Multi-center study of Parkinson mortality with early versus later dopa treatment

Effect of Early Levodopa Treatment on Mortality in People with Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND

The ideal timing for initiating levodopa in newly diagnosed people with Parkinson's disease (PD) is uncertain due to limited data on the long-term effects of levodopa.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to investigate whether early levodopa initiation postpones mortality (primary outcome), the requirement of device-aided therapies, and the incidence of PD-related complications, such as fall-induced injuries.

METHODS

Using nationwide claims data from Dutch hospitals (2012-2020), we grouped newly diagnosed PD individuals as "early initiators" (initiating levodopa within 2 years of diagnosis) or "nonearly initiators." We used the national death registry to assess mortality and health-care claims to assess PD-related complications and device-aided therapies. We used marginal structural models to compare mortality and device-aided therapy rates between groups, and a Poisson regression model to compare PD-related complication rates.

RESULTS

Among 29,943 newly diagnosed PD individuals (mean age at diagnosis: 71.6, 38.5% female), there were 24,847 early and 5096 nonearly levodopa initiators. Over a median 4.25 years, 8109 (27.1%) died. The causal risk ratio for mortality was 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.19) for early versus nonearly initiators. The risk ratio of receiving any device-aided therapy was 3.19 (95% CI 2.56-5.80). No association was observed with incidence of PD-related complications (incidence rate ratio: 1.00, 95% CI 0.96-1.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Early levodopa initiation in PD does neither postpone nor accelerate mortality or PD-related complications, nor does it precipitate earlier occurrence of PD-related complications or mortality. However, we cannot exclude that the results were influenced by residual confounding due to unmeasured risk factors of mortality.

Mucuna pruriens to treat Parkinson's disease in low-income countries: Recommendations and practical guidelines from the farmer to clinical trials. Paving the way for future use in clinical practice

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive and disabling neurodegenerative disease that rapidly worsens and results in premature mortality if left untreated. Although levodopa is the gold standard treatment for PD globally, its accessibility and affordability are severely limited in low- and middle-income countries worldwide. In this scenario, Mucuna pruriens (MP), a leguminous plant growing wild in tropical regions, emerges as a potential alternative or adjunct to levodopa-based medications due to its cost-effectiveness and global natural availability. Recent studies have demonstrated that MP can significantly ameliorate motor symptoms, although tolerability may vary. The proposition that MP could play a pivotal role in providing affordable and symptomatic relief for PD in low- and middle-income countries is grounded in its promising therapeutic profile, yet caution is warranted until more comprehensive data on the long-term safety and efficacy of MP become available. This manuscript summarizes the knowledge gained about MP by the authors, focusing on how to cultivate, store, and provide it to patients in the safest and most effective way in clinical trials. We aim to increase clinical trials investigating its safety and efficacy in PD, before promoting individual use of MP on a global scale, particularly in countries where availability and affordability of levodopa-based medications is still limited.

Neuroprotection by Mucuna pruriens in Neurodegenerative Diseases

The medicinal plant Mucuna pruriens (Fabaceae) is widely known for its anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory properties. It is a well-established drug in Ayurveda and has been widely used for the treatment of neurological disorders and male infertility for ages. The seeds of the plant have potent medicinal value and its extract has been tested in different models of neurodegenerative diseases, especially Parkinson's disease (PD). Apart from PD, Mucuna pruriens is now being studied in models of other nervous systems disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and stroke because of its neuroprotective importance. This review briefly discusses the pathogenesis of PD, AD, ALS and stroke. It aims to summarize the medicinal importance of Mucuna pruriens in treatment of these diseases, and put forward the potential targets where Mucuna pruriens can act for therapeutic interventions. In this review, the effect of Mucuna pruriens on ameliorating the neurodegeneration evident in PD, AD, ALS and stroke is briefly discussed. The potential targets for neuroprotection by the plant are delineated, which can be studied further to validate the hypothesis regarding the use of Mucuna pruriens for the treatment of these diseases.

New insights into pathogenesis of l-DOPA-induced dyskinesia

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive and self-propelling neurodegenerative disorder, which is characterized by motor symptoms, such as rigidity, tremor, slowness of movement and problems with gait. These symptoms become worse over time. To date, Dopamine (DA) replacement therapy with 3, 4-dihydroxy-l-phenylalanine (L-DOPA) is still the most effective pharmacotherapy for motor symptoms of PD. Unfortunately, motor fluctuations consisting of wearing-off effect actions and dyskinesia tend to occur in a few years of starting l-DOPA. Currently, l-DOPA-induced dyskinesia (LID) is troublesome and the pathogenesis of LID requires further investigation. Importantly, a new intervention for LID is imminent. Thus, this review mainly summarized the clinical features, risk factors and pathogenesis of LID to provide updatefor the development of therapeutic targets and new approaches for the treatment of LID.

Natural history of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease and the long-duration response to levodopa

The natural pattern of progression of Parkinson’s disease is largely unknown because patients are conventionally followed on treatment. As Parkinson’s disease progresses, the true magnitude of the long-duration response to levodopa remains unknown, because it can only be estimated indirectly in treated patients. We aimed to describe the natural course of motor symptoms by assessing the natural OFF in consecutive Parkinson’s disease patients never exposed to treatment (drug-naïve), and to investigate the effects of daily levodopa on the progression of motor disability in the OFF medication state over a 2-year period. In this prospective naturalistic study in sub-Saharan Africa, 30 Parkinson’s disease patients (age at onset 58 ± 14 years, disease duration 7 ± 4 years) began levodopa monotherapy and were prospectively assessed using the Unified Parkinson’s disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). Data were collected at baseline, at 1-year and 2-years follow-up. First-ever levodopa intake induced a significant improvement in motor symptoms (natural OFF versus ON state UPDRS-III 41.9 ± 15.9 versus 26.8 ± 15.1, respectively; P < 0.001). At 1-year follow-up, OFF state UPDRS-III score after overnight withdrawal of levodopa was considerably lower than natural OFF (26.5 ± 14.9; P < 0 .001). This effect was not modified by disease duration. At the 2-year follow-up, motor signs after overnight OFF (30.2 ± 14.2) were still 30% milder than natural OFF (P = 0.001). The ON state UPDRS-III at the first-ever levodopa challenge was similar to the overnight OFF score at 1-year follow-up and the two conditions were correlated (r = 0.72, P < 0.001). Compared to the natural progression of motor disability, levodopa treatment resulted in a 31% lower annual decline in UPDRS-III scores in the OFF state (3.33 versus 2.30 points/year) with a lower model’s variance explained by disease duration (67% versus 36%). Using the equation regressed on pretreatment data, we predicted the natural OFF at 1-year and 2-year follow-up visits and estimated that the magnitude of the long-duration response to levodopa ranged between 60% and 65% of total motor benefit provided by levodopa, independently of disease duration (P = 0.13). Although levodopa therapy was associated with motor fluctuations, overnight OFF disability during levodopa was invariably less severe than the natural course of the disease, independently of disease duration. The same applies to the yearly decline in UPDRS-III scores in the OFF state. Further research is needed to clarify the mechanisms underlying the long-duration response to levodopa in Parkinson’s disease. Understanding the natural course of Parkinson’s disease and the long-duration response to levodopa may help to develop therapeutic strategies increasing its magnitude to improve patient quality of life and to better interpret the outcome of randomized clinical trials on disease-modifying therapies that still rely on the overnight OFF to define Parkinson’s disease progression.

