The ultrastructure of oral (buccopharyngeal) membrane formation and rupture in the chick embryo

Jak2 and Jaw Muscles Are Required for Buccopharyngeal Membrane Perforation during Mouth Development

The mouth is a central feature of our face, without which we could not eat, breathe, or communicate. A critical and early event in mouth formation is the creation of a "hole" which connects the digestive system and the external environment. This hole, which has also been called the primary or embryonic mouth in vertebrates, is initially covered by a 1-2 cell layer thick structure called the buccopharyngeal membrane. When the buccopharyngeal membrane does not rupture, it impairs early mouth functions and may also lead to further craniofacial malformations. Using a chemical screen in an animal model (Xenopus laevis) and genetic data from humans, we determined that Janus kinase 2 (Jak2) has a role in buccopharyngeal membrane rupture. We have determined that decreased Jak2 function, using antisense morpholinos or a pharmacological antagonist, caused a persistent buccopharyngeal membrane as well as the loss of jaw muscles. Surprisingly, we observed that the jaw muscle compartments were connected to the oral epithelium that is continuous with the buccopharyngeal membrane. Severing such connections resulted in buccopharyngeal membrane buckling and persistence. We also noted puncta accumulation of F-actin, an indicator of tension, in the buccopharyngeal membrane during perforation. Taken together, the data has led us to a hypothesis that muscles are required to exert tension across the buccopharyngeal membrane, and such tension is necessary for its perforation.

The conundrum of pharyngeal teeth origin: the role of germ layers, pouches, and gill slits

There are several competing hypotheses on tooth origins, with discussions eventually settling in favour of an 'outside-in' scenario, in which internal odontodes (teeth) derived from external odontodes (skin denticles) in jawless vertebrates. The evolution of oral teeth from skin denticles can be intuitively understood from their location at the mouth entrance. However, the basal condition for jawed vertebrates is arguably to possess teeth distributed throughout the oropharynx (i.e. oral and pharyngeal teeth). As skin denticle development requires the presence of ectoderm-derived epithelium and of mesenchyme, it remains to be answered how odontode-forming skin epithelium, or its competence, were 'transferred' deep into the endoderm-covered oropharynx. The 'modified outside-in' hypothesis for tooth origins proposed that this transfer was accomplished through displacement of odontogenic epithelium, that is ectoderm, not only through the mouth, but also via any opening (e.g. gill slits) that connects the ectoderm to the epithelial lining of the pharynx (endoderm). This review explores from an evolutionary and from a developmental perspective whether ectoderm plays a role in (pharyngeal) tooth and denticle formation. Historic and recent studies on tooth development show that the odontogenic epithelium (enamel organ) of oral or pharyngeal teeth can be of ectodermal, endodermal, or of mixed ecto-endodermal origin. Comprehensive data are, however, only available for a few taxa. Interestingly, in these taxa, the enamel organ always develops from the basal layer of a stratified epithelium that is at least bilayered. In zebrafish, a miniaturised teleost that only retains pharyngeal teeth, an epithelial surface layer with ectoderm-like characters is required to initiate the formation of an enamel organ from the basal, endodermal epithelium. In urodele amphibians, the bilayered epithelium is endodermal, but the surface layer acquires ectodermal characters, here termed 'epidermalised endoderm'. Furthermore, ectoderm-endoderm contacts at pouch-cleft boundaries (i.e. the prospective gill slits) are important for pharyngeal tooth initiation, even if the influx of ectoderm via these routes is limited. A balance between sonic hedgehog and retinoic acid signalling could operate to assign tooth-initiating competence to the endoderm at the level of any particular pouch. In summary, three characters are identified as being required for pharyngeal tooth formation: (i) pouch-cleft contact, (ii) a stratified epithelium, of which (iii) the apical layer adopts ectodermal features. These characters delimit the area in which teeth can form, yet cannot alone explain the distribution of teeth over the different pharyngeal arches. The review concludes with a hypothetical evolutionary scenario regarding the persisting influence of ectoderm on pharyngeal tooth formation. Studies on basal osteichthyans with less-specialised types of early embryonic development will provide a crucial test for the potential role of ectoderm in pharyngeal tooth formation and for the 'modified outside-in' hypothesis of tooth origins.

