Risk factors for pneumonitis in patients treated with anti-programmed death-1 therapy: A case-control study

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting immune-related pneumonitis after sintilimab treatment

BACKGROUND

Immune-related pneumonitis is a rare and potentially fatal adverse event associated with sintilimab. We aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting the risk of immune-related pneumonitis in patients treated with sintilimab.

METHODS

The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to determine risk factors. Multivariable logistic regression was used to establish a prediction model. Its clinical validity was evaluated using calibration, discrimination, decision, and clinical impact curves. Internal validation was performed against the validation set and complete dataset.

RESULTS

The study included 632 patients; 59 were diagnosed with immune-related pneumonitis. LASSO regression analysis identified that the risk factors for immune-related pneumonitis were pulmonary metastases (odds ratio [OR], 4.015; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.725-9.340) and metastases at >3 sites (OR, 2.687; 95% CI: 1.151-6.269). The use of combined antibiotics (OR, 0.247; 95% CI: 0.083-0.738) and proton pump inhibitors (OR, 0.420; 95% CI: 0.211-0.837) were protective factors. The decision and clinical impact curves showed that the nomogram had clinical value for patients treated with sintilimab.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed and validated a practical nomogram model of sintilimab-associated immune-related pneumonitis, which provides clinical value for determining the risk of immune-related pneumonitis and facilitating the safe administration of sintilimab therapy.

Pulmonary toxicity of immune checkpoint immunotherapy

Cancer remains a leading cause of mortality on a global scale. Lung cancer, specifically non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is a prominent contributor to this burden. The management of NSCLC has advanced substantially in recent years, with immunotherapeutic agents, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), leading to improved patient outcomes. Although generally well tolerated, the administration of ICIs can result in unique side effects known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The occurrence of irAEs involving the lungs, specifically checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP), can have a profound effect on both future therapy options and overall survival. Despite CIP being one of the more common serious irAEs, limited treatment options are currently available, in part due to a lack of understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved in its development. In this Review, we aim to provide an overview of the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of CIP, followed by an examination of the emerging literature on the pathobiology of this condition.

Pre-existing Interstitial Lung Abnormalities and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Pneumonitis in Solid Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated efficacy over previous cytotoxic chemotherapies in clinical trials among various tumors. Despite their favorable outcomes, they are associated with a unique set of toxicities termed as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Among the toxicities, ICI-related pneumonitis has poor outcomes with little understanding of its risk factors. This retrospective study aimed to investigate whether pre-existing interstitial lung abnormality (ILA) is a potential risk factor for ICI-related pneumonitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer, malignant melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and gastric cancer, who was administered either nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab between September 2014 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Information on baseline characteristics, computed tomography findings before administration of ICIs, clinical outcomes, and irAEs were collected from their medical records. Pre-existing ILA was categorized based on previous studies.

RESULTS

Two-hundred-nine patients with a median age of 68 years were included and 23 (11.0%) developed ICI-related pneumonitis. While smoking history and ICI agents were associated with ICI-related pneumonitis (P = .005 and .044, respectively), the categories of ILA were not associated with ICI-related pneumonitis (P = .428). None of the features of lung abnormalities were also associated with ICI-related pneumonitis. Multivariate logistic analysis indicated that smoking history was the only significant predictor of ICI-related pneumonitis (P = .028).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study did not demonstrate statistically significant association between pre-existing ILA and ICI-related pneumonitis, nor an association between radiologic features of ILA and ICI-related pneumonitis. Smoking history was independently associated with ICI-related pneumonitis. Further research is warranted for further understanding of the risk factors of ICI-related pneumonitis.

Antiplatelet drugs may increase the risk for checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis in advanced cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are indicated for various cancers and are the mainstay of cancer immunotherapy. They are often associated with ICI-related pneumonitis (CIP), however, hindering a favorable clinical course. Recently, non-oncology concomitant drugs have been reported to affect the efficacy and toxicity of ICIs; however, the association between these drugs and the risk for CIP is uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of baseline concomitant drugs on CIP incidence in ICI-treated advanced cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study that included a cohort of 511 patients with advanced cancer (melanoma and non-small-cell lung, head and neck, genitourinary, and other types of cancer) treated with ICIs. Univariable analysis was conducted to identify baseline co-medications associated with CIP incidence. A propensity score matching analysis was used to adjust for potential CIP risk factors, and multivariable analysis was carried out to assess the impact of the identified co-medications on CIP risk.

RESULTS

Forty-seven (9.2%) patients developed CIP. In these patients, the organizing pneumonia pattern was the dominant radiological phenotype, and 42.6% had grade ≥3 CIP, including one patient with grade 5. Of the investigated baseline co-medications, the proportion of antiplatelet drugs (n = 50, 9.8%) was higher in patients with CIP (23.4% versus 8.4%). After propensity score matching, the CIP incidence was higher in patients with baseline antiplatelet drugs (22% versus 6%). Finally, baseline antiplatelet drug use was demonstrated to increase the risk for CIP incidence regardless of cancer type (hazard ratio, 3.46; 95% confidence interval 1.21-9.86).

CONCLUSIONS

An association between concomitant antiplatelet drug use at baseline and an increased risk for CIP was seen in our database. This implies the importance of assessing concomitant medications for CIP risk management.

Key Determinants of Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions to Oncology Drugs

To overcome the epidemiological severity of cancer, developing effective treatments is urgently required. In response, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been revealed as a promising resolution for treatment-resistant cancers across the world. Yet, they have both advantages and disadvantages, bringing therapeutic benefits while simultaneously inducing toxicity, and in particular, immune-mediated adverse drug reactions (imADRs), to the human body. These imADRs can be pathogenic and sometimes lethal, hampering health prediction and monitoring following the provision of ICI treatment. Therefore, it is necessary to collectively identify the determinant factors that contribute to these imADRs induced by ICIs. This article evaluated treatment-, tumor-, and patient-related determinants, and indicated a research gap for future investigations on the pathogenic mechanism of imADRs and translational conversion of determinants into clinical biomarkers to aid pharmacovigilance and cancer therapies.

Anti‑PD‑1/PD‑L1 and anti‑CTLA‑4 associated checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in non‑small cell lung cancer: Occurrence, pathogenesis and risk factors (Review)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a significant anti‑tumor role in the management of non‑small cell lung cancer. The most broadly used ICIs are anti‑programmed death 1 (PD‑1), anti‑programmed cell death‑ligand 1, and anti‑cytotoxic T lymphocyte‑associated antigen‑4 monoclonal antibody. Compared with traditional chemotherapy, ICIs have the advantages of greater efficiency and more specific targeting. However, the resulting immune‑related adverse events limit the clinical application of ICIs, especially checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP). CIP chiefly occurs within 6 months of administration of ICIs. Excessive activation and amplification of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, helper T cells, downregulation of regulatory T cells, and over‑secretion of pro‑inflammatory cytokines are the dominant mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of CIP. The dysregulation of innate immune cells, such as an increase in inflammatory monocytes, dendritic cells, neutrophils and M1 polarization of macrophages, an increase in IL‑10 and IL‑35, and a decrease in eosinophils, may underlie CIP. Although contested, several factors may accelerate CIP, such as a history of previous respiratory disease, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, administration of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, PD‑1 blockers, first‑line application of ICIs, and combined immunotherapy. Interestingly, first‑line ICIs plus chemotherapy may reduce CIP. Steroid hormones remain the primary treatment strategy against grade ≥2 CIP, although cytokine blockers are promising therapeutic agents. Herein, the current research on CIP occurrence, clinical and radiological characteristics, pathogenesis, risk factors, and management is summarized to further expand our understanding, clarify the prognosis, and guide treatment.

