1
|
Subbiah V. Optimizing Tomorrow's Drug Development with Project Optimus: Precision Dosing IS Precision Oncology. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:836-839. [PMID: 39233313 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.08.2337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Subbiah
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nathan P, Venugopal B, Ali J, Allison J, Ceruso M, Charnley N, Griffiths R, Michael A, Moore K, Perrot V, Prendergast Á, Sharma A, Szabados B, Larkin J. Real-world Treatment Sequencing and Outcomes With Cabozantinib After First-line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-based Combination Therapy For Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: CARINA Study Results. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102141. [PMID: 39107157 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Real-world data are limited on treatment sequencing and outcomes after first-line (1L) immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-based combination treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS In this real-world, UK-based, retrospective study (CARINA; NCT04957160), data were obtained from hospital and electronic prescribing records. Patients were aged ≥ 18 years at aRCC diagnosis and had received 1L CPI-CPI or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-CPI combination therapy before second-line (2L) therapy including cabozantinib. We describe treatment outcomes including 1L and 2L durations of treatment (DoT) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Data from April 2015 to June 2022 were collected on 281 patients from nine UK centres. Median 1L DoT was 2.3 months for CPI-CPI therapy (n = 171) and 5.0 months for TKI-CPI therapy (n = 58). After 1L CPI-CPI or TKI-CPI therapy, median 2L DoT was 5.8 versus 4.2 months, respectively, for cabozantinib (n = 163), and 3.8 versus 2.4 months for other therapies (n = 118); median 2L OS was 15.2 and 15.3 months, respectively, for cabozantinib, and 14.6 and 24.2 months for other therapies. CONCLUSION DoT for 2L treatment was numerically better for cabozantinib than for other therapies, and after 1L CPI-CPI therapy than after 1L TKI-CPI therapy. Median OS was similar for 2L cabozantinib and other 2L therapies, and median OS for 2L cabozantinib was similar after both 1L therapy types. These results demonstrate the antitumour effect of 2L therapies, including cabozantinib, after 1L CPI-based combination treatment, regardless of whether 1L CPI-CPI or TKI-CPI therapy is used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Nathan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.
| | - Balaji Venugopal
- School of Cancer Sciences, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jamshed Ali
- School of Cancer Sciences, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jennifer Allison
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Richard Griffiths
- Department of Medical Oncology, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Agnieszka Michael
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Kathryn Moore
- Nottingham Cancer Clinical Trials Team, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Valérie Perrot
- Medical Affairs Biometry, Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | | | - Anand Sharma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Bernadett Szabados
- Barts Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - James Larkin
- Urology and Skin Units, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Narang A, Gebrael G, Jo Y, Thomas VM, Li H, Fortuna GG, Sayegh N, Tandar C, Tripathi N, Chigarira B, Srivastava A, Hage Chehade C, Nordblad B, Maughan BL, Agarwal N, Swami U. Effectiveness of Second-Line Cabozantinib in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients After First-Line Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-based Combinations. KIDNEY CANCER 2024; 8:135-142. [PMID: 39263256 PMCID: PMC11385087 DOI: 10.3233/kca-240016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
Background Cabozantinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is a prevalent second-line (2 L) therapy and was approved for use after progression on TKIs. However, the 1 L treatment setting has changed since the approval of cabozantinib monotherapy in salvage therapy settings. Objective To assess the differential effectiveness of cabozantinib after prior progression on 1 L ipilimumab with nivolumab (IPI + NIVO) compared to programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) or PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) inhibitors (PD1/L1i) with TKIs. Methods Utilizing a nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database, we included patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) who received 1 L treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination and 2 L treatment with cabozantinib monotherapy. These patients were categorized based on the type of 1 L ICI-based combination received: IPI + NIVO vs. PD1/L1i with TKI. Real-world time to next therapy (rwTTNT) and real-world overall survival (rwOS) were summarized using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using Cox-proportional hazard models adjusted for International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups. Results Among 12,285 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, 237 were eligible and included. Median rwTTNT was 8 months for the IPI + NIVO subgroup and 7.5 months for the PD1/L1i + TKI subgroup (HR 1.05, 95% CI: 0.74-1.49, p = 0.8). Median rwOS was 17 months for IPI + NIVO and 16 months for PD1/L1i + TKI subgroup (HR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.52-1.20, p = 0.3). Conclusions Cabozantinib remains effective as a 2 L therapy for mccRCC independent of the type of prior 1 L ICI-based combination. Further research is needed to validate these findings and explore the ideal sequencing of therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arshit Narang
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Georges Gebrael
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Yeonjung Jo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Vinay Mathew Thomas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Haoran Li
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS, USA
| | - Gliceida Galarza Fortuna
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Nicolas Sayegh
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Clara Tandar
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Nishita Tripathi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Beverly Chigarira
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ayana Srivastava
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Chadi Hage Chehade
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Blake Nordblad
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Benjamin L Maughan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Umang Swami
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hamamoto S, Tasaki Y, Morikawa T, Naiki T, Etani T, Taguchi K, Iwatsuki S, Unno R, Takeda T, Nagai T, Kawase K, Mimura Y, Sugiyama Y, Okada A, Furukawa-Hibi Y, Yasui T. Efficacy and Safety of Immuno-Oncology Plus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors as Late-Line Combination Therapy for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3365. [PMID: 38929893 PMCID: PMC11204304 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13123365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Immuno-oncology plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO+TKI) combination therapy is an essential first-line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, reports of its efficacy and safety as late-line therapy are lacking. This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of IO+TKI combination therapy as a late-line therapy for patients with RCC. Methods: We retrospectively examined 17 patients with RCC who received IO+TKI combination therapy as a second-line therapy or beyond (pembrolizumab plus axitinib, n = 10; avelumab plus axitinib, n = 5; nivolumab plus cabozantinib, n = 2). Results: The overall response and disease control rates of IO+TKI combination therapy were 29.4% and 64.7%, respectively. The median overall survival was not attained. Progression-free survival was 552 days, and 94.1% of patients (n = 16) experienced adverse effects (AEs) of any grade; moreover, 41.2% of patients (n = 7) experienced grade ≥ 3 immuno-related AEs. Conclusions: IO+TKI combination therapy may be a late-line therapy option for RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuzo Hamamoto
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (T.M.); (T.N.); (T.E.); (K.T.); (S.I.); (R.U.); (T.T.); (T.N.); (K.K.); (A.O.); (T.Y.)
