1
|
Maceira D, Quintero REP, Suarez P, Peña Peña LV. Primary health care as a tool to promote equity and sustainability; a review of Latin American and Caribbean literature. Int J Equity Health 2024; 23:91. [PMID: 38711128 PMCID: PMC11075272 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02149-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Primary health care (PHC) has increased in global relevance as it has been demonstrated to be a useful strategy to promote community access to health services. Multilateral organizations and national governments have reached a consensus regarding the basic principles of PHC, but the application of these varies from country to country due to the particularities of local health systems.This article aims to review and summarize PHC strategies and the configuration of health networks in Latin American and Caribbean countries.The review was carried out using keywords in at least 9 databases. Papers in languages other than English, Portuguese, and Spanish were excluded, while non-refereed articles and regional gray literature were incorporated. As a result, 1,146 papers were identified. After three instances of analysis, 142 articles were selected for this investigation. Data were analyzed according to an analysis by theme.The evidence collected on health reforms in the region reflects the need to intensify care strategies supported by PHC and care networks. These must be resilient to changes in the population's needs and must be able to adapt to contexts of epidemiological accumulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Maceira
- Economics Department, Universidad de Buenos Aires; CONICET/CEDES; Universidad de San Andrés, Health Systems Global, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | | | - Patricia Suarez
- Center for the Study of State and Society (CEDES), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Taye BK, Gezie LD, Atnafu A, Mengiste SA, Kaasbøll J, Gullslett MK, Tilahun B. Effect of Performance-Based Nonfinancial Incentives on Data Quality in Individual Medical Records of Institutional Births: Quasi-Experimental Study. JMIR Med Inform 2024; 12:e54278. [PMID: 38578684 PMCID: PMC11031696 DOI: 10.2196/54278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the potential of routine health information systems in tackling persistent maternal deaths stemming from poor service quality at health facilities during and around childbirth, research has demonstrated their suboptimal performance, evident from the incomplete and inaccurate data unfit for practical use. There is a consensus that nonfinancial incentives can enhance health care providers' commitment toward achieving the desired health care quality. However, there is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of nonfinancial incentives in improving the data quality of institutional birth services in Ethiopia. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the effect of performance-based nonfinancial incentives on the completeness and consistency of data in the individual medical records of women who availed institutional birth services in northwest Ethiopia. METHODS We used a quasi-experimental design with a comparator group in the pre-post period, using a sample of 1969 women's medical records. The study was conducted in the "Wegera" and "Tach-armacheho" districts, which served as the intervention and comparator districts, respectively. The intervention comprised a multicomponent nonfinancial incentive, including smartphones, flash disks, power banks, certificates, and scholarships. Personal records of women who gave birth within 6 months before (April to September 2020) and after (February to July 2021) the intervention were included. Three distinct women's birth records were examined: the integrated card, integrated individual folder, and delivery register. The completeness of the data was determined by examining the presence of data elements, whereas the consistency check involved evaluating the agreement of data elements among women's birth records. The average treatment effect on the treated (ATET), with 95% CIs, was computed using a difference-in-differences model. RESULTS In the intervention district, data completeness in women's personal records was nearly 4 times higher (ATET 3.8, 95% CI 2.2-5.5; P=.02), and consistency was approximately 12 times more likely (ATET 11.6, 95% CI 4.18-19; P=.03) than in the comparator district. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that performance-based nonfinancial incentives enhance data quality in the personal records of institutional births. Health care planners can adapt these incentives to improve the data quality of comparable medical records, particularly pregnancy-related data within health care facilities. Future research is needed to assess the effectiveness of nonfinancial incentives across diverse contexts to support successful scale-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biniam Kefiyalew Taye
- Department of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
- Ministry of Health, The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Lemma Derseh Gezie
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Asmamaw Atnafu
- Department of Health System and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | | | - Jens Kaasbøll
- Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Monika Knudsen Gullslett
- Faculty of Health & Social Sciences, Science Center Health & Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway, Notodden, Norway
| | - Binyam Tilahun
- Department of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wagenschieber E, Blunck D. Impact of reimbursement systems on patient care - a systematic review of systematic reviews. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2024; 14:22. [PMID: 38492098 PMCID: PMC10944612 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00487-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is not yet sufficient scientific evidence to answer the question of the extent to which different reimbursement systems influence patient care and treatment quality. Due to the asymmetry of information between physicians, health insurers and patients, market-based mechanisms are necessary to ensure the best possible patient care. The aim of this study is to investigate how reimbursement systems influence multiple areas of patient care in form of structure, process and outcome indicators. METHODS For this purpose, a systematic literature review of systematic reviews is conducted in the databases PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. The reimbursement systems of salary, bundled payment, fee-for-service and value-based reimbursement are examined. Patient care is divided according to the three dimensions of structure, process, and outcome and evaluated in eight subcategories. RESULTS A total of 34 reviews of 971 underlying primary studies are included in this article. International studies identified the greatest effects in categories resource utilization and quality/health outcomes. Pay-for-performance and bundled payments were the most commonly studied models. Among the systems examined, fee-for-service and value-based reimbursement systems have the most positive impact on patient care. CONCLUSION Patient care can be influenced by the choice of reimbursement system. The factors for successful implementation need to be further explored in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Wagenschieber
- Department of Healthcare Management, Institute of Management, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Dominik Blunck
- Department of Healthcare Management, Institute of Management, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nuremberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Benipal H, Demers C, Cerasuolo JO, Perez R, You JJ, Amin F, Keshavjee K, Lee DS. Association of a Heart Failure Management Incentive in Primary Care With Clinical Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13:e031498. [PMID: 38156519 PMCID: PMC10863798 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.031498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aim to examine the association between primary care physicians' billing of Q050A, a pay-for-performance heart failure (HF) management incentive fee code, and the composite outcome of mortality, hospitalization, and emergency department visits. METHODS AND RESULTS This population-based cohort study linked administrative health databases in Ontario, Canada, for patients with HF aged >66 years between January 1, 2008, and March 31, 2020. Cases were patients with HF who had a Q050A fee code billed. Cases and controls were matched 1:1 on age, sex, patient status on being rostered to a primary care physician, cardiologist, or internist visit in the 6 months before study enrollment, Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Group resource use bands, days between HF diagnosis and study enrollment (±2 years), and the logit of the propensity score. A Cox proportional hazards model assessed the association of Q050A with the outcome. A total of 59 664 cases had a Q050A billed, whereas 244 883 patients did not. Before matching, patients who had a Q050A billed were more likely to be men (52% versus 49%), were rostered to a primary care physician (100% versus 96%), had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, and had higher health care costs. The mean follow-up was 481 days for cases and 530 days for controls. The composite outcome (hazard ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.09-1.12]) was significantly higher for cases than controls. CONCLUSIONS The Q050A incentive improved financial compensation for primary care physicians managing patients with HF but was not associated with improvements in the outcome. Research on promoting evidence-based HF management is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harsukh Benipal
- Temerty Faculty of MedicineUniversity of TorontoToronto, OntarioCanada
| | - Catherine Demers
- Department of MedicineMcMaster UniversityHamiltonOntarioCanada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and ImpactMcMaster UniversityHamiltonOntarioCanada
| | - Joshua O. Cerasuolo
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and ImpactMcMaster UniversityHamiltonOntarioCanada
- Institute of Clinical Evaluative SciencesTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Richard Perez
- Institute of Clinical Evaluative SciencesTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - John J. You
- Division of General Internal and Hospitalist MedicineCredit Valley Hospital, Trillium Health PartnersMississaugaOntarioCanada
| | - Faizan Amin
- Department of MedicineMcMaster UniversityHamiltonOntarioCanada
| | - Karim Keshavjee
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and EvaluationUniversity of TorontoToronto, OntarioCanada
- InfoClin IncTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Douglas S. Lee
- Temerty Faculty of MedicineUniversity of TorontoToronto, OntarioCanada
- Institute of Clinical Evaluative SciencesTorontoOntarioCanada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and EvaluationUniversity of TorontoToronto, OntarioCanada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Iskandar D, Pradipta IS, Anggriani A, Postma MJ, van Boven JFM. Multidisciplinary tuberculosis care: leveraging the role of hospital pharmacists. BMJ Open Respir Res 2023; 10:e001887. [PMID: 37949612 PMCID: PMC10649469 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Optimal pharmacological treatment of tuberculosis (TB) requires a multidisciplinary team, yet the hospital pharmacist's role is unclear. We aimed to analyse hospital pharmacist-provided clinical pharmacy services (CPS) implementation in TB care. METHOD A nationwide survey-based online cross-sectional study was conducted on hospital pharmacists in Indonesia from 1 November 2022 to 22 November 2022. Outcomes were the extent of pharmacists' involvement in multidisciplinary TB care, TB-related CPS provided and views on TB-related CPS. The probability of pharmacists' involvement in multidisciplinary TB teams was assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS In total, 439 pharmacists (mean age 31.2±6.22 years, 78% female) completed the survey. Thirty-six per cent were part of multidisciplinary TB care, and 23% had TB-related tasks. Adherence monitoring (90%) and drug use evaluation (86%) were the most conducted TB-related CPS. Pharmacists' views on TB-related CPS implementation were generally positive, except for financial incentives. Work experience (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.61), ever received TB-related training (OR 3.51, 95% CI 2.03 to 6.14) and specific assignments to provide TB-related CPS (OR 8.42, 95% CI 4.99 to 14.59) significantly increased pharmacist involvement in multidisciplinary TB care. CONCLUSION Around one-third of hospital pharmacists are part of multidisciplinary TB care, with medication adherence and drug use monitoring as primary tasks. Pharmacists' experience, training, assignment to provide TB-related CPS and financial incentives are key elements for further implementation in multidisciplinary TB care. Pharmacists should proactively support current TB care and conduct operational research, sharing data with healthcare peers and fostering a collaborative multidisciplinary TB care team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deni Iskandar
- Unit of Global Health, Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Bhakti Kencana University, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Ivan S Pradipta
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia
- Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Bandung, Indonesia
- Indonesian Tuberculosis Research Network/JetSet TB, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Ani Anggriani
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Bhakti Kencana University, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Maarten J Postma
- Unit of Global Health, Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Bandung, Indonesia
- Research Institute Science in Healthy Aging and healthcaRE (SHARE), University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Economics, Econometrics & Finance, Faculty of Economic & Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Job F M van Boven
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Center for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jansky M, Heyl L, Hach M, Kranz S, Lehmann T, Freytag A, Wedding U, Meißner W, Krauss SH, Schneider W, Nauck F. Structural characteristics and contractual terms of specialist palliative homecare in Germany. BMC Palliat Care 2023; 22:166. [PMID: 37904160 PMCID: PMC10617175 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01274-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multi-professional specialist palliative homecare (SPHC) teams care for palliative patients with complex symptoms. In Germany, the SPHC directive regulates care provision, but model contracts for each federal state are heterogeneous regarding staff requirements, cooperation with other healthcare providers, and financial reimbursement. The structural characteristics of SPHC teams also vary. AIM We provide a structured overview of the existing model contracts, as well as a nationwide assessment of SPHC teams and their structural characteristics. Furthermore, we explore whether these characteristics serve to find specifc patterns of SPHC team models, based on empirical data. METHODS This study is part of the multi-methods research project "SAVOIR", funded by the German Innovations Fund. Most model contracts are publicly available. Structural characteristics (e.g. number, professions, and affiliations of team members, and external cooperation) were assessed via an online database ("Wegweiser Hospiz- und Palliativversorgung") based on voluntary information obtained from SPHC teams. All the data were updated by phone during the assessment process. Data were descriptively analysed regarding staff, cooperation requirements, and reimbursement schemes, while latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify structural team models. RESULTS Model contracts have heterogeneous contract partners and terms related to staff requirements (number and qualifications) and cooperation with other services. Fourteen reimbursement schemes were available, all combining different payment models. Of the 283 SPHC teams, 196 provided structural characteristics. Teams reported between one and 298 members (mean: 30.3, median: 18), mainly nurses and physicians, while 37.8% had a psychosocial professional as a team member. Most teams were composed of nurses and physicians employed in different settings; for example, staff was employed by the team, in private practices/nursing services, or in hospitals. Latent class analysis identified four structural team models, based on the team size, team members' affiliation, and care organisation. CONCLUSION Both the contractual terms and teams' structural characteristics vary substantially, and this must be considered when analysing patient data from SPHC. The identified patterns of team models can form a starting point from which to analyse different forms of care provision and their impact on care quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximiliane Jansky
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany.
