1
|
Van der Speeten K, Kusamura S, Villeneuve L, Piso P, Verwaal VJ, González-Moreno S, Glehen O. The 2022 PSOGI International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: HIPEC Technologies. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15513-4. [PMID: 39037523 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15513-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
This manuscript reports the results of an international consensus on technologies of hyperthermic intraperitoneal perioperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) performed with the following goals: To provide recommendations for the technological parameters to perform HIPEC. To identify the role of heat and its application forms in treating peritoneal metastases. To provide recommendations regarding the correct dosimetry of intraperitoneal chemotherapy drugs and their carrier solutions. To identify for each intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen the best dosimetry and fractionation. To identify areas of future research pertaining to HIPEC technology and regimens. This consensus was performed by the Delphi technique and comprised two rounds of voting. In total, 96 of 102 eligible panelists replied to both Delphi rounds (94.1%) with a consensus of 39/51 questions on HIPEC technical aspects. Among the recommendations that met with the strongest consensus were those concerning the dose of HIPEC drug established in mg/m2, a target temperature of at least 42°C, and the use of at least three temperature probes to pursue hyperthermia. Ninety minutes as the ideal HIPEC duration seemed to make consensus. These results should be considered when designing new clinical trials in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt Van der Speeten
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
- Faculty of Life Sciences, BIOMED Research Institute, University Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
| | - Shigeki Kusamura
- Department of Surgical Oncology, PSM unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Laurent Villeneuve
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France
| | - Pompiliu Piso
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Vic J Verwaal
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancy and HIPEC Institute for Regional Sundhedforskning, Syddansk University, Odense, Sweden
| | | | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tozzi F, Matthys R, Molnar A, Ceelen W, Vankerschaver J, Rashidian N, Willaert W. Assessment of Intraoperative Scoring Systems for Predicting Cytoreduction Outcome in Peritoneal Metastatic Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15629-7. [PMID: 38918326 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15629-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is a widely acknowledged treatment approach for peritoneal metastasis, showing favorable prognosis and long-term survival. Intraoperative scoring systems quantify tumoral burden before CRS and may predict complete cytoreduction (CC). This study reviews the intraoperative scoring systems for predicting CC and optimal cytoreduction (OC) and evaluates the predictive performance of the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and Predictive Index Value (PIV). METHODS Systematic searches were conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science. Meta-analyses of extracted data were performed to compare the absolute predictive performances of PCI and PIV. RESULTS Thirty-eight studies (5834 patients) focusing on gynecological (n = 34; 89.5%), gastrointestinal (n = 2; 5.3%) malignancies, and on tumors of various origins (n = 2; 5.3%) were identified. Seventy-seven models assessing the predictive performance of scoring systems (54 for CC and 23 for OC) were identified with PCI (n = 39/77) and PIV (n = 16/77) being the most common. Twenty models (26.0%) reinterpreted previous scoring systems of which ten (13%) used a modified version of PIV (reclassification). Meta-analyses of models predicting CC based on PCI (n = 21) and PIV (n = 8) provided an AUC estimate of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.86; Q = 119.6, p = 0.0001; I2 = 74.1%) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.81; Q = 7.2, p = 0.41; I2 = 11.0%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Peritoneal Cancer Index models demonstrate an excellent estimate of CC, while PIV shows an acceptable performance. There is a need for high-quality studies to address management differences, establish standardized cutoff values, and focus on non-gynecological malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Tozzi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Rania Matthys
- Department of General, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Adris Molnar
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Wim Ceelen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joris Vankerschaver
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Informatics and Statistics, Center for Biosystems and Biotech Data Science, Ghent University Global Campus, Incheon, Korea
| | - Niki Rashidian
- Department of General, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Wouter Willaert
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shah R, Gangi A. Role of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Management of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2024; 37:90-95. [PMID: 38322605 PMCID: PMC10843886 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Peritoneal metastases from colon cancer are a particularly challenging disease process given the limited response to systemic chemotherapy. In patients with isolated peritoneal metastases, cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy offers a potential treatment option to these patients with limited peritoneal metastases as long as a complete cytoreduction is achieved. Decision about a patient's candidacy for this treatment modality should be undertaken by a multidisciplinary group at expert centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupen Shah
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute/Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Alexandra Gangi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ezanno AC, Chkair S, Quesada JL, Abba J, Malgras B, Trilling B, Sage PY, Bouvet S, Foote A, Aime A, Glehen O, Pocard M, Arvieux C, Tidadini F. Oncological outcomes and hospitalization cost of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) open and closed abdomen techniques: Results from two French expert centers. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:107931. [PMID: 38181533 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) associated with CC0 excision is performed using either an open (OPEN_HIPEC) or closed abdominal technique (CLOSED_HIPEC). However, little data is available on the costs of this treatment, as there is no code for HIPEC in the French Classification of Medical Acts. Oncological outcomes and the mean cost of hospitalization were compared. METHODS Between 2017 and 2021, 144 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (all etiologies) were included (OPEN_HIPEC, n = 70; CLOSED_HIPEC, n = 74) in this retrospective two-center study. Morbi-mortality, overall survival (OS), recurrence-free-survival (RFS) and mean cost of hospitalization were compared. RESULTS The median OS and RFS were 71.3 months [63-71.5] and 26.8 months [20-35.3] respectively, and were similar for both techniques; and after stratification by histology. Multivariate analysis adjusted on PCI score of OS identified mitomycin as a protective factor (HR = 0.31 [0.10-0.90], p = 0.032) and ASA score>2 (HR = 2.32 [1.32- 4.06], p = 0.003) and number of resection (HR = 1.21 [1.06-1.39], p = 0.006) as a risk factors of RFS. Complication rates at day 30 were similar between OPEN and CLOSED_HIPEC, 31 (44.3 %) vs 42 (56.8 %); p = 0.135. OPEN_HIPEC had more severe complications (11 (35.5 %) vs 6 (14.3 %); p = 0.034). The mean cost of hospitalization was estimated as €15,627 for OPEN_HIPEC and €14,211 for CLOSED_HIPEC for a mean length-of-stay of 12.7 and 16.7 days respectively. The mean amount received by the hospital per hospitalization was estimated at €16,399 and €15,536 respectively. CONCLUSIONS OS and RFS were similar for open and closed HIPEC. Severe complications at day 30 were more frequent in OPEN_HIPEC group. The amount received by hospital for both HIPEC techniques is sufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Cécile Ezanno
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France.
| | - Sihame Chkair
- Department of Biostatistics, Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health and Innovation in Methodology (BESPIM), CHU Nîmes, Univ Montpellier, Nîmes, France; IDESP, UMR-INSERM, Montpellier, France
| | - Jean-Louis Quesada
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit, INSERM CIC1406, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Julio Abba
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Brice Malgras
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France; French Military Health Service Academy, Ecole du Val de Grâce, Paris, France
| | - Bertrand Trilling
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Department of digestive Surgery, Grenoble INP, TIMC, 38000, Grenoble, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Sage
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Sophie Bouvet
- Department of Biostatistics, Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health and Innovation in Methodology (BESPIM), CHU Nîmes, Univ Montpellier, Nîmes, France
| | - Alison Foote
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Adeline Aime
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Lyon Center for Innovation in Cancer, EA 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Marc Pocard
- Department of Digestive Surgery, La Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France, INSERM, U965 CART Unit, Paris, France
| | - Catherine Arvieux
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France; Lyon Center for Innovation in Cancer, EA 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Fatah Tidadini
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France; Lyon Center for Innovation in Cancer, EA 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yokoi R, Tajima JY, Fukada M, Hayashi H, Kuno M, Asai R, Sato Y, Yasufuku I, Kiyama S, Tanaka Y, Murase K, Matsuhashi N. Optimizing Treatment Strategy for Oligometastases/Oligo-Recurrence of Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:142. [PMID: 38201569 PMCID: PMC10777959 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 12/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer, and nearly half of CRC patients experience metastases. Oligometastatic CRC represents a distinct clinical state characterized by limited metastatic involvement, demonstrating a less aggressive nature and potentially improved survival with multidisciplinary treatment. However, the varied clinical scenarios giving rise to oligometastases necessitate a precise definition, considering primary tumor status and oncological factors, to optimize treatment strategies. This review delineates the concepts of oligometastatic CRC, encompassing oligo-recurrence, where the primary tumor is under control, resulting in a more favorable prognosis. A comprehensive examination of multidisciplinary treatment with local treatments and systemic therapy is provided. The overarching objective in managing oligometastatic CRC is the complete eradication of metastases, offering prospects of a cure. Essential to this management approach are local treatments, with surgical resection serving as the standard of care. Percutaneous ablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy present less invasive alternatives for lesions unsuitable for surgery, demonstrating efficacy in select cases. Perioperative systemic therapy, aiming to control micrometastatic disease and enhance local treatment effectiveness, has shown improvements in progression-free survival through clinical trials. However, the extension of overall survival remains variable. The review emphasizes the need for further prospective trials to establish a cohesive definition and an optimized treatment strategy for oligometastatic CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Nobuhisa Matsuhashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery and Pediatric Surgery, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City 501-1194, Gifu, Japan; (R.Y.); (K.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Grávalos C, Pereira F, Vera R, Arjona-Sánchez A, Losa F, Ramos I, García-Alfonso P, Gonzalez-Bayón L, Cascales-Campos PA, Aranda E. Recommendations for the optimal management of peritoneal metastases in patients with colorectal cancer: a TTD and GECOP-SEOQ expert consensus statement. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:3378-3394. [PMID: 37140736 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03204-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Peritoneal metastases (PM) occur when cancer cells spread inside the abdominal cavity and entail an advanced stage of colorectal cancer (CRC). Prognosis, which is poor, correlates highly with tumour burden, as measured by the peritoneal cancer index (PCI). Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in specialized centres should be offered especially to patients with a low to moderate PCI when complete resection is expected. The presence of resectable metastatic disease in other organs is not a contraindication in well-selected patients. Although several retrospective and small prospective studies have suggested a survival benefit of adding hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to CRS, the recently published phase III studies PRODIGE-7 in CRC patients with PM, and COLOPEC and PROPHYLOCHIP in resected CRC with high-risk of PM, failed to show any survival advantage of this strategy using oxaliplatin in a 30-min perfusion. Final results from ongoing randomized phase III trials testing CRS plus HIPEC based on mitomycin C (MMC) are awaited with interest. In this article, a group of experts selected by the Spanish Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours (TTD) and the Spanish Group of Peritoneal Oncologic Surgery (GECOP), which is part of the Spanish Society of Surgical Oncology (SEOQ), reviewed the role of HIPEC plus CRS in CRC patients with PM. As a result, a series of recommendations to optimize the management of these patients is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Grávalos
- Medical Oncology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Pereira
- Departamento de Cirugía, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Camino del Molino, 2, 28942, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Ruth Vera
- Medical Oncology Department, Navarra University Hospital, Navarra's Health Research Institute (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Alvaro Arjona-Sánchez
- Unit of Surgical Oncology and GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncology Surgery, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
| | - Ferran Losa
- Medical Oncology Department, Sant Joan Despí - Moisés Broggi Hospital/ICO-Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabel Ramos
- Surgery Department, Sant Joan Despí - Moisés Broggi Hospital, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Pilar García-Alfonso
- Medical Oncology Department, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Gonzalez-Bayón
- Surgery Department, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Enrique Aranda
