1
|
Li RD, Joung RHS, Chung JW, Holl J, Bilimoria KY, Merkow RP. Divergent Trends in Postoperative Length of Stay and Postdischarge Complications over Time. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2024; 50:630-637. [PMID: 38853106 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a push toward shorter length of stay (LOS) after surgery by hospitals, payers, and policymakers. However, the extent to which these changes have shifted the occurrence of complications to the postdischarge setting is unknown. The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate changes in LOS and postdischarge complications over time and (2) assess factors associated with postdischarge complications. STUDY DESIGN Patients who underwent surgery across five specialties (colorectal, esophageal, hepatopancreatobiliary [HPB], gynecology, and urology) were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) procedure-targeted database (2014-2019). Trends in the proportion of postdischarge complications within 30 days of surgery and predictors of postdischarge complications were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Among 538,172 patients evaluated, median LOS decreased from 3 (2014) to 2 days (2019) (p < 0.001). Overall, 12.2% of patients experienced a 30-day complication, with 50.4% occurring postdischarge. with the highest in hysterectomy (80.9%), prostatectomy (74.6%), and cystectomy (54.6%). The overall postoperative complication decreased, but the proportion of postdischarge complications increased from 44.6% (2014) to 56.4% (2019) (p < 0.001), including surgical site infection (superficial/deep/organ space/wound dehiscence), other infection (pneumonia/urinary tract infection/sepsis), cardiovascular (myocardial infarction/cardiac arrest/stroke), and venous thromboembolism. Factors associated with an increased odds of postdischarge complications included Hispanic or other race, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class, dependent functional status, increased body mass index, higher wound class, inpatient complication, longer operation, and procedure type (HPB/colorectal/hysterectomy/esophagectomy, vs. prostatectomy) (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION This comprehensive retrospective analysis across five representative surgical specialties highlighted that although LOS has decreased over time, the proportion of postdischarge complications has increased over time. Focusing on the development of a comprehensive, proactive, postdischarge monitoring system to better identify and manage postdischarge complications is necessary.
Collapse
|
2
|
Piovano E, Puppo A, Camanni M, Castiglione A, Delpiano EM, Giacometti L, Rolfo M, Rizzo A, Zola P, Ciccone G, Pagano E. Implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for hysterectomy in a hospital network with audit and feedback: A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. BJOG 2024; 131:1207-1217. [PMID: 38404145 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of implementing the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol in patients undergoing elective hysterectomy in a network of regional hospitals, supported by an intensive audit-and-feedback (A&F) approach. DESIGN A multi-centre, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04063072). SETTING Gynaecological units in the Piemonte region, Italy. POPULATION Patients undergoing elective hysterectomy, either for cancer or for benign conditions. METHODS Twenty-three units (clusters), stratified by surgical volume, were randomised into four sequences. At baseline (first 3 months), standard care was continued in all units. Subsequently, the four sequences implemented the ERAS protocol successively every 3 months, after specific training. By the end of the study, each unit had a period in which standard care was maintained (control) and a period in which the protocol, supported by feedback, was applied (experimental). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Length of hospital stay (LOS), without outliers (>98th percentile). RESULTS Between September 2019 and May 2021, 2086 patients were included in the main analysis with an intention-to-treat approach: 1104 (53%) in the control period and 982 (47%) in the ERAS period. Compliance with the ERAS protocol increased from 60% in the control period to 76% in the experimental period, with an adjusted absolute difference of +13.3% (95% CI 11.6% to 15.0%). LOS, moving from 3.5 to 3.2 days, did not show a significant reduction (-0.12 days; 95% CI -0.30 to 0.07 days). No difference was observed in the occurrence of complications. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of the ERAS protocol for hysterectomy at the regional level, supported by an A&F approach, resulted in a substantial improvement in compliance, but without meaningful effects on LOS and complications. This study confirms the effectiveness of A&F in promoting important innovations in an entire hospital network and suggests the need of a higher compliance with the ERAS protocol to obtain valuable improvements in clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Piovano
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit 2U, Sant'Anna Hospital, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Puppo
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Marco Camanni
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Martini Hospital, ASL Città di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Anna Castiglione
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino and CPO Piemonte, Torino, Italy
| | - Elena Maria Delpiano
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Martini Hospital, ASL Città di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Lisa Giacometti
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino and CPO Piemonte, Torino, Italy
| | - Monica Rolfo
- Healthcare Services Direction, Humanitas Gradenigo, Torino, Italy
| | - Alessio Rizzo
- General Surgery and Oncology Unit, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Zola
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sant'Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giovannino Ciccone
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino and CPO Piemonte, Torino, Italy
| | - Eva Pagano
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino and CPO Piemonte, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bjerregaard F, Asklid D, Ljungqvist O, Elliot AH, Pekkari K, Gustafsson UO. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colonic procedures within an ERAS-protocol. A retrospective cohort study from the Swedish part of the international ERAS-database. World J Surg 2024; 48:1749-1758. [PMID: 38719788 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research on anastomotic leakage (AL) in colonic procedures within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol has not yet been conducted. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for AL after colonic surgery. METHODS The study included all consecutively recorded patients operated with colonic resection surgery in the Swedish part of the international ERAS® Interactive Audit System (EIAS) between September 2009 and June 2022. The cohort was analyzed and evaluated regarding risk factors for AL. RESULTS Altogether 10,632 patients were included, 10,219 were without AL and 413 (3.9%) were with AL. After adjusted analysis, male sex (4.6% AL), OR: 1.49; 95% CI (1.16-1.90), obesity (4.8% AL), OR: 1.62; 95% CI (1.18-2.24), previous surgery (4.4% AL), OR: 1.45; 95% CI (1.14-1.86), open surgery (4.4% AL), OR: 1.36; 95% CI (1.02-1.83), anastomosis between small bowel and rectum (13.1% AL), OR: 3.97; 95% CI (2.23-7.10), stapled anastomosis (5.3% AL), OR: 2.46; 95% CI (1.79-3.38), inhalation anesthesia (4.2% AL), OR: 1.80; 95% CI (1.26-2.57), and conversion to open surgery (5.5% AL), OR 1.49; 95% CI (1.02-2.19) were significant risk factors for AL. Although pre and intraoperative compliance to the ERAS-protocol was similar, excess of fluids day 0 was an independent predictor for AL. CONCLUSION Male sex, obesity, previous surgery, open surgery, stapled anastomotic technique, anastomosis between small bowel and rectum, inhalation anesthesia, conversion to open surgery, and among ERAS interventions, excess of fluids day 0, were significant risk factors for AL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Bjerregaard
- Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery and Urology, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Daniel Asklid
- Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery and Urology, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Olle Ljungqvist
- Department of Surgery, Örebro University and University Hospital, Örebro & Institute of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders H Elliot
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Division of Coloproctology, Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Klas Pekkari
- Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ulf O Gustafsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Division of Coloproctology, Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ushimaru Y, Nagano S, Kawabata R, Nishikawa K, Takeoka T, Kitagawa A, Ohara N, Tomihara H, Maeda S, Imasato M, Noura S, Miyamoto A. Enhancing surgical outcomes in elderly gastric cancer patients: the role of comprehensive preoperative assessment and support. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:136. [PMID: 38778314 PMCID: PMC11112811 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03421-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the prevalence of gastric cancer rises in aging populations, managing surgical risks and comorbidities in elderly patients presents a unique challenge. The Comprehensive Preoperative Assessment and Support (CPAS) program, through comprehensive preoperative assessments, aims to mitigate surgical stress and improve outcomes by enhancing patient awareness and preparation. This study investigates the efficacy of a CPAS program, incorporating frailty and sarcopenia evaluations, to improve short-term outcomes in elderly gastric cancer patients. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 127 patients aged 75 or older who underwent surgery with CPAS between 2018 and August 2023, compared to 170 historical controls from 2012 to 2017. Propensity score matching balanced both groups based on age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index and surgical details. The primary focus was on the impact of CPAS elements such as rehabilitation, nutrition, psychological support, oral frailty, and social support on short-term surgical outcomes. RESULTS Among 83 matched pairs, the CPAS group, despite 40.4% of patients in the CPAS group and 21.2% in the control group had an ASA-PS score of 3 or higher (P < 0.001), demonstrated significantly reduced blood loss (100 ml vs. 190 ml, P = 0.026) and lower incidence of serious complications (19.3% vs. 33.7%, P = 0.034), especially in infections and respiratory issues. Sarcopenia was identified in 38.6% of CPAS patients who received tailored support. Additionally, the median postoperative hospital stay was notably shorter in the CPAS group (10 days vs. 15 days, P < 0.001), with no in-hospital deaths. These results suggest that personalized preoperative care effectively mitigates operative stress and postoperative complications. CONCLUSION Implementing CPAS significantly enhances surgical safety and reduces complication rates in elderly gastric cancer patients, emphasizing the critical role of personalized preoperative care in surgical oncology for this demographic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Ushimaru
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Next Generation Endoscopic Intervention (Project ENGINE), Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shinnosuke Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Ryohei Kawabata
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan.
| | - Kazuhiro Nishikawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Tomohira Takeoka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Akihiro Kitagawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Nobuyoshi Ohara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Hideo Tomihara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Sakae Maeda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Mitsunobu Imasato
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Shingo Noura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Atsushi Miyamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pagano E, Pellegrino L, Robella M, Castiglione A, Brunetti F, Giacometti L, Rolfo M, Rizzo A, Palmisano S, Meineri M, Bachini I, Morino M, Allaix ME, Mellano A, Massucco P, Bellomo P, Polastri R, Ciccone G, Borghi F. Implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for colorectal cancer in a regional hospital network supported by audit and feedback: a stepped wedge, cluster randomised trial. BMJ Qual Saf 2024; 33:363-374. [PMID: 38423752 PMCID: PMC11103294 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are known to potentially improve the management and outcomes of patients undergoing colorectal surgery, with limited evidence of their implementation in hospital networks and in a large population. We aimed to assess the impact of the implementation of an ERAS protocol in colorectal cancer surgery in the entire region of Piemonte, Italy, supported by an audit and feedback (A&F) intervention. METHODS A large, stepped wedge, cluster randomised trial enrolled patients scheduled for elective surgery at 29 general surgery units (clusters). At baseline (first 3 months), standard care was continued in all units. Thereafter, four groups of clusters began to adopt the ERAS protocol successively. By the end of the study, each cluster had a period in which standard care was maintained (control) and a period in which the protocol was applied (experimental). ERAS implementation was supported by initial training and A&F initiatives. The primary endpoint was length of stay (LOS) without outliers (>94th percentile), and the secondary endpoints were outliers for LOS, postoperative medical and surgical complications, quality of recovery and compliance with ERAS items. RESULTS Of 2626 randomised patients, 2397 were included in the LOS analysis (1060 in the control period and 1337 in the experimental period). The mean LOS without outliers was 8.5 days during the control period (SD 3.9) and 7.5 (SD 3.5) during the experimental one. The adjusted difference between the two periods was a reduction of -0.58 days (95% CI -1.07, -0.09; p=0.021). The compliance with ERAS items increased from 52.4% to 67.3% (estimated absolute difference +13%; 95% CI 11.4%, 14.7%). No difference in the occurrence of complications was evidenced (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.89, 1.68). CONCLUSION Implementation of the ERAS protocol for colorectal cancer, supported by A&F approach, led to a substantial improvement in compliance and a reduction in LOS, without meaningful effects on complications. Trial registration number NCT04037787.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Pagano
- Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Luca Pellegrino
- Surgical Oncology Department, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy
| | - Manuela Robella
- Surgical Oncology Department, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy
| | - Anna Castiglione
- Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesco Brunetti
- Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Lisa Giacometti
- Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Alessio Rizzo
- General Surgery and Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Sarah Palmisano
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, S Croce and Carle Cuneo Hospital Districts, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Maurizio Meineri
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, S Croce and Carle Cuneo Hospital Districts, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Ilaria Bachini
- Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Mario Morino
- Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Center for Minimal Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Marco Ettore Allaix
- Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Center for Minimal Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Alfredo Mellano
- Surgical Oncology Department, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy
| | - Paolo Massucco
- General Surgery and Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Paola Bellomo
- General Surgery, Presidio Sanitario Gradenigo, Torino, Italy
| | - Roberto Polastri
- Department of Surgery, General Surgery Unit, Hospital of Biella, Ponderano, Biella, Italy
| | - Giovannino Ciccone
- Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Felice Borghi
- Surgical Oncology Department, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Süsstrunk J, Mijnssen R, von Strauss M, Müller BP, Wilhelm A, Steinemann DC. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in colorectal surgery: implementation is still beneficial despite modern surgical and anesthetic care. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 409:5. [PMID: 38091109 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03195-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have shown beneficial outcomes in the last 20 years. Nevertheless, simultaneously implemented technical improvements such as minimally invasive access or modified anesthesia care may play a crucial role in optimizing patient outcome. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of ERAS implementation in a highly specialized colorectal center. METHODS This is a propensity score matched single-center study comparing the short-term outcomes of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in a society-indepedent ERAS program from January 2021 to August 2022 to standard perioperative care from January 2019 to December 2020. RESULTS Four hundred fifty-six patients were included in the propensity score matched analysis with 228 patients per group (ERAS vs. standard care). Minimally invasive access was used in 80.2% vs. 77.6% (p = 0.88), and there were 16.6% vs. 18.8% (p = 0.92) rectal procedures in the ERAS and standard care group, respectively. Major complications occurred in 10.1% vs. 11.4% (p = 0.65) and anastomotic leakage demanding operative revision in 2.2% vs. 2.6% (p = 0.68) in the ERAS and standard care group, respectively. ERAS lead to a lower number of non-surgical complications compared to standard care (57 vs. 79; p = 0.02). Mean length of stay (LOS) and mean costs per case were lower in ERAS compared to standard care (9.2 ± 5.6 days vs. 12.7 ± 7.4 days, p < 0.01; costs 33,727 ± 15,883 USD vs. 40,309 ± 29,738 USD, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION The implementation of an ERAS protocol may lead to a reduction of LOS, costs, and a lower number of non-surgical complications even in a highly specialized colorectal unit using modern surgical and anesthetic care. ( ClinialTrials.gov number NCT05773248).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Süsstrunk
- Clarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Basel, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Remo Mijnssen
- Medical Faculty, University of Basel, 4001, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marco von Strauss
- Clarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Basel, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Beat Peter Müller
- Clarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Basel, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Wilhelm
- Clarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Basel, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Surgical Outcome Research Center Basel, University Hospital Basel, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Daniel C Steinemann
- Clarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Basel, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Elsenosy AM, Hassan E, Abdelgader M, Elgamily OS, Hegazy A. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Approach: A Medical Complex Experience. Cureus 2023; 15:e51208. [PMID: 38161529 PMCID: PMC10756688 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal, multidisciplinary approach aimed at reducing organ failure and mitigating stress reactions in surgery patients. This investigation sought to assess available data concerning the benefits of ERAS protocols in improving patient outcomes for individuals undergoing significant colorectal surgery. METHODS The study involved 65 patients who underwent colectomy and lower anterior resection for rectal cancers. Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 comprised 22 patients enrolled retrospectively who received the traditional protocol; Group 2 consisted of 20 patients enrolled prospectively who received the ERAS protocol; and Group 3 included 23 patients enrolled retrospectively who received the ERAS protocol. Each patient underwent a comprehensive history, physical examination, laboratory testing, computed tomography, MRI, and chest radiography. RESULTS Hospital stay durations were significantly shorter in both ERAS groups during the first and second cycles compared to the non-ERAS group (P<0.001, <0.001), with no significant difference between ERAS groups in either cycle. Delayed intestinal motility was significantly more pronounced in the non-ERAS group compared to ERAS groups in both cycles (P=0.005), with only five (22.7%) cases reported in the non-ERAS group. CONCLUSION ERAS implementation in the perioperative management of colorectal surgery patients is associated with improved outcomes and shorter recovery times. Implementation of ERAS in hospitals is feasible and beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eslam Hassan
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Poole General Hospital, Poole, GBR
| | | | - Omar S Elgamily
- General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Maadi Armed Forces Medical Complex, Cairo, EGY
| | - Abdelhares Hegazy
- General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Maadi Armed Forces Medical Complex, Cairo, EGY
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aggarwal A, Irrinki S, Kurdia KC, Khare S, Naik N, Tandup C, Savlania A, Dahiya D, Kaman L, Sakaray Y. Modified Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol Versus Non-ERAS Protocol in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy for Acute Intestinal Obstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. World J Surg 2023; 47:2990-2999. [PMID: 37740758 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07176-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal approach with promising results in improving patient outcome. Only recently, is evidence emerging highlighting how similar principles of care can be applied to patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. METHODS A randomized controlled trial was conducted from November 2021 to April 2022 at PGIMER Chandigarh, which is a leading tertiary care hospital in northern India. 60 patients with acute intestinal obstruction requiring emergency laparotomy were randomized and assigned to ERAS or Non-ERAS group. ERAS protocol with some modifications was applied. Primary endpoints were post-operative hospital stay. Secondary end points were morbidity, 30-day readmission and mortality rate. Data analysis was done using SPSS 22.0. Independent t test or Mann-Whitney test and Chi-square or Fisher-exact test were used for analysis. RESULTS A significant 3-day reduction in hospital stay was observed in ERAS compared to non-ERAS group (median (interquartile range) 5.50 (4.75-8.25) vs 8.0 (6.0-11.0) p = 0.003) with no difference in 30-day readmission rate, mortality rate and complication rate (according to Clavien-Dindo classification). ERAS group was associated with early recovery of gastrointestinal functions including time to first passage of flatus (p < 0.001), stools (p = 0.014), early ambulation (p < 0.001), time to first fluid diet (p < 0.001), solid diet (p = 0.001) and reduced nasogastric tube reinsertion rates (p = 0.01) despite its early removal. CONCLUSION ERAS with some modifications can be applied in patients with intestinal obstruction. Thus, we can expedite post-operative recovery and early regain of gastrointestinal function with decreased hospital stay, comparable morbidity and mortality. Further studies are needed to assess ERAS role in emergency gastrointestinal surgeries. Trial registration Ctri.gov Identifier: CTRI/2022/04/042156.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit Aggarwal
- Department of General Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | - Santosh Irrinki
- Department of General Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | - Kailash C Kurdia
- Department of General Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | - Siddhant Khare
- Department of General Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | - Naveen Naik
- Department of Anaesthesia, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | - Cherring Tandup
- Department of General Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | - Ajay Savlania
- Department of General Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | - Divya Dahiya
- Department of General Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | - Lileswar Kaman
- Department of General Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | - Yashwant Sakaray
- Department of General Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Reuter S, Schmalfeldt B, Haas SA, Zapf A, Cevirme S, Prieske K, Wölber L, Müller V, Zöllner C, Jaeger A. Impact of Introducing a PACU24 Concept on the Perioperative Outcome of Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83:1022-1030. [PMID: 37588253 PMCID: PMC10427201 DOI: 10.1055/a-2055-9349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Patients with ovarian cancer who undergo multivisceral surgery usually require intensive care monitoring postoperatively. In view of the ever-fewer numbers of high-care/intensive care beds and the introduction of fast-track treatment concepts, it is increasingly being suggested that these patients should be cared for postoperatively in 24-h Post Anesthesia Care Units (PACU24). No analyses have been carried out to date to investigate whether such a postoperative care concept might be associated with a potential increase in postoperative complications in this patient cohort. Methods A PACU24 unit was set up in our institution in 2015 and it has become the primary postoperative care pathway for patients with ovarian cancer who have undergone cytoreductive (debulking) surgery. A structured, retrospective analysis of data from patients treated before (control group) and after (PACU group) the introduction of this care concept was carried out, with a particular focus on postoperative complications and secondary admission to an intensive care unit where necessary. Results The data of 42 patients were analyzed for the PACU group and 45 patients for the control group. According to the analysis, the preoperative and surgical data of both groups were comparable (age, ASA, BMI, FIGO stage, duration of surgery, blood loss). The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM score) as a measure for the risk of postoperative complications was higher in the PACU group (11.1% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.001). Patients in the PACU group underwent bowel resection with anastomosis significantly more often (76.3% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001), although the extent of surgery was otherwise comparable. The total number, type and severity of postoperative complications and the duration of the overall stay in hospital did not differ between the two groups. None of the patients required secondary transfer from the PACU or normal ward to an intensive care unit (ICU). Summary Our data support the assumption that the care concept of transferring patients to a PACU24 represents a safe and cost-saving care pathway for the postoperative care of patients even after complex gynecological-oncological procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Reuter
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Barbara Schmalfeldt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian A. Haas
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Antonia Zapf
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sinan Cevirme
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Katharina Prieske
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Linn Wölber
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Zöllner
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anna Jaeger
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Turaga AH. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols for Improving Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Major Colorectal Surgery. Cureus 2023; 15:e41755. [PMID: 37575751 PMCID: PMC10416136 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have gained recognition as a perioperative care approach for patients undergoing major colorectal surgery. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of ERAS protocols on outcomes in this patient population. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases for studies published between January 2010 and September 2021. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies assessing the impact of ERAS protocols on patients undergoing major colorectal surgery. Data were extracted, and a qualitative synthesis of the included studies was performed. A total of 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. The implementation of ERAS protocols was associated with several positive outcomes. Compared to traditional care, ERAS protocols significantly reduced the length of hospital stay (mean difference [MD]: -1.64 days, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.21 to -1.08, p<0.00001), postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR]: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.71, p<0.00001), and readmission rates (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.85, p=0.006). ERAS protocols also led to a shorter time to return of bowel function (MD: -0.74 days, 95% CI: -1.03 to -0.45, p<0.00001), time to first mobilization (MD: -0.55 days, 95% CI: -0.82 to -0.28, p<0.0001), and time to first oral intake (MD: -0.62 days, 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.28, p=0.0003). Additionally, patients reported higher satisfaction levels with the implementation of ERAS protocols (MD: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.19 to 1.86, p=0.02). This systematic review demonstrates that the implementation of ERAS protocols in major colorectal surgery is associated with improved outcomes. ERAS protocols lead to reduced hospital stays, lower postoperative complications, and decreased readmission rates. Furthermore, they facilitate faster recovery of bowel function, mobilization, and oral intake. Patients also express higher satisfaction levels with ERAS implementation. Healthcare providers should consider adopting ERAS protocols to optimize perioperative care in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjani H Turaga
- Medicine and Surgery, Gandhi Medical College, Hyderabad, IND
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wyse R, Smith S, Zucca A, Fakes K, Mansfield E, Johnston SA, Robinson S, Oldmeadow C, Reeves P, Carey ML, Norton G, Sanson-Fisher RW. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a digital health intervention to support patients with colorectal cancer prepare for and recover from surgery: study protocol of the RecoverEsupport randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e067150. [PMID: 36878662 PMCID: PMC9990701 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgery is the most common treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) and can cause relative long average length of stay (LOS) and high risks of unplanned readmissions and complications. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways can reduce the LOS and postsurgical complications. Digital health interventions provide a flexible and low-cost way of supporting patients to achieve this. This protocol describes a trial aiming to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the RecoverEsupport digital health intervention in decreasing the hospital LOS in patients undergoing CRC surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The two-arm randomised controlled trial will assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the RecoverEsupport digital health intervention compared with usual care (control) in patients with CRC. The intervention consists of a website and a series of automatic prompts and alerts to support patients to adhere to the patient-led ERAS recommendations. The primary trial outcome is the length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes include days alive and out of hospital; emergency department presentations; quality of life; patient knowledge and behaviours related to the ERAS recommendations; health service utilisation; and intervention acceptability and use. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial has been approved by the Hunter New England Research Ethics Committee (2019/ETH00869) and the University of Newcastle Ethics Committee (H-2015-0364). Trial findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. If the intervention is effective, the research team will facilitate its adoption within the Local Health District for widespread adaptation and implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12621001533886.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Wyse
- School of Medicine & Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen Smith
- School of Medicine & Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alison Zucca
- School of Medicine & Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kristy Fakes
- School of Medicine & Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elise Mansfield
- School of Medicine & Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sally-Ann Johnston
- Department of Surgery, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sancha Robinson
- Department of Surgery, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Anaesthetics, John Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christopher Oldmeadow
- School of Medicine & Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Penny Reeves
- School of Medicine & Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mariko L Carey
- School of Medicine & Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Grace Norton
- School of Medicine & Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rob W Sanson-Fisher
