Essential updates to the surgical treatment of biliary tract cancer

Impact of Tumor Shrinkage Pattern with Biweekly Triplet Gemcitabine+Cisplatin+S-1 Regimen for Biliary Tract Cancers: Implications for Neoadjuvant Therapy from the Data of KHBO1401 (KHBO1401-1A Study)

INTRODUCTION

The multicenter randomized phase III KHBO1401 study (gemcitabine+cisplatin+S-1 [GCS] vs. GC in biliary tract cancers [BTC]) demonstrated that GCS not only prolonged patient survival but also achieved a high response rate and that it should be good for neoadjuvant therapy. Therefore, to explore the possibilities of neoadjuvant therapy, we investigated the tumor shrinkage pattern.

METHODS

Among the total of 246 patients enrolled in the KHBO1401, the tumor shrinkage pattern and survival were investigated in patients with measurable BTC (n = 183, 74%; GCS, n = 91; GC, n = 92).

RESULTS

The tumor shrinkage pattern could be divided into 4 categories based on the response at 100 days after enrollment: categories A (<-30% in size), B (-30-0%), C (0% to +20%), and D (>+20%). The GCS arm included more category A and B cases (61 [67%] vs. 33 [36%], p < 0.0001). Each category predicted the best response and overall survival (p < 0.0001). Category A showed sustained tumor response compared with category B; in GCS, the time to maximum tumor response was 165 ± 76 days in category A and 139 ± 78 in category B. Categories C and D did not achieve tumor shrinkage. The maximum tumor shrinkage size in category A was -53% in the GCS arm and -65% in the GC arm (p = 0.0892). Twenty percent of patients in the GCS showed tumor regrowth 154 ± 143 days later.

CONCLUSION

GCS provided faster and greater tumor shrinkage with better survival in comparison to GC, although 20% of patients showed regrowth after 6 cycles.

Impact of conversion surgery after chemotherapy in patients with initially unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer

Purpose

Gemcitabine, cisplatin, and S-1 chemotherapy was superior to gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy for progression-free survival and overall survival for unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer in a randomized phase III trial (KHBO1401). This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of conversion surgery after chemotherapy in biliary tract cancer patients (ancillary study, KHBO1401-3C).

Methods

A total of 246 patients were enrolled in KHBO1401. We compared progression-free and overall survivals between the conversion surgery and non-conversion surgery groups.

Results

Eight patients (3.3%) underwent conversion surgery with chemotherapy, seven of whom were diagnosed with unresectable disease and one with recurrence. Six and two patients received gemcitabine, cisplatin, and S-1 chemotherapy as well as gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy, respectively. Three patients in the conversion surgery group who received gemcitabine, cisplatin, and S-1 chemotherapy showed no disease progression and survived without postoperative chemotherapy. Preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level was a prognostic factor for conversion surgery. After correcting for immortal time bias, 1-year progression-free survival rates in the conversion surgery and non-conversion surgery groups were 50.0% and 19.0%, respectively (hazard ratio 0.343, 95% confidence interval 0.286-0.843, p = 0.0092). One-year overall survival rates in the conversion surgery and non-conversion surgery groups were 87.5% and 56.0%, respectively (hazard ratio 0.222, 95% confidence interval 0.226-0.877, p = 0.0197).

Conclusions

Conversion surgery might be an option for the treatment of unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer in patients with normal preoperative CA19-9 level.

Temporal Trends of Stages and Survival of Biliary Tract Cancers in the United States and Associations with Demographic Factors

BACKGROUND

The incidence of cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer has been increasing and decreasing respectively in the United States, whereas their mortality has been declining since 1980, which suggests improved overall survival of biliary tract cancers (BTC). We aimed to investigate temporal trends of BTC stages and survival and their associations with demographic factors.

METHODS

A total of 55,163 patients with BTC collected from 2000 to 2018 from the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 registry were included in this study. We assessed the temporal trend of BTC stages with diagnosis years using the annual percentage of change (APC) in the proportion of the stages. We estimated the association of BTC survival and stages with diagnosis years and demographic factors using the Cox regression models.

