Efficacy of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Oral Cyclophosphamide on Skin Thickness: Post Hoc Analyses From Two Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials

Can we define difficult-to-treat systemic sclerosis?

INTRODUCTION

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune rheumatic disease characterized by microvascular alterations, immunopathology, and widespread fibrosis involving various organs. It is considered difficult to treat due to several reasons: complex pathogenesis, heterogeneity, late diagnosis, limited treatment options for certain organ manifestations, lack of personalized medicine.

AREAS COVERED

This review presents the heterogeneity, survival and organ manifestations with their risk factors of systemic sclerosis and their current treatment options, while drawing attention to difficult-to-treat forms of the disease, based on literature indexed in PubMed.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite recent advances in the management of SSc over the last decades, the disease presents significant morbidity and mortality. Although available treatment protocols brought significant advancements in terms of survival in SSc-associated interstitial lung disease and pulmonary arterial hypertension, less success has been achieved in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon and digital ulcers and the results are modest in case of heart, gastrointestinal, and renal manifestations. There are patients who do not respond to treatment and deteriorate even with adequate therapy. They can be considered difficult-to treat (D2T) cases. We have created a possible score system based on the individual organ manifestations and highlighted treatment options for the D2T SSc category.

Interstitial Lung Disease Associated with Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by a tripod combining vasculopathy, fibrosis, and immune-mediated inflammatory processes. The prevalence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in SSc varies according to the methods used to detect it, ranging from 25 to 95%. The fibrotic and vascular pulmonary manifestations of SSc, particularly ILD, are the main causes of morbidity and mortality, contributing to 35% of deaths. Although early trials were conducted with cyclophosphamide, more recent randomized controlled trials have been performed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of several medications, mostly mycophenolate, rituximab, tocilizumab, and nintedanib. Although many uncertainties remain, expert consensus is emerging to optimize the therapeutic management and to provide clinicians with evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for patients with SSc-ILD. This article provides an overview, in the light of the latest advances, of the available evidence for the diagnosis and management of SSc-ILD.

Hearing impairment in systemic sclerosis patients-what do we really know?

Background

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a disease of a very heterogeneous clinical picture and immunological profile with progression rate that varies between individuals. Although hearing deterioration is not a complaint that comes to the fore in SSc patients, as it is not life-threatening compared to many other more severe symptoms of this disease, it can significantly impair the quality of life. Medical literature concerning this problem is rather scarce.

Materials and methods

In this article we systematically reviewed the medical publications concerning hearing impairment in patients with systemic sclerosis to evaluate current understanding of this complex problem. Following PRISMA guidelines a total of 19 papers were found and analysed including 11 original studies and 8 case reports.

Results

Although it seems that hearing impairment in SSc patients is relatively more common than in the general population, based on the analysis of available literature, no firm conclusions regarding its frequency and pathomechanism can be drawn yet. Microangiopathy leading to damage to the sensory cells of the inner ear is suspected to be the main mechanism of hearing loss, although damage to the higher levels of the auditory pathway appears to be underestimated due to incomplete audiological diagnosis.

Conclusion

Undoubtedly, the reason for the difficulty in such an evaluation are the complex and still not fully elucidated pathomechanism of SSc, the individually variable dynamics of the disease and the unique heterogeneity of symptoms. Nevertheless, further studies in larger and appropriately selected groups of patients, focused more on the dynamics of microangiopathy and not solely on clinical symptoms could provide answers to many key questions in this regard.

Recent Advances in Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis and Morphea

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) and morphea are autoimmune sclerosing diseases that cause significant morbidity, and in the case of SSc, mortality. The pathogenesis of both SSc and morphea share vascular dysfunction, auto-reactive T cells and Th2-associated cytokines, such as interleukin 4, and overproduction of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ). TGFβ stimulates fibroblast collagen and extra-cellular matrix production. Although morphea and SSc have similar pathogenic pathways and histological findings, they are distinct diseases. Recent advances in treatment of morphea, skin sclerosis in SSc, and interstitial lung disease in SSc are focused on targeting known pathogenic pathways.

Therapeutic management of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis patients - an analysis from the Swiss EUSTAR cohort

OBJECTIVES

Systemic sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune connective tissue disease leading to microvascular and fibrotic manifestations in multiple organs. Several treatment options and recommendations from different European countries are available. In this study, for which the ambit is Switzerland specifically, we aim to describe the treatment patterns of systemic sclerosis patients with fibrotic manifestations.

METHODS

Systemic sclerosis patients were selected from six Swiss tertiary centres recorded in the multicentre, prospective European Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) registry. Patients fulfilling the 2013 ACR/EULAR systemic sclerosis classification criteria at baseline were included. To determine the differences in treatment of varying degrees of fibrosis, four groups were identified: (1) patients with a modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) >0; (2) those with mRSS ≥7; (3) those with interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD), diagnosed by either chest X-Ray or high-resolution computed tomography; and (4) patients fulfilling one of the additional criteria for extensive interstitial lung disease, defined as interstitial lung disease involvement of >20% in high-resolution computed tomography, dyspnea NYHA-stage 3/4, or a predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) of <70%.

RESULTS

A total of 590 patients with systemic sclerosis fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In this cohort, 421 (71.4%) had mRSS >0, of whom 195 (33.1%) had mRSS ≥7; interstitial lung disease was diagnosed in 198 of 456 (43.4%), of whom 106 (18.0 %) showed extensive interstitial lung disease. Regarding non-biologic disease-modifying medications (DMARDs), the most frequently prescribed was methotrexate, followed by hydroxychloroquine and mycophenolate mofetil. Rituximab and tocilizumab were most frequently used among the biologic DMARDs. Specifically, 148/372 (39.8%) of treated patients with skin fibrosis received methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or rituximab, and 80/177 (45.2%) with interstitial lung disease received cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, tocilizumab or rituximab. Most patients received a proton-pump inhibitor, and few patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Overall, in Switzerland, a wide range of medications is prescribed for systemic sclerosis patients. This includes modern, targeted treatments for which randomised controlled clinical trial have been recently reported.

Is cyclophosphamide still the gold standard in early severe rapidly progressive systemic sclerosis?

Cyclophosphamide (CYC) has been a gold standard of treatment for severe progressive Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), especially in patients with concomitant interstitial lung disease (ILD). This approach was based on results of several interventional studies, including randomized control trials, which mainly addressed SSc-ILD as a primary end point and skin involvement as a second one. The use of CYC is time-limited due to significant adverse events. More recently, other immunosuppressive and biological agents showed efficacy but better safety profile in patients with SSc and SSc-ILD. With regards to other end-points, post-hoc analyses, systematic reviews and metalysis showed that CYC had limited influence on patients' quality of life, event-free survival and mortality. Comprehensive patient's stratification according to a molecular, cellular and phenotypic pattern may help in choosing of personalized medicine with more ambitious treatment effect and should be the future direction. According to the above available data and even if scientific evidence may be missing, experts' opinion has changed the attitude to CYC as an anchor drug in the management of severe SSc. Indeed, CYC has been pushed to the second and even third treatment option after mycophenolate mofetil, tocilizumab or rituximab. This position became obvious during debate on this topic at CORA meeting 2023.