- School of Medicine & Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Willis MA, Toews I, Soltau SL, Kalff JC, Meerpohl JJ, Vilz TO. Preoperative combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation for preventing complications in elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 2:CD014909. [PMID: 36748942 PMCID: PMC9908065 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014909.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The success of elective colorectal surgery is mainly influenced by the surgical procedure and postoperative complications. The most serious complications include anastomotic leakages and surgical site infections (SSI)s, which can lead to prolonged recovery with impaired long-term health. Compared with other abdominal procedures, colorectal resections have an increased risk of adverse events due to the physiological bacterial colonisation of the large bowel. Preoperative bowel preparation is used to remove faeces from the bowel lumen and reduce bacterial colonisation. This bowel preparation can be performed mechanically and/or with oral antibiotics. While mechanical bowel preparation alone is not beneficial, the benefits and harms of combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation is still unclear. OBJECTIVES To assess the evidence for the use of combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation for preventing complications in elective colorectal surgery. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and trial registries on 15 December 2021. In addition, we searched reference lists and contacted colorectal surgery organisations. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adult participants undergoing elective colorectal surgery comparing combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation (MBP+oAB) with either MBP alone, oAB alone, or no bowel preparation (nBP). We excluded studies in which no perioperative intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis was given. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures as recommended by Cochrane. Pooled results were reported as mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using the Mantel-Haenszel method. The certainty of the evidence was assessed with GRADE. MAIN RESULTS We included 21 RCTs analysing 5264 participants who underwent elective colorectal surgery. None of the included studies had a high risk of bias, but two-thirds of the included studies raised some concerns. This was mainly due to the lack of a predefined analysis plan or missing information about the randomisation process. Most included studies investigated both colon and rectal resections due to malignant and benign surgical indications. For MBP as well as oAB, the included studies used different regimens in terms of agent(s), dosage and timing. Data for all predefined outcomes could be extracted from the included studies. However, only four studies reported on side effects of bowel preparation, and none recorded the occurrence of adverse effects such as dehydration, electrolyte imbalances or the need to discontinue the intervention due to side effects. Seventeen trials compared MBP+oAB with sole MBP. The incidence of SSI could be reduced through MBP+oAB by 44% (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.74; 3917 participants from 16 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) and the risk of anastomotic leakage could be reduced by 40% (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.99; 2356 participants from 10 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). No difference between the two comparison groups was found with regard to mortality (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.27 to 2.82; 639 participants from 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), the incidence of postoperative ileus (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.32; 2013 participants from 6 studies, low-certainty of evidence) and length of hospital stay (MD -0.19, 95% CI -1.81 to 1.44; 621 participants from 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Three trials compared MBP+oAB with sole oAB. No difference was demonstrated between the two treatment alternatives in terms of SSI (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.34 to 2.21; 960 participants from 3 studies; very low-certainty evidence), anastomotic leakage (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.21 to 3.45; 960 participants from 3 studies; low-certainty evidence), mortality (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.30 to 3.50; 709 participants from 2 studies; low-certainty evidence), incidence of postoperative ileus (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.33; 709 participants from 2 studies; low-certainty evidence) or length of hospital stay (MD 0.1 respectively 0.2, 95% CI -0.68 to 1.08; data from 2 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). One trial (396 participants) compared MBP+oAB versus nBP. The evidence is uncertain about the effect of MBP+oAB on the incidence of SSI as well as mortality (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.23 respectively RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.22; low-certainty evidence), while no effect on the risk of anastomotic leakages (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.42; low-certainty evidence), the incidence of postoperative ileus (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.81; low-certainty evidence) or the length of hospital stay (MD 0.1, 95% CI -0.8 to 1; low-certainty evidence) could be demonstrated. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on moderate-certainty evidence, our results suggest that MBP+oAB is probably more effective than MBP alone in preventing postoperative complications. In particular, with respect to our primary outcomes, SSI and anastomotic leakage, a lower incidence was demonstrated using MBP+oAB. Whether oAB alone is actually equivalent to MBP+oAB, or leads to a reduction or increase in the risk of postoperative complications, cannot be clarified in light of the low- to very low-certainty evidence. Similarly, it remains unclear whether omitting preoperative bowel preparation leads to an increase in the risk of postoperative complications due to limited evidence. Additional RCTs, particularly on the comparisons of MBP+oAB versus oAB alone or nBP, are needed to assess the impact of oAB alone or nBP compared with MBP+oAB on postoperative complications and to improve confidence in the estimated effect. In addition, RCTs focusing on subgroups (e.g. in relation to type and location of colon resections) or reporting side effects of the intervention are needed to determine the most effective approach of preoperative bowel preparation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria A Willis
- Department of General, Visceral, Thorax and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ingrid Toews
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sophia Lv Soltau
- Department of General, Visceral, Thorax and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jörg C Kalff
- Department of General, Visceral, Thorax and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Joerg J Meerpohl
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Cochrane Germany, Cochrane Germany Foundation, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tim O Vilz
- Department of General, Visceral, Thorax and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tweed TTT, Sier MAT, Daher I, Bakens MJAM, Nel J, Bouvy ND, van Bastelaar J, Stoot JHMB. Accelerated 23-h enhanced recovery protocol for colon surgery: the CHASE-study. Sci Rep 2022; 12:20707. [PMID: 36456869 PMCID: PMC9715541 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25022-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The introduction of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program has radically improved postoperative outcomes in colorectal surgery. Optimization of ERAS program to an accelerated recovery program may further improve these said outcomes. This single-center, prospective study investigated the feasibility and safety of a 23-h accelerated enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) for colorectal cancer patients (ASA I-II) undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery. The 23-h accelerated ERP consisted of adjustments in pre-, peri- and postoperative care; this was called the CHASE-protocol. This group was compared to a retrospective cohort of colorectal cancer patients who received standard ERAS care. Patients were discharged within 23 h after surgery if they met the discharge criteria. Primary outcome was the rate of the successful discharge within 23 h. Successful discharge within the CHASE-cohort was realized in 33 out of the 41 included patients (80.5%). Compared to the retrospective cohort (n = 75), length of stay was significantly shorter in the CHASE-cohort (p = 0.000), and the readmission rate was higher (p = 0.051). Complication rate was similar, severe complications were observed less frequently in the CHASE-cohort (4.9% vs. 8.0%). Findings from this study support the feasibility and safety of the accelerated 23-h accelerated ERP with the CHASE-protocol in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thaís T. T. Tweed
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Dr. H. van der Hoffplein 1, 6162 BG Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Misha A. T. Sier
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Dr. H. van der Hoffplein 1, 6162 BG Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Imane Daher
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Dr. H. van der Hoffplein 1, 6162 BG Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Maikel J. A. M. Bakens
- grid.412966.e0000 0004 0480 1382Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debeyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Nel
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Dr. H. van der Hoffplein 1, 6162 BG Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole D. Bouvy
- grid.412966.e0000 0004 0480 1382Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debeyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - James van Bastelaar
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Dr. H. van der Hoffplein 1, 6162 BG Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan H. M. B. Stoot
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Dr. H. van der Hoffplein 1, 6162 BG Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Early Postoperative Low Compliance to Enhanced Recovery Pathway in Rectal Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235736. [PMID: 36497217 PMCID: PMC9738259 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Early postoperative low compliance to enhanced recovery protocols has been associated with morbidity following colon surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the possible causes of early postoperative low compliance to the enhanced recovery pathway and its relationship with morbidity following rectal surgery for cancer. A total of 439 consecutive patients who underwent elective surgery for rectal cancer have been included in the study. Compliance to enhanced recovery protocol on postoperative day (POD) 2 was evaluated in all patients. Indicators of compliance were naso-gastric tube and urinary catheter removal, recovery of both oral feeding and mobilization, and the stopping of intravenous fluids. Low compliance on POD 2 was defined as non- adherence to two or more items. One-third of patients had low compliance on POD 2. Removal of urinary catheter, intravenous fluids stop, and mobilization were the items with lowest adherence. Advanced age, duration of surgery, open surgery and diverting stoma were predictive factors of low compliance at multivariate analysis. Overall morbidity and major complications were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in patients with low compliance on POD 2. At multivariate analysis, failure to remove urinary catheter on POD 2 (OR = 1.83) was significantly correlated with postoperative complications. Low compliance to enhanced recovery protocol on POD 2 was significantly associated with morbidity. Failure to remove the urinary catheter was the most predictive indicator. Advanced age, long procedure, open surgery and diverting stoma were independent predictive factors of low compliance.
Collapse
|
15
|
Higueras A, Gonzalez G, de Lourdes Bolaños M, Redondo MV, Olazabal IM, Ruiz-Tovar J. Economic Impact of the Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocol in a Bariatric Patient Undergoing a Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:14946. [PMID: 36429661 PMCID: PMC9690327 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192214946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have proven to be cost-effective in various surgical procedures, mainly in colorectal surgeries. However, there is still little scientific evidence evaluating the economic impact of their application in bariatric surgery. The present study aimed to compare the economic cost of performing a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass following an ERAS protocol, with the costs of following a standard-of-care protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS A prospective non-randomized study of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: patients following an ERAS protocol and patients following a standard-of-care protocol. The total costs of the procedure were subdivided into pharmacological expenditures, surgical material, and time expenses, the price of complementary tests performed during the hospital stay, and costs related to the hospital stay. RESULTS The 84 patients included 58 women (69%) and 26 men (31%) with a mean age of 44.3 ± 11.6 years. There were no significant differences in age, gender, and distribution of comorbidities between groups. Postoperative pain, nausea or vomiting, and hospital stay were significantly lower within the ERAS group. The pharmacological expenditures, the price of complementary tests performed during the hospital stay, and the costs related to the hospital stay, were significantly lower in the ERAS group. There were no significant differences in the surgical material and surgical time costs between groups. Globally, the total cost of the procedure was significantly lower in the ERAS group with a mean saving of 1458.62$ per patient. The implementation of an ERAS protocol implied a mean saving of 21.25% of the total cost of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of an ERAS protocol significantly reduces the perioperative cost of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Maria de Lourdes Bolaños
- Neuroscience Institute, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológico Agropecuarias (CUCBA), University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44600, Mexico
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
吉田 好. [Surgical therapy for elderly cancer patients]. Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi 2022; 59:464-471. [PMID: 36476693 DOI: 10.3143/geriatrics.59.464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
17
|
Archer V, Cloutier Z, Berg A, McKechnie T, Wiercioch W, Eskicioglu C. Short-stay compared to long-stay admissions for loop ileostomy reversals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:2113-2124. [PMID: 36151483 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04256-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Short-stay admissions, with lengths of stay less than 24 h, are used for various surgeries without increasing adverse events. However, it is unclear if short-stay admissions would be safe for loop ileostomy reversals. This review aimed to compare outcomes between short (≤24 hours) and long (>24 hours) admissions for adults undergoing loop ileostomy reversals. METHODS Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies comparing short- to long-stay admissions in adults undergoing loop ileostomy reversals. Meta-analyses were conducted for mortality, reoperation, readmission, and non-reoperative complications. Quality of evidence was assessed with grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluations (GRADE) guidelines. RESULTS Four observational studies enrolling 24,628 patients were included. Moderate certainty evidence suggests there is no difference in readmissions between short- and long-stay admissions (relative risk (RR) 0.98, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.28, p 0.86). Low certainty evidence demonstrates that short stays may reduce non-reoperative complications (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.62, p < 0.01). Very low certainty evidence demonstrates that there is no difference in reoperations between short and long stays (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.26 to 5.04, p 0.87). CONCLUSIONS Moderate certainty evidence demonstrates that there is no difference in readmission rates between short- and long-stay admissions for loop ileostomy reversals. Less robust evidence suggests equivalence in reoperations and a decrease in non-reoperative complications. Future prospective trials are required to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of short-stay admissions. TRIAL REGISTRATION https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=307381 Prospero (CRD42022307381), January 30, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Archer
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. .,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - Zacharie Cloutier
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Annie Berg
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Tyler McKechnie
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Wojtek Wiercioch
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Cagla Eskicioglu
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Milone M, Elmore U, Manigrasso M, Ortenzi M, Botteri E, Arezzo A, Silecchia G, Guerrieri M, De Palma GD, Agresta F. ERas and COLorectal endoscopic surgery: an Italian society for endoscopic surgery and new technologies (SICE) national report. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7619-7627. [PMID: 35501602 PMCID: PMC9485180 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09212-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several reports demonstrated a strong association between the level of adherence to the protocol and improved clinical outcomes after surgery. However, it is difficult to obtain full adherence to the protocol into clinical practice and has still not been identified the threshold beyond which improved functional results can be reached. METHODS The ERCOLE (ERas and COLorectal Endoscopic surgery) study was as a cohort, prospective, multi-centre national study evaluating the association between adherence to ERAS items and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive colorectal surgery. The primary endpoint was to associate the percentage of ERAS adherence to functional recovery after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery. The secondary endpoints of the study was to validate safety of the ERAS programme evaluating complications' occurrence according to Clavien-Dindo classification and to evaluate the compliance of the Italian surgeons to each ERAS item. RESULTS 1138 patients were included. Adherence to the ERAS protocol was full only in 101 patients (8.9%), > 75% of the ERAS items in 736 (64.7%) and > 50% in 1127 (99%). Adherence to > 75% was associated with a better functional recovery with 90.2 ± 98.8 vs 95.9 ± 33.4 h (p = 0.003). At difference, full adherence to the ERAS components 91.7 ± 22.1 vs 92.2 ± 31.6 h (p = 0.8) was not associated with better recovery. CONCLUSIONS Our results were encouraging to affirm that adherence to the ERAS program up to 75% could be considered satisfactory to get the goal. Our study could be considered a call to simplify the ERAS protocol facilitating its penetrance into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II" University of Naples, via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Ugo Elmore
