1
|
Tuovinen T, Häkli J, Rytty R, Krüger J, Korhonen V, Järvelä M, Helakari H, Kananen J, Nikkinen J, Veijola J, Remes AM, Kiviniemi V. The relative brain signal variability increases in the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease but not in schizophrenia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2024:271678X241262583. [PMID: 38897598 DOI: 10.1177/0271678x241262583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Overlapping symptoms between Alzheimer's disease (AD), behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), and schizophrenia (SZ) can lead to misdiagnosis and delays in appropriate treatment, especially in cases of early-onset dementia. To determine the potential of brain signal variability as a diagnostic tool, we assessed the coefficient of variation of the BOLD signal (CVBOLD) in 234 participants spanning bvFTD (n = 53), AD (n = 17), SZ (n = 23), and controls (n = 141). All underwent functional and structural MRI scans. Data unveiled a notable increase in CVBOLD in bvFTD patients across both datasets (local and international, p < 0.05), revealing an association with clinical scores (CDR and MMSE, r = 0.46 and r = -0.48, p < 0.0001). While SZ and control group demonstrated no significant differences, a comparative analysis between AD and bvFTD patients spotlighted elevated CVBOLD in the frontopolar cortices for the latter (p < 0.05). Furthermore, CVBOLD not only presented excellent diagnostic accuracy for bvFTD (AUC 0.78-0.95) but also showcased longitudinal repeatability. During a one-year follow-up, the CVBOLD levels increased by an average of 35% in the bvFTD group, compared to a 2% increase in the control group (p < 0.05). Our findings suggest that CVBOLD holds promise as a biomarker for bvFTD, offering potential for monitoring disease progression and differentiating bvFTD from AD and SZ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timo Tuovinen
- Oulu Functional NeuroImaging, Research Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Oulu, Finland
| | - Jani Häkli
- Oulu Functional NeuroImaging, Research Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Oulu, Finland
| | - Riikka Rytty
- Oulu Functional NeuroImaging, Research Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Neurology, Hyvinkää Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of Central Uusimaa, Hyvinkää, Finland
| | - Johanna Krüger
- Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Oulu, Finland
- Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Neurology, Neurocenter, Oulu University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Oulu, Finland
| | - Vesa Korhonen
- Oulu Functional NeuroImaging, Research Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Oulu, Finland
| | - Matti Järvelä
- Oulu Functional NeuroImaging, Research Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Oulu, Finland
| | - Heta Helakari
- Oulu Functional NeuroImaging, Research Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Oulu, Finland
| | - Janne Kananen
- Oulu Functional NeuroImaging, Research Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Oulu, Finland
- Clinical Neurophysiology, Oulu University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Oulu, Finland
| | - Juha Nikkinen
- Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Oulu, Finland
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Oulu University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Oulu, Finland
| | - Juha Veijola
- Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Oulu, Finland
- Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Department of Psychiatry, Oulu University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Oulu, Finland
| | - Anne M Remes
- Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Clinical Neurosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Vesa Kiviniemi
- Oulu Functional NeuroImaging, Research Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Oulu, Finland
- Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nabizadeh F, Pirahesh K, Aarabi MH, Wennberg A, Pini L. Behavioral and dysexecutive variant of Alzheimer's disease: Insights from structural and molecular imaging studies. Heliyon 2024; 10:e29420. [PMID: 38638964 PMCID: PMC11024599 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Frontal variant Alzheimer's disease (AD) manifests with either behavioral or dysexecutive syndromes. Recent efforts to gain a deeper understanding of this phenotype have led to a re-conceptualization of frontal AD. Behavioral (bAD) and dysexecutive (dAD) phenotypes could be considered subtypes, as suggested by both clinical and neuroimaging studies. In this review, we focused on imaging studies to highlight specific brain patterns in these two uncommon clinical AD phenotypes. Although studies did not compare directly these two variants, a common epicenter located in the frontal cortex could be inferred. On the contrary, 18F-FDG-PET findings suggested differing metabolic patterns, with bAD showing specific involvement of frontal regions and dAD exhibiting widespread alterations. Structural MRI findings confirmed this pattern, suggesting that degeneration might involve neural circuits associated with behavioral control in bAD and attentional networks in dAD. Furthermore, molecular imaging has identified different neocortical tau distribution in bAD and dAD patients compared to typical AD patients, although the distribution is remarkably heterogeneous. In contrast, Aβ deposition patterns are less differentiated between these atypical variants and typical AD. Although preliminary, these findings underscore the complexity of AD frontal phenotypes and suggest that they represent distinct entities. Further research is essential to refine our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms in frontal AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fardin Nabizadeh
- School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Neuroscience Research Group (NRG), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
| | - Kasra Pirahesh
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Alexandra Wennberg
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lorenzo Pini
- Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Čihák M, Horáková H, Vyhnálek M, Veverová K, Matušková V, Laczó J, Hort J, Nikolai T. Evaluation of Differential Diagnostics Potential of Uniform Data Set 2 Neuropsychology Battery Using Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2024:acae028. [PMID: 38582748 DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acae028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the Uniform Data Set (UDS) 2 battery in distinguishing between individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) attributable to Alzheimer's disease (MCI-AD) and those with MCI due to other causes (MCI-nonAD), based on contemporary AT(N) biomarker criteria. Despite the implementation of the novel UDS 3 battery, the UDS 2 battery is still used in several non-English-speaking countries. METHODS We employed a cross-sectional design. A total of 113 Czech participants with MCI underwent a comprehensive diagnostic assessment, including cerebrospinal fluid biomarker evaluation, resulting in two groups: 45 individuals with prodromal AD (A+T+) and 68 participants with non-Alzheimer's pathological changes or normal AD biomarkers (A-). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed with neuropsychological test scores and demographic variables as predictors and AD status as an outcome. Model 1 included UDS 2 scores that differed between AD and non-AD groups (Logical Memory delayed recall), Model 2 employed also Letter Fluency and Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT). The two models were compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves. We also created separate logistic regression models for each of the UDS 2 scores. RESULTS Worse performance in delayed recall of Logical Memory significantly predicted the presence of positive AD biomarkers. In addition, the inclusion of Letter Fluency RAVLT into the model significantly enhanced its discriminative capacity. CONCLUSION Our findings demonstrate that using Letter Fluency and RAVLT alongside the UDS 2 battery can enhance its potential for differential diagnostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Čihák
- Department of Neurology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Hana Horáková
- Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, Charles University, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Motol University Hospital, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Vyhnálek
- Department of Neurology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Kateřina Veverová
- Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, Charles University, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, 116 38 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Veronika Matušková
- Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, Charles University, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Laczó
- Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, Charles University, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jakub Hort
- Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, Charles University, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Tomáš Nikolai
- Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, Charles University, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Motol University Hospital, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, 116 38 Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Perri R, Fadda L, Caltagirone C, Carlesimo GA. Subjective clustering in patients with fronto-temporal dementia. APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY. ADULT 2024; 31:144-154. [PMID: 35014573 DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2021.2002867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
In the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) memory deficits have been traditionally considered as due to difficulties in encoding/retrieval frontal strategies. However, the frontal origin of memory deficits in bvFTD has been questioned and hippocampal dysfunction has been also proposed. Here we analyzed bvFTD patients' proficiency in subjectively organizing memories without an external criterion. Twenty bvFTD patients and 20 healthy individuals were assessed with memory and executive tasks. The ability to subjectively organize memories in the immediate recall of a 15 unrelated word list was measured by calculating the index of subjective clustering (ISC) based on the constancies in response order across the five consecutive free recall trials. Results revealed reduced ISC in bvFTD patients with respect to normal controls. In the bvFTD group, the ISC score correlated with the Corsi span backward score and the number of categories achieved on the Modified Card Sorting Test. The bvFTD patients' reduced ISC and its correlation with executive performance suggest that executive deficits underlie their defective strategic organization of memories. However, as ISC did not predict memory accuracy in these patients, the memory deficit may not be the mere expression of their executive difficulties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Perri
- Laboratory of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Lucia Fadda
- Laboratory of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
- Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Caltagirone
- Laboratory of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni A Carlesimo
- Laboratory of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
- Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen Y, Spina S, Callahan P, Grinberg LT, Seeley WW, Rosen HJ, Kramer JH, Miller BL, Rankin KP. Pathology-specific patterns of cerebellar atrophy in neurodegenerative disorders. Alzheimers Dement 2024; 20:1771-1783. [PMID: 38109286 PMCID: PMC10984510 DOI: 10.1002/alz.13551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Associations of cerebellar atrophy with specific neuropathologies in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) have not been systematically analyzed. This study examined cerebellar gray matter volume across major pathological subtypes of ADRD. METHODS Cerebellar gray matter volume was examined using voxel-based morphometry in 309 autopsy-proven ADRD cases and 80 healthy controls. ADRD subtypes included AD, mixed Lewy body disease and AD (LBD-AD), and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Clinical function was assessed using the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale. RESULTS Distinct patterns of cerebellar atrophy were observed in all ADRD subtypes. Significant cerebellar gray matter changes appeared in the early stages of most subtypes and the very early stages of AD, LBD-AD, FTLD-TDP type A, and progressive supranuclear palsy. Cortical atrophy positively predicted cerebellar atrophy across all subtypes. DISCUSSION Our findings establish pathology-specific profiles of cerebellar atrophy in ADRD and propose cerebellar neuroimaging as a non-invasive biomarker for differential diagnosis and disease monitoring. HIGHLIGHTS Cerebellar atrophy was examined in 309 patients with autopsy-proven neurodegeneration. Distinct patterns of cerebellar atrophy are found in all pathological subtypes of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Cerebellar atrophy is seen in early-stage (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] ≤1) AD, Lewy body dementia (LBD), frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tau-positive inclusion (FTLD-tau), and FTLD-transactive response DNA binding protein (FTLD-TDP). Cortical atrophy positively predicts cerebellar atrophy across all neuropathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Chen
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterWeill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Salvatore Spina
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterWeill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Patrick Callahan
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterWeill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Lea T. Grinberg
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterWeill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
- Department of PathologyUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - William W. Seeley
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterWeill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
- Department of PathologyUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Howard J. Rosen
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterWeill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Joel H. Kramer
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterWeill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Bruce L. Miller
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterWeill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Katherine P. Rankin
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterWeill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu F, Shi Y, Wu Q, Chen H, Wang Y, Cai L, Zhang N. The value of FDG combined with PiB PET in the diagnosis of patients with cognitive impairment in a memory clinic. CNS Neurosci Ther 2024; 30:e14418. [PMID: 37602885 PMCID: PMC10848040 DOI: 10.1111/cns.14418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS To analyze the value of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) combined with amyloid PET in cognitive impairment diagnosis. METHODS A total of 187 patients with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) who underwent 11 C-Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) and FDG PET scans in a memory clinic were included in the final analysis. RESULTS Amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative dementia patient groups showed a significant difference in the proportion of individuals presenting temporoparietal cortex (p < 0.001) and posterior cingulate/precuneus cortex (p < 0.001) hypometabolism. The sensitivity and specificity of this hypometabolic pattern for identifying amyloid pathology were 72.61% and 77.97%, respectively, in patients clinically diagnosed with AD and 60.87% and 76.19%, respectively, in patients with MCI. The initial diagnosis was changed in 32.17% of patients with dementia after considering both PiB and FDG results. There was a significant difference in both the proportion of patients showing the hypometabolic pattern and PiB positivity between dementia conversion patients and patients with a stable diagnosis of MCI (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Temporoparietal and posterior cingulate/precuneus cortex hypometabolism on FDG PET suggested amyloid pathology in patients with cognitive impairment and is helpful in diagnostic decision-making and predicting AD dementia conversion from MCI, particularly when combined with amyloid PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Liu
- Department of NeurologyTianjin Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General HospitalTianjinChina
| | - Yudi Shi
- Department of NeurologyTianjin Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General HospitalTianjinChina
- Health Management CenterTianjin Medical University General Hospital Airport SiteTianjinChina
| | - Qiuyan Wu
- Department of NeurologyTianjin Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General HospitalTianjinChina
| | - Huifeng Chen
- Department of NeurologyTianjin Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General HospitalTianjinChina
- Department of NeurologyTianjin Medical University General Hospital Airport SiteTianjinChina
| | - Ying Wang
- PET/CT CenterTianjin Medical University General HospitalTianjinChina
| | - Li Cai
- PET/CT CenterTianjin Medical University General HospitalTianjinChina
| | - Nan Zhang
- Department of NeurologyTianjin Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General HospitalTianjinChina
- Department of NeurologyTianjin Medical University General Hospital Airport SiteTianjinChina
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu MN, Hu LY, Tsai CF, Hong CJ, Chou YH, Chang CC, Yang KC, You ZH, Lau CI. Abnormalities of Hippocampal Subfield and Amygdalar Nuclei Volumes and Clinical Correlates in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia with Obsessive-Compulsive Behavior-A Pilot Study. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1582. [PMID: 38002542 PMCID: PMC10669726 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13111582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The hippocampus (HP) and amygdala are essential structures in obsessive-compulsive behavior (OCB); however, the specific role of the HP in patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and OCB remains unclear. (2) Objective: We investigated the alterations of hippocampal and amygdalar volumes in patients with bvFTD and OCB and assessed the correlations of clinical severity with hippocampal subfield and amygdalar nuclei volumes in bvFTD patients with OCB. (3) Materials and methods: Eight bvFTD patients with OCB were recruited and compared with eight age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). Hippocampal subfield and amygdalar nuclei volumes were analyzed automatically using a 3T magnetic resonance image and FreeSurfer v7.1.1. All participants completed the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), and Frontal Behavioral Inventory (FBI). (4) Results: We observed remarkable reductions in bilateral total hippocampal volumes. Compared with the HCs, reductions in the left hippocampal subfield volume over the cornu ammonis (CA)1 body, CA2/3 body, CA4 body, granule cell layer, and molecular layer of the dentate gyrus (GC-ML-DG) body, molecular layer of the HP body, and hippocampal tail were more obvious in patients with bvFTD and OCB. Right subfield volumes over the CA1 body and molecular layer of the HP body were more significantly reduced in bvFTD patients with OCB than in those in HCs. We observed no significant difference in amygdalar nuclei volume between the groups. Among patients with bvFTD and OCB, Y-BOCS score was negatively correlated with left CA2/3 body volume (τb = -0.729, p < 0.001); total NPI score was negatively correlated with left GC-ML-DG body (τb = -0.648, p = 0.001) and total bilateral hippocampal volumes (left, τb = -0.629, p = 0.002; right, τb = -0.455, p = 0.023); and FBI score was negatively correlated with the left molecular layer of the HP body (τb = -0.668, p = 0.001), CA4 body (τb = -0.610, p = 0.002), and hippocampal tail volumes (τb = -0.552, p < 0.006). Mediation analysis confirmed these subfield volumes as direct biomarkers for clinical severity, independent of medial and lateral orbitofrontal volumes. (5) Conclusions: Alterations in hippocampal subfield volumes appear to be crucial in the pathophysiology of OCB development in patients with bvFTD.
