Radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations - perspectives and challenges

Current immunotherapy techniques in meningioma

INTRODUCTION

Although meningiomas are the most common primary brain tumor, there are limited treatment options for recurrent or aggressive lesions. Compared to other brain tumors, meningiomas may be uniquely amenable to immunotherapy by virtue of their location outside the blood-brain barrier.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes our current understanding of the immunology of the meninges, as well as immune cell infiltration and immune signaling in meningioma. Current literature on meningioma immunology and immunotherapy was comprehensively reviewed and summarized by a comprehensive search of MEDLINE (1/1/1990-6/1/2024). Further, we describe the current state of immunotherapeutic approaches, as well as potential future targets. Potential immunotherapeutic approaches include immune checkpoint inhibition, CAR-T approaches, tumor vaccine therapy, and immunogenic molecular markers.

EXPERT OPINION

Meningioma immunotherapy is in early stages, as no immunotherapies are currently included in treatment guidelines. There is substantial heterogeneity in immune cell infiltration, immunogenicity, and immune escape across tumors, even within tumor grade. Furthering our understanding of meningioma immunology and tumor classification will allow for careful selection of tumors and patient populations that may benefit from primary or adjunctive immunotherapy for meningioma.

Nivolumab with or without Ipilimumab Combined with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer: A Randomized Phase 2 Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefits of nivolumab with/without ipilimumab combined with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with pretreated metastatic biliary tract cancer (mBTC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was a phase 2 randomized trial with Simon's optimal two-stage design requiring 36 evaluable patients per group after second stage. Sixty-one patients were included from September 2018 to January 2022 and randomized (1:1) to receive SBRT (15 Gy × 1 on day 1 to a primary or metastatic lesion) and nivolumab (3 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 and every 2 weeks) with/without ipilimumab (1 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 and every 6 weeks). Primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as the percentage of patients with complete response, partial response, or stable disease. Decision to continue accrual into the second stage depended on the CBR from the first stage.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients received SBRT/nivolumab/ipilimumab with a CBR of 31.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 17.6-47.1]. Five patients (11.9%) achieved partial response with median duration of 4.4 months (range, 1.1-21.5). Nineteen patients received SBRT/nivolumab. This group was closed after the initial stage based on a CBR of 10.5% (95% CI, 1.3-33.1). Adverse events were graded with National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 13 (31%) and 3 (16%) patients in the SBRT/nivolumab/ipilimumab and SBRT/nivolumab groups, respectively. One patient died from immune-related hepatitis in the SBRT/nivolumab/ipilimumab group.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining SBRT, nivolumab, and ipilimumab is well tolerated, feasible, and shows response in a subgroup of patients with mBTC.

Is Local Ablative Stereotactic Radiation Therapy a Valuable Rescue Strategy for Time on Drug in Patients Enrolled in Phase I Trials?

PURPOSE

Patients with advanced tumors enrolled in phase I trials display strong treatment expectations and few therapeutic alternatives. When oligoacquired resistance (OAR; ≤3 lesions of disease progression) occurs, local ablative stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) could allow disease control and continuing the experimental systemic treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data from patients enrolled in phase I trials evaluating systemic treatments, who experienced OAR while on the phase I systemic therapy and subsequently received SRT between January 2014 and April 2023, were retrospectively analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS)1 (trial entry to OAR), PFS2 (SRT to first subsequent relapse), time to next systemic treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. First subsequent patterns of relapse after SRT were distinguished as OAR2, which could be locally rechallenged, or systemic acquired resistance (SAR; >3 lesions of disease progression). When available, correlations between molecular profile and pathway enrichments of OAR and SAR were explored.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with 52 oligoprogressive lesions were analyzed. The median follow-up was 24 months. SRT allowed a median PFS2 of 7.1 months and a median TTNT of 12.8 months. PFS2 included 49% OAR2 and 51% SAR. Median time to first subsequent relapse (9.6 vs 3.5 months; P = .014) and TTNT (22.4 vs 7.6 months; P < .001) were longer for OAR2 compared with that for SAR. No severe toxicities were reported. A PFS1 of <6 months and de novo oligoprogressive lesions were associated with the presence of SAR. More diverse enriched gene pathways were observed for SAR compared with that for OAR2.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients enrolled in phase I trials, OAR managed with SRT may increase time on investigational systemic treatments. Predictive factors reflecting tumor aggressiveness and clonal heterogeneity could help deciphering OAR2 from SAR and maximize SRT output in the oligoprogressive setting.

Eradicating gross tumor disease: a prerequisite for efficient radioimmunotherapy?

Radiation therapy may induce off-target antitumor "abscopal" immunostimulatory and immunosuppressive effects. Several preclinical and early clinical studies revealed promising results when combining radiation therapy with immunostimulatory agents. Most radioimmunotherapy randomized trials showed disappointing results in patients with advanced tumors. In contrast, outcomes were encouraging when immunotherapy was delivered on top of gross disease elimination with curative-intent radiation therapy. In this review, we highlight available results from randomized trials and discuss the potential impact of overall tumor burden on the observed efficacy of radioimmunotherapy.

Combination of Radiation Therapy, Wim's Tumor 1 (WT1) Dendritic Cell Vaccine Therapy, and α-Galactosylceramide-Pulsed Dendritic Cell Vaccine Therapy for End-Stage Small Bowel Cancer

There is no established treatment for terminal cancer patients who no longer respond to surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy, and palliative care is the standard worldwide. We performed intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pain relief in a 40-year-old male patient with end-stage small intestinal cancer who had been diagnosed with a life expectancy of two months after chemotherapy had been ineffective. Subsequent administration of seven doses of dendritic cell vaccine recognizing Wim's tumor 1 (WT1) and α-galactosylceramide antigens resulted in significant shrinkage of the cancer and marked improvement of the patient's general condition. The combination therapy of radiotherapy and dendritic cell vaccine therapy may suppress cancer progression and prolong survival, even in patients with chemotherapy-refractory terminal cancer. In particular, double dendritic cell vaccine therapy with WT1 and α-galactosylceramide-pulsed dendritic cell may provide an anti-tumor immune effect that is superior to that of the respective monotherapy.

A perspective on tumor radiation resistance following high-LET radiation treatment

High-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation is a promising alternative to conventional low-LET radiation for therapeutic gain against cancer owing to its ability to induce complex and clustered DNA lesions. However, the development of radiation resistance poses a significant barrier. The potential molecular mechanisms that could confer resistance development are translesion synthesis (TLS), replication gap suppression (RGS) mechanisms, autophagy, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) activation, release of exosomes, and epigenetic changes. This article will discuss various types of complex clustered DNA damage, their repair mechanisms, mutagenic potential, and the development of radiation resistance strategies. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of careful consideration and patient selection when employing high-LET radiotherapy in clinical settings.

CAR-macrophage versus CAR-T for solid tumors: The race between a rising star and a superstar

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) has been demonstrated to be one of the most promising cancer immunotherapy strategies due to its active antitumor capabilities in vivo. Engineering T cells to overexpress chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), for example, has shown potent efficacy in the therapy of some hematologic malignancies. However, the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy against solid tumors is still limited due to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) of solid tumors, difficulty in infiltrating tumor sites, lack of tumor-specific antigens, antigen escape, and severe side effects. In contrast, macrophages expressing CARs (CAR-macrophages) have emerged as another promising candidate in immunotherapy, particularly for solid tumors. Now at its nascent stage (with only one clinical trial progressing), CAR-macrophage still shows inspiring potential advantages over CAR-T in treating solid tumors, including more abundant antitumor mechanisms and better infiltration into tumors. In this review, we discuss the relationships and differences between CAR-T and CAR-macrophage therapies in terms of their CAR structures, antitumor mechanisms, challenges faced in treating solid tumors, and insights gleaned from clinical trials and practice for solid tumors. We especially highlight the potential advantages of CAR-macrophage therapy over CAR-T for solid tumors. Understanding these relationships and differences provides new insight into possible optimization strategies of both these two therapies in solid tumor treatment.