Common Myths and Misconceptions That Sidetrack Parkinson Disease Treatment, to the Detriment of Patients

Parkinson disease symptoms become apparent when there has been substantial loss of brain dopamine. That is the consequence of the slow progression of the Lewy body neurodegenerative process. Replenishment of brain dopamine with levodopa therapy dates back approximately a half century and continues to be the most efficacious symptomatic treatment. Understanding the fundamentals of levodopa treatment is crucial to therapeutic success. Various myths over the years have sabotaged treatment outcomes and have discouraged primary care physicians from managing patients with Parkinson disease. That is unfortunate because in some regions, neurologists, and in particular movement specialists, are in short supply. The long history of these persistent levodopa myths and the counterarguments are the focus of this article.

Genomic Analysis Identifies New Loci Associated With Motor Complications in Parkinson's Disease

Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder, characterized by a clinical symptomatology involving both motor and non-motor symptoms. Motor complications associated with long-term dopaminergic treatment include motor fluctuations and levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID), which may have a major impact on the quality of life. The clinical features and onset time of motor complications in the disease course are heterogeneous, and the etiology remains unknown. Objective: We aimed to identify genomic variants associated with the development of motor fluctuations and LID at 5 years after the onset of PD. Methods: Genomic data were obtained using Affymetrix Axiom KORV1.1 array, including an imputation genome-wide association study (GWAS) grid and other GWAS loci; functional variants of the non-synonymous exome; pharmacogenetic variants; variants in genes involved in absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of drugs; and expression quantitative trait loci in 741 patients with PD. Results: FAM129B single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs10760490 was nominally associated with the occurrence of motor fluctuations at 5 years after the onset of PD [odds ratio (OR) = 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.8-4.8, P = 6.5 × 10^-6]. GALNT14 SNP rs144125291 was significantly associated with the occurrence of LID (OR = 5.5, 95% CI = 2.9-10.3, P = 7.88 × 10^-9) and was still significant after Bonferroni correction. Several other genetic variants were associated with the occurrence of motor fluctuations or LID, but the associations were not significant after Bonferroni correction. Conclusion: This study identified new loci associated with the occurrence of motor fluctuations and LID at 5 years after the onset of PD. However, further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Mucuna pruriens in Parkinson disease: A double-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover study

Objective:

To investigate whether Mucuna pruriens (MP), a levodopa-containing leguminous plant growing in all tropical areas worldwide, may be used as alternative source of levodopa for indigent individuals with Parkinson disease (PD) who cannot afford long-term therapy with marketed levodopa preparations.

Methods:

We investigated efficacy and safety of single-dose intake of MP powder from roasted seeds obtained without any pharmacologic processing. Eighteen patients with advanced PD received the following treatments, whose sequence was randomized: (1) dispersible levodopa at 3.5 mg/kg combined with the dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor benserazide (LD+DDCI; the reference treatment); (2) high-dose MP (MP-Hd; 17.5 mg/kg); (3) low-dose MP (MP-Ld; 12.5 mg/kg); (4) pharmaceutical preparation of LD without DDCI (LD−DDCI; 17.5 mg/kg); (5) MP plus benserazide (MP+DDCI; 3.5 mg/kg); (6) placebo. Efficacy outcomes were the change in motor response at 90 and 180 minutes and the duration of on state. Safety measures included any adverse event (AE), changes in blood pressure and heart rate, and the severity of dyskinesias.

Results:

When compared to LD+DDCI, MP-Ld showed similar motor response with fewer dyskinesias and AEs, while MP-Hd induced greater motor improvement at 90 and 180 minutes, longer ON duration, and fewer dyskinesias. MP-Hd induced less AEs than LD+DDCI and LD−DDCI. No differences in cardiovascular response were recorded.

Conclusion:

Single-dose MP intake met all noninferiority efficacy and safety outcome measures in comparison to dispersible levodopa/benserazide. Clinical effects of high-dose MP were similar to levodopa alone at the same dose, with a more favorable tolerability profile.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:

NCT02680977.

Beneficial effects of Panax ginseng for the treatment and prevention of neurodegenerative diseases: past findings and future directions

In recent years, several therapeutic drugs have been rationally designed and synthesized based on the novel knowledge gained from investigating the actions of biologically active chemicals derived from foods, plants, and medicinal herbs. One of the major advantages of these naturalistic chemicals is their ability to interact with multiple targets in the body resulting in a combined beneficial effect. Ginseng is a perennial herb (Araliaceae family), a species within the genus Panax, and a highly valued and popular medicinal plant. Evidence for the medicinal and health benefits of Panax ginseng and its components in preventing neurodegeneration has increased significantly in the past decade. The beneficial effects of P. ginseng on neurodegenerative diseases have been attributed primarily to the antioxidative and immunomodulatory activities of its ginsenoside components. Mechanistic studies on the neuroprotective effects of ginsenosides revealed that they act not only as antioxidants but also as modulators of intracellular neuronal signaling and metabolism, cell survival/death genes, and mitochondrial function. The goal of the present paper is to provide a brief review of recent knowledge and developments concerning the beneficial effects as well as the mechanism of action of P. ginseng and its components in the treatment and prevention of neurodegenerative diseases.