Common methodological pitfalls in ICI pneumonitis risk prediction studies

Background

Pneumonitis is one of the most common adverse events induced by the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), accounting for a 20% of all ICI-associated deaths. Despite numerous efforts to identify risk factors and develop predictive models, there is no clinically deployed risk prediction model for patient risk stratification or for guiding subsequent monitoring. We believe this is due to systemic suboptimal approaches in study designs and methodologies in the literature. The nature and prevalence of different methodological approaches has not been thoroughly examined in prior systematic reviews.

Methods

The PubMed, medRxiv and bioRxiv databases were used to identify studies that aimed at risk factor discovery and/or risk prediction model development for ICI-induced pneumonitis (ICI pneumonitis). Studies were then analysed to identify common methodological pitfalls and their contribution to the risk of bias, assessed using the QUIPS and PROBAST tools.

Results

There were 51 manuscripts eligible for the review, with Japan-based studies over-represented, being nearly half (24/51) of all papers considered. Only 2/51 studies had a low risk of bias overall. Common bias-inducing practices included unclear diagnostic method or potential misdiagnosis, lack of multiple testing correction, the use of univariate analysis for selecting features for multivariable analysis, discretization of continuous variables, and inappropriate handling of missing values. Results from the risk model development studies were also likely to have been overoptimistic due to lack of holdout sets.

Conclusions

Studies with low risk of bias in their methodology are lacking in the existing literature. High-quality risk factor identification and risk model development studies are urgently required by the community to give the best chance of them progressing into a clinically deployable risk prediction model. Recommendations and alternative approaches for reducing the risk of bias were also discussed to guide future studies.

Immunotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: A system review

With the addition of immunotherapy, lung cancer, one of the most common cancers with high mortality rates, has broadened the treatment landscape. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated significant efficacy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are now used as the first-line therapy for metastatic disease, consolidation therapy after radiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced disease, and adjuvant therapy after surgical resection and chemotherapy for resectable disease. The use of adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with early-stage NSCLC, however, is still debatable. We will address several aspects, namely the initial efficacy of monotherapy, the efficacy of combination chemotherapy, immunotherapy-related biomarkers, adverse effects, ongoing randomized controlled trials, and current issues and future directions for immunotherapy in early-stage NSCLC will be discussed here.

A case report and literature review of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated pneumonia caused by penpulimab

Objective

From the perspective of intensive care physicians, this paper reviews the diagnosis and treatment of CIP patients, analyzes and refines relevant literature on CIP. To summarize the characteristics of diagnosis and treatment of severe CIP provides the basis and reference for early identification, diagnosis and treatment.

Methods

A case of severe CIP caused by piamprilizumab and ICI was reviewed and the literature was reviewed.

Results

This was a patient with lung squamous cell carcinoma with lymphoma who had been treated with multiple chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapy with piamprizumab. The patient was admitted to the ICU with respiratory failure. The intensive care physician performs anti-infective, fluid management, hormonal anti-inflammatory, respiratory and nutritional support treatment, and relies on mNGS to exclude severe infection and CIP treatment, thus successfully saving the patient's life and improving discharge.

Conclusions

The incidence of CIP is very low, and its diagnosis should be combined with clinical manifestations and previous drug use. mNGS can provide certain value in the exclusion of severe infections, so as to provide basis and reference for the early identification, diagnosis and treatment of severe CIP.

Tackling the current dilemma of immunotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A promising strategy of combining with radiotherapy

Progress in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been modest over the past decades until the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors, which have redefined the standard first-line treatment for extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). However, despite the positive results of several clinical trials, the limited survival benefit achieved suggests that the priming and sustaining of immunotherapeutic efficacy are poor and further investigation is urgently needed. In this review, we aim to summarize the potential mechanisms underlying the limited efficacy of immunotherapy and intrinsic resistance in ES-SCLC, including impaired antigen presentation and limited T cell infiltration. Moreover, to tackle the current dilemma, given the synergistic effects of radiotherapy on immunotherapy, especially the unique advantages of low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT), such as less immunosuppression and lower radiation toxicity, we propose radiotherapy as a booster to enhance the immunotherapeutic efficacy by overcoming the poor priming effect. Recent clinical trials, including ours, have also focused on adding radiotherapy, including LDRT, to first-line treatment of ES-SCLC. Additionally, we also suggest combination strategies to sustain the immunostimulatory effect of radiotherapy, as well as the cancer-immunity cycle, and further improve survival outcomes.

Predictive factors and prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer patients

Objective

To investigate the influencing factors and prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients during or after receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs).

Methods

The clinical and laboratory indicator data of 222 advanced NSCLC patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between December 2017 and November 2021 were collected retrospectively. The patients were divided into a CIP group (n=41) and a non-CIP group (n=181) according to whether they developed CIP or not before the end of follow-up. Logistic regression was used to evaluate risk factors of CIP, and Kaplan‒Meier curves were used to describe the overall survival (OS) of different groups. The log-rank test was used to compare the survival of different groups.

Results

There were 41 patients who developed CIP, and the incidence rate of CIP was 18.5%. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that low pretreatment hemoglobin (HB) and albumin (ALB) levels were independent risk factors for CIP. Univariate analysis suggested that history of chest radiotherapy was related to the incidence of CIP. The median OS of the CIP group and non-CIP were 15.63 months and 30.50 months (HR:2.167; 95%CI: 1.355-3.463, P<0.05), respectively. Univariate and multivariate COX analyses suggested that a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) level, a low ALB level and the development of CIP were independent prognostic factors for worse OS of advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. Additionally, the early-onset and high-grade CIP were related to shorter OS in the subgroup.

Conclusion

Lower pretreatment HB and ALB levels were independent risk factors for CIP. A high NLR level, a low ALB level and the development of CIP were independent risk factors for the prognosis of advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICIs.

The radiological appearances of lung cancer treated with immunotherapy

Therapy and prognosis of several solid and hematologic malignancies, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), have been favourably impacted by the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Their mechanism of action relies on the principle that some cancers can evade immune surveillance by expressing surface inhibitor molecules, known as "immune checkpoints". ICIs aim to conceal tumoural checkpoints on the cell surface and reinvigorate the ability of the host immune system to recognize tumour cells, triggering an antitumoural immune response.In this review, we will focus on the imaging patterns of different responses occurring in patients treated by ICIs. We will also discuss imaging findings of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), along with current and future perspectives of metabolic imaging. Finally, we will explore the role of radiomics in the setting of ICI-treated patients.