| | - Lia Heyl
- German Association for Palliative Medicine (DGP), Berlin, Germany
| | - Michaela Hach
- Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft SAPV (BAG), Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Steven Kranz
- German Association for Palliative Medicine (DGP), Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Lehmann
- Center for Clinical Studies, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Antje Freytag
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Ulrich Wedding
- Department of Palliative Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Winfried Meißner
- Department of Palliative Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Sabine H Krauss
- Center for Interdisciplinary Health Research, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Werner Schneider
- Center for Interdisciplinary Health Research, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Friedemann Nauck
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Njie H, Ilboudo PGC, Gopinathan U, Chola L, Wangen KR. Preferences of healthcare workers for provider payment systems in The Gambia's National Health Insurance Scheme. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:853. [PMID: 37568233 PMCID: PMC10422797 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09885-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Government of The Gambia introduced a national health insurance scheme (NHIS) in 2021 to promote universal health coverage (UHC). Provider payment systems (PPS) are strategic purchasing arrangements that can enhance provider performance, accountability, and efficiency in the NHIS. This study assessed healthcare workers' (HCWs') preferences for PPS across major service areas in the NHIS. METHODS A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted using a probability proportionate to size sampling technique to select an appropriate sample size. Health care workers were presented with options for PPS to choose from across major service areas. Descriptive statistics explored HCW socio-demographic and health service characteristics. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to assess the association between these characteristics and choices of PPS. RESULTS The majority of HCW did not have insurance coverage, but more than 60% of them were willing to join and pay for the NHIS. Gender, professional cadre, facility level, and region influenced HCW's preference for PPS across the major service areas. The preferred PPS varied among HCW depending on the service area, with capitation being the least preferred PPS across all service areas. CONCLUSION The National Health Insurance Authority (NHIA) needs to consider HCW's preference for PPS and factors that influence their preferences when choosing various payment systems. Strategic purchasing decisions should consider the incentives these payment systems may create to align incentives to guide provider behaviour towards UHC. The findings of this study can inform policy and decision-makers on the right mix of PPS to spur provider performance and value for money in The Gambia's NHIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan Njie
- Department of Community Medicine and Global Health, University of Oslo, Postboks 1130, Blindern, Oslo, 0318, Norway.
| | | | - Unni Gopinathan
- Cluster for Global Health, Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lumbwe Chola
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Reidar Wangen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Farcher R, Graber SM, Thüring N, Blozik E, Huber CA. Does the implementation of an incentive scheme increase adherence to diabetes guidelines? A retrospective cohort study of managed care enrollees. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:707. [PMID: 37386491 PMCID: PMC10308744 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09694-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A novel incentive scheme based on a joint agreement of a large Swiss health insurance with 56 physician networks was implemented in 2018. This study evaluated the effect of its implementation on adherence to evidence-based guidelines among patients with diabetes in managed care models. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study, using health care claims data from patients with diabetes enrolled in a managed care plan (2016-2019). Guideline adherence was assessed by four evidence-based performance measures and four hierarchically constructed adherence levels. Generalized multilevel models were used to examine the effect of the incentive scheme on guideline adherence. RESULTS A total of 6'273 patients with diabetes were included in this study. The raw descriptive statistics showed minor improvements in guideline adherence after the implementation. After adjusting for underlying patient characteristics and potential differences between physician networks, the likelihood of receiving a test was moderately but consistently higher after the implementation of the incentive scheme for most performance measures, ranging from 18% (albuminuria: OR, 1.18; 95%-CI, 1.05-1.33) to 58% (HDL cholesterol: OR, 1.58; 95%-CI, 1.40-1.78). Full adherence was more likely after implementation of the incentive scheme (OR, 1.37; 95%-CI, 1.20-1.55), whereas level 1 significantly decreased (OR, 0.74; 95%-CI, 0.65 - 0.85). The proportions of the other adherence levels were stable. CONCLUSION Incentive schemes including transparency of the achieved performance may be able to improve guideline adherence in patients with diabetes and are promising to increase quality of care in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Farcher
- Department of Health Sciences, Helsana Group, P.O. Box, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Sereina M. Graber
- Department of Health Sciences, Helsana Group, P.O. Box, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Nicole Thüring
- Department of Managed Care, Helsana Group, P.O. Box, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Eva Blozik
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zürich, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Carola A. Huber
- Department of Health Sciences, Helsana Group, P.O. Box, Zürich, Switzerland
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zürich, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Roseleur J, Gonzalez-Chica DA, Harvey G, Stocks NP, Karnon J. The Cost of Uncontrolled Blood Pressure in Australian General Practice: A Modelling Study Using Electronic Health Records (MedicineInsight). PHARMACOECONOMICS 2023; 41:573-587. [PMID: 36870035 PMCID: PMC9985098 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01251-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypertension is the most common condition seen in Australian general practice. Despite hypertension being amenable to lifestyle modifications and pharmacological treatment, only around half of these patients have controlled blood pressure levels (< 140/90 mmHg), placing them at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. OBJECTIVE We aimed to estimate the health and acute hospitalisation costs of uncontrolled hypertension among patients attending general practice. METHODS We used population data and electronic health records from 634,000 patients aged 45-74 years who regularly attended an Australian general practice between 2016 and 2018 (MedicineInsight database). An existing worksheet-based costing model was adapted to calculate the potential cost savings for acute hospitalisation of primary cardiovascular disease events by reducing the risk of a cardiovascular event over the next 5 years through improved systolic blood pressure control. The model estimated the number of expected cardiovascular disease events and associated acute hospital costs under current levels of systolic blood pressure and compared this estimate with the expected number of cardiovascular disease events and costs under different levels of systolic blood pressure control. RESULTS The model estimated that across all Australians aged 45-74 years who visit their general practitioner (n = 8.67 million), 261,858 cardiovascular disease events can be expected over the next 5 years at current systolic blood pressure levels (mean 137.8 mmHg, standard deviation = 12.3 mmHg), with a cost of AUD$1813 million (in 2019-20). By reducing the systolic blood pressure of all patients with a systolic blood pressure greater than 139 mmHg to 139 mmHg, 25,845 cardiovascular disease events could be avoided with an associated reduction in acute hospital costs of AUD$179 million. If systolic blood pressure is lowered further to 129 mmHg for all those with systolic blood pressure greater than 129 mmHg, 56,169 cardiovascular disease events could be avoided with potential cost savings of AUD$389 million. Sensitivity analyses indicate that potential cost savings range from AUD$46 million to AUD$1406 million and AUD$117 million to AUD$2009 million for the two scenarios, respectively. Cost savings by practice range from AUD$16,479 for small practices to AUD$82,493 for large practices. CONCLUSIONS The aggregate cost effects of poor blood pressure control in primary care are high, but cost implications at the individual practice level are modest. The potential cost savings improve the potential to design cost-effective interventions, but such interventions may be best targeted at a population level rather than at individual practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Roseleur
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
- Discipline of General Practice, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
- Flinders Health and Medical Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | - David A Gonzalez-Chica
- Discipline of General Practice, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Adelaide Rural Clinical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Gillian Harvey
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Nigel P Stocks
- Discipline of General Practice, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Jonathan Karnon
- Flinders Health and Medical Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Girard A, Dugas M, Lépine J, Carnovale V, Jalbert L, Turmel A, Stéfan T, Poirier AA, Mailhot B, Skidmore B, Couturier Y, Miller S, LeBlanc A. Strategies to engage family physicians in primary care research: A systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract 2023; 29:233-249. [PMID: 35796093 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE Moving towards high quality primary health care, involving family physicians in primary care research becomes an essential prerequisite to ensures a better adoption and routinization of patient-centred, evidence-based practices. AIM To assess the effectiveness of strategies to engage family physicians in primary care research. METHODS We systematically reviewed evidence for strategies used to engage family physicians in primary care research. We included any study design that reported at least one quantitative outcome. Searches were carried out on MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Pairs of reviewers independently screened for publications in two stages using standardized forms. We performed data analysis through a narrative synthesis approach, using the Reasoned-action approach as framework. RESULTS A total of 4859 deduped records were identified of which 41 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included for analysis. The majority of studies (n = 35) investigated family physician's participation in a research project. They aimed to influence family physicians' intention (n = 7) or their ability (n = 3) to participate in a research project. Three types of strategies (compensation/incentive, recruitment by a peer and support from a research network or an academic institution) demonstrated a significant increase in participation rate. Methodological quality of the studies evaluating these strategies was relatively low. Few studies (n = 6) targeted research capacity-building programmes with no significant impact noted. CONCLUSION Numerous strategies have been used to engage family physicians in primary care research, but few studies evaluated their effectiveness in a rigorous way. REGISTRATION The protocol of this review was registered with the SPOR Evidence Alliance and on the PROSPERO platform (registration number: CRD42020189322).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane Girard
- Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.,VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Michèle Dugas
- VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Johanie Lépine
- VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Laura Jalbert
- VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Audrey Turmel
- VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Théo Stéfan
- VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Benoit Mailhot
- VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Yves Couturier
- Réseau-1 Québec, Réseau de connaissances sur les soins primaires, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Shandi Miller
- Réseau-1 Québec, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Annie LeBlanc
- Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.,VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Québec, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kim W, Koo H, Lee HJ, Han E. The Effects of Cost Containment and Price Policies on Pharmaceutical Expenditure in South Korea. Int J Health Policy Manag 2022; 11:2198-2207. [PMID: 34814666 PMCID: PMC9808296 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Policy-makers have proposed and implemented various cost-containment policies for drug prices and quantities to regulate rising pharmaceutical spending. Our study focused on a major change in pricing policy and several incentive schemes for curbing pharmaceutical expenditure growth during the 2010s in Korea. METHODS We constructed the longitudinal dataset from 2008-2017 for 12 904 clinics to track the prescriber behavior before and after the implemented policies. Applying an interrupted time series model, we analyzed changes in trends in overall monthly drug expenditure and antibiotic drug expenditure per prescription for outpatient claims diagnosed with three major diseases before and after the policies' implementation. RESULTS Significant price reductions and incentives for more efficient drug prescriptions resulted in an immediate decrease in monthly drug expenditures in clinics. However, we found attenuated effects over the long run. The top-spending clinics showed the highest rate of increase in drug costs. CONCLUSION Future policy interventions can maximize their effects by targeting high-spending providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woohyeon Kim
- Korea Institute of Public Finance, Sejong, South Korea
| | - Heejo Koo
- College of Pharmacy, Yonsei Institute of Pharmaceutical Research, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hye-Jae Lee
- College of Pharmacy, Woosuk University, Wanju, South Korea
| | - Euna Han
- College of Pharmacy, Yonsei Institute of Pharmaceutical Research, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Koleva-Kolarova R, Buchanan J, Vellekoop H, Huygens S, Versteegh M, Mölken MRV, Szilberhorn L, Zelei T, Nagy B, Wordsworth S, Tsiachristas A. Financing and Reimbursement Models for Personalised Medicine: A Systematic Review to Identify Current Models and Future Options. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2022; 20:501-524. [PMID: 35368231 PMCID: PMC9206925 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-021-00714-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of healthcare interventions described as 'personalised medicine' (PM) is increasing rapidly. As healthcare systems struggle to decide whether to fund PM innovations, it is unclear what models for financing and reimbursement are appropriate to apply in this context. OBJECTIVE To review financing and reimbursement models for PM, summarise their key characteristics, and describe whether they can influence the development and uptake of PM. METHODS A literature review was conducted in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Econlit to identify studies published in English between 2009 and 2021, and reviews published before 2009. Grey literature was identified through Google Scholar, Google and subject-specific webpages. Articles that described financing and reimbursement of PM, and financing of non-PM were included. Data were extracted and synthesised narratively to report on the models, as well as facilitators, incentives, barriers and disincentives that could influence PM development and uptake. RESULTS One hundred and fifty-three papers were included. Research and development of PM was financed through both public and private sources and reimbursed largely through traditional models such as single fees, Diagnosis-Related Groups, and bundled payments. Financial-based reimbursement, including rebates and price-volume agreements, was mainly applied to targeted therapies. Performance-based reimbursement was identified mainly for gene and targeted therapies, and some companion diagnostics. Gene therapy manufacturers offered outcome-based rebates for treatment failure for interventions including Luxturna®, Kymriah®, Yescarta®, Zynteglo®, Zolgensma® and Strimvelis®, and coverage with evidence development for Kymriah® and Yescarta®. Targeted testing with OncotypeDX® was granted value-based reimbursement through initial coverage with evidence development. The main barriers and disincentives to PM financing and reimbursement were the lack of strong links between stakeholders and the lack of demonstrable benefit and value of PM. CONCLUSIONS Public-private financing agreements and performance-based reimbursement models could help facilitate the development and uptake of PM interventions with proven clinical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James Buchanan
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Heleen Vellekoop
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simone Huygens
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Versteegh
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - László Szilberhorn
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tamás Zelei
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Balázs Nagy
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Apostolos Tsiachristas
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Beauvais B, Whitaker Z, Kim F, Anderson B. Is the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program Associated with Reduced Hospital Readmissions? J Multidiscip Healthc 2022; 15:1089-1099. [PMID: 35592815 PMCID: PMC9113654 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s358733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Hospital readmissions have been associated with adverse outcomes and elevated financial costs to patients, families, and hospitals across the United States. Historically, nearly 20% of all Medicare discharges had a readmission within 30 days. In an effort to address this issue, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) established the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) in 2012 to positively influence readmissions associated with acute myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, pneumonia, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and total hip and/or knee arthroplasty. However, as recently as 2018, there were still 3.8 million 30-day all-cause adult hospital readmissions, with a 14% readmission rate and an average readmission cost of $15,200. The ACA also produced the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) program with the stated intent to (1) reduce mortality and complications, (2) reduce healthcare-associated infections, (3) increase patient safety, (4) improve the patient experience, and (5) increase efficiency and reduce costs. Given the costs and quality implications of an average readmission, it is logical to believe that HVBP eligible hospitals are simultaneously seeking to meet the goals of both programs. However, to date, no studies have examined if that is the case. Thus, in this study, we seek to determine if HVBP eligible hospitals are associated with a reduction in the core set of HRRP readmission rates better than the facilities that are not eligible for the HVBP program. Methods Hospital-level data from calendar year 2019 for 3,276 short-term acute care hospitals in the United States were evaluated using multivariate regression analysis to examine the readmission rate performance between 2,719 HVBP eligible hospitals and 557 ineligible hospitals. Results Our six separate multivariable linear regressions revealed a statistically significant and positive association between HVBP participation and readmission rates after controlling for numerous organizational, clinical complexity, and environmental factors. In each case, the magnitude of the positive directional association is moderate, ranging from and increase of +0.19% (pneumonia readmissions) to as high as +0.37% (all cause readmissions) for HVBP eligible hospitals. When considered in the context of the average number of discharges in our data set (x- = 9570), a third of a percent increase from the average 15.56% all cause readmissions to 16.08% in HVBP eligible hospitals equates to 50 additional readmissions annually (9570 × 15.56% = 1,489 vs 9570 × 16.08% = 1,539). At an average cost of $15,200 per readmission, which equates to an average additional cost to the average HVBP eligible hospital in excess of $760,000. Discussion The fact that there is a positive association between HVBP participating hospitals and readmissions at all, and that the same effect appears to be persistent across all dependent measures is concerning. One would logically expect hospitals that are focused on quality-based care to thoroughly care for individuals in order for them to not be readmitted to the hospital. The results provided do not necessarily prove that either program is not working. But they also do not confirm that the HVBP and HRRP programs are working together and accomplishing what they were originally designed to do: improve patient care and lower health-care costs.
