1
|
Cosgrove L, Mintzes B, Bursztajn HJ, D'Ambrozio G, Shaughnessy AF. Industry effects on evidence: a case study of long-acting injectable antipsychotics. Account Res 2024; 31:2-13. [PMID: 35634753 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2082289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
A vigorously debated issue in the psychiatric literature is whether long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) show clinical benefit over antipsychotics taken orally. In addressing this question, it is critical that systematic reviews incorporate risk of bias assessments of trial data in a robust way and are free of undue industry influence. In this paper, we present a case analysis in which we identify some of the design problems in a recent systematic review on LAIs vs oral formulations. This case illustrates how evidence syntheses that are shaped by commercial interests may undermine patient-centered models of recovery and care. We offer recommendations that address both the bioethical and research design issues that arise in the systematic review process when researchers have financial conflicts of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Cosgrove
- Counseling Psychology Department, Faculty Fellow, Applied Ethics Center, University of Massachusetts-Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Barbara Mintzes
- School of Pharmacy and Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Harold J Bursztajn
- Co-founder, Program in Psychiatry and the Law @ BIDMC Psychiatry of Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gianna D'Ambrozio
- Counseling Psychology Department, University of Massachusetts-Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Allen F Shaughnessy
- Department of Family Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Malden, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alhajahjeh A, Hmeidan M, Abdulelah AA, Al-Nezaa I, Al-Abbadi F, Dobbs RW, Sater ZA, Al Awamlh BAH, Lee DI, Shahait M. Factors affecting the non-publication of clinical trials of prevalent urological cancer. World J Urol 2024; 42:426. [PMID: 39037516 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05135-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinical trials (CTs) are critical in understanding and managing cancer. However, despite being completed, CT results are often unpublished, compromising the ability to glean useful information from them. This study aimed to evaluate factors influencing the non-publication of urological oncology clinical trials. METHODOLOGY We conducted a comprehensive search of ClinicalTrials.gov to identify CTs focused on urological cancers completed between 2000 and 2020. We used the National Clinical Trial (NCT) identifier number to check whether the trial was published. RESULTS 9,145 oncology CTs were conducted between 2000 and 2020, of which 8.39% (n = 767) focused on urological cancers, and 47.2% (n = 362) of these trials remained unpublished. Univariable analysis revealed that trials with a sample size of less than 50 and phase 4 were significantly associated with non-publication p < 0.001. In contrast, trials involving triple masking, a higher number of agents, and those conducted in High-Income Countries were associated with a higher likelihood of publication p < 0.05. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that trials enrolling more than 50 patients and employing three or more agents, along with triple and quadruple masking, had higher odds of being published (OR = 1.62; 95%CI (1.22-2.16), 1.89; 95%CI (1.10-3.27), 3.04; 95%CI (1.44-6.44), 5.62; 95%CI (1.72-18.37), and 5.41; 95%CI (1.76-16.67), p < 0.05, respectively). However, trials conducted in low-middle-income Countries had lower odds of publication (OR = 0.26; 95%CI (0.08-0.87), p = 0.02). CONCLUSION We found that almost one-half (47.2%) of all completed urologic oncology clinical trials are not published in a PubMed-indexed journal. This non-publication rate represents a significant loss of scientific knowledge and progress. We identified several key variables including sample size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulrahman Alhajahjeh
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), Amman, Jordan
- School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | | | - Ahmed A Abdulelah
- Edinburgh Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Faris Al-Abbadi
- Edinburgh Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Zahi Abdul Sater
- Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
- College of Public Health, Phoenicia University, Mazraat El Daoudiyeh, Lebanon
| | | | - David I Lee
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, CA, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Overgaard SH, Moos CM, Ioannidis JPA, Luta G, Berg JI, Nielsen SM, Andersen V, Christensen R. Impact of trial attrition rates on treatment effect estimates in chronic inflammatory diseases: A meta-epidemiological study. Res Synth Methods 2024; 15:561-575. [PMID: 38351627 DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
The objective of this meta-epidemiological study was to explore the impact of attrition rates on treatment effect estimates in randomised trials of chronic inflammatory diseases (CID) treated with biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying drugs. We sampled trials from Cochrane reviews. Attrition rates and primary endpoint results were retrieved from trial publications; Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated from the odds of withdrawing in the experimental intervention compared to the control comparison groups (i.e., differential attrition), as well as the odds of achieving a clinical response (i.e., the trial outcome). Trials were combined using random effects restricted maximum likelihood meta-regression models and associations between estimates of treatment effects and attrition rates were analysed. From 37 meta-analyses, 179 trials were included, and 163 were analysed (301 randomised comparisons; n = 62,220 patients). Overall, the odds of withdrawal were lower in the experimental compared to control groups (random effects summary OR = 0.45, 95% CI, 0.41-0.50). The corresponding overall treatment effects were large (random effects summary OR = 4.43, 95% CI 3.92-4.99) with considerable heterogeneity across interventions and clinical specialties (I2 = 85.7%). The ORs estimating treatment effect showed larger treatment benefits when the differential attrition was more prominent with more attrition in the control group (OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.96). Higher attrition rates from the control arm are associated with larger estimated benefits of treatments with biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying drugs in CID trials; differential attrition may affect estimates of treatment benefit in randomised trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silja H Overgaard
- The Molecular Diagnostics and Clinical Research Unit, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
- Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa, Denmark
| | - Caroline M Moos
- Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa, Denmark
| | - John P A Ioannidis
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Department of Statistics, Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford, California, USA
| | - George Luta
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Clinical Research Unit, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Johannes I Berg
- Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sabrina M Nielsen
- Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Vibeke Andersen
- The Molecular Diagnostics and Clinical Research Unit, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa, Denmark
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- OPEN Explorative Network, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Robin Christensen
- Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Vos CC, Meier K. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain. Nat Rev Neurol 2024:10.1038/s41582-024-00981-9. [PMID: 38951599 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-024-00981-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Cecile C de Vos
- Center for Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Kaare Meier
- Department of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Anesthesiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Balsby IM, Nielsen SM, Christensen R, Henriksen M, Dahl LUM, Berg JI, Tarp S, Kroon F, Kloppenburg M, Zhang W, Hunter DJ, Bliddal H, Døssing A. Comparative effectiveness of different placebos and comparator groups for hand osteoarthritis exploring the impact of contextual factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2024; 32:848-857. [PMID: 38679284 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2024.02.947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the pain relief effects of comparators (placebos and untreated control groups) in hand osteoarthritis trials and the impact of contextual factors. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL from inception to December 26, 2021. We included randomised controlled trials of people with hand osteoarthritis with a placebo or an untreated control group. We assessed the Risk of Bias with Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool version 2. Each comparator was contrasted with a null-arm, imputed as having a zero change from baseline with the same standard deviation as the comparator. We combined the standardised mean differences with a random effects meta-analysis. The contextual factors' effect was explored in meta-regression and stratified models with pain as the dependent variable. RESULTS 84 trials (7262 participants) were eligible for quantitative synthesis, of which 76 (6462 participants) were eligible for the stratified analyses. Placebos were superior to their matched null-arms in relieving pain with an effect size of -0.51 (95% confidence interval -0.61 to -0.42), while untreated control groups were not. When analysing all comparators, blinded trial designs and low risk of bias were associated with higher pain relief compared to an open-label trial design and some concern or high risk of bias. CONCLUSION The placebo response on pain for people with hand osteoarthritis was increased by appropriate blinding and a lower risk of bias assessment. Placebos were superior to a null-arm, while untreated control groups were not. Results emphasise the importance of using appropriate comparators in clinical trials. PROSPERO REGISTRATION ID CRD42022298984.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Maria Balsby
- Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Sabrina M Nielsen
- Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Robin Christensen
- Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Marius Henriksen
- The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Louise Ulff-Møller Dahl
- The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Johannes Iuel Berg
- The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Simon Tarp
- The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Féline Kroon
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
| | - Margreet Kloppenburg
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Weiya Zhang
- Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK.
| | - David J Hunter
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Henning Bliddal
- The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Anna Døssing
- The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McCambridge J, Kypri K, Boehnke JR, Bero L, Bendtsen M. Randomised study of the effects of sense of entitlement and conflict of interest contrarianism on researcher decision-making to work with the alcohol industry. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:1680. [PMID: 38914989 PMCID: PMC11197317 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18961-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is well established that the tobacco industry used research funding as a deliberate tactic to subvert science. There has been little wider attention to how researchers think about accepting industry funding. We developed, then tested, hypotheses about two psychological constructs, namely, entitlement and conflict of interest contrarianism (CoI-C) among alcohol researchers who had previously received industry funding. METHODS A mixed-methods pilot study involved construct and instrument development, followed by an online survey and nested 3-arm randomised trial. We randomly allocated alcohol industry funding recipients to one of three conditions. In two experimental conditions we asked participants questions to remind them (and thus increase the salience) of their sense of entitlement or CoI-C. We compared these groups with a control group who did not receive any reminder. The outcome was a composite measure of openness to working with the alcohol industry. RESULTS 133 researchers were randomised of whom 79 completed the experiment. The posterior distribution over effect estimates revealed that there was a 94.8% probability that reminding researchers of their CoI-C led them to self-report being more receptive to industry funding, whereas the probability was 68.1% that reminding them of their sense of entitlement did so. Biomedical researchers reported being more open to working with industry than did psychosocial researchers. CONCLUSION Holding contrarian views on conflict of interest could make researchers more open to working with industry. This study shows how it is possible to study researcher decision-making using quantitative experimental methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim McCambridge
- University of York, Seebohm Rowntree Building, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
| | | | - Jan R Boehnke
- School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Lisa Bero
- University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, US
| | - Marcus Bendtsen
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Moura L, Jones DT, Sheikh IS, Murphy S, Kalfin M, Kummer BR, Weathers AL, Grinspan ZM, Silsbee HM, Jones LK, Patel AD. Implications of Large Language Models for Quality and Efficiency of Neurologic Care: Emerging Issues in Neurology. Neurology 2024; 102:e209497. [PMID: 38759131 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000209497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems that excel in recognizing and generating human-like language, possibly serving as valuable tools for neurology-related information tasks. Although LLMs have shown remarkable potential in various areas, their performance in the dynamic environment of daily clinical practice remains uncertain. This article outlines multiple limitations and challenges of using LLMs in clinical settings that need to be addressed, including limited clinical reasoning, variable reliability and accuracy, reproducibility bias, self-serving bias, sponsorship bias, and potential for exacerbating health care disparities. These challenges are further compounded by practical business considerations and infrastructure requirements, including associated costs. To overcome these hurdles and harness the potential of LLMs effectively, this article includes considerations for health care organizations, researchers, and neurologists contemplating the use of LLMs in clinical practice. It is essential for health care organizations to cultivate a culture that welcomes AI solutions and aligns them seamlessly with health care operations. Clear objectives and business plans should guide the selection of AI solutions, ensuring they meet organizational needs and budget considerations. Engaging both clinical and nonclinical stakeholders can help secure necessary resources, foster trust, and ensure the long-term sustainability of AI implementations. Testing, validation, training, and ongoing monitoring are pivotal for successful integration. For neurologists, safeguarding patient data privacy is paramount. Seeking guidance from institutional information technology resources for informed, compliant decisions, and remaining vigilant against biases in LLM outputs are essential practices in responsible and unbiased utilization of AI tools. In research, obtaining institutional review board approval is crucial when dealing with patient data, even if deidentified, to ensure ethical use. Compliance with established guidelines like SPIRIT-AI, MI-CLAIM, and CONSORT-AI is necessary to maintain consistency and mitigate biases in AI research. In summary, the integration of LLMs into clinical neurology offers immense promise while presenting formidable challenges. Awareness of these considerations is vital for harnessing the potential of AI in neurologic care effectively and enhancing patient care quality and safety. The article serves as a guide for health care organizations, researchers, and neurologists navigating this transformative landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidia Moura
- From the Center for Value-based Health Care and Sciences (L.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.M., S.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (L.M., S.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.T.J., L.K.J.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (I.S.S.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Department of Neurology (M.K.), University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology (B.R.K.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Information Technology Division (A.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Pediatrics (Z.M.G.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; American Academy of Neurology (H.M.S.), Minneapolis, MN; and The Center for Clinical Excellence (A.D.P.), Nationwide Children's Hospital, Division of Neurology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - David T Jones
- From the Center for Value-based Health Care and Sciences (L.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.M., S.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (L.M., S.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.T.J., L.K.J.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (I.S.S.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Department of Neurology (M.K.), University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology (B.R.K.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Information Technology Division (A.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Pediatrics (Z.M.G.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; American Academy of Neurology (H.M.S.), Minneapolis, MN; and The Center for Clinical Excellence (A.D.P.), Nationwide Children's Hospital, Division of Neurology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - Irfan S Sheikh
- From the Center for Value-based Health Care and Sciences (L.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.M., S.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (L.M., S.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.T.J., L.K.J.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (I.S.S.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Department of Neurology (M.K.), University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology (B.R.K.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Information Technology Division (A.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Pediatrics (Z.M.G.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; American Academy of Neurology (H.M.S.), Minneapolis, MN; and The Center for Clinical Excellence (A.D.P.), Nationwide Children's Hospital, Division of Neurology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - Shawn Murphy
- From the Center for Value-based Health Care and Sciences (L.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.M., S.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (L.M., S.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.T.J., L.K.J.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (I.S.S.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Department of Neurology (M.K.), University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology (B.R.K.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Information Technology Division (A.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Pediatrics (Z.M.G.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; American Academy of Neurology (H.M.S.), Minneapolis, MN; and The Center for Clinical Excellence (A.D.P.), Nationwide Children's Hospital, Division of Neurology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - Michael Kalfin
- From the Center for Value-based Health Care and Sciences (L.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.M., S.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (L.M., S.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.T.J., L.K.J.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (I.S.S.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Department of Neurology (M.K.), University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology (B.R.K.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Information Technology Division (A.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Pediatrics (Z.M.G.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; American Academy of Neurology (H.M.S.), Minneapolis, MN; and The Center for Clinical Excellence (A.D.P.), Nationwide Children's Hospital, Division of Neurology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - Benjamin R Kummer
- From the Center for Value-based Health Care and Sciences (L.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.M., S.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (L.M., S.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.T.J., L.K.J.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (I.S.S.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Department of Neurology (M.K.), University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology (B.R.K.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Information Technology Division (A.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Pediatrics (Z.M.G.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; American Academy of Neurology (H.M.S.), Minneapolis, MN; and The Center for Clinical Excellence (A.D.P.), Nationwide Children's Hospital, Division of Neurology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - Allison L Weathers
