1
|
Hasanov M, Acikgoz Y, Davies MA. Melanoma Brain Metastasis: Biology and Therapeutic Advances. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2024; 38:1027-1043. [PMID: 38845301 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2024.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/03/2024]
Abstract
Metastasis to the brain is a frequent complication of advanced melanoma. Historically, patients with melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) have had dismal outcomes, but outcomes have improved with the development of more effective treatments, including stereotactic radiosurgery and effective immune and targeted therapies. Despite these advances, MBM remains a leading cause of death from this disease, and many therapies show decreased efficacy against these tumors compared with extracranial metastases. This differential efficacy may be because of recently revealed unique molecular and immune features of MBMs-which may also provide rational new therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merve Hasanov
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Suite 1335, Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Drive, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| | - Yusuf Acikgoz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 13th floor, Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Drive, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 0430, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Russano F, Rastrelli M, Dall'Olmo L, Del Fiore P, Gianesini C, Vecchiato A, Mazza M, Tropea S, Mocellin S. Therapeutic Treatment Options for In-Transit Metastases from Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3065. [PMID: 39272923 PMCID: PMC11394241 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16173065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2024] [Revised: 08/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Abstract
In-transit metastases (ITM) in melanoma present a significant therapeutic challenge due to their advanced stage and complex clinical nature. From traditional management with surgical resection, ITM treatment has evolved with the advent of systemic therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies, which have markedly improved survival outcomes. This study aims to review and highlight the efficacy of both systemic and locoregional treatment approaches for ITM. Methods include a comprehensive review of clinical studies examining the impact of treatments like immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapies, Isolated Limb Perfusion, and electrochemotherapy. The results indicate that combining systemic therapies with locoregional treatments enhances both local disease control and overall survival rates. The introduction of modern immunotherapies has not diminished the effectiveness of locoregional therapies but rather improved patient outcomes when used in conjunction. The conclusions emphasize that a multidisciplinary approach integrating systemic and locoregional therapies offers a promising strategy for optimizing the management of ITM in melanoma patients. This integrated treatment model not only improves survival rates but also enhances the quality of life for patients, suggesting a shift in standard care practices toward more comprehensive therapeutic regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Russano
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Marco Rastrelli
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DISCOG), University of Padua, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Luigi Dall'Olmo
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DISCOG), University of Padua, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Paolo Del Fiore
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Carlomaria Gianesini
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DISCOG), University of Padua, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Antonella Vecchiato
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Marcodomenico Mazza
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Saveria Tropea
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Simone Mocellin
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DISCOG), University of Padua, 35128 Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bellur S, Khosla AA, Ozair A, Kotecha R, McDermott MW, Ahluwalia MS. Management of Brain Metastases: A Review of Novel Therapies. Semin Neurol 2023; 43:845-858. [PMID: 38011864 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
Brain metastases (BMs) represent the most common intracranial tumors in adults, and most commonly originate from lung, followed by breast, melanoma, kidney, and colorectal cancer. Management of BM is individualized based on the size and number of brain metastases, the extent of extracranial disease, the primary tumor subtype, neurological symptoms, and prior lines of therapy. Until recently, treatment strategies were limited to local therapies, like surgical resection and radiotherapy, the latter in the form of whole-brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery. The next generation of local strategies includes laser interstitial thermal therapy, magnetic hyperthermic therapy, post-resection brachytherapy, and focused ultrasound. New targeted therapies and immunotherapies with documented intracranial activity have transformed clinical outcomes. Novel systemic therapies with intracranial utility include new anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors like brigatinib and ensartinib; selective "rearranged during transfection" inhibitors like selpercatinib and pralsetinib; B-raf proto-oncogene inhibitors like encorafenib and vemurafenib; Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene inhibitors like sotorasib and adagrasib; ROS1 gene rearrangement (ROS1) inhibitors, anti-neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase agents like larotrectinib and entrectinib; anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 agent like poziotinib; and antibody-drug conjugates like trastuzumab-emtansine and trastuzumab-deruxtecan. This review highlights the modern multidisciplinary management of BM, emphasizing the integration of systemic and local therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shreyas Bellur
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | | | - Ahmad Ozair
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida
| | - Michael W McDermott
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida
- Miami Neuroscience Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sherman WJ, Romiti E, Michaelides L, Moniz-Garcia D, Chaichana KL, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Porter AB. Systemic Therapy for Melanoma Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:1962-1977. [PMID: 38158477 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01155-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Melanoma has a high propensity to metastasize to the brain which portends a poorer prognosis. With advanced radiation techniques and targeted therapies, outcomes however are improving. Melanoma brain metastases are best managed in a multi-disciplinary approach, including medical oncologists, neuro-oncologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons. The sequence of therapies is dependent on the number and size of brain metastases, status of systemic disease control, prior therapies, performance status, and neurological symptoms. The goal of treatment is to minimize neurologic morbidity and prolong both progression free and overall survival while maximizing quality of life. Surgery should be considered for solitary metastases, or large and/or symptomatic metastases with edema. Stereotactic radiosurgery offers a benefit over whole-brain radiation attributed to the relative radioresistance of melanoma and reduction in neurotoxicity. Thus far, data supports a more durable response with systemic therapy using combination immunotherapy of ipilimumab and nivolumab, though targeting the presence of BRAF mutations can also be utilized. BRAF inhibitor therapy is often used after immunotherapy failure, unless a more rapid initial response is needed and then can be done prior to initiating immunotherapy. Further trials are needed, particularly for leptomeningeal metastases which currently require the multi-disciplinary approach to determine best treatment plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy J Sherman
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
| | - Edoardo Romiti
- Vita e Salute San Raffaele University in Milan, Via Olgettina, 58, 20132, Milan, MI, Italy
| | - Loizos Michaelides
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Diogo Moniz-Garcia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Kaisorn L Chaichana
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | | | - Alyx B Porter
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pham JP, Joshua AM, da Silva IP, Dummer R, Goldinger SM. Chemotherapy in Cutaneous Melanoma: Is There Still a Role? Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:609-621. [PMID: 36988735 PMCID: PMC10164011 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01385-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
In the preceding decade, the management of metastatic cutaneous melanoma has been revolutionised with the development of highly effective therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors (specifically CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors) and targeted therapies (BRAF and MEK inhibitors). The role of chemotherapy in the contemporary management of melanoma is undefined.
Recent Findings
Extended analyses highlight substantially improved 5-year survival rates of approximately 50% in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with first-line therapies. However, most patients will progress on these first-line treatments. Sequencing of chemotherapy following failure of targeted and immunotherapies is associated with low objective response rates and short progression-free survival, and thus, meaningful benefits to patients are minimal.
Summary
Chemotherapy has limited utility in the contemporary management of cutaneous melanoma (with a few exceptions, discussed herein) and should not be the standard treatment sequence following failure of first-line therapies. Instead, enrolment onto clinical trials should be standard-of-care in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James P Pham
- Medical Oncology, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Anthony M Joshua
- Medical Oncology, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Wollstonecraft, NSW, Australia
| | - Ines P da Silva
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Wollstonecraft, NSW, Australia
- Medical Oncology, Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, NSW, Australia
| | - Reinhard Dummer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Simone M Goldinger
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Several anthropogenic products in wastewater are considered a threat to the aquatic environment. In addition to common industrial pollutants, levels of pharmaceuticals have been increasingly found in the environment in recent years, which may present a strong risk to the aquatic species that live there. The constant consumption of biologically active chemicals for human health has been matched by an increase in the leaking of these compounds in natural habitats over the last two decades. This study is aimed at evaluating the developmental toxicity of fotemustine in the ecological environment. Zebrafish embryos were exposed to doses of 25, 50 and 100 µg/mL from 4 h post-fertilization to 120 h. This study confirms that fotemustine exposure at 50 and 100 µg/mL affects the survival and hatching rate, morphology score and body length. Additionally, it significantly disturbs the antioxidant defense system and increases ROS in zebrafish larvae. From the molecular point of view, fotemustine exposure strongly induces apoptosis, endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) and the Wnt signaling pathway.