Collapse
Grants
- 102-2314-B-075 -082, 105-2314-B-075 -024 -MY2, 104-2314-B-075 -039, 111-2314-B-075 -015 Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
- V108B-009, V112B-039, V110B-028, V111B-033 Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
- RVHCY111024 Chiayi branch of Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
- 2021SKHADR016 Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taiwan
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mu-N Liu
- Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan; (M.-N.L.); (C.-J.H.)
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - Li-Yu Hu
- Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan; (M.-N.L.); (C.-J.H.)
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Fen Tsai
- Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan; (M.-N.L.); (C.-J.H.)
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Jee Hong
- Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan; (M.-N.L.); (C.-J.H.)
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hwa Chou
- Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan; (M.-N.L.); (C.-J.H.)
- Center for Quality Management, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
| | - Chiung-Chih Chang
- Department of Neurology, Cognition and Aging Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
| | - Kai-Chun Yang
- Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan; (M.-N.L.); (C.-J.H.)
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - Zi-Hong You
- Department of Nephrology, Chiayi Branch, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Chiayi 60090, Taiwan
| | - Chi Ieong Lau
- Dementia Center, Department of Neurology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, No.95, Wenchang Rd., Shilin Dist., Taipei 11101, Taiwan
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Taipai, Macao SAR, China
- Institute of Biophotonics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 24205, Taiwan
- Applied Cognitive Neuroscience Group, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17 Queen Square, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sokołowski A, Roy ARK, Goh SM, Hardy EG, Datta S, Cobigo Y, Brown JA, Spina S, Grinberg L, Kramer J, Rankin KP, Seeley WW, Sturm VE, Rosen HJ, Miller BL, Perry DC. Neuropsychiatric symptoms and imbalance of atrophy in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Hum Brain Mapp 2023; 44:5013-5029. [PMID: 37471695 PMCID: PMC10502637 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia is characterized by heterogeneous frontal, insular, and anterior temporal atrophy patterns that vary along left-right and dorso-ventral axes. Little is known about how these structural imbalances impact clinical symptomatology. The goal of this study was to assess the frequency of frontotemporal asymmetry (right- or left-lateralization) and dorsality (ventral or dorsal predominance of atrophy) and to investigate their clinical correlates. Neuropsychiatric symptoms and structural images were analyzed for 250 patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Frontotemporal atrophy was most often symmetric while left-lateralized (9%) and right-lateralized (17%) atrophy were present in a minority of patients. Atrophy was more often ventral (32%) than dorsal (3%) predominant. Patients with right-lateralized atrophy were characterized by higher severity of abnormal eating behavior and hallucinations compared to those with left-lateralized atrophy. Subsequent analyses clarified that eating behavior was associated with right atrophy to a greater extent than a lack of left atrophy, and hallucinations were driven mainly by right atrophy. Dorsality analyses showed that anxiety, euphoria, and disinhibition correlated with ventral-predominant atrophy. Agitation, irritability, and depression showed greater severity with a lack of regional atrophy, including in dorsal regions. Aberrant motor behavior and apathy were not explained by asymmetry or dorsality. This study provides additional insight into how anatomical heterogeneity influences the clinical presentation of patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Behavioral symptoms can be associated not only with the presence or absence of focal atrophy, but also with right/left or dorsal/ventral imbalance of gray matter volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Sokołowski
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, UCSF Weill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Ashlin R. K. Roy
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, UCSF Weill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Sheng‐Yang M. Goh
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, UCSF Weill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Emily G. Hardy
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, UCSF Weill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Samir Datta
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, UCSF Weill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Yann Cobigo
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, UCSF Weill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Jesse A. Brown
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, UCSF Weill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Salvatore Spina
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, UCSF Weill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Lea Grinberg
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, UCSF Weill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Joel Kramer
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, UCSF Weill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Katherine P. Rankin
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, UCSF Weill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - William W. Seeley
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, UCSF Weill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
- Department of PathologyUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Virginia E. Sturm
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, UCSF Weill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Howard J. Rosen
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, UCSF Weill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Bruce L. Miller
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, UCSF Weill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - David C. Perry
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, UCSF Weill Institute for NeurosciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ananthavarathan P, Patel B, Peeros S, Obrocki R, Malek N. Neurological update: non-motor symptoms in atypical parkinsonian syndromes. J Neurol 2023; 270:4558-4578. [PMID: 37316556 PMCID: PMC10421812 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11807-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Among people with Parkinson's disease (PD), non-motor symptoms (NMS) are a well-recognised cause of significant morbidity and poor quality of life. Yet, it is only more recently that NMS have been recognised to affect the lives of patients with atypical parkinsonian syndromes in a similar fashion. The aim of this article is to highlight and compare the relative prevalence of NMS among patients with atypical parkinsonian syndromes in the published literature, which largely remain underreported and unaddressed in routine clinical practice. All NMS that are recognised to occur in PD are also found to commonly occur in atypical parkinsonian syndromes. In particular, excessive daytime sleepiness is more prevalent among atypical parkinsonian syndromes (94.3%) compared to PD (33.9%) or normal controls (10.5%) (p < 0.001). Urinary dysfunction (not limited to urinary incontinence) is not only found to occur in MSA (79.7%) and PD (79.9%), but has also been reported in nearly half of the patients with PSP (49.3%), DLB (42%) and CBD (53.8%) (p < 0.001). Apathy is significantly more common among the atypical parkinsonian syndromes [PSP (56%), MSA (48%), DLB (44%), CBD (43%)] compared to PD (35%) (p = 0.029). Early recognition and addressing of NMS among atypical parkinsonian syndromes may help improve the holistic patient care provided and may encompass a range of conservative and pharmacotherapeutic treatments to address these symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piriyankan Ananthavarathan
- Department of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK.
- Department of Neuroinflammation, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 1st Floor, Russell Square House, 10-12 Russell Square, London, WC1B 5EH, UK.
| | - B Patel
- Department of Neurology, Queen's Hospital, Romford, Essex, UK
| | - S Peeros
- Department of Neurology, Queen's Hospital, Romford, Essex, UK
| | - R Obrocki
- Department of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
- Department of Neurology, Queen's Hospital, Romford, Essex, UK
| | - N Malek
- Department of Neurology, Queen's Hospital, Romford, Essex, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brown A, Salo SK, Savage G. Frontal variant Alzheimer's disease: A systematic narrative synthesis. Cortex 2023; 166:121-153. [PMID: 37356113 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frontal variant Alzheimer's disease (fvAD) is considered a rare form of Alzheimer's disease (AD) which may be misdiagnosed as behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). The literature has tended to conflate behavioural and executive dysfunction in fvAD cohorts and uses both AD diagnostic criteria and bvFTD diagnostic criteria to classify fvAD cohorts. The primary aim of this narrative synthesis was to summarise neuropsychological findings in fvAD cohorts in the context of established AD pathology. METHODS EMBASE, PsycINFO, PROQUEST and MEDLINE databases were searched for studies eligible for inclusion. Studies with both neuropsychological and biomarker evidence were included in the final narrative synthesis. RESULTS Ten studies were reviewed, including samples totalling 342 fvAD participants, 178 typical AD participants and 250 bvFTD participants. The review revealed areas worthy of further investigation that may aid differential diagnosis, including the degree of executive dysfunction in fvAD cohorts relative to bvFTD cohorts, the onset of behavioural and cognitive symptomatology, and similarities between fvAD and typical AD cognitive profiles. CONCLUSION There was insufficient neuropsychological evidence to clearly differentiate fvAD and bvFTD cognitive phenotypes, however, the review has highlighted distinctive features of the two disorders that may guide differential diagnosis in future research. Moreover, the review has highlighted issues involving disparate diagnostic criteria used to classify fvAD cohorts, contributing to variation in findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Brown
- School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sarah K Salo
- Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK; School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Greg Savage
- School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ray NR, Ayodele T, Jean-Francois M, Baez P, Fernandez V, Bradley J, Crane PK, Dalgard CL, Kuzma A, Nicaretta H, Sims R, Williams J, Cuccaro ML, Pericak-Vance MA, Mayeux R, Wang LS, Schellenberg GD, Cruchaga C, Beecham GW, Reitz C. The Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease Whole-Genome Sequencing Project: Study design and methodology. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19:4187-4195. [PMID: 37390458 PMCID: PMC10527497 DOI: 10.1002/alz.13370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sequencing efforts to identify genetic variants and pathways underlying Alzheimer's disease (AD) have largely focused on late-onset AD although early-onset AD (EOAD), accounting for ∼10% of cases, is largely unexplained by known mutations, resulting in a lack of understanding of its molecular etiology. METHODS Whole-genome sequencing and harmonization of clinical, neuropathological, and biomarker data of over 5000 EOAD cases of diverse ancestries. RESULTS A publicly available genomics resource for EOAD with extensive harmonized phenotypes. Primary analysis will (1) identify novel EOAD risk loci and druggable targets; (2) assess local-ancestry effects; (3) create EOAD prediction models; and (4) assess genetic overlap with cardiovascular and other traits. DISCUSSION This novel resource complements over 50,000 control and late-onset AD samples generated through the Alzheimer's Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP). The harmonized EOAD/ADSP joint call will be available through upcoming ADSP data releases and will allow for additional analyses across the full onset range. HIGHLIGHTS Sequencing efforts to identify genetic variants and pathways underlying Alzheimer's disease (AD) have largely focused on late-onset AD although early-onset AD (EOAD), accounting for ∼10% of cases, is largely unexplained by known mutations. This results in a significant lack of understanding of the molecular etiology of this devastating form of the disease. The Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease Whole-genome Sequencing Project is a collaborative initiative to generate a large-scale genomics resource for early-onset Alzheimer's disease with extensive harmonized phenotype data. Primary analyses are designed to (1) identify novel EOAD risk and protective loci and druggable targets; (2) assess local-ancestry effects; (3) create EOAD prediction models; and (4) assess genetic overlap with cardiovascular and other traits. The harmonized genomic and phenotypic data from this initiative will be available through NIAGADS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas R. Ray
- Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University, New
York, NY 10032, USA
- Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease
and the Aging Brain, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Temitope Ayodele
- Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University, New
York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Melissa Jean-Francois
- The John P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics,
University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Dr. John T. MacDonald Foundation Department of Human
Genetics, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA
| | - Penelope Baez
- Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University, New
York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Victoria Fernandez
- Department of Psychiatry, Neurology and Genetics,
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
- Neurogenomics and Informatic (NGI) Center, Washington
University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Joseph Bradley
- Department of Psychiatry, Neurology and Genetics,
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
- Neurogenomics and Informatic (NGI) Center, Washington
University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Paul K. Crane
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Clifton L. Dalgard
- Department of Anatomy, Physiology & Genetics,
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
- The American Genome Center, Uniformed Services University
of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Amanda Kuzma
- Penn Neurodegeneration Genomics Center, Department of
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of
Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Heather Nicaretta
- Penn Neurodegeneration Genomics Center, Department of
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of
Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Rebecca Sims
- Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical
Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK
| | - Julie Williams
- UK Dementia Research Institute, Cardiff University,
Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK
- Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical
Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK
| | - Michael L. Cuccaro
- The John P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics,
University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Dr. John T. MacDonald Foundation Department of Human
Genetics, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA
| | - Margaret A. Pericak-Vance
- The John P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics,
University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Dr. John T. MacDonald Foundation Department of Human
Genetics, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA
| | - Richard Mayeux
- Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University, New
York, NY 10032, USA
- Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease
and the Aging Brain, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY
10032, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York,
NY 10032, USA
| | - Li-San Wang
- Penn Neurodegeneration Genomics Center, Department of
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of
Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Gerard D. Schellenberg
- Penn Neurodegeneration Genomics Center, Department of
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of
Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Carlos Cruchaga
- Department of Psychiatry, Neurology and Genetics,
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
- Neurogenomics and Informatic (NGI) Center, Washington
University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Gary W. Beecham
- The John P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics,
University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Dr. John T. MacDonald Foundation Department of Human
Genetics, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA
| | - Christiane Reitz
- Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University, New
York, NY 10032, USA
- Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease
and the Aging Brain, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY
10032, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York,
NY 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Donato L, Mordà D, Scimone C, Alibrandi S, D'Angelo R, Sidoti A. How Many Alzheimer-Perusini's Atypical Forms Do We Still Have to Discover? Biomedicines 2023; 11:2035. [PMID: 37509674 PMCID: PMC10377159 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11072035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer-Perusini's (AD) disease represents the most spread dementia around the world and constitutes a serious problem for public health. It was first described by the two physicians from whom it took its name. Nowadays, we have extensively expanded our knowledge about this disease. Starting from a merely clinical and histopathologic description, we have now reached better molecular comprehension. For instance, we passed from an old conceptualization of the disease based on plaques and tangles to a more modern vision of mixed proteinopathy in a one-to-one relationship with an alteration of specific glial and neuronal phenotypes. However, no disease-modifying therapies are yet available. It is likely that the only way to find a few "magic bullets" is to deepen this aspect more and more until we are able to draw up specific molecular profiles for single AD cases. This review reports the most recent classifications of AD atypical variants in order to summarize all the clinical evidence using several discrimina (for example, post mortem neurofibrillary tangle density, cerebral atrophy, or FDG-PET studies). The better defined four atypical forms are posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (LvPPA), behavioral/dysexecutive variant and AD with corticobasal degeneration (CBS). Moreover, we discuss the usefulness of such classifications before outlining the molecular-genetic aspects focusing on microglial activity or, more generally, immune system control of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Donato
