Metformin treatment before and during IVF or ICSI in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): British Fertility Society policy and practice guideline

This British Fertility Society (BFS) Policy and Practice guideline aims to support clinicians in preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients undergoing gonadotropin ovarian stimulation. A systematic literature search of the medical databases was performed. The Guideline Development Group (GDG) identified the risk factors of OHSS before and during ovarian stimulation. The relation of different pre-treatment measures and different ovarian stimulation protocols with OHSS was evaluated. The optimal monitoring during treatment was assessed. The current evidence on preventive strategies during and after ovarian stimulation and the available adjuvant preventive agents were examined. Based on this, the GDG developed evidence-based, graded recommendations for clinical practice. The evidence was evaluated within context, considering the effectiveness, cost and practical problems of assisted reproductive technology for patients and healthcare providers. Early identification and application of preventive measures identified in this guideline may reduce the incidence of OHSS or reduce its severity. Suggestions for future research on OHSS prevention are provided.

Improved psychosexual wellbeing with administration of combined Sildenafil plus Melatonin compared than either drug alone in management of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a 3-month randomized clinical study

BACKGROUND

Given the significant impact of depression, sexual function, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS), it is crucial to identify scientifically supported interventions that enhance these outcomes and thereby promote HRQOL.

AIM

The present study aimed to assess the effect of adjutant administration of Sildenafil plus Melatonin on psycho-sexual status in PCOS women undergoing Metformin in an Iranian population.

METHODS

This study was a randomized clinical trial. 216 Eligible women were assigned to four groups including Sildenafil plus Metformin, Melatonin plus Metformin, Melatonin plus Sildenafil and Metformin, and Metformin alone. The duration of intervention was 3 months.

OUTCOMES

The Female Sexual Function Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and modified PCOS health-related QOL questionnaire were used to evaluate sexual function, severity of depression and HRQOL, respectively.

RESULTS

Based on the results of the present study, statistically significant improvement was found in menstrual cyclicity, sexual function (desire and arousal), HRQOL concerning menstrual and emotional aspects and severity of depression between the groups before and after the intervention in Sildenafil plus Melatonin compared to other groups after 3 months (P < 0.05).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The present research determined administration of Sildenafil plus Melatonin enhances menstrual cyclicity status, mental well-being, sexual function, and HRQOL in women with PCOS who undergoing Metformin treatment.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

The current research possesses several strengths, notably its adherence to the rigorous standards of a randomized controlled trial with well-defined initial inclusion criteria. In addition, this questionnaire is based on the previously ratified tools used. A robust sample size was maintained, enhancing the statistical power of the analysis. However, all the sample participants were sourced from a university referral clinic. Additionally, due to cultural norms, every participant in this study was married. Lastly, the absence of a post-intervention follow-up period is a notable gap; such a period could help determine the duration of the clinical effects or assess if ongoing treatment with Sildenafil plus Melatonin is necessary to sustain these effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this initial randomized controlled trial indicate that a 12-week administration of Sildenafil plus Melatonin could enhance menstrual cyclicity status, reduce depression severity, and sexual function as well as HRQOL in women with PCOS who undergoing Metformin.

Minimising OHSS in women with PCOS

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a serious iatrogenic complication of ovarian stimulation during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment and is associated with significant morbidity and a small risk of mortality. Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are at a substantially increased risk of developing OHSS compared to those without. This paper reviews the current evidence for strategies to mitigate the risk of OHSS in this patient population. In order to minimise the risk of OHSS, clinicians should identify patients at high risk prior to commencing treatment and provide adequate pre-treatment counselling regarding the risks and benefits of IVF treatment, as well as alternative treatment options. Strategies that can reduce the risk of OHSS include co-treatment with metformin in gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist cycles, use of GnRH antagonist or PPOS protocols, appropriate gonadotropin dosing, the use of a GnRH agonist trigger for oocyte maturation in antagonist or PPOS protocols, cryopreservation of all embryos with deferred frozen embryo transfer, and treatment with dopamine-agonists after oocyte collection. In vitro maturation (IVM) offers an alternative with no risk of OHSS, however currently has a lower cumulative live birth rate than conventional IVF. These strategies can prevent significant early and late OHSS in women with PCOS and should be used to optimise the safety of IVF for this high-risk population, striving for OHSS-free treatment for all patients undergoing IVF.

Recent developments in drug treatment strategies for infertility in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Infertility related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) represents a significant challenge for women of reproductive age. Over the last few years, evidence-based medicine has driven new approaches for treating infertility in patients with PCOS, changing rapidly and deeply the clinical practice.

AREAS COVERED

The authors provide an in-depth examination of recent developments in drug treatment strategies that have impacted the clinical practice and changed the previous approach to infertility in patients with PCOS.