Collapse
|
7
|
McMahon JT, Faraj RR, Adamson DC. Emerging and investigational targeted chemotherapy and immunotherapy agents for metastatic brain tumors. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2020; 29:1389-1406. [PMID: 33040640 DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2020.1836154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Metastases to the central nervous system are the most common cause of malignant intracranial tumors in adults. Current standard of care includes surgery and radiation, but overall survival remains poor. A range of systemic therapies are emerging as promising treatment options for these patients. AREAS COVERED This study reviews novel drug regimens that are under investigation in phase 1 and 2 clinical trials. To identify relevant therapies under clinical investigation, a search was performed on http://clinicaltrials.gov and Pubmed with the keywords brain metastasis, Phase I clinical trial, and Phase II clinical trial from 2016 to 2020. The authors detail the mechanisms of action of all trial agents, outline evidence for their utility, and summarize the current state of the field. EXPERT OPINION Current advancements in the medical management of brain metastases can be categorized into targeted therapies, methods of overcoming treatment resistance, novel combinations of therapies, and modulation of the tumor microenvironment with a specific focus on immunotherapy. Each of these realms holds great promise for the field going forward. A more streamlined structure for enrollment into clinical trials will be a crucial step in accelerating progress in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Razan R Faraj
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University , Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - David Cory Adamson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University , Atlanta, GA, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Atlanta VA Medical Center , Decatur, GA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gutzmer R, Vordermark D, Hassel JC, Krex D, Wendl C, Schadendorf D, Sickmann T, Rieken S, Pukrop T, Höller C, Eigentler TK, Meier F. Melanoma brain metastases - Interdisciplinary management recommendations 2020. Cancer Treat Rev 2020; 89:102083. [PMID: 32736188 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Melanoma brain metastases (MBM) are common and associated with a particularly poor prognosis; they directly cause death in 60-70% of melanoma patients. In the past, systemic treatments have shown response rates around 5%, whole brain radiation as standard of care has achieved a median overall survival of approximately three months. Recently, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and combinations of MAP-kinase inhibitors both have shown very promising response rates of up to 55% and 58%, respectively, and improved survival. However, current clinical evidence is based on multi-cohort studies only, as prospectively randomized trials have been carried out rarely in MBM, independently whether investigating systemic therapy, radiotherapy or surgical techniques. Here, an interdisciplinary expert team reviewed the outcome of prospectively conducted clinical studies in MBM, identified evidence gaps and provided recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, outcome evaluation and monitoring of MBM patients. The recommendations refer to four distinct scenarios: patients (i) with 'brain-only' disease, (ii) with oligometastatic asymptomatic intra- and extracranial disease, (iii) with multiple asymptomatic metastases, and (iv) with multiple symptomatic MBM or leptomeningeal disease. Changes in current management recommendations comprise the use of immunotherapy - preferably combined anti-CTLA-4/PD-1-immunotherapy - in asymptomatic MBM minus/plus stereotactic radiosurgery which remains the mainstay of local brain therapy being safe and effective. Adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy provides no clinical benefit in oligometastatic MBM. Among the systemic therapies, combined MAPK-kinase inhibition provides, in BRAFV600-mutated patients with rapidly progressing or/and symptomatic MBM, an alternative to combined immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralf Gutzmer
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Skin Cancer Center Hannover, Hannover Medical School, Germany.
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Jessica C Hassel
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dietmar Krex
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christina Wendl
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Rieken
- Policlinic for Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Tobias Pukrop
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Höller
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas K Eigentler
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Methionine (MET) restriction (MR) has been shown to arrest cancer growth and sensitizes tumors to chemotherapy. MR total parenteral nutrition (MR TPN) with a chemotherapy-containing amino acid solution ("AO-90") (lacking both MET and L-cysteine[CYS]) showed synergistic effects with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in tumor-bearing rats and in a Phase I clinical trial with gastrointestinal tract cancers compared to 5-FU in a MET-containing TPN. All gastric cancer patients underwent gastrectomy. Resected tumors in the AO-90 group showed significant reduction of cancer histologically, while almost no effect was seen in the control group. A Phase II clinical trial of dietary MR combined with cystemustine treatment for melanoma or glioma was carried out. Twenty-two patients (20 with metastatic melanoma and 2 with recurrent gloma) received a median of four cycles of the combination of a 1-day MR diet with cystemustine (60 mg/m2) every 2 weeks. This combination was well tolerated (toxicity and nutritional status). The median disease-free survival was 1.8 months and the median survival was 4.6 months, with two long-duration stabilizations. MET depletion in plasma was 40%. In another study, eight patients with a variety of metastatic solid tumors were enrolled in a Phase I clinical trial of a commercially available MR medical food. Participants remained on the experimental diet for an average of 17.3 weeks. Plasma methionine levels fell from 21.6 to 9 μm within 2 weeks, a 58% decline. The only side effect was weight loss of approximately 0.5 kg per week. A feasibility study combining dietary MR with a FOLFOX regimen in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer was carried out. The plasma MET concentration was reduced by dietary MR by 58% on the first day of the MR diet. Among the four patients evaluable for response, three experienced a partial response and one patient had disease stabilization. The results of the above-described clinical trials indicate the clinical potential of MR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M Hoffman
- AntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sciacca V, Ciorra AA, Di Fonzo C, Rossi R, Pistillucci G, Lugini A, D'Aprile M. Long-term Survival of Metastatic Melanoma to the Ileum with Evidence of Primary Cutaneous Disease after 15 years of follow-up: A Case Report. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 96:640-3. [DOI: 10.1177/030089161009600423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The small bowel is the most common site of gastrointestinal metastasis from cutaneous melanoma. Malignant melanoma has a poor prognosis, especially if distant metastases appear. Although rare primary melanoma of the small bowel has been described, more frequently these lesions originate from unknown cutaneous melanoma. Here we report the case of a 58-year-old man with a diagnosis of melanoma of the ileum without evidence of primary cutaneous disease. After 15 years, during the clinical and radiological follow-up, a cutaneous melanoma in the left parietal side of the scalp, probably corresponding to the primary lesion with abdominal node metastasis, was diagnosed. After 6 months of chemotherapy with fotemustine, the patient showed a complete response. At present, he is still alive 18 years after the diagnosis of intestinal metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venerina Sciacca
- Division of Medical Oncology, “S. Maria Goretti” Hospital, Latina, “San Camillo De Lellis” Hospital, Rieti, Italy
| | - A Alida Ciorra
- Division of Medical Oncology, “S. Maria Goretti” Hospital, Latina, “San Camillo De Lellis” Hospital, Rieti, Italy
| | - Concetta Di Fonzo
- Palliative Care Unit, “Villa Azzurra” Hospice, Terracina (LT), “San Camillo De Lellis” Hospital, Rieti, Italy
| | - Rosalinda Rossi
- Division of Medical Oncology, “S. Maria Goretti” Hospital, Latina, “San Camillo De Lellis” Hospital, Rieti, Italy
| | - Giorgio Pistillucci
- Division of Medical Oncology, “S. Maria Goretti” Hospital, Latina, “San Camillo De Lellis” Hospital, Rieti, Italy
| | - Antonio Lugini
- Division of Medical Oncology, “San Camillo De Lellis” Hospital, Rieti, Italy
| | - Modesto D'Aprile
- Division of Medical Oncology, “S. Maria Goretti” Hospital, Latina, “San Camillo De Lellis” Hospital, Rieti, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nolan C, Deangelis LM. Overview of metastatic disease of the central nervous system. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2018; 149:3-23. [PMID: 29307359 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-811161-1.00001-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