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, Division of Medical Biotechnologies and Preventive Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98125 Messina, Italy
- Department of Biomolecular Strategies, Genetics, Cutting-Edge Therapies, Euro-Mediterranean Institute of Science and Technology, Via Michele Miraglia, 98139 Palermo, Italy
| | - Domenico Mordà
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, Division of Medical Biotechnologies and Preventive Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98125 Messina, Italy
- Department of Biomolecular Strategies, Genetics, Cutting-Edge Therapies, Euro-Mediterranean Institute of Science and Technology, Via Michele Miraglia, 98139 Palermo, Italy
| | - Concetta Scimone
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, Division of Medical Biotechnologies and Preventive Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98125 Messina, Italy
- Department of Biomolecular Strategies, Genetics, Cutting-Edge Therapies, Euro-Mediterranean Institute of Science and Technology, Via Michele Miraglia, 98139 Palermo, Italy
| | - Simona Alibrandi
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, Division of Medical Biotechnologies and Preventive Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98125 Messina, Italy
- Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Viale Ferdinando Stagno D'Alcontres 31, 98166 Messina, Italy
| | - Rosalia D'Angelo
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, Division of Medical Biotechnologies and Preventive Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98125 Messina, Italy
| | - Antonina Sidoti
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, Division of Medical Biotechnologies and Preventive Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98125 Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fiondella L, Gami-Patel P, Blok CA, Rozemuller AJM, Hoozemans JJM, Pijnenburg YAL, Scarioni M, Dijkstra AA. Movement disorders are linked to TDP-43 burden in the substantia nigra of FTLD-TDP brain donors. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2023; 11:63. [PMID: 37046309 PMCID: PMC10091586 DOI: 10.1186/s40478-023-01560-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Movement disorders (MD) have been linked to degeneration of the substantia nigra (SN) in Parkinson's disease and include bradykinesia, rigidity, and tremor. They are also present in frontotemporal dementia (FTD), where MD have been linked to frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tau pathology (FTLD-tau). Although MD can also occur in FTLD with TDP-43 pathology (FTLD-TDP), the local pathology in the SN of FTLD-TDP patients with MD is currently unexplored. The aims of this study are to characterize the frequency and the nature of MD in a cohort of FTLD-TDP brain donors and to investigate the relationship between the presence of MD, the nigral neuronal loss, and the TDP-43 burden in the SN. From our cohort of FTLD-TDP patients (n = 53), we included 13 donors who presented with MD (FTLD-MD+), and nine age-sex matched donors without MD (FTLD-MD-) for whom the SN was available. In these donors, the TDP-43 burden and the neuronal density in the SN were assessed with ImageJ and Qupath software. The results were compared between the two groups using T-test. We found that the TDP-43 burden in the SN was higher in FTLD-MD+ (mean 3,43%, SD ± 2,7) compared to FTLD-MD- (mean 1,21%, SD ± 0,67) (p = 0,04), while no significant difference in nigral neuronal density was found between the groups (p = 0,09). 17% of FTLD-TDP patients developed MD, which present as symmetric akinetic-rigid parkinsonism or CBS. Given the absence of a significant nigral neuronal cell loss, TDP-43 induced neuronal dysfunction could be sufficient to cause MD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Fiondella
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic, and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
| | - Priya Gami-Patel
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian A Blok
- Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemieke J M Rozemuller
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen J M Hoozemans
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yolande A L Pijnenburg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marta Scarioni
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Anke A Dijkstra
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Meneses AD, Koga S, Li Z, O’Leary J, Li F, Chen K, Murakami A, Qiao W, Kurti A, Heckman MG, White L, Xie M, Chen Y, Finch NA, Lim MJ, Delenclos M, DeTure MA, Linares C, Martin NB, Ikezu TC, van Blitterswijk MM, Wu LJ, McLean PJ, Rademakers R, Ross OA, Dickson DW, Bu G, Zhao N. APOE2 Exacerbates TDP-43 Related Toxicity in the Absence of Alzheimer Pathology. Ann Neurol 2023; 93:830-843. [PMID: 36546684 PMCID: PMC10471132 DOI: 10.1002/ana.26580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Recent evidence supports a link between increased TDP-43 burden and the presence of an APOE4 gene allele in Alzheimer's disease (AD); however, it is difficult to conclude the direct effect of APOE on TDP-43 pathology due to the presence of mixed AD pathologies. The goal of this study is to address how APOE isoforms impact TDP-43 pathology and related neurodegeneration in the absence of typical AD pathologies. METHODS We overexpressed human TDP-43 via viral transduction in humanized APOE2, APOE3, APOE4 mice, and murine Apoe-knockout (Apoe-KO) mice. Behavior tests were performed across ages. Animals were harvested at 11 months of age and TDP-43 overexpression-related neurodegeneration and gliosis were assessed. To further address the human relevance, we analyzed the association of APOE with TDP-43 pathology in 160 postmortem brains from autopsy-confirmed amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration with motor neuron disease (FTLD-MND) in the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank. RESULTS We found that TDP-43 overexpression induced motor function deficits, neuronal loss, and gliosis in the motor cortex, especially in APOE2 mice, with much milder or absent effects in APOE3, APOE4, or Apoe-KO mice. In the motor cortex of the ALS and FTLD-MND postmortem human brains, we found that the APOE2 allele was associated with more severe TDP-43-positive dystrophic neurites. INTERPRETATION Our data suggest a genotype-specific effect of APOE on TDP-43 proteinopathy and neurodegeneration in the absence of AD pathology, with the strongest association seen with APOE2. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:830-843.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel D. Meneses
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
- Clinical and Translational Science Graduate Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Shunsuke Koga
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Zonghua Li
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Justin O’Leary
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Fuyao Li
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Kai Chen
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Aya Murakami
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Wenhui Qiao
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Aishe Kurti
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Michael G. Heckman
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Launia White
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Manling Xie
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Yixing Chen
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - NiCole A. Finch
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Melina J. Lim
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Marion Delenclos
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Michael A. DeTure
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Cynthia Linares
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | | | - Tadafumi C. Ikezu
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | | | - Long-Jun Wu
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Pamela J. McLean
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Rosa Rademakers
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
- VIB Center for Molecular Neurology, VIB, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Owen A. Ross
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Dennis W. Dickson
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Guojun Bu
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Na Zhao
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Semenkova A, Piguet O, Johnen A, Schroeter ML, Godulla J, Linnemann C, Mühlhauser M, Sauer T, Baumgartner M, Anderl-Straub S, Otto M, Felbecker A, Kressig RW, Berres M, Sollberger M. The Behavioural Dysfunction Questionnaire discriminates behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer's disease dementia and major depressive disorder. J Neurol 2023:10.1007/s00415-023-11666-6. [PMID: 36952011 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11666-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Early-stage behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is often misdiagnosed, highlighting the need for new diagnostic instruments. Based on the revised diagnostic criteria for bvFTD, we developed the Behavioural Dysfunction Questionnaire (BDQ). In this explorative study, we aimed to determine the best scoring and analytical method for the BDQ to discriminate between bvFTD and non-bvFTD patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS 34 patients with early-stage bvFTD, 56 with early-stage Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD) and 41 with major depressive disorder (MDD) were recruited. We calculated BDQ-items with or without inclusion of a time criterion: (a) without time criterion, (b) with 10 years' time criterion (symptom presence less than 10 years), and (c) with 3 years' time criterion (symptom presentation within the first 3 years). Using these three differently calculated items, we generated six variables, i.e. 3*2 [BDQ-Global Score (BDQ-GS; domains average score); BDQ-Global Domain Score (BDQ-GDS; domains categorical score)]. Then, we performed univariate and bivariate (BDQ-GS and BDQ-GDS combined) ROC analyses. RESULTS Models including BDQ-GS, BDQ-GDS or both variables combined discriminated similarly between groups. In contrast, models without time criterion or with 10 years' time criterion discriminated better than models including variables with 3 years' time criterion. These models discriminated highly (AUC = 85.98-87.78) between bvFTD and MDD and bvFTD and ADD, respectively. CONCLUSION BDQ-scores without any time criterion discriminated highly between early-stage bvFTD and non-bvFTD groups, which could improve the early diagnosis of bvFTD. With its standardised procedure, the BDQ is also appropriate for repeated assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Semenkova
- Memory Clinic, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, Basel, Switzerland
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Olivier Piguet
- School of Psychology and Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andreas Johnen
- Clinic for Neurology, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Matthias L Schroeter
- Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jannis Godulla
- Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Thomas Sauer
- University Psychiatric Clinic, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Markus Otto
- Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - Ansgar Felbecker
- Clinic of Neurology und Neurophysiology, Canton Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Reto W Kressig
- Memory Clinic, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Manfred Berres
- Department of Mathematics and Technology, University of Applied Sciences Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
| | - Marc Sollberger
- Memory Clinic, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, Basel, Switzerland.
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Constantinides VC, Boufidou F, Bourbouli M, Pyrgelis ES, Ghika A, Koros C, Liakakis G, Papageorgiou S, Stefanis L, Paraskevas GP, Kapaki E. Application of the AT(N) and Other CSF Classification Systems in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13030332. [PMID: 36766437 PMCID: PMC9914032 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13030332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with a frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) usually manifest with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). Alzheimer's disease (AD) may also manifest with a predominant behavioral-dysexecutive syndrome, similar to bvFTD. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, such as total tau (τT), phosphorylated tau (τP-181) and amyloid beta with 42 amino-acids (Aβ42), can predict AD pathology in vivo. The aim of this study was to compare the τT/Aβ42 and τP-181/Aβ42 ratios, the BIOMARKAPD/ABSI criteria and the AT(N) classification system in a cohort of bvFTD patients. METHODS A total of 105 bvFTD patients (21 possible bvFTD; 20%) with CSF data, examined from 2008 to 2022, were included. Seventy-eight AD patients and 62 control subjects were included. The CSF biomarkers were measured with Innotest (2008-2017 subcohort) and EUROIMMUN (2017-2022 subcohort) ELISAs. RESULTS Depending on the classification system, 7.6 to 28.6% of bvFTD had an AD biochemical profile. The τT/Aβ42 and τP-181/Aβ42 ratios classified more patients as AD compared to the BIOMARKAPD/ABSI and AT(N) systems. The patients with possible bvFTD had higher frequencies of AD compared to the probable bvFTD patients. CONCLUSIONS The four classification criteria of CSF AD biomarkers resulted in differences in AD allocation in this bvFTD cohort. A consensus on the optimal classification criteria of CSF AD biomarkers is pivotal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasilios C. Constantinides
- First Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Vass. Sophias Ave. 74, 11528 Athens, Greece
- Neurochemistry and Biological Markers Unit, First Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Vass. Sophias Ave. 74, 11528 Athens, Greece
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +30-21-0728-9285
| | - Fotini Boufidou
- Neurochemistry and Biological Markers Unit, First Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Vass. Sophias Ave. 74, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Mara Bourbouli
- Neurochemistry and Biological Markers Unit, First Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Vass. Sophias Ave. 74, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Efstratios-Stylianos Pyrgelis
- First Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Vass. Sophias Ave. 74, 11528 Athens, Greece
- Neurochemistry and Biological Markers Unit, First Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Vass. Sophias Ave. 74, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Apostolia Ghika
- First Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Vass. Sophias Ave. 74, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Christos Koros
- First Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Vass. Sophias Ave. 74, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - George Liakakis
- First Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Vass. Sophias Ave. 74, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Sokratis Papageorgiou
- First Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Vass. Sophias Ave. 74, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Leonidas Stefanis
- First Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Vass. Sophias Ave. 74, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - George P. Paraskevas
- Neurochemistry and Biological Markers Unit, First Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Vass. Sophias Ave. 74, 11528 Athens, Greece
- Second Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University General Hospital, Rimini 1, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Elisabeth Kapaki
- First Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Vass. Sophias Ave. 74, 11528 Athens, Greece
- Neurochemistry and Biological Markers Unit, First Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Vass. Sophias Ave. 74, 11528 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
del Campo M, Zetterberg H, Gandy S, Onyike CU, Oliveira F, Udeh‐Momoh C, Lleó A, Teunissen CE, Pijnenburg Y. New developments of biofluid-based biomarkers for routine diagnosis and disease trajectories in frontotemporal dementia. Alzheimers Dement 2022; 18:2292-2307. [PMID: 35235699 PMCID: PMC9790674 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) covers a spectrum of neurodegenerative disorders with different phenotypes, genetic backgrounds, and pathological states. Its clinicopathological diversity challenges the diagnostic process and the execution of clinical trials, calling for specific diagnostic biomarkers of pathologic FTD types. There is also a need for biomarkers that facilitate disease staging, quantification of severity, monitoring in clinics and observational studies, and for evaluation of target engagement and treatment response in clinical trials. This review discusses current FTD biofluid-based biomarker knowledge taking into account the differing applications. The limitations, knowledge gaps, and challenges for the development and implementation of such markers are also examined. Strategies to overcome these hurdles are proposed, including the technologies available, patient cohorts, and collaborative research initiatives. Access to robust and reliable biomarkers that define the exact underlying pathophysiological FTD process will meet the needs for specific diagnosis, disease quantitation, clinical monitoring, and treatment development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta del Campo
- Departamento de Ciencias Farmacéuticas y de la SaludFacultad de FarmaciaUniversidad San Pablo‐CEUCEU UniversitiesMadridSpain
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Institute of Neuroscience and PhysiologyThe Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden,Clinical Neurochemistry LaboratorySahlgrenska University HospitalMölndalSweden,UK Dementia Research Institute at UCLLondonUK,Department of Neurodegenerative DiseaseUCL Institute of NeurologyLondonUK,Hong Kong Center for Neurodegenerative DiseasesHong KongChina
| | - Sam Gandy
- Department of NeurologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Chiadi U Onyike
- Division of Geriatric Psychiatry and NeuropsychiatryThe Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Fabricio Oliveira
- Department of Neurology and NeurosurgeryEscola Paulista de MedicinaFederal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP)São PauloSão PauloBrazil
| | - Chi Udeh‐Momoh
- Ageing Epidemiology Research UnitSchool of Public HealthFaculty of MedicineImperial College LondonLondonUK,Translational Health SciencesFaculty of MedicineUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - Alberto Lleó
- Neurology DepartmentHospital de la Santa Creu I Sant PauBarcelonaSpain
| | - Charlotte E. Teunissen
- Neurochemistry LaboratoryDepartment of Clinical ChemistryAmsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdam University Medical CentersVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Yolande Pijnenburg
