Evolution of the response to levodopa during the first 4 years of therapy

Dopa Responsiveness in Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND

Dopaminergic responsiveness is a defining feature of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, there is limited information on how this evolves over time.

OBJECTIVES

To examine serial dopaminergic responses, if there are distinct patterns, and which factors predict these.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative on repeated dopaminergic challenge tests (≥24.5% defined as a definite response). Growth-mixture modeling evaluated for different response patterns and multinomial logistic regression tested for predictors of these clusters.

RESULTS

1525 dopaminergic challenge tests were performed in 336 patients. At enrolment, mean age was 61.2 years (SD 9.6), 66.4% were male and disease duration was 0.5 years (SD 0.5). 1 to 2 years after diagnosis, 48.0% of tests showed a definite response, but this proportion increased with longer disease duration (51.1-74.3%). We identified 3 response groups: "Striking" (n = 29, 8.7%); "Excellent" (n = 110; 32.7%) and "Modest" (n = 197, 58.6%). Significant differences were as follows: striking responders commenced treatment earlier (P = 0.02), were less likely to be on dopamine agonist monotherapy (P = 0.01), and had better cognition (P < 0.01) and activities of daily living (P = 0.01). Excellent responders had higher challenge doses (P = 0.03) and were more likely to be on combination therapy (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Three distinct patterns of the dopaminergic response were observed. As the proportion of PD cases with definite dopa responsiveness increased over time, the initial treatment response may be an unreliable diagnostic aid.

Motivational Vigor in Parkinson's Disease Requires the Short and Long Duration Response to Levodopa

BACKGROUND

Impaired movement vigor (bradykinesia) is a cardinal feature of Parkinson's disease (PD) and hypothesized to result from abnormal motivational processes-impaired motivation-vigor coupling. Dopamine replacement therapy (DRT) improves bradykinesia, but the response to DRT is multifaceted, comprising a short-duration response (SDR) and a long-duration response (LDR) only manifesting with chronic treatment. Prior experiments assessing motivation-vigor coupling in PD used chronically treated subjects, obscuring the roles of the SDR and LDR.

METHODS

To disambiguate the SDR and LDR, 11 de novo PD subjects (6 male [M]:5 female [F]; mean age, 67) were studied before treatment, after an acute levodopa (l-dopa) dose, and in both the practical "off" (LDR) and "on" (LDR + SDR) states after chronic stable treatment. At each visit, subjects were characterized with a standard battery including the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) and an incentivized joystick task to assess motor performance in response to varying rewards.

RESULTS

l-Dopa induced a robust SDR and LDR, with further improvement in the combined SDR + LDR state. At baseline, after acute treatment (SDR), and after LDR induction, subjects did not exhibit the normal increase in movement speed with increasing reward. Only in the combined SDR + LDR state was there restoration of motivation-vigor coupling.

CONCLUSIONS

Although consistent with prior results in chronically treated PD subjects, the significant improvement in motor performance observed with the SDR and LDR suggests that bradykinesia is not solely secondary to deficient modulation of motivational processes. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Response to levodopa in Parkinson's disease over time. A 4-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

A good response to levodopa is a key factor to indicate device-aided therapies in people with Parkinson's disease (PwPD). The aim of the present study was to analyze the response to levodopa in PwPD with motor fluctuations followed for 4 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PwPD with motor fluctuations recruited from January 2016 to November 2017 from the COPPADIS cohort and assessed annually (from baseline to 4-year follow-up) during the OFF and ON states were included in this analysis. At each visit, the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - part III (UPDRS-III) was applied during the OFF state (without medication during the last 12 h) and during the ON state. General linear model repeated measures were used to test for changes in the mean UPDRS-III-OFF, UPDRS-III-ON, and ΔUPDRS-III (UPDRS-III-OFF - UPDRS-III-ON) between visits. Levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) was included as covariate.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients (63.94 ± 8.42 years old; 68.3% males) were included. Mean disease duration was 7.81 ± 3.64 years. From baseline to 4-year follow-up visit, a significant increase in both the UPDRS-III-OFF (from 27.98 ± 9.58 to 31.75 ± 12.39; p = 0.003) and the UPDRS-III-ON (from 15.92 ± 7.93 to 18.84 ± 8.17; p = 0.006) was observed despite the significant increase in the LEDD (from 896.35 ± 355.65 to 1085.51 ± 488.29; p = 0.003). However, no significant differences were detected between visits in the ΔUPDRS-III.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of PwPD with motor fluctuations, the response to levodopa did not weaken after a 4-year follow-up.

Adopting the Rumsfeld approach to understanding the action of levodopa and apomorphine in Parkinson's disease

Dopaminergic therapies dominate the treatment of the motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) but there have been no major advances in therapy in many decades. Two of the oldest drugs used appear more effective than others-levodopa and apomorphine-but the reasons for this are seldom discussed and this may be one cause for a lack of progress. This short review questions current thinking on drug action and looks at whether adopting the philosophy of ex-US Secretary of State Donald Rumsfeld reveals 'unknown' aspects of the actions of levodopa and apomorphine that provide clues for a way forward. It appears that both levodopa and apomorphine have a more complex pharmacology than classical views would suggest. In addition, there are unexpected facets to the mechanisms through which levodopa acts that are either forgotten as 'known unknowns' or ignored as 'unknown unknowns'. The conclusion reached is that we may not know as much as we think about drug action in PD and there is a case for looking beyond the obvious.

Optimizing the selection of Parkinson's disease patients for neuromodulation using the levodopa challenge test

BACKGROUND

In Parkinson's disease (PD), early stages are associated with a good long-duration response and as the disease advances, the short-duration response predominates. The transition between the long-duration and short-duration responses may be an important and measurable intermediate stage. A critical criterion in determining the candidature for neuromodulation is a beneficial response to an 'off-on' levodopa challenge test. This test is usually reserved for those that have already developed marked short-duration response and are candidates for deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. However, identifying those that are in transition may allow DBS to be offered earlier.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine if the transition from a long-duration to a short-duration response can be assessed on a levodopa challenge test.

