The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016 (J-SSCG 2016)

The prevalence of sepsis-induced coagulopathy in patients with sepsis - a secondary analysis of two German multicenter randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Sepsis and septic shock are frequently accompanied by coagulopathy. Since the sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) score was first described, subsequent studies from Asia revealed a SIC prevalence of 40-60%. In Europe, however, SIC prevalence in patients fulfilling sepsis criteria according to the third international consensus definition (SEPSIS-3) has not yet been evaluated.

METHODS

The Critical Care Trials Group of the German Sepsis Competence Network (SepNet) conducted a secondary analysis of two randomized controlled trials. Only patients fulfilling sepsis criteria according SEPSIS-3 were included in this secondary analysis. In a two step approach, SIC prevalence was determined in 267 patients with sepsis but not septic shock (at the time of inclusion) from the "Effect of Hydrocortisone on Development of Shock Among Patients With Severe Sepsis" (HYPRESS) trial. Then, we estimated SIC prevalence in 1,018 patients from the "Effect of Sodium Selenite Administration and Procalcitonin-Guided Therapy on Mortality in Patients With Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock" (SISPCT) trial using a simplified SIC score based on the platelet-SIC-subscore (PSSC). Study aims were to assess (i) the prevalence of SIC in patients with SEPSIS-3, (ii) the association of SIC with 90-day mortality and morbidity, (iii) the time when patients become SIC positive during the course of sepsis, and (iv) the value of the PSSC for predicting SIC.

RESULTS

In the HYPRESS trial, SIC prevalence was 22.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.5-27.5%). The estimated SIC prevalence in the SISPCT trial was 24.2% (95% CI 21.6-26.9%). In the HYPRESS trial, SIC was associated with significantly higher 90-day mortality (13.9% vs. 26.8%, p = 0.027) and morbidity. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, treatment arm, and (SIC-adapted) SOFA score confirmed the negative association of SIC with survival (p = 0.011). In the SISPCT trial, increased PSSCs were associated with higher 90-day mortality (PSSC 0: 34.4%, PSSC 1: 40.5%, PSSC 2: 53.3%; p < 0.001). In both trials, SIC was already present at sepsis diagnosis or occurred during the following 4 days.

CONCLUSIONS

SIC is a clinically relevant complication of sepsis. Although it might be less frequent than previously reported, its occurrence is associated with higher morbidity and mortality and should be interpreted as an early warning sign.

Management Strategies in Septic Coagulopathy: A Review of the Current Literature

One of the 'organs' that can be affected by sepsis is the coagulation system. Coagulopathy in sepsis may take the form of sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) or sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). It is important to identify SIC early, as at this stage of coagulopathy anticoagulants may be of the greatest benefit. The most recent diagnostic scoring systems for septic coagulopathy come from the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine. Recommendations regarding the management of septic coagulopathy differ between organizations. Moreover, septic coagulopathy is an area of intense research in recent years. Therefore we searched three databases to review the most recent management strategies in septic coagulopathy. The mainstream management strategies in septic coagulopathy include the causal treatment of sepsis, unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, antithrombin, and recombinant human thrombomodulin. The last two have been associated with the highest survival benefit. Nevertheless, the indiscriminate use of these anticoagulants should be avoided due to the lack of mortality benefit and increased risk of bleeding. The early diagnosis of SIC and monitoring of coagulation status during sepsis is crucial for the timely management and selection of the most suitable treatment at a time. New directions in septic coagulopathy include new diagnostic biomarkers, dynamic diagnostic models, genetic markers for SIC management, and new therapeutic agents. These new research avenues may potentially result in timelier SIC diagnosis and improved management of all stages of septic coagulopathy by making it more effective, safe, and personalized.

A case of disseminated intravascular coagulation of sepsis that caused extreme-thrombocytopenia treated at a remote-island-hospital

Sepsis is a critical syndrome and DIC often develops in severe septicemia. However, cares for severe patients are limited in remote hospitals. In addition, bad weather often makes medical evacuation difficult in such areas. A 66-year-old man had urinary tract infection by Escherichia coli, followed by septic shock and DIC rapidly just 2 days after the onset. He recovered in 3 weeks without any massive bleeding. Immediate insertion of the central venous catheter to maintain stable hemodynamics and Gram-staining for selecting antibiotics were considered essential techniques for the survival of sepsis patients even in remote hospitals.

Validation of Two Revised, Simplified Criteria for Assessing Sepsis-Associated Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in ICU Patients with Sepsis-3: A Retrospective Study

Objective

This study aimed to validate the performance of modified Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (m-JAAM) and simplified Japanese Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (s-JSTH) criteria in diagnosing coagulation disorders in sepsis and examine their prognostic value compared with sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) and International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) criteria.

Methods

This retrospective study included subjects diagnosed with sepsis (August 2020 to February 2021, n = 296). The m-JAAM, s-JSTH, SIC, and ISTH criteria were evaluated and compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and areas under the curve (AUCs).

Results

There was no significant difference in AUC for predicting in-hospital 28-day mortality by m-JAAM, s-JSTH, SCI, and ISTH criteria (0.745, 0.763, 0.760, and 0.730, respectively). The proportion of patients fulfilling the m-JAAM and SIC criteria was higher than that of the s-JSTH and ISTH criteria (43.2%, 56.1% vs. 25.0%, 22.6%, P &lt; .05).

Conclusion

The m-JAAM criteria might be more suitable for early-stage disseminated intravascular coagulation of sepsis than s-JSTH criteria.