RESULTS

While localized BTC proportion remained little changed from 2006 to 2018, the proportion of regional and distant BTCs significantly decreased (APC = -2.3%) and increased (APC = 2.7%), respectively, through the years. The overall and cancer-specific survival increased from 41.0% and 47.3% in 2000 to 2004 to 51.2% and 53.8% in 2015 to 2018, respectively. Patients with BTC who were older, Black, unmarried, or had lower socioeconomic status (SES) had significantly poorer overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that distant and regional BTC significantly increased and decreased, respectively, and the BTC survival significantly improved over time. Age, sex, race, SES, and marital status were significantly associated with overall survival and less evidently with cancer-specific survival of patients with BTC.

IMPACT

Our findings suggest that demographic factors were associated with BTC stages and BTC survival.

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy vs chemotherapy for resectable biliary tract cancer: a propensity score matching analysis based on the SEER database

BACKGROUND

Although the role of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) for resectable biliary tract cancer (BTC) is gradually recognized, the benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is still controversial. Our study is designed to compare the prognosis of CRT versus CT in BCT patients.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with operable gallbladder cancer (GBCA), intrahepatic bile duct cancer (IHBDC), or extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EHBDC) were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2015). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Selection bias were reduced by propensity-score matching (PSM). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the survival time.

RESULTS

Within 922 patients, 53.9% received adjuvant CRT, and 46.1% received adjuvant CT. Multivariate analysis showed age, primary tumor site, T stage, N stage, tumor size, number of removed lymph nodes, and treatment were independent risk factors for OS. Similar improvement of CRT on survival was identified by PSM in the matched cohort compared with CT (28.0 months vs. 25.0 months, p = 0.033), particularly in GBCA cohort (25.0 months vs. 19.0 months, p = 0.003). Subgroup analysis indicated CRT improved outcomes of patients with age ≥ 60, female, lymph nodes positive, tumor size ≥ 5 cm, and none removed lymph node diseases.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant CRT correlated with improved survival in patients with resected BTC compared with adjuvant CT, particularly in GBCAs. In addition, patients with age ≥ 60, female, lymph nodes positive, tumor size ≥ 5 cm, and none removed lymph node diseases may receive more benefits from adjuvant CRT.

Current progress in perioperative chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer

Biliary tract cancer (BTCs) is a heterogeneous malignancy divided into cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, and ampullary cancer. Due to little or no symptoms, most patients with BTCs are diagnosed with unresectable or metastatic disease. Only 20%-30% of all BTCs are suitable for potentially resectable diseases. Although radical resection with a negative surgical margin is the only potentially curative method for BTCs, most patients develop postoperative recurrence, which is associated with poor prognosis. Therefore, perioperative treatment is necessary to improve survival. There are very few randomized phase III clinical trials of perioperative chemotherapy due to the relative rarity of BTCs. Adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 for patients with resected BTC significantly increased overall survival compared with upfront surgery in a recent ASCOT trial. In East Asia, S-1 is currently considered the standard adjuvant chemotherapy, while capecitabine may still be used in other areas. Since then, our phase III trial (KHBO1401), gemcitabine and cisplatin plus S-1 (GCS) has become the standard chemotherapy for advanced BTCs. GCS not only improved overall survival but demonstrated a high response rate. The efficacy of GCS as a preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable BTCs has been investigated in a randomized phase III trial (JCOG1920) in Japan. In this review, we summarize the current and ongoing clinical trials focusing on adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for BTCs.

Phosphatidylcholine in bile-derived small extracellular vesicles as a novel biomarker of cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Owing to the lack of definite diagnostic modalities, it is challenging to distinguish malignant cases of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), which often causes biliary tract obstruction, from benign ones. Here, we investigated a novel lipid biomarker of CCA in bile-derived small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) and developed a simple detection method for clinical application.

METHODS

Bile samples from seven patients with malignant diseases (hilar CCA = 4, distal CCA = 3) and eight patients with benign diseases (gallstones = 6, primary sclerosing cholangitis = 1, autoimmune pancreatitis = 1) were collected through a nasal biliary drainage tube. sEVs were isolated via serial ultracentrifugation and characterized using nanoparticle tracking analysis, transmission electron microscopy, and immunoblotting (with CD9, CD63, CD81, and TSG101). Comprehensive lipidomic analysis was performed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Using a measurement kit, we further confirmed whether lipid concentrations could be used as a potential CCA marker.

