Pretreatment advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) for predicting early progression in nivolumab-treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Decision model for durable clinical benefit from front- or late-line immunotherapy alone or with chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Predictive biomarkers and models of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been extensively studied in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, evidence for many biomarkers remains inconclusive, and the opaqueness of machine learning models hinders practicality. We aimed to provide compelling evidence for biomarkers and develop a transparent decision tree model.

METHODS

We consolidated data from 3,288 ICI-treated patients with NSCLC across real-world multicenter, public cohorts and the Choice-01 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03856411). Over 50 features were examined for predicting durable clinical benefits (DCBs) from ICIs. Noteworthy biomarkers were identified to establish a decision tree model. Additionally, we explored the tumor microenvironment and peripheral CD8+ programmed death-1 (PD-1)+ T cell receptor (TCR) profiles.

FINDINGS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified tumor histology, PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, tumor mutational burden, line, and regimen of ICI treatment as significant factors. Mutation subtypes of EGFR, KRAS, KEAP1, STK11, and disruptive TP53 mutations were associated with DCB. The decision tree (DT10) model, using the ten clinicopathological and genomic markers, showed superior performance in predicting DCB in the training set (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.82) and consistently outperformed other models in test sets. DT10-predicted-DCB patients manifested longer survival, an enriched inflamed tumor immune phenotype (67%), and higher peripheral TCR diversity, whereas the DT10-predicted-NDB (non-durable benefit) group showed an enriched desert immune phenotype (86%) and higher peripheral TCR clonality.

CONCLUSIONS

The model effectively predicted DCB after front-/subsequent-line ICI treatment, with or without chemotherapy, for squamous and non-squamous lung cancer, offering clinicians valuable insights into efficacy prediction using cost-effective variables.

FUNDING

This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China.

Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index: A Novel Comprehensive Biomarker of Host Status for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Numerous biomarkers that reflect host status have been identified for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, there has been a paucity of biomarker studies that comprehensively indicate body composition, nutritional assessment, and systemic inflammation status. The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI), initially introduced as a screening tool for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer in 2013, emerges as a holistic marker encompassing all body composition, nutritional status, and systemic inflammation status. The index is calculated by the simple formula: body mass index × albumin value / neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Given its accessibility in routine clinical practice, the ALI has exhibited promising clinical utility in prognosticating outcomes for patients with multiple types of cancer. In this review, we focus on the significance of host status and the clinical applicability of the ALI in the treatment and management of patients with malignancies, including mCRC. We also suggest its potential in guiding the formulation of treatment strategies against mCRC and outline future perspectives.

Albumin-to-Globulin Ratio Combined with Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Predictor in Multiple Myeloma with Renal Impairment

Background

The albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have been recently regarded as promising prognostic factors in various malignancies. The present study investigated the prognostic value of combining the AGR and NLR (ANS) for risk assessments in multiple myeloma (MM) with renal impairment (RI).

Methods

From 2011 to 2018, 79 patients with MM and RI were enrolled in this study. Receiver operating curves (ROCs) were constructed to determine optimal AGR and NLR thresholds for predicting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) during follow up. The prognostic values of AGR, NLR, and ANS were evaluated with Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods. We also created a predictive nomogram for prognostic evaluations of OS and PFS, and the predictive accuracy was assessed with a concordance index (c-index).

Results

The ROC curves analyses showed that the optimal cut-off levels were 2.27 for NLR and 1.57 for AGR. A high NLR and a high ANS were significantly associated with worse OS and PFS. However, a high NLR combined with a low AGR was associated with worse OS. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that both the NLR and ANS were independent predictors for both OS and PFS and that a low AGR was an independent predictor of a reduced OS. The nomogram accurately predicted OS (c-index: 0.785) and PFS (c-index: 0.786) in patients with MM and RI.

Conclusion

ANS may serve as a potential prognostic biomarker in patients with MM and RI. The proposed nomograms may facilitate prognostic predictions for patients with MM and RI.

Clinical significance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy

The aim of the study was to investigate the prognostic significance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) undergoing definite chemo-radiotherapy (CRT). We included 87 patients with LS-SCLC from South Korea, treated between 2005 and 2019 with definite CRT. ALI was calculated using body mass index, serum albumin, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. We categorized 38 patients into the high ALI group (ALI ≥ 44.3) and 48 into the low ALI group (ALI < 44.3). Patients in the high ALI group exhibited longer overall survival (OS) than patients in the low ALI group. In multivariate analysis, prophylactic cranial irradiation (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.366, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.66, P = 0.0008), and high ALI (HR = 0.475, 95% CI 0.27-0.84, P = 0.0103) were identified as independent prognostic factors for predicting better OS. Notably, a high ALI score was particularly indicative of longer survival in patients treated with the combination of etoposide and cisplatin. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that a high pretreatment ALI was significantly associated with better OS in patients with LS-SCLC undergoing definite CRT. This suggests that ALI could be a useful tool for predicting prognosis and guiding chemotherapy regimen selections in clinical practice for LS-SCLC.

Association of the Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index (ALI) and Gustave Roussy Immune (GRIm) score with immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in patients with gastrointestinal and lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive analysis, evaluating the prognostic significance of the baseline Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index (ALI) and Gustave Roussy Immune (GRIm) Score in patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed across various databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar, until October 21, 2023, to compile relevant articles for analysis. The investigation encompassed diverse clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

This analysis included a total of 15 articles, comprising 19 studies involving 3335 patients. Among the 19 studies, nine studies focused on NSCLC, and six studies were conducted on HCC. Pooled results revealed that patients with elevated ALI levels experienced prolonged OS (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.37-0.70, p < 0.001) and extended PFS (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.52-0.72, p < 0.001). Furthermore, a GRIm score > 1 was associated with reduced OS (HR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.47-2.92, p < 0.001) and diminished PFS (HR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.35-2.34, p < 0.001) in cancer patients receiving ICIs. Subgroup analysis indicated that ALI cutoff values of 18 exhibited enhanced predictive potential. Additionally, for HCC patients, those with HCC-GRIm score > 2 showed a substantially decreased risk of mortality compared to individuals with HCC-GRIm score ≤ 2 (HR: 2.63, 95% CI: 1.89-3.65, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The ALI and GRIm score served as dependable prognostic indicators for patients undergoing ICI therapy in the context of cancer treatment.

Prognostic value of the Scottish Inflammatory prognostic Score in patients with NSCLC expressing PD-L1 ≥ 50 % progressing on first-line pembrolizumab

BACKGROUND

Most patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy will experience progressive disease (PD). Only a minority will go on to receive subsequent systemic anticancer therapy for which outcomes are guarded. We investigated the prognostic significance of biomarkers of systemic inflammation following failure of first-line pembrolizumab for NSCLC to aid subsequent management decisions.

METHODS

Patients with radiological and/or clinical evidence of PD on first-line pembrolizumab for advanced NSCLC at a regional Scottish cancer centre were identified. Inflammatory biomarkers at the time of PD, including serum albumin, neutrophil count and the Scottish Inflammatory Prognostic Score (SIPS; combing albumin and neutrophils), and clinicopathological factors, including age, sex, histology, PDL1 expression and time to PD were recorded. The relationship between these and post-progression overall survival (ppOS) were examined.

RESULTS

Data were available for 211 patients. Median ppOS was 2.1 months. Only SIPS was predictive of ppOS on multivariate analysis (HR2.54 (95 %CI 1.81-3.56) (<0.001)), stratifying ppOS from 0.8 months (SIPS2), to 1.8 months (SIPS1), to 8.1 months (SIPS0) (p < 0.001). Thirty (14 %) patients received second-line systemic anticancer therapy with median ppOS 8.7 months. These patients had lower levels of systemic inflammation, as defined by albumin (p < 0.001), neutrophil count (p = 0.002), and SIPS (p = 0.004)), than all other patients.

CONCLUSIONS

SIPS, a simple biomarker of systemic inflammation, predicts ppOS after first-line pembrolizumab and may be useful alongside routine assessments of patient fitness to inform individualised discussions about subsequent treatment. We highlight poor outcomes in this patient group and a role for SIPS in signposting transition to best supportive care and early referral to palliative care. It may also help identify a small group of patients most likely to benefit from further lines of therapy.

