Combination of CD19 and CD22 CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic transplantation

Efficacy and risk of donor-derived CAR-T treatment of relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The one-year survival rate for patients experiencing a relapse of B-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia (B-ALL) following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is approximately 30%. Patients experiencing a relapse after allogeneic HSCT frequently encounter difficulties in obtaining autologous CAR-T products. We conducted a study involving 14 patients who received donor-derived CAR-T therapy for relapsed B-ALL following HSCT between August 2019 and May 2023 in our center. The results revealed a CR/CRi rate of 78.6% (11/14), a GVHD rate of 21.4% (3/14), and a 1-year overall survival (OS) rate of 56%. Decreased bone marrow donor cell chimerism in 9 patients recovered after CAR-T therapy. The main causes of death were disease progression and infection. Further analysis showed that GVHD (HR 7.224, 95% CI 1.42-36.82, P = 0.017) and platelet recovery at 30 days (HR 6.807, 95% CI 1.61-28.83, P = 0.009) are significantly associated with OS after CAR-T therapy. Based on the findings, we conclude that donor-derived CAR-T cells are effective in treating relapsed B-ALL patients following HSCT. Additionally, GVHD and poor platelet recovery impact OS, but further verification with a larger sample size is needed.

Effect of sustained measurable residue disease negativity and post-remission treatment selection on the prognosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults

BACKGROUND

To explore the effects of monitoring measurable residual disease and post-remission treatment selection on the clinical outcomes of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) in adults.

METHODS

Between September 2010 and January 2022, adult patients with B-ALL who received combination chemotherapy, with or without allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), were included in the retrospective study, which was approved by the Ethics Committee and the observation of Declaration of Helsinki conditions.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-three B-ALL patients achieved complete remission (CR) were included in the study, of whom 94 patients (65.7%) received allo-HSCT in first complete remission (CR1). Multivariate analysis showed that the most powerful factors affecting OS were transplantation (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.540, p = 0.037) and sustained measurable residue disease (MRD) negativity (HR = 0.508, p = 0.037). The subgroup analysis showed that the prognosis of the allo-HSCT group was better than that of the chemotherapy group, regardless of whether MRD was negative or positive after two courses of consolidation therapy. After consolidation therapy, the prognosis of patients with positive MRD remained significantly better in the allo-HSCT group than in the chemotherapy group. However, no significant difference was observed in the prognosis between the allo-HSCT and chemotherapy groups with negative MRD after consolidation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

B-ALL patients who achieve sustained MRD negativity during consolidation therapy have excellent long-term outcomes even without allo-HSCT. Allo-HSCT is associated with a significant benefit in terms of OS and DFS for patients who were with positive MRD during consolidation therapy.

The role of chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting more than one antigen in the treatment of B-cell malignancies

Several products containing chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting CD19 (CART19) have been approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Despite very impressive response rates, a significant percentage of patients experience disease relapse and die of progressive disease. A major cause of CART19 failure is loss or downregulation of CD19 expression in tumour cells, which has prompted a myriad of novel strategies aimed at targeting more than one antigen (e.g. CD19 and CD20 or CD22). Dual targeting can the accomplished through co-administration of two separate products, co-transduction with two different vectors, bicistronic cassettes or tandem receptors. In this manuscript, we review the pros and cons of each strategy and the clinical results obtained so far.

Case report: Preventive infusion of donor-derived CD7 chimeric antigen receptor T cells after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T) targeting CD7 for T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL/LBL) showed promising efficacy and safety in some clinical trials. However, most of them were bridged with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We described successful treatment with preventive donor-derived anti-CD7 CAR-T therapy in a case of refractory T lymphoblastic lymphoma following allo-HSCT, who could not receive autologous anti-CD7 CAR-T products due to the low-quality of T lymphocytes. To date, the patient's complete remission has persisted for 20 months after HSCT.

High yield killing of lymphoma cells by anti-CD22 CAR-NK cell therapy

Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) offer a promising new approach for targeting B cell malignancies through the immune system. Despite the proven effectiveness of CAR T cells targeting CD19 and CD22 in hematological malignancies, it is imperative to note that their production remains a highly complex process. Unlike T cells, NK cells eliminate targets in a non-antigen-specific manner while avoiding graft vs. host disease (GvHD). CAR-NK cells are considered safer than CAR-T cells because they have a shorter lifespan and produce less toxic cytokines. Due to their unlimited ability to proliferate in vitro, NK-92 cells can be used as a source for CAR-engineered NK cells. We found that CARs created from the m971 anti-CD22 mAb, which specifically targets a proximal CD22 epitope, were more effective at anti-leukemic activity compared to those made with other binding domains. To further enhance the anti-leukemic capacity of NK cells, we used lentiviral transduction to generate the m971-CD28-CD3ζ NK-92. CD22 is highly expressed in B cell lymphoma. To evaluate the potential of targeting CD22, Raji cells were selected as CD22-positive cells. Our study aimed to investigate CD22 as a potential target for CAR-NK-92 therapy in the treatment of B cell lymphoma. We first generated m971-CD28-CD3ζ NK-92 that expressed a CAR for binding CD22 in vitro. Flow cytometric analysis was used to evaluate the expression of CAR. The 7AAD determined the cytotoxicity of the m971-CD28-CD3ζ NK-92 towards target lymphoma cell lines by flow cytometry assay. The ELISA assay evaluated cytokine production in CAR NK-92 cells in response to target cells. The m971-CD28-CD3ζ NK-92 cells have successfully expressed the CD22-specific CAR. m971-CD28-CD3ζ NK-92 cells efficiently lysed CD22-expressing lymphoma cell lines and produced large amounts of cytokines such as IFN-γ and GM-CSF but a lower level of IL-6 after coculturing with target cells. Based on our results, it is evident that transferring m971-CD28-CD3ζ NK-92 cells could be a promising immunotherapy for B cell lymphoma.

Quartic CAR-T Cell Bridging to Twice Allo-HSCT Therapy in a Patient with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Introduction

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is an effective bridging treatment for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, repetitive CAR-T cell therapy and allo-HSCT can only be performed in a few patients because of technical difficulties and patients' physical, economic, and social conditions.

Case Presentation

A 23-year-old female patient with second relapsed B-cell ALL (B-ALL) underwent human-murine chimeric CD19 CAR-T cell therapy twice, human-murine chimeric CD22 CAR-T cell therapy once, and humanized CD19 CAR-T cell therapy once. Moreover, she was sequentially bridged to her mother donor allo-HSCT once and cousin donor allo-HSCT once.

Conclusion

Repetitive CAR-T cell therapy bridging to repetitive allo-HSCT is still a safe and active therapeutic strategy for patients with relapsed or refractory ALL.

