Therapy related-chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML): Molecular, cytogenetic, and clinical distinctions from de novo CMML

CBL mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia often occur in the RING domain with multiple subclones per patient: Implications for targeting

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a rare blood cancer of older adults (3 in every 1,000,000 persons) characterized by poor survival and lacking effective mutation-specific therapy. Mutations in the ubiquitin ligase Cbl occur frequently in CMML and share biological and molecular features with a clonal disease occurring in children, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML). Here we analyzed the clinical presentations, molecular features and immunophenotype of CMML patients with CBL mutations enrolled in a prospective Phase II clinical trial stratified according to molecular markers. Clinically, CBL mutations were associated with increased bone marrow blasts at diagnosis, leukocytosis and splenomegaly, similar to patients harboring NRAS or KRAS mutations. Interestingly, 64% of patients presented with more than one CBL variant implying a complex subclonal architecture, often with co-occurrence of TET2 mutations. We found CBL mutations in CMML frequently clustered in the RING domain in contrast to JMML, where mutations frequently involve the linker helix region (P<0.0001). According to our comparative alignment of available X-ray structures, mutations in the linker helix region such as Y371E give rise to conformational differences that could be exploited by targeted therapy approaches. Furthermore, we noted an increased percentage of CMML CD34+ stem and progenitor cells expressing CD116 and CD131 in all CBL mutant cases and increased CD116 receptor density compared to healthy controls, similar to CMML overall. In summary, our data demonstrate that CBL mutations are associated with distinct molecular and clinical features in CMML and are potentially targetable with CD116-directed immunotherapy.

Therapy-related chronic myelomonocytic leukemia does not have the high-risk features of a therapy-related neoplasm

ABSTRACT

Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MNs) arise after exposure to cytotoxic therapies and are associated with high-risk genetic features and poor outcomes. We analyzed a cohort of patients with therapy-related chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (tCMML; n = 71) and compared its features to that of de novo CMML (dnCMML; n = 461). Median time from cytotoxic therapy to tCMML diagnosis was 6.5 years. Compared with dnCMML, chromosome-7 abnormalities (4% vs 13%; P = .005) but not complex karyotype (3% vs 7%; P = .15), were more frequent in tCMML. tCMML was characterized by higher TP53 mutation frequency (4% vs 12%; P = .04) and lower NRAS (6% vs 22%, P = .007) and CBL (4% vs 12%, P = .04) mutation frequency. Prior therapy with antimetabolites (odd ratio [OR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.42; P = .01) and mitotic inhibitors (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.06-1.44; P = .009) was associated with NF1 and SETBP1 mutations whereas prior mitotic inhibitor therapy was associated with lower TET2 mutation frequency (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.92; P = .01). Although no differences in median overall survival (OS) were observed among tCMML and dnCMML (34.7 months vs 35.9 months, P = .26), multivariate analysis for OS revealed that prior chemotherapy was associated with increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.07-2.89; P = .026). Compared with a cohort of therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome, tCMML had lower TP53 mutation frequency (12% vs 44.4%, P < .001) and less unfavorable outcomes. In summary, tCMML does not exhibit the high-risk features and poor outcomes of t-MNs.

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder with overlapping features of myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms, characterized by prominent monocytosis and an inherent risk for leukemic transformation (~15%-20% over 3-5 years).

DIAGNOSIS

Newly revised diagnostic criteria include sustained (>3 months) peripheral blood (PB) monocytosis (≥0.5 × 109/L; monocytes ≥10% of leukocyte count), consistent bone marrow (BM) morphology, <20% BM or PB blasts (including promonocytes), and cytogenetic or molecular evidence of clonality. Cytogenetic abnormalities occur in ~30% of patients, while >95% harbor somatic mutations: TET2 (~60%), SRSF2 (~50%), ASXL1 (~40%), RAS pathway (~30%), and others. The presence of ASXL1 and DNMT3A mutations and absence of TET2 mutations negatively impact overall survival (ASXL1WT/TET2MT genotype being favorable).

RISK STRATIFICATION

Several risk models serve similar purposes in identifying high-risk patients that are considered for allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) earlier than later. Risk factors in the Mayo Molecular Model (MMM) include presence of truncating ASXL1 mutations, absolute monocyte count >10 × 109/L, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, platelet count <100 × 109/L, and the presence of circulating immature myeloid cells; the resulting 4-tiered risk categorization includes high (≥3 risk factors), intermediate-2 (2 risk factors), intermediate-1 (1 risk factor), and low (no risk factors); the corresponding median survivals were 16, 31, 59, and 97 months. CMML is also classified as being "myeloproliferative (MP-CMML)" or "myelodysplastic (MD-CMML)," based on the presence or absence of leukocyte count of ≥13 × 109/L.

TREATMENT

ASCT is the only treatment modality that secures cure or long-term survival and is appropriate for MMM high/intermediate-2 risk disease. Drug therapy is currently not disease-modifying and includes hydroxyurea and hypomethylating agents; a recent phase-3 study (DACOTA) comparing hydroxyurea and decitabine, in high-risk MP-CMML, showed similar overall survival at 23.1 versus 18.4 months, respectively, despite response rates being higher for decitabine (56% vs. 31%).

UNIQUE DISEASE ASSOCIATIONS

These include systemic inflammatory autoimmune diseases, leukemia cutis and lysozyme-induced nephropathy; the latter requires close monitoring of renal function during leukocytosis and is a potential indication for cytoreductive therapy.

Novel scheme for defining the clinical implications of TP53 mutations in myeloid neoplasia

BACKGROUND

TP53 mutations (TP53MT) occur in diverse genomic configurations. Particularly, biallelic inactivation is associated with poor overall survival in cancer. Lesions affecting only one allele might not be directly leukemogenic, questioning the presence of cryptic biallelic subclones in cases with dismal prognosis.

METHODS

We have collected clinical and molecular data of 7400 patients with myeloid neoplasms and applied a novel model by identifying an optimal VAF cutoff using a statistically robust strategy of sampling-based regression on survival data to accurately classify the TP53 allelic configuration and assess prognosis more precisely.

