Autoimmune ataxic neuropathies (sensory ganglionopathies): are glycolipids the responsible autoantigens?

SARS-CoV-2 involvement in central nervous system tissue damage

As the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to spread globally, it became evident that the SARS-CoV-2 virus infects multiple organs including the brain. Several clinical studies revealed that patients with COVID-19 infection experience an array of neurological signs ranging in severity from headaches to life-threatening strokes. Although the exact mechanism by which the SARS-CoV-2 virus directly impacts the brain is not fully understood, several theories have been suggested including direct and indirect pathways induced by the virus. One possible theory is the invasion of SARS-CoV-2 to the brain occurs either through the bloodstream or via the nerve endings which is considered to be the direct route. Such findings are based on studies reporting the presence of viral material in the cerebrospinal fluid and brain cells. Nevertheless, the indirect mechanisms, including blood-clotting abnormalities and prolonged activation of the immune system, can result in further tissue and organ damages seen during the course of the disease. This overview attempts to give a thorough insight into SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus neurological infection and highlights the possible mechanisms leading to the neurological manifestations observed in infected patients.

SARS-CoV-2 Attacks in the Brain: Focus on the Sialome

The epidemiological observations suggest that respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms caused by severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are accompanied by short- and long-term neurological manifestations. There is increasing evidence that the neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV-2 is closely related to its capacity to interact with cell membrane sialome. Given the wide expression of sialylated compounds of cell membranes in the brain, the interplay between cell membrane sialoglycans and the virus is crucial for its attachment and cell entry, transport, neuronal damage and brain immunity. Here, we focus on the significance of the brain sialome in the progress of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and SARS-CoV-2-induced neuropathology.

Unraveling Muscle Impairment Associated With COVID-19 and the Role of 3D Culture in Its Investigation

COVID-19, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been considered a public health emergency, extensively investigated by researchers. Accordingly, the respiratory tract has been the main research focus, with some other studies outlining the effects on the neurological, cardiovascular, and renal systems. However, concerning SARS-CoV-2 outcomes on skeletal muscle, scientific evidence is still not sufficiently strong to trace, treat and prevent possible muscle impairment due to the COVID-19. Simultaneously, there has been a considerable amount of studies reporting skeletal muscle damage in the context of COVID-19. Among the detrimental musculoskeletal conditions associated with the viral infection, the most commonly described are sarcopenia, cachexia, myalgia, myositis, rhabdomyolysis, atrophy, peripheral neuropathy, and Guillain-Barré Syndrome. Of note, the risk of developing sarcopenia during or after COVID-19 is relatively high, which poses special importance to the condition amid the SARS-CoV-2 infection. The yet uncovered mechanisms by which musculoskeletal injury takes place in COVID-19 and the lack of published methods tailored to study the correlation between COVID-19 and skeletal muscle hinder the ability of healthcare professionals to provide SARS-CoV-2 infected patients with an adequate treatment plan. The present review aims to minimize this burden by both thoroughly exploring the interaction between COVID-19 and the musculoskeletal system and examining the cutting-edge 3D cell culture techniques capable of revolutionizing the study of muscle dynamics.

Mechanisms of Nerve Damage in Neuropathies Associated with Hematological Diseases: Lesson from Nerve Biopsies

Despite the introduction of non-invasive techniques in the study of peripheral neuropathies, sural nerve biopsy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of several neuropathies, including vasculitic neuropathy and neurolymphomatosis. Besides its diagnostic role, sural nerve biopsy has helped to shed light on the pathogenic mechanisms of different neuropathies. In the present review, we discuss how pathological findings helped understand the mechanisms of polyneuropathies complicating hematological diseases.

Guillain-Barré syndrome: The first documented COVID-19-triggered autoimmune neurologic disease: More to come with myositis in the offing

Objective

To present the COVID-19–associated GBS, the prototypic viral-triggered autoimmune disease, in the context of other emerging COVID-19–triggered autoimmunities, and discuss potential concerns with ongoing neuroimmunotherapies.

Methods

Eleven GBS cases in four key COVID-19 hotspots are discussed regarding presenting symptoms, response to therapies and cross-reactivity of COVID spike proteins with nerve glycolipids. Emerging cases of COVID-19–triggered autoimmune necrotizing myositis (NAM) and encephalopathies are also reviewed in the context of viral invasion, autoimmunity and ongoing immunotherapies.

