Neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced gastric carcinoma with etoposide, doxirubicin, and cisplatinum

Pre-therapeutic molecular biomarkers of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric and esophago-gastric junction adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Multimodal treatment is the standard of care in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Unfortunately, the response rate after neoadjuvant treatment remains limited. The ability to predict the response has a potential to improve patient outcomes by promoting a more individualized approach. We sought to describe the current state of research in pre-treatment molecular biomarkers of response to neoadjuvant therapy in gastric adenocarcinoma available for testing before the initiation of treatment and to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to summarize and evaluate the potential methods.

METHODS

A systematic MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL literature search was conducted to extract articles on potentially predictive molecular biomarkers of pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with gastric- and esophago-gastric junction adenocarcinoma. Fixed and random effects models were used to undertake the meta-analysis when appropriate.

RESULTS

Data on predictive biomarkers was reported in 38 studies. These articles described 47 biomarkers showing statistical significance. After evaluation of all reported biomarkers, 3 of them met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results indicate that >5 ​ng/mL pre-therapeutic serum concentration of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA; norm <5 ​ng/mL) is significantly associated with tumor response (RR ​= ​5.13, 95% CI 2.53-10.43, P ​= ​0.026).

CONCLUSION

Previous studies describe a large number of candidate biomarkers. Our meta-analysis indicated pre-therapeutic serum concentration of CEA >5 ​ng/mL as a potential and easy-accessible biomarker available for use before initiation of treatment. However, it could be only an additional tool for complex qualification for neoadjuvant therapy.

Survival Advantages in Gastric Cancer Patients Receiving Preoperative SOX Regimen Chemotherapy

Objective: This study addressed whether preoperative chemotherapy (PECT) plus surgery prolongs overall survival (OS) compared with surgery plus postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) among gastric cancer (GC) patients in Northwest China. Materials and Methods: The authors included 157 GC patients confirmed histologically or by gastroscopic pathological examination treated at the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University of China between 2012 and 2018. All patients were followed up by telephone in January 2019 within a 2-week period. The endpoint was death due to GC or its complications. Results: Thirty-eight patients received PECT, 41 patients received POCT, 40 patients received surgery alone, and 38 patients received chemotherapy alone. Surgery was performed with R0 resection and subsequent extended lymph node dissection. Chemotherapy was performed with the S-1, oxaliplatin capecitabine regimen. Patients who received PECT had longer OS than those with POCT treatment (hazard ratio = 2.409, p = 0.037). The 5-year OS rate was 32.7% higher in the PECT group than in the POCT group. Conclusions: PECT was associated with better OS in GC patients and should be considered by clinicians in GC treatment, although prospective studies are needed for confirmation.

Novel Drug Delivery Systems as an Emerging Platform for Stomach Cancer Therapy

Cancer has long been regarded as one of the world's most fatal diseases, claiming the lives of countless individuals each year. Stomach cancer is a prevalent cancer that has recently reached a high number of fatalities. It continues to be one of the most fatal cancer forms, requiring immediate attention due to its low overall survival rate. Early detection and appropriate therapy are, perhaps, of the most difficult challenges in the fight against stomach cancer. We focused on positive tactics for stomach cancer therapy in this paper, and we went over the most current advancements and progressions of nanotechnology-based systems in modern drug delivery and therapies in great detail. Recent therapeutic tactics used in nanotechnology-based delivery of drugs aim to improve cellular absorption, pharmacokinetics, and anticancer drug efficacy, allowing for more precise targeting of specific agents for effective stomach cancer treatment. The current review also provides information on ongoing research aimed at improving the curative effectiveness of existing anti-stomach cancer medicines. All these crucial matters discussed under one overarching title will be extremely useful to readers who are working on developing multi-functional nano-constructs for improved diagnosis and treatment of stomach cancer.

Diffusion kurtosis imaging in the prediction of poor responses of locally advanced gastric cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in the prediction of the treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).

METHODS

A total of 31 LAGC patients were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients underwent diffusion-weighted MRI examination (with b = 0₁, 200₁, 500₁, 800₂, 1000₄, 1500₄, 2000₆ s/mm², the subscript denotes the number of signal averages) before and after chemotherapy. DKI and mono-exponential (b = 0, 800 s/mm²) models were built. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), mean diffusivity (MD) and mean kurtosis (MK) of the LAGC tumors were measured. The absolute change values (ΔX) and percentage change values (%ΔX) of the above parameters post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) were calculated. The response was evaluated according to the pathological tumor regression grade scores (effective response group: TRG 0-2, poor response group: TRG 3). Mann-Whitney U test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were applicated for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There were 17 patients in the effective response group (ERG), and 14 patients in the poor response group (PRG). The MK_pre and MK_post values in PRG were significantly higher than those in ERG [(0.671 ± 0.026) and (0.641 ± 0.019) vs. (0.584 ± 0.023) and (0.519 ± 0.018), p < 0.001]. ADC_post and MD_post in PRG were significantly lower than those in ERG (p = 0.005, p =0.001). Significant differences were also observed for % ΔMK, ΔMD and ΔMK between the two groups (p < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) for the prediction of PRG was highest for MK_post (AUC = 0.958, cutoff value = 0.614). The MK_pre and MK_post had the highest sensitivity (91.70 %) and specificity (93.80 %) in the prediction of PRG, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both DKI and ADC values show potential for the prediction of the PRG in LAGC patients. The DKI parameters, especially MK_post displayed the best performance.

Progress in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in the digestive system. Surgery is currently considered to be the only radical treatment. As surgical techniques improve and progress is made in traditional radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and the implementation of neoadjuvant therapy, the 5-year survival rate of early gastric cancer can reach >95%. However, the low rate of early diagnosis means that most patients have advanced-stage disease at diagnosis and so the best surgical window is missed. Therefore, the main treatment for advanced gastric cancer is the combination of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, molecular-targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. In this article, we summarize several common methods used to treat advanced gastric cancer and discuss the progress made in the treatment of gastric cancer in detail. Only clinical practice and clinical research will allow us to prolong the survival time of patients and allow the patients to truly benefit by paying attention to the individual patient characteristics, drug choice, and developing a reasonable and comprehensive treatment plan.

A phase II study of perioperative S-1 combined with weekly docetaxel in patients with locally advanced gastric carcinoma: clinical outcomes and clinicopathological and pharmacogenetic predictors for survival

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative S-1 plus docetaxel in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) and to investigate the association between CYP2A6 genotype and outcome.

METHODS

Patients with LAGC [clinical stage III-IV (M0) by the Japanese staging system] received three cycles of pre- and postoperative chemotherapy (S-1 40 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14; intravenous docetaxel 35 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks) followed by gastrectomy with D2 dissection. We also performed a pharmacokinetic and CYP2A6 genotyping study (*1, *4, *7, *9, *10) for S-1.