RESULTS

Overall, TP53MT were found in 1010 patients. Following the traditional criteria, 36% of the cases were classified as single hits, while 64% exhibited double hits genomic configuration. Using a newly developed molecular algorithm, we found that 579 (57%) patients had unequivocally biallelic, 239 (24%) likely contained biallelic, and 192 (19%) had most likely monoallelic TP53MT. Interestingly, our method was able to upstage 192 out of 352 (54.5%) traditionally single hit lesions into a probable biallelic category. Such classification was further substantiated by a survival-based model built after re-categorization. Among cases traditionally considered monoallelic, the overall survival of those with probable monoallelic mutations was similar to the one of wild-type patients and was better than that of patients with a biallelic configuration. As a result, patients with certain biallelic hits, regardless of the disease subtype (AML or MDS), had a similar prognosis. Similar results were observed when the model was applied to an external cohort. In addition, single-cell DNA studies unveiled the biallelic nature of previously considered monoallelic cases.

CONCLUSION

Our novel approach more accurately resolves TP53 genomic configuration and uncovers genetic mosaicism for the use in the clinical setting to improve prognostic evaluation.

Genomics of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm

Myelodysplastic/ Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) demonstrate overlapping pathologic and molecular features of myelodysplastic (MDS) and myeloproliferative (MPN) neoplasms. Diagnosis is difficult based on morphology alone, requiring exclusion of various non-neoplastic causes for CBC abnormalities and morphologic findings and other myeloid neoplasms. Identifying a clonal abnormality by cytogenetics or molecular studies has vastly improved our ability to diagnose MDS/MPN and has been incorporated in the different classification schemas. Currently two separate classification systems are in use- The 5^th edition WHO and international consensus classification. The two competing classifications emphasize genetic work-up and are similar on many levels; however, they do introduce diagnostic dilemma when diagnosing certain entities such as chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in the presence of NPM1 mutations. The genetic profile overlaps among different subentities; however, the combination and the incidence of mutations; together with the clinical features and morphology helps in further subclassification. In this review, we discuss the advances in molecular characterization of MDS/MPN. We attempt to summarize the differences between the various classification schemes, and highlight the changes made in the diagnostic criteria.

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm, not otherwise specified: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative (MDS/MPN) neoplasms, not otherwise specified (NOS), are MDS/MPN overlap neoplasms characterized by leukocytosis, in the absence of monocytosis and eosinophilia, with <20% blasts in the blood and bone marrow.

DIAGNOSIS

aCML, previously known as aCML, BCR::ABL1 negative, was renamed as aCML by the ICC classification, and as MDS/MPN with neutrophilia by the 5th edition of the WHO classification. This entity is characterized by dysplastic neutrophilia with immature myeloid cells comprising ≥10% of the white blood cell count, with prominent dysgranulopoiesis. MDS/MPN-NOS consists of MDS/MPN overlap neoplasms not meeting criteria for defined categories such as chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), MDS/MPN-ring sideroblasts-thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T), and aCML.

MUTATIONS AND KARYOTYPE

Cytogenetic abnormalities are seen in 40-50% of patients in both categories. In aCML, somatic mutations commonly encountered include ASXL1, SETBP1, ETNK1, and EZH2 whereas MDS/MPN-NOS can be further stratified by mutational profiles into CMML-like, MDS/MPN-RS-T-like, aCML-like, TP35-mutated, and "others", respectively.

RISK STRATIFICATION

The Mayo Clinic aCML model stratifies patients based on age >67 years, hemoglobin <10 g/dl, and the presence of TET2 mutations into low-risk (0-1 points) and high-risk (>2 points) groups, with median survivals of 18 and 7 months, respectively. MDS/MPN-NOS patients have traditionally been risk stratified using MDS risk models such as IPSS and IPSS-R.

TREATMENT

Leukocytosis and anemia are managed like lower risk MPN and MDS. DNMT inhibitors have been used in both entities with suboptimal response rates. Allogeneic stem cell transplant remains the only curative strategy but is associated with high morbidity and mortality.

Case report: Genomic analysis of a therapy-related chronic myelomonocytic leukemia with KMT2A rearrangement that progressed to acute myeloid leukemia with acute promyelocytic leukemia-like features

We report a 69-year-old female who was a human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 carrier and exhibited a unique clinical course of developing three hematological malignancies within a short period: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMMoL), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although the blast cells in AML showed typical morphological and immunophenotypical features of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), it did not harbor RARα gene fusion and thus initially diagnosed as APL-like leukemia (APLL). The patient developed heart failure with a fulminant clinical course and died soon after the diagnosis of APLL. Retrospective analysis with whole-genome sequencing detected a chromosomal rearrangement between KMT2A and ACTN4 gene loci both in CMMoL and APLL samples, but not in the DLBCL sample. Therefore, CMMoL and APLL were considered to be derived from the same clone with KMT2A translocation associated with prior immunochemotherapy. However, KMT2A rearrangement is rarely found in CMMoL in general and ACTN4 is also a rare partner of KMT2A translocation. Thus, this case did not follow typical transformational process of CMMoL or KMT2A-rearranged leukemia. Importantly, additional genetic alterations, including NRAS G12 mutation, were found in APLL, but not in CMMoL samples, suggesting that they might contribute to leukemic transformation. This report highlights the diverse effects of KMT2A translocation and NRAS mutation on the transformation of hematological cells as well as the importance of upfront sequencing analysis to detect genetic backgrounds for a better understanding of therapy-related leukemia.

Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in 66 Patients with Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) in a Single Center

Introduction

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a rare hematological malignancy bearing of both myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasm characteristics. Despite the low incidence, the clinical diagnosis of CMML was difficult and the survival was poor. The optimal first-line therapy for CMML still remains a matter of debate.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics of 66 CMML patients in a single center during the past 10 years and studied the survival status of CMML patients in the real world and the influence of treatment methods on the prognosis of patients.