Management, risk factors and prognostic impact of checkpoint-inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) in lung cancer – A multicenter observational analysis

INTRODUCTION

Checkpoint-inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) represents a major immune-related adverse event (irAE) in patients with lung cancer. We aimed for the clinical characterization, diagnostics, risk factors, treatment and outcome in a large cohort of patients from everyday clinical practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

For this retrospective analysis, 1,376 patients having received checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) in any line of therapy from June 2015 until February 2020 from three large-volume lung cancer centers in Berlin, Germany were included and analyzed.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 35 months, all-grade, high-grade (CTCAE ≥ 3) and fatal CIP were observed in 83 (6.0%), 37 (2.7%) and 12 (0.9%) patients, respectively, with a median onset 4 months after initiation of CPI therapy. The most common radiologic patterns were organizing pneumonia (OP) and non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (37% and 31%). All except 7 patients with G1-2 CIP interrupted treatment. Corticosteroids were administered to 74 patients with a median starting dose of 0.75 mg/kg. After complete restitution (n = 67), re-exposure to CPI (n = 14) led to additional irAE in 43% of the cases. Thoracic radiotherapy targeting the lung was the only independent risk factor for CIP (odds ratio 2.8, p < 0.001) and pretherapeutic diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide inversely correlated with CIP severity. Compared with patients without CIP and non-CIP irAE, CIP was associated with impaired overall survival (hazard ratios 1.23, p = 0.24 and 2.01, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

High-grade CIP accounts for almost half of all CIP cases in an allcomer lung cancer population. A continuous vigilance, rapid diagnostics and adequate treatment are key to prevent disease progression associated with impaired survival.

Risk of pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer patients with preexisting interstitial lung diseases treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a nationwide retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with preexisting interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) increases the risk of developing pneumonitis. However, the association between pneumonitis and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and related factors remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide inpatient database. We included patients (aged ≥ 20 years) newly diagnosed with ILD and NSCLC and who started chemotherapy (ICIs or conventional chemotherapy) between January 2016 and December 2019. The primary endpoint was the onset of pneumonitis. We estimated the cumulative incidence function of pneumonitis and compared it with patients taking ICIs and patients receiving conventional chemotherapy using Gray's test. We calculated the subdistribution hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the incidence of pneumonitis using Fine and Gray's model to adjust for sex, age, smoking status, histology of NSCLC, surgical history, and medical histories, considering death as the competing risk.

RESULTS

We identified 1177 patients (mean age 72 years, 13.8% female), of which 328 and 849 were in the ICI and conventional chemotherapy groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence function of pneumonitis between the two groups (p = 0.868). The adjusted subdistribution HR for the incidence of pneumonitis was 1.08 (95% CI: 0.74-1.57). Age (≥ 65 years) (HR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.11-3.10) and smoking history (HR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.02-4.11) were associated with developing pneumonitis.

CONCLUSION

The risk of developing pneumonitis with ICIs for NSCLC patients with preexisting ILD was similar to that with conventional chemotherapy.

Evaluating Pneumonitis Incidence in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Immunotherapy and/or Chemotherapy Using Real-world and Clinical Trial Data

Pneumonitis is a potentially life-threatening complication of anticancer therapy, and future treatment decisions may be informed by characterizing patients receiving therapies in the real-world setting. In this study, the incidence of treatment-associated pneumonitis (TAP) was compared among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or chemotherapies in either of two settings: randomized clinical trials (RCT) or real world data (RWD)-based clinical practice. Pneumonitis cases were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes (for RWD), or the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms (for RCTs). TAP was defined as pneumonitis diagnosed during treatment or within 30 days of the last treatment administration. Overall TAP rates in the RWD cohort were lower [ICI: 1.9%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-3.2; chemotherapy: 0.8%; 95% CI, 0.4-1.6] than overall rates in the RCT cohort (ICI: 5.6%; 95% CI, 5.0-6.2; chemotherapy: 1.2%; 95% CI, 0.9-1.5). Overall RWD TAP rates were similar to grade 3+ RCT TAP rates (ICI: 2.0%; 95% CI, 1.6-2.3; chemotherapy: 0.6%; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9). In both cohorts, higher TAP incidence was observed among patients with a past medical history of pneumonitis than those without, regardless of treatment group. On the basis of this sizable study leveraging RWD, TAP incidence was low in the RWD cohort, likely in part due to methodology used for RWD focusing on clinically significant cases. Past medical history of pneumonitis was associated with TAP in both cohorts.

Significance

Pneumonitis is a potentially life-threatening complication of anticancer treatment. As treatment options expand, management decisions become increasingly complex, and there is a greater need to understand the safety profiles of the treatment options in the real-world setting. Real-world data serve as an additional source of valuable information to complement clinical trial data and inform understanding of toxicity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving ICIs or chemotherapies.

Radiation Recall Pneumonitis Anticipates Bilateral Immune-Induced Pneumonitis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Radiation recall pneumonitis (RRP) is a rare inflammatory reaction that occurs in previously irradiated fields, and it may be caused by various triggering agents. Immunotherapy has been reported to potentially be one of these triggers. However, precise mechanisms and specific treatments have not been explored yet due to a lack of data in this setting. Here, we report a case of a patient who received radiation therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. He developed first radiation recall pneumonitis and subsequently immune-checkpoint inhibitor-induced pneumonitis (IIP). After presenting the case, we discuss the currently available literature on RRP and the challenges of differential diagnosis between RRP, IIP, and other forms of pneumonitis. We believe that this case is of particular clinical value since it highlights the importance of including RRP in a differential diagnosis of lung consolidation during immunotherapy. Furthermore, it suggests that RRP might anticipate more extensive ICI-induced pneumonitis.

Cardiovascular, Renal and Pulmonary Toxicity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer: What the GP Should Know

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is administered in different cancer types and can lead to a wide range of immune-related adverse events including toxicity in vital organs such as the lungs, the kidneys, and the heart. The main hypothesis suggests an overactivation of the immune cells in the different organs. Whereas immune-related cardiotoxicity is very rare but life threatening, ICI-induced acute kidney injury and pneumonitis are more frequent but in general less severe. Renal toxicity corresponds in more than 90% to an acute tubulo-interstitial nephritis. Checkpoint inhibitors pneumonitis is diagnosed mainly on respiratory symptoms with new radiological features, especially under the form of a cryptogenic organising pneumonia. Cardiotoxicity is predominantly marked by myocarditis but also pericarditis and arrhythmias, among others. Early recognition, temporary or definitive cessation of ICI therapy and rapid initiation of high-dose corticosteroids are the cornerstones of the management, which must to be multidisciplinary in a specialised center.

Clinical outcomes and risk factor of immune checkpoint inhibitors-related pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

OBJECTIVES

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the most common co-morbidity associated with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors related pneumonitis (CIP) is a common immune-related adverse event that can be life-threatening. The study aims to evaluate the association of COPD with the incidence and outcome of CIP in NSCLC patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 122 patients diagnosed with NSCLC and treated with ICIs in our department. Baseline pulmonary function was performed in the whole cohort. The incidence, risk factors, treatment and outcome of CIP patients were evaluated. Furthermore, the efficacy of ICIs in patients with COPD was analyzed.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (15.5%, 19/122) developed CIP during ICIs treatment, most patients with CIP were grade 1-2, and the incidence of CIP was comparable in patients with COPD and those without COPD (18.0% vs. 13.1%, P = 0.618). In addition, an increasing trend in the incidence of CIP among patients with pulmonary fibrosis on baseline chest CT scans (27.3% vs. 13.0%, P = 0.093). There is a longer progression-free survival in COPD patients than the non-COPD patients.