Collapse
|
14
|
Vilendrer S, Amano A, Asch SM, Brown-Johnson C, Lu AC, Maggio P. Engaging Frontline Physicians in Value Improvement: A Qualitative Evaluation of Physician-Directed Reinvestment. J Healthc Leadersh 2022; 14:31-45. [PMID: 35422669 PMCID: PMC9005236 DOI: 10.2147/jhl.s335763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Methods Results Conclusion
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacie Vilendrer
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Correspondence: Stacie Vilendrer, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Road, Mail Code 5475, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA, Email
| | - Alexis Amano
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Steven M Asch
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- VA Center for Innovation to Implementation, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA
| | - Cati Brown-Johnson
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Amy C Lu
- Department of Anesthesia, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Paul Maggio
- Department of Surgery, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kalmus O, Chalkley M, Listl S. Effects of provider incentives on dental X-raying in NHS Scotland: what happens if patients switch providers? THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2022; 23:59-65. [PMID: 34255240 PMCID: PMC8882106 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01348-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In many market settings individuals are encouraged to switch health care providers as a means of ensuring more competition. Switching may have a potentially undesirable side effect of increasing unnecessary treatment. Focusing on the most common source of medical radiation (dental X-rays), the purpose of this study was to assess whether, upon switching dentist, X-ray exposure increases depending on the type of provider payment. METHODS The analysis used longitudinal data from 2005 to 2016 covering a 5% random sample of the Scottish adult population covered by the National Health Service (NHS). Multiple fixed-effects panel regression analyses were employed to determine the correlation of provider remuneration with patients' likelihood of receiving an X-ray upon switching to a new dentist other things equal. A broad set of covariates including a patient's copayment status was controlled for. RESULTS Upon switching to a dentist who was paid fee-for-service, patients had a by 9.6%-points (95% CI 7.4-11.8%) higher probability of receiving an X-ray, compared to switching to a salaried dentist. Results were robust when accounting for patient exemption status, as well as unobserved patient and dentist characteristics. CONCLUSIONS In comparison to staying with the same dentist, patients may be exposed to substantially more X-rays upon switching to a dentist who is paid fee-for-service. There may need to be better guidance and regulation to protect the health of those who have to switch provider due to moving and greater caution in advocating voluntary switching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Kalmus
- Section for Translational Health Economics, Department of Conservative Dentistry, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Listl
- Section for Translational Health Economics, Department of Conservative Dentistry, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of Dentistry - Quality and Safety of Oral Health Care, Radboudumc - Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Klaic M, Kapp S, Hudson P, Chapman W, Denehy L, Story D, Francis JJ. Implementability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a conceptual framework. Implement Sci 2022; 17:10. [PMID: 35086538 PMCID: PMC8793098 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01171-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Implementation research may play an important role in reducing research waste by identifying strategies that support translation of evidence into practice. Implementation of healthcare interventions is influenced by multiple factors including the organisational context, implementation strategies and features of the intervention as perceived by people delivering and receiving the intervention. Recently, concepts relating to perceived features of interventions have been gaining traction in published literature, namely, acceptability, fidelity, feasibility, scalability and sustainability. These concepts may influence uptake of healthcare interventions, yet there seems to be little consensus about their nature and impact. The aim of this paper is to develop a testable conceptual framework of implementability of healthcare interventions that includes these five concepts. Methods A multifaceted approach was used to develop and refine a conceptual framework of implementability of healthcare interventions. An overview of reviews identified reviews published between January 2000 and March 2021 that focused on at least one of the five concepts in relation to a healthcare intervention. These findings informed the development of a preliminary framework of implementability of healthcare interventions which was presented to a panel of experts. A nominal group process was used to critique, refine and agree on a final framework. Results A total of 252 publications were included in the overview of reviews. Of these, 32% were found to be feasible, 4% reported sustainable changes in practice and 9% were scaled up to other populations and/or settings. The expert panel proposed that scalability and sustainability of a healthcare intervention are dependent on its acceptability, fidelity and feasibility. Furthermore, acceptability, fidelity and feasibility require re-evaluation over time and as the intervention is developed and then implemented in different settings or with different populations. The final agreed framework of implementability provides the basis for a chronological, iterative approach to planning for wide-scale, long-term implementation of healthcare interventions. Conclusions We recommend that researchers consider the factors acceptability, fidelity and feasibility (proposed to influence sustainability and scalability) during the preliminary phases of intervention development, evaluation and implementation, and iteratively check these factors in different settings and over time. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-021-01171-7.
Collapse
|
17
|
Welch V, Dewidar O, Tanjong Ghogomu E, Abdisalam S, Al Ameer A, Barbeau VI, Brand K, Kebedom K, Benkhalti M, Kristjansson E, Madani MT, Antequera Martín AM, Mathew CM, McGowan J, McLeod W, Park HA, Petkovic J, Riddle A, Tugwell P, Petticrew M, Trawin J, Wells GA. How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 1:MR000028. [PMID: 35040487 PMCID: PMC8764740 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.mr000028.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhancing health equity is endorsed in the Sustainable Development Goals. The failure of systematic reviews to consider potential differences in effects across equity factors is cited by decision-makers as a limitation to their ability to inform policy and program decisions. OBJECTIVES: To explore what methods systematic reviewers use to consider health equity in systematic reviews of effectiveness. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases up to 26 February 2021: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Methodology Register, CINAHL, Education Resources Information Center, Education Abstracts, Criminal Justice Abstracts, Hein Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals, PAIS International, Social Services Abstracts, Sociological Abstracts, Digital Dissertations and the Health Technology Assessment Database. We searched SCOPUS to identify articles that cited any of the included studies on 10 June 10 2021. We contacted authors and searched the reference lists of included studies to identify additional potentially relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included empirical studies of cohorts of systematic reviews that assessed methods for measuring effects on health inequalities. We define health inequalities as unfair and avoidable differences across socially stratifying factors that limit opportunities for health. We operationalised this by assessing studies which evaluated differences in health across any component of the PROGRESS-Plus acronym, which stands for Place of residence, Race/ethnicity/culture/language, Occupation, Gender or sex, Religion, Education, Socioeconomic status, Social capital. "Plus" stands for other factors associated with discrimination, exclusion, marginalisation or vulnerability such as personal characteristics (e.g. age, disability), relationships that limit opportunities for health (e.g. children in a household with parents who smoke) or environmental situations which provide limited control of opportunities for health (e.g. school food environment). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data using a pre-tested form. Risk of bias was appraised for included studies according to the potential for bias in selection and detection of systematic reviews. MAIN RESULTS: In total, 48,814 studies were identified and the titles and abstracts were screened in duplicate. In this updated review, we identified an additional 124 methodological studies published in the 10 years since the first version of this review, which included 34 studies. Thus, 158 methodological studies met our criteria for inclusion. The methods used by these studies focused on evidence relevant to populations experiencing health inequity (108 out of 158 studies), assess subgroup analysis across PROGRESS-Plus (26 out of 158 studies), assess analysis of a gradient in effect across PROGRESS-Plus (2 out of 158 studies) or use a combination of subgroup analysis and focused approaches (20 out of 158 studies). The most common PROGRESS-Plus factors assessed were age (43 studies), socioeconomic status in 35 studies, low- and middle-income countries in 24 studies, gender or sex in 22 studies, race or ethnicity in 17 studies, and four studies assessed multiple factors across which health inequity may exist. Only 16 studies provided a definition of health inequity. Five methodological approaches to consider health equity in systematic reviews of effectiveness were identified: 1) descriptive assessment of reporting and analysis in systematic reviews (140 of 158 studies used a type of descriptive method); 2) descriptive assessment of reporting and analysis in original trials (50 studies); 3) analytic approaches which assessed differential effects across one or more PROGRESS-Plus factors (16 studies); 4) applicability assessment (25 studies) and 5) stakeholder engagement (28 studies), which is a new finding in this update and examines the appraisal of whether relevant stakeholders with lived experience of health inequity were included in the design of systematic reviews or design and delivery of interventions. Reporting for both approaches (analytic and applicability) lacked transparency and was insufficiently detailed to enable the assessment of credibility. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is a need for improvement in conceptual clarity about the definition of health equity, describing sufficient detail about analytic approaches (including subgroup analyses) and transparent reporting of judgments required for applicability assessments in order to consider health equity in systematic reviews of effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian Welch
- Methods Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Omar Dewidar
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Kevin Brand
- Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jessie McGowan
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Alison Riddle
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Marmora, Canada
| | - Peter Tugwell
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Mark Petticrew
- Department of Social & Environmental Health Research, Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - George A Wells
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
You Q, Bai D, Wu C, Gao J, Hou C. Status of work alienation among nurses in China: A systematic review. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:986139. [PMID: 36424993 PMCID: PMC9679294 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.986139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Work alienation is a common feeling of estrangement from the work and its context. Nurses are prone to feel alienated due to the high risk of infection, heavy workload, and the persistence of stress at high levels. Work alienation has serious negative outcomes, organizationally as well as personally. In recent years, the issue of work alienation among nurses has received considerable attention in China, but no systematic reviews have yet been published and its epidemiological status among Chinese nurses remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate the status and distribution characteristics of work alienation among nurses in China. METHODS CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, CENTRAL, Wanfang, SinoMed, CNKI, and VIP were searched for cross-sectional studies before 10 January 2022 on the current status of work alienation among nurses. Two investigators independently screened the articles, extracted the data, and evaluated the risk of literature bias. Stata16.0 software was used for analysis. RESULTS A total of 12 studies were included, with 7,265 nurses involved. Meta-analysis results showed that the score of work alienation was 35.43 [95%CI (31.82, 39.04)]. Subgroup analysis showed that the scores of male and female nurses were 37.62 and 35.79 respectively; the scores of junior, undergraduate, and graduate nurses were 34.90, 37.15, and 40.02 respectively; the scores of primary, intermediate, and senior nurses were 36.95, 35.38, and 33.11 respectively; the scores of unmarried and married nurses were 38.59 and 36.70 respectively; the scores of nurses who had worked for 1~ <6 years, 6~10 years, and more than 10 years were 37.46, 36.69, and 32.89 respectively; the scores of nurses with salary <5,000 yuan, 5,000~10,000 yuan, and more than 10,000 yuan were 40.25, 37.19 and 34.52 respectively; and the scores of nurses in emergency department and intensive care units, internal medicine, surgery, and pediatrics were 37.25, 38.73, 36.28, and 31.98 respectively. CONCLUSION Chinese nurses had a moderate level of work alienation. The scores of nurses in the following categories were quite high: male, higher education levels, low-professional titles, unmarried, shorter clinical working time, lower income, working in internal medicine, and working in the emergency department and intensive care units. Managers should take effective measures as soon as possible to reduce the occurrence of nurses' sense of work alienation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022298746.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian You
- School of Nursing, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
| | - Dingxi Bai
- School of Nursing, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
| | - Chenxi Wu
- School of Nursing, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
| | - Jing Gao
- School of Nursing, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
| | - Chaoming Hou
- School of Nursing, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bergman R, Forsberg BC, Sundewall J. Results-Based Financing for Health: A Case Study of Knowledge and Perceptions Among Stakeholders in a Donor-Funded Program in Zambia. GLOBAL HEALTH: SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2021; 9:936-947. [PMID: 34933988 PMCID: PMC8691872 DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-20-00463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
The lack of a fully developed results-based financing model before implementation of a program in the health sector begins can lead to difficulty in communicating about the program to different actors involved and delay components of implementation. In 2015, the Zambian government and the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) signed an agreement in which Sida committed to funding a program for Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child, Adolescent Health and Nutrition (RMNCAH). The program includes a results-based financing (RBF) model that aims to reward Zambian districts for improved district-wide results on relevant indicators with additional funding. We aimed to describe stakeholders' knowledge of the RBF model and perceptions of the incentive structure during the first 18 months of the program's implementation. This study illuminates the possible pitfalls of implementing an RBF scheme without giving attention to all necessary steps of the process. A qualitative case study was used and included a review of documents, in-depth interviews, and observations. From February–April 2017, we conducted 37 in-depth interviews, representing the views of 12 development partner agencies, government departments, and health facility staff throughout Zambia. We used a qualitative framework analysis. Findings show that the Zambian government and Sida had different perceptions on what levels of the health system RBF will incentivize and that most districts and hospital administrators interviewed were unaware of the indicators that the RBF was part of the RMNCAH program at all. The lack of knowledge about the RBF scheme among respondents suggests the possibility that the model did not ultimately have the necessary preconditions to create an effective incentive structure. These results demonstrate the need for improved communication between stakeholders and the importance of sufficiently planning an RBF model before implementation.