Results

For the 66 CMML patients, the median age was 60 years old (IQR 47.0-67.0), and an approximately 1.6:1.0 male-to-female ratio was found. CMML-0, CMML-1 and CMML-2 accounted for 13.7% (9/66), 43.9% (29/66) and 42.4% (28/66), respectively. The chromosome abnormality rate was 27.2% (18/66). Gene mutation was detected in 60 patients by sequenced in first-generation with 51.1% (22/43) gene mutations and in NGS with 82.3% (14/17) gene mutations. The top three mutation genes were ASXL1^MT (11/60, 18.3%), TET2^MT (10/60, 16.7%), and SRSF2 ^MT (9/60, 15.0%). There were 27 patients in supportive therapy group, and 39 patients in chemotherapy group including patients undergoing HSCT. Patients in chemotherapy group showed better OS than those in the supportive group before and after PSM analysis with p < 0.05. Patients with blast cell in bone marrow ≥10% or WHO CMML-2 benefited more from chemotherapy treatment achieving better OS. Multivariate analysis showed that supportive therapy and intermediate-2/high in CPSS were independent risk factors for OS after PSM.

Discussion

Chemotherapy including hypomethylating agents prolonged overall survival of CMML patients, especially in patients with blast cell ≥10% in bone marrow or WHO CMML-2 comparing with supportive therapy. Sequencing may provide direct insight into the molecular mechanism by detection of gene mutation, enabling personalized treatment in the future.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Mixed or Overlap Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Disorders

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and the remaining, less frequent hybrid, mixed, or overlap myelodysplastic syndromes/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDSs/MPNs) are difficult to treat neoplastic hematological disorders, exhibiting substantial clinical and prognostic heterogeneity, for which clear therapeutic guidelines or effective treatment options are still missing. CMML has an overall survival ranging from a few months to several years. Although patients with proliferative or dysplastic features may benefit from hydroxyurea and hypomethylating agent treatment, respectively, none of these treatments can establish long-term remission and prevent the inevitable transformation to acute leukemia. Novel targeted treatment approaches are emerging but are still under investigation. Therefore, currently, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) remains the only treatment modality with a curative potential, but its widespread application is limited, due to significant morbidity and mortality associated with the procedure, especially in the elderly and in patients with comorbidities. Recognition of patient eligibility for allo-SCT is crucial, and the procedure should be addressed to patients with a good performance status without severe comorbidities and mainly to those in intermediate- to high-risk category, with a suitable stem cell donor available. The issues of best timing for performing transplantation, patient and donor eligibility, the type of conditioning regimen, and the outcomes after various allo-SCT procedures are the topics of this review.

Oncogenic gene expression and epigenetic remodeling of cis-regulatory elements in ASXL1-mutant chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

Myeloid neoplasms are clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders driven by the sequential acquisition of recurrent genetic lesions. Truncating mutations in the chromatin remodeler ASXL1 (ASXL1MT) are associated with a high-risk disease phenotype with increased proliferation, epigenetic therapeutic resistance, and poor survival outcomes. We performed a multi-omics interrogation to define gene expression and chromatin remodeling associated with ASXL1MT in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). ASXL1MT are associated with a loss of repressive histone methylation and increase in permissive histone methylation and acetylation in promoter regions. ASXL1MT are further associated with de novo accessibility of distal enhancers binding ETS transcription factors, targeting important leukemogenic driver genes. Chromatin remodeling of promoters and enhancers is strongly associated with gene expression and heterogenous among overexpressed genes. These results provide a comprehensive map of the transcriptome and chromatin landscape of ASXL1MT CMML, forming an important framework for the development of novel therapeutic strategies targeting oncogenic cis interactions.

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: 2022 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder with overlapping features of myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms, with an inherent risk for leukemic transformation (~15% over 3-5 years).

DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis is based on the presence of sustained (>3 months) peripheral blood monocytosis (≥1 × 10⁹ /L; monocytes ≥10%), usually with accompanying bone marrow dysplasia. Clonal cytogenetic abnormalities occur in ~30% of patients, while >90% have somatic gene mutations. Mutations involving TET2 (~60%), SRSF2 (~50%), ASXL1 (~40%), and the oncogenic RAS pathway (~30%) are frequent, while the presence of ASXL1 and DNMT3A mutations and the absence of TET2 mutations negatively impact overall survival.

RISK-STRATIFICATION

Molecularly integrated prognostic models include the Groupe Français des Myélodysplasies, Mayo Molecular Model (MMM), and the CMML specific prognostic model. Risk factors incorporated into the MMM include presence of truncating ASXL1 mutations, absolute monocyte count >10 × 10⁹ /L, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, platelet count <100 × 10⁹ /L, and the presence of circulating immature myeloid cells. The MMM stratifies CMML patients into four groups: high (≥3 risk factors), intermediate-2 (2 risk factors), intermediate-1 (1 risk factor), and low (no risk factors), with median survivals of 16, 31, 59, and 97 months, respectively.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Hypomethylating agents such as 5-azacitidine and decitabine are commonly used, with overall response rates of ~40%-50% and complete remission rates of ~7%-17%; with no impact on mutational allele burdens. Allogeneic stem cell transplant is the only potentially curative option but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

Inherited heterozygous Fanconi anemia gene mutations in a therapy-related CMML patient with a rare NUP98-HOXC11 fusion: A case report

