Venetoclax with azacitidine or decitabine in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: Long term follow-up from a phase 1b study

Efficacy and safety of venetoclax-based combination therapy for previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To explore the efficacy and safety of venetoclax-based combination therapy for older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) with mono-HMAs or LDAC. The random or fixed effects model was applied to the studies based on heterogeneity. Dichotomous data were summarized using the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous variable data were reported as weighted mean differences (WMDs).

RESULTS

Nine studies, including a total of 1232 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. Thec complete remission (CR)/complete remission with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi) rate of the venetoclax (Ven) + azacytidine (Aza) group was significantly greater than that of the Aza monotherapy group (RR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.85-3.15; P < 0.001). Similarly, the CR/CRi rate of the Ven + LDAC group was also significantly greater than that of the LDAC monotherapy group (RR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.58-4.17; P = 0.00). The same results were observed for OS among these groups. However, the incidence of febrile neutropenia was greater in the Ven + Aza group than in the Ven + Decitabine (Dec) or monotherapy Aza group (RR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53-0.90; P = 0.006 and RR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.58-3.03; P < 0.001, respectively). In addition, the Ven + LDAC group had significantly greater rates of constipation, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting than the LDAC monotherapy group, with RRs and CIs of 0.61 (95% CI 0.44-0.83, P = 0.002), 1.81 (95% CI 1.22-2.67, P = 0.003), 1.39 (95% CI 1.06-1.82, P = 0.016), and 1.80 (95% CI 1.19-2.72, P = 0.005), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Venetoclax combined with azacitidine, decitabine, or LDAC significantly improved the CR/CRi and OS of patients with previously untreated AML. However, venetoclax plus azacitidine or LDAC was more likely to lead to increased febrile neutropenia and gastrointestinal toxicity.

KDM1A, a potent and selective target, for the treatment of DNMT3A-deficient non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

DNMT3A is a crucial epigenetic regulation enzyme. However, due to its heterogeneous nature and frequent mutation in various cancers, the role of DNMT3A remains controversial. Here, we determine the role of DNMT3A in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to identify potential treatment strategies.

METHODS

To investigate the role of loss-of-function mutations of DNMT3A in NSCLC, CRISPR/Cas9 was used to induce DNMT3A-inactivating mutations. Epigenetic inhibitor library was screened to find the synthetic lethal partner of DNMT3A. Both pharmacological inhibitors and gene manipulation were used to evaluate the synthetic lethal efficacy of DNMT3A/KDM1A in vitro and in vivo. Lastly, MS-PCR, ChIP-qPCR, dual luciferase reporter gene assay and clinical sample analysis were applied to elucidate the regulation mechanism of synthetic lethal interaction.

RESULTS

We identified DNMT3A is a tumour suppressor gene in NSCLC and KDM1A as a synthetic lethal partner of DNMT3A deletion. Both chemical KDM1A inhibitors and gene manipulation can selectively reduce the viability of DNMT3A-KO cells through inducing cell apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. We clarified that the synthetic lethality is not only limited to the death mode, but also involved into tumour metastasis. Mechanistically, DNMT3A deficiency induces KDM1A upregulation through reducing the methylation status of the KDM1A promoter and analysis of clinical samples indicated that DNMT3A expression was negatively correlated with KDM1A level.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide new insight into the role of DNMT3A in NSCLC and elucidate the mechanism of synthetic lethal interaction between KDM1A and DNMT3A, which might represent a promising approach for treating patients with DNMT3A-deficient tumours.

Improved Outcome of Allogeneic Transplantation in Older Patients Treated for Myeloid Malignancies Using Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide and Reduced Duration of Immune Suppression

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) offers curative potential for older patients with myeloid malignancies. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of alloSCT using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in combination with a very short duration of immune suppression (IS) in this population. We retrospectively analyzed 92 consecutive patients aged 65 years and older who underwent an alloSCT for myeloid malignancies between February 2018 and December 2022 at our institution. Data on patient characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes were collected. Ninety-two patients received an alloSCT with PTCy-based graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The majority had minimal comorbidities and were diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia. Patients mostly received conditioning regimens with low to intermediate transplant conditioning intensity scores. In 43% of patients, IS could be permanently stopped at day +90, resulting in a median time of IS of 2.93 months in high-risk patients. At a median follow-up of 21.3 months, the 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 89% and 87%, respectively. Relapse-free survival rates were 88% and 84% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The 1- and 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse were 8% and 13%, while treatment-related mortality (TRM) estimates were 9% at both time points. Acute GVHD grade 3 to 4 occurred in 7% within the first 180 days and severe chronic GVHD in 6% of patients. This all resulted in a 1- and 2-year graft versus host and relapse-free survival of 74% and 70%, respectively. AlloSCT using PTCy in combination with a short duration of IS in older patients with myeloid malignancies demonstrates favorable survival outcomes due to low relapse rates and a low TRM. The low incidence of relapse and acceptable rates of graft-versus-host disease suggest the efficacy and safety of this approach. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and optimize transplant strategies for older patients with myeloid malignancies.

Myelomonocytic and monocytic acute myeloid leukemia demonstrate comparable poor outcomes with venetoclax-based treatment: a monocentric real-world study

Venetoclax (VEN), a BCL-2 inhibitor, has transformed treatment strategies for elderly and unfit acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients by significantly improving response rates and survival. However, the predictive factors for VEN efficacy differ from traditional chemotherapy. The clinical relevance of the FAB (French-American-British) monocytic subtype, including M4 and M5, has been debated as a marker for VEN resistance. This real-world study examined 162 newly diagnosed (ND) and 85 relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML patients who received VEN-based therapy at West China Hospital, Sichuan University, from January 2019 to January 2023. We retrospectively collected clinical and treatment data from electronic medical records. The median age of the cohort was 55.5 years (range: 16.5-83.5). The composite complete remission (cCR) rate in the entire cohort was 60.7%. Specifically, among newly diagnosed (ND) patients, FAB monocytic subtypes exhibited lower cCR compared to non-monocytic subtypes (55.1% vs. 76.3%, P = 0.007). Additionally, there were no significant differences observed between M4 and M5 subtypes, both in the ND group (61.7% vs. 40.9%, p = 0.17) and the R/R group (38.2% vs. 40%, p > 0.9). Furthermore, the median follow-up was 238 (range: 7-1120) days. ND patients with monocytic subtypes had shorter overall survival compared to non-monocytic subtypes (295 days vs. not reached, p = 0.0017). Conversely, R/R patients showed no such difference (204 vs. 266 days, p = 0.72). In summary, our study suggests that the FAB monocytic subtype can predict VEN resistance and shorter survival in ND AML patients. Moreover, there is no significant distinction between M4 and M5 subtypes.

Impact of AML1/ETO Fusion on the Efficacy of Venetoclax Plus Hypomethylating Agents in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

BACKGROUND

AML1/ETO fusion confers favorable prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with intensive chemotherapy (IC). However, the impact of AML1/ETO fusion on the efficacy of venetoclax in the treatment of AML is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents (VEN/HMAs) in patients with AML1/ETO-positive AML.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed AML in two centers were reviewed and divided into three cohorts: AML1/ETO-positive AML treated with frontline VEN/HMA (Cohort A), AML1/ETO-negative AML treated with frontline VEN/HMA (Cohort B), or AML1/ETO-positive AML treated with frontline IC (Cohort C). The response and survival were compared between the cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 260 patients were included in the study. Patients in Cohort A had a significantly lower overall response rate (ORR) than patients in Cohort B (40.9% vs 71.2%, p = 0.005). The median event-free survival (EFS) in Cohort A and Cohort B was 2.7 months and 7.7 months, respectively, with no significant difference. The ORR and median EFS in Cohort C were 80.8% and 14.9 months, respectively, which were significantly superior to those in Cohort A, and the advantages remained significant after propensity score matching. ORR and EFS in KIT-mutated patients with AML1/ETO-positive AML receiving VEN/HMA were much inferior to those in KIT wild-type patients (ORR 0.0% vs 81.8%, p = 0.001; EFS 1.2 months vs not reached, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Newly diagnosed AML patients with AML1/ETO fusion had a poor response to frontline VEN/HMA treatment. When determining induction therapy for patients with AML1/ETO-positive AML, IC should be preferred over VEN/HM.