[Safety and efficacy of donor-derived chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation]

Objective: To investigated the safety and efficacy of donor-derived CD19+ or sequential CD19+ CD22+ chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Methods: The data of 22 patients with B-ALL who relapsed after allo-HSCT and who underwent donor-derived CAR-T therapy at the Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University and the 920th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of the People's Liberation Army of China from September 2015 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were event-free survival (EFS), complete remission (CR) rate, and Grade 3-4 adverse events. Results: A total of 81.82% (n=18) of the 22 patients achieved minimal residual disease-negative CR after CAR-T infusion. The median follow-up time was 1037 (95% CI 546-1509) days, and the median OS and EFS were 287 (95% CI 132-441) days and 212 (95% CI 120-303) days, respectively. The 6-month OS and EFS rates were 67.90% (95% CI 48.30%-84.50%) and 58.70% (95% CI 37.92%-79.48%), respectively, and the 1-year OS and EFS rates were 41.10% (95% CI 19.15%-63.05%) and 34.30% (95% CI 13.92%-54.68%), respectively. Grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome occurred in 36.36% (n=8) of the patients, and grade 3-4 occurred in 13.64% of the patients (n=3). Grade 2 and 4 graft-versus-host disease occurred in two patients. Conclusion: Donor-derived CAR-T therapy is safe and effective in patients with relapsed B-ALL after allo-HSCT.

CD19/CD22 targeting with cotransduced CAR T cells to prevent antigen-negative relapse after CAR T-cell therapy for B-cell ALL

ABSTRACT

CD19-negative relapse is a leading cause of treatment failure after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. We investigated a CAR T-cell product targeting CD19 and CD22 generated by lentiviral cotransduction with vectors encoding our previously described fast-off rate CD19 CAR (AUTO1) combined with a novel CD22 CAR capable of effective signaling at low antigen density. Twelve patients with advanced B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia were treated (CARPALL [Immunotherapy with CD19/22 CAR Redirected T Cells for High Risk/Relapsed Paediatric CD19+ and/or CD22+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia] study, NCT02443831), a third of whom had failed prior licensed CAR therapy. Toxicity was similar to that of AUTO1 alone, with no cases of severe cytokine release syndrome. Of 12 patients, 10 (83%) achieved a measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative complete remission at 2 months after infusion. Of 10 responding patients, 5 had emergence of MRD (n = 2) or relapse (n = 3) with CD19- and CD22-expressing disease associated with loss of CAR T-cell persistence. With a median follow-up of 8.7 months, there were no cases of relapse due to antigen-negative escape. Overall survival was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41%-91%) at 6 and 12 months. The 6- and 12-month event-free survival rates were 75% (95% CI, 41%-91%) and 60% (95% CI, 23%-84%), respectively. These data suggest dual targeting with cotransduction may prevent antigen-negative relapse after CAR T-cell therapy.

The Potential of Siglecs and Sialic Acids as Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Tumor Immunotherapy

The dysregulation of sialic acid is closely associated with oncogenesis and tumor progression. Most tumor cells exhibit sialic acid upregulation. Sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectins (Siglecs) are receptors that recognize sialic acid and are expressed in various immune cells. The activity of Siglecs in the tumor microenvironment promotes immune escape, mirroring the mechanisms of the well-characterized PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in cancer. Cancer cells utilize sialic acid-linked glycans to evade immune surveillance. As Siglecs exhibit similar mechanisms as the established immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), they are potential therapeutic targets for different forms of cancer, especially ICI-resistant malignancies. Additionally, the upregulation of sialic acid serves as a potential tumor biomarker. This review examines the feasibility of using sialic acid and Siglecs for early malignant tumor detection and discusses the potential of targeting Siglec-sialic acid interaction as a novel cancer therapeutic strategy.

Novel chimeric antigen receptor targets and constructs for acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Moving beyond CD19

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the second most common acute leukemia in adults with a poor prognosis with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell lineage ALL (B-ALL). Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown excellent response rates in RR B-ALL, but most patients relapse due to poor persistence of CAR T-cell therapy or other tumor-associated escape mechanisms. In addition, anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy causes several serious side effects such as cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. In this review, we will discuss novel CAR targets, CAR constructs, and various strategies to boost CARs for the treatment of RR B-ALL. In addition, we discuss a few novel strategies developed to reduce the side effects of CAR.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy treatment with lentiviral vector containing mini-dystrophin gene in vivo

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an incurable X-linked recessive genetic disease caused by mutations in the dystrophin gene. Many researchers aim to restore truncated dystrophin via viral vectors. However, the low packaging capacity and immunogenicity of vectors have hampered their clinical application. Herein, we constructed four lentiviral vectors with truncated and sequence-optimized dystrophin genes driven by muscle-specific promoters. The four lentiviral vectors stably expressed mini-dystrophin in C2C12 muscle cells in vitro. To estimate the treatment effect in vivo, we transferred the lentiviral vectors into neonatal C57BL/10ScSn-Dmdmdx mice through local injection. The levels of modified dystrophin expression increased, and their distribution was also restored in treated mice. At the same time, they exhibited the restoration of pull force and a decrease in the number of mononuclear cells. The remissions lasted 3-6 months in vivo. Moreover, no integration sites of vectors were distributed into the oncogenes. In summary, this study preliminarily demonstrated the feasibility and safety of lentiviral vectors with mini-dystrophin for DMD gene therapy and provided a new strategy to restore truncated dystrophin.

CAR-T Cell Therapy in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Treatment of refractory and relapsed (R/R) B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is an unmet medical need in both children and adults. Studies carried out in the last two decades have shown that autologous T cells engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) represent an effective technique for treating these patients. Antigens expressed on B-cells, such as CD19, CD20, and CD22, represent targets suitable for treating patients with R/R B-ALL. CD19 CAR-T cells induce a high rate (80-90%) of complete remissions in both pediatric and adult R/R B-ALL patients. However, despite this impressive rate of responses, about half of responding patients relapse within 1-2 years after CAR-T cell therapy. Allo-HSCT after CAR-T cell therapy might consolidate the therapeutic efficacy of CAR-T and increase long-term outcomes; however, not all the studies that have adopted allo-HSCT as a consolidative treatment strategy have shown a benefit deriving from transplantation. For B-ALL patients who relapse early after allo-HSCT or those with insufficient T-cell numbers for an autologous approach, using T cells from the original stem cell donor offers the opportunity for the successful generation of CAR-T cells and for an effective therapeutic approach. Finally, recent studies have introduced allogeneic CAR-T cells generated from healthy donors or unmatched, which are opportunely manipulated with gene editing to reduce the risk of immunological incompatibility, with promising therapeutic effects.

Donor-derived Anti-CD19 CAR T cells GC007g for relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic HSCT: a phase 1 trial

Background

Although chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells (CAR T) cell therapy has been widely reported in improving the outcomes of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), less research about the feasibility and safety of donor-derived CAR T after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) was reported.