METHODS

An 'off-on" levodopa challenge test was done in sixty-five PD patients divided into four groups based on the disease duration.

RESULTS

OFF motor scores increased in all groups [Mean ± STD; 22.94 ± 8.52, 31.53 ± 9.87, 34.05 ± 9.50, and 33.92 ± 10.15 in groups 1-4, respectively] while a significant response to medication was maintained on 'off-on' testing. The mean levodopa equivalency dose in groups 1 and 2 was significantly less than in groups 3 and 4. This transition occurred between years 7 and 9 of disease duration.

CONCLUSION

Performing a regular levodopa challenge test, when levodopa dose increases substantially, should be considered to determine the ideal time for DBS in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Natural history of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease and the long-duration response to levodopa

The natural pattern of progression of Parkinson’s disease is largely unknown because patients are conventionally followed on treatment. As Parkinson’s disease progresses, the true magnitude of the long-duration response to levodopa remains unknown, because it can only be estimated indirectly in treated patients. We aimed to describe the natural course of motor symptoms by assessing the natural OFF in consecutive Parkinson’s disease patients never exposed to treatment (drug-naïve), and to investigate the effects of daily levodopa on the progression of motor disability in the OFF medication state over a 2-year period. In this prospective naturalistic study in sub-Saharan Africa, 30 Parkinson’s disease patients (age at onset 58 ± 14 years, disease duration 7 ± 4 years) began levodopa monotherapy and were prospectively assessed using the Unified Parkinson’s disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). Data were collected at baseline, at 1-year and 2-years follow-up. First-ever levodopa intake induced a significant improvement in motor symptoms (natural OFF versus ON state UPDRS-III 41.9 ± 15.9 versus 26.8 ± 15.1, respectively; P < 0.001). At 1-year follow-up, OFF state UPDRS-III score after overnight withdrawal of levodopa was considerably lower than natural OFF (26.5 ± 14.9; P < 0 .001). This effect was not modified by disease duration. At the 2-year follow-up, motor signs after overnight OFF (30.2 ± 14.2) were still 30% milder than natural OFF (P = 0.001). The ON state UPDRS-III at the first-ever levodopa challenge was similar to the overnight OFF score at 1-year follow-up and the two conditions were correlated (r = 0.72, P < 0.001). Compared to the natural progression of motor disability, levodopa treatment resulted in a 31% lower annual decline in UPDRS-III scores in the OFF state (3.33 versus 2.30 points/year) with a lower model’s variance explained by disease duration (67% versus 36%). Using the equation regressed on pretreatment data, we predicted the natural OFF at 1-year and 2-year follow-up visits and estimated that the magnitude of the long-duration response to levodopa ranged between 60% and 65% of total motor benefit provided by levodopa, independently of disease duration (P = 0.13). Although levodopa therapy was associated with motor fluctuations, overnight OFF disability during levodopa was invariably less severe than the natural course of the disease, independently of disease duration. The same applies to the yearly decline in UPDRS-III scores in the OFF state. Further research is needed to clarify the mechanisms underlying the long-duration response to levodopa in Parkinson’s disease. Understanding the natural course of Parkinson’s disease and the long-duration response to levodopa may help to develop therapeutic strategies increasing its magnitude to improve patient quality of life and to better interpret the outcome of randomized clinical trials on disease-modifying therapies that still rely on the overnight OFF to define Parkinson’s disease progression.

Therapeutic Strategies to Treat or Prevent Off Episodes in Adults with Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson's disease is a chronic, neurodegenerative disease, which manifests with a mixture of motor, cognitive and behavioural symptoms. Levodopa is the most effective antiparkinsonian treatment to date, although chronic use engenders a mixture of complications in a substantial proportion of patients. Amongst these is the occurrence of episodes of worsening symptoms-'off' phenomena. These episodes can manifest with either motor or non-motor symptoms or a combination of these features and have been found to have profound impacts on patients' quality of life. Although preventative measures are poorly evidenced, avoiding excessive total daily levodopa intake in selected populations that are deemed to be of a higher risk for developing these episodes warrants further exploration. Methods to improve levodopa bioavailability and delivery to the brain are currently available and are of value in addressing these episodes once they have become established. These include modifications to levodopa formulations as well as the use of complimentary agents that improve levodopa bioavailability. The deployment of device-assisted approaches is a further dimension that can be considered in addressing these debilitating episodes. This review summarises the clinical manifestations of 'off' phenomena and the current approaches to treat them. Although we briefly discuss clinical advances on the horizon, the predominant focus is on existing, established treatments.

Long duration response in Parkinson's disease: levodopa revisited

This scientific commentary refers to ‘Natural history of motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease and the long-duration response to levodopa’, by Cilia etal. (doi:10.1093/brain/awaa181).

Dopamine Buffering Capacity Imaging: A Pharmacodynamic fMRI Method for Staging Parkinson Disease

We propose a novel pharmacological fMRI (phMRI) method for objectively quantifying disease severity in Parkinson disease (PD). It is based on the clinical observation that the benefit from a dose of levodopa wears off more quickly as PD progresses. Biologically this has been thought to represent decreased buffering capacity for dopamine as nigrostriatal cells die. Buffering capacity has been modeled based on clinical effects, but clinical measurements are influenced by confounding factors. The new method proposes to measure the effect objectively based on the timing of the known response of several brain regions to exogenous levodopa. Such responses are robust and can be quantified using perfusion MRI. Here we present simulation studies based on published clinical dose-response data and an intravenous levodopa infusion. Standard pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic methods were used to model the response. Then the effect site rate constant k e was estimated from simulated response data plus Gaussian noise. Predicted time - effect curves sampled at times consistent with phMRI differ substantially based on clinical severity. Estimated k e from noisy input data was recovered with good accuracy. These simulation results support the feasibility of levodopa phMRI hysteresis mapping to measure the severity of dopamine denervation objectively and simultaneously in all brain regions with a robust imaging response to exogenous levodopa.

