Current use of glucocorticoids in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Germany

State-of-the-art glucocorticoid-targeted drug therapies for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Glucocorticoids are steroid hormones broadly used for the treatment of several inflammatory and autoimmune diseases among other numerous indications, including rheumatoid arthritis.

AREAS COVERED

For the purposes of this article, the authors have performed an extensive review of the literature to present the latest studies on glucocorticoid use in rheumatoid arthritis. They also provide the reader with their expert perspectives on future developments.

EXPERT OPINION

The authors do not anticipate that glucocorticoids with be replaced in the near future by newer drugs. As such, rheumatologists should be fully aware of the possible side-effects and educate appropriately their patients to recognize and report them. Newer formulations, such as the liposomal/nanoparticle-based treatments, will result in less pronounced adverse effects, but the input of clinical experience along with the current recommendations for the glucocorticoid use will benefit both clinicians and patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Underlying mechanisms of glucocorticoid-induced β-cell death and dysfunction: a new role for glycogen synthase kinase 3

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are widely prescribed for their anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties as a treatment for a variety of diseases. The use of GCs is associated with important side effects, including diabetogenic effects. However, the underlying mechanisms of GC-mediated diabetogenic effects in β-cells are not well understood. In this study we investigated the role of glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) in the mediation of β-cell death and dysfunction induced by GCs. Using genetic and pharmacological approaches we showed that GSK3 is involved in GC-induced β-cell death and impaired insulin secretion. Further, we unraveled the underlying mechanisms of GC-GSK3 crosstalk. We showed that GSK3 is marginally implicated in the nuclear localization of GC receptor (GR) upon ligand binding. Furthermore, we showed that GSK3 regulates the expression of GR at mRNA and protein levels. Finally, we dissected the proper contribution of each GSK3 isoform and showed that GSK3β isoform is sufficient to mediate the pro-apoptotic effects of GCs in β-cells. Collectively, in this work we identified GSK3 as a viable target to mitigate GC deleterious effects in pancreatic β-cells.

Endocrine Disorders in Autoimmune Rheumatological Diseases: A Focus on Thyroid Autoimmune Diseases and on the Effects of Chronic Glucocorticoid Treatment

Autoimmune rheumatological diseases’ incidence and prevalence have risen over the last decades and they are becoming increasingly important worldwide. Thyroid autoimmune diseases share with them an imbalance in the immune system that lead to a pro-inflammatory environment. Usually this is the result of a multi-factorial process. In fact, it includes not only a possible genetic predisposition, but also environmental causes like microbiota dysbiosis, diet rich in processed foods, exposure to toxicants and infections. However, many aspects are currently under study. This paper aims to examine the factors that participate in the developing of rheumatological and thyroid autoimmune diseases. Moreover, as glucocorticoids still represent a leading treatment for systemic autoimmune rheumatological diseases, our secondary aim is to summarize the main effects of glucocorticoids treatment focusing on iatrogenic Cushing’s syndrome and glucocorticoids’ withdrawal syndrome.

Evaluation of changes in lens optical densitometry using Pentacam HR after renal transplantation: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

To compare the optical densitometric changes in the lens of patients with renal transplantation with those of a healthy group using Pentacam HR.

METHODS

Twenty-four right eyes of 24 healthy patients (Group 1) were compared with 24 right eyes of 24 kidney transplant recipients. Kidney transplant recipients were evaluated thrice (preoperatively: Group 2a, postoperative 1st month: Group 2b, postoperative 12th month: Group 2c). Corneal endothelial cell count, intraocular pressure, and central corneal thickness of all participants were measured. Lens optical densitometry was measured with Pentacam HR using 3D scanning mode. The optical density of the lens was analyzed by taking the corneal apex as the center and analysing the 12 mm diameter area. (Zone 1: 2.0 mm, Zone 2: 4.0 mm, and Zone 3: 6.0 mm).

RESULTS

Corneal endothelial cell count was 2571.2±106.7 cells/mm² in Group 1 and 2462.8±127.6 cells/mm² in Group 2a (p=0.001). For lens optical densities, significant differences were observed between the groups in Zone 1 and Zone 3, but the difference in Zone 2 was not significant (p=0.003, p=0.164, p=0.009, respectively). There was a positive correlation between dialysis time and preoperative lens optical densitometry in Zone 1, Zone 2, and Zone 3 (r= 0.496, r= 0.131, r= 0.463, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Although a decrease in lens transparency was observed after kidney transplantation, steroids may cause an increase in lens transparency in the postoperative period. Patients with renal transplantation should be followed closely for possible lens changes in the post-transplant period.

