessary. On a culture system of normal human breast epithelial (HBE) cells, we observed an inhibitory effect on cell growth of a long-term P treatment (7 days) in the presence or absence of E2, using two methods: a daily cell count providing a histometric growth index, and [3H]-thymidine incorporation during the exponential phase of cell growth. A scanning electron microscopy study confirmed these results. Cells exhibited a proliferative appearance after E2 treatment, and returned to a quiescent appearance when P was added to E2. In both studies, P proved to be as efficient as the synthetic progestin R5020. Moreover, the immunocytochemical study of E2 receptors indicated that E2 increases its own receptor level whereas P and R5020 have the opposite effect, thus limiting the stimulatory effect of E2 on cell growth. In the HBE cell culture system and in long-term treatment, P and R5020 appear predominantly to inhibit cell growth, both in the presence and absence of E2.

Activation of the Src/p21ras/Erk pathway by progesterone receptor via cross-talk with estrogen receptor

The molecular mechanisms by which ovarian hormones stimulate growth of breast tumors are unclear. It has been reported previously that estrogens activate the signal-transducing Src/p21(ras)/Erk pathway in human breast cancer cells via an interaction of estrogen receptor (ER) with c-Src. We now show that progestins stimulate human breast cancer T47D cell proliferation and induce a similar rapid and transient activation of the pathway which, surprisingly, is blocked not only by anti-progestins but also by anti-estrogens. In Cos-7 cells transfected with the B isoform of progesterone receptor (PRB), progestin activation of the MAP kinase pathway depends on co-transfection of ER. A transcriptionally inactive PRB mutant also activates the signaling pathway, demonstrating that this activity is independent of transcriptional effects. PRB does not interact with c-Src but associates via the N-terminal 168 amino acids with ER. This association is required for the signaling pathway activation by progestins. We propose that ER transmits to the Src/p21(ras)/Erk pathway signals received from the agonist-activated PRB. These findings reveal a hitherto unrecognized cross-talk between ovarian hormones which could be crucial for their growth-promoting effects on cancer cells.

Progestins and breast cancer

In the last years there has been an extraordinary development in the synthesis of new progestins. These compounds are classified, in agreement with their structure, in various groups which include progesterone, retroprogesterones, 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterones, 19-norprogesterones, 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone derivatives, androstane and estrane derivatives. The action of progestins is a function of many factors: its structure, affinity to the progesterone receptor or to other steroid receptors, the target tissue considered, the biological response, the experimental conditions, dose, and metabolic transformation. The information on the action of progestins in breast cancer patients is very limited. Positive response with the progestins: medroxyprogesterone acetate and megestrol acetate was obtained in post-menopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. However, extensive information on the effect of progestins was obtained in in vitro studies using hormone-dependent and hormone-independent human mammary cancer cell lines. It was demonstrated that in the hormone-dependent breast cancer cells, various progestins (nomegestrol acetate, tibolone, medrogestone, promegestone) are potent sulfatase inhibitory agents. The progestins can also involve the inhibition of mRNA of this enzyme. In another series of studies it was also demonstrated that various progestins are very active in inhibiting the 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase for the conversion of estrone to estradiol. More recently it was observed that the progestins promegestone or medrogestone stimulate the sulfotransferase for the formation of estrogen sulfates. Consequently, the blockage in the formation of estradiol via sulfatase, or the stimulatory effect on sulfotransferase activity, by progestins can open interesting and new possibilities in clinical applications in breast cancer.

Proliferation of the breast epithelium in relation to menstrual cycle phase, hormonal use, and reproductive factors

The proliferative rate in normal breast epithelium from 58 women undergoing reduction mammoplastics was studied using the formalin resistant antibody Ki-S5, and related to age at operation, menstrual cycle phase, family history of breast cancer, height and weight, parity, and hormonal use. The breast tissue from women operated on in the luteal menstrual cycle phase (day 15-28 among oral contraceptive (OC) users) had significantly higher proliferative rate than breast tissue removed from women in the follicular phase (day 1-14) (p = 0.01). Among women presently exposed to hormones, those with a positive family history of breast cancer among first and second degree relatives had significantly higher values than cases without such history (p = 0.02). Weight was not significantly related to proliferation rate, while a short height was associated with a significantly higher proliferation rate (p = 0.04). Women who used OCs before the first full-term pregnancy (FFTP) had a significantly higher proliferation rate compared with never users or late users (p = 0.04). No significant difference was seen between parous versus nulliparous women. The results from the univariate analysis persisted in multivariate models. An especially high proliferation rate was seen in young women with both a positive family history and present hormonal use (p = 0.001). Overall, it was found that young women had a non-significantly higher proliferation rate than older women (p = 0.10). Due to small sample size, these results must be regarded as preliminary, especially in the subgroup analyses.