| | - Yoshihiko Tasaki
- Department of Clinical Pharmaceutics, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (Y.T.); (Y.M.); (Y.S.); (Y.F.-H.)
| | - Toshiharu Morikawa
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (T.M.); (T.N.); (T.E.); (K.T.); (S.I.); (R.U.); (T.T.); (T.N.); (K.K.); (A.O.); (T.Y.)
| | - Taku Naiki
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (T.M.); (T.N.); (T.E.); (K.T.); (S.I.); (R.U.); (T.T.); (T.N.); (K.K.); (A.O.); (T.Y.)
| | - Toshiki Etani
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (T.M.); (T.N.); (T.E.); (K.T.); (S.I.); (R.U.); (T.T.); (T.N.); (K.K.); (A.O.); (T.Y.)
| | - Kazumi Taguchi
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (T.M.); (T.N.); (T.E.); (K.T.); (S.I.); (R.U.); (T.T.); (T.N.); (K.K.); (A.O.); (T.Y.)
| | - Shoichiro Iwatsuki
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (T.M.); (T.N.); (T.E.); (K.T.); (S.I.); (R.U.); (T.T.); (T.N.); (K.K.); (A.O.); (T.Y.)
| | - Rei Unno
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (T.M.); (T.N.); (T.E.); (K.T.); (S.I.); (R.U.); (T.T.); (T.N.); (K.K.); (A.O.); (T.Y.)
| | - Tomoki Takeda
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (T.M.); (T.N.); (T.E.); (K.T.); (S.I.); (R.U.); (T.T.); (T.N.); (K.K.); (A.O.); (T.Y.)
| | - Takashi Nagai
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (T.M.); (T.N.); (T.E.); (K.T.); (S.I.); (R.U.); (T.T.); (T.N.); (K.K.); (A.O.); (T.Y.)
| | - Kengo Kawase
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (T.M.); (T.N.); (T.E.); (K.T.); (S.I.); (R.U.); (T.T.); (T.N.); (K.K.); (A.O.); (T.Y.)
| | - Yoshihisa Mimura
- Department of Clinical Pharmaceutics, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (Y.T.); (Y.M.); (Y.S.); (Y.F.-H.)
| | - Yosuke Sugiyama
- Department of Clinical Pharmaceutics, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (Y.T.); (Y.M.); (Y.S.); (Y.F.-H.)
| | - Atsushi Okada
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (T.M.); (T.N.); (T.E.); (K.T.); (S.I.); (R.U.); (T.T.); (T.N.); (K.K.); (A.O.); (T.Y.)
| | - Yoko Furukawa-Hibi
- Department of Clinical Pharmaceutics, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (Y.T.); (Y.M.); (Y.S.); (Y.F.-H.)
| | - Takahiro Yasui
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (T.M.); (T.N.); (T.E.); (K.T.); (S.I.); (R.U.); (T.T.); (T.N.); (K.K.); (A.O.); (T.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brown J, Harrow B, Marciniak A, McCarthy C, Houchard A, Cirneanu L, Protheroe A. Cabozantinib and Axitinib After Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study from England. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2024; 11:195-207. [PMID: 38265633 PMCID: PMC11176148 DOI: 10.1007/s40801-023-00415-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The tyrosine kinase inhibitors cabozantinib and axitinib have been widely used in England to treat advanced renal cell carcinoma following prior vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy, but data on real-world usage remain limited. Our objective was to describe the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who received second-line or later-line (≥ 2L) cabozantinib or axitinib after vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy in clinical practice in England. METHODS This retrospective cohort study used clinical practice data (collected 2011-20) from the English Cancer Analysis System database. Patient characteristics, treatment sequence and duration, and overall survival (time from initiation of cabozantinib/axitinib treatment to death) were evaluated. RESULTS Data from 1485 eligible adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma were analyzed: 440 received ≥ 2L cabozantinib (2L for 88.6% of them); 1045 received ≥ 2L axitinib (2L for 89.5%). The most common first-line treatments were sunitinib (2L cabozantinib subcohort, 48%; 2L axitinib subcohort, 46%) and pazopanib (46% and 54%, respectively); nivolumab was the most common third-line treatment (18% and 19%, respectively). Median (interquartile range) 2L therapy duration was 5.52 (2.73-11.74) months for cabozantinib and 4.60 (1.45-12.36) months for axitinib. Following adjustment for potential confounders using inverse probability weighting, overall survival (median [interquartile range]) was longer for ≥ 2L cabozantinib (11.2 [5.7-28.0] months) than for ≥ 2L axitinib (10.4 [4.7-22.0] months; log-rank p = 0.0034). CONCLUSIONS The Cancer Analysis System database is a valuable research resource providing extensive real-world clinical data. Real-world overall survival was longer with ≥ 2L cabozantinib than with axitinib. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04637204; registered November 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Brown
- Division of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Andrew Protheroe
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Campbell MT, Balderrama-Brondani V, Jimenez C, Tamsen G, Marcal LP, Varghese J, Shah AY, Long JP, Zhang M, Ochieng J, Haymaker C, Habra MA. Cabozantinib monotherapy for advanced adrenocortical carcinoma: a single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:649-657. [PMID: 38608694 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00095-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare malignancy with poor response to systemic chemotherapy. Mitotane is the only approved therapy for adrenocortical carcinoma. Cabozantinib is a multikinase inhibitor approved in multiple malignancies. This is the first prospective trial to explore the anti-tumour activity, safety, and pharmacokinetic profile of cabozantinib in patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma. METHODS This investigator-initiated, single-arm, phase 2 trial in adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma was done at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA). Eligible patients had histologically confirmed adrenocortical carcinoma, were not candidates for surgery with curative intent, had measurable disease, had an estimated life expectancy of at least 3 months, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 with adequate organ function. Patients who had used mitotane within 6 months of study participation were required to have a serum mitotane level of less than 2 mg/L. Patients were given oral cabozantinib 60 mg daily with the option of dose reduction to manage adverse events. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 4 months, assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug per protocol. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03370718, and is now complete. FINDINGS Between March 1, 2018, and May 31, 2021, we enrolled 18 patients (ten males and eight females), all of whom received at least one dose of study treatment. Of the 18 patients, eight (44%) had an ECOG performance status of 0, nine (50%) patients had a performance status of 1, and one (6%) patient had a performance status of 2. Median follow-up was 36·8 months (IQR 30·2-50·3). At 4 months, 13 (72·2%; 95% CI 46·5-90·3) of 18 patients had progression-free survival and median progression-free survival was 6 months (95% CI 4·3 to not reached). One patient remains on treatment. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 11 (61%) of 18 patients. The most common grade 3 adverse events were lipase elevation (three [17%] of 18 patients), elevated γ-glutamyl transferase concentrations (two [11%] patients), elevated alanine aminotransferase concentrations (two [11%] patients), hypophosphatemia (two [11%] patients), and hypertension (two [11%] patients). One (6%) of 18 patients had grade 4 hypertension. No treatment related deaths occurred on study. INTERPRETATION Cabozantinib in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma showed promising efficacy with a manageable and anticipated safety profile. Further prospective studies with cabozantinib alone and in combination with immune checkpoint therapy are ongoing. FUNDING Exelixis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew T Campbell
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Vania Balderrama-Brondani
- Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Camilo Jimenez
- Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gina Tamsen
- Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Leonardo P Marcal
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeena Varghese
- Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amishi Y Shah
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James P Long
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Miao Zhang