Collapse
|
20
|
CLARKE LORCAN, ANDERSON MICHAEL, ANDERSON ROB, KLAUSEN MORTENBONDE, FORMAN REBECCA, KERNS JENNA, RABE ADRIAN, KRISTENSEN SØRENRUD, THEODORAKIS PAVLOS, VALDERAS JOSE, KLUGE HANS, MOSSIALOS ELIAS. Economic Aspects of Delivering Primary Care Services: An Evidence Synthesis to Inform Policy and Research Priorities. Milbank Q 2021; 99:974-1023. [PMID: 34472653 PMCID: PMC8718591 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Policy Points The 2018 Declaration of Astana reemphasized the importance of primary health care and its role in achieving universal health coverage. While there is a large amount of literature on the economic aspects of delivering primary care services, there is a need for more comprehensive overviews of this evidence. In this article, we offer such an overview. Evidence suggests that there are several strategies involving coverage, financing, service delivery, and governance arrangements which can, if implemented, have positive economic impacts on the delivery of primary care services. These include arrangements such as worker task-shifting and telemedicine. The implementation of any such arrangements, based on positive economic evidence, should carefully account for potential impacts on overall health care access and quality. There are many opportunities for further research, with notable gaps in evidence on the impacts of increasing primary care funding or the overall supply of primary care services. CONTEXT The 2018 Declaration of Astana reemphasized the importance of primary health care and its role in achieving universal health coverage. To strengthen primary health care, policymakers need guidance on how to allocate resources in a manner that maximizes its economic benefits. METHODS We collated and synthesized published systematic reviews of evidence on the economic aspects of different models of delivering primary care services. Building on previous efforts, we adapted existing taxonomies of primary care components to classify our results according to four categories: coverage, financing, service delivery, and governance. FINDINGS We identified and classified 109 reviews that met our inclusion criteria according to our taxonomy of primary care components: coverage, financing, service delivery, and governance arrangements. A significant body of evidence suggests that several specific primary care arrangements, such as health workers' task shifting and telemedicine, can have positive economic impacts (such as lower overall health care costs). Notably absent were reviews on the impact of increasing primary care funding or the overall supply of primary care services. CONCLUSIONS There is a great opportunity for further research to systematically examine the broader economic impacts of investing in primary care services. Despite progress over the last decade, significant evidence gaps on the economic implications of different models of primary care services remain, which could help inform the basis of future research efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LORCAN CLARKE
- London School of Economics and Political Science
- Trinity College Dublin
| | | | | | | | | | - JENNA KERNS
- London School of Economics and Political Science
| | | | | | | | | | - HANS KLUGE
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (WHO/Europe)
| | - ELIAS MOSSIALOS
- London School of Economics and Political Science
- Imperial College London
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zwaagstra Salvado E, van Elten HJ, van Raaij EM. The Linkages Between Reimbursement and Prevention: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Front Public Health 2021; 9:750122. [PMID: 34778183 PMCID: PMC8578935 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.750122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The benefits of prevention are widely recognized; ranging from avoiding disease onset to substantially reducing disease burden, which is especially relevant considering the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases. However, its delivery has encountered numerous obstacles in healthcare. While healthcare professionals play an important role in stimulating prevention, their behaviors can be influenced by incentives related to reimbursement schemes. Purpose: The purpose of this research is to obtain a detailed description and explanation of how reimbursement schemes specifically impact primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary prevention. Methods: Our study takes a mixed-methods approach. Based on a rapid review of the literature, we include and assess 27 studies. Moreover, we conducted semi-structured interviews with eight Dutch healthcare professionals and two representatives of insurance companies, to obtain a deeper understanding of healthcare professionals' behaviors in response to incentives. Results: Nor fee-for-service (FFS) nor salary can be unambiguously linked to higher or lower provision of preventive services. However, results suggest that FFS's widely reported incentive to increase production might work in favor of preventive services such as immunizations but provide less incentives for chronic disease management. Salary's incentive toward prevention will be (partially) determined by provider-organization's characteristics and reimbursement. Pay-for-performance (P4P) is not always necessarily translated into better health outcomes, effective prevention, or adequate chronic disease management. P4P is considered disruptive by professionals and our results expose how it can lead professionals to resort to (over)medicalization in order to achieve targets. Relatively new forms of reimbursement such as population-based payment may incentivize professionals to adapt the delivery of care to facilitate the delivery of some forms of prevention. Conclusion: There is not one reimbursement scheme that will stimulate all levels of prevention. Certain types of reimbursement work well for certain types of preventive care services. A volume incentive could be beneficial for prevention activities that are easy to specify. Population-based capitation can help promote preventive activities that require efforts that are not incentivized under other reimbursements, for instance activities that are not easily specified, such as providing education on lifestyle factors related to a patient's (chronic) disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hilco J van Elten
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Erik M van Raaij
- Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gadsden T, Mabunda SA, Palagyi A, Maharani A, Sujarwoto S, Baddeley M, Jan S. Performance-based incentives and community health workers' outputs, a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ 2021; 99:805-818. [PMID: 34737473 PMCID: PMC8542270 DOI: 10.2471/blt.20.285218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the evidence on the impact on measurable outcomes of performance-based incentives for community health workers (CHWs) in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of intervention studies published before November 2020 that evaluated the impact of financial and non-financial performance-based incentives for CHWs. Outcomes included patient health indicators; quality, utilization or delivery of health-care services; and CHW motivation or satisfaction. We assessed risk of bias for all included studies using the Cochrane tool. We based our narrative synthesis on a framework for measuring the performance of CHW programmes, comprising inputs, processes, performance outputs and health outcomes. FINDINGS Two reviewers screened 2811 records; we included 12 studies, 11 of which were randomized controlled trials and one a non-randomized trial. We found that non-financial, publicly displayed recognition of CHWs' efforts was effective in improved service delivery outcomes. While large financial incentives were more effective than small ones in bringing about improved performance, they often resulted in the reallocation of effort away from other, non-incentivized tasks. We found no studies that tested a combined package of financial and non-financial incentives. The rationale for the design of performance-based incentives or explanation of how incentives interacted with contextual factors were rarely reported. CONCLUSION Financial performance-based incentives alone can improve CHW service delivery outcomes, but at the risk of unincentivized tasks being neglected. As calls to professionalize CHW programmes gain momentum, research that explores the interactions among different forms of incentives, context and sustainability is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Gadsden
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Level 5/1 King St, Newtown 2042, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sikhumbuzo A Mabunda
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Level 5/1 King St, Newtown 2042, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anna Palagyi
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Level 5/1 King St, Newtown 2042, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Asri Maharani
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, England
| | - Sujarwoto Sujarwoto
- Department of Public Administration, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
| | - Michelle Baddeley
- UTS Business School, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stephen Jan
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Level 5/1 King St, Newtown 2042, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Role of financial incentives in family planning services in India: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:905. [PMID: 34479545 PMCID: PMC8414850 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06799-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In an effort to encourage Family Planning (FP) adoption, since 1952, the Government of India has been implementing various centrally sponsored schemes that offer financial incentives (FIs) to acceptors as well as service providers, for services related to certain FP methods. However, understanding of the role of FIs on uptake of FP services, and the quality of FP services provided, is limited and mixed. Methods A qualitative descriptive study was conducted in Chatra and Palamu districts of Jharkhand state. A total of 64 interviews involving multiple stakeholders were conducted. The stakeholders included recent FP acceptors or clients, FP service providers of public health facilities including Accredited Social Healthcare Activists (ASHAs), government health officials managing FP programs at the district and state level, and members of development partners supporting FP programs in Jharkhand. Data analysis included both inductive and deductive strategies. It was done using the software Atlas ti version 8. Results It has emerged that there is a strong felt need for FP among majority of the clients, and FIs may be a motivator for uptake of FP methods only among those belonging to the lower socio economic strata. For ASHAs, FI is the primary motivator for providing FP related services. There may be a tendency among them and the nurses to promote methods which have more financial incentives linked with them. There are mixed opinions on discontinuing FIs for clients or replacing them with non-financial incentives. Delays in payment of FIs to both clients and the ASHAs is a common issue and adversely effects the program. Conclusion FIs for clients have limited influence on their decision to take up a FP method while different amounts of FIs for ASHAs and nurses, linked with different FP methods, may be influencing their service provision. More research is needed to determine the effect of discontinuing FI for FP services. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06799-1.