Back to the future: targeting the extracellular matrix to treat systemic sclerosis

Fibrosis is the excessive deposition of a stable extracellular matrix (ECM); fibrotic tissue is composed principally of highly crosslinked type I collagen and highly contractile myofibroblasts. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a multisystem autoimmune connective tissue disease characterized by skin and organ fibrosis. The fibrotic process has been recognized in SSc for >40 years, but drugs with demonstrable efficacy against SSc fibrosis in ameliorating the lung involvement have only recently been identified. Unfortunately, these treatments are ineffective at improving the skin score in patients with SSc. Previous clinical trials in SSc have largely focused on the cross-purposing of anti-inflammatory drugs and the use of immunosuppressive drugs from the transplantation field, which address inflammatory and/or autoimmune processes. Limited examination has taken place of specific anti-fibrotic agents developed through their ability to directly target the ECM in SSc by, for example, alleviating the persistent matrix stiffness and mechanotransduction that might be required for both the initiation and maintenance of fibrosis, including in SSc. However, because of the importance of the ECM in the SSc phenotype, attempts have now been made to identify drugs that specifically target the ECM, including some drugs that are currently under consideration for the treatment of cancer.

Biomarkers in the Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a complex autoimmune disease characterized by vascular damage, vasoinstability, and decreased perfusion with ischemia, inflammation, and exuberant fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. Biomarkers are analytic indicators of the biological and disease processes within an individual that can be accurately and reproducibly measured. The field of biomarkers in SSc is complex as recent studies have implicated at least 240 pathways and dysregulated proteins in SSc pathogenesis. Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) are classical biomarkers with well-described clinical classifications and are present in more than 90% of SSc patients and include anti-centromere, anti-Th/To, anti-RNA polymerase III, and anti-topoisomerase I antibodies. Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) is central to the fibrotic process of SSc and is intimately intertwined with other biomarkers. Tyrosine kinases, interferon-1 signaling, IL-6 signaling, endogenous thrombin, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), lysophosphatidic acid receptors, and amino acid metabolites are new biomarkers with the potential for developing new therapeutic agents. Other biomarkers implicated in SSc-ILD include signal transducer and activator of transcription 4 (STAT4), CD226 (DNAX accessory molecule 1), interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5), interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-1 (IRAK1), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), pyrin domain containing 1 (NLRP1), T-cell surface glycoprotein zeta chain (CD3ζ) or CD247, the NLR family, SP-D (surfactant protein), KL-6, leucine-rich α2-glycoprotein-1 (LRG1), CCL19, genetic factors including DRB1 alleles, the interleukins (IL-1, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 IL-13, IL-16, IL-17, IL-18, IL-22, IL-32, and IL-35), the chemokines CCL (2,3,5,13,20,21,23), CXC (8,9,10,11,16), CX3CL1 (fractalkine), and GDF15. Adiponectin (an indicator of PPAR activation) and maresin 1 are reduced in SSc patients. A new trend has been the use of biomarker panels with combined complex multifactor analysis, machine learning, and artificial intelligence to determine disease activity and response to therapy. The present review is an update of the various biomarker molecules, pathways, and receptors involved in the pathology of SSc.

Biomarkers in Systemic Sclerosis: An Overview

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a complex autoimmune disease characterized by significant fibrosis of the skin and internal organs, with the main involvement of the lungs, kidneys, heart, esophagus, and intestines. SSc is also characterized by macro- and microvascular damage with reduced peripheral blood perfusion. Several studies have reported more than 240 pathways and numerous dysregulation proteins, giving insight into how the field of biomarkers in SSc is still extremely complex and evolving. Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are present in more than 90% of SSc patients, and anti-centromere and anti-topoisomerase I antibodies are considered classic biomarkers with precise clinical features. Recent studies have reported that trans-forming growth factor β (TGF-β) plays a central role in the fibrotic process. In addition, interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5), interleukin receptor-associated kinase-1 (IRAK-1), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), transducer and activator of transcription signal 4 (STAT4), pyrin-containing domain 1 (NLRP1), as well as genetic factors, including DRB1 alleles, are implicated in SSc damage. Several interleukins (e.g., IL-1, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, IL-22, and IL-35) and chemokines (e.g., CCL 2, 5, 23, and CXC 9, 10, 16) are elevated in SSc. While adiponectin and maresin 1 are reduced in patients with SSc, biomarkers are important in research but will be increasingly so in the diagnosis and therapeutic approach to SSc. This review aims to present and highlight the various biomarker molecules, pathways, and receptors involved in the pathology of SSc.

Perspectives on Mycophenolate Mofetil in the Management of Autoimmunity

Before becoming a cornerstone in the treatment of numerous immune-mediated diseases, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was first introduced as an immunosuppressive agent in transplant immunology and later received the attention of rheumatologists and clinicians involved in the management of autoimmune diseases. MMF is now a widespread immunosuppressive drug for the treatment of several conditions, including lupus nephritis, interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis, and anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis while being efficacious also as rescue therapy in various orphan diseases, including dermatomyositis and IgA-associated nephropathy. Similarly, case reports or series support a possible use of MMF in other rare autoimmune diseases. Beyond modulating lymphocyte activation, MMF acts on other immune and non-immune cells and these effects may explain the therapeutic profile of this medication. The effects of MMF are broadly characterized by the impact on the immune system and the antiproliferative and antifibrotic changes induced. In this latter case, mechanistic data on fibroblasts may in the future allow to reevaluate the use of MMF in selected patients with inflammatory arthritis or systemic sclerosis. Attention must be paid towards the possible occurrence of adverse events, such as gastrointestinal complaints and teratogenicity, while the risk of infections and cancer related to MMF needs to be further investigated.

Therapeutic Approaches to Systemic Sclerosis: Recent Approvals and Future Candidate Therapies

Systemic sclerosis is the rheumatic disease with the highest individual mortality. The severity of the disease is determined by the extent of fibrotic changes to cutaneous and internal organ tissues, the most life-threatening visceral manifestations being interstitial lung disease, SSc-associated-pulmonary arterial hypertension and myocardial involvement. The heterogeneity of the disease has initially hindered the design of successful clinical trials, but considerations on classification criteria have improved patient selection in trials, allowing the identification of more homogeneous groups of patients based on progressive visceral manifestations or the extent of skin involvement with a focus of patients with early disease. Two major subsets of systemic sclerosis are classically described: limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis characterized by distal skin fibrosis and the diffuse subset with distal and proximal skin thickening. Beyond this dichotomic subgrouping of systemic sclerosis, new phenotypic considerations based on antibody subtypes have provided a better understanding of the heterogeneity of the disease, anti-Scl70 antibodies being associated with progressive interstitial lung disease regardless of cutaneous involvement. Two targeted therapies, tocilizumab (a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-6 receptors (IL-6R)) and nintedanib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor), have recently been approved by the American Food & Drug Administration to limit the decline of lung function in patients with SSc-associated interstitial lung disease, demonstrating that such better understanding of the disease pathogenesis with the identification of key targets can lead to therapeutic advances in the management of some visceral manifestations of the disease. This review will provide a brief overview of the pathogenesis of SSc and will present a selection of therapies recently approved or evaluated in this context. Therapies evaluated and approved in SSc-ILD will be emphasized and a review of recent phase II trials in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis will be proposed. We will also discuss selected therapeutic pathways currently under investigation in systemic sclerosis that still lack clinical data in this context but that may show promising results in the future based on preclinical data.