Mouth development

A mouth is present in all animals, and comprises an opening from the outside into the oral cavity and the beginnings of the digestive tract to allow eating. This review focuses on the earliest steps in mouth formation. In the first half, we conclude that the mouth arose once during evolution. In all animals, the mouth forms from ectoderm and endoderm. A direct association of oral ectoderm and digestive endoderm is present even in triploblastic animals, and in chordates, this region is known as the extreme anterior domain (EAD). Further support for a single origin of the mouth is a conserved set of genes that form a 'mouth gene program' including foxA and otx2. In the second half of this review, we discuss steps involved in vertebrate mouth formation, using the frog Xenopus as a model. The vertebrate mouth derives from oral ectoderm from the anterior neural ridge, pharyngeal endoderm and cranial neural crest (NC). Vertebrates form a mouth by breaking through the body covering in a precise sequence including specification of EAD ectoderm and endoderm as well as NC, formation of a 'pre-mouth array,' basement membrane dissolution, stomodeum formation, and buccopharyngeal membrane perforation. In Xenopus, the EAD is also a craniofacial organizer that guides NC, while reciprocally, the NC signals to the EAD to elicit its morphogenesis into a pre-mouth array. Human mouth anomalies are prevalent and are affected by genetic and environmental factors, with understanding guided in part by use of animal models. WIREs Dev Biol 2017, 6:e275. doi: 10.1002/wdev.275 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

Role of JNK during buccopharyngeal membrane perforation, the last step of embryonic mouth formation

BACKGROUND

The buccopharyngeal membrane is a thin layer of cells covering the embryonic mouth. The perforation of this structure creates an opening connecting the external and the digestive tube which is essential for oral cavity formation. In humans, persistence of the buccopharyngeal membrane can lead to orofacial defects such as choanal atresia, oral synechiaes, and cleft palate. Little is known about the causes of a persistent buccopharyngeal membrane and, importantly, how this structure ruptures.

RESULTS

We have determined, using antisense and pharmacological approaches, that Xenopus embryos deficient c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling have a persistent buccopharyngeal membrane. JNK deficient embryos have decreased cell division and increased cellular stress and apoptosis. However, altering these processes independently of JNK did not affect buccopharyngeal membrane perforation. JNK deficient embryos also have increased intercellular adhesion and defects in e-cadherin localization. Conversely, embryos with overactive JNK have epidermal fragility, increased E-cadherin internalization, and increased membrane localized clathrin. In the buccopharyngeal membrane, clathrin is colocalized with active JNK. Furthermore, inhibition of endocytosis results in a persistent buccopharyngeal membrane, mimicking the JNK deficient phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that JNK has a role in the disassembly adherens junctions by means of endocytosis that is required during buccopharyngeal membrane perforation. Developmental Dynamics 246:100-115, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Hedgehog activity controls opening of the primary mouth

To feed or breathe, the oral opening must connect with the gut. The foregut and oral tissues converge at the primary mouth, forming the buccopharyngeal membrane (BPM), a bilayer epithelium. Failure to form the opening between gut and mouth has significant ramifications, and many craniofacial disorders have been associated with defects in this process. Oral perforation is characterized by dissolution of the BPM, but little is known about this process. In humans, failure to form a continuous mouth opening is associated with mutations in Hedgehog (Hh) pathway members; however, the role of Hh in primary mouth development is untested. Here, we show, using Xenopus, that Hh signaling is necessary and sufficient to initiate mouth formation, and that Hh activation is required in a dose-dependent fashion to determine the size of the mouth. This activity lies upstream of the previously demonstrated role for Wnt signal inhibition in oral perforation. We then turn to mouse mutants to establish that SHH and Gli3 are indeed necessary for mammalian mouth development. Our data suggest that Hh-mediated BPM persistence may underlie oral defects in human craniofacial syndromes.

The involvement of the proamnion in the development of the anterior amnion fold in the chicken

The amnion was one of the most important evolutionary novelties in the animal kingdom, allowing independence of water for reproduction and subsequent exploration of terrestrial habitats, and is therefore an important structure to understand evolution. We have studied chicken amniogenesis using ex ovo culture systems and 3D-reconstructions of serially sectioned chicken embryos. We provide evidence for a transient depression of the head in the proamnion, forming a pouch, that positions the extraembryonic membranes dorsal to the head and that is fundamental for the correct formation of the amnion and chorion membranes. When this "sinking" process in the proamnion was blocked, the amnion/chorion did not form, even though the growth of the embryo per se seemed unaffected. Here, we give insight in the role of the proamnion in amniogenesis.