Association between pretreatment C-reactive protein level and survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Current evidence suggests that C-reactive protein (CRP) levels may affect cancer prognosis. However, the effect of CRP has not been validated in immunotherapy recipients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to explore the prognostic value of CRP level in patients with NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases were systematically retrieved for eligible publications, and hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were extracted and merged to evaluate the correlation between pretreatment CRP levels and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to confirm these findings.

RESULTS

Thirty-five cohorts consisting of 4698 patients were included in the primary analysis. Pooled results demonstrated that a higher pretreatment CRP level is associated with worse OS and PFS (OS: HR = 1.13, 95 %CI:1.09-1.18; PFS: HR = 1.16, 95 %CI:1.10-1.22). These findings remained robust after further statistical analyses.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment CRP level could be a promising biomarker for NSCLC immunotherapy. However, prospective studies are required to validate these findings.

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio as potential predictive markers of treatment response in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The role of platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as independent prognostic markers in different tumors is well established. However, there is a limited review of the potential of NLR and PLR as predictors of treatment outcomes from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Objective

To establish a correlation between NLR and PLR and the potential of clinical benefit from ICIs.

Methods

The literature search was performed for studies that reported the association between NLR, PLR, and treatment outcomes among cancer patients treated with ICIs. The outcomes of interest were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progressive disease (PD). ORR was the summation of patients who achieved complete response and partial response. DCR included patients who achieved stable disease. PD was the proportion of patients who progressed, relapsed, or discontinued the treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using the STATA 12.0 package. Heterogeneity was determined by the I2 value. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Egger's test was used to establish publication bias and sensitivity analysis.

Results

A total of 40 papers that met the inclusion criteria were included in the systematic review. However, only 17 studies were used in the meta-analysis to determine the correlation between NLR, PLR, and treatment response. We found that treatment with ICIs and monitoring of outcomes and adverse events using PLR and NLR parameters have been studied in different tumors. Our analysis showed that low NLR correlated with higher ORR (OR = 0.62 (95% CI 0.47-0.81, p = 0.001) and higher DCR (OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.14-0.36, p < 0.001). Higher NLR predicted a higher probability of PD (OR = 3.12, 95% CI 1.44, 6.77, p = 0.004). Similarly, low PLR correlated with higher ORR (OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.5, 0.95, p = 0.025). Generally, patients with low NLR and PLR were more likely to achieve clinical benefit and better response (p-value < 0.001). Meanwhile, patients with high ratios were more likely to progress (p-value < 0.005), although there was significant heterogeneity among studies. There was no significant publication bias observed.

Conclusion

The study showed that high NLR and PLR either at baseline or during treatment is associated with poorer treatment outcome. Therefore, these ratios can be utilized in clinical practice with other markers to determine treatment efficacy from immunotherapy.

Exploring the implications of modified advanced lung cancer inflammation index on outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Aim

Sarcopenia and skeletal muscle density (SMD) have been shown to be both predictive and prognostic marker in oncology. Advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) has been shown to predict overall survival (OS) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Computed tomography (CT) enables skeletal muscle to be quantified, whereas body mass index (BMI) cannot accurately reflect body composition. The purpose was to evaluate the prognostic value of modified ALI (mALI) using CT-determined third lumbar vertebra (L3) muscle index beyond original ALI and see the interaction between sarcopenia, SMD, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), ALI and mALI at baseline and post 4 cycles of chemotherapy and their effects on OS and progress free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced non-SCLC (NSCLC).

Methods

This retrospective study consisted of a total of 285 advanced NSCLC patients. The morphometric parameters such as SMD, skeletal muscle index (SMI) and fat-free mass (FFM) were measured by CT at the L3 vertebra. ALI was defined as BMI × serum albumin/NLR and mALI was defined as SMI × serum albumin/NLR.

Results

Sarcopenia was observed in over 70% of patients across all BMI categories. Patients having sarcopenia suffered from a higher incidence of chemotherapeutic drug toxicities but this was not found to be statistically significant. Concordance was seen between ALI and mALI in the pre-treatment setting and this was statistically significant. A significant proportion of patients with poor ALI (90.9%), poor pre-chemotherapy mALI (91.3%) and poor post-chemotherapy mALI (89%) had poor NLR and each of them was statistically significant.

Conclusions

In both univariate and multivariate analyses, this study demonstrated the statistical significance of sarcopenia, SMD, and mALI as predictive factors for OS. Additionally, sarcopenia and SMD were also found to be statistically significant factors in predicting PFS. These biomarkers could potentially help triage patients for active nutritional intervention for better outcomes.

The prognostic biological markers of immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: current landscape and future perspective

The emergence of immunotherapy, particularly programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) produced profound transformations for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, not all NSCLC patients can benefit from immunotherapy in clinical practice. In addition to limited response rates, exorbitant treatment costs, and the substantial threats involved with immune-related adverse events, the intricate interplay between long-term survival outcomes and early disease progression, including early immune hyperprogression, remains unclear. Consequently, there is an urgent imperative to identify robust predictive and prognostic biological markers, which not only possess the potential to accurately forecast the therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy in NSCLC but also facilitate the identification of patient subgroups amenable to personalized treatment approaches. Furthermore, this advancement in patient stratification based on certain biological markers can also provide invaluable support for the management of immunotherapy in NSCLC patients. Hence, in this review, we comprehensively examine the current landscape of individual biological markers, including PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, hematological biological markers, and gene mutations, while also exploring the potential of combined biological markers encompassing radiological and radiomic markers, as well as prediction models that have the potential to better predict responders to immunotherapy in NSCLC with an emphasis on some directions that warrant further investigation which can also deepen the understanding of clinicians and provide a reference for clinical practice.

Soluble biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer treated by immune checkpoints inhibitors

Lung cancer remains the first cause of cancer-related death despite many therapeutic innovations, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). ICI are now well used in daily practice at late metastatic stages and locally advanced stages after a chemo-radiation. ICI are also emerging in the peri-operative context. However, all patients do not benefit from ICI and even suffer from additional immune side effects. A current challenge remains to identify patients eligible for ICI and benefiting from these drugs. Currently, the prediction of ICI response is only supported by Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor expression with perfectible results and limitations inherent to tumor-biopsy specimen analysis. Here, we reviewed alternative markers based on liquid biopsy and focused on the most promising biomarkers to modify clinical practice, including non-tumoral blood cell count such as absolute neutrophil counts, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio. We also discussed soluble-derived immune checkpoint-related products such as sPD-L1, circulating tumor cells (detection, count, and marker expression), and circulating tumor DNA-related products. Finally, we explored perspectives for liquid biopsies in the immune landscape and discussed how they could be implemented into lung cancer management with a potential biological-driven decision.

Impact of Lymphopenia Recovery After Chemoradiotherapy on Durvalumab Consolidation Therapy in Stage III NSCLC

Introduction

Durvalumab maintenance therapy after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment modality for stage III NSCLC. Although severe treatment-related lymphopenia (TRL) during CRT may impair the efficacy of subsequent durvalumab therapy, data on the effect of TRL recovery on consolidation durvalumab therapy are lacking.

Methods

This retrospective study evaluated patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with durvalumab after concurrent CRT. The patients were enrolled across nine institutes throughout Japan between August 2018 and March 2020. The effect of TRL recovery on survival was evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups on the basis of their lymphocyte recovery status: the recovery group involved patients who did not experience severe TRL or experienced TRL but exhibited lymphocyte count recovery at durvalumab initiation, and the nonrecovery group involved patients who experienced severe TRL and did not exhibit lymphocyte count recovery on durvalumab initiation.

Results

Among the 151 patients evaluated, 41 (27%) and 110 (73%) patients were classified into the recovery and the nonrecovery groups, respectively. The nonrecovery group had significantly worse progression-free survival than the recovery group (21.9 mo versus not reached, p = 0.018). Recovery from TRL (p = 0.027) and high pre-CRT lymphocyte count (p = 0.028) independently influenced progression-free survival.