Risk for Serious Infection With Low-Dose Glucocorticoids in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis : A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Low-dose glucocorticoids are frequently used for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other chronic conditions, but the safety of long-term use remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the risk for hospitalized infection with long-term use of low-dose glucocorticoids in patients with RA receiving stable disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Medicare claims data and Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart database from 2006 to 2015.

PATIENTS

Adults with RA receiving a stable DMARD regimen for more than 6 months.

MEASUREMENTS

Associations between glucocorticoid dose (none, ≤5 mg/d, >5 to 10 mg/d, and >10 mg/d) and hospitalized infection were evaluated using inverse probability-weighted analyses, with 1-year cumulative incidence predicted from weighted models.

RESULTS

247 297 observations were identified among 172 041 patients in Medicare and 58 279 observations among 44 118 patients in Optum. After 6 months of stable DMARD use, 47.1% of Medicare patients and 39.5% of Optum patients were receiving glucocorticoids. The 1-year cumulative incidence of hospitalized infection in Medicare patients not receiving glucocorticoids was 8.6% versus 11.0% (95% CI, 10.6% to 11.5%) for glucocorticoid dose of 5 mg or less per day, 14.4% (CI, 13.8% to 15.1%) for greater than 5 to 10 mg/d, and 17.7% (CI, 16.5% to 19.1%) for greater than 10 mg/d (all P < 0.001 vs. no glucocorticoids). The 1-year cumulative incidence of hospitalized infection in Optum patients not receiving glucocorticoids was 4.0% versus 5.2% (CI, 4.7% to 5.8%) for glucocorticoid dose of 5 mg or less per day, 8.1% (CI, 7.0% to 9.3%) for greater than 5 to 10 mg/d, and 10.6% (CI, 8.5% to 13.2%) for greater than 10 mg/d (all P < 0.001 vs. no glucocorticoids).

LIMITATION

Potential for residual confounding and misclassification of glucocorticoid dose.

CONCLUSION

In patients with RA receiving stable DMARD therapy, glucocorticoids were associated with a dose-dependent increase in the risk for serious infection, with small but significant risks even at doses of 5 mg or less per day. Clinicians should balance the benefits of low-dose glucocorticoids with this potential risk.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.

Variability in Glucocorticoid Prescribing for Rheumatoid Arthritis and the Influence of Provider Preference on Long-Term Use of Glucocorticoids

OBJECTIVE

Glucocorticoids are recommended for short-term use in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but many patients continue receiving long-term therapy. We evaluated the variability in glucocorticoid prescribing across rheumatologists to inform interventions to limit long-term glucocorticoid use to the lowest dose necessary.

METHODS

Two cohorts were created using Medicare data from 2006 to 2015. Using cohort 1 (RA patients receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs [DMARDs]), we calculated each rheumatologist's "provider preference" for glucocorticoids (frequency of use compared to other providers), using the ratio of observed to expected number of patients receiving glucocorticoids to account for case mix. In cohort 2 (RA patients receiving stable DMARD therapy), we evaluated whether provider preference for glucocorticoids could independently predict use of ≥5 mg/day of glucocorticoids 6-9 months after initiation of DMARD therapy.

RESULTS

Using cohort 1 (1,272,644 yearly observations; 385,597 patients), we calculated provider preference among 6,875 rheumatologists (28,936 yearly observations). Provider preference was highly variable, with physicians at the lowest and upper quartiles prescribing glucocorticoids 33% less often to 31% more often (25th and 75th percentiles, respectively) than expected. In cohort 2 (155,539 patients receiving stable DMARD therapy), provider preference was strongly associated with glucocorticoid use ≥5 mg/day at 6-9 months, with a predicted probability of use of 22% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 21.7-22.7) versus 11% (95% CI 10.2-10.9) for a patient seeing a provider in the highest versus lowest quintile of preference.

CONCLUSION

Glucocorticoid prescribing for RA varies greatly among rheumatologists, and provider preference is one of the strongest predictors of a patient's long-term glucocorticoid use. These findings raise quality of care concerns and highlight the need for stronger evidence to guide RA treatment.

Glucocorticoids in rheumatoid arthritis: the silent companion in the therapeutic strategy

INTRODUCTION

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are key actors in RA management, despite the increasing number of available drugs. In fact, due to their efficacy and safety, the combination therapy between GCs and conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) is still recommended in the early phase of RA treatment, because improving the long-term results.

AREAS COVERED

In this paper, we reviewed the role of GCs in RA management, focusing on mechanisms of action as well as the benefit/risk ratio of GCs and newer therapeutic formulations. Furthermore, we analyzed GCs DMARDs proprieties on disease activity and their long-term effects on radiographic damage. We designed a narrative review aimed to provide an overview concerning GCs in RA management.