Progestogen use and decreased risk of breast cancer in a cohort study of premenopausal women with benign breast disease

A cohort study of 1,150 premenopausal French women with benign breast disease diagnosed in two breast clinics between 1976 and 1979 was carried out to analyse the relationship between progestogen use and the risk of breast cancer. The follow-up accumulated 12,462 person-years. The risk of breast cancer was estimated using a Poisson regression analysis on person-time data and the proportional hazards model. In the latter analysis, cumulated progestogen use and age were considered as time-varying covariables and adjustment was performed on the main risk factors for breast cancer. Neither overall progestogen use nor the duration of use was found to be significantly associated with the risk of breast cancer. When progestogens were classified into two categories according to their hormonal potency (19-nortestosterone derivatives vs other progestogens), 19-nortestosterone derivative use was found to be significantly associated with a lower risk of breast cancer. In the adjusted model, the corresponding risk of breast cancer was 0.48 (95% confidence interval 0.25-0.90). In addition, there was a linear trend in the decrease of the relative risk of breast cancer with the duration of use (P = 0.02). These results do not support the hypothesis that progestogens might increase the breast cancer risk. They suggest, instead, that treatment with 19-nortestosterone derivatives might have a beneficial effect on the risk of breast cancer in women with benign breast disease.

Norgestrel and gestodene stimulate breast cancer cell growth through an oestrogen receptor mediated mechanism

There is great concern over the long-term influence of oral contraceptives on the development of breast cancer in women. Oestrogens are known to stimulate the growth of human breast cancer cells, and this laboratory has previously reported (Jeng & Jordan, 1991) that the 19-norprogestin norethindrone could stimulate the proliferation of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. We studied the influence of the 19-norprogestins norgestrel and gestodene compared to a 'non' 19-norprogestin medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) on MCF-7 cell proliferation. The 19-norprogestins stimulated proliferation at a concentration of 10(-8) M, while MPA could not stimulate proliferation at concentrations as great as 3 x 10(-6) M. The stimulatory activity of the 19-norprogestins could be blocked by the antioestrogen ICI 164,384, but not by the antiprogestin RU486. Transfection studies with the reporter plasmids containing an oestrogen response element or progesterone response element (vitERE-CAT, pS2ERE-CAT, and PRE15-CAT) were performed to determine the intracellular action of norgestrel and gestodene. The 19-norprogestins stimulated the vitERE-CAT activity maximally at 10(-6) M, and this stimulation was inhibited by the addition of ICI 164,384. MPA did not stimulate vitERE-CAT activity. A single base pair alteration in the palindromic sequence of vitERE (resulting in the pS2ERE) led to a dramatic decrease in CAT expression by the 19-norprogestins, suggesting that the progestin activity required specific response element base sequencing. PRE15-CAT activity was stimulated by norgestrel, gestodene and MPA at concentrations well below growth stimulatory activity. This stimulation could be blocked by RU486. These studies suggest that the 19-norprogestins norgestrel and gestodene stimulate MCF-7 breast cancer cell growth by activating the oestrogen receptor.

The safety and efficacy issues of progestin-only oral contraceptives--an epidemiologic perspective

Progestogen-only oral contraceptives (POCs) are generally considered a good contraceptive choice for brestfeeding women and for women who want to use an oral form of contraception, but are not suited for, or cannot tolerate the side effects of, estrogen-containing preparations. However, a number of POCs' safety, efficacy and other related issues remain to be addressed. This paper reviews recent literature and evaluates these issues from an epidemiologic perspective. The small number of users imposes severe limitations in designing epidemiologic studies to address POCs' long-term safety issues, but available information suggests POCs are at least as safe as, if not safer than, COCs. Compared to COCs, POCs are more likely to cause menstrual disturbances which, in turn, could affect their acceptability and lead to poor compliance and hence higher pregnancy rates. POCs' efficacy has been estimated to be between 1.4 and 4.3 pregnancies per 100 woman-years of use. Lower pregnancy rates approaching those of COCs have been reported in centers with good counseling. POCs' benefits outweigh their risks. However, more studies are needed to further address POCs' safety and efficacy issues.