Conclusions

Baseline lymphocyte count and recovery from TRL at the start of durvalumab therapy were predictive factors for survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC treated with durvalumab consolidation after concurrent CRT.

Advanced lung cancer inflammation index predicts survival outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving immunotherapy

Objective

We evaluate the predictive significance of the Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index (ALI) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following therapy with immune checkpoint drugs.

Methods

In 2018-2020, 98 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors at our hospital were compiled. Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the appropriate cut-off point for ALI was determined. Kaplan-Meier analysis, the Cox proportional hazards model, and Nomogram plots highlighted the relationship between ALI and overall survival (OS). The model was validated using calibration plots, receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), and decision curve analysis (DCA), which was performed on 52 patient sets by external validation.

Results

The AUC for ALI was 0.663. The best cutoff value was 36.5, with a median overall survival (OS) of 473 days for patients with ALI≤ 36.5 and 611 days for those with ALI > 36.5. Univariate analysis revealed that the presence or absence of local treatment, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and ALI were prognostic factors; LASSO regression analysis identified four candidate variables. Multifactorial COX analysis revealed that high ALI was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in both groups (HR = 0.411; 95% CI: 0.244-0.651; P<0.001). In addition, the Nomogram model that included ALI was able to predict the success of immunotherapy in patients with advanced liver cancer more accurately.

Conclusion

ALI is a novel prognostic marker in immunotherapy-treated patients with advanced hepatocellular cancer.

Effect of Cancer-Related Cachexia and Associated Changes in Nutritional Status, Inflammatory Status, and Muscle Mass on Immunotherapy Efficacy and Survival in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based immunotherapy has significantly improved the survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, a significant percentage of patients do not benefit from this approach, and predictive biomarkers are needed. Increasing evidence demonstrates that cachexia, a complex syndrome driven by cancer-related chronic inflammation often encountered in patients with NSCLC, may impair the immune response and ICI efficacy. Herein, we carried out a prospective study aimed at evaluating the prognostic and predictive role of cachexia with the related changes in nutritional, metabolic, and inflammatory parameters (assessed by the multidimensional miniCASCO tool) on the survival and clinical response (i.e., disease control rate) to ICI-based immunotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. We included 74 consecutive patients. Upon multivariate regression analysis, we found a negative association between IL-6 levels (odds ratio (OR) = 0.9036; 95%CI = 0.8408-0.9711; p = 0.0025) and the miniCASCO score (OR = 0.9768; 95%CI = 0.9102-0.9999; p = 0.0310) with the clinical response. As for survival outcomes, multivariate COX regression analysis found that IL-6 levels and miniCASCO-based cachexia severity significantly affected PFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.0388; 95%CI = 1.0230-1.0548; p < 0.001 and HR = 1.2587; 95%CI = 1.0850-1.4602; p = 0.0024, respectively) and OS (HR = 1.0404; 95%CI = 1.0221-1.0589; p < 0.0001 and HR = 2.3834; 95%CI = 1.1504-4.9378; p = 0.0194, respectively). A comparison of the survival curves by Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly lower OS in patients with cachexia versus those without cachexia (p = 0.0323), as well as higher miniCASCO-based cachexia severity (p = 0.0428), an mGPS of 2 versus those with a lower mGPS (p = 0.0074), and higher IL-6 levels (>6 ng/mL) versus those with lower IL-6 levels (≤6 ng/mL) (p = 0.0120). In conclusion, our study supports the evidence that cachexia, with its related changes in inflammatory, body composition, and nutritional parameters, is a key prognostic and predictive factor for ICIs. Further larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and to explore the potential benefit of counteracting cachexia to improve immunotherapy efficacy.

Emerging Biomarkers in Immune Oncology to Guide Lung Cancer Management

Over the last decade, the use of targeted therapies and immune therapies led to drastic changes in the management lung cancer and translated to improved survival outcomes. This growing arsenal of therapies available for the management of non-small cell lung cancer added more complexity to treatment decisions. The genomic profiling of tumors and the molecular characterization of the tumor microenvironment gradually became essential steps in exploring and identifying markers that can enhance patient selection to facilitate treatment personalization and narrow down therapy options. The advent of innovative diagnostic platforms, such as next-generation sequencing and plasma genotyping (also known as liquid biopsies), has aided in this quest. Currently, programmed cell death ligand 1 expression remains the most recognized and fully validated predictive biomarker of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Other markers such as tumor mutational burden, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, driver mutations, and other molecular elements of the tumor microenvironment bear the potential to be predictive tools; however, the majority are still investigational. In this review, we describe the advances noted thus far on currently validated as well as novel emerging biomarkers that have the potential to guide the use of immunotherapy agents in the management of non-small cell lung cancer.

Elevated pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio indicate low survival rate in apatinib-treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A STROBE-compliant article

This study aimed to analyze the predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) to better clarify which patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) would benefit most from apatinib after multiline treatment for drug resistance. This observational cohort study involved patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with apatinib between May 2016 to May 2018. The participants in this study had previously been treated with at least two treatment regimens. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional risk models were used to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the pretreatment NLR. A total of 125 patients were reviewed. The median age was 64 years (range, 33-92); and 32.8% of the patients were female. Only 0.8% of the patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) score ≥ 2. In multivariate analysis, pretreatment NLR ≥ 5 had an independent correlation with inferior OS (median 2.07 vs 3.40 months; HR 1.493, 95% CI 1.022-2.182; P = .038) and inferior PFS (median 1.83 vs 2.76 months; HR 1.478, 95% CI 1.015-2.153; P = .042). Elevated pretreatment NLR is associated with shorter OS and PFS in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with apatinib after multiline treatment for drug resistance.

The advanced lung cancer inflammation index predicts chemotherapy response and infection risk in multiple myeloma patients receiving induction chemotherapy

Objective: This study aims to determine the clinical significance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in predicting prognosis, chemotherapy response, and infection risk in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients receiving induction therapy. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the clinical characteristics and laboratory data of 111 newly diagnosed MM patients from the Haematology Department of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2014 to March 2020 was performed. We first determined the relationship between ALI and overall survival (OS), as well as clinical and laboratory parameters. Second, predictive factors for chemotherapy response were analysed by univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Third, univariate regression analysis of risk factors was performed using infection as the evaluable outcome. Results: Of the 111 evaluable patients, the low ALI group (<32.7) exhibited significantly poorer survival than the high ALI group (51 months versus 77 months). Multivariable analysis showed that advanced age, chemotherapy response and serum calcium level were independent prognostic factors for OS. Better chemotherapy efficacy in the high ALI group (89.3%) than in the low ALI group (42.2%) (p < 0.001) was noted. Multivariate analysis suggested that only ALI [HR: 0.110, 95% CI (0.035-0.350), p = 0.000] is an independent predictive factor in evaluating the efficiency of induction chemotherapy. Forty patients (36.04%) presented with infection after induction chemotherapy. Univariate analysis suggested that low ALI and abnormal renal function increase risk of infection in newly diagnosed MM patients. Conclusion: Our study confirmed that ALI is not only a prognostic biomarker for newly diagnosed patients, but also predicts chemotherapy efficacy in newly diagnosed MM patients receiving induction therapy.

The value of the Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index (ALI) in assessing the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with camrelizumab: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index (ALI) is considered a useful prognostic biomarker for clinical outcome in patients with malignancy. However, the prognostic value of ALI in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unclear. In this study we assessed the prognostic value of the ALI in patients with HCC treated with camrelizumab.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with the ICI, camrelizumab alone or in combination at Henan Cancer Hospital from January 2017 to January 2020. Sixty-five patients were finally screened for at least 2 years of follow-up according to the inclusion criteria, with no significant differences in patient baseline data. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cut-off point for the ALI which was compared to other clinical indicators for predicting survival. A Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional analysis were conducted to examine the association between the ALI and patient prognosis.