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamDepartment of NeurologyAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Perez SD, Phillips JS, Norise C, Kinney NG, Vaddi P, Halpin A, Rascovsky K, Irwin DJ, McMillan CT, Xie L, Wisse LE, Yushkevich PA, Kallogjeri D, Grossman M, Cousins KA. Neuropsychological and Neuroanatomical Features of Patients with Behavioral/Dysexecutive Variant Alzheimer’s disease (AD): A Comparison to Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia and Amnestic AD Groups. J Alzheimers Dis 2022; 89:641-658. [PMID: 35938245 PMCID: PMC10117623 DOI: 10.3233/jad-215728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background: An understudied variant of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the behavioral/dysexecutive variant of AD (bvAD), is associated with progressive personality, behavior, and/or executive dysfunction and frontal atrophy. Objective: This study characterizes the neuropsychological and neuroanatomical features associated with bvAD by comparing it to behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), amnestic AD (aAD), and subjects with normal cognition. Methods: Subjects included 16 bvAD, 67 bvFTD, and 18 aAD patients, and 26 healthy controls. Neuropsychological assessment and MRI data were compared between these groups. Results: Compared to bvFTD, bvAD showed more significant visuospatial impairments (Rey Figure copy and recall), more irritability (Neuropsychological Inventory), and equivalent verbal memory (Philadelphia Verbal Learning Test). Compared to aAD, bvAD indicated more executive dysfunction (F-letter fluency) and better visuospatial performance. Neuroimaging analysis found that bvAD showed cortical thinning relative to bvFTD posteriorly in left temporal-occipital regions; bvFTD had cortical thinning relative to bvAD in left inferior frontal cortex. bvAD had cortical thinning relative to aAD in prefrontal and anterior temporal regions. All patient groups had lower volumes than controls in both anterior and posterior hippocampus. However, bvAD patients had higher average volume than aAD patients in posterior hippocampus and higher volume than bvFTD patients in anterior hippocampus after adjustment for age and intracranial volume. Conclusion: Findings demonstrated that underlying pathology mediates disease presentation in bvAD and bvFTD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Dominguez Perez
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (FTDC), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Jeffrey S. Phillips
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (FTDC), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Catherine Norise
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nikolas G. Kinney
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (FTDC), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Prerana Vaddi
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (FTDC), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amy Halpin
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (FTDC), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychology, University of Maine, Orono, ME, USA
| | - Katya Rascovsky
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (FTDC), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David J. Irwin
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (FTDC), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Corey T. McMillan
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (FTDC), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Long Xie
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Image Computing and Science Lab & Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Laura E.M. Wisse
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Image Computing and Science Lab & Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Paul A. Yushkevich
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Image Computing and Science Lab & Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Dorina Kallogjeri
- Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Murray Grossman
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (FTDC), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Katheryn A.Q. Cousins
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (FTDC), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Matti N, Javanshiri K, Haglund M, Saenz-Sardá X, Englund E. Locus Coeruleus Degeneration Differs Between Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Subtypes. J Alzheimers Dis 2022; 89:463-471. [PMID: 35871340 PMCID: PMC9535600 DOI: 10.3233/jad-220276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Background: There are few studies on the locus coeruleus (LC) in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and the potential differences in the LC related to the underlying proteinopathy. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the LC in FTLD subgroups. Methods: Neuropathological cases diagnosed with FTLD were included. The subgroups consisted of FTLD with tau, transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP) and fused in sarcoma (FUS). Micro- and macroscopical degeneration of the LC were assessed with respect to the number of neurons and the degree of depigmentation. A group of cognitively healthy subjects and a group with vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) served as comparison groups. Results: A total of 85 FTLD cases were included, of which 44 had FTLD-TDP, 38 had FTLD-tau, and three had FTLD-FUS. The groups were compared with 25 VCI cases and 41 cognitively healthy control cases (N = 151 for the entire study). All FTLD groups had a statistically higher microscopical degeneration of the LC compared to the controls, but the FTLD-tau group had greater micro- and macroscopical degeneration than the FTLD-TDP group. Age correlated positively with the LC score in the FTLD-tau group, but not in the FTLD-TDP group. Conclusion: A greater microscopical degeneration of the LC was observed in all FTLD cases compared to healthy controls and those with VCI. The LC degeneration was more severe in FTLD-tau than in FTLD-TDP. The macroscopically differential degeneration of the LC in FTLD subgroups may facilitate differential diagnostics, potentially with imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Matti
- Division of Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Keivan Javanshiri
- Division of Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Mattias Haglund
- Division of Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Xavier Saenz-Sardá
- Division of Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Elisabet Englund
- Division of Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Newberg AB, Coble R, Khosravi M, Alavi A. Positron Emission Tomography-Based Assessment of Cognitive Impairment and Dementias, Critical Role of Fluorodeoxyglucose in such Settings. PET Clin 2022; 17:479-494. [PMID: 35717103 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2022.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) has been a key component in the diagnostic armamentarium for assessing neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer or Parkinson disease. PET imaging has been useful for diagnosing these disorders, identifying their pathophysiology, and following their treatment. Further, PET imaging has been extensively used for both clinical and research purposes, particularly for helping with potential therapeutic approaches for managing neurodegenerative diseases. This article will review the current literature regarding PET imaging in patients with neurodegenerative disorders. This includes an evaluation of the most commonly used tracer fluorodeoxyglucose that measures cerebral glucose metabolism, tracers that assess neurotransmitter systems, and tracers designed to reveal disease-specific pathophysiological processes. With the continuing development of an expanding variety of radiopharmaceuticals, PET imaging will likely play a prominent role in future research and clinical applications for neurodegenerative diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew B Newberg
- Marcus Institute of Integrative Health, Thomas Jefferson University, 789 East Lancaster Avenue, Suite 110, Villanova, PA 19085, USA; Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Roger Coble
- Marcus Institute of Integrative Health, Thomas Jefferson University, 789 East Lancaster Avenue, Suite 110, Villanova, PA 19085, USA; University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Mohsen Khosravi
- Marcus Institute of Integrative Health, Thomas Jefferson University, 789 East Lancaster Avenue, Suite 110, Villanova, PA 19085, USA
| | - Abass Alavi
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Polsinelli AJ, Apostolova LG. Atypical Alzheimer Disease Variants. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2022; 28:676-701. [PMID: 35678398 PMCID: PMC10028410 DOI: 10.1212/con.0000000000001082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article discusses the clinical, neuroimaging, and biomarker profiles of sporadic atypical Alzheimer disease (AD) variants, including early-onset AD, posterior cortical atrophy, logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia, dysexecutive variant and behavioral variant AD, and corticobasal syndrome. RECENT FINDINGS Significant advances are being made in the recognition and characterization of the syndromically diverse AD variants. These variants are identified by the predominant cognitive and clinical features: early-onset amnestic syndrome, aphasia, visuospatial impairments, dysexecutive and behavioral disturbance, or motor symptoms. Although understanding of regional susceptibility to disease remains in its infancy, visualizing amyloid and tau pathology in vivo and CSF examination of amyloid-β and tau proteins are particularly useful in atypical AD, which can be otherwise prone to misdiagnosis. Large-scale research efforts, such as LEADS (the Longitudinal Early-Onset Alzheimer Disease Study), are currently ongoing and will continue to shed light on our understanding of these diverse presentations. SUMMARY Understanding the clinical, neuroimaging, and biomarker profiles of the heterogeneous group of atypical AD syndromes improves diagnostic accuracy in patients who are at increased risk of misdiagnosis. Earlier accurate identification facilitates access to important interventions, social services and disability assistance, and crucial patient and family education.
Collapse
|
22
|
Frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43): its journey of more than 100 years. J Neurol 2022; 269:4030-4054. [PMID: 35320398 PMCID: PMC10184567 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11073-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) with TDP-43-immunoreactive inclusions (FTLD-TDP) is a neurodegenerative disease associated with clinical, genetic, and neuropathological heterogeneity. An association between TDP-43, FTLD and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) was first described in 2006. However, a century before immunohistochemistry existed, atypical dementias displaying behavioral, language and/or pyramidal symptoms and showing non-specific FTLD with superficial cortical neuronal loss, gliosis and spongiosis were often confused with Alzheimer's or Pick's disease. Initially this pathology was termed dementia lacking distinctive histopathology (DLDH), but this was later renamed when ubiquitinated inclusions originally found in ALS were also discovered in (DLDH), thus warranting a recategorization as FTLD-U (ubiquitin). Finally, the ubiquitinated protein was identified as TDP-43, which aggregates in cortical, subcortical, limbic and brainstem neurons and glial cells. The topography and morphology of TDP-43 inclusions associate with specific clinical syndromes and genetic mutations which implies different pathomechanisms that are yet to be discovered; hence, the TDP-43 journey has actually just begun. In this review, we describe how FTLD-TDP was established and defined clinically and neuropathologically throughout the past century.
Collapse
|
23
|
Mahaman YAR, Embaye KS, Huang F, Li L, Zhu F, Wang JZ, Liu R, Feng J, Wang X. Biomarkers used in Alzheimer's disease diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Ageing Res Rev 2022; 74:101544. [PMID: 34933129 DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD), being the number one in terms of dementia burden, is an insidious age-related neurodegenerative disease and is presently considered a global public health threat. Its main histological hallmarks are the Aβ senile plaques and the P-tau neurofibrillary tangles, while clinically it is marked by a progressive cognitive decline that reflects the underlying synaptic loss and neurodegeneration. Many of the drug therapies targeting the two pathological hallmarks namely Aβ and P-tau have been proven futile. This is probably attributed to the initiation of therapy at a stage where cognitive alterations are already obvious. In other words, the underlying neuropathological changes are at a stage where these drugs lack any therapeutic value in reversing the damage. Therefore, there is an urgent need to start treatment in the very early stage where these changes can be reversed, and hence, early diagnosis is of primordial importance. To this aim, the use of robust and informative biomarkers that could provide accurate diagnosis preferably at an earlier phase of the disease is of the essence. To date, several biomarkers have been established that, to a different extent, allow researchers and clinicians to evaluate, diagnose, and more specially exclude other related pathologies. In this study, we extensively reviewed data on the currently explored biomarkers in terms of AD pathology-specific and non-specific biomarkers and highlighted the recent developments in the diagnostic and theragnostic domains. In the end, we have presented a separate elaboration on aspects of future perspectives and concluding remarks.
Collapse
|
24
|
Ossenkoppele R, Singleton EH, Groot C, Dijkstra AA, Eikelboom WS, Seeley WW, Miller B, Laforce RJ, Scheltens P, Papma JM, Rabinovici GD, Pijnenburg YAL. Research Criteria for the Behavioral Variant of Alzheimer Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 2021; 79:48-60. [PMID: 34870696 PMCID: PMC8649917 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.4417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Importance The behavioral variant of Alzheimer disease (bvAD) is characterized by early and predominant behavioral deficits caused by AD pathology. This AD phenotype is insufficiently understood and lacks standardized clinical criteria, limiting reliability and reproducibility of diagnosis and scientific reporting. Objective To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the bvAD literature and use the outcomes to propose research criteria for this syndrome. Data Sources A systematic literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science databases (from inception through April 7, 2021) was performed in duplicate. Study Selection Studies reporting on behavioral, neuropsychological, or neuroimaging features in bvAD and, when available, providing comparisons with typical amnestic-predominant AD (tAD) or behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). Data Extraction and Synthesis This analysis involved random-effects meta-analyses on group-level study results of clinical data and systematic review of the neuroimaging literature. The study was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Main Outcomes and Measures Behavioral symptoms (neuropsychiatric symptoms and bvFTD core clinical criteria), cognitive function (global cognition, episodic memory, and executive functioning), and neuroimaging features (structural magnetic resonance imaging, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography, perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography, amyloid positron emission tomography, and tau positron emission tomography). Results The search led to the assessment of 83 studies, including 13 suitable for meta-analysis. Data were collected for 591 patients with bvAD. There was moderate to substantial heterogeneity and moderate risk of bias across studies. Cases with bvAD showed more severe behavioral symptoms than tAD (standardized mean difference [SMD], 1.16 [95% CI, 0.74-1.59]; P < .001) and a trend toward less severe behavioral symptoms compared with bvFTD (SMD, -0.22 [95% CI, -0.47 to 0.04]; P = .10). Meta-analyses of cognitive data indicated worse executive performance in bvAD vs tAD (SMD, -1.03 [95% CI, -1.74 to -0.32]; P = .008) but not compared with bvFTD (SMD, -0.61 [95% CI, -1.75 to 0.53]; P = .29). Cases with bvAD showed a nonsignificant difference of worse memory performance compared with bvFTD (SMD, -1.31 [95% CI, -2.75 to 0.14]; P = .08) but did not differ from tAD (SMD, 0.43 [95% CI, -0.46 to 1.33]; P = .34). The neuroimaging literature revealed 2 distinct bvAD neuroimaging phenotypes: an AD-like pattern with relative frontal sparing and a relatively more bvFTD-like pattern characterized by additional anterior involvement, with the AD-like pattern being more prevalent. Conclusions and Relevance These data indicate that bvAD is clinically most similar to bvFTD, while it shares most pathophysiological features with tAD. Based on these insights, we propose research criteria for bvAD aimed at improving the consistency and reliability of future research and aiding the clinical assessment of this AD phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Lund University, Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ellen H Singleton
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Colin Groot
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anke A Dijkstra
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location VUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Willem S Eikelboom
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - William W Seeley
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Bruce Miller
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Robert Jr Laforce
- Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Janne M Papma
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gil D Rabinovici
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.,Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.,Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.,Associate Editor, JAMA Neurology
| | - Yolande A L Pijnenburg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Apostolova LG, Aisen P, Eloyan A, Fagan A, Fargo KN, Foroud T, Gatsonis C, Grinberg LT, Jack CR, Kramer J, Koeppe R, Kukull WA, Murray ME, Nudelman K, Rumbaugh M, Toga A, Vemuri P, Trullinger A, Iaccarino L, Day GS, Graff‐Radford NR, Honig LS, Jones DT, Masdeu J, Mendez M, Musiek E, Onyike CU, Rogalski E, Salloway S, Wolk DA, Wingo TS, Carrillo MC, Dickerson BC, Rabinovici GD. The Longitudinal Early-onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS): Framework and methodology. Alzheimers Dement 2021; 17:2043-2055. [PMID: 34018654 PMCID: PMC8939858 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Patients with early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) are commonly excluded from large-scale observational and therapeutic studies due to their young age, atypical presentation, or absence of pathogenic mutations. The goals of the Longitudinal EOAD Study (LEADS) are to (1) define the clinical, imaging, and fluid biomarker characteristics of EOAD; (2) develop sensitive cognitive and biomarker measures for future clinical and research use; and (3) establish a trial-ready network. LEADS will follow 400 amyloid beta (Aβ)-positive EOAD, 200 Aβ-negative EOnonAD that meet National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) criteria for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD dementia, and 100 age-matched controls. Participants will undergo clinical and cognitive assessments, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), [18 F]Florbetaben and [18 F]Flortaucipir positron emission tomography (PET), lumbar puncture, and blood draw for DNA, RNA, plasma, serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and post-mortem assessment. To develop more effective AD treatments, scientists need to understand the genetic, biological, and clinical processes involved in EOAD. LEADS will develop a public resource that will enable future planning and implementation of EOAD clinical trials.