Repurposing drugs to treat l-DOPA-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease

In this review, we discuss the opportunity for repurposing drugs for use in l-DOPA-induced dyskinesia (LID) in Parkinson's disease. LID is a particularly suitable indication for drug repurposing given its pharmacological diversity, translatability of animal-models, availability of Phase II proof-of-concept (PoC) methodologies and the indication-specific regulatory environment. A compound fit for repurposing is defined as one with appropriate human safety-data as well as animal safety, toxicology and pharmacokinetic data as found in an Investigational New Drug (IND) package for another indication. We first focus on how such repurposing candidates can be identified and then discuss development strategies that might progress such a candidate towards a Phase II clinical PoC. We discuss traditional means for identifying repurposing candidates and contrast these with newer approaches, especially focussing on the use of computational and artificial intelligence (AI) platforms. We discuss strategies that can be categorised broadly as: in vivo phenotypic screening in a hypothesis-free manner; in vivo phenotypic screening based on analogy to a related disorder; hypothesis-driven evaluation of candidates in vivo and in silico screening with a hypothesis-agnostic component to the selection. To highlight the power of AI approaches, we describe a case study using IBM Watson where a training set of compounds, with demonstrated ability to reduce LID, were employed to identify novel repurposing candidates. Using the approaches discussed, many diverse candidates for repurposing in LID, originally envisaged for other indications, will be described that have already been evaluated for efficacy in non-human primate models of LID and/or clinically. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Drug Repurposing: old molecules, new ways to fast track drug discovery and development for CNS disorders'.

Molecular basis of dopamine replacement therapy and its side effects in Parkinson's disease

There is currently no cure for Parkinson's disease. The symptomatic therapeutic strategy essentially relies on dopamine replacement whose efficacy was demonstrated more than 50 years ago following the introduction of the dopamine precursor, levodopa. The spectacular antiparkinsonian effect of levodopa is, however, balanced by major limitations including the occurrence of motor complications related to its particular pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Other therapeutic strategies have thus been developed to overcome these problems such as the use of dopamine receptor agonists, dopamine metabolism inhibitors and non-dopaminergic drugs. Here we review the pharmacology and molecular mechanisms of dopamine replacement therapy in Parkinson's disease, both at the presynaptic and postsynaptic levels. The perspectives in terms of novel drug development and prediction of drug response for a more personalised medicine will be discussed.

The spectrum of "off" in Parkinson's disease: What have we learned over 40 years?

The terms "on" and "off" were used by Marsden and his contemporaries over 40 years ago to describe times when Parkinson's disease patients experienced good motor function ("on") and immobility ("off"). Yet there remains no published consensus definition of "off", leading clinicians and patients to develop individualized impressions of "off" determinations. In this paper, we first discuss the evolution of the terminology and understanding of "off" states since Marsden's time, which now include non-motor as well as motor symptoms. We then review pathophysiology and risk factors for the development of "off" states as well as tools to detect the "off" state, before proposing a practical definition of "off" for consideration. A common, practical definition of the "off" state could improve clinical recognition of "off" symptoms and lead to significant benefit for patients.

Intracerebral Transplantation of Genetically Engineered Cells for Parkinson's Disease: Toward Clinical Application

Over the last decade, molecular biology has progressively developed, leading to new technology with subsequent clinical application for various cerebral diseases including Parkinson's disease (PD), one of the most investigated neurodegenerative disorders. The therapy for PD is mainly composed of medication, including drug replacement therapy, surgical treatment, and cell transplantation. Cell therapy for PD has been explored by using fetal nigral cells as an allo- or xenograft, autologous sympathetic ganglion, adrenal medulla, and carotid body in clinical settings. In addition, neurotrophic factors, including glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), have a strong potency to rescue degenerating dopaminergic cells. Protein and/or gene therapy also might be a therapeutic option for PD. In this review, genetically engineered cell transplantation for animal models of PD, including catecholamine/neurotrophic factor-secreting cell transplantation with or without encapsulation, as performed in our laboratories, and their potential future as clinical applications are described with recent clinical studies in this field.

Baseline motor findings and Parkinson disease prognostic subtypes

Objective:

To identify the significance of baseline motor features to the lifelong prognostic motor subtypes in a Parkinson disease (PD) cohort.

Methods:

In a previous study of 166 PD cases, we observed different prognosis in tremor-dominant, akinetic-rigid, and mixed subtypes. This study includes the same cases, but we excluded 10 cases with symptoms of ≥15 years duration at baseline. Relative severity of tremor, bradykinesia/akinesia, and rigidity at baseline were evaluated as predictors of the motor subtypes, which are known to have different prognosis.

Results:

The most common motor subtype was mixed, followed by akinetic-rigid and then the tremor-dominant. Seventy cases were not receiving antiparkinsonian drugs at baseline. The prognostic subtypes could be predicted at baseline in 85% of all and in 91% of the treatment-naive cases. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were strong for the mixed and the akinetic-rigid but weak for the tremor-dominant subtype.

Conclusions:

Our data show that motor profile at baseline can predict prognosis in most PD cases. These findings can be incorporated into clinical practice.

Quantitative estimation of motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVES

To provide a quantitative estimation of motor fluctuations in PD through a 12-h Waking-day Motor Assessment (WDMA) and to develop new WDMA-based tools, the Motor Fluctuation Indices.

METHODS

Two independent samples of PD patients (exploratory population N = 51, testing population N = 109) were examined. Patients underwent a WDMA using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and were classified as either having or not having motor fluctuations. To quantify motor fluctuations, the Worsening Index (WI), the Mean Fluctuation Index (MFI) and the Coefficient of Variation (CV) were computed. The optimal cut-off for each index distinguishing patients with or without fluctuations was calculated on the exploratory population. Cut-offs' accuracy was then verified in the testing population.

RESULTS

Optimal cut-off scores to differentiate stable patients from fluctuating ones were 8.3 for WI, 5 for MFI and 12.9 for CV. Sensitivity and a specificity were 91.2% (95%CI: 85.9 to 96.5) and 87.8% (95%CI: 81.7 to 93.9) for WI; 75% (95%CI: 66.9 to 83.1) and 90.2% (95%CI: 84.7 to 95.8) for MFI; 69.1% (95%CI: 60.4 to 77.8) and 95.1% (95%CI: 91.1 to 99.2) for CV. Patients with a larger magnitude of fluctuation had higher values for all three indices, whereas patients with multiple daily fluctuations presented only higher WI values.