- Medical Oncology Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba University, Center for Biomedical Research in Cancer Network (CIBERONC), Carlos III Health Institute, Córdoba, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vietti Violi N, Gavane S, Argiriadi P, Law A, Heiba S, Bekhor EY, Babb JS, Ghesani M, Labow DM, Taouli B. FDG-PET/MRI for the preoperative diagnosis and staging of peritoneal carcinomatosis: a prospective multireader pilot study. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:3634-3642. [PMID: 36308554 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03703-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/MRI for the preoperative diagnosis and staging of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) using surgical Sugarbaker's PC index (PCI) as the reference in a multireader pilot study. METHODS Fourteen adult patients (M/F: 3/11, mean age: 57 ± 12 year) with PC were prospectively included in this single-center study. Patients underwent FDG-PET/MRI prior to surgery (mean delay: 14 d, range: 1-63 d). Images were reviewed independently by 2 abdominal radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine physicians. The radiologists assessed contrast-enhanced abdominal MR images, while the nuclear medicine physicians assessed PET images fused with T2-weighted images. The abdomen was divided in 13 regions, scored from 0 to 3. A hybrid FDG-PET/MRI radiological PCI was created by combining the study data. Radiological PCI was compared to the surgical PCI on a per-patient and per-region basis. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated. RESULTS Mean surgical PCI was 10 ± 8 (range: 0-24). Inter-reader agreement was almost perfect for all sets for radiologic PCI (Kappa: 0.81-0.98). PCI scores for all reading sets significantly correlated with the surgical PCI score (r range: 0.57-0.74, p range: < 0.001-0.003). Pooled per-patient sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 75%/50%/71.4% for MRI, 66.7%/50%/64.3% for FDG-PET, and 91.7%/50%/85.7% for FDG-PET/MRI, without significant difference (p value range 0.13-1). FDG-PET/MRI achieved 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for a cutoff PCI of 20. Per-region sensitivity and accuracy were lower: 37%/61.8% for MRI, 17.8%/64.3% for FDG-PET, and 52.7%/60.4% for FDG-PET/MRI, with significantly higher sensitivity for FDG-PET/MRI. Per-region specificity was higher for FDG-PET (95%) compared to MRI (78.4%) and FDG-PET/MRI (66.5%). CONCLUSION FDG-PET/MRI achieved an excellent diagnostic accuracy per-patient and weaker performance per-region for detection of PC. The added value of PET/MRI compared to MRI and FDG-PET remains to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naik Vietti Violi
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai, 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10029, USA
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Somali Gavane
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pamela Argiriadi
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amy Law
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sherif Heiba
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eliahu Y Bekhor
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - James S Babb
- Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Munir Ghesani
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel M Labow
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bachir Taouli
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai, 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Soriano Hervás M, Robles-Hernández D, Serra A, Játiva-Porcar R, Gómez Quiles L, Maiocchi K, Llorca S, Climent MT, Llueca A. Analysis of Intraoperative Variables Responsible for the Increase in Lactic Acid in Patients Undergoing Debulking Surgery. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1540. [PMID: 38003855 PMCID: PMC10672096 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13111540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is a complex procedure with a high incidence of perioperative complications. Elevated lactacidaemia levels have been associated with complications and perioperative morbidity and mortality. This study aims to analyse the intraoperative variables of patients undergoing CRS and their relationship with lactacidaemia levels. Methods: This retrospective, observational study included 51 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis who underwent CRS between 2014 and 2016 at the Abdomino-Pelvic Oncological Surgery Reference Unit (URCOAP) of the General University Hospital of Castellón (HGUCS). The main variable of interest was the level of lactic acid at the end of surgery. Intraoperative variables, including preoperative haemoglobin, duration of surgery, intraoperative bleeding, fluid therapy administered, administration of blood products, and intraoperative peritoneal cancer index (PCI), were analysed. Results: Positive correlations were found between lactic acid levels and PCI, duration of intervention, fluid therapy, intraoperative bleeding, and transfusion of blood products. Additionally, a negative correlation was observed between haemoglobin levels and lactic acid levels. Notably, the strongest correlations were found with operative PCI (ρ = 0.532; p-value < 0.001) and duration of surgery (ρ = 0.518; p-value < 0.001). Conclusions: PCI and duration of surgery are decisive variables in determining the prognosis of patients undergoing debulking surgery. This study suggests that, for each minute of surgery, lactic acid levels increase by 0.005 mmol/L, and for each unit increase in PCI, lactic acid levels increase by 0.060 mmol/L.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Soriano Hervás
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University General Hospital of Castellon, 12004 Castellon, Spain;
- MUAPOS (Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdomino-Pelvic Oncology Surgery), University General Hospital of Castellon, 12004 Castellon, Spain; (A.S.)
| | - Daniel Robles-Hernández
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University La Plana Hospital, Road from Vila-Real to Burriana, km 0.5, 12540 Castellón, Spain
| | - Anna Serra
- MUAPOS (Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdomino-Pelvic Oncology Surgery), University General Hospital of Castellon, 12004 Castellon, Spain; (A.S.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University General Hospital of Castellon, 12004 Castellon, Spain
| | - Rosa Játiva-Porcar
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University General Hospital of Castellon, 12004 Castellon, Spain;
- MUAPOS (Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdomino-Pelvic Oncology Surgery), University General Hospital of Castellon, 12004 Castellon, Spain; (A.S.)
| | - Luis Gómez Quiles
- MUAPOS (Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdomino-Pelvic Oncology Surgery), University General Hospital of Castellon, 12004 Castellon, Spain; (A.S.)
- Department of General Surgery, University General Hospital of Castellon, 12004 Castellon, Spain
| | - Karina Maiocchi
- MUAPOS (Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdomino-Pelvic Oncology Surgery), University General Hospital of Castellon, 12004 Castellon, Spain; (A.S.)
- Department of General Surgery, University General Hospital of Castellon, 12004 Castellon, Spain
| | - Sara Llorca
- MUAPOS (Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdomino-Pelvic Oncology Surgery), University General Hospital of Castellon, 12004 Castellon, Spain; (A.S.)
- Department of General Surgery, University General Hospital of Castellon, 12004 Castellon, Spain
| | - María Teresa Climent
- MUAPOS (Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdomino-Pelvic Oncology Surgery), University General Hospital of Castellon, 12004 Castellon, Spain; (A.S.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University General Hospital of Castellon, 12004 Castellon, Spain
| | - Antoni Llueca
- MUAPOS (Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdomino-Pelvic Oncology Surgery), University General Hospital of Castellon, 12004 Castellon, Spain; (A.S.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University General Hospital of Castellon, 12004 Castellon, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fugazzola P, Moroni A, Agnoletti V, Catena F, Cobianchi L, Corallo S, Dal Mas F, Frassini S, Maestri M, Magnone S, Pagani A, Pedrazzoli P, Rigamonti A, Santandrea G, Tomasoni M, Vallicelli C, Viganò J, Ansaloni L. Should we exclude patients with peritoneal carcinosis of colorectal origin and high PCI from CRS + HIPEC? Updates Surg 2023; 75:1819-1825. [PMID: 37423956 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01579-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
International guidelines exclude from surgery patients with peritoneal carcinosis of colorectal origin and a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) ≥ 16. This study aims to analyze the outcomes of patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinosis and PCI greater or equal to 16 treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) (CRS + HIPEC). We retrospectively performed a multicenter observational study involving three Italian institutions, namely the IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo in Pavia, the M. Bufalini Hospital in Cesena, and the ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital in Bergamo. The study included all patients undergoing CRS + HIPEC for peritoneal carcinosis from colorectal origin from November 2011 to June 2022. The study included 71 patients: 56 with PCI < 16 and 15 with PCI ≥ 16. Patients with higher PCI had longer operative times and a statistically significant higher rate of not complete cytoreduction, with a Completeness of Cytoreduction score (CC) 1 (microscopical disease) of 30.8% (p = 0.004). The 2-year OS was 81% for PCI < 16 and 37% for PCI ≥ 16 (p < 0.001). The 2-years DFS was 29% for PCI < 16 and 0% for PCI ≥ 16 (p < 0.001). The 2-year peritoneal DFS for patients with PCI < 16 was 48%, and for patients with PCI ≥ 16 was 57% (p = 0.783). CRS and HIPEC provide reasonable local disease control for patients with carcinosis of colorectal origin and PCI ≥ 16. Such results form the basis for new studies to reassess the exclusion of these patients, as set out in the current guidelines, from CRS and HIPEC. This therapy, combined with new therapeutical strategies, i.e., pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC), could offer reasonable local control of the disease, preventing local complications. As a result, it increases the patient's chances of receiving chemotherapy to improve the systemic control of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Fugazzola
- General Surgery I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
- Department of Clinical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Alessandro Brambilla, 74, 27100, Pavia, PV, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Moroni
- General Surgery I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- Intensive Care Unit, M. Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Cesena, Italy
| | - Fausto Catena
- General Surgery, M. Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Cesena, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Cobianchi
- General Surgery I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Alessandro Brambilla, 74, 27100, Pavia, PV, Italy
| | - Salvatore Corallo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca Dal Mas
- Department of Management, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy
| | - Simone Frassini
- General Surgery I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marcello Maestri
- General Surgery I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Stefano Magnone
- General Surgery, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Anna Pagani
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| | - Paolo Pedrazzoli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapy, University of Pavia, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| | - Andrea Rigamonti
- General Surgery, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Tomasoni
- General Surgery I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Carlo Vallicelli
- General Surgery, M. Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Cesena, Italy
| | - Jacopo Viganò
- General Surgery I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- General Surgery I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Alessandro Brambilla, 74, 27100, Pavia, PV, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aziret M, Eskiler G, Çakar GÇ, Ercan M, Bilir C, Polat E, Koçer HB, Yıldırım EK, Duman M, Özkan AD. Effect of the MiR-99b and MiR-135b on peritoneal carcinomatosis and liver metastasis in colorectal cancer. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2023; 78:100271. [PMID: 37639911 PMCID: PMC10470417 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to evaluate the expression levels of miR-99b and miR-135b in peritoneal carcinoma and liver metastases associated with Colorectal Cancer (CRC), assess their association with the intracellular signaling pathway proteins Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Virus (KRAS) and Akt, and investigate their effects on survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS Changes in the KRAS gene and Akt proteins, expression levels of miR-99b and miR-135b, and factors affecting survival were compared between colorectal cancer-associated peritoneal carcinomatosis and liver metastasis. RESULTS The expression levels of miR-99b and miR-135b and the immunohistochemical grade classification score of Akt were higher in colorectal cancer, peritoneal carcinomatosis, and liver metastasis than in normal tissues (p < 0.05). MiR-99b expression was highest in CRC, whereas miR-135b expression was highest in peritoneal carcinomatosis (p < 0.05). The expression level of miR-99b decreased and that of miR-135b increased in peritoneal and liver metastases compared with that in the tumor tissue. MiR-99b, Akt, and recurrence were risk factors that affected the overall survival rate in the model of clinical predictions (p = 0.045, p = 0.006, and p = 0.012, respectively). CONCLUSION While the expression of miR-99b was highest in the primary tumor, its decrease in liver metastasis and peritoneal carcinomatosis suggests that miR-99b has a protective effect against liver metastasis and peritoneal carcinomatosis. However, the detection of miR-135b expression was highest in peritoneal carcinomatosis and liver metastasis compared with that in the colorectal cancer tissues suggesting that it facilitates peritoneal carcinomatosis and liver metastasis. Furthermore, miR-99b, KRAS mutations, and Akt are risk factors for the overall survival of colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Aziret
- University of Health Science, Balıkesir City Training and Research Hospital, Balıkesir, Turkey.
| | - Gamze Eskiler
- Sakarya Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey
| | | | - Metin Ercan
- Sakarya Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey
| | | | - Erdal Polat
- University of Health Science, Kartal Kosuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | | | - Mustafa Duman
- University of Health Science, Kartal Kosuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ihemelandu C. The Landmark Series: Scoring Systems for Primary Peritoneal Surface Malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:1832-1837. [PMID: 36550329 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12941-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) represents an innovative approach to treat or prevent peritoneal metastasis. However, given the morbidity that can be associated with this procedure, adequate patient selection facilitated by scoring systems for primary peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) is paramount to ensure equitable morbidity as well as acceptable survival outcome. METHODS Seminal studies on scoring systems for PSM that have laid the foundation for adequate patient selection and prognostication are spotlighted. RESULTS Quantitative prognostic indicators have been defined for patients with PSM that enable the surgeon to make sound clinical judgements as to who may or may not benefit from CRS/HIPEC. These prognostic indicators include the histopathology of the tumor, findings on the preoperative abdominal and pelvic computerized axial tomography, the Peritoneal Cancer Index, completeness of cytoreduction score, and prior surgical score. CONCLUSIONS Scoring systems for primary peritoneal surface malignancy reviewed in this article highlight the utility of these systems for patient selection for CRS/HIPEC and prognostication.