Targeting the CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway to reduce radiation treatment side effects

High precision, image-guided radiotherapy (RT) has increased the therapeutic ratio, enabling higher tumor and lower normal tissue doses, leading to improved patient outcomes. Nevertheless, some patients remain at risk of developing serious side effects.In many clinical situations, the radiation tolerance of normal tissues close to the target volume limits the dose that can safely be delivered and thus the potential for tumor control and cure. This is particularly so in patients being re-treated for tumor progression or a second primary tumor within a previous irradiated volume, scenarios that are becoming more frequent in clinical practice.Various normal tissue 'radioprotective' drugs with the potential to reduce side effects have been studied previously. Unfortunately, most have failed to impact clinical practice because of lack of therapeutic efficacy, concern about concurrent tumor protection or excessive drug-related toxicity. This review highlights the evidence indicating that targeting the CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway can mitigate acute and late RT-induced injury and reduce treatment side effects in a manner that overcomes these previous translational challenges. Pre-clinical studies involving a broad range of normal tissues commonly affected in clinical practice, including skin, lung, the gastrointestinal tract and brain, have shown that CXCL12 signalling is upregulated by RT and attracts CXCR4-expressing inflammatory cells that exacerbate acute tissue injury and late fibrosis. These studies also provide convincing evidence that inhibition of CXCL12/CXCR4 signalling during or after RT can reduce or prevent RT side effects, warranting further evaluation in clinical studies. Greater dialogue with the pharmaceutical industry is needed to prioritize the development and availability of CXCL12/CXCR4 inhibitors for future RT studies.

TLR3 activation enhances abscopal effect of radiotherapy in HCC by promoting tumor ferroptosis

Radiotherapy (RT) has been reported to induce abscopal effect in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but such phenomenon was only observed in sporadic cases. Here, we demonstrated that subcutaneous administration of Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) agonist poly(I:C) could strengthen the abscopal effect during RT through activating tumor cell ferroptosis signals in bilateral HCC subcutaneous tumor mouse models, which could be significantly abolished by TLR3 knock-out or ferroptosis inhibitor ferrostatin-1. Moreover, poly(I:C) could promote the presentation of tumor neoantigens by dendritic cells to enhance the recruitment of activated CD8+ T cells into distant tumor tissues for inducing tumor cell ferroptosis during RT treatment. Finally, the safety and feasibility of combining poly(I:C) with RT for treating advanced HCC patients were further verified in a prospective clinical trial. Thus, enhancing TLR3 signaling activation during RT could provide a novel strategy for strengthening abscopal effect to improve the clinical benefits of advanced HCC patients.

Progress of Mesoporous Silica Coated Gold Nanorods for Biological Imaging and Cancer Therapy

For unique surface plasmon absorption and fluorescence characteristics, gold nanorods have been developed and widely employed in the biomedical field. However, limitations still exist due their low specific surface area, instability and tendency agglomerate in cytoplasm. Mesoporous silica materials have been broadly applied in field of catalysts, adsorbents, nanoreactors, and drug carriers due to its unique mesoporous structure, highly comparative surface area, good stability and biocompatibility. Therefore, coating gold nanorods with a dendritic mesopore channels can effectively prevent particle agglomeration, while increasing the specific surface area and drug loading efficiency. This review discusses the advancements of GNR@MSN in synthetic process, bio-imaging technique and tumor therapy. Additionally, the further application of GNR@MSN in imaging-guided treatment modalities is explored, while its promising superior application prospect is highlighted. Finally, the issues related to in vivo studies are critically examined for facilitating the transition of this promising nanoplatform into clinical trials.

Radiotherapy protocols for mouse cancer model

Radiotherapy is a crucial treatment modality for cancer patients, with approximately 60% of individuals undergoing ionizing radiation as part of their disease management. In recent years, there has been a growing trend toward minimizing irradiation fields through the use of image-guided dosimetry and innovative technologies. These advancements allow for selective irradiation, delivering higher local doses while reducing the number of treatment sessions. Consequently, computer-assisted methods have significantly enhanced the effectiveness of radiotherapy in the curative and palliative treatment of various cancers. Although radiation therapy alone can effectively achieve local control in some cancer types, it may not be sufficient for others. As a result, further preclinical research is necessary to explore novel approaches including new schedules of radiotherapy treatments. Unfortunately, there is a concerning lack of correlation between clinical outcomes and experiments conducted on mouse models. We hypothesize that this disparity arises from the differences in irradiation strategies employed in preclinical studies compared to those used in clinical practice, which ultimately affects the translatability of findings to patients. In this study, we present two comprehensive radiotherapy protocols for the treatment of orthotopic melanoma and glioblastoma tumors. These protocols utilize a small animal radiation research platform, which is an ideal radiation device for delivering localized and precise X-ray doses to the tumor mass. By employing these platforms, we aim to limit the side effects associated with irradiating healthy surrounding tissues. Our detailed protocols offer a valuable framework for conducting preclinical studies that closely mimic clinical radiotherapy techniques, bridging the gap between experimental results and patient outcomes.

An international phase II trial and immune profiling of SBRT and atezolizumab in advanced pretreated colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Immuno-radiotherapy may improve outcomes for patients with advanced solid tumors, although optimized combination modalities remain unclear. Here, we report the colorectal (CRC) cohort analysis from the SABR-PDL1 trial that evaluated the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab in combination with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in advanced cancer patients.

METHODS

Eligible patients received atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks until progression or unmanageable toxicity, together with ablative SBRT delivered concurrently with the 2nd cycle (recommended dose of 45 Gy in 3 fractions, adapted upon normal tissue tolerance constraint). SBRT was delivered to at least one tumor site, with at least one additional measurable lesion being kept from the radiation field. The primary efficacy endpoint was one-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate from the start of atezolizumab. Sequential tumor biopsies were collected for deep multi-feature immune profiling.

RESULTS

Sixty pretreated (median of 2 prior lines) advanced CRC patients (38 men [63%]; median age, 59 years [range, 20-81 years]; 77% with liver metastases) were enrolled in five centers (France: n = 4, Spain: n = 1) from 11/2016 to 04/2019. All but one (98%) received atezolizumab and 54/60 (90%) received SBRT. The most frequently irradiated site was lung (n = 30/54; 56.3%). Treatment-related G3 (no G4-5) toxicity was observed in 3 (5%) patients. Median OS and PFS were respectively 8.4 [95%CI:5.9-11.6] and 1.4 months [95%CI:1.2-2.6], including five (9%) patients with PFS > 1 year (median time to progression: 19.2 months, including 2/5 MMR-proficient). Best overall responses consisted of stable disease (n = 38; 64%), partial (n = 3; 5%) and complete response (n = 1; 2%). Immune-centric multiplex IHC and RNAseq showed that SBRT redirected immune cells towards tumor lesions, even in the case of radio-induced lymphopenia. Baseline tumor PD-L1 and IRF1 nuclear expression (both in CD3 + T cells and in CD68 + cells) were higher in responding patients. Upregulation of genes that encode for proteins known to increase T and B cell trafficking to tumors (CCL19, CXCL9), migration (MACF1) and tumor cell killing (GZMB) correlated with responses.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides new data on the feasibility, efficacy, and immune context of tumors that may help identifying advanced CRC patients most likely to respond to immuno-radiotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT N°: 2015-005464-42; Clinicaltrial.gov number: NCT02992912.

Efficacy and safety of thoracic radiotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients receiving first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy: a propensity score matched multicentre retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Platinum-etoposide chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been recommended as the first-line standard treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, the effect of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) on these patients is still unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TRT for ES-SCLC patients who responded to first-line ICIs and chemotherapy (CHT).

METHODS

Patients who received 4 to 6 cycles of ICIs and CHT as first-line therapy at three hospitals between 2018 and 2022 were included in the analysis. All patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received TRT as first-line treatment, and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to ensure that the characteristics of two groups were well-balanced. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was toxic effects.