In 2016, the American Society of Clinical Oncology reported that 1.7 million Americans were diagnosed with cancer; this number will rise to 2.3 million in the United States and 22 million worldwide in 2030. This rising need is being met by an explosion of new cancer therapies, including: immune checkpoint inhibitors, T-cell therapies, tumor vaccines, antiangiogenic therapies, and various targeted therapies. This armamentarium of targeted therapies has led to better systemic control of disease and longer patient overall survival (OS). The incidence of metastatic disease to the central nervous system (CNS) is rising as patients are living longer with these more effective systemic therapies. Prolonged OS allows increased time to develop CNS metastases. The CNS is also a sanctuary for metastatic tumor cells that are protected from full exposure to therapeutic concentrations of most anticancer agents by the blood-brain barrier, the tumor microenvironment, and immune system. In addition, CNS metastases often develop late in the course of the disease, so patients are frequently heavily pretreated, resulting in drug resistance. Although genomic profiling has led to more effective therapies for systemic disease, the same therapy may not be effective in treating CNS disease, not only due to failure of blood-brain barrier penetration, but from discordance between the molecular profile in systemic and CNS tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig Nolan
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
| | - Lisa M Deangelis
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Eigentler TK, Mühlenbein C, Follmann M, Schadendorf D, Garbe C. S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Melanoms - Update 2015/2016, Kurzversion 2.0. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2017; 15:e1-e41. [DOI: 10.1111/ddg.13247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
13
|
Gupta A, Gomes F, Lorigan P. The role for chemotherapy in the modern management of melanoma. Melanoma Manag 2017; 4:125-136. [PMID: 30190915 PMCID: PMC6094602 DOI: 10.2217/mmt-2017-0003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The treatment of malignant melanoma has changed beyond recognition in the last 7 years. Where previously single agent dacarbazine was often the only treatment used for advanced disease, now there are potentially multiple lines of treatment, based on immunotherapy and targeted treatment options, either as monotherapy or in combination. In this brave new world the question arises, does chemotherapy still have any relevance in the modern management of melanoma? In this review, we summarize the various chemotherapeutic options that have been trialled in melanoma to date, and discuss the role chemotherapy may still play in treating melanoma, potentially in combination with more novel agents, or in certain subtypes of melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avinash Gupta
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Fabio Gomes
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Paul Lorigan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Molecular & Clinical Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chamberlain MC, Baik CS, Gadi VK, Bhatia S, Chow LQM. Systemic therapy of brain metastases: non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. Neuro Oncol 2017; 19:i1-i24. [PMID: 28031389 PMCID: PMC5193029 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/now197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BM) occur frequently in many cancers, particularly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer, and melanoma. The development of BM is associated with poor prognosis and has an adverse impact on survival and quality of life. Commonly used therapies for BM such as surgery or radiotherapy are associated with only modest benefits. However, recent advances in systemic therapy of many cancers have generated considerable interest in exploration of those therapies for treatment of intracranial metastases.This review discusses the epidemiology of BM from the aforementioned primary tumors and the challenges of using systemic therapies for metastatic disease located within the central nervous system. Cumulative data from several retrospective and small prospective studies suggest that molecularly targeted systemic therapies may be an effective option for the treatment of BM from NSCLC, breast cancer, and melanoma, either as monotherapy or in conjunction with other therapies. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further characterize the efficacy and safety profiles of these targeted agents for the treatment of BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc C Chamberlain
- Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle, Washington (M.C.C., C.S.B., V.K.G., S.B., L.Q.M.C.); Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (C.S.B., V.K.G., L.Q.M.C.); Departments of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.C.); Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (C.S.B., V.K.G., S.B., L.Q.M.C)
| | - Christina S Baik
- Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle, Washington (M.C.C., C.S.B., V.K.G., S.B., L.Q.M.C.); Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (C.S.B., V.K.G., L.Q.M.C.); Departments of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.C.); Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (C.S.B., V.K.G., S.B., L.Q.M.C)
| | - Vijayakrishna K Gadi
- Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle, Washington (M.C.C., C.S.B., V.K.G., S.B., L.Q.M.C.); Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (C.S.B., V.K.G., L.Q.M.C.); Departments of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.C.); Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (C.S.B., V.K.G., S.B., L.Q.M.C)
| | - Shailender Bhatia
- Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle, Washington (M.C.C., C.S.B., V.K.G., S.B., L.Q.M.C.); Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (C.S.B., V.K.G., L.Q.M.C.); Departments of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.C.); Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (C.S.B., V.K.G., S.B., L.Q.M.C)
| | - Laura Q M Chow
- Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle, Washington (M.C.C., C.S.B., V.K.G., S.B., L.Q.M.C.); Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (C.S.B., V.K.G., L.Q.M.C.); Departments of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.C.); Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (C.S.B., V.K.G., S.B., L.Q.M.C)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Letort S, Balieu S, Erb W, Gouhier G, Estour F. Interactions of cyclodextrins and their derivatives with toxic organophosphorus compounds. Beilstein J Org Chem 2016; 12:204-28. [PMID: 26977180 PMCID: PMC4778500 DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.12.23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2015] [Accepted: 01/21/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this review is to provide an update on the current use of cyclodextrins against organophosphorus compound intoxications. Organophosphorus pesticides and nerve agents play a determinant role in the inhibition of cholinesterases. The cyclic structure of cyclodextrins and their toroidal shape are perfectly suitable to design new chemical scavengers able to trap and hydrolyze the organophosphorus compounds before they reach their biological target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Letort
- Normandie Université, COBRA, UMR 6014 et FR 3038, Université de Rouen, INSA de Rouen, CNRS, 1 rue Tesnière, 76821 Mont-Saint-Aignan Cedex, France
| | - Sébastien Balieu
- Normandie Université, COBRA, UMR 6014 et FR 3038, Université de Rouen, INSA de Rouen, CNRS, 1 rue Tesnière, 76821 Mont-Saint-Aignan Cedex, France
| | - William Erb
- Normandie Université, COBRA, UMR 6014 et FR 3038, Université de Rouen, INSA de Rouen, CNRS, 1 rue Tesnière, 76821 Mont-Saint-Aignan Cedex, France
| | - Géraldine Gouhier
- Normandie Université, COBRA, UMR 6014 et FR 3038, Université de Rouen, INSA de Rouen, CNRS, 1 rue Tesnière, 76821 Mont-Saint-Aignan Cedex, France
| | - François Estour
- Normandie Université, COBRA, UMR 6014 et FR 3038, Université de Rouen, INSA de Rouen, CNRS, 1 rue Tesnière, 76821 Mont-Saint-Aignan Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
The discovery of the BRAFV600 mutation and the development of targeted therapies directed against this mutation as well as effective immunotherapies with durable benefits have revolutionized the treatment of patients with melanoma. Nonetheless, the frequent occurrence of brain metastases in patients with advanced melanoma represents a significant obstacle to long-term, high quality survival. The application of stereotactic radiation therapy has provided an opportunity to control brain metastases in the majority of patients with metastatic melanoma reducing the impact of these lesions on morbidity and mortality and enabling patients to receive and potentially benefit from these novel systemic treatments. Encouragingly, several of these novel new therapies have shown antitumor activity against CNS metastases that approach that seen against extracranial disease. As a consequence, several effective treatment options are now available for patients with melanoma brain metastases. With these tools in hand, it is anticipated that further investigation into the optimal sequence and/or combination of systemic therapies and local therapies along with multidisciplinary team practice will continue to improve the outcome of patients with this previously life-limiting disease complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sekwon Jang
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, D.C., USA
| | - Michael B Atkins
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, D.C., USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cohen JV, Alomari AK, Vortmeyer AO, Jilaveanu LB, Goldberg SB, Mahajan A, Chiang VL, Kluger HM. Melanoma Brain Metastasis Pseudoprogression after Pembrolizumab Treatment. Cancer Immunol Res 2015; 4:179-82. [PMID: 26701266 DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-15-0160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2015] [Accepted: 10/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The role of immunotherapy in treatment of brain metastases is unknown because most trials exclude patients with active brain lesions. As new immunomodulating agents gain approval for many malignancies, it is important to know if they have unique effects in the central nervous system (CNS). Here, we present a case of a patient with progressing brain metastases treated with a single cycle of pembrolizumab, who presented with mental status changes 11 days thereafter. MRI of the brain showed enlargement of CNS lesions with intense central enhancement and diffuse perilesional edema. Histologic evaluation of a resected lesion revealed isolated clusters of tumor cells surrounded by reactive astrocytosis, scattered inflammatory cells, and an abundance of microglial cells. Given the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with brain metastases from melanoma and other diseases, recognition of pseudoprogression and management with immune suppression are essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine V Cohen