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Manigrasso
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" University of Naples, via Pansini 5, Naples, Italy
| | - Monica Ortenzi
- Department of General Surgery, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Piazza Roma 22, 60121, Ancona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Botteri
- General Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili Di Brescia, Montichiari, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Silecchia
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Biotechnologies, Faculty Pharmacy and Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Guerrieri
- Department of General Surgery, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Piazza Roma 22, 60121, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Domenico De Palma
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II" University of Naples, via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Ferdinando Agresta
- Department of General Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Ulss2 Marca Trevigiana, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Li RD, Joung RHS, Brajcich BC, Schlick CJR, Yang AD, McGee MF, Bentrem D, Bilimoria KY, Merkow RP. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Trends in Length of Stay and Post-discharge Complications After Colon Surgery in the USA. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:2184-2192. [PMID: 35819663 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05391-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With widespread adoption of enhanced recovery protocols and a push toward shorter length of stay (LOS) following colon surgery, the extent to which complications have shifted to the post-discharge setting is unknown. The objectives of this study were to (1) characterize changes in LOS and post-discharge complications over time and (2) evaluate risk factors associated with post-discharge complications. METHODS Patients who underwent elective colon resection from 2012 to 2018 were identified from the ACS NSQIP Colectomy-Targeted Dataset. Changes in LOS and the proportion of post-discharge complications were evaluated over time, and predictors of post-discharge complications were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Of the 98,136 patients who underwent colon resection, median LOS decreased from 5 days in 2012 to 4 days in 2018. Overall, 30-day complication rate was 21.5%, which decreased during the study period (25.8 to 19.1%, p < 0.001). Of the 13 individual complications evaluated, 4 demonstrated a significant increase in the proportion of post-discharge events including overall SSI (55.8 to 63.3%, p = 0.002), superficial SSI (57.3 to 75.7%, p < 0.001), wound disruption (46.0 to 62.1%, p = 0.047), and UTI (41.5 to 62.7%, p < 0.001). Factors associated with the development of any post-discharge complication included female sex, ASA III/IV/V, dependent functional status, and higher BMI. Intraoperative factors included wound class, operation time, and approach. CONCLUSIONS Although LOS and 30-day complications decreased over time, the proportion of events occurring post-discharge increased for several complications. We identified specific factors associated with post-discharge complications which emphasize the importance of a patient monitoring program to early identify and manage post-discharge complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruojia Debbie Li
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, 633 N St Clair St 20th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Rachel Hae-Soo Joung
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, 633 N St Clair St 20th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.,Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Brian C Brajcich
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, 633 N St Clair St 20th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.,Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Cary Jo R Schlick
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, 633 N St Clair St 20th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.,Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Anthony D Yang
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, 633 N St Clair St 20th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.,Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael F McGee
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David Bentrem
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, 633 N St Clair St 20th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.,Surgery Service, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Karl Y Bilimoria
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, 633 N St Clair St 20th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.,Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ryan P Merkow
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, 633 N St Clair St 20th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. .,Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Milone M, Elmore U, Manigrasso M, Ortenzi M, Botteri E, Arezzo A, Silecchia G, Guerrieri M, De Palma GD, Agresta F, Agresta F, Pizza F, D’Antonio D, Amalfitano F, Selvaggi F, Sciaudone G, Selvaggi L, Prando D, Cavallo F, Guerrieri M, Ortenzi M, Lezoche G, Cuccurullo D, Tartaglia E, Sagnelli C, Coratti A, Tribuzi A, Di Marino M, Anania G, Bombardini C, Zago MP, Tagliabue F, Burati M, Di Saverio S, Colombo S, Adla SE, De Luca M, Zese M, Parini D, Prosperi P, Alemanno G, Martellucci J, Olmi S, Oldani A, Uccelli M, Bono D, Scaglione D, Saracco R, Podda M, Pisanu A, Murzi V, Agrusa A, Buscemi S, Muttillo IA, Picardi B, Muttillo EM, Solaini L, Cavaliere D, Ercolani G, Corcione F, Peltrini R, Bracale U, Lucchi A, Vittori L, Grassia M, Porcu A, Perra T, Feo C, Angelini P, Izzo D, Ricciardelli L, Trompetto M, Gallo G, Luc AR, Muratore A, Calabrò M, Cuzzola B, Barberis A, Costanzo F, Angelini G, Ceccarelli G, Rondelli F, De Rosa M, Cassinotti E, Boni L, Baldari L, Bianchi PP, Formisano G, Giuliani G, Ceretti AAP, Mariani NM, Giovenzana M, Farfaglia R, Marcianò P, Arizzi V, Piccoli M, Pecchini F, Pattacini GC, Botteri E, Vettoretto N, Guarnieri C, Laface L, Abate E, Casati M, Feo C, Fabri N, Pesce A, Maida P, Marte G, Abete R, Casali L, Marchignoli A, Dall’Aglio M, Scabini S, Pertile D, Aprile A, Andreuccetti J, Di Leo A, Crepaz L, Maione F, Vertaldi S, Chini A, Rosati R, Puccetti F, Maggi G, Cossu A, Sartori A, De Luca M, Piatto G, Perrotta N, Celiento M, Scorzelli M, Pilone V, Tramontano S, Calabrese P, Sechi R, Cillara N, Putzu G, Podda MG, Montuori M, Pinotti E, Sica G, Franceschilli M, Sensi B, Degiuli M, Reddavid R, Puca L, Farsi M, Minuzzo A, Gia E, Baiocchi GL, Ranieri V, Celotti A, Bianco F, Grassia S, Novi A. ERas and COLorectal endoscopic surgery: an Italian society for endoscopic surgery and new technologies (SICE) national report. Surg Endosc 2022. [DOI: https:/doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09212-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Several reports demonstrated a strong association between the level of adherence to the protocol and improved clinical outcomes after surgery. However, it is difficult to obtain full adherence to the protocol into clinical practice and has still not been identified the threshold beyond which improved functional results can be reached.
Methods
The ERCOLE (ERas and COLorectal Endoscopic surgery) study was as a cohort, prospective, multi-centre national study evaluating the association between adherence to ERAS items and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive colorectal surgery. The primary endpoint was to associate the percentage of ERAS adherence to functional recovery after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery. The secondary endpoints of the study was to validate safety of the ERAS programme evaluating complications’ occurrence according to Clavien-Dindo classification and to evaluate the compliance of the Italian surgeons to each ERAS item.
Results
1138 patients were included. Adherence to the ERAS protocol was full only in 101 patients (8.9%), > 75% of the ERAS items in 736 (64.7%) and > 50% in 1127 (99%). Adherence to > 75% was associated with a better functional recovery with 90.2 ± 98.8 vs 95.9 ± 33.4 h (p = 0.003). At difference, full adherence to the ERAS components 91.7 ± 22.1 vs 92.2 ± 31.6 h (p = 0.8) was not associated with better recovery.
Conclusions
Our results were encouraging to affirm that adherence to the ERAS program up to 75% could be considered satisfactory to get the goal. Our study could be considered a call to simplify the ERAS protocol facilitating its penetrance into clinical practice.
Collapse
|
21
|
Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery Targeting Opioid Prescriptions (BSTOP) protocol on postoperative pain control. Surg Endosc 2022:10.1007/s00464-022-09646-4. [PMID: 36167874 PMCID: PMC9514885 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09646-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical pain management is a critical component in the success of bariatric procedures. With the opioid epidemic, there have been increased efforts to decrease opioid use. In 2019, the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program developed the BSTOP protocol, a multimodal perioperative pain management regimen to minimize opioid use. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the BSTOP protocol on patients' need for opioid medications during their perioperative care. METHODS This is a single-institution prospective cohort study on patients who underwent bariatric surgery from 10/2019 to 5/2021. Data was collected on morphine equivalent dose of opioids during different stages of inpatient and outpatient care. BSTOP was implemented on 7/2020. Primary outcomes were total inpatient and outpatient opioid use as well as hospital length of hospital stay (LOS). Gabapentin was removed from the protocol between 10/20/2020 and 12/31/2020 due to side effects; it was re-implemented on 1/1/2021 due to observed spikes in opioid use during its absence. RESULTS 1264 patients who had bariatric surgery between 10/2019 and 5/2021 were included in the study, with 409 patients before (pre-BSTOP) and 855 patients after BSTOP implementation. There was a 36% reduction in total inpatient opiate use and a 57% reduction in total outpatient opiate use. LOS also significantly decreased, from 1.53 to 1.28 days. 179 patients received BSTOP without gabapentin. These patients used more opioids in the post-anesthesia care unit and on the inpatient floors compared to pre-BSTOP and BSTOP with gabapentin patients. With total inpatient and outpatient opioid use, patients on BSTOP without gabapentin used fewer opioids than those pre-BSTOP. However, those on BSTOP without gabapentin used more opioids than those with gabapentin. CONCLUSION The BSTOP protocol significantly reduced inpatient and outpatient opioid use as well as LOS. Gabapentin is a crucial component of the BSTOP protocol.
Collapse
|
22
|
Boatman S, Nalluri H, Gaertner WB. Colon and Rectal Cancer Management in Low-Resource Settings. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2022; 35:402-409. [PMID: 36111080 PMCID: PMC9470288 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1746189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is rising in low- and middle-income countries, which also face disproportionate mortality from CRC, mainly due to diagnosis at late stages. Various challenges to CRC care exist at multiple societal levels in underserved populations. In this article, barriers to CRC care, strategies for screening, and treatment in resource-limited settings, and future directions are discussed within a global context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Boatman
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Harika Nalluri
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Wolfgang B. Gaertner
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Shi BW, Xu L, Gong CX, Yang F, Han YD, Chen HZ, Li CG. Preoperative Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Complications After Esophageal Resection That can be Used as Inclusion Criteria for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery. Front Surg 2022; 9:897716. [PMID: 35910480 PMCID: PMC9326077 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.897716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been reported as an indicator for poor prognosis in many cancers including esophageal cancer. However, the relationship between the NLR and postoperative complications after esophageal cancer resection remains unclear. At present, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) lacks inclusion criteria. The aim of this study is to determine whether the preoperative NLR (preNLR) can predict complications after esophageal cancer resection, which could represent the criteria for ERAS. Methods This was a retrospective study on 171 patients who underwent esophagectomy at Hospital between November 2020 and November 2021(68 patients from Changhai Hospital, 65 patients from Shanghai General Hospital and 38 patients from Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to demonstrate that the preNLR could predict complications after esophagectomy. Results A preNLR cutoff value of 2.30 was identified as having the greatest ability to predict complications with a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 65%. Moreover, the Chi-squared test results showed that the preNLR was significantly associated with complications (x2 = 13.641, p < 0.001), and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that body mass index (BMI), p stage and preNLR were independent variables associated with the development of postoperative complications (p < 0.05). Conclusion The preNLR can predict complications after esophagectomy, and these predicted complications can represent the criteria for recruiting patients for ERAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo-Wen Shi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Navy Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Li Xu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chun-Xia Gong
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Navy Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Fu Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu-Dong Han
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - He-Zhong Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Navy Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chun-Guang Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Laios A, Kalampokis E, Johnson R, Munot S, Thangavelu A, Hutson R, Broadhead T, Theophilou G, Leach C, Nugent D, De Jong D. Factors Predicting Surgical Effort Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Advanced Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143447. [PMID: 35884506 PMCID: PMC9316555 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Surgical cytoreduction for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a complex procedure. Encompassed within the performance skills to achieve surgical precision, intra-operative surgical decision-making remains a core feature. The use of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) could potentially interpret the influence of human factors on the surgical effort for the cytoreductive outcome in question; (2) Methods: The retrospective cohort study evaluated 560 consecutive EOC patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery between January 2014 and December 2019 in a single public institution. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Deep Neural Network (DNN) algorithms were employed to develop the predictive model, including patient- and operation-specific features, and novel features reflecting human factors in surgical heuristics. The precision, recall, F1 score, and area under curve (AUC) were compared between both training algorithms. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework was used to provide global and local explainability for the predictive model; (3) Results: A surgical complexity score (SCS) cut-off value of five was calculated using a Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve, above which the probability of incomplete cytoreduction was more likely (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.644; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.598−0.69; sensitivity and specificity 34.1%, 86.5%, respectively; p = 0.000). The XGBoost outperformed the DNN assessment for the prediction of the above threshold surgical effort outcome (AUC = 0.77; 95% [CI] 0.69−0.85; p < 0.05 vs. AUC 0.739; 95% [CI] 0.655−0.823; p < 0.95). We identified “turning points” that demonstrated a clear preference towards above the given cut-off level of surgical effort; in consultant surgeons with <12 years of experience, age <53 years old, who, when attempting primary cytoreductive surgery, recorded the presence of ascites, an Intraoperative Mapping of Ovarian Cancer score >4, and a Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index >7, in a surgical environment with the optimization of infrastructural support. (4) Conclusions: Using XAI, we explain how intra-operative decisions may consider human factors during EOC cytoreduction alongside factual knowledge, to maximize the magnitude of the selected trade-off in effort. XAI techniques are critical for a better understanding of Artificial Intelligence frameworks, and to enhance their incorporation in medical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandros Laios
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (R.J.); (S.M.); (A.T.); (R.H.); (T.B.); (G.T.); (D.N.); (D.D.J.)