RESULTS

From October 2006 to June 2008, 44 patients entered the study. 43 eligible patients completed preoperative chemotherapy and 40 completed postoperative chemotherapy. The most common G3/4 toxicities during pre- and postoperative chemotherapy were neutropenia, stomatitis, and abdominal pain. The clinical response rate by RECIST was 74.4 % (95 % CI, 61.4-87.4 %), and the R0 resection rate was 97.7 %. Clinical downstaging in T or N occurred in 41.9 % of patients. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 62.8 % and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 69.6 %. PFS and OS differed significantly according to clinical response, clinical downstaging, and CYP2A6 genotype. Patients with CYP2A6 variant/variant genotypes had a higher tegafur C max and worse survival than those with wild/wild or wild/variant genotypes.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative S-1 plus docetaxel is active with a manageable toxicity in patients with LAGC receiving D2 surgery. Clinical tumor response, clinical downstaging, and CYP2A6 genotype may predict efficacy.

Interim endoscopy results during neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer correlate with histopathological response and prognosis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer leads to major histopathological response in less than 30 % of patients. Data on interim endoscopic response assessment do not exist. This exploratory prospective study evaluates early endoscopy after 50 % of the chemotherapy as predictor for later response and prognosis.

METHODS

Forty-seven consecutive patients were included (45 resected; 33 R0 resections). All patients received baseline endoscopy and CT scans, after 50 % of their chemotherapy (EGD-1, CT-1) and after completion of chemotherapy (EGD-2, CT-2). Interim endoscopic response (EGD-1) was assessed after having received 50 % (6 weeks) of the planned 12 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Post-chemotherapy response was clinically assessed by a combination of CT scan (CT-2) and endoscopy (EGD-2). Histopathological response was determined by a standardized scoring system (Becker criteria). Endoscopic response was defined as a reduction of >75 % of the tumor mass.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were responders at EGD-1 and 13 at EGD-2. Nine patients (19.1 %) were clinical responders and 7 patients (15.6 %) were histopathological responders after chemotherapy. Specificity, accuracy, and negative predictive value of the interim EGD-1 for subsequent histopathological response were 31/38 (82 %), 36/47 (76 %), and 31/33 (93 %); and for recurrence or death, 28/30 (93.3 %), 38/47 (80.9 %), and 28/35 (80.0 %). Response at EGD-1 was significantly associated with histopathological response (p = 0.010), survival (p < 0.001), and recurrence-free survival (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Interim endoscopy after 6 weeks predicts response and prognosis. Therefore, tailoring treatment according to interim endoscopic assessment could be feasible, but the findings of this study should be validated in a larger patient cohort.

Histological complete response to a combined docetaxel/cisplatin/fluorouracil neoadjuvant chemotherapy for T4 stage gastric adenocarcinoma

Local advanced gastric carcinoma has a very poor prognosis. When a T4 gastric carcinoma has invaded the surrounding tissues and organs, curative resection is unlikely. We present here a case of a 63-year-old woman with a T4 unresectable gastric adenocarcinoma. She underwent two 3-week cycles of docetaxel/cisplatin/fluorouracil chemotherapy, followed by radical gastric resection. Each cycle consisted of 75 mg/m² docetaxel and 75 mg/m² cisplatin on day 1, and 200 mg/m² leucovorin and 500 mg/m² fluorouracil on days 1 through 5. The patient exhibited a complete histologic response. Our results indicate that docetaxel/cisplatin/fluorouracil neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a promising method of treatment for advanced gastric cancer.

Is preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery the appropriate treatment for signet ring cell containing adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction and stomach?

BACKGROUND

Recent data suggest primary resection as the preferable approach in patients with signet ring cell gastric cancer (SRC). The aim of our retrospective exploratory study was to evaluate the influence of SRC on prognosis and response in esophagogastric adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 723 locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinomas (cT3/4 N any) documented in a prospective database from two academic centers were classified according to the WHO definition for SRC (more than 50 % SRC) and analyzed for their association with response and prognosis after neoadjuvant treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 235 tumors (32.5 %) contained SRC. Median survival of SRC was 26.3 compared with 46.6 months (p < 0.001) for non-SRC. SRC were significantly associated with female gender, gastric localization, advanced ypT and R1/2 categories, and lower risk of surgical complications and anastomotic leakage (each p < 0.001). Clinical (21.1 vs. 33.7 %, p = 0.001) and histopathological response (less than 10 % residual tumor: 16.3 vs. 28.9 %, p < 0.001) were significantly less frequent in SRC. Clinical response (p = 0.003) and complete histopathological response (pCR) (3.4 %) (p = 0.003) were associated with improved prognosis in SRC. Clinical response, surgical complications, ypTN categories, but not SRC were independent prognostic factors in forward Cox regression analysis in R0 resected patients. Risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis was increased (p < 0.001), while local (p = 0.015) and distant metastases (p = 0.02) were less frequent than in non-SRC.

CONCLUSIONS

Prognosis of SRC is unfavorable. Although response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is rare in SRC, it is associated with improved outcome. Thus, chemotherapy might not generally be abandoned in SRC. A stratification based on SRC should be included in clinical trials.

S-1-based therapy versus S-1 monotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

This study aimed to derive a more precise estimate of the prognostic significance of S-1-based therapy over S-1 monotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC), including overall survival (OS) time, progression-free survival (PFS) time, objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). Studies stratifying OS, PFS, ORR, and AEs in AGC patients in an S-1-based therapy versus an S-1 monotherapy setting were eligible for analysis by systematic computerized PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library searches. Data from these studies were pooled using STATA package version 11.0. Six studies that investigated outcomes in a total of 913 AGC cases, of which 443 (48.5%) received S-1-based therapy and 470 (51.5%) received S-1 monotherapy, were included in the meta-analysis. Median OS and median PFS were significantly prolonged in AGC patients receiving S-1-based therapy compared with those receiving S-1 monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.96, P = 0.015, and HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.80, P = 0.000, respectively). The ORR favored patients with S-1-based therapy (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.34-2.06, P = 0.000). Higher incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia was found in patients with S-1-based therapy (P = 0.000). For the Asian population, S-1-based therapy significantly improved OS and PFS and enhanced ORR in comparison to S-1 monotherapy. The safety profile was poorer in patients with S-1-based therapy, but could be considerable between the S-1-based therapy and S-1 monotherapy group. Our conclusion needs to be confirmed via high-quality trials and the results need to be reproduced in other regions and populations.

Requirement for a standardised definition of advanced gastric cancer

Each year, ~988,000 new cases of stomach cancer are reported worldwide. Uniformity for the definition of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is required to ensure the improved management of patients. Various classifications do actually exist for gastric cancer, but the classification determined by lesion depth is extremely important, as it has been shown to correlate with patient prognosis; for example, early gastric cancer (EGC) has a favourable prognosis when compared with AGC. In the literature, the definition of EGC is clear, however, there is heterogeneity in the definition of AGC. In the current study, all parameters of the TNM classification for AGC reported in each previous study were individually analysed. It was necessary to perform a comprehensive systematic literature search of all previous studies that have reported a definition of ACG to guarantee homogeneity in the assessment of surgical outcome. It must be understood that the term ‘advanced gastric cancer’ may implicate a number of stages of disease, and studies must highlight the exact clinical TNM stages used for evaluation of the study.