CONCLUSION

Coexisting COPD did not predict the higher risk of CIP in NSCLC treated with ICIs therapy. Nevertheless, pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis on CT scan may increase the risk of CIP, close monitoring is advised in these patients during ICIs.

Chinese expert consensus on the multidisciplinary management of pneumonitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have successfully treated a number of different types of cancer, which is of great significance for cancer treatment. With the widespread use of ICIs in clinical practice, the increasing checkpoint inhibitor pneumonia (CIP) will be a challenge to clinicians. To guide the diagnosis and treatment of CIP, we conducted in-depth discussions based on the latest evidence, forming a consensus among Chinese experts on the multidisciplinary management of CIP.

Pneumocystis pneumonia in patient with lung adenocarcinoma: early side effects from pembrolizumab

Immune check point inhibitor has made far-reaching changes in the management of lung adenocarcinoma improving drastically the prognosis. We present a case of a 50 years old women beneficiary of pembrolizumab who has suffered an acute pneumonitis diagnosed with CT imaging the days following the initiation of the drug. The occurrence of immune-related events such as pneumonitis complicates the use of immunotherapy and requires a well verse radiologist in the matter to diagnosis and helps prevent further aggravation.

Immune-related pneumonitis requiring low-dose prednisone maintenance in one patient with durable complete response

INTRODUCTION

Immune-related pneumonitis is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening adverse event associated with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 therapy, and has a higher recurrence rate than that of other pneumonitis. Glucocorticoids are the first treatment of choice for patients with immune-related pneumonitis over grade 1. Given the toxicity associated with glucocorticoids, they should be withdrawn gradually as soon as pneumonitis is controlled. However, low-dose glucocorticoids are maintained in some patients to prevent immune-related pneumonitis.

CASE REPORT

We report a rare case of a patient with Hodgkin lymphoma who developed grade 2 immune-related pneumonitis, requiring long-term low-dose glucocorticoid maintenance therapy, during which pneumonitis disappeared, and complete response was achieved.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

Tislelizumab treatment was stopped tentatively, and the patient was given prednisone at an initiating dose of 1 mg/kg/d. The cough symptoms were relieved significantly, and pneumonitis was reduced. The prednisone gradually dwindled, but the immune-related pneumonitis was recurrent, requiring prednisone 10 mg daily maintenance therapy. Subsequently, prednisone and tislelizumab were administered simultaneously, and at present, pneumonitis disappeared and the lesions are in complete remission.

DISCUSSION

Low-dose glucocorticoids might play an important role in controlling the recurrence and development of immune-related pneumonitis. The dose and course of glucocorticoid in immune-related pneumonitis patients should be individualized to minimize the toxicity of glucocorticoid.

Durvalumab after Sequential High Dose Chemoradiotherapy versus Standard of Care (SoC) for Stage III NSCLC: A Bi-Centric Trospective Comparison Focusing on Pulmonary Toxicity

Introduction: The standard of care (SoC) for unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is durvalumab maintenance therapy after concurrent chemoradiation in patients with PD-L1 > 1%. However, the concurrent approach is only amenable for about one-third of patients due to co-morbidities. Although sequential regimens are usually not regarded as curative, these schedules applied in a dose-escalated manner may be similarly radical as SoC. As combining high-dose radiation and durvalumab remains a question of debate this retrospective bi-center study aims to evaluate pulmonary toxicity after high-dose chemoradiotherapy beyond 70 Gy compared to SoC. Patients and Methods: Patients with NSCLC stage III received durvalumab after either sequential high-dose chemoradiation or concomitant SoC. Chemotherapy consisted of platinum combined with either pemetrexed, taxotere, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine. The primary endpoint was short-term pulmonary toxicity occurring within six months after the end of radiotherapy (RT). Results: A total of 78 patients were eligible for this analysis. 18F-FDG-PET-CT, cranial MRT, and histological/cytological verification were mandatory in the diagnostic work-up. The high-dose and SoC group included 42/78 (53.8%) and 36/78 (46.2%) patients, respectively, which were matched according to baseline clinical variables. While the interval between the end of RT and the start of durvalumab was equal in both groups (p = 0.841), more courses were administered in the high-dose cohort (p = 0.031). Pulmonary toxicity was similar in both groups (p = 0.599), whereas intrathoracic disease control was better in the high-dose group (local control p = 0.081, regional control p = 0.184). Conclusion: The data of this hypothesis-generating study suggest that sequential high-dose chemoradiation followed by durvalumab might be similar to SoC in terms of pulmonary toxicity and potentially more effective with respect to intra-thoracic disease control. Larger trials with a prospective design are warranted to validate these results.

Real-world incidence and impact of pneumonitis in patients with lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a multi-institutional cohort study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved survival and are increasingly used for non-small cell lung cancer. However, use may be limited by immune-related adverse events such as checkpoint-inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP). Literature estimates for CIP incidence are inconsistent. Real-world adherence to guidelines, clinical course, and healthcare utilization in the treatment of CIP has not been described in large cohorts.

METHODS

A combined claims and electronic health record database (TriNetX) was used to identify 13,113 patients with lung cancer treated with programmed cell death receptor/ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors, and a propensity score-matched control cohort treated with chemotherapy or targeted therapies. The attributable risk of CIP was calculated in the first 12 months after therapy by comparing the incidence of diagnosis codes for pneumonitis/pneumonia between cohorts. Cases of CIP, identified by the most specific code for drug-induced respiratory conditions, were further analyzed for medication usage, rates of diagnostic bronchoscopy, ICI discontinuation rates, and usage of hospital services compared with patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors who did not develop CIP.

RESULTS

The attributable risk of pneumonitis to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors was 2.49% (95% CI, 1.50% to 3.47%). Median time to onset in the CIP subcohort was 3.9 months (IQR, 2.1-7.3 months). Steroid and antibiotic use increased dramatically after a pneumonitis diagnosis, and 70.2% of patients permanently discontinued ICI therapy. Compared with controls, patients with CIP had more than a threefold increased risk of needing critical care (relative risk 3.59, 95% CI, 2.31 to 5.57) and an increased risk of mortality (HR 2.34, 95% CI, 1.47 to 3.71).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large claims-based analysis, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors increase the risk of pneumonitis in patients with lung cancer by 2.49%. Cases of CIP are associated with high healthcare utilization, discontinuation of ICIs, and mortality.