Presepsin cut-off value for diagnosis of sepsis in patients with renal dysfunction

Presepsin is used as a marker for diagnosing sepsis, but its serum concentration is affected by renal function. We investigated the effect of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) determined by creatinine on the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin to identify the optimal cut-off value in patients with renal dysfunction. A total of 834 patients aged ≥18 years with serum presepsin and creatinine measured on the same day over a period of 1 year were included. Sepsis was diagnosed in three ways: sepsis-1, sepsis-3, and clinical diagnosis (Sep-C). Presepsin showed a significant negative correlation with eGFR (r = −0.55, p<0.01), with median and interquartile ranges of presepsin values for patients in each eGFR category as follows: ≥90, 263 (169–460); ≥60–<90, 309 (205–578); ≥45–<60, 406 (279–683); ≥30–<45, 605 (379–1109); ≥15–<30, 1027 (675–1953); <15, 1977 (1199–3477); and on hemodialysis, 3964 (2343–6967). In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) for sepsis-1 was the lowest (0.64 ± 0.02), while Sep-C (0.80± 0.03) and sepsis-3 (0.75 ± 0.03) were moderately accurate. Comparing AUCs after dividing patients into eGFR ≥60 and <60 showed that the AUC of Sep-C was lower in the eGFR ≥60 group, while the AUC of sepsis-3 was ≥ 0.7 in both groups. The following cut-offs were obtained by ROC analysis for sepsis-3: 466 pg/mL in the ≥60 group and 960 pg/mLin the < 60 group. Presepsin facilitated diagnosis sepsis based on sepsis-3 criteria regardless of renal function. We found that the optimal cut-offs for patients in this study were 500 pg/mL for eGFR ≥ 60 and 1000 pg/mL for < 60. However, future prospective diagnostic studies on sepsis-3 are needed to determine the cut-offs for patients with renal dysfunction.

Comparison between the persistence of post COVID-19 symptoms on critical patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation and non-critical patients

Background

During follow-up, patients severely affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), show symptoms of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) such as cognitive impairment, psychological disability, and neuromuscular deconditioning. In COVID-19 pandemic, it is a priority to develop multidisciplinary post-acute care services to address the long-term multisystemic impact of COVID-19.

Research question

Which are the most relevant multisystemic sequelae in severe post-COVID-19 patients?

Study design and methods

Observational chart review study that included adult patients discharged from a referral hospital for respiratory diseases in Mexico after recovering from severe COVID-19 disease from December 23, 2020, to April 24, 2021. Data were collected from 280 of 612 potentially eligible patients to evaluate persistent symptoms and compare sequelae in patients who required intubation, using a standardized questionnaire of symptoms, in addition to findings reported during the face-to-face health assessment. Univariable and multivariate analyses were performed for the association among the requirement of IMV and the long-term persistence of symptoms.

Results

280 patients were included. The median age was 55 (range, 19 to 86) years, and 152 (54.3%) were men. The mean length of hospital stay was 19 (SD, 14.1) days. During hospitalization 168 (60%) participants received IMV.

A large proportion of these patients reported fatigue (38.7%), paresthesia (35.1%), dyspnea (32.7%) and headache (28%); meanwhile only 3 (1.8%) of them were asymptomatic. Patients who required intubation were more likely to have neuropsychiatric (67.3% vs 55.4%; OR, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.08 to 2.97]) and musculoskeletal involvement (38.7% vs. 25.9%; OR, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.12 to 3.27]), adjusted for age,sex and hospitalization time.

Interpretation

The proportion of patients requiring intubation was 60%, reporting persistent symptoms in 98% of them. Neuropsychiatric and musculoskeletal symptoms were the most predominant symptoms in these patients, with a significant difference. Post-COVID-19 syndrome is a frequent problem in patients who required IVM. Physicians in ICU and in care of COVID-19 patients should be aware of this syndrome in order to avoid more complications.

Frequency, associated factors, and associated outcomes of dysphagia following sepsis

BACKGROUND

Identifying dysphagia as a potential complication of sepsis may improve swallowing function and survival while decreasing hospital length of stay.

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to determine the frequency of dysphagia in sepsis survivors on the 7th day after admission, as well as their associated factors and outcomes.

METHODS

This single-centre, retrospective, observational study analysed data from sepsis survivors admitted to Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital from 2018 to 2019. Participants with sepsis were assigned to one of two study groups based on the presence or absence of dysphagia using the criterion of Functional Oral Intake Scale score <5 on the 7th day after admission. We used multivariate logistic regression to determine factors independently associated with dysphagia on the 7th day after admission. Multivariate logistic regression was also used to determine associations between groups and outcomes, including dysphagia on hospital discharge, direct discharge home (discharge of patients directly to their home), and total dependency (Barthel Index score ≤20) on hospital discharge.

RESULTS

One hundred one patients met the study inclusion criteria, 55 with dysphagia and 46 without dysphagia. Fasting period (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.59) and enteral tube feeding (AOR: 8.56, 95% CI: 1.95-37.5) were independently associated with the presence of dysphagia on the 7th day after admission. Dysphagia on the 7th day after admission was associated with dysphagia on hospital discharge (AOR: 46.0, 95%, CI: 7.90-268.3), a lower chance of direct discharge home (AOR: 0.03, 95% CI: 0.01-0.15), and a higher incidence of total dependency (AOR: 9.30, 95% CI: 2.68-32.2).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that dysphagia was commonly encountered post sepsis. Fasting period and enteral tube feeding were independently associated with dysphagia on the 7th day after admission. Dysphagia on the 7th day after admission was also associated with dysphagia on hospital discharge, nondirect discharge home, and dependency in activities of daily living at the time of hospital discharge.

Association between Early Mobilization in the ICU and Psychiatric Symptoms after Surviving a Critical Illness: A Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Study

This is a prospective multicenter cohort study aiming to investigate the association between early mobilization (EM), defined as a rehabilitation level of sitting at the edge of the bed or higher within 72 h of ICU admission, and psychiatric outcome. Consecutive patients, admitted to the ICU for more than 48 h, were enrolled. The primary outcome was the incidence of psychiatric symptoms at 3 months after hospital discharge defined as the presence of any of three symptoms: depression, anxiety, or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Risk ratio (RR) and multiple logistic regression analysis were used. As a sensitivity analysis, two methods for inverse probability of treatment weighting statistics were performed. Of the 192 discharged patients, 99 (52%) were assessed. The patients who achieved EM had a lower incidence of psychiatric symptoms compared to those who did not (25% vs. 51%, p-value 0.008, odds ratio (OR) 0.27, adjusted p = 0.032). The RR for psychiatric symptoms in the EM group was 0.49 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.29–0.83]. Sensitivity analysis accounting for the influence of death, loss to follow-up (OR 0.28, adjusted p = 0.008), or potential confounders (OR 0.49, adjusted p = 0.046) consistently showed a lower incidence of psychiatric symptoms in the EM group. EM was consistently associated with fewer psychiatric symptoms.