Development and evolution of the vertebrate primary mouth

The vertebrate oral region represents a key interface between outer and inner environments, and its structural and functional design is among the limiting factors for survival of its owners. Both formation of the respective oral opening (primary mouth) and establishment of the food-processing apparatus (secondary mouth) require interplay between several embryonic tissues and complex embryonic rearrangements. Although many aspects of the secondary mouth formation, including development of the jaws, teeth or taste buds, are known in considerable detail, general knowledge about primary mouth formation is regrettably low. In this paper, primary mouth formation is reviewed from a comparative point of view in order to reveal its underestimated morphogenetic diversity among, and also within, particular vertebrate clades. In general, three main developmental modes were identified. The most common is characterized by primary mouth formation via a deeply invaginated ectodermal stomodeum and subsequent rupture of the bilaminar oral membrane. However, in salamander, lungfish and also in some frog species, the mouth develops alternatively via stomodeal collar formation contributed both by the ecto- and endoderm. In ray-finned fishes, on the other hand, the mouth forms via an ectoderm wedge and later horizontal detachment of the initially compressed oral epithelia with probably a mixed germ-layer derivation. A very intriguing situation can be seen in agnathan fishes: whereas lampreys develop their primary mouth in a manner similar to the most common gnathostome pattern, hagfishes seem to undergo a unique oropharyngeal morphogenesis when compared with other vertebrates. In discussing the early formative embryonic correlates of primary mouth formation likely to be responsible for evolutionary-developmental modifications of this area, we stress an essential role of four factors: first, positioning and amount of yolk tissue; closely related to, second, endoderm formation during gastrulation, which initiates the process and constrains possible evolutionary changes within this area; third, incipient structure of the stomodeal primordium at the anterior neural plate border, where the ectoderm component of the prospective primary mouth is formed; and fourth, the prime role of Pitx genes for establishment and later morphogenesis of oral region both in vertebrates and non-vertebrate chordates.

The odontode explosion: the origin of tooth-like structures in vertebrates

Essentially we show recent data to shed new light on the thorny controversy of how teeth arose in evolution. Essentially we show (a) how teeth can form equally from any epithelium, be it endoderm, ectoderm or a combination of the two and (b) that the gene expression programs of oral versus pharyngeal teeth are remarkably similar. Classic theories suggest that (i) skin denticles evolved first and odontode-inductive surface ectoderm merged inside the oral cavity to form teeth (the 'outside-in' hypothesis) or that (ii) patterned odontodes evolved first from endoderm deep inside the pharyngeal cavity (the 'inside-out' hypothesis). We propose a new perspective that views odontodes as structures sharing a deep molecular homology, united by sets of co-expressed genes defining a competent thickened epithelium and a collaborative neural crest-derived ectomesenchyme. Simply put, odontodes develop 'inside and out', wherever and whenever these co-expressed gene sets signal to one another. Our perspective complements the classic theories and highlights an agenda for specific experimental manipulations in model and non-model organisms.

Germ layer differentiation during early hindgut and cloaca formation in rabbit and pig embryos

Relative to recent advances in understanding molecular requirements for endoderm differentiation, the dynamics of germ layer morphology and the topographical distribution of molecular factors involved in endoderm formation at the caudal pole of the embryonic disc are still poorly defined. To discover common principles of mammalian germ layer development, pig and rabbit embryos at late gastrulation and early neurulation stages were analysed as species with a human-like embryonic disc morphology, using correlative light and electron microscopy. Close intercellular contact but no direct structural evidence of endoderm formation such as mesenchymal-epithelial transition between posterior primitive streak mesoderm and the emerging posterior endoderm were found. However, a two-step process closely related to posterior germ layer differentiation emerged for the formation of the cloacal membrane: (i) a continuous mesoderm layer and numerous patches of electron-dense flocculent extracellular matrix mark the prospective region of cloacal membrane formation; and (ii) mesoderm cells and all extracellular matrix including the basement membrane are lost locally and close intercellular contact between the endoderm and ectoderm is established. The latter process involves single cells at first and then gradually spreads to form a longitudinally oriented seam-like cloacal membrane. These gradual changes were found from gastrulation to early somite stages in the pig, whereas they were found from early somite to mid-somite stages in the rabbit; in both species cloacal membrane formation is complete prior to secondary neurulation. The results highlight the structural requirements for endoderm formation during development of the hindgut and suggest new mechanisms for the pathogenesis of common urogenital and anorectal malformations.