Adjuvant IMRT/XELOX radiochemotherapy improves long-term overall- and disease-free survival in advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

In a retrospective analysis, adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined with modern chemotherapy improved advanced gastric cancer survival rates compared to a combination of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and conventional chemotherapy. We report on the long-term outcomes of two consecutive patient cohorts that were treated with either IMRT and intensive chemotherapy, or 3D-CRT and conventional chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2001 and 2008, 65 consecutive gastric cancer patients received either 3D-CRT (n = 27) or IMRT (n = 38) following tumor resection. Chemotherapy comprised predominantly 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/FA) in the earlier cohort and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) in the latter. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Median OS times were 18 and 43 months in the 3D-CRT and IMRT groups, respectively (p = 0.0602). Actuarial 5-year OS rates were 26 and 47  %, respectively. Within the IMRT group, XELOX gave better results than 5-FU/FA in terms of OS, but this difference was not statistically significant. The primary cause of death in both groups was distant metastasis. Median DFS times were 14 and 35 months in the 3D-CRT and IMRT groups, respectively (p = 0.0693). Actuarial 5-year DFS rates were 22 and 44  %, respectively. Among patients receiving 5-FU/FA, DFS tended to be better in the IMRT group, but this was not statistically significant. A similar analysis for the XELOX group was not possible as 3D-CRT was almost never used to treat these patients. No late toxicity exceeding grade 3 or secondary tumors were observed.

CONCLUSION

After a median follow-up period of over 5 years, OS and DFS were improved in the IMRT/XELOX treated patients compared to the 3D-CRT/5-FU/FA group. Long-term observation revealed no clinical indications of therapy-induced secondary tumors or renal toxicity.

A phase II study of neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 for locally advanced resectable gastric cancer: nucleotide excision repair (NER) as potential chemoresistance marker

PURPOSE

The combination of docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) chemotherapy is expected to be a promising regimen for advanced gastric cancer. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant DCS chemotherapy for locally advanced resectable gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced gastric cancer received 2 courses of preoperative chemotherapy with S-1 (40 mg/m(2) b.i.d.) on days 1-14 and docetaxel (60 mg/m(2)) plus cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) on day 8 every 3 weeks, followed by standard curative surgery within 4-8 weeks. The primary endpoint was R0 resectability. Expression of damage DNA binding protein complex subunit 2 (DDB2)/excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1) in the pretreated tumor tissues was examined by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The response rate was 74.4%, and disease control ratio was 100%. Grade 4 neutropenia developed in 53.5% of patients and febrile neutropenia in 16.3%. Non-hematological grade 3/4 adverse events were anorexia (23.3%), nausea (14.0%), and diarrhea (23.3%), but these were generally transient and manageable. The proportion of R0 resections in the 43 eligible patients was 90.7%, and a pathological response was found in 65.9% of patients. There were no treatment-related deaths and no major surgical complications. The accuracy of the combination of DDB2 and ERCC1 expression for predicting chemoresistance was 82.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative treatment with DCS combination for locally advanced gastric cancer demonstrated a sufficient R0 resection rate and a good pathological response with manageable toxicities. The DDB2/ERCC1-high phenotype, as determined by immunohistochemistry, may be useful predictor of resistance to DCS chemotherapy.

Factors predicting prognosis and recurrence in patients with esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma and histopathological response with less than 10 % residual tumor

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant treatment is an accepted standard approach for treating locally advanced esophago-gastric adenocarcinomas. Despite a response of the primary tumor, a significant percentage dies from tumor recurrence. The aim of this retrospective exploratory study from two academic centers was to identify predictors of survival and recurrence in histopathologically responding patients.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty one patients with adenocarcinomas (esophagus: n = 185, stomach: n = 46, cT3/4, cN0/+, cM0) treated with preoperative chemotherapy (n = 212) or chemoradiotherapy (n = 19) followed by resection achieved a histopathological response (regression 1a: no residual tumor (n = 58), and regression 1b < 10 % residual tumor (n = 173)).

RESULTS

The estimated median overall survival was 92.4 months (5-year survival, 56.6 %) for all patients. For patients with regression 1a, median survival is not reached (5-year survival, 71.6 %) compared to patients with regression 1b with 75.3 months median (5-year survival, 52.2 %) (p = 0.031). Patients with a regression 1a had lymph node metastases in 19.0 versus 33.7 % in regression 1b. The ypT-category (p < 0.001), the M-category (p = 0.005), and the type of treatment (p = 0.04) were found to be independent prognostic factors in R0-resected patients. The recurrence rate was 31.7 % (n = 66) (local, 39.4 %; peritoneal carcinomatosis, 25.7 %; distant metastases, 50 %). Recurrence was predicted by female gender (p = 0.013), ypT-category (p = 0.007), and M-category (p = 0.003) in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Response of the primary tumor does not guarantee recurrence-free long-term survival, but histopathological complete responders have better prognosis compared to partial responders. Established prognostic factors strongly influence the outcome, which could, in the future, be used for stratification of adjuvant treatment approaches. Increasing the rate of histopathological complete responders is a valid endpoint for future clinical trials investigating new drugs.

[Gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: principles of neoadjuvant therapy]

According to the current European and German S3 guidelines, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is now an integral part of the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Neoadjuvant therapy seeks to achieve downsizing of the primary tumor, lowering of the T and N categories and eradication of micrometastases. As the indications for neoadjuvant treatment are based on pretherapeutic information alone, a sophisticated clinical staging plays a central role. Despite all progress made in the field of diagnostic work-up, clinical staging often fails. Despite this fact, controlled randomized trials showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy enhances the rate of curative (R0) resections and reduces the likelihood of systemic relapse. Overall, survival can be improved by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The current research is focused on the molecular prediction of response and early response monitoring with functional imaging. New targeted drugs are being integrated into the peri-operative treatment.

A decade in gastric cancer curative surgery: Evidence of progress (1999-2009)

To investigate the progress in evidence-based surgical treatment of non-metastatic gastric cancer, we reviewed the last ten years’ literature. The data used in this review were identified by searches made on MEDLINE, Current Contents, PubMed, and other references taken from relevant original articles (on prospective and retrospective studies) concerning gastric cancer surgery. Only papers published in English between January 1999 and December 2009 were selected. Data from ongoing studies were obtained in December 2009, from the trials registry of the United States National Institutes of Health (http://www.clinicaltrial.gov). The citations list was presented according to evidence based relevance (i.e., randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, retrospective series). In the last ten years, many challenges have been faced relating to the extension of gastric resection and nodal dissection as well as surgical timing, but we found only limited evidence, regardless of latitude of study. The ongoing phase-III trials may provide answers that will be valid for the coming decades, and which may bring definitive answers for the currently unresolved questions.