- From the Center for Value-based Health Care and Sciences (L.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.M., S.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (L.M., S.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.T.J., L.K.J.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (I.S.S.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Department of Neurology (M.K.), University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology (B.R.K.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Information Technology Division (A.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Pediatrics (Z.M.G.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; American Academy of Neurology (H.M.S.), Minneapolis, MN; and The Center for Clinical Excellence (A.D.P.), Nationwide Children's Hospital, Division of Neurology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - Zachary M Grinspan
- From the Center for Value-based Health Care and Sciences (L.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.M., S.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (L.M., S.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.T.J., L.K.J.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (I.S.S.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Department of Neurology (M.K.), University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology (B.R.K.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Information Technology Division (A.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Pediatrics (Z.M.G.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; American Academy of Neurology (H.M.S.), Minneapolis, MN; and The Center for Clinical Excellence (A.D.P.), Nationwide Children's Hospital, Division of Neurology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - Heather M Silsbee
- From the Center for Value-based Health Care and Sciences (L.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.M., S.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (L.M., S.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.T.J., L.K.J.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (I.S.S.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Department of Neurology (M.K.), University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology (B.R.K.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Information Technology Division (A.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Pediatrics (Z.M.G.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; American Academy of Neurology (H.M.S.), Minneapolis, MN; and The Center for Clinical Excellence (A.D.P.), Nationwide Children's Hospital, Division of Neurology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - Lyell K Jones
- From the Center for Value-based Health Care and Sciences (L.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.M., S.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (L.M., S.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.T.J., L.K.J.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (I.S.S.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Department of Neurology (M.K.), University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology (B.R.K.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Information Technology Division (A.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Pediatrics (Z.M.G.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; American Academy of Neurology (H.M.S.), Minneapolis, MN; and The Center for Clinical Excellence (A.D.P.), Nationwide Children's Hospital, Division of Neurology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - Anup D Patel
- From the Center for Value-based Health Care and Sciences (L.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.M., S.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (L.M., S.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.T.J., L.K.J.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (I.S.S.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Department of Neurology (M.K.), University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology (B.R.K.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Information Technology Division (A.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Pediatrics (Z.M.G.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; American Academy of Neurology (H.M.S.), Minneapolis, MN; and The Center for Clinical Excellence (A.D.P.), Nationwide Children's Hospital, Division of Neurology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Naing C, Ni H, Aung HH, Htet NH, Nikolova D. Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 6:CD013731. [PMID: 38837373 PMCID: PMC11152182 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013731.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common type of liver cancer, accounting for 70% to 85% of individuals with primary liver cancer. Gene therapy, which uses genes to treat or prevent diseases, holds potential for treatment, especially for tumours. Trials on the effects of gene therapy in people with hepatocellular carcinoma have been published or are ongoing. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of gene therapy in people with hepatocellular carcinoma, irrespective of sex, administered dose, and type of formulation. SEARCH METHODS We identified randomised clinical trials through electronic searches in The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science. We searched five online clinical trial registries to identify unpublished or ongoing trials. We checked reference lists of the retrieved studies for further trials. The date of last search was 20 January 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA We aimed to include randomised clinical trials assessing any type of gene therapy in people diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma, irrespective of year, language of publication, format, or outcomes reported. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We followed Cochrane methodology and used Review Manager to prepare the review. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality/overall survival (whatever data were provided), serious adverse events during treatment, and health-related quality of life. The secondary outcomes were proportion of people with disease progression, adverse events considered non-serious, and proportion of people without improvement in liver function tests. We assessed risk of bias of the included trials using RoB 2 and the certainty of evidence using GRADE. We presented the results of time-to-event outcomes as hazard ratios (HR), dichotomous outcomes as risk ratios (RR), and continuous outcomes as mean difference (MD) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Our primary analyses were based on intention-to-treat and outcome data at the longest follow-up. MAIN RESULTS We included six randomised clinical trials with 364 participants. The participants had unresectable (i.e. advanced inoperable) hepatocellular carcinoma. We found no trials assessing the effects of gene therapy in people with operable hepatocellular carcinoma. Four trials were conducted in China, one in several countries (from North America, Asia, and Europe), and one in Egypt. The number of participants in the six trials ranged from 10 to 129 (median 47), median age was 55.2 years, and the mean proportion of males was 72.7%. The follow-up duration ranged from six months to five years. As the trials compared different types of gene therapy and had different controls, we could not perform meta-analyses. Five of the six trials administered co-interventions equally to the experimental and control groups. All trials assessed one or more outcomes of interest in this review. The certainty of evidence was very low in five of the six comparisons and low in the double-dose gene therapy comparison. Below, we reported the results of the primary outcomes only. Pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa-Vec) plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone There is uncertainty about whether there may be little to no difference between the effect of Pexa-Vec plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone on overall survival (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.82; 1 trial (censored observation at 20-month follow-up), 129 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and on serious adverse events (RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.60 to 3.33; 1 trial at 20 months after treatment, 129 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The trial reported quality of life narratively as "assessment of quality of life and time to symptomatic progression was confounded by the high patient dropout rate." Adenovirus-thymidine kinase with ganciclovir (ADV-TK/GCV) plus liver transplantation versus liver transplantation alone There is uncertainty about whether ADV-TK/GCV plus liver transplantation may benefit all-cause mortality at the two-year follow-up (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.76; 1 trial, 45 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The trial did not report serious adverse events other than mortality or quality of life. Double-dose ADV-TK/GCV plus liver transplantation versus liver transplantation alone There is uncertainty about whether double-dose ADV-TK/GCV plus liver transplantation versus liver transplantation may benefit all-cause mortality at five-year follow-up (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.73; 1 trial, 86 participants; low-certainty evidence). The trial did not report serious adverse events other than mortality or quality of life. Recombinant human adenovirus-p53 with hydroxycamptothecin (rAd-p53/HCT) versus hydroxycamptothecin alone There is uncertainty about whether there may be little to no difference between the effect of rAd-p53/HCT versus hydroxycamptothecin alone on the overall survival at 12-month follow-up (RR 3.06, 95% CI 0.16 to 60.47; 1 trial, 48 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The trial did not report serious adverse events or quality of life. rAd-p53/5-Fu (5-fluorouracil) plus transarterial chemoembolisation versus transarterial chemoembolisation alone The trial included 46 participants. We had insufficient data to assess overall survival. The trial did not report serious adverse events or quality of life. E1B-deleted (dl1520) adenovirus versus percutaneous ethanol injection The trial included 10 participants. It did not report data on overall survival, serious adverse events, or health-related quality of life. One trial did not provide any information on sponsorship; one trial received a national research grant, one trial by the Pedersen foundation, and three were industry-funded trials. We found five ongoing randomised clinical trials. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of gene therapy on the studied outcomes because of high risk of bias and imprecision of outcome results. The trials were underpowered and lacked trial data on clinically important outcomes. There was only one trial per comparison, and we could not perform meta-analyses. Therefore, we do not know if gene therapy may reduce, increase, or have little to no effect on all-cause mortality or overall survival, or serious adverse events in adults with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. The impact of gene therapy on adverse events needs to be investigated further. Evidence on the effect of gene therapy on health-related quality of life is lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cho Naing
- Division of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia
| | - Han Ni
- Department of Medicine, Newcastle University Medicine Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia
| | - Htar Htar Aung
- School of Medicine, IMU University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | - Dimitrinka Nikolova
- Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital ─ Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
D'Souza RS, Barrington MJ, Sen A, Mascha EJ, Kelley GA. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in regional anesthesia and pain medicine (Part II): guidelines for performing the systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024; 49:403-422. [PMID: 37945064 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
In Part I of this series, we provide guidance for preparing a systematic review protocol. In this article, we highlight important steps and supplement with exemplars on conducting and reporting the results of a systematic review. We suggest how authors can manage protocol violations, multiplicity of outcomes and analyses, and heterogeneity. The quality (certainty) of the evidence and strength of recommendations should follow the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. It is our goal that Part II of this series provides valid guidance to authors and peer reviewers who conduct systematic reviews to adhere to important constructs of transparency, structure, reproducibility, and accountability. This will likely result in more rigorous systematic reviews being submitted for publication to the journals like Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine and Anesthesia & Analgesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan S D'Souza
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michael J Barrington
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Pain Medicine, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Ananda Sen
- Departments of Biostatistics and Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Edward J Mascha
- Departments of Quantitative Health Sciences and Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - George A Kelley
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fried EI, Cristea IA, Naudet F. Treating Bipolar Depression Using Psilocybin-Validity Threats Regarding Efficacy and Safety. JAMA Psychiatry 2024; 81:633-634. [PMID: 38598200 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.0420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Eiko I Fried
- Department of Psychology, Clinical Psychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ioana A Cristea
- Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Florian Naudet
- University of Rennes, University Hospital of Rennes, Inserm, Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jones EC, Kummer BR, Wilkinson JR. Teleneurology and Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2024; 30:904-914. [PMID: 38830075 DOI: 10.1212/con.0000000000001430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT As teleheath becomes integrated into the practice of medicine, it is important to understand the benefits, limitations, and variety of applications. Telestroke was an early example of teleneurology that arose from a need for urgent access to neurologists for time-sensitive treatments for stroke. It made a scarce resource widely available via video conferencing technologies. Additionally, applications such as outpatient video visits, electronic consultation (e-consult), and wearable devices developed in neurology, as well. Telehealth dramatically increased during the COVID-19 pandemic when offices were closed and hospitals were overwhelmed; a multitude of both outpatient and inpatient programs developed and matured during this time. It is helpful to explore what has been learned regarding the quality of telehealth, disparities in care, and how artificial intelligence can interact with medical practices in the teleneurology context.
Collapse
|
12
|
Bjelakovic G, Nikolova D, Bjelakovic M, Pavlov CS, Sethi NJ, Korang SK, Gluud C. Effects of primary or secondary prevention with vitamin A supplementation on clinically important outcomes: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e078053. [PMID: 38816049 PMCID: PMC11141198 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This systematic review with meta-analyses of randomised trials evaluated the preventive effects of vitamin A supplements versus placebo or no intervention on clinically important outcomes, in people of any age. METHODS We searched different electronic databases and other resources for randomised clinical trials that had compared vitamin A supplements versus placebo or no intervention (last search 16 April 2024). We used Cochrane methodology. We used the random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RRs), with 95% CIs. We analysed individually and cluster randomised trials separately. Our primary outcomes were mortality, adverse events and quality of life. We assessed risks of bias in the trials and used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) to assess the certainty of the evidence. RESULTS We included 120 randomised trials (1 671 672 participants); 105 trials allocated individuals and 15 allocated clusters. 92 trials included children (78 individually; 14 cluster randomised) and 28 adults (27 individually; 1 cluster randomised). 14/105 individually randomised trials (13%) and none of the cluster randomised trials were at overall low risk of bias. Vitamin A did not reduce mortality in individually randomised trials (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.05; I²=32%; p=0.19; 105 trials; moderate certainty), and this effect was not affected by the risk of bias. In individually randomised trials, vitamin A had no effect on mortality in children (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.04; I²=24%; p=0.28; 78 trials, 178 094 participants) nor in adults (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.13; I²=24%; p=0.27; 27 trials, 61 880 participants). Vitamin A reduced mortality in the cluster randomised trials (0.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.93; I²=66%; p=0.0008; 15 trials, 14 in children and 1 in adults; 364 343 participants; very low certainty). No trial reported serious adverse events or quality of life. Vitamin A slightly increased bulging fontanelle of neonates and infants. We are uncertain whether vitamin A influences blindness under the conditions examined. CONCLUSIONS Based on moderate certainty of evidence, vitamin A had no effect on mortality in the individually randomised trials. Very low certainty evidence obtained from cluster randomised trials suggested a beneficial effect of vitamin A on mortality. If preventive vitamin A programmes are to be continued, supporting evidence should come from randomised trials allocating individuals and assessing patient-meaningful outcomes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018104347.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Goran Bjelakovic
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Nis, Nis, Serbia
- Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Clinic of Gastroenterohepatology, University Clinical Centre, Nis, Serbia
| | - Dimitrinka Nikolova
- Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Milica Bjelakovic
- Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Clinic of Gastroenterohepatology, University Clinical Centre, Nis, Serbia
| | - Chavdar S Pavlov
- Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Gastroenterology, Botkin Hospital, Moscow, Russian Federation
- Department of Therapy, I.M. Sechenov, First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Naqash J Sethi
- Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Steven Kwasi Korang
- Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian Gluud
- Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, The Faculty of Heath Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Majdik ZP, Graham SS, Shiva Edward JC, Rodriguez SN, Karnes MS, Jensen JT, Barbour JB, Rousseau JF. Sample Size Considerations for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Named Entity Recognition Tasks: Methodological Study. JMIR AI 2024; 3:e52095. [PMID: 38875593 PMCID: PMC11140272 DOI: 10.2196/52095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to support promising new applications in health informatics. However, practical data on sample size considerations for fine-tuning LLMs to perform specific tasks in biomedical and health policy contexts are lacking. OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate sample size and sample selection techniques for fine-tuning LLMs to support improved named entity recognition (NER) for a custom data set of conflicts of interest disclosure statements. METHODS A random sample of 200 disclosure statements was prepared for annotation. All "PERSON" and "ORG" entities were identified by each of the 2 raters, and once appropriate agreement was established, the annotators independently annotated an additional 290 disclosure statements. From the 490 annotated documents, 2500 stratified random samples in different size ranges were drawn. The 2500 training set subsamples were used to fine-tune a selection of language models across 2 model architectures (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers [BERT] and Generative Pre-trained Transformer [GPT]) for improved NER, and multiple regression was used to assess the relationship between sample size (sentences), entity density (entities per sentence [EPS]), and trained model performance (F1-score). Additionally, single-predictor threshold regression models were used to evaluate the possibility of diminishing marginal returns from increased sample size or entity density. RESULTS Fine-tuned models ranged in topline NER performance from F1-score=0.79 to F1-score=0.96 across architectures. Two-predictor multiple linear regression models were statistically significant with multiple R2 ranging from 0.6057 to 0.7896 (all P<.001). EPS and the number of sentences were significant predictors of F1-scores in all cases ( P<.001), except for the GPT-2_large model, where EPS was not a significant predictor (P=.184). Model thresholds indicate points of diminishing marginal return from increased training data set sample size measured by the number of sentences, with point estimates ranging from 439 sentences for RoBERTa_large to 527 sentences for GPT-2_large. Likewise, the threshold regression models indicate a diminishing marginal return for EPS with point estimates between 1.36 and 1.38. CONCLUSIONS Relatively modest sample sizes can be used to fine-tune LLMs for NER tasks applied to biomedical text, and training data entity density should representatively approximate entity density in production data. Training data quality and a model architecture's intended use (text generation vs text processing or classification) may be as, or more, important as training data volume and model parameter size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoltan P Majdik