EXPERT OPINION

A large amount of evidence supports the use of GCs in RA, especially in the earliest phases of the disease. Besides GCs symptomatic effects due to their strong anti-inflammatory effects, data from several randomized clinical trials have shown a substantial benefit of low-dose GCs in inhibiting the radiographic damage, thus highlighting GCs DMARDs properties. Besides their recognized role in the treatment of early RA, systematic monitoring of adverse events should be recommended to minimize GCs toxicity.

Factors associated with osteoporosis medication use in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from the Institute of Rheumatology Rheumatoid Arthritis cohort study

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate factors associated with osteoporosis medication use in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

Patients with RA who enrolled in our cohort completed self-administered questionnaires which included questions regarding their osteoporosis medications. Logistic regression was used to determine the association of variables with the use of these medications.

Results

Among 5660 Japanese patients with RA who responded to the questionnaires (mean age, 61.8 years; 86.0% female), 1983 patients (35.0%) and 1211 patients (21.4%) reported taking osteoporosis medications and antiresorptive agents, respectively. In multivariate models, age, female sex, lower body mass index (BMI), self-reported fracture history, Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (JHAQ-DI), daily dosage of prednisone (PSL), weekly dosage of methotrexate (MTX), and concomitant use of hypertension and hyperlipidemia medications were significantly associated with the use of osteoporosis medications (P < 0.05). Among women with RA, the use of hypertension medications was significantly correlated with the use of both osteoporosis medications and antiresorptive agents (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Age, female sex, a lower BMI, duration of RA, self-reported fracture history, JHAQ-DI, daily dosage of PSL, weekly dosage of MTX, and the use of medications for hypertension and hyperlipidemia appear to be associated with the use of osteoporosis medications in Japanese patients with RA.

Long-term trends in rheumatology care : Achievements and deficits in 25 years of the German national rheumatology database

BACKGROUND

Since 1993, data on the care and quality of life of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases have been collected in the German National Database (NDB) of the regional collaborative rheumatology centers.

OBJECTIVE

In this review long-term trends on treatment, disease activity and gainful employment of the most common inflammatory rheumatic diseases are presented and the most important analyses from 25 years of the NDB are summarized.

METHODS

Between 15 and 17 rheumatological institutions take part in the NDB and once a year collect data from a total of more than 10,000 patients. The rheumatologists document the disease status and care, the patients report on their state of health and the effects of the disease.

RESULTS

The biologics era at the beginning of the twenty-first century has led to changes in the therapeutic spectrum of most inflammatory rheumatic diseases, especially in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Some basic therapies formerly used are hardly used anymore and glucocorticoids are used less frequently. Methotrexate has remained the standard therapy for rheumatoid arthritis over the years. Nowadays, nearly 30% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis receive treatment with biologics. Disease activity, functional and social restrictions have decreased across all diseases.

CONCLUSION

The improved health status of many patients with rheumatic diseases confirms the high level of care provided by the rheumatism centers involved in the NDB. The increasing specification of measuring instruments and the standardization of documentation systems are major challenges that the NDB will have to face in the coming years if it is to remain in the digital age.

Anabolics in the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: an evidence-based review of long-term safety, efficacy and place in therapy

Introduction

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is an underrecognized complication of chronic glucocorticoid therapy characterized by a decrease in new bone formation. Anabolic therapies, such as teriparatide, a recombinant human parathyroid hormone, combat the disease by promoting new bone growth.

Aims

This article outlines the pathophysiology of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and details the evidence of efficacy, safety, and patterns of use of teriparatide and other future anabolic therapies.

Evidence review

In multiple clinical trials, teriparatide has been shown to significantly increase lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis when compared with placebo, alendronate, and risedronate. When compared with alendronate, significantly fewer vertebral fractures were noted in the teriparatide group. Adverse effects noted in clinical trials include nausea, insomnia, flushing, myalgias, and mild hypercalcemia/hyperuricemia. Early studies in rats noted an increased incidence of osteosarcoma; however, an increased rate beyond levels seen in general populations has not been noted in human studies or with long-term pharmacovigilance. Abaloparatide and romosozumab are newer anabolic therapies that have shown some benefit in postmenopausal osteoporosis but have not yet been studied in the chronic glucocorticoid population.

Place in therapy

Major specialty organizations continue to recommend bisphosphonates as first-line therapy in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis due to the proven benefit and relative affordability. However, the use of anabolics shows promise to improve outcomes by increasing BMD and reducing fracture-associated morbidity and mortality and has a role for selected populations at high fracture risk.