Clinical Utilization of Stress Dose Hydrocortisone in Adult Patients With Septic Shock: A Retrospective Observational Study at a Large Academic Medical Center

Background: The use of stress dose corticosteroids, specifically, hydrocortisone, in septic shock is heterogeneous, and current clinical trials yield conflicting results. Regardless, they are still recommended by guidelines for vasopressor-dependent septic shock. Objectives: This study sought to characterize current practice of hydrocortisone use in patients with septic shock and secondarily to compare clinical outcomes of those who received hydrocortisone to those who did not. Methods: This single center, retrospective cohort study evaluated patients with septic shock admitted to a tertiary care center between 2012 and 2017. Patients receiving hydrocortisone for at least two doses were compared to those without. Results: 3411 septic shock patients were included; 1593 (47%) received hydrocortisone and 1818 (53%) did not. Patients who received hydrocortisone had higher lactate (4.0 vs 3.4 mmol/L; P < .01) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III scores (104.1 vs 91.0; P < .01). Vasopressor duration was 1.7 days longer in the hydrocortisone group (P < .01), and the hydrocortisone group had higher hospital mortality (52% vs 38%; P < .01). A propensity score-matched population was conducted in patients with APACHE scores >100: vasopressor duration was longer in those who received hydrocortisone (3.9 vs 2.0 days; P < .01), and hospital mortality was higher (59.3% vs 53.1%; P = .036); however, after multivariable adjustment, no association between receipt of hydrocortisone and hospital mortality was detected (OR 1.2 [95% CI .9-1.6]). Conclusions: Patients who received hydrocortisone were more severely ill than those that did not, making retrospective evaluation of this question challenging. These results highlight the wide variability and heterogeneity in hydrocortisone use in clinical practice.

Unfractionated heparin improves the clinical efficacy in adult sepsis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The anticoagulant treatment and clinical efficacy of heparin in sepsis remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the clinical efficacy of unfractionated heparin (UFH) in adult septic patients.

Method

A systematic review of Medline, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, WEIPU database, CNKI database, WANFANG database was performed from inception to January 2021. We included Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the main outcome was 28 d mortality. Data analysis was performed with Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.3 software. The meta-analysis included 2617 patients from 15 RCTs.

Results

Comparing to control group, UFH could reduce 28 d mortality (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.94) especially for patient with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) > 15, (RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.96). In UFH group, the platelet (PLT) (MD: 9.18; 95% CI: 0.68 to 17.68) was higher, the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) was shorter (MD: -8.01; 95% CI: − 13.84 to − 2.18) and the prothrombin time (PT) results (P > 0.05) failed to reach statistical significance. UFH decreased multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) incidence (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.84), length of stay (LOS) in ICU (MD: -4.94; 95% CI: − 6.89 to − 2.99) and ventilation time (MD: -3.01; 95% CI: − 4.0 to − 2.02). And UFH had no adverse impact on bleeding (RR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.54 to 2.23).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis suggests that UFH may reduce 28 d mortality and improve the clinical efficacy in sepsis patients without bleeding adverse effect.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-021-01545-w.

Dielectric Blood Coagulometry for the Early Detection of Sepsis-Induced Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation: A Prospective Observational Study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the utility of dielectric blood coagulometry for early sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnosis.

DESIGN

Single-center, prospective observational study.

SETTING

Patients with sepsis or septic shock at the Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital of Medicine between September 2019 and September 2020.

PATIENTS

The patients were divided into three groups according to the timing of disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnosis based on the Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation score by the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine: 1) no disseminated intravascular coagulation group, 2) late-diagnosed disseminated intravascular coagulation group: not diagnosed with disseminated intravascular coagulation on day 1 but diagnosed within 48 hours after admission, and 3) disseminated intravascular coagulation group: diagnosed with disseminated intravascular coagulation on day 1. The study evaluated 80 patients (no disseminated intravascular coagulation, 31 [38.8%]; late-diagnosed disseminated intravascular coagulation, 34 (42.5%); disseminated intravascular coagulation, 15 [18.8%]).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We compared the clinical severity scores and mortality of the groups and assessed the correlation between the dielectric blood coagulometry-derived coagulation marker, thrombin levels, and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation score using Spearman rank correlation. The mortality rate was 0% (0/31) in the no disseminated intravascular coagulation group, 35.3% (12/34) in the late-diagnosed disseminated intravascular coagulation group, and 33.3% (5/15) in the disseminated intravascular coagulation group. Although the Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation score on day 1 did not reflect disseminated intravascular coagulation in approximately 70% of patients who developed disseminated intravascular coagulation by day 2, dielectric clot strength measured by dielectric blood coagulometry on day 1 strongly correlated with disseminated intravascular coagulation development by day 2 (Spearman ρ = 0.824; p < 0.05) and with thrombin level on day 1 (Spearman ρ = 0.844; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Dielectric blood coagulometry can be used to detect early-phase disseminated intravascular coagulation in patients with sepsis and is strongly correlated with thrombin levels. Larger studies are needed to verify our results for developing clinical applications.

Effects of Mobilization among Critically Ill Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: A Single-center Retrospective Study

Objectives:

This study investigated the effect of early mobilization [EM; physical rehabilitation with the intensity needed to sit on the edge of the bed started within 5 days of intensive care unit (ICU) admission] in relation to improvements in gait independence and other clinical outcomes.

Methods:

This retrospective single-center study evaluated patients aged at least 18 years who stayed in the ICU for at least 48 h and were categorized into EM and late mobilization (LM; physical rehabilitation started more than 5 days after ICU admission) groups. Outcomes were compared after adjusting for 20 background factors by propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting. The primary outcome was independent gait at discharge. The secondary outcomes were medical costs, 90-day survival, and durations of ICU and hospital stays.