Iguratimod as an alternative therapy for systemic sclerosis and prevention of the occurrence of ischemic digital ulcer

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of iguratimod (IGU) as an alternative treatment for systemic sclerosis (SSc), especially in the prevention of ischemic digital ulcers (DUs).

Methods

We constructed two cohorts from the Renji SSc registry. In the first cohort, SSc patients receiving IGU were observed prospectively with effectiveness and safety. In the second cohort, we picked up all the DU patients with at least a 3-month follow-up to investigate the prevention of IGU on ischemic DU.

Results

From 2017 to 2021, 182 SSc patients were enrolled in our SSc registry. A total of 23 patients received IGU. With a median follow-up of 61 weeks (IQR: 15-82 weeks), the drug persistence was 13/23. In total, 91.3% of the patients (21/23) became free of deterioration in the last visit with IGU. Of note, 10 patients withdrew from the study due to the following reasons: two patients withdrew due to deterioration, three due to incompliance, and five due to mild-to-moderate side effects. All the patients with side effects recovered fully after stopping IGU. Of note, 11 patients had ischemic DU, and 8 out of 11 (72.7%) patients had no new occurrence of DU during the follow-up. In the second cohort of 31 DU patients receiving a combination of vasoactive agents with a median follow-up of 47 weeks (IQR, 16-107 weeks), IGU treatment was protective of new DU occurrence (adjusted risk ratio = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.05-0.94; adjusted odds ratio = 0.07; and 95% CI, 0.01-0.49).

Conclusion

Our study for the first time describes the potential of IGU possibly as an alternative treatment for SSc. To our surprise, this study provides a hint that IGU treatment can be used for the prevention of the occurrence of ischemic DU and merits further investigation.

Systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis, also known as scleroderma, is a rare and complex autoimmune connective-tissue disease. Once considered an untreatable and unpredictable condition, research advancements have improved our understanding of its disease pathogenesis and clinical phenotypes and expanded our treatment armamentarium. Early and accurate diagnosis is essential, while ongoing efforts to risk stratify patients have a central role in predicting both organ involvement and disease progression. A holistic approach is required when choosing the optimal therapeutic strategy, balancing the side-effect profile with efficacy and tailoring the treatment according to the goals of care of the patient. This Seminar reviews the multiple clinical dimensions of systemic sclerosis, beginning at a precursor very early stage of disease, with a focus on timely early detection of organ involvement. This Seminar also summarises management considerations according to the pathological hallmarks of systemic sclerosis (eg, inflammation, fibrosis, and vasculopathy) and highlights unmet needs and opportunities for future research and discovery.

Systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis, also known as scleroderma, is a rare and complex autoimmune connective-tissue disease. Once considered an untreatable and unpredictable condition, research advancements have improved our understanding of its disease pathogenesis and clinical phenotypes and expanded our treatment armamentarium. Early and accurate diagnosis is essential, while ongoing efforts to risk stratify patients have a central role in predicting both organ involvement and disease progression. A holistic approach is required when choosing the optimal therapeutic strategy, balancing the side-effect profile with efficacy and tailoring the treatment according to the goals of care of the patient. This Seminar reviews the multiple clinical dimensions of systemic sclerosis, beginning at a precursor very early stage of disease, with a focus on timely early detection of organ involvement. This Seminar also summarises management considerations according to the pathological hallmarks of systemic sclerosis (eg, inflammation, fibrosis, and vasculopathy) and highlights unmet needs and opportunities for future research and discovery.

Treatment of juvenile localized scleroderma: current recommendations, response factors, and potential alternative treatments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Juvenile localized scleroderma (jLS) is a chronic autoimmune and fibrosing disease associated with a high risk for functional impairment. Antifibrotic options are limited, so current treatment strategies are focused on disease activity control. Pediatric rheumatologists are in consensus on the need to treat with systemic immunosuppressants, in particular, methotrexate. However, more than 30% of patients fail initial methotrexate treatment. This review provides an update on current management and reviews reports on potential alternative treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

An overview of current treatment recommendations and its efficacy are discussed. Recent studies have identified several factors associated with likelihood of treatment response. These include time to initiation of treatment, certain subtypes, and extracutaneous involvement. Findings from recent reports of alternative systemic immunomodulators, including biologic medications, will be summarized.

SUMMARY

Methotrexate treatment has greatly improved outcome for most jLS patients but a substantial portion have refractory cutaneous and/or extracutaneous disease. Treatment response factors are being identified, which could lead to improved management strategies. Recent studies provide further support on mycophenolate mofetil as an alternative treatment. Data on biologic therapies is encouraging, with data suggesting efficacy for many extracutaneous manifestations but more studies are needed to evaluate these and other options for jLS.

Systemic Scleroderma-Definition, Clinical Picture and Laboratory Diagnostics

(1) Background: Scleroderma (Sc) is a rare connective tissue disease classified as an autoimmune disorder. The pathogenesis of this disease is not fully understood. (2) Methods: This article reviews the literature on systemic scleroderma (SSc). A review of available scientific articles was conducted using the PubMed database with a time range of January 1985 to December 2021. (3) Results and Conclusions: The article is a review of information on epidemiology, criteria for diagnosis, pathogenesis, a variety of clinical pictures and the possibility of laboratory diagnostic in the diagnosis and monitoring of systemic scleroderma.

Current advances in the treatment of systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare, systemic autoimmune disease of unknown etiology. Among the systemic rheumatic diseases, SSc carries the highest mortality, in part due to the historical lack of disease modifying therapies. Recently, landmark randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted that have illustrated the heterogeneous nature of SSc and furthered our understanding of the key inflammatory and fibrotic pathways involved in SSc pathogenesis. Although SSc affects various organ systems, RCTs have focused on investigating treatments for diffuse cutaneous sclerosis (dcSSc) and interstitial lung disease (ILD). While recent RCTs for dcSSc have failed to demonstrate a treatment benefit, the outcomes of two RCTs led to the approval of two novel therapies for SSc-ILD: nintedanib and tocilizumab. This review summarizes the salient outcome data from recent SSc trials within a practical clinical framework and points out gaps in knowledge that may help inform the design of future SSc studies.