- Correspondence:
| | | | - Racheal Johnson
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (R.J.); (S.M.); (A.T.); (R.H.); (T.B.); (G.T.); (D.N.); (D.D.J.)
| | - Sarika Munot
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (R.J.); (S.M.); (A.T.); (R.H.); (T.B.); (G.T.); (D.N.); (D.D.J.)
| | - Amudha Thangavelu
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (R.J.); (S.M.); (A.T.); (R.H.); (T.B.); (G.T.); (D.N.); (D.D.J.)
| | - Richard Hutson
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (R.J.); (S.M.); (A.T.); (R.H.); (T.B.); (G.T.); (D.N.); (D.D.J.)
| | - Tim Broadhead
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (R.J.); (S.M.); (A.T.); (R.H.); (T.B.); (G.T.); (D.N.); (D.D.J.)
| | - Georgios Theophilou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (R.J.); (S.M.); (A.T.); (R.H.); (T.B.); (G.T.); (D.N.); (D.D.J.)
| | - Chris Leach
- School of Human & Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK;
- Department of Psychology Services, South West Yorkshire Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, The Laura Mitchell Health & Wellbeing Centre, Halifax HX1 1YR, UK
| | - David Nugent
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (R.J.); (S.M.); (A.T.); (R.H.); (T.B.); (G.T.); (D.N.); (D.D.J.)
| | - Diederick De Jong
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (R.J.); (S.M.); (A.T.); (R.H.); (T.B.); (G.T.); (D.N.); (D.D.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
George JA, Salazar AJG, Irfan A, Prichett L, Nasr IW, Garcia AV, Boss EF, Jelin EB. Effect of implementing an enhanced recovery protocol for pediatric colorectal surgery on complication rate, length of stay, and opioid use in children. J Pediatr Surg 2022; 57:1349-1353. [PMID: 35153077 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Introduction In the past two decades, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways for adults have improved efficiency of care and decreased length of stay (LOS) without increasing postoperative complications. The effects of enhanced recovery pathways for children are less well known. In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the effects of an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) implementation in children undergoing colorectal surgery. Methods We introduced a colorectal ERP in 2017. Children and young adults (ages 2-22 years) were divided into pre-intervention (2014-2016) and post-intervention groups (2017-2019) for analysis. We abstracted data, including demographics, primary surgery, LOS, postoperative pain scores, and postoperative complications. Results A total of 432 patients were included. Of those,148 (34%) were pre-ERP implementation and 284 (66%) were post-ERP implementation. Post-ERP patients experienced significantly shorter LOS (5.7 vs. 8.3 days, p<0.01); required less intraoperative local anesthetic (9.5% vs. 38.5%, p<0.01) because 55% of patients received an epidural and 18% received an abdominal plane block; and used less postoperative opioid (62.5% vs. 98.7%, p<0.01) than did pre-ERAS patients. After protocol implementation, average pain scores were lower on postoperative day 1 (3.6 vs. 4.5, p<0.05) and across the hospitalization (3.0 vs. 4.0, p<0.01). Conclusion Enhanced recovery pathways decrease LOS, opioid use, and postoperative pain scores for children undergoing colorectal surgery and should be considered for this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A George
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Pediatric Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins University, The Charlotte R. Bloomberg Children's Center, 1800 Orleans Street, Suite 6321, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States.
| | - Andres J Gonzalez Salazar
- Department of General Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, 1800 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| | - Ahmer Irfan
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 202 Boshell Diabetes Building, 1808 7th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35233, United States
| | - Laura Prichett
- Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Data Management (BEAD) Core, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Mason F. Lord Bldg, Center Tower, Suite 4200, 5200 Eastern Ave., Baltimore, MD 21224, United States
| | - Isam W Nasr
- Department of General Pediatric Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, The Charlotte R. Bloomberg Children's Center, 1800 Orleans Street, Suite 7323, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| | - Alejandro V Garcia
- Department of General Pediatric Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, The Charlotte R. Bloomberg Children's Center, 1800 Orleans Street, Suite 7323, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| | - Emily F Boss
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, The Charlotte R. Bloomberg Children's Center, 1800 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| | - Eric B Jelin
- Department of General Pediatric Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, The Charlotte R. Bloomberg Children's Center, 1800 Orleans Street, Suite 7323, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Perioperative Protocol of Ankle Fracture and Distal Radius Fracture Based on Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Program: A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Controlled study. Pain Res Manag 2022; 2022:3458056. [PMID: 35711611 PMCID: PMC9197648 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3458056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is aimed to shorten patients’ recovery process and improve clinical outcomes. This study aimed to compare the outcomes between the ERAS program and the traditional pathway among patients with ankle fracture and distal radius fracture. Methods. This is a multicenter prospective clinical controlled study consisting of 323 consecutive adults with ankle fracture from 12 centers and 323 consecutive adults with distal radial fracture from 13 centers scheduled for open reduction and internal fixation between January 2017 and December 2018. According to the perioperative protocol, patients were divided into two groups: the ERAS group and the traditional group. The primary outcome was the patients’ satisfaction of the whole treatment on discharge and at 6 months postoperatively. The secondary outcomes include delapsed time between admission and surgery, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, functional score, and the MOS item short form health survey-36. Results. Data describing 772 patients with ankle fracture and 658 patients with distal radius fracture were collected, of which 323 patients with ankle fracture and 323 patients with distal radial fracture were included for analysis. The patients in the ERAS group showed higher satisfaction levels on discharge and at 6 months postoperatively than in the traditional group (
). In the subgroup analysis, patients with distal radial fracture in the ERAS group were more satisfied with the treatment (
). Furthermore, patients with ankle fracture had less time in bed (
) and shorter hospital stay (
) and patients with distal radial fracture received surgery quickly after being admitted into the ward in the ERAS group than in the traditional group (
). Conclusions. Perioperative protocol based on the ERAS program was associated with high satisfaction levels, less time in bed, and short hospital stay without increased complication rate and decreased functional outcomes.
Collapse
|
27
|
Catarci M, Ruffo G, Viola MG, Pirozzi F, Delrio P, Borghi F, Garulli G, Baldazzi G, Marini P, Sica G. ERAS program adherence-institutionalization, major morbidity and anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal surgery: the iCral2 multicenter prospective study. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:3965-3984. [PMID: 34519893 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08717-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs influence morbidity rates and length of stay after colorectal surgery (CRS), and may also impact major complications and anastomotic leakage rates. A prospective multicenter observational study to investigate the interactions between ERAS program adherence and early outcomes after elective CRS was carried out. METHODS Prospective enrolment of patients submitted to elective CRS with anastomosis in 18 months. Adherence to 21 items of ERAS program was measured upon explicit criteria in every case. After univariate analysis, independent predictors of primary endpoints [major morbidity (MM) and anastomotic leakage (AL) rates] were identified through logistic regression analyses including all significant variables, presenting odds ratios (OR). RESULTS Institutional ERAS protocol was declared by 27 out of 38 (71.0%) participating centers. Median overall adherence to ERAS program items was 71.4%. Among 3830 patients included in the study, MM and AL rates were 4.7% and 4.2%, respectively. MM rates were independently influenced by intra- and/or postoperative blood transfusions (OR 7.79, 95% CI 5.46-11.10; p < 0.0001) and standard anesthesia protocol (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.96; p = 0.028). AL rates were independently influenced by male gender (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.06-2.07; p = 0.021), intra- and/or postoperative blood transfusions (OR 4.29, 95% CI 2.93-6.50; p < 0.0001) and non-standard resections (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01-2.22; p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS This study disclosed wide room for improvement in compliance to several ERAS program items. It failed to detect any significant association between institutionalization and/or adherence rates to ERAS program with primary endpoints. These outcomes were independently influenced by gender, intra- and postoperative blood transfusions, non-standard resections, and standard anesthesia protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, "C. E G. Mazzoni" Hospital, Ascoli Piceno, Italy. .,General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, Via dei Monti Tiburtini, 385, 00157, Rome, Italy.
| | - Giacomo Ruffo
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy
| | | | - Felice Pirozzi
- General Surgery Unit, ASL Napoli 2 Nord, Pozzuoli, NA, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS-Italia", Naples, Italy
| | - Felice Borghi
- General & Oncologic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | | | | | - Pierluigi Marini
- General Surgery Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sica
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Policlinico tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Copperthwaite A, Sahebally SM, Raza ZM, Devane L, McCawley N, Kearney D, Burke J, McNamara D. A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ir J Med Sci 2022; 192:795-803. [PMID: 35499808 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-022-03017-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery programmes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) employ combined approaches to achieve postoperative analgesia. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a locoregional anaesthetic technique that may reduce postoperative pain. AIMS To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic- versus ultrasound-guided TAP block in LCS. METHODS Databases were searched for relevant articles from inception until March 2022. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared laparoscopic (LTB) versus ultrasound-guided (UTB) TAP blocks in LCS were included. The primary outcome was narcotic consumption at 24 h postoperatively, whilst secondary outcomes included pain scores at 24 h postoperatively, operative time, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and complication rates. Random effects models were used to calculate pooled effect size estimates. RESULTS Three RCTs were included capturing 219 patients. Studies were clinically heterogenous. On random effects analysis, LTB was associated with significantly lower narcotic consumption (SMD - 0.30 mg, 95% CI = - 0.57 to - 0.03, p = 0.03) and pain scores (SMD - 0.29, 95% CI = - 0.56 to - 0.03, p = 0.03) at 24 h. However, there were no differences in operative time (SMD - 0.09 min, 95% CI = - 0.40 to 0.22, p = 0.56), PONV (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.36 to 2.65, p = 0.96) or complication (OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 0.64 to 2.64, p = 0.47) rates. CONCLUSIONS LTB is associated with significantly less narcotic usage and pain at 24 h postoperatively but similar PONV, operative time and complication rates, compared to UTB. However, the data were inconsistent, and our findings require further investigation. LTB obviates the need for ultrasound devices whilst also decreasing procedure logistical complexity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Copperthwaite
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, 9, Dublin, Ireland.
- Royal College of Surgeons, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland.
- Department of Otolaryngology, Sligo University Hospital, Sligo, Ireland.