Fanconi anemia (FA) genes play critical roles in the repair of DNA lesions. Non-FA (or underlying FA) patients harboring heterozygous germline FA gene mutations may also face an increased risk of developing bone marrow failure, primary immunodeficiency disease, and hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes. We report a female patient who suffered from ovarian cancer at 50 years of age. During the initial treatment, six cycles of docetaxel and carboplatin (DC) combination chemotherapy were administered followed by two cycles of docetaxel maintenance therapy. Then, she received a routine follow-up every 3 months for the next 3 years, and all the results of the examination and laboratory tests were normal. Unfortunately, at 54 years of age, she developed a secondary cancer of therapy-related (t-) chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (t-CMML). After two courses of a highly intensive induction chemotherapy regimen with DAC (decitabine) and HAA (homoharringtonine, cytarabine), the patient suffered from severe and persistent bone marrow failure (BMF). Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of a panel of 80 genes was performed on her initial bone marrow aspirate sample and identified PTPN11, NRAS, and DNMT3A somatic mutations. In addition, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) revealed a rare NUP98-HOXC11 fusion. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) verified RAD51C, BRIP1, PALB2, and FANCG heterozygous germline mutations of the FA pathway, which were further confirmed in buccal swab samples by Sanger sequencing. For this patient, we hypothesized that an altered FA pathway resulted in genomic instability, hypersensitivity to DNA-crosslinking agents or cytotoxic chemotherapeutics, and unsuccessful DNA damage repair. Consequently, she developed ovarian cancer and secondary t-CMML and then suffered from BMF and delayed post-chemotherapy bone marrow recovery after several chemotherapy courses. This case highlights the importance of genetic counseling in patients with hematopoietic neoplasms with high clinical suspicion for carrying cancer susceptibility gene mutations, which require timely diagnosis and personalized management.

Hybrid or Mixed Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Disorders - Epidemiological Features and Overview

The WHO-category Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPNs) recognizes a unique group of clonal myeloid malignancies exhibiting overlapping features of myelodysplastic as well as myeloproliferative neoplasms. The group consists of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR-ABL1-negative (aCML), juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML), myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm with ringed sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T), and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms, unclassifiable (MDS/MPN-U). The most frequent entity in this category is CMML, while all other diseases are extremely rare. Thus, only very limited data on the epidemiology of these subgroups exists. An appropriate diagnosis and classification can be challenging since the diagnosis is still largely based on morphologic criteria and myelodysplastic as well as myeloproliferative features can be found in various occurrences. The diseases in this category share several features that are common in this specific WHO-category, but also exhibit specific traits for each disease. This review summarizes published data on epidemiological features and offers a brief overview of the main diagnostic criteria and clinical characteristics of the five MDS/MPN subgroups.

Mutational landscape of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and its potential clinical significance

We evaluated the mutational landscape of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and its potential clinical significance. We analyzed 47 samples with a panel of 112 genes using next-generation sequencing. Forty-five of the 47 patients (95.74%) had at least one mutation identified, with an average of 3.7 (range 0-9) per patient. The most common mutation was NRAS, followed by ASXL1, TET2, SRSF2, RUNX1, KRAS, and SETBP1. Patients 60 years and older more frequently had mutations in TET2 (56% vs. 9.09%, P = 0.001) and ASXL1 (48% vs. 18.18%, P = 0.031) than patients younger than 60 years. Median overall survival (OS) in patients with CMML was 22.0 months (95% CI 19.7-24.3 months). ASXL1 (18 vs. 22 months, P = 0.012), RUNX1 (17 vs. 22 months, P = 0.001), and SETBP1 (20 vs. 27 months, P = 0.032) mutations predicted inferior OS. However, only RUNX1 mutation was significantly associated with inferior acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-free survival. Our data showed that mutation profile differed significantly between CMML patients aged 60 years and older versus those younger than 60 years, and some of these mutations impact the progression and prognosis of the disease to a certain extent.

Examining disease boundaries: Genetics of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms

Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) are clonal myeloid malignancies that are characterized by dysplasia resulting in cytopenias as well as proliferative features such as thrombocytosis or splenomegaly. Recent studies have better defined the genetics underlying this diverse group of disorders. Trisomy 8, monosomy 7, and loss of Y chromosome are the most common cytogenetic abnormalities seen. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) likely develops from early clones with TET2 mutations that drive granulomonocytic differentiation. Mutations in SRSF2 are common and those in the RAS-MAPK pathway are typically implicated in disease with a proliferative phenotype. Several prognostic systems have incorporated genetic features, with ASXL1 most consistently demonstrating worse prognosis. Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) is most known for granulocytosis with marked dysplasia and often harbors ASXL1 mutations, but SETBP1 and ETNK1 are more specific to this disease. MDS/MPN with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T) most commonly involves spliceosome mutations (namely SF3B1) and mutations in the JAK-STAT pathway. Finally, MDS/MPN-unclassifiable (MDS/MPN-U) is least characterized but a significant fraction carries mutations in TP53. The remaining patients have clinical and/or genetic features similar to the other MDS/MPNs, suggesting there is room to better characterize this entity. Evolution from age-related clonal hematopoiesis to MDS/MPN likely depends on the order of mutation acquisition and interactions between various biologic factors. Genetics will continue to play a critical role in our understanding of these illnesses and advancing patient care.

Successful management of therapy-related chronic myelomonocytic leukemia with cytarabine, aclarubicin, and azacitidine following tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil

A 55-year-old man was diagnosed with therapy-related chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (t-CMML) after exposure to tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil. Although he was refractory to hydroxyurea and low-dose cytarabine, combination therapy with cytarabine, aclarubicin and azacitidine (CA-AZA) provided good disease control, and he underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation. This report has two key massages. First, tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil may have a potential risk of developing t-CMML. Second, CA-AZA therapy may be considered as a therapeutic option for patients with t-CMML.

RAS mutations drive proliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia via a KMT2A-PLK1 axis

Proliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (pCMML), an aggressive CMML subtype, is associated with dismal outcomes. RAS pathway mutations, mainly NRASG12D, define the pCMML phenotype as demonstrated by our exome sequencing, progenitor colony assays and a Vav-Cre-NrasG12D mouse model. Further, these mutations promote CMML transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. Using a multiomics platform and biochemical and molecular studies we show that in pCMML RAS pathway mutations are associated with a unique gene expression profile enriched in mitotic kinases such as polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1). PLK1 transcript levels are shown to be regulated by an unmutated lysine methyl-transferase (KMT2A) resulting in increased promoter monomethylation of lysine 4 of histone 3. Pharmacologic inhibition of PLK1 in RAS mutant patient-derived xenografts, demonstrates the utility of personalized biomarker-driven therapeutics in pCMML.