A Markov analysis of azacitidine and venetoclax vs induction chemotherapy for medically fit patients with AML

ABSTRACT

Although induction chemotherapy (IC) is the standard of care in medically fit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), limited retrospective data indicate that patients at adverse-risk may benefit from azacytidine and venetoclax (aza-ven). Our goal was to perform a Markov decision analysis to determine whether IC or aza-ven is the optimal induction regimen in this population. Using the TreeAge software, Markov models were created for adverse-risk and intermediate-risk cohorts. A systematic review of the literature informed the transition probabilities and utilities included in the analyses. Our primary outcome was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained over 5 years after diagnosis. Overall, patients at adverse risk treated with IC gained 1.4 QALYs, compared with 2.0 QALYs in patients treated with aza-ven. Patients at adverse risk treated with IC and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), IC, aza-ven and allo-SCT, or aza-ven gained 2.1, 1.5, 3.0, and 1.9 QALYs, respectively. Meanwhile, patients at intermediate risk treated with IC gained 2.0 QALY, compared with 1.7 QALY in patients treated with aza-ven. Patients at intermediate risk treated with IC and allo-SCT, IC, aza-ven and allo-SCT, and aza-ven gained 2.7, 2.3, 2.6, and 1.8 QALYs, respectively. We have demonstrated that medically fit patients with newly diagnosed adverse-risk AML may benefit from treatment with aza-ven over those treated with IC, whereas IC remains the preferred approach for patients at intermediate risk. Our work challenges the use of the European LeukemiaNet risk classification for patients treated with aza-ven and highlights the need for prospective investigation into aza-ven as induction therapy for medically fit patients.

Real-world treatment outcomes from a retrospective cohort of patients with acute myeloid leukemia from an urban safety net hospital

INTRODUCTION

While continual advancements in acute myeloid leukemia have augmented response rates and survival, outcomes in clinical trials may not correlate with real-world practice as trials may underrepresent individuals with comorbidities, decreased performance status, and older age. Additionally, clinical trials may underrepresent certain ethnicities, and disparities based on ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and insurance have been demonstrated in acute myeloid leukemia.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia who were treated at Harbor-UCLA from 2014 to 2022 to examine patient characteristics, management patterns, and outcomes in a safety net hospital setting.

RESULTS

The median age was 56 years old (range 18-84). In regards to risk stratification, 22%, 33%, and 41% had favorable, intermediate, and adverse risk acute myeloid leukemia, respectively. The most common induction regimens included 7 + 3 (55%), azacitidine (10%), azacitidine + venetoclax (7%), and 7 + 3 + midostaurin (7%). The complete remission rate was 51%. Among patients who received intensive induction chemotherapy, 15% underwent re-induction with a second cycle, 51% received consolidation therapy, and 5% received maintenance therapy with a targeted agent. Overall, 12% of patients received allogeneic stem cell transplant. Median overall survival was 12.2 months, and 5-year overall survival was 18%.

CONCLUSIONS

Suboptimal response rates and survival in this population may be related to low rates of re-induction and allogeneic transplant in addition to high rates of adverse cytogenetics, secondary acute myeloid leukemia, and supportive care only. Efforts to increase access to clinical trials, novel therapies, and transplants for diverse and underinsured populations are essential.

Transcriptional and phenotypic heterogeneity underpinning venetoclax resistance in AML

The venetoclax BCL2 inhibitor in combination with hypomethylating agents represents a cornerstone of induction therapy for older AML patients, unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Like other targeted therapies, venetoclax-based therapies suffer from innate and acquired resistance. While several mechanisms of resistance have been identified, the heterogeneity of resistance mechanism across patient populations is poorly understood. Here we utilized integrative analysis of transcriptomic and ex-vivo drug response data in AML patients to identify four transcriptionally distinct VEN resistant clusters (VR_C1-4), with distinct phenotypic, genetic and drug response patterns. VR_C1 was characterized by enrichment for differentiated monocytic- and cDC-like blasts, transcriptional activation of PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling axis, and energy metabolism pathways. They showed sensitivity to mTOR and CDK inhibition. VR_C2 was enriched for NRAS mutations and associated with distinctive transcriptional suppression of HOX expression. VR_C3 was characterized by enrichment for TP53 mutations and higher infiltration by cytotoxic T cells. This cluster showed transcriptional expression of erythroid markers, suggesting tumor cells mimicking erythroid differentiation, activation of JAK-STAT signaling, and sensitivity to JAK inhibition, which in a subset of cases synergized with venetoclax. VR_C4 shared transcriptional similarities with venetoclax-sensitive patients, with modest over-expression of interferon signaling. They were also characterized by high rates of DNMT3A mutations. Finally, we projected venetoclax-resistance states onto single cells profiled from a patient who relapsed under venetoclax therapy capturing multiple resistance states in the tumor and shifts in their abundance under venetoclax selection, suggesting that single tumors may consist of cells mimicking multiple VR_Cs contributing to intra-tumor heterogeneity. Taken together, our results provide a strategy to evaluate inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity of venetoclax resistance mechanisms and provide insights into approaches to navigate further management of patients who failed therapy with BCL2 inhibitors.

Venetoclax in adult acute myeloid leukemia

Venetoclax is a potent inhibitor that specifically targets B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2), which has been demonstrated to be effective in preclinical studies utilizing acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell lines and xenograft models. Significant antileukemic activity was also observed in clinical trials, both as a monotherapy and in combination with other drugs. This novel therapeutic approach has revolutionized the treatment prospects for AML patients with unfavorable prognoses and those who are unable to tolerate intensive chemotherapy. Nevertheless, further investigations are required to establish the optimal dosing, sequencing, and combinational strategies of venetoclax for AML treatments. Additionally, identifying biomarkers is crucial for predicting response and resistance to this targeted intervention. In this review, we provide an overview of venetoclax-based therapy for AML and explore potential avenues for future research.

Impact of previous anthracycline therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving venetoclax

Venetoclax (VEN) combination regimens are now recognized as effective against acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the prognosis of patients who do not attain a composite complete response (cCR) is extremely poor, and clinical determinants of response remain unknown. Medical records of 57 patients with AML treated with VEN combination regimens from April 2021 to March 2022 at six institutions were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was cCR, complete remission, or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery after one cycle of VEN combination regimen. Five patients had previously relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). The treatment regimen was azacitidine-VEN in 48 patients (84%) and low-dose cytarabine-VEN in 9 patients (16%). Thirty patients (53%) achieved cCR after one cycle of a VEN regimen. In univariate analysis, the number of prior chemotherapy regimens, post-allo-SCT relapse, and cytogenetic risk category were associated with a decreased likelihood of achieving cCR. In multivariate analysis, second-line chemotherapy remained a significant predictor of response. Patients who received anthracycline immediately before the VEN regimen had a higher cCR rate than patients who did not receive anthracycline. In this study, prior chemotherapy/allo-SCT and cytogenetic risk were associated with VEN treatment outcomes.

Low-dose decitabine for previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy aged 65 years or older: a prospective study based on comprehensive geriatric assessment

Background

The outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) aged ⩾65 years is poor. Effective treatment options are limited for patients with AML who cannot tolerate intensive chemotherapy.

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose decitabine in previously untreated patients with AML aged ⩾65 years who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment.

Design

We performed a prospective, multicenter, open-label, and non-randomized study.

Methods

Patients were enrolled at four centers in Beijing between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2020. They were treated with decitabine at a dose of 6 mg/m2 for 10 days. The treatment was repeated every 28 days for one cycle for a total of six cycles. The primary endpoint of our study was overall survival (OS) at the end of the first year after enrolment. The secondary endpoints included overall response rate, leukemia-free survival, relapse rate, treatment-related mortality (TRM), quality of life, safety, and transfusion dependence. Patients were continuously monitored for toxicity.