RESULTS

A total of 276 patients were included, and the median follow-up time was 22.3 (range, 4.0-53.73) months. After PSM, 197 patients were further analysed, and 99 of whom received TRT. The baseline characteristics were well-balanced between patients in the TRT and non-TRT groups. There were significant differences in PFS between the TRT and non-TRT groups, with the median PFS of 10.76 and 7.63 months, respectively (P = 0.014). Significantly improved OS was observed in the TRT group (21.67 vs. 16.6 months, P = 0.009). In addition, the use of TRT was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS of ES-SCLC patients receiving ICIs plus CHT. In terms of safety, no significant increase of any grades adverse event (AE) (P = 0.874) and G3-4 AE (P = 0.909) was observed for patients receiving TRT. Radiation esophagitis, gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities were the most common AEs in TRT group, which were tolerable. And high-dose radiotherapy was associated with higher incidence of pneumonitis.

CONCLUSION

Addition of TRT showed significant survival benefits and well tolerability in ES-SCLC patients receiving platinum-etoposide CHT and ICIs, which could be a feasible first-line treatment strategy for ES-SCLC patients.

Thermal Ablation Combined with Immune Checkpoint Blockers: A 10-Year Monocentric Experience

PURPOSE

We report a 10-year experience in cancer therapy with concomitant treatment of percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) and immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all patients at a single tertiary cancer center who had received ICBs at most 90 days before, or 30 days after, PTA. Feasibility and safety were assessed as the primary outcomes. The procedure-related complications and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were categorized according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 (CTCAE). Efficacy was evaluated based on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local progression-free survival (LPFS) according to the indication, ablation modality, neoplasm histology, and ICB type.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2021, 78 patients (57% male; median age: 61 years) were included. The PTA modality was predominantly cryoablation (CA) (61%), followed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (31%). PTA indications were the treatment of oligo-persistence (29%), oligo-progression (14%), and palliation of symptomatic lesions or prevention of skeletal-related events (SREs) (56%). Most patients received anti-PD1 ICB monotherapy with pembrolizumab (n = 35) or nivolumab (n = 24). The feasibility was excellent, with all combined treatment performed and completed as planned. Ten patients (13%) experienced procedure-related complications (90% grade 1-2), and 34 patients (44%) experienced an irAE (86% grade 1-2). The only factor statistically associated with better OS and PFS was the ablation indication, favoring oligo-persistence (p = 0.02). Tumor response was suggestive of an abscopal effect in four patients (5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The concomitant treatment of PTA and ICBs within 2-4 weeks is feasible and safe for both palliative and local control indications. Overall, PTA outcomes were found to be similar to standards for patients not on ICB therapy. While a consistently reproducible abscopal effect remains elusive, the safety profile of concomitant therapy provides the framework for continued assessment as ICB therapies evolve.

Differences in Radiosensitivity According to EGFR Mutation Status in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Clinical and In Vitro Study

Unlike drug selection, radiation parameters (field, dose) are not based on driver gene mutations in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to compare radiosensitivity in NSCLC with and without EGFR driver gene mutations using clinical and in vitro data. The clinical study included 42 patients who underwent whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases from NSCLC; of these, 13 patients had EGFR mutation-positive tumors. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the cranial control rate without intracranial recurrence. In the in vitro study, colony formation and double-strand DNA breaks were examined in two EGFR mutation-negative and three EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC-derived cell lines. Colony formation was assessed 14 days after irradiation with 0 (control), 2, 4, or 8 Gy. DNA double-strand breaks were evaluated 0.5 and 24 h after irradiation. EGFR mutation-positive patients had a significantly better cranial control rates than EGFR mutation-negative patients (p = 0.021). EGFR mutation-positive cells formed significantly fewer colonies after irradiation with 2 or 4 Gy than EGFR mutation-negative cells (p = 0.002, respectively) and had significantly more DNA double-strand breaks at 24 h after irradiation (p < 0.001). Both clinical and in vitro data suggest that EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC is radiosensitive.

Combination of radiosurgery and immunotherapy in brain metastases: balance between efficacy and toxicities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The incidence of brain metastasis is high and still increasing. Among local therapies, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment option, optimally sparing normal brain, even for multiple brain metastases. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) become the new standard of care in an increasing number of cancers, and the combination SRS and ICI is often proposed to patients, but few data have been published on the efficacy and the toxicity of this association.

RECENT FINDINGS

Explaining this lack of consensus: retrospective studies with different primary cancers, various treatment lines and unknown levels of steroid exposure. Concerning the toxicity, the independent association of radionecrosis with brain-PTV volume was confirmed, and a decreased dose of SRS is now tested in a randomized study. Finally, a 'concurrent' delivery of SRS and ICI (within a 4 weeks' interval) seems the optimal schedule; fractionated radiosurgery for large brain metastasis should be favored. Radio-sensitizing nanoparticles and devices aiming to increase the permeability of the blood brain barrier should be considered in future combinations.

SUMMARY

The efficacy/toxicity balance of SRS-ICI combination should be regularly re-evaluated, anticipating continued progress in ICI and SRS delivery, with more long-survivors potentially exposed to long-term toxicities. Patients should be included in clinical trials and clearly informed to participate more closely in the final choice.

Carbon ion radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy: synergistic anti-tumor efficacy and preliminary investigation of ferroptosis

Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) may yield satisfactory clinical outcomes for patients who are resistant to radiotherapy. However, the therapeutic impact of carbon ions is still limited in certain recurring or refractory tumors. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the synergistic anti-tumor effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with CIRT. We then explored the involvement of ferroptosis in a preliminary investigation. A tumor-bearing mouse model was established, and mice were inoculated subcutaneously with B16-OVA cells into the flanks of both hind legs. Mice were assigned to four groups to receive CIRT, ICIs, or combined treatment. Thereafter, we conducted transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq), bioinformatics analysis, and various immune-related experiments on the available tumor tissues to investigate differences in the synergistic anticancer effects and potential mechanisms across the groups. The combination therapies significantly improved the survival of mice and inhibited tumor growth, both at local and distant sites. Based on bioinformatics and RNA-seq data, immune-related pathways and genes, immune cell infiltration, and the production of cytokines and chemokines were the most enhanced in the combined treatment group compared to other groups. Finally, we identified a potential role for ferroptosis in the development of local anti-tumor synergy during CIRT combination treatment. In conclusion, this study showed that CIRT and ICIs can enhance the anti-tumor immune effects. We also proposed that ferroptosis may induce anti-tumor effects in CIRT combination therapy, offering a unique perspective on its ability to enhance immunotherapy responses.

Fecal microbiota transplantation plus tislelizumab and fruquintinib in refractory microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer: an open-label, single-arm, phase II trial (RENMIN-215)

Background

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of cancer. However, microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) shows a low response to PD-1 inhibitors. Antiangiogenic therapy can enhance anti-PD-1 efficacy, but it still cannot meet clinical needs. Increasing evidence supported a close relationship between gut microbiome and anti-PD-1 efficacy. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of the combination of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and tislelizumab and fruquintinib in refractory MSS mCRC.

Methods

In the phase II trial, MSS mCRC patients were administered FMT plus tislelizumab and fruquintinib as a third-line or above treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), safety and quality of life. Feces and peripheral blood were collected for exploratory biomarker analysis. This study is registered with Chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2100046768.

Findings

From May 10, 2021 to January 17, 2022, 20 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 13.7 months. Median PFS was 9.6 months (95% CI 4.1-15.1). Median OS was 13.7 months (95% CI 9.3-17.7). Median DoR was 8.1 months (95% CI 1.7-10.6). ORR was 20% (95% CI 5.7-43.7). DCR was 95% (95% CI 75.1-99.9). CBR was 60% (95% CI 36.1-80.9). Nineteen patients (95%) experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). Six patients (30%) had grade 3-4 TRAEs, with the most common being albuminuria (10%), urine occult blood (10%), fecal occult blood (10%), hypertension (5%), hyperglycemia (5%), liver dysfunction (5%), hand-foot skin reaction (5%), and hypothyroidism (5%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Responders had a high-abundance of Proteobacteria and Lachnospiraceae family and a low-abundance of Actinobacteriota and Bifidobacterium. The treatment did not change the structure of peripheral blood TCR repertoire. However, the expanded TCRs exhibited the characteristics of antigen-driven responses in responders.