Methods

This phase 1 clinical trial aims to evaluate safety and efficacy of donor-derived anti-CD19 CAR T cells (GC007g) in B-ALL patients who relapsed after allo-HSCT. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04516551.

Findings

Between 15 March 2021 and 19 May 2022, fifteen patients were screened, three patients were excluded due to withdraw of consent, donor's reason, and death, respectively. Patients received donor-derived CAR T cells infusions at 6 × 105/kg (n = 3) or 2 × 106/kg (n = 6) dose level. The median time from HSCT to relapse was 185 days (range, 81-2063). The median age of patients was 31 years (range 21-48). Seven patients (77.8%) had BCR-ABL fusion gene. CAR T cells expanded in vivo and the median time to reach Cmax was 9 days (range, 7-11). One patient had hyperbilirubinemia after GC007g infusion which was defined as a dose-limiting toxicity. All patients experienced CRS and hematological adverse events. Three patients had acute graft-versus-host-disease (grade I, n = 1; grade II, n = 1; grade IV, n = 1) and all resolved after treatment. They received CAR T cells from matched sister, haploidentical matched father and sisiter, respectively. At 28 days after infusion, all patients achieved complete remission with/without incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi/CR) with undetectable MRD. At a median follow-up of 475 days (range 322-732), seven patients remained in CR/CRi while two had CD19-negative relapse. The overall response rates (ORR) were 100% (9/9), 88.9% (8/9), and 75% (6/8) at 3 month, 6 month, and 12 month, respectively. The 1-year progression-free and overall survival were 77.8% and 85.7%, respectively.

Interpretation

GC007g expanded and induced durable remission in patients with B-ALL relapsed after allo-HSCT, with manageable safety profiles.

Funding

Gracell Biotechnologies Inc.

The Current State of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for B Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Over the past decade, CAR T cell therapy has transformed the treatment of relapsed or refractory B-ALL in children and adults. CD19-directed CAR T cells can induce complete remissions in a large majority of patients with B-ALL, and up to half of these patients will go on to maintain durable remissions. However, significant challenges remain for patients who relapse or do not respond. This review will discuss the history of CAR T cell therapy for B-ALL, the treatment considerations for CAR T cell recipients, and current clinical trials and future directions for CAR T cell therapy in B-ALL.

Exploratory study on the efficacy of bortezomib combining mitoxantrone or CD22-CAR T therapy targeting CD19-negative relapse after CD19-CAR T cell therapy with a simpler cell-line-based model

Target-negative relapse after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor engineered (CAR) T cell therapy for patients with B lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) presents limited treatment options with dismal outcomes. Although CD22-CAR T cells mediate similarly potent antineoplastic effects in patients with CD19dim or even CD19-negative relapse following CD19-directed immunotherapy, a high rate of relapse associated with diminished CD22 cell surface expression has also been observed. Therefore, it is unclear whether any other therapeutic options are available. Mitoxantrone has shown significant antineoplastic activity in patients with relapsed or refractory leukemia over the past decades, and in some cases, the addition of bortezomib to conventional chemotherapeutic agents has demonstrated improved response rates. However, whether this mitoxantrone and bortezomib combination therapy is effective for those patients who have relapsed B-ALL after receiving CD19-CAR T cell therapy remains to be elucidated. In this study, we established a cellular model system using a CD19-positive B-ALL cell line Nalm-6 to investigate the treatment options for CD19-negative relapsed B-ALL after CD19-CAR T cell therapy. In addition to CD22-CAR T therapy, we observed that the combination of bortezomib and mitoxantrone exhibited effective anti-leukemia activity in the CD19-negative Nalm-6 cell line by downregulating p-AKT and p-mTOR. These results suggest that this combination therapy is a possible option for target-negative refractory leukemia cells after CAR-T cell treatment.

[Treatment response of a two-dose regimen of dose-adjusted inotuzumab ozogamicin in relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia]

Objective: To observe the treatment response of a two-dose regimen of inotuzumab ozogamicin (inotuzumab), a monoclonal antibody targeting CD22, for patients with heavily treated relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL), including those failed or relapsed after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) -T-cell therapy. Methods: Pediatric and adult patients who received two doses of inotuzumab and who were evaluated after inotuzumab treatment were included. Antibody infusions were performed between March 2020 and September 2022. All patients expressed CD22 antigen as detected by flow cytometry (>80% leukemic cells displaying CD22) before treatment. For adults, the maximum dosage per administration was 1 mg (with a total of two administrations). For children, the maximum dosage per administration was 0.85 mg/m(2) (no more than 1 mg/dose; total of two administrations). The total dosage administered to each patient was less than the standard dosage of 1.8 mg/m(2). Results: Twenty-one patients with R/R B-ALL were included, including five children (<18 years old) and sixteen adults. Seventeen patients presented with 5.0% -99.0% leukemic blasts in the bone marrow/peripheral blood or with extramedullary disease, and four patients were minimal residual disease (MRD) -positive. Fourteen patients underwent both CD19 and CD22 CAR-T-cell therapy, four underwent CD19 CAR-T-cell therapy, and three underwent blinatumomab therapy. Eleven patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). After inotuzumab treatment, 14 of 21 patients (66.7% ) achieved a complete response (CR, one was MRD-positive CR), and all four MRD-positive patients turned MRD-negative. Four of six patients who failed recent CD22 CAR-T-cell therapy achieved a CR after subsequent inotuzumab treatment. Seven patients (33.3% ) demonstrated no response. Grade 1-3 hepatotoxicity occurred in five patients (23.8% ), one child with no response experienced hepatic veno-occlusive disease (HVOD) during salvage transplantation and recovered completely. Conclusion: For patients with heavily treated R/R B-ALL, including those who had undergone allo-HSCT and CD19/CD22 CAR-T-cell therapy, the two-dose regimen of inotuzumab resulted in a CR rate of 66.7%, and the frequency of hepatotoxicity and HVOD was low.

Differences in efficacy and safety among CAR-Ts anti-CD19/CD22, anti-CD19, and anti-CD22, in adult patients with relapse/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL) is a challenging disease with low rates of remission and survival in adult patients. Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cells (CAR-Ts) therapies have been approved for these patients. Dual-target CAR-Ts against CD19 and CD22 have recently been developed to improve the efficacy of the single-target therapy; however, extent of the improvement using this dual-target therapy has yet to be determined. We performed a meta-analysis of the outcome and safety of CAR-Ts, comparing anti-CD19 vs anti-CD22 vs dual-target anti-CD19/CD22 CAR-Ts, to elucidate the differences and limitations of these therapies in adult patients with R/R B-ALL. Although the limitations of our study derived from heterogeneity in the included publications, our results suggest that anti-CD19/CD22 CAR-Ts generate lower incidence of relapse and neurotoxicity, but similar results were obtained regarding complete remission, minimal residual disease, overall survival, and cytokine release syndrome compared with single-target anti-CD19 and anti-CD22 CAR-Ts.