Results

Overall, 47 patients (30 males and 17 females) participated in this study. The median age of the enrolled patients was 78 (range, 65-90) years. The median follow-up time was 22.2 (range, 4.6-38.8) months. Fifteen (31.9%) patients achieved complete remission (CR), 11 (23.4%) patients achieved partial remission, 3 (6.4%) patients achieved hematological improvement only, and 18 (38.3%) patients did not achieve remission. The median time to obtain CR was 2 months. The median CR was 8.5 months. Of the patients, 36 (76.6%) patients completed six cycles of treatment with low-dose decitabine, and the 1-year OS was 36.1%. According to instrumental activities of daily living scales, age, comorbidities, and albumin (IACA) scores, the median survival was 11.2 months in the unfit group and 6 months in the frail group. The 1-year OS rates in the unfit and frail groups were 49.2% and 23.4%, respectively. Grade ⩾3 non-hematological toxicity was observed in 70.2% (33/47) of the patients. TRM occurred in three patients. No early deaths occurred after treatment.

Conclusion

In newly diagnosed older patients with AML whose IACA assessment was unfit or frail for standard chemotherapy, treatment with low-dose decitabine demonstrated clinical activity and good security in our study.

Venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents and the CAG regimen in relapsed/refractory AML: a single-center clinical trial

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents and CAG (VEN-DCAG) regimens in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML).

Methods

The treatment response was analyzed by retrospective methods in R/R AML patients treated with the VEN-DCAG regimen at our institution. This included, but was not limited to, CR/CRi (complete remission/complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery) rate, measurable residual disease (MRD) negative rate, and overall survival (OS).

Results

20 patients with R/R AML were recruited, with a median age of 40 years (10-70), 11 of whom were male (55%), and a median follow-up of 10.4 months (0.7-21.8). The overall response rate (ORR) after receiving 1 course of VEN-DCAG was 90% (18/20), with 17 (85%) CR/CRi (10 MRD-CR), 1 (5%) PR, and 2 (10%) NR. Subsequently, 12 patients (7 MRD-CR, 4 MRD+CR, 1 NR) were treated with the VEN-DCAG regimen, and 3 MRD+CR patients turned negative, and 13 patients finally achieved MRD-CR. Among them, 7 patients were in the relapse group, all achieving CR/CRi (6 MRD-CR), and 13 patients in the refractory group, with 10 CR/CRi (7 MRD-CR). The ORR for patients in the relapse and refractory groups was 100% (7/7) and 84.6% (11/13), respectively. Further, all patients experienced adverse events (AEs) of varying degrees of severity, with hematologic AEs primarily consisting of myelosuppression, while non-hematologic AEs were more common in the form of fever, gastrointestinal distress, and infections. 11 patients were followed up with bridging allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) therapy. At the last follow-up, 11 patients (7 MRD-CR, 4 MRD+CR) who received allo-HSCT, 1 (MRD+CR) died, and 9 patients (6 MRD-CR, 1 PR, 2 NR) who did not receive allo-HSCT, 5 (2 MRD-CR, 1 PR, 2 NR) died as well.

Conclusion

The VEN-DCAG regimen may be an effective treatment option for R/R AML patients, with high ORR and MRD negative remission rates in both the relapsed and refractory groups. It is recommend that patients should be bridged to allo-HSCT as soon as possible after induction to CR by the VEN-DCAG regimen, which can lead to a significant long-term survival benefit.

Clinical trial registration

https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2300075985.

[How did the survival of acute myeloid leukemia change over the last ten years in our unit?]

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological malignancy with high mortality rate. The treatment is especially challenging in patients older than 65 years, which is the large majority of those. For patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy regimens, only palliative cytoreduction and basic supportive care used to be the options in our unit. However, from 2018, the azacitidine-venetoclax combination has been a new therapeutic alternative. This treatment resulted in marked survival benefit in clinical trials, however, its impact on the daily clinical practice and the entire patient population is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to evaluate how the application of azacitidine-venetoclax changed the treatment and survival of AML patients in our practice.

METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed the available clinical data of all AML patients treated consecutively between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2021 at the 3rd Department of Internal Medicine (from 2020 onward called Department of Internal Medicine and Hematology), examining their treatment depending on the time period of therapy (2011-2017 and 2018-2021). Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded.

RESULTS

423 patients were diagnosed during this period. The number of cases showed a marked increase: in the first 7 years of our study, 184 patients were diagnosed, while this rose to 239 during the subsequent 4 years. The median age of patients was 67.6 years, with more than 60% of patients aged over 65. An improving trend can be observed in the overall survival: between 2011 and 2017, the median overall survival was 4.8 ± 0.9 months, while between 2018 and 2021, it was 8.3 ± 1.4 months (p = 0.051). Moreover, in the case of patients over 65 there was a significant overall survival improvement: 3.1 ± 0.5 vs. 4.9 ± 0.6 months (p = 0,01). The main factor behind this improvement could be that a large proportion of over 65 patients previously only fit for supportive care could now be treated with azacitidine-venetoclax: the percentage of actively treated patients grew from 57.1% to 75.3% in the second period.

CONCLUSION

The survival of patients unfit for curative therapy and older than 65 showed a steady increase which can be attributed to the introduction of new therapeutic alternatives. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(45): 1787-1794.

Clinical Correlates of Venetoclax-Based Combination Sensitivities to Augment Acute Myeloid Leukemia Therapy

The BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax combined with the hypomethylating agent azacytidine shows significant clinical benefit in a subset of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, resistance limits response and durability. We prospectively profiled the ex vivo activity of 25 venetoclax-inclusive combinations on primary AML patient samples to identify those with improved potency and synergy compared with venetoclax + azacytidine (Ven + azacytidine). Combination sensitivities correlated with tumor cell state to discern three patterns: primitive selectivity resembling Ven + azacytidine, monocytic selectivity, and broad efficacy independent of cell state. Incorporation of immunophenotype, mutation, and cytogenetic features further stratified combination sensitivity for distinct patient subtypes. We dissect the biology underlying the broad, cell state-independent efficacy for the combination of venetoclax plus the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib. Together, these findings support opportunities for expanding the impact of venetoclax-based drug combinations in AML by leveraging clinical and molecular biomarkers associated with ex vivo responses.

SIGNIFICANCE

By mapping drug sensitivity data to clinical features and tumor cell state, we identify novel venetoclax combinations targeting patient subtypes who lack sensitivity to Ven + azacytidine. This provides a framework for a taxonomy of AML informed by readily available sets of clinical and genetic features obtained as part of standard care. See related commentary by Becker, p. 437 . This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 419.

Potent Personalized Venetoclax Partners for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Identified by Ex Vivo Drug Screening

SUMMARY

High-throughput screens (HTS) have been utilized to assess the efficacy of single drugs against patient tumor samples with the purpose of optimizing precision therapy, but testing the synergy of drug combinations can identify the ideal second drug to add. With novel sophisticated HTS, effective venetoclax combinations can be revealed that provide the cell state, phenotype, and molecular features of the susceptible and resistant cell populations. See related article by Eide, Kurtz et al., p. 452 (14) .

What Influences the Decision to Proceed to Transplant for Patients With AML in First Remission?

Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the backbone of curative treatment for the majority of fit adults diagnosed with AML, there is indeed a subset of patients for whom long-term remission may be achieved without transplantation. Remarkable changes in our knowledge of AML biology in recent years has transformed the landscape of diagnosis, management, and treatment of AML. Specifically, markedly increased understanding of molecular characteristics of AML, the expanded application of minimal/measurable residual diseases testing, and an increased armamentarium of leukemia-directed therapeutic agents have created a new paradigm for the medical care of patients with AML. An attempt is herein made to decipher the decision to proceed to transplant for patients with AML in first complete remission on the basis of the current best available evidence. The focus is on factors affecting the biology and treatment of AML itself, rather than on variables related to allo-HCT, an area characterized by significant advancements that have reduced overall therapy-related complications. This review seeks to focus on areas of particular complexity, while simultaneously providing clarity on how our current knowledge and treatment strategies may, or may not, influence the decision to pursue allo-HCT in patients with AML.