EXPERT OPINION

The authors identify four primary areas of interest that have impacted clinical practice in the last few years. Specifically, they discuss the current role of metformin administration in women with PCOS and infertility, the choice for using clomiphene citrate or letrozole as first-line treatment for ovulation induction, the use of new gonadotropin formulations for in vitro fertilization (IVF) program, and the elective embryo transfer in IVF cycles as golden standard treatment for patients with PCOS at high-risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Association of Plasma Metal Levels with Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

The objective of this study is to explore the correlation of metal levels with assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients. The individuals were recruited who met the research criteria, only tubal factor or male infertility served as the control group (n = 40) and patient group was PCOS patients (n = 35). Individuals (n = 75) were divided into PCOS group (n = 35) and control group (n = 40). The normal body mass index (BMI) group (control) includes women with BMI < 25 kg/m2 in PCOS group (n = 24) and control group (n = 33), and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 in PCOS group (n = 11) and control group (n = 7). We performed an analysis of insulin resistance (IR) (n = 15) group and without insulin resistance (NIR) group (n = 20) in PCOS patient and control patients. Comparing difference demographic data, ART outcomes and the metal levels in every group respectively, the correlation of metal levels and ART outcomes in control participants and PCOS patients were analyzed by the Spearman correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression model was used to examine the association between the concentration of 19 metals and ART outcomes in PCOS group and control group. Plasma manganese (Mn), titanium (Ti), sodium (Na), magnesium (Mg), copper (Cu), calcium (Ca)/Mg ratio, and Cu/zinc (Zn) ratio levels in PCOS patients were higher than that in control, while Zn and Ca levels were lower in PCOS patients than that in control. The Mg levels had a positive connection with the number of eggs recovered, and the iron (Fe) levels were positively associated with the number of transplanted embryos in PCOS-IR. In PCOS-NIR, Mn levels positively correlated with the number of follicles and the number of good embryos. Silver (Ag) levels were negatively correlated with the number of follicles, and aluminum (Al) levels were negatively related with the normal fertilization and the number of good embryos. The Spearman analysis in PCOS-BMI ≥ 25 group exhibited that nickel (Ni) levels were negatively associated with the number of follicles. The plasma metal levels seem to affect the clinical manifestations and in vitro fertilization outcomes in assisted reproduction.

Unveiling therapeutic potentials and exploring maternal-fetal health benefits of metformin in pregnancy: A scoping review

This scoping review synthesizes evidence on metformin's use during pregnancy, encompassing diverse conditions like gestational diabetes, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and obesity. Metformin demonstrates comparable efficacy to insulin in gestational diabetes, positive outcomes in type 2 diabetes pregnancies, and potential benefits in reducing complications. The review highlights nuances in its effects across conditions, indicating advantages such as reduced risk of macrosomia and cesarean section in gestational diabetes. However, its prophylactic role in preventing gestational diabetes and associated complications remains inconclusive. In obese pregnant women, mixed results are observed, with potential benefits in reducing pre-eclampsia risk. Metformin shows promise in preventing preterm birth and late miscarriage in PCOS pregnancies. Categorizing patient subgroups is crucial for identifying advantages, especially in gestational diabetes and type 2 diabetes. Challenges arise from study heterogeneity, necessitating standardized indications for dosage, timing, and postpartum follow ups. Efforts to identify patient characteristics influencing metformin efficacy are crucial for tailored therapy. Although metformin emerges as a viable option in complicated pregnancies, comprehensive research, standardized protocols, and subgroup identification efforts will enhance clinical utility, ensuring evidence-based therapies and optimal maternal and fetal outcomes. Bridging existing knowledge gaps remains imperative for advancing metformin's role in pregnancy management.

Short-Term Metformin Therapy in Clomiphene Citrate Resistant PCOS Patients Improves Fertility Outcome by Regulating Follicular Fluid Redox Balance: A Case-Controlled Study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of short-term metformin administration on follicular fluid (FF) total oxidant status (TOS), total antioxidant status (TAS), oxidative stress index (OSI) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) in women with clomiphene citrate-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients aged 23-34 who were planned to have intracytoplasmic sperm injection due to clomiphene citrate-resistant PCOS were included in the study. Participants were divided into two groups according to whether they used metformin or not. While 30 of 58 PCOS patients were using short-term metformin in combination with controlled ovarian stimulation, 28 PCOS patients were not using metformin. Metformin was started in the mid-luteal period and continued until the day before oocyte retrieval at 850 mg twice daily. To determine FF-NF-kB, TAS, TOS and OSI values, a dominant follicle ≥17-18 mm in diameter was selected for aspiration.

RESULTS

The number of mature follicles and fertilization rates of the metformin group were significantly higher than those not taking metformin. FF-TOS and OSI of the metformin group were significantly lower than those of the group not receiving metformin. Patients receiving metformin had higher FF-TAS than the group not receiving metformin. FF-NF-kB levels of the metformin group were significantly lower than the group not receiving metformin. Insulin resistance, FF-NF-kB and FF-TOS were negatively correlated with the number of mature oocytes. FF-TAS was positively correlated with the number of oocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term metformin treatment in clomiphene-resistant PCOS improves the number of mature follicles and fertilization rates by regulating the intra-follicle redox balance.