Interpretation

FMT plus tislelizumab and fruquintinib as third-line or above treatment showed improved survival and manageable safety in refractory MSS mCRC, suggesting a valuable new treatment option for this patient population.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82102954 to Wensi Zhao) and the Special Project of Central Government for Local Science and Technology Development of Hubei Province (ZYYD2020000169 to Yongshun Chen).

Dissecting the role of the gut microbiome and fecal microbiota transplantation in radio- and immunotherapy treatment of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers and poses a major burden on the human health worldwide. At the moment, treatment of CRC consists of surgery in combination with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. More recently, immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) have also been approved for CRC treatment. In addition, recent studies have shown that radiotherapy and ICBs act synergistically, with radiotherapy stimulating the immune system that is activated by ICBs. However, both treatments are also associated with severe toxicity and efficacy issues, which can lead to temporary or permanent discontinuation of these treatment programs. There's growing evidence pointing to the gut microbiome playing a role in these issues. Some microorganisms seem to contribute to radiotherapy-associated toxicity and hinder ICB efficacy, while others seem to reduce radiotherapy-associated toxicity or enhance ICB efficacy. Consequently, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been applied to reduce radio- and immunotherapy-related toxicity and enhance their efficacies. Here, we have reviewed the currently available preclinical and clinical data in CRC treatment, with a focus on how the gut microbiome influences radio- and immunotherapy toxicity and efficacy and if these treatments could benefit from FMT.

Local control strategies for management of NSCLC with oligoprogressive disease

Progresses of systemic treatments in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), such as immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) and targeted therapies, led to the increased incidence of oligoprogressive disease (OPD). The OPD is a subtype of oligometastatic disease (OMD) defined as a progression of a limited number of lesions during systemic treatment exposure. The hypothesis was formulated that local radical treatments (LRT) could eradicate progressive lesions resulting from resistant clones, ultimately leading to systemic treatment sensitivity restoration. Recently published international consensuses and guidelines aim to obtain a uniform definition of OMD NSCLC, to standardize the inclusion of these patients in future clinical trials, as well as their management in daily practice. Although there is no specific definition of OPD, LRT strategies in OPD are supported after reporting promising results. Both retrospective and preliminary prospective randomized data of LRT for patients with OPD NSCLC are encouraging. More clinical and translational data are needed for selecting best scenarios where LRT should be delivered. In this review, we analyze the current available literature on LRT for patients with OPD in advanced NSCLC and discuss about future trial design and challenges.

Tumor Microenvironment Landscape of NSCLC Reveals Resistance Mechanisms for Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Blockade After Chemoradiotherapy: A Multicenter Prospective Biomarker Study (WJOG11518L:SUBMARINE)

INTRODUCTION

The PACIFIC regimen of consolidation therapy with the programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibitor durvalumab after definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy has become a standard of care for individuals with unresectable stage III NSCLC. Nevertheless, approximately half of the treated patients experience disease progression within 1 year, with the mechanisms of treatment resistance being poorly understood. We here performed a nationwide prospective biomarker study to explore the resistance mechanisms (WJOG11518L:SUBMARINE).

METHODS

A total of 135 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who received the PACIFIC regimen were included for comprehensive profiling of the tumor microenvironment by immunohistochemistry, transcriptome analysis, and genomic sequencing of pretreatment tumor tissue and flow cytometric analysis of circulating immune cells. Progression-free survival was compared on the basis of these biomarkers.

RESULTS

The importance of preexisting effective adaptive immunity in tumors was revealed for treatment benefit regardless of genomic features. We also identified CD73 expression by cancer cells as a mechanism of resistance to the PACIFIC regimen. Multivariable analysis of immunohistochemistry data with key clinical factors as covariables indicated that low CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density and the high CD73+ cancer cells were independently associated with poor durvalumab outcome (hazard ratios = 4.05 [95% confidence interval: 1.17-14.04] for CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; 4.79 [95% confidence interval: 1.12-20.58] for CD73). In addition, whole-exome sequencing of paired tumor samples suggested that cancer cells eventually escaped immune pressure as a result of neoantigen plasticity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study emphasizes the importance of functional adaptive immunity in stage III NSCLC and implicates CD73 as a promising treatment target, thus providing insight forming a basis for development of a new treatment approach in NSCLC.

The screening, identification, design and clinical application of tumor-specific neoantigens for TCR-T cells

Recent advances in neoantigen research have accelerated the development of tumor immunotherapies, including adoptive cell therapies (ACTs), cancer vaccines and antibody-based therapies, particularly for solid tumors. With the development of next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics technology, the rapid identification and prediction of tumor-specific antigens (TSAs) has become possible. Compared with tumor-associated antigens (TAAs), highly immunogenic TSAs provide new targets for personalized tumor immunotherapy and can be used as prospective indicators for predicting tumor patient survival, prognosis, and immune checkpoint blockade response. Here, the identification and characterization of neoantigens and the clinical application of neoantigen-based TCR-T immunotherapy strategies are summarized, and the current status, inherent challenges, and clinical translational potential of these strategies are discussed.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors after Radiation Therapy Improve Overall Survival Rates in Patients with Stage IV Lung Cancer

This exploratory and retrospective study aimed to evaluate whether there is a difference in the overall survival (OS) rates of patients with stage IV lung cancer who underwent radiation therapy (RT) depending on the presence or absence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the timing of their use. Eighty patients with histologically confirmed stage IV lung cancer were enrolled, and ICIs were administered to thirty (37.5%). ICIs were administered before RT and after RT in 11 and 20 patients, respectively. The median follow-up period was 6 (range: 1-37) months. Patients treated with ICIs had significantly better OS rates than those not treated with ICIs (p < 0.001). The 6-month OS rates in patients treated with and without ICIs were 76.3% and 34.5%, respectively. The group that received ICI therapy after RT had a significantly better OS rate than the group that received ICI therapy prior to RT (6-month OS: 94.7% vs. 40.0%, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, performance status (0-1 vs. 2-4) and ICI use after RT were significant factors for OS (p = 0.032 and p < 0.001, respectively). Our results suggest that ICI administration after RT may prolong the OS of patients with stage IV lung cancer.

Safety and efficacy of camrelizumab combined with radiotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective single-arm phase II clinical trial protocol

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy is the standard of care for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, approximately 30% of patients still develop distant metastases and have a high incidence of treatment-related adverse events. Immunotherapy, as a new modality for anti-cancer treatment, has shown promising clinical benefits for patients with ESCC. The synergistic effects of immunotherapy and radiotherapy make their combination promising as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced ESCC.

METHODS

All participants who meet the inclusion criteria will be enrolled after signing the informed consent form. Patients with thoracic segment esophageal cancer with clinical stage T2-3 N0 M0 or T2-3 N + M0 will be included. A total of 25 patients are to be recruited for the study. Twelve patients will be recruited in phase I, with at least two achieving major pathological response (MPR) before entering phase II. They will be treated with radical surgery within 4-8 weeks after the completion of two cycles of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in combination with camrelizumab according to the study schedule. The primary endpoint is the major pathological remission rate of all per-protocol patients. The secondary endpoints are the R0 resection rate, pathological complete remission rate, and adverse events. The interim analysis will be conducted after 12 patients have been enrolled. The trials will be terminated when more than two treatment-related deaths occur or fewer than five patients have major pathological remission.