CONCLUSIONS

WDMA-derived Motor Fluctuation Indices may represent reliable tools for evaluating and quantifying the severity of motor fluctuations in PD patients. Even if WDMA is a time-consuming procedure, the detection of Motor Fluctuation Indices could be helpful in assessing therapeutic efficacy on motor fluctuations.

Switching L-dopa Therapy from Pulsatile to Pulse Administration Reduces Motor Complications in Parkinson's Disease

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the severity of wearing-off and dyskinesia in patients with complicated Parkinson disease (PD) after switching L-dopa oral therapy from a "pulsatile" administration, consisting in intermittent multiple daily small doses of the drug, to a "pulse" administration, consisting in standard oral doses given at specific interdose intervals.

METHODS

Thirty-four PD patients with motor complications were monitored twice with standardized waking day motor status evaluations using the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale-Motor Examination (UPDRS-ME) and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) after switching L-dopa administration modality from "pulsatile" to "pulse." To quantify predictable motor fluctuations, a Wearing Off Index was computed based on changes in treatment response magnitude.

RESULTS

On the whole, after switching from "pulsatile" to "pulse" administration, there was a reduction in number of L-dopa daily doses and an increase in the amount of the dosage of the single doses, AIMS maximum score decreased without increasing motor disability. More specifically, in predominant fluctuating patients, there was a significant reduction in UPDRS-ME average score as well as in Wearing Off Index. In predominant dyskinetic patients, there was a significant reduction in average and maximum AIMS scores with no changes in average and maximum UPDRS-ME scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching L-dopa therapy from "pulsatile" to "pulse" modality may reduce the severity of wearing-off and dyskinesia in complicated PD.

Restoration of the Dopamine Transporter through Cell Therapy Improves Dyskinesia in a Rat Model of Parkinson's Disease

The dyskinesia of Parkinson's Disease is most likely due to excess levels of dopamine in the striatum. The mechanism may be due to aberrant synthesis but also, a deficiency or absence of the Dopamine Transporter. In this study we have examined the proposition that reinstating Dopamine Transporter expression in the striatum would reduce dyskinesia. We transplanted c17.2 cells that stably expressed the Dopamine Transporter into dyskinetic rats. There was a reduction in dyskinesia in rats that received grafts expressing the Dopamine Transporter. Strategies designed to increase Dopamine Transporter in the striatum may be useful in treating the dyskinesia associated with human Parkinson's Disease.

Validation of the UPDRS section IV for detection of motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

The UPDRS-IV represents the most common screening tool to assess motor fluctuations in patients with PD despite the lack of a clinimetric validation.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated sensitivity and specificity of UPDRS-IV using a 12-h waking-day motor assessment as the gold standard.

METHODS

We consecutively enrolled PD patients who underwent a 12-h waking-day motor assessment in the study. Patients were clinically evaluated every 2 h for 12 h using the UPDRS-III. Motor scores were reported as a line graph and six blinded raters classified patients as having or not having motor fluctuations. The UPDRS-IV was used in order to assess the presence of predictable and unpredictable motor fluctuations according to items 36-38.

RESULTS

Sixty two PD patients were enrolled in the study. According to the raters' evaluations, 39 (62.9%) were classified as having motor fluctuations, while according to the UPDRS-IV 47 (75.8%) presented a motor fluctuation giving a sensitivity of 87.2% (95%CI 72.6-95.7) and a specificity of 43.5% (95%CI 23.2-65.5).

CONCLUSION

Our study results confirm the high level of sensitivity with a lower level of specificity of UPDRS-IV to screen motor fluctuations in PD patients.

The Human Experience with Intravenous Levodopa

Objective: To compile a comprehensive summary of published human experience with levodopa given intravenously, with a focus on information required by regulatory agencies.

Background: While safe intravenous (IV) use of levodopa has been documented for over 50 years, regulatory supervision for pharmaceuticals given by a route other than that approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has become increasingly cautious. If delivering a drug by an alternate route raises the risk of adverse events, an investigational new drug (IND) application is required, including a comprehensive review of toxicity data.

Methods: Over 200 articles referring to IV levodopa were examined for details of administration, pharmacokinetics, benefit, and side effects.

Results: We identified 142 original reports describing IVLD use in humans, beginning with psychiatric research in 1959–1960 before the development of peripheral decarboxylase inhibitors. At least 2760 subjects have received IV levodopa, and reported outcomes include parkinsonian signs, sleep variables, hormone levels, hemodynamics, CSF amino acid composition, regional cerebral blood flow, cognition, perception and complex behavior. Mean pharmacokinetic variables were summarized for 49 healthy subjects and 190 with Parkinson's disease. Side effects were those expected from clinical experience with oral levodopa and dopamine agonists. No articles reported deaths or induction of psychosis.

Conclusion: At least 2760 patients have received IV levodopa with a safety profile comparable to that seen with oral administration.

What is a clinically important change in the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale in Parkinson's disease?

INTRODUCTION

Dyskinesia remain a significant problem in Parkinson Disease (PD). The translation process of novel drug targets for dyskinesia has proven difficult with several failures at phase III level. Determining the 'clinically important change' (CIC) for dyskinesia rating scales in phase II clinical trials may assist in optimizing drug development of new anti-dyskinetic treatments. We used a standard phase IIa acute levodopa infusion paradigm to determine for the first time the CIC for dyskinesia using the new UDysRS.

METHODS

We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study with eleven PD patients with stable bothersome dyskinesia. We used the following patient-reported clinically important events as CIC anchors: onset, maximum intensity, remission of dyskinesia. Objective dyskinesia scores using the UDysRS part III Impairment were determined at these same events by blinded video-rating. The CIC was determined using the 'within-patient' score change and a sensitivity- and specificity-based approach.