Influence of chronic L-DOPA treatment on immune response following allogeneic and xenogeneic graft in a rat model of Parkinson's disease

Although intrastriatal transplantation of fetal cells for the treatment of Parkinson's disease had shown encouraging results in initial open-label clinical trials, subsequent double-blind studies reported more debatable outcomes. These studies highlighted the need for greater preclinical analysis of the parameters that may influence the success of cell therapy. While much of this has focused on the cells and location of the transplants, few have attempted to replicate potentially critical patient centered factors. Of particular relevance is that patients will be under continued L-DOPA treatment prior to and following transplantation, and that typically the grafts will not be immunologically compatible with the host. The aim of this study was therefore to determine the effect of chronic L-DOPA administered during different phases of the transplantation process on the survival and function of grafts with differing degrees of immunological compatibility. To that end, unilaterally 6-OHDA lesioned rats received sham surgery, allogeneic or xenogeneic transplants, while being treated with L-DOPA before and/or after transplantation. Irrespective of the L-DOPA treatment, dopaminergic grafts improved function and reduced the onset of L-DOPA induced dyskinesia. Importantly, although L-DOPA administered post transplantation was found to have no detrimental effect on graft survival, it did significantly promote the immune response around xenogeneic transplants, despite the administration of immunosuppressive treatment (cyclosporine). This study is the first to systematically examine the effect of L-DOPA on graft tolerance, which is dependent on the donor-host compatibility. These findings emphasize the importance of using animal models that adequately represent the patient paradigm.

Prospective comorbidity-matched study of Parkinson's disease and risk of mortality among women

BACKGROUND

Individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) may have an increased risk of overall mortality compared to the general population. Women may have lower mortality rates from PD than men; however, studies among women on the effect of PD on mortality have been limited and may not have adequately controlled for confounding by comorbidities.

METHODS

We conducted a matched cohort study among participants in the Women's Health Study. 396 incident PD cases were identified through self-report. Each PD case was matched by age to a comparator who was alive and had the same modified Charlson comorbidity score as the PD case. The PD cases and matched comparators were followed for all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age at the index date, smoking, alcohol consumption, exercise and body mass index were used to determine the association between PD and mortality.

RESULTS

During a median of 6.2 years of follow-up, 72 women died (47 PD cases and 25 comparators). The multivariable-adjusted HR for mortality was 2.60 (95% CI 1.56 to 4.32).

CONCLUSIONS

PD was associated with more than a twofold increased risk of all-cause mortality among women. Results are similar to those observed among men.

Early versus delayed initiation of pharmacotherapy in Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer's disease and pathologically is characterised by a progressive loss of dopaminergic cells of the nigrostriatal pathway. Clinically, PD is mainly defined by the presence of the motor symptoms of bradykinesia, rigidity, rest tremor and postural instability, but non-motor symptoms such as depression, dementia and autonomic disturbances are recognised as integral parts of the disease. Although pharmacotherapy for PD was introduced almost 50 years ago, and has improved significantly over the intervening period, the timing of initiation of treatment in newly diagnosed PD remains controversial. While some physicians favour an early start of pharmacotherapy at or soon after diagnosis, others prefer to delay pharmacological treatment until a certain degree of disability has developed. This article aims to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both strategies by exploring their effects on symptoms, disease progression and quality of life. Although the data on putative disease-modifying effects of early pharmacological intervention in PD are still inconclusive, we believe that the most important indication for an early initiation of anti-parkinsonian treatment should be to maintain the quality of life of PD patients and to secure their socioeconomic status as long as possible.

The modern pre-levodopa era of Parkinson's disease: insights into motor complications from sub-Saharan Africa

Delaying the initiation of levodopa has been proposed to reduce the risk of motor complications in Parkinson’s disease. In a 4-year multicentre study in Ghana, Cilia et al. find that motor fluctuations and dyskinesias are predicted by disease duration and levodopa dose, but not by the duration of levodopa therapy.

During the past decade, a number of large drug trials suggested that the initiation of levodopa therapy should be delayed to reduce the risk of motor complications in patients with Parkinson’s disease. However, the relative contribution of the cumulative exposure to levodopa and of disease progression to the pathophysiology of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias is still poorly understood. In this 4-year multicentre study, we investigated a large cohort of patients with Parkinson’s disease in a sub-Saharan African country (Ghana), where access to medication is limited and the initiation of levodopa therapy often occurs many years after onset. The primary objective was to investigate whether the occurrence of motor complications is primarily related to the duration of levodopa therapy or to disease-related factors. Study design included a cross-sectional case-control analysis of data collected between December 2008 and November 2012, and a prospective study of patients followed-up for at least 6 months after the initiation of levodopa therapy. Ninety-one patients fulfilled criteria for clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (58 males, mean age at onset 60.6 ± 11.3 years). Demographic data were compared to those of 2282 consecutive Italian patients recruited during the same period, whereas nested matched subgroups were used to compare clinical variables. Demographic features, frequency and severity of motor and non-motor symptoms were comparable between the two populations, with the only exception of more frequent tremor-dominant presentation in Ghana. At baseline, the proportion of Ghanaian patients with motor fluctuations and dyskinesias was 56% and 14%, respectively. Although levodopa therapy was introduced later in Ghana (mean disease duration 4.2 ± 2.8 versus 2.4 ± 2.1 years, P < 0.001), disease duration at the occurrence of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias was similar in the two populations. In multivariate analysis, disease duration and levodopa daily dose (mg/kg of body weight) were associated with motor complications, while the disease duration at the initiation of levodopa was not. Prospective follow-up for a mean of 2.6 ± 1.3 years of a subgroup of 21 patients who were drug-naïve at baseline [median disease duration 4.5 (interquartile range, 2.3–5) years] revealed that the median time to development of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias after initiation of levodopa therapy was 6 months. We conclude that motor fluctuations and dyskinesias are not associated with the duration of levodopa therapy, but rather with longer disease duration and higher levodopa daily dose. Hence, the practice to withhold levodopa therapy with the objective of delaying the occurrence of motor complications is not justified.

Mortality in levodopa-treated Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with increased mortality despite many advances in treatment. Following the introduction of levodopa in the late 1960's, many studies reported improved or normalized mortality rates in PD. Despite the remarkable symptomatic benefits provided by levodopa, multiple recent studies have demonstrated that PD patients continue to die at a rate in excess of their peers. We undertook this retrospective study of 211 deceased PD patients to determine the factors associated with mortality in levodopa-treated PD. Our findings confirm that PD is associated with increased mortality in both men and women. Unlike the majority of other mortality studies, we found that women have a greater reduction in lifespan compared to men. We also found that patients with early onset PD (onset at the age of 50 or before) have reduced survival relative to PD patients with later ages of onset. A final important finding is that survival is equal in PD patients treated with levodopa early (within 2 years or less of PD onset) versus later.

L-DOPA: a scapegoat for accelerated neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease?