Laboratory Evaluation and Pathological Workup of Neoplastic Monocytosis - Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia and Beyond

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Monocytosis is a distinct but non-specific manifestation of various physiologic and pathologic conditions. Among hematopoietic stem cell neoplasms, depending on the criteria used for disease classification, monocytosis may be a consistent and integral component of diseases such as chronic myelomonocytic leukemia or acute myeloid leukemia with monocytic differentiation, or it may represent an inconsistent finding that often provides a clue to the underlying genetic changes driving the neoplasm. The purpose of this review is to provide the readers with a laboratory-based approach to neoplastic monocytosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

In-depth elucidation of the genomic landscape of myeloid neoplasms within the past few years has broadened our understanding of monocytosis and its implications for diagnosis and prognosis. Genetic findings also shed light on potential disease response - or lack thereof - to various therapeutic agents used in the setting of myeloid neoplasms. In this review, we provide our approach to diagnose neoplastic monocytosis in the context of case-based studies while incorporating the most recent literature on this topic.

Myelodysplastic syndromes and overlap syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematological neoplasms characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, morphologic dysplasia, and cytopenia. MDS overlap syndromes include various disorders, such as myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms and hypoplastic MDS with aplastic anemia characteristics. MDS overlap syndromes share the characteristics of other diseases, which make differential diagnoses challenging. Advances in genomic studies have led to the discovery of frequent mutations in MDS and overlap syndromes; however, most of the mutations are not specific for the diagnosis of these diseases. The molecular characteristics of the overlap syndromes usually do not show a just "in-between" form but rather heterogeneous features. Established diagnostic criteria for these diseases based on clinical, morphologic, and laboratory features are still useful when combined with genomic data. It is expected that further studies for MDS and overlap syndromes will place emphasis on the roles of mutations as therapeutic targets and prognostic indicators.

Genetic Aspects of Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Simple Summary

Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) are clonal myeloid neoplasms characterized, at the time of their presentation, by the simultaneous presence of both myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative features. In MDS/MPN, the karyotype is often normal but mutations in genes that are common across myeloid neoplasms can be detected in a high proportion of cases by targeted sequencing. In this review, we intend to summarize the main genetic findings across all MDS/MPN overlap syndromes and discuss their relevance in the management of patients.

Abstract

Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) are myeloid neoplasms characterized by the presentation of overlapping features from both myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms. Although the classification of MDS/MPN relies largely on clinical features and peripheral blood and bone marrow morphology, studies have demonstrated that a large proportion of patients (~90%) with this disease harbor somatic mutations in a group of genes that are common across myeloid neoplasms. These mutations play a role in the clinical heterogeneity of these diseases and their clinical evolution. Nevertheless, none of them is specific to MDS/MPN and current diagnostic criteria do not include molecular data. Even when such alterations can be helpful for differential diagnosis, they should not be used alone as proof of neoplasia because some of these mutations may also occur in healthy older people. Here, we intend to review the main genetic findings across all MDS/MPN overlap syndromes and discuss their relevance in the management of the patients.

Mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and their prognostic relevance

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a hematologic malignancy that overlaps with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and tends to transform into acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Among cases of CMML, > 90% have gene mutations, primarily involving TET2 (~ 60%), ASXL1 (~ 40%), SRSF2 (~ 50%), and the RAS pathways (~ 30%). These gene mutations are associated with both the clinical phenotypes and the prognosis of CMML, special CMML variants and pre-phases of CMML. Cytogenetic abnormalities and the size of genome are also associated with prognosis. Meanwhile, cases with ASXL1, DNMT3A, NRAS, SETBP1, CBL and RUNX1 mutations may have inferior prognoses, but only ASXL1 mutations were confirmed to be independent predictors of the patient outcome and were included in three prognostic models. Novel treatment targets related to the various gene mutations are emerging. Therefore, this review provides new insights to explore the correlations among gene mutations, clinical phenotypes, prognosis, and novel drugs in CMML.

Genomic Landscape and Risk Stratification in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

PURPOSE

The advent of next-generation sequencing has allowed for the annotation of a vast array of recurrent somatic mutations across human malignancies, ushering in a new era of precision oncology. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia is recognized as a myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm and displays heterogenous clinical and genetic features. Herein, we review what is currently understood regarding the genomic landscape of this disease and discuss how somatic mutations have impacted current risk stratification methods.

RECENT FINDINGS

Genomic studies in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia have identified a characteristic spectrum of cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities. Chromosomal abnormalities are detected in ~30% of patients and somatic gene mutations in up to 90% of patients, most commonly in TET2, SRSF2, and ASXL1. While cytogenetic abnormalities have long been known to impact the prognosis of myeloid neoplasms, recent studies have identified that somatic mutations impact prognosis independent of cytogenetic and clinical variables. This is best exemplified by mutations in ASXL1, which have been uniformly associated with inferior survival. These findings have led to the development of three molecularly inspired prognostic models, in an attempt to more accurately prognosticate in the disease. Our understanding of the genomic landscape of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia continues to evolve, with somatic mutations demonstrating an expanding role in diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapeutic decision-making. Given these findings, molecular profiling by next-generation sequencing should be considered standard of care in all patients.

Genetic complexity of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

In recent years CMML has received increased attention as the most commonly observed MDS/MPN overlap syndrome. Renewed interest has occurred in part due to widespread adoption of next-generation sequencing panels that help render the diagnosis in the absence of morphologic dysplasia. Although most CMML patients exhibit somatic mutations in epigenetic modifiers, spliceosome components, transcription factors and signal transduction genes, it is increasingly clear that a small subset harbors an inherited predisposition to CMML and other myeloid neoplasms. More intriguing is the fact that the mutational spectrum observed in CMML is found in other types of myeloid leukemias, begging the question of how similar genetic backgrounds can lead to such divergent clinical phenotypes. In this review we present a contemporary snapshot of the genetic complexity inherent to CMML, explore the relationship between genotype-phenotype and present a stepwise model of CMML pathogenesis and progression.