Results

Collective data indicate that in this pandemic any patient presenting with an acute paralytic disease-like GBS, encephalomyelitis or myositis-even without systemic symptoms, may represent the first manifestation of COVID-19. Anosmia, ageusia, other cranial neuropathies and lymphocytopenia are red flags enhancing early diagnostic suspicion. In Miller-Fisher Syndrome, ganglioside antibodies against GD1b, instead of QG1b, were found; because the COVID-19 spike protein also binds to sialic acid-containing glycoproteins for cell-entry and anti-GD1b antibodies typically cause ataxic neuropathy, cross-reactivity between COVID-19–bearing gangliosides and peripheral nerve glycolipids was addressed. Elevated Creatine Kinase (>10,000) is reported in 10% of COVID-19–infected patients; two such patients presented with painful muscle weakness responding to IVIg indicating that COVID-19–triggered NAM is an overlooked entity. Cases of acute necrotizing brainstem encephalitis, cranial neuropathies with leptomeningeal enhancement, and tumefactive postgadolinium-enhanced demyelinating lesions are now emerging with the need to explore neuroinvasion and autoimmunity. Concerns for modifications-if any-of chronic immunotherapies with steroids, mycophenolate, azathioprine, IVIg, and anti-B-cell agents were addressed; the role of complement in innate immunity to viral responses and anti-complement therapeutics (i.e. eculizumab) were reviewed.

Conclusions

Emerging data indicate that COVID-19 can trigger not only GBS but other autoimmune neurological diseases necessitating vigilance for early diagnosis and therapy initiation. Although COVID-19 infection, like most other viruses, can potentially worsen patients with pre-existing autoimmunity, there is no evidence that patients with autoimmune neurological diseases stable on common immunotherapies are facing increased risks of infection.

Waldenstrom-associated anti-MAG paraprotein polyneuropathy with neurogenic tremor

A 71-year-old female patient presented with a 14-year history of slowly progressive distal limb numbness, paraesthesia and reduced vibration perception, ataxic gait and intentional tremor. Examination revealed with a length-dependent sensory neuropathy. Nerve conduction studies showed a chronic sensorimotor inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment (on two occasions) proved ineffective. Serum electrophoresis showed increased monoclonal IgM with kappa light chains. Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) levels were extremely elevated, >70 000 BTU. Bone marrow biopsy revealed 15%-20% small B cells and positive MYD88 mutation, indicative of Waldenstrom macroglobulinaemia. A diagnosis of Waldenstrom-associated anti-MAG paraprotein neuropathy with intentional (neurogenic) tremor was made. Repeat nerve conduction study showed a severe sensory demyelinating neuropathy with no axonal lesion. Treatment with rituximab was given for 1 month with minimal improvement. Repeat anti-MAG levels dropped to 53 670 BTU, with minimal clinical improvement.

Advances in the diagnosis, immunopathogenesis and therapies of IgM-anti-MAG antibody-mediated neuropathies

Polyneuropathy with immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal gammopathy is the most common paraproteinemic neuropathy, comprising a clinicopathologically and immunologically distinct entity. The clinical spectrum spans from distal paresthesias and mild gait imbalance to more severe sensory ataxia, with falls and a varying degree of distal sensorimotor deficits. In approximately 75% of patients, the monoclonal IgM immunoreacts with myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) and sulfoglucuronyl glycosphingolipid (SGPG), or other peripheral nerve glycolipids that serve as antigens. These antibodies are considered pathogenic because IgM and complement are deposited on the myelin sheath, splitting the myelin lamellae, while adoptive transfer of patients’ IgM into susceptible host animals causes sensory ataxia and reproduces the human pathology. In spite of the apparently convincing pathogenicity of these antibodies, the response to immunotherapies remains suboptimal. Clorambuscil, cladibrine, cyclophospamide and intravenous immunoglobulin may help some patients but the benefits are minimal and transient. Open-label studies in >200 patients indicate that rituximab is helpful in 30–50% of these patients, even with long-term benefits, probably by suppressing IgM anti-MAG antibodies or inducing immunoregulatory T cells. Two controlled studies with rituximab did not however meet the primary endpoint, mostly because of the poor sensitivity of the scales used; they did however show statistical improvement in secondary endpoints and improved clinical functions in several patients. This review provides an overview of the clinical phenotypes and immunoreactivity of IgM to glycolipids or glycoproteins of peripheral nerve myelin, summarizes the progress on treatment with rituximab as a promising therapy, discusses the pitfalls of scales used, identifies possible biomarkers of response to therapy and highlights the promising new anti-B cell or target-specific immunotherapies.