Complete spectrum of adverse events associated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies have been approved by FDA to treat relapsed or refractory hematological malignancies. However, the adverse effects of CAR-T cell therapies are complex and can be challenging to diagnose and treat. In this review, we summarize the major adverse events, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and CAR T-cell associated HLH (carHLH), and discuss their pathophysiology, symptoms, grading, and diagnosis systems, as well as management. In a future outlook, we also provide an overview of measures and modifications to CAR-T cells that are currently being explored to limit toxicity.

Targeting CD22 for B-cell hematologic malignancies

CD19-targeted chimeric receptor antigen (CAR)-T cell therapy has shown remarkable clinical efficacy in the treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell malignancies. However, 30%-60% of patients eventually relapsed, with the CD19-negative relapse being an important hurdle to sustained remission. CD22 expression is independent of CD19 expression in malignant B cells. Consequently, CD22 is a potential alternative target for CD19 CAR-T cell-resistant patients. CD22-targeted therapies, mainly including the antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and CAR-T cells, have come into wide clinical use with acceptable toxicities and promising efficacy. In this review, we explore the molecular and physiological characteristics of CD22, development of CD22 ADCs and CAR-T cells, and the available clinical data on CD22 ADCs and CAR-T cell therapies. Furthermore, we propose some perspectives for overcoming tumor escape and enhancing the efficacy of CD22-targeted therapies.

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

The immune system plays a major role in preventing infections and cancers. Impairment in immunity may facilitate the development of neoplasia owing to defective immune surveillance, among other mechanisms. Immune evasion plays a significant role in relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT); one purported mechanism is through immune checkpoint signaling pathways. Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are FDA approved for relapsed classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma (cHL), primary mediastinal large B cell Lymphoma (PMBCL) and other solid tumors. Retrospective studies evaluating the outcomes of alloHCT after prior exposure to CPIs showed favorable survival outcomes but high rates of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD); the risk appears to be lower when using post-transplant cyclophosphamide as GVHD prophylaxis. CPIs have increasingly been used to prevent or treat post-alloHCT relapse. Available data, albeit limited, supports the clinical activity of CPIs in post-alloHCT relapse; however, serious and even fatal cases of GVHD have been reported. The optimal timing, schedule, dosing, and patients likely to benefit from this strategy are yet to be identified. In this review, we highlight the immune system's role in cancer surveillance and relapse prevention and discuss the current clinical evidence of CPIs use in post-alloHCT relapse.

Incidence of CD19-negative relapse after CD19-targeted immunotherapy in R/R BCP acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a review

There are inconsistencies in the reporting of CD19 antigen status following treatment with CD19-targeted therapies. A majority of evidence comes from studies reporting small sample sizes. In this review, we systematically summarize published studies that have reported rates of CD19-negative relapse after treatment with either blinatumomab or CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy and report the rates of CD19-negative relapse when evaluated in a standardized way across trials. CD19-negative relapse appears to occur more commonly in relapses following CAR T-cell therapy compared with blinatumomab, whether proportions are calculated among all treated patients (8.7% vs 4.5%) or among patients who relapse (30% vs 22.5%). The median (range) duration of follow-up was 29.3 (17.4-50.8) and 20.4 (6.9-49.0) months for publications on blinatumomab (n = 10) and CAR T-cell therapies (n = 23), respectively. There is a need for standardized reporting of CD19 antigen status in the setting of relapse following novel immunotherapies to inform clinical practice.

Effectiveness and safety of CD22 and CD19 dual-targeting chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of CD22 or CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells in the management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) was observed. Because antigen loss and lack of CAR-T-cell persistence are the leading causes of progressive disease following single-antigen targeting, we evaluated CD22/CD19 dual-targeting CAR-T-cell therapy efficacy and safety in relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies.

METHODS

The Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched until July 2022. Patients confirmed with any relapsed/refractory B-cell hematological malignancies were included regardless of age, gender, or ethnicity, receiving CD22 and CD19-dual-targeting CAR-T-cell therapy. The studies conducted on patients with coexisting other cancer were excluded. We used random-effect models to explore the outcome, and heterogeneity was investigated by subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies (405 patients) were included. The pooled overall response (OR) and complete remission (CR) were 97% and 93%, respectively, for ALL patients. The 1-year proportions of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 70% and 49%, respectively. For NHL, OR occurred in 85% of patients, and 57% experienced CR. The results illustrated that the 1-year OS and 1-year PFS were 77% and 65%, respectively. The subgroup analysis showed that the dual-targeting modality achieved higher CR in the following cases: coadministration of CD22/CD19-CAR-T cells and third-generation CAR-T cells combined with ASCT and BEAM pretreatment. The ALL and NHL groups seemed similar in treatment-related toxicity: all grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS), severe CRS, and neurotoxicity occurred in 86%, 7%, and 12% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the CD22/CD19 dual-targeting CAR-T-cell strategy has high efficiency with tolerable adverse effects in B-cell malignancies.

Donor-derived CAR-T therapy improves the survival of relapsed B-ALL after allogeneic transplantation compared with donor lymphocyte infusion

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy revolutionized treatment for various hematologic malignances. However, limited studies were reported to compare the efficacy and safety of CAR-T and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) for patients with relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) comprehensively. We conducted a single-center, retrospective comparative study that consisted of 12 patients who were treated with DLI (control group) and 12 patients treated with donor-derived CD19 CAR-T cells (experimental group, 6 patients also received CD22 or CD123 CAR-T cells sequentially) with 3 overlaps. The event-free survival (EFS) of patients in experimental group was superior to that of the control group: 516 days versus 98 days (p = 0.0415). Compared with 7 of 12 patients treated with DLI suffered grades III-IV acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD), one grade III aGVHD developed in patients treated with CAR-T therapy. No significant difference in the incidence of infection was identified between these two groups. Most patients in the experimental group had only mild cytokine release syndrome and none developed neurotoxicity. The univariate analysis of patients in the experiment group revealed that earlier CAR-T therapy for post-transplantation relapse was associated with better EFS. There was no significant difference in EFS between patients treated with dual-target CAR-T with those with single CD19 CAR-T. In this study, our data supported that donor-derived CAR-T therapy is a safe and potentially effective treatment for relapsed B-ALL after HSCT and may be superior to DLI.