Complications following novel therapies for non-small cell lung cancer

The emergence of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors has paved a new era for the management of non-small cell lung cancer, which has for many years lacked major clinical breakthroughs. Historically, 5-year overall survival remained below 5% in individuals with metastatic disease. These novel treatments have led to significant prolongation of survival in the locally advanced and metastatic setting, exceeding 25% in selected populations. However, they present new challenges to clinicians due to their inherently different spectrum of toxicity unique to each specific drug's pharmacodynamic profile. Internists commonly come across these side effects in their daily clinical practice. Their optimal recognition and management are of utmost importance, because it is associated with significant improvements in patient survival outcomes and their quality of life. The aim of this review is to summarize the complications following these novel treatments for non-small cell lung cancer.

Risk Factors and Biomarkers for Immune-Related Adverse Events: A Practical Guide to Identifying High-Risk Patients and Rechallenging Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are a range of complications associated with the use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Two major classes of ICIs widely used are Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA4) and Programmed Cell death-1 (PD-1)/Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. High-grade irAEs are life-threatening and often cause a severe decline in performance status in such that patients do not qualify for any further anticancer treatments. It is difficult to generalize the evidence in the current literature on risk factors or biomarkers for the entire class of ICIs as the studies so far are either disease-specific (e.g., lung cancer or melanoma) or ICI agent-specific (e.g., pembrolizumab, ipilimumab) or irAE-specific (e.g., pneumonitis or gastritis). In this review, risk factors and biomarkers to consider before initiating or monitoring ICI are listed with a practical purpose in day-to-day practice. Risk factors are grouped into demographics and social history, medical history, and medication history, tumor-specific and agent-specific risk factors. A higher risk of irAE is associated with age <60 years, high body mass index, women on CTLA4 and men on PD-1/PD-L1 agents, and chronic smokers. Patients with significant kidney (Stage IV-V), cardiac (heart failure, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, hypertension), and lung (asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) are at a higher risk of respective organ-specific irAEs. Pre-existing autoimmune disease and chronic use of certain drugs (proton pump inhibitors, diuretics, anti-inflammatory drugs) also increase the irAE-risk. Biomarkers are categorized into circulating blood counts, cytokines, autoantibodies, HLA genotypes, microRNA, gene expression profiling, and serum proteins. The blood counts and certain protein markers (albumin and thyroid-stimulating hormone) are readily accessible in current practice. High neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, eosinophil/monocyte/lymphocyte counts; TSH and troponins at diagnosis and drop in the white count and lymphocyte count can predict irAE. Other biomarkers with limited evidence are cytokines, autoantibodies, HLA genotypes, microRNA, and gene expression profiling. With fast-expanding approvals for ICIs in various cancer types, knowledge on risk factors and biomarkers can help providers assess the irAE-risk of their patients. Prospective disease and agent-specific studies are needed to provide further insight on this essential aspect of ICI therapy.

Checkpoint Inhibitor Pneumonitis Induced by Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Occurrence and Mechanism

Immune checkpointty inhibitors (ICIs), particularly those targeting programmed death 1 (PD-1) and anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), enhance the antitumor effect by restoring the function of the inhibited effector T cells and produce durable responses in a large variety of metastatic and late patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Although often well tolerated, the activation of the immune system results in side effects known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can affect multiple organ systems, including the lungs. The occurrence of severe pulmonary irAEs, especially checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP), is rare but has extremely high mortality and often overlaps with the respiratory symptoms and imaging of primary tumors. The development of CIP may be accompanied by radiation pneumonia and infectious pneumonia, leading to the simultaneous occurrence of a mixture of several types of inflammation in the lungs. However, there is a lack of authoritative diagnosis, grading criteria and clarified mechanisms of CIP. In this article, we review the incidence and median time to onset of CIP in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in clinical studies. We also summarize the clinical features, potential mechanisms, management and predictive biomarkers of CIP caused by PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in non-small-cell lung cancer treatment.

Holistic Approach to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Adverse Events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) block inhibitory molecules, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), or its ligand, programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) and enhance antitumor T-cell activity. ICIs provide clinical benefits in a percentage of patients with advanced cancers, but they are usually associated with a remarkable spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (e.g., rash, colitis, hepatitis, pneumonitis, endocrine, cardiac and musculoskeletal dysfunctions). Particularly patients on combination therapy (e.g., anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1/PD-L1) experience some form of irAEs. Different mechanisms have been postulated to explain these adverse events. Host factors such as genotype, gut microbiome and pre-existing autoimmune disorders may affect the risk of adverse events. Fatal ICI-related irAEs are due to myocarditis, colitis or pneumonitis. irAEs usually occur within the first months after ICI initiation but can develop as early as after the first dose to years after ICI initiation. Most irAEs resolve pharmacologically, but some appear to be persistent. Glucocorticoids represent the mainstay of management of irAEs, but other immunosuppressive drugs can be used to mitigate refractory irAEs. In the absence of specific trials, several guidelines, based on data from retrospective studies and expert consensus, have been published to guide the management of ICI-related irAEs.

Rapid Improvement Following Receipt of Infliximab in Steroid-refractory Durvalumab-Associated Grade 3 Pneumonitis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are important novel agents used in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) standard regimens; however, their use increases the risk of immune-related adverse effects (IRAEs). The incidence of IRAE pneumonitis is well documented in ICI use. Corticosteroids continue to be the mainstay of treatment for IRAEs. Here we report one of the first cases of using infliximab to treat durvalumab-associated pneumonitis.

Biomarkers and risk factors for the early prediction of immune-related adverse events: a review

In recent years, immunotherapy has been widely used to treat patients with malignant tumors. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) significantly improve the prognosis of cancer patients, the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is increasing. Not only can irAEs accumulate in multiple organ systems throughout the body, but rare adverse reactions may also occur continuously. In severe cases, irAEs can be life-threatening or even lead to death. Therefore, the early identification, diagnosis and treatment of irAEs are very important. Early identification of patients with high-risk irAEs as well as the reduction or avoidance of severe irAEs have important clinical significance. This article will review the research progress of early predictive biomarkers and risk factors for the occurrence of irAEs and propose potential future directions for follow-up research and clinical applications.

Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis: Short review of literature and case report

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has fundamentally improved the treatment landscape of advanced lung cancer. Improved tolerability and encouraging duration of response in selected patients are some of the advantages of ICB over conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) possibly affecting multiple organs pose challenges in diagnosis and management. Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is a rare but clinically highly relevant irAE that can significantly impair quality of life and can be potentially life threatening. Since its heterogeneity in clinical and radiographic presentation, diagnosis can be challenging. Treatment usually consists of discontinuing or delaying the administration of ICB. If there is no sufficient recovery with this measure, steroid therapy is indicated. Although the majority of cases improves with this therapy, steroid-refractory CIP can be a therapeutic challenge as there is currently no evidence-based standard treatment. We herein present a short review of literature and a case report of relapsing CIP under steroid treatment.

Real World Outcomes versus Clinical Trial Results of Durvalumab Maintenance in Veterans with Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

The standard of care for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer is concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by maintenance durvalumab based on outcomes from the PACIFIC trial. The efficacy of this regimen in a real-world population has not been extensively studied. We found that the addition of durvalumab has significantly improved both progression-free and overall survival in veterans with stage III non-small cell lung cancer as compared to veterans who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone, but overall survival of veterans is reduced compared to patients in the PACIFIC trial. Additional studies will need to be performed to understand this efficacy-effectiveness gap.