Collapse
|
12
|
Sökmen S, Bişgin T, Manoğlu B, Altay C, Ellidokuz H. Extreme cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in treatment of peritoneal metastasis. Turk J Surg 2023; 39:43-51. [PMID: 37275926 PMCID: PMC10234707 DOI: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.5881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Objectives It was aimed to define the oncologic concept of "extremeness" in cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) to determine morbidity-mortality results and final oncologic outcomes. Material and Methods Prospectively recorded data of 666 patients with peritoneal metastases who had undergone CRS/HIPEC between 2007 and 2020 were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups as extreme (n= 371) and non-extreme (n= 295). Extreme CRS was defined as resection of ≥5 major organs or creation of ≥2 bowel anastomoses or peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI)≥ 15 or re-cytoreductive surgery. Results More CC-1 or CC-2 cytoreduction (p <.001), increased mortality and morbidity (p <.001), prolonged operative time (p <.001), increased intraoperative erythrocyte suspension (p <.001), albumin (p <.001), fresh frozen plasma (FFP) (p <.001), and post-operative erythrocyte suspension (p <.001) usage were found in the extreme CRS/HIPEC group. Operative time, CC-1 or CC-2 cytoreduction, presence of ostomy, development of infection, and use of intra-operative albumin and FFP were found to be independent prognostic factors in Cox regression analysis. Three and five-year survival rates were significantly lower in the extreme CRS/HIPEC group (p <.001). Conclusion High-volume peritoneal metastatic disease can be completely resected with extreme cytoreduction in carefully selected patients responsive to chemotherapy. Since the significant morbi-mortality related to the treatment of peritoneal metastasis is a real concern, it should be considered in experienced complex cancer centers that provides relatively better oncological outcomes compared to conventional treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selman Sökmen
- Department of General Surgery, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye
| | - Tayfun Bişgin
- Department of General Surgery, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye
| | - Berke Manoğlu
- Department of General Surgery, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye
| | - Canan Altay
- Department of Radiology, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye
| | - Hülya Ellidokuz
- Department of Biostatistics, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Beal EW, Srinivas S, Shen C, Kim A, Johnston FM, Greer J, Abbott DE, Pokrzywa C, Raoof M, Grotz TE, Leiting JL, Fournier K, Dineen S, Powers B, Veerapong J, Kothari A, Maduekew U, Maithel S, Wilson GC, Patel SH, Lambert L, Abdel-Misih S, Cloyd JM. Conditional Survival Following Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Surface Malignancies: An Analysis from the US HIPEC Collaborative. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:1840-1849. [PMID: 36310315 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12753-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The long-term prognosis of patients who undergo cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) varies considerably on the basis of histological and operative factors. While overall survival (OS) estimates are used to inform adjuvant therapy and surveillance strategies, conditional survival may provide more clinically relevant estimates of prognosis by accounting for disease-free time elapsed. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients from 12 academic institutions who underwent CRS ± HIPEC for PSM from 2000 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. OS and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method while conditional overall (COS) and conditional disease-free survival (CDFS) rates were calculated at 1, 2, or 3 years from surgery for different tumor histologies. RESULTS Overall, 1610 patients underwent CRS ± HIPEC. Among patients with benign appendiceal mucinous tumors (N = 460), 5-year OS and COS at 3 years were 92.1% and 96.3% (Δ4.2%), respectively. For patients with well-differentiated appendiceal cancers (N = 400), 5-year OS and COS at 3 years were 76.3% and 88.3% (Δ12.0%), respectively. For patients with high-grade appendiceal cancers (N = 258), 5-year OS and COS at 3 years were 43.8% and 75.4% (Δ31.6%), respectively. For patients with colorectal cancers (N = 362), 5-year OS and COS at 3 years were 31.8% and 67.3% (Δ35.5%), respectively. For patients with peritoneal mesothelioma (N = 130), 5-year OS and COS at 3 years were 67.6% and 89.7% (Δ22.1%), respectively. Similar trends were observed for DFS/CDFS. CONCLUSION The conditional survival of patients undergoing CRS ± HIPEC for PSM is associated with tumor histology. COS and CDFS provide a more accurate, dynamic estimate of survival than OS and DFS, especially for patients with more aggressive histologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliza W Beal
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Shruthi Srinivas
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Chengli Shen
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Alex Kim
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Anai Kothari
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Laura Lambert
- University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Sherif Abdel-Misih
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Roensholdt S, Detlefsen S, Mortensen MB, Graversen M. Response Evaluation in Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis Treated with Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC). J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041289. [PMID: 36835824 PMCID: PMC9963217 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) directed therapy emerged as a treatment of peritoneal metastasis (PM) a decade ago. The response assessment of PIPAC is not uniform. This narrative review describes non-invasive and invasive methods for response evaluation of PIPAC and summarizes their current status. PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for eligible publications, and data were reported on an intention-to-treat basis. The peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS) showed a response in 18-58% of patients after two PIPACs. Five studies showed a cytological response in ascites or peritoneal lavage fluid in 6-15% of the patients. The proportion of patients with malignant cytology decreased between the first and third PIPAC. A computed tomography showed stable or regressive disease following PIPAC in 15-78% of patients. The peritoneal cancer index was mainly used as a demographic variable, but prospective studies reported a response to treatment in 57-72% of patients. The role of serum biomarkers of cancer or inflammation in the selection of candidates for and responders to PIPAC is not fully evaluated. In conclusion, response evaluation after PIPAC in patients with PM remains difficult, but PRGS seems to be the most promising response evaluation modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Signe Roensholdt
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Sönke Detlefsen
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 15, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsloews Vej 19, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Michael Bau Mortensen
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsloews Vej 19, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Martin Graversen
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsloews Vej 19, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hu J, Wang Z, Wang X, Xie S. Side-effects of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. PeerJ 2023; 11:e15277. [PMID: 37138820 PMCID: PMC10150720 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) produces unwanted side-effects that are mainly caused by chemotherapeutic drugs in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, and these effects have not been systematically summarized. The aim of this article was to provide a comprehensive overview of the side-effects of HIPEC for GI cancers and propose practical strategies for adverse event management. Methodology PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for side-effects of HIPEC in GI cancers prior to October 20, 2022. A total of 79 articles were included in this review. Results Adverse events, such as enterocutaneous digestive fistulas, GI tract perforation, neutropenia, postoperative bleeding, ventricular tachycardia, hyperglycemia, hypocalcemia, renal impairment, encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis, scrotal ulceration, and sarcopenia were described, and their clinical management was discussed. These side-effects involve the digestive, hematopoietic, circulatory, metabolic, and urinary systems. Effective methods for adverse event management included an expert multidisciplinary team, replacing chemotherapy drugs, using Chinese medicine, and careful preoperative assessments. Conclusion The side-effects of HIPEC are frequent and can be minimized by several effective methods. This study proposes practical strategies for adverse event management of HIPEC to assist physicians in choosing the optimal treatment method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiyun Hu
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Zhenxing Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Haikou People’s Hospital/Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Haikou, Hainan, China
| | - Xinrun Wang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Shucai Xie
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Haikou People’s Hospital/Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Haikou, Hainan, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Qin X, Siyad Mohamed M, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Wu Z, Luo R, Yi L, Wang H, Wang H. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy following up-front cytoreductive surgery versus cytoreductive surgery alone for isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases: A retrospective, observational study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:959514. [PMID: 36330501 PMCID: PMC9623104 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.959514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To date, the value of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) following up-front resection for isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases seems controversial. Patients and Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted from September 1, 2012, to September 1, 2019, at a tertiary medical center in China. Patients with isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases were included in CRS plus HIPEC group or CRS alone group based on the treatment history. Overall survival and relapse-free survival were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and Kaplan–Meier method. Results 78 patients with isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases were identified among 396 patients with synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases. 43 were in the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group and 35 were in the cytoreductive surgery alone group. Among them, 61 patients had relapse-free survival data. The median peritoneal cancer index was 4 in all patients. After a median follow-up of 46.0 months, 5-year overall survival was 66.8% and the median relapse-free survival was 36.0 (95% CI, 6.8-65.1) months in the CRS plus HIPEC group. 5-year overall survival was 31.2% and the median relapse-free survival was 12.0 (95% CI, 9.0-15.0) months in the CRS alone group. Cox regression analyses showed that HIPEC was the independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P = 0.004) and relapse-free survival (P = 0.049). Conclusion Findings of the present study suggest that HIPEC following up-front CRS could improve overall survival and relapse-free survival in patients with isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiusen Qin
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Supported by National Key Clinical Discipline, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mohamed Siyad Mohamed
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuanxin Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuefang Chen
- Department of Anesthesia, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhijie Wu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rui Luo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liang Yi
- Department of Anorectal Surgery, Liangzhou Hospital, Wuwei, China
- *Correspondence: Huaiming Wang, ; Hui Wang, ; Liang Yi,
| | - Hui Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Supported by National Key Clinical Discipline, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Huaiming Wang, ; Hui Wang, ; Liang Yi,
| | - Huaiming Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Supported by National Key Clinical Discipline, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Huaiming Wang, ; Hui Wang, ; Liang Yi,
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhang Q, Yuan Y, Li S, Li Z, Jing G, Lu J, Shao C, Hao Q, Lu Y, Shen F. A CT-Based Radiomics Model for Evaluating Peritoneal Cancer Index in Peritoneal Metastasis Cases: A Preliminary Study. Acad Radiol 2022:S1076-6332(22)00492-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
18
|
Pacelli F, Gerardi C, Rulli E, Abatini C, Rotolo S, Garattini S, Melotti G, Torri V, Galli F, Rulli E, Di Giorgio A. Prophylactic surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC CO2) versus standard surgery in colorectal carcinoma at high risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis: short-term and long-term outcomes from the CHECK study - protocol for a randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e051324. [PMID: 35914916 PMCID: PMC9345052 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Up to one-fifth of patients with colorectal cancer will develop peritoneal metastases, frequently without other districts' involvement. Despite the recent unsuccesses of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases treatment, the rationale in the prophylactic setting remains strong. Several clinical and pharmacokinetic data suggest that the efficacy of intraperitoneal chemotherapy is highest when the disease is microscopic. However, robust evidence demonstrating whether the addition of HIPEC for high-risk colorectal cancers offers better control of local recurrence is lacking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a multicentre randomised phase 3 trial comparing prophylactic surgery plus HIPEC CO2 with mitomycin, over standard surgical excision in patients with colorectal cancer at high risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis; 388 patients will be included in this study. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of prophylactic surgery (radical colorectal resection, omentectomy, appendectomy, round ligament of the liver resection and bilateral adnexectomy) plus HIPEC CO2 with mitomycin and standard surgery in terms of local recurrence-free survival. The main secondary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. The primary endpoint will be described with a cumulative incidence function and will be analysed with Grey test to take account of the competing risks. DFS and OS will be described with the Kaplan-Meier method. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This trial has been evaluated by the Italian Medicines Agency, local ethics committees and will be submitted to the Ministry of Health to notify the start of the trial according to the regulation of trials on devices with CE mark/certification.The results will be submitted for presentation at academic meetings and for publication in a peer-reviewed journal, whatever the findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03914820.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Pacelli