Prediction of response and prognosis by a score including only pretherapeutic parameters in 410 neoadjuvant treated gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an independent prognostic factor in locally advanced gastric cancer. However, no prospectively tested pretherapeutic parameters predicting response and/or survival in gastric cancer are available in clinical routine.

METHODS

We evaluated the prognostic significance of various clinical pathologic parameters in 410 patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy. Clinical and histopathologic response evaluation was performed by using standardized criteria. A prognostic score was created on the basis of the variables identified in the multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Three pretherapeutic parameters were identified as positive predictive factors for response and prognosis: tumor localization in the middle third of the stomach (P=0.001), well-differentiated tumors (P=0.001), and intestinal tumor type according to Laurén classification (P=0.03). A prognostic index was constructed, dividing the patients into three risk groups: low (n=73), intermediate (n=274), and high (n=63). The three groups had significantly different clinical (P=0.007) and histopathologic response rates (P=0.001) and survival times, with a median survival time that was not reached in the low-risk group, 39.2 months in the intermediate-risk group, and 20.5 months in the high-risk group. The corresponding 5-year survival rates were 65.3, 41.2, and 21.2% (P<0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple scoring system based on three clinicopathologic parameters accurately predicts response and prognosis in neoadjuvant treated gastric cancer. This system provides additional useful information that could be applied to select gastric cancer patients pretherapeutically for different treatment approaches. Prospective testing of the score in an independent patient cohort is warranted.

Preoperative docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma

Perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery improves survival compared to surgery alone in GE junctional (GEJ) and gastric adenocarcinomas. The docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (DCF) combination is superior to CF in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of preoperative DCF chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric and GEJ cancer. Twenty-one gastric and 10 gastroesophageal junctional (GEJ) cancer patients received 2-3 cycles of preoperative docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, 5-FU 750 mg/m(2) (continuous infusion) on days 1-5 every 3 weeks. Clinical response was evaluated by comparing pre- and postchemotherapy CT scans. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated from the initiation of chemotherapy. None of the patients achieved complete clinical remission while 11 (35%) patients achieved partial clinical remission. Ten patients with GEJ cancer (100%) and 13 with gastric cancer (62%) underwent curative surgery (P = 0.023). Seventeen (55%) patients experienced grade 3-4 chemotherapy-related adverse events. The most common adverse events were anemia, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, and febrile neutropenia. At a median follow-up of 17.0 months, median OS and PFS were 26.1 months (95% CI: 22.7-29.5) and 18.8 months (95% CI: 9.9-27.7), respectively. The DCF regimen is active in patients with gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma in the preoperative setting.

DNA methyltransferase 1 as a predictive biomarker and potential therapeutic target for chemotherapy in gastric cancer

PURPOSE

DNA methylation contributes to carcinogenesis by mediating transcriptional regulation and chromatin remodelling, which may influence the effect of DNA-damaging drugs. We examined the prognostic and predictive impact of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) 1 and 3b expression in gastric carcinomas (GC) treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In vitro, DNMT1 expression and chemosensitivity were investigated for a functional relationship and the DNMT inhibitor decitabine (DAC) was tested as an alternative treatment option.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

DNMT1/3b expression was analysed immunohistochemically in 127 pretherapeutic biopsies of neoadjuvant (platinum/5-fluorouracil)-treated GC patients and correlated with response and overall survival (OS). Short hairpin RNA technology was used to knockdown DNMT1 in the GC cell line, AGS. The chemosensitivity of GC cell lines to DAC alone and to DAC in combination with cisplatin was analysed by XTT or colony formation assays.

RESULTS

High DNMT1 and DNMT3b expression was found in 105/127 (83%) and 79/127 (62%) carcinomas, respectively. Patients with low DNMT1 expression demonstrated a significantly better histopathological/clinical response (P=0.03/P=0.008) and OS (P(log-rank)=0.001). In vitro, knockdown of DNMT1 caused an increased chemosensitivity towards cisplatin. Combined treatment with cisplatin and DAC showed a synergistic effect leading to increased cytotoxicity in the cisplatin-resistant cell line AGS.

CONCLUSION

Low DNMT1 expression defines a subgroup of GC patients with better outcomes following platinum/5FU-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In vitro data support a functional relationship between DNMT1 and cisplatin sensitivity. Besides its potential use as a predictive biomarker, DNMT1 may represent a promising target for alternative therapeutic strategies for a subset of GC patients.

Surgical resection of locally advanced primary transverse colon cancer--not a worse outcome in stage II tumor

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In locally advanced primary transverse colon cancer, a tumor may cause perforation or invade adjacent organs. Extensive resection is the best choice of treatment, but such procedures must be weighed against the potential survival benefits. This study was performed to identify the clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes of such tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the database of the Colorectal Cancer Registry of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between February 1995 and December 2005. Patients with colon cancer sited between the hepatic and splenic flexure that involved an adjacent organ without distant metastasis were defined as having locally advanced transverse colon cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 827 patients who underwent surgery for transverse primary colon cancer were enrolled in the study. Stage II and stage III colon cancer were diagnosed in 548 patients. Thirty-two (5.8%) patients were diagnosed with locally advanced tumors. Multivariate analysis revealed that stage III, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen ≥5 ng/mL, a tumor with perforation or obstruction, and the presence of a locally advanced tumor were significant prognostic factors for both overall and cancer-specific survival. Postoperative morbidity rates differed significantly between the locally advanced and non-locally advanced tumor groups (22.7% vs. 12.3%, P < 0.01). No significant overall survival difference was observed among the stage II transverse colon tumors (P = 0.21).

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection of locally advanced transverse colon tumors resulted in a higher morbidity and mortality than that of non-locally advanced tumors, but the benefit of extensive surgery in the case of locally advanced tumors cannot be underestimated. Furthermore, this benefit is more pronounced in the case of stage II tumors.

Significance of histopathological tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric adenocarcinomas: a summary of 480 cases

OBJECTIVE

An increasing number of patients with locally advanced gastric carcinomas (GC) are being treated with preoperative chemotherapy before surgery.

BACKGROUND

Histopathological tumor regression may have an important prognostic impact in addition to the UICC-TNM classification system.

METHODS

We evaluated the histopathological tumor regression in 480 surgical resection specimens of GC after neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy, using an established system encompassing three tumor regression grades based on the estimation of the percentage of residual tumor tissue at the primary tumor site in relation to the macroscopically identifiable former tumor bed. Tumor regression was correlated to clinicopathological characteristics and patient survival.