| | - Shaheel Mohammad Sahebally
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, 9, Dublin, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Zeeshan Muhammad Raza
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, 9, Dublin, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Liam Devane
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, 9, Dublin, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Niamh McCawley
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, 9, Dublin, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland
| | - David Kearney
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, 9, Dublin, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John Burke
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, 9, Dublin, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Deborah McNamara
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, 9, Dublin, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Martínez-Ortega AJ, Piñar-Gutiérrez A, Serrano-Aguayo P, González-Navarro I, Remón-Ruíz PJ, Pereira-Cunill JL, García-Luna PP. Perioperative Nutritional Support: A Review of Current Literature. Nutrients 2022; 14:1601. [PMID: 35458163 PMCID: PMC9030898 DOI: 10.3390/nu14081601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the beginning of the practice of surgery, the reduction of postoperative complications and early recovery have been two of the fundamental pillars that have driven the improvement of surgical techniques and perioperative management. Despite great advances in these fields, the rationalization of antibiotic prophylaxis, and other important innovations, postoperative recovery (especially in elderly patients, oncological pathology or digestive or head and neck surgery) is tortuous. This can be explained by several reasons, among which, malnutrition has a major role. Perioperative nutritional support, included within the ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol, has proven to be a main element and a critical step to achieve better surgical results. Starting with the preoperative nutritional assessment and treatment in elective surgery, we can improve nutritional status using oral supplements and immunomodulatory formulas. If we add early nutritional support in the postoperative scenario, we are able to significantly reduce infectious complications, need for intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, costs, and mortality. Throughout this review, we will review the latest developments and the available literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - José Luís Pereira-Cunill
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, 41013 Seville, Spain; (A.J.M.-O.); (A.P.-G.); (P.S.-A.); (I.G.-N.); (P.J.R.-R.); (P.P.G.-L.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chau JPC, Liu X, Lo SHS, Chien WT, Hui SK, Choi KC, Zhao J. Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for women with gynaecological cancers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 3:CD008239. [PMID: 35289396 PMCID: PMC8922407 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008239.pub5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gynaecological cancers account for 15% of newly diagnosed cancer cases in women worldwide. In recent years, increasing evidence demonstrates that traditional approaches in perioperative care practice may be unnecessary or even harmful. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme has therefore been gradually introduced to replace traditional approaches in perioperative care. There is an emerging body of evidence outside of gynaecological cancer which has identified that perioperative ERAS programmes decrease length of postoperative hospital stay and reduce medical expenditure without increasing complication rates, mortality, and readmission rates. However, evidence-based decisions on perioperative care practice for major surgery in gynaecological cancer are limited. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in Issue 3, 2015. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes in gynaecological cancer care on length of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, mortality, readmission, bowel functions, quality of life, participant satisfaction, and economic outcomes. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following electronic databases for the literature published from inception until October 2020: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Scopus, and four Chinese databases including the China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), WanFang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Weipu Database. We also searched four trial registration platforms and grey literature databases for ongoing and unpublished trials, and handsearched the reference lists of included trials and accessible reviews for relevant references. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared ERAS programmes for perioperative care in women with gynaecological cancer to traditional care strategies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted the data and assessed methodological quality for each included study using the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 (RoB 2) for RCTs. Using Review Manager 5.4, we pooled the data and calculated the measures of treatment effect with the mean difference (MD), standardised mean difference (SMD), and risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) to reflect the summary estimates and uncertainty. MAIN RESULTS We included seven RCTs with 747 participants. All studies compared ERAS programmes with traditional care strategies for women with gynaecological cancer. We had substantial concerns regarding the methodological quality of the included studies since the included RCTs had moderate to high risk of bias in domains including randomisation process, deviations from intended interventions, and measurement of outcomes. ERAS programmes may reduce length of postoperative hospital stay (MD -1.71 days, 95% CI -2.59 to -0.84; I2 = 86%; 6 studies, 638 participants; low-certainty evidence). ERAS programmes may result in no difference in overall complication rates (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.05; I2 = 42%; 5 studies, 537 participants; low-certainty evidence). The certainty of evidence was very low regarding the effect of ERAS programmes on all-cause mortality within 30 days of discharge (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.14 to 6.68; 1 study, 99 participants). ERAS programmes may reduce readmission rates within 30 days of operation (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.90; I2 = 0%; 3 studies, 385 participants; low-certainty evidence). ERAS programmes may reduce the time to first flatus (MD -0.82 days, 95% CI -1.00 to -0.63; I2 = 35%; 4 studies, 432 participants; low-certainty evidence) and the time to first defaecation (MD -0.96 days, 95% CI -1.47 to -0.44; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 228 participants; low-certainty evidence). The studies did not report the effects of ERAS programmes on quality of life. The evidence on the effects of ERAS programmes on participant satisfaction was very uncertain due to the limited number of studies. The adoption of ERAS strategies may not increase medical expenditure, though the evidence was of very low certainty (SMD -0.22, 95% CI -0.68 to 0.25; I2 = 54%; 2 studies, 167 participants). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Low-certainty evidence suggests that ERAS programmes may shorten length of postoperative hospital stay, reduce readmissions, and facilitate postoperative bowel function recovery without compromising participant safety. Further well-conducted studies are required in order to validate the certainty of these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janita Pak Chun Chau
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Xu Liu
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Suzanne Hoi Shan Lo
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Wai Tong Chien
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Sze Ki Hui
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kai Chow Choi
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jie Zhao
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Willis MA, Toews I, Meerpohl JJ, Vilz TO. Preoperative combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation for preventing complications in elective colorectal surgery. Hippokratia 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria A Willis
- Department of General, Visceral, Thorax and Vascular Surgery; University Hospital Bonn; Bonn Germany
| | - Ingrid Toews
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine; Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg; Freiburg Germany
| | - Joerg J Meerpohl
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine; Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg; Freiburg Germany
| | - Tim O Vilz
- Department of General, Visceral, Thorax and Vascular Surgery; University Hospital Bonn; Bonn Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Nobuhara H, Matsugu Y, Tanaka J, Akita T, Ito K. The preventive effects of perioperative oral care on surgical site infections after pancreatic cancer surgery: a retrospective study. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:3337-3344. [PMID: 34988706 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06791-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most malignant cancer of the gastrointestinal system, and is associated with high rates of postoperative complications, including surgical site infections (SSIs). Perioperative oral care is an effective measure for preventing postoperative pneumonia. However, the preventive effects of perioperative oral care on SSIs have not been reported. We investigated the preventive effects of perioperative oral care on SSIs after pancreatic cancer surgery. METHODS A total of 103 patients with PDAC who underwent radical resection at Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital (2011-2018) were enrolled in this retrospective study. Of the 103 patients, 75 received perioperative oral care by dentists and dental hygienists (oral care group), whereas 28 did not (control group). Univariate and multivariate analyses with propensity score as a covariate were used to investigate the incidence and risk factors of SSIs in the oral care and control groups. RESULTS The incidence of SSIs was significantly lower in the oral care group than in the control group (12.0% vs. 39.3%, P = 0.004). Logistic regression analysis revealed that a soft pancreas, the surgical procedure (pancreaticoduodenectomy), blood transfusion, diabetes mellitus, and the absence of oral care intervention were risk factors for SSIs. The odds ratio for the absence of oral care intervention was 6.090 (95% confidence interval: 1.750-21.200, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that perioperative oral care may reduce the risk of developing SSIs after pancreatic cancer surgery. These findings need to be evaluated in future prospective studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION UMIN registration number: UMIN000042082; October 15, 2020, retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Nobuhara
- Department of Dentistry, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujina-Kanda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Matsugu
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujina-Kanda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan. .,Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Transplant Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujina-Kanda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan.
| | - Junko Tanaka
- Department of Epidemiology, Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Graduate School of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Akita
- Department of Epidemiology, Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Graduate School of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Keiko Ito
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujina-Kanda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kim EY. Perception and implementation status of enhanced recovery after surgery. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 2021. [DOI: 10.5124/jkma.2021.64.12.826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program that is being implemented in Korea is difficult to investigate because it is not a standardized protocol with a unified content, and it instead differs according to the details for each hospital. Herein, the author would like to introduce and analyze the results of a recently conducted large-scale survey on the current status and perception of the ERAS program in Korea among large domestic hospitals.Current Concepts: Surveys of domestic general surgeons in 2019 and hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgeons in 2020 both showed lower-than-expected response rates of less than 50% in questions related to perception and clinical implementation of the ERAS program. Thus, implementation of ERAS items related to the limited application of preoperative fasting and surgical drain insertion and active nutritional support before and after surgery remains low.Discussion and Conclusion: For surgeons in Korea, the implementation of ERAS programs and perception levels were low. In this regard, it is necessary to improve awareness through systematic education and promotion of the ERAS program, and supplementation of related multidisciplinary professional manpower and financial resources is essential to facilitate practical implementation of ERAS programs in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
34
|
Ripollés-Melchor J, Fernández Dorado F, Rubio Aguilera AI, Criado Camargo A, Chico García M, Abad-Motos A, Abad-Gurumeta A. Association between preoperative baseline pulse pressure and estimated pulse wave velocity and acute renal failure and mortality following colorectal surgery. A single-centre observational study. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION 2021; 68:564-575. [PMID: 34844912 DOI: 10.1016/j.redare.2021.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elevated pulse wave velocity is a haemodynamic parameter considered to be a risk factor for the development of cardiovascular alterations, while pulse pressure is a predictor of cardiovascular complications and development of acute renal failure after both cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. Our objective was to determine whether baseline pulse pressure and estimated pulse wave velocity are associated with renal failure and 30-day mortality following colorectal surgery. METHODS Retrospective observational study. A total of 816 adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery were evaluated by performing multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine whether baseline pulse pressure and estimated pulse wave velocity were independently associated with complications, specifically renal failure and 30-day postoperative mortality, and whether pulse pressure and estimated pulse wave velocity thresholds correlated with outcomes. RESULTS Baseline pulse pressure was 56.00 mmHg (45.00;68.00) and estimated pulse wave velocity was 13.16 m/s (10.76;14.85). Baseline pulse pressure was not associated with acute renal failure or mortality in the univariate model. Baseline estimated pulse wave velocity was not associated with complications, acute renal failure, or mortality. An estimated pulse wave velocity of 13.78 m/s significantly predicted acute renal failure (AUC 0.654 [0.588-0.720]) and mortality (AUC 0.698 [0.600-0.796]). CONCLUSIONS Neither pulse pressure nor preoperative baseline estimated pulse wave velocity were associated with acute renal failure or postoperative mortality. The preoperative estimated pulse wave velocity threshold of 13.78 m/s predicted an increased risk of acute renal failure and postoperative mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Ripollés-Melchor
- Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Spanish Perioperative Audit and Research Network (REDGERM), Grupo Español de Rehabilitación Multimodal (GERM), Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | - A Abad-Motos
- Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Spanish Perioperative Audit and Research Network (REDGERM), Grupo Español de Rehabilitación Multimodal (GERM), Madrid, Spain
| | - A Abad-Gurumeta
- Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Spanish Perioperative Audit and Research Network (REDGERM), Grupo Español de Rehabilitación Multimodal (GERM), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bertocchi E, Barugola G, Gentile I, Zuppini T, Zamperini M, Guerriero M, Avesani R, Bonadiman S, Anselmi C, Ruffo G. iColon, a patient-focused mobile application for perioperative care in colorectal surgery: an observational, real-world study protocol. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e045526. [PMID: 34728438 PMCID: PMC8565532 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol provides optimised care guidelines for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. To ensure high compliance with active ERAS elements, patients must be educated to actively participate in the perioperative care pathway. Mobile health is a rapidly expanding area of the digital health sector that is effective in educating and engaging patients during follow-up. iColon is a mobile application designed by the Operative Unit of General Surgery of IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital of Negrar of Valpolicella, which is specifically targeted at patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. iColon is organised into ERAS phases, and it provides real-time feedback to surgeons about a patient's adherence to perioperative active ERAS elements. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We hypothesise that by providing a patient-focused mobile application, compliance with active ERAS elements could be improved.The first coprimary objective is to build patient confidence in using the mobile application, iColon, during perioperative care. The second coprimary objective is to establish patient compliance with active ERAS elements.Secondary objectives include examining: length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, postoperative complications and patient satisfaction of received care.This study is a prospective observational real-world study of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery who are following the ERAS protocol and using iColon during perioperative periods between September 2020 and December 2022.By educating and engaging patients in the ERAS protocol, the mobile application, iColon, should stimulate patients to be more proactive in managing their healthcare by complying more closely with active ERAS elements. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been approved by the local Ethics Committee with the protocol number 29219 of 25 May 2020. The results will be actively disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and various community engagement activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Bertocchi
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Giuliano Barugola
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Irene Gentile
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Teresa Zuppini
- Hospital Pharmacy, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Massimo Zamperini
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Massimo Guerriero
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Clinical Research Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Renato Avesani
- Rehabilitation Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Silvia Bonadiman
- Rehabilitation Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Chiara Anselmi
- Dietetic Service, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Giacomo Ruffo
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gupta S, Rane A. Enhanced Recovery after Surgery: Perspective in Elder Women. J Midlife Health 2021; 12:93-98. [PMID: 34526741 PMCID: PMC8409712 DOI: 10.4103/jmh.jmh_89_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Revised: 06/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal convention first reported for colorectal and gynecologic procedures. The main benefits have been a shorter length of stay and reduced complications, leading to improved clinical outcomes and cost savings substantially. With increase in life expectancy, recent years has shown a significant rise in advanced age population, and similarly, a rise in age-related disorders requiring surgical management. Due to pathophysiological and metabolic changes in geriatric age group with increased incidence of medical comorbidities, there is higher risk of enhanced surgical stress response with undesirable postoperative morbidity, complications, prolonged immobility, and extended convalescence. The feasibility and effectiveness of ERAS protocols have been well researched and documented among all age groups, including the geriatric high-risk population.[1] Adhering to ERAS protocols after colorectal surgery showed no significant difference in postoperative complications, hospital stay, or readmission rate among various age groups.[2] A recent report mentions the safety and benefits following ERAS guidelines with reduced length of stay in elderly patients with short-level lumbar fusion surgery.[3] The concept of prehabilitation has evolved as an integral part of ERAS to build up physiological reserve, especially in geriatric high-risk group, and to adapt better to surgical stress.[4] High levels of compliance with ERAS interventions combined with prehabilitation can be achieved when a dedicated multidisciplinary team is involved in care of these high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandhya Gupta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| | - Ajay Rane
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cristóbal Poch L, Cagigas Fernández C, Gómez-Ruiz M, Ortega Roldán M, Cantero Cid R, Castillo Diego J, Gómez-Fleitas M. Implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery program with robotic surgery in high-risk patients obtains optimal results after colorectal resections. J Robot Surg 2021; 16:575-586. [PMID: 34278544 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01281-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Enhanced recovery after surgery programs reduce postoperative complications and length of stay after laparoscopic colorectal surgery, but are still under evaluation after robotic colorectal surgery. To evaluate potential benefits in terms of length of stay and complications of an Enhanced recovery after surgery program in colorectal surgery. A subanalysis was performed to assess what combination of surgical approach and perioperative care had better outcomes. Prospective observational cohort study. 300 consecutive colorectal surgery patients: 150 were prospectively included in the enhanced recovery after Surgery program group and 150 retrospectively in the traditional care group, and subdivided according to the type of surgery, in Hospital Marques de Valdecilla, between 2013 and 2016. Postoperative complications decreased significantly (p = 0.002) from 46 to 28% (traditional care vs program group). The length of stay was decreased by 2 days (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated similar effect sizes after adjusting for age, gender, Charlson score, and type of surgery. Type of surgery was an independent predictive factor for postoperative complications and length of stay. Compared to open surgery, postoperative complications decreased by 50% (p < 0.001) after robotic surgery and by 40% (p = 0.01) after laparoscopic surgery, while the median length of stay decreased by three days (p < 0.001) after minimally invasive surgery. Enhanced recovery after surgery program and minimally invasive surgery were associated with decreased morbidity and length of stay after colorectal surgery compared to open surgery and traditional care. An enhanced recovery after surgery program with robotic surgery in high-risk patients might be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidia Cristóbal Poch
- Colorectal Surgery Unit. Hospital Universitario "Marques de Valdecilla", Av. de Valdecilla S/N, 25, 39008, Santander, Cantabria, Spain.