Innate Immune Response to Viral Vectors in Gene Therapy

Viral vectors play a pivotal role in the field of gene therapy, with several related drugs having already gained clinical approval from the EMA and FDA. However, numerous viral gene therapy vectors are currently undergoing pre-clinical research or participating in clinical trials. Despite advancements, the innate response remains a significant barrier impeding the clinical development of viral gene therapy. The innate immune response to viral gene therapy vectors and transgenes is still an important reason hindering its clinical development. Extensive studies have demonstrated that different DNA and RNA sensors can detect adenoviruses, adeno-associated viruses, and lentiviruses, thereby activating various innate immune pathways such as Toll-like receptor (TLR), cyclic GMP-AMP synthase-stimulator of interferon genes (cGAS-STING), and retinoic acid-inducible gene I-mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (RLR-MAVS). This review focuses on elucidating the mechanisms underlying the innate immune response induced by three widely utilized viral vectors: adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, and lentivirus, as well as the strategies employed to circumvent innate immunity.

Challenges and new technologies in adoptive cell therapy

Adoptive cell therapies (ACTs) have existed for decades. From the initial infusion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes to the subsequent specific enhanced T cell receptor (TCR)-T and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies, many novel strategies for cancer treatment have been developed. Owing to its promising outcomes, CAR-T cell therapy has revolutionized the field of ACTs, particularly for hematologic malignancies. Despite these advances, CAR-T cell therapy still has limitations in both autologous and allogeneic settings, including practicality and toxicity issues. To overcome these challenges, researchers have focused on the application of CAR engineering technology to other types of immune cell engineering. Consequently, several new cell therapies based on CAR technology have been developed, including CAR-NK, CAR-macrophage, CAR-γδT, and CAR-NKT. In this review, we describe the development, advantages, and possible challenges of the aforementioned ACTs and discuss current strategies aimed at maximizing the therapeutic potential of ACTs. We also provide an overview of the various gene transduction strategies employed in immunotherapy given their importance in immune cell engineering. Furthermore, we discuss the possibility that strategies capable of creating a positive feedback immune circuit, as healthy immune systems do, could address the flaw of a single type of ACT, and thus serve as key players in future cancer immunotherapy.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: state-of-the-(C)ART and the road ahead

Autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has recently been added to the armamentarium in the battle against B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). In this review, we discuss the trials that led to US Food and Drug Administration approval of CAR T-cell therapies in patients with B-ALL. We evaluate the evolving role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in the CAR T-cell era and discuss lessons learned from the first steps with CAR T-cell therapy in ALL. Upcoming innovations in CAR technology, including combined and alternative targets and off-the-shelf allogeneic CAR T-cell strategies are presented. Finally, we envision the role that CAR T cells could take in the management of adult patients with B-ALL in the near future.

Which one is better for refractory/relapsed acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia: Single-target (CD19) or dual-target (tandem or sequential CD19/CD22) CAR T-cell therapy?

CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown great success against B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Tandem and sequential CD19/CD22 dual-target CAR T-cell therapies have been developed to reduce the possibility of CD19-negative relapse; however, the superior strategy is still uncertain. This study screened 219 patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL who were enrolled in clinical trials of either CD19 (NCT03919240) or CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy (NCT03614858). The complete remission (CR) rates in the single CD19, tandem CD19/CD22, and sequential CD19/CD22 groups were 83.0% (122/147), 98.0% (50/51), and 95.2% (20/21), respectively (single CD19 vs. tandem CD19/CD22, P = 0.006). Patients with high-risk factors achieved a higher rate of CR in the tandem CD19/CD22 group than in the single CD19 group (100.0% vs. 82.4%, P = 0.017). Tandem CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy was one of the significant favorable factors in the multivariate analysis of the CR rate. The incidence of adverse events was similar among the three groups. Multivariable analysis in CR patients showed that a low frequency of relapse, a low tumor burden, minimal residual disease-negative CR and bridging to transplantation were independently associated with better leukemia-free survival. Our findings suggested that tandem CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy obtains a better response than CD19 CAR T-cell therapy and a similar response to sequential CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy.

Biocompatibility evaluation of polyethersulfone-pyrolytic carbon composite membrane in artificial pancreas

Polyethersulfone (PES) membranes are widely used in medical devices, especially intravascular devices such as intravascular bioartificial pancreases. In the current work, the pure PES and PES-pyrolytic carbon (PyC) composite membranes were synthesized and permeability studies were conducted. In addition, the cytocompatibility and hemocompatibility of the pure PES and PES-PyC membranes were investigated. These materials were characterized using peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) activation, platelet activation, platelet adhesion, ß-cell viability and proliferation, and ß-cell response to hyperglycemia. The results showed that platelet activation decreased from 87.3% to 27.8%. Any alteration in the morphology of sticking platelets was prevented, and the number of attached platelets decreased by modification with PyC. The 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay corroborated that PBMC activation was encouraged by the PyC-modified PES membrane surface. It can be concluded that PES-modified membranes show higher hemocompatibility than pure PES membranes. ß-cells cultured on all the three membranes displayed a lower rate of proliferation although the cells on the PES-PyC (0.1 wt. %) membrane indicated a slightly higher viability and proliferation than those on the pure PES and PES-PyC (0.05 wt. %) membranes. It shows that the PES-PyC (0.1 wt. %) membrane possesses superior cytocompatibility over the other membranes.

Coadministration of CD19- and CD22-Directed Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Childhood B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Single-Arm, Multicenter, Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

We determined the safety and efficacy of coadministration of CD19- and CD22-chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in patients with refractory disease or high-risk hematologic or isolated extramedullary relapse of B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase II trial enrolled 225 evaluable patients age ≤ 20 years between September 17, 2019, and December 31, 2021. We first conducted a safety run-in stage to determine the recommended dose. After interim analysis of the first 30 patients treated (27 at the recommended dose) showing that the treatment was safe and effective, the study enrolled additional patients according to the study design.

RESULTS

Complete remission was achieved in 99.0% of the 194 patients with refractory leukemia or hematologic relapse, all negative for minimal residual disease. Their overall 12-month event-free survival (EFS) was 73.5% (95% CI, 67.3 to 80.3). Relapse occurred in 43 patients (24 with CD19+/CD22+ relapse, 16 CD19-/CD22+, one CD19-/CD22-, and two unknown). Consolidative transplantation and persistent B-cell aplasia at 6 months were associated with favorable outcomes. The 12-month EFS was 85.0% (95% CI, 77.2 to 93.6) for the 78 patients treated with transplantation and 69.2% (95% CI, 60.8 to 78.8) for the 116 nontransplanted patients (P = .03, time-dependent covariate Cox model). All 25 patients with persistent B-cell aplasia at 6 months remained in remission at 12 months. The 12-month EFS for the 20 patients with isolated testicular relapse was 95.0% (95% CI, 85.9 to 100), and for the 10 patients with isolated CNS relapse, it was 68.6% (95% CI, 44.5 to 100). Cytokine release syndrome developed in 198 (88.0%) patients, and CAR T-cell neurotoxicity in 47 (20.9%), resulting in three deaths.

CONCLUSION

CD19-/CD22-CAR T-cell therapy achieved relatively durable remission in children with relapsed or refractory B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia, including those with isolated or combined extramedullary relapse.

[Media: see text].