Collapse
|
26
|
Geser F, Mitrovics TCG, Haybaeck J, Yilmazer-Hanke D. Premorbid de novo artistic creativity in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) syndromes. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2021; 128:1813-1833. [PMID: 34618237 DOI: 10.1007/s00702-021-02426-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The emergence of new artistic activities or shifts in artistic style in patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) syndromes is well documented at or after disease onset. However, a closer look in the literature reveals emerging artistic creativity also before FTD onset, although the significance and underlying pathology of such creative endeavors remain elusive. Here, we systematically review relevant studies and report an additional FTD case to elaborate on artistic activities that developed years before disease manifestation by paying particular attention to the sequence of events in individual patients' biography and clinical history. We further discuss the FTD patient's creative activities in the context of their life events, other initial or "premorbid" dementia symptoms or risk factors described in the literature such as mental illness and mild behavioral impairment (MBI), as well as changes in neuronal systems (i.e., neuroimaging and neuropathology). In addition to our FTD patient, we identified five published cases with an FTD syndrome, including three with FTD, one with primary progressive aphasia (PPA), and one with the behavioral variant of PPA (bvPPA). Premorbid novel creativity emerged across different domains (visual, musical, writing), with the FTD diagnosis ensuing artistic productivity by a median of 8 years. Data on late-life and pre-dementia life events were available in four cases. The late creative phase in our case was accompanied by personality changes, accentuation of personality traits, and cessation of painting activities occurred with the onset of memory complaints. Thus, premorbid personality changes in FTD patients can be associated with de novo creative activity. Stressful life events may also contribute to the burgeoning of creativity. Moreover, primary neocortical areas that are largely spared by pathology at early FTD stages may facilitate the engagement in artistic activities, offering a window of opportunity for art therapy and other therapeutic interventions during the MBI stage or even earlier.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Geser
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Klinikum Christophsbad, Faurndauer Str. 6-28, 73035, Göppingen, Germany.
| | - Tibor C G Mitrovics
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Klinikum Christophsbad, Göppingen, Germany
| | - Johannes Haybaeck
- Institute of Pathology, Neuropathology and Molecular Pathology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.,Diagnostic & Research Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Deniz Yilmazer-Hanke
- Clinical Neuroanatomy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hwangbo S, Hwang S, Suh MK, Kim SJ, Kim Y, Kim HJ, Na DL, Seo SW, Suh YL. Two cases of non-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia with different pathological diagnoses. PRECISION AND FUTURE MEDICINE 2021. [DOI: 10.23838/pfm.2021.00044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA), a subtype of frontotemporal lobar dementia syndrome, has been proven to have various pathological diagnoses. A 63-year-old woman and 71-year-old man separately visited our clinic for language dysfunction. Both patients showed non-fluent speech. The female patient showed personality change accompanied by language dysfunction, while the male patient had parkinsonian symptoms such as bradykinesia and cogwheel rigidity. Both patients were clinically diagnosed with nfvPPA. Several years after the first visit, the patients died, and a brain autopsy was performed. On postmortem examination, the female patient was pathologically diagnosed with Pick’s disease, while the male patient was diagnosed with progressive supranuclear palsy. Our report suggests that nfvPPA patients might show distinct clinical features depending on underlying pathologies.
Collapse
|
28
|
Hartnell IJ, Blum D, Nicoll JAR, Dorothee G, Boche D. Glial cells and adaptive immunity in frontotemporal dementia with tau pathology. Brain 2021; 144:724-745. [PMID: 33527991 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuroinflammation is involved in the aetiology of many neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and motor neuron disease. Whether neuroinflammation also plays an important role in the pathophysiology of frontotemporal dementia is less well known. Frontotemporal dementia is a heterogeneous classification that covers many subtypes, with the main pathology known as frontotemporal lobar degeneration. The disease can be categorized with respect to the identity of the protein that causes the frontotemporal lobar degeneration in the brain. The most common subgroup describes diseases caused by frontotemporal lobar degeneration associated with tau aggregation, also known as primary tauopathies. Evidence suggests that neuroinflammation may play a role in primary tauopathies with genome-wide association studies finding enrichment of genetic variants associated with specific inflammation-related gene loci. These loci are related to both the innate immune system, including brain resident microglia, and the adaptive immune system through possible peripheral T-cell involvement. This review discusses the genetic evidence and relates it to findings in animal models expressing pathogenic tau as well as to post-mortem and PET studies in human disease. Across experimental paradigms, there seems to be a consensus regarding the involvement of innate immunity in primary tauopathies, with increased microglia and astrocyte density and/or activation, as well as increases in pro-inflammatory markers. Whilst it is less clear as to whether inflammation precedes tau aggregation or vice versa; there is strong evidence to support a microglial contribution to the propagation of hyperphosphorylated in tau frontotemporal lobar degeneration associated with tau aggregation. Experimental evidence-albeit limited-also corroborates genetic data pointing to the involvement of cellular adaptive immunity in primary tauopathies. However, it is still unclear whether brain recruitment of peripheral immune cells is an aberrant result of pathological changes or a physiological aspect of the neuroinflammatory response to the tau pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iain J Hartnell
- Clinical Neurosciences, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - David Blum
- University of Lille, Inserm, CHU-Lille, UMR-S 1172-Lille Neuroscience and Cognition, Lille, France.,Alzheimer & Tauopathies, LabEx DISTALZ, France
| | - James A R Nicoll
- Clinical Neurosciences, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,Department of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Guillaume Dorothee
- Inserm, Sorbonne University, UMRS 938 Saint-Antoine Research Center, Immune System and Neuroinflammation Laboratory, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Delphine Boche
- Clinical Neurosciences, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Long Z, Irish M, Hodges JR, Halliday G, Piguet O, Burrell JR. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis features predict TDP-43 pathology in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurobiol Aging 2021; 107:11-20. [PMID: 34371283 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Clinical and pathological heterogeneity is common in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) pathology. This investigated clinical or imaging characteristics that differentiate FTLD-TDP from FTLD-tau, FTLD-TDP subtypes from each other, or pathological stages of FTLD-TDP. Initial clinical, neuropsychological and neuroimaging characteristics were compared between pathologically defined FTLD-tau and FTLD-TDP groups. Voxel-based morphometry analyses contrasted grey matter atrophy patterns. Twenty-six FTLD-TDP, 28 FTLD-tau and 78 controls were included. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis features, when present, were highly specific FTLD-TDP, which displayed greater cortical and subcortical atrophy than FTLD-tau. FTLD-TDP-43 type B had significantly shorter survival than type A. Type A patients were more cognitively impaired than type B, and basal ganglia atrophy appeared to distinguish type A from type B. Age at onset and survival duration were comparable between stages II and IV. In conclusion, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis features may be useful in distinguishing FTLD-TDP from FTLD-tau. TDP-43 type A and B appear to present with distinct profiles. The relationship between clinical features and pathological staging in FTLD-TDP-43 is complex, and TDP-43 subtyping may have more clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe Long
- Department of Neurology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China; The Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Muireann Irish
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John R Hodges
- The Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Glenda Halliday
- The Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Olivier Piguet
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James R Burrell
- The Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Concord Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Past, present and future role of retinal imaging in neurodegenerative disease. Prog Retin Eye Res 2021; 83:100938. [PMID: 33460813 PMCID: PMC8280255 DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Retinal imaging technology is rapidly advancing and can provide ever-increasing amounts of information about the structure, function and molecular composition of retinal tissue in humans in vivo. Most importantly, this information can be obtained rapidly, non-invasively and in many cases using Food and Drug Administration-approved devices that are commercially available. Technologies such as optical coherence tomography have dramatically changed our understanding of retinal disease and in many cases have significantly improved their clinical management. Since the retina is an extension of the brain and shares a common embryological origin with the central nervous system, there has also been intense interest in leveraging the expanding armamentarium of retinal imaging technology to understand, diagnose and monitor neurological diseases. This is particularly appealing because of the high spatial resolution, relatively low-cost and wide availability of retinal imaging modalities such as fundus photography or OCT compared to brain imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography. The purpose of this article is to review and synthesize current research about retinal imaging in neurodegenerative disease by providing examples from the literature and elaborating on limitations, challenges and future directions. We begin by providing a general background of the most relevant retinal imaging modalities to ensure that the reader has a foundation on which to understand the clinical studies that are subsequently discussed. We then review the application and results of retinal imaging methodologies to several prevalent neurodegenerative diseases where extensive work has been done including sporadic late onset Alzheimer's Disease, Parkinson's Disease and Huntington's Disease. We also discuss Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer's Disease and cerebrovascular small vessel disease, where the application of retinal imaging holds promise but data is currently scarce. Although cerebrovascular disease is not generally considered a neurodegenerative process, it is both a confounder and contributor to neurodegenerative disease processes that requires more attention. Finally, we discuss ongoing efforts to overcome the limitations in the field and unmet clinical and scientific needs.
Collapse
|
31
|
Bergeron D, Sellami L, Poulin S, Verret L, Bouchard RW, Laforce R. The Behavioral/Dysexecutive Variant of Alzheimer's Disease: A Case Series with Clinical, Neuropsychological, and FDG-PET Characterization. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2021; 49:518-525. [PMID: 33207355 DOI: 10.1159/000511210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It is well known that some patients with Alz-heimer's disease (AD) have atypical, nonamnestic presentations. While logopenic aphasia and posterior cortical atrophy are well-characterized atypical variants of AD, the behavioral/dysexecutive variant remains a controversial entity, lacking consensus regarding its distinctive clinical and imaging features. METHODS We present a case series of 8 patients with biomarker confirmation of AD (cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] analysis or amyloid positron emission tomography [PET]) and a progressive frontal syndrome, defined as prominent behavioral and/or executive deficits at initial presentation. We characterize the cohort based on clinical features, cognitive performance in 4 domains (memory, visuospatial, executive, and language) as well as behavior on the Dépistage Cognitif de Québec (DCQ), and regional brain metabolism using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET (FDG-PET). We compare these features with 8 age-matched patients diagnosed with the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and 37 patients with typical amnestic AD. RESULTS Patients with the behavioral/dysexecutive variant of AD presented with early-onset (mean age: 59 years old) progressive executive and behavioral problems reminiscent of bvFTD, including disinhibition, loss of social conventions, and hyperorality. Patients scored higher on the Memory Index and lower on the Behavioral Index than patients with amnestic AD on the DCQ, yet they were indistinguishable from patients with bvFTD on each of the cognitive indices. Visual analysis of FDG-PET revealed half of patients with behavioral/dysexecutive AD presented with frontal hypometabolism suggestive of bvFTD and only 3/8 (37.5%) presented significant hypometabolism of the posterior cingulate cortex. Group-level analysis of FDG-PET data revealed that the most hypometabolic regions were the middle temporal, inferior temporal, and angular gyri in behavioral/dysexecutive AD and the inferior frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, caudate nucleus, and insula in bvFTD. CONCLUSION The behavioral/dysexecutive variant of AD is a rare, atypical young-onset variant of AD defined clinically by early and prominent impairments in executive and behavioral domains. While behavioral/dysexecutive AD is hardly distinguishable from bvFTD using clinical and cognitive features alone, CSF biomarkers and temporoparietal hypometabolism help predict underlying pathology during life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Bergeron
- Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire (CIME) du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada,
| | - Leila Sellami
- Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire (CIME) du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Stéphane Poulin
- Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire (CIME) du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Louis Verret
- Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire (CIME) du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Rémi W Bouchard
- Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire (CIME) du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Robert Laforce
- Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire (CIME) du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Singleton E, Hansson O, Pijnenburg YAL, La Joie R, Mantyh WG, Tideman P, Stomrud E, Leuzy A, Johansson M, Strandberg O, Smith R, Berendrecht E, Miller BL, Iaccarino L, Edwards L, Strom A, Wolters EE, Coomans E, Visser D, Golla SSV, Tuncel H, Bouwman F, Van Swieten JC, Papma JM, van Berckel B, Scheltens P, Dijkstra AA, Rabinovici GD, Ossenkoppele R. Heterogeneous distribution of tau pathology in the behavioural variant of Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2021; 92:jnnp-2020-325497. [PMID: 33850001 PMCID: PMC8292599 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-325497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The clinical phenotype of the rare behavioural variant of Alzheimer's disease (bvAD) is insufficiently understood. Given the strong clinico-anatomical correlations of tau pathology in AD, we investigated the distribution of tau deposits in bvAD, in-vivo and ex-vivo, using positron emission tomography (PET) and postmortem examination. METHODS For the tau PET study, seven amyloid-β positive bvAD patients underwent [18F]flortaucipir or [18F]RO948 PET. We converted tau PET uptake values into standardised (W-)scores, adjusting for age, sex and mini mental state examination in a 'typical' memory-predominant AD (n=205) group. W-scores were computed within entorhinal, temporoparietal, medial and lateral prefrontal, insular and whole-brain regions-of-interest, frontal-to-entorhinal and frontal-to-parietal ratios and within intrinsic functional connectivity network templates. For the postmortem study, the percentage of AT8 (tau)-positive area in hippocampus CA1, temporal, parietal, frontal and insular cortices were compared between autopsy-confirmed patients with bvAD (n=8) and typical AD (tAD;n=7). RESULTS Individual regional W-scores ≥1.96 (corresponding to p<0.05) were observed in three cases, that is, case #5: medial prefrontal cortex (W=2.13) and anterior default mode network (W=3.79), case #2: lateral prefrontal cortex (W=2.79) and salience network (W=2.77), and case #7: frontal-to-entorhinal ratio (W=2.04). The remaining four cases fell within the normal distributions of the tAD group. Postmortem AT8 staining indicated no group-level regional differences in phosphorylated tau levels between bvAD and tAD (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Both in-vivo and ex-vivo, patients with bvAD showed heterogeneous distributions of tau pathology. Since key regions involved in behavioural regulation were not consistently disproportionally affected by tau pathology, other factors are more likely driving the clinical phenotype in bvAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Singleton
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Oskar Hansson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Yolande A L Pijnenburg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Renaud La Joie
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - William G Mantyh
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Pontus Tideman
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden
| | - Erik Stomrud
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden
| | - Antoine Leuzy
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Maurits Johansson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Olof Strandberg
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ruben Smith
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Evi Berendrecht
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bruce L Miller
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Leonardo Iaccarino
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- In Vivo Human Molecular and Structural Neuroimaging Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Lauren Edwards
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Amelia Strom
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Emma E Wolters
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Emma Coomans
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Denise Visser
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hayel Tuncel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Femke Bouwman
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Janne M Papma
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bart van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anke A Dijkstra
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gil D Rabinovici
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Graff-Radford J, Yong KXX, Apostolova LG, Bouwman FH, Carrillo M, Dickerson BC, Rabinovici GD, Schott JM, Jones DT, Murray ME. New insights into atypical Alzheimer's disease in the era of biomarkers. Lancet Neurol 2021; 20:222-234. [PMID: 33609479 PMCID: PMC8056394 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30440-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 217] [Impact Index Per Article: 72.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Most patients with Alzheimer's disease present with amnestic problems; however, a substantial proportion, over-represented in young-onset cases, have atypical phenotypes including predominant visual, language, executive, behavioural, or motor dysfunction. In the past, these individuals often received a late diagnosis; however, availability of CSF and PET biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease pathologies and incorporation of atypical forms of Alzheimer's disease into new diagnostic criteria increasingly allows them to be more confidently diagnosed early in their illness. This early diagnosis in turn allows patients to be offered tailored information, appropriate care and support, and individualised treatment plans. These advances will provide improved access to clinical trials, which often exclude atypical phenotypes. Research into atypical Alzheimer's disease has revealed previously unrecognised neuropathological heterogeneity across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum. Neuroimaging, genetic, biomarker, and basic science studies are providing key insights into the factors that might drive selective vulnerability of differing brain networks, with potential mechanistic implications for understanding typical late-onset Alzheimer's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Keir X. X. Yong