Abstract

One year of durvalumab following concurrent chemoradiotherapy improves progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the real-world efficacy of durvalumab has not been determined. We conducted a multi-center observational cohort study across the Veterans Health Administration, including patients with stage III NSCLC who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab, compared to patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression approaches were used to identify factors associated with PFS and OS. We calculated a hazard ratio and efficacy-effectiveness factor to compare OS of veterans to the referenced clinical trial population. A total of 1006 patients with stage III NSCLC who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy and at least one dose of durvalumab from November 2017 to April 2021 were compared to 989 patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone from January 2015 to December 2016. Adjuvant durvalumab was associated with higher PFS (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.55–0.70, p < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.50–0.66, p < 0.001). OS was shorter in veterans compared to PACIFIC (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03–1.48, p = 0.02: EE gap 0.73). OS of veterans with stage III NSCLC treated with adjuvant durvalumab is improved compared to a modern comparator but is reduced compared to the PACIFIC population.

Pulmonary Toxicities of Immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a form of immunotherapy that are increasingly being used in a wide variety of cancers. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) pose a major challenge in the treatment of cancer patients. Pneumonitis, the most common lung irAE, can cause significant disruptions in the treatment of cancer and may be life-threatening. The goal of this chapter is to instruct readers on the incidence and clinical manifestations of pneumonitis and to offer guidance in the evaluation and treatment of patients with pneumonitis.

Pretreatment Lung Function and Checkpoint Inhibitor Pneumonitis in NSCLC

Introduction

Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is a serious toxicity of anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1 immunotherapy. Whether pretreatment differences in pulmonary function exist in patients who develop CIP is unknown. We analyzed the pulmonary function tests (PFTs) of patients with NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to evaluate whether pretreatment lung function was associated with CIP development.

Methods

Patients were included if they completed greater than or equal to 1 PFT within 2 years preceding ICI initiation. CIP status (CIP+: developed CIP, CIP-: did not develop CIP) was determined clinically. Generalized estimating equation-based linear regression was used to evaluate the effects of time and CIP on lung function. Primary outcomes included the following: percent-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1pp), percent-predicted forced vital capacity (FVCpp), and FEV1/FVC.

Results

A total of 43 patients (34 CIP-, 9 CIP+) with 79 PFTs (59 CIP-, 20 CIP+) were included. CIP+ patients had a 21.7% lower pretreatment FEV1pp compared with the CIP- group (95% confidence interval: -38.6 to -4.7). No statistically significant differences in FVCpp or FEV1/FVC were observed. The prevalence of obstructive lung disease was similar in both groups at 67% and 62% for the CIP+ and CIP- cohorts, as was the prevalence of current/former smoking at 100% and 93%, respectively.

Conclusions

Pretherapy differences in lung function were evident between patients who did and did not develop CIP, though the prevalence of obstructive lung disease was similar. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings, inform potential risk factors for CIP, and investigate the effects of ICI treatment and CIP on pulmonary function in patients with NSCLC.

Immunotherapy for Stage III NSCLC: Durvalumab and Beyond

Immunocheckpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have altered the treatment landscape of a wide range of malignancies, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This class of agents inhibits the interaction between PD1 and PDL1, and was shown to be efficacious in the landmark PACIFIC trial with 1 year of maintenance durvalumab (anti-PDL1 antibody). This trial demonstrated that its use as a consolidation treatment given after definitive chemoradiotherapy improved progression free survival and overall survival compared to standard-of-care treatment. In this review, we discuss both clinical trial and real-world data that have been published since PACIFIC that support the use of durvalumab for stage III unresectable NSCLC. In addition, we highlight specific populations that may require special considerations for the use of durvalumab in this setting, such as oncogene-addicted NSCLC, the toxicity of immunotherapy, and future directions in ICI research in stage III NSCLC.

Insights into Potential Pathogenesis and Treatment Options for Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Pneumonitis

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), and programmed cell death-1-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have become new treatment options for various malignancies. ICIs bind to immune-checkpoint inhibitory receptors or to the foregoing ligands and block inhibitory signals to release the brakes on the immune system, thereby enhancing immune anti-tumor responses. On the other hand, unlike conventional chemotherapies, ICIs can cause specific side effects, called immune-related adverse events (irAEs). These toxicities may affect various organs, including the lungs. ICI-related pneumonitis (ICI-pneumonitis) is not the most frequent adverse event, but it is serious and can be fatal. In this review, we summarize recent findings regarding ICI-pneumonitis, with a focus on potential pathogenesis and treatment.

Improvement in recurring nivolumab-induced pneumonitis with repetitive administration of infliximab in a patient with head and neck cancer: A case report

Severe pneumonitis induced by nivolumab, an anti-programmed cell death-1 monoclonal antibody, is a rare but potentially fatal immune-related adverse event. In cases of steroid-refractory pneumonitis, an appropriate therapeutic strategy using anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) antibody has not been established. A 59-year-old female was diagnosed with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Previous therapies including chemoradiotherapy and throat laryngectomy were performed, but metastatic recurrence appeared in the intrapulmonary and mediastinal lymph nodes. The patient was administered nivolumab. On the 14th day of nivolumab administration, the patient experienced dyspnea and computed tomography of the chest showed multiple consolidations in the right lung. She was diagnosed with nivolumab-induced pneumonitis. Because the pneumonitis was refractory to steroid therapy, she was administered infliximab, and the pneumonitis improved. On the 72nd and 101st days of nivolumab administration, nivolumab-induced pneumonitis re-appeared with an elevated serum TNF-α concentration. In each occurrence of pneumonitis, repetitive administration of infliximab improved the pneumonitis. Repetitive administration of infliximab may be effective for treating recurrent nivolumab-induced pneumonitis that is associated with an increased serum TNF-α concentration.

Immune checkpoint inhibition in COVID-19: risks and benefits

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is a novel cancer immunotherapy, which is administered in patients with metastatic, refractory, or relapsed solid cancer types. Since the initiation of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many studies have reported a higher severity and mortality rate of COVID-19 among patients with cancer in general.

AREAS COVERED

The immunomodulatory effects of ICI can modify the patients' immune system function in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. There is controversy over whether the severity of COVID-19 in cancer patients who previously received ICI compared to other patients with cancer has increased. There is evidence that the upregulation of immune checkpoint molecules in T cells, lymphopenia, and inflammatory cytokine secretion are associated with the severity of COVID-19 symptoms.

EXPERT OPINION

ICI can interrupt the T cell exhaustion and depletion by interrupting the inhibitory signaling of checkpoint molecules in T cells, and augments the immune system response in COVID-19 patients with lymphopenia. However, ICI may also increase the risk of cytokine release syndrome. ICI can be considered not only as a cancer immunotherapy but also as immunotherapy in COVID-19. More studies are needed to assess the safety of ICI in COVID-19 patients with or without cancer.

Clinical and molecular parameters associated to pneumonitis development in non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy from NADIM trial

BACKGROUND

Pneumonitis (Pn) is one of the main immune-related adverse effects, having a special importance in lung cancer, since they share affected tissue. Despite its clinical relevance, Pn development remains an unpredictable treatment adverse effect, whose mechanisms are mainly unknown, being even more obscure when it is associated to chemoimmunotherapy.