Ectoderm, endoderm, and the evolution of heterodont dentitions

Mammalian dentitions consist of different shapes/types of teeth that are positioned in different regions of the jaw (heterodont) whereas in many fish and reptiles all teeth are of similar type (homodont). The process by which heterodont dentitions have evolved in mammals is not understood. In many teleosts teeth develop in the pharynx from endoderm (endodermal teeth), whereas mammalian teeth develop from the oral ectoderm indicating that teeth can develop (and thus possibly evolve) via different mechanisms. In this article, we compare the molecular characteristics of pharyngeal/foregut endoderm with the molecular characteristics of oral ectoderm during mouse development. The expression domains of Claudin6, Hnf3beta, alpha-fetoprotein, Rbm35a, and Sox2 in the embryonic endoderm have boundaries overlapping the molar tooth-forming region, but not the incisor region in the oral ectoderm. These results suggest that molar teeth (but not incisors) develop from epithelium that shares molecular characteristics with pharyngeal endoderm. This opens the possibility that the two different theories proposed for the evolution of teeth may both be correct. Multicuspid (eg. molars) having evolved from the externalization of endodermal teeth into the oral cavity and monocuspid (eg. incisors) having evolved from internalization of ectodermal armour odontodes of ancient fishes. The two different mechanisms of tooth development may have provided the developmental and genetic diversity on which evolution has acted to produce heterodont dentitions in mammals.

Tweaking the hinge and caps: testing a model of the organization of jaws

Historically, examinations of gnathostome skulls have indicated that for essentially the entirety of their existence, jaws have been characterized by a high degree of fidelity to an initial basic structural design that will then go on to manifest an amazing array of end-point phenotypes. These two traits-bauplan fidelity and elaboration of design-are inter-connected and striking, and beg a number of questions, including: Are all jaws made in the same manner and if not how not? To begin to tackle such questions, we herein operationally define jaws as two appositional, hinged cranial units for which polarity and potential modularity are characteristics, and then address what is necessary for them to form, including delineating both the sources of cells and tissues that will formally yield the jaws as well as what informs their ontogeny (e.g., sources of positional information and factors directing the interpretation of developmental cues). Following on this, we briefly describe a predictive, testable model of jaw development (the "Hinge and Caps" model) and present evidence that the Satb2+cell population in the developing jaw primordia of mice defines a developmentally and evolutionarily significant jaw module such as would be predicted by the model.

Embryonic origin of gustatory cranial sensory neurons

Cranial nerves VII, IX and X provide both gustatory (taste) and non-gustatory (touch, pain, temperature) innervation to the oral cavity of vertebrates. Gustatory neurons innervate taste buds and project centrally to the rostral nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), whereas neurons providing general epithelial innervation to the oropharynx project to non-gustatory hindbrain regions, i.e., spinal trigeminal nucleus. In addition to this dichotomy in function, cranial ganglia VII, IX and X have dual embryonic origins, comprising sensory neurons derived from both cranial neural crest and epibranchial placodes. We used a fate mapping approach to test the hypothesis that epibranchial placodes give rise to gustatory neurons, whereas the neural crest generates non-gustatory cells. Placodal ectoderm or neural crest was grafted from Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) expressing salamander embryos into unlabeled hosts, allowing us to discern the postembryonic central and peripheral projections of each embryonic neuronal population. Neurites that innervate taste buds are exclusively placodal in origin, and their central processes project to the NTS, consistent with a gustatory fate. In contrast, neural crest-derived neurons do not innervate taste buds; instead, neurites of these sensory neurons terminate as free nerve endings within the oral epithelium. Further, the majority of centrally directed fibers of neural crest neurons terminate outside the NTS, in regions that receive general epithelial afferents. Our data provide empirical evidence that embryonic origin dictates mature neuron function within cranial sensory ganglia: specifically, gustatory neurons derive from epibranchial placodes, whereas neural crest-derived neurons provide general epithelial innervation to the oral cavity.