Repurposing metabolic regulators: antidiabetic drugs as anticancer agents

Drug repurposing in cancer taps into the capabilities of existing drugs, initially designed for other ailments, as potential cancer treatments. It offers several advantages over traditional drug discovery, including reduced costs, reduced development timelines, and a lower risk of adverse effects. However, not all drug classes align seamlessly with a patient's condition or long-term usage. Hence, repurposing of chronically used drugs presents a more attractive option. On the other hand, metabolic reprogramming being an important hallmark of cancer paves the metabolic regulators as possible cancer therapeutics. This review emphasizes the importance and offers current insights into the repurposing of antidiabetic drugs, including metformin, sulfonylureas, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), thiazolidinediones (TZD), and α-glucosidase inhibitors, against various types of cancers. Antidiabetic drugs, regulating metabolic pathways have gained considerable attention in cancer research. The literature reveals a complex relationship between antidiabetic drugs and cancer risk. Among the antidiabetic drugs, metformin may possess anti-cancer properties, potentially reducing cancer cell proliferation, inducing apoptosis, and enhancing cancer cell sensitivity to chemotherapy. However, other antidiabetic drugs have revealed heterogeneous responses. Sulfonylureas and TZDs have not demonstrated consistent anti-cancer activity, while SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors have shown some potential benefits. GLP-1RAs have raised concerns due to possible associations with an increased risk of certain cancers. This review highlights that further research is warranted to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the potential anti-cancer effects of these drugs and to establish their efficacy and safety in clinical settings.

Interlukin-22 improves ovarian function in polycystic ovary syndrome independent of metabolic regulation: a mouse-based experimental study

BACKGROUND

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a reproductive endocrine disorder with multiple metabolic abnormalities. Most PCOS patients have concomitant metabolic syndromes such as insulin resistance and obesity, which often lead to the development of type II diabetes and cardiovascular disease with serious consequences. Current treatment of PCOS with symptomatic treatments such as hormone replacement, which has many side effects. Research on its origin and pathogenesis is urgently needed. Although improving the metabolic status of the body can alleviate reproductive function in some patients, there is still a subset of patients with metabolically normal PCOS that lacks therapeutic tools to address ovarian etiology.

METHODS

The effect of IL-22 on PCOS ovarian function was verified in a non-metabolic PCOS mouse model induced by dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and rosiglitazone, as well as granulosa cell -specific STAT3 knockout (Fshrcre+Stat3f/f) mice (10 groups totally and n = 5 per group). Mice were maintained under controlled temperature and lighting conditions with free access to food and water in a specific pathogen-free (SPF) facility. Secondary follicles separated from Fshrcre+Stat3f/f mice were cultured in vitro with DHEA to mimic the hyperandrogenic environment in PCOS ovaries (4 groups and n = 7 per group) and then were treated with IL-22 to investigate the specific role of IL-22 on ovarian function.

RESULTS

We developed a non-metabolic mice model with rosiglitazone superimposed on DHEA. This model has normal metabolic function as evidenced by normal glucose tolerance without insulin resistance and PCOS-like ovarian function as evidenced by irregular estrous cycle, polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM), abnormalities in sex hormone level. Supplementation with IL-22 improved these ovarian functions in non-metabolic PCOS mice. Application of DHEA in an in vitro follicular culture system to simulate PCOS follicular developmental block and ovulation impairment. Follicles from Fshrcre+Stat3f/f did not show improvement in POCS follicle development with the addition of IL-22. In DHEA-induced PCOS mice, selective ablation of STAT3 in granulosa cells significantly reversed the ameliorative effect of IL-22 on ovarian function.

CONCLUSION

IL-22 can improve non-metabolic PCOS mice ovarian function. Granulosa cells deficient in STAT3 reverses the role of IL-22 in alleviating ovary dysfunction in non-metabolic PCOS mice.

Efficacy and safety of follitropin delta versus follitropin alpha/beta in infertility treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Follitropin δ may be an alternative to conventional follitropin α/β for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) within assisted reproductive treatment (ART), but its efficacy and safety remain unknown. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of follitropin δ and follitropin α/β.

Methods

We searched randomized controlled trials comparing follitropin δ and follitropin α/β using MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO-ITCRP on December 14, 2022. The primary outcomes were the live birth rate and the incidence of moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation approach. The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework.

Results

Three studies involving 2682 participants were included in our meta-analysis. The results indicated that follitropin δ may result in little to no difference in live birth rates (risk ratio [RR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-1.38; low certainty) and the incidence of moderate or severe OHSS (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.48-1.26; low certainty) compared with follitropin α/β.

Conclusion

Follitropin δ may result in little to no difference in COS compared with follitropin α/β, especially in terms of live births and safety.

Which transfer day results in the highest live birth rate for PCOS patients undergoing in vitro fertilization?

BACKGROUND

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) has unusual levels of hormones. The hormone receptors in the endometrium have a hostile effect and make the microenvironment unfavorable for embryo implantation. The use of gonadotropin stimulation during in vitro fertilization (IVF) may have an impact on embryo implantation and live birth rate. According to recent data, the clinical results of day 4 embryo transfer (D4 transfer) were on par with those of day 5 embryo transfer (D5 transfer) in IVF-ET. There are few studies comparing the outcomes of transplants with various etiologies and days. The purpose of this study was to determine which transfer day had the best result for PCOS patients undergoing IVF.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Xingtai Infertility Specialist Hospital between January 2017 and November 2021. A total of 1,664 fresh ART cycles met inclusion criteria, including 242 PCOS transfers and 1422 tubal factor infertility transfers.

CONCLUSIONS

PCOS individuals had the highest live birth rate on D4 transferred. It was not need to culture embryos to blastocysts to optimize embryo transfer for PCOS women. This could be a novel approach to transplantation for PCOS.