There is consensus that amelioration of the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease is most effective with L-DOPA (levodopa). However, this necessary therapeutic step is biased by an enduring belief that L-DOPA is toxic to the remaining substantia nigra dopaminergic neurons by itself, or by specific metabolites such as dopamine. The concept of L-DOPA toxicity originated from pre-clinical studies conducted mainly in cell culture, demonstrating that L-DOPA or its derivatives damage dopaminergic neurons due to oxidative stress and other mechanisms. However, the in vitro data remain controversial as some studies showed neuroprotective, rather than toxic action of the drug. The relevance of this debate needs to be considered in the context of the studies conducted on animals and in clinical trials that do not provide convincing evidence for L-DOPA toxicity in vivo. This review presents the current views on the pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease, focusing on mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative/proteolytic stress, the factors that can be affected by L-DOPA or its metabolites. We then critically discuss the evidence supporting the two opposing views on the effects of L-DOPA in vitro, as well as the animal and human data. We also address the problem of inadequate experimental models used in these studies. L-DOPA remains the symptomatic 'hero' of Parkinson's disease. Whether it contributes to degeneration of nigral dopaminergic neurons, or is a 'scapegoat' for explaining undesirable or unexpected effects of the treatment, remains a hotly debated topic.

Neuroprotection in Parkinson models varies with toxin administration protocol

Numerous factors contribute to substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) dopamine (DA) neuron death in Parkinson's disease (PD), thus complicating the search for effective neuroprotective agents for this disease. Although the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-treated mouse has been widely used for assessing neuroprotective agents for PD, the pathological processes resulting from MPTP exposure can vary greatly depending upon the MPTP administration protocol. This study assessed the degree to which the neuroprotective efficacy of particular agents may depend upon the MPTP administration protocol (i.e. acute vs. subacute toxin administration). Endpoints analysed were changes in tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and NeuN cell numbers in the SNc, striatal DA and metabolite levels, and striatal TH+ fiber density. The efficacy of putative neuroprotective agents [i.e. LIGA 20, nicotinamide and pramipexole (PPX)] varied depending upon the MPTP administration protocol. LIGA 20 spared striatal DA levels in both MPTP models, while nicotinamide was only effective in the acute toxin administration model and PPX was only effective in the subacute model. In both MPTP models, LIGA 20 and nicotinamide significantly spared DAergic neurons; PPX only spared DAergic neurons in the subacute model. Only acute MPTP-treated mice that received nicotinamide had a significant sparing of striatal DAergic fibers. These results underscore the need to assess putative neuroprotective agents for PD in multiple animal models using multiple endpoints. This strategy may better identify compounds with broad neuroprotective/neurorestorative profiles that may be more likely to be clinically effective.

Levodopa Slows Progression of Parkinson’s Disease. External Validation by Clinical Trial Simulation

PURPOSE

To externally validate the model predictions of a DATATOP cohort analysis through application of clinical trial simulation with the study design of the ELLDOPA trial.

METHODS

The stochastic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic and disease progress model was developed from the large DATATOP cohort of patients followed for 8 years. ELLDOPA was designed to detect a difference between placebo and levodopa treated arms in the total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) taken at baseline and following 2 weeks levodopa washout after 40 weeks of treatment. The total UPDRS response was simulated with different assumptions on levodopa effect (symptomatic with/without disease modifying capability) and washout speed of symptomatic effect.

RESULTS

The observed results of ELLDOPA were similar to the model predictions assuming levodopa slows disease progression and has a slow washout of symptomatic effect.

CONCLUSIONS

This simulation work confirmed the conclusion of the DATATOP analysis finding that levodopa slows disease progression. The simulation results also showed that a dose-related increased rate of progression in Parkinson's disease, obscured by symptomatic benefit, is very unlikely. Finally, the simulation results also shown that 2 weeks washout period was not adequate to completely eliminate the symptomatic benefits of levodopa.

Neuroimaging and therapeutics in movement disorders

In this review, we discuss the role of neuroimaging in assessing treatment options for movement disorders, particularly Parkinson's disease (PD). Imaging methods to assess dopaminergic function have recently been applied in trials of potential neuroprotective agents. Other imaging methods using regional metabolism and/or cerebral perfusion have been recently introduced to quantify the modulation of network activity as an objective marker of the treatment response. Both imaging strategies have provided novel insights into the mechanisms underlying a variety of pharmacological and stereotaxic surgical treatment strategies for PD and other movement disorders.

FDG PET in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonian disorders

The differential diagnosis of parkinsonian disorders can be challenging, especially early in the disease course. PET imaging with [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) has been used to identify characteristic patterns of regional glucose metabolism in patient cohorts with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD), as well as variant forms of parkinsonism such as multiple system atrophy (MSA), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and corticobasal degeneration (CBGD). In this study, we assessed the utility of FDG PET in the differential diagnosis of individual patients with clinical parkinsonism. 135 parkinsonian patients were referred for FDG PET to determine whether their diagnosis could be made accurately based upon their scans. Imaging-based diagnosis was obtained by visual assessment of the individual scans and also by computer-assisted interpretation. The results were compared with 2-year follow-up clinical assessments made by independent movement disorders specialists who were blinded to the original PET findings. We found that blinded computer assessment agreed with clinical diagnosis in 92.4% of all subjects (97.7% early PD, 91.6% late PD, 96% MSA, 85% PSP, 90.1% CBGD, 86.5% healthy control subjects). Concordance of visual inspection with clinical diagnosis was achieved in 85.4% of the patients scanned (88.4% early PD, 97.2% late PD, 76% MSA, 60% PSP, 90.9% CBGD, 90.9% healthy control subjects). This study demonstrates that FDG PET performed at the time of initial referral for parkinsonism accurately predicted the clinical diagnosis of individual patients made at subsequent follow-up. Computer-assisted methodologies may be particularly helpful in situations where experienced readers of FDG PET images are not readily available.

Challenging conventional wisdom: the etiologic role of dopamine oxidative stress in Parkinson's disease

Oxidative stress is well documented in Parkinson's disease (PD) and has been attributed to dopamine oxidative metabolism. However, evidence of oxidative stress is found in a variety of neurodegenerative disorders, suggesting that more general factors are responsible or that cytodestructive processes secondarily generate oxyradical products. Increasing evidence points away from dopamine metabolism as an important contributor to PD neurodegeneration. Predictions from the dopamine oxidative stress hypothesis of PD reveal multiple inconsistencies. Although the clinical and therapeutic importance of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system is undeniable, PD neuropathology is much more widespread.