- Chirurgia del Peritoneo e del Retroperitoneo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Chiara Gerardi
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Eliana Rulli
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Carlo Abatini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Stefano Rotolo
- Chirurgia del Peritoneo e del Retroperitoneo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
- Dipartimento di Discipline Chirurgiche, Oncologiche e Stomatologiche (Di.Chir.On.S.), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Silvio Garattini
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Valter Torri
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Fabio Galli
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Erica Rulli
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Andrea Di Giorgio
- Chirurgia del Peritoneo e del Retroperitoneo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bansal B, Ray M, Barua A, Saikia J, Deo S. Evaluation of Peritoneal Cancer Index as a Prognostic Marker in Primary Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma Undergoing “Interval Cytoreductive Surgery” After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. J Gynecol Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1089/gyn.2020.0099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Babul Bansal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
| | - Mukurdipi Ray
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
| | - Areendam Barua
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
| | - Jyoutishman Saikia
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
| | - Suryanarayana Deo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tsai TY, You JF, Hsu YJ, Jhuang JR, Chern YJ, Hung HY, Yeh CY, Hsieh PS, Chiang SF, Lai CC, Chiang JM, Tang R, Tsai WS. A Prediction Model for Metachronous Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Patients with Stage T4 Colon Cancer after Curative Resection. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2808. [PMID: 34200032 PMCID: PMC8200190 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model for assessing individual mPC risk in patients with pT4 colon cancer. Methods: A total of 2003 patients with pT4 colon cancer undergoing R0 resection were categorized into the training or testing set. Based on the training set, 2044 Cox prediction models were developed. Next, models with the maximal C-index and minimal prediction error were selected. The final model was then validated based on the testing set using a time-dependent area under the curve and Brier score, and a scoring system was developed. Patients were stratified into the high- or low-risk group by their risk score, with the cut-off points determined by a classification and regression tree (CART). (2) Results: The five candidate predictors were tumor location, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen value, histologic type, T stage and nodal stage. Based on the CART, patients were categorized into the low-risk or high-risk groups. The model has high predictive accuracy (prediction error ≤5%) and good discrimination ability (area under the curve >0.7). (3) Conclusions: The prediction model quantifies individual risk and is feasible for selecting patients with pT4 colon cancer who are at high risk of developing mPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tzong-Yun Tsai
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan; (T.-Y.T.); (J.-F.Y.); (Y.-J.H.); (Y.-J.C.); (H.-Y.H.); (C.-Y.Y.); (P.-S.H.); (S.-F.C.); (C.-C.L.); (J.-M.C.); (R.T.)
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
| | - Jeng-Fu You
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan; (T.-Y.T.); (J.-F.Y.); (Y.-J.H.); (Y.-J.C.); (H.-Y.H.); (C.-Y.Y.); (P.-S.H.); (S.-F.C.); (C.-C.L.); (J.-M.C.); (R.T.)
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Jen Hsu
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan; (T.-Y.T.); (J.-F.Y.); (Y.-J.H.); (Y.-J.C.); (H.-Y.H.); (C.-Y.Y.); (P.-S.H.); (S.-F.C.); (C.-C.L.); (J.-M.C.); (R.T.)
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
| | - Jing-Rong Jhuang
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City 10055, Taiwan;
| | - Yih-Jong Chern
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan; (T.-Y.T.); (J.-F.Y.); (Y.-J.H.); (Y.-J.C.); (H.-Y.H.); (C.-Y.Y.); (P.-S.H.); (S.-F.C.); (C.-C.L.); (J.-M.C.); (R.T.)
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Yuan Hung
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan; (T.-Y.T.); (J.-F.Y.); (Y.-J.H.); (Y.-J.C.); (H.-Y.H.); (C.-Y.Y.); (P.-S.H.); (S.-F.C.); (C.-C.L.); (J.-M.C.); (R.T.)
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Yuh Yeh
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan; (T.-Y.T.); (J.-F.Y.); (Y.-J.H.); (Y.-J.C.); (H.-Y.H.); (C.-Y.Y.); (P.-S.H.); (S.-F.C.); (C.-C.L.); (J.-M.C.); (R.T.)
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
| | - Pao-Shiu Hsieh
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan; (T.-Y.T.); (J.-F.Y.); (Y.-J.H.); (Y.-J.C.); (H.-Y.H.); (C.-Y.Y.); (P.-S.H.); (S.-F.C.); (C.-C.L.); (J.-M.C.); (R.T.)
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
| | - Sum-Fu Chiang
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan; (T.-Y.T.); (J.-F.Y.); (Y.-J.H.); (Y.-J.C.); (H.-Y.H.); (C.-Y.Y.); (P.-S.H.); (S.-F.C.); (C.-C.L.); (J.-M.C.); (R.T.)
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Chou Lai
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan; (T.-Y.T.); (J.-F.Y.); (Y.-J.H.); (Y.-J.C.); (H.-Y.H.); (C.-Y.Y.); (P.-S.H.); (S.-F.C.); (C.-C.L.); (J.-M.C.); (R.T.)
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
| | - Jy-Ming Chiang
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan; (T.-Y.T.); (J.-F.Y.); (Y.-J.H.); (Y.-J.C.); (H.-Y.H.); (C.-Y.Y.); (P.-S.H.); (S.-F.C.); (C.-C.L.); (J.-M.C.); (R.T.)
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
| | - Reiping Tang
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan; (T.-Y.T.); (J.-F.Y.); (Y.-J.H.); (Y.-J.C.); (H.-Y.H.); (C.-Y.Y.); (P.-S.H.); (S.-F.C.); (C.-C.L.); (J.-M.C.); (R.T.)
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Sy Tsai
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan; (T.-Y.T.); (J.-F.Y.); (Y.-J.H.); (Y.-J.C.); (H.-Y.H.); (C.-Y.Y.); (P.-S.H.); (S.-F.C.); (C.-C.L.); (J.-M.C.); (R.T.)
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bijelic L, Ramos I, Goeré D. The Landmark Series: Surgical Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:4140-4150. [PMID: 33969466 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10049-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal metastases (PM) are a form of metastatic spread affecting approximately 5-15% of colon cancer patients. The attitude towards management of peritoneal metastases has evolved from therapeutic nihilism towards a more comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach, in large part due to the development of cytoreductive surgery (CRS), usually coupled with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), along with the constant improvement of systemic chemotherapy of colorectal cancer. Several landmark studies, including 5 randomized controlled trials have marked the development and refinement of surgical approaches to treating colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases. METHODS This review article focuses on these landmark studies and their influence in 4 key areas: the evidence supporting surgical resection of peritoneal metastases, the identification and standardization of important prognostic variables influencing patient selection, the role of surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy in prevention of colorectal PM and the role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy as an adjuvant to surgical resection. RESULTS These landmark studies indicate that surgical resection of colorectal PM should be considered as a therapeutic option in appropriately selected patients and when adequate surgical expertise is available. Standardized prognostic variables including the Peritoneal Cancer Index and the Completeness of Cytoreduction Score should be used for evaluating both indications and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Current evidence does not support the use of second look surgery with oxaliplatin HIPEC or prophylactic oxaliplatin HIPEC in patients with high risk colon cancer nor the use of oxaliplatin HIPEC with CRS of colorectal PM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lana Bijelic
- Peritoneal Malignancies Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Moises Broggi, Consorci Sanitari Integral, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Isabel Ramos
- Peritoneal Malignancies Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Moises Broggi, Consorci Sanitari Integral, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Diane Goeré
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Hôpital Saint-Louis - APHP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zhou S, Feng Q, Zhang J, Zhou H, Jiang Z, Liang J, Pei W, Liu Q, Zhou Z, Wang X. Can Elderly Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis Induced by Appendiceal or Colorectal Tumours Benefit from Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC)? Clin Interv Aging 2021; 16:559-568. [PMID: 33833505 PMCID: PMC8019608 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s293412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) added with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can improve the survival rate of certain patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM). However, the perioperative safety and long-term survival of this intricate and possibly life-threatening procedure in elderly patients (≥65 years) remain controversial. Methods Patients with PM due to appendiceal or colorectal tumours who underwent CRS/HIPEC were evaluated systematically at the National Cancer Center of China and the Huanxing Cancer Hospital between June 2017 and June 2019. The recruited subjects were retrospectively categorized into elderly (age ≥65) and non-elderly (age<65) groups according to their age. Clinical and pathological features, postoperative outcomes, and prognoses were gathered and analysed. Results Both groups had similar overall morbidity (56.0% vs 38.7%, P=0.130) and grade 3/4 morbidity (28.0% vs 20.0%, P=0.403) after CRS/HIPEC. However, more patients in the elderly group suffered from ileus postoperatively (16.0% vs 2.6%, P=0.033). After a follow-up period of a median of 20 months, it was concluded that elderly patients had significantly worse 3-year overall survival (OS) than non-elderly patients (16.3% vs 51.4%, P=0.001). Independent prognostic factors were identified to be a high peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) score (HR, 1.10, 95% CI, 1.04–1.16; P=0.001) and age ≥65 (HR, 2.42, 95% CI, 1.32–4.45; P=0.004) were independent prognostic factors through cox regression analysis. Conclusion CRS and HIPEC are related with an elevated prevalence of postoperative ileus but not with the overall morbidity or the grade 3/4 morbidity in elderly patients. However, since worse survival outcomes were observed more commonly in elderly patients compared to younger patients from CRS+HIPEC, this complex and potentially life-threatening procedure should be considered carefully in patients aged ≥65 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sicheng Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiang Feng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Huanxing Cancer Hospital, Beijing, 100122, People's Republic of China
| | - Haitao Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Zheng Jiang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianwei Liang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Pei
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Qian Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhixiang Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Xishan Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kobayashi H, Kotake K, Sugihara K. Impact of R0 resection for synchronous peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis of a multi-institutional database. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021; 5:221-227. [PMID: 33860142 PMCID: PMC8034688 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To investigate the usefulness of resection for synchronous peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer. METHODS The patients who underwent surgery for stage IV colorectal cancer at 16 hospitals between 1991 and 2007 were enrolled in this study. The overall survival rates of patients with synchronous peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer with and without R0 resection were compared using a propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS Among the 3965 patients with stage IV colorectal cancer, 1169 had synchronous peritoneal metastasis (28.5%). No patients received hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in this study. Among the 1169 patients, 783 had enough clinicopathologic information and went through further analysis. Out of 783 patients, 204 underwent R0 resection. A multivariate analysis revealed that severity of peritoneal metastasis according to the Japanese classification (P < .0001) and distant metastases (P < .0001) were independently associated with non-R0 resection. In a propensity score-matched analysis, 118 patients who underwent R0 resection were matched with 118 patients who did not undergo R0 resection. There was no significant difference in each parameter between patients with and without R0 resection. After matching, the overall survival in patients with R0 resection was better than that without R0 resection (median survival time: 28.8 months and 15.6 months, P < .0001). CONCLUSION The overall survival of patients with R0 resection for synchronous peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer was better than that without R0 resection even without HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirotoshi Kobayashi