RESULTS

Patients were most aware of 'onset of dyskinesia', followed by 'remission of dyskinesia'. An 11.1-point median change (UDysRS Part III Impairment, p < 0.0001) was the CIC for patient-reported remission of dyskinesia from a practically defined-OFF state. A 2.32-point change (UDysRS Part III Impairment) had the best specificity and sensitivity to distinguish between patient-reported remission and perception of dyskinesia.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we provide the first report of a CIC for the UDysRS Part III Impairment. Early knowledge of a CIC may help inform the decision to advance into phase III trials and contribute for a higher yield of success in finding new anti-dyskinetic treatments.

An objective fluctuation score for Parkinson's disease

Introduction

Establishing the presence and severity of fluctuations is important in managing Parkinson’s Disease yet there is no reliable, objective means of doing this. In this study we have evaluated a Fluctuation Score derived from variations in dyskinesia and bradykinesia scores produced by an accelerometry based system.

Methods

The Fluctuation Score was produced by summing the interquartile range of bradykinesia scores and dyskinesia scores produced every 2 minutes between 0900-1800 for at least 6 days by the accelerometry based system and expressing it as an algorithm.

Results

This Score could distinguish between fluctuating and non-fluctuating patients with high sensitivity and selectivity and was significant lower following activation of deep brain stimulators. The scores following deep brain stimulation lay in a band just above the score separating fluctuators from non-fluctuators, suggesting a range representing adequate motor control. When compared with control subjects the score of newly diagnosed patients show a loss of fluctuation with onset of PD. The score was calculated in subjects whose duration of disease was known and this showed that newly diagnosed patients soon develop higher scores which either fall under or within the range representing adequate motor control or instead go on to develop more severe fluctuations.

Conclusion

The Fluctuation Score described here promises to be a useful tool for identifying patients whose fluctuations are progressing and may require therapeutic changes. It also shows promise as a useful research tool. Further studies are required to more accurately identify therapeutic targets and ranges.

Dissociable effects of dopamine on learning and performance within sensorimotor striatum

Striatal dopamine is an important modulator of current behavior, as seen in the rapid and dramatic effects of dopamine replacement therapy in Parkinson Disease (PD). Yet there is also extensive evidence that dopamine acts as a learning signal, modulating synaptic plasticity within striatum to affect future behavior. Disentangling these "performance" and "learning" functions is important for designing effective, long-term PD treatments. We conducted a series of unilateral drug manipulations and dopamine terminal lesions in the dorsolateral striatum of rats highly-trained to perform brief instructed head/neck movements (two-alternative forced choice task). Reaction times and accuracy were measured longitudinally to determine if task behavior changed immediately, progressed over time, and/or persisted after drug withdrawal. Enhanced dopamine signaling with amphetamine caused an immediate, nonprogressive, and bilateral decrease in reaction times (RT). The altered RT distributions were consistent with reduced distance to threshold in the linear approach to threshold with ergodic rate (LATER) model of decision-making. Conversely, the dopamine antagonist flupenthixol caused experience-dependent, persistent changes in RT and accuracy indicative of a "learning" effect. These RT distributions were consistent with a slowed rate of approach to decision threshold. Our results show that dopaminergic signaling makes dissociable contributions to current and future behavior even within a single striatal subregion, and provide important clues for both models of normal decision-making and the design of novel drug therapies in PD.

Performance of a motor task learned on levodopa deteriorates when subsequently practiced off

Studies in animals and in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) demonstrate complex effects of dopamine on learning motor tasks; its effect on retention of motor learning has received little attention. Recent animal studies demonstrate that practicing a task in the off state, when initially learned in the on state, leads to progressive deterioration in performance. We measured the acquisition and retention of 3 different motor tasks in the presence and absence of levodopa. Twenty individuals with Hoehn and Yahr Stage 1.5 to 3 PD practiced the tasks daily for two 4-day weeks, one half practicing on L-dopa the first week and off the second week. The other half practiced off l-dopa both weeks. The tasks were (1) alternate tapping of 2 keys, (2) moving the body toward 2 targets on a posturography device, and (3) mirror drawing of a star. For the tapping and body movement tests, those who practiced on the first week had a progressive decline in performance with practice during week 2, while subjects off during week 1 maintained or improved. In contrast, for the mirror task, subjects on L-dopa initially had much more difficulty completing the task compared to subjects who practiced off. Both groups improved with practice the first week and had flat performance the second week. These data suggest that performance of speed-accuracy tasks learned in the on state may progressively worsen if subsequently practiced in the off state. In addition, performance, but not learning, of some tasks may be impeded by L-dopa.

The role of neuroplasticity in dopaminergic therapy for Parkinson disease

Dopamine replacement is a mainstay of therapeutic strategies for Parkinson disease (PD). The motor response to therapy involves an immediate improvement in motor function, known as the short-duration response (SDR), followed by a long-duration response (LDR) that develops more slowly, over weeks. Here, we review evidence in patients and animal models suggesting that dopamine-dependent corticostriatal plasticity, and retention of such plasticity in the absence of dopamine, are the mechanisms underlying the LDR. Conversely, experience-dependent aberrant plasticity that develops slowly under reduced dopamine levels could contribute substantially to PD motor symptoms before initiation of dopamine replacement therapy. We place these findings in the context of the role of dopamine in basal ganglia function and corticostriatal plasticity, and provide a new framework suggesting that therapies that enhance the LDR could be more effective than those targeting the SDR. We further propose that changes in neuroplasticity constitute a form of disease modification that is distinct from prevention of degeneration, and could be responsible for some of the unexplained disease-modifying effects of certain therapies. Understanding such plasticity could provide novel therapeutic approaches that combine rehabilitation and pharmacotherapy for treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders involving basal ganglia dysfunction.

Progression of motor and nonmotor features of Parkinson's disease and their response to treatment

AIMS

(i) To describe the progression of the cardinal features of Parkinson's disease (PD); (ii) to investigate whether baseline PD subtypes explain disease progression; and (iii) to quantify the symptomatic and disease-modifying effects of anti-parkinsonian treatments.