The HERA (Hyper-response Risk Assessment) Delphi consensus for the management of hyper-responders in in vitro fertilization

PURPOSE

To provide agreed-upon guidelines on the management of a hyper-responsive patient undergoing ovarian stimulation (OS) METHODS: A literature search was performed regarding the management of hyper-response to OS for assisted reproductive technology. A scientific committee consisting of 4 experts discussed, amended, and selected the final statements. A priori, it was decided that consensus would be reached when ≥66% of the participants agreed, and ≤3 rounds would be used to obtain this consensus. A total of 28/31 experts responded (selected for global coverage), anonymous to each other.

RESULTS

A total of 26/28 statements reached consensus. The most relevant are summarized here. The target number of oocytes to be collected in a stimulation cycle for IVF in an anticipated hyper-responder is 15-19 (89.3% consensus). For a potential hyper-responder, it is preferable to achieve a hyper-response and freeze all than aim for a fresh transfer (71.4% consensus). GnRH agonists should be avoided for pituitary suppression in anticipated hyper-responders performing IVF (96.4% consensus). The preferred starting dose in the first IVF stimulation cycle of an anticipated hyper-responder of average weight is 150 IU/day (82.1% consensus). ICoasting in order to decrease the risk of OHSS should not be used (89.7% consensus). Metformin should be added before/during ovarian stimulation to anticipated hyper-responders only if the patient has PCOS and is insulin resistant (82.1% consensus). In the case of a hyper-response, a dopaminergic agent should be used only if hCG will be used as a trigger (including dual/double trigger) with or without a fresh transfer (67.9% consensus). After using a GnRH agonist trigger due to a perceived risk of OHSS, luteal phase rescue with hCG and an attempt of a fresh transfer is discouraged regardless of the number of oocytes collected (72.4% consensus). The choice of the FET protocol is not influenced by the fact that the patient is a hyper-responder (82.8% consensus). In the cases of freeze all due to OHSS risk, a FET cycle can be performed in the immediate first menstrual cycle (92.9% consensus).

CONCLUSION

These guidelines for the management of hyper-response can be useful for tailoring patient care and for harmonizing future research.

Association between serum AMH levels and IVF/ICSI outcomes in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels are increased in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients and are associated with PCOS severity.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the associations between serum AMH levels and in vitro fertilization (IVF)/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes in patients with PCOS.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched on 11 July 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies reporting the association between serum AMH levels and IVF/ICSI outcomes in PCOS patients were considered for inclusion. The primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy, live birth, and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted using a standardized data extraction form. Study quality was assessed independently by two groups of researchers.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Nineteen studies were included in this review. Meta-analyses demonstrated that PCOS patients with a serum AMH level within the 75-100th percentile had a decreased odds of clinical pregnancy (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.63-0.93) and livebirth (OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.58-0.87) compared to those within the 0-25th percentile. An increased AMH level was also correlated with an increased number of oocytes retrieved (SMD: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.30-1.51) and a lower odds of fertilization (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87-0.98). There was no significant difference in the number of MII oocytes (SMD: 1.85, 95% CI: -1.07-4.78), E2 on the day of hCG (SMD: 0.12; 95% CI: -0.98-1.23), or implantation (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.28-2.39) between the two groups. In addition, we found significant dose-response associations between serum AMH level and clinical pregnancy, live birth, number of oocytes retrieved, and fertilization in PCOS patients.

CONCLUSION

AMH may have clinical utility in counseling regarding IVF/ICSI outcomes among women with PCOS who wish to undergo fertility treatment. More large-scale, high-quality cohort studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Position paper of the Italian Association of Medical Diabetologists (AMD), Italian Society of Diabetology (SID), and the Italian Study Group of Diabetes in pregnancy: Metformin use in pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

This document purpose is to create an evidence-based position statement on the role of metformin therapy in pregnancy complicated by obesity, gestational diabetes (GDM), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART).

METHODS

A comprehensive review of international diabetes guidelines and a search of medical literature was performed to identify studies presenting data on the use of metformin in pregnancy. The document was approved by the councils of the two scientific societies.

RESULTS

In condition affecting the fertility, as PCOS, metformin use in pre-conception or early in pregnancy may be beneficial for clinical pregnancy, even in ART treatment, and in obese-PCOS women may reduce preterm delivery. In obese women, even in the presence of GDM or T2DM, metformin use in pregnancy is associated with a lower gestational weight gain. In pregnancy complicated by diabetes (GDM or T2DM), metformin improves maternal glycemic control and may reduce insulin dose. Neonatal and infant outcomes related to metformin exposure in utero are lacking. Metformin use in women with GDM or T2DM is associated with lower birth weight. However, an increased tendency to overweight-obesity has been observed in children, later in life.

CONCLUSIONS

Metformin may represent a therapeutic option in selected women with obesity, PCOS, GDM, T2DM, and in women undergoing ART. However, more research is required specifically on the long-term effects of in utero exposition to metformin.