The Spectrum and Pathogenesis of Antibody-mediated Neuropathies

Antibodies reacting with carbohydrate epitopes on neural glycoconjugates are present in several forms of neuropathy. These include monoclonal antibodies to the myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) and to gan gliosides in patients with neuropathy in association with IgM gammopathy, as well as polyclonal antibodies to gangliosides in inflammatory polyneuropathies, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome and multifocal motor neuropathy. There are several correlations between antibody specificity and clinical symptoms, including anti-MAG antibodies with demyelinating sensory or sensorimotor neuropathy, anti-GM1 ganglioside anti bodies with motor nerve disorders, anti-GQ1b ganglioside antibodies with Miller-Fisher syndrome, and antibodies to gangliosides containing disialosyl moieties with sensory ataxic neuropathy. This review will emphasize recent developments concerning the origins of the anti-glycoconjugate antibodies in patients, pathogenic mechanisms by which the antibodies may cause the neuropathies, and the implications of these findings for therapy. NEUROSCIENTIST 3:195-204, 1997

Antibody testing in peripheral nerve disorders

The identification of autoantibodies associated with dysimmune neuropathies was a major contribution to the characterization of peripheral nerve disorders, the understanding of their pathophysiology, and the clinical diagnosis of neuropathies. Antibodies directed to GM1, GQ1b, and disyalilated gangliosides, and anti-MAG antibodies are very useful in the diagnosis of acute or chronic motor or sensory-motor neuropathies with or without monoclonal IgM. Anti-onconeural anti-Hu and anti-CV2/CRMP antibodies allow when they are detected the diagnosis of paraneoplastic neuropathies. This chapter focuses on the description of these antibodies as diagnostic markers and on their immunopathogenesis. We give a background overview on the origin of these antibodies, their detection, and review those studies, which clearly show that these antibodies are capable of binding to the target tissues in peripheral nerve and thereby can exert a variety of pathophysiological effects. The corresponding electrophysiological and histological changes observed both in human and animal models are exemplified in order to get a better understanding of the immune mechanisms of these antibody-mediated neuropathies.

Placebo-controlled trial of rituximab in IgM anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibody demyelinating neuropathy

OBJECTIVE

Report a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of rituximab in patients with anti-MAG demyelinating polyneuropathy (A-MAG-DP).

METHODS

Twenty-six patients were randomized to four weekly infusions of 375 mg/m(2) rituximab or placebo. Sample size was calculated to detect changes of > or = 1 Inflammatory Neuropathy Course and Treatment (INCAT) leg disability scores at month 8. IgM levels, anti-MAG titers, B cells, antigen-presenting cells, and immunoregulatory T cells were monitored every 2 months.

RESULTS

Thirteen A-MAG-DP patients were randomized to rituximab and 13 to placebo. Randomization was balanced for age, electrophysiology, disease duration, disability scores, and baseline B cells. After 8 months, by intention to treat, 4 of 13 rituximab-treated patients improved by > or = 1 INCAT score compared with 0 of 13 patients taking placebo (p = 0.096). Excluding one rituximab-randomized patient who had normal INCAT score at entry, and thus could not improve, the results were significant (p = 0.036). The time to 10m walk was significantly reduced in the rituximab group (p = 0.042) (intention to treat). Clinically, walking improved in 7 of 13 rituximab-treated patients. At month 8, IgM was reduced by 34% and anti-MAG titers by 50%. CD25+CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory cells significantly increased by month 8. The most improved patients were those with high anti-MAG titers and most severe sensory deficits at baseline.

INTERPRETATION

Rituximab is the first drug that improves some patients with A-MAG-DP in a controlled study. The benefit may be exerted by reducing the putative pathogenic antibodies or by inducing immunoregulatory T cells. The results warrant confirmation with a larger trial.