RESULTS

Of the patients in this study, 102 (21.2%) had complete or subtotal tumor regression (<10% residual tumor), 121 (25.2%) had partial tumor regression (10-50% residual tumor), and 257 (53.5%) had minimal or no regression (>50% residual tumor). Tumor regression was significantly associated with posttreatment tumor category (pT), lymph node status (pN), lymphatic invasion status (pL), and resection status (P < 0.001). Major histopathological regression was less frequent in tumors of the distal stomach and tumors of nonintestinal type (P = 0.003). Tumor regression (P = 0.009) and postoperative Lymph node status (P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for survival in a multivariate analysis of tumor regression, ypT/N/L category, resection status, grading and Lauren´s classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of histological tumor regression after preoperative chemotherapy in GC provides objective and highly valuable prognostic information in addition to posttherapeutic lymph node status. A standardized tumor regression grading system should be implemented in pathological reports of these tumors.

Tratamento paliativo do adenocarcinoma gástrico

INTRODUÇÃO: Embora decrescendo nos países do chamado primeiro mundo, o adenocarcinoma gástrico mantém-se como terceiro tumor mais frequente no sexo masculino mundialmente. Sua mortalidade é muito elevada, fruto do diagnóstico tardio em lesões muito avançadas, o que frequentemente torna paliativo seu tratamento, motivos pelos quais se justificam estudos no sentido de melhorar estes resultados. MÉTODO: Revisão da literatura através do portal de periódicos da CAPES indicados por busca no sites da Bireme e PubMed. Além disso, foram consultados os sumários do 8º Congresso Internacional de Câncer Gástrico em 2009. Foi apresentada uma sugestão de algoritmo de atendimento destes pacientes. CONCLUSÕES: O surgimento de novas drogas anticancer, mais efetivas, está propiciando novas alternativas para a ressecção gástrica como tratamento paliativo. Novos protocolos estão surgindo mostrando boas perspectivas para melhorar os resultados desta doença.

Gastric cancer: surgery in 2011

BACKGROUND

Treatment of gastric cancer is more and more becoming an individualized decision. The choice of the optimal approach is based on prognostic factors, on the anatomic site of the tumor, and on expectations about the response to neoadjuvant treatment. Early gastric cancer that is limited to the mucosal layer is the domain of endoscopic resections. As soon as the submucosal layer is invaded, surgical strategies with adequate lymphadenectomy become necessary.

DISCUSSION

In many East Asian Centers and some other centers in the world, these tumors are resected by a laparoscopic approach. With a high experience, this can be done with excellent quality and outcome. In locally advanced gastric cancer, multimodal treatment can improve survival in comparison to surgery alone. However, the strategies differ significantly around the world. While adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is standard in the USA, in Europe, perioperative chemotherapy is the first choice, and in Japan, adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended. In Europe, three randomized phase III studies on the value of preoperative chemotherapy have been performed. Two of them have shown that perioperative chemotherapy does significantly improve the survival of patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach and of the esophagogastric junction. The one including only preoperative chemotherapy failed to show a survival benefit for the combined treatment arm but showed excellent outcomes in both the surgery alone and the preoperative chemotherapy arms. Based on these studies, patients with stage II or stage III disease are now treated with perioperative chemotherapy. Additionally, it is generally accepted for more than 10 years now that responding patients have a significantly improved prognosis compared to nonresponding patients. The percentage of responding patients varies depending on the applied regimen between 20% and 45%. Therefore, early response evaluation or response prediction is an utmost important field of research. Proximal tumors are treated with a transhiatal extended gastrectomy, tumors in the middle third with a total gastrectomy, and distal tumors with a subtotal gastrectomy, if possible. Modified D2 lymphadenectomy avoiding splenectomy is now accepted as the standard procedure, providing improved prognosis for certain subgroups of patients. Individualized resection and lymphadenectomy techniques for early tumor stages and response-based neoadjuvant concepts for locally advanced tumors are the challenge for the future.

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) 1 and 2 expression and chemotherapy in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) modulate chromatin and may influence the effect of DNA-damaging drugs. We investigated HDAC1 and -2 expression in gastric carcinomas (GCs) for an association of patient outcome with conventional neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In vitro, HDAC inhibitors were evaluated as alternative treatment options.

METHODS

HDAC1/2 expression was analyzed immunohistochemically in 127 pretherapeutic biopsy samples of neoadjuvant (platinum/5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy-treated GC patients and correlated with response and overall survival (OS). Chemosensitivity of four GC cell lines to cisplatin and the HDAC inhibitors suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) and valproic acid was determined by XTT assays. Efficiencies of combined drug schedules were analyzed.

RESULTS

High expression of HDAC1/2 was found in 69 (54%) of 127 and 108 (85%) of 127 carcinomas, respectively, and was not associated with response or OS. In patients whose disease responded to therapy, high HDAC1 expression was associated with worse OS (P = 0.005). In cell lines, sequential treatment with SAHA and cisplatin showed synergistic effects irrespective of the initial cisplatin sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

HDAC1 and -2 expression is not suitable to predict response or survival for neoadjuvant-treated GC patients, but HDAC1 expression may be used for risk stratification in patients whose disease responds to therapy. Sequential treatment with SAHA and cisplatin may represent an alternative treatment option for GC patients.

Neoadjuvant therapy of locally advanced gastric cancer

Treatment of gastric cancer has evolved with the advent of randomized trials demonstrating chemotherapeutic agents with efficacy in advanced disease. Level I evidence supports delivering chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting; the data shows improvement in progression-free and overall survival. A clinical response to therapy is associated with improved R0 resection rates, pathologic response, and outcome in patients with locally advanced disease. Early assessment of metabolic response to therapy can potentially be utilized to tailor treatment.

Pre-operative chemotherapy for gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is highly prevalent in several countries around the world and remains an incurable disease. Treatment involves surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. Surgical resection remains the definitive treatment for early stage (T1 and T2) gastric cancer, with 5-year survival rates of 70 - 95%. Localized tumours that extend beyond the submucosa are, however, associated with worse outcomes and a 5-year survival rate of 20 - 30%. Recent advances mainly concern chemotherapy prior to surgical resection. The goal of pre-operative chemotherapy is to allow an early attack on systemic micrometastatic disease and, by downstaging the primary tumour, to increase the percentage of patients able to undergo curative resection. Pre-operative chemotherapy remains experimental, but several phase II and III studies have shown promising results. One approach involves systemic, pre-operative chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer. This review focuses on the development of pre-operative chemotherapy as a component of the multimodal treatment of gastric cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a combination of docetaxel, cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin in nonresectable advanced gastric cancer: a short communication

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel (TAX), cisplatin (CDDP), and fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin (CF) as the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) regimens in the treatment of nonresectable advanced gastric cancer. Twelve patients with nonresectable advanced gastric cancer were treated with NACT regimens consisted of docetaxel, cisplatin, fluorouracil, plus leucovorin before operation. Nine of the 12 patients were downstaged and 8 were radically operated after the end of the NACT. The overall response rate was 75% with 8.3% complete response and 66.7% partial response, and the ascites disappeared in 63.6%. The most common toxicities were bone marrow suppression, nausea, vomiting, alopecia, and heptoses. The toxicities were recoverable after symptomatic treatment. The results confirmed that the combination of docetaxel, cisplatin, fluorouracil plus leucovorin (CF) is a very effective and well-tolerated regimen as NACT for the patients with nonresectable advanced gastric cancer.