- Department of Communication, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States
| | - S Scott Graham
- Department of Rhetoric & Writing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Jade C Shiva Edward
- Department of Rhetoric & Writing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Sabrina N Rodriguez
- Department of Neurology, The Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Martha S Karnes
- Department of Rhetoric & Writing, University of Arkansas Little Rock, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Jared T Jensen
- Department of Rhetoric & Writing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Joshua B Barbour
- Department of Communication, The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States
| | - Justin F Rousseau
- Statistical Planning and Analysis Section, Department of Neurology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. Brain Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Coderre-Ball A, Phillips SP. Extent, transparency and impact of industry funding for pelvic mesh research: a review of the literature. Res Integr Peer Rev 2024; 9:4. [PMID: 38685078 PMCID: PMC11059718 DOI: 10.1186/s41073-024-00145-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conflicts of interest inherent in industry funding can bias medical research methods, outcomes, reporting and clinical applications. This study explored the extent of funding provided to American physician researchers studying surgical mesh used to treat uterine prolapse or stress urinary incontinence, and whether that funding was declared by researchers or influenced the ethical integrity of resulting publications in peer reviewed journals. METHODS Publications identified via a Pubmed search (2014-2021) of the terms mesh and pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence and with at least one US physician author were reviewed. Using the CMS Open Payments database industry funding received by those MDs in the year before, of and after publication was recorded, as were each study's declarations of funding and 14 quality measures. RESULTS Fifty-three of the 56 studies reviewed had at least one American MD author who received industry funding in the year of, or one year before or after publication. For 47 articles this funding was not declared. Of 247 physician authors, 60% received > $100 while 13% received $100,000-$1,000,000 of which approximately 60% was undeclared. While 57% of the studies reviewed explicitly concluded that mesh was safe, only 39% of outcomes supported this. Neither the quality indicator of follow-up duration nor overall statements as to mesh safety varied with declaration status. CONCLUSIONS Journal editors' guidelines re declaring conflicts of interest are not being followed. Financial involvement of industry in mesh research is extensive, often undeclared, and may shape the quality of, and conclusions drawn, resulting in overstated benefit and overuse of pelvic mesh in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan P Phillips
- Centre for Studies in Primary Care, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
- Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Braznell S, Van Den Akker A, Metcalfe C, Taylor GMJ, Hartmann-Boyce J. Critical appraisal of interventional clinical trials assessing heated tobacco products: a systematic review. Tob Control 2024; 33:383-394. [PMID: 36347620 PMCID: PMC11041615 DOI: 10.1136/tc-2022-057522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To critically assess the methodological characteristics and quality of interventional clinical trials investigating the effects of heated tobacco products (HTPs). DATA SOURCES Web of Science (Core collection and MEDLINE), Scopus, MedRxiv, ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP trial databases and transnational HTP manufacturer online publication libraries were searched for clinical trials on HTPs published between January 2010 and April 2022. STUDY SELECTION Interventional clinical trials of any design, in which at least one group of adult participants used a currently marketed HTP, were selected by two reviewers with good or very good agreement. DATA EXTRACTION Data relating to trial characteristics and effects of intervention on primary outcomes were extracted using a predesigned form. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool v1. DATA SYNTHESIS 40 trials were included, 29 of which were tobacco industry affiliated. Methodological characteristics, such as registration, design, setting, comparator interventions, participants, outcomes and analyses, varied between trials, though there were few significant differences between industry-affiliated and independent trials. Of the 40 trials, 33 were judged to be at high risk of bias and 6 at unclear risk of bias. Trial findings were not significantly associated with either affiliation or risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS The conduct and reporting of HTP interventional clinical trials were poor in many respects and limited to investigating effects of short-term exposure. These trials fall short of what is needed to determine whether HTPs are beneficial to public health, meaning they may not be a sound basis for tobacco control policy decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Chris Metcalfe
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Gemma M J Taylor
- Addiction and Mental Health Group (AIM), Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Jamie Hartmann-Boyce
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford Division of Public Health and Primary Health Care, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
McCambridge J, Golder S. Alcohol, cardiovascular disease and industry funding: A co-authorship network analysis of epidemiological studies. Addict Behav 2024; 151:107932. [PMID: 38103279 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Alcohol's effects on cardiovascular disease (CVD) are controversial. Alcohol industry actors have shown particular interest in this subject, and been extensively involved through research funding, and in other ways, generating concerns about bias, particularly in reviews. MATERIAL & METHODS We conducted a co-authorship network analysis of the primary studies included within a previous co-authorship study of 60 systematic reviews on the impact of alcohol on CVD. Additionally, we examined the relationships between declared alcohol industry funding and network structure. RESULTS There were 713 unique primary studies with 2832 authors published between 1969 and 2019 located within 229 co-authorship subnetworks. There was industry funding across subnetworks and approximately 8% of all papers declared industry funding. The largest subnetwork dominated, comprising 43% of all authors, with sparse evidence of substantial industry funding. The second largest subnetwork contained approximately 4% of all authors, with largely different industry funders involved. Harvard affiliated authors who at the review level formed co-authorship subnetworks with industry funded authors were seen at the primary study level to belong to the largest epidemiological subnetwork. A small number of key authors make extensive alcohol industry funding declarations. CONCLUSIONS There was no straightforward relationship between co-authorship network formation and alcohol industry funding of epidemiological studies on alcohol and CVD. More fine-grained attention to patterns of alcohol industry funding and to key nodes may shed further light on how far industry funding may be responsible for conflicting findings on alcohol and CVD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim McCambridge
- Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
| | - Su Golder
- Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Barbosa-Liz DM, Giannakopoulos NN, Carvajal-Flórez Á, Zapata-Noreña Ó, Faggion CM. Overview of systematic reviews on periodontal-orthodontic interactions: A comprehensive literature analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res 2024; 27:193-202. [PMID: 37909862 DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
The aims of this research were to investigate the methodological quality of systematic reviews on periodontal-orthodontic interactions (i.e. reviews of primary research broadly defined as any including both periodontic and orthodontic components) and to provide a mapping of the researched topics. We searched four major databases (PubMed, Lilacs, Web of Science, and Embase) for systematic reviews of periodontal-orthodontic interactions. We used the AMSTAR-2 tool (the acronym is derived from 'a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews') to assess the methodological quality of the included systematic reviews. Individual AMSTAR-2 ratings were tabulated, and the percentage per item was calculated. To assess the association between the AMSTAR-2 percentage score and the overall confidence in the systematic review results, an ordinal regression model was used. We initially retrieved 973 documents, and 43 systematic reviews were included. Systematic reviews of interventions were the most prevalent (n = 26, 60.5%). Most of the systematic reviews did not report a meta-analysis (n = 25, 58.1%). In addition, most of the studies included in the systematic reviews had an unclear or high risk of bias. Most of the systematic reviews were rated as having critically low or low overall confidence (n = 34, 79.1%). A significant correlation was found between the AMSTAR-2 percentage score and overall confidence in the results. The methodological quality of systematic reviews on periodontal-orthodontic interactions can be improved. The limitations of our study include potential language bias and an arbitrary classification of the topics researched.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana María Barbosa-Liz
- Orthodontic Postgraduate Program, Gionorto Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Nikolaos Nikitas Giannakopoulos
- Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Álvaro Carvajal-Flórez
- Orthodontic Postgraduate Program, Gionorto Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Óscar Zapata-Noreña
- Orthodontic Postgraduate Program, Gionorto Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Clovis Mariano Faggion
- Department of Periodontology and Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Frith H, Jankowski GS. Psychosocial impact of androgenetic alopecia on men: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PSYCHOL HEALTH MED 2024; 29:822-842. [PMID: 37605428 DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2023.2242049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
The adverse psychosocial impact of androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is often framed as an essential motivation for developing efficacious treatments to halt hair loss or promote regrowth, especially since AGA is common among men but does not result in physically harmful or life-limiting consequences. Yet, empirical evidence documenting the impact of AGA on men's psychological wellbeing and quality of life is patchy and has not previously been subject to systematic review. This systemic review and meta-analyses aim to integrate and evaluate evidence regarding the psychosocial impact of AGA on men. A database and manual reference search identified English-language articles which reported: 1) empirical research; of ii) psychosocial distress (mental health, depression, anxiety, self-esteem, or quality of life); and iii) data separately for male AGA participants. Screening of 607 articles resulted in 37 (6%) for inclusion. PRISMA guidelines, the (modified) AXIS quality assessment tool, and independent extraction were deployed. Heterogeneity in measures and study aims, moderate study quality (M = 7.37, SD = 1.31), probable conflicts of interest (78%) and biased samples (68%) suggest that results should be treated cautiously. Meta-analyses revealed no impact on depression (pooled M = 8.8, 95% CI = 6.8-10.8) and moderate impact on quality of life (pooled m = 9.12, 95% CI = 6.14-12.10). Men with AGA were found to have average or better mental health compared to those without AGA. Overall, there was limited evidence of a severe impact on mental health and quality of life for men experiencing hair loss, with most studies evidencing (at best) a moderate impact. Good dermatological care includes accurately educating about the psychosocial impact of AGA on men, taking care not to overstate levels of distress, and screening for distress using validated measures which have clear clinical thresholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Frith
- School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Takata ET, Eschert J, Stafford K, Alejo A, Yu AS, Saffer R, Shaikhly M, Luong L, O’Connor C, Motupally S, Staff I, Walker A, Finkel KJ. Attitudes Towards Conflicts of Interest in Medical Research: A Survey of US Medical Students. MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR 2024; 34:429-437. [PMID: 38686160 PMCID: PMC11055806 DOI: 10.1007/s40670-024-02002-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
Industry funds nearly two-thirds of US healthcare research, and industry-sponsorship may produce more favorable research results and conclusions. Medical students report feeling inadequately prepared to avoid negative industry influence. Research of educational interventions that educate students on the potential effects of industry influence is lacking, and no interventions have demonstrated long-term benefit. Surveying and assessing student opinions of the relationship between industry and research may help improve future educational interventions. We surveyed preclinical and clinical students at seven US medical schools regarding their attitudes towards industry conflicts of interest (COIs) in medical research. A total of 466 medical students including 232 preclinical and 234 clinical students completed the survey. Of those who had research experience, clinical students were more likely than preclinical students to look for COIs (62.0% v 45.9%, p = .014) and to consider whether author COIs are pertinent to the article (68.1% v 54.1%, p = .023). Many disagreed that they felt adequately educated on the issue of COIs (42.7%), but most agreed that medical school should take a role in guiding student interactions with industry (65.0%). Students responded that all listed financial relationships between industry and investigator, except for providing food and/or beverage, would likely bias the investigator's research. Many students feel inadequately educated on industry issues in biomedical research, and most believe medical schools should help guide interactions with industry. Our findings support further development of educational interventions that prepare students to navigate the relationship between industry and medical research during and after medical school.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmund T. Takata
- New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY USA
| | - John Eschert
- Integrated Anesthesia Associates, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT USA
| | - Kerri Stafford
- New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY USA
| | - Andrew Alejo
- Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH USA
| | | | - Ryan Saffer
- Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, FL USA
| | - Marianna Shaikhly
- Kansas City University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City, MO USA
| | - Lucas Luong
- University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT USA
| | - Cameron O’Connor
- Quinnipiac University Frank H. Netter M.D. School of Medicine, North Haven, CT USA
| | - Saagar Motupally
- Integrated Anesthesia Associates, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT USA
| | - Ilene Staff
- Research Program, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT USA
| | - Aseel Walker
- Integrated Anesthesia Associates, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT USA
| | - Kevin J. Finkel
- Integrated Anesthesia Associates, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mintzes B. Information on medicines: Does independence from industry influence matter? Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med 2024; 16:e1-e2. [PMID: 38572857 PMCID: PMC11019035 DOI: 10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
No abstract available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Mintzes
- School of Pharmacy and Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Naing C, Ni H, Aung HH, Pavlov CS. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 3:CD014944. [PMID: 38517086 PMCID: PMC10958761 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014944.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The sphincter of Oddi comprises a muscular complex encircling the distal part of the common bile duct and the pancreatic duct regulating the outflow from these ducts. Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction refers to the abnormal opening and closing of the muscular valve, which impairs the circulation of bile and pancreatic juices. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of any type of endoscopic sphincterotomy compared with a placebo drug, sham operation, or any pharmaceutical treatment, administered orally or endoscopically, alone or in combination, or a different type of endoscopic sphincterotomy in adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. SEARCH METHODS We used extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 16 May 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised clinical trials assessing any type of endoscopic sphincterotomy versus placebo drug, sham operation, or any pharmaceutical treatment, alone or in combination, or a different type of endoscopic sphincterotomy in adults diagnosed with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, irrespective of year, language of publication, format, or outcomes reported. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods and Review Manager to prepare the review. Our primary outcomes were: proportion of participants without successful treatment; proportion of participants with one or more serious adverse events; and health-related quality of life. Our secondary outcomes were: all-cause mortality; proportion of participants with one or more non-serious adverse events; length of hospital stay; and proportion of participants without improvement in liver function tests. We used the outcome data at the longest follow-up and the random-effects model for our primary analyses. We assessed the risk of bias of the included trials using RoB 2 and the certainty of evidence using GRADE. We planned to present the results of time-to-event outcomes as hazard ratios (HR). We presented dichotomous outcomes as risk ratios (RR) and continuous outcomes as mean difference (MD) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN RESULTS We included four randomised clinical trials, including 433 participants. Trials were published between 1989 and 2015. The trial participants had sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Two trials were conducted in the USA, one in Australia, and one in Japan. One was a multicentre trial conducted in seven US centres, and the remaining three were single-centre trials. One trial used a two-stage randomisation, resulting in two comparisons. The number of participants in the four trials ranged from 47 to 214 (median 86), with a median age of 45 years, and the mean proportion of males was 49%. The follow-up duration ranged from one year to four years after the end of treatment. All trials assessed one or more outcomes of interest to our review. The trials provided data for the comparisons and outcomes below, in conformity with our review protocol. The certainty of evidence for all the outcomes was very low. Endoscopic sphincterotomy versus sham Endoscopic sphincterotomy versus sham may have little to no effect on treatment success (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.66; 3 trials, 340 participants; follow-up range 1 to 4 years); serious adverse events (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.46; 1 trial, 214 participants; follow-up 1 year), health-related quality of life (Physical scale) (MD -1.00, 95% CI -3.84 to 1.84; 1 trial, 214 participants; follow-up 1 year), health-related quality of life (Mental scale) (MD -1.00, 95% CI -4.16 to 2.16; 1 trial, 214 participants; follow-up 1 year), and no improvement in liver function test (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.26; 1 trial, 47 participants; follow-up 1 year), but the evidence is very uncertain. Endoscopic sphincterotomy versus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation Endoscopic sphincterotomy versus endoscopic papillary balloon dilationmay have little to no effect on serious adverse events (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.15; 1 trial, 91 participants; follow-up 1 year), but the evidence is very uncertain. Endoscopic sphincterotomy versus dual endoscopic sphincterotomy Endoscopic sphincterotomy versus dual endoscopic sphincterotomy may have little to no effect on treatment success (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.31; 1 trial, 99 participants; follow-up 1 year), but the evidence is very uncertain. Funding One trial did not provide any information on sponsorship; one trial was funded by a foundation (the National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIDDK), and two trials seemed to be funded by the local health institutes or universities where the investigators worked. We did not identify any ongoing randomised clinical trials. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on very low-certainty evidence from the trials included in this review, we do not know if endoscopic sphincterotomy versus sham or versus dual endoscopic sphincterotomy increases, reduces, or makes no difference to the number of people with treatment success; if endoscopic sphincterotomy versus sham or versus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation increases, reduces, or makes no difference to serious adverse events; or if endoscopic sphincterotomy versus sham improves, worsens, or makes no difference to health-related quality of life and liver function tests in adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Evidence on the effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy compared with sham, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation,or dual endoscopic sphincterotomyon all-cause mortality, non-serious adverse events, and length of hospital stay is lacking. We found no trials comparing endoscopic sphincterotomy versus a placebo drug or versus any other pharmaceutical treatment, alone or in combination. All four trials were underpowered and lacked trial data on clinically important outcomes. We lack randomised clinical trials assessing clinically and patient-relevant outcomes to demonstrate the effects of endoscopic sphincterotomy in adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cho Naing