DISCUSSION

We designed this prospective single-arm phase II clinical study to evaluate the combination of camrelizumab and standard radiotherapy as preoperative neoadjuvant therapy for patients with resectable ESCC as part of the quest for better treatment options for patients with locally advanced ESCC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial protocol has been registered on the NIH Clinical Trials database ( www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/ , NCT05176002. Registered on 2022/01/04). The posted information will be updated as needed to reflect protocol amendments and study progress.

Mechanisms of cancer cell death induction by triptolide

Drug resistance is a hot topic issue in cancer research and therapy. Although cancer therapy including radiotherapy and anti-cancer drugs can kill malignant cells within the tumor, cancer cells can develop a wide range of mechanisms to resist the toxic effects of anti-cancer agents. Cancer cells may provide some mechanisms to resist oxidative stress and escape from apoptosis and attack by the immune system. Furthermore, cancer cells may resist senescence, pyroptosis, ferroptosis, necroptosis, and autophagic cell death by modulating several critical genes. The development of these mechanisms leads to resistance to anti-cancer drugs and also radiotherapy. Resistance to therapy can increase mortality and reduce survival following cancer therapy. Thus, overcoming mechanisms of resistance to cell death in malignant cells can facilitate tumor elimination and increase the efficiency of anti-cancer therapy. Natural-derived molecules are intriguing agents that may be suggested to be used as an adjuvant in combination with other anticancer drugs or radiotherapy to sensitize cancer cells to therapy with at least side effects. This paper aims to review the potential of triptolide for inducing various types of cell death in cancer cells. We review the induction or resistance to different cell death mechanisms such as apoptosis, autophagic cell death, senescence, pyroptosis, ferroptosis, and necrosis following the administration of triptolide. We also review the safety and future perspectives for triptolide and its derivatives in experimental and human studies. The anticancer potential of triptolide and its derivatives may make them effective adjuvants for enhancing tumor suppression in combination with anticancer therapy.

Low-dose radiotherapy effects the progression of anti-tumor response

The history of low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT or LDR) as a treatment modality for malignant tumors dates back to the 1920s. Even with the minimal total dose administered during treatment, LDRT can result in long-lasting remission. Autocrine and paracrine signaling are widely recognized for fostering the growth and development of tumor cells. LDRT exerts systemic anti-tumor effects through various mechanisms, such as enhancing the activity of immune cells and cytokines, shifting the immune response towards an anti-tumor phenotype, influencing gene expression, and blocking crucial immunosuppressive pathways. Additionally, LDRT has been demonstrated to enhance the infiltration of activated T cells and initiate a series of inflammatory processes while modulating the tumor microenvironment. In this context, the objective of receiving radiation is not to directly kill tumor cells but to reprogram the immune system. Enhancing anti-tumor immunity may be a critical mechanism by which LDRT plays a role in cancer suppression. Therefore, this review primarily focuses on the clinical and preclinical efficacy of LDRT in combination with other anti-cancer strategies, such as the interaction between LDRT and the tumor microenvironment, and the remodeling of the immune system.

Optimal dosing regimen of CD73 blockade improves tumor response to radiotherapy through iCOS downregulation

BACKGROUND

Irradiation (IR) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination is a promising treatment modality. However, local and distance treatment failure and resistance can occur. To counteract this resistance, several studies propose CD73, an ectoenzyme, as a potential target to improve the antitumor efficiency of IR and ICI. Although CD73 targeting in combination with IR and ICI has shown attractive antitumor effects in preclinical models, the rationale for CD73 targeting based on CD73 tumor expression level deserves further investigations.

METHODS

Here we evaluated for the first time the efficacy of two administration regimens of CD73 neutralizing antibody (one dose vs four doses) in combination with IR according to the expression level of CD73 in two subcutaneous tumor models expressing different levels of CD73.

RESULTS

We showed that CD73 is weakly expressed by MC38 tumors even after IR, when compared with the TS/A model that highly expressed CD73. Treatment with four doses of anti-CD73 improved the TS/A tumor response to IR, while it was ineffective against the CD73 low-expressing MC38 tumors. Surprisingly, a single dose of anti-CD73 exerted a significant antitumor activity against MC38 tumors. On CD73 overexpression in MC38 cells, four doses of anti-CD73 were required to improve the efficacy of IR. Mechanistically, a correlation between a downregulation of iCOS expression in CD4⁺ T cells and an improved response to IR after anti-CD73 treatment was observed and iCOS targeting could restore an impaired benefit from anti-CD73 treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These data emphasize the importance of the dosing regimen for anti-CD73 treatment to improve tumor response to IR and identify iCOS as part of the underlying molecular mechanisms. Our data suggest that the selection of appropriate dosing regimen is required to optimize the therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy-radiotherapy combinations.

A Mathematical Model for Predicting Patient Responses to Combined Radiotherapy with CTLA-4 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

The purpose of this study was to develop a cell-cell interaction model that could predict a tumor's response to radiotherapy (RT) combined with CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The previously developed model was extended by adding a new term representing tremelimumab, an inhibitor of CTLA-4. The distribution of the new immune activation term was derived from the results of a clinical trial for tremelimumab monotherapy (NCT01008358). The proposed model successfully reproduced longitudinal tumor diameter changes in HCC patients treated with tremelimumab (complete response = 0%, partial response = 17.6%, stable disease = 58.8%, and progressive disease = 23.6%). For the non-irradiated tumor control group, adding ICI to RT increased the clinical benefit rate from 8% to 32%. The simulation predicts that it is beneficial to start CTLA-4 blockade before RT in terms of treatment sequences. We developed a mathematical model that can predict the response of patients to the combined CTLA-4 blockade with radiation therapy. We anticipate that the developed model will be helpful for designing clinical trials with the ultimate aim of maximizing the efficacy of ICI-RT combination therapy.

Targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) for treatment of non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC); the recent advances

The immune system uses various immune checkpoint axes to adjust responses, support homeostasis, and deter self-reactivity and autoimmunity. Nevertheless, non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) can use protective mechanisms to facilitate immune evasion, which leads to potentiated cancer survival and proliferation. In this light, many blocking anti-bodies have been developed to negatively regulate checkpoint molecules, in particular, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) / PD-ligand 1 (L1), and bypass these immune suppressive mechanisms. Meanwhile, anti-PD-1 anti-bodies such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab, and sintilimab have shown excellent competence in successfully inspiring immune responses versus NSCLC. Accordingly, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently approved nivolumab (alone or in combination with ipilimumab) and pembrolizumab (alone or in combination with chemotherapy) as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC patients. However, PD-1 blockade monotherapy remains inefficient in more than 60% of NSCLC patients, and many patients don't respond or acquire resistance to this modality. Also, toxicities related to anti-PD-1 anti-body have been progressively identified in clinical trials and oncology practice. Herein, we will outline the clinical benefits of PD-1 blockade therapy alone or in combination with other treatments (e.g., chemotherapy, radiotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy) in NSCLC patients. Moreover, we will take a glimpse into the recently identified predictive biomarkers to determine patients most likely to suffer serious adverse events to decrease untoward toxicity risk and diminish treatment costs.

First-line atezolizumab/durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide combined with radiotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy has made significant advances in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), but data in combination with radiotherapy are scarce. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study analyzed patients with ES-SCLC who received standard platinum-etoposide chemotherapy combined with atezolizumab or durvalumab immunotherapy as induction treatment, followed by consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (CTRT) before disease progression in the first-line setting. Adverse events during radiotherapy with or without maintenance immunotherapy and survival outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Between December 2019 and November 2021, 36 patients with ES-SCLC were identified to have received such treatment modality at one hospital. The number of metastatic sites at diagnosis was 1-4. The biological effective dose of CTRT ranged from 52 to 113 Gy. Only two patients (6%) developed grade 3 toxic effect of thrombocytopenia, but none experienced grade 4 or 5 toxicity. Four patients developed immune-related pneumonitis during the induction treatment period but successfully completed later CTRT. The rate of radiation-related pneumonitis was 8% with grades 1-2 and well tolerated. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.8 months, but the median overall survival (OS) was not determined. The estimated 1-year OS was 80.2% and 1-year PFS was 53.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunotherapy combined with CTRT for ES-SCLC is safe and has ample survival benefit.