RESULTS

Lipidomic analysis of bile sEVs in the two groups identified 209 significantly increased lipid species in the malignant group. When focusing on lipid class, phosphatidylcholine (PC) level was 4.98-fold higher in the malignant group than in the benign group (P = 0.037). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed a sensitivity of 71.4%, a specificity of 100%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.857 (95% confidence interval [CI]:0.643-1.000). Using a PC assay kit, the ROC curve showed a cutoff value of 16.1 μg/mL, a sensitivity of 71.4%, a specificity of 100%, and an AUC of 0.839 (95% CI: 0.620-1.000).

CONCLUSION

PC level in sEVs from human bile is a potential diagnostic marker for CCA and can be assessed by a commercially available assay kit.

Clinical outcomes of second‑line chemotherapy after gemcitabine and cisplatin plus S‑1 treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer in the KHBO1401‑3A study

Since the completion of the KHBO1401 study, which evaluated the efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and cisplatin (GC) compared with GC plus S‑1 (GCS), GCS has become a standard chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, there are currently no data revealing second‑line therapy options after GCS. The present study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes of patients receiving second‑line chemotherapy for advanced BTC, refractory or intolerant to GCS, using data from the KHBO1401 study. Patients who received a second‑line treatment after GCS chemotherapy between July 2014 and February 2016 were retrospectively studied. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the day of GCS treatment failure or the first day of second‑line chemotherapy to the final follow‑up date or until death from any cause. Among 83 patients refractory or intolerant to GCS chemotherapy, 51 (61%) received second‑line chemotherapy, including GCS (n=8), GC (n=15), GEM (n=6), GEM plus S‑1 (GS) (n=4) and S‑1 (n=18). The 6‑ and 12‑month OS rates were 66.7 and 44.4%, respectively, following second‑line chemotherapy, and 6.3 and 3.1%, respectively, in the best supportive care group (P<0.0001). In addition, the 12‑ and 24‑month OS rates were 59.3 and 36.2%, respectively, in the multidrug chemotherapy group, and 26.9 and 9.0%, respectively, in the single‑agent chemotherapy group (P=0.0191). These results suggested that second‑line combination chemotherapy is a viable treatment option for patients with advanced BTC that is refractory or intolerant to first‑line GCS therapy.

Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine, cisplatin plus S-1 versus gemcitabine, cisplatin for advanced biliary tract cancer (KHBO1401- MITSUBA)

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) combination therapy has been the standard palliative chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). No randomized clinical trials have been able to demonstrate the survival benefit over GC during the past decade. In our previous phase II trial, adding S-1 to GC (GCS) showed promising efficacy and we aimed to determine whether GCS could improve overall survival compared with GC for patients with advanced BTC.

METHODS

We performed a mulitcenter, randomized phase III trial across 39 centers. Enrolled patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to either the GCS or GC arm. The GCS regimen comprised gemcitabine (1000 mg/m² ) and cisplatin (25 mg/m² ) infusion on day 1 and 80 mg/m² of S-1 on days 1-7 every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and adverse events (AEs). This study is registered with Clinical trial identification: NCT02182778.

RESULTS

Between July 2014 and February 2016, 246 patients were enrolled. The median OS and 1-year OS rate were 13.5 months and 59.4% in the GCS arm and 12.6 months and 53.7% in the GC arm, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.628-0.996; P = .046 [stratified log-rank test]). Median PFS was 7.4 months in the GCS arm and 5.5 months in the GC arm (HR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.577-0.970; P = .015). RR was 41.5% in the GCS arm and 15.0% in the GC arm. Grade 3 or worse AEs did not show significant differences between the two arms.

CONCLUSIONS

GCS is the first regimen which demonstrated survival benefits as well as higher RR over GC in a randomized phase III trial and could be the new first-line standard chemotherapy for advanced BTC. To exploit the advantage of its high RR, GCS is now tested in the neoadjuvant setting in a randomized phase III trial for potentially resectable BTC.

Evaluation of abnormal gallbladder imaging findings: Surgical management and pathologic correlations in early-stage gallbladder cancer

Gallbladder cancer is a rare but potentially fatal disease. It is often asymptomatic in early stages and is frequently found incidentally or during the workup for benign biliary disease. We present two patients who each had suspicious gallbladder imaging findings and highlight their differences on radiologic and pathologic examination.