- Division of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia
| | - Han Ni
- Department of Medicine, Newcastle University Medicine Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia
| | - Htar Htar Aung
- School of Medicine, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Chavdar S Pavlov
- Department of Gastroenterology, Botkin Hospital, Moscow, Russian Federation
- Department of Therapy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bartels K, Afonso S, Brown L, Carriles C, Kim R, Lazier J, Mercimek-Andrews S, Nelson TN, Stedman I, Thain E, Vanneste R, Chad L. Next generation of free? Points to consider when navigating sponsored genetic testing. J Med Genet 2024; 61:299-304. [PMID: 37932018 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2023-109571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
Genetics has been integrated into patient care across many subspecialties. However, genetic and genomic testing (GT) remain expensive with disparities in access both within Canada and internationally. It is, therefore, not surprising that sponsored GT has emerged as one alternative. Sponsored GT, for the purpose of this document, refers to clinical-grade GT partially or fully subsidised by industry. In return, industry sponsors-usually pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies-may have access to patients' genetic data, practitioner information, DNA and/or other information. The availability of sponsored GT options in the Canadian healthcare landscape has appeared to simplify patient and practitioner access to GT, but the potential ethical and legal considerations, as well as the nuances of a publicly funded healthcare system, must also be considered. This document offers preliminary guidance for Canadian healthcare practitioners encountering sponsored GT in practice. Further research and dialogue is urgently needed to explore this issue to provide fulsome considerations that one must be aware of when availing such options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten Bartels
- Department of Medicine, Providence Health Care Heart Centre, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Samantha Afonso
- Heart, Lung and Vascular Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lindsay Brown
- Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Claudia Carriles
- Genomics Laboratory, Shared Health Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Raymond Kim
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joanna Lazier
- Medical Genetics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Tanya N Nelson
- Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ian Stedman
- School of Public Policy and Administration, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emily Thain
- Familial Cancer Clinic, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Vanneste
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Lauren Chad
- Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Bioethics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Win TZ, Perinpanathan T, Mukadi P, Smith C, Edwards T, Han SM, Maung HT, Brett-Major DM, Lee N. Antibiotic prophylaxis for leptospirosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 3:CD014959. [PMID: 38483067 PMCID: PMC10938880 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014959.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Leptospirosis is a global zoonotic and waterborne disease caused by pathogenic Leptospira species. Antibiotics are used as a strategy for prevention of leptospirosis, in particular in travellers and high-risk groups. However, the clinical benefits are unknown, especially when considering possible treatment-associated adverse effects. This review assesses the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in leptospirosis and is an update of a previously published review in the Cochrane Library (2009, Issue 3). OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of antibiotic prophylaxis for human leptospirosis. SEARCH METHODS We identified randomised clinical trials through electronic searches of the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded, and other resources. We searched online clinical trial registries to identify unpublished or ongoing trials. We checked reference lists of the retrieved studies for further trials. The last date of search was 17 April 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised clinical trials of any trial design, assessing antibiotics for prevention of leptospirosis, and with no restrictions on age, sex, occupation, or comorbidity of trial participants. We looked for trials assessing antibiotics irrespective of route of administration, dosage, and schedule versus placebo or no intervention. We also included trials assessing antibiotics versus other antibiotics using these criteria, or the same antibiotic but with another dose or schedule. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We followed Cochrane methodology. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, laboratory-confirmed leptospirosis regardless of the presence of an identified clinical syndrome (inclusive of asymptomatic cases), clinical diagnosis of leptospirosis regardless of the presence of laboratory confirmation, clinical diagnosis of leptospirosis confirmed by laboratory diagnosis (exclusive of asymptomatic cases), and serious adverse events. The secondary outcomes were quality of life and the proportion of people with non-serious adverse events. We assessed the risk of bias of the included trials using the RoB 2 tool and the certainty of evidence using GRADE. We presented dichotomous outcomes as risk ratios (RR) and continuous outcomes as mean difference (MD), with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used a random-effects model for our main analyses and the fixed-effect model for sensitivity analyses. Our primary outcome analyses included trial data at the longest follow-up. MAIN RESULTS We identified five randomised clinical trials comprising 2593 participants that compared antibiotics (doxycycline, azithromycin, or penicillin) with placebo, or one antibiotic compared with another. Four trials assessed doxycycline with different durations, one trial assessed azithromycin, and one trial assessed penicillin. One trial had three intervention groups: doxycycline, azithromycin, and placebo. Three trials assessed pre-exposure prophylaxis, one trial assessed postexposure prophylaxis, and one did not report this clearly. Four trials recruited residents in endemic areas, and one trial recruited soldiers who experienced limited time exposure. The participants' ages in the included trials were 10 to 80 years. Follow-up ranged from one to three months. Antibiotics versus placebo Doxycycline compared with placebo may result in little to no difference in all-cause mortality (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.83; 1 trial, 782 participants; low-certainty evidence). Prophylactic antibiotics may have little to no effect on laboratory-confirmed leptospirosis, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.26; 5 trials, 2593 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Antibiotics may result in little to no difference in the clinical diagnosis of leptospirosis regardless of laboratory confirmation (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.08; 4 trials, 1653 participants; low-certainty evidence) and the clinical diagnosis of leptospirosis with laboratory confirmation (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.26; 4 trials, 1653 participants; low-certainty evidence). Antibiotics compared with placebo may increase non-serious adverse events, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 10.13, 95% CI 2.40 to 42.71; 3 trials, 1909 participants; very low-certainty evidence). One antibiotic versus another antibiotic One trial assessed doxycycline versus azithromycin but did not report mortality. Compared to azithromycin, doxycycline may have little to no effect on laboratory-confirmed leptospirosis regardless of the presence of an identified clinical syndrome (RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.51 to 4.32; 1 trial, 137 participants), on the clinical diagnosis of leptospirosis regardless of the presence of laboratory confirmation (RR 4.18, 95% CI 0.94 to 18.66; 1 trial, 137 participants), on the clinical diagnosis of leptospirosis confirmed by laboratory diagnosis (RR 4.18, 95% CI 0.94 to 18.66; 1 trial, 137 participants), and on non-serious adverse events (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.36 to 3.48; 1 trial, 137 participants), but the evidence is very uncertain. The certainty of evidence for all the outcomes was very low. None of the five included trials reported serious adverse events or assessed quality of life. One study is awaiting classification. Funding Four of the five trials included statements disclosing their funding/supporting sources, and the remaining trial did not include this. Three of the four trials that disclosed their supporting sources received the supply of trial drugs directly from the same pharmaceutical company, and the remaining trial received financial support from a governmental source. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We do not know if antibiotics versus placebo or another antibiotic has little or have no effect on all-cause mortality or leptospirosis infection because the certainty of evidence is low or very low. We do not know if antibiotics versus placebo may increase the overall risk of non-serious adverse events because of very low-certainty evidence. We lack definitive rigorous data from randomised trials to support the use of antibiotics for the prophylaxis of leptospirosis infection. We lack trials reporting data on clinically relevant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tin Zar Win
- School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Tanaraj Perinpanathan
- School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Patrick Mukadi
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
- Program for Nurturing Global Leaders in Tropical and Emerging Communicable Diseases, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
- Institut National de Recherche Biomedicale (INRB), Kinshasa, DRC
| | - Chris Smith
- School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Tansy Edwards
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Su Myat Han
- School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Hsu Thinzar Maung
- School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - David M Brett-Major
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nathaniel Lee
- School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gomes CM, Marchini G, de Bessa J, Carvalhal G, Caldeira MPR, Saldiva PH, Krieger JE, Agena F, Reis S, Paschoal C, Froes M, Srougi M, Nahas WC, Favorito LA. The landscape of biomedical research funding in Brazil: a current overview. Int Braz J Urol 2024; 50:209-222. [PMID: 38386791 PMCID: PMC10953608 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2024.9905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this narrative review is to discuss the current state of research funding in Brazil. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study is based on the most recent edition of the course Funding for Research and Innovation in the University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine which was a three-day course with 12 hours of instruction. The course brought together leading experts in the field to comprehensively discuss the current state of research funding in Brazil. Each speaker provided a presentation on a specific topic related to research funding. After the workshop, speakers assembled relevant topics in this manuscript. RESULTS collaborative research is critical for securing research funding. It optimizes proposal competitiveness, amplifies societal impact, and manages risks effectively. As such, fostering and supporting these collaborations is paramount for both researchers and funding agencies. To maintain the highest integrity in research, investigators involved in these collaborations must disclose any relationships that could potentially influence the outcomes or interpretation of their projects. CONCLUSIONS In Brazil, the mainstay of research funding stems from public entities, with agencies such as CNPq, CAPES, and state bodies like FAPESP, FAPERJ, FAPEMIG and others at the forefront. Concurrently, industry funding offers viable pathways, especially through industry-sponsored studies, investigator-led projects, and collaborative initiatives. The Brazilian funding landscape is further enriched by innovative platforms, including crowdfunding and the contributions of institutions like the Serrapilheira Institute. Internationally, esteemed organizations such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation stand out as potential funders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiano M. Gomes
- Universidade de São PauloHospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de MedicinaDepartamento de UrologiaSão PauloSPBrasilDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
| | - Giovanni Marchini
- Universidade de São PauloHospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de MedicinaDepartamento de UrologiaSão PauloSPBrasilDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
| | - Jose de Bessa
- Universidade Estadual de Feira de SantanaDepartamento de CirurgiaFeira de SantanaBABrasilDepartamento de Cirurgia, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana - UEFS, Feira de Santana, BA, Brasil;
| | - Gustavo Carvalhal
- Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreRSBrasilPontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul – PUC RS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil;
| | - Marina P. R. Caldeira
- Universidade de São PauloFaculdade de MedicinaUnidade de Apoio à Pesquisa e InovaçãoSão PauloSPBrasilUnidade de Apoio à Pesquisa e Inovação, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
| | - Paulo Hilario Saldiva
- Universidade de São PauloFaculdade de MedicinaDepartamento de PatologiaSão PauloSPBrasilDepartamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
| | - Jose Eduardo Krieger
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São PauloHospital das ClínicasInstituto do CoraçãoSão PauloSPBrasilInstituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
| | - Fabiana Agena
- Universidade de São PauloHospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de MedicinaDepartamento de UrologiaSão PauloSPBrasilDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
| | - Sabrina Reis
- Universidade de São PauloHospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de MedicinaDepartamento de UrologiaSão PauloSPBrasilDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
| | - Candice Paschoal
- Universidade de São PauloHospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de MedicinaDepartamento de UrologiaSão PauloSPBrasilDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
| | - Milena Froes
- Universidade de São PauloEscola de EnfermagemSão PauloSPBrasilEscola de Enfermagem da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
| | - Miguel Srougi
- Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e EnsinoSão PauloSPBrasilInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
| | - William C. Nahas
- Universidade de São PauloHospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de MedicinaDepartamento de UrologiaSão PauloSPBrasilDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
| | - Luciano A. Favorito
- Universidade Estadual do Rio de JaneiroUnidade de Pesquisa UrogenitalRio de JaneiroRJBrasilUnidade de Pesquisa Urogenital – Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cohen SE, Zantvoord JB, Storosum BWC, Mattila TK, Daams J, Wezenberg B, de Boer A, Denys DAJP. Influence of study characteristics, methodological rigour and publication bias on efficacy of pharmacotherapy in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, placebo-controlled trials. BMJ MENTAL HEALTH 2024; 27:e300951. [PMID: 38350669 PMCID: PMC10862307 DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
QUESTION We examined the effect of study characteristics, risk of bias and publication bias on the efficacy of pharmacotherapy in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS We conducted a systematic search of double-blinded, placebo-controlled, short-term RCTs with selective serotonergic reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or clomipramine. We performed a random-effect meta-analysis using change in the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) as the primary outcome. We performed meta-regression for risk of bias, intervention, sponsor status, number of trial arms, use of placebo run-in, dosing, publication year, age, severity, illness duration and gender distribution. Furthermore, we analysed publication bias using a Bayesian selection model. FINDINGS We screened 3729 articles and included 21 studies, with 4102 participants. Meta-analysis showed an effect size of -0.59 (Hedges' G, 95% CI -0.73 to -0.46), equalling a 4.2-point reduction in the YBOCS compared with placebo. The most recent trial was performed in 2007 and most trials were at risk of bias. We found an indication for publication bias, and subsequent correction for this bias resulted in a depleted effect size. In our meta-regression, we found that high risk of bias was associated with a larger effect size. Clomipramine was more effective than SSRIs, even after correcting for risk of bias. After correction for multiple testing, other selected predictors were non-significant. CONCLUSIONS Our findings reveal superiority of clomipramine over SSRIs, even after adjusting for risk of bias. Effect sizes may be attenuated when considering publication bias and methodological rigour, emphasising the importance of robust studies to guide clinical utility of OCD pharmacotherapy. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42023394924.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sem E Cohen
- Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jasper Brian Zantvoord
- Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bram W C Storosum
- Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joost Daams
- Medical Library, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Babet Wezenberg
- Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anthonius de Boer
- Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Damiaan A J P Denys
- Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Shrestha R, Saito H, Yamashita E, Shrestha S, Tanimoto T, Ozaki A. Nature and Trend of Pharmaceutical Payments to Japanese Board-Certified Neurologists Between 2016 and 2019: A Pre-emergence Analysis Amidst the Development of Next-Generation Alzheimer's Disease Drugs. Cureus 2024; 16:e53848. [PMID: 38465045 PMCID: PMC10924646 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is insufficient data on the financial relationships between Japanese neurologists and pharmaceutical companies prior to the advent of new-generation Alzheimer's disease drugs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the magnitude, prevalence, and trend of the financial relationship between Japanese neurologists and pharmaceutical companies between 2016 and 2019. METHODS A cross-sectional study was undertaken to evaluate the financial relationships between all board-certified neurology specialists and pharmaceutical companies in Japan from 2016 and 2019. Descriptive statistics were applied to measure the magnitude and prevalence of payments among specialists, as well as their trends during the study periods. RESULTS In a four-year analysis, 77 pharmaceutical companies disbursed a total of USD 36,869,204 across 50,050 payments to 2,696 neurologists in Japan, revealing a mean payment of USD 10,809 per specialist. Notably, the Gini index of 0.997 indicated a high inequality in payment distribution, with a minority of specialists receiving a substantial proportion of payments. Trends displayed irregularities, but an overall increase in total payments from 2016 to 2019, with a significant contribution from the top 10 pharmaceutical companies accounting for 74.2% of total payments, with Takeda Pharmaceutical and Eisai Company notably increasing payments in 2019. There were notable geographical variations in neurologist and payment distribution across 47 prefectures. CONCLUSION Our analysis of neurologist payments from pharmaceutical companies in Japan showed a substantial financial relationship with overall increases, yearly varied increments, and payment inequality. Caution is warranted as financial ties may intensify with the continued development of next-generation Alzheimer's disease drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajeev Shrestha
- Palliative Care and Chronic Disease, Green Pastures Hospital, Pokhara, NPL
| | | | - Erika Yamashita
- Heart Care, Medical Governance Research Institute, Tokyo, JPN
| | | | | | - Akihiko Ozaki
- Surgery, Graduate School of Public Health, Teikyo University, Tokyo, JPN