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia - a review

INTRODUCTION

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal myeloid neoplasm, denoted by overlapping myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative features, with poor overall survival and high transformation rate to acute myeloid leukemia.

AREAS COVERED

This review, following a thorough Medline search of pertinent published literature, discusses the diagnostic criteria, the pathogenesis, and the complex genetic landscape of the disease. Prognostication, response criteria, therapeutic management of patients, efficacy of established and novel treatment modalities are thoroughly reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Cytogenetic abnormalities and mutations in genes involved in epigenetic and transcriptional regulation, and cell-signaling are abundant in CMML and implicated in its complex pathogenesis. As presence of these mutations carry a prognostic impact, they are increasingly incorporated in risk-stratification schemes. Novel response criteria have been proposed, considering the unique features of the disease. Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only treatment with curative intent, it is reserved for a minority of patients; therefore, there is an unmet need for optimizing treatment modalities, such as hypomethylating agents, and introducing novel agents, which could substantially improve survival and quality of life of CMML patients. Clinical trials dedicated specifically to CMML are needed to explore the efficacy and safety of novel treatment modalities.

Genomics of myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm overlap syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) overlap syndromes are uniquely classified neoplasms occurring in both children and adults. This category consists of 5 neoplastic subtypes: chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML), BCR-ABL1-negative atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML), MDS/MPN-ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T), and MDS/MPN-unclassifiable (U). Cytogenetic abnormalities and somatic copy number variations are uncommon; however, >90% patients harbor gene mutations. Although no single gene mutation is specific to a disease subtype, certain mutational signatures in the context of appropriate clinical and morphological features can be used to establish a diagnosis. In CMML, mutated coexpression of TET2 and SRSF2 results in clonal hematopoiesis skewed toward monocytosis, and the ensuing acquisition of driver mutations including ASXL1, NRAS, and CBL results in overt disease. MDS/MPN-RS-T demonstrates features of SF3B1-mutant MDS with ring sideroblasts (MDS-RS), with the development of thrombocytosis secondary to the acquisition of signaling mutations, most commonly JAK2V617F. JMML, the only pediatric entity, is a bona fide RASopathy, with germline and somatic mutations occurring in the oncogenic RAS pathway giving rise to disease. BCR-ABL1-negative aCML is characterized by dysplastic neutrophilia and is enriched in SETBP1 and ETNK1 mutations, whereas MDS/MPN-U is the least defined and lacks a characteristic mutational signature. Molecular profiling also provides prognostic information, with truncating ASXL1 mutations being universally detrimental and germline CBL mutations in JMML showing spontaneous regression. Sequencing information in certain cases can help identify potential targeted therapies (IDH1, IDH2, and splicing mutations) and should be a mainstay in the diagnosis and management of these neoplasms.

Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes deserve specific diagnostic sub-classification and risk-stratification-an approach to classification of patients with t-MDS

In the current World Health Organization (WHO)-classification, therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes (t-MDS) are categorized together with therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and t-myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms into one subgroup independent of morphologic or prognostic features. Analyzing data of 2087 t-MDS patients from different international MDS groups to evaluate classification and prognostication tools we found that applying the WHO classification for p-MDS successfully predicts time to transformation and survival (both p < 0.001). The results regarding carefully reviewed cytogenetic data, classifications, and prognostic scores confirmed that t-MDS are similarly heterogeneous as p-MDS and therefore deserve the same careful differentiation regarding risk. As reference, these results were compared with 4593 primary MDS (p-MDS) patients represented in the International Working Group for Prognosis in MDS database (IWG-PM). Although a less favorable clinical outcome occurred in each t-MDS subset compared with p-MDS subgroups, FAB and WHO-classification, IPSS-R, and WPSS-R separated t-MDS patients into differing risk groups effectively, indicating that all established risk factors for p-MDS maintained relevance in t-MDS, with cytogenetic features having enhanced predictive power. These data strongly argue to classify t-MDS as a separate entity distinct from other WHO-classified t-myeloid neoplasms, which would enhance treatment decisions and facilitate the inclusion of t-MDS patients into clinical studies.

Prognostic scoring systems and comorbidities in chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia: a nationwide population-based study

Outcomes in chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) are highly variable and may be affected by comorbidity. Therefore, prognostic models and comorbidity indices are important tools to estimate survival and to guide clinicians in individualising treatment. In this nationwide population-based study, we assess comorbidities and for the first time validate comorbidity indices in CMML. We also compare the prognostic power of: the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS), MD Anderson Prognostic Scoring System (MDAPS) and Mayo score. In this cohort of 337 patients with CMML, diagnosed between 2009 and 2015, the median overall survival was 21·3 months. Autoimmune conditions were present in 25% of the patients, with polymyalgia rheumatica and Hashimoto's thyroiditis being most common. Of the tested comorbidity indices: the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Haematopoietic cell transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) and Myelodysplastic Syndrome-Specific Comorbidity Index (MDS-CI), CCI had the highest C-index (0·62) and was the only comorbidity index independently associated with survival in multivariable analyses. When comparing the prognostic power of the scoring systems, the CPSS had the highest C-index (0·69). In conclusion, using 'real-world' data we found that the CCI and CPSS have the best prognostic power and that autoimmune conditions are overrepresented in CMML.

Contemporary treatment approaches to CMML - Is allogeneic HCT the only cure?

Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemias are frequently diagnosed in older adults. Their prognosis is heterogeneous, but several prognostic factors can identify patients with an expected survival of a few years only, including among younger patients eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Based on the retrospective data available, we discuss how to identify CMML patients for whom curative therapy must be envisaged. We emphasize that, although transplantation remains the only path to cure in CMML, it can be envisaged in only a minority of patients. Despite increased donor availability, its potential remains limited by significant rates of mortality caused both by the procedure and by post-transplantation relapses. We review the options available to bridge patients to transplant, the management of transplantation itself (choice of donor, graft source and condition regimen), and finally the potential for post-transplantation interventions. Our review underscores the need for further prospective studies of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in CMML.