Conversion surgery following gemcitabine plus cisplatin therapy for initially unresectable gallbladder cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a case report

Background

Conversion surgery, which is defined as chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery, may improve survival of patients with initially unresectable advanced biliary tract cancer, including gallbladder cancer. However, there are few reports on conversion surgery for advanced gallbladder cancer.

Case presentation

A 69-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with initially unresectable gallbladder cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis. She underwent gemcitabine plus cisplatin therapy for 9 months. Extended cholecystectomy, resection of the extrahepatic bile duct with regional lymph node dissection, and total omentectomy were then performed as conversion surgery. The patient has survived without recurrence for 19 months postoperatively (31 months after the initial diagnosis) while continuing chemotherapy.

Conclusions

This case suggests that conversion surgery for advanced gallbladder cancer is effective and may be curative for locally advanced disease and distant metastasis such as peritoneal carcinomatosis.

ACAT-1-Regulated Cholesteryl Ester Accumulation Modulates Gemcitabine Resistance in Biliary Tract Cancer

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) has few choices of chemotherapy, including gemcitabine, therefore exploring the mechanisms of gemcitabine resistance is important. We focused on lipid metabolism because biliary tract epithelial cells are essential in cholesterol and bile acid metabolism and the messenger RNA (mRNA) microarray analysis showed high acyl coenzyme A: cholesterol acyltransferase 1 (ACAT-1) expression in BTC gemcitabine-resistant (GR) cell lines. We hypothesized that aberrant accumulation of cholesteryl ester (CE) regulated by ACAT-1 could modulate GR in BTC.

METHODS

CE accumulations were measured in human BTC cell lines, and the relationships between CE levels, ACAT-1 expressions, and gemcitabine sensitivity were analyzed. We performed a small-interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated knockdown and biochemical inhibition of ACAT-1 in BTC cell lines and alterations of gemcitabine sensitivity were evaluated. To evaluate the clinical significance of ACAT-1 in regard to GR, immunohistochemistry was performed and ACAT-1 expressions were analyzed in resected BTC specimens.

RESULTS

CE levels were correlated with ACAT-1 expressions and GR in four human BTC cell lines. siRNA-mediated knockdown of ACAT-1 in two independent GR cell clones as well as ACAT-1 inhibitor treatment significantly increased gemcitabine sensitivity; knockdown of ACAT-1: 5.63- and 8.02-fold; ACAT-1 inhibitor: 8.75- and 9.13-fold, respectively. ACAT-1 expression in resected BTC specimens revealed that the disease-free survival of the ACAT-1 low-intensity group (median 2.3 years) had a significantly better outcome than that of the ACAT-1 high-intensity group (median 1.1 years) under gemcitabine treatment after surgery (*p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that CE and ACAT-1 might be a novel therapeutic target for GR in BTC.

Conversion surgery for initially unresectable extrahepatic biliary tract cancer

Backgrounds/Aims

Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for biliary tract cancers; however, most patients undergo palliative chemotherapy because they are contraindicated for surgery. Conversion surgery, a treatment strategy for downsizing chemotherapy and subsequent surgical resection, is feasible for initially unresectable biliary tract cancers following the introduction of effective chemotherapeutic agents.

Methods

Patients initially diagnosed with unresectable biliary tract cancers, and treated with conversion surgery after palliative chemotherapy between 2013 and 2019, were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

Twelve patients underwent conversion surgery after palliative chemotherapy for initially unresectable biliary tract cancers. The final pathological diagnosis included six perihilar cholangiocarcinomas, four distal common bile duct cancers, and two gallbladder cancers. Different chemotherapy regimens were used, but all the patients were treated with gemcitabine at some point during their treatment. The median overall survival was 28 months, which was longer than that of patients treated with isolated palliative chemotherapy in previous studies.

Conclusions

Conversion surgery represents a therapeutic alternative for specific cases of unresectable biliary tract cancers. Palliative chemotherapy for initially unresectable biliary tract cancers is recommended for downsizing the tumor and expanding the indications for surgery. Further studies and clinical trials are required to develop new and effective chemotherapeutic regimens.