Results:

Of 177 patients, 85 and 92 were enrolled in the EM and LM groups, respectively. Propensity score matching created 37 patient pairs. There was no significant difference in the 90-day survival rate (P=0.308) or medical costs (P=0.054), whereas independent gait at discharge (P=0.025) and duration of hospital stay (P=0.013) differed significantly. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that EM was independently associated with independent gait at discharge (P=0.011) and duration of hospital stay (P=0.010) but was not associated with 90-day survival (odds ratio: 2.64, 95% confidence interval: 0.67–13.12, P=0.169).

Conclusions:

Early mobilization in the ICU did not affect 90-day survival and did not lower medical costs but was associated with independent gait at discharge and shorter hospital stays.

[Post-intensive care syndrome in pediatrics]

Introduction

The term “Post-intensive care syndrome” describe new impairments after critical illness, that worsen physical, cognitive, or mental health, and persist after acute care hospitalization.

Methods

a bibliographic search was carried out using the Medline database. The search period was from 2012 to 2020 using keywords.

Results

Emerging evidence suggests that there are significant and persistent physical, cognitive, and psychiatric morbidities among adult and pediatric survivors of critical illness. In this population it can also affect the “social health” sphere. The families of hospitalized patients often manifest psychological symptoms. For prevention and management there are various tools, the package of measures "ABCDEFGH", the conformation and organization of the health team, early mobilization and physical rehabilitation, nutritional contribution, environmental management, intensive care unit diaries and support between pairs.

Conclusion

Each patient´s situation is unique and the challenges they face may require different interventions. These should be studied to increase the available evidence in the pediatric population. We still do not have a specific instrument to monitor the syndrome in pediatrics or information on long-term sequelae in children.

Coagulation and fibrinolysis balance in disseminated intravascular coagulation

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is a common underlying disease associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). We have recently determined hemostatic pathological states at diagnosis through simultaneous assessment of coagulation and fibrinolysis potentials in sepsis-associated DIC using clot-fibrinolysis waveform analysis. Here we aimed to investigate hemostatic pathological states, focusing on the balance between coagulation and fibrinolysis dynamics during the clinical course in pediatric sepsis-associated DIC.

METHODS

Coagulation and fibrinolysis potential functions in three pediatric patients with sepsis-associated DIC during their clinical course were quantified using clot-fibrinolysis waveform analysis. A maximum coagulation velocity (|min1|) and maximum fibrinolysis velocity (|FL-min1|) was calculated as a ratio relative to normal plasma.

RESULTS

In case 1, coagulation-enhanced and fibrinolysis-depressed state (|min1|-ratio 2.22 and |FL-min1|-ratio 0.42) was observed on day 1. This discrepancy significantly reduced after anticoagulant therapy and plasma exchange on day 2. A well-balanced hemostatic state (0.70 and 0.62, respectively) was restored on day 7. In case 2, fibrinolysis-impaired state (|min1|-ratio 1.09 and |FL-min1|-ratio 0.21) was seen on day 1. The |min1| ratio was slightly prolonged and the |FL-min1| ratio was severely decreased. Both were restored on day 7 and returned to normal levels on day 12. In case 3, twofold coagulation- and fibrinolysis-enhanced states (|min1|-ratio 1.99 and |FL-min1|-ratio 1.11) were seen on day 1. However, both potentials rapidly decreased on day 2 (0.49 and 0.0, respectively). She died on day 5.

CONCLUSIONS

The hemostatic pathological states in sepsis-associated DIC depend on disease progression. Comprehensive assessment of coagulation-fibrinolysis potentials over time may therefore be helpful in considering optimal treatment plans for sepsis-associated DIC.

Changes in barriers to implementing early mobilization in the intensive care unit: a single center retrospective cohort study

This study was undertaken to investigate the rate of mobilization, defined as a rehabilitation level of sitting on the edge of a bed or higher, and its association with changes in barriers in the intensive care unit (ICU). Consecutive patients from January 2016 to March 2019 admitted to the ICU, 18 years old or older, who did not meet exclusion criteria, were eligible. The primary outcome was the rate of mobilization. Barriers, their changes on a daily basis, and clinical outcomes, such as walking independence at hospital discharge, were also investigated. The association between the barriers and mobilization, and walking independence were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. During the study period, 177 patients were enrolled. Mobilization was achieved by 116 patients (66%) by the 7th ICU day. The barrier to mobilization was circulatory status on days 1 and 2, consciousness level on days 3 to 5, and medical staff factors on days 6 and 7. Multivariate analysis showed that consciousness level (OR: 0.38, p=0.01), and medical staff factors (OR: 0.49, p=0.01) were significantly associated with mobilization. By hospital discharge 125 patients (71%) could walk independently. Consciousness level was associated (OR: 0.52, p=0.04) with walking independence. In this study, over half of patients could achieve mobilization within the first 7 days. Barriers to mobilization in the ICU change over time. Consciousness level is significantly associated with both mobilization and independent walking at discharge.

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020)

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020), a Japanese-specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created as revised from J-SSCG 2016 jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in September 2020 and published in February 2021. An English-language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese-language version. The purpose of this guideline is to assist medical staff in making appropriate decisions to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing treatment for sepsis and septic shock. We aimed to provide high-quality guidelines that are easy to use and understand for specialists, general clinicians, and multidisciplinary medical professionals. J-SSCG 2016 took up new subjects that were not present in SSCG 2016 (e.g., ICU-acquired weakness [ICU-AW], post-intensive care syndrome [PICS], and body temperature management). The J-SSCG 2020 covered a total of 22 areas with four additional new areas (patient- and family-centered care, sepsis treatment system, neuro-intensive treatment, and stress ulcers). A total of 118 important clinical issues (clinical questions, CQs) were extracted regardless of the presence or absence of evidence. These CQs also include those that have been given particular focus within Japan. This is a large-scale guideline covering multiple fields; thus, in addition to the 25 committee members, we had the participation and support of a total of 226 members who are professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists) and medical workers with a history of sepsis or critical illness. The GRADE method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members.As a result, 79 GRADE-based recommendations, 5 Good Practice Statements (GPS), 18 expert consensuses, 27 answers to background questions (BQs), and summaries of definitions and diagnosis of sepsis were created as responses to 118 CQs. We also incorporated visual information for each CQ according to the time course of treatment, and we will also distribute this as an app. The J-SSCG 2020 is expected to be widely used as a useful bedside guideline in the field of sepsis treatment both in Japan and overseas involving multiple disciplines.