Skin involvement in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: an unmet clinical need

Diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) is associated with high mortality resulting from early internal-organ involvement. Clinicians therefore tend to focus on early diagnosis and treatment of potentially life-threatening cardiorespiratory and renal disease. However, the rapidly progressive painful, itchy skin tightening that characterizes dcSSc is the symptom that has the greatest effect on patients' quality of life, and there is currently no effective disease-modifying treatment for it. Considerable advances have been made in predicting the extent and rate of skin-disease progression (which vary between patients), including the development of techniques such as molecular analysis of skin biopsy samples. Risk stratification for progressive skin disease is especially relevant now that haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is a treatment option, because stratification will inform the balance of risk versus benefit for each patient. Measurement of skin disease is a major challenge. Results from clinical trials have highlighted limitations of the modified Rodnan skin score (the current gold standard). Alternative patient-reported and other potential outcome measures have been and are being developed. Patients with early dcSSc should be referred to specialist centres to ensure best-practice management, including the management of their skin disease, and to maximize opportunities for inclusion in clinical trials.

Problems to Consider Before Determining the Regimen of the Treatment for Juvenile Systemic Sclerosis Treatment: A Case Report Where Tocilizumab Monotherapy Succeeded Efficiently and Safely

Juvenile systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare condition that results in various disorders, including growth retardation and learning disabilities in addition to impaired quality of life due to fibrosis and microvascular disorders in multiple organs. Recently, efficacies of immunosuppressants such as cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil, as well as biological agents, have been reported in adult patients with SSc. However, there has been no consensus in the treatment of juvenile SSc due to its rarity and the fact that skin sclerosis may be self-limiting in some patients. Here, we present a case of 13-year-onset SSc with growth retardation and learning disabilities, in addition to skin sclerosis, interstitial lung disease, and possible myocardial fibrosis that was successfully treated with tocilizumab monotherapy without remarkable adverse reactions. As careful case-by-case management of patient's growth and education along with standard treatment is needed, the documentation of such case is important for the evaluation of the efficient and safe therapy for juvenile SSc.

[Systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease: Diagnostic and therapeutic strategy in the light of recent clinical trials]

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease associated to fibrotic manifestations. Interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD), one of the main fibrotic features of SSc, is the first cause of SSc-related death. The management of SSc-ILD has recently benefited from the results of key randomised controlled trials. French authorities have approved Nintedanib for the treatment of SSc-ILD, and tocilizumab has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United-States (US). These recent approvals challenge the management of this fibrotic manifestation of SSc. This narrative literature review, at the crossroad of internal medicine and pulmonology, discusses what could be an up-to date approach, in terms of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for SSc-ILD, in the light of the results from recent clinical trials.

Systemic Sclerosis: From Pathophysiology to Novel Therapeutic Approaches

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a systemic, immune-mediated chronic disorder characterized by small vessel alterations and progressive fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. The combination of a predisposing genetic background and triggering factors that causes a persistent activation of immune system at microvascular and tissue level is thought to be the pathogenetic driver of SSc. Endothelial alterations with subsequent myofibroblast activation, excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, and unrestrained tissue fibrosis are the pathogenetic steps responsible for the clinical manifestations of this disease, which can be highly heterogeneous according to the different entity of each pathogenic step in individual subjects. Although substantial progress has been made in the management of SSc in recent years, disease-modifying therapies are still lacking. Several molecular pathways involved in SSc pathogenesis are currently under evaluation as possible therapeutic targets in clinical trials. These include drugs targeting fibrotic and metabolic pathways (e.g., TGF-β, autotaxin/LPA, melanocortin, and mTOR), as well as molecules and cells involved in the persistent activation of the immune system (e.g., IL4/IL13, IL23, JAK/STAT, B cells, and plasma cells). In this review, we provide an overview of the most promising therapeutic targets that could improve the future clinical management of SSc.

Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: How to Incorporate Two Food and Drug Administration-Approved Therapies in Clinical Practice

Systemic sclerosis (SSc; scleroderma) has the highest individual mortality of all rheumatic diseases, and interstitial lung disease (ILD) is among the leading causes of SSc-related death. Two drugs are now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and indicated for slowing the rate of decline in pulmonary function in patients with SSc-associated ILD (SSc-ILD): nintedanib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor) and tocilizumab (the first biologic agent targeting the interleukin-6 pathway in SSc). In addition, 2 generic drugs with cytotoxic and immunoregulatory activity, mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide, have shown comparable efficacy in a phase II trial but are not FDA-approved for SSc-ILD. In light of the heterogeneity of the disease, the optimal therapeutic strategy for the management of SSc-ILD is still to be determined. The objectives of this review are 2-fold: 1) review the body of research focused on the diagnosis and treatment of SSc-ILD; and 2) propose a practical approach for diagnosis, stratification, management, and therapeutic decision-making in this clinical context. This review presents a practical classification of SSc patients in terms of disease severity (subclinical versus clinical ILD) and associated risk of progression (low versus high risk). The pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic options for first- and second-line therapy, as well as potential combination approaches, are discussed in light of the recent approval of tocilizumab for SSc-ILD.

Advances in the Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis

Although systemic sclerosis (SSc) is currently incurable, there have been recent advances in treatment. This review article begins by providing a brief background to SSc in terms of disease subtyping and autoantibodies, because both predict disease trajectory and help clinicians to select appropriate monitoring and treatment protocols. Broad principles of management are then described: ‘disease-modifying’ therapies and therapies directed at reducing disease burden and/or progression of SSc-related digital vascular disease and of internal organ involvement. Next, advances in the management of digital vasculopathy, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), interstitial lung disease (ILD) and early diffuse cutaneous SSc are discussed in turn, for example: (a) increased use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors and endothelin receptor antagonists for digital vasculopathy; (b) early recognition and treatment of PAH, including with combination therapies; (c) increased use of mycophenolate mofetil and of nintedanib in ILD; and (d) immunosuppression now as standard practice in early diffuse cutaneous SSc, and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for highly selected patients with progressive diffuse disease. Finally, future challenges are discussed, including ensuring that all patients with SSc are monitored and treated according to best practice guidelines, and whenever possible giving patients the opportunity to participate in clinical trials.

Treatment of systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare connective tissue disease characterized by skin and visceral fibrosis, vascular hyperreactivity and obliterative vasculopathy. Some of its complications such as interstitial lung disease (ILD), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and heart involvement can be life-threatening and are associated with a high mortality and a poor prognosis. Many clinical trials were carried out in order to improve the survival and prognosis of SSc patients. The management of SSc is based on the frequent and regular assessment of the potential organ damage, and if present, the establishment of graduated pharmacological therapeutic strategies, associated with non-pharmacological procedures. Several randomized clinical trials have showed significant positive outcomes regarding some specific involvements. Many advances have been made, especially in the field of targeted therapies and personalized medicine, based on specific characteristics of the patient and the SSc.