| | - Carmen Cagigas Fernández
- Colorectal Surgery Unit. Hospital Universitario "Marques de Valdecilla", Av. de Valdecilla S/N, 25, 39008, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Marcos Gómez-Ruiz
- Colorectal Surgery Unit. Hospital Universitario "Marques de Valdecilla", Av. de Valdecilla S/N, 25, 39008, Santander, Cantabria, Spain.,Surgical Innovation Research Group Valdecilla Biomedical Research Center, IDIVAL, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Marta Ortega Roldán
- University of Cantabria, Av de Los Castros, 39008, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Ramón Cantero Cid
- Colorectal Surgery Unit. Hospital Universitario "La Paz", Paseo de la Castellana, 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Julio Castillo Diego
- Colorectal Surgery Unit. Hospital Universitario "Marques de Valdecilla", Av. de Valdecilla S/N, 25, 39008, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Manuel Gómez-Fleitas
- University of Cantabria, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitario, "Marques de Valdecilla", Av da. Valdecilla S/N, 39008, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ruel M, Ramirez Garcia M, Arbour C. Transition from hospital to home after elective colorectal surgery performed in an enhanced recovery program: An integrative review. Nurs Open 2021; 8:1550-1570. [PMID: 34102021 PMCID: PMC8186688 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Revised: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to investigate the transition from hospital to home after elective colorectal surgery performed in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme. DESIGN An integrative review. METHODS A search of ten electronic databases was conducted. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two authors. Data analysis and synthesis were based on Meleis' Transitions Theory (2010). RESULTS Forty-two articles were included, and most (N = 27) were of good or very good quality. The researchers identified five categories to document the nature of transition postsurgery, three conditions affecting such transition, eleven indicators informing about the quality of the transition and several nursing interventions. Overall, this review revealed that the transition from hospital to home after ERAS colorectal surgery is complex. A holistic understanding of this phenomenon may help nurses to recognize what they need to do to optimize the in-home recovery of this clientele.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maria‐Pilar Ramirez Garcia
- Faculty of NursingUniversité de MontréalMontréalQCCanada
- Research CenterCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalMontréalQCCanada
| | - Caroline Arbour
- Faculty of NursingUniversité de MontréalMontréalQCCanada
- Research CenterHôpital du Sacré‐Cœur de MontréalCIUSSS du Nord‐de‐l’Île‐de‐MontréalMontréalQCCanada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Tejedor P, González Ayora S, Ortega López M, León Arellano M, Guadalajara H, García-Olmo D, Pastor C. Implementation barriers for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in rectal cancer surgery: a comparative analysis of compliance with colon cancer surgeries. Updates Surg 2021; 73:2161-2168. [PMID: 34143398 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01115-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
We aim to analyze differences in compliance between colon and rectal cancer surgeries under Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for colorectal procedures, and to detect implementation barriers for rectal cancer surgeries. Patients who underwent elective rectal cancer surgeries under ERAS were case-matched based on gender, age, and P-POSSUM with an equal number of patients who underwent colonic surgeries. Achievements of ≥ 70% of ERAS items were considered an acceptable level of compliance. A multivariate analysis was carried out to identify independent risk factors for lower compliance. A total of 434 patients were included over a 5-year period. After matching, there were 111 patients in each group. Overall compliance was significantly lower in the rectal surgery group (73% vs 82%, p = 0.001). A good compliance rate differed from 55% in rectal vs 77.5% in colonic procedures (p = 0.000). We identified three independent risk factors for lower compliance rates: open surgical approach, the use of epidural catheter, and the presence of postoperative ileus. Our data showed that rectal cancer surgeries are more exigent to success on ERAS interventions when compared to colonic resections. There is a need to introduce specific modifications on the protocols for colorectal surgeries when applied to these particular procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Tejedor
- Colorectal Surgery Department, University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Calle del Dr. Esquerdo, 46, Madrid, Spain. .,Colorectal Surgery Department, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | - Mario Ortega López
- Colorectal Surgery Department, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel León Arellano
- Colorectal Surgery Department, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Hector Guadalajara
- Colorectal Surgery Department, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Damián García-Olmo
- Colorectal Surgery Department, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Pastor
- Colorectal Surgery Department, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.,Colorectal Surgery Department, University Clinic of Navarre, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Pagano E, Pellegrino L, Rinaldi F, Palazzo V, Donati D, Meineri M, Palmisano S, Rolfo M, Bachini I, Bertetto O, Borghi F, Ciccone G. Implementation of the ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol for colorectal cancer surgery in the Piemonte Region with an Audit and Feedback approach: study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: a study of the EASY-NET project. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e047491. [PMID: 34083345 PMCID: PMC8183289 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The ERAS protocol (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) is a multimodal pathway aimed to reduce surgical stress and to allow a rapid postoperative recovery. Application of the ERAS protocol to colorectal cancer surgery has been limited to a minority of hospitals in Italy. To promote the systematic adoption of ERAS in the entire regional hospital network in Piemonte an Audit and Feedback approach (A&F) has been adopted together with a cluster randomised trial to estimate the true impact of the protocol on a large, unselected population. METHODS A multicentre stepped wedge cluster randomised trial is designed for comparison between standard perioperative management and the management according to the ERAS protocol. The primary outcome is the length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes are: incidence of postoperative complications, time to patients' recovery, control of pain and patients' satisfaction. With an A&F approach the adherence to the ERAS items is monitored through a dedicated area in the study web site. The study includes 28 surgical centres, stratified by activity volume and randomly divided into four groups. Each group is randomly assigned to a different activation period of the ERAS protocol. There are four activation periods, one every 3 months. However, the planned calendar and the total duration of the study have been extended by 6 months due to the COVID-19 pandemic.The expected sample size of about 2200 patients has a high statistical power (98%) to detect a reduction of LOS of 1 day and to estimate clinically meaningful changes in the other endpoints. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study protocol has been approved by the Ethical Committee of the coordinating centre and by all participating centres. Study results will be timely circulated within the hospital network and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04037787.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Pagano
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit and CPO Piemonte, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Luca Pellegrino
- Department of Surgery, General and Oncologic Surgery Unit, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | | | | | - Danilo Donati
- Department of Surgery, General and Oncologic Surgery Unit, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Maurizio Meineri
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Sarah Palmisano
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Monica Rolfo
- Healthcare Services Direction, Humanitas, Torino, Italy
| | - Ilaria Bachini
- Unit of Dietetic and Clinical Nutrition, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Oscar Bertetto
- Dipartimento Interaziendale Interregionale Rete Oncologica Piemonte-Valle d'Aosta, Torino, Italy
| | - Felice Borghi
- Department of Surgery, General and Oncologic Surgery Unit, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Giovannino Ciccone
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit and CPO Piemonte, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
You K, Sohn DK, Park SS, Park SC, Oh JH, Han KS, Hong CW, Park HC, Lee DW. Factors associated with diet failure after colon cancer surgery. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:2861-2868. [PMID: 34046714 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08575-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the introduction of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS), early diet after surgery has been emphasized and clinical outcomes have improved, though vomiting has been reported frequently. We defined diet failure based on clinical manifestation and images after colon cancer surgery and attempted to analyze underlying risk factors by comparing the early diet group with the conventional diet group. METHODS All consecutive patients underwent colectomy with curative intent at a single institution between August 2015 and July 2017. The early diet group was started on soft diet on the second day after surgery, while the conventional group started the same after flatulence. The primary outcome was the difference in the incidence of diet failure between the two groups. Secondary outcomes were analyzed to determine risk factors for diet failure and readmission due to ileus. RESULTS Overall, 293 patients were included in the conventional diet group and 231 in the early diet group. There were no significant differences between the two groups, except for shorter hospital stays in the early diet group (median 8 days, p < 0.001). A total of 46 patients (early diet, n = 20; conventional diet, n = 26, p = 1.000) had diet failure. Multivariate analysis showed that operation time (odds ratio [OR] 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-2.32) and side-to-side anastomosis compared with the end-to-end method (OR 4.41, 95% CI 2.10-9.24) were independent risk factors for diet failure. Sixteen patients were readmitted due to ileus that occurred within 2 months after surgical operation. Diet resumption time was not a risk factor for both diet failure and ileus. CONCLUSIONS Early diet resumption does not increase diet failure and can reduce hospital stay. Anastomosis and operation time may be related to diet failure. Our study suggests that evaluation of surgical factors is important for postoperative recovery, and well-designed follow-up studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiho You
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-Ro, Ilsan Dong-Gu, Goyang, 10408, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae Kyung Sohn
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-Ro, Ilsan Dong-Gu, Goyang, 10408, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Sil Park
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-Ro, Ilsan Dong-Gu, Goyang, 10408, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Chan Park
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-Ro, Ilsan Dong-Gu, Goyang, 10408, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Hwan Oh
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-Ro, Ilsan Dong-Gu, Goyang, 10408, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Su Han
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-Ro, Ilsan Dong-Gu, Goyang, 10408, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Won Hong
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-Ro, Ilsan Dong-Gu, Goyang, 10408, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyoung-Chul Park
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-Ro, Ilsan Dong-Gu, Goyang, 10408, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Woon Lee
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-Ro, Ilsan Dong-Gu, Goyang, 10408, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Shestakov AL, Tarasova IA, Tskhovrebov AT, Boeva IA, Bitarov TT, Bezaltynnykh AA, Shakhbanov ME, Dergunova AP, Vasilyeva ES. [Reconstructive esophageal surgery in fast track epoch]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2021:73-83. [PMID: 34032792 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202106273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate an efficiency and safety of perioperative fast track management in reconstructive esophageal surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS Perioperative fast track management protocol in reconstructive esophageal surgery has been applied since 2014 at the Department of Thoracoabdominal Surgery and Oncology of the Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery. These patients (2017-2020) were included in the main group (n=75). Patients who underwent traditional perioperative care (2010-2013) were enrolled in the control group (n=63). The primary outcome was postoperative hospital-stay. We also evaluated ICU stay, incidence of complications according to Clavien-Dindo grading system with particular registration of respiratory complications, mortality, enteral and oral feeding onset. RESULTS There were no significant between-group differences in sex, age, ASA grade, body mass index. Fast track management reduced hospital-stay from 14 (12; 17) days in the control group to 11 (8; 22) days in the main group (p=0.008). Mean ICU-stay decreased up to 1 (0.8; 2) day in the main group compared to the control group (4.1 (3.5; 5.6) days, p<0.0001). Pneumonia was noted in 5 patients after fast track recovery and 15 patients in the control group (p=0.004). No patients died in the main group, 3 (4.8%) patients - in the control group (p=1). CONCLUSION Modern perioperative fast track management protocol is safe and effective for extensive reconstructive esophageal interventions. This approach reduces hospital-stay and ICU stay, as well as the incidence of respiratory complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Shestakov
- Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russia
| | - I A Tarasova
- Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russia
| | - A T Tskhovrebov
- Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russia
| | - I A Boeva
- Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russia
| | - T T Bitarov
- Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - M E Shakhbanov
- Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russia
| | - A P Dergunova
- Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russia
| | - E S Vasilyeva
- Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Thangavel D, Gerges B, Brand A. Prospective study of patient satisfaction with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in the immediate post-operative period in gynaecological oncology. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 61:591-598. [PMID: 33890284 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal protocol which aims to facilitate faster discharge from hospital and recovery after surgery by minimising physiological and physical stress on the body before, during and after surgery. AIMS The aim of this study is to evaluate patient satisfaction while being managed with the ERAS pathway and to determine whether it is an acceptable model of care in this respect. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study is an observational study of patient satisfaction in ERAS in gynaecological oncology. Patients who underwent laparoscopy or laparotomy for malignancy or suspected malignancy were asked to complete a validated questionnaire (EORTC IN-PATSAT32) prior to discharge from hospital after surgery. RESULTS There were 113 (75.33%) patients recruited out of 150 patients who were approached. There were 68 cases of laparotomy and 45 cases of laparoscopy. There were no statistically significant differences between baseline characteristics of responders and non-responders in both the laparotomy and the laparoscopy group. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction, with a mean score for general satisfaction of 92.2 (SD 11.44 ± 1.387) in the laparotomy group and 92.4 (SD 10.69 ± 1.594) for the laparoscopy group. CONCLUSIONS The results of our study reflect high levels of patient satisfaction in both the laparotomy and laparoscopy groups. This could be attributed to a strong focus on discharge planning through a multi-disciplinary approach, specifically addressing key aspects to recovery from initial consultation. The study reflects the successful implementation of an ERAS protocol with gynaecological oncological surgery in this unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dhivya Thangavel
- Westmead Centre of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bassem Gerges
- Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery, Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alison Brand