Muscle atrophy in critically ill patients : a review of its cause, evaluation, and prevention

Critically ill patients exhibit prominent muscle atrophy, which occurs rapidly after ICU admission and leads to poor clinical outcomes. The extent of atrophy differs among muscles as follows: upper limb: 0.7%-2.4% per day, lower limb: 1.2%-3.0% per day, and diaphragm 1.1%-10.9% per day. This atrophy is caused by numerous risk factors such as inflammation, immobilization, nutrition, hyperglycemia, medication, and mechanical ventilation. Muscle atrophy should be monitored noninvasively by ultrasound at the bedside. Ultrasound can assess muscle mass in most patients, although physical assessment is limited to almost half of all critically ill patients due to impaired consciousness. Important strategies to prevent muscle atrophy are physical therapy and electrical muscular stimulation. Electrical muscular stimulation is especially effective for patients with limited physical therapy. Regarding diaphragm atrophy, mechanical ventilation should be adjusted to maintain spontaneous breathing and titrate inspiratory pressure. However, the sufficient timing and amount of nutritional intervention remain unclear. Further investigation is necessary to prevent muscle atrophy and improve long-term outcomes. J. Med. Invest. 67 : 1-10, February, 2020.

The effectiveness of early anticoagulant treatment in Covid-19 patients

OBJECTIVES

Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is an emerging, fast-spreading and worldwide infectious disease that would be deteriorated with the precipitation of systemic or local thrombosis. The aim of current study was evaluating the effects of early anticoagulant treatment in hospitalized Covid-19 patients.

METHOD

The present retrospective and comparative cohort study investigated 413 hospitalized Covid-19 patients treated with or without Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (n = 187 and 226, respectively) in the Covid Clinics of Gulhane Education and Research Hospital in Ankara, Turkey, between March 18 and May 03, 2020. The treatment groups were consisted of the patients evaluated before and after The Covid-19 Treatment Guide update on April 12, 2020 that included the anticoagulant treatment thereafter.

RESULTS

The mean age of all 413 patients (204 male and 209 female) at disease onset was 50.6 ± 16.7 years. The LMWH-treated patients had significantly higher coagulation markers such as d-dimer and platelet count than LMWH-untreated patients (p values < 0.05). The inflammatory markers, ferritin, interleukin-6 and procalcitonin were significantly increased in LMWH-untreated patients (p values < 0.05). The presence of any comorbidity was significantly more common in LMWH-treated patients compared to LMWH-untreated group (39.6% vs 19.9%, respectively; p < 0.001). Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were the most frequent comorbidities in both groups. The number of intensive care unit (ICU) transfer and longer length of hospital stay were more commonly observed in LMWH-untreated patients (p values <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Early anticoagulant treatment with relatively higher doses of LMWH may improve the clinical outcome of Covid-19 patients and shorten the length of hospital stay.

Efficacy of the treatment for elderly emergency patients with sepsis

Objectives

We evaluated the impact of age in septic patients admitted through the ER on clinical outcome and cost.

Methods

Patients with sepsis admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) through the emergency room in our hospital between January 2013 and December 2018 were analyzed. They were divided into three groups according to their age: <65 years (group Y); 65–79 years (group M); and ≥80 years (group E). The duration of ICU and hospital stay, prognosis, and total hospital costs were compared among the three groups.

Results

During this period, 1,392 patients were admitted to the ICU through the emergency room, and 174 patients with sepsis were analyzed. There were 49, 79, and 46 patients in groups Y, M, and E, respectively. There was no significant difference in ICU stay. Group E exhibited the shortest hospital stay and the lowest total hospital cost with statistically significant difference (p = 0.010 and p = 0.007, respectively). However, group E showed the highest rate of hospital mortality (30.4%) compared to groups Y and M (14.3% and 21.5%, respectively; p = 0.163).

Conclusions

Elderly (aged ≥80 years) emergency patients with sepsis require shorter hospital stay and are associated with lower total hospital cost. However, it may be difficult for these patients to maintain the hospital mortality equivalent to those observed in patients aged <80 years.

Incidence and Impact of Dysglycemia in Patients with Sepsis Under Moderate Glycemic Control

ABSTRACT

Glycemic control strategies for sepsis have changed significantly over the last decade, but their impact on dysglycemia and its associated outcomes has been poorly understood. In addition, there is controversy regarding the detrimental effects of hyperglycemia in sepsis. To evaluate the incidence and risks of dysglycemia under current strategy, we conducted a preplanned subanalysis of the sepsis cohort in a prospective, multicenter FORECAST study. A total of 1,140 patients with severe sepsis, including 259 patients with pre-existing diabetes, were included. Median blood glucose levels were approximately 140 mg/dL at 0 h and 72 h indicating that blood glucose was moderately controlled. The rate of initial and late hyperglycemia was 27.3% and 21.7%, respectively. The rate of early hypoglycemic episodes during the initial 24 h was 13.2%. Glycemic control was accompanied by a higher percentage of initial and late hyperglycemia but not with early hypoglycemic episodes, suggesting that glycemic control was targeted at excess hyperglycemia. In nondiabetic patients, late hyperglycemia (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval; p-value: 1.816, 1.116-2.955, 0.016) and early hypoglycemic episodes (1.936, 1.180-3.175, 0.009) were positively associated with in-hospital mortality. Further subgroup analysis suggested that late hyperglycemia and early hypoglycemic episodes independently, and probably synergistically, affect the outcomes. In diabetic patients, however, these correlations were not observed. In conclusion, a significantly high incidence of dysglycemia was observed in our sepsis cohort under moderate glycemic control. Late hyperglycemia in addition to early hypoglycemia was associated with poor outcomes at least in nondiabetic patients. More sophisticated approaches are necessary to reduce the incidence of these serious complications.