Induction of experimental ataxic sensory neuronopathy in cats by immunization with purified SGPG

IgM paraproteins in about 50% of the patients with neuropathy associated with IgM gammopathy react with carbohydrate moieties in myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) and in sulfated glucuronic glycolipids (SGGLs) in human peripheral nerves. However, the role of anti-MAG/SGGL antibodies in the pathogenesis of neuropathy remains unclear. In order to induce an animal model of neuropathy associated with anti-MAG/SGGL antibodies, cats were immunized with sulfoglucuronyl paragloboside (SGPG). All four cats immunized with SGPG developed clinical signs of sensory neuronopathy within 11 months after initial immunization, characterized by unsteadiness, falling, hind limb weakness and ataxia. In two cats the ataxia and hind limb paralysis were so severe that the animals had to be euthanized. Pathological examination revealed sensory ganglionitis with inflammatory infiltrates in the dorsal root ganglia. No overt signs of pathology were noted in the examined roots or nerves. High titer anti-SGPG/MAG antibodies were detected in all 4 cats immunized with SGPG but not in 3 control cats. Our data demonstrate that immunization of cats with SGPG induced anti-SGPG antibodies and sensory neuronopathy clinically resembling the sensory ataxia of patients with monoclonal IgM anti-MAG/SGPG antibodies. This study suggests that these anti-MAG/SGPG antibodies play a role in the pathogenesis of this neuropathy.

Antibody testing in peripheral neuropathies

Many autoantibodies have been described in association with peripheral neuropathy, but the use of antibody testing in clinical practice remains a matter of some debate. Serum autoantibodies to gangliosides or glycoproteins are implicated in a variety of sensory and motor neuropathy syndromes. Paraneoplastic antibodies help identify patients who have a neuropathy related to an underlying malignancy. Detection of an autoantibody in the right clinical setting provides some evidence that the peripheral nerve disturbance is immune mediated and that immunomodulatory therapy may be of benefit.

B cells in the pathophysiology of autoimmune neurological disorders: A credible therapeutic target

There is evidence that B cells are involved in the pathophysiology of many neurological diseases, either in a causative or contributory role, via production of autoantibodies, cytokine secretion, or by acting as antigen-presenting cells leading to T cell activation. Clonal expansion of B cells either in situ or intrathecally and circulating autoantibodies are critical elements in multiple sclerosis (MS), Devic's disease, paraneoplastic central nervous system disorders, stiff-person syndrome, myasthenia gravis, autoimmune demyelinating neuropathies and dermatomyositis. The pathogenic role of B cells and autoantibodies in central and peripheral nervous system disorders, as reviewed here, provides a rationale for investigating whether depletion of B cells with new agents can improve clinical symptomatology and, potentially, restore immune function. Preliminary results from several clinical studies and case reports suggest that B cell depletion may become a viable alternative approach to the treatment of autoimmune neurological disorders.

Paraproteinemic neuropathies

The occurrence of a peripheral neuropathy (PN) in association with a monoclonal gammopathy is quite common and suggests that monoclonal proteins may play a pathogenetic role in peripheral nervous system damage. In fact, paraproteinemic PN constitute an heterogeneous group of disorders related to various pathogenetic factors, and the histopathologic features in peripheral nerve biopsies differ from one condition to another. In several well defined disorders, the responsibility of the monoclonal component in the development of the PN has been evidenced. This is the case for most of the PN associated with an IgM monoclonal gammopathy, either a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) or Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia. The responsibility of the monoclonal protein in the occurrence of amyloid neuropathy related to multiple myeloma is also recognized. However, most IgG or IgA MGUS, as well as the monoclonal component in POEMS syndrome, have an uncertain causal relationship with the neuropathy. PN associated with monoclonal cryoglobulin (type 1) are occasional and differ from those associated with mixed cryoglobulins (types 2 or 3).

Sensory neuron diseases

Sensory neuron diseases (SND) are a distinct subgroup of peripheral-nervous-system diseases, first acknowledged in 1948. Acquired SND have a subacute or chronic course and are associated with systemic immune-mediated diseases, vitamin intoxication or deficiency, neurotoxic drugs, and life-threatening diseases such as cancer. SND are commonly idiopathic but can be genetic diseases; the latter tend to involve subtypes of sensory neurons and are associated with certain clinical pictures. The loss of sensory neurons in dorsal root ganglia causes the degeneration of short and long peripheral axons and central sensory projections in the posterior columns. This pathological process leads to a pattern of sensory nerve degeneration that is not length dependent and explains distinct clinical and neurophysiological abnormalities. Here we propose a comprehensive approach to the diagnosis of acquired and hereditary SND and discuss clinical, genetic, neurophysiological, neuroradiological, and neuropathological assessments.