The detachment cascade during metastasis

The cause of detachment of tumour cells during metastasis is still one of the most intriguing questions of tumour propagation. A hypothesis is suggested herein for lysis of extracellular matrix that could ultimately lead to the detachment and spreading of malignant cells. According to this theory a certain optimal estrogen level initiates a series of enzymatic activations that culminate in detachment and spreading of tumour cells.

Effects of estrogen, epidermal growth factor, and transforming growth factor-alpha on the growth of human breast epithelial cells in primary culture

Since 17 beta-estradiol (E2)-stimulated growth in human breast cancer cell lines has been shown to be accompanied by increased production of epidermal growth factor (EGF) and transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-alpha) and their receptor, we investigated the effects of E2 and these growth factors on the growth of human breast epithelial cells (HBEC) in primary culture. HBEC from normal, benign, and malignant tissues were cultured in serum-free medium [DME:F12(1:1), 5 mg/ml BSA, 10 ng/ml cholera toxin, 0.5 micrograms/ml cortisol, 10 micrograms/ml insulin] in the presence and absence of E2, EGF, and TGF-alpha. Tritiated-thymidine ([3H]TdR) incorporation into DNA was used as a measure of cell growth. E2 did not stimulate growth of any of the cultures at all concentrations examined (10(-9) to 10(-6) M). In contrast, EGF ranging from 1 to 100 ng/ml consistently increased the growth of cells of all three breast tissue types in a dose-dependent manner. The EGF stimulation was inhibited by MAb 528, a monoclonal antibody against the EGF receptor. TGF-alpha was equally or more effective in stimulating proliferation, although its dose-response range was different than that of EGF. E2 and EGF together acted in a synergistic manner in 50% of the samples examined. These studies suggest that E2 can exert effects on HBEC growth via modulation of the cells' response to EGF.

Contraceptive steroids and the mammary gland: is there a hazard?--Insights from animal studies

The safety of synthetic steroid hormones to be used for contraception in the human female is tested in rats, beagle dogs, and (once marketing starts) in monkeys. Because early studies did not show a mammary tumor stimulating effect in the human, in contrast to findings in the dog, many objections have been raised to the use of the dog for these toxicity studies. It has been claimed that the dog is unique in its sensitivity to the mammary tumor promoting effect of progestins and that this tumorigenic effect results from progestin-induced growth hormone (GH) induction. A thorough review of the literature does not support these claims. Tumor stimulatory effects of progesterone or synthetic progestins can be observed under some conditions in rodents as well as in cats and monkeys. In addition, recent evidence suggests a role for progesterone in mammary tumorigenesis in the human, and contraceptive steroids may also not be completely without risk. While the suggested role for GH in dog mammary tumorigenesis is far from proven, such a role cannot be excluded in the other species. Whether tumor stimulatory effects of sex steroids are based upon induction of proliferation in target cells or upon genotoxic effects or both is not yet certain.

Oral contraceptives and breast disease

Epidemiologic data support the hypothesis that the types of OCs used before the mid-1970s protected against most forms of benign breast disease. It is unclear whether current low-dose progestogen OCs will confer the same protection. Further studies are necessary to clarify this. For breast cancer, the relationship is more complex. It is possible that prolonged use of high-dose OCs exert a small increased risk for breast cancer development in women before age 45. Furthermore, prolonged use before a first term pregnancy may result in a small increase in risk for breast cancer before age 45. Studies evaluating the effect of current low-dose OCs are necessary to elucidate what, if any, effect they may have on breast cancer development. Furthermore, as our population ages, studies will be able to determine what effect, if any, may be present in women over age 60, those women with the highest underlying risk of breast cancer. And finally, more research of basic breast tissue physiology and the effect of endogenous and exogenous hormones on this complex organ is needed.