Surgery for Bismuth-Corlette Type 4 Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Results from a Western Multicenter Collaborative Group

Background

Although Bismuth-Corlette (BC) type 4 perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is no longer considered a contraindication for curative surgery, few data are available from Western series to indicate the outcomes for these patients. This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes for patients with BC type 4 versus BC types 2 and 3 pCCA undergoing surgical resection using a multi-institutional international database.

Methods

Uni- and multivariable analyses of patients undergoing surgery at 20 Western centers for BC types 2 and 3 pCCA and BC type 4 pCCA.

Results

Among 1138 pCCA patients included in the study, 826 (73%) had BC type 2 or 3 disease and 312 (27%) had type 4 disease. The two groups demonstrated significant differences in terms of clinicopathologic characteristics (i.e., portal vein embolization, extended hepatectomy, and positive margin). The incidence of severe complications was 46% for the BC types 2 and 3 patients and 51% for the BC type 4 patients (p = 0.1). Moreover, the 90-day mortality was 13% for the BC types 2 and 3 patients and 12% for the BC type 4 patients (p = 0.57). Lymph-node metastasis (N1; hazard-ratio [HR], 1.62), positive margins (R1; HR, 1.36), perineural invasion (HR, 1.53), and poor grade of differentiation (HR, 1.25) were predictors of survival (all p ≤0.004), but BC type was not associated with prognosis. Among the N0 and R0 patients, the 5-year overall survival was 43% for the patients with BC types 2 and 3 pCCA and 41% for those with BC type 4 pCCA (p = 0.60).

Conclusions

In this analysis of a large Western multi-institutional cohort, resection was shown to be an acceptable curative treatment option for selected patients with BC type 4 pCCA although a more technically challenging surgical approach was required.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-09905-z.

Role of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for resectable biliary tract cancer

Introduction: Although the safety of biliary tract cancer resection has improved over the years, the recurrence rate is still high, and the postoperative prognosis remains low after biliary tract cancer resection. Therefore, the development of effective adjuvant therapy is essential to improve treatment outcomes. Because biliary tract cancer is rare compared with other gastrointestinal cancers, there have been only a small number of clinical trials of adjuvant therapy. However, in recent years, the results of several large-scale randomized controlled trials have been published, and clinical trials investigating the efficacy of new regimens are currently ongoing.Areas covered: This review presents the results of previously published important phase II and III clinical trials of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for biliary tract cancer and discusses their interpretation. The future direction of new research on resectable biliary tract cancer treatment is also discussed.Expert opinion: The foundations of large-scale clinical trials of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for biliary tract cancer are underway, and new trials will establish evidence of their effectiveness. Additionally, breakthroughs in treatment through genetic and molecular research are expected.

FGFR inhibitors in elderly patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: an unsolved issue

Background: Despite recent advances in the understanding of the molecular landscape of biliary tract cancer (BTC), advanced disease continues to carry a poor prognosis, and the benefit from systemic treatments remains modest. However, BTCs have emerged as malignancies harboring specific potentially druggable aberrations, and thus, several molecularly targeted treatments have been recently tested. Among these, fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors have shown interesting results in previously treated BTC patients with advanced diseaseAreas covered: In this review, we aimed to provide an overview of available evidence on FGFR inhibitors in elderly patients with metastatic BTC, especially focusing on subgroup analyses of recently published trials exploring this novel therapeutic approach in these aggressive malignancies.Expert opinion: The FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR3 inhibitor pemigatinib has been recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in metastatic BTCs harboring FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangement. However, few data are available regarding the use of FGFR inhibitors in elderly BTCs, a patient population that remains seriously under-represented in clinical trials.

Central hepatic bisectionectomy with hepatic artery and biliary tracts reconstruction for the patient with nodular type intrahepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A case report

•

A central hepatic bisectionectomy (CHBS) for malignant hepatic tumors is a challenging procedure due to surgical difficulty.

•

We describe radical CHBS with hepatic artery and biliary tracts reconstruction for a patient with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA).

•

We reconstructed the anastomosis of the hepatic artery and then performed choledochojejunostoies.

•

Aggressive liver resection for hilar CCA could achieve similar long-term survival rates.