Embryonic development of Python sebae – II: Craniofacial microscopic anatomy, cell proliferation and apoptosis

This study explores the microscopic craniofacial morphogenesis of the oviparous African rock python (Python sebae) spanning the first two-thirds of the post-oviposition period. At the time of laying, the python embryo consists of largely undifferentiated mesenchyme and epithelium with the exception of the cranial base and trabeculae cranii, which are undergoing chondrogenesis. The facial prominences are well defined and are at a late stage, close to the time when lip fusion begins. Later (11-12d), specializations in the epithelia begin to differentiate (vomeronasal and olfactory epithelia, teeth). Dental development in snakes is different from that of mammals in several aspects including an extended dental lamina with the capacity to form 4 sets of generational teeth. In addition, the ophidian olfactory system is very different from the mammalian. There is a large vomeronasal organ, a nasal cavity proper and an extraconchal space. All of these areas are lined with a greatly expanded olfactory epithelium. Intramembranous bone differentiation is taking place at stage 3 with some bones already ossifying whereas most are only represented as mesenchymal condensations. In addition to routine histological staining, PCNA immunohistochemistry reveals relatively higher levels of proliferation in the extending dental laminae, in osseous mesenchymal condensations and in the olfactory epithelia. Areas undergoing apoptosis were noted in the enamel organs of the teeth and osseous mesenchymal condensations. We propose that localized apoptosis helps to divide a single condensation into multiple ossification centres and this is a mechanism whereby novel morphology can be selected in response to evolutionary pressures. Several additional differences in head morphology between snakes and other amniotes were noted including a palatal groove separating the inner and outer row of teeth in the upper jaw, a tracheal opening within the tongue and a pharyngeal adhesion that closes off the pharynx from the oral cavity between stages 1 and 4. Our studies on these and other differences in the python will provide valuable insights into in developmental, molecular and evolutionary mechanisms of patterning.

Positioning the extreme anterior in Xenopus: cement gland, primary mouth and anterior pituitary

The extreme anterior of the deuterostome embryo is unusual in that ectoderm and endoderm are directly juxtaposed, without intervening mesoderm. In all vertebrates, this region gives rise to the anterior pituitary, the primary mouth and, in most frogs, to the mucus-secreting cement gland. Using the frog Xenopus laevis as a paradigm, we suggest that, initially, the extreme anterior forms a homogenous domain characterized by expression of pitx genes. Subsequently, this domain becomes subdivided to form these three different structures under the influence of different inductive signals from surrounding tissues.

Development of the primary mouth in Xenopus laevis

The initial opening between the gut and the outside of the deuterostome embryo breaks through at the extreme anterior. This region is unique in that ectoderm and endoderm are directly juxtaposed, without intervening mesoderm. This opening has been called the stomodeum, buccopharyngeal membrane or oral cavity at various stages of its formation, however, in order to clarify its function, we have termed this the "primary mouth". In vertebrates, the neural crest grows around the primary mouth to form the face and a "secondary mouth" forms. The primary mouth then becomes the pharyngeal opening. In order to establish a molecular understanding of primary mouth formation, we have begun to examine this process during Xenopus laevis development. An early step during this process occurs at tailbud and involves dissolution of the basement membrane between the ectoderm and endoderm. This is followed by ectodermal invagination to create the stomodeum. A subsequent step involves localized cell death in the ectoderm, which may lead to ectodermal thinning. Subsequently, ectoderm and endoderm apparently intercalate to generate one to two cell layers. The final step is perforation, where (after hatching) the primary mouth opens. Fate mapping has defined the ectodermal and endodermal regions that will form the primary mouth. Extirpations and transplants of these and adjacent regions indicate that, at tailbud, the oral ectoderm is not specifically required for primary mouth formation. In contrast, underlying endoderm and surrounding regions are crucial, presumably sources of necessary signals. This study indicates the complexity of primary mouth formation, and lays the groundwork for future molecular analyses of this important structure.