Collapse
|
24
|
Vilendrer S, Brown-Johnson C, Kling SMR, Veruttipong D, Amano A, Bohman B, Daines WP, Overton D, Srivastava R, Asch SM. Financial Incentives for Medical Assistants: A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Bonus Structures, Motivation, and Population Health Quality Measures. Ann Fam Med 2021; 19:427-436. [PMID: 34546949 PMCID: PMC8437570 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Medical assistants (MAs) have seen their roles expand as a result of team-based primary care models. Unlike their physician counterparts, MAs rarely receive financial incentives as a part of their compensation. This exploratory study aims to understand MA acceptability of financial incentives and perceived MA control over common population health measures. METHODS We conducted semistructured focus groups between August and December of 2019 across 10 clinics affiliated with 3 institutions in California and Utah. MAs' perceptions of experienced and hypothetical financial incentives, their potential influence on workflow processes, and perceived levels of control over population health measures were discussed, recorded, and qualitatively analyzed for emerging themes. Perceived levels of control were further quantified using a Likert survey; measures were grouped into factors representing vaccinations, and workflow completed in the same day or multiple days (multiday). Mean scores for each factor were compared using repeated 1-way ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer adjustment. RESULTS MAs reported little direct experience with financial incentives. They indicated that a hypothetical bonus representing 2% to 3% of their average annual base pay would be acceptable and influential in improving consistent performance during patient rooming workflow. MAs reported having greater perceived control over vaccinations (P <.001) and same-day measures (P <.001) as compared with multiday measures. CONCLUSIONS MAs perceived that relatively small financial incentives would increase their motivation and quality of care. Our findings suggests target measures should focus on MA work processes that are completed in the same day as the patient encounter, particularly vaccinations. Future investigation is needed to understand the effectiveness of MA financial incentives in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacie Vilendrer
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Cati Brown-Johnson
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Samantha M R Kling
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Darlene Veruttipong
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Alexis Amano
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Bryan Bohman
- Department of Anesthesiology Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - William P Daines
- Internal Medicine Clinical Program, Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, Utah
| | | | - Raj Srivastava
- Intermountain Healthcare Delivery Institute, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Steven M Asch
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.,Center for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs, Menlo Park, California
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Garcia-Cerde R, Torres-Pereda P, Olvera-Garcia M, Hulme J. Health care workers' perceptions of episiotomy in the era of respectful maternity care: a qualitative study of an obstetric training program in Mexico. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21:549. [PMID: 34384395 PMCID: PMC8359587 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04022-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Episiotomy in Mexico is highly prevalent and often routine - performed in up to 95% of births to primiparous women. The WHO suggests that episiotomy be used in selective cases, with an expected prevalence of 15%. Training programs to date have been unsuccessful in changing this practice. This research aims to understand how and why this practice persists despite shifts in knowledge and attitudes facilitated by the implementation of an obstetric training program. METHODS This is a descriptive and interpretative qualitative study. We conducted 53 pre and post-intervention (PRONTO© Program) semi-structured interviews with general physician, gynecologists and nurses (N = 32, 56% women). Thematic analysis was carried out using Atlas-ti© software to iteratively organize codes. Through interpretive triangulation, the team found theoretical saturation and explanatory depth on key analytical categories. RESULTS Themes fell into five major themes surrounding their perceptions of episiotomy: as a preventive measure, as a procedure that resolves problems in the moment, as a practice that gives the clinician control, as a risky practice, and the role of social norms in practicing it. Results show contradictory discourses among professionals. Despite the growing support for the selective use of episiotomy, it remains positively perceived as an effective prophylaxis for the complications of childbirth while maintaining control in the hands of health care providers. CONCLUSIONS Perceptions of episiotomy shed light on how and why routine episiotomy persists, and provides insight into the multi-faceted approaches that will be required to affect this harmful obstetrical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Garcia-Cerde
- Departamento de Salud Reproductiva (Department of Reproductive Health), Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional (Center for Research in Population Health), Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública de México (National Institute of Public Health of Mexico), Av. Universidad 655, Col. Sta. Maria Ahuacatitlán. Cp, 62100, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Pilar Torres-Pereda
- Dirección de Investigación en Equidad para la Salud (Health Equity Research Department), Centro de Investiación en Sistemas de Salud (Center for Health Systems Research), Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública de México (National Institute of Public Health of Mexico), Av. Universidad 655, Col. Sta. Maria Ahuacatitlán. Cp, 62100, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Marisela Olvera-Garcia
- Departamento de Salud Reproductiva (Department of Reproductive Health), Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional (Center for Research in Population Health), Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública de México (National Institute of Public Health of Mexico), Av. Universidad 655, Col. Sta. Maria Ahuacatitlán. Cp, 62100, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Jennifer Hulme
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, R. Fraser Elliott Building, Ground Floor, Room 480, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Khedmati Morasae E, Rose TC, Gabbay M, Buckels L, Morris C, Poll S, Goodall M, Barnett R, Barr B. Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Local Primary Care Incentive Scheme: A Difference-in-Differences Study. Med Care Res Rev 2021; 79:394-403. [PMID: 34323143 PMCID: PMC9052704 DOI: 10.1177/10775587211035280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
National financial incentive schemes for improving the quality of primary care
have come under criticism in the United Kingdom, leading to calls for localized
alternatives. This study investigated whether a local general practice
incentive-based quality improvement scheme launched in 2011 in a city in the
North West of England was associated with a reduction in all-cause emergency
hospital admissions. Difference-in-differences analysis was used to compare the
change in emergency admission rates in the intervention city, to the change in a
matched comparison population. Emergency admissions rates fell by 19 per 1,000
people in the years following the intervention (95% confidence interval [17,
21]) in the intervention city, relative to the comparison population. This
effect was greater among more disadvantaged populations, narrowing socioeconomic
inequalities in emergency admissions. The findings suggest that similar
approaches could be an effective component of strategies to reduce unplanned
hospital admissions elsewhere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Laura Buckels
- Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Sharon Poll
- Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Rob Barnett
- Liverpool Local Medical Committee, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ben Barr
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Nudges are interventions that alter the way options are presented, enabling individuals to more easily select the best option. Health systems and researchers have tested nudges to shape clinician decision-making with the aim of improving healthcare service delivery. We aimed to systematically study the use and effectiveness of nudges designed to improve clinicians' decisions in healthcare settings. DESIGN A systematic review was conducted to collect and consolidate results from studies testing nudges and to determine whether nudges directed at improving clinical decisions in healthcare settings across clinician types were effective. We systematically searched seven databases (EBSCO MegaFILE, EconLit, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) and used a snowball sampling technique to identify peer-reviewed published studies available between 1 January 1984 and 22 April 2020. Eligible studies were critically appraised and narratively synthesised. We categorised nudges according to a taxonomy derived from the Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Included studies were appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. RESULTS We screened 3608 studies and 39 studies met our criteria. The majority of the studies (90%) were conducted in the USA and 36% were randomised controlled trials. The most commonly studied nudge intervention (46%) framed information for clinicians, often through peer comparison feedback. Nudges that guided clinical decisions through default options or by enabling choice were also frequently studied (31%). Information framing, default and enabling choice nudges showed promise, whereas the effectiveness of other nudge types was mixed. Given the inclusion of non-experimental designs, only a small portion of studies were at minimal risk of bias (33%) across all Cochrane criteria. CONCLUSIONS Nudges that frame information, change default options or enable choice are frequently studied and show promise in improving clinical decision-making. Future work should examine how nudges compare to non-nudge interventions (eg, policy interventions) in improving healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Briana S Last
- Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alison M Buttenheim
- Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics (CHIBE), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISCE@LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Carter E Timon
- College of Liberal and Professional Studies, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nandita Mitra
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rinad S Beidas
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics (CHIBE), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISCE@LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Weir A, Presseau J, Kitto S, Colman I, Hatcher S. Strategies for facilitating the delivery of cluster randomized trials in hospitals: A study informed by the CFIR-ERIC matching tool. Clin Trials 2021; 18:398-407. [PMID: 33863242 PMCID: PMC8290989 DOI: 10.1177/17407745211001504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recruitment and engagement of clusters in a cluster randomized controlled trial can sometimes prove challenging. Identification of successful or unsuccessful strategies may be beneficial in guiding future researchers in conducting their cluster randomized controlled trial. This study aimed to identify strategies that could be used to facilitate the delivery of cluster randomized controlled trials in hospitals. METHODS The study employed the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change matching tool. The barriers and enablers to cluster randomized controlled trial conduct identified in our previously conducted studies served as a means of determinant identification for the conduct of cluster randomized controlled trials. These determinants were mapped to Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs and then matched to Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change compilation strategies using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change matching tool. RESULTS The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change strategies matched to at least one determinant Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research construct were as follows: (1) 'Identify and prepare champions', (2) 'Conduct local needs assessment', (3) 'Conduct educational meetings', (4) 'Inform local opinion leaders', (5) 'Build a coalition', (6) 'Promote adaptability', (7) 'Develop a formal implementation blueprint', (8) 'Involve patients/consumers and family members', (9) 'Obtain and use patients/consumers and family feedback', (10) 'Develop educational materials', (11) 'Promote network weaving', (12) 'Distribute educational materials', (13) 'Access new funding' and (14) 'Develop academic partnerships'. CONCLUSION This study was intended as a step in the research agenda aimed at facilitating cluster randomized controlled trial delivery in hospitals and can act as a resource for future researchers when planning their cluster randomized controlled trial, with the expectation that the strategies identified here will be tailored to each context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arielle Weir
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Justin Presseau
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Simon Kitto
- Department of Innovation in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Ian Colman
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Simon Hatcher
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zaresani A, Scott A. Is the evidence on the effectiveness of pay for performance schemes in healthcare changing? Evidence from a meta-regression analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:175. [PMID: 33627112 PMCID: PMC7905606 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06118-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated if the evidence on the success of the Pay for Performance (P4P) schemes in healthcare is changing as the schemes continue to evolve by updating a previous systematic review. METHODS A meta-regression analysis using 116 studies evaluating P4P schemes published between January 2010 to February 2018. The effects of the research design, incentive schemes, use of incentives, and the size of the payment to revenue ratio on the proportion of statically significant effects in each study were examined. RESULTS There was evidence of an increase in the range of countries adopting P4P schemes and weak evidence that the proportion of studies with statistically significant effects have increased. Factors hypothesized to influence the success of schemes have not changed. Studies evaluating P4P schemes which made payments for improvement over time, were associated with a lower proportion of statistically significant effects. There was weak evidence of a positive association between the incentives' size and the proportion of statistically significant effects. CONCLUSION The evidence on the effectiveness of P4P schemes is evolving slowly, with little evidence that lessons are being learned concerning the design and evaluation of P4P schemes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arezou Zaresani
- University of Manitoba, Institute for Labor Studies (IZA) and Tax and Transfer Policy Institute (TTPI), 15 Chancellors Circle, Fletcher Argue Building, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ahmed K, Hashim S, Khankhara M, Said I, Shandakumar AT, Zaman S, Veiga A. What drives general practitioners in the UK to improve the quality of care? A systematic literature review. BMJ Open Qual 2021; 10:e001127. [PMID: 33574115 PMCID: PMC7880106 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the UK, the National Health Service has various incentivisation schemes in place to improve the provision of high-quality care. The Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF) and other Pay for Performance (P4P) schemes are incentive frameworks that focus on meeting predetermined clinical outcomes. However, the ability of these schemes to meet their aims is debated. OBJECTIVES (1) To explore current incentive schemes available in general practice in the UK, their impact and effectiveness in improving quality of care and (2) To identify other types of incentives discussed in the literature. METHODS This systematic literature review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Six databases were searched: Cochrane, PubMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence, Health Management Information Consortium, Embase and Health Management. Articles were screened according to the selection criteria, evaluated against critical appraisal checklists and categorised into themes. RESULTS 35 articles were included from an initial search result of 22087. Articles were categorised into the following three overarching themes: financial incentives, non-financial incentives and competition. DISCUSSION The majority of the literature focused on QOF. Its positive effects included reduced mortality rates, better data recording and improved sociodemographic inequalities. However, limitations involved decreased quality of care in non-incentivised activities, poor patient experiences due to tick-box exercises and increased pressure to meet non-specific targets. Findings surrounding competition were mixed, with limited evidence found on the use of non-financial incentives in primary care. CONCLUSION Current research looks extensively into financial incentives, however, we propose more research into the effects of intrinsic motivation alongside existing P4P schemes to enhance motivation and improve quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanwal Ahmed
- School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, London, UK
| | - Salma Hashim
- School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, London, UK
| | | | - Ilhan Said
- School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, London, UK
| | | | - Sadia Zaman
- School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, London, UK
| | - Andre Veiga
- Business School, Imperial College London, London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Jia L, Meng Q, Scott A, Yuan B, Zhang L. Payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 1:CD011865. [PMID: 33469932 PMCID: PMC8094987 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011865.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Changes to the method of payment for healthcare providers, including pay-for-performance schemes, are increasingly being used by governments, health insurers, and employers to help align financial incentives with health system goals. In this review we focused on changes to the method and level of payment for all types of healthcare providers in outpatient healthcare settings. Outpatient healthcare settings, broadly defined as 'out of hospital' care including primary care, are important for health systems in reducing the use of more expensive hospital services. OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of different payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings on the quantity and quality of health service provision, patient outcomes, healthcare provider outcomes, cost of service provision, and adverse effects. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase (searched 5 March 2019), and several other databases. In addition, we searched clinical trials platforms, grey literature, screened reference lists of included studies, did a cited reference search for included studies, and contacted study authors to identify additional studies. We screened records from an updated search in August 2020, with any potentially relevant studies categorised as awaiting classification. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised trials, non-randomised trials, controlled before-after studies, interrupted time series, and repeated measures studies that compared different payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient care settings. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We conducted a structured synthesis. We first categorised the payment methods comparisons and outcomes, and then described the effects of different types of payment methods on different outcome categories. Where feasible, we used meta-analysis to synthesise the effects of payment interventions under the same category. Where it was not possible to perform meta-analysis, we have reported means/medians and full ranges of the available point estimates. We have reported the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and the relative difference (as per cent change or mean difference (MD)) for continuous outcomes. MAIN RESULTS We included 27 studies in the review: 12 randomised trials, 13 controlled before-and-after studies, one interrupted time series, and one repeated measure study. Most healthcare providers were primary care physicians. Most of the payment methods were implemented by health insurance schemes in high-income countries, with only one study from a low- or middle-income country. The included studies were categorised into four groups based on comparisons of different payment methods. (1) Pay for performance (P4P) plus existing payment methods compared with existing payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings P4P incentives probably improve child immunisation status (RR 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 to 1.36; 3760 patients; moderate-certainty evidence) and may slightly increase the number of patients who are asked more detailed questions on their disease by their pharmacist (MD 1.24, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.54; 454 patients; low-certainty evidence). P4P may slightly improve primary care physicians' prescribing of guideline-recommended antihypertensive medicines compared with an existing payment method (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.12; 362 patients; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain about the effects of extra P4P incentives on mean blood pressure reduction for patients and costs for providing services compared with an existing payment method (very low-certainty evidence). Outcomes related to workload or other health professional outcomes were not reported in the included studies. One randomised trial found that compared to the control group, the performance of incentivised professionals was not sustained after the P4P intervention had ended. (2) Fee for service (FFS) compared with existing payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings We are uncertain about the effect of FFS on the quantity of health services delivered (outpatient visits and hospitalisations), patient health outcomes, and total drugs cost compared to an existing payment method due to very low-certainty evidence. The quality of service provision and health professional outcomes were not reported in the included studies. One randomised trial reported that physicians paid via FFS may see more well patients than salaried physicians (low-certainty evidence), possibly implying that more unnecessary services were delivered through FFS. (3) FFS mixed with existing payment methods compared with existing payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings FFS mixed payment method may increase the quantity of health services provided compared with an existing payment method (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.76; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain about the effect of FFS mixed payment on quality of services provided, patient health outcomes, and health professional outcomes compared with an existing payment method due to very low-certainty evidence. Cost outcomes and adverse effects were not reported in the included studies. (4) Enhanced FFS compared with FFS for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings Enhanced FFS (higher FFS payment) probably increases child immunisation rates (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.48; moderate-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether higher FFS payment results in more primary care visits and about the effect of enhanced FFS on the net expenditure per year on covered children with regular FFS (very low-certainty evidence). Quality of service provision, patient outcomes, health professional outcomes, and adverse effects were not reported in the included studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS For healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings, P4P or an increase in FFS payment level probably increases the quantity of health service provision (moderate-certainty evidence), and P4P may slightly improve the quality of service provision for targeted conditions (low-certainty evidence). The effects of changes in payment methods on health outcomes is uncertain due to very low-certainty evidence. Information to explore the influence of specific payment method design features, such as the size of incentives and type of performance measures, was insufficient. Furthermore, due to limited and very low-certainty evidence, it is uncertain if changing payment models without including additional funding for professionals would have similar effects. There is a need for further well-conducted research on payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings in low- and middle-income countries; more studies comparing the impacts of different designs of the same payment method; and studies that consider the unintended consequences of payment interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liying Jia
- Center for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- NHC Key Lab for Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Qingyue Meng
- China Center for Health Development Studies (CCHDS), Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Anthony Scott
- Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Beibei Yuan
- China Center for Health Development Studies (CCHDS), Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Lu Zhang
- Weihai Health Care Security Administration, Weihai, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Beidas R, Stirman SW. Realizing the Promise of Learning Organizations to Transform Mental Health Care: Telepsychiatry Care As an Exemplar. Psychiatr Serv 2021; 72:86-88. [PMID: 32781927 PMCID: PMC7869972 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
To address the global mental health crisis exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, an urgent need has emerged to transform the accessibility, efficiency, and quality of mental health care. The next suite of efforts to transform mental health care must foster the implementation of "learning organizations," that is, organizations that continuously improve patient-centered care through ongoing data collection. The concept of learning organizations is highly regarded, but the key features of such organizations, particularly those providing mental health care, are less well defined. Using telepsychiatry care as an example, the authors of this Open Forum concretely describe the key building blocks for operationalizing a learning organization in mental health care to set a research agenda for services transformation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rinad Beidas
- Departments of Psychiatry, Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, 3015, Philadelphia, PA 19104
- Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Shannon Wiltsey Stirman
- National Center for PTSD, Menlo Park, CA
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Etchegary C, Taylor L, Mahoney K, Parfrey O, Hall A. Changing Health-Related Behaviours 5: On Interventions to Change Physician Behaviours. Methods Mol Biol 2021; 2249:613-630. [PMID: 33871867 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
In many countries, there is a large amount of public money spent on health care. Some patient tests and treatments are not only unnecessary but also may be harmful, leading health researchers to look for the most effective interventions to change physician behaviour. The purpose of this chapter is to describe some of the interventions used to modify physician behaviour and highlight their challenges observed in a Canadian provincial context. We begin with a brief description of the increasing interest in behaviour change interventions in recent years and their theoretical basis. We then describe several interventions used to change physician behaviour ranging from nudges to choice restriction and the available evidence on their effectiveness. We provide examples of interventions and their challenges as we've experienced them in our research program, Quality of Care NL. We conclude with a summary of what the evidence tells us about interventions to change physicians' behaviours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl Etchegary
- Quality of Care NL, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
| | - Lynn Taylor
- Quality of Care NL, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | - Krista Mahoney
- Quality of Care NL, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | - Owen Parfrey
- Quality of Care NL, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | - Amanda Hall
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Gupta N, Ayles HM. The evidence gap on gendered impacts of performance-based financing among family physicians for chronic disease care: a systematic review reanalysis in contexts of single-payer universal coverage. HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH 2020; 18:69. [PMID: 32962707 PMCID: PMC7507591 DOI: 10.1186/s12960-020-00512-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although pay-for-performance (P4P) among primary care physicians for enhanced chronic disease management is increasingly common, the evidence base is fragmented in terms of socially equitable impacts in achieving the quadruple aim for healthcare improvement: better population health, reduced healthcare costs, and enhanced patient and provider experiences. This study aimed to assess the literature from a systematic review on how P4P for diabetes services impacts on gender equity in patient outcomes and the physician workforce. METHODS A gender-based analysis was performed of studies retrieved through a systematic search of 10 abstract and citation databases plus grey literature sources for P4P impact assessments in multiple languages over the period January 2000 to April 2018, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The study was restricted to single-payer national health systems to minimize the risk of physicians sorting out of health organizations with a strong performance pay component. Two reviewers scored and synthesized the integration of sex and gender in assessing patient- and provider-oriented outcomes as well as the quality of the evidence. FINDINGS Of the 2218 identified records, 39 studies covering eight P4P interventions in seven countries were included for analysis. Most (79%) of the studies reported having considered sex/gender in the design, but only 28% presented sex-disaggregated patient data in the results of the P4P assessment models, and none (0%) assessed the interaction of patients' sex with the policy intervention. Few (15%) of the studies controlled for the provider's sex, and none (0%) discussed impacts of P4P on the work life of providers from a gender perspective (e.g., pay equity). CONCLUSIONS There is a dearth of evidence on gender-based outcomes of publicly funded incentivizing physician payment schemes for chronic disease care. As the popularity of P4P to achieve health system goals continues to grow, so does the risk of unintended consequences. There is a critical need for research integrating gender concerns to help inform performance-based health workforce financing policy options in the era of the Sustainable Development Goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeru Gupta
- Department of Sociology, University of New Brunswick, PO Box 4400, 9 Macaulay Lane, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 5A3, Canada.
| | - Holly M Ayles
- Faculty of Management, University of New Brunswick, PO Box 4400, 7 Macaulay Lane, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 5A3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Baldwin C, Smith R, Gibbs M, Weekes CE, Emery PW. Quality of the Evidence Supporting the Role of Oral Nutritional Supplements in the Management of Malnutrition: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Adv Nutr 2020; 12:503-522. [PMID: 32945835 PMCID: PMC8009750 DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmaa108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
There is considerable heterogeneity across the findings of systematic reviews of oral nutritional supplement (ONS) interventions, presenting difficulties for healthcare decision-makers and patients alike. It is not known whether heterogeneity arises from differences in patient populations or relates to methodological rigor. This overview aimed to collate and compare findings from systematic reviews of ONSs compared with routine care in adult patients who were malnourished or at risk of malnutrition with any clinical condition and to examine their methodological quality. Three electronic databases were searched to July 2019, supplemented with hand-searching. Data on all outcomes were extracted and review methodological quality assessed using A MeaSurement Tool for Assessment of systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). Twenty-two reviews were included, 11 in groups from mixed clinical backgrounds and 11 in specific clinical conditions. Ninety-one meta-analyses were identified for 12 different outcomes but there was discordance between results. Significant benefits of ONSs were reported in 4 of 4 analyses of energy intake, 7 of 11 analyses of body weight, 7 of 22 analyses of mortality, 10 of 17 analyses of complications (total and infectious), 1 of 3 analyses of muscle strength, 4 of 9 analyses of body composition/nutritional status, 2 of 14 analyses of length of stay, and 2 of 5 analyses of hospital readmissions. Ten reviews were high quality (AMSTAR scores 8-11), 9 moderate (AMSTAR scores 3-8), and 3 poor (AMSTAR scores 0-3). Methodological deficiencies were limitations to searches, poor reporting of heterogeneity, and failure to incorporate quality of evidence into any recommendations. Discordance between reviews was not markedly reduced when only high-quality reviews were considered. Evidence for the effects of ONS in malnourished patients or those who are at risk of malnutrition is uncertain, and discordance in results can arise from differences in clinical background of patients or the etiological basis of malnutrition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rosemary Smith
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michelle Gibbs
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - C Elizabeth Weekes
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom,Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter W Emery
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kong E, Beshears J, Laibson D, Madrian B, Volpp K, Loewenstein G, Kolstad J, Choi JJ. Do physician incentives increase patient medication adherence? Health Serv Res 2020; 55:503-511. [PMID: 32700389 PMCID: PMC7376007 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test the effectiveness of physician incentives for increasing patient medication adherence in three drug classes: diabetes medication, antihypertensives, and statins. DATA SOURCES Pharmacy and medical claims from a large Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan from January 2011 to December 2012. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a randomized experiment (911 primary care practices and 8,935 nonadherent patients) to test the effect of paying physicians for increasing patient medication adherence in three drug classes: diabetes medication, antihypertensives, and statins. We measured patients' medication adherence for 18 (6) months before (after) the intervention. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS We obtained data directly from the health insurer. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS We found no evidence that physician incentives increased adherence in any drug class. Our results rule out increases in the proportion of days covered by medication larger than 4.2 percentage points. CONCLUSIONS Physician incentives of $50 per patient per drug class are not effective for increasing patient medication adherence among the drug classes and primary care practices studied. Such incentives may be more likely to improve measures under physicians' direct control rather than those that predominantly reflect patient behaviors. Additional research is warranted to disentangle whether physician effort is not responsive to these types of incentives, or medication adherence is not responsive to physician effort. Our results suggest that significant changes in the incentive amount or program design may be necessary to produce responses from physicians or patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Kong
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMA
- Harvard Department of EconomicsCambridgeMA
| | - John Beshears
- Negotiation, Organizations & Markets UnitHarvard Business SchoolBostonMA
- National Bureau of Economic ResearchCambridgeMA
| | - David Laibson
- Harvard Department of EconomicsCambridgeMA
- National Bureau of Economic ResearchCambridgeMA
| | - Brigitte Madrian
- National Bureau of Economic ResearchCambridgeMA
- Department of FinanceRomney Institute of Public Service and EthicsBrigham Young University Marriott School of ManagementProvoUT
| | - Kevin Volpp
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health PolicyUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPA
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral EconomicsUniversity of Pennsylvania Wharton SchoolPhiladelphiaPA
| | - George Loewenstein
- Department of Social and Decision SciencesCarnegie Mellon University Dietrich College of Humanities and Social SciencesPittsburghPA
| | - Jonathan Kolstad
- National Bureau of Economic ResearchCambridgeMA
- Economic Analysis and Policy GroupUniversity of California Berkeley Haas School of BusinessBerkeleyCA
| | - James J. Choi
- National Bureau of Economic ResearchCambridgeMA
- Department of FinanceYale School of ManagementNew HavenCT
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Raulinajtys-Grzybek M, Grabska-Liberek I, Opala A, Słomka M, Chrobot M. Budget impact analysis of lens material on the posterior capsule opacification (PCO) as a complication after the cataract surgery. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2020; 18:19. [PMID: 32549794 PMCID: PMC7296914 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-020-00214-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Over 300,000 cataract operations are performed in Poland every year, and the most common, late complication of cataract removal surgery is posterior capsule opacification (PCO). The risk of PCO depends on the lens material. Hydrophobic acrylic lenses cause PCO less frequently as lymphatic endothelial cells show lower affinity for the surface of the lens made of silicone. The objective of this study is to assess the economic impact of using hydrophobic acrylic lenses compared to using hydrophilic acrylic lenses for cataract treatment in the Polish inpatient and outpatient settings. Methods A budget impact analysis (BIA) compared the economic outcomes associated with using hydrophobic acrylic lenses versus using hydrophilic lenses for patients undergoing cataract surgery. The BIA predicted annual expenses in the following scenarios: performing Nd:YAG to treat PCO within 2 and 3 years after implantation of hydrophobic or hydrophilic acrylic lenses for different lens structure. Data used to assess the frequency of PCO was determined in systematic literature review. Costs of current and predicted interventions were estimated based on average data from 19 Polish hospitals. Prices of health services were taken from official public tariff lists. Results The use of a hydrophobic lens significantly limits the number of complications after cataract surgery relative to a hydrophilic lens. As hydrophobic lenses have a higher unit price their use increases the cost of treatment which currently is not reflected by adequate difference in price of the service. Total annual National Health Fund (NHF) expenses for 3-year follow-up model range from 139.1 million EUR to 143.1 million EUR depending on the lens structure, due to the cost of complications. Conclusions BIA indicates the possibility of introducing surcharge for the use of hydrophobic lenses, which could increase the frequency of their use and reduce the number of complications after cataract surgery. It was estimated that total NHF expenses reach the minimum value for the surcharge at the level of 9 EUR. The surcharge of 14 EUR is the maximum value that does not increase the initial NHF expenses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Iwona Grabska-Liberek
- Department of Ophthalmology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Opala
- Department of Ophthalmology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Marta Słomka
- Department of Neurochemistry, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Jacobs R, Aylott L, Dare C, Doran T, Gilbody S, Goddard M, Gravelle H, Gutacker N, Kasteridis P, Kendrick T, Mason A, Rice N, Ride J, Siddiqi N, Williams R. The association between primary care quality and health-care use, costs and outcomes for people with serious mental illness: a retrospective observational study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr08250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background
Serious mental illness, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and other psychoses, is linked with high disease burden, poor outcomes, high treatment costs and lower life expectancy. In the UK, most people with serious mental illness are treated in primary care by general practitioners, who are financially incentivised to meet quality targets for patients with chronic conditions, including serious mental illness, under the Quality and Outcomes Framework. The Quality and Outcomes Framework, however, omits important aspects of quality.
Objectives
We examined whether or not better quality of primary care for people with serious mental illness improved a range of outcomes.
Design and setting
We used administrative data from English primary care practices that contribute to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database, linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, accident and emergency attendances, Office for National Statistics mortality data and community mental health records in the Mental Health Minimum Data Set. We used survival analysis to estimate whether or not selected quality indicators affect the time until patients experience an outcome.
Participants
Four cohorts of people with serious mental illness, depending on the outcomes examined and inclusion criteria.
Interventions
Quality of care was measured with (1) Quality and Outcomes Framework indicators (care plans and annual physical reviews) and (2) non-Quality and Outcomes Framework indicators identified through a systematic review (antipsychotic polypharmacy and continuity of care provided by general practitioners).
Main outcome measures
Several outcomes were examined: emergency admissions for serious mental illness and ambulatory care sensitive conditions; all unplanned admissions; accident and emergency attendances; mortality; re-entry into specialist mental health services; and costs attributed to primary, secondary and community mental health care.