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joshua Ochieng
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cara Haymaker
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mouhammed Amir Habra
- Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Blanchet B, Xu-Vuilard A, Jouinot A, Puisset F, Combarel D, Huillard O, Le Louedec F, Thomas F, Teixeira M, Flippot R, Mourey L, Albiges L, Pudlarz T, Joly C, Tournigand C, Chauvin J, Puszkiel A, Chatelut E, Decleves X, Vidal M, Goldwasser F, Oudard S, Medioni J, Vano YA. Exposure-response relationship of cabozantinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated in routine care. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:961-969. [PMID: 38272963 PMCID: PMC10950854 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02585-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interindividual pharmacokinetic variability may influence the clinical benefit or toxicity of cabozantinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We aimed to investigate the exposure-toxicity and exposure-response relationship of cabozantinib in unselected mRCC patients treated in routine care. METHODS This ambispective multicenter study enrolled consecutive patients receiving cabozantinib in monotherapy. Steady-state trough concentration (Cmin,ss) within the first 3 months after treatment initiation was used for the PK/PD analysis with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and survival outcomes. Logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to identify the risk factors of DLT and inefficacy in patients, respectively. RESULTS Seventy-eight mRCC patients were eligible for the statistical analysis. Fifty-two patients (67%) experienced DLT with a median onset of 2.1 months (95%CI 0.7-8.2). In multivariate analysis, Cmin,ss was identified as an independent risk factor of DLT (OR 1.46, 95%CI [1.04-2.04]; p = 0.029). PFS and OS were not statistically associated with the starting dose (p = 0.81 and p = 0.98, respectively). In the multivariate analysis of PFS, Cmin, ss > 336 ng/mL resulted in a hazard ratio of 0.28 (95%CI, 0.10-0.77, p = 0.014). By contrast, Cmin, ss > 336 ng/mL was not statistically associated with longer OS. CONCLUSION Early plasma drug monitoring may be useful to optimise cabozantinib treatment in mRCC patients treated in monotherapy, especially in frail patients starting at a lower than standard dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoit Blanchet
- Université de Paris, CNRS, INSERM, CiTCoM, U1268, F-75006, Paris, France.
- Biologie du Médicament - Toxicologie, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
- Groupe de Pharmacologie Clinique Oncologique GPCO-Unicancer, Paris, France.
| | - Alexandre Xu-Vuilard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Anne Jouinot
- Department of Medical Oncology, ARIANE, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Institut Cochin, Inserm U1016, CNRS UMR8104, Paris, France
| | - Florent Puisset
- Groupe de Pharmacologie Clinique Oncologique GPCO-Unicancer, Paris, France
- Oncopole Claudius-Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - David Combarel
- Groupe de Pharmacologie Clinique Oncologique GPCO-Unicancer, Paris, France
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Faculté de pharmacie, Université Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
- Medical School, University of Paris XI, Saclay, France
| | - Olivier Huillard
- Department of Medical Oncology, ARIANE, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Félicien Le Louedec
- Groupe de Pharmacologie Clinique Oncologique GPCO-Unicancer, Paris, France
- Oncopole Claudius-Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Fabienne Thomas
- Groupe de Pharmacologie Clinique Oncologique GPCO-Unicancer, Paris, France
- Oncopole Claudius-Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 31059, Toulouse, France
- CRCT, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, 31037, Toulouse, France
| | - Marcus Teixeira
- Department of Oncological Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Medical School, University of Paris XI Saclay, Saclay, France
| | - Ronan Flippot
- Department of Oncological Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Medical School, University of Paris XI Saclay, Saclay, France
- Laboratoire d'immunomonitoring en oncologie, CNRS3655 & INSERM US23, Université Paris Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Loic Mourey
- Oncopole Claudius-Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Laurence Albiges
- Department of Oncological Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Medical School, University of Paris XI Saclay, Saclay, France
| | - Thomas Pudlarz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Charlotte Joly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Université de Paris Est, Créteil, France
| | - Christophe Tournigand
- Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Université de Paris Est, Créteil, France
| | | | - Alicja Puszkiel
- Biologie du Médicament - Toxicologie, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
- Groupe de Pharmacologie Clinique Oncologique GPCO-Unicancer, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Inserm, UMR-S1144, Paris, France
| | - Etienne Chatelut
- Groupe de Pharmacologie Clinique Oncologique GPCO-Unicancer, Paris, France
- Oncopole Claudius-Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 31059, Toulouse, France
- CRCT, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, 31037, Toulouse, France
| | - Xavier Decleves
- Biologie du Médicament - Toxicologie, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
- Groupe de Pharmacologie Clinique Oncologique GPCO-Unicancer, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Inserm, UMR-S1144, Paris, France
| | - Michel Vidal
- Université de Paris, CNRS, INSERM, CiTCoM, U1268, F-75006, Paris, France
- Biologie du Médicament - Toxicologie, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - François Goldwasser
- Department of Medical Oncology, ARIANE, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Oudard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
- Université de Paris Cité, INSERM U970, PARCC, Paris, France
| | - Jacques Medioni
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Yann-Alexandre Vano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
- Université de Paris Cité, UMR_S1138-INSERM, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Graham J, Ghosh S, Breau RH, Wood L, Tanguay S, Bosse D, Lalani AK, Bhindi B, Heng D, Finelli A, Fallah-Rad N, Castonguay V, Basappa NS, Soulières D, Pouliot F, Kollmannsberger C, Bjarnason GA. Association of Cabozantinib Dose Reductions for Toxicity With Clinical Effectiveness in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC): Results From the Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System (CKCis). Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024:102060. [PMID: 38521648 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cabozantinib, an oral multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has demonstrated efficacy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The association between toxicity and therapeutic effectiveness has been established with other TKIs. We investigated whether cabozantinib dose reductions, a surrogate for toxicity and adequate drug exposure, were associated with improved clinical outcomes in mRCC. METHODS Employing the CKCis database, we analyzed patients treated with cabozantinib in the second line or later between 2011 to 2021. The cohort was stratified into those needing dose reductions (DR) during treatment and those not (no-DR). Outcomes, including objective response rate (ORR), time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS), were compared based on dose reduction status. The influence of the initial dose on outcomes was also explored. RESULTS Among 319 cabozantinib-treated patients, 48.3% underwent dose reductions. Response rates exhibited no significant difference between the DR and no-DR groups (15.1% vs. 18.2%, P = .55). Patients with DR had superior median OS (26.15 vs. 15.47 months, P = .019) and TTF (12.74 vs. 6.44 months, P = .022) compared to no-DR patients. These differences retained significance following adjustment for IMDC risk group (OS HR = 0.67, P = .032; TTF HR = 0.65, P = .008). There was no association between the initial dose and ORR, OS, or TTF. CONCLUSION This study highlights the link between cabozantinib dose reductions due to toxicity and improved survival and time to treatment failure in mRCC patients. These findings underscore the potential of using on-treatment toxicity as an indicator of adequate drug exposure to individualize dosing and optimize treatment effectiveness. Larger studies are warranted to validate these results and develop individualized strategies for cabozantinib when given alone or in combination with immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Graham