Development of a scoring system for predicting primary resistance to venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in acute myeloid leukemia patients

In recent years, one of the most promising advances in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the combination of a hypomethylating agent (HMA) with the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN). To better understand the key factors associated with the response of VEN plus HMA, 212 consecutive AML patients were retrospectively recruited to establish and validate a scoring system for predicting the primary resistance to VEN-based induced therapy. All AML patients were divided randomly into a training set (n = 155) and a validation set (n = 57). Factors were selected using a multivariate logistic regression model, including FAB-M5, myelodysplastic syndrome-secondary acute myeloid leukemia (MDS-sAML), RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and FLT3-ITD mutation (FLT3-ITDm). A nomogram was then constructed including all these four predictors. The nomogram both presented a good performance of discrimination and calibration, with a C-index of 0.770 and 0.733 in the training and validation set. Decision curve analysis also indicated that the nomogram was feasible to make beneficial decisions. Eventually a total scoring system of 8 points was developed, which was divided into three risk groups: low-risk (score 0-2), medium-risk (score 3-4), and high-risk (score 5-8). There was a significant difference in the nonremission (NR) rate of these three risk groups (22.8% vs. 60.0% vs. 77.8%, p < 0.001). After adjustment of the other variables, patients in medium- or high-risk groups also presented a worse event-free survival (EFS) than that in the low-risk group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.62, p = 0.03). In conclusion, we highlighted the response determinants of AML patients receiving a combination therapy of VEN plus HMAs. The scoring system can be used to predict the resistance of VEN, providing better guidance for clinical treatment.

Mechanisms of Resistance to Small Molecules in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

In recent years, great progress has been made in the therapy of AML by targeting cellular processes associated with specific molecular features of the disease. Various small molecules inhibiting FLT3, IDH1/IDH2, and BCL2 have already gained approval from the respective authorities and are essential parts of personalized therapeutic regimens in modern therapy of AML. Unfortunately, primary and secondary resistance to these inhibitors is a frequent problem. Here, we comprehensively review the current state of knowledge regarding molecular processes involved in primary and secondary resistance to these agents, covering both genetic and nongenetic mechanisms. In addition, we introduce concepts and strategies for how these resistance mechanisms might be overcome.

Real-world experience with selinexor-containing chemotherapy-free or low-dose chemotherapy regimens for patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia and myeloid sarcoma

Introduction: Treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) and myeloid sarcoma (MS) has presented challenges for decades. Studies on selinexor in combination with various standard or intensive chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of R/R AML have demonstrated promising results. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy-free or low-dose chemotherapy regimens with selinexor for R/R AML and MS patients. Methods: Ten patients with R/R AML or MS who received chemotherapy-free or low-dose chemotherapy regimens in combination with selinexor at Tongji Hospital from October 2021 to August 2022 were included in this study. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints included complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi), partial remission (PR), transplantation rate, and safety. Results: All patients were evaluable for response, achieving CR in four (40.0%) patients and CRi in two (20.0%) patients for a total CR/CRi of 60.0%. The ORR was 80.0% when patients with PR were included. Five (50.0%) patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) after treatment with selinexor-containing regimens. At the end of the follow-up, seven (70.0%) patients were alive, and three patients died of transplant-related complications or disease progression. The most frequently reported nonhematologic adverse events (AEs) in patients were grade 1 or 2 asymptomatic hyponatremia. Conclusion: The chemotherapy-free or low-dose chemotherapy regimens in combination with selinexor for R/R AML are feasible and tolerable and provide an opportunity for patients to receive transplantation.

De Novo Pure Erythroid Leukemia With Rapid Progression and Multiple Lytic Bone Lesions: A Case Report

 A 62-year-old male patient presented with malaise and severe macrocytic anemia. Computed tomography revealed an osteolytic lesion in the left iliac bone. Bone marrow examination revealed that 90% of erythroblasts were large with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS)-positive staining while flow cytometry and immunostaining revealed CD71 (+), GP-A (+), p53 (+), CD117 (+), and CD34 (-) results, indicating pure erythroid leukemia (PEL) diagnosis. A needle biopsy of the osteolytic lesion revealed the same characteristics as PEL. Azacitidine therapy was administered as the first-line treatment, and his general condition temporarily improved. However, PEL quickly deteriorated, and he died 42 days of hospitalization after initial admission. PEL is an extremely rare form of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and has presented cytogenetic characteristics in addition to the TP53 mutation. Other AML treatment is used because a standard treatment method is unavailable. However, the prognosis is extremely poor. Furthermore, few cases of concurrent bone lesions are reported globally, and more cases must be accumulated and analyzed.

Venetoclax: A New Partner in the Novel Treatment Era for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) are two closely related blood cancers that are more frequent in older adults. AML is the most common type of adult acute leukemia, and MDS is characterized by ineffective blood cell production and abnormalities in the bone marrow and blood. Both can be resistant to treatment, often due to dysfunction in the process of apoptosis, the body's natural mechanism for cell death. Venetoclax, an orally-administered medication that selectively targets the BCL-2 protein, has shown promise in enhancing treatment sensitivity in some hematological malignancies by reducing the apoptotic threshold. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of venetoclax in treating AML and MDS, as well as potential mechanisms of resistance to the medication.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted utilizing PUBMED to capture all relevant research articles on the use of venetoclax as a therapy for both diseases. The MeSH terms "acute myeloid leukemia", "myelodysplastic syndrome" and "venetoclax" were searched. Furthermore, Clinicaltrials.gov was accessed to ensure the inclusion of all ongoing clinical trials.

RESULTS

Although Venetoclax showed modest results as a single-agent therapy in AML, venetoclax-based combination therapies? mainly with hypomethylating agents or low-dose cytarabine? yielded significantly positive results. Preliminary results oN the use of venetoclax-based combination therapy with HMA, mainly azacitidine, in unfit high-risk MDS also yielded optimistic results. Identification of mutations for which various drugs have been approved has spurred active investigation of venetoclax in combination trials.

CONCLUSION

Venetoclax-based combination therapies have been shown to induce rapid responses and increase overall survival in AML patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. These therapies are also yielding positive preliminary results in high-risk MDS patients in phase I trials. Resistance to venetoclax and drug-related toxicity are two main obstacles that need to be overcome to reap the full benefits of this therapy.

Real-world outcomes of frontline venetoclax-based therapy in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: an analysis utilizing EHR data

Venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMA) or low-dose cytarabine has become the standard of care for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible to receive intensive induction chemotherapy. Clinical trials are performed in a controlled setting that can be difficult to emulate in the real world. We sought to investigate outcomes of patients treated with VEN-based therapy in the real world. Patients with an age of ≥65 years who received frontline VEN-based therapy were identified using the COTA database (n = 112). The majority of patients (91%) were treated in the community setting and had adverse-risk AML (63%). The real-world overall response rate (rwORR) was 55% with a median real-world overall survival (rwOS) of 13 months after VEN/HMA. The rwORR was lower and median rwOS was shorter than those reported in the VIALE-A trial, underscoring the importance of studying novel therapies using real-world data.

Prediction of survival with lower intensity therapy among older patients with acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic model for survival in older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who were treated with lower-intensity chemotherapy regimens.

METHODS

The authors reviewed all older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML who received lower-intensity chemotherapy from 2000 until 2020 at their institution. A total of 1462 patients were included. They were divided (3:1 basis) into a training (n = 1088) and a validation group (n = 374).

RESULTS

In the training cohort of 1088 patients (median age, 72 years), the multivariate analysis identified 11 consistent independent adverse factors associated with survival: older age, therapy-related myeloid neoplasm, existence of previous myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative neoplasms, poor performance status, pulmonary comorbidity, anemia, thrombocytopenia, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, cytogenetic abnormalities, and the presence of infection at diagnosis, and therapy not containing venetoclax. The 3-year survival rates were 52%, 24%, 10%, and 1% in favorable, intermediate, poor, and very poor risk, respectively. This survival model was validated in an independent cohort. In a subset of patients in whom molecular mutation profiles were performed in more recent times, adding the mutation profiles after accounting for the effects of previous factors identified IDH2 (favorable), NPM1 (favorable), and TP53 (unfavorable) mutations as molecular prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

The proposed survival model with lower-intensity chemotherapy in older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML may help to advise patients on their expected outcome, to propose different strategies in first complete remission, and to compare the results of different existing or future investigational therapies.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Lower intensity therapy can be considered for older patients to avoid severe toxicities and adverse events. However, survival prediction in AML was commonly developed in patients who received intensive chemotherapy. In this study, we have proposed a survival model to guide therapeutic approach in older patients who received lower-intensity therapy.