- Department of SurgeryTokyo Metropolitan Hiroo HospitalTokyoJapan
- Department of SurgeryTeikyo University School of MedicineMizonokuchi HospitalKanagawaJapan
| | | | - Kenichi Sugihara
- Department of Surgical OncologyGraduate SchoolTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Larentzakis A, Anagnostou E, Georgiou K, Vrakopoulou GZ, Zografos CG, Zografos GC, Toutouzas KG. Place of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the armament against pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A survival, mortality and morbidity systematic review. Oncol Lett 2021; 21:246. [PMID: 33664810 PMCID: PMC7882886 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2021.12507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is one of the deadliest types of cancer worldwide, with a 5-year survival rate of 8% despite recent treatment advancements. The present systematic review aimed to investigate the role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) following surgical resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, with or without peritoneal carcinomatosis. A systematic search of the MEDLINE and SCOPUS electronic databases was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All possible relevant articles published between January 1980 and May 2019 were retrieved using multiple search terms associated with HIPEC and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The initial search resulted in 1,244 reports, which condensed to 41 reports following screening of titles and abstracts, and subsequently to four reports following full-text thorough examination. The four reports included involved a prospective cohort study of HIPEC use in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and three retrospective studies of HIPEC use following cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal carcinomatosis due to pancreatic adenocarcinoma, resulting in a total of 47 patients. The overall survival ranged between 2 and 62 months, and the hospital mortality rate was 8.5%. Morbidity (34%) was mainly attributed to anastomotic leak or respiratory failure. Due to the small sample size and low quality of evidence of the included studies, no valid conclusions could be drawn. Therefore, further studies are required to justify the use of HIPEC as an adjuvant therapy in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, while cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in peritoneal carcinomatosis of pancreatic origin seems not only not useful but also unsafe at this level of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Larentzakis
- First Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippocration General Athens Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - Evangelos Anagnostou
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Whitechapel, E1 2AT London, UK
| | - Konstantinos Georgiou
- First Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippocration General Athens Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - Gavriella-Zoi Vrakopoulou
- First Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippocration General Athens Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - Constantinos G Zografos
- First Department of Surgery, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Goudi, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - Georgios C Zografos
- First Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippocration General Athens Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - Konstantinos G Toutouzas
- First Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippocration General Athens Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhou S, Feng Q, Zhang J, Zhou H, Jiang Z, Liu Z, Zheng Z, Chen H, Wang Z, Liang J, Pei W, Liu Q, Zhou Z, Wang X. High-grade postoperative complications affect survival outcomes of patients with colorectal Cancer peritoneal metastases treated with Cytoreductive surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal chemotherapy. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:41. [PMID: 33413223 PMCID: PMC7791857 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07756-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to evaluate the impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival in patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) arising from colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Methods Patients with PM arising from CRC treated with CRS and HIPEC were systematically reviewed at the China National Cancer Center and Huanxing Cancer Hospital from June 2017 to June 2019. High-grade complications that occurred within 30 days were defined as grade 3 to 4 events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) classification. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models for overall survival were created. Predictors of high-grade postoperative complications were evaluated with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results In all, 86 consecutive cases were included in this study. Forty-one patients (47.7%) developed postoperative complications, while 22 patients (25.6%) experienced high-grade complications. No mortality occurred during the postoperative period. The median survival of all patients was 25 months, and the estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 35.0%. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, a high peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) score (HR, 1.07, 95% CI, 1.01–1.14; P=0.015) and grade 3–4 postoperative complications (HR, 1.86, 95% CI, 1.22–3.51; P=0.044) correlated with worse overall survival. High estimated blood loss (OR, 1.01, 95% CI, 1.01–1.02; P< 0.001) was identified as an independent risk factor for developing high-grade complications. Conclusion Careful patient selection, high levels of technical skill and improved perioperative management are crucial to ensure patient survival benefits after CRS+HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sicheng Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Qiang Feng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Huanxing Cancer Hospital, Beijing, 100122, China
| | - Haitao Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zheng Jiang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zhaoxu Zheng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Haipeng Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jianwei Liang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Wei Pei
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Qian Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zhixiang Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xishan Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Qi Y, Guo L, Jiang Y, Shi Y, Sui H, Zhao L. Brain delivery of quercetin-loaded exosomes improved cognitive function in AD mice by inhibiting phosphorylated tau-mediated neurofibrillary tangles. Drug Deliv 2020; 27:745-755. [PMID: 32397764 PMCID: PMC7269046 DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2020.1762262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
It is reported that quercetin (Que) can prevent tau pathology and induce neuroprotection by improving cognitive and functional symptoms in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, its clinical application has been limited due to its poor brain targeting and bioavailability. Exosomes are considered as cargo carriers for intercellular communication and especially serve as a natural and important drug brain delivery platform for achieving better treatment of central neurological diseases. Here, we developed plasma exosomes (Exo) loaded with Que (Exo-Que) to improve the drug bioavailability, enhance the brain targeting of Que and potently ameliorate cognitive dysfunction in okadaic acid (OA)-induced AD mice. Our results showed that Exo-Que improved brain targeting of Que as well as significantly enhanced bioavailability of Que. Furthermore, compared with free Que, Exo-Que better relieved the symptoms of AD by inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5)-mediated phosphorylation of Tau and reducing formation of insoluble neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), suggesting its therapeutic potential for better treatment of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Qi
- School of Pharmacy, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, P R China
| | - Lin Guo
- School of Pharmacy, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, P R China
| | - Yibing Jiang
- School of Pharmacy, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, P R China
| | - Yijie Shi
- School of Pharmacy, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, P R China
| | - Haijuan Sui
- Department of Pharmacology, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, P R China
| | - Liang Zhao
- School of Pharmacy, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, P R China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cianci R, Delli Pizzi A, Patriarca G, Massari R, Basilico R, Gabrielli D, Filippone A. Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: Is There a True Benefit From Diffusion-Weighted Imaging? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2020; 49:392-397. [DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Revised: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
28
|
Leiting JL, Day CN, Harmsen WS, Cloyd JM, Abdel-Misih S, Fournier K, Lee AJ, Dineen S, Dessureault S, Veerapongh J, Baumgartner JM, Clarke C, Mogal H, Russell MC, Zaidi MY, Patel SH, Morris MC, Hendrix RJ, Lambert LA, Abbott DE, Pokrzywa C, Raoof M, Eng O, Johnston FM, Greer J, Grotz TE. The impact of HIPEC vs. EPIC for the treatment of mucinous appendiceal carcinoma: a study from the US HIPEC collaborative. Int J Hyperthermia 2020; 37:1182-1188. [PMID: 33040617 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1819571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mucinous appendiceal carcinoma is a rare malignancy that commonly spreads to the peritoneum leading to peritoneal metastases. Complete cytoreduction with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) is the mainstay of treatment, administered as either hyperthermic intra peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) or early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC). Our goal was to assess the perioperative and long term survival outcomes associated with these two PIC methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with mucinous appendiceal carcinoma were identified in the US HIPEC Collaborative database from 12 academic institutions. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and survival outcomes were compared among patients who underwent HIPEC vs. EPIC with inverse probability weighting (IPW) used for adjustment. RESULTS Among 921 patients with mucinous appendiceal carcinoma, 9% underwent EPIC while 91% underwent HIPEC. There was no difference in Grade III-V complications between the two groups (18.5% for HIPEC vs. 15.0% for EPIC, p=.43) though patients who underwent HIPEC had higher rates of readmissions (21.2% vs. 8.8%, p<.01). Additionally, PIC method was not an independent predictor for overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) after adjustment on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with mucinous appendiceal carcinoma, both EPIC and HIPEC appear to be associated with similar perioperative and long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Leiting
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Courtney N Day
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - William S Harmsen
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Sherif Abdel-Misih
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Keith Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sean Dineen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sophie Dessureault
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jula Veerapongh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Joel M Baumgartner
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Callisia Clarke
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Harveshp Mogal
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Maria C Russell
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mohammad Y Zaidi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sameer H Patel
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Mackenzie C Morris
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Ryan J Hendrix
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Laura A Lambert
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program Section of Surgical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Daniel E Abbott
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Courtney Pokrzywa
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Mustafa Raoof
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Oliver Eng
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | - Jonathan Greer
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Travis E Grotz
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Survival after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A systematic review and discussion of latest controversies. Surgeon 2020; 19:310-320. [PMID: 33023847 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Peritoneal metastases confer the worst survival amongst all sites of metastatic colorectal cancer. The adoption of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has become an option for patients with isolated colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes following CRS and HIPEC for CRPM from published high volume cohort studies and to highlight the latest controversies and future directions of CRPM treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review was performed on published studies on the treatment outcomes of CRS and HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases. RESULTS Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. The median survival for all patients ranged from 14.6 to 60.1 months. The 5-year overall survival ranged from 23.4% to 52%. For patients with complete cytoreduction, the median survival was 25 to 49 months. Major morbidity and mortality ranged from 15.1% to 47.2% and 0% to 4.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION CRS and HIPEC for the treatment of CRPM is safe and current evidence suggests it improves both median and disease-free survival. However, the efficacy of intraperitoneal chemotherapy, in particular oxaliplatin, has recently come under scrutiny. Accordingly, higher quality evidence is urgently required to contribute to multidisciplinary and international consensus on CRPM treatment strategies.