Progestin stimulation of thymidine kinase in the human breast cancer cell line T47D

Our laboratory has previously reported that progestins stimulate growth of the human breast cancer cell line T47D. In an attempt to probe further into this stimulation, we are investigating progestin effects on thymidine kinase (EC 2.7.1.21), an enzyme known to be involved in growth regulation. This report relates our finding that progestins stimulate thymidine kinase activity, at physiological progestin concentrations, in a dose-responsive manner. Estradiol-17 beta also stimulates, but testosterone, hydrocortisone and aldosterone do not. The antiprogestin RU486 inhibits progestin stimulation, but also stimulates on its own. Maximal by 24 h, the progestin stimulation then falls off with time. Experiments with actinomycin D and cycloheximide suggest that the thymidine kinase stimulation depends on new RNA and protein synthesis. These data shed further light on progestin stimulation of the growth of human breast cancer. To our knowledge, this is the first report of progestin stimulation of thymidine kinase in human breast cancer cells.

Routine culturing of normal, dysplastic and malignant human mammary epithelial cells from small tissue samples

We compared the growth and morphology of normal, dysplastic and malignant human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC) in medium containing 5% human serum, a serum-free medium (32) and serum-free medium with a low Ca++ concentration. Tissues were dissociated and epithelial organoids or single cells were seeded onto collagen-coated dishes. The cells grew in serum-containing medium, but growth of fibroblasts was also stimulated. The serum-free medium consistently selected for and stimulated the growth of epithelial cells. There was little advantage in reducing the Ca++ concentration to further increase cell yield. This serum-free primary culture system allows us to routinely produce sufficient numbers of HMEC from small tissue samples for molecular biological investigations. Furthermore, the maintenance of cells in a defined medium can provide a system for evaluating the direct effects of factors on gene expression.

Approaches to breast cancer prevention

It may be possible to delay the step-by-step progression towards frank invasive cancer by avoiding one or more of the well-known clinical risk factors. In addition current clinical trials in the USA and Europe are assessing whether the use of tamoxifen, vitamin analogues or a low-fat diet can delay the appearance of overt disease in women known to be at high risk, but it will be several years before such trials can be evaluated. For women seeking advice on prevention, non-toxic supplements to the diet such as beta-carotene, vitamin A analogues or selenium compounds, and the avoidance of alcohol and obesity, are examples of practical advice which can do no harm yet may help to protect against breast cancer development. In the case of the very anxious first degree relative of a breast cancer patient, the current choice lies essentially between regular monitoring, mastectomy with reconstruction, early termination of ovarian activity and anti-oestrogen therapy. Currently, considerable research is being directed towards identifying oncogenes and growth factors which are involved in the growth of breast cancer. In the meantime, more research needs to be devoted to the effect of various progestagens in counteracting oestrogen support of breast cancer growth, and to biological observations on different formulations and doses of combined oestrogen/progestagen preparations which may reduce breast cancer risk both in pre- and postmenopausal women.

Oral contraceptive use influences resting breast proliferation

The controversy that surrounds oral contraceptive use and breast cancer risk has arisen from epidemiologic studies, yet the direct effect of such use on breast tissue remains undefined. Breast epithelial proliferation was assessed by 3H-thymidine labeling of normal lobular units dissected from benign biopsies of 347 females aged 14 to 48 years. Factors shown to influence this response included cycle phase, time since menarche (breast age), and parity status. Multivariate analysis allowing for these influences was used to compare activity of natural cycles and those artificially regulated by oral contraceptives (OC). The increased activity in nulliparous OC users was highly significant (P less than .005). Comparing the effect of differences in OC type, whether combined, triphasic, progestin only, or according to estrogen or progestin content, showed a heterogeneity in response that was significant (P less than .01). Examined specifically, the formulation of OC according to progestin content did not have a significant influence, although progestin-only OC was most active, while the influence of increasing estrogen content was significant (P less than .05). However, emphasis is given to acknowledging the multiple factors and interactive processes responsible for breast epithelial stimulation when considering strategies of intervention.