Results

The median overall survival (OS) for the overall group of patients was 383 days, the area under the curve for ALI was 0.815 and the optimal cut-off value for predicting OS was 34.65. The median OS for patients with an ALI score ≤34.65 was 336 days and that for patients with an ALI score >34.65 was 524 days. The univariate analysis showed that the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level, and the ALI score predicted OS. The multivariate analysis showed that the ALI score was an independent prognostic factor of OS in patients with advanced HCC who had been treated with immunotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) =0.285, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.097-0.833, P=0.022]. A nomogram that included ALI performed well relative to the prediction of prognosis after immunotherapy for patients with advanced liver cancer.

Conclusions

The ALI may be a new prognostic marker in patients with advanced HCC undergoing immunotherapy.

Peripheral Blood Markers Predictive of Progression-Free Survival in Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated With PD-1 Inhibitors Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy

Aim: To determine the prognostic value of peripheral blood markers in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients receiving programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 54 patients with advanced ESCC was performed to assess 12 blood markers involving inflammation, nutrition, and tumor burden. Analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to explore the difference in markers among different response to therapy. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox models were applied to identify independent predictors of outcome. Results: Patients who achieved response had significantly higher prealbumin, increased BMI, and lower hs-CRP levels at baseline compared with those who experienced disease progression. In the univariate analysis, ALI > 23.55, PNI > 45.175, NLR ≤ 5, and hs-CRP ≤ 6.7 mg/L were significantly associated with a better progression-free survival. Cox regression analysis revealed that ALI >23.55 (P = 0.037) and hs-CRP ≤6.7 mg/L (P = 0.043) were independently associated with superior PFS. Increased tumor abnormal protein (TAP) levels post two cycles was significantly associated with a worse prognosis (P = 0.004). Conclusions: A baseline signature of low ALI and high hs-CRP as well as an early increase in TAP in ESCC appear to be predictive of inferior PFS.

Validation of Patras Immunotherapy Score model for prediction and prognosis of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab: results from a European multicentre study

Background:

Recently, the Patras Immunotherapy Score (PIOS) has been developed to estimate the survival benefit of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab. The aim of this study was to validate the clinical value of PIOS in an external cohort of aNSCLC patients.

Methods:

PIOS is a baseline formula produced by the combination of performance status, body mass index, age and line of treatment. In this multicentre study, 626 patients with confirmed NSCLC pathology, who had been treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab, as well as 444 patients with aNSCLC, who had been managed with chemotherapy alone, were retrospectively enrolled. Predictive and prognostic values of PIOS were finally evaluated.

Results:

Patients treated with immunotherapy and higher PIOS score had an improved progression-free survival not only in univariate [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.621, p = 0.001], but also in multivariable analysis (HR = 0.651, p = 0.003). In addition, improved overall survival with increasing PIOS score was also observed (HR = 0.608, p < 0.001) with this association remaining statistically significant after adjusting for programmed-cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (HR = 0.620, p < 0.001). In addition, patients with disease progression (PD) had lower scores compared to those with stable disease (SD), partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) in a two-tier model (p < 0.001) as well as in a four-tier model (PD, SD, PR and CR; p < 0.001). Prognostic significance of PIOS score also persisted using a binary logistic regression analysis, adjusted for disease stage and PD-L1 status (p = 0.002, odds ratio: 0.578). Contrarily, PIOS had no prognostic significance in the chemotherapy group; however, upon combined analysis of the two cohorts, PIOS was found to have a significant interaction with the type of treatment (HR = 0.066 with p < 0.001), confirming its predictive value for immunotherapy.

Conclusions:

This study provides further validation of PIOS in aNSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy.

Clinical implication of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index in patients with right-sided colon cancer after complete mesocolic excision: a propensity score-matched analysis

Background

This study aimed to assess the clinical implications of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in patients with right-sided colon cancer (RCC) after complete mesocolic excision (CME).

Methods

A total of 441 patients with RCC who underwent CME were included. The optimal cut-off value for the ALI was determined using the X-tile software. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for postoperative complications and long-term outcomes. Predictive nomograms for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were constructed after propensity score matching (PSM), and their performance was assessed using the net reclassification improvement index (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement index (IDI), and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (time-ROC) curve analysis.

Results

The optimal preoperative ALI cut-off value was 36.3. After PSM, ASA classification 3/4, operative duration, and a low ALI were independently associated with postoperative complications in the multivariate analysis (all P<0.05). Cox regression analysis revealed that an age >60 years, a carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level >37 U/mL, pathological N+ stage, and a low ALI were independently correlated with OS (all P<0.05). A CA19-9 level >37 U/mL, pathological N+ stage, lymphovascular invasion, and a low ALI were independent predictors of DFS (all P<0.05). Predictive nomograms for OS and DFS were constructed using PSM. Furthermore, a nomogram combined with the ALI was consistently superior to a non-ALI nomogram or the pathological tumor-node-metastasis classification based on the NRI, IDI, and time-ROC curve analysis after PSM (all P<0.05).

Conclusion

The ALI was an effective indicator for predicting short- and long-term outcomes in patients with RCC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02712-0.

No association between BMI and immunotoxicity or clinical outcomes for immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background: The impact of BMI on immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicity and efficacy has not been clearly characterized. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective single-center study of patients with advanced unresectable/metastatic cancer initiated on immune checkpoint inhibitors. Results: Of the 409 patients included in the study, 115 (28%) had a BMI ≥30. There was no difference in the development of immune-related adverse events, treatment response or overall survival with respect to BMI <30 versus ≥30 for the whole study population or the melanoma subgroup. Conclusion: Patients with BMI in the obese range (≥30) were not at increased risk of immunotoxicity. Furthermore, BMI was not correlated with treatment response or overall survival in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Highly elevated systemic inflammation is a strong independent predictor of early mortality in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Ample evidence support inflammation as a marker of outcome in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here we explore the outcome for a subgroup of patients with advanced disease and substantially elevated systemic inflammatory activity.

METHODS

The source cohort included consecutive patients diagnosed with NSCLC between January 2016 - May 2017 (n = 155). Patients with active infection were excluded. Blood parameters were examined individually, and cut-offs (ESR > 60 mm, CRP > 20 mg/L, WBC > 10 × 10⁹, PLT > 400 × 10⁹) were set to define the group of hyperinflamed patients. A score was developed by assigning one point for each parameter above cut-off (0-4 points).

RESULTS

High systemic inflammation was associated with advanced stage and was seldom present in limited NSCLC. However, the one year survival of patients in stage IIIB-IV (n = 93) with an inflammation score of ≥2 was 0% compared to 33% and 50% among patients with a score of 1 and 0 respectively. The effect of a high inflammation score on overall survival remained significant in multi-variate analysis adjusted for confounding factors. The independent hazard ratio of an inflammation score ≥ 2 in multi-variate analysis (HR 3.43, CI 1.76-6.71) was comparable to a change in ECOG PS from 0 to 2 (HR 2.42, CI 1.13-5.18).

CONCLUSION

Our results show that high level systemic inflammation is a strong independent predictor of poor survival in advanced stage NSCLC. This observation may indicate a need to use hyperinflammation as an additional clinical parameter for stratification of patients in clinical studies and warrants further research on underlying mechanisms linked to tumor progression.

Prognostic value of pretreatment advanced lung cancer inflammation index in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Purpose To identify the prognostic value of pretreatment advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) including surgical patients who were diagnosed with early stage. Methods The PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science electronic databases were searched up to January 12, 2022 for relevant studies. The hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined to assess the association between pretreatment ALI and overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) of NSCLC patients. All statistical analyses were conducted by STATA 12.0 software. Results A total of 14 studies involving 3607 participates were included. The pooled results indicated that lower pretreatment ALI was significantly related with poorer OS (HR =2.20, 95% CI: 1.46-3.33, P<0.001) and PFS (HR =1.78, 95% CI: 1.49-2.13, P<0.001). Besides, subgroup analysis also demonstrated that lower pretreatment ALI was associated with worse OS in surgical (P<0.001) and non-metastatic (P<0.001) patients and worse PFS of surgical (P<0.001) NSCLC patients. Conclusion Pretreatment ALI was a novel and reliable prognostic indicator in NSCLC and lower pretreatment ALI predicted worse survival including patients diagnosed with early stage. However, more prospective high-quality studies are still needed to verify above findings.