Differentiation of idiopathic Parkinson's disease, multiple system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, and healthy controls using magnetization transfer imaging

The differentiation of multiple system atrophy (MSA) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) from idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) is difficult. Magnetization transfer imaging (MTI), a measure that correlates with myelination and axonal density, was employed in this study in the attempt to distinguish between these disorders. Measurements were carried out in 15 patients with IPD, 12 patients with MSA, 10 patients with PSP, and in 20 aged-matched healthy control subjects. The main finding was a change in the magnetization transfer ratio in the globus pallidus, putamen, caudate nucleus, substantia nigra, and white matter in IPD, MSA, and PSP patients, matching the pathological features of the underlying disorder. Furthermore, stepwise linear discriminant analysis provided a good classification of the individual patients into the different disease groups. All IPD patients and control subjects were correctly separated from the MSA and PSP cohort, and all PSP patients and 11 of 12 MSA patients were correctly separated from the IPD and control cohort. There was also a fairly good discrimination of IPD patients from control subjects and of MSA from PSP patients. In conclusion, MTI revealed degenerative changes in patients with different parkinsonian syndromes matching the underlying pathological features of the different diseases, underlining the high potential of this method in distinguishing MSA and PSP from IPD.

A pulmonary formulation of L-dopa enhances its effectiveness in a rat model of Parkinson's disease

The efficacy of oral L-dopa becomes problematic with the progression of Parkinson's disease, due in large part to a lost ability to accommodate L-dopa's inherently poor pharmacokinetics. Pulmonary delivery represents a novel approach to reducing this problem. L-dopa was formulated into inhalable (Alkermes AIR) particles, and its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics compared with those of an oral formulation. Pulmonary administration of L-dopa (2 mg) to rats resulted in a rapid elevation of plasma levels (C(max) = 4.8 +/- 1.10 microg/ml at 2 min), whereas oral administration of L-dopa produced a much delayed and lower C(max) (1.8 +/- 0.40 microg/ml at 30 min). In a rat model of Parkinson's disease (unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesion), the pulmonary formulation of L-dopa (0.5-2.0 mg) yielded more rapid and robust elevations in striatal L-dopa, dopamine, and dihydroxyphenylacetic acid levels, as well as 2.5 to 3.7 times as many c-fos-expressing striatal neurons. Moreover, motor function was significantly improved by 10 min after administration, with peak improvements occurring within 15 to 30 min. In contrast, considerably higher doses (6.8-10 mg) of orally administered L-dopa took over three times longer to produce similar effects. These results suggest that an inhalable formulation of l-dopa has superior pharmacokinetic properties and may provide patients with a more effective form of rescue therapy as well as being a reliable adjuvant or replacement for first-line oral therapy.

Designing neuroprotection trials in Parkinson's disease

A major goal of the neuroscience community is to develop neuroprotective treatment strategies that will slow or forestall the progression of Parkinson's disease, one of the most common adult-onset neurodegenerative disorders, affecting approximately 1 million people in North America. Although prior research to identify neuroprotective interventions has not been conclusive, recent advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease, including the development of relevant animal models, provide the opportunity for rational clinical trials to assess neuroprotective treatments.

Effect of late initiation of levodopa treatment in patients with long-standing Parkinson's disease

The time of initiation of levodopa therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) is still debatable, as is the hypothesis of levodopa toxicity Some researchers argue that late initiation of treatment will delay the appearance of response fluctuations. In the present study, 11 patients in whom treatment with low doses of levodopa was delayed for a mean of 7.9 +/- 3.1 years were followed for a mean of 15.7 +/- 3.3 years. Time of onset of response fluctuations and disease severity were compared with those in 17 patients with fluctuating PD who were treated with levodopa from disease onset. There was no significant change in time to onset of response fluctuations and dyskinesias once levodopa treatment was started, and late initiation of levodopa did not affect disease progression. The authors conclude that the decision of when to initiate levodopa treatment should be taken according to the patient's needs.

The medial prefrontal cortex mediates 3-methoxytyramine-induced behavioural changes in rat

L-3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) remains a common treatment for Parkinson's disease; however, side effects (i.e., dyskinesia and hallucinations) also remain problematic. We recently reported that the dopamine metabolite 3-methoxytyramine causes stereotypy in rats via dopamine receptors, raising the possibility that 3-methoxytyramine is involved in the adverse side effects of chronic L-DOPA treatment. Thus, the present study examined the sites of 3-methoxytyramine action in the rat brain. After intracerebroventricular administration of 3-methoxytyramine, significantly more neurones expressed c-Fos in mesocortico-limbic dopamine areas including frontal cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, piriform cortex, the nucleus accumbens shell, and ventral tegmental area. 3-Methoxytyramine injection into the medial prefrontal cortex specifically resulted in behavioural changes characteristic of those elicited by the more general intracerebroventricular injection of 3-methoxytyramine. This suggests that the medial prefrontal cortex mediates the 3-methoxytyramine-induced behavioural changes and that a reduction of its action there may alleviate the adverse effects of chronic L-DOPA treatment.

Behavioral activity and stereotypy in rats induced by L-DOPA metabolites: a possible role in the adverse effects of chronic L-DOPA treatment of Parkinson's disease

L-3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) is a common and effective treatment for Parkinson's disease, but dyskinesia continues to be a serious adverse effect with chronic use. Evidence suggests that L-DOPA induces increases in dopamine, which then binds to supersensitive dopamine receptors, resulting in dyskinesia. We have shown previously that L-DOPA directly causes stereotypy in rats, suggesting that chronic L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia is also caused by L-DOPA itself. This raises the possibility that other L-DOPA metabolites have a role in dyskinesia. We examined the behavioral effects of five L-DOPA metabolites (3-methoxytyramine, 3-MT; 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine, DOPAC; dopamine; homovanillic acid, and 3-o-methyl-DOPA) in rats. A unilateral, intracerebroventricular injection of 3-MT (10-200 microg, 40 microl) over 30 min, dose-dependently increased behavioral activity and stereotypy. This effect was suppressed by the dopamine D1/5-receptor antagonist SCH 23390, but not by the dopamine D2/3/4-receptor antagonist sulpiride. Dopamine denervation resulted in behavioral supersensitivity to 3-MT. Neither dopamine nor DOPAC levels increased in the striatum after 3-MT administration, as measured using in vivo voltammetry. The behavioral changes paralleled a rise in 3-MT in the contralateral striatum. DOPAC also caused behavioral changes and stereotypy, but to a smaller degree than 3-MT. Dopamine-denervated rats did not exhibit a supersensitive response to DOPAC, however. Other L-DOPA metabolites did not cause behavioral effects. These data suggest that 3-MT directly induced dopamine-D1/5-receptor-mediated behavioral changes in rats, and that 3-MT may have a role in dyskinesia due to chronic L-DOPA treatment in Parkinson's disease patients.