METHODS

Data were available for 795 PD subjects, initially untreated, followed for up to 8 years. Cardinal features [tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, and postural instability and gait disorder (PIGD)] were derived from the total unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (total UPDRS), cognitive status from the mini-mental status exam score (MMSE) and depression status from the Hamilton depression scale (HAM-D). Analysis was performed using a nonlinear mixed effects approach with an asymptotic model for natural disease progression. Treatment effects (i.e. symptomatic and disease modifying) were evaluated by describing changes in the natural history model parameters.

RESULTS

Tremor progressed more slowly (half-time of 3.9 years) than all other motor features (half-time 2-3 years). The MMSE progression was negligible, while HAM-D progressed with a half-time of 5 years. Levodopa had marked symptomatic effects on all features, but low potency for effect on PIGD (ED₅₀ of 1237 mg day⁻¹ compared with 7-24 mg day⁻¹ for other motor and nonmotor features). Other anti-parkinsonian treatments had much smaller symptomatic effects. All treatments had disease-modifying effects on the cardinal features of PD. Baseline PD subtypes only explained small differences in disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis indicates that tremor progresses more slowly than other cardinal features and that PIGD is less treatment responsive in early PD patients. There was no evidence of baseline PD subtypes as a clinically useful predictor of disease progression rate. Anti-parkinsonian treatments have symptomatic and disease-modifying effects on all major features of PD.

Activity enhances dopaminergic long-duration response in Parkinson disease

OBJECTIVE

We tested the hypothesis that dopamine-dependent motor learning mechanism underlies the long-duration response to levodopa in Parkinson disease (PD) based on our studies in a mouse model. By data-mining the motor task performance in dominant and nondominant hands of the subjects in a double-blind randomized trial of levodopa therapy, the effects of activity and dopamine therapy were examined.

METHODS

We data-mined the Earlier versus Later Levodopa Therapy in Parkinson's Disease (ELLDOPA) study published in 2005 and performed statistical analysis comparing the effects of levodopa and dominance of handedness over 42 weeks.

RESULTS

The mean change in finger-tapping counts from baseline before the initiation of therapy to predose at 9 weeks and 40 weeks increased more in the dominant compared to nondominant hand in levodopa-treated subjects in a dose-dependent fashion. There was no significant difference in dominant vs nondominant hands in the placebo group. The short-duration response assessed by the difference of postdose performance compared to predose performance at the same visit did not show any significant difference between dominant vs nondominant hands.

CONCLUSIONS

Active use of the dominant hand and dopamine replacement therapy produces synergistic effect on long-lasting motor task performance during "off" medication state. Such effect was confined to dopamine-responsive symptoms and not seen in dopamine-resistant symptoms such as gait and balance. We propose that long-lasting motor learning facilitated by activity and dopamine is a form of disease modification that is often seen in trials of medications that have symptomatic effects.

Pharmacokinetics of levodopa

This paper reviews the clinically relevant determinants of levodopa peripheral pharmacokinetics and main observed changes in the levodopa concentration-effect relationship with Parkinson's disease (PD) progression. Available clinically practical strategies to optimise levodopa pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are briefly discussed. Levodopa shows particular pharmacokinetics including an extensive presystemic metabolism, overcome by the combined use of extracerebral inhibitors of the enzyme L: -amino acid decarboxylase and rapid absorption in the proximal small bowel by a saturable facilitated transport system shared with other large neutral amino acids. Drug transport from plasma to the brain is mediated by the same carriers operating in the intestinal mucosa. The main strategies to assure reproducibility of both intestinal absorption and delivery to the brain, and the clinical effect include standardization of levodopa dosing with respect to meal times and a controlled dietary protein intake. Levodopa plasma half-life is very short, resulting in marked plasma drug concentration fluctuations which are matched, as the disease progresses, to swings in the therapeutic response ("wearing-off" phenomena). "Wearing-off" phenomena can also be associated, at the more advanced disease stages, with a "negative", both parkinsonism-exacerbating and dyskinetic effect of levodopa at low, subtherapeutic plasma concentrations. Dyskinesias may also be related to high-levodopa, excessive plasma concentrations. Recognition of the different levodopa toxic response patterns can be difficult on a clinical basis alone and simultaneous monitoring of the levodopa concentration-effect relationship may prove useful to disclose the underlying mechanism and in planning the correct management. Clinically practical strategies to optimise levodopa pharmacokinetics, and possibly its therapeutic response, include liquid drug solutions, controlled release formulations and the use of inhibitors of levodopa metabolism. Unfortunately, these attempts have proved so far only partly successful, due to the complex alterations in cerebral levodopa kinetics which accompany the progressive degeneration of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system in PD patients.

A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for duodenal levodopa infusion

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this work was to identify and estimate a population pharmacokinetic- pharmacodynamic model for duodenal infusion of a levodopa/carbidopa gel (Duodopa) to examine pharmacological properties of this treatment.

METHODS

The modeling involved pooling data from 3 studies (on advanced Parkinson disease) and fixing some parameters to values found in literature. The first study involved 12 patients studied on 3 occasions each and was previously published. The second study involved 3 patients on 2 occasions. A bolus dose was given after a washout during night. Plasma samples and motor ratings (clinical assessment of motor function on a 7-point treatment response scale ranging from "very off" to "very hyperkinetic") were collected until the clinical effect returned to baseline. The third study involved 5 patients on 3 occasions receiving 5 different dose levels. Different structural models were evaluated using the nonlinear mixed-effects modeling program NONMEM VI. Population mean parameter values, and interindividual, interoccasion, and residual variabilities were estimated.

RESULTS

Absorption of the levodopa/carbidopa gel can be adequately described with first-order absorption with bioavailability and lag time. Estimated population parameter values were a mean absorption time of 28.5 minutes, a lag time of 2.9 minutes, and a bioavailability of 88%. The pharmacodynamic model for motor ratings had the following population values: a half-life of effect delay of 21 minutes, a concentration at 50% effect of 1.55 mg/L, an Emax of 2.39 U on the treatment response scale, and a sigmoidicity of the Emax function of 11.6.