Pharmacological treatments for SSc-ILD: Systematic review and critical appraisal of the evidence

Many therapies have been investigated for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD), including immunosuppressive therapies, antifibrotic agents, immunomodulators and monoclonal antibodies. There is a high unmet medical need to better understand the current evidence for treatment efficacy and safety. This systematic review aims to present the existing literature on different drug treatments investigated for SSc-ILD and to critically assess the level of evidence for these drugs. A systematic review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A structured literature search was performed for clinical trials and observational studies on the treatment of SSc-ILD with pharmaceutical interventions from 1 January 1990 to 15 December 2020. The quality of each reference was assessed using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. A total of 77 references were reviewed and 13 different treatments were identified. We found high-quality evidence for the use of cyclophosphamide, nintedanib, mycophenolate and tocilizumab. Therefore, we would posit that the clinical community has four valid options for treatment of SSc-ILD. Further research is mandatory to provide more evidence for the optimal treatment strategy in SSc-ILD, including the optimal time to initiate treatment, selection of patients for treatment and upfront combination therapy.

Updates in Systemic Sclerosis Treatment and Applicability to Pediatric Scleroderma

Juvenile-onset systemic sclerosis (jSSc) is a complex multisystem inflammatory-driven disease of fibrosis, requiring multifaceted treatment including pharmacologic therapy, supportive care, and lifestyle modification. Most regimens are adapted from adult SSc treatment given the rarity of the disease. Landmark trials over the past decade in adult SSc have led to 2 Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for SSc-associated interstitial lung disease, and several ongoing trials of other biological agents are underway. Resetting the immune system with autologous stem cell transplant to halt this disease earlier in its course, especially in pediatric onset where disease burden can accumulate, is on the horizon.

Mycophenolate mofetil for methotrexate-resistant juvenile localized scleroderma

OBJECTIVES

To investigate safety and efficacy of MMF in patients with severe or MTX-refractory juvenile localized scleroderma.

METHODS

Consecutive juvenile localized scleroderma patients undergoing systemic treatment were included in a retrospective longitudinal study. Patients treated with MMF because they were refractory or intolerant to MTX (MMF-group) were compared with responders to MTX (MTX-group). Disease activity was assessed by Localized Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool and thermography. Disease course was established on the number of relapses and treatment changes. Relapse-free survival was examined by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

MMF and MTX groups included 22 and 47 patients, respectively. No significant difference in demographics, follow-up duration and treatment before diagnosis was observed between groups. The most represented clinical subtypes in the MMF-group were pansclerotic morphea and mixed subtype (P = 0.008 and P = 0.029, respectively), and linear scleroderma of the face in the MTX-group (P = 0.048). MMF was started because of MTX resistance (18 patients), relapse during MTX tapering/withdrawal (3 patients) and anaphylaxis to MTX (1 patient). After mean 9.4 years of follow-up, 90.9% of patients on MMF and 100% of those on MTX had inactive disease. No significant difference in relapse-free survival between the groups was found (P = 0.066, log-rank test), although MMF likely induced more persistent remission. MMF was well tolerated and combination of MMF and MTX did not increase its efficacy.

CONCLUSION

The present study adds strong evidence on the efficacy and tolerance of MMF in severe and/or MTX-refractory juvenile localized scleroderma. Further controlled studies are needed to prove its efficacy as first line treatment.

Does tocilizumab have a role in dermatology? A review of clinical applications, its adverse side effects and practical considerations

Tocilizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody to the interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor which was first approved for use in refractory rheumatoid arthritis almost a decade ago. Since then, its use has expanded to a number of rheumatological and inflammatory conditions. In dermatology, off-label use of tocilizumab has been reported to be efficacious in morphoea, systemic sclerosis, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, vitiligo, graft-versus-host disease, pyoderma gangrenosum, Behcet's disease, Schnitzler's syndrome, sarcoidosis, and cutaneous adverse reactions. That being said, the evidence demonstrating tocilizumab's efficacy in dermatology is predominantly low-level case-based evidence, and one must consider the potential for publication bias. In this review we will discuss the reported clinical applications of tocilizumab in dermatology, mechanisms of action, and the range of associated adverse effects (both cutaneous and non-cutaneous) that can occur. Additionally, we will discuss the role of tocilizumab in the management of COVID-19.

Treatment for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides an overview of the current treatments for systemic sclerosis-interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) and proposes a conceptual framework for disease management with case scenarios.

RECENT FINDINGS

Broad treatment categories include traditional cytotoxic therapies, biologic disease-modifying rheumatic drugs, antifibrotic agents, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and lung transplantation. The optimal use of each option varies depending on SSc-ILD severity, progression, and comorbidities of individual patients. A high-quality randomized controlled trial demonstrated nintedanib's ability to retard decline of lung function in patients with limited and diffuse cutaneous disease, with established ILD. Tocilizumab, recently approved by the FDA, provides a unique intervention in those with early SSc associated with ILD with elevated acute-phase reactants: two well designed trials showed lung function preservation in phase 2 and phase 3 trials.

SUMMARY

Stratifying patients based on key SSc-ILD characteristics (e.g. severity, risk of progression, comorbid disease presentation) may provide a useful guide for practitioners treating SSc-ILD.

Safety and efficacy of abatacept in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (ASSET): open-label extension of a phase 2, double-blind randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Abatacept was well tolerated by patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis in a phase 2, double-blind randomised trial, with potential efficacy at 12 months. We report here the results of an open-label extension for 6 months.

METHODS

Patients (aged ≥18 years) with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis of less than 3 years' duration from their first non-Raynaud's symptom were enrolled into the ASSET trial (A Study of Subcutaneous Abatacept to Treat DiffuseCutaneous Systemic Sclerosis), which is a double-blind trial at 22 sites in Canada, the UK, and the USA. Aftercompletion of 12 months of treatment with either abatacept or placebo, patients received a further 6 months ofabatacept (125 mg subcutaneous every week) in an open-label extension. The primary endpoint of the double-blind trial was modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) at 12 months, which was reassessed at 18 months in the open-label extension. The primary analysis included all participants who completed the double-blind trial and received at least one dose of open-label treatment (modified intention to treat). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02161406.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 22, 2014, and March 15, 2017, 88 participants were randomly allocated in the double-blind trial either abatacept (n=44) or placebo (44); 32 patients from each treatment group completed the 6-month open-labelextension. Among patients assigned abatacept, a mean improvement from baseline in mRSS was noted at 12 months (-6·6 [SD 6·4]), with further improvement seen during the open-label extension period (-9·8 [8·1] at month 18). Participants assigned placebo had a mean improvement from baseline in mRSS at 12 months (-3·7 [SD 7·6]), with a further improvement at month 18 (-6·3 [9·3]). Infections during the open-label extension phase occurred in nine patients in the placebo-abatacept group (12 adverse events, one serious adverse event) and in 11 patients in theabatacept-abatacept group (14 adverse events, one serious adverse event). Two deaths occurred during the 12-month double-blind period in the abatacept group, which were related to scleroderma renal crisis; no deaths were recorded during the open-label extension.

INTERPRETATION

During the 6-month open-label extension, no new safety signals for abatacept were identified in the treatment of diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Clinically meaningful improvements in mRSS and other outcome measures were observed in both the abatacept and placebo groups when patients transitioned to open-label treatment. These data support further studies of abatacept in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.

FUNDING

Bristol-Myers Squibb and National Institutes of Health.