Introduction and importance

A central hepatic bisectionectomy (CHBS) for a hilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is technically challenging because bilateral biliary reconstruction is required after resection. On the other hand, hepatic artery resection and reconstruction in a major liver resection are also technical procedures. In this report, we describe our radical CHBS with hepatic artery and biliary tracts reconstruction for a patient with nodular type intrahepatic hilar CCA.

Case presentation

A 76-year-old man was referred for further investigation of an incidental hepatic tumor. The hepatic tumor was located from medial sector to anterior sector with encasement of the anterior branch of the right hepatic artery. Based on these findings, we performed a CHBS with right hepatic artery and biliary tracts reconstruction. The histopathological findings revealed that the tumor consisted of moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma with tumor necrosis without a fibrous capsule. In this area, tumors cells had invaded branches of the hepatic vein; however, there was no destructive invasion to the hepatic artery. Consequently, he was diagnosed with a nodular type intrahepatic hilar CCA with pT2aN0M0.

Clinical discussion

A CHBS is usually performed with the intent of anatomically preserving a patient’s liver as much as possible. Concomitant resection and reconstruction of the hilar vessels and biliary tracts with CHBS is one of the most technically challenging procedures in liver resections.

Conclusion

A CHBS with hepatic artery and biliary reconstruction may be a promising alternative if expert surgeons perform it on strictly selected patients.

IDH inhibitors in advanced cholangiocarcinoma: Another arrow in the quiver?

Cholangiocarcinomas (CCAs) are a heterogenous group of hepatobiliary tumors with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. In the last decade, the advent of genomic profiling has led to the identification of several putative actionable aberrations in CCAs, and genomic characterization is playing an increasing role in the management of these malignancies. Thus, a wide number of targetable mutations are currently under investigation, and early studies on this approach in CCAs have been recently presented or published. Among these, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations have been reported in approximately 15-20% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) patients, while these aberrations are considered to be less frequent in perihilar CCA (pCCA), distal CCA (dCCA), and gallbladder cancer. Of note, the recent findings of the ClarIDHy phase III trial add to mounting evidence showing the potential advantages of molecularly targeted therapies in CCA, on the basis of a benefit in previously treated IDH1-mutant patients receiving ivosidenib versus placebo. However, although the results of this trial showed a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival for IDH-mutant CCAs treated with ivosidenib, several questions regarding the real impact of IDH inhibitors in this setting remain open. In this review, we will provide an overview on the biological rationale behind the use of IDH inhibitors in CCA patients and current clinical implications of these molecularly targeted agents. The recently published results of the ClarIDHy - as well as ongoing clinical trials in this setting - are highlighted and critically discussed.

Different role of MSLN and CA125 co-expression as a prognostic predictor between perihilar and distal bile duct carcinoma

Recent studies have suggested that the interaction of mesothelin (MSLN) and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) enhances tumor metastases. The aim of the present study was to clarify the impact of MSLN and CA125 co-expression on the prognosis of patients with extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma (BDC). Tissue samples from patients who underwent surgical resection between 2007 and 2015 for perihilar or distal BDC were immunohistochemically examined. The expression levels of MSLN and CA125 in tumor cells were analyzed. The expression in <50% and ≥50% of the total tumor cells were defined as low- and high-level expression, respectively. Tissue samples were obtained from 31 patients with perihilar BDC and 43 patients with distal BDC. Lymph node metastases were associated with MSLN and CA125 co-expression in patients with perihilar BDC (P=0.002), while there was no association between lymph node metastasis and co-expression in patients with distal BDC (P=0.362). MSLN and CA125 co-expression was associated with a worse overall survival rate in patients with perihilar BDC (5-year overall survival rate, co-expression positive vs. negative, 24 vs. 63%; P=0.038). To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to report an association between co-expression of MSLN and CA125 with a poor prognosis in patients with perihilar BDC. The current findings suggested that the significance of co-expression differed according to the BDC location.

The Efficacy of S-1 as Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resected Biliary Tract Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis

Even though S-1 is a widely used chemotherapeutic agent, there is no evidence for its use in an adjuvant setting for biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). Patients who underwent surgical treatment for BTC between August 2007 and December 2018 were selected. Propensity score matching was performed between patients who received S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy (S-1 group) and those who underwent surgical treatment alone (observation group). Of 170 eligible patients, 38 patients were selected in each group after propensity score matching. Among those in the matched cohort, both the median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in the S-1 group were significantly longer than those in the observation group (RFS, 61.2 vs. 13.1 months, p = 0.033; OS, not available vs. 28.2 months, p = 0.003). A multivariate analysis of the OS revealed that perineural invasion and adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. According to a subgroup analysis of the OS, the S-1 group showed significantly better prognoses than the observation group among patients with perineural invasion (p < 0.001). S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy might improve the prognosis of BTC, especially in patients with perineural invasion.