The relationship between NLR/PLR/LMR levels and survival prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The relationship between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) and the dire prognosis of non-small cell lung carcinoma patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are not known yet.

METHODS

We screened the articles that meet the criteria from the database. The relationship between NLR/PLR/LMR levels and the survival and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with ICIs was analyzed. Summarize hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) to study progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies involving 3124 patients were enrolled in the final analysis. In short, high pre-treatment NLR was related to poor OS (HR = 2.13, 95% CI:1.74-2.61, P < .001, I2 = 83.3%, P < .001) and PFS (HR = 1.77, 95% CI:1.44-2.17, P < .001, I2 = 79.5%, P < .001). Simultaneously, high pre-treatment PLR was related to poor OS (HR = 1.49, 95% CI:1.17-1.91, P < .001, I2 = 57.6%, P = .003) and PFS (HR = 1.62, 95% CI:1.38-1.89, P < .001, I2 = 47.1%, P = .036). In all subgroup analysis, most subgroups showed that low LMR was related to poor OS (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.34-0.59, P < .001) and PFS (HR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.47-0.77, P < 0.001, I2 = 0.0%, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

High pre-treatment NLR and pre-treatment PLR in non-small cell lung carcinoma patients treated with ICIs are associated with low survival rates. Low pre-treatment and post-treatment LMR are also related to unsatisfactory survival outcomes. However, the significance of post-treatment NLR and post-treatment PLR deserve further prospective research to prove.

Body composition and inflammation impact in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated by first-line immunotherapy

Background: Immunotherapy changed the landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Efforts were made to implement its action. This study aims to describe body composition, nutritional and inflammatory status in NSCLC patients treated by first-line immunotherapy, their correlation, variation and impact. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 44 consecutive patients who received pembrolizumab treatment. Results: During the therapy, inflammation and visceral fat increased, whereas muscle and subcutaneous fat decreased. Parameters related to inflammation had an interesting prognostic impact. High numbers of white blood cells remained significantly correlated with a high risk of death in multivariate model. Conclusion: For the best treatment choice, a combination of clinical and biological factors will be most likely be necessary. Prospective and larger studies with a multidimensional approach are needed.

Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index Predicts Survival Outcomes of Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer Following Curative Surgery

Aim

The aim of our study was to investigate the prognostic value of preoperative advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) and to establish prognostic nomograms for the prediction of survival outcomes in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

Materials and Methods

A total of 372 patients who received primary curative surgery for OSCC during 2008–2017 at a tertiary referral center were enrolled. We used the receiver operating characteristic curve to determine the optimal cutoff point of ALI. Through a Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan–Meier analysis, we elucidated the ALI–overall survival (OS) and ALI–disease-free survival (DFS) associations. Prognostic nomograms based on ALI and the results of multivariate analysis were created to predict the OS and DFS. We used the concordance indices (C-indices) and calibration plots to assess the discriminatory and predictive ability.

Results

The results revealed that the ALI cutoff was 33.6, and 105 and 267 patients had ALI values of <33.6 and ≥33.6, respectively. ALI < 33.6 significantly indicated lower OS (44.0% vs. 80.1%, p < 0.001) and DFS (33.6% vs. 62.8%; p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, ALI < 33.6 was independently associated with poor OS and DFS (both p < 0.001). The C-indices of established nomograms were 0.773 and 0.674 for OS and DFS, respectively; moreover, the calibration plots revealed good consistency between nomogram-predicted and actual observed OS and DFS.

Conclusion

ALI is a promising prognostic biomarker in patients undergoing primary surgery for OSCC; moreover, ALI-based nomograms may be a useful prognostic tool for individualized OS and DFS estimations.

Prognostic implication of erector spinae muscles in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with immuno-oncology combinatorial chemotherapy

Background

The quantity of skeletal muscles has recently been reported to have prognostic value in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with second‐line immunotherapy. However, the prognostic role of skeletal muscle assessment in NSCLC patients undergoing first‐line immuno‐oncology (IO) combinatorial treatment (IO‐chemotherapy) has not been elucidated.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 36 patients with NSCLC undergoing first‐line IO‐chemotherapy between April 2018 and June 2021 in our hospital. The cross‐sectional area of the erector spinae muscle (ESM_CSA) was evaluated by manual tracing on computed tomography scans at the level of the 12th thoracic vertebra before initiating IO‐chemotherapy. To minimize deviation due to physique, the ESM_CSA was adjusted by body surface area (BSA) (ESM_CSA to BSA ratio: ESM_CSA/BSA). A survival time analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log‐rank test. A multivariate analysis with Cox proportional hazards model was conducted to investigate the prognostic value of the ESM_CSA/BSA and inflammatory and nutritional indices.

Results

The median progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.5 and 16.6 months, respectively. Intergroup comparison by the log‐rank test revealed that there was no significant difference in the median PFS, but the median OS was significantly long in the high ESM_CSA/BSA (>19 cm^2/m²) (high ESM_CSA/BSA group, p = 0.0373). The multivariate analysis showed that ESM_CSA/BSA was an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio 0.79, p = 0.044).

Conclusions

The results of this study indicate that the pretreatment ESM_CSA/BSA may be a potential prognostic factor in NSCLC patients receiving first‐line IO‐chemotherapy.

Current state of knowledge on immunotherapy in ECOG PS 2 patients. A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 2 (ECOG PS 2) are not included in most randomized clinical trials and registry studies. Nevertheless, immune checkpoint inhibitors are registered in the USA and Europe regardless of the performance status. Evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of such treatment in this cohort is sparse.

METHODS

Using PubMed (to July 2020), the relevant literature on the effect of ECOG PS 2 on the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ECOG PS 2 was searched.

RESULTS

A database search conducted using an international repository (PubMed) identified 191 records. Additional 3 records were identified through other sources. After pre-selection, 92 records were excluded, and 102 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. With further exclusion of articles not meeting the inclusion criteria, 44 studies were entered into the qualitative synthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunotherapy seems to be justified in PS 2 patients with NSCLC. This method of treatment has been proven to be safe and tolerable. However, outcomes in this population remain suboptimal and the impact of immunotherapy in this cohort is less dramatic. Multiple scales evaluating many factors beyond PS scores have been suggested to help stratify the PS 2 to reinforce the chance of achieving better treatment outcomes. Randomized trials are needed to determine the benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for patients with poor ECOG PS.

The predictive value of body mass index on prognosis and adverse events of cancers treated with immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

High body mass index (BMI) greater than 25 kg/m² has a complex relationship with cancers. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to explore controversy over whether BMI is correlated with outcomes including survival and immunotherapy-related adverse events (irAEs) in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library for relevant studies published up to June 2020. Title/abstract screening, full-text review, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed independently. Subgroup analysis was based on sex, treatment lines, the status of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and tumor types. Sensitivity analysis was performed by synthesizing studies that adjusted for certain covariates or studies with good quality. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated by the I² value. Meta-analysis was performed with hazard ratio (HR) / odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as the effect measures.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included for survival and irAEs analyses. Patients with high BMI who underwent immunotherapy had longer overall survival (OS) (pooled hazard ratio, pHR = 0.71 [95% CI: 0.59-0.85]) and progression-free survival (PFS) (pHR = 0.76 [95% CI: 0.65-0.88]) than those with low BMI; at the same time, high-BMI patients had increased irAEs (OR = 2.54 [95% CI: 1.12-5.79]).

CONCLUSION

In general, high BMI was correlated with improved OS and PFS in patients treated with immunotherapy along with a high risk of irAEs. However, discrepant findings from subgroup analyses urgently call for further analysis.

Biomarkers or factors for predicting the efficacy and adverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer: achievements and prospective

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used in lung cancer therapy due to their effectiveness and minimal side effects. However, only a few lung cancer patients benefit from ICI therapy, driving the need to develop alternative biomarkers. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) molecules expressed in tumor cells and immune cells play a key role in the immune checkpoint pathway. Therefore, PD-L1 expression is a prognostic biomarker in evaluating the effectiveness of programmed death-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 inhibitors. Nevertheless, adverse predictive outcomes suggest that other factors are implicated in the response. In this review, we present a detailed introduction of existing biomarkers concerning tumor abnormality and host immunity. PD-L1 expression, tumor mutation burden, neoantigens, specific gene mutations, circulating tumor DNA, human leukocyte antigen class I, tumor microenvironment, peripheral inflammatory cells, and microbiome are discussed in detail. To sum up, this review provides information on the current application and future prospects of ICI biomarkers.