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Liana G. Apostolova
- Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Femke H. Bouwman
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center
| | | | - Bradford C. Dickerson
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gil D. Rabinovici
- Departments of Neurology, Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan M. Schott
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - David T. Jones
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lesman-Segev OH, La Joie R, Iaccarino L, Lobach I, Rosen HJ, Seo SW, Janabi M, Baker SL, Edwards L, Pham J, Olichney J, Boxer A, Huang E, Gorno-Tempini M, DeCarli C, Hepker M, Hwang JHL, Miller BL, Spina S, Grinberg LT, Seeley WW, Jagust WJ, Rabinovici GD. Diagnostic Accuracy of Amyloid versus 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Autopsy-Confirmed Dementia. Ann Neurol 2021; 89:389-401. [PMID: 33219525 PMCID: PMC7856004 DOI: 10.1002/ana.25968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 11/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of antemortem 11 C-Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) and 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) versus autopsy diagnosis in a heterogenous sample of patients. METHODS One hundred one participants underwent PIB and FDG PET during life and neuropathological assessment. PET scans were visually interpreted by 3 raters blinded to clinical information. PIB PET was rated as positive or negative for cortical retention, whereas FDG scans were read as showing an Alzheimer disease (AD) or non-AD pattern. Neuropathological diagnoses were assigned using research criteria. Majority visual reads were compared to intermediate-high AD neuropathological change (ADNC). RESULTS One hundred one participants were included (mean age = 67.2 years, 41 females, Mini-Mental State Examination = 21.9, PET-to-autopsy interval = 4.4 years). At autopsy, 32 patients showed primary AD, 56 showed non-AD neuropathology (primarily frontotemporal lobar degeneration [FTLD]), and 13 showed mixed AD/FTLD pathology. PIB showed higher sensitivity than FDG for detecting intermediate-high ADNC (96%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 89-100% vs 80%, 95% CI = 68-92%, p = 0.02), but equivalent specificity (86%, 95% CI = 76-95% vs 84%, 95% CI = 74-93%, p = 0.80). In patients with congruent PIB and FDG reads (77/101), combined sensitivity was 97% (95% CI = 92-100%) and specificity was 98% (95% CI = 93-100%). Nine of 24 patients with incongruent reads were found to have co-occurrence of AD and non-AD pathologies. INTERPRETATION In our sample enriched for younger onset cognitive impairment, PIB-PET had higher sensitivity than FDG-PET for intermediate-high ADNC, with similar specificity. When both modalities are congruent, sensitivity and specificity approach 100%, whereas mixed pathology should be considered when PIB and FDG are incongruent. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:389-401.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orit H Lesman-Segev
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Renaud La Joie
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Leonardo Iaccarino
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Iryna Lobach
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Howard J Rosen
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sang Won Seo
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mustafa Janabi
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Suzanne L Baker
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Lauren Edwards
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Julie Pham
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - John Olichney
- Alzheimer's Disease Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Adam Boxer
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eric Huang
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Marilu Gorno-Tempini
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Charles DeCarli
- Alzheimer's Disease Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Mackenzie Hepker
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ji-Hye L Hwang
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bruce L Miller
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Salvatore Spina
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lea T Grinberg
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - William W Seeley
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - William J Jagust
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Gil D Rabinovici
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Alzheimer's Disease Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
- Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Zhang JV, Irwin DJ, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Lee EB, Shaw LM, Rascovsky K, Massimo L, McMillan CT, Chen-Plotkin A, Elman L, Lee VMY, McCluskey L, Toledo JB, Weintraub D, Wolk D, Trojanowski JQ, Grossman M. Neurofilament Light Chain Related to Longitudinal Decline in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration. Neurol Clin Pract 2020; 11:105-116. [PMID: 33842063 DOI: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000000959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Objective Accurate diagnosis and prognosis of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) during life is an urgent concern in the context of emerging disease-modifying treatment trials. Few CSF markers have been validated longitudinally in patients with known pathology, and we hypothesized that CSF neurofilament light chain (NfL) would be associated with longitudinal cognitive decline in patients with known FTLD-TAR DNA binding protein ~43kD (TDP) pathology. Methods This case-control study evaluated CSF NfL, total tau, phosphorylated tau, and β-amyloid1-42 in patients with known FTLD-tau or FTLD-TDP pathology (n = 50) and healthy controls (n = 65) and an extended cohort of clinically diagnosed patients with likely FTLD-tau or FTLD-TDP (n = 148). Regression analyses related CSF analytes to longitudinal cognitive decline (follow-up ∼1 year), controlling for demographic variables and core AD CSF analytes. Results In FTLD-TDP with known pathology, CSF NfL is significantly elevated compared with controls and significantly associated with longitudinal decline on specific executive and language measures, after controlling for age, disease duration, and core AD CSF analytes. Similar findings are found in the extended cohort, also including clinically identified likely FTLD-TDP. Although CSF NfL is elevated in FTLD-tau compared with controls, the association between NfL and longitudinal cognitive decline is limited to executive measures. Conclusion CSF NfL is associated with longitudinal clinical decline in relevant cognitive domains in patients with FTLD-TDP after controlling for demographic factors and core AD CSF analytes and may also be related to longitudinal decline in executive functioning in FTLD-tau.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiasi Vicky Zhang
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (JVZ, DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, MG) and Department of Neurology (DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, AC-P, LE, L. McCluskey, D. Wolk, MG), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (EBL, LMS, VM-YL, JBT, JQT), Department of Psychiatry (D. Weintraub), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (KB, HZ), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (KB, HZ), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (HZ); and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease (HZ), UCL Institute of Neurology, UK
| | - David J Irwin
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (JVZ, DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, MG) and Department of Neurology (DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, AC-P, LE, L. McCluskey, D. Wolk, MG), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (EBL, LMS, VM-YL, JBT, JQT), Department of Psychiatry (D. Weintraub), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (KB, HZ), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (KB, HZ), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (HZ); and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease (HZ), UCL Institute of Neurology, UK
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (JVZ, DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, MG) and Department of Neurology (DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, AC-P, LE, L. McCluskey, D. Wolk, MG), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (EBL, LMS, VM-YL, JBT, JQT), Department of Psychiatry (D. Weintraub), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (KB, HZ), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (KB, HZ), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (HZ); and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease (HZ), UCL Institute of Neurology, UK
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (JVZ, DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, MG) and Department of Neurology (DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, AC-P, LE, L. McCluskey, D. Wolk, MG), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (EBL, LMS, VM-YL, JBT, JQT), Department of Psychiatry (D. Weintraub), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (KB, HZ), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (KB, HZ), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (HZ); and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease (HZ), UCL Institute of Neurology, UK
| | - Edward B Lee
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (JVZ, DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, MG) and Department of Neurology (DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, AC-P, LE, L. McCluskey, D. Wolk, MG), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (EBL, LMS, VM-YL, JBT, JQT), Department of Psychiatry (D. Weintraub), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (KB, HZ), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (KB, HZ), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (HZ); and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease (HZ), UCL Institute of Neurology, UK
| | - Leslie M Shaw
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (JVZ, DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, MG) and Department of Neurology (DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, AC-P, LE, L. McCluskey, D. Wolk, MG), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (EBL, LMS, VM-YL, JBT, JQT), Department of Psychiatry (D. Weintraub), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (KB, HZ), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (KB, HZ), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (HZ); and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease (HZ), UCL Institute of Neurology, UK
| | - Katya Rascovsky
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (JVZ, DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, MG) and Department of Neurology (DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, AC-P, LE, L. McCluskey, D. Wolk, MG), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (EBL, LMS, VM-YL, JBT, JQT), Department of Psychiatry (D. Weintraub), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (KB, HZ), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (KB, HZ), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (HZ); and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease (HZ), UCL Institute of Neurology, UK
| | - Lauren Massimo
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (JVZ, DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, MG) and Department of Neurology (DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, AC-P, LE, L. McCluskey, D. Wolk, MG), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (EBL, LMS, VM-YL, JBT, JQT), Department of Psychiatry (D. Weintraub), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (KB, HZ), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (KB, HZ), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (HZ); and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease (HZ), UCL Institute of Neurology, UK
| | - Corey T McMillan
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (JVZ, DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, MG) and Department of Neurology (DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, AC-P, LE, L. McCluskey, D. Wolk, MG), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (EBL, LMS, VM-YL, JBT, JQT), Department of Psychiatry (D. Weintraub), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (KB, HZ), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (KB, HZ), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (HZ); and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease (HZ), UCL Institute of Neurology, UK
| | - Alice Chen-Plotkin
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (JVZ, DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, MG) and Department of Neurology (DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, AC-P, LE, L. McCluskey, D. Wolk, MG), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (EBL, LMS, VM-YL, JBT, JQT), Department of Psychiatry (D. Weintraub), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (KB, HZ), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (KB, HZ), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (HZ); and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease (HZ), UCL Institute of Neurology, UK
| | - Lauren Elman
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (JVZ, DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, MG) and Department of Neurology (DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, AC-P, LE, L. McCluskey, D. Wolk, MG), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (EBL, LMS, VM-YL, JBT, JQT), Department of Psychiatry (D. Weintraub), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (KB, HZ), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (KB, HZ), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (HZ); and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease (HZ), UCL Institute of Neurology, UK
| | - Virginia M-Y Lee
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (JVZ, DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, MG) and Department of Neurology (DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, AC-P, LE, L. McCluskey, D. Wolk, MG), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (EBL, LMS, VM-YL, JBT, JQT), Department of Psychiatry (D. Weintraub), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (KB, HZ), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (KB, HZ), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (HZ); and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease (HZ), UCL Institute of Neurology, UK
| | - Leo McCluskey
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (JVZ, DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, MG) and Department of Neurology (DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, AC-P, LE, L. McCluskey, D. Wolk, MG), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (EBL, LMS, VM-YL, JBT, JQT), Department of Psychiatry (D. Weintraub), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (KB, HZ), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (KB, HZ), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (HZ); and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease (HZ), UCL Institute of Neurology, UK
| | - Jon B Toledo
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (JVZ, DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, MG) and Department of Neurology (DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, AC-P, LE, L. McCluskey, D. Wolk, MG), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (EBL, LMS, VM-YL, JBT, JQT), Department of Psychiatry (D. Weintraub), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (KB, HZ), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (KB, HZ), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (HZ); and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease (HZ), UCL Institute of Neurology, UK
| | - Daniel Weintraub
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (JVZ, DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, MG) and Department of Neurology (DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, AC-P, LE, L. McCluskey, D. Wolk, MG), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (EBL, LMS, VM-YL, JBT, JQT), Department of Psychiatry (D. Weintraub), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (KB, HZ), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (KB, HZ), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (HZ); and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease (HZ), UCL Institute of Neurology, UK
| | - David Wolk
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (JVZ, DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, MG) and Department of Neurology (DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, AC-P, LE, L. McCluskey, D. Wolk, MG), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (EBL, LMS, VM-YL, JBT, JQT), Department of Psychiatry (D. Weintraub), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (KB, HZ), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (KB, HZ), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (HZ); and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease (HZ), UCL Institute of Neurology, UK
| | - John Q Trojanowski
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (JVZ, DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, MG) and Department of Neurology (DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, AC-P, LE, L. McCluskey, D. Wolk, MG), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (EBL, LMS, VM-YL, JBT, JQT), Department of Psychiatry (D. Weintraub), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (KB, HZ), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (KB, HZ), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (HZ); and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease (HZ), UCL Institute of Neurology, UK
| | - Murray Grossman
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center (JVZ, DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, MG) and Department of Neurology (DJI, KR, L. Massimo, CTM, AC-P, LE, L. McCluskey, D. Wolk, MG), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (EBL, LMS, VM-YL, JBT, JQT), Department of Psychiatry (D. Weintraub), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (KB, HZ), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (KB, HZ), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (HZ); and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease (HZ), UCL Institute of Neurology, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Neumann M, Mackenzie IRA. Review: Neuropathology of non-tau frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2020; 45:19-40. [PMID: 30357887 DOI: 10.1111/nan.12526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 09/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) as a relatively consistent neuropathological hallmark feature. However, the discoveries in the past decade of many of the relevant pathological proteins aggregating in human FTD brains in addition to several new FTD causing gene mutations underlined that FTD is a diverse condition on the neuropathological and genetic basis. This resulted in a novel molecular classification of these conditions based on the predominant protein abnormality and allows most cases of FTD to be placed now into one of three broad molecular subgroups; FTLD with tau, TAR DNA-binding protein 43 or FET protein accumulation (FTLD-tau, FTLD-TDP and FTLD-FET respectively). This review will provide an overview of the molecular neuropathology of non-tau FTLD, insights into disease mechanisms gained from the study of human post mortem tissue as well as discussion of current controversies in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Neumann
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Molecular Neuropathology of Neurodegenerative Diseases, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tübingen, Germany
| | - I R A Mackenzie
- Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Robinson JL, Yan N, Caswell C, Xie SX, Suh E, Van Deerlin VM, Gibbons G, Irwin DJ, Grossman M, Lee EB, Lee VMY, Miller B, Trojanowski JQ. Primary Tau Pathology, Not Copathology, Correlates With Clinical Symptoms in PSP and CBD. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2020; 79:296-304. [PMID: 31999351 DOI: 10.1093/jnen/nlz141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Distinct neuronal and glial tau pathologies define corticobasal degeneration (CBD) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Additional Alzheimer disease, TDP-43, and Lewy body copathologies are also common. The interplay of these pathologies with clinical symptoms remains unclear as individuals can present with corticobasal syndrome, frontotemporal dementia, PSP, or atypical Parkinsonism and may have additional secondary impairments. We report clinical, pathological, and genetic interactions in a cohort of CBD and PSP cases. Neurofibrillary tangles and plaques were common. Apolipoprotein E (APOE)ε4 carriers had more plaques while PSP APOEε2 carriers had fewer plaques. TDP-43 copathology was present and age-associated in 14% of PSP, and age-independent in 33% of CBD. Lewy body copathology varied from 9% to 15% and was not age-associated. The primary FTD-Tau burden-a sum of the neuronal, astrocytic and oligodendrocytic tau-was not age-, APOE-, or MAPT-related. In PSP, FTD-Tau, independent of copathology, associated with executive, language, motor, and visuospatial impairments, while PSP with Parkinsonism had a lower FTD-Tau burden, but this was not the case in CBD. Taken together, our results indicate that the primary tauopathy burden is the strongest correlate of clinical PSP, while copathologies are principally determined by age and genetic risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John L Robinson
- From the Penn Alzheimer's Disease Core Center.,Penn Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
| | - Ning Yan
- From the Penn Alzheimer's Disease Core Center.,Penn Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.,Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Carrie Caswell
- Penn Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research.,Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, and Informatics
| | - Sharon X Xie
- From the Penn Alzheimer's Disease Core Center.,Penn Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.,Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, and Informatics
| | - EunRan Suh
- From the Penn Alzheimer's Disease Core Center.,Penn Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
| | - Vivianna M Van Deerlin
- From the Penn Alzheimer's Disease Core Center.,Penn Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
| | - Garrett Gibbons
- From the Penn Alzheimer's Disease Core Center.,Penn Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
| | - David J Irwin
- From the Penn Alzheimer's Disease Core Center.,Penn Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.,Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center.,Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Murray Grossman
- From the Penn Alzheimer's Disease Core Center.,Penn Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research.,Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center.,Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Edward B Lee
- From the Penn Alzheimer's Disease Core Center.,Penn Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
| | - Virginia M-Y Lee
- From the Penn Alzheimer's Disease Core Center.,Penn Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.,Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Bruce Miller
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - John Q Trojanowski
- From the Penn Alzheimer's Disease Core Center.,Penn Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.,Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Zhu J, Wang N, Li X, Zheng X, Zhao J, Xia H, Mao Q. Suppression of Progranulin Expression Leads to Formation of Intranuclear TDP-43 Inclusions In Vitro: A Cell Model of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2020; 78:1124-1129. [PMID: 31626287 DOI: 10.1093/jnen/nlz102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Mutations in the GRN gene coding for progranulin (PGRN) are responsible for many cases of familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) with TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43)-positive inclusions (FTLD-TDP). GRN mutations create null alleles resulting in decreased progranulin protein or haploinsufficiency. FTLD-TDP with GRN mutations is characterized by lentiform neuronal intranuclear inclusions that are positive for TDP-43 in affected brain regions. In this study, by stably expressed short hairpin RNA, we established a neuroblastoma cell line with decreased PGRN level. This cell line reveals TDP-43-positive intranuclear inclusions. In addition, replacement with purified PGRN protein restores normal TDP-43 nuclear distribution. This cell model can be valuable for the study of the role of PGRN in the pathogenesis in FTLD-TDP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiuling Zhu
- Laboratory of Gene Therapy, Department of Biochemistry, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P.R. China
| | | | - Xianan Li
- Mesulam Center for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Xiaojing Zheng
- Laboratory of Gene Therapy, Department of Biochemistry, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P.R. China
| | - Junli Zhao
- Laboratory of Gene Therapy, Department of Biochemistry, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P.R. China
| | | | - Qinwen Mao
- Mesulam Center for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Chaudhry A, Houlden H, Rizig M. Novel fluid biomarkers to differentiate frontotemporal dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies from Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review. J Neurol Sci 2020; 415:116886. [PMID: 32428759 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Revised: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) are two common forms of neurodegenerative dementia, subsequent to Alzheimer's disease (AD). AD is the only dementia that includes clinically validated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in the diagnostic criteria. FTD and DLB often overlap with AD in their clinical and pathological features, making it challenging to differentiate between these conditions. AIM This systematic review aimed to identify if novel fluid biomarkers are useful in differentiating FTD and DLB from AD. Increasing the certainty of the differentiation between dementia subtypes would be advantageous clinically and in research. METHODS PubMed and Scopus were searched for studies that quantified and assessed diagnostic accuracy of novel fluid biomarkers in clinically diagnosed patients with FTD or DLB, in comparison to patients with AD. Meta-analyses were performed on biomarkers that were quantified in 3 studies or more. RESULTS The search strategy yielded 614 results, from which, 27 studies were included. When comparing bio-fluid levels in AD and FTD patients, neurofilament light chain (NfL) level was often higher in FTD, whilst brain soluble amyloid precursor protein β (sAPPβ) was higher in patients with AD. When comparing bio-fluid levels in AD and DLB patients, α-synuclein ensued heterogeneous findings, while the noradrenaline metabolite (MHPG) was found to be lower in DLB. Ratios of Aβ42/Aβ38 and Aβ42/Aβ40 were lower in AD than FTD and DLB and offered better diagnostic accuracy than raw amyloid-β (Aβ) concentrations. CONCLUSIONS Several promising novel biomarkers were highlighted in this review. Combinations of fluid biomarkers were more often useful than individual biomarkers in distinguishing subtypes of dementia. Considering the heterogeneity in methods and results between the studies, further validation, ideally with longitudinal prospective designs with large sample sizes and unified protocols, are fundamental before conclusions can be finalised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aiysha Chaudhry
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
| | - Henry Houlden
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
| | - Mie Rizig
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Scarioni M, Gami-Patel P, Timar Y, Seelaar H, van Swieten JC, Rozemuller AJM, Dols A, Scarpini E, Galimberti D, Hoozemans JJM, Pijnenburg YAL, Dijkstra AA. Frontotemporal Dementia: Correlations Between Psychiatric Symptoms and Pathology. Ann Neurol 2020; 87:950-961. [PMID: 32281118 PMCID: PMC7318614 DOI: 10.1002/ana.25739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The pathology of frontotemporal dementia, termed frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), is characterized by distinct molecular classes of aggregated proteins, the most common being TAR DNA-binding protein-43 (TDP-43), tau, and fused in sarcoma (FUS). With a few exceptions, it is currently not possible to predict the underlying pathology based on the clinical syndrome. In this study, we set out to investigate the relationship between pathological and clinical presentation at single symptom level, including neuropsychiatric features. METHODS The presence or absence of symptoms from the current clinical guidelines, together with neuropsychiatric features, such as hallucinations and delusions, were scored and compared across pathological groups in a cohort of 150 brain donors. RESULTS Our cohort consisted of 68.6% FTLD donors (35.3% TDP-43, 28% tau, and 5.3% FUS) and 31.3% non-FTLD donors with a clinical diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia and a different pathological substrate, such as Alzheimer's disease (23%). The presence of hyperorality points to FTLD rather than non-FTLD pathology (p < 0.001). Within the FTLD group, hallucinations in the initial years of the disease were related to TDP-43 pathology (p = 0.02), including but not limited to chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72) repeat expansion carriers. The presence of perseverative or compulsive behavior was more common in the TDP-B and TDP-C histotypes (p = 0.002). INTERPRETATION Our findings indicate that neuropsychiatric features are common in FTLD and form an important indicator of underlying pathology. In order to allow better inclusion of patients in targeted molecular trials, the routine evaluation of patients with frontotemporal dementia should include the presence and nature of neuropsychiatric symptoms. ANN NEUROL 2020;87:950-961.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Scarioni
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.,Dino Ferrari Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Priya Gami-Patel
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yannick Timar
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harro Seelaar
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John C van Swieten
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemieke J M Rozemuller
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemiek Dols
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Old Age Psychiatry, GGZinGeest/Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elio Scarpini
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.,Dino Ferrari Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Galimberti
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.,Dino Ferrari Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | -
- Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen J M Hoozemans
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yolande A L Pijnenburg
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anke A Dijkstra
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Update on PET in neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory disorders manifesting on a behavioural level: imaging for differential diagnosis. Curr Opin Neurol 2020; 32:548-556. [PMID: 31107281 DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000000706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To give an update on recent findings concerning the use of PET for differential diagnosis in neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory disorders manifesting on a behavioural level. RECENT FINDINGS Although accurate differential diagnosis of dementia can be achieved by imaging disease-specific patterns of cerebral glucose metabolism with [F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([F]FDG)-PET, the diagnostic impact of [F]FDG-PET in primary psychiatric disorders is limited. Amyloid-beta PET provides an incremental value beyond [F]FDG-PET in the differential diagnosis of dementia and was proposed as a biomarker defining the so-called Alzheimer continuum. Recently developed tau-specific tracers might also aid in the diagnostic process (biological definition of Alzheimer's disease together with amyloid-beta). Surpassing the diagnostic accuracy of other techniques, such as MRI, [F]FDG-PET has also gained widespread clinical use for diagnosis and follow-up of paraneoplastic and autoimmune disorders of the central nervous system (CNS) as an important differential diagnosis for rapid progressive dementia and subacute onset of psychiatric syndromes. SUMMARY Molecular neuroimaging with PET is an established method for the differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative and autoimmune CNS disorders manifesting on a behavioural level with significant therapeutic and prognostic impact. Future prospective studies are needed to define the value of tau imaging for diagnosis and prognosis in neurodegenerative disorders.
Collapse
|
42
|
Transcriptomic and Network Analysis Identifies Shared and Unique Pathways across Dementia Spectrum Disorders. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21062050. [PMID: 32192109 PMCID: PMC7139711 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21062050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Dementia is a growing public health concern with an estimated prevalence of 50 million people worldwide. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and vascular and frontotemporal dementias (VaD, FTD), share many clinical, genetical, and pathological features making the diagnosis difficult. Methods: In this study, we compared the transcriptome from the frontal cortex of patients with AD, VaD, and FTD to identify dysregulated pathways. Results: Upregulated genes in AD were enriched in adherens and tight junctions, mitogen-activated protein kinase, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and protein kinase B/Akt signaling pathways, whereas downregulated genes associated with calcium signaling. Upregulated genes in VaD were centered on infectious diseases and nuclear factor kappa beta signaling, whereas downregulated genes are involved in biosynthesis of amino acids and the pentose phosphate pathway. Upregulated genes in FTD were associated with ECM receptor interactions and the lysosome, whereas downregulated genes were involved in glutamatergic synapse and MAPK signaling. The transcription factor KFL4 was shared among the 3 types of dementia. Conclusions: Collectively, we identified similarities and differences in dysregulated pathways and transcription factors among the dementias. The shared pathways and transcription factors may indicate a potential common etiology, whereas the differences may be useful for distinguishing dementias.
Collapse
|
43
|
Li CH, Fan SP, Chen TF, Chiu MJ, Yen RF, Lin CH. Frontal variant of Alzheimer's disease with asymmetric presentation mimicking frontotemporal dementia: Case report and literature review. Brain Behav 2020; 10:e01548. [PMID: 31989779 PMCID: PMC7066333 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Revised: 01/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Frontal variant of Alzheimer's disease (fvAD) is a rare nonamnestic syndrome of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Differentiating it from behavior variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), which has implications for treatment responses and prognosis, remains a clinical challenge. METHODS Molecular neuroimaging and biofluid markers were performed for the index patient for accurate premortem diagnosis of fvAD. The clinical, neuroimaging, and biofluid characteristics of the patient were compared to those reported in previous studies of fvAD from 1999 to 2019. RESULTS A 66-year-old man presented with progressive executive dysfunction, personality and behavioral changes, and memory decline since age 59. He had no family history of neurodegenerative disorders. A stimulus-sensitive myoclonus was noted over his left upper extremity. Neuropsychological assessment revealed moderate dementia with a Mini-Mental State Exam score of 10/30 and compromised executive and memory performance. Brain imaging showed asymmetrical atrophy and hypometabolism over the right frontal and temporal areas, mimicking bvFTD. However, we observed increased tau depositions based on 18 F-labeled T807 Tau PET in these areas and diffusely increased amyloid deposition based on 11 C-labeled Pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomography (PET). Plasma biomarker measures indicated an AD profile with increased Aβ1-42 (18.66 pg/ml; cutoff: 16.42 pg/ml), Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratio (0.45; cutoff: 0.30), total tau (29.78 pg/ml; cutoff: 23.89 pg/ml), and phosphorylated tau (4.11 pg/ml; cutoff: 3.08 pg/ml). These results supported a diagnosis of fvAD. CONCLUSIONS Our results with asymmetrical presentations extend current knowledge about this rare AD variant. Application of biofluid and molecular imaging markers could assist in early, accurate diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng-Hsuan Li
- Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Sung-Pin Fan
- Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ta-Fu Chen
- Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Jang Chiu
- Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Brain and Mind Sciences, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Bioinformatics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Graduate institute of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ruoh-Fang Yen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chin-Hsien Lin
- Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
|
45
|
Turcano P, Stang CD, Mielke MM, Martin PR, Upadhyaya SG, Josephs KA, Boeve BF, Knopman DS, Petersen RC, Savica R. Incidence of frontotemporal disorders in Olmsted County: A population-based study. Alzheimers Dement 2020; 16:482-490. [PMID: 31784373 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.08.199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Frontotemporal dementia disorders (FTDs) are heterogeneous phenotypical behavioral and language disorders usually associated with frontal and/or temporal lobe degeneration. We investigated their incidence in a population-based cohort. METHODS Using a records-linkage system, we identified all patients with a diagnostic code for dementia in Olmsted County, MN, 1995-2010, and confirmed the diagnosis of FTD. A behavioral neurologist verified the clinical diagnosis and determined phenotypes. RESULTS We identified 35 FTDs cases. Overall, the incidence of FTDs was 4.3/100,000/year (95% CI: 2.9, 5.7). Incidence was higher in men (6.3/100,000, 95% CI 3.6, 9.0) than women (2.9/100,000; 95% CI: 1.3, 4.5); we observed an increased trend over time (B = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.54, 1.11, P < .001). At autopsy, clinical diagnosis was confirmed in eight (72.7%) cases. DISCUSSION We observed an increased incidence and trends of FTDs over time. This may reflect a better recognition by clinicians and improvement of clinical criteria and diagnostic tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cole D Stang
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michelle M Mielke
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Peter R Martin
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Rodolfo Savica
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Feis RA, Bouts MJRJ, Dopper EGP, Filippini N, Heise V, Trachtenberg AJ, van Swieten JC, van Buchem MA, van der Grond J, Mackay CE, Rombouts SARB. Multimodal MRI of grey matter, white matter, and functional connectivity in cognitively healthy mutation carriers at risk for frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. BMC Neurol 2019; 19:343. [PMID: 31881858 PMCID: PMC6933911 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-019-1567-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) are associated with divergent differences in grey matter volume, white matter diffusion, and functional connectivity. However, it is unknown at what disease stage these differences emerge. Here, we investigate whether divergent differences in grey matter volume, white matter diffusion, and functional connectivity are already apparent between cognitively healthy carriers of pathogenic FTD mutations, and cognitively healthy carriers at increased AD risk. METHODS We acquired multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scans in cognitively healthy subjects with (n=39) and without (n=36) microtubule-associated protein Tau (MAPT) or progranulin (GRN) mutations, and with (n=37) and without (n=38) apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE4) allele. We evaluated grey matter volume using voxel-based morphometry, white matter diffusion using tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS), and region-to-network functional connectivity using dual regression in the default mode network and salience network. We tested for differences between the respective carriers and controls, as well as for divergence of those differences. For the divergence contrast, we additionally performed region-of-interest TBSS analyses in known areas of white matter diffusion differences between FTD and AD (i.e., uncinate fasciculus, forceps minor, and anterior thalamic radiation). RESULTS MAPT/GRN carriers did not differ from controls in any modality. APOE4 carriers had lower fractional anisotropy than controls in the callosal splenium and right inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, but did not show grey matter volume or functional connectivity differences. We found no divergent differences between both carrier-control contrasts in any modality, even in region-of-interest analyses. CONCLUSIONS Concluding, we could not find differences suggestive of divergent pathways of underlying FTD and AD pathology in asymptomatic risk mutation carriers. Future studies should focus on asymptomatic mutation carriers that are closer to symptom onset to capture the first specific signs that may differentiate between FTD and AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rogier A. Feis