- Department of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Ahmed K Alomari
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Lucia B Jilaveanu
- Department of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Sarah B Goldberg
- Department of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Amit Mahajan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Veronica L Chiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Department of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Long GV, Margolin KA. Multidisciplinary approach to brain metastasis from melanoma: the emerging role of systemic therapies. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2015:393-8. [PMID: 23714558 DOI: 10.14694/edbook_am.2013.33.393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Melanoma brain metastases are common, difficult to treat, and carry a poor prognosis. Until recently, systemic therapy was ineffective. Local therapy (including surgery, stereotactic radiotherapy, and whole brain radiotherapy) was considered the only option for a chance of disease control in the brain, and was highly dependent on the patient's performance status and age, number and size of brain metastases, and the presence of extracranial metastases. Since 2010, three drugs have demonstrated activity in progressing or "active" brain metastases including the anti-CTLA4 antibody ipilimumab (phase II study of 72 patients), and the BRAF inhibitors dabrafenib (phase II study of 172 patients, both previously treated and untreated brain metastases) and vemurafenib (a pilot study of 24 patients with heavily pretreated brain metastases). The challenge and unanswered question for clinicians is how to sequence all the available therapies, both local and systemic, to optimize the patient's quality of life and survival. This is an area of intense clinical research. The treatment of patients with melanoma brain metastases should be discussed by a multidisciplinary team of melanoma experts including a neurosurgeon, medical oncologist, and radiation oncologist. Important clinical features that help determine appropriate first line therapy include single compared with solitary brain metastasis, resectablity, BRAF mutation status of melanoma, rate of progression/performance status, and the presence of extracranial disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgina V Long
- From the Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
McAleer MF, Kim DW, Trinh VA, Hwu WJ. Management of melanoma brain metastases. Melanoma Manag 2015; 2:225-239. [PMID: 30190852 PMCID: PMC6094653 DOI: 10.2217/mmt.15.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Relapses in the brain remain a major obstacle to cure in many patients with advanced melanoma. At present, the management of melanoma brain metastases continues to rely heavily on surgical and radiotherapeutic interventions, which have become safer and more effective with modern imaging, surgery and radiation technologies. Additionally, novel targeted and immunotherapeutic agents, shown to generate meaningful intracranial response and survival benefit in patients with melanoma brain metastases when compared with historical controls, expand systemic treatment options for this subset of patients. These systemic therapies become particularly important when intracranial disease burden precludes neuro- or radio-surgery. Considerable multidisciplinary research effort is ongoing to improve outcomes for melanoma patients with brain metastases, a key challenge in the management of advanced melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Dae W Kim
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Van A Trinh
- Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Pharmacy Clinical Programs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Wen-Jen Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
OSTHEIMER CHRISTIAN, BORMANN CAROLINE, FIEDLER ECKHARD, MARSCH WOLFGANG, VORDERMARK DIRK. Malignant melanoma brain metastases: Treatment results and prognostic factors - a single-center retrospective study. Int J Oncol 2015; 46:2439-48. [DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2015.2970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2015] [Accepted: 03/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
21
|
Obrist F, Manic G, Kroemer G, Vitale I, Galluzzi L. Trial Watch: Proteasomal inhibitors for anticancer therapy. Mol Cell Oncol 2015; 2:e974463. [PMID: 27308423 PMCID: PMC4904962 DOI: 10.4161/23723556.2014.974463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2014] [Revised: 09/15/2014] [Accepted: 09/17/2014] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
The so-called "ubiquitin-proteasome system" (UPS) is a multicomponent molecular apparatus that catalyzes the covalent attachment of several copies of the small protein ubiquitin to other proteins that are generally (but not always) destined to proteasomal degradation. This enzymatic cascade is crucial for the maintenance of intracellular protein homeostasis (both in physiological conditions and in the course of adaptive stress responses), and regulates a wide array of signaling pathways. In line with this notion, defects in the UPS have been associated with aging as well as with several pathological conditions including cardiac, neurodegenerative, and neoplastic disorders. As transformed cells often experience a constant state of stress (as a result of the hyperactivation of oncogenic signaling pathways and/or adverse microenvironmental conditions), their survival and proliferation are highly dependent on the integrity of the UPS. This rationale has driven an intense wave of preclinical and clinical investigation culminating in 2003 with the approval of the proteasomal inhibitor bortezomib by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in multiple myeloma patients. Another proteasomal inhibitor, carfilzomib, is now licensed by international regulatory agencies for use in multiple myeloma patients, and the approved indications for bortezomib have been extended to mantle cell lymphoma. This said, the clinical activity of bortezomib and carfilzomib is often limited by off-target effects, innate/acquired resistance, and the absence of validated predictive biomarkers. Moreover, the antineoplastic activity of proteasome inhibitors against solid tumors is poor. In this Trial Watch we discuss the contribution of the UPS to oncogenesis and tumor progression and summarize the design and/or results of recent clinical studies evaluating the therapeutic profile of proteasome inhibitors in cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florine Obrist
- Université Paris-Sud/Paris XI; Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- INSERM, U1138; Paris, France
- Equipe 11 labelisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Center de Recherche des Cordeliers; Paris, France
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus; Villejuif, France
| | | | - Guido Kroemer
- INSERM, U1138; Paris, France
- Equipe 11 labelisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Center de Recherche des Cordeliers; Paris, France
- Université Paris Descartes/Paris V; Sorbonne Paris Cité; Paris, France
- Pôle de Biologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou; Paris, France
- Metabolomics and Cell Biology Platforms; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus; Villejuif, France
| | - Ilio Vitale
- Regina Elena National Cancer Institute; Rome, Italy
- Department of Biology, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”
| | - Lorenzo Galluzzi
- INSERM, U1138; Paris, France
- Equipe 11 labelisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Center de Recherche des Cordeliers; Paris, France
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus; Villejuif, France
- Université Paris Descartes/Paris V; Sorbonne Paris Cité; Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Le Rhun É, Mateus C, Mortier L, Dhermain F, Guillot B, Grob JJ, Lebbe C, Thomas M, Jouary T, Leccia MT, Robert C. [Systemic treatment of melanoma brain metastases]. Cancer Radiother 2015; 19:48-54. [PMID: 25656856 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2014.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2014] [Accepted: 11/28/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Melanomas have a high rate of brain metastases. Both the functional prognosis and the overall survival are poor in these patients. Until now, surgery and radiotherapy represented the two main modalities of treatment. Nevertheless, due to the improvement in the management of the extracerebral melanoma, the systemic treatment may be an option in patients with brain metastases. Immunotherapy with anti-CTLA4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4) - ipilimumab - or BRAF (serine/threonine-protein kinase B-raf) inhibitors - vemurafenib, dabrafenib - has shown efficacy in the management of brain metastases in a- or pauci-symptomatic patients. Studies are ongoing with anti-PD1 (programmed cell death 1) and combinations of targeted therapies associating anti-RAF (raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase) and anti-MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- É Le Rhun
- Neuro-oncologie, département de neurochirurgie, hôpital Roger-Salengro, CHRU, rue Émile-Laine, 59037 Lille cedex, France; Oncologie médicale, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, BP 307, 59020 Lille cedex, France; Inserm U1192, laboratoire Prism, université Lille 1, bâtiment SN3 1(er) étage, 59655 Villeneuve-d'Ascq cedex, France; Groupe de réflexion sur la prise en charge des métastases cérébrales (GRPCMaC), 13273 Marseille cedex 09, France.