METHODS

In order to identify parameters associated to treatment related Pn, we analyzed clinical variables and molecular parameters from 46 patients with potentially resectable stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy included in the NADIM clinical trial (NCT03081689). Pn was defined as clinical or radiographic evidence of lung inflammation without alternative diagnoses, from treatment initiation to 180 days.

RESULTS

Among 46 patients, 12 developed Pn (26.1%). Sex, age, smoking status, packs-year, histological subtype, clinical or pathological response, progression-free survival, overall survival and number of nivolumab cycles, were not associated to Pn development. Regarding molecular parameters at diagnosis, Pn development was not associated to programmed death ligand 1, TPS, T cell receptor repertoire parameters, or tumor mutational burden. However, patients who developed Pn had statistically significant lower blood median levels of platelet to monocyte ratio (p=0.012) and teratocarcinoma-derived growth factor 1 (p=0.013; area under the curve (AUC) 0.801), but higher median percentages of natural killers (NKs) (p=0.019; AUC 0.786), monocytes (p=0.017; AUC 0.791), MSP (p=0.006; AUC 0.838), PARN (p=0.017; AUC 0.790), and E-Cadherin (p=0.022; AUC 0.788). In addition, the immune scenario of Pn after neoadjuvant treatment involves: high levels of neutrophils and NK cells, but low levels of B and T cells in peripheral blood; increased clonality of intratumoral T cells; and elevated plasma levels of several growth factors (EGF, HGF, VEGF, ANG-1, PDGF, NGF, and NT4) and inflammatory cytokines (MIF, CCL16, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, BMP-4, and u-PAR).

CONCLUSIONS

Although statistically underpowered, our results shed light on the possible mechanisms behind Pn development, involving innate and adaptative immunity, and open the possibility to predict patients at high risk. If confirmed, this may allow the personalization of both, the surveillance strategy and the therapeutic approaches to manage Pn in patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Pneumonitis in Lung Cancer: Real-World Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management Practices Across Six Health Care Centers in North Carolina

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer and have expanded use in small cell lung cancer. Although generally better tolerated than traditional chemotherapy, immune-related adverse events, such as immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (ICI-P), remain poorly understood toxicities that limit ICI treatment and can result in considerable morbidity. In this retrospective case-control study, we assessed a lung cancer cohort to identify ICI-P risk factors.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the risk factors, clinical presentations, radiographic findings, and outcomes for ICI-P in a real-world lung cancer cohort? Do chronic pulmonary diseases confer increased risk for ICI-P?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Medical records from lung cancer patients receiving nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or combination ipilimumab and nivolumab at six centers in North Carolina were reviewed (January 2004-July 2017). Patients with ICI-P and control participants were characterized, and logistic regression was used to assess for ICI-P risk factors.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifteen lung cancer patients who predominantly received nivolumab (76.5%) or pembrolizumab (22%) were included. The incidence of ICI-P was 9.5%, with a median time to diagnosis of 52.5 days. Most patients with ICI-P had cases of high severity, and eight patients (27%) died with ongoing ICI-P treatment. Development of ICI-P was independently associated with the presence of baseline fibrosis on chest CT scan (adjusted OR [aOR], 6.61; 95% CI, 2.48-17.7), a composite measure of obstructive lung disease (aOR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.07-7.29), and treatment with pembrolizumab (aOR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.08-6.11).

INTERPRETATION

In this cohort, ICI-P was more common and severe than previously reported and carried an unexpectedly high mortality rate. Risk for ICI-P was shown to be independently associated with several chronic pulmonary diseases, which may account for the higher incidence of ICI-P in patients with lung cancer.

Patterns of immunotherapy-induced pneumonitis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a case series

Background

Immunotherapy has become an efficacious option in the management of solid organ malignancies. Immune-related adverse events including pneumonitis are well described and may be particularly of concern in patients receiving immunotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Case presentations

In this paper, we describe three cases of immunotherapy-induced pneumonitis occurring in the management of lung malignancy. Our cases include a 54-year-old Caucasian woman with squamous cell lung cancer who was successfully rechallenged with immunotherapy after prior significant pneumonitis, a 65-year-old Caucasian man with metastatic squamous cell lung cancer who developed pneumonitis after multiple cycles of uneventful immunotherapy, and a 73-year-old Caucasian man with squamous cell lung cancer who developed early-onset pneumonitis with rebound on steroid taper.

Conclusions

This case series has provided further insight into the presentation and risk factors for pneumonitis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Each of the cases of immunotherapy-induced pneumonitis illustrates the different potential patterns that may arise when immunotherapy-induced pneumonitis develops. This case series provides key learning points that may assist physicians managing non-small-cell lung cancer with immunotherapy.

A Review of Treatment-Induced Pulmonary Toxicity in Breast Cancer

This article reviews the available literature that describes the incidence, diagnosis, mechanism, symptoms, and management of pulmonary toxicity induced by radiation therapy and current systemic medications used to treat breast cancer. An extensive literature search was conducted via Ovid Medline to identify all potentially relevant articles written in English from 2010 through January 2020. Additional relevant articles outside the time frame were included as needed. Although the risk of pulmonary toxicity from various breast cancer treatments is small in most instances, it can be fatal. Due to the high prevalence of breast cancer and the range of treatment options, healthcare providers should be aware of the risk of pulmonary toxicity from those treatments and how to prevent or manage complications.

The knowns & unknowns of pulmonary toxicity following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies: a narrative review

Since their discovery immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have dramatically changed the treatment landscape for many cancers. In addition to their efficacy they are generally well tolerated, however, they have led to a new range of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) including pneumonitis. While not the most frequently reported immune-related adverse event in the clinical trial setting, recent real-world data suggests a significantly higher rate of pneumonitis leading to treatment suspension or cessation. It also appears to disproportionately contribute to immune-related mortality, particularly with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. While indicators have emerged regarding risk factors, incomplete prospective recording of patient characteristics hampers strong conclusions. Presenting symptoms are non-specific and the differential diagnosis is broad, made more complex by concomitant treatment with traditional chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Radiological findings are diverse and inconsistent terminology makes comparison and more complete characterization difficult. Further, little is known about the role of baseline testing or surveillance for early detection of pneumonitis, or the real-world role of bronchoscopy or biopsy in assessment. Scant literature exists to direct these complex decisions, so treatment guidelines have been published based on expert consensus. Here we provide a narrative review of what is known about ICI pneumonitis and propose key questions to enhance our understanding into the future.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Pneumonitis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Understanding in Characteristics, Diagnosis, and Management

Immunotherapy that includes programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), programmed cell death- ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors has revolutionized the therapeutic strategy in multiple malignancies. Although it has achieved significant breakthrough in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) including checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP), are widely reported. As the particularly worrisome and potentially lethal form of irAEs, CIP should be attached more importance. Especially in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, the features of CIP may be more complicated on account of the overlapping respiratory signs compromised by primary tumor following immunotherapy. Herein, we included the previous relevant reports and comprehensively summarized the characteristics, diagnosis, and management of CIP. We also discussed the future direction of optimal steroid therapeutic schedule for patients with CIP in NSCLC based on the current evidence.