Localization of cartilage linking protein 1 during primary neurulation in the chick embryo

Primary neurulation is a form-shaping event during the early development of the vertebrate embryo in which the neural plate is rolled up into the neural tube, the rudiment of the central nervous system. In an effort to identify genes specifically expressed in tissues lateral to the chick neural plate--tissues known to generate extrinsic forces for primary neurulation--we designed a subtractive scheme and identified a positive clone as the gene encoding chick cartilage linking protein 1 (CRTL1). CRTL1 (also known as link protein) is a small glycoprotein of the extracellular matrix that was originally identified for its role in stabilizing aggregates of aggrecan and hyaluronan in cartilage. In addition to being expressed in cartilage, CRTL1 is also immunolocalized in several noncartilaginous tissues as assessed with the 4B6 monoclonal antibody. Using the 4B6 antibody and the G9 riboprobe derived from our subtraction, we report the detailed distribution of CRTL1 protein and crtl1 transcripts during primary neurulation in chick embryos. This report emphasizes and briefly discusses important differences between the RNA expression pattern and the domains of accumulation of the protein. CRTL1 prominently accumulates in the basal lamina of the epidermal ectoderm just lateral to the neural plate. Based on the crucial role of the interface between this tissue and the neuroepithelium in the formation of the neural folds, and because of the biophysical role of hyaluronan in tissue morphogenesis, we propose that crtl1 represents is an excellent candidate neurulation gene, worthy of further study.

Cell reorganisation during epithelial fusion and perforation: the case of ascidian branchial fissures

In this study, we have analysed ultrastructurally the mechanism of epithelial fusion and perforation during the development of branchial fissures in the larva and bud of the colonial urochordate Botryllus schlosseri. Perforation of membranes represents an important process during embryogenesis, occurring to create communication between two separate compartments. For example, all chordate embryos share the formation of pharyngeal plates, which are constituted of apposed endodermal and ectodermal epithelia, which have the capacity to fuse and perforate. Although the process of perforation is extremely common, its cellular mechanism remains little understood in detail, because of the complexity of the structures involved. In B. schlosseri, two epithelial monolayers, the peribranchial and the branchial ones, with no interposed mesenchymal cells, participate in pharyngeal perforation. Blood flows in the interspace between the two cellular leaflets. Apico-lateral zonulae occludentes seal the cells of each epithelium, so that the blood compartment is separated from the environment of the peribranchial and branchial chambers; here, sea water will flow when the zooid siphons open. Stigmata primordia appear as contiguous thickened discs of palisading cells of branchial and peribranchial epithelia. The peribranchial component invaginates to contact the branchial one. Here, the basal laminae intermingle, compact, and are degraded, while the intercellular space between the two epithelia is reduced to achieve the same width as that found between the lateral membranes of adjacent cells. Cells involved in this fusion rapidly change their polarity: they acquire a new epithelial axis, because part of the adhering basal membrane becomes a new lateral surface, whereas the original lateral membranes become new apical surfaces. Before disassembling the old tight junctions and establishing communication between branchial and peribranchial chambers, cells of the stigmata rudiments form new tight junctions organised as distinct entities, so that the structural continuum of the epithelial layers is maintained throughout the time of fusion and perforation.

Apoptosis removes chick embryo tail gut and remnant of the primitive streak

Removal of transient features in morphogenesis of chick embryo tail is by programmed cell death. We used ApopTagTM (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD) with the peroxidase/diaminobenzidine (DAB) procedure to correlate apoptosis with earlier reports of patterns of cell death in stage HH17-25 embryos, and our results suggest that the cell death inferred with supravital staining and appearance of cells in morphogenesis of the tail bud is programmed cell death called apoptosis. Apoptosis markers in tail bud are most abundant in the median cell cord of occluded degenerating tail gut. Tail bud mesenchyme marks for apoptosis most frequently in the ventrum of older stages, where cell death has been reported. Cells of the remnant of the primitive streak (Hensen's node) mark for apoptosis, suggesting that programmed cell death is a stop signal for axial organization at the caudal terminus. Apoptosis markers in postmembrane cloacal endoderm anticipate the transient cloacal fenestra. Lack of apoptosis markers in neural tube, notochord, and somites supports the suggestion of Schoenwolf ([1981] Anat, Embryol. (Beri.) 162:183-197) that cells of those areas in the tail bud are assimilated into the growing rump of the chick embryo. Lack of markers in neural tube of tail bud formed by secondary neurulation suggests that apoptosis is not involved in cavitation of medullary cord, but further investigation is necessary. A limited investigation of pharyngeal membranes and midgut, where cell death has not been reported to be as important in morphogenesis, did not show apoptosis markers in those tissues (Miller and Briglin [1994] "Cell Death in Development and Cancer," Houston: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, pp, 82-83). Absence of apoptosis markers in roof of gut tube suggests that the lower frequency of thymidine labeling reported for those cells (Miller [1986] Anat. Rec. 214: 87A) is not a result of apoptosis. Clearly marked cells correlated with expected locations of migrating neural crest and primordial germ cells in these stages, but distribution of apoptosis markers was not abundant or general for either cell type.