Results
Care plans were associated with lower risk of accident and emergency attendance (hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 0.80), serious mental illness admission (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.75), ambulatory care sensitive condition admission (hazard ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.83), and lower overall health-care (£53), primary care (£9), hospital (£26) and mental health-care costs (£12). Annual reviews were associated with reduced risk of accident and emergency attendance (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 0.85), serious mental illness admission (hazard ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.84), ambulatory care sensitive condition admission (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.87), and lower overall health-care (£34), primary care (£9) and mental health-care costs (£30). Higher general practitioner continuity was associated with lower risk of accident and emergency presentation (hazard ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 0.97) and ambulatory care sensitive condition admission (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.92), but not with serious mental illness admission. High continuity was associated with lower primary care costs (£3). Antipsychotic polypharmacy was not statistically significantly associated with the risk of unplanned admission, death or accident and emergency presentation. None of the quality measures was statistically significantly associated with risk of re-entry into specialist mental health care.
Limitations
There is risk of bias from unobserved factors. To mitigate this, we controlled for observed patient characteristics at baseline and adjusted for the influence of time-invariant unobserved patient differences.
Conclusions
Better performance on Quality and Outcomes Framework measures and continuity of care are associated with better outcomes and lower resource utilisation, and could generate moderate cost savings.
Future work
Future research should examine the impact of primary care quality on measures that capture broader aspects of health and functioning.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 25. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rowena Jacobs
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Lauren Aylott
- Expert by experience
- Hull York Medical School, York, UK
| | | | | | - Simon Gilbody
- Hull York Medical School, York, UK
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Maria Goddard
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Hugh Gravelle
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Nils Gutacker
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Tony Kendrick
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Anne Mason
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Nigel Rice
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Jemimah Ride
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- Hull York Medical School, York, UK
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Rachael Williams
- Clinical Practice Research Datalink, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Goossen K, Hess S, Lunny C, Pieper D. Database combinations to retrieve systematic reviews in overviews of reviews: a methodological study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020; 20:138. [PMID: 32487023 PMCID: PMC7268249 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-00983-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background When conducting an Overviews of Reviews on health-related topics, it is unclear which combination of bibliographic databases authors should use for searching for SRs. Our goal was to determine which databases included the most systematic reviews and identify an optimal database combination for searching systematic reviews. Methods A set of 86 Overviews of Reviews with 1219 included systematic reviews was extracted from a previous study. Inclusion of the systematic reviews was assessed in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Epistemonikos, PsycINFO, and TRIP. The mean inclusion rate (% of included systematic reviews) and corresponding 95% confidence interval were calculated for each database individually, as well as for combinations of MEDLINE with each other database and reference checking. Results Inclusion of systematic reviews was higher in MEDLINE than in any other single database (mean inclusion rate 89.7%; 95% confidence interval [89.0–90.3%]). Combined with reference checking, this value increased to 93.7% [93.2–94.2%]. The best combination of two databases plus reference checking consisted of MEDLINE and Epistemonikos (99.2% [99.0–99.3%]). Stratification by Health Technology Assessment reports (97.7% [96.5–98.9%]) vs. Cochrane Overviews (100.0%) vs. non-Cochrane Overviews (99.3% [99.1–99.4%]) showed that inclusion was only slightly lower for Health Technology Assessment reports. However, MEDLINE, Epistemonikos, and reference checking remained the best combination. Among the 10/1219 systematic reviews not identified by this combination, five were published as websites rather than journals, two were included in CINAHL and Embase, and one was included in the database ERIC. Conclusions MEDLINE and Epistemonikos, complemented by reference checking of included studies, is the best database combination to identify systematic reviews on health-related topics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Käthe Goossen
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Simone Hess
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany
| | - Carole Lunny
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Cochrane Hypertension Review Group and the Therapeutics Initiative, University of British Columbia, 2329 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Dawid Pieper
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Allison R, Lecky DM, Beech E, Costelloe C, Ashiru-Oredope D, Owens R, McNulty CAM. What antimicrobial stewardship strategies do NHS commissioning organizations implement in primary care in England? JAC Antimicrob Resist 2020; 2:dlaa020. [PMID: 34222984 DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaa020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Revised: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To identify and explore strategies that English NHS commissioning organizations implemented to improve antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) within primary care. Methods Questionnaire sent to the medicines management teams (MMTs) of all 209 clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) in England, in 2017. Results A total of 89% (187/209) of all English CCGs responded to the questionnaire; 74% of responding CCGs (123/167) had a prescribing incentive/engagement scheme, with MMTs representing 88% (90/102) considering incentive schemes successful or very successful for prioritizing AMS in primary care, especially when linked to prescribing NHS Quality Premium indicators. AMS audits were considered successful or very successful by 91% (126/138) of responding CCGs, as they identify reasons for inappropriate prescribing and opportunities for future improvement. All responding MMTs (169/169 CCGs) reported feeding back local/national antimicrobial prescribing data to the general practices they commission, 85% (142/168) to their CCG/Commissioning Support Unit (CSU) board and only 33% (56/169) to out-of-hours services. Benchmarking prescribing data was reported as a powerful tool to engage practices, facilitating an element of competition and peer pressure. Conclusions National antimicrobial resistance improvement schemes, in particular the NHS England Quality Premium, have influenced CCG improvement priorities. Most CCGs now report successful improvement strategies including the use of both local and national antibiotic prescribing data to motivate improvements; these should be continued and extended to out-of-hours providers. As local audit data have helped to identify reasons for inappropriate prescribing and inform improvement planning, all organizations should adopt this strategy and include it in local quality improvement schemes, ensuring performance reporting to organizational board level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Céire Costelloe
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in HCAI and AMR, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Fowler T, Garr D, Mager NDP, Stanley J. Enhancing primary care and preventive services through Interprofessional practice and education. Isr J Health Policy Res 2020; 9:12. [PMID: 32204734 PMCID: PMC7092466 DOI: 10.1186/s13584-020-00371-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Interprofessional (IP) practice and education are important when seeking to respond to the growing demand for primary and preventive care services. Multiple professions with synergistic expertise are needed to effectively provide health promotion, disease prevention, and patient education and to help patients with multiple comorbidities, chronic health conditions, and care coordination. A recent study by Schor et al. titled, "Multidisciplinary work promotes preventive medicine and health education in primary care: a cross-sectional survey," compares the implementation of preventive services in three primary care models. Higher rates of health services, patient education, and health outcomes were documented in two different models of care involving persons in multiple professions when compared with independent solo physicians' practices. In this commentary, we focus on the value of IP team-based care, continuing professional development, and the impact of the team on practice performance and health outcomes. Key components of effective IP teams include using consistent terminology to describe the team composition and function, team structures with purposeful selection of professions to address gaps in care, leadership support, and IP continuing professional development and education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terri Fowler
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, 99 Jonathan Lucas Street, MSC 160, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
| | - David Garr
- College of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 5 Charleston Center, Suite 263, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
| | | | - Joan Stanley
- American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 655 K Street, NW, Suite 750, Washington, DC 20001 USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Brocklehurst P, Tickle M, Birch S, McDonald R, Walsh T, Goodwin TL, Hill H, Howarth E, Donaldson M, O’Carolan D, Fitzpatrick S, McCrory G, Slee C. Impact of changing provider remuneration on NHS general dental practitioner services in Northern Ireland: a mixed-methods study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr08060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Policy-makers wanted to reform the NHS dental contract in Northern Ireland to contain costs, secure access and incentivise prevention and quality. A pilot project was undertaken to remunerate general dental practitioners using a capitation-based payment system rather than the existing fee-for-service system.
Objective
To investigate the impact of this change in remuneration.
Design
Mixed-methods design using a difference-in-difference evaluation of clinical activity levels, a questionnaire of patient-rated outcomes and qualitative assessment of general dental practitioners’ and patients’ views.
Setting
NHS dental practices in Northern Ireland.
Participants
General dental practitioners and patients in 11 intervention practices and 18 control practices.
Interventions
Change from fee for service to a capitation-based system for 1 year and then reversion back to fee for service.
Main outcome measures
Access to care, activity levels, service mix and financial impact, and patient-rated outcomes of care.
Results
The difference-in-difference analyses showed significant and rapid changes in the patterns of care provided by general dental practitioners to patients (compared with the control practices) when they moved from a fee-for-service system to a capitation-based remuneration system. The number of registered patients in the intervention practices compared with the control practices showed a small but statistically significant increase during the capitation period (p < 0.01), but this difference was small. There were statistically significant reductions in the volume of activity across all treatments in the intervention practices during the capitation period, compared with the control practices. This produced a concomitant reduction in patient charge revenue of £2403 per practice per month (p < 0.05). All outcome measures rapidly returned to baseline levels following reversion from the capitation-based system back to a fee-for-service system. The analysis of the questionnaires suggests that patients did not appear to notice very much change. Qualitative interviews showed variation in general dental practitioners’ behaviour in response to the intervention and how they managed the tension between professional ethics and maximising the profits of their business. Behaviours were also heavily influenced by local context. Practice principals preferred the capitation model as it freed up time and provided opportunities for private work, whereas capitation payments were seen by some principals as a ‘retainer fee’ for continuing to provide NHS care. Non-equity-owning associates perceived the capitation model as a financial risk.
Limitations
The active NHS pilot period was only 1 year, which may have limited the scope for meaningful change. The number of sites was restricted by the financial budget for the NHS pilot.
Conclusions
General dental practitioners respond rapidly and consistently to changes in remuneration, but differences were found in the extent of this change by practice and provider type. A move from a fee-for-service system to a capitation-based system had little impact on access but produced large reductions in clinical activity and patient charge income. Patients noticed little difference in the service that they received.
Future work
With changing population need and increasing financial pressure on the NHS, research is required on how to most efficiently meet the expectations of patients within an affordable cost envelope. Work is also needed to identify and evaluate interventions that can complement changes in remuneration to meet policy goals.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN29840057.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 6. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martin Tickle
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephen Birch
- Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ruth McDonald
- Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Tanya Walsh
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Harry Hill
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Wiles LK, de Wet C, Dalton C, Murphy E, Harris MF, Hibbert PD, Molloy CJ, Arnolda G, Ting HP, Braithwaite J. The quality of preventive care for pre-school aged children in Australian general practice. BMC Med 2019; 17:218. [PMID: 31805928 PMCID: PMC6896286 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-019-1455-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Variable and poor care quality are important causes of preventable patient harm. Many patients receive less than recommended care, but the extent of the problem remains largely unknown. The CareTrack Kids (CTK) research programme sought to address this evidence gap by developing a set of indicators to measure the quality of care for common paediatric conditions. In this study, we focus on one clinical area, 'preventive care' for pre-school aged children. Our objectives were two-fold: (i) develop and validate preventive care quality indicators and (ii) apply them in general medical practice to measure adherence. METHODS Clinical experts (n = 6) developed indicator questions (IQs) from clinical practice guideline (CPG) recommendations using a multi-stage modified Delphi process, which were pilot tested in general practice. The medical records of Australian children (n = 976) from general practices (n = 80) in Queensland, New South Wales and South Australia identified as having a consultation for one of 17 CTK conditions of interest were retrospectively reviewed by trained paediatric nurses. Statistical analyses were performed to estimate percentage compliance and its 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS IQs (n = 43) and eight care 'bundles' were developed and validated. Care was delivered in line with the IQs in 43.3% of eligible healthcare encounters (95% CI 30.5-56.7). The bundles of care with the highest compliance were 'immunisation' (80.1%, 95% CI 65.7-90.4), 'anthropometric measurements' (52.7%, 95% CI 35.6-69.4) and 'nutrition assessments' (38.5%, 95% CI 24.3-54.3), and lowest for 'visual assessment' (17.9%, 95% CI 8.2-31.9), 'musculoskeletal examinations' (24.4%, 95% CI 13.1-39.1) and 'cardiovascular examinations' (30.9%, 95% CI 12.3-55.5). CONCLUSIONS This study is the first known attempt to develop specific preventive care quality indicators and measure their delivery to Australian children in general practice. Our findings that preventive care is not reliably delivered to all Australian children and that there is substantial variation in adherence with the IQs provide a starting point for clinicians, researchers and policy makers when considering how the gap between recommended and actual care may be narrowed. The findings may also help inform the development of specific improvement interventions, incentives and national standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise K Wiles
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Australian Centre for Precision Health, University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute (UniSA CRI), School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Carl de Wet
- Healthcare Improvement Unit, Clinical Excellence Division, Queensland Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Elisabeth Murphy
- New South Wales Ministry of Health, North Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark F Harris
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter D Hibbert
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Australian Centre for Precision Health, University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute (UniSA CRI), School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Charlotte J Molloy
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Australian Centre for Precision Health, University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute (UniSA CRI), School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Gaston Arnolda
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Hsuen P Ting
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rooks-Peck CR, Wichser ME, Adegbite AH, DeLuca JB, Barham T, Ross LW, Higa DH, Sipe TA. Analysis of Systematic Reviews of Medication Adherence Interventions for Persons with HIV, 1996-2017. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2019; 33:528-537. [PMID: 31750731 PMCID: PMC8237207 DOI: 10.1089/apc.2019.0125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
This overview of reviews summarizes the evidence from systematic reviews (SR) on the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence interventions for people with HIV (PWH) and descriptively compares adherence interventions among key populations. Relevant articles published during 1996-2017 were identified by comprehensive searches of CDC's HIV/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) Prevention Research Synthesis Database and manual searches. Included SRs examined primary interventions intended to improve ART adherence, focused on PWH, and assessed medication adherence or biologic outcomes (e.g., viral load). We synthesized the qualitative data and used the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) for quality assessment. Forty-one SRs met inclusion criteria. Average quality was high. SRs that evaluated text-messaging interventions (n = 9) consistently reported statistically significant improvements in adherence and biologic outcomes. Other ART adherence strategies [e.g., behavioral, directly administered antiretroviral therapy (DAART)] reported improvements, but did not report significant effects for both outcomes, or intervention effects that did not persist postintervention. In the review focused on people who inject drugs (n = 1), DAART alone or in combination with medication-assisted therapy improved both outcomes. In SRs focused on children or adolescents aged <18 years (n = 5), regimen-related and hospital-based DAART improved biologic outcomes. ART adherence interventions (e.g., text-messaging) improved adherence and biologic outcomes; however, results differed for other intervention strategies, populations, and outcomes. Because few SRs reported evidence for populations at high risk (e.g., men who have sex with men), the results are not generalizable to all PWH. Future implementation studies are needed to examine medication adherence interventions in specific populations and address the identified gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cherie R. Rooks-Peck
- Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Julia B. DeLuca
- Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Terrika Barham
- Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Leslie W. Ross
- Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
- Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Darrel H. Higa
- Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Theresa Ann Sipe
- Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Prevention Research Synthesis Project
- Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Gupta N, Ayles HM. Effects of pay-for-performance for primary care physicians on diabetes outcomes in single-payer health systems: a systematic review. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2019; 20:1303-1315. [PMID: 31401699 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-019-01097-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although pay-for-performance (P4P) for diabetes care is increasingly common, evidence of its effectiveness in improving population health and health system sustainability is deficient. This information gap is attributable in part to the heterogeneity of healthcare financing, covered medical conditions, care settings, and provider remuneration arrangements within and across countries. We systematically reviewed the literature concentrating on whether P4P for physicians in primary and community care leads to better diabetes outcomes in single-payer national health insurance systems. METHODS Studies were identified by searching ten databases (01/2000-04/2018) and scanning the reference lists of review articles and other global health literature. We included primary studies evaluating the effects of introducing P4P for diabetes care among primary care physicians in countries of universal health coverage. Outcomes of interest included patient morbidity, avoidable hospitalization, premature death, and healthcare costs. RESULTS We identified 2218 reports; after exclusions, 10 articles covering 8 P4P interventions in 7 countries were eligible for analysis. Five studies, capturing records from 717,166 patients with diabetes, were graded as high-quality evaluations of P4P on health outcomes. Based on three quality studies, P4P can result in reduced risk of mortality over the longer term-when linked to performance metrics. However, studies from other jurisdictions, where P4P was not linked to specific patient-oriented objectives, yielded little or mixed evidence of positive health impacts. CONCLUSION Evidence of the effectiveness of P4P depends on whether physicians' incentive payments are explicitly tied to performance metrics. However, the most appropriate indicators for performance monitoring remain in question. More research with rigorous evaluation in different settings is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeru Gupta
- University of New Brunswick, PO Box 4400, Fredericton, NB, E3B 5A3, Canada.