[Principles of neoadjuvant therapy]

Neoadjuvant therapy is now an integral part in the treatment of locally advanced cancer of the esophagus and stomach. The mechanisms of action comprise downsizing of the primary tumor, improvement of the T and N categories and the earliest possible eradication of micrometastases. Several controlled clinical studies could show that these principles can indeed augment the rate of curative (R0) resections and can reduce the likelihood of systemic recurrences. As a consequence overall survival is improved by neoadjuvant therapy. This article summarizes how the basic principles of neoadjuvant therapy translate into clinical practice and gives a review of current developmental perspectives in this field.

Preoperative treatment and surgery in gastric cancer: friends or foes?

Until 2006, most reports of preoperative (neoadjuvant) treatments for gastric carcinoma were inconclusive and produced confusing results due to inhomogeneous treatment regimens, selection of patients, and response assessment. Since publication of the results from the MAGIC trial, substantial scientific evidence has suggested the benefits of perioperative (preoperative and postoperative) chemotherapy to locally advanced gastric cancer. To date, this phase III trial, coupled with preliminary data from other published reports on neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, supports the theoretical advantages of preoperative treatment for gastric carcinoma, thus introducing the concept of delayed surgery. Neoadjuvant treatment of resectable, locally advanced tumours might improve patients' outcomes and postpone the need for curative resection, but it also exposes patients to the risk of tumour progression.

Evaluation of lymph node metastases in gastric cancer using magnetic resonance imaging with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO): diagnostic performance in post-contrast images using new diagnostic criteria

BACKGROUND

We assessed the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) with new diagnostic criteria, in the evaluation of regional lymph node metastases in gastric cancer.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with gastric cancer were enrolled. 1000 lymph nodes were dissected during surgery, and of these, 519 nodes (51.9%) were identified by currently used MRI imaging analysis. We evaluated lymph nodes on USPIO-post-contrast T2*-weighted images using the following two criteria: (1) we diagnosed the nodes on T2*-weighted images according to conventional criteria, where a node having an overall low signal intensity (pattern A) was nonmetastatic, while a node having partial (pattern B) or overall (pattern C) high signal intensity was metastatic; (2) we subdivided pattern B nodes on T1-weighted images using the new criteria, in which a node for which the high-intensity area on T2*-weighted images was not defined as adipose tissue on T1-weighted images (pattern B1) was metastatic, while a node for which the high-intensity area was defined as adipose tissue (pattern B2) was nonmetastatic.

RESULTS

(1) The results using the conventional criteria were 96.2% sensitivity, 92.5% specificity, 76.3% positive predictive value (PPV), 99.0% negative predictive value (NPV), and 93.3% accuracy. (2) The results using the new criteria were 96.2% sensitivity, 98.3% specificity, 90.1% PPV, 99.0% NPV, and 97.1% accuracy.

CONCLUSION

The assessment of lymph node metastases from USPIO-post-contrast MRI alone using the new criteria was useful in the diagnosis of regional lymph node metastases in gastric cancer.

Endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography in restaging and predicting prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The objective of the current study was to assess the staging accuracy and prognostic role of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Presurgical LAGC patients underwent EUS and CT before and after 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was comprised of docetaxel (at a dose of 36 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (at a dose of 40 mg/m(2)) on Days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled in the study. After chemotherapy, the accuracy of EUS and CT was found to be 47% and 57%, respectively for T classification (P = .22) and 39% and 37%, respectively for N classification (P > .99). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate for patients downstaged with EUS for T and/or N classification was greater than that for nondownstaged patients (69% vs 41%; P = .05). The 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was also better for the EUS-downstaged patients than for the nondownstaged patients (77% vs 47%; P = .04). On multivariate analysis, EUS downstaging was found to be correlated with OS (hazards ratio [HR] of 0.12; P = .04), and was correlated with RFS with borderline statistical significance (HR of 0.27; P = .07). The differences in OS and RFS between the patients downstaged with CT and those not downstaged were not found to be statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Restaging by EUS and CT after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with LAGC was found to be inaccurate. However, T and/or N downstaging by EUS was found to be correlated with better OS and RFS. Thus, downstaging by EUS may be a useful clinical parameter with which to predict a better outcome for LAGC patients.

Glutathione-S-transferase P1, T1 and M1 genetic polymorphisms in neoadjuvant-treated locally advanced gastric cancer: GSTM1-present genotype is associated with better prognosis in completely resected patients

OBJECTIVE

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer is now standard in the Western world; however, only 30-40% of the patients respond to induction therapy. Pretherapeutic predictors of response and prognosis would be of utmost interest to individualize treatment. Glutathione-S-transferase enzymes detoxify therapeutic drugs such as platin derivates and may influence outcome of the treated patients. Therefore, glutathione-S-transferase (GST) polymorphisms were assessed as predictive markers in cisplatinum-based neoadjuvant-treated gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

DNA was isolated from 139 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (cT3/4 anyN cM0) before chemotherapy. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction was used for GSTT1 and GSTM1 genes, and allelic discrimination assay with the TaqMan system for the GSTP1 gene.

RESULTS

One hundred ten patients could be analyzed for GSTT1 (T-:23; T+87), 112 for GSTM1 (M-:52; M+:60) and 132 for GSTP1 (Ile/Ile: 55; Ile/Val: 59; Val/Val: 18). There was no significant correlation between any of the GSTT1, GSTM1, or GSTP1 genotypes and patients' characteristics or histopathological data; only the GSTM1+ genotype was associated with the non-intestinal subtype of the Lauren classification (p=0.045). GSTT1, GSTM1, and GSTP1 genotypes were not correlated with response to chemotherapy (p=0.57, p=0.38, p=0.33). In R0 resected patients, we found an improved survival for patients with the GSTM1-present genotype compared to patients with the GSTM1-null genotype (p=0.017). Moreover, the GSTM1-present genotype showed a significantly better tumor-related (p=0.017) and disease-free survival (p=0.029).

CONCLUSION

None of the common GST polymorphisms predicts response in our study, but the GSTM1+ genotype was associated with a better prognosis in completely resected patients. Further investigations on chemotherapy-associated gene polymorphisms are warranted.