Chronic Myelomonocytic leukemia: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder with overlapping features of myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms, with an inherent risk for leukemic transformation (~15% over 3-5 years).

DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis is based on the presence of sustained (>3 months) peripheral blood monocytosis (≥1 × 10⁹ /L; monocytes ≥10%), along with bone marrow dysplasia. Clonal cytogenetic abnormalities occur in ~ 30% of patients, while >90% have gene mutations. Mutations involving TET2 (~60%), SRSF2 (~50%), ASXL1 (~40%) and the oncogenic RAS pathway (~30%) are frequent; while the presence of ASXL1 and DNMT3A mutations and the absence of TET2 mutations negatively impact over-all survival.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Molecularly integrated prognostic models include; the Groupe Français des Myélodysplasies (GFM), Mayo Molecular Model (MMM) and the CMML specific prognostic model (CPSS-Mol). Risk factors incorporated into the MMM include presence of nonsense or frameshift ASXL1 mutations, absolute monocyte count>10 × 10⁹ /L, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, platelet count <100 × 10⁹ /L and the presence of circulating immature myeloid cells. The MMM stratifies CMML patients into four groups; high (≥3 risk factors), intermediate-2 (2 risk factors), intermediate-1 (1 risk factor) and low (no risk factors), with median survivals of 16, 31, 59 and 97 months, respectively.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Hypomethylating agents such as 5-azacitidine and decitabine are commonly used, with overall response rates of ~40%-50% and complete remission rates of ~7%-17%; with no impact on mutational allele burdens. Allogeneic stem cell transplant is the only potentially curative option, but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms: are morphology and immunophenotyping still relevant?

The term myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) refers to a group of clonal hematopoietic neoplasms with overlapping clinical, morphologic and genetic myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative features observed at the time of first presentation. Impaired hematopoiesis morphologically associated with evidence of myelodysplasia manifests clinically with cytopenia/s. Simultaneously, myeloproliferation is seen within the bone marrow and leads to cytosis in the peripheral blood. The diagnostic category of MDS/MPN encompasses a heterogeneous group of diseases which share similarities among them, but at the same time have distinct clinical and pathologic features and eventually diverse prognosis; such differences justify their separation in a classification scheme. In the era of genetic and genomic tests, their distinction from conventional myelodysplastic syndromes or myeloproliferative neoplasms still relies on close clinocopathological correlation, with evaluation of both peripheral blood and bone marrow samples being essential in this sense. A multiparametric integration of clinicopathologic data and cytogenetics and molecular genetics results is the preferred diagnostic approach.

Autoimmune disease in CMML-the chicken or the egg?

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal disorder that is associated with a wide range of systemic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases (SIADs). Approximately 20% of patients with CMML will have an associated SIAD and recognizing this association is critical to the evaluation, prognostication and management of patients with CMML. In this paper, we review the evidence supporting a causative link between these two entities as well as the direction of this relationship. We argue that the data favors CMML as the antecedent and causative disease state with a few notable exceptions. Better understanding of this relationship aids clinicians in the education of their patients and in determining the optimal management approach at the bedside. It is important to recognize opportunities to harmonize the treatments of these disease processes, which may enhance the effectiveness of treatment while reducing the burden of adverse effects from redundant therapies.

How I investigate chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

The 2016 revised 4th edition of the World Health Organization classification of hematopoietic neoplasms updated the diagnostic criteria for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Persistent peripheral blood monocytosis of at least 1 × 10⁹ /L and a percentage of monocytes ≥10% of the circulating white blood cell count (WBC) are both prerequisite criteria for this diagnosis. CMML represents the prototype of "overlapping" myeloid neoplasms with concurrent myeloproliferative and myelodysplastic features. However, clinical presentation is heterogeneous, with cases showing prevailing "dysplastic" features and others a predominant "proliferative" phenotype. Accounting for this diversity, two variants of CMML are recognized: "dysplastic" CMML defined by WBC < 13 × 10⁹ /L and "proliferative" CMML with WBC ≥ 13 × 10⁹ /L often showing features mimicking a myeloproliferative neoplasm. Although not an official WHO category, the "oligomonocytic" variant of CMML is defined by relative monocytosis with an absolute monocyte count of 0.5-0.9 × 10⁹ /L. It can be considered a "pre-phase," as it frequently anticipates the development of an overt, classic CMML. In an attempt at improving disease prognostication, the blast count based grading system for CMML of the WHO 2008 Classification has been expanded in 2016 to include a new "CMML-0" category. Lastly, the large body of knowledge on the molecular events occurring in CMML has been used to assist diagnosis and assess prognosis. Despite the step forwards, diagnosis of CMML still remains one of exclusion as no clinical, pathologic or molecular findings are specific for this disease. The current review brings insight into the spectrum of CMML and provides practical advice to approach suspected cases of CMML.

Defining the Boundary Between Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

In this article we provide a practical and comprehensive review of myeloid neoplasms with overlapping myelodysplastic (MDS) and myeloproliferative (MPN) features, with emphasis on recent updates in classification, particularly the utility of morphologic, cytogenetic, and molecular findings in better defining and classifying these disease entities. We provide the reader with a summary of the most recent developments and updates that have helped further our understanding of the genomic landscape, clinicopathologic features, and prognostic elements of myeloid neoplasms with MDS/MPN features.

Recent Updates on Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this review is to provide a practical and comprehensive update on changes in the classification of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and a summary of the most recent developments in our understanding of its genomic landscape, prognostic models, and therapeutic approaches.

RECENT FINDINGS

The 2017 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification includes substantial changes to the subclassification CMML. The clinical utility of the newly revised subclassification scheme is discussed. In addition, we provide an overview of the genetic changes involved in the pathogenesis of CMML and discuss the clinical utility of the more recently developed molecularly integrated prognostic models and their management and therapeutic implications. Finally, we provide an overview of the currently available treatment options for patients with CMML. The classification of CMML as well as our understanding of its genomic landscape and optimal treatment approaches has advanced significantly over the past decade but remains in flux.