Amsacrine-based induction therapy in AML patients with cardiac comorbidities: a retrospective single-center analysis

Intensive chemotherapy is the backbone of induction treatment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, AML patients with concomitant cardiac disease may not be eligible for anthracycline-based therapies. In a small cohort of patients, we have previously shown that anthracycline-free, amsacrine-based chemotherapy TAA (thioguanine, cytarabine, amsacrine) may be as effective as cytarabine/daunorubicin for induction therapy in these patients. In this systematic retrospective single-center analysis, we documented the outcome of 31 patients with significant cardiac comorbidities including coronary heart disease or cardiomyopathy receiving TAA as induction chemotherapy. Median (range) ejection fraction (EF) was 48% (30-67%) in this cohort. Patients with EF below 30% were considered unfit for intensive induction therapy. Event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 1.61, 5.46, and 13.6 months respectively. Poor outcome was primarily related to a high early mortality rate within the first 30 days of therapy, mainly caused by infectious complications. TAA cannot be recommended as a substitute of standard induction for AML patients with significant concomitant cardiac disease. In the era of novel agents, alternative strategies (e.g., hypomethylating agents plus venetoclax) should be considered when anthracycline-based regimens are not suitable.

Hypomethylating agent-based therapies in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia - A joint review by the Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology and European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Trainee Committee

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcomes in older adults. A major goal of treatment is to balance quality of life and functional independence with disease control. With the approval of new, more tolerable regimens, more older adults are able to receive AML-directed therapy. Among these options are hypomethylating agents (HMAs), specifically azacitidine and decitabine. HMAs have become an integral part of AML therapy over the last two decades. These agents are used either as monotherapy or nowadays more commonly in combination with other agents such as the Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax. Biological AML characteristics, such as molecular and cytogenetic risk factors, play crucial roles in guiding treatment decisions. In patients with high-risk AML, HMAs are increasingly used rather than intensive chemotherapy, although further trials based on a risk-adapted approach using patient- and disease-related factors are needed. Here, we review trials and evidence for the use of HMA monotherapy and combination therapy in the management of older adults with AML. Furthermore, we discuss the use of HMAs and HMA combination therapies in AML, mechanisms of action, their incorporation into hematopoietic stem cell transplantation strategies, and their use in patients with comorbidities and reduced organ function.

Integrative Analyses Reveal the Anticancer Mechanisms and Sensitivity Markers of the Next-Generation Hypomethylating Agent NTX-301

Epigenetic dysregulation characterized by aberrant DNA hypermethylation is a hallmark of cancer, and it can be targeted by hypomethylating agents (HMAs). Recently, we described the superior therapeutic efficacy of a novel HMA, namely, NTX-301, when used as a monotherapy and in combination with venetoclax in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Following a previous study, we further explored the therapeutic properties of NTX-301 based on experimental investigations and integrative data analyses. Comprehensive sensitivity profiling revealed that NTX-301 primarily exerted anticancer effects against blood cancers and exhibited improved potency against a wide range of solid cancers. Subsequent assays showed that the superior efficacy of NTX-301 depended on its strong effects on cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and differentiation. Due to its superior efficacy, low doses of NTX-301 achieved sufficiently substantial tumor regression in vivo. Multiomics analyses revealed the mechanisms of action (MoAs) of NTX-301 and linked these MoAs to markers of sensitivity to NTX-301 and to the demethylation activity of NTX-301 with high concordance. In conclusion, our findings provide a rationale for currently ongoing clinical trials of NTX-301 and will help guide the development of novel therapeutic options for cancer patients.

Assessing eligibility for treatment in acute myeloid leukemia in 2023

INTRODUCTION

Age has historically been considered the main criterion to determine eligibility for intensive chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but age alone can no longer be considered an absolute indicator in determining which patients should be defined as unfit. Assessment of fitness for a given treatment today serves an important role in tailoring therapeutic options.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the main options used in real life to define eligibility for intensive and nonintensive chemotherapy in patients with AML, with a main focus on the Italian SIE/SIES/GITMO Consensus Criteria. Other published real-life experiences are also reviewed, analyzing the correlation between these criteria and short-term mortality, and thus expected outcomes.

EXPERT OPINION

Assessment of fitness is mandatory at diagnosis to tailor treatment to the greatest degree possible, evaluating the patient's individual profile. This is especially relevant when considering the availability of newer, less toxic therapeutic regimens, which have shown promising results in patients with AML who are older or considered unfit for intensive treatment. Fitness assessment is now a fundamental part of AML management and a critical step that can potentially influence outcomes and not just predict them.

Treatment outcomes for newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

TP53 mutations, which are present in 5% to 10% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), are associated with treatment resistance and poor outcomes. First-line therapies for TP53-mutated (TP53m) AML consist of intensive chemotherapy (IC), hypomethylating agents (HMA), or venetoclax combined with HMA (VEN + HMA).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to describe and compare treatment outcomes in newly diagnosed treatment-naïve patients with TP53m AML. Randomized controlled trials, single-arm trials, prospective observational studies, and retrospective studies were included that reported on complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), duration of response (DoR), and overall response rate (ORR) among patients with TP53m AML receiving first-line treatment with IC, HMA, or VEN + HMA.

RESULTS

Searches of EMBASE and MEDLINE identified 3006 abstracts, and 17 publications describing 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Random-effects models were used to pool response rates, and time-related outcomes were analyzed with the median of medians method. IC was associated with the greatest CR rate of 43%, and CR rates were 33% for VEN + HMA and 13% for HMA. Rates of CR/CRi were comparable for IC (46%) and VEN + HMA (49%) but were lower for HMA (13%). Median OS was uniformly poor across treatments: IC, 6.5 months; VEN + HMA, 6.2 months; and HMA, 6.1 months. For IC, the EFS estimate was 3.7 months; EFS was not reported for VEN + HMA or HMA. The ORR was 41% for IC, 65% for VEN + HMA, and 47% for HMA. DoR was 3.5 months for IC, 5.0 months for VEN + HMA, and was not reported for HMA.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite improved responses seen with IC and VEN + HMA compared to HMA, survival was uniformly poor, and clinical benefits were limited across all treatments for patients with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve TP53m AML, demonstrating a significant need for improved treatment for this difficult-to-treat population.

DNA methylation landscape reveals LIN7A as a decitabine-responsive marker in patients with t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

Despite its inconsistent response rate, decitabine, a demethylating agent, is often used as a non-intensive alternative therapeutic agent for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). It has been reported that relapsed/refractory AML patients with t(8;21) translocation achieved better clinical outcomes with a decitabine-based combination regimen than other AML subtypes; however, the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain unknown. Herein, the DNA methylation landscape of de novo patients with the t(8;21) translocation was compared with that of patients without the translocation. Moreover, the methylation changes induced by decitabine-based combination regimens in de novo/complete remission paired samples were investigated to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the better responses observed in t(8;21) AML patients treated with decitabine.

METHODS

Thirty-three bone marrow samples from 28 non-M3 AML patients were subjected to DNA methylation sequencing to identify the differentially methylated regions and genes of interest. TCGA-AML Genome Atlas-AML transcriptome dataset was used to identify decitabine-sensitive genes that were downregulated following exposure to a decitabine-based regimen. In addition, the effect of decitabine-sensitive gene on cell apoptosis was examined in vitro using Kasumi-1 and SKNO-1 cells.

RESULTS

A total of 1377 differentially methylated regions that specifically responsive to decitabine in t(8;21) AML were identified, of which 210 showed hypomethylation patterns following decitabine treatment aligned with the promoter regions of 72 genes. And the methylation-silencing genes, LIN7A, CEBPA, BASP1, and EMB were identified as critical decitabine-sensitive genes in t(8;21) AML. Moreover, AML patients with hypermethylated LIN7A and reduced LIN7A expression had poor clinical outcomes. Meanwhile, the downregulation of LIN7A inhibited decitabine/cytarabine combination treatment-induced apoptosis in t(8;21) AML cells in vitro.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that LIN7A is a decitabine-sensitive gene in t(8;21) AML patients that may serve as a prognostic biomarker for decitabine-based therapy.