CONCLUSIONS

For the typical unmedicated subject, it will take 51.4 minutes until the peak levodopa effect is reached after a bolus dose. This delay is, like the magnitude of the effect, highly variable in this patient group. The residual error magnitudes of 20% for levodopa concentrations and 0.92 U (SD) for motor ratings indicate that the models developed provide predictions of a relevant quality. The developed model may be a first step toward model-guided treatment individualization of duodenal infusion of levodopa.

Nonmotor symptoms groups in Parkinson's disease patients: results of a pilot, exploratory study

Nonmotor symptoms (NMS) like neuropsychiatric symptoms, sleep disturbances or autonomic symptoms are a common feature of Parkinson's disease (PD). To explore the existence of groups of NMS and to relate them to PD characteristics, 71 idiopathic non-demented PD out-patients were recruited. Sleep was evaluated by the PD Sleep Scale (PDSS). Several neuropsychiatric, gastrointestinal and urogenital symptoms were obtained from the NMSQuest. Sialorrhea or dysphagia severity was obtained from the Unified PD Rating Scale activities of daily living section. MADRS depression scale was also administered. Exploratory factor analysis revealed the presence of 5 factors, explaining 70% of variance. The first factor included PDSS measurement of sleep quality, nocturnal restlessness, off-related problems and daytime somnolence; the second factor included nocturia (PDSS) and nocturnal activity; the third one included gastrointestinal and genitourinary symptoms; the forth one included nocturnal psychosis (PDSS), sialorrhea and dysphagia (UPDRS); and the last one included the MADRS score as well as neuropsychiatric symptoms. Sleep disorders correlated with presence of wearing-off, nocturia with age >69 years, and nocturnal psychosis with levodopa equivalent dose or UPDRS II score. Neuropsychiatric symptoms correlated with UPDRS II+III score and non-tricyclic antidepressants. These results support the occurrence of significant NMS grouping in PD patients.

Levodopa effect on electromyographic activation patterns of tibialis anterior muscle during walking in Parkinson's disease

Previous studies have reported that patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) show, in the "off medication" state, a reduced activation of tibialis anterior (TA) in the late swing-early stance phase of the gait cycle. In PD patients the pathophysiological picture may cause differences among the stride cycles. Our aims were to evaluate how frequently TA activity is reduced in the late swing-early stance phase and if there is a relationship between the TA pattern and the clinical picture. Thirty PD patients were studied 2 h after Levodopa administration ("on-med") and 12 h after Levodopa wash-out ("off-med"). They were evaluated by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III) and surface electromyography of TA and gastrocnemius medialis (GM). The root mean square (RMS) of the TA activity in late swing-early stance phase (RMS-A) was normalized as a percent of the RMS of the TA activity in late stance-early swing (RMS-B). RMS-A was reduced in 30% of patients in the "off-med" condition. Within these patients, the percentage of stride cycles with reduced RMS-A, ranged between 28% and 83%. After Levodopa intake, no stride cycle showed reduced RMS-A. Patients with reduced RMS-A had a lower UPDRS III total score in the "on-med" rather than in the "off-med" condition (p=0.02). Our data confirm and extend previous observations indicating that, in "off-med" the function of TA is impaired in those patients clinically more responsive to Levodopa. TA activation is reduced in a relatively high percent of gait cycles in the "off-med" state. Since the variability of TA activation disappears after Levodopa administration, this phenomenon could be the expression of an abnormal dopaminergic drive.

A phase I study of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase gene therapy for Parkinson's disease

Gene transfer of dopamine-synthesizing enzymes into the striatal neurons has led to behavioral recovery in animal models of Parkinson's disease (PD). We evaluated the safety, tolerability, and potential efficacy of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector-mediated gene delivery of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) into the putamen of PD patients. Six PD patients were evaluated at baseline and at 6 months, using multiple measures, including the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), motor state diaries, and positron emission tomography (PET) with 6-[(18)F]fluoro-L-m-tyrosine (FMT), a tracer for AADC. The short-duration response to levodopa was measured in three patients. The procedure was well tolerated. Six months after surgery, motor functions in the OFF-medication state improved an average of 46% based on the UPDRS scores, without apparent changes in the short-duration response to levodopa. PET revealed a 56% increase in FMT activity, which persisted up to 96 weeks. Our findings provide class IV evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of AADC gene therapy and warrant further evaluation in a randomized, controlled, phase 2 setting.

Dopamine-dependent motor learning: insight into levodopa's long-duration response

OBJECTIVE

Dopamine (DA) is critical for motor performance, motor learning, and corticostriatal plasticity. The relationship between motor performance and learning, and the role of DA in the mediation of them, however, remain unclear.

METHODS

To examine this question, we took advantage of PITx3-deficient mice (aphakia mice), in which DA in the dorsal striatum is reduced by 90%. PITx3-deficient mice do not display obvious motor deficits in their home cage, but are impaired in motor tasks that require new motor skills. We used the accelerating rotarod as a motor learning task.

RESULTS

We show that the deficiency in motor skill learning in PITx3(-/-) is dramatic and can be rescued with levodopa treatment. In addition, cessation of levodopa treatment after acquisition of the motor skill does not result in an immediate drop in performance. Instead, there is a gradual decline of performance that lasts for a few days, which is not related to levodopa pharmacokinetics. We show that this gradual decline is dependent on the retesting experience.

INTERPRETATION

This observation resembles the long-duration response to levodopa therapy in its slow buildup of improvement after the initiation of therapy and gradual degradation. We hypothesize that motor learning may play a significant, underappreciated role in the symptomatology of Parkinson disease as well as in the therapeutic effects of levodopa. We suggest that the important, yet enigmatic long-duration response to chronic levodopa treatment is a manifestation of rescued motor learning.

Dyskinesia and the antiparkinsonian response always temporally coincide: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To clinically characterize the temporal relationship between dyskinesia and the antiparkinsonian response when dyskinesia first emerges during long-term levodopa therapy and to determine if it is consistent with the hypothesized mechanism by which dyskinesia develops.