Role for differential cell proliferation in perforation and rupture of chick pharyngeal closing plates

Patterns of cell proliferation show two distinct domains around avian pharyngeal closing plates as they form, perforate, and rupture. Pouch endoderm and groove ectoderm are in one domain showing 81-86% proliferation, which suggests relatively rapid growth. Cells in epithelia that comprise the pharyngeal closing plates contiguous with pouch and groove epithelia are vital but are dividing at a significantly lower percentage (62-64%). This phenomenon is similar to the lag in growth reported for cells in the oral membrane around the time of rupture (Miller and Olcott, 1989: Anat. Rec., 223:204-208), is consistent with Waterman's suggestion (1985: Anat. Rec., 211:450-457) that cellular reorganization, rather than massive degeneration, is a major mechanism of initial perforation, and suggests that differential growth is a contributor to performation and rupture of chick pharyngeal closing plates.

Cell proliferation in chick oral membrane lags behind that of adjacent epithelia at the time of rupture

Radioautographic analysis showed that ectoderm and endoderm cells in chick oral membrane continued to label with tritiated thymidine through the period of rupture, but their frequency of labeling was significantly lower than those of adjacent epithelia. Frequency of labeling increased in adjacent ectoderm and endoderm, while oral membrane rates remained relatively low, suggesting that growth in the membrane lags relative to adjacent epithelia. Relatively greater proliferation in adjacent epithelia could generate tension and pull apart the thinned oral membrane. Differentials in rates of cell proliferation, when considered along with knowledge of cellular rearrangements following changes in basal lamina and matrical components, suggest that differential growth is an important force in rupture of the avian oral membrane.

Morphological changes in the oral (buccopharyngeal) membrane in urodelan embryos: development of the mouth opening

The ultrastructure of the oral (buccopharyngeal) membrane in the embryo of the urodelan, Hynobius tokyoensis, was examined by transmission (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The oral membrane consists of the stomodeal ectoderm and foregut endoderm, and is three to five cell layers thick at stage 24. The oral membrane gradually thickens as development proceeds. The stomodeal collar, derived from the ectoderm, is folded inward along the foregut endoderm. Tooth germs are formed partly by cells of the stomodeal collar and partly by mesenchymal cells and calcification takes place before hatching. Secretory granules, which are markers of epithelial differentiation, appear in some cells of the foregut endoderm. Within the oral membrane, the cells of the stomodeal collar become the basal cells, and the endodermal cells of the foregut become the apical cells of the future oral epithelium. Gaps are formed by the epithelial differentiation of the endodermal cells of the foregut in the oral membrane. The gaps connect with each other, with the stomodeum, and with the foregut. As a result of these events, the mouth opens at stage 43, just after hatching.

Cell degeneration and mitosis in the buccopharyngeal and branchial membranes in the mouse embryo

The frequencies of cell degeneration and mitosis were investigated in the rupturing buccopharyngeal membrane (BPM) and in the persistent first branchial membrane (BM). In the BPM, cell degeneration starts many hours before rupture is visible, but mitotic figures are absent. In the BM this situation is reversed: mitotic figures are regularly observed, but a degenerating cell only occasionally. It is concluded that the ratio between the numbers of degenerating and dividing cells regulates the fate of both the BPM and the BM.