[Monocentric study on pharmaceuticals taken by patients to treat systemic sclerosis]

INTRODUCTION

Pharmaceutical prescription in systemic sclerosis is guided by national and international recommendations. This study's primary objective was to describe and analyze these prescriptions among patients of our cohort. We also aimed to assess drug compliance among our patients.

METHODS

This is a monocentric observational study on two cohorts of patients with systemic sclerosis; a primary cohort comprising ambulatory patients, who were prospectively included, with exhaustive prescription's data collection; and a secondary cohort included patients asked to fill in a self-questionnaire on treatment compliance.

RESULTS

The main cohort included 157 patients, including 31 cases of diffuse systemic sclerosis. A vasodilator drug for Raynaud's phenomenon was prescribed in 75 patients (47.9%) and a specific treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension in 10 patients (6.4%). Immuno-modulators/immunosuppressants was prescribed in 62 patients (39.5%), who received prednisone (n=37, 23.6%), mycophenolate mofetil (n=14, 8.9%), hydroxychloroquine (n=12, 7.6%) and colchicine (n=22, 14%). Treatment for "gastro-intestinal tract involvement" was prescribed for 106 patients (67.5%) and treatment of a scleroderma renal crisis with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor for 6 patients (3.8%). Among the 42 patients in the secondary cohort, 21.4% reported a good compliance, mostly older patients (P=0.045) or those who had not experienced adverse events (P=0.009).

CONCLUSION

This study provides original real-life data illustrating the heterogeneity of prescription habits in systemic sclerosis. As previously reported, treatment compliance was insufficient.

An update on the pharmacotherapeutic options and treatment strategies for systemic sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a multi-dimensional connective tissue disease of unknown etiology. Given the immense clinical complexity of SSc, the treatment of this condition is not standardized and considerable heterogeneity exists in SSc management approaches. The purpose of this article is to highlight novel therapeutic strategies and new medications under development for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc).

AREAS COVERED

Herein, the authors focus primarily on recently completed clinical trials and phase 3 and 4 clinical trials of therapeutic agents that show promise in SSc. This review is organized by the clinical complications that occur in SSc, for which novel treatment strategies are under study.

EXPERT OPINION

Combining therapies to address the individual manifestations of SSc is a cornerstone to the comprehensive management of this condition. Therapeutic strategies must take into account the organs involved, the level of disease activity in each area, and the disease stage. Controlling the complex biological network, progressive vasculopathy and fibrosis, as well as manifestations of end-organ dysfunction are all critical considerations when determining the best treatment approach for SSc.

Is there still a role for cyclophosphamide in the treatment of systemic sclerosis?

Cyclophosphamide has been the cornerstone of treatment of systemic sclerosis for a long time and is the first-choice therapy for treating systemic sclerosis–associated interstitial lung disease according to the European League Against Rheumatism recommendations on treatment of systemic sclerosis. However, new therapeutic options are emerging, and treatment with cyclophosphamide is hampered by its toxicity and restricted possible treatment duration. This review has a focus on the evidence of efficacy of cyclophosphamide in different aspects of systemic sclerosis and its organ involvements, reviews its toxicity, and will answer the question whether there is still a role for cyclophosphamide in the treatment of systemic sclerosis, taking the evidence and current therapeutic options into account.

Current immunosuppressive and antifibrotic therapies of systemic sclerosis and emerging therapeutic strategies

INTRODUCTION

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare, difficult to treat disease with profound effects on quality of life and high mortality. Complex and incompletely understood pathophysiologic processes and greatly heterogeneous clinical presentations and outcomes have hampered drug development.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the currently available immunosuppressive and antifibrotic therapies and discusses novel approaches for the treatment of SSc. We reviewed the literature using the MEDLINE and ClinicalTrial.gov databases between May and September 2020.

EXPERT OPINION

Available immunosuppressive and antifibrotic drugs only modestly impact the course of the disease. Most drugs are currently only investigated in the subset of patients with early diffuse cutaneous SSc. In this patient population, hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is currently the only treatment that has demonstrated reversal of lung involvement, enhanced quality of life and reduced long-term mortality, but carries the risk of short-term treatment-related mortality. A great need to provide better therapeutic options to patients exists also for those patients who have limited cutaneous skin involvement. A better understanding of SSc pathophysiology has enabled the identification of numerous new therapeutic targets. The progress made in the design of clinical trials and outcome parameters will likely result in the improvement of effective management options.

The burning question: To use or not to use cyclophosphamide in systemic sclerosis

Fibrosis, inflammation, and vasculopathy are the main determinants of systemic sclerosis (SSc) pathogenesis. Cyclophosphamide (CYC), an alkylating agent, has been used to treat skin fibrosis and interstitial lung diseases in SSc for many years and still represents a mainstay in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Despite significant effect in reducing lung functional impairment and skin tightness, CYC has a significant safety burden, including infection risk and bone marrow and bladder toxicity. Moreover, it can affect fertility and also cause a predisposition for cancer development in the future, particularly in the bladder. This review summarizes the current evidences regarding the use of CYC to treat SSc, its efficacy and safety profile, and currently available or tested alternative drugs for lung and skin involvement in SSc.

Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in systemic sclerosis. A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To synthetize the available evidence concerning efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in systemic sclerosis (SSc).

METHODS

A systematic search following the PRISMA-statement in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases up to 7 February 2020 was conducted. Considering the substantial heterogeneity expected, a random-effects model to pool data from selected studies was adopted.

RESULTS

After a treatment period ranging from 6 to 12 months, the pooled analysis revealed that imatinib mesylate significantly improved modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) (mean difference [MD] = -3.091, 95%CI -6.081 to -0.102, p = 0.043), whereas health-related assessment questionnaire (HAQ) remains unchanged (-0.096; 95 CI -0.197 to -0.006). Data regarding change in pulmonary function tests were insufficiently consistent to be considered eligible for meta-analysis. Finally, regarding safety, the authors found a pooled dropout rate due to all adverse events of 22% and a rate of serious adverse events of 17%.

CONCLUSION

The significant change within the range of clinical relevance of mRSS suggests the possible use of imatinib mesylate in SSc, whereas it is still not possible to draw firm conclusions regarding the efficacy of the drug on lung involvement. Specifically designed and powered studies are needed to investigate imatinib mesylate therapy in SSc.

Treatment with cyclophosphamide i.v. pulse therapy is an option for effective treatment of skin fibrosis in patients with early systemic sclerosis

Objectives

SSc is a autoimmune disease characterized by fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. There is a lack of evidence for the efficacy of i.v. CYC pulse therapy on skin thickening. We aimed to examine the response of i.v. CYC pulse therapy on skin thickening in our cohort of SSc patients and analysed factors that predict this response.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the data for 143 patients with SSc from baseline to 12, 24 and 36 months. All patients were treated with at least 6 i.v. CYC pulses (750 mg/m²/month). We applied the modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) to assess skin thickening. A clinically relevant response was defined as a decrease in mRSS of 5 points and 25% from baseline. Different baseline variables for predicting response on month 12 were tested in logistic regression analyses.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the patients with dcSSc and lcSSc were collected. Forty-three percent (n = 42) of dcSSc patients had a clinically relevant response on month 12. Non-responding on month 6 predicts non-response on month 12 (odds ratio 37.1; 95% CI 4.5, 306.4).