Coagulopathy Induced by Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Is Associated With a Poor Outcome in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: In recent years, the use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in patients with cardiopulmonary arrest who do not respond to conventional resuscitation, has increased. However, despite the development of VA-ECMO, the outcomes of resuscitated patients remain poor. The poor prognosis may be attributed to deterioration owing to the post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS); this includes the systemic inflammatory response and coagulation activation caused by the extracorporeal circulation (VA-ECMO circuit) itself. This study aimed to evaluate the coagulofibrinolytic changes caused by VA-ECMO and to identify predictive factors of poor prognosis.

Methods: We analyzed 151 cases of PCAS with witnessed cardiac arrest. As biomarkers, platelet counts, prothrombin time ratio, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products, fibrinogen, antithrombin, and lactate were recorded from blood samples from the time of delivery to the third day of hospitalization. The maximum (max) and minimum (min) values of each factor during the study period were calculated. To evaluate the impact of VA-ECMO on patients with PCAS, we performed propensity score matching between the patients who received and did not receive VA-ECMO. Sub-analysis was performed for the group with VA-ECMO.

Results: There were significant differences in all baseline characteristics and demographics except the time from detection to hospital arrival, percentage of cardiopulmonary resuscitations (CPR) by witnesses, and the initial rhythm between the groups. Propensity score matching adjusted for prehospital factors demonstrated that the patients who received VA-ECMO developed significantly severe coagulation disorders. In a sub-analysis, significant differences were noted in the prothrombin time ratio min, fibrinogen max, antithrombin max, and lactate min between survivors and non-survivors. In particular, the prothrombin time ratio min and antithrombin max were strongly correlated with poor outcome.

Conclusion: In the present study, significant coagulopathy was observed in patients who received VA-ECMO for CPR. In particular, in patients receiving VA-ECMO, the minimum prothrombin time ratio and maximum antithrombin by day 3 of hospitalization were strongly correlated with poor outcomes. These results suggest that VA-ECMO-induced coagulopathy can be a promising therapeutic target for patients resuscitated by VA-ECMO.

Therapeutic strategies in patients with coagulopathy and disseminated intravascular coagulation: awareness of the phase-dependent characteristics

INTRODUCTION

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) has long been understood as a condition where both thrombotic and hemostatic abnormalities coexist. DIC is a difficult complication for clinicians to manage as it is due to multiple underlying complications of pathophysiologic abnormalities in diverse disease states. Ongoing research continues to define the meaning of DIC, evaluate therapeutic options, and how it presents with the complex paradigm of systemic activation of coagulation. In this review we introduce the current topis regarding this tough situation.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Online search of published medical literature through MEDLINE and Web of Sience using the term "disseminated intravascular coagulation", "coagulopathy", "coagulation disorder", "hemostasis", "fibrinolysis", "thrombus" and "anticoagulants".

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Articles were chosen for inclusion based on their relevance to disseminated intravascular coagulation, coagulopathy, hemostasis and thrombosis in sepsis, COVID-19, trauma, and obstetrics. Reference lists were reviewed to identify additional relevant articles.

CONCLUSIONS

DIC is recognized as a pathologically triggered and dysregulated systemic activation of coagulation in response to various noxious stimuli. DIC's phenotype and clinical manifestations can vary from prothrombotic to hemorrhagic, depending on the underlying diseases. However, the fundamental mechanisms of systemic and vascular endothelial dysfunction can be explained as different phases of the acute response, with an initial prothrombotic phase that can commonly change to hemostatic insufficiency. Thrombin is the key initiator of the pathophysiologic process along with endothelial injury and initially fibrinolysis activation followed by fibrinolysis suppression. There is no established approach for managing DIC beyond initially treating the underlying disease and replacement therapy for the management of coagulopathy. Targeting anticoagulation therapy with antithrombin concentrates and recombinant thrombomodulin for the prevention of microthrombus formation, and antifibrinolytic therapy using tranexamic acid for the coagulopathy after massive bleeding, continue to be studied as therapeutic options.

Coagulopathy in COVID-19

Hemostatic derangement is a hallmark in severe COVID-19. Markedly elevation of D-dimer and fibrinogen degradation product levels were observed in patients with severe COVID-19 higher and 71.4% of nonsurvivors met the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Although the clinical and epidemiological features of COVID-19 have been well-described, the underlying mechanism influencing disease severity remains to be elucidated. Herein, the aim of this review article is to evaluate hemostasis in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and its role in the management of this unprecedented pandemic.

Determining the factors affecting serum presepsin level and its diagnostic utility: A cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to identify factors affecting presepsin levels and to determine their diagnostic utility.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted at an outpatient clinic and emergency department at an acute care hospital in Japan between January 2015 and December 2017. We enrolled 1,840 consecutive outpatients with at least one measurement of serum presepsin, who were suspected of having bacterial infection. The outcome variables were bacterial infection, lower respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, cholangitis, and other infections diagnoses, based on the chart review. We collected blood analysis data on the patients' presepsin levels.

RESULTS

There was a significant association between presepsin level and the diagnosis of bacterial infection even when adjusted for age, sex, renal function, and biliary enzyme levels. An increase of 1 unit in the log of presepsin values resulted in a relative risk ratio of 1.71 (1.09-2.66), 2.1 (1.58-2.79), 2.93 (2.05-4.19), 4.7(2.90-7.61), and 2.41(1.70-3.43), for bacterial infection, lower respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, cholangitis, and other infections, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Presepsin showed a statistically significant increase in the diagnosis of bacterial infections (lower respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, cholangitis, and non-severe patients) in a community hospital setting. However, in patients with renal dysfunction, presepsin levels should be interpreted with caution.