Comparison between azacitidine and decitabine as front-line therapy in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients not eligible for intensive chemotherapy

We compared the efficacy of azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC) in elderly patients with untreated AML, diagnosed according to WHO criteria. In the two groups, we evaluated complete remission (CR), overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS). The AZA and DEC groups included 139 and 186 patients, respectively. To minimize the effects of treatment selection bias, adjustments were made using the propensity-score matching method, which yielded 136 patient pairs. In the AZA and DEC cohort, median age was 75 years in both, (IQR, 71-78 and 71-77), median WBCc at treatment onset 2.5 × 10⁹/L (IQR, 1.6-5.8) and 2.9 × 10⁹/L (IQR, 1.5-8.1), median bone marrow (BM) blast count 30% (IQR, 24-41%) and 49% (IQR, 30-67%), 59 (43%) and 63 (46%) patients had a secondary AML, respectively. Karyotype was evaluable in 115 and 120 patients: 80 (59%) and 87 (64%) had intermediate-risk, 35 (26%) and 33 (24%) an adverse risk karyotype, respectively. Median number of cycles delivered was 6 (IQR, 3.0-11.0) and 4 (IQR, 2.0-9.0), CR rate was 24% vs 29%, median OS and 2-year OS rates 11.3 (95% CI 9.5-13.8) vs 12.0 (95% CI 7.1-16.5) months and 20% vs 24%, respectively. No differences in CR and OS were found within the following subgroup: intermediate- and adverse-risk cytogenetic, frequency of WBCc at treatment ≥ 5 × 10^9 L and < 5 × 10^9/L, de novo and secondary AML, BM blast count < and ≥ 30%. Median DFS for AZA and DEC treated patients was 9.2 vs 12 months, respectively. Our analysis indicates similar outcomes with AZA compared to DEC.

Therapy-related core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia

Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) usually stems from exposure of the bone marrow to cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. t-AML is usually associated with poor overall survival, but occasionally t-AML can involve favorable-risk cytogenetics, including core binding factor AML (CBF-AML), which shows a recurrent chromosomal rearrangement with t(8;21) (q22;22) and 'inv(16) (p13.1;q22)/t(16;16)(p13.1;q22)', leading to 'RUNX1::RUNX1T1 and CBFB::MYH11' fusion genes, respectively. Therapy-related CBF-AML (t-CBF-AML) accounts for 5-15% of CBF-AML cases and tends to have better outcomes than t-AML with unfavorable cytogenetics. Although CBF-AML is sensitive to high-dose cytarabine, t-CBF-AML has worse overall survival than de novo CBF- AML. The objective of this review is to discuss the available data on the pathogenesis, mutations, and therapeutic options in patients with t-CBF-AML.

The clinical impact of the molecular landscape of acute myeloid leukemia

Research into the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has led to remarkable advances in our understanding of the disease. Mutations now allow us to explore the enormous diversity among cytogenetically defined subsets of AML, particularly the large subset of cytogenetically normal AML. Despite the progress in unraveling the tumor genome, only a small number of recurrent mutations have been incorporated into risk-stratification schemes and have been proven to be clinically relevant, targetable lesions. The current World Health Organization Classification of myeloid neoplasms and leukemia includes eight AML categories defined by recurrent genetic abnormalities as well as three categories defined by gene mutations. We here discuss the utility of molecular markers in AML in prognostication and treatment decision-making. New therapies based on targetable markers include IDH inhibitors (ivosidenib, enasidenib), venetoclax-based therapy, FLT3 inhibitors (midostaurin, gilteritinib, and quizartinib), gemtuzumab ozogamicin, magrolimab and menin inhibitors.

Comparison of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with chemotherapy in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) outcomes are very poor in older patients. Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) helps to achieve long-term survival. However, the benefit of haplo-SCT versus chemotherapy is unclear in older adults with AML. Outcomes were retrospectively compared among patients aged 55‒65 years for chemotherapy consolidation or haplo-SCT for AML in the first complete remission with intermediate to high-risk disease. Forty-six patients who underwent chemotherapy and 38 patients who underwent haplo-SCT were evaluated in the final analysis. Compared with the chemotherapy group, patients in the haplo-SCT group had significantly better overall survival (OS) (74.0% versus 23.9% at 36 months, p = 0.005) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) (74.0% versus 21.6%, p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was significantly lower in the haplo-SCT group (17.3% versus 75.4%, p < 0.001). Treatment-related mortality (TRM) was similar in the haplo-SCT and chemotherapy groups (7.9% versus 4.8%, p = 0.587). In the multivariate analysis, haplo-SCT was associated with improved OS, LFS, and decreased CIR. Haplo-SCT did not affect TRM. In conclusion, our data suggest that haploidentical transplant may be an alternative to consolidation chemotherapy as post-remission therapy in patients with intermediate or high-risk AML aged 55‒65 years. Further well-designed studies are needed to validate this result.

How to improve the outcomes of elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients through allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

In recent years, with the gradual advancement of haploidentical transplantation technology, the availability of donors has increased significantly, along with the widespread use of reduced-intensity conditioning and the improvement of nursing techniques, giving more elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients the chance to receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We have summarized the classic and recently proposed pre-transplant assessment methods and assessed the various sources of donors, conditioning regimens, and post-transplant complication management based on the outcomes of large-scale clinical studies for elderly AML patients.

Curcumin combined with arsenic trioxide in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia: network pharmacology analysis and experimental validation

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of curcumin by co-administration of arsenic trioxide (As₂O₃) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment, using network pharmacology and experimental validation.

METHODS

Using Pubchem database, Traditional Chinese Medicine Information Database (TCMID) database, and Swiss target prediction database to predict compound-related targets, AML-associated targets were determined using GeneCards and Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) databases. We identify overlapping common targets by comparing Compounds-related and AML-associated targets and using these targets to perform GO and KEGG functional enrichment analyses. Subsequently, these targets were input into the STRING database, and we used Cytoscape to construct protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. Finally, we used KG1-a cells and the AML mouse model to measure the anti-leukemia effects of curcumin and As₂O₃ and their combination.

RESULTS

Compounds and targets screening hinted that 85 intersection targets were predicted in the curcumin treatment of AML, 75 targets in the As₂O₃ treatment of AML, and 48 targets in the curcumin combined with the As₂O₃ treatment of AML. GO and KEGG analyses indicated that the top 10 enriched biological processes and top 20 pathways implicated in the therapeutic effects of curcumin and As₂O₃ on AML, respectively. In addition, network pharmacology screening revealed STAT3, TP53, EP300, MAPK1, and PIK3CA as the top five genes in PPI network of curcumin treatment of AML and TP53, MAPK3, MAPK1, STAT3, and SRC as the top five genes in PPI network of As₂O₃ treatment of AML. Moreover, the in vitro experiment demonstrated that curcumin combined with As₂O₃ inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis in KG1-a cells, and this effect is more substantial than curcumin or As₂O₃ alone. Mechanistically, the curcumin combined with As₂O₃ significantly down-regulated the protein expression of JAK2, STAT3, and Bcl-2, and up-regulated the levels of P53, P27, and Bax. In the mouse model, the survival time of mice in each administration group was drawn out to varying degrees, with the most significant prolongation in the curcumin combined with the As₂O₃ group.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested that curcumin and As₂O₃ combination therapy exerts more significant anti-leukemia effects in the treatment of AML than curcumin or As₂O₃ monotherapy by up-regulating p53 pathway and down-regulating the JAK2/STAT3 pathway.