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- FMRIB, Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- LIBC, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mark J. R. J. Bouts
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- LIBC, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Elise G. P. Dopper
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicola Filippini
- FMRIB, Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Verena Heise
- FMRIB, Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Aaron J. Trachtenberg
- FMRIB, Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Mark A. van Buchem
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- LIBC, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen van der Grond
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Clare E. Mackay
- FMRIB, Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Serge A. R. B. Rombouts
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- LIBC, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bachli MB, Sedeño L, Ochab JK, Piguet O, Kumfor F, Reyes P, Torralva T, Roca M, Cardona JF, Campo CG, Herrera E, Slachevsky A, Matallana D, Manes F, García AM, Ibáñez A, Chialvo DR. Evaluating the reliability of neurocognitive biomarkers of neurodegenerative diseases across countries: A machine learning approach. Neuroimage 2019; 208:116456. [PMID: 31841681 PMCID: PMC7008715 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Revised: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Accurate early diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases represents a growing challenge for current clinical practice. Promisingly, current tools can be complemented by computational decision-support methods to objectively analyze multidimensional measures and increase diagnostic confidence. Yet, widespread application of these tools cannot be recommended unless they are proven to perform consistently and reproducibly across samples from different countries. We implemented machine-learning algorithms to evaluate the prediction power of neurocognitive biomarkers (behavioral and imaging measures) for classifying two neurodegenerative conditions –Alzheimer Disease (AD) and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD)– across three different countries (>200 participants). We use machine-learning tools integrating multimodal measures such as cognitive scores (executive functions and cognitive screening) and brain atrophy volume (voxel based morphometry from fronto-temporo-insular regions in bvFTD, and temporo-parietal regions in AD) to identify the most relevant features in predicting the incidence of the diseases. In the Country-1 cohort, predictions of AD and bvFTD became maximally improved upon inclusion of cognitive screenings outcomes combined with atrophy levels. Multimodal training data from this cohort allowed predicting both AD and bvFTD in the other two novel datasets from other countries with high accuracy (>90%), demonstrating the robustness of the approach as well as the differential specificity and reliability of behavioral and neural markers for each condition. In sum, this is the first study, across centers and countries, to validate the predictive power of cognitive signatures combined with atrophy levels for contrastive neurodegenerative conditions, validating a benchmark for future assessments of reliability and reproducibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Belen Bachli
- Center for Complex Systems & Brain Sciences (CEMSC(3)), Escuela de Ciencia y Tecnologia (ECyT), Universidad Nacional de San Martín, 25 de Mayo 1169, San Martín, (1650), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Lucas Sedeño
- Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Godoy Cruz 2290, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Jeremi K Ochab
- Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Mark Kac Complex Systems Research Center Jagiellonian University, Ul. Łojasiewicza 11, PL30-348, Kraków, Poland
| | - Olivier Piguet
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, Brain and Mind Centre and School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Fiona Kumfor
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, Brain and Mind Centre and School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Pablo Reyes
- Radiology, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio (HUSI), Bogotá, Colombia; Medical School, Physiology Sciences, Psychiatry and Mental Health Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (PUJ) - Centro de Memoria y Cognición Intellectus, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio (HUSI), Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Teresa Torralva
- Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - María Roca
- Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Cecilia Gonzalez Campo
- Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Godoy Cruz 2290, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Eduar Herrera
- Departamento de Estudios Psicológicos, Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia
| | - Andrea Slachevsky
- Gerosciences Center for Brain Health and Metabolism, Santiago, Chile; Neuropsychology and Clinical Neuroscience Laboratory (LANNEC), Physiopathology Department, ICBM, Neurosciences Department, East Neuroscience Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Avenida Salvador 486, Providencia, Santiago, Chile; Memory and Neuropsychiatric Clinic (CMYN) Neurology Department- Hospital del Salvador & University of Chile, Av. Salvador 364, Providencia, Santiago, Chile; Servicio de Neurología, Departamento de Medicina, Clínica Alemana-Universidad del Desarrollo, Chile
| | - Diana Matallana
- Medical School, Aging Institute, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (PUJ) - Centro de Memoria y Cognición Intellectus. Hospital Universitario San Ignacio (HUSI), Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Facundo Manes
- Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Godoy Cruz 2290, Buenos Aires, Argentina; ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders, Sydney, Australia
| | - Adolfo M García
- Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Godoy Cruz 2290, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Faculty of Education, National University of Cuyo (UNCuyo), Sobremonte 74, C5500, Mendoza, Argentina
| | - Agustín Ibáñez
- Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Godoy Cruz 2290, Buenos Aires, Argentina; ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders, Sydney, Australia; Universidad Autónoma del Caribe, Calle 90, No 46-112, C2754, Barranquilla, Colombia; Center for Social and Cognitive Neuroscience (CSCN), School of Psychology, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Diagonal Las Torres, 2640, Santiago, Chile
| | - Dante R Chialvo
- Center for Complex Systems & Brain Sciences (CEMSC(3)), Escuela de Ciencia y Tecnologia (ECyT), Universidad Nacional de San Martín, 25 de Mayo 1169, San Martín, (1650), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Godoy Cruz 2290, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Donnelly-Kehoe PA, Pascariello GO, García AM, Hodges JR, Miller B, Rosen H, Manes F, Landin-Romero R, Matallana D, Serrano C, Herrera E, Reyes P, Santamaria-Garcia H, Kumfor F, Piguet O, Ibanez A, Sedeño L. Robust automated computational approach for classifying frontotemporal neurodegeneration: Multimodal/multicenter neuroimaging. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS) 2019; 11:588-598. [PMID: 31497638 PMCID: PMC6719282 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadm.2019.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Timely diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) remains challenging because it depends on clinical expertise and potentially ambiguous diagnostic guidelines. Recent recommendations highlight the role of multimodal neuroimaging and machine learning methods as complementary tools to address this problem. METHODS We developed an automatic, cross-center, multimodal computational approach for robust classification of patients with bvFTD and healthy controls. We analyzed structural magnetic resonance imaging and resting-state functional connectivity from 44 patients with bvFTD and 60 healthy controls (across three imaging centers with different acquisition protocols) using a fully automated processing pipeline, including site normalization, native space feature extraction, and a random forest classifier. RESULTS Our method successfully combined multimodal imaging information with high accuracy (91%), sensitivity (83.7%), and specificity (96.6%). DISCUSSION This multimodal approach enhanced the system's performance and provided a clinically informative method for neuroimaging analysis. This underscores the relevance of combining multimodal imaging and machine learning as a gold standard for dementia diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricio Andres Donnelly-Kehoe
- Multimedia Signal Processing Group - Neuroimage Division, French-Argentine International Center for Information and Systems Sciences (CIFASIS) - National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Rosario, Argentina
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Neuroscience (LANEN), INECO Foundation Rosario, Rosario, Argentina
| | - Guido Orlando Pascariello
- Multimedia Signal Processing Group - Neuroimage Division, French-Argentine International Center for Information and Systems Sciences (CIFASIS) - National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Rosario, Argentina
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Neuroscience (LANEN), INECO Foundation Rosario, Rosario, Argentina
| | - Adolfo M. García
- Laboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Faculty of Education, National University of Cuyo (UNCuyo), Mendoza, Argentina
| | - John R. Hodges
- Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Australian Research Council (ARC), Sydney, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Brain and Mind Centre and Clinical Medical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bruce Miller
- Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Howie Rosen
- Department of Neurology, Memory Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Facundo Manes
- Laboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Australian Research Council (ARC), Sydney, Australia
| | - Ramon Landin-Romero
- Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Australian Research Council (ARC), Sydney, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Brain and Mind Centre and School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Diana Matallana
- Medical School, Aging Institute, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (PUJ), Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Cecilia Serrano
- Memory and Balance Clinic, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Department of Neurology, Dr Cesar Milstein Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Eduar Herrera
- Departamento de Estudios Psicológicos, Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia (eduar)
| | - Pablo Reyes
- Radiology, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio (HUSI), Bogotá, Colombia
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Departments of Physiology and Psychiatry – Centro de Memoria y Cognición Intellectus, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Hernando Santamaria-Garcia
- Radiology, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio (HUSI), Bogotá, Colombia
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Departments of Physiology and Psychiatry – Centro de Memoria y Cognición Intellectus, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Fiona Kumfor
- Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Australian Research Council (ARC), Sydney, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Brain and Mind Centre and School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Olivier Piguet
- Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Australian Research Council (ARC), Sydney, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Brain and Mind Centre and School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Agustin Ibanez
- Laboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Australian Research Council (ARC), Sydney, Australia
- Universidad Autónoma del Caribe, Barranquilla, Colombia
- Center for Social and Cognitive Neuroscience (CSCN), School of Psychology, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile
| | - Lucas Sedeño
- Laboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Wang L, Heywood A, Stocks J, Bae J, Ma D, Popuri K, Toga AW, Kantarci K, Younes L, Mackenzie IR, Zhang F, Beg MF, Rosen H. Grant Report on PREDICT-ADFTD: Multimodal Imaging Prediction of AD/FTD and Differential Diagnosis. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND BRAIN SCIENCE 2019; 4:e190017. [PMID: 31754634 PMCID: PMC6868780 DOI: 10.20900/jpbs.20190017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
We report on the ongoing project "PREDICT-ADFTD: Multimodal Imaging Prediction of AD/FTD and Differential Diagnosis" describing completed and future work supported by this grant. This project is a multi-site, multi-study collaboration effort with research spanning seven sites across the US and Canada. The overall goal of the project is to study neurodegeneration within Alzheimer's Disease, Frontotemporal Dementia, and related neurodegenerative disorders, using a variety of brain imaging and computational techniques to develop methods for the early and accurate prediction of disease and its course. The overarching goal of the project is to develop the earliest and most accurate biomarker that can differentiate clinical diagnoses to inform clinical trials and patient care. In its third year, this project has already completed several projects to achieve this goal, focusing on (1) structural MRI (2) machine learning and (3) FDG-PET and multimodal imaging. Studies utilizing structural MRI have identified key features of underlying pathology by studying hippocampal deformation that is unique to clinical diagnosis and also post-mortem confirmed neuropathology. Several machine learning experiments have shown high classification accuracy in the prediction of disease based on Convolutional Neural Networks utilizing MRI images as input. In addition, we have also achieved high accuracy in predicting conversion to DAT up to five years in the future. Further, we evaluated multimodal models that combine structural and FDG-PET imaging, in order to compare the predictive power of multimodal to unimodal models. Studies utilizing FDG-PET have shown significant predictive ability in the prediction and progression of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Wang
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, 60611 IL, USA
| | - Ashley Heywood
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, 60611 IL, USA
| | - Jane Stocks
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, 60611 IL, USA
| | - Jinhyeong Bae
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, 60611 IL, USA
| | - Da Ma
- School of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, V6A1S6 BC, Canada
| | - Karteek Popuri
- School of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, V6A1S6 BC, Canada
| | - Arthur W. Toga
- Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 90033 CA, USA
| | - Kejal Kantarci
- Departments of Neurology and Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905 MN, USA
| | - Laurent Younes
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 21218 MD, USA
| | - Ian R. Mackenzie
- Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B6T1Z4 BC, Canada
| | - Fengqing Zhang
- Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, 19104 PA, USA
| | - Mirza Faisal Beg
- School of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, V6A1S6 BC, Canada
| | - Howard Rosen
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, 94143 CA, USA
| | - Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
- Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (http://adni.loni.usc.edu/). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNIAcknowledgement_List.pdf
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lleó A, Irwin DJ, Illán-Gala I, McMillan CT, Wolk DA, Lee EB, Van Deerlin VM, Shaw LM, Trojanowski JQ, Grossman M. A 2-Step Cerebrospinal Algorithm for the Selection of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Subtypes. JAMA Neurol 2019; 75:738-745. [PMID: 29554190 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Importance Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) core Alzheimer disease (AD) biomarkers have shown an excellent capacity for the in vivo detection of AD. Previous studies have shown that CSF levels of phosphorylated tau (p-tau) also correlate with tau pathology in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) after accounting for AD copathology. Objective To develop an algorithm based on core AD CSF measures to exclude cases with AD pathology and then differentiate between FTLD-tau and FTLD transactive response DNA-binding protein of approximately 43kDa (FTLD-TDP). Design, Setting, and Participants A case-control study at the University of Pennsylvania. Participants were selected from a database of 1796 patients included between 1992 and 2016 with different neurodegenerative diseases with available CSF. Three patient cohorts were included: a cohort of patients with sporadic, autopsy-confirmed FTLD and AD (n = 143); a cohort of patients with frontotemporal degeneration (FTD) with TDP-associated or tau-associated mutations (n = 60); and a living cohort of patients with syndromes highly predictive of FTLD (progressive supranuclear palsy and FTD-amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; n = 62). Main Outcomes and Measures Cerebrospinal fluid values of amyloid β1-42 (Aβ1-42), total tau (t-tau), and p-tau obtained using the INNO-BIA AlzBio3 (xMAP; Luminex) assay or INNOTEST enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay transformed using a previously validated algorithm. Sensitivities and specificities for differentiating AD from FTLD groups were calculated. Results This autopsy cohort included FTLD-tau (n = 27; mean [SD] age at onset, 60.8 [9.7] years), FTLD-TDP (n = 13; mean [SD] age at onset, 62.4 [8.5] years), AD (n = 89, mean [SD] age at onset, 66.5 [9.7] years); and mixed FTLD-AD (n = 14, mean [SD] age at onset, 70.6 [8.5] years).The p-tau/Aβ1-42 ratio showed an excellent diagnostic accuracy to exclude AD cases in the autopsy cohort with single neurodegenerative pathologies (area under the curve [AUC], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00). Cerebrospinal fluid p-tau levels showed a good AUC (0.87; 95% CI, 0.73-1.00) for discriminating pure FTLD-TDP from pure FTLD-tau. The application of an algorithm using cutpoints of CSF p-tau to Aβ1-42 ratio and p-tau allowed a good discrimination of pure FTLD-TDP cases from the remaining FTLD-tau and mixed FTLD cases. The diagnostic value of this algorithm was confirmed in an independent cohort of living patients with progressive supranuclear palsy and FTD-amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (AUC, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.81-0.99). However, the algorithm was less useful in FTD cases carrying a pathogenic mutation (AUC, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.38-0.77) owing to elevated p-tau levels in TDP-associated mutation carriers. Conclusions and Relevance Alzheimer disease CSF core biomarkers can be used with high specificity for the in vivo identification of patients with pure FTLD-TDP and FTLD-tau when accounting for comorbid AD and genetic status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Lleó
- Department of Neurology, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Sant Pau, Hospital de Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David J Irwin
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Ignacio Illán-Gala
- Department of Neurology, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Sant Pau, Hospital de Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Corey T McMillan
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - David A Wolk
- Alzheimer's Disease Core Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Edward B Lee
- Alzheimer's Disease Core Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.,Translational Neuropathology Research Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Vivianna M Van Deerlin
- Alzheimer's Disease Core Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.,Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Leslie M Shaw
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - John Q Trojanowski
- Alzheimer's Disease Core Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.,Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Murray Grossman
- Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.,Alzheimer's Disease Core Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|