A reappraisal of ovarian stimulation strategies used in assisted reproductive technology

Ovarian stimulation is a fundamental step in assisted reproductive technology (ART) with the intention of inducing ovarian follicle development prior to timed intercourse or intra-uterine insemination and facilitating the retrieval of multiple oocytes during a single in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. The basis of ovarian stimulation includes the administration of exogenous gonadotropins, with or without pre-treatment with oral hormonal therapy. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist is given in addition to the gonadotropins to prevent a premature rise of endogenous luteinizing hormone that would in turn lead to premature ovulation. With the advancement in technology, various stimulation protocols have been devised to cater for different patient needs. However, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and its serious complications may occur following ovarian stimulation. It is also evident that suboptimal ovarian stimulation strategies may have a negative impact on oogenesis, embryo quality, endometrial receptivity, and reproductive outcomes over recent years. This review describes the various forms of pre-treatment for ovarian stimulation and stimulation protocols, and aims to provide clinicians with the latest available evidence.

Effect of lifestyle or metformin interventions before IVF/ICSI treatment on infertile women with overweight/obese and insulin resistance: a factorial design randomised controlled pilot trial

BACKGROUND

For infertile women with overweight/obesity and insulin resistance (IR), it is uncertain whether intervention before infertility treatment can improve live birth rate (LBR). We implemented a factorial-design study to explore the effectiveness of lifestyle and metformin interventions. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a definitive study.

METHODS

We randomised 80 women without polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) who planned to start their first or second IVF/ICSI treatment with a body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 and IR. Participants were randomised (1:1:1:1) into four groups: (A) lifestyle intervention, (B) metformin intervention, (C) lifestyle + metformin intervention, or (D) no intervention. All interventions were performed before IVF/ICSI treatment.

RESULTS

During 10 months, 114 women were screened and eligible; 80 were randomised, and 72 received the assigned treatment. The recruitment rate was 70.18% (80/114, 95% CI 61.65%-78.70%). An average of 10 participants were randomised each month. None of the participants crossed over from one group to another. Approximately 93.15% (68/73) of the participants achieved good intervention compliance. Only 77.78% (56/72) of the recruited participants started infertility treatment after achieving the goal of the intervention. All randomised participants completed the follow-up. Mild adverse events after metformin administration were reported in 43.24% (16/37) of the cases, although no serious adverse events related to the interventions occurred. The LBR for groups A + C and B + D were 33.33% (12/36) and 33.33% (12/36) (RR = 1.00, 95%CI:0.52-1.92) (lifestyle intervention effect). The LBR for groups B + C and A + D were 43.24% (16/37) and 22.86% (8/35) (RR = 1.89, 95% CI:0.93-3.86) (metformin intervention effect). There was no evidence for an intervention interaction between lifestyle and metformin. We cannot yet confirm the effects of lifestyle, metformin, or their interaction owing to the insufficient sample size in this pilot study.

CONCLUSIONS

Instituting a 2 × 2 factorial design randomized controlled trial (RCT) is feasible, as the pilot study showed a high recruitment rate and compliance. There is no evidence that lifestyle or metformin improves live birth, and adequately powered clinical trials are required.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov NCT03898037. Registered: April 1, 2019.

Effect of Metformin (MTF) Intervention During Pregnancy in Women With Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS): A Systematic Review

Metformin (MTF) is a commonly prescribed medication for women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), but its impact on pregnancy outcomes in women with PCOS remains controversial. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of MTF intervention on pregnancy outcomes in women with PCOS and the impact of MTF on offspring. A comprehensive search is conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect databases from 2019 up to May 16, 2023. Only review articles and meta-analyses are included, focusing on women with PCOS who received MTF during pregnancy or as part of infertility treatment. The primary outcomes of interest are clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), miscarriage rate, preterm birth rate, and live birth rate. Secondary outcomes are the safety profile of MTF. Data extraction and quality assessment are performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the assessment using the multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool, respectively. The initial search produced 1877 studies. Thirteen studies were included in the review. While the use of MTF during pregnancy in women with PCOS may have some benefits in reducing certain pregnancy complications such as pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preeclampsia, preterm delivery, reducing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in women with PCOS undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF); however, there is no significant difference in clinical pregnancy and live birth rates overall, but subgroup analysis suggests potential benefits for women with a higher body mass index (BMI). MTF is associated with a larger fetal head circumference and potential long-term effects on offspring's BMI and obesity. Further research is needed to better understand the optimal dosing of MTF, long-term effects, and effects in specific subgroups. The heterogeneity of the included studies limited the ability to analyze the data effectively, leading to challenges in drawing definitive conclusions.

Women with PCOS who undergo IVF: a comprehensive review of therapeutic strategies for successful outcomes

Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a widespread syndrome that poses unique challenges and constraints to the field of assisted reproductive technology. This condition is the most common cause of anovulation among infertile couples. Debate exists over the best therapeutic course of action when patients with PCOS proceed to IVF. In this review, we evaluate the best-performing and safest methods of IVF preparation, ovarian stimulation, trigger method for maturation of stimulated egg growth, and planning for embryo transfer. Pre-IVF considerations include being aware of individual AMH and vitamin D levels as well as BMI prior to selecting an ovarian stimulation protocol. Numerous supplements such as myo-inositol complement the benefits of lifestyle change and may enhance IVF performance including oocyte yield and pregnancy rate. Concerning stimulation protocols, antagonist cycles with the judicious use of GnRH agonist trigger, pre-treatment with metformin and vitamin D repletion may help mitigate the accompanied risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Following ovarian stimulation, PCOS patients typically undergo programmed frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles which are more conducive for women with irregular cycles, but likely carry a higher risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. However, newer stimulated FET protocols using Letrozole may offer improved outcomes. Overall, patients with PCOS require careful individual tailoring of their IVF cycle to achieve optimal results.