Pemigatinib: Hot topics behind the first approval of a targeted therapy in cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) includes a heterogeneous group of malignancies with limited treatment options. Despite recent advances in medical oncology, the prognosis of CCA patients with metastatic disease remains poor, with a median overall survival of less than a year. In the last decade, notable efforts have been made by the CCA medical community in an attempt to improve clinical outcomes of patients, with the development of molecularly targeted therapies in this setting. Among these treatments, the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2 inhibitor pemigatinib has received accelerated approval in April 2020 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in CCA patients harboring FGFR2 gene fusions or other rearrangements, on the basis of the results of the FIGHT-202 trial, and thus, representing the first molecularly targeted therapy to be approved for the treatment of CCA. However, several issues remain, including the emergence of polyclonal mutations determining resistance to pemigatinib, the identification of biomarkers predictive of response, and the knowledge gaps regarding the role of other FGFR gene aberrations. This review aims to provide an overview of recent development of pemigatinib, especially focusing on the results of the pivotal FIGHT-202 trial, the approval of this FGFR inhibitor, and the future challenges concerning the use of FGFR-directed treatments in CCA patients.

Adjuvant systemic treatment in resected biliary tract cancer: State of the art, controversies, and future directions

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) includes a heterogeneous group of aggressive malignancies comprising gallbladder cancer (GBC), ampulla of Vater cancer (AVC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA). Unfortunately, potentially curative resection is possible in approximately the 25% of presenting patients, and relapse rates are high, with a notable proportion of BTCs experiencing disease recurrence. Recent years have seen the publication of several prospective clinical trials evaluating the role of adjuvant systemic treatments, and among these, the phase III BILCAP study provided evidence supporting the use of capecitabine after radical surgery in BTC patients; in fact, although the study failed to meet its primary endpoint, the capecitabine arm showed improved clinical outcomes in terms of overall survival (pre-planned sensitivity analysis in the intention-to-treat population and in the per-protocol analysis) and relapse-free survival. However, the BILCAP has been widely criticized, with several authors that have not accepted adjuvant capecitabine as novel standard of care. In this review, we summarize current state of the art regarding adjuvant systemic treatment in BTC, highlighting advantages and disadvantages of recent clinical trials, and suggesting new research directions in this setting.

First-line Chemotherapy in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Ten Years After the ABC-02 Trial: "And Yet It Moves!"

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) include a heterogeneous group of highly aggressive hepatobiliary malignancies, representing the 3% of all gastrointestinal cancers and the second most frequent type of primary liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma. Ten years after the publication of the phase III, randomized, ABC-02 trial, the combination of cisplatin plus gemcitabine remains the standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced BTC. In the last decade, a large number of attempts has been made to improve the efficacy of the reference doublet by using novel drugs or adding a third agent to cisplatin-gemcitabine. Unfortunately, despite the addition of different cytotoxic drugs failed to improve clinical outcomes in several studies, recently published clinical trials have provided interesting results, and other first-line chemotherapy options are currently under investigation in randomized phase III studies. Moreover, recent years have witnessed the parallel emergence of molecularly targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, with these novel agents having the potential to revolutionize the therapeutic algorithm of advanced BTC. In this review, we will provide an overview on first-line therapeutic opportunities currently available in the management of advanced BTCs, especially focusing on recently published data and ongoing clinical trials in this setting.

The impact of peritoneal lavage cytology in biliary tract cancer (KHBO1701): Kansai Hepato-Biliary Oncology Group

Background

Only few studies in literature have analyzed the clinical effects of peritoneal lavage status in biliary tract cancers.

Aim

We aimed to assess the effect of cytology‐positive peritoneal lavage on survival for patients with biliary tract cancer who underwent curative resection.