The new credo: induction chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer: consequences for surgical strategies

Perioperative chemotherapy in stage II and stage III gastric cancer is now accepted as a standard of care in the Western world. Two randomized phase III studies have shown improved survival for patients with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone. It is generally accepted that patients who respond to induction therapy have a significantly improved survival compared with that in nonresponding patients. Unfortunately no prospectively tested markers predicting response and/or prognosis are available for clinical practice. In adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) prospectively was established as a surrogate predicting response and prognosis. The MUNICON (Metabolic response evalUatioN for Individualisation of neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in oesOphageal and oesophagogastric adeNocarcinoma) I study confirmed prospectively the usefulness of early metabolic response evaluation and showed the feasibility of a PET-guided treatment algorithm. These findings are an important step forward in the tailoring of multimodal treatment in accordance with tumor biology. In gastric cancer, we have analyzed FDG-PET in a prospective study. In gastric cancer the issue is more complicated, because about 30% of gastric cancers cannot be visualized with sufficient contrast for quantification. Insufficient FDG uptake is mostly associated with diffuse-type gastric cancer with signet ring cells and mucinous content. In FDG-avid patients, FDG-PET can be used for response evaluation, comparable to that in AEG. The prognosis of FDG-nonavid patients is similar to that in metabolic nonresponders. The addition of new tracers such as fluorothymidine may increase the sensitivity of PET in the future. Treatment concepts such as immediate resection after only 2 weeks of induction therapy with or without adjuvant treatment could be considered in metabolic nonresponders, or modified chemotherapy regimens, possibly including biologically targeted drugs, could be considered in those with FDG-nonavid tumors.

7-Year survival results of perioperative chemotherapy with epidoxorubicin, etoposide, and cisplatin (EEP) in locally advanced resectable gastric cancer: up-to-date analysis of a phase-II study

BACKGROUND

Perioperative chemotherapy is considered an effective treatment option for patients with gastric carcinoma. We report the results after a 7-year follow-up of a study aimed at evaluating a perioperative chemotherapy protocol in a group of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).

METHODS

Between February 1996 and May 2000, 24 patients with LAGC underwent D2-gastrectomy after three preoperative cycles of chemotherapy (Epidoxorubicin, Etoposide, Cisplatinum). Three further cycles were planned after surgery. Differences among groups were evaluated using the chi-square test. Survival rate was calculated after a 7-year follow-up, and differences were assessed using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients received preoperative chemotherapy and underwent surgical resection. Of these, 17 (71%) received postoperative treatment. The main toxicity was grade 3-4 neutropenia. Curative resection (R0) was achieved in 83.3% of patients. No pathologic complete responses were documented, but tumor downstaging was obtained in 10 of 24 patients (41.7%). Overall median survival was 40 months, and 7-year survival rate was 46%. At univariate and multivariate analysis, R0 resection and tumor diameter were the most important prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

Long-term results in our series show a survival benefit for LAGC patients treated by perioperative chemotherapy and D2-gastrectomy when compared with previously studied controls who had surgery with postoperative chemotherapy alone. The high rate and prognostic impact of R0 resection in this study stressed the role of the therapy during the preoperative phase.

S-1 monotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer

S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine, is an effective therapeutic agent for gastric cancer. Herein, we report a case with locally advanced gastric cancer that achieved a curative resection after S-1 monotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment. A 68-year-old man was diagnosed with gastric cancer and massive lymphadenopathy involving the perigastric, celiac axis and splenic hilum. His clinical stage was cT3N2H0P0M0. Considering his relatively poor performance (ECOG 2, severe weight loss) and advanced age, we started the patient on S-1 monotherapy at a dose of 35 mg/m2 bid for 4 consecutive weeks followed by a 2-week rest. Follow-up study after 4 treatment cycles revealed disappearance of the lymphadenopathy of the perigastric and celiac axis with diminished extension of the stomach mass. The patient had a partial response (PR) with a 72% tumor reduction, according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). His performance status was improved to an ECOG 1 and he gained 7 kg. A curative (R0) resection was achieved with a radical total gastrectomy and D2 dissection. The pathological stage was pT3N2M0, stage IIIB. In conclusion, S-1 neoadjuvant chemotherapy aided in the treatment of gastric cancer in this patient.

Pathological complete response following docetaxel-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma

Locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma has a poor outcome. Neoadjuvant treatment is being tested in locally advanced non-resectable tumours and in those resectable tumours with a high risk of recurrence. Efforts to identify prognostic factors and more active and less toxic preoperative regimens are being searched for. We report the case of a patient achieving a complete histopathological complete response following docetaxel- based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

[MSCT for staging and response evaluation of esophageal cancer]

Squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas account for the majority of cases of esophageal cancer. Esophageal cancer often is diagnosed in advanced stages as clinical symptoms are lacking in early stages. The major aims of imaging in esophageal cancer are to determine local tumor extension (T and N staging), to rule out systemic disease (M staging), and to assess response to neoadjuvant therapy (response evaluation). CT is still inferior to endoscopic ultrasound in differentiating T stages and detecting regional lymph node metastases. However, it plays a central role in determining infiltration into adjacent organs (T4 stage) and in ruling out distant metastases. Multislice-CT (MSCT) offers the possibility of reconstructions, which often help to assess the relationship between tumor and anatomic landmarks like the tracheobronchial tree or the diaphragm. First results of CT volumetry for response evaluation are promising; however, PET and PET/CT with the glucose analogue FDG are the standard methods to evaluate response to neoadjuvant therapy.

Response-Vorhersage – frühe Response-Evaluation

Response to perioperative chemotherapy or chemoradiation can hardly be predicted on the basis of molecular marker analyses. In contrast, by means of metabolic and molecular imaging using positron emission tomography, response can be assessed as early as 14 days after the start chemotherapy for many tumors. There is no doubt that the prognosis of patients with surgically resected tumors is much better in the case of a response to chemotherapy or chemoradiation. Important consequences can be deduced from this regarding the indications for perioperative therapies, the radicality of surgery or the surgical indications per se. In the following, we delineate the current knowledge on response prediction and early response evaluation in selected tumor entities and draw possible conclusions for clinical practice and future clinical studies.

Retrospective analysis of 45 consecutive patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy using an S-1/CDDP combination

BACKGROUND

Standard treatment for highly advanced gastric cancer (AGC) has not been established yet. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) represents a promising approach, which may improve the prognosis of AGC. In this study, we analyzed the feasibility and efficacy of NAC with S-1 (TS-1)/cisplatin CDDP in order to design appropriate clinical trials for AGC.

METHODS

Results for a series of 45 consecutive patients with AGC treated with S-1/CDDP induction chemotherapy since January 2002 were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The primary tumor was resected in 36 of the 45 patients (resectability, 80.0%). Progression of the disease during chemotherapy was observed in 1 patient only (2.2%). No treatment-related deaths occurred, and serious adverse effects (grade 3-4) were noted in only 2.2% of the patients. The overall median survival time was 1.82 years. Especially noteworthy is that, in patients with highly advanced disease (pretreatment [c]-stage IV; n = 27), resectability was 66.7% and curative (R0) resection was possible in 10 patients. The median survival times for c-stage IV patients who had total, curative, and noncurative resections were 20.8, 22.3 and 12.6 months, respectively. R0 resection was possible for all c-stage III patients (n = 17), with a 2-year overall survival of 90.9%. The downstaging rate was 55.6% (20/36), resulting in a significantly improved prognosis for the downstaged patients (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Induction chemotherapy using S-1/CDDP for AGC appears to be a safe and promising treatment. We have therefore started two independent multiinstitutional clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of this treatment.

Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and effects of tumor regression in gastric cancer

AIMS

Aim of this study is the evaluation of the effects induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and its impact on survival on a series of locally advanced gastric carcinomas.

METHODS

Downstaging was assessed comparing pre-treatment clinical and laparoscopic staging with post-operative pathologic staging on 30 consecutive patients who completed a 3-year follow-up. Tumor downstaging and the grade of pathologic response were included in a statistical correlation between tumor regression induced by NACT and 3-year survival.

RESULTS

In this series tumor downstaging was obtained in 13 out of 30 patients. After the completion of 3-year follow-up, overall survival was >37.5months with an overall survival rate of 56.7%; this figure reached up to 70.8% in those cases who benefited from a R0-resection (24/30 patients: R0-resection rate 80.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study the 3-year survival for locally advanced gastric cancer treated by NACT prior to "D2" surgical resection, compares favourably with historical series treated by surgery alone. Patients who obtained T-downstaging and subsequently benefited from a R0-resection had a definitely better chance of cure, according to a complete 3-year follow-up.

Adenocarcinomas of Esophagogastric Junction: Multi–Detector Row CT to Evaluate Early Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in the assessment of early response during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Thirty-one patients with an AEG (stage T3 N0/1 M0 or T4 N0/1 M0) were examined with multi-detector row CT before and 2 weeks after the initiation of chemotherapy. There were seven women and 24 men with a mean age of 62 years +/- 8.1 (standard deviation). The maximal transverse tumor diameter was measured and tumor volumetry was performed by three independent readers. The resulting changes were correlated with the histopathologic grade of regression in 21 patients. The differentiation of responders from nonresponders was assessed with receiver operating characteristic analysis in these 21 patients. Interobserver variability was determined in all 31 patients with the Spearman rank correlation. Survival without disease progression was estimated in all patients according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical comparisons between different groups of patients were performed with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The interobserver variability for the diameter measurements (R = 0.13-0.20) was higher than that for the volumetric measurements (R = 0.70-0.82). The correlation of histopathologic grades of regression with changes in diameter was not statistically significant for the three readers, whereas the correlation of volume changes with histopathologic grades of regression was statistically significant for two of the three readers (P = .01, .05, and .08). Results of receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed an optimal cutoff level for tumor volumetry at a reduction of volume of 14.8%, which resulted in a sensitivity of 100% (six of six patients) and a specificity of 53% (eight of 15 patients). Although the probability of progression was higher in the nonresponder group than in the responder group (61% vs 40%, respectively), the differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Tumor volumetry based on multi-detector row CT can help predict early response to treatment 2 weeks after the initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with AEG; however, the classic approach of tumor diameter measurement failed to show significant correlation with histopathologic tumor regression.

Thethymidylate synthase tandem repeat promoter polymorphism: A predictor for tumor-related survival in neoadjuvant treated locally advanced gastric cancer

We evaluated DNA polymorphisms in the thymidylate synthase (TS) and 5,10-methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) genes for an association with response and survival in locally advanced gastric cancer treated with 5-FU based preoperative chemotherapy (CTx). DNA of 238 patients (CTx-group: total n = 135, completely resected (R0) n = 102; without CTx: R0 n = 103) was isolated from blood or from nontumorous tissues. In the CTx-group, genotyping of the tandem repeat and the G/C polymorphism in the triple repeat in the promoter region of the TS gene and of the C677T polymorphism of the MTHFR gene was performed. None of the TS or MTHFR genotypes were associated with histopathological response and only the TS tandem repeat polymorphism was significantly related to survival (all patients n = 135, p = 0.002; R0 resected patients n = 102, p = 0.007; log-rank test). Multivariate analysis revealed ypN (p < 0.001) and the TS tandem repeat polymorphism as independent prognostic factors in the CTx-R0-group (p = 0.003). Analyzing the prognostic significance of the TS polymorphisms in the R0-group without CTx, TS genotypes were not significantly associated with survival. Comparing survival between R0 patients with and without CTx in the respective TS genotype groups of the tandem repeat polymorphism, a significant survival benefit for the patients with CTx was found for the 2rpt/2rpt (n = 49; p = 0.002) and 2rpt/3rpt genotypes (n = 99; p = 0.004), but not for the 3rpt/3rpt genotype (n = 57; p = 0.93). Patients' survival after CTx was associated with the TS tandem repeat polymorphism. CTx did not improve survival of patients with the 3rpt/3rpt genotype. Thus, a different therapy might be more appropriate for these patients.

High curative resection rate with weekly cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin, 6S-leucovorin, glutathione, and filgastrim in patients with locally advanced, unresectable gastric cancer: a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD)

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of a weekly preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced, unresectable gastric cancer. In all, 82 patients with an Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group PS <or=2 and normal cardiac function were enrolled onto the study. Surgical unresectability was confirmed in 52 patients (63%) at laparotomy, and in 30 (27%) cases by CT scan of the abdomen and endoscopic ultrasonography. Chemotherapy treatment was: cisplatin 40 mg x m(-2); 5-fluorouracil 500 mg x m(-2); epidoxorubicin 35 mg x m(-2); 6S-leucovorin 250 mg x m(-2) and glutathione 1.5 g x m(-2) (PELF). One cycle consisted of 8 weekly treatments. Response to chemotherapy was observed in 40 of 82 patients (49%): six (7%) complete and 34 (41%) partial responses, and in four (5%) cases a complete pathological response was confirmed. Of the 40 responding patients, 37 (45%) had potentially curative surgery. Grade 3/4 leucopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in three and two patients. At a median follow-up of 48 months, 25 of the 37 resected patients (68%) were alive and 24 (65%) were disease free. The median and 4-year survival for the whole group was 17 months and 31%, respectively. The median survival was 12 months for inoperable patients and it was not reached in resected patients.

Neoadjuvant therapy for oesophagogastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognosis after surgery for oesophagogastric cancer remains poor.

METHODS

This review clarifies current indications for neoadjuvant therapy for oesophageal and gastric cancer. A systematic literature research and evaluation of data from international cancer meetings were carried out.

RESULTS

Recently published results of large randomized phase III trials underscore the potential value of neoadjuvant treatment for oesophagogastric cancer. However, it remains uncertain which subgroups of patients should routinely undergo preoperative therapy. Metabolic response evaluation during neoadjuvant treatment is a promising tool for the selection of responding patients.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a valid option for locally advanced oesophageal and gastric cancer. In the future, more effective and better tolerated treatment strategies, tailored to the specific tumour characteristics of each individual, should be possible.