- CancerCare Manitoba, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
| | - Sunita Ghosh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Rodney H Breau
- Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Lori Wood
- Division of Medical Oncology, QEII Health Sciences Center, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Simon Tanguay
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Dominick Bosse
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Aly-Khan Lalani
- Division of Medical Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Bimal Bhindi
- Division of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Daniel Heng
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Antonio Finelli
- Division of Urology, Departments of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nazanin Fallah-Rad
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vincent Castonguay
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval (CRCHUQc-UL), Centre de recherche sur le cancer (CRC) de l'Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Naveen S Basappa
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Denis Soulières
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Frédéric Pouliot
- Cancer Research Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | | | - Georg A Bjarnason
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Borkowetz A, Sommer U, Baretton G, Gruellich C, Bürk BT, Erb HHH, Thomas C. Identification of genomic drivers for the therapeutic response of Cabozantinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 2024; 42:94. [PMID: 38386122 PMCID: PMC10884127 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04783-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cabozantinib (CAB) as monotherapy or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors is used for systemic treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, little is known about predictors of treatment response to CAB. For this reason, known genomic drivers were examined to identify potential predictors of treatment response with CAB. METHODS Twenty mRCC patients receiving monotherapy (≥ first-line) with CAB were prospectively included. DNA was extracted from archived primary tumors or metastatic tissue. Targeted DNA sequencing was performed using a gene panel including 328 genes (QIAseq Targeted DNA V3 Panel, Qiagen). The variant evaluation was performed using Varsome. The endpoints were treatment-failure-free-survival (TFFS) to CAB. RESULTS 26% of patients received systemic RCC treatment as the primary option. Six patients were treated with CAB in first-line (1L) and 12 patients in ≥ 2L. The median follow-up after initiation of systemic treatment was 26.7 months (mo). The PBRM1 (7 alleles), SETD2 (7 alleles), VHL (11 alleles), and CHEK2 (14 alleles) genes were most frequently altered. The median time to TFFS was 10.5 mo (95% confidence interval (CI) 6.2-14.7 mo). There was a longer treatment response to CAB in patients with alterations of the SETD2 gene (SETD2 alteration median TFFS not reached vs. no SETD2 alterations 8.4 mo (95% CI 5.2-11.6 mo); p = 0.024). CONCLUSION Pathogenic variant genes may indicate treatment response to systemic therapy in mRCC. Patients with alterations of the SETD2 gene show longer responses to CAB treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelika Borkowetz
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Site, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Ulrich Sommer
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Gustavo Baretton
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Carsten Gruellich
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Björn Thorben Bürk
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Holger H H Erb
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Site, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christian Thomas
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gross-Goupil M, Bodnar L, Campbell MT, Michael A, Venugopal B, Żołnierek J, Dutailly P, Procopio G, Albiges L. Cabozantinib in the Routine Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review of Real-World Evidence. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:84-97. [PMID: 38101983 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
Real-world cabozantinib use has increased since its approval to treat patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in 2016. We reviewed cabozantinib use in real-world clinical practice and compared outcomes with pivotal cabozantinib randomized control trials (RCTs). This PRISMA-standard systematic literature review evaluated real-world effectiveness and tolerability of cabozantinib in patients with RCC (PROSPERO registration: CRD42021245854). Systematic MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane database searches were conducted on November 2, 2022. Eligible publications included ≥ 20 patients with RCC receiving cabozantinib. After double-screening for eligibility, standardized data were abstracted, qualitatively summarized, and assessed for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Of 353 screened publications, 41 were included, representing approximately 11,000 real-world patients. Most publications reported cabozantinib monotherapy cohort studies (40/41) of retrospective (39/41) and multicenter (32/41) design; most included patients from North America and/or Europe (30/41). Baseline characteristics were demographically similar between real-world and pivotal RCT populations, but real-world populations showed greater variation in prevalence of prior nephrectomy, multiple-site/brain metastasis, and nonclear-cell RCC histology. Cabozantinib activity was reported across real-world treatment lines and tumor types. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate values from pivotal RCTs were within the ranges reported for equivalent outcomes across real-world studies. Common real-world grade ≥ 3 adverse events were consistent with those in pivotal RCTs (fatigue, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, diarrhea, hypertension), but less frequent. No new tolerability concerns were identified. Real-world RCC survival outcomes for cabozantinib monotherapy were broadly consistent with pivotal RCTs, despite greater heterogeneity in real-world populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lubomir Bodnar
- University of Natural Sciences and Humanities in Siedlce, Institute of Health Sciences, Siedlce, Poland
| | | | - Agnieszka Michael
- University of Surrey, School of Biosciences and Medicine, Guildford, UK
| | - Balaji Venugopal
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lolli C, Verde A, Esposti LD, Acciai V, Brigido A, Proietti E, Scagliarini S. Cabozantinib use in second or subsequent line of treatment in renal cell carcinoma: an analysis of Italian administrative databases. GLOBAL & REGIONAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 2024; 11:154-160. [PMID: 38979548 PMCID: PMC11228513 DOI: 10.33393/grhta.2024.2892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Cabozantinib use in everyday clinical practice for advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is relatively recent, and real-world data on treatment persistence, adherence and sequencing are still limited. Methods We conducted an analysis based on an integrated administrative database, covering around 6.9 million health-assisted Italian individuals, to explore the use of cabozantinib for RCC. Patients with at least one prescription for cabozantinib during 2017-2020 were searched. These were characterized during all available period (i.e. from 2010 onwards) before the index date and were observed after inclusion. Results A total of 113 patients treated with cabozantinib in second or subsequent line were included, and their demographic, clinical and treatment characteristics were described. About half of these RCC patients were aged >65 years (47.8%). Sixty patients (53.1%) were highly adherent to cabozantinib therapy, and the median cabozantinib treatment duration of use was 8.7 months (95% confidence interval: 5.8-11.1). During the first year of follow-up, the average total cost per patient was €32,508. Conclusions We described second or subsequent line cabozantinib treatment for RCC in a real-world setting and the economic burden of disease in Italy, taking advantage of large, integrated administrative databases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristian Lolli