Clinical features and pathophysiological basis of sensory neuronopathies (ganglionopathies)

Sensory ganglionopathies have a frequent association with neoplastic disorders (paraneoplastic subacute sensory neuronopathy, or SSN) or dysimmune disorders (Sjögren's syndrome, SS; Miller Fisher syndrome; and Bickerstaff's brainstem encephalitis, BBE), with drugs, such as cisplatin or pyridoxine, and with inherited disorders with degeneration of dorsal root ganglion cells. Unsteady gait and pseudoathetoid movements of the hand are the distinctive signs encountered in these disorders. The chronic disorders are characterized by non-length-dependent abnormalities of sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) and differ from other sensory neuropathies in showing a global, rather than distal, decrease in SNAP amplitudes. This review focuses on recent advances in defining the mechanisms involved in sensory ganglionopathies. Specific topics include a summary of their clinical features, pathological findings, and immunopathology. In SSN, early diagnosis by the detection of anti-Hu antibodies and early treatment of the cancer gives the best chance of stabilizing the disorder. In SS sensory ganglionitis, response to treatment has been disappointing, but immunomodulating treatments are emerging. The immunological profile common to BBE and Fisher syndrome supports a common pathogenesis. In toxic sensory neuronopathy, no treatment is available. The differential diagnosis involves separating sensory ganglionopathies from other ataxic polyneuropathies, such as infectious neuropathies, sensory neuropathies with various autoantibodies, and the neuropathies seen in celiac disease.

Immunotherapy in autoimmune neuromuscular disorders

Important progress has been made in our understanding of the cellular and molecular processes underlying autoimmune neuromuscular diseases that has led us to identify targets for rational therapeutic intervention. Although antigen-specific immunotherapy is not yet available, old and new immunomodulatory treatments, alone or in combination, provide effective immunotherapy for most autoimmune disorders. In parallel, the achievements of molecular medicine provide more specific yet largely experimental therapeutic tools that need to be tested in the human diseases. Here we review the principles and targets of immunotherapy for autoimmune neuromuscular disorders, address applications and practical guidelines, and give an outlook on future developments.

Immunotherapy for IgM anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein paraprotein-associated peripheral neuropathies

BACKGROUND

Serum monoclonal anti-Myelin Associated Glycoprotein antibodies may be pathogenic in some patients with IgM paraprotein and demyelinating neuropathy. Immunotherapies aimed at reducing the level of these antibodies might be expected to be of benefit in the treatment of the neuropathy. Many potential therapies have been described in small trials, uncontrolled studies and case reports.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the efficacy of any form of immunotherapy in reducing disability and impairment resulting from IgM anti-Myelin Associated Glycoprotein paraprotein-associated demyelinating peripheral neuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group register (August 2002) and MEDLINE (January 1966 - August 2002) and EMBASE (January 1980 - August 2002) for controlled trials, checked the bibliographies to identify other controlled trials and contacted authors and other experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Types of studies: randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials.

TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS

patients of any age with anti-Myelin Associated Glycoprotein antibody associated demyelinating peripheral neuropathy with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance of any severity. Types of interventions: any type of immunotherapy. Types of outcome measures: Primary: improvement in the Neuropathy Disability Score or Modified Rankin Scale six months after randomisation Secondary: Neuropathy Disability Score and/or the Modified Rankin Score 12 months after randomisation. Ten metre walk time, subjective clinical scores and electrophysiological parameters at six and 12 months after randomisation. IgM paraprotein levels and anti-Myelin Associated Glycoprotein antibody titres six months after randomisation. Adverse effects of treatments.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We identified six randomised controlled trials of which five were included after discussion between the authors. One author extracted the data and the other checked them. No missing data could be obtained from authors.

MAIN RESULTS

The five eligible trials used four of the many available immunotherapy treatments. Only two had comparable interventions and outcomes but these were only short-term studies. There were no significant benefits of the treatments used in the predefined outcomes. However intravenous immunoglobulin showed benefits in terms of improved Modified Rankin Scale at two weeks and 10 metre walk time at four weeks. Serious adverse effects of intravenous immunoglobulin are known to occur from observational studies but none were encountered in these trials.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There is inadequate reliable evidence from trials of immunotherapies in anti-Myelin Associated Glycoprotein paraproteinaemic neuropathy to recommend any particular immunotherapy treatment. Intravenous immunoglobulin is relatively safe and may produce some short-term benefit. Large well designed randomised trials are required to assess the efficacy of promising new therapies.