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Moens M, Van Doorslaer L, Billot M, Eeckman E, Roulaud M, Rigoard P, Fobelets M, Goudman L. Examining the Type, Quality, and Content of Web-Based Information for People With Chronic Pain Interested in Spinal Cord Stimulation: Social Listening Study. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e48599. [PMID: 38289645 PMCID: PMC10865187 DOI: 10.2196/48599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increased availability of web-based medical information has encouraged patients with chronic pain to seek health care information from multiple sources, such as consultation with health care providers combined with web-based information. The type and quality of information that is available on the web is very heterogeneous, in terms of content, reliability, and trustworthiness. To date, no studies have evaluated what information is available about neuromodulation on the web for patients with chronic pain. OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore the type, quality, and content of web-based information regarding spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for chronic pain that is freely available and targeted at health care consumers. METHODS The social listening tool Awario was used to search Facebook (Meta Platforms, Inc), Twitter (Twitter, Inc), YouTube (Google LLC), Instagram (Meta Platforms, Inc), blogs, and the web for suitable hits with "pain" and "neuromodulation" as keywords. Quality appraisal of the extracted information was performed using the DISCERN instrument. A thematic analysis through inductive coding was conducted. RESULTS The initial search identified 2174 entries, of which 630 (28.98%) entries were eventually withheld, which could be categorized as web pages, including news and blogs (114/630, 18.1%); Reddit (Reddit, Inc) posts (32/630, 5.1%); Vimeo (Vimeo, Inc) hits (38/630, 6%); or YouTube (Google LLC) hits (446/630, 70.8%). Most posts originated in the United States (519/630, 82.4%). Regarding the content of information, 66.2% (383/579) of the entries discussed (fully discussed or partially discussed) how SCS works. In total, 55.6% (322/579) of the entries did not elaborate on the fact that there may be >1 potential treatment choice and 47.7% (276/579) did not discuss the influence of SCS on the overall quality of life. The inductive coding revealed 4 main themes. The first theme of pain and the burden of pain (1274/8886, 14.34% coding references) explained about pain, pain management, individual impact of pain, and patient experiences. The second theme included neuromodulation as a treatment approach (3258/8886, 36.66% coding references), incorporating the background on neuromodulation, patient-centered care, SCS therapy, and risks. Third, several device-related aspects (1722/8886, 19.38% coding references) were presented. As a final theme, patient benefits and testimonials of treatment with SCS (2632/8886, 29.62% coding references) were revealed with subthemes regarding patient benefits, eligibility, and testimonials and expectations. CONCLUSIONS Health care consumers have access to web-based information about SCS, where details about the surgical procedures, the type of material, working mechanisms, risks, patient expectations, testimonials, and the potential benefits of this therapy are discussed. The reliability, trustworthiness, and correctness of web-based sources should be carefully considered before automatically relying on the content.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten Moens
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- STIMULUS (reSearch and TeachIng neuroModULation Uz bruSsel) Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Center for Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Leen Van Doorslaer
- STIMULUS (reSearch and TeachIng neuroModULation Uz bruSsel) Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Maxime Billot
- PRISMATICS (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery) Lab, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Edgard Eeckman
- ECHO Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Manuel Roulaud
- PRISMATICS (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery) Lab, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Philippe Rigoard
- PRISMATICS (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery) Lab, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
- Department of Spine Surgery & Neuromodulation, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
- Pprime Institute UPR 3346, CNRS, ISAE-ENSMA, University of Poitiers, Chasseneuil-du-Poitou, France
| | - Maaike Fobelets
- Biostatistics and Medical Informatics Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Brussels Institute for Teacher Education, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lisa Goudman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- STIMULUS (reSearch and TeachIng neuroModULation Uz bruSsel) Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Center for Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pelgrim TAD, Philipsen A, Young AH, Juruena M, Jimenez E, Vieta E, Jukić M, Van der Eycken E, Heilbronner U, Moldovan R, Kas MJH, Jagesar RR, Nöthen MM, Hoffmann P, Shomron N, Kilarski LL, van Amelsvoort T, Campforts B, van Westrhenen R. A New Intervention for Implementation of Pharmacogenetics in Psychiatry: A Description of the PSY-PGx Clinical Study. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2024; 17:151. [PMID: 38399366 PMCID: PMC10892863 DOI: 10.3390/ph17020151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background Pharmacological treatment for psychiatric disorders has shown to only be effective in about one-third of patients, as it is associated with frequent treatment failure, often because of side effects, and a long process of trial-and-error pharmacotherapy until an effective and tolerable treatment is found. This notion emphasizes the urgency for a personalized medicine approach in psychiatry. (2) Methods This prospective patient- and rater-blinded, randomized, controlled study will investigate the effect of dose-adjustment of antidepressants escitalopram and sertraline or antipsychotics risperidone and aripiprazole according to the latest state-of-the-art international dosing recommendations for CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 metabolizer status in patients with mood, anxiety, and psychotic disorders. A total sample of N = 2500 will be recruited at nine sites in seven countries (expected drop-out rate of 30%). Patients will be randomized to a pharmacogenetic group or a dosing-as-usual group and treated over a 24-week period with four study visits. The primary outcome is personal recovery using the Recovery Assessment Scale as assessed by the patient (RAS-DS), with secondary outcomes including clinical effects (response or symptomatic remission), side effects, general well-being, digital phenotyping, and psychosocial functioning. (3) Conclusions This is, to our knowledge, the first international, multi-center, non-industry-sponsored randomized controlled trial (RCT) that may provide insights into the effectiveness and utility of implementing pharmacogenetic-guided treatment of psychiatric disorders, and as such, results will be incorporated in already available dosing guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teuntje A. D. Pelgrim
- Department of Psychiatry, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, 1062HN Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra Philipsen
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, 53105 Bonn, Germany
| | - Allan H. Young
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London & South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Monks Orchard Road Beckenham, Kent BR3 3BX, UK
| | - Mario Juruena
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London & South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Monks Orchard Road Beckenham, Kent BR3 3BX, UK
| | - Ester Jimenez
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Hospital Clinic & Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, ISCIII, University of Barcelona, 08036 Catalonia, Spain
| | - Eduard Vieta
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Hospital Clinic & Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, ISCIII, University of Barcelona, 08036 Catalonia, Spain
| | - Marin Jukić
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
- Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Erik Van der Eycken
- Global Alliance of Mental Illness Advocacy Networks-Europe (GAMIAN-Europe), 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Urs Heilbronner
- Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics (IPPG), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Ramona Moldovan
- Department of Psychology, Babeş-Bolyai University, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
- Manchester Center for Genomic Medicine, St. Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Martien J. H. Kas
- Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, 9700CC Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Raj R. Jagesar
- Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, 9700CC Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Markus M. Nöthen
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital of Bonn and University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Per Hoffmann
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital of Bonn and University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Noam Shomron
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
| | - Laura L. Kilarski
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, 53105 Bonn, Germany
| | - Thérèse van Amelsvoort
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, 6226NB Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bea Campforts
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, 6226NB Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Roos van Westrhenen
- Department of Psychiatry, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, 1062HN Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London & South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Monks Orchard Road Beckenham, Kent BR3 3BX, UK
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, 6226NB Maastricht, The Netherlands
- St. John’s National Academy of Health Sciences, Bangalore 560034, India
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Omerovic E, Petrie M, Redfors B, Fremes S, Murphy G, Marquis-Gravel G, Lansky A, Velazquez E, Perera D, Reid C, Smith J, van der Meer P, Lipsic E, Juni P, McMurray J, Bauersachs J, Køber L, Rouleau JL, Doenst T. Pragmatic randomized controlled trials: strengthening the concept through a robust international collaborative network: PRIME-9-Pragmatic Research and Innovation through Multinational Experimentation. Trials 2024; 25:80. [PMID: 38263138 PMCID: PMC10807265 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-07935-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
In an era focused on value-based healthcare, the quality of healthcare and resource allocation should be underpinned by empirical evidence. Pragmatic clinical trials (pRCTs) are essential in this endeavor, providing randomized controlled trial (RCT) insights that encapsulate real-world effects of interventions. The rising popularity of pRCTs can be attributed to their ability to mirror real-world practices, accommodate larger sample sizes, and provide cost advantages over traditional RCTs. By harmonizing efficacy with effectiveness, pRCTs assist decision-makers in prioritizing interventions that have a substantial public health impact and align with the tenets of value-based health care. An international network for pRCT provides several advantages, including larger and diverse patient populations, access to a broader range of healthcare settings, sharing knowledge and expertise, and overcoming ethical and regulatory barriers. The hypothesis and study design of pRCT answers the decision-maker's questions. pRCT compares clinically relevant alternative interventions, recruits participants from diverse practice settings, and collects data on various health outcomes. They are scarce because the medical products industry typically does not fund pRCT. Prioritizing these studies by expanding the infrastructure to conduct clinical research within the healthcare delivery system and increasing public and private funding for these studies will be necessary to facilitate pRCTs. These changes require more clinical and health policy decision-makers in clinical research priority setting, infrastructure development, and funding. This paper presents a comprehensive overview of pRCTs, emphasizing their importance in evidence-based medicine and the advantages of an international collaborative network for their execution. It details the development of PRIME-9, an international initiative across nine countries to advance pRCTs, and explores various statistical approaches for these trials. The paper underscores the need to overcome current challenges, such as funding limitations and infrastructural constraints, to leverage the full potential of pRCTs in optimizing healthcare quality and resource utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elmir Omerovic
- Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Bruna Stråket 16, 41345, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Mark Petrie
- British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Björn Redfors
- Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Bruna Stråket 16, 41345, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Stephen Fremes
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gavin Murphy
- Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester, LE3 9QP, UK
| | | | - Alexandra Lansky
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Eric Velazquez
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Divaka Perera
- British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence and National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre at the School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Christopher Reid
- Curtin School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia
| | - Julian Smith
- Department of Surgery (School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health), Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter van der Meer
- Department of Cardiology, Center for Blistering Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Eric Lipsic
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Peter Juni
- Oxford Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - John McMurray
- British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Johann Bauersachs
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Lars Køber
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jean L Rouleau
- Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Torsten Doenst
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Feinberg C, Mayes KD, Portman E, Carr C, Mannix R. Non-invasive fluid biomarkers in the diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI): a systematic review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2024; 95:184-192. [PMID: 37147117 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-331220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite approximately 55.9 million annual mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) worldwide, the accurate diagnosis of mTBI continues to challenge clinicians due to symptom ambiguity, reliance on subjective report and presentation variability. Non-invasive fluid biomarkers of mTBI offer a biological measure to diagnose and monitor mTBI without the need for blood draws or neuroimaging. The objective of this study is to systematically review the utility of such biomarkers to diagnose mTBI and predict disease progression. METHODS A systematic review performed in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and Web of Science followed by a manual search of references without a specified timeframe. Search strings were generated and run (27 June 2022) by a research librarian. Studies were included if they: (1) included human mTBI subjects, (2) assessed utility of a non-invasive biomarker and (3) published in English. Exclusion criteria were (1) non-mTBI subjects, (2) mTBI not assessed separately from moderate/severe TBI, (3) required intracranial haemorrhage or (4) solely assesses genetic susceptibility to mTBI. RESULTS A total of 29 studies from 27 subject populations (1268 mTBI subjects) passed the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Twelve biomarkers were studied. Salivary RNAs, including microRNA, were assessed in 11 studies. Cortisol and melatonin were assessed in four and three studies, respectively. Eight salivary and two urinary biomarkers contained diagnostic or disease monitoring capability. DISCUSSION This systematic review identified several salivary and urinary biomarkers that demonstrate the potential to be used as a diagnostic, prognostic and monitoring tool for mTBI. Further research should examine miRNA-based models for diagnostic and predictive utility in patients with mTBI. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022329293.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Feinberg
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School TH Chan School of Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Ellie Portman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Catherine Carr
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School TH Chan School of Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rebekah Mannix
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Choi H, Song S, Ahn H, Yang H, Lim H, Park Y, Kim J, Yong H, Yoon M, Han MA. Trends in Research on Patients With COVID-19 in Korean Medical Journals. J Prev Med Public Health 2024; 57:47-54. [PMID: 38272016 PMCID: PMC10861326 DOI: 10.3961/jpmph.23.254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study was conducted to systematically summarize trends in research concerning patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as reported in Korean medical journals. METHODS We performed a literature search of KoreaMed from January 2020 to September 2022. We included only primary studies of patients with COVID-19. Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts, then performed full-text screening, both independently and in duplicate. We first identified the 5 journals with the greatest numbers of eligible publications, then extracted data pertaining to the general characteristics, study population attributes, and research features of papers published in these journals. RESULTS Our analysis encompassed 142 primary studies. Of these, approximately 41.0% reported a funding source, while 3.5% disclosed a conflict of interest. In 2020, 42.9% of studies included fewer than 10 participants; however, by 2022, the proportion of studies with over 200 participants had increased to 40.6%. The most common design was the cohort study (48.6%), followed by case reports/series (35.2%). Only 3 randomized controlled trials were identified. Studies most frequently focused on prognosis (58.5%), followed by therapy/intervention (20.4%). Regarding the type of intervention/exposure, therapeutic clinical interventions comprised 26.1%, while studies of morbidity accounted for 13.4%. As for the outcomes measured, 50.7% of studies assessed symptoms/clinical status/improvement, and 14.1% evaluated mortality. CONCLUSIONS Employing a systematic approach, we examined the characteristics of research involving patients with COVID-19 that was published in Korean medical journals from 2020 onward. Subsequent research should assess not only publication trends over a longer timeframe but also the quality of evidence provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heejeong Choi
- Department of Medicine, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Seunggwan Song
- Department of Medicine, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Heesang Ahn
- Department of Medicine, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Hyobean Yang
- Department of Medicine, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Hyeonseong Lim
- Department of Medicine, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Yohan Park
- Department of Medicine, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Juhyun Kim
- Department of Medicine, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Hongju Yong
- Department of Medicine, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Minseok Yoon
- Department of Medicine, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Mi Ah Han
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sieferle K, Schaefer C, Bitzer EM. Management of evidence and conflict of interest in guidelines on early childhood allergy prevention and child nutrition: study protocol of a systematic synthesis of guidelines and explorative network analysis. F1000Res 2023; 11:1290. [PMID: 38239264 PMCID: PMC10794862 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.123571.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background With the rising prevalence of allergic diseases in children, prevention of childhood allergies becomes an important public health issue. Recently, a paradigm shift is taking place in the approach to preventing allergies, and clinical practice guidelines (CPG) and food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG) play an important role in providing practitioners with the latest evidence and reliable guidance. However, concern about the methodological quality of the development of FBDGs and CPGs, including limitations in the systematic reviews, lack of transparency and unmanaged conflicts of interest (COI), reduce the trust in these guidelines. Methods We aim to synthesize the available guidance on early childhood allergy prevention (ECAP) through a systematic search for national and international CPGs and FBDGs concerning ECAP and child nutrition (CN) and to assess the quality of the guidelines and management of COI. Additionally, we will analyse the content and the evidence base of the recommendation statements. We aim to quantify the COI in guideline panellists and explore possible associations between COI and recommendations. Through a social network analysis, we expect to elucidate ties between panellists, researchers, institutions, industry and other sponsors. Guidelines are an important tool to inform healthcare practitioners with the newest evidence, but quality and reliability have to be high. This study will help identify potential for further improvement in the development of guidelines and the management of COI. If the social network analysis proves feasible and reveals more information on COI in comparison to disclosed COI from the previous analyses, the methodology can be developed further to identify undisclosed COIs in panelists. Ethics and dissemination This research does not require ethical approval because no human subjects are involved. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed open access journals and via presentations at scientific conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Sieferle