New concepts to reduce glucocorticoid toxicity

70 years after their first use, low-dose glucocorticoids are a common part of pharmacological rheumatoid arthritis treatment. This is due to their well-proven capacities in symptom severity and disease activity reduction, in particular when combined with a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, such as methotrexate. Nevertheless, glucocorticoid administration, in long-term especially, is also seen critically because of its potential adverse conditions. In order to achieve a reduction in treatment-related adverse events, modern therapy regimes should take into consideration patients' risk factors and therefore be individual. The Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index is a method to measure side effects of glucocorticoid therapy objectively and will be central in future studies comparing different therapy regimes. Such a new therapy regime is modified-release prednisone, which - thanks to a different time of liberation - seems to capable of reducing morning stiffness much more effectively than conventional prednisone, whilst showing similar properties in disease activity reduction and safety. Still, confirmation of these first data in further trials will be necessary. Eventually, other innovative concepts are liposomal glucocorticoids, dissociated agonists of glucocorticoid receptors and intramuscular application of glucocorticoids. Though these approaches appear to be promising, additional research will be required.

THE RISK OF OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: RESULTS OF THE PROGRAM «OSTEOSCREENING RUSSIA»

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the use of glucocorticoids (GCs) are proven risk factors for osteoporosis (OP) and osteoporotic fractures (OPF). There are also other reasons for increased fracture risk in RA.

Objective: to determine the rate of RA in an epidemiological sample of persons aged 50 years and older and to identify those in need of antiosteoporotic therapy among the patients with RA in order to prevent OPF.

Subjects and methods. The epidemiological sample included 18,018 people aged 50 years and older (13,941 women and 4,077 men; mean age, 62±10 years). The survey consisted of a unified questionnaire, measurement of daily dietary calcium intake, and calculation of a 10-year fracture risk using the FRAX® algorithm.

Results and discussion. The prevalence of RA in the epidemiological population sample aged 50 years and older was 1.7% (1.9% in women and 1.2% in men; p=0.0047). The mean FRAX® values for major OPF in RA patients were significantly higher than those in non-RA individuals: 18.4±10 and 13.2±7.9%, respectively (p=0.0001) for women and 8.9±6.4 and 6.2±3.7%, respectively (p=0.0001) for men. 42% of the patients with RA were at high risk for OPF. Thus, 48% of the women with RA had FRAX® values above the therapeutic intervention threshold; and the non-RA group needed antiosteoporotic therapy significantly less (31%; p=0.00001). At the same time, the detection rate of high-risk OPF in men with and without RA did not differ significantly (8 and 5%, respectively; p>0.05). The most common risk factors (RFs) for OP and OPF in RA patients included previous fractures (33%), secondary causes of OP (30%), GC use (18%), and, additionally, smoking (33%) in male patients with RA. The female patients with RA significantly more frequently took GCs (17%) and had other secondary causes of OP and OPF (33%) than those without RA (7.7% (p=0.0001) and 23% (p=0.0004, respectively). The male patients with RA versus to the population-based control showed significant differences when they only used GCs (20 and 5%, respectively; p = 0.0001); the remaining RFs were encountered at the same frequency. Less than half of the normal daily calcium intake was observed in 20% of men and 16% of women (p=0.53).

Conclusion. 42% of the RA patients aged 50 years and older were at high risk for OPF and needed antiosteoporotic therapy. Every third woman with RA had at least one other comorbidity or condition associated with the increased risk of OPF. In the male patients with RA, the FRAX® algorithm could reveal only 8% of persons at high risk for fractures, while 58% of them had two or more additional RFs that can negatively affect bone mineral density and increase the risk of fracture. To identify those who require prevention and treatment of OP and OPF, it is preferable to perform bone densitometry of the axial skeleton among male patients with RA. 

Defining conditions where long-term glucocorticoid treatment has an acceptably low level of harm to facilitate implementation of existing recommendations: viewpoints from an EULAR task force

There is convincing evidence for the known and unambiguously accepted beneficial effects of glucocorticoids at low dosages. However, the implementation of existing recommendations and guidelines on the management of glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatic diseases is lagging behind. As a first step to improve implementation, we aimed at defining conditions under which long-term glucocorticoid therapy may have an acceptably low level of harm. A multidisciplinary European League Against Rheumatism task force group of experts including patients with rheumatic diseases was assembled. After a systematic literature search, breakout groups critically reviewed the evidence on the four most worrisome adverse effects of glucocorticoid therapy (osteoporosis, hyperglycaemia/diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases and infections) and presented their results to the other group members following a structured questionnaire for final discussion and consensus finding. Robust evidence on the risk of harm of long-term glucocorticoid therapy was often lacking since relevant study results were often either missing, contradictory or carried a high risk of bias. The group agreed that the risk of harm is low for the majority of patients at long-term dosages of ≤5 mg prednisone equivalent per day, whereas at dosages of >10 mg/day the risk of harm is elevated. At dosages between >5 and ≤10 mg/day, patient-specific characteristics (protective and risk factors) determine the risk of harm. The level of harm of glucocorticoids depends on both dose and patient-specific parameters. General and glucocorticoid-associated risk factors and protective factors such as a healthy lifestyle should be taken into account when evaluating the actual and future risk.