The effect of stage of Parkinson's disease at the onset of levodopa therapy on development of motor complications

The aim of this study was to ascertain whether the stage of Parkinson's disease (PD) (according to the Hoehn and Yahr staging system) would affect the length of time between the introduction of levodopa therapy and appearance of levodopa-associated motor complications. Forty patients with clinically definite PD were studied. In all, clinical and therapeutic data were collected from the time of diagnosis to the time of levodopa-associated motor complications (i.e. dyskinesia, motor fluctuations). In 17 patients, levodopa could be started in Hoehn and Yahr stage I (H & Y-I; 16.2 months after the onset of PD), whilst in 13 patients levodopa could be started in H & Y-II (19.6 months after the onset of the disease) and in 10 in H & Y-III (45.1 months after the onset of PD). Cox proportional hazard regression model shows that the PD patients in whom the initial levodopa treatment was introduced at stage III develop both dyskinesias and motor fluctuations significantly earlier than the patients whose levodopa started in stage I and II of PD. The median interval to develop dyskinesias was 66, 72 and 24 months for patients in whom levodopa was introduced in stage I, II and III, respectively. These values were 64, 55 and 14 months for motor fluctuations. These findings add to the clinical arguments that favour an essential role of severity of PD at levodopa initiation as a risk factor for the development of levodopa-associated motor complications.

Bilateral subthalamic stimulation monotherapy in advanced Parkinson's disease: long-term follow-up of patients

Bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation (STN-DBS) is used to improve parkinsonian symptoms and attenuate levodopa-induced motor complications. In some patients, such clinical improvement allows antiparkinsonian medication (ApMed) withdrawal. We show the clinical outcome at the long-term follow-up of patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) in which STN-DBS was used in monotherapy, and compare the clinical results of patients without medication with those obtained in parkinsonian patients in which ApMed were reduced but could not be totally displaced after surgery. We analyzed clinical outcome of ten patients with PD in which all ApMed was withdrawn after bilateral subthalamic stimulation and 16 parkinsonian patients still taking antiparkinsonian medication after surgery. After 1.5 years, STN-DBS monotherapy produced UPDRS motor scores similar to those observed in the on-drug condition before surgery without the inconvenience of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. No significant differences were seen in most of clinical outcome measures when comparing patients still taking ApMed with patients in STN-DBS monotherapy but a few patients still taking ApMed presented mild dyskinesias and motor fluctuations and patients with STN-DBS monotherapy did not. STN-DBS is useful in the treatment of advanced PD and in some patients it is possible to maintain this therapy alone in the long term. The therapeutic effect of STN-DBS on motor signs can be equipotent to that of levodopa with the additional benefit of avoiding motor fluctuations and dyskinesias.

Parkinson's Disease: Initial Treatment with Levodopa or Dopamine Agonists

The question of whether to use levodopa (LD) or dopamine agonists as initial therapy in Parkinson's disease has been a controversy for nearly 20 years. There are several issues relating to this treatment regimen that may effect ones decision. Review of them results in the following conclusions: LD does not cause the onset of motor fluctuations and dyskinesia; it probably relates to disease progression. Tolerance does not develop with long-term LD therapy. LD is not toxic. LD decreases mortality in Parkinson's disease. Motor fluctuations can occur with dopamine-agonist monotherapy, but the actual frequency is as yet unknown. Dopamine agonists are not neuroprotective. Clinical trials have indicated that LD remains the most potent symptomatic therapeutic agent available. Dopamine agonists do provide some symptomatic relief when used alone in early Parkinson's disease. Standard preparations of LD have the same effect on early disease as controlled release preparations. Dopamine agonists cause less dyskinesia and fluctuations. These conclusions indicate that both drugs are effective symptomatic agents with their own positive and negative aspects. There is no incorrect choice. It is reasonable to start young onset patients (younger than 50 years of age) with an agonist, because they seem to be more prone to develop motor fluctuations and dyskinesia. However, if employment is in jeopardy then LD may be needed. Because agonists cause more hallucinations, freezing, and somnolence, problems of particular relevance to the elderly (older than 70 years), then LD would be the best agent for older onset patients. In general, but particularly for those falling in between these age groups, treatment should be individualized. In this time of cost effectiveness, LD remains the least expensive of these agents.

Parkinson's disease: medical and surgical treatment

It has been over three decades since the introduction of L-dihydroxyphenylalanine or levodopa therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). The early levodopa trials were driven by recognition of a profound cerebral dopamine deficiency state in this disorder. Whereas dopamine fails to cross the blood brain barrier and hence is ineffective as therapy, the amino acid precursor, dopa, is transported across this barrier and provides a substrate for dopamine synthesis. Levodopa is converted to dopamine within the brain by dopa decarboxylase, replenishing central dopamine stores and potentially reversing the motor symptoms of PD.

Treatment of early Parkinson's disease

Levodopa is still the most effective therapeutic agent for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Initially, levodopa provides a stable therapeutic response but, during long-term treatment its beneficial effect declines and a gradually increasing number of patients experience fluctuations in motor response. Therefore, in the management of PD it is important to minimise the risks for the development of motor fluctuations. In this context, recent double-blind long-term studies have confirmed the earlier results, suggesting that it appears advisable to initiate dopaminergic treatment in early PD by initially using a dopamine agonist and by adding levodopa when the benefit is no longer adequate with dopamine agonist alone. Another alternative would be to start with selegiline alone, then depending on the disability of the patient, add a dopamine agonist and finally levodopa.

Treatment of Parkinson's disease

The aim of current treatment of Parkinson's disease is to ameliorate the symptoms while seeking to lessen the potential development of late levodopa complications. To this end, there is ample evidence that the early use of dopamine agonists is beneficial in younger Parkinsonian patients but monotherapy with dopamine agonists is for only a select few. Nonergot dopamine agonists offer the potential for fewer side effects. Lower dose levodopa therapy delays the onset and reduces severity of dyskinesia and end of dose failure. However levodopa remains the treatment of choice in Parkinson's disease and should not be restricted unnecessarily in patients with disability. There is no evidence that levodopa is toxic to dopaminergic neurons in people with Parkinson's disease. As yet, no drugs are of proven neuroprotective value. Dopamine agonists, catechol-o-methyltransferase inhibitors, amantadine and apomorphine have differing but beneficial roles in the management of levodopa side effects. Ablative surgery and deep brain stimulation of thalamus, globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus are increasingly available but choice of procedure depends not just on patient symptomatology, but also on local experience and results. Ideally, deep brain stimulation is the treatment of choice as it offers less morbidity than bilateral ablative surgery, the possibility of postoperative adjustments and the potential for reversibility if better treatments become available.