| | - Holly M Ayles
- University of New Brunswick, PO Box 4400, Fredericton, NB, E3B 5A3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Forstner J, Kunz A, Straßner C, Uhlmann L, Kuemmel S, Szecsenyi J, Wensing M. Improving continuity of patient care across sectors: study protocol of the process evaluation of a quasi-experimental multi-centre study regarding an admission and discharge model in Germany (VESPEERA). BMJ Open 2019; 9:e031245. [PMID: 31722944 PMCID: PMC6858220 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hospital stays are critical events as they often disrupt continuity of care. This process evaluation aims to describe and explore the implementation of the VESPEERA programme (Improving continuity of patient care across sectors: An admission and discharge model in general practices and hospitals, Versorgungskontinuitaet sichern: Patientenorientiertes Einweisungs- und Entlassmanagement in Hausarztpraxen und Krankenhauesern). The evaluation concerns the intervention fidelity, reach in targeted populations, perceived effects, working mechanisms, feasibility, determinants for implementation, including contextual factors, and associations with the outcomes evaluation. The aim of the VESPEERA programme is the development, implementation and evaluation of a structured admission and discharge programme in general practices and hospitals. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The process evaluation is linked to the VESPEERA outcomes evaluation, which has a quasi-experimental multi-centre design with four study arms and is conducted in hospitals and general practices in Germany. The VESPEERA programme comprises several components: an assessment before admission, an admission letter, a telephonic discharge conversation between hospital and general practice before discharge, discharge information for patients, structured planning of follow-up care after discharge in the general practice and a telephone monitoring for patients with a risk of rehospitalisation. The process evaluation has a mixed-methods design, incorporating interviews (patients, both care providers who do and do not participate in the VESPEERA programme, total n=75), questionnaires (patients and care providers who participate in the VESPEERA programme, total n=475), implementation plans of hospitals, data documented in general practices, claims-based data and hospital process data. Data analysis is descriptive and explorative. Qualitative data will be transcribed and analysed using framework analysis based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Associations between the outcomes of the program and measures in the process evaluation will be explored in regression models. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval has been obtained by the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty Heidelberg prior to the start of the study (S-352/2018). Results will be disseminated through a final report to the funding agency, articles in peer-reviewed journals and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER http://www.drks.de/DRKS00015183. TRIAL STATUS The study protocol on hand is the protocol V.1.1 from 18 June 2018. Recruitment for interviews started on 3 September 2018 and will approximately be completed by the end of May 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Forstner
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aline Kunz
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cornelia Straßner
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lorenz Uhlmann
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Joachim Szecsenyi
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michel Wensing
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Colley SK, Kane PK, MacDonald Gibson J. Risk Communication and Factors Influencing Private Well Testing Behavior: A Systematic Scoping Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:E4333. [PMID: 31703259 PMCID: PMC6888409 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16224333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Unregulated private wells may be at risk for certain types of contamination associated with adverse health effects. Well water testing is a primary method to identify such risks, although testing rates are generally low. Risk communication is used as an intervention to promote private well testing behavior; however, little is known about whether these efforts are effective as well as the mechanisms that influence effectiveness. A systematic scoping review was conducted to evaluate the current evidence base for risk communication effectiveness and factors that influence well testing behavior. The review was conducted with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework. Data were synthesized using a health behavior model (Health Belief Model) to identify areas amenable to intervention and factors to consider when designing risk communication interventions. We identified a significant shortage of studies examining the effectiveness of risk communication interventions targeted to well testing behavior, with only two quasi-experimental studies identified. The review also identified seventeen studies that examined or described factors relating to well testing behavior. The two empirical studies suggest risk communication methods can be successful in motivating private well owners to test their water, while the remaining studies present considerations for developing effective, community-specific content.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah K. Colley
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA;
| | - Peter K.M. Kane
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA;
| | - Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Belogianni K, Baldwin C. Types of Interventions Targeting Dietary, Physical Activity, and Weight-Related Outcomes among University Students: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews. Adv Nutr 2019; 10:848-863. [PMID: 31181143 PMCID: PMC6743817 DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmz027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
A plethora of studies aiming to improve dietary, physical activity (PA), and weight-related (WR) outcomes among university students have been implemented and summarized in a series of systematic reviews, with unclear conclusions regarding their effectiveness. This overview aims to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies aiming to improve health outcomes in university students, to assess their methodological quality, to identify the different types of interventions used and outcomes assessed, and to estimate their overall effect. Four electronic databases were searched until 19 March, 2018 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The identified reviews were described and their methodological quality was rated. The studies of reviews were investigated to identify the different types of interventions used and outcomes assessed. Effectiveness was assessed by measuring the overall number of improved outcomes out of the total number of outcomes reported. As a result, 8 reviews were identified targeting food sales (n = 2), dietary (n = 3), PA (n = 1), WR (n = 1), or all outcomes (n = 1). The methodological quality of the reviews was moderate (n = 5) to low (n = 3). In all, the reviews included 122 studies, of which 36 used an environmental, 51 a face-to-face, 30 an e-intervention, and 5 a combined approach. Environmental interventions improved a moderate number of food sales (32 of 61) and dietary intake (22 of 47) outcomes. Face-to-face interventions improved a high number of dietary cognitive outcomes (15 of 18), a moderate number of dietary intake (28 of 65) and WR (11 of 18) outcomes, and a low number of PA behavioral (22 of 69) and cognitive (2 of 14) outcomes. E-interventions improved a high number of dietary cognitive variables (11 of 16) but had a low effect (≤33%) on the other types of outcomes. In conclusion, face-to-face and e-interventions improved cognitive variables toward diet or PA but were less effective in changing actual behaviors. Environmental interventions favorably changed food sales. Face-to-face and e-interventions moderately affected WR outcomes. Future research should focus on long-term studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katerina Belogianni
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom,Address correspondence to KB (e-mail: )
| | - Christine Baldwin
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Distribution of monetary incentives in health insurance scheme influences acupuncture treatment choices: An experimental study. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0218154. [PMID: 31181131 PMCID: PMC6557502 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding how doctors respond to occupational and monetary incentives in health care payment systems is important for determining the effectiveness of such systems. This study examined changes in doctors' behaviors in response to monetary incentives within health care payment systems in a ceteris paribus setting. METHODS An online experiment was developed to analyze the effect of monetary incentives similar to fee-for-service (FFS) and capitation (CAP) on doctors' prescription patterns. In the first session, no monetary values were presented. In the second session conducted 1 week later, doctors were randomly assigned to one of two monetary incentive groups (FFS group: n = 25, CAP group: n = 25). In all sessions, doctors were presented with 10 cases and asked to determine the type and number of treatments. RESULTS In the first session with no monetary incentives, there was no significant difference between the FFS and CAP groups in the number of treatments. When monetary incentives were provided, doctors in the CAP group prescribed fewer treatments than the FFS group. The perceived severity of the cases did not change significantly between sessions and between groups. linear mixed-effects regression model indicated the treatment choices were influenced by monetary incentives, but not by the perceived severity of the patient's symptoms. CONCLUSION The monetary values incentivized the doctors' treatment choices, but not their professional evaluation of patients. Monetary values designed within health care systems influence the doctor's decisions in the form of external rewards, in addition to occupational values, and can thus be adjusted by more effective incentives.
Collapse
|
50
|
Schor A, Bergovoy-Yellin L, Landsberger D, Kolobov T, Baron-Epel O. Multidisciplinary work promotes preventive medicine and health education in primary care: a cross-sectional survey. Isr J Health Policy Res 2019; 8:50. [PMID: 31171033 PMCID: PMC6551853 DOI: 10.1186/s13584-019-0318-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Preventive medicine and health education are among the strategies used in coping with chronic diseases. However, it is yet to be determined what effect do personal and organizational aspects have on its’ implementation in primary care. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in order to assess and compare preventive medicine and health education activities in three types of primary care models: solo working independent physicians, nurse-physician collaborations and teamwork (nurses, dietitians and social workers working alongside a physician). Questionnaires were emailed to 1203 health professionals between September and November 2015, working at Maccabi Healthcare Services, the second largest Israeli healthcare organization. Self-reported rates of health education groups conducted, proactive appointments scheduling and self-empowerment techniques use during routine appointments, were compared among the three models. Independent variables included clinic size as well as health professionals’ occupation, health behaviors and training. A series of multivariate linear regressions were performed in order to identify predictors of preventive medicine and health education implementation. Computerized health records (CHR) validated our self-report data through data regarding patients’ health behaviours and outcomes, including health education group registration, adherence to occult blood tests and influenza vaccinations as well as blood lipid levels. Results Responders included physicians, nurses, dietitians and social workers working at 921 clinics (n = 516, response rate = 31%). Higher rates of proactive appointments scheduling and health education groups were found in the Teamwork and Collaboration models, compared to the Independent Physician Model. Occupation (nurses and dietitians), group facilitation training and personal screening adherence were identified as preventive medicine and health education implementation predictors. Group registration, occult blood tests, healthy population’s well-controlled blood lipids as well as influenza vaccinations among chronically ill patients were all significantly higher in the Teamwork and Collaboration models, compared to the Independent Physician Model. Conclusions The Teamwork and Collaboration models presented higher rates of preventive medicine and health education implementation as well as higher rates of patients’ positive health behaviours documented in these models. This suggests multidisciplinary primary care models may contribute to population’s health by enhancing preventive medicine and health education implementation alongside health professionals’ characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayelet Schor
- School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. .,, Sde-varburg, Israel.
| | - Lucia Bergovoy-Yellin
- Department of Health Services Research and Health Economics, Maccabi Healthcare Services, 27 Ha'Mered Street, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Daniel Landsberger
- Maccabi Healthcare Services, 3 Ha'Netsach Street, Ramat-Hasharon, Israel
| | - Tania Kolobov
- School of Education, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.,, Qyriat Bialik, Israel
| | - Orna Baron-Epel
- School of Public Health, University of Haifa, 199 Abba khoushy Mount Carmel, 3498838, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|