Effectiveness and safety of radiotherapy plus programmed death-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy (RT) may function synergistically with immunotherapy and targeted agents (TA). This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of RT combined with programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and lenvatinib in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC).

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with relapsed or refractory advanced BTC who received RT combined with PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients who received RT combined with PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib as a second- or later-line therapy were analyzed. RT sites were mainly distributed in the liver lesions (64.5%) and lymph nodes (58.1%). The ORR and DCR were 32.3% (10/31; 95% CI: 14.8-49.7) and 87.1% (27/31; 95% CI: 74.6-99.6), respectively. The median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS) were 7.9 (95% CI: 7.1-8.7) and 11.7 (95% CI: 8.3-15.0) months, respectively. Subgroup analyses of this cohort included 12 and 19 patients who received concurrent and salvage (> 6 weeks after commencing PD-1 inhibitor therapy) RT, respectively. The salvage RT group had higher mOS (11.7 vs. 10.5; p = 0.75) and mPFS (7.9 vs. 6.9; p = 0.85) than the concurrent RT group; however, statistical significance was not reached. All patients experienced any-grade adverse events (AEs), and excessive PD-1 inhibitors or RT toxicity were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

RT, PD-1 inhibitors, and lenvatinib may be safely combined and have antitumor effectiveness in patients with advanced BTC.

Cytofluorometric characterization of the myeloid compartment of irradiated mouse tumors

The use of ionizing radiation (IR) is a cornerstone for the treatment of cancer and radiotherapy (RT) is used in roughly 50% of cancer patients. It is now well established that RT exerts widespread effects on the tumor stroma, including the immune environment. Together with its deeply characterized effects on the lymphoid compartment, RT also deeply affects the myeloid cell compartment. Fluorescence-activated flow cytometry is one of the most widely used technologies in immunology, allowing the multiparametric analysis of cells on a cell-by-cell basis. Here, we provide a detailed flow cytometry protocol to analyze the myeloid cell populations of human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive TC1/Luc tumors engrafted in the oral mucosa of immunocompetent mice, and to evaluate their modulations in response to RT. The same method, with slight modifications, can be used to study the tumor myeloid cells from a variety of other mouse tumors.

Ataxia telangiectasia mutated kinase inhibition promotes irradiation-induced PD-L1 expression in tumour-associated macrophages through IFN-I/JAK signalling pathway

Tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) are one of the primary sources of PD-L1 expression in the tumour microenvironment (TME). Ionizing radiation (IR) promotes PD-L1 expression in tumour cells. However, the effect of IR on macrophage PD-L1 expression and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. ATM kinase, as the key kinase for initiating DNA damage repair (DDR) process, is associated with innate immune STING axis activation. Here, we explored the molecular mechanism implicated in macrophage PD-L1 expression regulated by IR as well as the role of ATM kinase in this process. IR-regulated PD-L1 expression in macrophages and associated signalling pathways were explored by in vitro studies using murine and human macrophage cell lines. A colorectal xenograft murine model was employed to demonstrate the impact of targeting ATM and PD-L1 expression in TAMs following IR on growth of tumour in vivo. IR up-regulated PD-L1 expression in macrophages, which was further augmented by ATM kinase inhibition. ATM inhibition increased IR-induced DNA damage, which activated STING/interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) signalling pathway and up-regulated type I interferon (IFN-I) expression in macrophages. IFN-I bound to the IFN α receptor 1 on macrophages, activated the downstream JAK1 and STAT1/3 signalling and eventually led to PD-L1 up-expression. ATM inhibition augmented IR-induced PD-L1 expression in macrophages and CD8⁺ T cell infiltration, and promoted anti-tumour efficacy in vivo. These results suggested that ATM inhibition promoted IR-induced PD-L1 expression through the activation of innate immunity in TAMs, which provided a novel approach to enhance the anti-tumour efficacy of RT.

Immunotherapy combined with radiotherapy to reverse immunosuppression in microsatellite stable colorectal cancer

In recent years, the exploration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has resulted in substantial progress and has changed the pattern of cancer treatment. ICIs have revolutionized the treatment landscape of microsatellite instable colorectal cancer while the efficacy is very limited in patients with microsatellite stable colorectal cancer. Therefore, sensitizing MSS CRC to immunotherapy is a major challenge in the field of CRC immunotherapy. Immunotherapy-based combination therapy is an effective strategy. This review of radiotherapy (RT) as a local treatment has dramatically changed in recent years, and it is now widely accepted that RT can deeply reshape the tumor environment by modulating the immune response. Such evidence gives a strong rationale for the synergism of radiotherapy and immunotherapy, introducing the era of 'immunoradiotherapy'. How to give full play to the synergistic effect of radiotherapy and immunotherapy to improve the therapeutic effect of MSS CRC and bring good prognosis is a hot problem to be solved in the field of cancer treatment.This article reviews the development of CRC immunotherapy, the immune resistance mechanism of MSS CRC, and the impact and potential value of immunotherapy combined with radiotherapy on the immune environment of CRC.

Nanoparticles augment the therapeutic window of RT and immunotherapy for treating cancers: pivotal role of autophagy

Immunotherapies are now emerging as an efficient anticancer therapeutic strategy. Cancer immunotherapy utilizes the host's immune system to fight against cancer cells and has gained increasing interest due to its durable efficacy and low toxicity compared to traditional antitumor treatments, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT). Although the combination of RT and immunotherapy has drawn extensive attention in the clinical setting, the overall response rates are still low. Therefore, strategies for further improvement are urgently needed. Nanotechnology has been used in cancer immunotherapy and RT to target not only cancer cells but also the tumor microenvironment (TME), thereby helping to generate a long-term immune response. Nanomaterials can be an effective delivery system and a strong autophagy inducer, with the ability to elevate autophagy to very high levels. Interestingly, autophagy could play a critical role in optimal immune function, mediating cell-extrinsic homeostatic effects through the regulation of danger signaling in neoplastic cells under immunogenic chemotherapy and/or RT. In this review, we summarize the preclinical and clinical development of the combination of immunotherapy and RT in cancer therapy and highlight the latest progress in nanotechnology for augmenting the anticancer effects of immunotherapy and RT. The underlying mechanisms of nanomaterial-triggered autophagy in tumor cells and the TME are discussed in depth. Finally, we suggest the implications of these three strategies combined together to achieve the goal of maximizing the therapeutic advantages of cancer therapy and show recent advances in biomarkers for tumor response in the evaluation of those therapies.

Immune microenvironment of cholangiocarcinoma: Biological concepts and treatment strategies

Cholangiocarcinoma is characterized by a poor prognosis with limited treatment and management options. Chemotherapy using gemcitabine with cisplatin is the only available first-line therapy for patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma, although it offers only palliation and yields a median survival of < 1 year. Recently there has been a resurgence of immunotherapy studies focusing on the ability of immunotherapy to inhibit cancer growth by impacting the tumor microenvironment. Based on the TOPAZ-1 trial, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved the combination of durvalumab and gemcitabine with cisplatin as the first-line treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. However, immunotherapy, like immune checkpoint blockade, is less effective in cholangiocarcinoma than in other types of cancer. Although several factors such as the exuberant desmoplastic reaction are responsible for cholangiocarcinoma treatment resistance, existing literature on cholangiocarcinoma cites the inflammatory and immunosuppressive environment as the most common factor. However, mechanisms activating the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment contributing to cholangiocarcinoma drug resistance are complicated. Therefore, gaining insight into the interplay between immune cells and cholangiocarcinoma cells, as well as the natural development and evolution of the immune tumor microenvironment, would provide targets for therapeutic intervention and improve therapeutic efficacy by developing multimodal and multiagent immunotherapeutic approaches of cholangiocarcinoma to overcome the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. In this review, we discuss the role of the inflammatory microenvironment-cholangiocarcinoma crosstalk and reinforce the importance of inflammatory cells in the tumor microenvironment, thereby highlighting the explanatory and therapeutic shortcomings of immunotherapy monotherapy and proposing potentially promising combinational immunotherapeutic strategies.