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola - Italy
| | - Antonio Verde
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples - Italy
| | - Luca Degli Esposti
- Clicon S.r.l. Società Benefit, Health, Economics & Outcomes Research, Bologna - Italy
| | | | | | | | - Sarah Scagliarini
- Department of Medical Oncology, AORN "A. Cardarelli", Naples - Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Albiges L, McGregor BA, Heng DYC, Procopio G, de Velasco G, Taguieva-Pioger N, Martín-Couce L, Tannir NM, Powles T. Vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma pretreated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic literature review. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 122:102652. [PMID: 37980876 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We conducted a systematic literature review to identify evidence for use of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted (anti-VEGF) treatment in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following prior checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-based therapy. METHODS This was a PRISMA-standard systematic literature review; registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021255568). Literature searches were conducted in MEDLINE®, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (January 28, 2021; updated September 13, 2022) to identify publications reporting efficacy/effectiveness and safety/tolerability evidence for anti-VEGF treatment in patients with RCC who had received prior CPI therapy. RESULTS Of 2,639 publications screened, 48 were eligible and featured 2,759 patients treated in trials and 2,209 in real-world studies (RWS). Most patients with available data were treated with anti-VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor-based regimens (trials: 93 %; RWS: 100 %), most commonly cabozantinib, which accounted for 46 % of trial and 62 % of RWS patients in publications with available data. Collectively, there was consistent evidence of anti-VEGF treatment activity after prior CPI therapy. Activity was reported for all anti-VEGF regimens and regardless of prior CPI-based regimen. No new safety signals were detected for subsequent anti-VEGF therapy; no studies suggested increased immune-related adverse events associated with prior CPI therapy. The results were limited by data quality; study heterogeneity prohibited meta-analyses. CONCLUSION Based on the available data (most commonly for cabozantinib), anti-VEGF therapy appears to be a rational treatment choice in patients with RCC who have progressed despite prior CPI-based therapy. Results from ongoing trials of combination anti-VEGF plus CPI regimen post prior CPI therapy trials will contribute more definitive evidence. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Anticancer treatments that work by reducing levels of a substance in the body called Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor are known as anti-VEGF drugs. Reducing VEGF levels helps to reduce blood supply to tumors, which can slow the speed at which the cancer grows. Some other types of anticancer drugs that help the immune system to fight cancer cells are called checkpoint inhibitors. Here, we looked at published studies that investigated how anti-VEGF drugs work, and what side effects they cause, in people who have already been treated with checkpoint inhibitors for a type of kidney cancer called renal cell carcinoma. We aimed to summarize the available evidence to help doctors decide how best to use anti-VEGF drugs in these patients. We found 48 studies that included almost 5,000 patients. The results of the studies showed that anti-VEGF drugs have anticancer effects in people with renal cell carcinoma who had already been treated with checkpoint inhibitors. All of the VEGF-targeting drugs had anticancer effects, irrespective of what checkpoint inhibitor treatment people had received before. There were different amounts of evidence available for the different anti-VEGF drugs. The anti-VEGF cabozantinib had the largest amount of evidence. Importantly, previous checkpoint inhibitor treatment did not seem to affect the number or type of side-effects associated with anti-VEGF drugs. Results from ongoing, well-designed studies will be helpful to confirm these results. Our findings may be useful for doctors considering using anti-VEGF drugs in patients with renal cell carcinoma who have received checkpoint inhibitor treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurence Albiges
- Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
| | | | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Division of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Giuseppe Procopio
- Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Guillermo de Velasco
- University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Department of Medical Oncology, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Nizar M Tannir
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Cancer Research UK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Department of Genitourinary Oncology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Domański P, Jarosińska J, Kruczyk B, Piętak M, Mydlak A, Demkow T, Kuncman Ł, Darewicz M, Sikora-Kupis B, Dumnicka P, Kucharz J. Activity of cabozantinib in further line treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Real-world experience in a single-center retrospective study. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2023; 27:190-197. [PMID: 38239858 PMCID: PMC10793615 DOI: 10.5114/wo.2023.133545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Cabozantinib is an oral inhibitor of MET, AXL, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors. It has an immunomodulatory effect and may influence the tumor's microenvironment and make mutated cells more sensitive to immune-mediated killing. These properties have made cabozantinib an effective drug for first-line or subsequent-line treatment after progression of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), even after immunotherapy. Material and methods Seventy-one patients with mRCC were treated with second or further lines of cabozantinib at the Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology. This study retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness of cabozantinib in subsequent lines of treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary endpoints. The best overall response (BOR) to cabozantinib was the secondary endpoint. For this purpose, Cox's proportional hazard model was used. Results The median PFS was 11 months (5; 23) and the median OS was 16 months (10; 42) and differed significantly in the second and further lines of treatment. Progression in the second and further lines was observed in 28 (93%) and 27 (66%) patients, respectively (p = 0.006). Partial response as the BOR was observed in one patient (3%) in the second line and 13 patients (32%) in the further lines (p = 0.012). Conclusions Cabozantinib has antitumor effects in the second and further lines of treatment. In this study we observed high efficiency of cabozantinib in further lines of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Domański
- Department of Uro-Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Experimental Immunotherapy, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jadwiga Jarosińska
- Department of Uro-Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Barbara Kruczyk
- Department of Uro-Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Mateusz Piętak
- Department of Uro-Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna Mydlak
- Department of Experimental Immunotherapy, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tomasz Demkow
- Department of Uro-Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Łukasz Kuncman
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Łódź, Poland
- Department of External Beam Radiotherapy, Nicolaus Copernicus Multidisciplinary Center for Oncology and Traumatology, Łódź, Poland
| | - Marta Darewicz
- Department of Uro-Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Bożena Sikora-Kupis