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020)

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020), a Japanese-specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created as revised from J-SSCG 2016 jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in September 2020 and published in February 2021. An English-language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese-language version. The purpose of this guideline is to assist medical staff in making appropriate decisions to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing treatment for sepsis and septic shock. We aimed to provide high-quality guidelines that are easy to use and understand for specialists, general clinicians, and multidisciplinary medical professionals. J-SSCG 2016 took up new subjects that were not present in SSCG 2016 (e.g., ICU-acquired weakness [ICU-AW], post-intensive care syndrome [PICS], and body temperature management). The J-SSCG 2020 covered a total of 22 areas with four additional new areas (patient- and family-centered care, sepsis treatment system, neuro-intensive treatment, and stress ulcers). A total of 118 important clinical issues (clinical questions, CQs) were extracted regardless of the presence or absence of evidence. These CQs also include those that have been given particular focus within Japan. This is a large-scale guideline covering multiple fields; thus, in addition to the 25 committee members, we had the participation and support of a total of 226 members who are professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists) and medical workers with a history of sepsis or critical illness. The GRADE method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members. As a result, 79 GRADE-based recommendations, 5 Good Practice Statements (GPS), 18 expert consensuses, 27 answers to background questions (BQs), and summaries of definitions and diagnosis of sepsis were created as responses to 118 CQs. We also incorporated visual information for each CQ according to the time course of treatment, and we will also distribute this as an app. The J-SSCG 2020 is expected to be widely used as a useful bedside guideline in the field of sepsis treatment both in Japan and overseas involving multiple disciplines.

Why thromboembolism occurs in some patients with thrombocytopenia and treatment strategies

Platelets play such an important role in the process of thrombosis that patients with thrombocytopenia generally have an increased risk of bleeding. However, abnormal thrombotic events can sometimes occur in patients with thrombocytopenia, which is unusual and inexplicable. The treatments for thrombocytopenia and thromboembolism are usually contradictory. This review introduces the mechanisms of thromboembolism in patients with different types of thrombocytopenia and outlines treatment recommendations for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis. According to the cause of thrombocytopenia, this article addresses four etiologies, including inherited thrombocytopenia (Myh9-related disease, ANKRD26-associated thrombocytopenia, Glanzmann thrombasthenia, Bernard-Soulier syndrome), thrombotic microangiopathy (thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, hemolytic uremic syndrome, Hemolysis Elevated Liver enzymes and Low Platelets syndrome, disseminated intravascular coagulation), autoimmune-related thrombocytopenia (immune thrombocytopenic purpura, antiphospholipid syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus), and acquired thrombocytopenia (Infection-induced thrombocytopenia and drug-induced thrombocytopenia, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia). We hope to provide more evidence for clinical applications and future research.

Utility of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for predicting bacterial infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving Tocilizumab

This study aimed to describe the utility of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for predicting bacterial infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with Tocilizumab (TCZ). We extracted RA patients treated with TCZ in whom an infection developed between April 2008 and March 2018 from our hospital database. We divided these patients into the bacterial infection and non-bacterial infection groups and compared their background, C-reactive protein (CRP) values, white blood cell count (WBC), the NLR at the time of infection diagnosis, and the ratio of the NLR at the time of infection diagnosis (post-NLR) to the NLR at baseline (pre-NLR). Of the 196 patients who received TCZ, 21 experienced a bacterial infection and 20 had a non-bacterial infection. The median CRP level, WBC count, post-NLR, and post-NLR/pre-NLR ratio in the bacterial infection group were significantly higher than in the non-bacterial infection group. In receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis for predicting bacterial infection, the area under the curve (AUC) for CRP, WBC, NLR, and the post-NLR/pre-NLR ratio were 0.787, 0.857, 0.887, and 0.975, respectively. The cut-off value of 2.25 for the post-NLR/pre-NLR ratio showed the greatest sensitivity (90.5%) and specificity (100%). The post-NLR/pre-NLR ratio may be a useful surrogate marker for predicting bacterial infections in patients with RA treated with TCZ.

Galápagosization of sepsis management in Japan: a nationwide survey of current practices

Aim

Sepsis treatment has been standardized in many countries worldwide. However, treatment of sepsis in Japan has developed independently, and how Japanese physicians actually treat sepsis patients nationwide remains uninvestigated. The aim of this study was to clarify the current practice for septic patients in Japan and how it differs from standard care throughout the world.

Methods

This study was designed as a prospective, cross‐sectional, self‐reported questionnaire‐ and Web‐based electronic survey in Japan. The survey was undertaken to assess respondents’ clinical practices and preferences regarding treatment strategies, sepsis assessment, and management in the setting of critical illness. An exploratory factor analysis and a hierarchical cluster analysis were carried out to identify the treatments distinctive to Japan, called “Galápagos therapies”.

Results

The final analysis included 295 respondents. According to the factor analysis, we defined anticoagulant therapy for disseminated intravascular coagulation, antimediator renal replacement therapy, and others as Galápagos therapies. These Galápagos therapies were undertaken by approximately two‐thirds of the Japanese physicians who responded. We classified Japanese physicians according to three patterns of clinical practice carried out for sepsis: (i) those who do not perform Galápagos therapies but do perform worldwide standardized care, (ii) those who perform Galápagos therapies on top of worldwide standardized care, (iii) those who do not perform worldwide standardized care.