A composite biomarker of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and hemoglobin level correlates with clinical response to PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancers

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been incorporated into various clinical oncology guidelines for systemic treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancers (aNSCLC). However, less than 50% (and 20%) of the patients responded to the therapy as a first (or second) line of therapy. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is an extensively studied biomarker of response to ICI, but results from this test have equivocal predictive power. In order to identify other biomarkers that support clinical decision-making around whether to treat with ICIs or not, we performed a retrospective study of patients with aNSCLC who underwent ICI-based therapy in the Mount Sinai Health System between 2014 and 2019.

METHODS

We analyzed data from standard laboratory tests performed in patients as a part of the routine clinical workup during treatment, including complete blood counts (CBC) and a comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP), to correlate test results with clinical response and survival.

RESULTS

Of 11,138 NSCLC patients identified, 249 had been treated with ICIs. We found associations between high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR ≥ 5) and poor survival in ICI-treated NSCLC. We further observed that sustained high NLR after initiation of treatment had a more profound impact on survival than baseline NLR, regardless of PD-L1 status. Hazard ratios when comparing patients with NLR ≥ 5 vs. NLR < 5 are 1.7 (p = 0.02), 3.4 (p = 4.2 × 10^- 8), and 3.9 (p = 1.4 × 10^- 6) at baseline, 2-8 weeks, and 8-14 weeks after treatment start, respectively. Mild anemia, defined as hemoglobin (HGB) less than 12 g/dL was correlated with survival independently of NLR. Finally, we developed a composite NLR and HGB biomarker. Patients with pretreatment NLR ≥ 5 and HGB < 12 g/dL had a median overall survival (OS) of 8.0 months (95% CI 4.5-11.5) compared to the rest of the cohort with a median OS not reached (95% CI 15.9-NE, p = 1.8 × 10^- 5), and a hazard ratio of 2.6 (95% CI 1.7-4.1, p = 3.5 × 10^- 5).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a novel composite biomarker for ICI-based therapy in NSCLC based on routine CBC tests, which may provide meaningful clinical utility to guide treatment decision. The results suggest that treatment of anemia to elevate HGB before initiation of ICI therapy may improve patient outcomes or the use of alternative non-chemotherapy containing regimens.

Impact of body composition, nutritional and inflammatory status on outcome of non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immunotherapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Body composition and balance of nutritional and inflammatory status are important for the immune system. Alterations of these aspects may impact on response, outcome and toxicities of immunotherapy. In this review we try to clarify some definitions and tools used for the assessment of the different aspects of nutritional disorders, body composition and inflammatory status with a focus on lung cancer.

METHODS

We primary investigate the definitions of malnutrition, cachexia, sarcopenia and overweight. Secondary, tools used to measure body composition, nutritional and inflammatory status, mainly in lung cancer are reviewed.

RESULTS

All these features, in the time of precision medicine may improve assessment and selection of patients, incorporating also early palliative care in standard therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

A multimodal approach based on nutrition assessment and physical exercise should be evaluated to improve aspects of the immune response against cancer and to propose the best treatment to every patient.

The Predictive Significance of the Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index (ALI) in Patients with Melanoma Treated with Immunotherapy as Second-Line Therapy

PURPOSE

The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) is a useful tool to predict the clinical outcome in several malignancies. The ALI not only contains indices related to inflammation but also the body mass index (BMI), which was reported to correlate with the sarcopenic status. However, to date, its predictive significance in metastatic melanoma patients treated with second-line immunotherapy has not been evaluated.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who were diagnosed with metastatic melanoma and treated with immunotherapy as second-line therapy between 2016 and 2019. Weight, height, neutrophil, lymphocyte and serum albumin were collected at baseline prior to receiving immunotherapy. The BMI was calculated by dividing the weight by height squared. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was calculated by dividing the absolute neutrophil count by the absolute lymphocyte count. The ALI was defined as follows: ALI=BMI×serum albumin/NLR. The receiver operator curve (ROC) was used to determine the best cutoff value for ALI in predicting disease control (consisting of complete response, partial response and stable disease). The aim of this study was to investigate whether the ALI is a predictive indicator for progression-free survival in melanoma patients.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were included in this retrospective cohort study. By ROC, ALI>50.98 before immunotherapy was predictive of disease control. Baseline continuous variables, such as BMI, NLR, C-reactive protein and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio, had significantly worse scores in patients of the low-ALI group (n=24) than high-ALI group (n=19). The median progression-free survival was significantly worse in the patients with ALI<50.98 than the patients with ALI>50.98 (2.60 months vs 11.17 months, P = 0.023, hazard ratio: 2.241, 95% confidence interval: 1.167-5.097).

CONCLUSION

The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) >50.98 before immunotherapy is a strong predictor for disease control. The ALI also provides great predictive value for metastatic melanoma patients treated with immunotherapy as second-line therapy.

Association between skeletal muscle loss and the response to nivolumab immunotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Skeletal muscle loss is a hallmark of malignancies, including advanced gastric cancer (GC). Although programmed death (PD)-1 inhibitors, including nivolumab, have promising anti-cancer effects, there is limited information regarding markers that can predict these therapeutic effects, which include PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and the tumor mutation burden. Therefore, we evaluated whether the baseline psoas muscle mass index (PMI, a surrogate for skeletal muscle mass) could predict the response of GC to nivolumab treatment, based on progression-free survival (PFS), the objective response rate, and the disease control rate.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 31 Japanese patients who received nivolumab for advanced GC and underwent imaging analysis between November 2017 and November 2019. The computed tomography results were used to estimate the psoas major muscle mass. Sex-specific cut-off values were used for the PMI, with low PMI values defined as < 3.6 cm²/m² for male patients and < 2.9 cm²/m² for female patients.

RESULTS

The median PFS interval was 2.3 months for the patients with stage IV GC. Nine patients (29%) had a low baseline PMI, and these patients had significantly shorter median PFS than the group with a non-low baseline PMI (0.5 months vs. 2.4 months, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

As a surrogate marker for skeletal muscle loss, the PMI may be useful for predicting the response to nivolumab among patients with advanced GC.

Predictors of survival among Japanese patients receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background

First‐line chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) has improved overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) outcomes among patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The immunological and nutritional statuses of patients fluctuate during treatment using immune checkpoint inhibitors, and are closely related to treatment outcomes. However, it is unclear whether these markers are significant in patients who are receiving CIT.

Methods

This retrospective single‐center study evaluated 34 consecutive Japanese patients with NSCLC who were treated using first‐line CIT. Previously reported markers that reflect immunological and nutritional statuses were evaluated at three time points: at the start of CIT, after three weeks, and at the end of induction therapy.

Results

The median PFS was 7.2 months (95% confidence interval: 6.3 months–not reached) and the median OS was not reached (95% confidence interval: 9.6 months–not reached). The PFS duration was significantly associated with the baseline neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio and the three‐week values for the modified Glasgow prognostic score, C‐reactive protein‐albumin ratio, prognostic nutrition index, and advanced lung cancer inflammation index. The OS duration was significantly associated with the pre‐treatment values for the neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio and advanced lung cancer inflammation index, as well as the prognostic nutrition index at the end of induction therapy.

Conclusions

Immunological and nutritional markers could be useful for predicting the outcomes of CIT for Japanese patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer. The timing of their evaluation may also be important.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

Overall survival in patients receiving first‐line chemoimmunotherapy for advanced lung cancer were associated with pretreatment values of neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio, advanced lung cancer inflammation index, and the prognostic nutrition index at the end of induction therapy.

What this study adds

Repetitive evaluation of immunological and nutritional markers may be useful for guiding prognostication and treatment selection for Japanese patients with advanced lung cancer.