Interventions to prevent or reduce the incidence and severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a systematic umbrella review of the best clinical evidence

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a potentially life-threating iatrogenic complication of the early luteal phase and/or early pregnancy after in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. The aim of the current study was to identify the most effective methods for preventing of and reducing the incidence and severity of OHSS in IVF patients. A systematic review of systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with meta-analysis was used to assess each potential intervention (PROSPERO website, CRD 268626) and only studies with the highest quality were included in the qualitative analysis. Primary outcomes included prevention and reduction of OHSS incidence and severity. Secondary outcomes were maternal death, incidence of hospital admission, days of hospitalization, and reproductive outcomes, such as incidence of live-births, clinical pregnancies, pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriages, and oocytes retrieved. A total of specific interventions related to OHSS were analyzed in 28 systematic reviews of RCTs with meta-analyses. The quality assessment of the included studies was high, moderate, and low for 23, 2, and 3 studies, respectively. The certainty of evidence (CoE) for interventions was reported for 37 specific situations/populations and resulted high, moderate, and low-to-very low for one, 5, and 26 cases, respectively, while it was not reported in 5 cases. Considering the effective interventions without deleterious reproductive effects, GnRH-ant co-treatment (36 RCTs; OR 0.61, 95% C 0.51 to 0.72, n = 7,944; I2 = 31%) and GnRH agonist triggering (8 RCTs; OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.47, n = 989; I2 = 42%) emerged as the most effective interventions for preventing OHSS with a moderate CoE, even though elective embryo cryopreservation exhibited a low CoE. Furthermore, the use of mild ovarian stimulation (9 RCTs; RR 0.26, CI 0.14 to 0.49, n = 1,925; I2 = 0%), and dopaminergic agonists (10 RCTs; OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.44, n = 1,202; I2 = 13%) coadministration proved effective and safe with a moderate CoE. In conclusion, the current study demonstrates that only a few interventions currently can be considered effective to reduce the incidence of OHSS and its severity with high/moderate CoE despite the numerous published studies on the topic. Further well-designed RCTs are needed, particularly for GnRH-a down-regulated IVF cycles.

Low dose of liraglutide combined with metformin leads to a significant weight loss in Chinese Han women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder with complex pathophysiological mechanism. It is reported that even a modest weight loss of 5-10% substantially may improve the reproductive and metabolic profile. This study aims to assess the efficacy of the low dose of liraglutide (0.6 mg QD) combined with metformin (0.85 mg BID) in weight loss in Chinese Han women with PCOS.

METHODS

We included clinical data of 102 obese/overweight (≥18 years, body mass index ≥28 kg/m² or ≥24 kg/m²) women who were diagnosed with PCOS from October 2016 to March 2018 in Wuhan Union Hospital initially. They were treated with dinae-35, low dose of liraglutide (0.6 mg QD) and metformin (0.85 mg BID) for 12 weeks. The demographic and clinical data were retrieved retrospectively, and weight loss was the main outcome measure. Student's paired t-test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to compare the differences before and after therapy, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Participants(n = 102)had lost a mean of 7.20 ± 3.42 kg of body weight (95%CI: 6.55-7.86, p < 0.001), and the mean reduction of BMI was 2.87 ± 1.36 kg/m² (95%CI: 0.02-0.27, p < 0.001). A total of 88.24% of participants lost more than 5% of their body weight.

CONCLUSION

The combination of low dose of liraglutide and metformin was associated with significant reduction of body weight in Chinese Han women with PCOS. Additionally, a larger randomized double-blind multicenter controlled clinical trial is needed to confirm that.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered on http://www.chictr.org.cn as ChiCTR1900024384.

Lights and shadows on the use of metformin in pregnancy: from the preconception phase to breastfeeding and beyond

During pregnancy, the complex hormonal changes lead to a progressive decrease of insulin sensitivity that can drive the onset of gestational diabetes (GDM) or worsen an already-known condition of insulin resistance like type 2 diabetes, polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), and obesity, with complications for the mother and the fetus. Metformin during pregnancy is proving to be safe in a growing number of studies, although it freely crosses the placenta, leading to a fetal level similar to maternal concentration. The aim of this literature review is to analyze the main available evidence on the use of metformin during, throughout, and beyond pregnancy, including fertilization, lactation, and medium-term effects on offspring. Analyzed studies support the safety and efficacy of metformin during pregnancy. In pregnant women with GDM and type 2 diabetes, metformin improves obstetric and perinatal outcomes. There is no evidence that it prevents GDM in women with pregestational insulin resistance or improves lipid profile and risk of GDM in pregnant women with PCOS or obesity. Metformin could have a role in reducing the risk of preeclampsia in pregnant women with severe obesity, the risk of late miscarriages and preterm delivery in women with PCOS, and the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, increasing the clinical pregnancy rate in women with PCOS undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF/FIVET). Offspring of mothers with GDM exposed to metformin have no significant differences in body composition compared with insulin treatment, while it appears to be protective for metabolic and cardiovascular risk.