- Department of Public Health and Health Education, Pädagogische Hochschule, Freiburg, 79117, Germany
| | | | - Eva Maria Bitzer
- Department of Public Health and Health Education, Pädagogische Hochschule, Freiburg, 79117, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Menne MC, Su N, Faggion CM. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in dentistry including animal studies: a cross-sectional study. Ir Vet J 2023; 76:33. [PMID: 38098065 PMCID: PMC10720166 DOI: 10.1186/s13620-023-00261-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews including animal models can be heterogeneous. We assessed the methodological quality of systematic reviews including animal models in dentistry as well as the overall confidence in the results of those systematic reviews. MATERIAL & METHODS PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were searched for systematic reviews including animal studies in dentistry published later than January 2010 until 18th of July 2022. Overall confidence in the results was assessed using a modified version of the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2) checklist. Checklist items were rated as yes, partial yes, no and not applicable. Linear regression analysis was used to investigate associations between systematic review characteristics and the overall adherence to the AMSTAR-2 checklist. The overall confidence in the results was calculated based on the number of critical and non-critical weaknesses presented in the AMSTAR-2 items and rated as high, moderate, low and critical low. RESULTS Of initially 951 retrieved systematic reviews, 190 were included in the study. The overall confidence in the results was low in 43 (22.6%) and critically low in 133 (70.0%) systematic reviews. While some AMSTAR-2 items were regularly reported (e.g. conflict of interest, selection in duplicate), others were not (e.g. FUNDING n = 1; 0.5%). Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that the adherence scores of AMSTAR-2 was significantly associated with publication year, journal impact factor (IF), topic, and the use of tools to assess risk of bias (RoB) of the systematic reviews. CONCLUSION Although the methodological quality of dental systematic reviews of animal models improved over the years, it is still suboptimal. The overall confidence in the results was mostly low or critically low. Systematic reviews, which were published later, published in a journal with a higher IF, focused on non-surgery topics, and used at least one tool to assess RoB correlated with greater adherence to the AMSTAR-2 guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max C Menne
- Department of Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, University Hospital Münster, Waldeyerstraße 30, Münster, 48149, Germany
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Fachklinik Hornheide, Dorbaumstraße 300, Münster, 48157, Germany
| | - Naichuan Su
- Department of Oral Public Health, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081LA, The Netherlands
| | - Clovis M Faggion
- Department of Periodontology and Operative Dentistry, University Hospital Münster, Waldeyerstraße 30, Münster, 48149, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Thompson AA, Mayfield CK, Bashrum BS, Abu-Zahra M, Petrigliano FA, Liu JN. Evaluation of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2023; 5:100808. [PMID: 37965531 PMCID: PMC10641735 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To identify the quantity and types of spin present in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) outcomes and to characterize the studies with spin to determine if any patterns exist. Methods This study was conducted per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. In August 2022, PubMed, Scopus, and SportDiscus databases were searched using the terms "ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction" AND "systematic review" OR "meta-analysis." Each abstract was assessed for the presence of the 15 most common types of spin derived from a previously established methodology. General data that were extracted included study title, authors, publication year, journal, level of evidence, study design, funding source, reported adherence to PRISMA guidelines, preregistration of the study protocol, and methodologic quality per A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews Version 2 (AMSTAR 2). Results In total, 122 studies were identified during the preliminary search, of which 19 met the inclusion criteria. Each study had at least 1 form of spin. The most common type of spin identified was type 5 ("The conclusion claims the beneficial effect of the experimental treatment despite a high risk of bias in primary studies") (7/19, 36.8%). AMSTAR type 9 ("Did the review authors use a satisfactory technique for assessing the RoB [risk of bias] in individual studies that were included in the review?") was associated with both a lower Clarivate Impact Factor (P = .001) and a lower Scopus CiteScore (P = .015). Studies receiving external funding were associated with the failure to satisfy AMSTAR type 3 ("Did the review authors explain their selection of the study designs for inclusion in the review?") (P = .047). Conclusions Spin is highly prevalent in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses that investigate the outcomes of UCLR. Clinical Relevance Spin has been identified in peer-reviewed articles published on various topics, including many in orthopaedics. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses contain the most comprehensive evidence regarding a clinical question, so it is important to identify spin that may be included in these reports. Greater efforts are needed to ensure that the abstracts of papers accurately represent the results in the full text.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley A. Thompson
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Cory K. Mayfield
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Bryan S. Bashrum
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Maya Abu-Zahra
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Frank A. Petrigliano
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Joseph N. Liu
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Guan X, Lao Y, Wang J, Wang Y, Bai Y, Li X, Liu S, Li Z, Li F, Dong Z. The methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome using AMSTAR2. BMC Med Res Methodol 2023; 23:281. [PMID: 38012566 PMCID: PMC10680214 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-02095-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to assess the methodological quality of the systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) using A Measurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR2) and to explore the potential influencing factors. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies. AMSTAR2 was used for evaluating the methodological quality of eligible SRs/MAs. Differences between methodological characteristics of SRs/MAs were compared using chi-square tests. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess reviewer agreement in the pre-experiment. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify potential factors affecting methodological quality. RESULTS A total of 45 SRs/MAs were included. After AMSTAR2 evaluation, only two (4.4%) of 45 SRs/MAs were moderate, three (6.7%) were rated as low quality, and the remainder 40 (88.9%) were rated as critically low quality. Among the 16 items of AMSTAR2, item 3 and item 10 had the poorest adherence. Item 4 received the most significant number of "Partial Yes" responses. Univariable analysis indicated that there were significant differences in methodological quality in SRs between different continents (P = 0.027) as well as between preregistered SRs and those that were not (P = 0.004). However, in multivariate analysis, there was no significant association between methodological quality and the following research characteristics: publication year, continent, whether reporting followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA), preregistration, funding support, randomized controlled trials (RCT) enrollment, whether SR was published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), and whether with meta-analysis. Additionally, subgroup analysis based on interventional SRs/MAs showed that continent was independently associated with the methodological quality of SRs/MAs of CP/CPPS via univariable and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates that the methodological quality of SRs/MAs of CP/CPPS was generally poor. SRs/MAs of CP/CPPS should adopt the AMSTAR2 to enhance their methodological quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Guan
- Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yongfeng Lao
- Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yanan Wang
- Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yanan Bai
- Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Laboratory Medicine Center, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiaolong Li
- Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Shuai Liu
- Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Zewen Li
- Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Fuhan Li
- Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Zhilong Dong
- Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
- Department of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Tornøe AS, Pind AH, Laursen CCW, Andersen C, Maagaard M, Mathiesen O. Ketamine for postoperative pain treatment in spinal surgery: Systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2023; 67:1306-1321. [PMID: 37468443 DOI: 10.1111/aas.14307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
AIM We aimed to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of perioperative pain treatment with ketamine in patients undergoing spinal surgery. METHODS We searched Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception until 15 February 2023 for randomised clinical trials comparing ketamine with placebo or no intervention in patients undergoing spinal surgery. The primary outcomes were cumulative opioid consumption at 24 h postoperatively and serious adverse events. We adhered to recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration and performed meta-analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) to assess the risks of random errors, risk of bias assessment to evaluate the risks of systematic errors, and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS We included a total of 28 randomised clinical trials enrolling 2110 participants providing data for our pre-defined outcomes. Twenty-three trials enrolled adult participants and 5 trials enrolled paediatric participants. Three trials were at low risk of bias. Meta-analysis and TSA of trials including adults showed that ketamine versus placebo or no intervention seemed to reduce the cumulative 24-h opioid consumption (mean difference -17.57 mg; TSA-adjusted 95% confidence interval, -24.22 to -10.92; p < .01; low certainty of evidence), and there was no evidence of a difference of ketamine versus placebo or no intervention on the risk of serious adverse events (risk ratio 2.16; 96.7% confidence interval, 0.35 to 13.17; p = .36; very low certainty of evidence). CONCLUSION In adults undergoing spinal surgery, ketamine may reduce cumulative 24-h opioid consumption. Ketamine may increase the occurrence of serious adverse events, but the evidence was very uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Schou Tornøe
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Alison Holten Pind
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | | | - Cheme Andersen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Mathias Maagaard
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Ole Mathiesen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Freckmann G, Eichenlaub M, Waldenmaier D, Pleus S, Wehrstedt S, Haug C, Witthauer L, Jendle J, Hinzmann R, Thomas A, Eriksson Boija E, Makris K, Diem P, Tran N, Klonoff DC, Nichols JH, Slingerland RJ. Clinical Performance Evaluation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems: A Scoping Review and Recommendations for Reporting. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023; 17:1506-1526. [PMID: 37599389 PMCID: PMC10658695 DOI: 10.1177/19322968231190941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
The use of different approaches for design and results presentation of studies for the clinical performance evaluation of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems has long been recognized as a major challenge in comparing their results. However, a comprehensive characterization of the variability in study designs is currently unavailable. This article presents a scoping review of clinical CGM performance evaluations published between 2002 and 2022. Specifically, this review quantifies the prevalence of numerous options associated with various aspects of study design, including subject population, comparator (reference) method selection, testing procedures, and statistical accuracy evaluation. We found that there is a large variability in nearly all of those aspects and, in particular, in the characteristics of the comparator measurements. Furthermore, these characteristics as well as other crucial aspects of study design are often not reported in sufficient detail to allow an informed interpretation of study results. We therefore provide recommendations for reporting the general study design, CGM system use, comparator measurement approach, testing procedures, and data analysis/statistical performance evaluation. Additionally, this review aims to serve as a foundation for the development of a standardized CGM performance evaluation procedure, thereby supporting the goals and objectives of the Working Group on CGM established by the Scientific Division of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Freckmann
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Manuel Eichenlaub
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Delia Waldenmaier
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Stefan Pleus
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Stephanie Wehrstedt
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Cornelia Haug
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Lilian Witthauer
- Diabetes Center Berne, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Johan Jendle
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Rolf Hinzmann
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Roche Diabetes Care GmbH, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Andreas Thomas
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Pirna, Germany
| | - Elisabet Eriksson Boija
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Equalis AB, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Konstantinos Makris
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Clinical Biochemistry Department, KAT General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Peter Diem
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Endokrinologie Diabetologie Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nam Tran
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - David C. Klonoff
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Diabetes Research Institute, Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, CA, USA
| | - James H. Nichols
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Robbert J. Slingerland
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lišnić V, Ashraf H, Viđak M, Marušić A. Completeness of intervention description in invasive cardiology trials: an observational study of ClinicalTrials.gov registry and corresponding publications. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1276847. [PMID: 37881632 PMCID: PMC10597631 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1276847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Non-pharmacological invasive interventions in cardiology are complex and often inadequately reported. Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide were developed to aid reporting and assessment of non-pharmacological interventions. The aim of our study was to assess the completeness of describing invasive cardiology interventions in clinical trials at the level of trial registration and corresponding journal article publication. Methodology We searched for clinical trials in invasive cardiology registered in Clinicaltrials.gov and corresponding journal publications. We used the 10-item TIDieR checklist for registries and 12-item checklist for journal publications. Results Out of 7,017 registry items retrieved by our search, 301 items were included in the analysis. The search for corresponding published articles yielded 192 journal publications. The majority of trials were funded by the industry and were medical device trials. The median number of reported TIDieR items was 4.5 (95% CI 4.49-4.51) out of 10, and while the corresponding journal articles reported 6.5 (95% CI 6.0-6.5) out of 12 TIDieR items. Conclusion Registration and reporting of invasive cardiology trials is often incomplete and adequate detailed description of the interventions is not provided. TIDieR checklist is an important tool which should be used to ensure rigorous reporting of non-pharmacological interventions in cardiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viktoria Lišnić
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Split, Split, Croatia
| | - Hishaam Ashraf
- Wirral University Teaching Hospital, Wirral, United Kingdom
| | - Marin Viđak
- Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
- Department of Cardiology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ana Marušić
- Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Dugré N. Lipid-lowering therapies for cardiovascular disease prevention and management in primary care: PEER umbrella systematic review of systematic reviews. CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN MEDECIN DE FAMILLE CANADIEN 2023; 69:701-711. [PMID: 37833094 PMCID: PMC10575662 DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6910701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the benefits and harms of lipid-lowering therapies used to prevent or manage cardiovascular disease including bile acid sequestrants (BAS), ezetimibe, fibrates, niacin, omega-3 supplements, proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, and statins. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and a grey literature search. STUDY SELECTION Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials published between January 2017 and March 2022 looking at statins, ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors, fibrates, BAS, niacin, and omega-3 supplements for preventing cardiovascular outcomes were selected. Outcomes of interest included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and adverse events. SYNTHESIS A total of 76 systematic reviews were included. Four randomized controlled trials were also included for BAS because no efficacy systematic review was identified. Statins significantly reduced MACE (6 systematic reviews; median risk ratio [RR]=0.74; interquartile range [IQR]=0.71 to 0.76), cardiovascular mortality (7 systematic reviews; median RR=0.85, IQR=0.83 to 0.86), and all-cause mortality (8 systematic reviews; median RR=0.91, IQR=0.88 to 0.92). Major adverse cardiovascular events were also significantly reduced by ezetimibe (3 systematic reviews; median RR=0.93, IQR=0.93 to 0.94), PCSK9 inhibitors (14 systematic reviews; median RR=0.84, IQR=0.83 to 0.87), and fibrates (2 systematic reviews; mean RR=0.86), but these interventions had no effect on cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. Fibrates had no effect on any cardiovascular outcomes when added to a statin. Omega-3 combination supplements had no effect on MACE or all-cause mortality but significantly reduced cardiovascular mortality (5 systematic reviews; median RR=0.93, IQR=0.93 to 0.94). Eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester alone significantly reduced MACE (1 systematic review, RR=0.78) and cardiovascular mortality (2 systematic reviews; RRs of 0.82 and 0.82). In primary cardiovascular prevention, only statins showed consistent benefits on MACE (6 systematic reviews; median RR=0.75, IQR=0.73 to 0.78), cardiovascularall-cause mortality (7 systematic reviews, median RR=0.83, IQR=0.81 to 0.90), and all-cause mortality (8 systematic reviews; median RR=0.91, IQR=0.87 to 0.91). CONCLUSION Statins have the most consistent evidence for the prevention of cardiovascular complications with a relative risk reduction of about 25% for MACE and 10% to 15% for mortality. The addition of ezetimibe, a PCSK9 inhibitor, or eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester to a statin provides additional MACE risk reduction but has no effect on all-cause mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Dugré
- Pharmacist at the CIUSSS du Nord-de-l’Île-de-Montréal and Clinical Associate Professor in the Faculty of Pharmacy at the University of Montréal in Quebec