Proposed diagnostic criteria for classical chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), CMML variants and pre-CMML conditions

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a myeloid neoplasm characterized by dysplasia, abnormal production and accumulation of monocytic cells and an elevated risk of transforming into acute leukemia. Over the past two decades, our knowledge about the pathogenesis and molecular mechanisms in CMML has increased substantially. In parallel, better diagnostic criteria and therapeutic strategies have been developed. However, many questions remain regarding prognostication and optimal therapy. In addition, there is a need to define potential pre-phases of CMML and special CMML variants, and to separate these entities from each other and from conditions mimicking CMML. To address these unmet needs, an international consensus group met in a Working Conference in August 2018 and discussed open questions and issues around CMML, its variants, and pre-CMML conditions. The outcomes of this meeting are summarized herein and include diag nostic criteria and a proposed classification of pre-CMML conditions as well as refined minimal diagnostic criteria for classical CMML and special CMML variants, including oligomonocytic CMML and CMML associated with systemic mastocytosis. Moreover, we propose diagnostic standards and tools to distinguish between 'normal', pre-CMML and CMML entities. These criteria and standards should facilitate diagnostic and prognostic evaluations in daily practice and clinical studies in applied hematology.

Advances in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and future prospects: Lessons learned from precision genomics

In the latest World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) exists as a separate entity under the category of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative (MDS/MPN) overlap syndromes. Outcomes remain uniformly poor with a median overall survival of ~2 years and an inherent risk of transformation into acute myeloid leukemia (15-20% over 5 years). Due to unique biologic characteristics such as overlapping features of myelodysplasia and myeloproliferation, and clinical diversity despite relative genomic homogeneity, CMML represents a unique model to study chronic myeloid tumor biology. Recent advances have focused on understanding the role of putative genomic abnormalities, in particular, clonal evolution of pathogenic alterations in genes regulating the epigenome (TET2), chromatin architecture (ASXL1), spliceosome complex (SRSF2, SF3B1) and cell signaling (NRAS, KRAS, CBL, JAK2). Disease prognostication has evolved from purely clinical prognostic models to those incorporating pathogenic gene variations. Therapeutic options in this disease remain dismal with only two agents approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, namely 5-azacitidine and decitabine. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the sole curative option in this disease; however is associated with substantial treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Future areas of research include opportunities to further improve disease prognostication by employing novel technologies such as machine learning, incorporation of methylation and cytokine signatures, in addition to gene mutations; insights into clonal origins of this disease, and novel therapeutic strategies.

Splenectomy in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: Indications, histopathological findings and clinical outcomes in a single institutional series of thirty-nine patients

In a 28-year period, 39 (7%) patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) (median age 66 years, 64% male) underwent a splenectomy at our institution. Primary indications for splenectomy were refractory thrombocytopenia (36%), progressive spleen related symptoms (33%), emergent splenectomy for splenic rupture (21%), refractory anemia (8%), and prior to allogeneic stem cell transplant (3%). Eleven (28%) patients had anemia at the time of splenectomy, of which 3 (27%) were autoimmune. The median time to splenectomy from CMML diagnosis was 6 months (0-40); perioperative morbidity and mortality rates were 43% and 13%, while the median postsplenectomy survival was 25 months (11-38). Durable remission in spleen related symptoms, thrombocytopenia, complications from splenic rupture, and anemia were achieved in 85%, 50%, 62%, and 21% of patients, respectively. Perioperative morbidity (n = 30) included infections/sepsis in 6 (20%), intraabdominal bleeding in 4 (13%), venous thromboembolism (VTE) in 3 (10%), and acute lung injury in 2 (7%) patients. The median duration of hospital stay was 6 days (1-25), with 5 deaths occurring secondary to respiratory failure (n = 2), multiorgan dysfunction (n = 2) and hemorrhagic shock (n = 1). There was no difference in overall survival between CMML patients that underwent splenectomy, in comparison to those that did not. Unlike in myelofibrosis, portal hypertension was not an indication for splenectomy and no patients developed post-splenectomy thrombocytosis. In conclusion, apart from being a lifesaving emergent modality in the event of splenic rupture, splenectomy has an important palliative role in patients with CMML, with significant and durable improvements in spleen related symptoms and refractory cytopenias.

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: 2018 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder with overlapping features of myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms, with an inherent risk for leukemic transformation (∼15%-20% over 3-5 years).

DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis is based on the presence of sustained (>3 months) peripheral blood monocytosis (≥1 × 10⁹ /L; monocytes ≥10%), along with bone marrow dysplasia. Clonal cytogenetic abnormalities occur in ∼ 30% of patients, while >90% have gene mutations. Mutations involving TET2 (∼60%), SRSF2 (∼50%), ASXL1 (∼40%) and the oncogenic RAS pathway (∼30%) are frequent; while the presence of ASXL1 and DNMT3A mutations and the absence of TET2 mutations negatively impact over-all survival.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Molecularly integrated prognostic models include; the Groupe Français des Myélodysplasies (GFM), Mayo Molecular Model (MMM), and the CMML specific prognostic model (CPSS-Mol). Risk factors incorporated into the MMM include presence of nonsense or frameshift ASXL1 mutations, absolute monocyte count > 10 × 10⁹ /L, hemoglobin <10 gm/dL, platelet count <100 × 10⁹ /L and the presence of circulating immature myeloid cells. The MMM stratifies CMML patients into 4 groups; high (≥3 risk factors), intermediate-2 (2 risk factors), intermediate-1 (1 risk factor), and low (no risk factors), with median survivals of 16, 31, 59, and 97 months, respectively.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Hypomethylating agents such as 5-azacitidine and decitabine are commonly used, with overall response rates of ∼30%-40% and complete remission rates of ∼7%-17%; with no impact on mutational allele burdens. Allogeneic stem cell transplant is the only potentially curative option, but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.