Postvaccinal inflammatory neuropathy: peripheral nerve biopsy in 3 cases

Autoimmune inflammatory polyneuropathy (PN) can be triggered by vaccination. We report 3 such cases. A 36-year-old female nurse presented 15 days after a hepatitis B vaccination (HBV) with acute sensory disturbances in the lower limbs. She had severe ataxia but no weakness. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein level was 84 mg/100 mL, with 3 lymphocytes. A 66-year-old man presented 21 days after HBV with severe motor and sensory PN involving all 4 limbs. A 66-year-old man presented 15 days after a yellow fever vaccination with progressive motor and sensory PN involving all 4 limbs and bilateral facial paralysis. CSF protein level was 300 mg/100 mL, with 5 lymphocytes. Six weeks later, a tracheostomy was performed. In these 3 patients, the nerve deficits lasted for months. In each case, peripheral nerve biopsy showed KP1-positive histiocytes but no T-lymphocytes in the endoneurium. On ultrastructural examination, there was axonal degeneration in the first 2 cases; in case 2, a few myelinated fibers exhibited an intra-axonal macrophage but the myelin sheath was preserved. There was only 1 example of macrophage-associated demyelination in case 2, but these were numerous in case 3. It is likely that in the first 2 cases, an autoimmune reaction against some axonal or neuronal components was triggered by HBV. It induced an acute sensory ataxic PN in case 1 and an acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN) in case 2. The third patient had a chronic inflammatory demyelinating PN, likely triggered by yellow fever vaccination.

Anti-GD1a antibodies from an acute motor axonal neuropathy patient selectively bind to motor nerve fiber nodes of Ranvier

Acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN) is associated with high titer anti-GD1a antibodies. We have found that very high titer IgG anti-GD1a antibodies (Ab) from one AMAN patient selectively bind to motor, but not sensory, nerve nodes of Ranvier. Binding is abolished by preadsorption with GD1a. Sera negative for Ab do not immunostain motor and sensory nerve roots. We have also found that botulinum toxin A (BTA), which binds to GD1a, stains both motor and sensory nerve nodes of Ranvier. Our results strongly support the pathogenetic role of anti-GD1a antibodies in AMAN. Why BTA also binds to sensory fibers still remains to be elucidated, although the different size of BTA and its specificity to other gangliosides present in sensory axons might represent important factors.

Sensorimotor polyneuropathy associated with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, IgM antigangliosides antibody and human T-cell leukemia virus I infection

A 65-year-old man presented with a sensorimotor polyneuropathy associated with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody to various gangliosides. Electrophysiological studies denoted significant abnormalities of motor and sensory nerve conduction. Although the pathology of sural nerve biopsy looked minimally affected, immunohistochemical studies showed specific binding of IgM to the human peripheral nerve. Our patient also had high titer of antibody to human T-cell leukemia virus I (HTLV-I) in both serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which might activate B-cell-mediated immunity and facilitate the production of IgM antibody. The other unique feature is the reactivity of antibody to gangliosides. The patient had IgM antibody reactivities to gangliosides with disialosyl residue such as GT1b, GQ1b and GD3, but not to GD1b. IgM antibody to gangliosides with disialosyl residue has been reported in ataxic symptoms, but our patient failed to demonstrate ataxia. Without reactivity to GD1b, sensory ataxic neuropathy might not develop even in the presence of antibody reactive to other gangliosides with disialosyl residue.

Autoantibodies associated with peripheral neuropathy

High titers of serum antibodies to neural antigens occur in several forms of neuropathy. These include neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathy, inflammatory polyneuropathies, and paraneoplastic neuropathies. The antibodies frequently react with glycosylated cell surface molecules, including glycolipids, glycoproteins, and glycosaminoglycans, but antibodies to intracellular proteins have also been described. There are several correlations between antibody specificity and clinical symptoms, such as anti-MAG antibodies with demyelinating sensory or sensorimotor neuropathy, anti-GM1 ganglioside antibodies with motor nerve disorders, antibodies to gangliosides containing disialosyl moieties with sensory ataxic neuropathy and Miller-Fisher syndrome, and antibodies to the neuronal nuclear Hu antigens with paraneoplastic sensory neuronopathy. These correlations suggest that the neuropathies may be caused by the antibodies, but evidence for a causal relationship is stronger in some examples than others. In this review, we discuss the origins of the antibodies, evidence for and against their involvement in pathogenic mechanisms, and the implications of these findings for therapy.