The effect of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors on the risk of pneumonitis for solid tumours: a meta-analysis of phase III randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become one of the standard treatment options for solid tumours; however, treatment-related adverse events, including pneumonitis, sometimes disrupt the ongoing treatment. To evaluate the impact of ICI addition on the risk of pneumonitis, a meta-analysis was conducted.

METHODS

Phase III randomised controlled trials comparing ICIs and conventional therapy with conventional therapy alone were selected by searching databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. The odds ratio (OR) of any grade and grade III-V pneumonitis was calculated. Meta-analysis was performed to compare the incidence of pneumonitis between the treatment arm with additional ICIs and the arm with conventional therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 25 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) representing 16,343 patients for grade I-V and 23 RCTs with 15,006 patients for grade III-V pneumonitis were analysed. Adding ICIs was associated with a significant increase in pneumonitis (grade I-V: OR, 2.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.12-3.37, grade III-V: OR, 1.83, 95% CI: 1.26-2.65). In subgroup analyses based on the mechanism of action of ICIs, cancer types (lung and non-lung cancer) and each ICI, no significant difference in heterogeneity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding ICIs to the conventional treatment for solid tumours significantly increased both grade I-V and grade III-V pneumonitis regardless of the mechanisms of ICIs and cancer type. These results would be helpful for oncologists to choose the appropriate treatment options using ICIs, particularly for patients with known risk factors of pneumonitis or interstitial lung disease.

Persistent anti-tumor response in cancer patients experiencing pneumonitis related to immune checkpoint blockade

Background: Immunotherapy in the form of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is now well established as acornerstone for treating many advanced malignancies. Nevertheless, as the number of indications for checkpoint inhibitors increases, so does the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs).Methods: We report two patient cases who, after being treated by an anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), presented with grade III dyspnea due to pneumonitis.Discussion: Immunotherapy was discontinued and the patients required treatment with systemic corticosteroids. At the time of writing, both patients are still in complete response (CR), more than 1year beyond immunotherapy discontinuation. We discuss our cases with regard to recent literature reports on immune-related pneumonitis and persistence of response beyond discontinuation.

Overview of checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis: incidence and associated risk factors

Introduction: The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been a breakthrough in the treatment of several types of cancer. With the widespread use of ICIs in clinical practice, checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is expected to increase and its management will pose a challenge for clinicians.Areas covered: In this article, we review the incidence, associated risk factors, radiological patterns, clinical features, and management of CIP.Expert opinion: Several clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of combination treatments with various drugs and ICIs have been conducted. From the results of these trials, CIP is thought to be an acceptable side effect because the frequency of its development was slightly higher during combination therapies than during ICI monotherapies. However, the risk of developing CIP associated with combinations of chemotherapy and ICIs may be higher in the real world than in clinical trials. Because combinations of chemotherapy and ICIs are associated with increased toxicity, the proper management of immune-related adverse events is necessary to maximize the efficacy of the treatment.

Imaging of Oncologic Treatment-Related Pneumonitis: A Focused Review on Emerging Issues of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Pneumonitis, From the AJR Special Series on Inflammation

Treatment-related pneumonitis represents a major challenge in oncology patients undergoing therapy, and imaging plays an essential role in detection, diagnosis, and monitoring of pneumonitis in these patients. Among various types of pneumonitis from different kinds of cancer treatments, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related pneumonitis has been recognized as an important topic in the radiology and oncology communities since 2015, given the increasing clinical indications for ICI therapy in patients with cancer. Moreover, clinical applications of ICIs continue to advance rapidly with novel combination approaches, leading to further emerging challenges. This focused review describes the current knowledge about ICI pneumonitis and discusses several newly emerging issues involving recurrence and flare of ICI pneumonitis, as well as involving pneumonitis from new combination approaches including ICI with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors and ICI with radiotherapy. The article concludes with a summary of unmet needs in the care of patients with ICI pneumonitis as well as of future directions in the advancement of knowledge about ICI pneumonitis and patient care for ICI pneumonitis. Given the proven multifaceted value of imaging in ICI pneumonitis, radiologists will remain central in the ongoing multidisciplinary journey to further understand and overcome this challenging toxicity for patients with cancer.

Combination of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Radiotherapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Objectives

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) combined with radiotherapy (RT) have emerged as a breakthrough therapy in the treatment of various cancers. The combination has a strong rationale, but data on their efficacy and safety are still limited. Hence, we comprehensively searched the database and performed this study to elucidate the clinical manifestations of this combined strategy.

Methods

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials that compared ICI plus RT with placebo plus RT or ICI alone for the treatment of advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and prostate cancer. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events. A fixed-effects or random-effects model was adopted depending on between-study heterogeneity.

Results

Three trials involving 1584 patients were included. ICI plus RT was significantly associated with improvement of OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70–0.94, P=0.004), PFS (HR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.56–0.72, P < 0.00001), and DCR (relative risk [RR] = 1.38; 95% CI 1.03–1.84, P=0.03). A significant predictor for PFS with the combination of ICI and RT was age, as a significant improvement in PFS (HR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.37–0.64, P < 0.00001) was observed in NSCLC patients aged under 65 years. In safety analyses, patients receiving ICI plus RT had a significantly higher incidence of dyspnea (RR = 2.43; 95% CI 1.16–5.08, P=0.02) and pneumonitis of grade 3 or higher (RR = 2.78; 95% CI 1.32–5.85, P=0.007).

Conclusion

The combination of ICI and RT was associated with improved OS, PFS, and DCR. Patients under 65 years will be the dominant beneficiaries. However, the incidence of dyspnea and pneumonia of grade 3 or higher also increased, which deserves our vigilance.

Impact of interstitial lung disease associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors on prognosis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated interstitial lung disease (ICI-ILD) is a serious immune-related adverse event. We aimed to evaluate the impact of ICI-ILD severity and imaging patterns or post-ILD cancer therapy on prognosis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed NSCLC patients who developed ICI-ILD in our institution between January 2016 and March 2019. The primary objective was to report prognosis following onset of ICI-ILD, stratified by severity grade or imaging pattern. The secondary objective was the analysis of cancer therapy after ICI-ILD.

RESULTS

Among 222 patients treated with ICI, 27 (12.2%) developed ICI-ILD. No trend for different prognosis depending on severity grade was seen unless ICI-ILD was fatal. Most patients (91.3%) with organising pneumonia (OP) or nonspecific interstitial pneumonia pattern on imaging showed grade 1 or 2, while all patients with a diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) pattern showed grade 3 or higher, and one reached grade 5. Among patients who overcame ICI-ILD, eight patients (30.8%) have been followed up without chemotherapy because of long-term disease control and seven had shown an OP pattern on imaging at onset of ICI-ILD. Three patients underwent ICI rechallenge, but two showed ICI-ILD recurrence and no patient achieved response to rechallenge treatment.

CONCLUSION

The DAD pattern may predict short-term adverse prognosis for ICI-ILD. Once ICI-ILD is overcome, severity grade is not associated with prognosis. Even if initial immunotherapy proves effective, ICI rechallenge requires careful consideration.