| | - C Mateus
- Département de dermatologie, institut de cancérologie Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif cedex, France
| | - L Mortier
- Département de dermatologie, centre hospitalier régional et universitaire de Lille, 2, avenue Oscar-Lambret, 59037 Lille cedex, France
| | - F Dhermain
- Groupe de réflexion sur la prise en charge des métastases cérébrales (GRPCMaC), 13273 Marseille cedex 09, France; Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif cedex, France; Réunion de concertation pluridisciplinaire de neuro-oncologie, institut de cancérologie Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif cedex, France
| | - B Guillot
- Département de dermatologie, centre hospitalier universitaire, 80, avenue Augustin-Fliche, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France; Université Montpellier 1, 5, boulevard Henri-IV, CS 19044, 34967 Montpellier cedex 2, France
| | - J-J Grob
- Département de dermatologie, centre hospitalo-universitaire, AP-HM, 264, rue Saint-Pierre, 13385 Marseille cedex 05, France
| | - C Lebbe
- Département de dermatologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - M Thomas
- Département de dermatologie, institut de cancérologie Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif cedex, France
| | - T Jouary
- Service de dermatologie, pôle d'oncologie-radiothérapie, de dermatologie et des soins palliatifs, groupe hospitalier Saint-André, centre hospitalier universitaire de Bordeaux, 1, rue Jean-Burguet, 33075 Bordeaux, France
| | - M-T Leccia
- Clinique de dermatologie, d'allergologie et de photobiologie, centre hospitalier Albert-Michallon, boulevard de la Chantourne, BP 217, 38043 Grenoble cedex 9, France; Inserm U832, institut A.-Bonniot, 38043 Grenoble cedex 09, France
| | - C Robert
- Département de dermatologie, institut de cancérologie Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Systemic treatments for brain metastases from breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma and renal cell carcinoma: An overview of the literature. Cancer Treat Rev 2014; 40:951-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2014] [Revised: 05/16/2014] [Accepted: 05/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
24
|
Shah DJ, Dronca RS. Latest advances in chemotherapeutic, targeted, and immune approaches in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Mayo Clin Proc 2014; 89:504-19. [PMID: 24684873 PMCID: PMC4034544 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2013] [Revised: 02/03/2014] [Accepted: 02/05/2014] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Melanoma is the most dangerous form of skin cancer owing to its metastatic potential and is an important public health concern. The melanoma incidence has been increasing worldwide. Although potentially curable when diagnosed early, metastatic melanoma carries a poor prognosis. Until recently, systemic therapy for metastatic melanoma was ineffective, but the recent successes in the development of new therapies for metastatic melanoma, such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway inhibitors, anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway blocking antibodies, as well as combination strategies of cytotoxic chemotherapy and inhibitors of angiogenesis, have all yielded promising results, changing the continually evolving landscape of therapeutic options for patients with this disease. The aim of this review was to summarize the evolution of and recent advances in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive PubMed search between January 1, 1960, and February 1, 2014, using the search term melanoma or metastatic melanoma combined with terms such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1, adoptive T cell, targeted therapy, MAPK, molecular biology, and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darshil J Shah
- Department of Internal Medicine, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI.
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gorantla V, Kirkwood JM, Tawbi HA. Melanoma brain metastases: an unmet challenge in the era of active therapy. Curr Oncol Rep 2014; 15:483-91. [PMID: 23954973 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-013-0335-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Metastatic disease to the brain is a frequent manifestation of melanoma and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and poor prognosis. Surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery provide local control but less frequently affect the overall outcome of melanoma brain metastases (MBM). The role of systemic therapies for active brain lesions has been largely underinvestigated, and patients with active brain lesions are excluded from the vast majority of clinical trials. The advent of active systemic therapy has revolutionized the care of melanoma patients, but this benefit has not been systematically translated into intracranial activity. In this article, we review the biology and clinical outcomes of patients with MBM, and the evidence supporting the use of radiation, surgery, and systemic therapy in MBM. Prospective studies that included patients with active MBM have shown clinical intracranial activity that parallels systemic activity and support the inclusion of patients with active MBM in clinical trials involving novel agents and combination therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikram Gorantla
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Samlowski WE, Jensen RL, Shrieve DC. Multimodality management of brain metastases in metastatic melanoma patients. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 7:1699-705. [DOI: 10.1586/14737140.7.12.1699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
27
|
McWilliams RR, Rao RD, Buckner JC, Link MJ, Markovic S, Brown PD. Melanoma-induced brain metastases. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 8:743-55. [DOI: 10.1586/14737140.8.5.743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
28
|
Flanigan JC, Jilaveanu LB, Chiang VL, Kluger HM. Advances in therapy for melanoma brain metastases. Clin Dermatol 2013; 31:264-81. [PMID: 23608446 DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2012.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Melanoma cells frequently metastasize to the brain, and approximately 50% of patients with metastatic melanoma develop intracranial disease. Historically, central nervous system dissemination has portended a very poor prognosis. Recent advances in systemic therapies for melanoma, supported by improved local therapy control of brain lesions, have resulted in better median survival for these patients. We review current local and systemic approaches for patients with melanoma brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaclyn C Flanigan
- Department of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Papadatos-Pastos D, Januszewski A, Dalgleish A. Revisiting the role of systemic therapies in patients with metastatic melanoma to the CNS. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2013; 13:559-67. [PMID: 23617347 DOI: 10.1586/era.13.33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The CNS is a common site of metastasis in patients with malignant melanoma. Locoregional control either with surgery or radiotherapy is first-line treatment for patients with brain metastasis should they be suitable candidates. For those patients who are not and those who progress after previous treatment, there is an unmet clinical need for effective systemic therapies. Systemic cytotoxics, such as temozolamide and fotemustine, have only modest activity, resulting in a median progression-free survival ranging from 1-2 months, in patients with metastatic melanoma to the brain. Newer systemic treatments such as vemurafenib and ipilimumab have been approved for the treatment of melanoma, but evidence regarding their activity in brain metastases is inconclusive due to the limited access of patients to clinical trials. This is now being revised and more data are emerging supporting the inclusion of patients with brain metastasis in trials. In this review, the authors present data regarding the efficacy of systemically administered therapies in patients with metastatic melanoma to the brain.