Intratumoral BO-112 in combination with radiotherapy synergizes to achieve CD8 T-cell-mediated local tumor control

BACKGROUND

Radioimmunotherapy combines irradiation of tumor lesions with immunotherapy to achieve local and abscopal control of cancer. Most immunotherapy agents are given systemically, but strategies for delivering immunotherapy locally are under clinical scrutiny to maximize efficacy and avoid toxicity. Local immunotherapy, by injecting various pathogen-associated molecular patterns, has shown efficacy both preclinically and clinically. BO-112 is a viral mimetic based on nanoplexed double-stranded RNA (poly I:C) which exerts immune-mediated antitumor effects in mice and humans on intratumoral delivery. BO-112 and focal irradiation were used to make the proof-of-concept for local immunotherapy plus radiation therapy combinations.

METHODS

Murine transplantable tumor cell lines (TS/A, MC38 and B16-OVA) were used to show increased immunogenic features under irradiation, as well as in bilateral tumor models in which only one of the lesions was irradiated or/and injected with BO-112. Flow cytometry and multiplex tissue immunofluorescence were used to determine the effects on antitumor immunity. Depletions of immune cell populations and knockout mice for the IFNAR and BATF-3 genes were used to delineate the immune system requirements for efficacy.

RESULTS

In cultures of TS/A breast cancer cells, the combination of irradiation and BO-112 showed more prominent features of immunogenic tumor cell death in terms of calreticulin exposure. Injection of BO-112 into the tumor lesion receiving radiation achieved excellent control of the treated tumor and modest delays in contralateral tumor progression. Local effects were associated with more prominent infiltrates of antitumor cytotoxic tumor lymphocytes (CTLs). Importantly, local irradiation plus BO-112 in one of the tumor lesions that enhanced the therapeutic effects of radiotherapy on distant irradiated lesions that were not injected with BO-112. Hence, this beneficial effect of local irradiation plus BO-112 on a tumor lesion enhanced the therapeutic response to radiotherapy on distant non-injected lesions.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that local BO-112 immunotherapy and focal irradiation may act in synergy to achieve local tumor control. Irradiation plus BO-112 in one of the tumor lesions enhanced the therapeutic effects on distant irradiated lesions that were not injected with BO-112, suggesting strategies to treat oligometastatic patients with lesions susceptible to radiotherapy and with at least one tumor accessible for repeated BO-112 intratumoral injections.

Safety and feasibility of toripalimab plus lenvatinib with or without radiotherapy in advanced BTC

Background

Toripalimab shows antitumor efficacy in cholangiocarcinoma. Radiotherapy (RT) may enhance systemic responses of PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib. This study was designed to assess the safety and feasibility of toripalimab plus lenvatinib with or without RT in advanced BTC.

Methods

This study involved 88 patients with advanced BTC receiving toripalimab plus lenvatinib with or without RT from the clinical trials (NCT03892577). Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) analysis was used to balance potential bias. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated.

Results

After PSM, the final analysis included 40 patients: 20 receiving toripalimab plus lenvatinib without RT (NRT); 20 receiving toripalimab plus lenvatinib with RT. The AEs were more frequent in the RT group than in the NRT group without treatment-associated mortality. The addition of RT did not cause specific AEs. The median PFS was significantly longer with RT (10.8 versus 4.6 months, p<0.001). The median OS was 13.7 months with RT versus 9.2 months in the NRT group (p=0.008). The ORR was 35% (95% CI: 12.1-57.9) in the RT group versus 20% (95% CI: 0.8-39.2) in the NRT group.

Conclusions

The addition of RT may enhance the efficacy of toripalimab plus lenvatinib. Toripalimab plus lenvatinib with RT have a good safety profile without an increase in specific toxicities in advanced BTC patients.

Clonogenicity-based radioresistance determines the expression of immune suppressive immune checkpoint molecules after hypofractionated irradiation of MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast cancer cells

Only a subset of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) benefits from a combination of radio- (RT) and immunotherapy. Therefore, we aimed to examine the impact of radioresistance and brain metastasizing potential on the immunological phenotype of TNBC cells following hypofractionated RT by analyzing cell death, immune checkpoint molecule (ICM) expression and activation of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs). MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast cancer tumor cells were used as model system. Apoptosis was the dominant cell death form of brain metastasizing tumor cells, while Hsp70 release was generally significantly increased following RT and went along with necrosis induction. The ICMs PD-L1, PD-L2, HVEM, ICOS-L, CD137-L and OX40-L were found on the tumor cell surfaces and were significantly upregulated by RT with 5 x 5.2 Gy. Strikingly, the expression of immune suppressive ICMs was significantly higher on radioresistant clones compared to their respective non-radioresistant ones. Although hypofractionated RT led to significant cell death induction and release of Hsp70 in all tumor cell lines, human monocyte-derived DCs were not activated after co-incubation with RT-treated tumor cells. We conclude that radioresistance is a potent driver of immune suppressive ICM expression on the surface of TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells. This mechanism is generally known to predominantly influence the effector phase, rather than the priming phase, of anti-tumor immune responses.

Radiotherapy as a means to increase the efficacy of T-cell therapy in solid tumors

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells have demonstrated significant improvements in the treatment of refractory B-cell malignancies that previously showed limited survival. In contrast, early-phase clinical studies targeting solid tumors have been disappointing. This may be due to both a lack of specific and homogeneously expressed targets at the surface of tumor cells, as well as intrinsic properties of the solid tumor microenvironment that limit homing and activation of adoptive T cells. Faced with these antagonistic conditions, radiotherapy (RT) has the potential to change the overall tumor landscape, from depleting tumor cells to reshaping the tumor microenvironment. In this article, we describe the current landscape and discuss how RT may play a pivotal role for enhancing the efficacy of adoptive T-cell therapies in solid tumors. Indeed, by improving homing, expansion and activation of infused T cells while reducing tumor volume and heterogeneity, the use of RT could help the implementation of engineered T cells in the treatment of solid tumors.

Changing Role of PET/CT in Cancer Care With a Focus on Radiotherapy

Positron emission tomography (PET) integrated with computed tomography (CT) has brought revolutionary changes in improving cancer care (CC) for patients. These include improved detection of previously unrecognizable disease, ability to identify oligometastatic status enabling more aggressive treatment strategies when the disease burden is lower, its use in better defining treatment targets in radiotherapy (RT), ability to monitor treatment responses early and thus improve the ability for early interventions of non-responding tumors, and as a prognosticating tool as well as outcome predicting tool. PET/CT has enabled the emergence of new concepts such as radiobiotherapy (RBT), radioimmunotherapy, theranostics, and pharmaco-radiotherapy. This is a rapidly evolving field, and this primer is to help summarize the current status and to give an impetus to developing new ideas, clinical trials, and CC outcome improvements.

Disruption of the NKG2A:HLA-E Immune Checkpoint Axis to Enhance NK Cell Activation against Cancer

Ligation of the inhibitory receptor NKG2A by its ligand HLA-E negatively regulates the activation of natural killer (NK) cells, as well as subsets of CD8+ T cells and innate T cell populations. NKG2A has recently become a novel immune checkpoint target for the treatment of cancer and direct antibody mediated blockade of NKG2A function is currently under assessment in two phase 3 clinical trials. In addition to direct targeting, the NKG2A:HLA-E axis can also be disrupted indirectly via multiple different targeted cancer agents that were not previously recognised to possess immunomodulatory properties. Increased understanding of immune cell modulation by targeted cancer therapies will allow for the design of rational and more efficacious drug combination strategies to improve cancer patient outcomes. In this review, we summarise and discuss the various strategies currently in development which either directly or indirectly disrupt the NKG2A:HLA-E interaction to enhance NK cell activation against cancer.