Collapse
|
30
|
Ba M, Chen C, Long H, Gong Y, Wu Y, Lin K, Tu Y, Zhang B, Wu W. Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for malignant ascites from colorectal cancer - a randomized study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e21546. [PMID: 32872001 PMCID: PMC7437737 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000021546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The efficacy of different timings of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in controlling malignant ascites caused by peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) is not well defined. The study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of different timings of CRS with HIPEC for malignant ascites caused by peritoneal carcinomatosis from CRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a preliminary randomized controlled study performed at the Intracelom Hyperthermic Perfusion Therapy Center of the Cancer Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (China) from December 2008 to December 2016. The patients were randomized to: CRS, followed by HIPEC (CRS+HIPEC; n = 14), and ultrasound-guided HIPEC, followed by CRS 1 to 2 weeks later (HIPEC+ delayed cytoreductive surgery (dCRS) group, n = 14). The endpoints were complete remission rate of ascites, successful complete CRS rate, and overall survival. RESULTS Malignant ascites in all patients showed complete remission; the total effective rate was 100%. Complete CRS was not feasible in any patient. The median follow-up of the 2 groups was 41.9 and 42.3 months in the CRS+HIPEC and HIPEC+dCRS groups, respectively. Overall survival was 14.5 (95%CI: 7-19 months) and 14.3 months (95%CI: 4-21 months) (P > .05). The adverse effects of HIPEC were manageable. CONCLUSIONS CRS+HIPEC and HIPEC+dCRS have the same efficacy in controlling malignant ascites caused by CRC and peritoneal carcinomatosis. The timing of CRS and HIPEC does not prolong the survival of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from CRC, even when a complete CRS is not feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingchen Ba
- Intracelom Hyperthermic Perfusion Therapy Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University
| | - Cheng Chen
- Intracelom Hyperthermic Perfusion Therapy Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University
| | - Hui Long
- Department of Pharmacy, Guangzhou Dermatology Institute, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Yuanfeng Gong
- Intracelom Hyperthermic Perfusion Therapy Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University
| | - Yinbin Wu
- Intracelom Hyperthermic Perfusion Therapy Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University
| | - Kunpeng Lin
- Intracelom Hyperthermic Perfusion Therapy Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University
| | - Yinuo Tu
- Intracelom Hyperthermic Perfusion Therapy Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University
| | - Bohuo Zhang
- Intracelom Hyperthermic Perfusion Therapy Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University
| | - Wanbo Wu
- Intracelom Hyperthermic Perfusion Therapy Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yonemura Y, Iahibashi H, Sako S, Mizumoto A, Takao N, Ichinose M, Motoi S, Liu Y, Wakama S, Kamada Y, Nishihara K. Advances with pharmacotherapy for peritoneal metastasis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020; 21:2057-2066. [PMID: 32783786 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1793957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A new treatment strategy involving cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with perioperative intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy was proposed in 1999 by the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International, and the strategy is now justified as a state-of-the-art treatment to improve the long-term survival of patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM). To achieve cure in the patients with PM, complete removal of macroscopic tumors and eradication of micrometastasis on the peritoneum, left after CRS are essential. Systemic chemotherapy is not indicated for the treatment of PM. In contrast, intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy brings about significantly higher locoregional dose intensity in the peritoneal cavity and subperitoneal tissues. In combination with anticancer drugs, hyperthermia enhances cytotoxicity against cancer cells. AREA COVERED This article provides a systematic overview of PM from various cancers including gastric, colorectal, small bowel, appendiceal cancer, and mesothelioma. It also includes all the essential aspects of therapy. EXPERT OPINION CRS plus perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy is safe with acceptable morbidity and mortality. It is justified as a standard treatment to improve the long-term survival of patients with PM and is now performed with curative intent for PM from various malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutaka Yonemura
- Department of Regional Cancer Therapies, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital , Kishiwada City, Oosaka-Fu, Japan.,Department of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment, Kusatsu General Hospital , Kusatsu City, Shiga, Japan
| | - Haruaki Iahibashi
- Department of Regional Cancer Therapies, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital , Kishiwada City, Oosaka-Fu, Japan
| | - Shouzou Sako
- Department of Regional Cancer Therapies, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital , Kishiwada City, Oosaka-Fu, Japan
| | - Akiyoshi Mizumoto
- Department of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment, Kusatsu General Hospital , Kusatsu City, Shiga, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Takao
- Department of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment, Kusatsu General Hospital , Kusatsu City, Shiga, Japan
| | - Masumi Ichinose
- Department of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment, Kusatsu General Hospital , Kusatsu City, Shiga, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Motoi
- Department of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment, Kusatsu General Hospital , Kusatsu City, Shiga, Japan
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of Regional Cancer Therapies, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital , Kishiwada City, Oosaka-Fu, Japan
| | - Satoshi Wakama
- Department of Regional Cancer Therapies, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital , Kishiwada City, Oosaka-Fu, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Kamada
- Department of Regional Cancer Therapies, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital , Kishiwada City, Oosaka-Fu, Japan
| | - Kazurou Nishihara
- Department of Regional Cancer Therapies, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital , Kishiwada City, Oosaka-Fu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
He R, Jiang Y, Shi Y, Liang J, Zhao L. Curcumin-laden exosomes target ischemic brain tissue and alleviate cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting ROS-mediated mitochondrial apoptosis. MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING. C, MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS 2020; 117:111314. [PMID: 32919674 DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The pathogenesis of ischemic cerebrovascular disease has revealed that ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury often leads to aggravation of metabolic oxidative stress and blood-brain barrier (BBB) destruction, eventually causing secondary brain tissue damage. Accumulated reactive oxygen species (ROS) in focal ischemia activate mitochondria-mediated apoptosis and damage the BBB by degrading tight junction proteins (TJPs). Herein, we report macrophage-derived exosomes (Ex) loaded with curcumin (cur) as a multifunctional biomimetic delivery vehicle (Ex-cur) for targeting ischemic brain tissue and alleviating cerebral I/R injury by inhibiting ROS-mediated mitochondrial apoptosis in a transient cerebral ischemia rat model. The design principle relies on unique features of macrophage-derived exosomes and the natural ingredient cur. Specifically, cur can be entrapped within exosomes when incubated with murine macrophage RAW264.7 cells, and its stability is subsequently significantly improved. The resultant Ex-cur can target ischemic regions by leveraging the targeting migration capability of Ex driven by inflammation. Accumulated Ex-cur in ischemic regions is experimentally proven to be highly effective at reducing ROS accumulation by virtue of the antioxidant properties of cur. Using Ex-cur to down-regulate ROS accumulation in lesions, we alleviate BBB damage and suppress mitochondria-mediated neuronal apoptosis, which is confirmed by a series of relevant protein analysis. These findings demonstrate good therapeutic efficacy of Ex-cur for treating I/R injury, providing experimental evidence for the potential clinical benefits of Ex-cur for other modes of neuroprotection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruyi He
- School of Pharmacy, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121000, PR China
| | - Yibing Jiang
- School of Pharmacy, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121000, PR China
| | - Yijie Shi
- School of Pharmacy, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121000, PR China
| | - Jia Liang
- Life Science Institution, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121000, PR China
| | - Liang Zhao
- School of Pharmacy, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121000, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Stewart JH, Blazer DG, Calderon MJG, Carter TM, Eckhoff A, Al Efishat MA, Fernando DG, Foster JM, Hayes-Jordan A, Johnston FM, Lautz TB, Levine EA, Maduekwe UN, Mangieri CW, Moaven O, Mogal H, Shen P, Votanopoulos KI. The Evolving Management of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies. Curr Probl Surg 2020; 58:100860. [PMID: 33832580 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2020.100860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dan G Blazer
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jason M Foster
- Fred and Pamela Buffet Cancer Center, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE
| | | | - Fabian M Johnston
- Complex General Surgical Oncology Program, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Timothy B Lautz
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Ugwuji N Maduekwe
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | | | - Perry Shen
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Verheij FS, Bakkers C, van Eden WJ, Aalbers AGJ, Nienhuijs SW, Jóźwiak K, de Hingh IHJT, Kok NFM. Comparison of the Peritoneal Cancer Index and Dutch region count as tools to stage patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer. BJS Open 2020; 4:1153-1161. [PMID: 32573969 PMCID: PMC7709381 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extent of peritoneal metastases (PM) is among the most powerful prognostic factors for survival after cytoreductive surgery (CRS). This study aimed to compare the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and the Dutch region count as tools for staging PM of colorectal cancer. The Dutch region count is a simpler classification that distinguishes seven rather than 13 abdominal regions. Presence or absence of PM is recorded. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study in two tertiary referral centres in the Netherlands. Consecutive patients with colorectal PM who were intentionally treated with CRS and subsequent hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in 2016 and 2017 were included. The PCI and Dutch region count were both recorded during laparotomy. Correlation between scoring tools was calculated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Diagnostic values were calculated for different cut-off values of the PCI, alongside the Dutch region count. The correlation of both scores was determined for the exploration and validation cohorts separately. RESULTS In the exploration and validation cohorts, 73 and 85 patients respectively were included. Spearman's correlation coefficients of 0·897 and 0·961 were observed for continuous scores of the Dutch region count and PCI in the exploration and validation group respectively. A cut-off value of 20 for the PCI score and 5 for the Dutch region count showed 91·9 and 94·5 per cent sensitivity, and 81·8 and 91·7 per cent specificity, respectively. CONCLUSION The Dutch region count correlated well with the PCI score, and may help to simplify reporting of the extent of peritoneal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F. S. Verheij
- Departments of Surgical OncologyAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - C. Bakkers
- Department of Surgical OncologyCatharina HospitalEindhoventhe Netherlands
| | - W. J. van Eden
- Departments of Surgical OncologyAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | | | - S. W. Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgical OncologyCatharina HospitalEindhoventhe Netherlands
| | - K. Jóźwiak
- Epidemiology and BiostatisticsNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - I. H. J. T. de Hingh
- Department of Surgical OncologyCatharina HospitalEindhoventhe Netherlands
- GROW, School for Oncology and Development BiologyMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtthe Netherlands
| | - N. F. M. Kok
- Departments of Surgical OncologyAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Shen MY, Chang SH, Liu TI, Lu TY, Sabu A, Chen HH, Chiu HC. Combo-targeted nanoassemblies as a chemotherapy delivery system against peritoneal carcinomatosis colorectal cancer. Biomater Sci 2020; 8:3885-3895. [PMID: 32539060 DOI: 10.1039/d0bm00583e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis colorectal cancer (pcCRC) is one of the most challenging cases in clinical treatment due to its aggressive characteristics and diagnostic limitations, impeding the therapeutic efficacy of chemotherapy. In this study, a poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticle (NP)-based drug delivery system capable of encapsulating the chemodrug SN38 and enhancing drug accumulation in metastatic tumors was developed for the treatment of pcCRC. The SN38-loaded NPs with a diameter of ca. 160 nm were decorated with N-acetyl histidine-modified d-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol succinate (TPGS) and folate-TPGS on their surfaces for enhancing drug accumulation through surface charge conversion in a mildly acidic tumor microenvironment and further allowing the NPs to selectively target the folate receptor-overexpressed colon cancer cells. This hierarchically targeted drug delivery strategy improved not only the highly enhanced cellular uptake of drug-loaded NPs, but also the prominent anticancer effect against CT26 cancer cells in vitro. In vivo studies demonstrated the sound tumor inhibition of the SN38-loaded NPs in terms of large reductions in both tumor size and nodule number and prolongation of the survival time of pcCRC-bearing mice, indicating their high therapeutic potential for the practical treatment of pcCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Yin Shen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ambe PC, Kankam J, Zarras K. Peritoneal spillage is not an issue in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:107. [PMID: 32460842 PMCID: PMC7254702 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01882-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasingly being performed via the minimally invasive route. However, reports of postoperative wound and port site seeding as well as peritoneal spillage have been worrisome. We investigated the risk of peritoneal spillage in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for CRC. METHODS Cytology specimens were gained from the retrieval bag following intracorporeal resection and specimen retrieval using an endoscopic retrieval bag. Histopathologic examination of the cytology specimens was performed for the presence of malignant cells. RESULTS Cytology specimens of 73 (34 female and 39 male) consecutive patients with a median age of 71 years were included for analysis. Advanced CRC in stages III and IV was present in 41% of the study population. Malignant cells were not found in any specimen. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic oncologic resection of colorectal cancer is not a risk factor for peritoneal spillage. Minimally invasive oncologic colorectal resection is safe without the increased risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter C Ambe