A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa

BACKGROUND

There is debate about whether the initial treatment for patients with Parkinson's disease should be levodopa or a dopamine agonist.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we compared the safety and efficacy of the dopamine D2-receptor agonist ropinirole with that of levodopa over a period of five years in 268 patients with early Parkinson's disease. If symptoms were not adequately controlled by the assigned study medication, patients could receive supplementary levodopa, administered in an open-label fashion. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of dyskinesia.

RESULTS

Eighty-five of the 179 patients in the ropinirole group (47 percent) and 45 of the 89 patients in the levodopa group (51 percent) completed all five years of the study. In the ropinirole group 29 of the 85 patients (34 percent) received no levodopa supplementation. The analysis of the time to dyskinesia showed a significant difference in favor of ropinirole (hazard ratio for remaining free of dyskinesia, 2.82; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.78 to 4.44; P<0.001). At five years, the cumulative incidence of dyskinesia (excluding the three patients who had dyskinesia at base line), regardless of levodopa supplementation, was 20 percent (36 of 177 patients) in the ropinirole group and 45 percent (40 of 88 patients) in the levodopa group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the mean change in scores for activities of daily living among those who completed the study. Adverse events led to the early withdrawal from the study of 48 of 179 patients in the ropinirole group (27 percent) and 29 of 89 patients in the levodopa group (33 percent). The mean (+/-SD) daily doses given by the end of the study were 16.5+/-6.6 mg of ropinirole (plus 427+/-221 mg of levodopa in patients who received supplementation) and 753+/-398 mg of levodopa (including supplements).

CONCLUSIONS

Early Parkinson's disease can be managed successfully for up to five years with a reduced risk of dyskinesia by initiating treatment with ropinirole alone and supplementing it with levodopa if necessary.

Levodopa in Parkinson's disease: neurotoxicity issue laid to rest?

Orally administered levodopa remains the most effective symptomatic treatment for Parkinson's disease. The introduction of levodopa therapy is often delayed, however, because of the fear that it might be toxic for the remaining dopaminergic neurons, and thus accelerate the deterioration of the patient's condition. Evidence for levodopa toxicity comes mainly from in vitro studies which have demonstrated that levodopa can damage dopaminergic neurons by a mechanism that probably involves oxidative stress. It is widely accepted, however, that levodopa is not toxic for healthy animals and humans who do not have Parkinson's disease. It has been argued that the lesioned mesostriatal dopaminergic system could be more vulnerable to levodopa-induced toxicity, because the brain extracellular concentrations attained by levodopa are higher when the dopaminergic system is damaged, and remaining dopaminergic neurons experience a process of compensatory hyperactivity. Evidence for in vivo levodopa toxicity in animal models of Parkinson's disease is scarce and contradictory. A comprehensive recent study failed to find any evidence of levodopa toxicity in rats with either moderate or severe lesions of the mesostriatal dopaminergic system. Concerning the hypothesis of toxicity, some recent reports have shown that levodopa can have trophic effects on dopaminergic neurons in vitro, and our own work has shown that long term levodopa therapy promotes recovery of striatal dopaminergic markers in rats with moderate nigrostriatal lesions. Given that neither epidemiological nor clinical studies have ever provided evidence to support that long term levodopa administration can accelerate the progression of Parkinson's disease, we believe that levodopa therapy should not be delayed on the basis of an unconfirmed hypothesis.

The sydney multicentre study of Parkinson's disease: progression and mortality at 10 years

OBJECTIVES

To report on a 10 year follow up of patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease, particularly with respect to mortality and the effect of early treatment with bromocriptine.

METHODS

The patients are from the 149 new patients recruited for a double blind, randomised study of low dose levodopa-carbidopa versus low dose bromocriptine. Patients were examined neurologically at least yearly. Neuropsychological examinations were performed at 0, 3, 5, and 10 years. Mortality and cause of death in these patients were compared with the Australian population using standardised mortality ratios (SMRs). Mortality and disease progression were compared by sex and treatment group. Predictors of death within 10 years, nursing home admission, and progression in Columbia score of >/=20 points were examined by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were excluded as having atypical Parkinsonism and six were lost to follow up. All available patients have been followed up for 10 years. Fifty patients (38%) were dead by 10 years and 63 by the last follow up. The SMR was 1.58 for all patients (p<0. 001). There was no significant difference in SMRs between the sexes. The mean duration of disease until death was 9.1 years. Parkinson's disease was thought to have contributed substantially to the death of 30 patients. The most common cause of death was pneumonia. Women progressed at a similar rate to men until 8 years, when the severity of their disease as measured by Hoehn and Yahr stage became greater (p<0.05). Older age of onset correlated with increased risk of death but the SMR was increased even in those aged <70 years (SMR 1.80, p=0.03). Early use of bromocriptine did not reduce mortality or slow progression of disease. One quarter of all patients had been admitted to nursing homes by 10 years. Only four patients were still employed.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality in Parkinson's disease remains increased despite low dose levodopa-carbidopa therapy and no additional benefit was gained from early use of bromocriptine. Duration of disease was similar to that in the era before levodopa.

The initial treatment of Parkinson's disease should begin with levodopa

For over two decades controversy has surrounded the initial choice of therapeutic agent for patients with early symptomatic Parkinson's disease. Whether levodopa or dopamine receptor agonist monotherapy in these patients is more efficacious and/or results in fewer long-term complications of dopaminergic therapy such as motor fluctuations, dyskinesias, or psychiatric disorders is unresolved. This article examines the evidence related to levodopa-sparing strategies and levodopa-induced toxicity in Parkinson's disease. At this time, there is little evidence to support levodopa-sparing strategies or to suggest that levodopa is toxic and harmful to patients with Parkinson's disease.