Clinical efficacy of azacytidine and venetoclax and prognostic impact of Tim-3 and galectin-9 in acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: A single-center real-life experience

Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is difficult in older patients with comorbidities and high-risk disease factors. Venetoclax, the first-in-class Bcl-2 inhibitor, has proven efficacy and safety in combination with azacytidine for treatment of high-risk myeloid diseases. In this single-center real-life retrospective study, a total of 27 consecutive patients treated with azacytidine plus venetoclax were included, and clinical outcomes, hematological improvements, and biomarkers of responsiveness to therapy were compared to those observed in an historical cohort of 95 consecutive patients treated with azacytidine as single agent. Azacytidine plus venetoclax was effective and safe in older and frail AML and high-risk MDS patients, with median overall survival of 22.3 months, higher than that reported in phase III trial (14.7 months), and higher than that of historical cohort (5.94 months). Progression-free survival was higher in patients treated with the drug combination compared to those treated with azacytidine as single agent (p = 0.0065). Clinical benefits might increase when azacytidine and venetoclax are administered as upfront therapy (p = 0.0500). We showed that Tim-3 expression could be a promising therapeutic target in refractory/relapsed patients, and galectin-9 a biomarker of responsiveness to therapy. Moreover, patients treated with azacytidine and venetoclax displayed a higher overall survival regardless the presence of negative prognostic markers at diagnosis (e.g., increased WT1 copies and/or normalized blast count). These encouraging results in a real-world setting supported efficacy and safety of azacytidine plus venetoclax as upfront therapy in AML and high-risk MDS, with clinical outcomes comparable to those of clinical trials when an appropriate venetoclax management with bone marrow assessment at every first, second, fourth, and eighth cycle, and dose adjustments for toxicities are performed.

Venetoclax with decitabine versus decitabine monotherapy in elderly acute myeloid leukemia: a propensity score-matched analysis

Venetoclax (VEN) combined with azacitidine (AZA) or decitabine (DEC) has been approved for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) unfit for intensive chemotherapy based on the pivotal VIALE-A trial. However, this trial only compared AZA + VEN with AZA monotherapy. Therefore, we compared the outcomes of consecutive older adults (65 years or older) with newly diagnosed AML who received DEC (n = 230) or DEC + VEN (n = 74) after propensity score matching to construct a one-to-one matched cohort by the nearest neighbor algorithm. The median overall survival was longer in the DEC + VEN group than in the DEC group (13.4 months vs. 8.3 months, p = 0.01). The median event-free survivals were 8.6 and 5.8 months in the DEC + VEN and DEC groups, respectively (p = 0.02). The response rate (complete response, complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery, and morphologic leukemia-free state) was significantly higher in the DEC + VEN group than in the DEC group (70.3% vs. 24.3%, p < 0.01). The 30-day (2.7% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.17) and 60-day (9.5% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.16) mortality rates did not differ between the two groups, nor did the median hospitalization and transfusion rates (hospitalization: 23 days vs. 21 days, p = 0.20; red blood cells: 3.2 units/month vs. 3.5 units/month, p = 0.73; platelets: 2.7 units/month vs. 2.3 units/months, p = 0.48). Of those who received DEC + VEN and became leukemia-free, 29% underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation and had excellent survival outcomes (one-year survival: 79.4%; one-year non-relapse mortality: 13.3%). This study is the first to provide real-world evidence that DEC + VEN has superior outcomes to DEC monotherapy.

The path to venetoclax resistance is paved with mutations, metabolism, and more

Venetoclax is a B cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2)-selective antagonist used to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Although this has been a promising therapeutic option for these patients, many of these patients develop resistance and relapsed disease. Here, we summarize the emerging mechanisms of resistance to venetoclax treatment, discuss the promising combination strategies, and highlight the combinations that are currently in clinical trials. Efforts to understand mechanisms of resistance are critical to advance the development of new targeted therapeutic strategies and further our understanding of the biological functions of BCL-2 in tumor cells.

Promising therapeutic aspects in human genetic imprinting disorders

Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon of monoallelic gene expression pattern depending on parental origin. In humans, congenital imprinting disruptions resulting from genetic or epigenetic mechanisms can cause a group of diseases known as genetic imprinting disorders (IDs). Genetic IDs involve several distinct syndromes sharing homologies in terms of genetic etiologies and phenotypic features. However, the molecular pathogenesis of genetic IDs is complex and remains largely uncharacterized, resulting in a lack of effective therapeutic approaches for patients. In this review, we begin with an overview of the genomic and epigenomic molecular basis of human genetic IDs. Notably, we address ethical aspects as a priority of employing emerging techniques for therapeutic applications in human IDs. With a particular focus, we delineate the current field of emerging therapeutics for genetic IDs. We briefly summarize novel symptomatic drugs and highlight the key milestones of new techniques and therapeutic programs as they stand today which can offer highly promising disease-modifying interventions for genetic IDs accompanied by various challenges.

The Growing Role of the BH3 Mimetic Drug Venetoclax in the Therapy of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Despite recent progress, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a disease associated with poor prognosis, particularly in older AML patients unfit to tolerate intensive chemotherapy treatment. The development and introduction in the therapy of Venetoclax (VEN), a potent BH3 mimetic targeting the antiapoptotic protein BCL-2, inducing apoptosis of leukemic cells, has shown to be a promising treatment for newly diagnosed, relapsed, and refractory AML patients ineligible for induction chemotherapy. Combination treatments using Ventoclax and a hypomethylating agent (azacitidine or decitabine) or low-intensity chemotherapy have shown in newly diagnosed patients variable response rates, with highly responsive patients with NPM1, IDH1-IDH2, TET2, and RUNX1 mutations and with scarcely responsive patients with FLT3, TP53 and ASXL1 mutations, complex karyotypes, and secondary AMLs. Patients with refractory/relapsing disease are less responsive to Venetoclax-based regimens. However, in the majority of patients, the responses have only a limited duration, and the development of resistance is frequently observed. Therefore, understanding the resistance mechanisms is crucial for developing new strategies and identifying rational drug combination regimens. In this context, two strategies seem to be promising: (i) triplet therapies based on the combined administration of Venetoclax, a hypomethylating agent (or low-dose chemotherapy), and an agent targeting a specific genetic alteration of leukemic cells (i.e., FLT3 inhibitors in FLT3-mutated AMLs) or an altered signaling pathway; (ii) combination therapies based on the administration of two BH3 mimetics (i.e., BCL-2 +MCL-1 mimetics) and a hypomethylating agent.

The Role of N6-Methyladenosine Modification in Microvascular Dysfunction

Microvascular dysfunction (MVD) has long plagued the medical field despite improvements in its prevention, diagnosis, and intervention. Microvascular lesions from MVD increase with age and further lead to impaired microcirculation, target organ dysfunction, and a mass of microvascular complications, thus contributing to a heavy medical burden and rising disability rates. An up-to-date understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying MVD will facilitate discoveries of more effective therapeutic strategies. Recent advances in epigenetics have revealed that RNA methylation, an epigenetic modification, has a pivotal role in vascular events. The N⁶-methylation of adenosine (m⁶A) modification is the most prevalent internal RNA modification in eukaryotic cells, which regulates vascular transcripts through splicing, degradation, translation, as well as translocation, thus maintaining microvascular homeostasis. Conversely, the disruption of the m⁶A regulatory network will lead to MVD. Herein, we provide a review discussing how m⁶A methylation interacts with MVD. We also focus on alterations of the m⁶A regulatory network under pathological conditions. Finally, we highlight the value of m⁶A regulators as prognostic biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets, which might be a promising addition to clinical medicine.

Machine Learning–Based Exploratory Clinical Decision Support for Newly Diagnosed Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated With 7 + 3 Type Chemotherapy or Venetoclax/Azacitidine

PURPOSE

There are currently limited objective criteria to help assist physicians in determining whether an individual patient with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is likely to do better with induction with either standard 7 + 3 chemotherapy or targeted therapy with venetoclax plus azacitidine. The study goal was to address this need by developing exploratory clinical decision support methods.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Univariable and multivariable analysis as well as comparison of a range of machine learning (ML) predictors were performed using cohorts of 120 newly diagnosed 7 + 3-treated AML patients compared with 101 venetoclax plus azacitidine–treated patients.

RESULTS

A variety of features in the two patient cohorts were identified that may potentially correlate with short- and long-term outcomes, toxicities, and other considerations. A subset of these diagnostic features was then used to develop ML-based predictors with relatively high areas under the curve of short- and long-term outcomes, hospital stays, transfusion requirements, and toxicities for individual patients treated with either venetoclax/azacitidine or 7 + 3.

CONCLUSION

Potential ML-based approaches to clinical decision support to help guide individual patients with newly diagnosed AML to either 7 + 3 or venetoclax plus azacitidine induction therapy were identified. Larger cohorts with separate test and validation studies are necessary to confirm these initial findings.