Conclusion

We concluded that i.v. CYC pulse therapy should be considered as an effective treatment option for skin thickening in dcSSc patients, because 43% of this group of patients were found to have a clinically relevant response. Of the dcSSC patients who did not respond by month 6, only 29% had a response by month 12. This finding can help the physician and patient in shared decision making about whether or not to continue therapy.

Treatment With Mycophenolate and Cyclophosphamide Leads to Clinically Meaningful Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes in Scleroderma Lung Disease: Results of Scleroderma Lung Study II

Objective

Our objective was to determine if treatment with cyclophosphamide (CYC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) improves patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) among patients with systemic sclerosis‐related interstitial lung disease (SSc‐ILD).

Methods

This study examined PROs in patients with SSc‐ILD (N = 142) who participated in the Scleroderma Lung Study II, a randomized controlled trial comparing MMF for 2 years with oral CYC for 1 year followed by 1 year of a placebo. Joint models were created to evaluate the course of PROs over 2 years. The difference in PRO scores from baseline to 24 months was measured, and the percentage of patients meeting the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated. Correlations between PROs and SSc‐ILD disease severity measures were also examined.

Results

Treatment with CYC and MMF led to improvements in several PROs with no between‐treatment differences. Scores for the Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) and St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) improved significantly over 2 years, and 29%/24% and 28%/25% of participants in the CYC/MMF groups met or exceeded the MCID estimates for TDI and SGRQ, respectively. At baseline, the forced vital capacity (FVC) percentage predicted (FVC%‐predicted) did not correlate with the Baseline Dyspnea Index or SGRQ. However, improvements in the FVC%‐predicted were weakly associated with improvements in dyspnea (assessed by the TDI) and SGRQ scores.

Conclusion

Treatment with CYC and MMF improved overall health‐related quality of life in patients with SSc‐ILD. The relationship between PRO measures and the FVC was relatively weak, suggesting that PROs provide complementary information about treatment efficacy not captured by changes in the FVC alone in this patient population.

Current and Future Outlook on Disease Modification and Defining Low Disease Activity in Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune rheumatic disease with heterogeneous clinical manifestations and a variable course in which the severity of the pathology dictates the disease prognosis and course. Among autoimmune rheumatic diseases, SSc has the highest mortality rate among all rheumatic diseases, though there are exciting new therapeutic targets that appear to halt the progression of SSc manifestations such as skin or lung fibrosis. In selected patients, high-intensity regimens with autologous stem cell transplantation can favorably modify the course. In what was once thought to be an untreatable disease, targeted therapies have now changed the outlook of SSc to a treatable disorder. Herein, we discuss the targeted therapies modifying the outlook on selected organ involvement and creating opportunities for future treatment. We also present a framework for defining low disease activity in SSc.

Mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine and tacrolimus: mechanisms in rheumatology

The introduction of biologic DMARDs into rheumatology has resulted in a substantial reduction of the burden of many rheumatic diseases. In the slipstream of the success achieved with these biologic DMARDs, some conventional immunosuppressive drugs have also found use in new indications. Notably, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine and tacrolimus have made their way from solid organ transplantation drugs to become useful assets in rheumatology practice. Mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine inhibit the purine pathway and subsequently diminish cell proliferation. Both drugs have a pivotal role in the treatment of various rheumatic diseases, including lupus nephritis. Tacrolimus inhibits lymphocyte activation by inhibiting the calcineurin pathway. Mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus are, among other indications, increasingly being recognized as useful drugs in the treatment of interstitial lung disease in systemic rheumatic diseases and skin fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. A broad array of trials with mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine and/or tacrolimus are ongoing within the field of rheumatology that might provide further novel avenues for the use of these drugs. In this Review, we discuss the historical perspective, pharmacodynamics, clinical indications and novel avenues for mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine and tacrolimus in rheumatology.

Ongoing clinical trials and treatment options for patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease

SSc is a rare CTD that affects multiple organ systems, resulting in substantial morbidity and mortality. Evidence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is seen in ∼80% of patients with SSc. Currently there is no approved disease-modifying treatment for ILD and few effective treatment options are available. CYC is included in treatment guidelines, but it has limited efficacy and is associated with toxicity. MMF is becoming the most commonly used medication in clinical practice in North America and the UK, but its use is not universal. Newer agents targeting the pathogenic mechanisms underlying SSc-ILD, including fibrotic and inflammatory pathways, lymphocytes, cell-cell and cell-extracellular membrane interactions, hold promise for better treatment outcomes, including improved lung function, patient-related outcomes and quality of life. Here we review ongoing trials of established and novel agents that are currently recruiting patients with SSc-ILD.

Lung transplantation in scleroderma: recent advances and lessons

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to highlight recent data regarding feasibility and outcomes following lung transplantation for patients with systemic sclerosis related pulmonary disease as well as to emphasize areas of uncertainly in need of further study. We include a description of our centre's approach to lung transplant evaluation and posttransplant management in this complex patient population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Historical data have demonstrated that patients with scleroderma have an increased risk of complications following lung transplantation owing to the multisystem nature of disease, particularly concurrent gastrointestinal, cardiac and renal involvement. Emerging data support the safety of lung transplant in appropriately selected patients with scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease and pulmonary arterial hypertension.

SUMMARY

Accumulating evidence validates that a diagnosis of scleroderma is not a priori a contraindication to lung transplant. In the carefully selected patient, both short-term and long-term outcomes following lung transplantation are comparable to counterparts with fibrotic lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension. However, further prospective study to detail how these patients should be evaluated and managed posttransplant is definitely needed. Cardiac disease is an emerging cause of morbidity and mortality in the scleroderma population and deserves particular attention during the pre and posttransplant period.

New insights into the genetics and epigenetics of systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a severe autoimmune disease that is characterized by vascular abnormalities, immunological alterations and fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. The results of genetic studies in patients with SSc have revealed statistically significant genetic associations with disease manifestations and progression. Nevertheless, genetic susceptibility to SSc is moderate, and the functional consequences of genetic associations remain only partially characterized. A current hypothesis is that, in genetically susceptible individuals, epigenetic modifications constitute the driving force for disease initiation. As epigenetic alterations can occur years before fibrosis appears, these changes could represent a potential link between inflammation and tissue fibrosis. Epigenetics is a fast-growing discipline, and a considerable number of important epigenetic studies in SSc have been published in the past few years that span histone post-translational modifications, DNA methylation, microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs. This Review describes the latest insights into genetic and epigenetic contributions to the pathogenesis of SSc and aims to provide an improved understanding of the molecular pathways that link inflammation and fibrosis. This knowledge will be of paramount importance for the development of medicines that are effective in treating or even reversing tissue fibrosis.