Glucocorticoid treatment and endocrine pancreas function: implications for glucose homeostasis, insulin resistance and diabetes

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are broadly prescribed for numerous pathological conditions because of their anti-inflammatory, antiallergic and immunosuppressive effects, among other actions. Nevertheless, GCs can produce undesired diabetogenic side effects through interactions with the regulation of glucose homeostasis. Under conditions of excess and/or long-term treatment, GCs can induce peripheral insulin resistance (IR) by impairing insulin signalling, which results in reduced glucose disposal and augmented endogenous glucose production. In addition, GCs can promote abdominal obesity, elevate plasma fatty acids and triglycerides, and suppress osteocalcin synthesis in bone tissue. In response to GC-induced peripheral IR and in an attempt to maintain normoglycaemia, pancreatic β-cells undergo several morphofunctional adaptations that result in hyperinsulinaemia. Failure of β-cells to compensate for this situation favours glucose homeostasis disruption, which can result in hyperglycaemia, particularly in susceptible individuals. GC treatment does not only alter pancreatic β-cell function but also affect them by their actions that can lead to hyperglucagonaemia, further contributing to glucose homeostasis imbalance and hyperglycaemia. In addition, the release of other islet hormones, such as somatostatin, amylin and ghrelin, is also affected by GC administration. These undesired GC actions merit further consideration for the design of improved GC therapies without diabetogenic effects. In summary, in this review, we consider the implication of GC treatment on peripheral IR, islet function and glucose homeostasis.

The value of glucocorticoid co-therapy in different rheumatic diseases--positive and adverse effects

Glucocorticoids play a pivotal role in the management of many inflammatory rheumatic diseases. The therapeutic effects range from pain relief in arthritides, to disease-modifying effects in early rheumatoid arthritis, and to strong immunosuppressive actions in vasculitides and systemic lupus erythematosus. There are multiple indications that adverse effects are more frequent with the longer use of glucocorticoids and use of higher dosages, but high-quality data on the occurrence of adverse effects are scarce especially for dosages above 10 mg prednisone daily. The underlying rheumatic disease, disease activity, risk factors and individual responsiveness of the patient should guide treatment decisions. Monitoring for adverse effects should also be tailored to the patient. Continuously balancing the benefits and risks of glucocorticoid therapy is recommended. There is an ongoing quest for new drugs with glucocorticoid actions without the potential to cause harmful effects, such as selective glucocorticoid receptor agonists, but the application of a new compound in clinical practice will probably not occur within the next few years. In the meantime, basic research on glucocorticoid effects and detailed reports on therapeutic efficacy and occurrence of adverse effects will be valuable in weighing benefits and risks in clinical practice.

Bone safety of low-dose glucocorticoids in rheumatic diseases

Glucocorticoids are widely used internationally for the treatment of inflammatory disease, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although the benefit of glucocorticoids in RA on both disease activity and severity are well known, there remain unanswered questions about the overall bone safety of chronic low-dose glucocorticoids in RA. Debate exists about the merits of glucocorticoids for bone health on the basis of their benefits in promoting activity and reducing proinflammatory cytokines. Overall current evidence supports the view that bone loss is a disease related both to RA and to glucocorticoid use independently. Calcium and vitamin D, along with prescription antiosteoporosis therapies, particularly bisphosphonates and teriparatide, play an important role in stabilizing bone mineral density and potentially lowering spinal fracture risk at the spine. International guidelines provide pathways for appropriate prevention of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). Despite the evidence and these guidelines, many patients do not receive adequate management to prevent GIOP.

The intelligent use of systemic glucocorticoids in rheumatoid arthritis

Glucocorticoids (GC) have potent anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects and are widely used in the management of rheumatoid arthritis in combination with other disease-modifying anti-rheumatoid drugs. Concern about the risk of adverse effects may be to some extent misplaced as low to moderate doses of GC have different mechanisms of action and risk profiles compared with high doses. This review discusses the current understanding about the different modes of action of GC, their strong disease-modifying properties and the efforts at improving the therapeutic ratio of GC through the development of new drugs which promise greater safety such as selective GC receptor agonists, liposomal GC and modified-release (MR) prednisone.