Variability in the binding of anti-MAG and anti-SGPG antibodies to target antigens in demyelinating neuropathy and IgM paraproteinemia

Densitometry of immunostained Western blots or thin layer chromatograms and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were used to compare the relative strengths of IgM binding to myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG), P0 glycoprotein, peripheral myelin protein-22 (PMP-22), sulfate-3-glucuronyl paragloboside (SGPG), and other potential target antigens in a series of eleven patients with sensory or sensorimotor demyelinating neuropathy and IgM paraproteinemia. The IgM from all patients exhibited reactivity with both MAG and SGPG, and there was a statistically significant correlation between the overlay assays and ELISAs for measuring the strength of IgM binding to MAG and to SGPG. However, the data revealed variations in the relative strengths with which the antibodies bound to the potential target antigens and heterogeneity in their fine specificities. First, there was a poor correlation between the strength of binding to MAG and to SGPG, respectively. Second, reactivity with MAG or SGPG in a few of the patients was only detected by one of the two assay systems. Third, about one-third of the patients' IgM absolutely required the sulfate on SGPG for reactivity, whereas the others retained some reactivity after removal of the sulfate. Fourth, IgM from two of the patients exhibited unusually strong reactivity with the proteins of compact myelin, P0 and PMP22. These relative differences in strengths of antibody binding to the potential antigens were compared with the patients' clinical presentations and with their responses to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy in a clinical trial in which they participated. For the most part, these variations did not correlate with clinical presentation, which was relatively homogeneous in this series of patients. However, an inverse relationship was noted between degree of reactivity to MAG by ELISA and response to IVIg. Two of the patients who responded had only mild elevations of IgM antibodies to nerve glycoconjugates and exhibited some unusual immunochemical and clinical characteristics in comparison to the other patients. The results demonstrate differences in the relative strengths with which anti-MAG and anti-SGPG IgM antibodies from different patients bind to potential neural target antigens which may affect pathogenic mechanisms and response to therapy.

Gelsolin-related spinal and cerebral amyloid angiopathy

Gelsolin-related amyloidosis (familial amyloidosis, Finnish type) is a rare disorder, reported worldwide in kindreds carrying a G654A or G654T gelsolin gene mutation. Facial palsy, mild peripheral neuropathy, and corneal lattice dystrophy are characteristic, but atrophic bulbar palsy, ataxia of gait, and minor cognitive impairment may occur. In histological and immunohistochemical studies of the central nervous system in 4 patients with a G654A gelsolin mutation, we found widespread spinal, cerebral, and meningeal amyloid angiopathy, with deposition of gelsolin-related amyloid (AGel). Marked extravascular deposits occurred in the dura, spinal nerve roots, and sensory ganglia. The amyloid deposits were also variably immunoreactive for apolipoprotein E (ApoE), alpha1-antichymotrypsin (alpha1-ACT), and cystatin C (Cys C). Cerebral perivascular fibrinogen immunoreactivity was occasionally noted. The patients showed posterior column degeneration and diffuse loss of myelin in the centrum semiovale with perivascular accentuation. Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging, performed on 1 patient, showed white matter lesions, colocalizing with the histological abnormalities. Our study shows that deposition of AGel in the spinal and cerebral blood vessel walls, meninges, as well as spinal nerve roots and sensory ganglia is an essential feature of this form of systemic amyloidosis and may contribute to the central nervous system symptoms.

Peripheral neuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy: correlations between M-protein antibody activity and clinical/electrophysiological features in 40 cases

Forty cases of polyneuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy were retrospectively studied to investigate the relevance of clinical and electrophysiological features to M-protein antibody activity. There were 26 men and 14 women; mean age was 65 +/- 11.7 years at the time of the study. Thirty-nine patients had a symmetrical polyneuropathy, of whom 13 had a predominantly sensory and 17 a purely sensory neuropathy (i.e., 30 sensory neuropathies). The remaining patient had a multifocal mononeuropathy. Electrophysiological studies allowed the polyneuropathies to be classified as demyelinating in 33 cases (82.5%) and axonal in 6 cases. Antibody studies disclosed anti-MAG antibodies in 65% and anti-SGPG antibodies in 82.5% of patients. Anti-MAG antibodies were associated with only demyelinating polyneuropathies. Anti-SGPG antibodies were found in 91% of demyelinating polyneuropathies and 50% of axonopathies. In addition, anti-MAG/SGPG antibody activity was significantly correlated with the subgroup of sensory neuropathies (P < 0.01). Last, antisulfatide antibodies were found at significant titers in 18 cases, and their presence was significantly correlated with anti-MAG/SGPG antibody activity, but not with some clinical/electrophysiological features.