Collapse
|
30
|
Panasiti V, Curzio M, Roberti V, Lieto P, Devirgiliis V, Gobbi S, Naspi A, Coppola R, Lopez T, di Meo N, Gatti A, Trevisan G, Londei P, Calvieri S. Metastatic volume: an old oncologic concept and a new prognostic factor for stage IV melanoma patients. Dermatology 2013; 227:55-61. [PMID: 24008289 DOI: 10.1159/000351713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2012] [Accepted: 04/26/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The last melanoma staging system of the 2009 American Joint Committee on Cancer takes into account, for stage IV disease, the serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and the site of distant metastases. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to compare the significance of metastatic volume, as evaluated at the time of stage IV melanoma diagnosis, with other clinical predictors of prognosis. METHODS We conducted a retrospective multicentric study. To establish which variables were statistically correlated both with death and survival time, contingency tables were evaluated. The overall survival curves were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Metastatic volume and number of affected organs were statistically related to death. In detail, patients with a metastatic volume >15 cm(3) had a worse prognosis than those with a volume lower than this value (survival probability at 60 months: 6.8 vs. 40.9%, respectively). The Kaplan-Meier method confirmed that survival time was significantly related to the site(s) of metastases, to elevated LDH serum levels and to melanoma stage according to the latest system. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that metastatic volume may be considered as a useful prognostic factor for survival among melanoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Panasiti
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Addeo R, Zappavigna S, Luce A, Facchini S, Caraglia M. Chemotherapy in the management of brain metastases: the emerging role of fotemustine for patients with melanoma and NSCLC. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2013; 12:729-40. [PMID: 23560594 DOI: 10.1517/14740338.2013.789017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION An estimated 20 - 40% of cancer patients will develop brain metastases that are the most common intracranial tumors in adults. Patients with cerebral metastases represent a variegate group where selection of the most appropriate treatment depends on many patient- and disease-related factors. The impact of therapeutic option on overall survival is lacking and it is important to consider quality of life (QOL) when treating patients with brain metastases. AREAS COVERED A considerable proportion of patients are treated with palliative approaches such as whole-brain radiotherapy. The role of chemotherapy was limited in the past. Recently, several chemotherapeutic agents have been identified as potentially useful. This article examines the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety and tolerability of fotemustine (FTM) for the management of patients with cerebral metastasis from melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EXPERT OPINION FTM is a third-generation nitrosourea that has proved its efficacy on brain metastases of melanoma and showed promising results for the treatment of brain metastasis of NSCLC because of its ability to pass the blood-brain barrier.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaele Addeo
- "S. Giovanni di Dio" Hospital, ASL Napoli 2Nord, Oncology Unit, Frattamaggiore, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Brain metastases affect 37% of patients suffering from metastatic melanoma, and their prognosis remains poor, with an overall survival lower than six months. At the moment, there is no standard therapeutic strategy for management of melanoma brain metastases. In some cases, having recourse to a systemic treatment is justified, for example, when brain metastases are combined with a progressive peripheral disease, or with unresecable brain lesions. In France, the use of fotemustine, which received the AMM approval, for metastatic melanoma treatment, is one of the treatments recommended in the case of brain metastases as this chemotherapy, that is active on the melanoma passes the blood-brain barrier. Temozolomide also shows some activity in the brain metastases treatment of melanoma that remains modest in monotherapy but seems interesting when it is combined with radiotherapy. The place of new drugs, in particular ipilimumab and vemurafenib, in the strategy of melanoma brain metastases treatment, still has to be defined and may improve the prognosis of these patients and their quality of life. The new targeted therapies, the widespread use of stereotactic radiosurgery and the improvement in neurosurgical operations would need a prospective clinical assessment, all the more so, in most of clinical studies, the presence of metastases is an exclusion criterion.
Collapse
|
33
|
Nicholas S, Mathios D, Jackson C, Lim M. Metastatic Melanoma to the Brain: Surgery and Radiation Is Still the Standard of Care. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2013; 14:264-79. [DOI: 10.1007/s11864-013-0228-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
34
|
Daponte A, Signoriello S, Maiorino L, Massidda B, Simeone E, Grimaldi AM, Caracò C, Palmieri G, Cossu A, Botti G, Petrillo A, Lastoria S, Cavalcanti E, Aprea P, Mozzillo N, Gallo C, Comella G, Ascierto PA. Phase III randomized study of fotemustine and dacarbazine versus dacarbazine with or without interferon-α in advanced malignant melanoma. J Transl Med 2013; 11:38. [PMID: 23402397 PMCID: PMC3598549 DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2012] [Accepted: 02/11/2013] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of the addition of fotemustine and/or interferon (IFN) to standard therapy with dacarbazine alone in patients with advanced malignant melanoma was investigated in a multicenter, randomized 2x2 factorial design trial. METHODS A total of 260 patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: (A) fotemustine and dacarbazine repeated on 3-week cycle; (B) same treatment as (A) plus IFN-α2b three times per week; (C) dacarbazine alone repeated on 3-week cycle; (D) same treatment as (C) plus IFN-α2b three times per week. Two comparisons were planned to assess the efficacy of fotemustine (groups A+B vs. C+D) and IFN-α2b (groups A+C vs. B+D). RESULTS Addition of fotemustine did not significantly improve overall survival (OS) (p=0.28) or progression-free survival (PFS) (p=0.55); Hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 0.93 (95% CI 0.71-1.21). Similarly, addition of IFN-α2b did not improve OS (p=0.68) or PFS (p=0.65); HR for OS was 0.92 (95% CI 0.70-1.20). Overall response rate was not improved by the addition of either fotemustine (p=0.87) or IFN-α2b (p=0.57). The combination of all three drugs resulted in the highest occurrence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS No significant improvement in outcomes were observed with the addition of either fotemustine or IFN-α2b to dacarbazine. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01359956.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Daponte
- Department of Melanoma, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Velho TR. Metastatic melanoma - a review of current and future drugs. Drugs Context 2012; 2012:212242. [PMID: 24432031 PMCID: PMC3885142 DOI: 10.7573/dic.212242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2012] [Accepted: 08/20/2012] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Melanoma is one of the most aggressive cancers, and it is estimated that 76,250 men and women will be diagnosed with melanoma of the skin in the USA in 2012. Over the last few decades many drugs have been developed but only in 2011 have new drugs demonstrated an impact on survival in metastatic melanoma. Methods: A systematic search of literature was conducted, and studies providing data on the effectiveness of current and/or future drugs used in the treatment of metastatic melanoma were selected for review. This review discusses the advantages and limitations of these agents, evaluating past, current and future clinical trials designed to overcome such limitations. Results: To date, there are four drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration for melanoma (dacarbazine, interleukin-2, ipilimumab and vemurafenib). Despite efforts to develop new drugs, few of them have demonstrated any clinical benefits. Approved in 1975, dacarbazine remains the gold standard in chemotherapy, although ipilimumab and vemurafenib have raised many hopes in the last few years. Combining dacarbazine or other chemotherapy agents with new pharmacological agents may be a new way to achieve better clinical responses in patients with metastatic melanoma. Discussion: Advances in the molecular knowledge of melanoma have led to major improvements in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma, providing new targets and insights. However, heterogeneity amongst study populations, different approaches to treatment and the different melanoma types and localisations included in the trials makes their comparison difficult. New studies focusing on drugs developed in recent decades are warranted.