- Department of Uro-Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paulina Dumnicka
- Chair of Medical Biochemistry, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Jakub Kucharz
- Department of Uro-Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ishihara H, Nemoto Y, Tachibana H, Fukuda H, Yoshida K, Kobayashi H, Iizuka J, Hashimoto Y, Kondo T, Takagi T. Real-world efficacy and safety of cabozantinib following immune checkpoint inhibitor failure in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2023; 53:977-983. [PMID: 37519060 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyad087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-world data of cabozantinib after failure of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced renal cell carcinoma in Japanese population are limited. Additionally, prognostic factors of cabozantinib in this setting are still unknown. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated data of 56 patients treated with cabozantinib subsequent to failed immune checkpoint inhibitors at four institutions. Regarding the efficacy profile, progression-free survival, overall survival and objective response rate were assessed. In terms of the safety profile, rate of adverse events, dose reduction and treatment interruption were assessed. Furthermore, risk factors of progression-free survival were analyzed. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients (52%) were treated with cabozantinib as second-line therapy. Most frequent prior immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment was nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy as first-line therapy (n = 30, 54%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 9.76 and 25.5 months, respectively, and objective response rate was 34%. All patients experienced at least one adverse event, and grade ≥ 3 adverse events were observed in 31 patients (55%). Forty-four (79%) and 31 (55%) patients needed dose reduction and treatment interruption, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that reduced initial dose (i.e. <60 mg) (hazard ratio: 2.50, P = 0.0355) and presence of lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio: 2.50, P = 0.0172) were independent factors of shorter progression-free survival. CONCLUSION Cabozantinib in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who failed immune checkpoint inhibitors was efficacious and had a manageable safety profile. These results appear to be similar to those of previous clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Ishihara
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Nemoto
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Adachi Medical Center, Adachi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Hironori Fukuda
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Yoshida
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirohito Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Adachi Medical Center, Adachi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junpei Iizuka
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasunobu Hashimoto
- Department of Urology, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Kawaguchi, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tsunenori Kondo
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Adachi Medical Center, Adachi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshio Takagi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Méndez-Vidal MJ, Lázaro Quintela M, Lainez-Milagro N, Perez-Valderrama B, Suárez Rodriguez C, Arranz Arija JÁ, Peláez Fernández I, Gallardo Díaz E, Lambea Sorrosal J, González-del-Alba A. SEOM SOGUG clinical guideline for treatment of kidney cancer (2022). Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:2732-2748. [PMID: 37556095 PMCID: PMC10425490 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03276-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
Renal cancer is the seventh most common cancer in men and the tenth in women. The aim of this article is to review the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of renal carcinoma accompanied by recommendations with new evidence and treatment algorithms. A new pathologic classification of RCC by the World Health Organization (WHO) was published in 2022 and this classification would be considered a "bridge" to a future molecular classification. For patients with localized disease, surgery is the treatment of choice with nephron-sparing surgery recommended when feasible. Adjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab is an option for intermediate-or high-risk cases, as well as patients after complete resection of metastatic disease. More data are needed in the future, including positive overall survival data. Clinical prognostic classification, preferably IMDC, should be used for treatment decision making in mRCC. Cytoreductive nephrectomy should not be deemed mandatory in individuals with intermediate-poor IMDC/MSKCC risk who require systemic therapy. Metastasectomy can be contemplated in selected subjects with a limited number of metastases or long metachronous disease-free interval. For the population of patients with metastatic ccRCC as a whole, the combination of pembrolizumab-axitinib, nivolumab-cabozantinib, or pembrolizumab-lenvatinib can be considered as the first option based on the benefit obtained in OS versus sunitinib. In cases that have an intermediate IMDC and poor prognosis, the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab has demonstrated superior OS compared to sunitinib. As for individuals with advanced RCC previously treated with one or two antiangiogenic tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, nivolumab and cabozantinib are the options of choice. When there is progression following initial immunotherapy-based treatment, we recommend treatment with an antiangiogenic tyrosine-kinase inhibitor. While no clear sequence can be advocated, medical oncologists and patients should be aware of the recent advances and new strategies that improve survival and quality of life in the setting of metastatic RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María José Méndez-Vidal
- Medical Oncology Department, Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Martin Lázaro Quintela
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Alvaro Cunqueiro-Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain
| | - Nuria Lainez-Milagro
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Pamplona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Julio Lambea Sorrosal
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Santoni M, Massari F, Myint ZW, Iacovelli R, Pichler M, Basso U, Kopecky J, Kucharz J, Buti S, Rizzo M, Galli L, Büttner T, De Giorgi U, Kanesvaran R, Fiala O, Grande E, Zucali PA, Fornarini G, Bourlon MT, Scagliarini S, Molina-Cerrillo J, Aurilio G, Matrana MR, Pichler R, Cattrini C, Büchler T, Seront E, Calabrò F, Pinto A, Berardi R, Zgura A, Mammone G, Ansari J, Atzori F, Chiari R, Bamias A, Caffo O, Procopio G, Bassanelli M, Merler S, Messina C, Küronya Z, Mosca A, Bhuva D, Vau N, Incorvaia L, Rebuzzi SE, Roviello G, Zabalza IO, Rizzo A, Mollica V, Sorgentoni G, Monteiro FSM, Montironi R, Battelli N, Porta C. Global Real-World Outcomes of Patients Receiving Immuno-Oncology Combinations for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: The ARON-1 Study. Target Oncol 2023:10.1007/s11523-023-00978-2. [PMID: 37369815 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-023-00978-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immuno-oncology combinations have achieved survival benefits in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). OBJECTIVE The ARON-1 study (NCT05287464) was designed to globally collect real-world data on the use of immuno-combinations as first-line therapy for mRCC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients aged ≥ 18 years with a cytologically and/or histologically confirmed diagnosis of mRCC treated with first-line immuno-combination therapies were retrospectively included from 47 International Institutions from 16 countries. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall clinical benefit (OCB). RESULTS A total of 729 patients were included; tumor histology was clear-cell RCC in 86% of cases; 313 patients received dual immuno-oncology (IO + IO) therapy while 416 were treated with IO-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO + TKI) combinations. In the overall study population, the median OS and PFS were 36.5 and 15.0 months, respectively. The median OS was longer with IO+TKI compared with IO+IO therapy in the 616 patients with intermediate/poor International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk criteria (55.7 vs 29.7 months; p = 0.045). OCB was 84% for IO+TKI and 72% for IO + IO combination (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our study may suggest that immuno-oncology combinations are effective as first-line therapy in the mRCC real-world context, showing outcome differences between IO + IO and IO + TKI combinations in mRCC subpopulations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05287464.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Santoni