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Harrison RA, Majd NK, Johnson MO, Urbauer DL, Puduvalli V, Khasraw M. Characterization of industry relationships in oncology. Cancer 2023; 129:2848-2855. [PMID: 37227811 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Collaborative relationships between academic oncology and industry (pharmaceutical, biotechnology, "omic," and medical device companies) are essential for therapeutic development in oncology; however, limited research on engagement in and perceptions of these relationships has been done. METHODS Survey questions were developed to evaluate relationships between academic oncology and industry. An electronic survey was delivered to 1000 randomly selected members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, a professional organization for oncologists, eliciting respondents' views around oncology-industry collaborations. The responses were analyzed according to prespecified plans. RESULTS There were 225 survey respondents. Most were from the United States (70.0%), worked at an academic institution (60.1%), worked in medical oncology (81.2%), and had an active relationship with industry (85.8%). One quarter (26.7%) of respondents reported difficulty establishing a relationship with industry collaborators, and most respondents (75%) did not report having had mentorship in developing these relationships. The majority (85.3%) of respondents considered these collaborations important to their careers. Respondents generally thought that scientific integrity was preserved (92%), and most respondents (95%) had little concern over the quality of the collaborative product. Many (60%) shared concerns over potential conflict of interest if an individual with a compensated relationship promoted an industry product for clinical care/research, yet most respondents (67%) stated these relationships did not shape their interactions with patients. CONCLUSIONS This study provides novel data characterizing the nature of collaborative relationships between clinicians, researchers, and industry in oncology. Although respondents considered these collaborations an important part of clinical and academic oncology, formal education or mentorship around these relationships was rare. Conflicting findings around conflict of interest highlight the importance of more dedicated research in this area. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Business enterprises in health care play a central role in cancer research and care, driving the development of new medical testing, drugs, and devices. Effective working relationships among clinicians, researchers, and these industry partners can promote innovative research and enhance patient care. Study of these collaborations has been limited to date. Through distribution of a questionnaire to cancer clinicians and researchers, we found that most participants consider these relationships valuable, though they find establishing such relationships challenging partly because of gaps in educational programs in this area. Our findings also highlight the need for further policy around the potential bias these relationships can introduce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Harrison
- Division of Neurology, BC Cancer, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nazanin K Majd
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Margaret O Johnson
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Diana L Urbauer
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Vinay Puduvalli
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mustafa Khasraw
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Tingle SJ, Dobbins JJ, Thompson ER, Figueiredo RS, Mahendran B, Pandanaboyana S, Wilson C. Machine perfusion in liver transplantation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 9:CD014685. [PMID: 37698189 PMCID: PMC10496129 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014685.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation is the only chance of cure for people with end-stage liver disease and some people with advanced liver cancers or acute liver failure. The increasing prevalence of these conditions drives demand and necessitates the increasing use of donated livers which have traditionally been considered suboptimal. Several novel machine perfusion preservation technologies have been developed, which attempt to ameliorate some of the deleterious effects of ischaemia reperfusion injury. Machine perfusion technology aims to improve organ quality, thereby improving outcomes in recipients of suboptimal livers when compared to traditional static cold storage (SCS; ice box). OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of different methods of machine perfusion (including hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE), normothermic machine perfusion (NMP), controlled oxygenated rewarming, and normothermic regional perfusion) versus each other or versus static cold storage (SCS) in people undergoing liver transplantation. SEARCH METHODS We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 10 January 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised clinical trials which compared different methods of machine perfusion, either with each other or with SCS. Studies comparing HOPE via both hepatic artery and portal vein, or via portal vein only, were grouped. The protocol detailed that we also planned to include quasi-randomised studies to assess treatment harms. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. overall participant survival, 2. quality of life, and 3. serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes were 4. graft survival, 5. ischaemic biliary complications, 6. primary non-function of the graft, 7. early allograft function, 8. non-serious adverse events, 9. transplant utilisation, and 10. transaminase release during the first week post-transplant. We assessed bias using Cochrane's RoB 2 tool and used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS We included seven randomised trials (1024 transplant recipients from 1301 randomised/included livers). All trials were parallel two-group trials; four compared HOPE versus SCS, and three compared NMP versus SCS. No trials used normothermic regional perfusion. When compared with SCS, it was uncertain whether overall participant survival was improved with either HOPE (hazard ratio (HR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 1.98; P = 0.81, I2 = 0%; 4 trials, 482 recipients; low-certainty evidence due to imprecision because of low number of events) or NMP (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.31 to 3.80; P = 0.90; 1 trial, 222 recipients; very low-certainty evidence due to imprecision and risk of bias). No trials reported quality of life. When compared with SCS alone, HOPE was associated with improvement in the following clinically relevant outcomes: graft survival (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.87; P = 0.02, I2 = 0%; 4 trials, 482 recipients; high-certainty evidence), serious adverse events in extended criteria DBD liver transplants (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.91; P = 0.03, I2 = 0%; 2 trials, 156 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and clinically significant ischaemic cholangiopathy in recipients of DCD livers (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.92; P = 0.03; 1 trial, 156 recipients; high-certainty evidence). In contrast, NMP was not associated with improvement in any of these clinically relevant outcomes. NMP was associated with improved utilisation compared with SCS (one trial found a 50% lower rate of organ discard; P = 0.008), but the reasons underlying this effect are unknown. We identified 11 ongoing studies investigating machine perfusion technologies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In situations where the decision has been made to transplant a liver donated after circulatory death or donated following brain death, end-ischaemic HOPE will provide superior clinically relevant outcomes compared with SCS alone. Specifically, graft survival is improved (high-certainty evidence), serious adverse events are reduced (moderate-certainty evidence), and in donors after circulatory death, clinically relevant ischaemic biliary complications are reduced (high-certainty evidence). There is no good evidence that NMP has the same benefits over SCS in terms of these clinically relevant outcomes. NMP does appear to improve utilisation of grafts that would otherwise be discarded with SCS; however, the reasons for this, and whether this effect is specific to NMP, is not clear. Further studies into NMP viability criteria and utilisation, as well as head-to-head trials with other perfusion technologies are needed. In the setting of donation following circulatory death transplantation, further trials are needed to assess the effect of these ex situ machine perfusion methods against, or in combination with, normothermic regional perfusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J Tingle
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Emily R Thompson
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Colin Wilson
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Malik AK, Amer AO, Tingle SJ, Thompson ER, White SA, Manas DM, Wilson C. Fibrin-based haemostatic agents for reducing blood loss in adult liver resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 8:CD010872. [PMID: 37551841 PMCID: PMC10411946 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010872.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver resection is the optimal treatment for selected benign and malignant liver tumours, but it can be associated with significant blood loss. Numerous anaesthetic and surgical techniques have been developed to reduce blood loss and improve perioperative outcomes. One such technique is the application of topical fibrin-based haemostatic agents (FBHAs) to the resection surface. There is no standard practice for FBHA use, and a variety of commercial agents and devices are available, as well as non-FBHAs (e.g. collagen-based agents). The literature is inconclusive on the effectiveness of these methods and on the clinical benefits of their routine use. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of fibrin-based haemostatic agents in reducing intraoperative blood loss in adults undergoing liver resection. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group (CHBG) Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science up to 20 January 2023. We also searched online trial registries, checked the reference lists of all primary studies, and contacted the authors of included trials for additional published or unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We considered for inclusion all randomised clinical trials evaluating FBHAs versus no topical intervention or non-FBHAs, irrespective of publication type, publication status, language of publication, and outcomes reported. Eligible participants could have any liver pathology and be undergoing major or minor liver resections through open or laparoscopic surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened the results of the literature search and used data extraction forms to collate the results. We expressed dichotomous outcome results as risk ratios (RRs) and continuous outcome results as mean differences (MDs), each with their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We used a random-effects model for the main analyses. Our primary outcomes were perioperative mortality, serious adverse events, haemostatic efficacy, and health-related quality of life. Our secondary outcomes were efficacy as sealant, adverse events considered non-serious, operating time, and length of hospital stay. We assessed the certainty of the evidence with GRADE and presented results in two summary of findings tables. MAIN RESULTS We included 22 trials (2945 participants) evaluating FBHAs versus no intervention or non-FBHAs; 19 trials with 2642 participants provided data for the meta-analyses. Twelve trials reported commercial funding, one trial reported no financial support, and nine trials provided no information on funding. Below we present the most clinically relevant outcome results, also displayed in our summary of findings table. Fibrin-based haemostatic agents versus no intervention Six trials (1001 participants) compared FBHAs with no intervention. One trial was at low risk of bias in all five domains, and all other trials were at high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain. Two trials were at high risk of bias related to blinding. It is unclear if FBHAs compared with no intervention have an effect on perioperative mortality (RR 2.58, 95% CI 0.89 to 7.44; 4 trials, 782 participants), serious adverse events (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.05; 4 trials, 782 participants), postoperative transfusion (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.40; 5 trials, 864 participants), reoperation (RR 2.92, 95% CI 0.58 to 14.61; 2 trials, 612 participants), or postoperative bile leak (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.48; 4 trials, 782 participants), as the certainty of evidence was very low for all these outcomes. Fibrin-based haemostatic agents versus non-fibrin-based haemostatic agents Sixteen trials (1944 participants) compared FBHAs with non-FBHAs. All trials had at least one domain at high or unclear risk of bias. Twelve trials were at high risk of bias related to blinding. It is unclear if FBHAs compared with non-FBHAs have an effect on perioperative mortality (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.72; 11 trials, 1436 participants), postoperative transfusion (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.25; 7 trials, 599 participants), reoperation (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.90; 3 trials, 358 participants), or postoperative bile leak (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.21; 9 trials, 1115 participants), as the certainty of evidence was very low for all these outcomes. FBHAs compared with non-FBHAs may have little or no effect on the risk of serious adverse events (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.03; 9 trials, 1176 participants; low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The evidence for the outcomes in both comparisons (FBHAs versus no intervention and FBHAs versus non-FBHAs) was of very low certainty (or low certainty in one instance) and cannot justify the routine use of FBHAs to reduce blood loss in adult liver resection. While the meta-analysis showed a reduced risk of reoperation with FBHAs compared with non-FBHAs, the analysis was confounded by the small number of trials reporting the event and the risk of bias in all these trials. Future trials should focus on the use of FBHAs in people undergoing liver resection who are at particularly high risk of bleeding. Investigators should evaluate clinically meaningful and patient-important outcomes and follow the SPIRIT and CONSORT statements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah K Malik
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Aimen O Amer
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Samuel J Tingle
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Emily R Thompson
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Steven A White
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Derek M Manas
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Colin Wilson
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Mohamed ZU, Varghese CT, Sudhakar A, Kumar L, Gopalakrishnan U, Balakrishnan D, Narayanamenon R, Sudhindran S. Prostaglandins for adult liver transplanted recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 8:CD006006. [PMID: 37540003 PMCID: PMC10401650 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006006.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostaglandins are naturally occurring lipids that are synthesised from arachidonic acid. Multiple studies have evaluated the benefits of prostaglandins in reducing ischaemia reperfusion injury after liver transplantation. New studies have been published since the previous review, and hence it was important to update the evidence for this intervention. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of prostaglandins in adults undergoing liver transplantation compared with placebo or standard care. SEARCH METHODS We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 27 December 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised clinical trials evaluating prostaglandins initiated in the perioperative period compared with placebo or standard care for adults undergoing liver transplantation. We included trials irrespective of reported outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. all-cause mortality, 2. serious adverse events, and 3. health-related quality of life. Our secondary outcomes were 4. liver retransplantation, 5. early allograft dysfunction, 6. primary non-function of the allograft, 7. acute kidney failure, 8. length of hospital stay, and 9. adverse events considered non-serious. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS We included 11 randomised clinical trials with 771 adult liver transplant recipients (mean age 47.31 years, male 61.48%), of whom 378 people were randomised to receive prostaglandins and 393 people were randomised to either placebo (272 participants) or standard care (121 participants). All trials were published between 1993 and 2016. Ten trials were conducted in high- and upper-middle-income countries. Prostaglandins may reduce all-cause mortality up to one month (risk ratio (RR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61 to 1.23; risk difference (RD) 21 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 63 fewer to 36 more; 11 trials, 771 participants; low-certainty evidence). Prostaglandins may result in little to no difference in serious adverse events (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.40; RD 81 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 148 fewer to 18 more; 6 trials, 568 participants; low-certainty evidence). None of the included trials reported health-related quality of life. Prostaglandins may result in little to no difference in liver retransplantation (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.96; RD 1 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 33 fewer to 62 more; 6 trials, 468 participants; low-certainty evidence); early allograft dysfunction (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.18; RD 137 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 241 fewer to 47 more; 1 trial, 99 participants; low-certainty evidence); primary non-function of the allograft (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.32; RD 23 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 40 fewer to 16 more; 7 trials, 624 participants; low-certainty evidence); and length of hospital stay (mean difference (MD) -1.15 days, 95% CI -5.44 to 3.14; 4 trials, 369 participants; low-certainty evidence). Prostaglandins may result in a large reduction in the development of acute kidney failure requiring dialysis (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.73; RD 100 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 132 fewer to 49 fewer; 5 trials, 477 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of prostaglandins on adverse events considered non-serious (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.42 to 3.36; RD 225 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 294 fewer to 65 fewer; 4 trials, 329 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Two trials reported receiving funding; one of these was with vested interests. We found one registered ongoing trial. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Eleven trials evaluated prostaglandins in adult liver transplanted recipients. Based on low-certainty evidence, prostaglandins may reduce all-cause mortality up to one month; may cause little to no difference in serious adverse events, liver retransplantation, early allograft dysfunction, primary non-function of the allograft, and length of hospital stay; and may have a large reduction in the development of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis. We do not know the effect of prostaglandins on adverse events considered non-serious. We lack adequately powered, high-quality trials evaluating the effects of prostaglandins for people undergoing liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zubair Umer Mohamed
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, India
- Department of Critical Care, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Madinah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Christi Titus Varghese
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, India
| | - Abish Sudhakar
- Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, India
| | - Lakshmi Kumar
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, India
| | - Unnikrishnan Gopalakrishnan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, India
| | - Dinesh Balakrishnan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, India
| | - Ramachandran Narayanamenon
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, India
| | - Surendran Sudhindran
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, India
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
O'Kelley L. The Cost of Industry Funding and Sponsorship. West J Nurs Res 2023; 45:679. [PMID: 37466181 DOI: 10.1177/01939459231189321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
|
45
|
Polevikov S. Advancing AI in healthcare: A comprehensive review of best practices. Clin Chim Acta 2023; 548:117519. [PMID: 37595864 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2023.117519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023]
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) are powerful tools shaping the healthcare sector. This review considers twelve key aspects of AI in clinical practice: 1) Ethical AI; 2) Explainable AI; 3) Health Equity and Bias in AI; 4) Sponsorship Bias; 5) Data Privacy; 6) Genomics and Privacy; 7) Insufficient Sample Size and Self-Serving Bias; 8) Bridging the Gap Between Training Datasets and Real-World Scenarios; 9) Open Source and Collaborative Development; 10) Dataset Bias and Synthetic Data; 11) Measurement Bias; 12) Reproducibility in AI Research. These categories represent both the challenges and opportunities of AI implementation in healthcare. While AI holds significant potential for improving patient care, it also presents risks and challenges, such as ensuring privacy, combating bias, and maintaining transparency and ethics. The review underscores the necessity of developing comprehensive best practices for healthcare organizations and fostering a diverse dialogue involving data scientists, clinicians, patient advocates, ethicists, economists, and policymakers. We are at the precipice of significant transformation in healthcare powered by AI. By continuing to reassess and refine our approach, we can ensure that AI is implemented responsibly and ethically, maximizing its benefit to patient care and public health.