Methods

The KHBO1701 study was a multi‐institutional retrospective study that assessed the clinical effects of peritoneal lavage cytology in biliary tract cancers. Using clinicopathological data from 11 Japanese institutions, we compared long‐term outcomes between patients with cytology‐positive and cytology‐negative peritoneal lavage.

Results

Of 169 patients who underwent curative resection, 164 were cytology‐negative, and five were cytology‐positive. The incidence of portal invasion and preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19‐9 levels were higher in the cytology‐positive group than in the cytology‐negative group. The incidence of peritoneal metastatic recurrence was also higher, and overall survival tended to be worse in the cytology‐positive group. In contrast, recurrence‐free survival was similar between the cytology‐negative and cytology‐positive groups.

Conclusions

The positive status of peritoneal lavage cytology could moderately affect the survival of patients with biliary tract cancers. Given that surgical resection is the only curative treatment option, it may be acceptable to resect biliary tract cancers without other non‐curative factors, regardless of peritoneal lavage cytology status.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Simultaneous Hepatic Artery Resection and Reconstruction for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Introduction

Because surgical resection with simultaneous hepatic artery (HA) resection and reconstruction for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is technically demanding, the surgical indication for this challenging procedure is controversial. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of simultaneous HA resection and reconstruction for PHC.

Methods

Between January 2002 and January 2018, 13 patients with PHC underwent surgical intervention with simultaneous resection and reconstruction of the HA at Yamaguchi University Hospital (Ube, Japan) and Osaka University Hospital (Suita, Japan).

Results

There were 2 cases (15.4%) of 90-day postoperative mortality. Nine patients (69.2%) developed major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥IIIa). Curative resections (R0) were achieved in 8 cases (61.5%). The median survival time (MST) and 1- and 3-year survival rates after resection (including in-hospital deaths) were 20.9 months and 61.5 and 10.3%, respectively. The MST and 1- and 2-year survival rates of 8 patients who underwent R0 resection were significantly better than those of the other 5 patients (24.2 vs. 10.2 months, 75.0 vs. 40.0%, and 50.0 vs. 0.0%, respectively, p = 0.0228).

Conclusions

Simultaneous HA resection and reconstruction is technically possible and may provide long-term survival in selected patients with locally advanced PHC.

Laparoscopic total biopsy for suspected gallbladder cancer: A case series

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Imaging diagnosis of gallbladder cancer remains difficult to achieve preoperatively. We developed a novel approach based on laparoscopic whole-layer cholecystectomy (LWLC) and laparoscopic gallbladder bed dissection (LGBD) for total biopsy, for ultimately determining the optimal treatment strategy for suspected gallbladder cancer detected on preoperative imaging. Here, we describe a case series of patients who underwent this procedure at our institution.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined clinicopathological data of consecutive patients with suspected gallbladder carcinoma at Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine from September 2016 to July 2018 on which a laparoscopic approach was used. Preoperative imaging findings suggestive of gallbladder cancer were defined as follows: elevated lesion >10 mm in diameter, increasing tumor size over time compared with the previous imaging, sessile lesion, irregular wall thickness lesion mimicking cancer, elevated lesion with dense enhancement, or positive results on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. LWLC was performed for early-stage or suspected malignant lesions without liver invasion, and LGBD was performed for lesions with an unclear border between the gallbladder and the liver. When postoperative pathological examination revealed the presence of gallbladder cancer invading into the subserosal layer, additional gallbladder bed resection and regional lymphadenectomy were considered. Patient characteristics, perioperative findings, pathological findings, and postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent LWLC or LGBD were reviewed retrospectively, and the short-term outcomes of the laparoscopic approach were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifteen consecutive patients were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 63 years (IQR 42-76 years); 7 patients were males. We performed LWLC in 12 cases and LBGD in 3 cases. Median (IQR) operation time was 159 (140-193) min and median blood loss was 10 (5-30) mL. No bile leakage caused by intraoperative perforation of the gallbladder was seen. Median hospital stay was 7 (5-9) days. Only one patient developed postoperative complications (abdominal abscess). Histologically, gallbladder cancer was diagnosed in five cases (pT1a, n = 2; pT2, n = 3), and two of the pT2 patients underwent additional open surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our laparoscopic-based approach for suspected gallbladder cancer might represent a safe strategy and could play an important role in defining the optimal treatment strategy.