Conclusion

On the basis of a nationwide questionnaire‐based survey in Japan, we clarified distinctive sepsis treatments performed in Japan, such as antimediator renal replacement therapy and treatment for sepsis‐induced disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Coagulopathy and thromboembolic events in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: pathogenesis and management strategies

In October 2019, a viral infectious disease appeared in the city of Wuhan in China. A new betacoronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, has been recognized as the responsible pathogen in this infection. Although coronavirus disease is principally expressed as a pulmonary infection, critical SARS-CoV-2 infection is frequently complicated with coagulopathy, and thromboembolic events are recognizable in several patients. Dehydration, acute inflammatory condition, protracted immobilization during disease, existence of multiple cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes, obesity or hypertension, previous coronary artery disease, ischemic stroke, peripheral artery disease are frequent comorbidities in SARS-CoV-2 hospitalized subjects, which possibly augment thrombo-embolic risk. However, other causal factors can still be identified such as unrestricted angiotensin II action, the use of immunoglobulins, an increased production of adhesion molecules able to induce vascular inflammation and endothelial activation, complement stimulation, excessive production of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), and increased platelet count. Low-molecular-weight heparin should be chosen as early treatment because of its anti-inflammatory action and its ability to antagonize histones and so defend the endothelium. However, several therapeutic possibilities have also been proposed such as fibrinolytic treatment, drugs that target NETs, and complement inhibition. Nevertheless, although the violence of the pandemic may suggest the use of heroic treatments to reduce the frightening mortality that accompanies SARS-CoV-2 infection, we believe that experimental treatments should only be used within approved and controlled protocols, the only ones that can provide useful and specify information on the validity of the treatments.

Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients

BACKGROUND

There is no gold standard to diagnose septic shock-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The objective of our multicenter prospective study was to assess the performances of the different major scoring systems in terms of mortality prediction and DIC diagnosis. The JAAM-DIC 2016 score, the ISTH overt-DIC 2001 score, the associations of sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) score with JAAM-DIC 2016 or ISTH overt-DIC scores were tested in patients within 12 h of their admission in ICU for septic shock (day 1) and at day 2.

RESULTS

582 patients were enrolled in the study. 182/567 (32.1%) were diagnosed with DIC according to ISTH overt-DIC score, and 193/561 (34.4%) according to JAAM-DIC score; 486/577 patients (84.2%) were diagnosed with a coagulopathy according to SIC score. A moderate concordance was observed between ISTH overt-DIC and JAAM-DIC [κ = 0.67 (0.60, 0.73), p < 0.001]. The delay of positivity of the scores for early DIC patients was not different between JAAM-DIC and ISTH overt-DIC scores. Although it was positive earlier, SIC score had worse diagnosis specificity, as 84.2% of the patients with septic shock were diagnosed with "coagulopathy". The specificity of SIC score alone to predict mortality was very low [0.18 (0.15; 0.22)], compared to the ones of JAAM-DIC score [0.71 (0.67; 0.75)], and of ISTH overt-DIC score [0.76 (0.72; 0.80)], p < 0.001. The sensitivity of SIC score to predict mortality was 0.95 [0.89; 0.98], and the ones of JAAM-DIC score and ISTH overt-DIC score were 0.61 [0.50; 0.70] and 0.68 [0.58; 0.77], respectively. There was no benefit in sensitivity and specificity in combining SIC score to JAAM-DIC score or to ISTH overt-DIC score, compared to JAAM-DIC score or ISTH overt-DIC score alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the added value of SIC score alone or combined with other scores is limited, and that both JAAM-DIC score and ISTH overt-DIC score can be used in septic shock patients. Trial registration clinicaltrial; Trial registration number: NCT02391792; Date of registration: 18/03/2015; URL of trial registry record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02391792?term=meziani&draw=4&rank=1.

Significance of body temperature in elderly patients with sepsis

Background

Elderly patients have a blunted host response, which may influence vital signs and clinical outcomes of sepsis. This study was aimed to investigate whether the associations between the vital signs and mortality are different in elderly and non-elderly patients with sepsis.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study. A Japanese multicenter sepsis cohort (FORECAST, n = 1148) was used for the discovery analyses. Significant discovery results were tested for replication using two validation cohorts of sepsis (JAAMSR, Japan, n = 624; SPH, Canada, n = 1004). Patients were categorized into elderly and non-elderly groups (age ≥ 75 or < 75 years). We tested for association between vital signs (body temperature [BT], heart rate, mean arterial pressure, systolic blood pressure, and respiratory rate) and 90-day in-hospital mortality (primary outcome).

Results

In the discovery cohort, non-elderly patients with BT < 36.0 °C had significantly increased 90-day mortality (P = 0.025, adjusted hazard ratio 1.70, 95% CI 1.07–2.71). In the validation cohorts, non-elderly patients with BT < 36.0 °C had significantly increased mortality (JAAMSR, P = 0.0024, adjusted hazard ratio 2.05, 95% CI 1.29–3.26; SPH, P = 0.029, adjusted hazard ratio 1.36, 95% CI 1.03–1.80). These differences were not observed in elderly patients in the three cohorts. Associations between the other four vital signs and mortality were not different in elderly and non-elderly patients. The interaction of age and hypothermia/fever was significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

In septic patients, we found mortality in non-elderly sepsis patients was increased with hypothermia and decreased with fever. However, mortality in elderly patients was not associated with BT. These results illuminate the difference in the inflammatory response of the elderly compared to non-elderly sepsis patients.

Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy

BACKGROUND

A relatively high mortality of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is worrying, and the application of heparin in COVID-19 has been recommended by some expert consensus because of the risk of disseminated intravascular coagulation and venous thromboembolism. However, its efficacy remains to be validated.

METHODS

Coagulation results, medications, and outcomes of consecutive patients being classified as having severe COVID-19 in Tongji hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The 28-day mortality between heparin users and nonusers were compared, as was a different risk of coagulopathy, which was stratified by the sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) score or D-dimer result.

RESULTS

There were 449 patients with severe COVID-19 enrolled into the study, 99 of them received heparin (mainly with low molecular weight heparin) for 7 days or longer. D-dimer, prothrombin time, and age were positively, and platelet count was negatively, correlated with 28-day mortality in multivariate analysis. No difference in 28-day mortality was found between heparin users and nonusers (30.3% vs 29.7%, P = .910). But the 28-day mortality of heparin users was lower than nonusers in patients with SIC score ≥4 (40.0% vs 64.2%, P = .029), or D-dimer >6-fold of upper limit of normal (32.8% vs 52.4%, P = .017).

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulant therapy mainly with low molecular weight heparin appears to be associated with better prognosis in severe COVID-19 patients meeting SIC criteria or with markedly elevated D-dimer.