[Updates in systemic sclerosis pathogenesis: Toward new therapeutic opportunities]

Systemic sclerosis is a rare connective tissue disease characterized by skin and several internal organ fibrosis, systemic vasculopathy and immune abnormalities. Even if fibroblasts and endothelial cells dysfunction, as well as lymphocytes and other immune cells implication are now well described, the exact origin and chronology of the disease pathogenesis remain unclear. Oxidative stress, influenced by genetic and environmental factors, seems to play a key role. Indeed, it seems to be implicated in the early phases of fibrosis development, vasculopathy and in immune tolerance abnormalities shared by all patients, although disease expression is heterogeneous. To date, no curative treatment is available. Even if immunosuppressive treatment or drugs acting on vascular system are proposed for some patients, overall, treatment efficiency remains modest. Only autologous hematopoietic stem cells transplantation, reserved for patients with severe or rapidly progressive fibrosis, has recently demonstrated efficiency, with lasting regression of fibrosis. Nevertheless, this treatment can expose to important, life-threatening toxicity. In the last decade, new mechanisms implicated in the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis have been unraveled, bringing new therapeutic opportunities. In this review, we offer to focus on recent insights in the knowledge of systemic sclerosis pathogenesis and its implication in current and future medical care.

Recurrence of progressive skin involvement following discontinuation or dose reduction of Mycophenolate Mofetil treatment in patients with diffuse Systemic Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Rapidly progressive diffuse cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis (rp-dcSSc) is associated with severe internal organ involvement and high mortality. Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) has been shown to halt the progression of rp-dcSSc cutaneous and pulmonary involvement in observational and randomized controlled trials, respectively. However, optimal MMF therapy duration has not been established. Here, we describe the clinical evolution of rp-dcSSc patients successfully treated with MMF following MMF therapy discontinuation or dose reduction.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with recent-onset (< 24 mo) rp-dcSSc received MMF as the only SSc disease-modifying therapy. Following MMF discontinuation or dose reduction to or below 1000 mg/day after an average of two years, the Modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) and Pulmonary function tests (PFT) were serially evaluated for additional 5 years. MMF therapy was re-instituted if the mRSS increased by greater than 20% or if restrictive lung disease developed.

RESULTS

From nineteen patients serially evaluated following MMF discontinuation or dose reduction, five patients (26.3%) developed recurrence of rapid skin involvement with an average of 35.9% increase in mRSS from 7.8 to 10.6 points requiring MMF re-institution. Two of these patients also presented worsening respiratory symptoms and reduction of lung volumes in PFTs. Following MMF resumption, mRSS returned to baseline or stabilized and PFTs improved or stabilized. All these patients were maintained on high dose long term MMF treatment.

CONCLUSION

Recurrence of severe skin involvement occurred in 26.3% of patients with rp-dcSSc following MMF discontinuation or dose reduction, requiring prompt MMF therapy resumption. These findings confirm the therapeutic benefit of MMF in rp-dcSSc and suggest that MMF treatment should be maintained for longer than 2 years.

Evaluation of Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium training recommendations on modified Rodnan skin score assessment in scleroderma

Aim

The modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) is a validated outcome measure for skin thickness in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Training has been shown to reduce variability in the measurement of mRSS. Our objective was to assess the inter‐ and intra‐observer variability of mRSS scoring using the proposed recommendations for training by the Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium (SCTC) and World Scleroderma Foundation (WSF).

Method

Fifty‐two trainees and eight adult SSc patients participated in the SSc skin scoring workshop that was conducted in two sessions by four teachers. Each session, attended by 26 trainees, had a teaching and evaluation phase. The teaching phase comprised of: (a) lecture on mRSS scoring; (b) video demonstration of mRSS scoring; and (c) live demonstration of mRSS on one SSc patient. In the evaluation phase, each trainee independently assessed the mRSS in four SSc patients. For intra‐observer reliability, 14 trainees re‐assessed the mRSS of two SSc patients whom they had previously examined. We computed the inter‐ and intra‐observer variability using a linear mixed model.

Results

For the evaluation phase, 34 (65.4%) trainees were within five units of the established teachers' score in 3 out of 4 patients. Overall, the whole group had acceptable inter‐observer variability (intra‐class correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.71, mean = 8.64 and within‐patient standard deviation [SD] = 4.25). The intra‐observer ICC was 0.85 and within‐patient SD was 2.73.

Conclusion

There was good inter‐observer and excellent intra‐observer reliability. This is the first study examining the training of assessors using the SCTC/WSF recommendations and our results support the importance of standardized training for skin scoring.

Minimal Clinically Important Differences for the Modified Rodnan Skin Score: Results from the Scleroderma Lung Studies (SLS-I and SLS-II)

Objective

This study aimed to assess the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) using combined data from the Scleroderma Lung Studies (I and II).

Methods

MCID estimates for the mRSS at 12 months were calculated using three anchors: change in scores on the Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index from baseline to 12 months, change in scores on the Patient Global Assessment from baseline to 12 months, and answer at 12 month for the Short Form-36 health transition question “Compared to one year ago, how would you rate your health in general now?” We determined the mRSS MCID estimates for all participants and for those with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc). We then assessed associations between MCID estimates of mRSS improvement and patient-reported outcomes, using Student’s t test to compare the mean differences in patient outcomes between those who met the MCID improvement criteria versus those who did not meet the improvement criteria.

Results

The mean (SD) mRSS at baseline was 14.75 (10.72) for all participants and 20.93 (9.61) for those with dcSSc. The MCID estimate for mRSS improvement at 12 months ranged from 3 to 4 units for the overall group (improvement of 20–27% from baseline) and was 5 units for those with dcSSc (improvement of 24% from baseline). Those who met the mRSS MCID improvement criteria had statistically significant improvements in scores on the Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary, the Transition Dyspnea Index, and joint contractures at 12 months.

Conclusion

MCID estimates for the mRSS were 3–4 units for all participants and 5 units for those with dcSSc. These findings are consistent with previously reported MCID estimates for systemic sclerosis.

Immunotherapy of systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic systemic disease characterized by microvasculopathy, immune activation, and extensive collagen deposition. Microvasculopathy and immune activation occur very early in the disease process. Evidence from animal models and in vitro studies indicate that T-cells and B-cells activate fibroblasts to produce collagen. Traditional immunosuppressants, cyclophosphamide(CyP), methotrexate(MTX), and more recently mycophenolate mofetil(MMF), may prove more effective if used very early in the disease course. These drugs showed some benefit in skin (MTX, CyP, MMF) and lung function (CyP, MMF). Biologicals, such as intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), belimumab(Beli), tocilizumab(TCZ), abatacept(Aba), rituximab(RTX) and fresolimumab(Fresu) appear promising as they exhibited some benefit in skin (IVIg, Beli, TCZ, Aba, RTX, Fresu), hand function (IVIg), and joints (IVIg, TCZ, Aba). Autologous stem cell transplantation showed the best therapeutic efficacy on skin and internal organs, and looks very promising, as modification of transplantation immunosuppression is decreasing the early high mortality.