Collapse
|
36
|
Nieder C, Grosu AL, Mehta MP. Brain metastases research 1990-2010: pattern of citation and systematic review of highly cited articles. ScientificWorldJournal 2012; 2012:721598. [PMID: 23028253 PMCID: PMC3458272 DOI: 10.1100/2012/721598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2012] [Accepted: 08/26/2012] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High and continuously increasing research activity related to different aspects of prevention, prediction, diagnosis and treatment of brain metastases has been performed between 1990 and 2010. One of the major databases contains 2695 scientific articles that were published during this time period. Different measures of impact, visibility, and quality of published research are available, each with its own pros and cons. For this overview, article citation rate was chosen. RESULTS Among the 10 most cited articles, 7 reported on randomized clinical trials. Nine covered surgical or radiosurgical approaches and the remaining one a widely adopted prognostic score. Overall, 30 randomized clinical trials were published between 1990 and 2010, including those with phase II design and excluding duplicate publications, for example, after longer followup or with focus on secondary endpoints. Twenty of these randomized clinical trials were published before 2008. Their median number of citations was 110, range 13-1013, compared to 5-6 citations for all types of publications. Annual citation rate appeared to gradually increase during the first 2-3 years after publication before reaching high levels. CONCLUSIONS A large variety of preclinical and clinical topics achieved high numbers of citations. However, areas such as quality of life, side effects, and end-of-life care were underrepresented. Efforts to increase their visibility might be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten Nieder
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital, 8092 Bodø, Norway.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Brain metastases are the most common neurologic complication related to systemic cancer. With continued improvements in systemic treatment, the incidence is expected to increase. This article reviews the clinical presentation, pathophysiology, prognostic factors, and treatment of metastatic brain tumors. RECENT FINDINGS Brain metastases from systemic cancer are up to 10 times more common than primary malignant brain tumors and are a significant burden in the management of patients with advanced cancer. Common presenting symptoms include headache, focal weakness or numbness, mental status change, and seizure. Management and treatment of metastatic brain tumors is complex and dependent on several factors, including age, performance status, number of metastases at presentation, and status of systemic disease. At the time of diagnosis, most patients have more than one brain metastasis, and treatment has traditionally consisted of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). For those patients with single brain metastases, aggressive local treatment with surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) combined with WBRT has been shown to improve survival and neurologic outcomes compared with WBRT alone. In patients with a limited number of brain metastases, SRS alone is being increasingly explored as a treatment option that spares the upfront toxicity of WBRT. Currently, the role of chemotherapy is limited to experimental settings and salvage after radiation therapy. SUMMARY Patients with brain metastases have complex needs and require a multidisciplinary approach in order to optimize intracranial disease control while maximizing neurologic function and quality of life. Patients with multiple metastases, uncontrolled systemic disease, and poor functional status are typically treated with WBRT alone, whereas surgery and SRS may be used for additional local control in a subset of patients with fewer tumors and good functional status. The incorporation of neuropsychological outcomes, neurologic function, and quality of life as end points in future studies will offer further guidance for providing comprehensive care to patients with metastatic brain tumors.
Collapse
|
38
|
Di Giacomo AM, Ascierto PA, Pilla L, Santinami M, Ferrucci PF, Giannarelli D, Marasco A, Rivoltini L, Simeone E, Nicoletti SV, Fonsatti E, Annesi D, Queirolo P, Testori A, Ridolfi R, Parmiani G, Maio M. Ipilimumab and fotemustine in patients with advanced melanoma (NIBIT-M1): an open-label, single-arm phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13:879-86. [PMID: 22894884 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70324-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 220] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ipilimumab improves survival of patients with metastatic melanoma, many of whom develop brain metastases. Chemotherapy-induced release of tumour antigens might amplify ipilimumab's antitumour activity. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ipilimumab plus fotemustine in patients with metastatic melanoma with or without asymptomatic brain metastases. METHODS In our open-label, single-arm phase 2 trial, we enrolled patients 18 years or older with measurable, locally advanced, unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma between July 6, 2010, and April 14, 2011. Eligible patients had a life expectancy of 16 weeks or more and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or less, and could have received a maximum of one previous line of chemotherapy. Participants received induction treatment of 10 mg/kg intravenous ipilimumab every 3 weeks to a total of four doses, and 100 mg/m(2) intravenous fotemustine weekly for 3 weeks and then every 3 weeks from week 9 to week 24. Patients with a confirmed clinical response were eligible for maintenance treatment from week 24, with ipilimumab every 12 weeks and fotemustine every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with immune-related disease control as established with immune-related response criteria. Analyses were done per protocol. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2010-019356-50, and with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01654692. FINDINGS 86 patients were eligible for treatment, of whom 20 had asymptomatic brain metastases at baseline. 40 patients in the study population achieved disease control (46·5%, 95% CI 35·7-57·6), as did ten with brain metastases (50·0%, 27·2-72·8). 47 patients (55%) had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events, of which the most common was myelotoxicity (thrombocytopenia in 21 [24%] patients and neutropenia in 16 [19%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events were hepatic: 21 patients (24%) had grade 3 or 4 increases in concentrations of alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase. INTERPRETATION The combination of ipilimumab plus fotemustine has clinical activity in patients with metastatic melanoma, including those with brain metastases. FUNDING Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Maria Di Giacomo
- Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Siena, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Brain metastases occur commonly in patients with metastatic melanoma, are associated with a poor prognosis, and cause significant morbidity. Both surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery are used to control brain metastases and, in selected patients, improve survival. In those with extensive brain involvement, whole-brain radiotherapy can alleviate symptoms. Historically, systemic therapy has had little role to play in the management of melanoma brain metastases; however, early clinical trials of BRAF inhibitors have shown promising activity. This review examines the evidence for local and systemic treatments in the management of patients with melanoma brain metastases. We present a new treatment algorithm for melanoma patients with brain metastases, which integrates the evolving evidence for the use of BRAF inhibitors.
Collapse
|
40
|
Predictive factors for the development of brain metastasis in advanced unresectable metastatic melanoma. Am J Clin Oncol 2012; 34:603-10. [PMID: 21150567 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0b013e3181f9456a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Melanoma that metastasizes to distant sites is associated with a grave prognosis. The objectives of the study were (1) to identify predictive factors for the development of brain metastases from the time of diagnosis of stage III/IV disease, (2) to identify predictive factors for the development of central nervous system (CNS) metastases from the time of diagnosis of primary melanoma, and (3) to assess whether the incidence of brain metastasis is more frequent in patients who had no tumor response to systemic therapy for stage III/IV disease compared with those who had partial or complete response. PATIENTS AND METHODS We collected and retrospectively analyzed information of 740 patients with advanced metastatic melanoma treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center over 15 years. Three hundred and twenty-nine patients had CNS metastases. The characteristics of these patients in terms of median age, sex, primary site, Breslow thickness, stage at first visit, baseline serum parameters, and response to systemic therapy were compared with those of patients who did not develop CNS metastasis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the cause-specific hazard function for CNS metastasis and deaths without CNS metastasis. RESULTS We identified that M-stage [stage M1b vs. stage III or M1a, hazard ratio (HR)=2.64; stage M1c vs. stage III or M1a, HR=2.13, P<0.0001] and lactic acid dehydrogenase (LDH) (elevated vs. normal LDH, HR=1.51, P<0.001) at diagnosis of unresectable stage III/IV disease can independently predict the risk of developing CNS metastasis from the time of diagnosis of stage III/IV disease. Older age (HR=1.01, P=0.076), chemoresistance (stable disease+progressive disease vs. complete response+partial response HR=2.91, P<0.0001), low level of albumin (vs. normal HR=2.87, P<0.0001), elevated LDH (vs. normal HR=1.55, P=0.0004), and M-stage (M1c disease vs. stage III or M1a HR=1.89, P<0.0001) can independently predict shorter time to death without CNS metastasis from the diagnosis of stage III/IV disease. The location (head and neck vs. limbs HR=1.56, P=0.028; trunk and abdomen vs. limbs HR=1.45, P=0.029; unknown site vs. limbs HR=8.43, P=0.036) and pathology [Clark level (CL)=3 and/or BR2 to 4 mm vs. CL≤2 and/or BR<2 mm HR=1.60, P=0.037; CL>3 and/or BR> 4 mm vs. CL≤2 and/or BR<2 mm HR=2.03, P=0.001) of the primary melanoma can independently predict CNS metastasis-free interval from the time of diagnosis of primaries. Age (HR=1.012, P=0.034) and pathology of the primary melanoma (CL>3 and/or BR>4 mm vs. CL≤2 and/or BR<2 mm HR=1.54, P=0.024) can independently predict time to death without CNS metastasis from primaries. CONCLUSION We identified the predictive factors associated with the development of CNS metastasis in patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma.