Recent applications of covalent chemistries in protein-protein interaction inhibitors

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are large, often featureless domains whose modulations by small-molecules are challenging. Whilst there are some notable successes, such as the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax, the requirement for larger ligands to achieve the desired level of potency and selectivity may result in poor "drug-like" properties. Covalent chemistry is presently enjoying a renaissance. In particular, targeted covalent inhibition (TCI), in which a weakly electrophilic "warhead" is installed onto a protein ligand scaffold, is a powerful strategy to develop potent inhibitors of PPIs that are smaller/more drug-like yet have enhanced affinities by virtue of the reinforcing effect on the existing non-covalent interactions by the resulting protein-ligand covalent bond. Furthermore, the covalent bond delivers sustained inhibition, which may translate into significantly reduced therapeutic dosing. Herein, we discuss recent applications of a spectrum of TCIs, as well as covalent screening strategies, in the discovery of more effective inhibitors of PPIs using the HDM2 and BCL-2 protein families as case studies.

Scaffold hopping from indoles to indazoles yields dual MCL-1/BCL-2 inhibitors from MCL-1 selective leads

Overexpression of the anti-apoptotic BCL-2 proteins is associated with the development and progression of a range of cancers. Venetoclax, an FDA-approved BCL-2 inhibitor, is fast becoming the standard-of-care for acute myeloid leukemia and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. However, the median survival offered by venetoclax is only 18 months (as part of a combination therapy regimen), and one of the primary culprits for this is the concomitant upregulation of sister anti-apoptotic proteins, in particular MCL-1 (and BCL-xL), which provides an escape route that manifests as venetoclax resistance. Since inhibition of BCL-xL leads to thrombocytopenia, we believe that a dual MCL-1/BCL-2 inhibitor may provide an enhanced therapeutic effect relative to a selective BCL-2 inhibitor. Beginning with a carboxylic acid-containing literature compound that is a potent inhibitor of MCL-1 and a moderate inhibitor of BCL-2, we herein describe our efforts to develop dual inhibitors of MCL-1 and BCL-2 by scaffold hopping from an indole core to an indazole framework. Subsequently, further elaboration of our novel N2-substituted, indazole-3-carboxylic acid lead into a family of indazole-3-acylsulfonamides resulted in improved inhibition of both MCL-1 and BCL-2, possibly through occupation of the p4 pocket, with minimal or no inhibition of BCL-xL.

Profile of Glasdegib for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): Evidence to Date

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematologic malignancy primarily affecting older adults. Historically, the highest rates of response have been achieved with intensive induction chemotherapy; however, a significant portion of older or unfit adults with AML are unable to tolerate intensive therapy or have chemotherapy-resistant disease, creating a large need for active and less intensive treatment strategies. Glasdegib, an oral inhibitor of the transmembrane protein Smoothened (SMO) involved in the Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway, was approved in 2018 for older or unfit adults with AML and attained a role in clinical practice after showing an overall survival (OS) advantage when combined with the established agent low-dose cytarabine (LDAC). Since that time, however, several other highly active lower intensity therapies such as venetoclax plus a hypomethylating agent (HMA) have garnered a dominant role in the treatment of this patient population. In this review, we summarize the role of glasdegib in the current treatment landscape of newly diagnosed AML and discuss ongoing investigations into its role in novel combination therapies.

Isolated leukemia cutis as extramedullary relapse of acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) arises from clonal expansion of malignant hematopoietic precursor cells in the bone marrow. In rare instances, AML can recur with prominent extramedullary manifestations (i.e., leukemia cutis or myeloid sarcoma), either simultaneously or preceding marrow involvement, or as a sole site of primary disease relapse.

How Genetics Can Drive Initial Therapy Choices for Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

OPINION STATEMENT

Treatment of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is challenging. Therapy decisions must be guided by multiple factors including aging-related conditions (e.g., comorbidities, functional impairment), therapy benefits and risks, patient preferences, and disease characteristics. Balancing these factors requires understanding the unique, and frequently higher-risk cytogenetic and molecular characteristics of AML in older adult populations, which should caution providers not to reduce therapy intensity on the basis of age alone. Instead, geriatric assessments should be employed to determine fitness for therapy. Treatment options in AML are increasingly targeted to specific mutations or recognized to have differential benefits on the basis of genomics, and representation of older adults and geriatric outcome reporting in clinical trials is improving. Additionally, newer studies have begun to explore personalized therapy strategies on the basis of initial genetic testing. Review and refinement of practice guidelines for older patients on the basis of these advances is needed and is anticipated to remain an important topic in ongoing hematology/oncology clinical education.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Venetoclax in Combination with Azacitidine Versus Azacitidine Monotherapy in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who are Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: From a US Third Party Payer Perspective

OBJECTIVES

Using individual patient-level data from the phase 3 VIALE-A trial, this study assessed the cost-effectiveness of venetoclax in combination with azacitidine compared with azacitidine monotherapy for patients newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, from a United States (US) third-party payer perspective.

METHODS

A partitioned survival model with a 28-day cycle and three health states (event-free survival (EFS), progressive/relapsed disease, and death) was developed to estimate costs and effectiveness of venetoclax + azacitidine versus azacitidine over a lifetime (25-year) horizon. Efficacy inputs (overall survival (OS), EFS, and complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi) rate) were estimated using VIALE-A data. Best-fit parametric models per Akaike Information Criterion were used to extrapolate OS until reaching EFS and extrapolate EFS until Year 5. Within EFS, the time spent in CR/CRi was estimated by applying the CR/CRi rate to the EFS curve. Past Year 5, patients still in EFS were considered cured and to have the same mortality as the US general population. Mean time on treatment (ToT) for both regimens was based on the time observed in VIALE-A. Costs of drug acquisition, drug administration (initial and subsequent treatments), subsequent stem cell transplant procedures, adverse events (AEs), and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) associated with health states were obtained from the literature/public data and inflated to 2021 US dollars. Health state utilities were estimated using EuroQol-5 dimension-5 level data from VIALE-A; AE disutilities were obtained from the literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per life-year (LY) and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained were estimated. Deterministic sensitivity analyses (DSA), scenario analyses, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were also performed.

RESULTS

Over a lifetime horizon, venetoclax + azacitidine versus azacitidine led to gains of 1.89 LYs (2.99 vs. 1.10, respectively) and 1.45 QALYs (2.30 vs. 0.84, respectively). Patients receiving venetoclax + azacitidine incurred higher total lifetime costs ($250,486 vs. $110,034 (azacitidine)). The ICERs for venetoclax + azacitidine versus azacitidine were estimated at $74,141 per LY and $96,579 per QALY gained. Results from the DSA and scenario analyses supported the base-case findings, with ICERs ranging from $60,718 to $138,554 per QALY gained. The results were most sensitive to varying the parameters for the venetoclax + azacitidine base-case EFS parametric function (Gompertz), followed by alternative approaches for ToT estimation, treatment costs of venetoclax + azacitidine, standard mortality rate value and ToT estimation, alternative sources to inform HRU, different cure modeling assumptions, and the parameters for the venetoclax + azacitidine base-case OS parametric function (log-normal). Results from the PSA showed that, compared with azacitidine, venetoclax + azacitidine was cost-effective in 99.9% of cases at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that venetoclax + azacitidine offers a cost-effective strategy in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed AML who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy from a US third-party payer perspective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02993523. Date of registration: 15 December 2016.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of many solid tumors, with limited progress made in the area of myeloid malignancies. The low mutational burden of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is one potential reason behind the lack of activity of T-cell harnessing ICIs, particularly CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors. Innate immune checkpoints play a critical role in the immune escape of AML and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The CD47 targeting agent, magrolimab, has shown promising activity when combined with azacitidine in early phase trials conducted in AML and higher-risk MDS, especially among patients harboring a TP53 mutation. Similarly, sabatolimab (an anti-TIM-3 monoclonal antibody) plus hypomethylating agents have shown durable responses in higher-risk MDS and AML in early clinical trials. Randomized trials are currently ongoing to confirm the efficacy of these agents. In this review, we will present the current progress and future directions of immune checkpoint inhibition in AML and MDS.