The role of iron in neurodegeneration: prospects for pharmacotherapy of Parkinson's disease

Although the aetiology of Parkinson's disease (PD) and related neurodegenerative disorders is still unknown, recent evidence from human and experimental animal models suggests that a misregulation of iron metabolism, iron-induced oxidative stress and free radical formation are major pathogenic factors. These factors trigger a cascade of deleterious events leading to neuronal death and the ensuing biochemical disturbances of clinical relevance. A review of the available data in PD provides the following evidence in support of this hypothesis: (i) an increase of iron in the brain, which in PD selectively involves neuromelanin in substantia nigra (SN) neurons; (ii) decreased availability of glutathione (GSH) and other antioxidant substances; (iii) increase of lipid peroxidation products and reactive oxygen (O2)species (ROS); and (iv) impaired mitochondrial electron transport mechanisms. Most of these changes appear to be closely related to interactions between iron and neuromelanin, which result in accumulation of iron and a continuous production of cytotoxic species leading to neuronal death. Some of these findings have been reproduced in animal models using 6-hydroxydopamine, N-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), iron loading and beta-carbolines, although none of them is an accurate model for PD in humans. Although it is not clear whether iron accumulation and oxidative stress are the initial events causing cell death or consequences of the disease process, therapeutic efforts aimed at preventing or at least delaying disease progression by reducing the overload of iron and generation of ROS may be beneficial in PD and related neurodegenerative disorders. Current pharmacotherapy of PD, in addition to symptomatic levodopa treatment, includes 'neuroprotective' strategies with dopamine agonists, monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors (MAO-B), glutamate antagonists, catechol O-methyltransferase inhibitors and other antioxidants or free radical scavengers. In the future, these agents could be used in combination with, or partly replaced by, iron chelators and lazaroids that prevent iron-induced generation of deleterious substances. Although experimental and preclinical data suggest the therapeutic potential of these drugs, their clinical applicability will be a major challenge for future research.

Orphan neurones and amine excess: the functional neuropathology of Parkinsonism and neuropsychiatric disease

The aetiology and treatment of Parkinsonism is currently conceptualised within a dopamine (DA) deficiency-repletion framework. Loss of striatal DA is thought to cause motor impairment of which tremor, bradykinaesia and rigidity are prominent features. Repletion of deficient DA should at least minimise parkinsonian signs and symptoms. In Section 2, based on extensive pre-clinical and clinical findings, the instability of this approach to Parkinsonism is scrutinised as the existing negative findings challenging the DA deficiency hypothesis are reviewed and reinterpreted. In Section 3 it is suggested that Parkinsonism is due to a DA excess far from the striatum in the area of the posterior lateral hypothalamus (PLH) and the substantia nigra (SN). This unique area, around the diencephalon/mesencephalon border (DCMCB), is packed with many ascending and descending fibres which undergo functional transformation during degeneration, collectively labelled 'orphan neurones'. These malformed cells remain functional resulting in pathological release of transmitter and perpetual neurotoxicity. Orphan neurone formation is commonly observed in the PLH of animals and in man exhibiting Parkinsonism. The mechanism by which orphan neurones impair motor function is analogous to that seen in the diseased human heart. From this perspective, to conceptualise orphan neurones at the DCMCB as 'Time bombs in the brain' is neither fanciful nor unrealistic [E.M. Stricker, M.J. Zigmond, Comments on effects of nigro-striatal dopamine lesions, Appetite 5 (1984) 266-267] as the DA excess phenomenon demands a different therapeutic approach for the management of Parkinsonism. In Section 4 the focus is on this novel concept of treatment strategies by concentrating on non-invasive, pharmacological and surgical modification of functional orphan neurones as they affect adjacent systems. The Orphan neurone/DA excess hypothesis permits a more comprehensive and defendable interpretation of the interrelationship between Parkinsonism and schizophrenia and other related disorders.

Chronic levodopa is not toxic for remaining dopamine neurons, but instead promotes their recovery, in rats with moderate nigrostriatal lesions

Orally administered levodopa remains the most effective symptomatic treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). The introduction of levodopa therapy is often delayed, however, because of the fear that it might be toxic for the remaining dopaminergic neurons and, thus, accelerate the deterioration of patients. However, in vivo evidence of levodopa toxicity is scarce. We have evaluated the effects of a 6-month oral levodopa treatment on several dopaminergic markers, in rats with moderate or severe 6-hydroxydopamine-induced lesions of mesencephalic dopamine neurons and sham-lesioned animals. Counts of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-immunoreactive neurons in the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area showed no significant difference between levodopa-treated and vehicle-treated rats. In addition, for rats of the sham-lesioned and severely lesioned groups, immunoradiolabeling for TH, the dopamine transporter (DAT), and the vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT2) at the striatal level was not significantly different between rats treated with levodopa or vehicle. It was unexpected that quantification of immunoautoradiograms showed a partial recovery of all three dopaminergic markers (TH, DAT, and VMAT2) in the denervated territories of the striatum of moderately lesioned rats receiving levodopa. Furthermore, the density of TH-positive fibers observed in moderately lesioned rats was higher in those treated chronically with levodopa than in those receiving vehicle. Last, that chronic levodopa administration reversed the up-regulation of D2 dopamine receptors seen in severely lesioned rats provided evidence that levodopa reached a biologically active concentration at the basal ganglia. Our results demonstrate that a pharmacologically effective 6-month oral levodopa treatment is not toxic for remaining dopamine neurons in a rat model of PD but instead promotes the recovery of striatal innervation in rats with partial lesions.

Does combined levodopa and bromocriptine therapy in Parkinson's disease prevent late motor complications?

Levodopa-carbidopa (LD) in low dosages adequately controls symptoms in most patients with Parkinson's disease and delays the appearance of fluctuations and dyskinesias. It has been suggested that early combination therapy with bromocriptine and levodopa delays or prevents the onset of late treatment complication associated with LD monotherapy in Parkinson's disease. We have conducted this study to assess the possible benefit of combined therapy compared with levodopa monotherapy. Seventy-eight previously untreated patients with Parkinson's disease were recruited over a period of 54 months and randomly allocated to either a levodopa-carbidopa (LD) Group or a levodopa-carbidopa in combination with low-dose bromocriptine (LD-Br) Group. The appearance of motor complications determined the end point of the study. We gradually increased the doses of bromocriptine (2.5-15 mg/d) or levodopa (125-500 mg/d) until the maximum "on" time was reached. In six patients, the doses of levodopa had to be increased up to the optimal dose (625-1000 mg/day). In the last evaluation the on-time and parkinsonian disability were similar in both treatment groups. We did not find statistically significant differences in the frequency of motor complications when comparing the two groups of treatment. Our study suggests that early combination of levodopa and bromocriptine does not confer any clinical benefit over levodopa alone in treating early Parkinson's disease, nor will it influence the evolution of the disease.Copyright Lippincott-Raven Publishers