Treatment beyond progression in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Treatment beyond progression (TBP) is defined as treatment continuing in spite of disease progression, according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide evidence for the effects of TBP on lung cancer survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study has been conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials from the inception of each database to December 2021 was conducted. Two authors independently reviewed articles for inclusion and extract data from all the retrieved articles. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, version 3 (Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA). Hazard ratios (HRs) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used for survival outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified five (15.6%) prospective randomized trials and twenty-seven (84.4%) retrospective observational studies of a total of 9,631 patients for the meta-analysis. 3,941 patients (40.9%) were in a TBP group and 5,690 patients (59.1%) were in a non-TBP group. There is a statistically significant advantage for patients who received TBP compared with those who did not in post progression progression-free survival (ppPFS), post progression overall survival (ppOS), and overall survival (OS) from initiation of drugs (ppPFS: HR, 0.746; 95% CI, 0.644-0.865; P<0.001; ppOS: HR, 0.689; 95% CI, 0.596-0.797; P<0.001; OS from initiation of drugs: HR, 0.515; 95% CI, 0.387-0.685; P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study provides further evidence in support of TBP for NSCLC, however, these results require cautious interpretation. Large, randomized, controlled trials investigating the efficacy of TBP in lung cancer treatment are warranted.

SYSTEMIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ identifier CRD42021285147.

Immune-related arthritis following pelvic radiation therapy in a patient with lung cancer receiving long-term immune checkpoint blocker treatment: Case report

Radiotherapy can trigger immune-related out-of-field "abscopal" response. We report a patient with advanced NSCLC (non-small cell lung cancer) receiving long-term anti-PD1 (programmed cell death protein 1) who have developed out-of-field immune-related arthritis following pelvic irradiation.

LPAR5 confers radioresistance to cancer cells associated with EMT activation via the ERK/Snail pathway

BACKGROUND

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a critical event contributing to more aggressive phenotypes in cancer cells. EMT is frequently activated in radiation-targeted cells during the course of radiotherapy, which often endows cancers with acquired radioresistance. However, the upstream molecules driving the signaling pathways of radiation-induced EMT have not been fully delineated.

METHODS

In this study, RNA-seq-based transcriptome analysis was performed to identify the early responsive genes of HeLa cells to γ-ray irradiation. EMT-associated genes were knocked down by siRNA technology or overexpressed in HeLa cells and A549 cells, and the resulting changes in phenotypes of EMT and radiosensitivity were assessed using qPCR and Western blotting analyses, migration assays, colony-forming ability and apoptosis of flow cytometer assays.

RESULTS

Through RNA-seq-based transcriptome analysis, we found that LPAR5 is downregulated in the early response of HeLa cells to γ-ray irradiation. Radiation-induced alterations in LPAR5 expression were further revealed to be a bidirectional dynamic process in HeLa and A549 cells, i.e., the early downregulating phase at 2 ~ 4 h and the late upregulating phase at 24 h post-irradiation. Overexpression of LPAR5 prompts EMT programing and migration of cancer cells. Moreover, increased expression of LPAR5 is significantly associated with IR-induced EMT and confers radioresistance to cancer cells. Knockdown of LPAR5 suppressed IR-induced EMT by attenuating the activation of ERK signaling and downstream Snail, MMP1, and MMP9 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

LPAR5 is an important upstream regulator of IR-induced EMT that modulates the ERK/Snail pathway. This study provides further insights into understanding the mechanism of radiation-induced EMT and identifies promising targets for improving the effectiveness of cancer radiation therapy.

Combining a nanoparticle-mediated immunoradiotherapy with dual blockade of LAG3 and TIGIT improves the treatment efficacy in anti-PD1 resistant lung cancer

BACKGROUND

While improvements in immunoradiotherapy have significantly improved outcomes for cancer patients, this treatment approach has nevertheless proven ineffective at controlling the majority of malignancies. One of the mechanisms of resistance to immunoradiotherapy is that immune cells may be suppressed via the myriad of different immune checkpoint receptors. Therefore, simultaneous blockade of multiple immune checkpoint receptors may enhance the treatment efficacy of immunoradiotherapy.

METHODS

We combined NBTXR3-enhanced localized radiation with the simultaneous blockade of three different checkpoint receptors: PD1, LAG3, and TIGIT, and tested the treatment efficacy in an anti-PD1-resistant lung cancer model in mice. 129 Sv/Ev mice were inoculated with fifty thousand αPD1-resistant 344SQR cells in the right leg on day 0 to establish primary tumors and with the same number of cells in the left leg on day 4 to establish the secondary tumors. NBTXR3 was intratumorally injected into the primary tumors on day 7, which were irradiated with 12 Gy on days 8, 9, and 10. Anti-PD1 (200 µg), αLAG3 (200 µg), and αTIGIT (200 µg) were given to mice by intraperitoneal injections on days 5, 8, 11, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42.

RESULTS

This nanoparticle-mediated combination therapy is effective at controlling the growth of irradiated and distant unirradiated tumors, enhancing animal survival, and is the only one that led to the destruction of both tumors in approximately 30% of the treated mice. Corresponding with this improved response is robust activation of the immune response, as manifested by increased numbers of immune cells along with a transcriptional signature of both innate and adaptive immunity within the tumor. Furthermore, mice treated with this combinatorial therapy display immunological memory response when rechallenged by the same cancer cells, preventing tumor engraftment.

CONCLUSION

Our results strongly attest to the efficacy and validity of combining nanoparticle-enhanced radiotherapy and simultaneous blockade of multiple immune checkpoint receptors and provide a pre-clinical rationale for investigating its translation into human patients.

Mechanisms of tumor resistance to immune checkpoint blockade and combination strategies to overcome resistance

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has rapidly transformed the treatment paradigm for various cancer types. Multiple single or combinations of ICB treatments have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, providing more options for patients with advanced cancer. However, most patients could not benefit from these immunotherapies due to primary and acquired drug resistance. Thus, a better understanding of the mechanisms of ICB resistance is urgently needed to improve clinical outcomes. Here, we focused on the changes in the biological functions of CD8⁺ T cells to elucidate the underlying resistance mechanisms of ICB therapies and summarized the advanced coping strategies to increase ICB efficacy. Combinational ICB approaches and individualized immunotherapies require further in-depth investigation to facilitate longer-lasting efficacy and a more excellent safety of ICB in a broader range of patients.

Radiation-induced lymphopenia does not impact treatment efficacy in a mouse tumor model

Radiation-induced lymphopenia is a common occurrence in radiation oncology and an established negative prognostic factor, however the mechanisms underlying the relationship between lymphopenia and inferior survival remain elusive. The relevance of lymphocyte co-irradiation as critical normal tissue component at risk is an emerging topic of high clinical relevance, even more so in the context of potentially synergistic radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations. The impact of the radiotherapy treatment volume on the lymphocytes of healthy and tumor-bearing mice was investigated in a novel mouse model of radiation-induced lymphopenia. Using an image-guided small-animal radiotherapy treatment platform, translationally relevant tumor-oriented volumes of irradiation with an anatomically defined increasing amount of normal tissue were irradiated, with a focus on the circulating blood and lymph nodes. In healthy mice, the influence of irradiation with increasing radiotherapy treatment volumes was quantified on the level of circulating blood cells and in the spleen. A significant decrease in the lymphocytes was observed in response to irradiation, including the minimally irradiated putative tumor area. The extent of lymphopenia correlated with the increasing volumes of irradiation. In tumor-bearing mice, differential radiotherapy treatment volumes did not influence the overall therapeutic response to radiotherapy alone. Intriguingly, an improved treatment efficacy in mice treated with draining-lymph node co-irradiation was observed in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Taken together, our study reveals compelling data on the importance of radiotherapy treatment volume in the context of lymphocytes as critical components of normal tissue co-irradiation and highlights emerging challenges at the interface of radiotherapy and immunotherapy.