- Department of Visceral, Minimally Invasive and Oncologic Surgery, Marien Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. .,Department of Health, Faculty of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
| | - Joseph Kankam
- Department of Visceral, Minimally Invasive and Oncologic Surgery, Marien Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Zarras
- Department of Visceral, Minimally Invasive and Oncologic Surgery, Marien Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bezu L, Raineau M, Deloménie M, Cholley B, Pirracchio R. Haemodynamic management during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: A systematic review. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2020; 39:531-542. [PMID: 32320757 DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2019] [Revised: 02/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a surgical technique for peritoneal carcinomatosis combining cytoreduction surgery and peritoneal irrigation of cytotoxic agents responsible for haemodynamics and fluid homeostasis alterations. To this day, no guidelines exist concerning intraoperative management. OBJECTIVES To review data on haemodynamic monitoring and management of patients undergoing HIPEC and to help design a standardised anaesthetic protocol. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane library were searched using the following. STUDY SELECTION Original articles and case-reports. Letters to editors and reviews were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION Data on haemodynamic management, morbidity and mortality. DATA SYNTHESIS Haemodynamic management during HIPEC is highly variable and depends on local protocols. Only one randomised controlled trial evaluated the benefit of goal-directed fluid administration (GDFA). GDFA guided by advanced haemodynamic monitoring resulted in significantly less complication, shorter length of stay and less mortality compared to standard fluid administration. Renal protection protocol did not decrease the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). CONCLUSION Our review reveals that fluid administration guided by advanced monitoring seems to be associated with less postoperative morbidity and mortality after HIPEC. Nevertheless, the literature review shows that intraoperative haemodynamic management is highly variable for this surgery. The use of renal protection strategy does not decrease the prevalence of AKI. Further prospective trials comparing different fluid management and haemodynamic monitoring strategies are urgently needed (PROSPERO registration CRD42018115720).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucillia Bezu
- Service d'anesthésie, hôpitaux universitaires Paris Ouest, hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
| | - Mégane Raineau
- Service d'anesthésie, hôpitaux universitaires Paris Ouest, hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Myriam Deloménie
- Service de chirurgie cancérologique gynécologique et du sein, hôpitaux universitaires Paris Ouest, hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Bernard Cholley
- Service d'anesthésie, hôpitaux universitaires Paris Ouest, hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; Inserm UMR S1140, Paris, France
| | - Romain Pirracchio
- Service d'anesthésie, hôpitaux universitaires Paris Ouest, hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Luo J, Wu Z, Lu Y, Xiong K, Wen Q, Zhao L, Wang B, Gui Y, Fu S. Intraperitoneal administration of biocompatible hyaluronic acid hydrogel containing multi-chemotherapeutic agents for treatment of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Int J Biol Macromol 2020; 152:718-726. [PMID: 32126201 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2019] [Revised: 02/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC) is an advanced stage of colorectal cancer (CRC), which significantly decreases patient survival and quality of life. Here, the naturally occurring polysaccharide hyaluronic acid (HA) was used to prepare an injectable hydrogel and simultaneously deliver 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cisplatin (DDP) and paclitaxel (PTX) microspheres for intraperitoneal CRPC chemotherapy. The drug-loaded HA hydrogel released the drugs in a sustained manner, and showed low toxicity both in vitro and in a mouse model of CRPC. Furthermore, direct injection of the drug-loaded HA hydrogel in the abdominal cavity of tumor-bearing mice significantly decreased tumor growth and liver/lung metastasis, along with decreasing the volume of ascites and inhibiting local intestinal infiltration of the tumor cells. Therefore, this novel multi-drug hydrogel delivery system may effectively clear CRPC tumors without any adverse effects when used in intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Luo
- Department of Oncology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China
| | - ZhouXue Wu
- Department of Oncology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China
| | - Yun Lu
- Department of Oncology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China
| | - Kang Xiong
- Department of Oncology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China
| | - Qian Wen
- Department of Oncology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China
| | - Ling Zhao
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China
| | - BiQiong Wang
- Department of Oncology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China
| | - Yan Gui
- Department of Oncology, the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, China.
| | - ShaoZhi Fu
- Department of Oncology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kim BC, Bae JH, Park SM, Won DY, Lee IK. Is ascites CEA a risk factor for peritoneal carcinomatosis in colorectal cancer?: a long-term follow-up study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:147-155. [PMID: 31802190 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03448-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our previous study reported that carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in peritoneal fluid were significantly correlated with the prevalence of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) in colorectal cancer (CRC). The purpose of this study was a long-term follow up of the author's previous study, as well as the identification of correlations with the known risk factors of PC and the comparison of the predictive power of PC in CRC. METHODS A total of 495 patients without PC who underwent CRC operations at St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, from January 2006 to November 2014 were included in this study. Tumor markers of peritoneal fluid sampled at the beginning of each operation were prospectively analyzed and compared with the known risk factors for PC in CRC. RESULTS Multivariate analysis of PC revealed that T4 cancer (OR 5.143, 95% CI 1.400-18.897, p = 0.014), T3 mucinous cancer (OR 17.480, 95% CI 1.577-193.714, p = 0.020), obstructed tumors (OR 6.030, 95% CI 1.627-22.343, p = 0.007), and peritoneal fluid CEA above 5 ng/dl (OR 4.073, 95% CI 1.315-12.615, p = 0.015) were significant risk factors. T4 cancer, obstructed tumors, and peritoneal fluid CEA above 5 ng/dl showed correlations with cancer-free survival. Generally, higher CEA levels in peritoneal fluid were correlated with previously known risk factors for PC in CRC. CONCLUSION Peritoneal fluid CEA has predictive value for PC and prognostic value in CRC. Therefore, we recommend routinely performing ascites CEA analysis in colorectal cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byung Chul Kim
- Departments of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.,Graduate School of Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Hoon Bae
- Departments of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Min Park
- Departments of Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae Youn Won
- Departments of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - In Kyu Lee
- Departments of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lei Z, Wang J, Li Z, Li B, Luo J, Wang X, Wang J, Ba M, Tang H, He Q, Liao Q, Yang X, Guan T, Liang H, Cui S, On Behalf Of The Chinese Peritoneal Oncology Study Group. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis: A multicenter propensity score-matched cohort study. Chin J Cancer Res 2020; 32:794-803. [PMID: 33447001 PMCID: PMC7797229 DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2020.06.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Systemic chemotherapy has limited efficacy in the treatment of peritoneal metastasis (PM) in gastric cancer (GC). Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) combined with complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has shown promising outcomes but remains controversial. The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HIPEC without CRS in GC patients with PM. Methods This retrospective propensity score-matched multicenter cohort study included GC patients with PM treated with either chemotherapy alone (Cx group) or with HIPEC combined with chemotherapy (HIPEC-Cx group) in four Chinese high-volume gastric medical centers between 2010 and 2017. The primary outcomes were median survival time (MST) and 3-year overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching was performed to compensate for controlling potential confounding effects and selection bias. Results Of 663 eligible patients, 498 were matched. The MST in the Cx and HIPEC-Cx groups was 10.8 and 15.9 months, respectively [hazard ratio (HR)=0.71, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.58−0.88; P=0.002]. The 3-year OS rate was 10.1% (95% CI, 5.4%−14.8%) and 18.4% (95% CI, 12.3%−24.5%) in the Cx and HIPEC-Cx groups, respectively (P=0.017). The complication rates were comparable. The time to first flatus and length of hospital stay for patients undergoing HIPEC combined with chemotherapy was longer than that of chemotherapy alone (4.6±2.4 dvs. 2.7±1.8 d, P<0.001; 14.2±5.8 dvs. 11.4±7.7 d, P<0.001), respectively. The median follow-up period was 33.2 months.
Conclusions Compared with standard systemic chemotherapy, HIPEC combined with chemotherapy revealed a statistically significant survival benefit for GC patients with PM, without compromising patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziying Lei
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China
| | - Jiahong Wang
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China
| | - Zhi Li
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Tumor Hospital of Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450008, China
| | - Baozhong Li
- Department of Surgery, Anyang Tumor Hospital, Anyang 455000, China
| | - Jiali Luo
- Department of Oncology, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China
| | - Xuejun Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Jin Wang
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China
| | - Mingchen Ba
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China
| | - Hongsheng Tang
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China
| | - Qingjun He
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China
| | - Quanxing Liao
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China
| | - Xiansheng Yang
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China
| | - Tianpei Guan
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China
| | - Han Liang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Shuzhong Cui
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China
| | - On Behalf Of The Chinese Peritoneal Oncology Study Group
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China.,Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Tumor Hospital of Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450008, China.,Department of Surgery, Anyang Tumor Hospital, Anyang 455000, China.,Department of Oncology, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China.,Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Coco D, Leanza S. Outcome of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer. MÆDICA 2019; 14:280-286. [PMID: 31798746 DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2019.14.3.280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is stated as the third most frequent cancer in people around the world. In patients, its recurrence occurs most commonly in the peritoneum, accounting for 25% to 35% of all recurrences, making it the second most common site for CRC. Although new and more effective chemotherapeutic agents and combinations were developed, the results of systemic chemotherapy showed only a limited impact on survival, which is disappointing. It is known that cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in combination with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) lead to survival improvement in comparison to the sole treatment consisting in intravenous chemotherapy. This combined procedure showed encouraging results in terms of overall survival, lower complication rates and better patient outcomes in many reported findings. The objective of this article was to review published data for evaluating the outcome of CRS and HIPEC versus standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danilo Coco
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Silvana Leanza
- Department of General Surgery, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Yang SY, Kang JH, Kim HS, Han YD, Min BS, Lee KY. Status of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 10:1251-1265. [PMID: 31949946 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.01.36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) was previously considered an incurable disease with a poor survival outcome. As our understanding of its biology evolved, the paradigm of the management of PC from colorectal cancer (CRC) has changed, including the combination of macroscopic disease control, cytoreductive surgery (CRS), maximal regional chemotherapy to treat residual microscopic disease, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). As with many surgical innovations, CRS with HIPEC has evolved faster than data to support it, leaving many skeptics and critics. This review highlights the recent evidence of current practice and outcome of CRS with HIPEC. Furthermore, it also summarizes the ongoing clinical trials and potential future progress of this treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Yoon Yang
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae Hyun Kang
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ho Seung Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yoon Dae Han
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Byung Soh Min