Efficacy and Safety of Dual-Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory B Cell Lymphoid Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Dual-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has been proposed as a potential solution for overcoming antigen escape during anti-CD19 CAR-T treatment. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of this novel treatment in patients with B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) and B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). We systematically searched relevant literature based on databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane) and conference abstracts. The primary outcomes measured were the best objective response rate (ORR) or complete response (CR), 12-month overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and neurotoxicity. Fifteen registered prospective open-label clinical trials were included. Among the 260 patients with B-NHL, the pooled best ORR and CR were 77% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.82) and 52% (95% CI: 0.40-0.63), respectively, and the pooled 12-month PFS and OS were 54.0% (95% CI: 0.47-0.61) and 66.0% (95% CI: 0.56-0.77), respectively. In the 159 patients with B-ALL, the combined best CR was observed to be 92% (95% CI: 0.82-0.99) and the pooled 12-month PFS and OS were 65.0% (95% CI: 0.51-0.77) and 73.0% (95% CI: 0.56-0.92), respectively. Moreover, in B-NHL patients, grade ≥3 CRS was observed in 14.0% (95% CI: 0.04-0.29) of these patients, and 5.0% (95% CI: 0.02-0.08) showed grade ≥3 neurotoxicity; in the case of B-ALL patients, grade ≥3 CRS and neurotoxicity occurred in 11.0% (95% CI: 0.04-0.19) and 2.0% (95% CI: 0.00-0.06), respectively. This study demonstrates the safety and clinical efficacy of dual-targeting CAR-T cell therapies in B cell malignancies. Further, well-designed randomized controlled trials are required to establish the role of dual-targeting CAR-T cell therapy in patients with B cell malignancies.

Safety and efficacy of autologous and allogeneic humanized CD19-targeted CAR-T cell therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL

BACKGROUND

Murine chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, the potential immunogenicity of the murine single-chain variable fragment domain may limit the persistence of CAR-T cell, leading to relapse.

METHODS

We performed a clinical trial to determine the safety and efficacy of autologous and allogeneic humanized CD19-targeted CAR-T cell (hCART19) for R/R B-ALL. Fifty-eight patients (aged 13-74 years) were enrolled and treated between February 2020 and March 2022. The endpoints were complete remission (CR) rate, overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and safety.

RESULTS

Overall, 93.1% (54/58) of patients achieved CR or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) by day 28, with 53 patients having minimal residual disease negativity. With a median follow-up of 13.5 months, the estimated 1-year OS and EFS were 73.6% (95% CI 62.1% to 87.4%) and 46.0% (95% CI 33.7% to 62.8%), with a median OS and EFS of 21.5 months and 9.5 months, respectively. No significant increase in human antimouse antibodies was observed following infusion (p=0.78). Duration of B-cell aplasia in the blood was observed for as long as 616 days, which was longer than that in our prior mCART19 trial. All toxicities were reversible, including severe cytokine release syndrome, which developed in 36% (21/58) of patients and severe neurotoxicity, which developed in 5% (3/58) of patients. Compared with our prior mCART19 trial, patients treated with hCART19 had longer EFS without increased toxicity. Additionally, our data also suggest that patients treated with consolidation therapy, including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or CD22-targeted CAR-T cell, following hCART19 therapy had a longer EFS than those without consolidation therapy.

CONCLUSION

hCART19 has good short-term efficacy and manageable toxicity in R/R B-ALL patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04532268.

Emerging Trends in Nano-Driven Immunotherapy for Treatment of Cancer

Despite advancements in the development of anticancer medications and therapies, cancer still has the greatest fatality rate due to a dismal prognosis. Traditional cancer therapies include chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy. The conventional treatments have a number of shortcomings, such as a lack of selectivity, non-specific cytotoxicity, suboptimal drug delivery to tumour locations, and multi-drug resistance, which results in a less potent/ineffective therapeutic outcome. Cancer immunotherapy is an emerging and promising strategy to elicit a pronounced immune response against cancer. Immunotherapy stimulates the immune system with cancer-specific antigens or immune checkpoint inhibitors to overcome the immune suppressive tumour microenvironment and kill the cancer cells. However, delivery of the antigen or immune checkpoint inhibitors and activation of the immune response need to circumvent the issues pertaining to short lifetimes and effect times, as well as adverse effects associated with off-targeting, suboptimal, or hyperactivation of the immune system. Additional challenges posed by the tumour suppressive microenvironment are less tumour immunogenicity and the inhibition of effector T cells. The evolution of nanotechnology in recent years has paved the way for improving treatment efficacy by facilitating site-specific and sustained delivery of the therapeutic moiety to elicit a robust immune response. The amenability of nanoparticles towards surface functionalization and tuneable physicochemical properties, size, shape, and surfaces charge have been successfully harnessed for immunotherapy, as well as combination therapy, against cancer. In this review, we have summarized the recent advancements made in choosing different nanomaterial combinations and their modifications made to enable their interaction with different molecular and cellular targets for efficient immunotherapy. This review also highlights recent trends in immunotherapy strategies to be used independently, as well as in combination, for the destruction of cancer cells, as well as prevent metastasis and recurrence.

Challenges and optimal strategies of CAR T therapy for hematological malignancies

ABSTRACT

Remarkable improvement relative to traditional approaches in the treatment of hematological malignancies by chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has promoted sequential approvals of eight commercial CAR T products within last 5 years. Although CAR T cells' productization is now rapidly boosting their extensive clinical application in real-world patients, the limitation of their clinical efficacy and related toxicities inspire further optimization of CAR structure and substantial development of innovative trials in various scenarios. Herein, we first summarized the current status and major progress in CAR T therapy for hematological malignancies, then described crucial factors which possibly compromise the clinical efficacies of CAR T cells, such as CAR T cell exhaustion and loss of antigen, and finally, we discussed the potential optimization strategies to tackle the challenges in the field of CAR T therapy.

Prognostic factors of second hematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation among hematological malignancy patients relapsed after first hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A single center study

Introduction

We aimed to evaluate prognostic factors of a second allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT2) among hematological malignancy patients who have relapsed after the first allo-HSCT(allo-HSCT1).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 199 hematological malignancy patients who received allo-HSCT2 as a salvage treatment post allo-HSCT1 relapse between November 2012 and October 2021.