Metformin: new applications for an old drug

Metformin is a biguanide, evolved as one of the most widely used medicines. The applications of this component include but are not limited to reducing blood glucose, weight loss, and polycystic ovary syndrome. Studies about other probable indications have emerged, indicating that this agent can also be utilized for other purposes. In this review, applications of metformin are noticed based on the current evidence. Metformin commonly is used as an off-label drug in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), but it worsens inflammation and should not be used for this purpose, according to the latest research. Metformin decreased the risk of death in patients with liver cirrhosis. It is an effective agent in the prevention and improvement of survival in patients suffering hepatocellular carcinoma. There is evidence of the beneficial effects of metformin in colorectal cancer, early-stage prostate cancer, breast cancer, urothelial cancer, blood cancer, melanoma, and bone cancer, suggesting metformin as a potent anti-tumor agent. Metformin shows neuroprotective effects and provides a potential therapeutic benefit for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease (AD). It also has been shown to improve mental function and reduce the incidence of dementia. Another condition that metformin has been shown to slow the progression of is Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Regarding infectious diseases, tuberculosis (TB) and coronavirus disease (COVID-19) are among the conditions suggested to be affected by metformin. The beneficial effects of metformin in cardiovascular diseases were also reported in the literature. Concerning renal function, studies showed that daily oral administration of metformin could ameliorate kidney fibrosis and normalize kidney structure and function. This study reviewed the clinical and preclinical evidence about the possible benefits of metformin based on recent studies. Numerous questions like whether these probable indications of metformin can be observed in non-diabetics, need to be described by future basic experiments and clinical studies.

The homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance is a judgment criterion for metformin pre-treatment before IVF/ICSI and embryo transfer cycles in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to explore the value of the homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) as a judgment criterion for metformin pre-treatment before in vitro fertilization/intracellular sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) and embryo transfer (ET) for polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical and laboratory information of PCOS patients who received IVF/ICSI-ET from January 2017 to September 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. We compared the clinical pregnancy rate (primary outcome) and controlled ovarian stimulation (COS)-related parameters (secondary outcomes) between patients with and without metformin pre-treatment for all PCOS patients not grouped by HOMA-IR, PCOS patients with HOMA-IR < 2.71, and PCOS patients with HOMA-IR ≥ 2.71.

RESULTS

A total of 969 PCOS patients who received the GnRH-antagonist protocol were included in this study. For all PCOS patients, the metformin group showed comparable clinical pregnancy rates in fresh ET cycles and frozen ET cycles compared with the control group (55.9% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.821 and 63.8% vs. 60.9%, p = 0.497). For PCOS patients with HOMA-IR < 2.71, the clinical pregnancy rates in both fresh ET cycles and frozen ET cycles were statistically similar between the two groups (61.5% vs. 57.6%, p = 0.658 and 70.6% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.535). For PCOS patients with HOMA-IR ≥ 2.71, the clinical pregnancy rate in fresh ET cycles was comparable between the two groups (51.5% vs. 56.3, p = 0.590), but it was statistically higher in the metformin group than in the control group in frozen ET cycles (57.1% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.023). The metformin group had less oocytes retrieved, a lower cleaved oocyte rate, a lower available D3 embryo rate, a lower blastocyst formation rate, and a lower available blastocyst rate than the control group.

CONCLUSION

HOMA-IR is a judgment criterion for metformin pre-treatment before IVF/ICSI-ET in patients with PCOS. Metformin pre-treatment could be added for PCOS patients with HOMA-IR ≥ 2.71 during frozen IVF/ICSI-ET cycles to improve the clinical pregnancy rate.

Metformin in therapeutic applications in human diseases: its mechanism of action and clinical study

Metformin, a biguanide drug, is the most commonly used first-line medication for type 2 diabetes mellites due to its outstanding glucose-lowering ability. After oral administration of 1 g, metformin peaked plasma concentration of approximately 20-30 μM in 3 h, and then it mainly accumulated in the gastrointestinal tract, liver and kidney. Substantial studies have indicated that metformin exerts its beneficial or deleterious effect by multiple mechanisms, apart from AMPK-dependent mechanism, also including several AMPK-independent mechanisms, such as restoring of redox balance, affecting mitochondrial function, modulating gut microbiome and regulating several other signals, such as FBP1, PP2A, FGF21, SIRT1 and mTOR. On the basis of these multiple mechanisms, researchers tried to repurpose this old drug and further explored the possible indications and adverse effects of metformin. Through investigating with clinical studies, researchers concluded that in addition to decreasing cardiovascular events and anti-obesity, metformin is also beneficial for neurodegenerative disease, polycystic ovary syndrome, aging, cancer and COVID-19, however, it also induces some adverse effects, such as gastrointestinal complaints, lactic acidosis, vitamin B12 deficiency, neurodegenerative disease and offspring impairment. Of note, the dose of metformin used in most studies is much higher than its clinically relevant dose, which may cast doubt on the actual effects of metformin on these disease in the clinic. This review summarizes these research developments on the mechanism of action and clinical evidence of metformin and discusses its therapeutic potential and clinical safety.

Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles for Varied Patient Profiles: An Indian Perspective

Controlled ovarian stimulation has been an integral part of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment cycles. Availability of different gonadotropins for ovarian stimulation and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues for prevention of premature rise of leutinising hormone during follicular phase offer an opportunity to utilise them for a successful outcome in women with different subsets of ovarian response. Further, use of GnRH agonist as an alternative for human chorionic gonadotropin improves safety of ovarian stimulation in hyper-responders. Mild ovarian stimulation protocols have emerged as an alternative to conventional protocols in the recent years. Individualisation plays an important role in improving safety of IVF in hyper-responders while efforts continue to improve efficacy in poor responders. Some of the follicular and peri-ovulatory phase interventions may be associated with negative impact on the luteal phase and segmentalisation of the treatment with frozen embryo transfer may be an effective strategy in such a clinical scenario. This narrative review looks at the available evidence on various aspects of ovarian stimulation strategies and their consequences. In addition, it provides a concise summary of the evidence that has emerged from India on various aspects of ovarian stimulation.

Metformin: Sex/Gender Differences in Its Uses and Effects—Narrative Review

Metformin (MTF) occupies a major and fundamental position in the therapeutic management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Gender differences in some effects and actions of MTF have been reported. Women are usually prescribed lower MTF doses compared to men and report more gastrointestinal side effects. The incidence of cardiovascular events in women on MTF has been found to be lower to that of men on MTF. Despite some promising results with MTF regarding pregnancy rates in women with PCOS, the management of gestational diabetes, cancer prevention or adjunctive cancer treatment and COVID-19, most robust meta-analyses have yet to confirm such beneficial effects.

The use of metformin in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: an updated review

PURPOSES

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a major cause of female infertility, being present in up to 20% of women of childbearing age. Insulin resistance (IR) plays an important role in the pathophysiology of PCOS; therefore, its treatment may benefit women with the syndrome. The main drug used for IR management is metformin (MT). We aim to review the literature on the use of metformin in women with PCOS.

METHODS

Using the terms "metformin" and "polycystic ovary syndrome," we conducted a search the PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases. The research was restricted to articles published in English. Initially, only published meta-analyses were included, in the absence of meta-analyzes, RCT and well-designed prospective studies were used.

RESULTS

Metformin increases success rates and decreases complication rates when used as an adjunctive medication for ovulation induction during low complexity assisted reproduction treatments and during ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization in women with PCOS. Evidence about the effect of metformin on fetal and obstetric complication rates is conflicting. Metformin is associated with high incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms; however, serious adverse effects are rare and there is no evidence of teratogenicity.

CONCLUSION

For women with PCOS, metformin is a good adjunctive medication for ovulation induction/stimulation for high and low complexity assisted reproduction therapies. The adverse effects are mostly mild, and there is no risk of teratogenicity, but the risk of long-term complications for the offspring is not yet defined. High heterogeneity of the studies limits extrapolation of findings, and further research is needed to determine which women will benefit most from the medication.

[Clinical guidelines «Polycystic Ovary Syndrome»]

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a polygenic endocrine disorder caused by both genetic and epigenetic factors. Depending on the period of a woman's life, the clinical picture, diagnosis, and treatment tactics of the disease are different. PCOS has a complex of reproductive, metabolic and psychological characteristics. The target audience of these clinical recommendations are obstetrician-gynecologists, endocrinologists, general practitioners, general practitioners. In these clinical guidelines, all information is ranked according to the level of persuasiveness of recommendations and the reliability of evidence, depending on the number and quality of studies on this issue.

A Prospective Cohort Study of Metformin as an Adjuvant Therapy for Infertile Women With Endometrial Complex Hyperplasia/Complex Atypical Hyperplasia and Their Subsequent Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the adjuvant efficacy of metformin treatment to achieve pathological complete response (CR) in patients with endometrial complex hyperplasia (CH) and complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH), and secondarily, to evaluate their pregnancy outcomes after following assisted reproductive technology (ART).

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective cohort study analyzed 219 patients diagnosed with infertility and CH/CAH from January 2016 to December 2020. Among these patients, 138 were assigned to the control group (progesterone alone) and 81 were assigned to the study group (progesterone+metformin). After 8/12 weeks of therapy, the treatment responses were assessed by histological examination of curettage specimens obtained by hysteroscopy. Once the pathological results indicated CR, the patients were able to receive ART. The ART treatment and follow-up data of these patients were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

116 patients in the control group achieved CR, compared with 76 patients in the study group. The CR rate in the control group was significantly lower than that in the study group (P=0.034). We then divided the patients into subgroups to compare the treatment responses. In the subgroup analyses, patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m² and patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) had higher CR rates in the metformin group compared with the control group (P=0.015, P=0.028 respectively). Subsequently, 68 patients in the control group and 47 patients in the study group received an ART cycle. We examined the pregnancy indications and found no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate between the two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Regression of CH/CAH may be improved by progesterone+metformin compared with progesterone alone. The effect was particularly pronounced in patients with BMI ≥25 kg/m² and patients with PCOS. Metformin had no obvious effect on subsequent ART outcomes. The trial is registered on the publicly accessible website.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=15372, identifier ChiCTR-ONR-16009078.