- Oncology Unit, Macerata Hospital, Via Santa Lucia 2, 62100, Macerata, Italy.
| | - Francesco Massari
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni-15, Bologna, Italy
| | - Zin W Myint
- Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40536-0293, USA
| | - Roberto Iacovelli
- Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Martin Pichler
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Augenbruggerplatz 15, 8010, Graz, Austria
| | - Umberto Basso
- Oncology 3 Unit, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Jindrich Kopecky
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Jakub Kucharz
- Department of Uro-oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Sebastiano Buti
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Mimma Rizzo
- Division of Medical Oncology, A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Luca Galli
- Oncology Unit 2, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Thomas Büttner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Bonn (UKB), 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Ravindran Kanesvaran
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ondřej Fiala
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Enrique Grande
- Department of Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paolo Andrea Zucali
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Maria T Bourlon
- Hematology and Oncology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Sarah Scagliarini
- UOC di Oncologia, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale Cardarelli di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Gaetano Aurilio
- Medical Oncology Division of Urogenital and Head and Neck Tumours, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marc R Matrana
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Carlo Cattrini
- Department of Medical Oncology, "Maggiore della Carità" University Hospital, 28100, Novara, Italy
| | - Tomas Büchler
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Thomayer University Hospital, 14059, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Emmanuel Seront
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de Jolimont, Haine Saint Paul, Belgium
| | - Fabio Calabrò
- Department of Oncology, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alvaro Pinto
- Medical Oncology Department, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, AOU Ospedali Riuniti delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Anca Zgura
- Department of Oncology-Radiotherapy, Prof. Dr. Alexandru Trestioreanu Institute of Oncology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Giulia Mammone
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Science, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Jawaher Ansari
- Medical Oncology, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Francesco Atzori
- Unità di Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Rita Chiari
- UOC Oncologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Tuscany, Italy
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Procopio
- Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Oncologia Medica, Ospedale Maggiore di Cremona, Cremona, Italy
| | - Maria Bassanelli
- Medical Oncology 1, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Merler
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona School of Medicine, Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Zsófia Küronya
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology and Clinical Pharmacology, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Alessandra Mosca
- Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, IRCCS-FPO, 10060, Turin, Italy
| | - Dipen Bhuva
- Department of Medical Oncology, Army Hospital Research and Referral, New Delhi, India
| | - Nuno Vau
- Urologic Oncology, Champalimaud Clinical Center, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Lorena Incorvaia
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Sara Elena Rebuzzi
- Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, 17100, Savona, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (Di.M.I.), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giandomenico Roviello
- Department of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, 50139, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Rizzo
- Struttura Semplice Dipartimentale di Oncologia Medica per la Presa in Carico Globale del Paziente Oncologico "Don Tonino Bello", I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Veronica Mollica
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni-15, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Sorgentoni
- Oncology Unit, Macerata Hospital, Via Santa Lucia 2, 62100, Macerata, Italy
| | - Fernando Sabino M Monteiro
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group-LACOG, Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Oncology and Hematology Department, Hospital Santa Lucia, SHLS 716 Cj. C, Brasília, DF, 70390-700, Brazil
| | - Rodolfo Montironi
- Molecular Medicine and Cell Therapy Foundation, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Nicola Battelli
- Oncology Unit, Macerata Hospital, Via Santa Lucia 2, 62100, Macerata, Italy
| | - Camillo Porta
- Division of Medical Oncology, A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
- Chair of Oncology, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Analysis of Anti-Angiogenesis-Related Adverse Events Associated with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Target Oncol 2023; 18:247-255. [PMID: 36826462 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-023-00951-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited studies have evaluated anti-angiogenesis-related adverse events involving oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma using real-world data. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the incidence, patterns, and impact on the dose intensity of anti-angiogenesis-related adverse events associated with the use of VEGFR-TKIs in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma using real-world data. METHODS This cross-sectional study included patients with a diagnosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received axitinib, cabozantinib, pazopanib, sorafenib, and sunitinib at a tertiary hospital in South Korea. We categorized the patients into those who had not previously received a VEGFR-TKI (VEGFR-TKI-naive) and those who had previously received a VEGFR-TKI (VEGFR-TKI-experienced). Anti-angiogenesis-related adverse events were defined as hypertension, proteinuria, bleeding, thrombosis, hypothyroidism, and left ventricular dysfunction, which were rated "possible" or higher based on a causality assessment scale. RESULTS Among a total of 988 patients, 674 patients were VEGFR-TKI-naïve and 314 patients were VEGFR-TKI-experienced. Anti-angiogenesis-related adverse events of any grade and severe adverse events occurred in 65.1 and 34.6% of VEGFR-TKI-naïve patients and 54.8 and 36.0% of VEGFR-TKI-experienced patients, respectively. Regardless of treatment history, the most common adverse event was hypertension, with 48.6% in VEGFR-TKI-naïve patients and 35.0% in VEGFR-TKI-experienced patients. For VEGFR-TKI-experienced patients, the overall rate of anti-angiogenesis-related adverse events for sorafenib (24.3%) was lower than that for other VEGFR-TKIs (p < 0.05). Patients experiencing anti-angiogenesis-related adverse events were 1.6 times more likely to receive a low relative dose intensity. CONCLUSIONS More than half and more than one-third of patients with renal cell carcinoma receiving VEGFR-TKIs experienced any and severe anti-angiogenesis-related adverse events, respectively. The relative dose intensity of VEGFR-TKI treatment was associated with anti-angiogenesis-related adverse events.