Hormone replacement therapy in women treated for breast cancer

We must still maintain the conventional advice that unopposed low dosages of oestrogen should not be used for the treatment of menopausal symptoms in women treated previously for breast cancer. There is, however, epidemiological, laboratory and clinical evidence that certain combinations of oestrogen and progestagen are more likely to be beneficial than harmful, in respect to the risk of reactivating subclinical residual breast cancer or causing progression in premalignant lesions. It is no longer justifiable to deprive a woman with a history of breast cancer treatment of a hormonal therapy capable of safely relieving symptoms which are making her life intolerable. A clinical trial of such treatment is reported.

Risk factors for breast cancer by oestrogen receptor status: a population-based case-control study

Data from a population-based case-control study conducted in Adelaide, South Australia, and involving 451 case-control pairs, were analysed to determine whether the associations of menstrual, reproductive, dietary and other factors with risk of breast cancer differed by oestrogen receptor (ER) status. Data on ER status were available for 380 cases. The proportion of tumours which were ER+ increased with age, and there was a higher proportion of ER+ tumours in post-menopausal than in premenopausal women. Both oral contraceptive use (P = 0.055) and cigarette smoking (P = 0.047) were associated with increased (unadjusted) risk of ER- cancer, while having little association with risk of ER+ cancer. Most dietary factors had little association with risk of either cancer type, the main exception being the reduction in risk of ER- breast cancer with increasing beta-carotene intake (P for trend = 0.017). In general, however, links with the factors examined were not strong enough to suggest different causal pathways for ER- and ER+ breast cancer.

The effect of age and menstrual cycle upon proliferative activity of the normal human breast

The aim of this study was to determine the proliferative activity within the epithelial cells of the normal human breast in 122 patients (6 reduction mammoplasties and 116 fibroadenoma excisions) in relation to age and the phase of the menstrual cycle. Thirty three of the patients were on oral contraceptives and 33 were parous. Thin tissue slices were incubated with tritiated thymidine and processed for autoradiography. Other samples were fixed directly and prepared for histology. The labelling, mitotic and apoptotic indices (LI, MI and AI) were determined and all illustrated considerable variability. The labelling indices are significantly (P less than 0.05) influenced by both patient age and stage during the menstrual cycle and ranged from 0-11.5%. Maximum LI values were obtained on the 20.8th day of the cycle. A square root transformation of the data was used to reduce the skewness of the data to a more normal distribution. The square root of the LI declined by 0.22 per decade. The mitotic data showed similar significant (P less than 0.05) correlations against age and day of cycle with a peak on the 21.5th day of the cycle, a decline by 0.072 per decade and a range from 0-0.6%. The data for apoptotic cells were less clearly influenced by the stage of the menstrual cycle but showed a significant (P less than 0.5) decline with age. The AI in parous patients was significantly higher than that in non-parous patients. There was no significant effect of oral contraceptives on any of the parameters measured when age and stage of cycle were taken into account. The considerable variability in the data could not be fully accounted for by either technical factors, the age of the patients, or the day of the cycle. We conclude that proliferation is negatively related to age and is influenced by the menstrual cycle but that additional as yet unknown factors must account for a large part of the variability seen in the data.

The role of oestrogens and progestagens in the epidemiology and prevention of breast cancer

The protective effect of early menopause shows that ovarian hormones increase the risk of breast cancer: it is likely that this is because they stimulate breast cell division. The mitotic rate of breast cells is higher during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle than during the follicular phase, suggesting either that progesterone and oestrogen together induce more mitoses than oestrogen alone (the 'oestrogen plus progestagen hypothesis') or that oestrogen alone induces breast cell mitoses in a dose-dependent manner and that progesterone has no effect (the 'oestrogen alone hypothesis'). Both hypotheses are consistent with the known effects of reproductive history, obesity, combined oral contraceptives and oestrogen replacement therapy (ERT) on breast cancer risk, but while the oestrogen alone hypothesis predicts that hormone replacement therapy with oestrogen and a progestagen (HRT) will cause the same increase in risk as ERT, the oestrogen plus progestagen hypothesis predicts that HRT will cause a greater increase in risk than ERT. Both hypotheses suggest that the risk of breast cancer could be reduced by delaying the onset of regular ovulatory menstrual cycles and by minimizing the therapeutic use of oestrogens, and possibly of progestagens, in postmenopausal women. It may be possible to design hormonal contraceptives that will decrease breast cancer risk.