Emerging Blood-Based Biomarkers for Predicting Response to Checkpoint Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have brought impressive clinical benefits in a variety of malignancies over the past years, which dramatically revolutionized the cancer treatment paradigm. Monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy of ICIs targeting programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) has emerged as an alternative treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, constrained by primary or acquired resistance, most patients obtain limited benefits from ICIs and occasionally suffer from severe immune-related adverse events. Moreover, owing to the complexity of the tumor microenvironment and the technical limitations, clinical application of PD-L1 and tumor mutation burden as biomarkers shows many deficiencies. Thus, additional predictive biomarkers are required to further advance the precision of proper patient selection, avoiding the exposure of potential non-responders to unnecessary immunotoxicity. Nowadays, an increasing number of investigations are focusing on peripheral blood as a noninvasive alternative to tissue biopsy in predicting and monitoring treatment outcomes. Herein, we summarize the emerging blood-based biomarkers that could predict the clinical response to checkpoint immunotherapy, specifically in patients with NSCLC.

Real-world effectiveness of nivolumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The effectiveness of immunotherapies for non-small-cell lung cancer under real-world clinical settings remains uncertain. Materials & methods: Systematic searches of PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were conducted. Random-effects models were used to estimate pooled median overall survival and progression-free survival estimates. Results: 36 studies of nivolumab were included for narrative synthesis and 11 of these studies were included for meta-analysis. Age, sex, histology and prior lines of treatment did not affect survival outcomes, while Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status and brain metastasis were inversely associated with survival. In the meta-analysis, nivolumab was associated with 9.6 months (95% CI: 8.4–10.9) of overall survival and 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.6–3.6) of progression-free survival. Conclusion: Very-low-certainty evidence suggested the real-world effectiveness of nivolumab was consistent with those observed in the clinical trials.

Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index Predicts Outcomes of Patients With Colorectal Cancer After Surgical Resection

BACKGROUND

The advanced lung cancer inflammation index is considered a useful prognostic biomarker of clinical outcomes in patients with malignancies. However, the prognostic value of the advanced lung cancer index in patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of the advanced lung cancer index in patients with colorectal cancer.

DESIGN

Prospectively obtained data of patients with colorectal cancer were retrospectively evaluated to clarify the clinical relevance of the advanced lung cancer index.

SETTINGS

We conducted this study at a single expert center.

PATIENTS

We enrolled 298 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection in this retrospective study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the clinical relevance of the advanced lung cancer index in patients with rectal cancer.

RESULTS

Low status of advanced lung cancer index was significantly correlated with undifferentiated histology (p = 0.004), T stage progression (p < 0.001), R1/R2 resection for primary surgery (p = 0.004), and distant metastasis (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that low advanced lung cancer index status was an independent prognostic factor for both overall survival (HR = 3.21 (95% CI, 1.97-5.19); p < 0.001) and disease-free survival (HR = 2.13 (95% CI, 1.23-3.63); p = 0.008) in patients with colorectal cancer. Furthermore, the clinical burden of the advanced lung cancer index was consistent between sexes, and its prognostic value was verified in patients with clinically relevant stage III colorectal cancer.

LIMITATIONS

The present study had several limitations, including retrospective observation and a small sample size of Japanese patients from a single institution.

CONCLUSIONS

The advanced lung cancer index could be a useful prognostic indicator of clinical outcomes in patients who underwent surgical resection for colorectal cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B267. EL ÍNDICE AVANZADO DE INFLAMACIÓN DEL CÁNCER DE PULMÓN, PREDICE LOS RESULTADOS DE LOS PACIENTES CON CÁNCER COLORRECTAL DESPUÉS DE LA RESECCIÓN QUIRÚRGICA: El índice avanzado de inflamación del cáncer de pulmón, es considerado como un útil biomarcador pronóstico, en los resultados clínicos de pacientes con neoplasias malignas. Sin embargo, aún no está claro el valor pronóstico del índice avanzado de cáncer de pulmón, en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal sometidos a resección quirúrgica.Evaluar el valor pronóstico del índice avanzado del cáncer de pulmón, en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal.Los datos obtenidos prospectivamente de pacientes con cáncer colorrectal, fueron evaluados retrospectivamente, para aclarar la relevancia clínica del índice avanzado del cáncer de pulmónEstudio realizado en un solo centro experto.Estudio retrospectivo, incluyendo 298 pacientes con cáncer colorrectal, sometidos a resección quirúrgica.El resultado primario fue la relevancia clínica del índice avanzado de cáncer de pulmón, en pacientes con cáncer rectal.Un índice avanzado de cáncer de pulmón bajo, se correlacionó significativamente con la histología indiferenciada (p = 0.004), la progresión de la etapa T (p <0.001), la resección R1 / R2 para cirugía primaria (p = 0.004) y la metástasis a distancia (p <0.001). El análisis multivariante mostró que el índice avanzado de cáncer de pulmón bajo, era un factor pronóstico independiente, tanto para la supervivencia general (HR = 3.21 IC 95% 1.97-5.19 p <0.001) como para la supervivencia libre de enfermedad (HR = 2.13, IC 95% 1.23-3.63, p = 0,008), en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal. Además, la carga clínica del índice avanzado de cáncer de pulmón, fue consistente entre los sexos y su valor pronóstico se verificó clínicamente relevante, en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal en estadio III.El presente estudio tuvo varias limitaciones, incluyendo la observación retrospectiva y la pequeña muestra de pacientes japoneses, en una sola institución.El índice avanzado de cáncer de pulmón, podría ser un indicador pronóstico útil, en los resultados clínicos de pacientes sometidos a resección quirúrgica por cáncer colorrectal. Consulte Video Resumen http://links.lww.com/DCR/B267.

Neutrophil diversity and plasticity in tumour progression and therapy

Neutrophils play a key role in defence against infection and in the activation and regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. In cancer, tumour-associated neutrophils (TANs) have emerged as an important component of the tumour microenvironment. Here, they can exert dual functions. TANs can be part of tumour-promoting inflammation by driving angiogenesis, extracellular matrix remodelling, metastasis and immunosuppression. Conversely, neutrophils can also mediate antitumour responses by direct killing of tumour cells and by participating in cellular networks that mediate antitumour resistance. Neutrophil diversity and plasticity underlie the dual potential of TANs in the tumour microenvironment. Myeloid checkpoints as well as the tumour and tissue contexture shape neutrophil function in response to conventional therapies and immunotherapy. We surmise that neutrophils can provide tools to tailor current immunotherapy strategies and pave the way to myeloid cell-centred therapeutic strategies, which would be complementary to current approaches.

The prediction potential of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for the therapeutic outcomes of programmed death receptor-1/programmed death ligand 1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have been demonstrated to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with chemotherapy. However, there were still some non-responders. Thus, how to effectively screen the responder may be an important issue. Recent studies revealed the immune-related indicator, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), may predict the therapeutic effects of anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies; however, the results were controversial. This study was to re-evaluate the prognostic potential of NLR for NSCLC patients receiving PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors by performing a meta-analysis.

METHODS

Eligible studies were identified by searching online databases of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. The predictive values of NLR for overall survival, (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) were estimated by hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies involving 2196 patients were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated that elevated NLR before PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment was a predictor of poor OS (HR = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.64 - 2.87, P < .001), PFS (HR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.34 - 1.78, P < .001) and low ORR (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.44 - 0.95, P = .027) in NSCLC patients. Subgroup analysis revealed the predictive ability of NLR for OS and PFS was not changed by ethnicity, sample size, cut-off, HR source, study design or inhibitor type (except the combined anti-PD-L1 group); while its association with ORR was only significant when the cut-off value was less than 5 and the studies were prospectively designed.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest patients with lower NLR may benefit from the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to prolong their survival period.

NLCIPS: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Immunotherapy Prognosis Score

Introduction

Currently in China, many immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Some patients can not benefit from ICIs, and approximately 50% of patients have immunotherapy-related toxicity. Therefore, it is necessary to monitor carefully the selection of immunotherapy population using biomarkers to maximize the benefit of patients with NSCLC.