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kang Young Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Spiliotis J, Kalles V, Kyriazanos I, Terra A, Prodromidou A, Raptis A, Kopanakis N, Christopoulou A. CRS and HIPEC in patients with peritoneal metastasis secondary to colorectal cancer: The small-bowel PCI score as a predictor of survival. Pleura Peritoneum 2019; 4:20190018. [PMID: 31799372 PMCID: PMC6881666 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2019-0018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Combining cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with Hyperthermic IntraPeritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) can benefit patients with peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer. The present study evaluates the small bowel subset of the Peritoneal Cancer Index (Small-Bowel-PCI score (SB-PCI), min-max 0–12) as a prognostic factor in such patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients that underwent CRS and HIPEC for recurrent colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastasis. Patient characteristics, procedure details, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results Eighty patients were included. The mean intraoperative PCI-score was 16.8, with a mean SB-PCI score of 5.9. CC0/1 was achieved in 62/80 patients. The mean follow-up period was 26.3 months. Univariate regression analysis showed that the ECOG status, the presence of severe complications, the HIPEC regimen (oxaliplatin vs. mitomycin-C), the PCI score, the SB-PCI score and the completeness of cytoreduction correlated significantly with overall survival. In multivariate analysis, the SB-PCI and CC score were identified as independent prognostic factors of survival. When the SB-PCI was stratified in three groups (0–4, 5–8 and 9–12), Kaplan–Meier curve analysis showed significant difference in survival (p<0.001). Conclusions The SB-PCI correlates with overall survival in patients with peritoneal metastases secondary to colorectal cancer in this retrospective cohort. Its use should be validated in prospective patient series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Spiliotis
- Department of Peritoneal Surface Oncology, Athens Medical Centre, Athens, Attica, Greece
| | - Vasileios Kalles
- Department of Surgery, Naval Hospital of Athens, Deinokratous 70, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Kyriazanos
- Department of Surgery, Naval Hospital of Athens, Deinokratous 70, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexios Terra
- Department of Surgery, Metaxa Cancer Hospital of Piraeus, Piraeus, Attike, Greece
| | | | - Apostolos Raptis
- Department of Peritoneal Surface Oncology, Athens Medical Centre, Athens, Attica, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Kopanakis
- Department of Surgery, Metaxa Cancer Hospital of Piraeus, Piraeus, Attike, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ocak S, Buk OF, Genc B, Avcı B, Uzuner HO, Gundogdu SB. The effects of platelet-rich-plasma gel application to the colonic anastomosis in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: An experimental rat model. Int Wound J 2019; 16:1426-1432. [PMID: 31448554 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2019] [Revised: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has cytotoxic effects on tumour cells but also negative impacts on anastomotic healing. Platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) is used for wound care but data about effects on gastrointestinal anastomosis are limited. In this experimental study, we aimed to investigate the effects of PRP application on colon anastomosis in rats those received HIPEC with cisplatin. Five rats were sacrificed to obtain PRP gel. Thirty rats were divided into three groups; Group 1: control group, Group 2: colon anastomosis and HIPEC with cisplatin, and Group 3: colon anastomosis enhanced by PRP and HIPEC with cisplatin. The rats were re-operated on postoperative day seven and anastomotic bursting pressure (ABP) was recorded. Also, tissue samples were taken for hydroxyproline assessment and histopathological examination. There were significant differences in ABP between Groups 2 and 3, and also those groups had lower ABP compared with the control group. Group 3 had significantly higher hydroxyproline levels and had better histopathological findings than group 2. According to our findings, we suggest that PRP application improves the anastomotic healing by increasing anastomotic bursting pressure, hydroxyproline levels, and decreasing inflammatory response. Further clinical studies are needed to prove our hypothesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonmez Ocak
- Department of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Samsun Research and Training Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Omer F Buk
- Department of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Samsun Research and Training Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Bugra Genc
- Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Bahattin Avcı
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Hatice O Uzuner
- Department of Pathology, University of Health Sciences, Samsun Research and Training Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Salih B Gundogdu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Research and Training Hospital Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wang H, Sui H, Zheng Y, Jiang Y, Shi Y, Liang J, Zhao L. Curcumin-primed exosomes potently ameliorate cognitive function in AD mice by inhibiting hyperphosphorylation of the Tau protein through the AKT/GSK-3β pathway. NANOSCALE 2019; 11:7481-7496. [PMID: 30942233 DOI: 10.1039/c9nr01255a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 190] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the progressive development of fatal neurodegenerative diseases. Owing to the unclearness of the pathogenesis of AD and the failure of the drug to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), there is currently a lack of effective diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in the treatment of AD. The aim of this study was to design exosomes (Exo) as a specifically designed carrier able to carry curcumin (cur) to prevent neuronal death in vitro and in vivo to alleviate the AD symptoms. Our results demonstrated that Exo improved the solubility and bioavailability of cur and increased drug penetration across the BBB by specific active targeting between Exo, inheriting the lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1) and endothelial intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1). Exosomes derived from curcumin-treated (primed) cells (Exo-cur) can better prevent the death of neurons in vitro and in vivo to relieve the symptoms of AD by inhibiting phosphorylation of the Tau protein through activating the AKT/GSK-3β pathway. Our results suggested that Exo-cur featured highly effective BBB-crossing via receptor-mediated transcytosis to access brain tissues and inhibited Tau phosphorylation, holding great potential in improving targeted drug delivery and the recovery of neuronal function in AD therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Wang
- School of Pharmacy, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121000, P R China.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Zhu W, Han C, Dong Y, Jian B. Enzyme-responsive mechanism based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes and pectin complex tablets for oral colon-specific drug delivery system. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s10967-019-06501-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
47
|
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an evolving strategy in the locoregional management of peritoneal surface malignancies, and the role of laparoscopy is expanding. Staging laparoscopy is routinely used to obtain tissue for diagnosis and assess extent of tumor burden. Laparoscopic CRS and HIPEC with curative intent is safe and effective in patients with a low disease burden. In patients with refractory malignant ascites, complete resolution of ascites and improvement in quality of life have been demonstrated with palliative laparoscopic HIPEC. Laparoscopic CRS and HIPEC has an expanding role in the treatment of peritoneal surface disease.
Collapse
|
48
|
Systematic Review of Variations in Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Med 2018; 7:jcm7120567. [PMID: 30572653 PMCID: PMC6306814 DOI: 10.3390/jcm7120567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Revised: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS), followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), combines radical surgery with abdominal heated chemotherapy, constituting a multimodal treatment approach. Since clear standards for HIPEC conduct in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) are lacking, we aimed to provide a comprehensive structured survey. Data sources and study eligibility criteria: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, with keywords “HIPEC” and “colorectal cancer”, according to established guidelines. Articles were systematically screened, selecting 87 publications complemented by 48 publications identified through extended search for subsequent synthesis and evaluation, extracting inter alia details on used drugs, dosage, temperature, exposure times, and carrier solutions. Results: Compiled publications contained 171 reports on HIPEC conduct foremost with mitomycin C and oxaliplatin, but also other drugs and drug combinations, comprising at least 60 different procedures. We hence provide an overview of interconnections between HIPEC protocols, used drugs and carrier solutions as well as their volumes. In addition, HIPEC temperatures and dosing benchmarks, as well as an estimate of in vivo resulting drug concentrations are demonstrated. Conclusions and implications: Owing to recent developments, HIPEC conduct and practices need to be reassessed. Unfortunately, imprecise and lacking reporting is frequent, which is why minimal information requirements should be established for HIPEC and the introduction of final drug concentrations for comparability reasons seems sensible.
Collapse
|
49
|
Preoperative CT-based predictive factors for resectability and medium-term overall survival in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. Clin Radiol 2018; 73:756.e11-756.e16. [DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
50
|
McGee S, AlGhareeb W, Ahmad C, Armstrong D, Babak S, Berry S, Biagi J, Booth C, Bossé D, Champion P, Colwell B, Finn N, Goel R, Gray S, Green J, Harb M, Hyde A, Jeyakumar A, Jonker D, Kanagaratnam S, Kavan P, MacMillan A, Muinuddin A, Patil N, Porter G, Powell E, Ramjeesingh R, Raza M, Rorke S, Seal M, Servidio-Italiano F, Siddiqui J, Simms J, Smithson L, Snow S, St-Hilaire E, Stuckless T, Tate A, Tehfe M, Thirlwell M, Tsvetkova E, Valdes M, Vickers M, Virik K, Welch S, Marginean C, Asmis T. Eastern Canadian Colorectal Cancer Consensus Conference 2017. Curr Oncol 2018; 25:262-274. [PMID: 30111967 PMCID: PMC6092057 DOI: 10.3747/co.25.4083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The annual Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2017 was held in St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, 28-30 September. Experts in radiation oncology, medical oncology, surgical oncology, and cancer genetics who are involved in the management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies participated in presentations and discussion sessions for the purpose of developing the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses multiple topics in the management of gastric, rectal, and colon cancer, including ■ identification and management of hereditary gastric and colorectal cancer (crc);■ palliative systemic therapy for metastatic gastric cancer;■ optimum duration of preoperative radiation in rectal cancer-that is, short- compared with long-course radiation;■ management options for peritoneal carcinomatosis in crc;■ implications of tumour location for treatment and prognosis in crc; and■ new molecular markers in crc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S.F. McGee
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - W. AlGhareeb
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - C.H. Ahmad
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - D. Armstrong
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - S. Babak
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - S. Berry
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - J. Biagi
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - C. Booth
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - D. Bossé
- Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, U.S.A
| | - P. Champion
- Prince Edward Island—Prince Edward Island Cancer Treatment Centre, Charlottetown
| | - B. Colwell
- Nova Scotia—qeii Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax
| | - N. Finn
- New Brunswick—Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John (Gray); Centre hospitalier universitaire Dr-Georges-L.-Dumont, Moncton (Finn, St-Hilaire); Dr. Everett Chalmers Hospital, Fredericton (Raza); Moncton City Hospital (Harb)
| | - R. Goel
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - S. Gray
- New Brunswick—Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John (Gray); Centre hospitalier universitaire Dr-Georges-L.-Dumont, Moncton (Finn, St-Hilaire); Dr. Everett Chalmers Hospital, Fredericton (Raza); Moncton City Hospital (Harb)
| | - J. Green
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - M. Harb
- New Brunswick—Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John (Gray); Centre hospitalier universitaire Dr-Georges-L.-Dumont, Moncton (Finn, St-Hilaire); Dr. Everett Chalmers Hospital, Fredericton (Raza); Moncton City Hospital (Harb)
| | - A. Hyde
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - A. Jeyakumar
- Nova Scotia—qeii Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax
| | - D. Jonker
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - S. Kanagaratnam
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - P. Kavan
- Quebec—McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (Kavan, Thirlwell); Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal (Tehfé)
| | - A. MacMillan
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - A. Muinuddin
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - N. Patil
- Nova Scotia—qeii Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax
| | - G. Porter
- Nova Scotia—qeii Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax
| | - E. Powell
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - R. Ramjeesingh
- Nova Scotia—qeii Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax
| | - M. Raza
- New Brunswick—Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John (Gray); Centre hospitalier universitaire Dr-Georges-L.-Dumont, Moncton (Finn, St-Hilaire); Dr. Everett Chalmers Hospital, Fredericton (Raza); Moncton City Hospital (Harb)
| | - S. Rorke
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - M. Seal
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - F. Servidio-Italiano
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - J. Siddiqui
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - J. Simms
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - L. Smithson
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - S. Snow
- Nova Scotia—qeii Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax
| | - E. St-Hilaire
- New Brunswick—Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John (Gray); Centre hospitalier universitaire Dr-Georges-L.-Dumont, Moncton (Finn, St-Hilaire); Dr. Everett Chalmers Hospital, Fredericton (Raza); Moncton City Hospital (Harb)
| | - T. Stuckless
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - A. Tate
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - M. Tehfe
- Quebec—McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (Kavan, Thirlwell); Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal (Tehfé)
| | - M. Thirlwell
- Quebec—McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (Kavan, Thirlwell); Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal (Tehfé)
| | - E. Tsvetkova
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - M. Valdes
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - M. Vickers
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - K. Virik
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - S. Welch
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - C. Marginean
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - T. Asmis
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| |
Collapse
|