Optimized glucocorticoid therapy: teaching old drugs new tricks

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are commonly used in the treatment of a wide range of rheumatic and other inflammatory diseases. They exert their potent anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects primarily via so called genomic mechanisms, mediated by the cytosolic glucocorticoid receptor (cGR). This mechanism of GC action can be divided into the transactivation and the transrepression processes. However, also rapid effects of GCs exist which are mediated by specific and unspecific non-genomic mechanisms. A clinical relevance of this mode of GC action is assumed for effects mediated by membrane-bound glucocorticoid receptors, but detailed knowledge on the underlying mechanisms is still missing. Great efforts have been made in the past to diminish GC-induced adverse effects, thus improving the benefit/risk ratio of the drugs. Besides approaches to improve the treatment with conventional glucocorticoids currently available to clinicians, new innovative GCs or GC receptor ligands are also being developed.

Immediate and delayed impact of oral glucocorticoid therapy on risk of serious infection in older patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a nested case-control analysis

Objectives

To explore the relationship of serious infection risk with current and prior oral glucocorticoid (GC) therapy in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

A case-control analysis matched 1947 serious infection cases to five controls, selected from 16207 RA patients aged ≥65 between 1985–2003 in Quebec, Canada. Adjusted odds ratios for infection associated with different GC patterns were estimated using conventional models and a weighted cumulative dose (WCD) model.

Results

The WCD model predicted risks better than conventional models. Current and recent GC doses had highest impact on current risk. Doses taken up to 2.5 years ago were also associated with increased risk, albeit to a lesser extent. A current user of 5mg prednisolone had a 30%, 46% or 100% increased risk of serious infection when used continuously for the last 3 months, 6 months or 3 years, respectively, compared to a non-user. The risk associated with 5mg prednisolone taken for the last 3 years was similar to that associated with 30mg taken for the last month. Discontinuing a two-year course of 10mg prednisolone six months ago halved the risk compared to ongoing use.

Conclusions

GC therapy is associated with infection risk in older patients with RA. The WCD model provided more accurate risk estimates than conventional models. Current and recent doses have greatest impact on infection risk, but the cumulative impact of doses taken in the last 2–3 years still affects risk. Knowing how risk depends on pattern of GC use will contribute to an improved benefit/harm assessment.

Intravenously delivered glucocorticoid liposomes inhibit osteoclast activity and bone erosion in murine antigen-induced arthritis

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of systemic delivery of prednisolone phosphate (PLP) encapsulated within long circulating 'stealth' liposomes on bone erosion and osteoclast activity during experimental antigen-induced arthritis (AIA). Liposomal PLP strongly suppressed knee joint swelling, synovial infiltrate and bone erosion in antigen-induced arthritis. The number of active osteoclasts was not only suppressed in bone lesions near inflamed synovium, but also within the trabecular bone of the tibia, suggesting a systemic suppression of osteoclast activation. Furthermore, liposomal PLP directly blocked osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption in vitro while it also suppressed expression of osteoclast differentiation factors M-CSF and RANKL in the synovium. Targeting studies showed that liposomes are most efficiently phagocytosed by macrophages and early precursors of osteoclasts in the bone marrow rather than by mature osteoclasts, indicating a possible inhibition of osteoclast differentiation from an early stage.

CONCLUSION

Liposomal glucocorticoid delivery rather than free PLP offers a more efficacious way to inhibit both inflammation and bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis.

A rational use of glucocorticoids in patients with early arthritis has a minimal impact on bone mass

Introduction

Glucocorticoid (GC)-induced osteoporosis is a frequent complication in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, little information exists about the consequences of GC use in patients with early arthritis. Here we describe the variables underlying the use of GC in early arthritis, as well as its effect on bone-mineral density.

Methods

Data from 116 patients in our early arthritis register were analyzed (90 women; median age, 52.5 years, interquartile range (IQR, 38.5-66); 6-month median disease duration at entry (IQR, 4-9)). In this register, the clinical and treatment information was recorded systematically, including the cumulative GC dose. Lumbar spine, hip, and forearm bone-mineral density (BMD) measurements were performed at entry and after a 2-year follow-up. A multivariate analysis was performed to establish the variables associated with the use of GCs, as well as those associated with variations in BMD.

Results

Of the patients with early arthritis studied, 67% received GCs during the 2-year follow-up. GCs were more frequently prescribed to elderly patients, those with higher basal disease activity and disability, and patients with positive rheumatoid factor. When adjusted for these variables, GCs were less frequently prescribed to female patients. The use of GCs was associated with an increase of BMD in the ultradistal region of the forearm, although it induced a significant loss of BMD in the medial region of the forearm. No relevant effect of GC was noted on the BMD measured at other locations.

Conclusions

The frequent use of GCs as a "bridge therapy" in patients with early arthritis does not seem to be associated with relevant loss of bone mass. Moreover, cumulative GC administration might be associated with an increase of juxtaarticular BMD.