- Westmead Centre of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Willis MA, Engel FM, Wiedemann C, van Beekum C, Coburn M, Thudium M, Kalff JC, Vilz TO. [Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the Perioperative Management of Colorectal Surgery]. Zentralbl Chir 2021; 146:269-276. [PMID: 33851406 DOI: 10.1055/a-1402-0788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In recent years, perioperative care of patients after colorectal surgery has been increasingly standardised according to the fast-track concept and is accepted as a structured method of care to reduce perioperative complications. Indeed, initial studies have indicated that there is a long-term favourable effect on the oncological outcome, if the adherence to the individual measures is at least 70%. Even though there is unambiguous evidence for the efficacy of the modern perioperative treatment concept, it is often difficult to comply with the protocol during normal clinical work, particularly in Germany. The objective of this study was to record the rate of compliance before and after the introduction of the SOP and to evaluate its efficacy. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of the patient data after all elective colorectal surgery in the Bonn University Hospital from 2017 to 2020. 153 patients were operated on before the implementation of the SOP in January 2019 (group I); the remaining 153 patients were operated on after the implementation of the SOP and received appropriate care (group II). Compliance to the protocol was analysed for both the individual key interventions and the overall concept. RESULTS There was significant improvement in the compliance for both the individual measures (prehabilitation group I: 5.9%, group II: 42.5%, p < 0.001; preparation of the intestine I: 16.5%, II: 73.9%, p < 0.001; intraoperative volume management I: 14,00 ml/kg BW/h, II: 9.12 ml/kg BW/h, p < 0.001, BW: body weight; minimally invasive surgical technique I: 53.6%, II: 73.9%, p < 0.001; etc.) and for the overall perioperative treatment concept (I: 39%, II: 54%, p = 0.02). However, we fell far short of compliance of at least 70%. Nevertheless, patient autonomy was achieved earlier after introduction of the SOP (I: day 15, II: day 9, p < 0.001) and the postoperative hospital stay was shortened (I: 14 [6 - 99] days, II 11 [4 - 64] days; p = 0.007). CONCLUSION Although the implementation of the SOP led to significant improvements, further optimisation is required to attain the recommended protocol compliance of 70%. Measures within the hospital could include foundation of an interdisciplinary fast-track team and a specialised nurse as the connecting link between the patients, nursing and physicians. On the other hand, implementation throughout Germany can only be achieved by more influential actions. One possible support would be the S3 guideline on perioperative management of gastrointestinal tumours, which is under development. This could, for example, be used to support argumentation with funding providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria A Willis
- Klinik- und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Felix M Engel
- Klinik- und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Charlotte Wiedemann
- Klinik- und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Cornelius van Beekum
- Klinik- und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Mark Coburn
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Marcus Thudium
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Jörg C Kalff
- Klinik- und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Tim O Vilz
- Klinik- und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Siragusa L, Sensi B, Vinci D, Franceschilli M, Pathirannehalage Don C, Bagaglini G, Bellato V, Campanelli M, Sica GS. Volume-outcome relationship in rectal cancer surgery. Discov Oncol 2021; 12:11. [PMID: 35201453 PMCID: PMC8777490 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-021-00406-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hospital centralization effect is reported to lower complications and mortality for high risk and complex surgery operations, including colorectal surgery. However, no linear relation between volume and outcome has been demonstrated. Aim of the study was to evaluate the increased surgical volume effect on early outcomes of patient undergoing laparoscopic restorative anterior rectal resection (ARR). METHODS A retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients undergoing ARR with primary anastomosis between November 2016 and December 2020 after centralization of rectal cancer cases in an academic Centre. Short-term outcomes are compared to those of patients operated in the same unit during the previous 10 years before service centralization. The primary outcome was estimated anastomotic leak rate. Mean operative time, need of conversion, postoperative use of blood transfusion, radicality, in-hospital stay, number and type of complications, readmission and reoperation rate, mortality and 1-year and stoma persistence rates were evaluated as secondary outcomes. RESULTS 86 patients were operated in the study period and outcomes compared to those of 101 patients operated during the previous ten years. Difference in volume of surgery was significant between the two periods (p 0.019) and the estimated leak rate was significantly lower in the higher volume unit (p 0.047). Mean operative time, need of conversion, postoperative use of blood transfusion and in-hospital stay (p < 0.05) were also significantly reduced in Group A. CONCLUSION This study suggests that the shift toward higher volume in rectal cancer surgery is associated to decreased anastomotic leak rate. Potentiation of lower volume surgical units may yield optimal perioperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Siragusa
- Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
| | - B Sensi
- Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - D Vinci
- Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - M Franceschilli
- Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - C Pathirannehalage Don
- Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - G Bagaglini
- Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - V Bellato
- Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - M Campanelli
- Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - G S Sica
- Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Xu Y, Udumyan R, Fall K, Ljungqvist O, Montgomery S, Gustafsson UO. Validity of Routinely Collected Swedish Data in the International Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Database. World J Surg 2021; 45:1622-1629. [PMID: 33825960 PMCID: PMC8093151 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06094-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Background This study aims to assess patient coverage, validity and data quality in the Swedish part of the International Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Interactive Audit System (EIAS). Method All Swedish ERAS centers that recorded colorectal surgery data in EIAS between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017, were included (N = 12). Information registered in EIAS was compared with data from electronic medical records at each hospital to assess the overall coverage of EIAS. Twenty random-selected patients from each of the contributing centers were assessed for accuracy for a set of clinically relevant variables. All patients admitted to the contributing centers were included for the assessment of rate of missing on a selection of key clinical variables. Results Eight hospitals provided complete information for the evaluation, while four hospitals only allowed assessment of coverage and missing data. The eight hospitals had an overall coverage of 98.8% in EIAS (n = 1301) and the four 86.7% (n = 811). The average agreement for the assessed postoperative outcome variables was 96.5%. The accuracy was excellent for ‘length of hospital stay,’ ‘reoperation,’ and ‘any complications,’ but lower for other types of complications. Only a few variables had more than 5% missing data, and missingness was associated with hospital type and size. Conclusion This validation of the Swedish part of the international ERAS database suggests high patient coverage in EIAS and high agreement and limited missingness in clinically relevant variables. This validation approach or a modified version can be used for continued validation of the International ERAS database. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00268-021-06094-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin Xu
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Ruzan Udumyan
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Katja Fall
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.,Integrative Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Olle Ljungqvist
- Department of Surgery, Örebro & Institute of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Örebro University and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Scott Montgomery
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.,Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ulf O Gustafsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, 18288, Danderyd, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Tang JH, Wang B, Chow JLJ, Joseph PM, Chan JY, Abdul Rahman N, Low YH, Tan YP, Shelat VG. Improving postoperative mobilisation rates in patients undergoing elective major hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. Postgrad Med J 2021; 97:239-247. [PMID: 33184138 DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-138650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 09/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early mobilisation reduces postoperative complications such as pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis and hospital length of stay. Many authors have reported poor compliance with early mobilisation within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery initiatives. OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to increase postoperative day (POD) 2 mobilisation rate from 23% to 75% in patients undergoing elective major hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery within 6 months. METHODS We report a multidisciplinary team clinical practice improvement project (CPIP) to improve postoperative mobilisation of patients undergoing elective major HPB surgery. We identified the common barriers to mobilisation and analysed using the fishbone or cause-and-effect diagram and Pareto chart. A series of Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles followed this. We tracked the rate of early mobilisation and mean distance walked. In the post hoc analysis, we examined the potential cost savings based on reduced hospital length of stay. RESULTS Mobilisation rate on POD 2 following elective major HPB surgery improved from 23% to 78.9%, and this sustained at 6 months after the CPIP. Wound pain was the most common reason for failure to ambulate on POD 2. Hospital length of stay reduced from a median of 8 days to 6 days with an estimated cost saving of S$2228 per hospital stay. CONCLUSION Multidisciplinary quality improvement intervention effort resulted in an improved POD 2 mobilisation rate for patients who underwent elective major HPB surgery. This observed outcome was sustained at 6 months after completion of the CPIP with potential cost savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Han Tang
- General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Bei Wang
- General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | | | | | | | | | - Yi Hui Low
- General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Yen Pin Tan
- General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Liska D, Novello M, Cengiz BT, Holubar SD, Aiello A, Gorgun E, Steele SR, Delaney CP. Enhanced Recovery Pathway Benefits Patients Undergoing Nonelective Colorectal Surgery. Ann Surg 2021; 273:772-777. [PMID: 32697898 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of our study was to determine if an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) can successfully be applied in nonelective colorectal surgery. BACKGROUND ERPs have been shown to reduce hospital length of stay (LOS), complications, and costs after elective colorectal surgery. Yet, little data exist regarding the benefits of ERPs in patients undergoing nonelective colorectal surgery. We hypothesized that ERP implementation in a nonelective colorectal surgery population is associated with decreased postoperative LOS. METHODS A prospectively-maintained database was used to identify consecutive patients undergoing colorectal surgery after emergency room (ER) or hospital transfer admissions over a period from 2 years before until 1 year after implementation of a comprehensive ERP. The primary endpoint was LOS. Secondary endpoints included total LOS [TLOS = postoperative LOS + LOS of readmission(s)], readmission rates, complication rates, 30-day mortality, and hospital costs. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the relationship between ERP implementation and LOS. RESULTS We identified 269 pre-ERP and 135 ERP patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Admit source (ER 43.4% vs transfers 56.7%), Charlson comorbidity index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, diagnosis (inflammatory bowel disease 45.8%, malignancy 19.6%, benign intestinal obstructions 10.4%, diverticulitis 9.4%, others 10.4%), and blood loss were comparable (P > 0.05) between the cohorts. Pre-ERP patients had a higher number of previous abdominal surgeries, whereas post-ERP patients had more laparoscopy and more compliance with ERP elements. ERP patients had a shorter postoperative LOS [6 (4, 10) vs 7 (5, 12) days; P = 0.0007]. Hospital costs were 13.4% lower (P = 0.004). Postoperative 30-day morbidity, mortality, and readmissions were comparable, although reoperation rate was higher in the ERP group. On multivariate analysis, ERP implementation and laparoscopy were the only modifiable variables independently associated with shorter LOS, whereas longer operative times and higher ASA classification were associated with longer LOS. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing nonelective colorectal surgery after ER or hospital transfer admission benefit from the use of an ERP, demonstrating decreased LOS and costs without an increase in complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Liska
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Preoperative risk stratification in cancer surgery is important to improve treatment and outcome. Sarcopenia is defined by progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength and is now getting attention as a poor prognostic factor. The purpose of this review was to explore the impact of sarcopenia on short and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing surgical resection of gastrointestinal tumors. Recent studies suggest that sarcopenia contributes to postoperative complications and overall survival. The relatively simple evaluability, as well as its modifiable nature, provides an intriguing potential for sarcopenia to be included in standard preoperative clinical evaluation. Such evaluations can provide physicians with important information to target high-risk individuals with prophylactic measures and eventually improve surgical outcomes.
Collapse
|
50
|
Rose AV, Duhamel T, Hyde C, Kent DE, Afilalo J, Schultz ASH, Chudyk A, Kehler DS, Dave M, Arora RC. Randomised controlled trial protocol for the PROTECT-CS Study: PROTein to Enhance outComes of (pre)frail paTients undergoing Cardiac Surgery. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e037240. [PMID: 33514571 PMCID: PMC7849881 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the past 20 years, the increasing burden of heart disease in an ageing population has resulted in cardiac surgery (CS) being offered to more frail and older patients with multiple comorbidities. Frailty and malnutrition are key geriatric syndromes that impact postoperative outcomes, including morbidity, mortality and prolonged hospital length of stay. Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs), such as prehabilitation, have been associated with a reduction in complications after CS in vulnerable patients. The use of nutritional ERPs may enhance short-term and long-term recovery and mitigate frailty progression while improving patient-reported outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This trial is a two-centre, double-blinded, placebo, randomised controlled trial with blinded endpoint assessment and intention-to-treat analysis. One-hundred and fifty CS patients will be randomised to receive either a leucine-rich protein supplement or a placebo with no supplemented protein. Patients will consume their assigned supplement two times per day for approximately 2 weeks pre-procedure, during in-hospital postoperative recovery and for 8 weeks following discharge. The primary outcome will be the Short Physical Performance Battery score. Data collection will occur at four time points including baseline, in-hospital (pre-discharge), 2-month and 6-month time points post-surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The University of Manitoba Biomedical Research Ethics Board (20 March 2018) and the St Boniface Hospital Research Review Committee (28 June 2019) approved the trial protocol for the primary site in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. The second site's (Montreal, Quebec) ethics has been submitted and pending approval from the Research Ethics and New Technology Development Committee for the Montreal Heart Institute (December 2020). Recruitment for the primary site started February 2020 and the second site will begin January 2021. Data gathered from the PROTein to Enhance outComes of (pre)frail paTients undergoing Cardiac Surgery Study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. Knowledge translation strategies will be created to share findings with stakeholders who are positioned to implement evidence-informed change. POTENTIAL STUDY IMPACT Malnutrition and frailty play a crucial role in post-CS recovery. Nutritional ERPs are increasingly being recognised as a clinically relevant aspect of perioperative care. As such, this trial is to determine if leucine-rich protein supplementation at key intervals can mitigate frailty progression and facilitate enhanced postoperative recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04038294).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra V Rose
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Todd Duhamel
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Health, Leisure and Human Performance Research Institute, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, St. Boniface General Hospital Albrechtsen Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Chris Hyde
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Dave E Kent
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Cardiac Science Manitoba, St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Jonathan Afilalo
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Anna Chudyk
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Dustin S Kehler
- Department of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Mudra Dave
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Cardiac Science Manitoba, St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Rakesh C Arora
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, St. Boniface General Hospital Albrechtsen Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Cardiac Science Manitoba, St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|