Methods

A prospective analysis was performed on patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with ICIS at our hospital from March 2018 to June 2019, up to the follow-up deadline of December 31, 2019. The primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary end points were objective response rate and disease control rate. A lasso regression was used for the univariate analysis, and Cox regression analysis was used for the multivariate analysis. An efficacy prediction line chart was developed.

Results

A total of 63 patients were included in the study. The median PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.0–11.0) and did not reach the median OS. According to the lasso regression, significant univariate factors were smoking index, PD-ligand 1 expression, and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR). According to the multivariate analysis, the Cox proportional hazards model showed that smoking index and NLR are independent predictors of PFS in immunotherapy. A model comprised of independent predictors was developed based on a multivariate logical analysis of the main cohort—non-small cell lung cancer immunotherapy prognosis score. This model is shown as a nomogram with a C-index of 0.801 (95% CI, 0.744, 0.858), which has high prediction accuracy.

Conclusion

This predictive model, including NLR and smoking index, can achieve a 1-year PFS in immunotherapy of patients. PD-1 inhibitors have been demonstrated to be effective and safe in the clinical treatment of patients with NSCLC.

Pretreatment body mass index and clinical outcomes in cancer patients following immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between pretreatment body mass index (BMI) and clinical outcomes in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS

Systematical searches of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were carried out. Studies reporting on the association between BMI and outcomes of ICIs were included. The intended outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Quantitative analyses and dose-response meta-analyses were performed under random effect models.

RESULTS

Twenty-two eligible studies involving 5686 cancer patients treated with ICIs were identified. Compared to those with lower BMI, patients with higher BMI obtained a significant benefit on OS (HR = 0.698, 95% CI 0.614-0.794, P < 0.001; I² = 45.9%) and PFS (HR = 0.760, 95% CI 0.672-0.861, P < 0.001; I² = 37.9%). Most stratified analyses for OS and PFS also showed similar pooled risk estimates. For an increment of every 5 kg/m² in BMI, the risk for death reduced by approximately 15.6% (HR = 0.844, 95% CI 0.752-0.945, P = 0.003). Moreover, patients with higher BMI had a remarkably better ORR (OR = 0.468, 95% CI 0.263-0.833, P = 0.010; I² = 73.6%) than that of those with lower BMI. However, no statistically significant differences were found in the incidence of any grade irAEs (P = 0.073) and ≥ 3 grade irAEs (P = 0.105) between higher and lower BMI.

CONCLUSION

Higher BMI is significantly associated with improved outcomes in patients treated with ICIs. Further large-scale prospective research is warranted to better illuminate the association between BMI and outcomes from ICIs.

External validation of the prognostic relevance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in pancreatic cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) was first introduced for prognosis prediction in lung cancer patients and since then evaluated in several other malignancies. However, in pancreatic cancer (PC) the ALI and its prognostic utility were only investigated in a comparably small and specific cohort of locally advanced PC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

In our single-center cohort study, we included 429 patients with histologically verified PC who were treated between 2003 and 2015 at our academic institution. The ALI was defined as body mass index (BMI; kg/m2 ) × serum albumin levels (g/dL)/neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and we defined the optimal cutoff for biomarker dichotomization by ROC-analysis. Kaplan-Meier method as well as uni- and multivariate Cox regression Hazard proportional models were implemented to assess the prognostic potential of ALI in PC patients. We considered cancer-specific survival (CSS) as the primary endpoint of the study.

RESULTS

The ALI showed a significant negative correlation with CA19-9 levels and C-reactive protein levels whereas we found an association with localized tumor stage and better performance status (P < .05 for all mentioned variables). As opposed to patients with a high ALI, decreased ALI was significantly associated with shorter CSS (HR = 0.606, 95% CI: 0.471-0.779, P = .001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated tumor grade, tumor stage, chemotherapy, C-reactive protein levels, and CA19-9 levels to independently predict for CSS (all P < .05). In contrast the ALI failed to independently predict for CSS in the performed multivariate models (HR = 0.878, 95% CI: 0.643-1.198, P = .411).

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of PC patients, the ALI did not complement existing clinicopathological factors for outcome determination.

Prognostic significance of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in patients undergoing treatment with nivolumab for recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer

Aim

We investigated the prognostic potential of pretherapy measurement of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients (n = 56) with non-small-cell lung cancer deemed suitable for treatment with nivolumab.

Materials & methods

This was a multicenter, noninterventional, retrospective data analysis, involving five oncology centers.

Results

Patients with prenivolumab NLR values of <5 and ≥5 had respective median overall survival (OS) values of 14.5 and 7.02 months (p = 0.0026). Patients with ≤2 and >2 metastatic sites had median OS values of 11.4 and 6.1 months, respectively (p = 0.0174). A Cox multiple regression model revealed baseline NLR ≥5 as the only variable significantly associated with decreased OS (p < 0.0447).

Conclusion

Pretreatment elevated NLR values are associated with poor outcomes in patients with recurrent metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab.

Pretreatment High MCV as Adverse Prognostic Marker in Nonanemic Patients with Head and Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Mean corpuscular volume (MCV) has been shown in to be a reliable prognostic marker in other cancers; however, no evidence exists on its use in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). This study aimed to investigate the association between MCV, hemoglobin, platelet count and albumin concentration, and survival in stage III/IVA-B HNSCC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective study, we analyzed MCV, platelet count, hemoglobin concentration, and albumin concentration in peripheral blood samples from 260 patients with HNSCC undergoing organ preservation treatment with curative intent at the time of diagnosis. We then analyzed survival outcomes after accounting for confounders using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

After adjustment for potential confounders, patients with low hemoglobin had a 3.3-fold higher risk of death (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.26-4.81) than those with normal hemoglobin. Patients with an elevated MCV had a 1.54-fold higher risk of death (95% CI: 1.06-2.24), independent of site, stage, and human papillomavirus status. Interestingly, the effect of MCV on overall and progression-free survival was limited to those with a normal pretreatment hemoglobin. We identified no associations between pretreatment platelet count or albumin concentration and survival.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that pretreatment anemia and macrocytosis are independent predictors of lower overall and progression-free survival in HNSCC patients undergoing organ preservation treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III Laryngoscope, 131:E836-E843, 2021.

Pretreatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) May Predict the Outcomes of Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs)

Background: Recent studies have demonstrated the predictive value of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in advanced cancers; however, the role of NLR in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remained to be explored. Thus, we aimed to investigate whether pretreatment NLR was associated with the outcomes of advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICIs.

Methods: A comprehensive literature research was first conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Central Library, and Embase for studies that evaluated the association between pretreatment NLR and survival of advanced NSCLC patients with ICIs treatment. We then conducted a retrospective study in Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital (Beijing, China) to validate these findings.

Results: A total of 17 eligible studies with 2,106 patients were included in our meta-analysis, of which, 12 studies reported progression-free survival (PFS), and 13 studies reported overall survival (OS). The pooled results showed that high pretreatment NLR was significantly associated with poorer PFS (HR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.26–1.65; P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 2.86, 95% CI 2.11–3.87; P < 0.001) compared with those with low pretreatment NLR. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the association between baseline NLR and PFS remained significant except that the cut-off value of NLR was 3 (HR = 1.48, 95% CI 0.93–2.37; P = 0.098) and region of Asia (HR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.00–2.39; P = 0.051). These results were further validated in our retrospective study that patients with pretreatment NLR ≥ 6.0 had shorter PFS (median: 5.0 vs. 9.1 months, HR = 1.39; 95% CI 1.01–1.91; P = 0.02) and OS (median: 10.0 vs. 17.3 months, HR = 1.71; 95% CI 1.18–2.46; P < 0.001) compared with those with NLR < 6.0. The associations between NLR and survival were consistent in subgroup analysis stratified by age, gender, ECOG PS, histology, stage, smoking history, treatment, and prior lines of therapy. Dynamics of NLR (dNLR) that increased ≥3.0 from baseline was also significantly associated with worse PFS (median: 3.1 vs. 9.1 months; P = 0.01) and OS (median: 6.8 vs. 17.0 months; P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that pretreatment NLR and dNLR from baseline are associated with the outcomes of advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICIs; however, it warrants further prospective studies.