Novel insights into mechanisms of glucocorticoid action and the development of new glucocorticoid receptor ligands

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are potent anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressant agents. Unfortunately, they also produce serious side effects that limit their usage. This discrepancy is the driving force for the intensive search for novel GC receptor ligands with a better benefit-risk ratio as compared to conventional GCs. A better understanding of the molecular mode of GC action might result in the identification of novel drug targets. Genomic GC effects are mediated by transrepression or transactivation, the latter being largely responsible for GC side effects. We here discuss novel GC receptor ligands, such as selective glucocorticoid receptor agonists (SEGRAs), which might optimize genomic GC effects as they preferentially induce transrepression with little or no transactivating activity. In addition to genomic GC effects, GCs also produce rapid genomic-independent activities, termed nongenomic, and we here review the possible implications of a recently reported mechanism underlying nongenomic GC-induced immunosuppression in T cells. It was shown that the synthetic GC dexamethasone targets membrane-bound GC receptors leading to impaired T cell receptor signaling. As a consequence, membrane-linked GC receptors might be a potential candidate target for GC therapy. The ultimate goal is to convert these molecular insights into new GC receptor modulators with an improved therapeutic index.

Genomic and nongenomic effects of glucocorticoids

The strong anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects of glucocorticoids are mediated primarily by the cytosolic glucocorticoid receptors. These receptors are members of the steroid hormone receptor family, a superfamily of ligand-inducible transcription factors, and exert genomic effects that can result in increased expression of regulatory-including anti-inflammatory-proteins (transactivation), or decreased production of proinflammatory proteins (transrepression). Transactivation is thought to be responsible for numerous adverse effects of glucocorticoids; transrepression is thought to be responsible for many of the clinically desirable anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects of glucocorticoids. Optimized glucocorticoids, such as selective glucocorticoid receptor agonists, are being developed to try to minimize the adverse effects many patients experience. Glucocorticoids also exert their effects via rapid, nongenomic mechanisms that can be classified as involving nonspecific interactions of glucocorticoids with cellular membranes, nongenomic effects that are mediated by cytosolic glucocorticoid receptors, or specific interactions with membrane-bound glucocorticoid receptors. Increased understanding of these mechanisms of glucocorticoid action could enable the development of novel drugs with which to treat patients with inflammatory and autoimmune disease.

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a global perspective on the use of antirheumatic drugs

Modern therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is based on knowledge of the severity of the natural history of the disease. RA patients are approached with early and aggressive treatment strategies, methotrexate as an anchor drug, biological targeted therapies in those with inadequate response to methotrexate, and “tight control,” aiming for remission and low disease activity according to quantitative monitoring. This chapter presents a rationale for current treatment strategies for RA with antirheumatic drugs, a review of published reports concerning treatments in clinical cohorts outside of clinical trials, and current treatments at 61 sites in 21 countries in the QUEST-RA database.

Efficacy of modified-release versus standard prednisone to reduce duration of morning stiffness of the joints in rheumatoid arthritis (CAPRA-1): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Circadian rhythms are changed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A new modified-release delivery system has been developed which adapts the release of the administered glucocorticoid to the circadian rhythms of endogenous cortisol and disease symptoms to improve the benefit-risk ratio of glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a new modified-release prednisone tablet compared with immediate-release prednisone in patients with this disease.

METHODS

In a 12-week, multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial, 288 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were randomly assigned to either a modified-release prednisone tablet (n=144) or to an immediate-release prednisone tablet (n=144). The modified-release tablet was taken at bedtime and prednisone was released with a delay of 4 h after ingestion. This treatment was compared with morning administration of immediate-release prednisone as an active comparator. The primary outcome measure was duration of morning stiffness of the joints. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00146640.

FINDINGS

The mean relative change in duration of morning stiffness of the joints from baseline to end of treatment was significantly higher with modified-release prednisone than with immediate-release prednisone (-22.7%vs -0.4%; difference=22.4% [95% CI 0.49-44.30]; p=0.045). Patients in the prednisone modified-release group achieved a mean reduction of 44.0 (SD 136.6) min compared with baseline. The absolute difference between the treatment groups was 29.2 min (95% CI -2.59 to 61.9) in favour of modified-release prednisone (p=0.072). The safety profile did not differ between treatments.

INTERPRETATION

Modified-release prednisone is well tolerated, convenient to administer, and produces a clinically relevant reduction of morning stiffness of the joints in addition to all known therapeutic effects of immediate-release prednisone.