Prominent sensory ataxia in Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with IgG anti-GD1b antibody

Sensitization with GD1b has been shown to cause sensory neuropathy in rabbit. A patient with chronic sensory-dominant polyneuropathy who had IgM antibody specifically to GD1b has been reported previously. This report describes the first patient with acute demyelinating polyneuropathy with prominent sensory symptoms who had a high titer of serum IgG anti-GD1b antibody. The serum reacted with neither GM1 nor with other b-series gangliosides (GD2, GD3, GT1b and GQ1b). Improvement in symptoms was coincident with decrease in IgG anti-GD1b antibody titer after plasmapheresis. This case supports the experimental results in rabbit suggesting that anti-GD1b antibody functions in the development of sensory ataxia.

Antibody panels in idiopathic polyneuropathy and motor neuron disease

We prospectively evaluated patients with idiopathic polyneuropathy (PN) and motor neuron disease (MND) with commercial antibody (Ab) panels. Patients with sensorimotor PN received a "sensorimotor neuropathy profile" [3-sulfated glucuronyl paragloboside (SGPG)/myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG), GM1, asialo-GM1, GD1b, Hu, sulfatide]. Motor neuropathy or MND patients underwent a "motor neuropathy profile" (SGPG/MAG, GM1, asialo-GM1). Seven of 78 patients (9.0%) with sensorimotor PN and 3 of 44 patients (6.8%) with MND had abnormal panels. None of 60 patients with axonal sensory or sensorimotor PN had antisulfatide Ab. Seven of 13 patients (54%) with multifocal motor neuropathy had abnormal panels, with 6 seropositive to GM1. We found abnormal Ab panels in fewer than 10% of patients with idiopathic sensorimotor PN and MND. Moreover, abnormal Ab tests often did not relate to the clinical context. Our data do not support the use of commercial Ab panels in the evaluation of patients with idiopathic PN or MND.

Glycosphingolipids as potential diagnostic markers and/or antigens in neurological disorders

Glycosphingolipids are most abundant in the nervous system within which are developmental, regional, structural and cellular differences regarding their composition. The are shedded to the cerebrospinal fluid and thus potential markers for pathogenic alterations in the brain, such as developmental abnormalities, demyelination, gliosis, neuronal cell destruction. The glycosphingolipids have also been found to be antigens in autoimmune processes involving the nervous system, in particular in peripheral neuropathies like Guillain Barré syndrome, multifocal motor neuropathy etc. The immune response might have been triggered by infectious agents with an antigen epitope which mimic the glycosphingolipid or by a primary nerve tissue damage leading to release of glycosphingolipids. There is a series of support for a clinical significance of cerebrospinal fluid glycosphingolipid determinations and the presence of anti-glycosphingolipid antibodies but this has to be further explored. This paper is a mini review of the state of the art and discuss methodological aspects and improvements that might help to explore the relevance of glycosphingolipids in neurological disorders.

A controlled study of intravenous immunoglobulin in demyelinating neuropathy with IgM gammopathy

Eleven patients with demyelinating polyneuropathy associated with monoclonal IgM antibodies were randomized to receive IVIg or placebo, monthly, for 3 months in a double-blind study. After a washout period, they crossed over to the alternate therapy. Response was gauged by evaluating muscle strength, sensation, and neuromuscular symptoms at baseline, after 3 months, and at treatment's end. After IVIg therapy, the strength improved in only 2 of 11 patients, by 28 and 38.5 points from baseline, and declined after placebo. In 1 other patient, the sensory score improved by 13 points. Antibody titers to MAG/SGPG or gangliosides did not appreciably change. We conclude that IVIg has only a modest benefit to not more than 18% of patients with IgM paraproteinemic demyelinating neuropathy.