Results

The median age at allo-HSCT2 was 23 (range: 3-60) years. The median time to relapse after HSCT1 was 9 (range: 1-72) months. Prior to allo-HSCT2, patients had the following hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity indexes (HCT-CI): 127 with a score of 0, 52 with a score of 1, and 20 with a score of 2 or greater. Fifty percent of patients received chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy following HSCT1 relapse. Disease status was minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete remission (CR) among 119 patients, MRD-positive CR among 37 patients and non-remission (NR) for 43 patients prior to allo-HSCT2. Allo-HSCT2 was performed from a new donor in 194 patients (97.4%) and 134 patients (67.3%) received a graft with a new mismatched haplotype. The median follow-up time was 24 months (range: 6-98 months), and the 2-year OS and LFS were 43.8% ± 4.0% and 42.1% ± 4.1%, respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 30.0%±4.8% and 38.5%±3.8%, respectively. Cox regression multivariate analysis showed that disease statusof MRD-negative CR, HCT-CI score of 0 prior to allo-HSCT2, and new mismatched haplotype donor were predictive factors of improved OS and LFS compared to patients without these characteristics. Based on these three favorable factors, we developed a predictive scoring system for patients who received allo-HSCT2. Patients with a prognostic score of 3 who had the three factors showed a superior 2-year OS of 63.3% ± 6.7% and LFS of 63.3% ± 6.7% and a lower CIR of 5.5% ± 3.1% than patients with a prognostic score of 0. Allo-HSCT2 is feasible and patients with good prognostic features prior to allo-HSCT2 -disease status of CR/MRD- and HCT-CI score of 0 as well as a second donor with a new mismatched haplotype could have the maximal benefit from the second allo-HSCT.

Conclusions

Allo-HSCT2 is feasible and patients with good prognostic features prior to allo-HSCT2 -disease status of CR/MRD- and HCT-CI score of 0 as well as a second donor with a new mismatched haplotype could have the maximal benefit from the second allo-HSCT.

Failure of ALL recognition by CAR T cells: a review of CD 19-negative relapses after anti-CD 19 CAR-T treatment in B-ALL

The use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T lymphocytes in the treatment of refractory or relapsed (R/R) B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has meant a radical change in the prognosis of these patients, whose chances of survival with conventional treatment are very low. The current probability of event-free survival by R/R B-ALL patients treated using anti-CD 19 CART cell therapy is as high as 50-60% at 1.5 years, which is a very important advance for this group of very ill patients. Although most patients (70 to 94%) achieve complete remission (CR), the main problem continues to be relapse of the disease. Most relapses, both in clinical trials and real-world evidence, are due to failure of CAR-T cell expansion or limited CAR-T persistence. However, despite the adequate functioning of infused CART lymphocytes, the tumor cells of an important group of patients manage to evade CAR-T attack, resulting in a CD 19-negative relapse. Several mechanisms have been described that may be able to produce the escape of leukemic cells, such as acquired mutations and alternative splicing of the CD19 antigen, CD19 epitope loss or masking, leukemia lineage switching, and trogocytosis. In the present review, we comprehensively analyze the leukemic cell escape mechanisms, the incidence of CD19-negative relapse reported in clinical trials and real-world evidence (outside clinical trials), and provide an update on the main lines of current research into the prevention of leukemia evasion.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of CD22 CAR T-cells alone or in combination with CD19 CAR T-cells

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells are an emerging therapy for the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. While CD19 CAR-T cells have been FDA-approved, CAR T-cells targeting CD22, as well as dual-targeting CD19/CD22 CAR T-cells, are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CD22-targeting CAR T-cell therapies. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to March 3rd 2022 for full-length articles and conference abstracts of clinical trials employing CD22-targeting CAR T-cells in acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The primary outcome was best complete response (bCR). A DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model with arcsine transformation was used to pool outcome proportions. From 1068 references screened, 100 were included, representing 30 early phase studies with 637 patients, investigating CD22 or CD19/CD22 CAR T-cells. CD22 CAR T-cells had a bCR of 68% [95% CI, 53-81%] in ALL (n= 116), and 64% [95% CI, 46-81%] in NHL (n= 28) with 74% and 96% of patients having received anti-CD19 CAR T-cells previously in ALL and NHL studies respectively. CD19/CD22 CAR T-cells had a bCR rate of 90% [95% CI, 84-95%] in ALL (n= 297) and 47% [95% CI, 34-61%] in NHL (n= 137). The estimated incidence of total and severe (grade ≥3) CRS were 87% [95% CI, 80-92%] and 6% [95% CI, 3-9%] respectively. ICANS and severe ICANS had an estimated incidence of 16% [95% CI, 9-25%] and 3% [95% CI, 1-5%] respectively. Early phase trials of CD22 and CD19/CD22 CAR T-cells show high remission rates in ALL and NHL. Severe CRS or ICANS were (1)rare and dual-targeting did not increase toxicity. Variability in CAR construct, dose, and patient factors amongst studies limits comparisons, with long-term outcomes yet to be reported.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42020193027.

Efficacy and safety of CD22-specific and CD19/CD22-bispecific CAR-T cell therapy in patients with hematologic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

CD22 single and CD19/CD22 bispecific targeted chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy are promising immunotherapy modalities for the treatment of hematologic malignancies. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of CD22 and CD19/CD22 targeted CAR-T cell therapy by summarizing the existing evidence.

Methods

Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were comprehensively searched from inception up to November 30, 2022. Pooled response rates and minimal residual disease (MRD) negative response rates, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) rates and neurotoxicity rates were calculated. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the type of immunotherapy.

Results

Ten clinical studies including 194 patients with hematologic malignancies were included after a systematical screening of literature. The pooled complete response (CR) rates of CD22 and CD19/CD22 CAR-T cell therapy for relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) were 0.75 (95% CI: 0.60 - 0.88) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.76 - 0.96). The overall MRD negative response rates of CD22 and CD19/CD22 CAR-T were 0.54 (95% CI: 0.42 - 0.66) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.47 - 0.88). Pooled CRS rates of CD22 targeted and CD19/CD22 targeted immunotherapy were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.82 - 0.98) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.82 - 1.00), respectively.

Conclusion

Both CD22 and CD19/CD22 CAR-T immunotherapy demonstrated favorable efficacy and acceptable adverse events in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Well-designed and large sample-sized clinical trials are warranted.

Future development of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies for patients suffering from malignant glioma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has been successful in some haematologic malignancies, but the central nervous system (CNS) presents unique obstacles to its use against tumours arising therein. This review discusses recent improvements in the delivery and design of these cells to improve the efficacy and safety of this treatment against malignant gliomas.

RECENT FINDINGS

The immunosuppressive environment of the CNS affects the functionality of CAR T cells, but recent developments using metabolic manipulation and cytokine delivery have shown that the performance of CAR T cells can be improved in this environment. Emerging techniques can improve the delivery of CAR T cells to the CNS parenchyma, which is normally well protected from peripheral immune cells. The implementation of novel antigens and CAR-expression regulation strategies will improve the specificity and efficacy of these cells. Finally, although autologous T cells have historically been the standard, recent developments have made the use of allogeneic T cells or natural killer (NK) cells more clinically feasible.