Eight versus 16-week re-evaluation period in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with leflunomide or methotrexate accompanied by moderate dose prednisone

In a step-up approach of DMARD treatment of RA a fast response and an early DMARD switch in the case of non-response is important. Therefore, we performed an open trial in which we compared an 8-week and a 16-week observation period during treatment of RA with MTX or LEF, both given in intensified starting doses and accompanied by moderate dose prednisone. MTX and LEF naïve patients with RA (mean time since diagnosis: 2.3 years) were randomised to receive either LEF in a 3-day-loading dose of 100 mg/day followed by 20 mg/day (n = 19) or MTX intramuscularly in a dose of 25 mg once weekly (n = 21). All patients received concomitant treatment with oral prednisone in an initial dose of 20 mg/day with weekly dose reductions of 5 mg/day. The disease activity was re-evaluated 8 and 16 weeks after the start of the treatment. Mean DAS28 before the start of treatment was 5.36 +/- 0.8 for the MTX-group and 5.46 +/- 0.8 for the LEF-group. After 8 weeks of treatment the DAS28 in the MTX-group was 2.59 +/- 1.0 and 3.16 +/- 0.8 in the LEF group (difference not significant). The mean DAS28 at re-evaluation 16 weeks after the starting of treatment (2.58 +/- 1.5 for the MTX-group and 3.25 +/- 1.16 for the LEF-group) was significantly different neither in between the both treatment groups nor in comparison to the week 8 evaluation. Efficiency of RA treatment with MTX or LEF in intensified doses and in combination with moderate dose prednisone can be sufficiently judged 8 weeks after its initiation.

Treatment of older adult patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis: Improved but not optimal

OBJECTIVE

The National Committee on Quality Assurance has determined that all patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) should be treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Our objective was to determine the rate and predictors of DMARD use in a cohort of elderly patients with RA.

METHODS

We analyzed health care utilization data for 5,864 Medicare beneficiaries with RA who also participated in a state-run pharmaceutical benefit program in Pennsylvania. Patients with RA were defined as those with at least 3 diagnoses of RA (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code 714.xx) at least 1 week apart who were enrolled in these programs for at least 12 months during 1995-2004. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess predictors of synthetic or biologic DMARD use in the 12 months after cohort entry.

RESULTS

Thirty percent of patients filled a DMARD prescription during 12 months of followup. Frequency of DMARD use increased steadily over time: 24% received DMARDs in 1996 compared with 43% in 2003 (P for trend <0.001). Of patients with at least 1 rheumatologist visit, 41% received a DMARD in 1996 compared with 70% in 2003 (P < 0.001). After the introduction of biologic DMARDs in 1998, 6% of all patients with RA received a biologic, including 12% who saw a rheumatologist. Patients ages 75-84 were 52% less likely to receive DMARDs (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 46-58%) and patients ages >or=85 were 74% less likely (95% CI 69-79%) compared with patients ages 65-74.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of patients in the community with full prescription drug coverage, most patients diagnosed with RA did not receive a DMARD during the 12 months after cohort entry. Older patients and those not seeing a rheumatologist were less likely to receive a DMARD and may provide a target for quality improvement interventions.

[The National Database of the German Arthritis Centres--a 12 year balance]

The National Database of the German Collaborative Arthritis Centres is the most important source for the evaluation of current health care for German rheumatology patients. Since 1993, all outpatients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases treated in one of 24 arthritis centres have been recorded once a year using a clinical record form and a patient questionnaire. The aim is to gain knowledge on the outcomes and the medical, social and economic consequences of inflammatory rheumatic diseases in the real world, and to monitor continuously the current state and trends in health care. Data from more than 200,000 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases from 11 years (1993-2003) are available, making it possible to analyse even very rare diseases with a sufficient numbers of cases. Selected results on the health care situation, practice variation in rheumatology and the burden of illness in various diseases are reported.

[Prescription of glucocorticoids by rheumatologists in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Germany]

Systemic GCs are among the most important therapeutic options in modern rheumatology. Due to their fast clinical effects and their high anti-inflammatory potential, they are indispensable in a large number of cases. This applies despite the well-known spectrum of adverse events and despite limited evidence from randomized clinical trials. In this situation, the results of observational studies gain additional importance. They provide information on therapeutic decisions of rheumatologists concerning GC therapy and their combination with other drugs as well as concerning the prevention of adverse events such as GC induced osteoporosis. The data gathered in the national database of the German Collaborative Arthritis Centers show that at the time of documentation 60% of all RA patients were under therapy with GCs, 85% of these were treated with a dosage of up to 7.5 mg/d. GCs are especially frequently used in combination with new or highly potent DMARDs. This underlines that rheumatologists take activity and severity into account in deciding both about GCs and DMARDs. However, there is high practice variation regarding the frequency of GC use among the rheumatological facilities which demonstrates the lack of good evidence.Rheumatologists are aware of various patient risks when prescribing GCs and adapt their therapies to these risks. Two thirds of all patients under GCs were receiving therapy for the prevention or treatment of osteoporosis at documentation, high risk groups such as women over 50 even more frequently. The data emphasize the high importance of GCs in modern rheumatology.