METHODS

Dyskinesia and the antiparkinsonian response to levodopa during 2-hour levodopa infusions were monitored at intervals through the first 4 years of long-term levodopa therapy in 20 subjects with idiopathic Parkinson disease (PD) and previously untreated with levodopa. The onset and offset of the antiparkinsonian response and dyskinesia were compared when dyskinesia first appeared during the 4 years. The findings were compared to 20 subjects with PD on long-term levodopa with dyskinesia and motor fluctuations.

RESULTS

The onset and offset of the antiparkinsonian response and dyskinesia generally coincided when dyskinesia first appeared during the 4 years and did not suggest any temporal dissociation of the 2 responses. Further, the latency to the onsets of dyskinesia and the antiparkinsonian response tended to shorten during long-term levodopa therapy, suggesting that both responses were sensitized by long-term levodopa.

CONCLUSIONS

The similar onsets and offsets of the antiparkinsonian response and dyskinesia when dyskinesia first appears are not consistent with the postulated progressive decrease in threshold for dyskinesia during long-term levodopa therapy. Other mechanisms for the development of dyskinesia need to be considered.

Longitudinal study of the levodopa motor response in Parkinson's disease: relationship between cognitive decline and motor function

In this prospective study of 34 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), measurements of the short duration levodopa motor response have been performed every 3 years in defined off states. The mean time from initiation of levodopa treatment was 14.8 years, and 17 patients survived to the latest assessment stage. Off phase motor function worsened at a yearly rate of 2.2% of the maximum disability score. The magnitude of the levodopa response is well preserved as the disease progresses, and patients who developed motor fluctuations maintained better on phase motor function than nonfluctuators (P = 0.01). Ten patients, of whom 5 survive, developed dementia. There was no difference in pretreatment disability or initial levodopa response between demented and nondemented subjects. However, dementia was associated with worse on and off motor disability scores after 11 and 14 years (P < 0.001), and a smaller levodopa response magnitude after 14 years (P = 0.008). The plot of sequential scores shows the association between cognitive decline and accelerating increase in motor disability. This suggests that the advanced phase of PD, when Lewy body pathology involves the cerebral cortex, progresses in an exponential rather than linear fashion.

Therapy for dyskinesias in Parkinson’s disease patients

Dyskinesia hampers the quality of life for most Parkinson’s disease patients following several years of therapy. However, the severity of L-Dopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) varies between patients, being quite tolerable in late-onset patients. Understanding the pathogenesis of LID has contributed to the development of a set of therapeutic strategies, including the choice, in early stages, of the least pulsatile regimen of dopamine-receptor activation. In cases where LIDs are already disabling, there is only a limited number of options: the optimization of ongoing DOPA-centered treatment, the utilization of glutamate antagonists and the exploration of the benefits of antipsychotic agents. More radical solutions are provided by deep brain stimulation in the subthalamic nucleus (or internal pallidus). This approach has proved efficacious in reducing LID, largely because it allows a reduction in dopaminergic daily doses. Stereotactic neurosurgery has fuelled several lines of investigation regarding the crosstalk between the basal ganglia and motor cortex. Here, we will present interesting evidence highlighting the potential for repetitive transcranial stimulation in reducing the occurrence of LID. The future may disclose important new avenues for the treatment of LIDs, given the current development of promising agents that might target different facets of dyskinesia, such as the impairment of striatal plasticity and non-Dopaminergic contributors such as adenosine, nitric oxide and the nucleotide cascade.

Central levodopa influx and the clinical motor response to levodopa in patients with Parkinson disease complicated with motor fluctuations and dyskinesias

OBJECTIVE

To study the possible relationship between central levodopa influx and short-term antiparkinsonian and dyskinetic responses to levodopa in patients with Parkinson disease.

METHODS

The clinical response to a single oral dose of standard and controlled-release levodopa/carbidopa was assessed in 12 patients with Parkinson disease complicated with motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Plasma concentrations of levodopa and large neutral amino acids were determined, and the theoretical central levodopa influx was calculated using a model based on competitive inhibition of substrates to cross the blood-brain barrier.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) central levodopa influxes at the onset of the antiparkinsonian clinical effect were 19.7 (10.9 x 10(-3) and 19.1 (7.4 x 10(-3) nmol min(-1) g(-)1 (P >0.1) for standard and controlled-release levodopa, respectively. The mean (SD) central levodopa influxes at the onset of choreic dyskinesias were 20.1 (8.2 x 10 (-3) and 19.9 (10.8 x 10(-3) nmol min (-1) g(-)1 (P 9 0.1) for standard and controlled-release levodopa, respectively. During the tests, choreic dyskinesias were associated with a central levodopa influx of 10 x 10(-3) nmol min(-1) g(-1) or greater, and foot dystonia occurred with a central levodopa influx less than 9 x 10(-3) nmol min(-1) g(-1).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical response to levodopa in patients with advanced Parkinson disease may be related to central levodopa influx. We found no differences in the central levodopa influx threshold for clinical improvement with different levodopa formulations. The central levodopa influxes at the onset of choreic dyskinesias and antiparkinsonian effect were similar. Choreic dyskinesias and foot dystonia were associated with high and low central levodopa influx, respectively.

Biomarkers in Huntington's and Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson's (PD) and Huntington's disease (HD) are chronic neurodegenerative conditions of the brain with a variety of clinical presentations including a disorder of movement and a range of nonmotor deficits. HD is genetic in origin and the causative gene and protein known, namely mutant Huntingtin, which leads to widespread early neuronal dysfunction and death throughout the brain. In contrast, the etiology of sporadic PD is unknown, and the pathology targets the nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons with the formation of alpha-synuclein positive Lewy bodies. In both diseases, the ability to accurately diagnose the disease in the early stages and monitor progression over time remains a major challenge given the majority of the pathology is sited deep within the CNS. This challenge has gained extra significance as the development of disease-modifying drugs starts to emerge into the clinic. To this end, there is a need to find biomarkers that will help in the accurate diagnosis of the disease and/or prediction of its clinical onset as well as biomarkers that are able to faithfully track disease progression independent of any symptomatic effects of any therapies. In addition, these same markers may also help stratify each of these heterogeneous disorders into specific subtypes that share particular clinical and pathological characteristics.