SUMMARY

The discoveries highlighted in this review will aid the development of CAR cells that are safer, more resilient against immunosuppressive signals in the CNS, and able to specifically target intracranial tumour cells.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: What We Expect Soon

The treatment landscape for hematologic malignancies has changed since the recent approval of highly effective chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies (CAR-T). Moreover, more than 600 active trials are currently ongoing. However, early enthusiasm should be tempered since several issues are still unsolved and represent the challenges for the coming years. The lack of initial responses and early relapse are some hurdles to be tackled. Moreover, new strategies are needed to increase the safety profile or shorten the manufacturing process during CAR-T cells therapy production. Nowadays, most clinically evaluated CAR-T cells products are derived from autologous immune cells. The use of allogeneic CAR-T cells products generated using cells from healthy donors has the potential to change the scenario and overcome many of these limitations. In addition, CAR-T cells carry a high price tag, and there is an urgent need to understand how to pay for these therapies as many of today’s current payment systems do not feature the functionality to address the reimbursement gap. Finally, the clinical experience with CAR-T cells for solid tumors has been less encouraging, and development in this setting is desirable.

Tumor buster - where will the CAR-T cell therapy 'missile' go?

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell (CAR-T cell) therapy based on gene editing technology represents a significant breakthrough in personalized immunotherapy for human cancer. This strategy uses genetic modification to enable T cells to target tumor-specific antigens, attack specific cancer cells, and bypass tumor cell apoptosis avoidance mechanisms to some extent. This method has been extensively used to treat hematologic diseases, but the therapeutic effect in solid tumors is not ideal. Tumor antigen escape, treatment-related toxicity, and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) limit their use of it. Target selection is the most critical aspect in determining the prognosis of patients receiving this treatment. This review provides a comprehensive summary of all therapeutic targets used in the clinic or shown promising potential. We summarize CAR-T cell therapies’ clinical trials, applications, research frontiers, and limitations in treating different cancers. We also explore coping strategies when encountering sub-optimal tumor-associated antigens (TAA) or TAA loss. Moreover, the importance of CAR-T cell therapy in cancer immunotherapy is emphasized.

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy for cancer: clinical applications and practical considerations

Chimeric antigen receptor T cells have revolutionized the treatment of hematological malignancies during the past five years, boasting impressive response rates and durable remissions for patients who previously had no viable options. In this review, we provide a brief historical overview of their development. We focus on the practical aspects of a patient’s journey through this treatment and the unique toxicities and current best practices to manage those. We then discuss the key registration trials that have led to approvals for the treatment of relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and multiple myeloma. Finally, we consider the future development and research directions of this cutting edge therapy.

Combination strategies to optimize the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in haematological malignancies

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of haematological malignancies. However, resistance and relapse remain prominent limitations, and they are related to the limited persistence and efficacy of CAR T cells, downregulation or loss of tumour antigens, intrinsic resistance of tumours to death signalling, and immune suppressive microenvironment. Rational combined modality treatments are regarded as a promising strategy to further unlock the antitumor potential of CAR T cell therapy, which can be applied before CAR T cell infusion as a conditioning regimen or in ex vivo culture settings as well as concomitant with or after CAR T cell infusion. In this review, we summarize the combinatorial strategies, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, targeted therapies and other immunotherapies, in an effort to further enhance the effectiveness of this impressive therapy and benefit more patients.

CAR‐T therapy as a consolidation in remission B‐ALL patients with poor prognosis

Background

To date, almost all studies regarding chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)‐T cell therapy for B‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B‐ALL) were performed in refractory/relapsed (r/r) or minimal residual disease‐positive patients. CAR‐T therapy in remission patients has not been reported.

Aim

To observe the treatment outcome of CAR‐T cells for remission B‐ALL patients with poor prognosis.

Methods and Results

CAR‐T treatment was applied to two B‐ALL patients in remission status who had poor prognostic factors and refused transplantation, and one case was unable to accept standard chemotherapy owing to multiple complications. The procedure of CAR‐T therapy in these two remission patients was the same as that in r/r B‐ALL patients. Lentiviral vectors encoding second generation CARs composed of CD3ζ and 4‐1BB were used to produce CAR‐T cells. Lymphodepleting agents fludarabine and cyclophosphamide were administered prior to cell infusion. Grade I cytokine release syndrome occurred after each T‐cell infusion and there was no neurotoxicity. CAR‐T treatment followed by non‐intensive maintenance chemotherapy and targeted drugs allowed both patients to obtain a long‐term event‐free survival of more than three and a half years without transplantation.

Conclusions

CAR‐T therapy could be used in high‐risk B‐ALL patients as a consolidation to avoid transplantation, the combination of CAR‐T and following maintenance therapy may be better than CAR‐T alone for durable remission.

Understanding CAR T cell-tumor interactions: Paving the way for successful clinical outcomes

Since their approval 5 years ago, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have gained great importance in the daily clinical practice and treatment of hematological malignancies, although many challenges to their use remain, such as limited long-term CAR T cell efficacy due to disease resistance or recurrence. After a brief overview of CAR T cells, their approval, therapeutic successes, and ongoing limitations, this review discusses what is known about CAR T cell activation, their expansion and persistence, their mechanisms of cytotoxicity, and how the CAR design and/or tumor-intrinsic factors influence these functions. This review also examines the role of cytokines in CAR T cell-associated toxicity and their effects on CAR T cell function. Furthermore, we discuss several resistance mechanisms, including obstacles associated with CAR treatment of solid tumors. Finally, we provide a future outlook on next-generation strategies to further optimize CARs and improve clinical outcomes.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy: Current Status and Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Hematologic Malignancies

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy has transformed the treatment paradigm for pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), with complete remission rates in key pivotal CD19-CART trials ranging from 65% to 90%. Alongside this new therapy, new toxicity profiles and treatment limitations have emerged, necessitating toxicity consensus grading systems, cooperative group trials, and novel management approaches. This review highlights the results of key clinical trials of CART for pediatric hematologic malignancies, discusses the most common toxicities seen to date, and elucidates challenges, opportunities, and areas of active research to optimize this therapy.

Efficacy and safety of CD19 CAR-T cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an effective therapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Although allo-HSCT can be curative for some B-ALL patients, relapse still occurs in some patients following allo-HSCT. Conventional chemotherapies show poor efficacy in B-ALL patients who have relapsed following allo-HSCT. In the past decade, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has shown to be efficacious for B-ALL patients. In particular, autologous CD19 CAR-T therapy results in a high remission rate. However, there are challenges in the use of CD19 CAR-T therapy for B-ALL patients who have relapsed following allo-HSCT, including the selection of CAR-T cell source for manufacturing, post-CAR-T graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) risk, maintenance of long-term efficacy after remission through CAR-T therapy, and whether a consolidative second transplant is needed. In this review, we describe the current status of CAR-T therapy for B-ALL patients who have relapsed following allo-HSCT, the advantages and disadvantages of various CAR-T cell sources, the characteristics and management of GVHD following CAR-T therapy, and the risk factors that may affect long-term efficacy.