Collapse
|
41
|
|
42
|
Lutzky J. New therapeutic options in the medical management of advanced melanoma. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011; 29:249-57. [PMID: 21277538 DOI: 10.1016/j.sder.2010.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
During the past 3 decades, the incidence, morbidity, and mortality of malignant melanoma have increased dramatically. Advanced melanoma has remained a disease that is for the most part incurable and has challenged all therapeutic efforts to make a dent in its natural history. Recent advances in the understanding of the molecular alterations in melanoma and in the immunologic mechanisms playing a role in this malignancy have brought hope that significant progress can be achieved, as evidenced by early encouraging clinical data. This review will summarize these recent developments and their impact on current clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Lutzky
- Melanoma Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Metastatic melanoma is one of the most resistant tumors to standard chemotherapy approaches. The median overall survival of patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma is lower than 9 months. Current approved treatments offer only marginal survival advantages. New immunotherapeutic targets have appeared recently trying to modulate the host immune response against the tumor. New targeted agents have changed the standard of care of other solid tumor types like breast cancer. Here, we discuss the new advances and achievements in the treatment of this highly resistant disease.
Collapse
|
44
|
Guida M, Cramarossa A, Fistola E, Porcelli M, Giudice G, Lubello K, Colucci G. High activity of sequential low dose chemo-modulating Temozolomide in combination with Fotemustine in metastatic melanoma. A feasibility study. J Transl Med 2010; 8:115. [PMID: 21067582 PMCID: PMC2992498 DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-8-115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2010] [Accepted: 11/10/2010] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Guida
- Department of Medical Oncology; National Institute of Cancer, Bari, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Croghan GA, Suman VJ, Maples WJ, Albertini M, Linette G, Flaherty L, Eckardt J, Ma C, Markovic SN, Erlichman C. A study of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bortezomib in the treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma: a phase 2 consortium study. Cancer 2010; 116:3463-8. [PMID: 20564112 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy has not been reported to have a significant impact on survival for patients with metastatic melanoma. Bortezomib was shown to have additive/synergistic effects with several chemotherapeutic agents, including paclitaxel and platinum. A phase 1 trial of this 3-drug combination reported that 6 of 28 patients treated with bortezomib followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin achieved a partial response (including 2 of 5 patients with metastatic melanoma). METHODS A 2-stage phase 2 clinical trial was conducted to assess the antitumor activity of this 3-agent combination in patients with metastatic melanoma who had received at most 1 prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Treatment included bortezomib at a dose of 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously on Days 1, 4, and 8; paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg/m2; and carboplatin at an area under the concentration (AUC) of 6 on Day 2 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint of this trial was tumor response rate (TRR). RESULTS Seventeen eligible patients were enrolled. A median of 4 cycles were administered (range, 1-7 cycles). Three patients discontinued treatment due to persistent grade 4 (based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]) neutropenia with grade 3 leukopenia (2 patients) or grade 4 pulmonary embolism (1 patient). Grade>or=3 toxicities included neutropenia (71%), leukopenia (41%), thrombocytopenia (29%), and arthralgia (12%). Two partial responses were observed (TRR, 11.8%). Four patients had stable disease at >12 weeks. The median progression-free survival was 3.2 months, and the median overall survival was 7.0 months. CONCLUSIONS Due to insufficient clinical efficacy, this trial did not proceed to second-stage accrual. The combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bortezomib demonstrated limited clinical benefit and was associated with significant toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary A Croghan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Melanoma Study Group, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Orouji A, Goerdt S, Utikal J. Systemic therapy of non-resectable metastatic melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2010; 2:955-69. [PMID: 24281101 PMCID: PMC3835112 DOI: 10.3390/cancers2020955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2010] [Revised: 05/11/2010] [Accepted: 05/12/2010] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
In advanced metastatic melanoma (non-resectable stage III/IV), the prognosis still remains poor, with median survival times between six and twelve months. Systemic therapeutic approaches for metastatic melanoma include chemotherapy, immunotherapy, immunochemotherapy, small molecules and targeted therapy. In this review, we will focus on the various treatment modalities as well as new agents used for targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Azadeh Orouji
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Current research and development of chemotherapeutic agents for melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2010; 2:397-419. [PMID: 24281076 PMCID: PMC3835084 DOI: 10.3390/cancers2020397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2010] [Revised: 03/25/2010] [Accepted: 04/06/2010] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Cutaneous malignant melanoma is the most lethal form of skin cancer and an increasingly common disease worldwide. It remains one of the most treatment-refractory malignancies. The current treatment options for patients with metastatic melanoma are limited and in most cases non-curative. This review focuses on conventional chemotherapeutic drugs for melanoma treatment, by a single or combinational agent approach, but also summarizes some potential novel phytoagents discovered from dietary vegetables or traditional herbal medicines as alternative options or future medicine for melanoma prevention. We explore the mode of actions of these natural phytoagents against metastatic melanoma.
Collapse
|
48
|
Treatment for metastatic malignant melanoma: Old drugs and new strategies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2010; 74:27-39. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2008] [Revised: 08/04/2009] [Accepted: 08/27/2009] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
|
49
|
Garbe C, Peris K, Hauschild A, Saiag P, Middleton M, Spatz A, Grob JJ, Malvehy J, Newton-Bishop J, Stratigos A, Pehamberger H, Eggermont A. Diagnosis and treatment of melanoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline. Eur J Cancer 2009; 46:270-83. [PMID: 19959353 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.10.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 218] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2009] [Accepted: 10/29/2009] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is potentially the most dangerous form of skin tumour and causes 90% of skin cancer mortality. A unique collaboration of multi-disciplinary experts from the European Dermatology Forum, the European Association of Dermato-Oncology and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer was formed to make recommendations on CM diagnosis and treatment, based on systematic literature reviews and the experts' experience. Diagnosis is made clinically and staging is based upon the AJCC system. CMs are excised with one to two centimetre safety margins. Sentinel lymph node dissection is routinely offered as a staging procedure in patients with tumours more than 1mm in thickness, although there is as yet no resultant survival benefit. Interferon-alpha treatment can be offered to patients with more than 1.5mm in thickness and stage II to III melanoma as an adjuvant therapy, as this treatment increases the relapse-free survival. The lack of a clear survival benefit and the presence of toxicity however limit its use in practice. In distant metastasis, all options of surgical therapy have to be considered thoroughly. In the absence of surgical options, systemic medical treatment is indicated, but with, to date, low response rates. Therapeutic decisions should be made by the melanoma team and the informed patient after full discussion of the options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claus Garbe
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Jilaveanu LB, Aziz SA, Kluger HM. Chemotherapy and biologic therapies for melanoma: do they work? Clin Dermatol 2009; 27:614-25. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2008.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|