Collapse
|
46
|
Schroll JB, Black AY, Farquhar C, Chen I. Combined oral contraceptive pill for primary dysmenorrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 7:CD002120. [PMID: 37523477 PMCID: PMC10388393 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002120.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dysmenorrhoea (painful menstrual cramps) is common and a major cause of pain in women. Combined oral contraceptives (OCPs) are often used in the management of primary dysmenorrhoea, but there is a need for reporting the benefits and harms. Primary dysmenorrhoea is defined as painful menstrual cramps without pelvic pathology. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of combined oral contraceptive pills for the management of primary dysmenorrhoea. SEARCH METHODS We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date 28 March 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing all combined OCPs with other combined OCPs, placebo, or management with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Participants had to have primary dysmenorrhoea, diagnosed by ruling out pelvic pathology through pelvic examination or ultrasound. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. The primary outcomes were pain score after treatment, improvement in pain, and adverse events. MAIN RESULTS We included 21 RCTs (3723 women). Eleven RCTs compared combined OCP with placebo, eight compared different dosages of combined OCP, one compared two OCP regimens with placebo, and one compared OCP with NSAIDs. OCP versus placebo or no treatment OCPs reduce pain in women with dysmenorrhoea more effectively than placebo. Six studies reported treatment effects on different scales; the result can be interpreted as a moderate reduction in pain (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.74 to -0.41; I² = 28%; 6 RCTs, 588 women; high-quality evidence). Six studies also reported pain improvement as a dichotomous outcome (risk ratio (RR) 1.65, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.10; I² = 69%; 6 RCTs, 717 women; low-quality evidence). The data suggest that in women with a 28% chance of improvement in pain with placebo or no treatment, the improvement in women using combined OCP will be between 37% and 60%. Compared to placebo or no treatment, OCPs probably increase the risk of any adverse events (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.43; I² = 79%; 7 RCTs, 1025 women; moderate-quality evidence), and may also increase the risk of serious adverse events (RR 1.77, 95% CI 0.49 to 6.43; I² = 22%; 4 RCTs, 512 women; low-quality evidence). Women who received OCPs had an increased risk of irregular bleeding compared to women who received placebo or no treatment (RR 2.63, 95% CI 2.11 to 3.28; I² = 29%; 7 RCTs, 1025 women; high-quality evidence). In women with a risk of irregular bleeding of 18% if using placebo or no treatment, the risk would be between 39% and 60% if using combined OCP. OCPs probably increase the risk of headaches (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.04; I² = 44%; 5 RCTs, 656 women; moderate-quality evidence), and nausea (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.30; I² = 39%; 8 RCTs, 948 women; moderate-quality evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of OCP on weight gain (RR 1.83, 95% CI 0.75 to 4.45; 1 RCT, 76 women; low-quality evidence). OCPs may slightly reduce requirements for additional medication (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.98; I² = 0%; 2 RCTs, 163 women; low-quality evidence), and absence from work (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.97; I² = 0%; 2 RCTs, 148 women; low-quality evidence). One OCP versus another OCP Continuous use of OCPs (no pause or inactive tablets after the usual 21 days of hormone pills) may reduce pain in women with dysmenorrhoea more effectively than the standard regimen (SMD -0.73, 95% CI -1.13 to 0.34; 2 RCTs, 106 women; low-quality evidence). There was insufficient evidence to determine if there was a difference in pain improvement between ethinylestradiol 20 μg and ethinylestradiol 30 μg OCPs (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.74; 1 RCT, 326 women; moderate-quality evidence). There is probably little or no difference between third- and fourth-generation and first- and second-generation OCPs (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.05; 1 RCT, 178 women; moderate-quality evidence). The standard regimen of OCPs may slightly increase the risk of any adverse events over the continuous regimen (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.22; I² = 76%; 3 RCTs, 602 women; low-quality evidence), and probably increases the risk of irregular bleeding (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.69; 2 RCTs, 379 women; moderate-quality evidence). Due to lack of studies, it is uncertain if there is a difference between continuous and standard regimen OCPs in serious adverse events (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.24; 1 RCT, 212 women), headaches (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.76; I² = 0%; 2 RCTs, 435 women), or nausea (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.51 to 2.30; I² = 23%; 2 RCTs, 435 women) (all very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain if one type of OCP reduces absence from work more than the other (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.99; 1 RCT, 445 women; very low-quality evidence). OCPs versus NSAIDs There were insufficient data to determine whether OCPs were more effective than NSAIDs for pain (mean difference -0.30, 95% CI -5.43 to 4.83; 1 RCT, 91 women; low-quality evidence). The study did not report on adverse events. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS OCPs are effective for treating dysmenorrhoea, but they cause irregular bleeding, and probably headache and nausea. Long-term effects were not covered in this review. Continuous use of OCPs was probably more effective than the standard regimen but safety should be ensured with long-term data. Due to lack of data, we are uncertain whether NSAIDs are better than OCPs for treating dysmenorrhoea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeppe B Schroll
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Amanda Y Black
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Cindy Farquhar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Innie Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Zhu L, Yang Z, Deng H, Zhang Y, Liao X, Clarke M. Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews. Syst Rev 2023; 12:120. [PMID: 37443094 PMCID: PMC10347811 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02270-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the number of citations for Cochrane Methodology Reviews after they have been updated or co-published in another journal, and the effect of co-publishing the review on the co-publishing journal's impact factor (IF). METHODS We identified all Cochrane Methodology Reviews published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) before 2018 and searched for co-published versions in the Web of Science Core Collection database up to 16 August 2022. The included reviews were in two cohorts: those that had been published and updated in CDSR and those that had been published in CDSR and co-published in another journal. The primary outcome measured the citation number to updated and original reviews in the first five years after publication of the updated review, and assessed the citation number of co-published and non-co-published reviews in the first five years after publication of the co-published version. The secondary outcome was the ratio of an adjusted IF and the actual IF of the co-publishing journal. RESULTS Eight updated and six original reviews were identified for the updated cohort of reviews, and four co-published reviews were included in the co-published cohort. The original reviews continued to be cited after the update was published but the median for the total number of citations was non-significantly higher for the updated reviews than for their original version[161 (Interquartile range (IQR) 85, 198) versus 113 (IQR 15, 433)]. The median number of total citations [362 (IQR 179, 840) versus 145 (IQR 75, 445)] and the median number of citations to the review in the first five years after co-publication combined and in each of those years was higher in the co-published group than in the non-co-published group. One of the three journals that co-published Reviews in the first year and two journals in the second year had a lower IF after co-publication. CONCLUSIONS Earlier versions of Cochrane Methodology Reviews continue to be cited after an update is published, which raises doubts about whether those citing are using the most recent evidence or are aware of the update. Co-publication facilitates broader application and dissemination of Cochrane methodology evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linlin Zhu
- General Practice Ward/International Medical Center Ward, General Practice Medical Center and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Ziyu Yang
- General Practice Ward/International Medical Center Ward, General Practice Medical Center and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Hongyu Deng
- General Practice Ward/International Medical Center Ward, General Practice Medical Center and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Yonggang Zhang
- Department of Periodical Press and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| | - Xiaoyang Liao
- General Practice Ward/International Medical Center Ward, General Practice Medical Center and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| | - Mike Clarke
- Northern Ireland Methodology Hub, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT12 6BJ, Northern Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Reinhart M, Puil L, Salzwedel DM, Wright JM. First-line diuretics versus other classes of antihypertensive drugs for hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 7:CD008161. [PMID: 37439548 PMCID: PMC10339786 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008161.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Different first-line drug classes for patients with hypertension are often assumed to have similar effectiveness with respect to reducing mortality and morbidity outcomes, and lowering blood pressure. First-line low-dose thiazide diuretics have been previously shown to have the best mortality and morbidity evidence when compared with placebo or no treatment. Head-to-head comparisons of thiazides with other blood pressure-lowering drug classes would demonstrate whether there are important differences. OBJECTIVES To compare the effects of first-line diuretic drugs with other individual first-line classes of antihypertensive drugs on mortality, morbidity, and withdrawals due to adverse effects in patients with hypertension. Secondary objectives included assessments of the need for added drugs, drug switching, and blood pressure-lowering. SEARCH METHODS Cochrane Hypertension's Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Hypertension Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and trials registers to March 2021. We also checked references and contacted study authors to identify additional studies. A top-up search of the Specialized Register was carried out in June 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized active comparator trials of at least one year's duration were included. Trials had a clearly defined intervention arm of a first-line diuretic (thiazide, thiazide-like, or loop diuretic) compared to another first-line drug class: beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, alpha adrenergic blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, direct renin inhibitors, or other antihypertensive drug classes. Studies had to include clearly defined mortality and morbidity outcomes (serious adverse events, total cardiovascular events, stroke, coronary heart disease (CHD), congestive heart failure, and withdrawals due to adverse effects). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. MAIN RESULTS We included 20 trials with 26 comparator arms randomizing over 90,000 participants. The findings are relevant to first-line use of drug classes in older male and female hypertensive patients (aged 50 to 75) with multiple co-morbidities, including type 2 diabetes. First-line thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics were compared with beta-blockers (six trials), calcium channel blockers (eight trials), ACE inhibitors (five trials), and alpha-adrenergic blockers (three trials); other comparators included angiotensin II receptor blockers, aliskiren (a direct renin inhibitor), and clonidine (a centrally acting drug). Only three studies reported data for total serious adverse events: two studies compared diuretics with calcium channel blockers and one with a direct renin inhibitor. Compared to first-line beta-blockers, first-line thiazides probably result in little to no difference in total mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.10; 5 trials, 18,241 participants; moderate-certainty), probably reduce total cardiovascular events (5.4% versus 4.8%; RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.00; 4 trials, 18,135 participants; absolute risk reduction (ARR) 0.6%, moderate-certainty), may result in little to no difference in stroke (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.09; 4 trials, 18,135 participants; low-certainty), CHD (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.07; 4 trials, 18,135 participants; low-certainty), or heart failure (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.19; 1 trial, 6569 participants; low-certainty), and probably reduce withdrawals due to adverse effects (10.1% versus 7.9%; RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.85; 5 trials, 18,501 participants; ARR 2.2%; moderate-certainty). Compared to first-line calcium channel blockers, first-line thiazides probably result in little to no difference in total mortality (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.08; 7 trials, 35,417 participants; moderate-certainty), may result in little to no difference in serious adverse events (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.24; 2 trials, 7204 participants; low-certainty), probably reduce total cardiovascular events (14.3% versus 13.3%; RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.98; 6 trials, 35,217 participants; ARR 1.0%; moderate-certainty), probably result in little to no difference in stroke (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.18; 6 trials, 35,217 participants; moderate-certainty) or CHD (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.08; 6 trials, 35,217 participants; moderate-certainty), probably reduce heart failure (4.4% versus 3.2%; RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.82; 6 trials, 35,217 participants; ARR 1.2%; moderate-certainty), and may reduce withdrawals due to adverse effects (7.6% versus 6.2%; RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.88; 7 trials, 33,908 participants; ARR 1.4%; low-certainty). Compared to first-line ACE inhibitors, first-line thiazides probably result in little to no difference in total mortality (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.07; 3 trials, 30,961 participants; moderate-certainty), may result in little to no difference in total cardiovascular events (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.02; 3 trials, 30,900 participants; low-certainty), probably reduce stroke slightly (4.7% versus 4.1%; RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.99; 3 trials, 30,900 participants; ARR 0.6%; moderate-certainty), probably result in little to no difference in CHD (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.12; 3 trials, 30,900 participants; moderate-certainty) or heart failure (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.04; 2 trials, 30,392 participants; moderate-certainty), and probably reduce withdrawals due to adverse effects (3.9% versus 2.9%; RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.84; 3 trials, 25,254 participants; ARR 1.0%; moderate-certainty). Compared to first-line alpha-blockers, first-line thiazides probably result in little to no difference in total mortality (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.09; 1 trial, 24,316 participants; moderate-certainty), probably reduce total cardiovascular events (12.1% versus 9.0%; RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.80; 2 trials, 24,396 participants; ARR 3.1%; moderate-certainty) and stroke (2.7% versus 2.3%; RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.01; 2 trials, 24,396 participants; ARR 0.4%; moderate-certainty), may result in little to no difference in CHD (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.11; 2 trials, 24,396 participants; low-certainty), probably reduce heart failure (5.4% versus 2.8%; RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.58; 1 trial, 24,316 participants; ARR 2.6%; moderate-certainty), and may reduce withdrawals due to adverse effects (1.3% versus 0.9%; RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.89; 3 trials, 24,772 participants; ARR 0.4%; low-certainty). For the other drug classes, data were insufficient. No antihypertensive drug class demonstrated any clinically important advantages over first-line thiazides. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS When used as first-line agents for the treatment of hypertension, thiazides and thiazide-like drugs likely do not change total mortality and likely decrease some morbidity outcomes such as cardiovascular events and withdrawals due to adverse effects, when compared to beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, and alpha-blockers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcia Reinhart
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Lorri Puil
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Douglas M Salzwedel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - James M Wright
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Sáenz-Ravello G, Ossandón-Zúñiga B, Muñoz-Meza V, Mora-Ferraro D, Baeza M, Fan S, Sagheb K, Schiegnitz E, Díaz L. Short implants compared to regular dental implants after bone augmentation in the atrophic posterior mandible: umbrella review and meta-analysis of success outcomes. Int J Implant Dent 2023; 9:18. [PMID: 37400739 DOI: 10.1186/s40729-023-00476-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the body of evidence of short versus regular implants after bone augmentation (BA) in the atrophic posterior mandible in the context of implant treatment success outcomes. METHODS Seven databases, two registries, and reference lists were searched for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (SR/MA), randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and longitudinal studies published in English, Spanish or German since 2012. Confidence in the SR/MA methodology was evaluated using AMSTAR-2 and the risk of bias of primary studies using Cochrane's RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I. A random-effects meta-analysis and a meta-regression were performed for continuous and dichotomous outcomes. GRADE approach was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. RESULTS Eighteen SRs/MAs, most of them "critically low" and "low" confidence with substantial overlap, included 14 relevant RCTs with a high risk of bias. A cohort study with moderate risk of bias was added. Quantitative synthesis of 595 implants and 281 hemiarches/patients indicates that the use of short implants (< 10 mm) compared to regular implants and BA may reduce implant failure at 1-year follow-up, and marginal bone loss (MBL) at 3-, 5-, and 8-year follow-up; is likely to reduce the risk of biological complications at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 8-year follow-up; and may be the patient's preferred alternative. There is a correlation between bone height, MBL and biological complications. CONCLUSIONS The available evidence partially suggests that the use of short implants could decrease implant failure, MBL, and biological complications, and increase patient satisfaction. However, given the need for further RCTs and real-world evidence to fully evaluate short- and long-term outcomes, it would be prudent for clinicians to carefully consider the individual needs and circumstances of the patients before deciding whether to use short implants. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42022333526.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Sáenz-Ravello
- Faculty of Dentistry, Center for Epidemiology and Surveillance of Oral Diseases, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | | | | | | | - Mauricio Baeza
- Faculty of Dentistry, Center for Epidemiology and Surveillance of Oral Diseases, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Shengchi Fan
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes-Gutenberg University, Augustusplatz 2, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Keyvan Sagheb
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes-Gutenberg University, Augustusplatz 2, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Eik Schiegnitz
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes-Gutenberg University, Augustusplatz 2, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Leonardo Díaz
- Faculty of Dentistry, Postgraduate School, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes-Gutenberg University, Augustusplatz 2, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ugwu EO, Eleje GU, Ugwu AO, Nwagha UI, Ikechebelu JI, Umeh UA, Okafor HU. Antivirals for prevention of hepatitis B virus mother-to-child transmission in human immunodeficiency virus positive pregnant women co-infected with hepatitis B virus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 6:CD013653. [PMID: 37306558 PMCID: PMC10259198 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013653.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection promotes an aggressive disease course of HBV infection. In the only available non-Cochrane systematic review on antiviral therapy during pregnancy for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HBV, none of the women studied had HBV-HIV co-infection but were either HBV- or HIV-seropositive. Treatment of HBV alone may develop HIV-strains that are resistant to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Accordingly, co-treatment of the HIV infection is recommended. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimens versus placebo, tenofovir alone, or non-tenofovir-based antiviral regimen either alone or in combination with HBV for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HBV in HIV-positive pregnant women co-infected with HBV. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, LILACS (Bireme), Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science), and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (Web of Science) on 30 January 2023. We manually searched the reference lists of included trials, searched on-line trial registries, and contacted experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies for any further potential trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We aimed to include randomised clinical trials comparing tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimens (anti-HIV regimen with lopinavir-ritonavir therapy, or any other antiviral therapy, and two drugs with activity against HBV, specifically, tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), plus lamivudine or emtricitabine) with placebo alone, or tenofovir alone, or non-tenofovir-based antiviral regimen (zidovudine, lamivudine, telbivudine, emtricitabine, entecavir, lopinavir-ritonavir, or any other antiviral therapy) either alone or in combination with at least two other antivirals. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Primary outcomes included all-cause infant mortality, proportion of infants with serious adverse events, proportion of infants with HBV mother-to-child transmission, all-cause maternal mortality, and proportion of mothers with serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included proportion of infants with adverse events not considered serious, proportion of mothers with detectable HBV DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) (before delivery), maternal hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) to HBe-antibody seroconversion (before delivery) and maternal adverse events not considered serious. We used RevMan Web to carry out analyses and presented results, where feasible, using a random-effects model and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We performed sensitivity analysis. We assessed risk of bias using predefined domains, assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE, controlled risk of random errors with Trial Sequential Analysis, and presented outcome results in a summary of findings table. MAIN RESULTS Five completed trials were included, of which four trials contributed data to one or more of the outcomes. They included a total of 533 participants randomised to tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimens (196 participants) versus control (337 participants). The control groups received non-tenofovir-based antiviral regimens either as zidovudine alone (three trials) or as a combination of zidovudine, lamivudine and lopinavir-ritonavir (five trials). None of the trials used placebo or tenofovir alone. All trials were at unclear risk of bias. Four trials used intention-to-treat analyses. In the remaining trial, two participants in the intervention group and two in the control group were lost to follow-up. However, the outcomes of these four participants were not described. Tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimen versus control We are very uncertain about the effect of a tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimen versus control on all-cause infant mortality (RR 2.24, 95% CI 0.72 to 6.96; participants = 132; trials = 1; very low-certainty evidence); proportion of infants with serious adverse events (RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.43; participants = 132; trials = 1; very low-certainty evidence), and proportion of mothers with serious adverse events (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.32; participants = 262; trials = 2; very low-certainty evidence). No trial reported data on the proportion of infants with HBV mother-to-child transmission and all-cause maternal mortality. We are also very uncertain about the effect of tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimens versus control on the proportion of infants with adverse events not considered serious (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.06 to 13.68; participants = 31; trials = 1; very low-certainty evidence), and proportion of mothers with detectable HBV DNA (before delivery) (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.02; participants = 169; trials = 2; very low-certainty evidence). No trial reported data on maternal hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) to HBe-antibody seroconversion (before delivery) and maternal adverse events not considered serious. All trials received support from industry. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We do not know what the effects of tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimens are on all-cause infant mortality, proportion of infants with serious adverse events and proportion of mothers with serious adverse events, proportion of infants with adverse events not considered serious, and proportion of mothers with detectable HBV DNA before delivery because the certainty of evidence was very low. Only one or two trials, with insufficient power, contributed data for analyses. We lack randomised clinical trials at low risk of systematic and random errors, and fully reporting all-cause infant mortality, serious adverse events and reporting on clinical and laboratory outcomes, such as infants with HBV mother-to-child transmission, all-cause maternal mortality, maternal hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) to HBe-antibody seroconversion before delivery and maternal adverse events not considered serious.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel O Ugwu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Nsukka/University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu State, Enugu, Nigeria
| | - George U Eleje
- Effective Care Research Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi Campus, PMB 5001, Nnewi, Nigeria
| | - Angela O Ugwu
- Department of Haematology and Immunolology, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Nsukka/University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku Ozalla, Enugu State, Enugu, Nigeria
| | - Uchenna I Nwagha
- Department of Haematology and Immunology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Nsukka/University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu State, Enugu, Nigeria
| | - Joseph I Ikechebelu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria
| | - Uchenna A Umeh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical Science, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus/University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu State, Enugu, Nigeria
| | - Henrietta U Okafor
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus/University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu State, Enugu, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|