The ultrastructure of oral (buccopharyngeal) membrane formation and rupture in the anuran embryo

The ultrastructure of the oral (buccopharyngeal) membrane was examined by transmission and electron microscopy in the anuran, Rana japonica, embryo. The stomodeum is recognizable on the ventral surface anterior to the neural folds as the neural folds are beginning to close (neural tube stage). The stomodeum is gradually enlarged and deepened as development proceeds. At the neural tube stage, the oral membrane is 5-7 cell layers thick and the stomodeal ectodermal cells are cuboidal and the foregut endodermal cells are cuboidal or columnar. Desmosomes and basal lamina could not be found between the ectodermal and endodermal epithelia. The oral membrane gradually thins between the neural tube and hatching stages. At the hatching stage, the oral membrane becomes two or three cell layers thick and each cell is flattened. Many perforations of the oral membrane after hatching and the oral membrane appears "net-like." Necrotic cells occur in the oral membrane and these cells contain many autophagic vacuoles. ACPase-positive lysosomes, Golgi regions, and autophagic vacuoles were present in the oral membrane. At the asymmetrical trunk stage, a large part of the oral membrane disappears and only remnants are left.

Epithelial fusion during early semicircular canal formation in the embryonic zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio

The developing inner ear of the teleost, Brachydanio rerio, provides an opportunity for observing an epithelial fusion between the apical surfaces of apposed epithelia in a vertebrate embryo in vivo. The developing otocyst was filmed for periods up to 4 days in unanesthetized embryos, and specimens were fixed at intervals and processed for light microscopy, TEM, and SEM. The semicircular canals are formed as a consequence of the union between the tips of three cylindrical projections from the wall of the otocyst, which grow toward corresponding bulges of a projection from the lateral wall. The epithelial cells covering the projections contain extensive rough endopasmic reticulum, exhibit apical junctional complexes, and are not underlain by a basal lamina. The core of each projection contains large amounts of flocculent and fibrillar extracellular material. After a period of growth and elongation, the tip of each projection contacts, and adheres to, the appropriate bulge to create a circular, flattened, bilayered, epithelial plate. Small, focal junctions form between the apposed apical cell surfaces within the plate during this period, but they are not numerous. Junctional complexes do develop, however, between apposed cells at the periphery of the plate. After 1-2 hours, the basal surface of the plate exhibit considerable alteration in contour. Adjacent cells within the plate then separate to allow continuity of the connective tissue components of the two structures. The observations of this study indicate that following an initial period of contact and adhesion, cellular reorientation and changes in junctional contacts between adjacent cells within the epithelial plate, rather than cell degeneration, are responsible for perforation of the plate.

Ontogeny and immunocytochemical differentiation of the pituitary gland in a sea turtle, Caretta caretta

In the sea turtle Caretta caretta the dorsal wall of the pituitary anlage and the apex of the hypophyseal angle are derived from stomodeal epithelium adherent to the neural epithelium of the diencephalon; a substantial part of the ventral wall of the anlage is derived from epithelium of mixed origin (stomodeum and foregut). Distribution of immunoreactive cells in the embryonic gland suggests that pituitary peptide hormones (adrenocorticotropin, ACTH; melanotropin, MSH; prolactin, PRL; growth hormone, GH) are synthesized in cells from the dorsal wall, while cells producing glycoprotein hormones (luteinizing hormone, LH; thyrotropin, TSH) trace their lineage to ventral and ventrolateral areas of the anlage that include some endoderm. Mesenchymal movements mold the epithelial anlage in two steps, delineating first the posterior and subsequently the anterior area of the gland. During the former process the lateral lobes are defined, and material immunoreactive with antiserum to ACTH appears in epithelial cells of presumptive pars distalis (PD) and pars intermedia (PI). Delineation of the anterior end of the pituitary gland occurs as the hypophyseal stalk forms, approximately one-fourth through ontogenesis. Shortly thereafter, immunoreactions demonstrate synthetic activity of distinctively distributed cells containing ACTH, PRL, GH, LH and TSH. In Caretta the lateral lobes of the pituitary anlage give rise to a distinct layer of tissue around the PD (pars tuberalis interna, PTint) and a thick layer on the floor of the hypothalamus (juxtaneural pars tuberalis, juxPT). In the pituitaries of late embryos, juxPT tissue proximal to the PD contains many cells immunoreactive with LH antiserum; whereas cells in distal areas of the juxPT do not react with any antisera tested. LH-cells also occur in large numbers in the PTint and in the posterior PD where tissues of the partes tuberalis and distalis are continuous. Cells reactive with antiserum to TSH are found in small numbers in the PTint, and in larger numbers along with the LH-cells in the posterior PD. PRL-cells occur in the anterior PD, GH-cells in the posterior. ACTH-cells are found primarily in the anterior two-thirds of the PD.