Collapse
|
18
|
Navani V, Wells JC, Boyne DJ, Cheung WY, Brenner DM, McGregor BA, Labaki C, Schmidt AL, McKay RR, Meza L, Pal SK, Donskov F, Beuselinck B, Otiato M, Ludwig L, Powles T, Szabados BE, Choueiri TK, Heng DYC. CABOSEQ: The Effectiveness of Cabozantinib in Patients With Treatment Refractory Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC). Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:106.e1-106.e8. [PMID: 35945133 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are limited data evaluating the activity of cabozantinib (CABO) as second line (2L) therapy post standard of care ipilimumab-nivolumab (IPI-NIVO) or immuno-oncology(IO)/vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor (VEGFi) combinations (IOVE). MATERIALS AND METHODS Using the IMDC database, we sought to identify the objective response rate, time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) of 2L CABO after IPI-NIVO, IOVE combinations, pazopanib or sunitinib (PAZ/SUN) or other first line (1L) therapies. Multivariable Cox regression, adjusted for underlying differences in IMDC groups, was used to compare differences in OS for 2L CABO based on preceding therapy. RESULTS Three hundred and forty-six patients received 2L CABO (78 post IPI NIVO, 46 post IOVE, 161 post PAZ/SUN, 61 post Other). Of the entire cohort, 12.6%, 62.6%, and 24.8% were IMDC favourable, intermediate, and poor risk, respectively. Patients that received 1L IPI-NIVO had a median OS of 21.4 (95% CI, 12.1 - NE [Not evaluable]) months compared to 15.7 (95% CI, 9.3 - NE) months in 1L IOVE and 20.7 (95% CI, 15.6 - 35.6) months in 1L PAZ/SUN, P = .28. Median TTF from the initiation of 2L CABO in the overall population was 7.6 (95% CI, 6.6 - 9.0) months. We were unable to detect a significant difference in 2L CABO OS based on type of 1L therapy received: 1L IPI-NIVO (reference group) vs. 1L IOVE HR 1.73 (95% CI, 0.83 - 3.62 P = .14), 1L PAZ/SUN 1.16 (95% CI, 0.67 - 2.00 P = .60), however given the retrospective observational nature of this work a lack of sufficient power may contribute to this. CONCLUSION In a large real world dataset, we identified clinically meaningful activity of 2L CABO after all evaluated contemporary 1L therapies, irrespective of whether the 1L regimen included a VEGFi. These are real world benchmarks with which to counsel our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Winson Y Cheung
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Canada; University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Rana R McKay
- University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, United States
| | - Luis Meza
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, United States
| | - Sumanta K Pal
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, United States
| | - Frede Donskov
- University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Iinuma K, Tomioka-Inagawa R, Kameyama K, Taniguchi T, Kawada K, Ishida T, Nagai S, Enomoto T, Ueda S, Kawase M, Takeuchi S, Kawase K, Kato D, Takai M, Nakane K, Koie T. Efficacy and Safety of Cabozantinib in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10123172. [PMID: 36551927 PMCID: PMC9775439 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A multicenter retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib in patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We enrolled 53 patients with mRCC who received cabozantinib at eight institutions in Japan. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS). In addition, we analyzed prognostic factors in patients with mRCC treated with cabozantinib. The median follow-up period was 8 months, and the median OS was 20.0 months. The ORR and DCR were 39.6% and 83.0%, respectively. The median PFS was 11.0 months. PFS was significantly shorter in patients previously treated with at least two tyrosine kinase inhibitors and in those with C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 1.27 mg/dL (p = 0.021 and p = 0.029, respectively). Adverse events of any grade and grades ≥3 occurred in 42 (79.2%) and 10 (18.9%) patients, respectively. Cabozantinib is a useful treatment option for patients with mRCC and may benefit from earlier use. In this study, CRP ≥ 1.27 mg/dL is a poor prognostic factor in patients treated with cabozantinib, and careful follow-up may be required in treating patients with high CRP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Iinuma
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Risa Tomioka-Inagawa
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Koji Kameyama
- Department of Urology, Kizawa Memorial Hospital, 590 shimokobi, Kobicho, Minokamo, Gifu 505-8503, Japan
| | - Tomoki Taniguchi
- Department of Urology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, 4-86 Minaminokawa-cho, Ogaki, Gifu 503-8502, Japan
| | - Kei Kawada
- Department of Urology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, 4-6-1 Noisiki, Gifu 500-8717, Japan
| | - Takashi Ishida
- Department of Urology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, 7-1 Kashimacho, Gifu 500-8513, Japan
| | - Shingo Nagai
- Department of Urology, Toyota Memorial Hospital, 1-1 Heiwacho, Toyota, Aichi 471-8513, Japan
| | - Torai Enomoto
- Department of Urology, Matsunami General Hospital, 185-1 Kasamatsucho, Hashima-gun, Gifu 501-6062, Japan
| | - Shota Ueda
- Department of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Takayama Hospital, 3-113-11 Tenman-machi, Takayama-shi, Gifu 506-8550, Japan
| | - Makoto Kawase
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Shinichi Takeuchi
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Kota Kawase
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Daiki Kato
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Manabu Takai
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Keita Nakane
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Takuya Koie
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-58-230-6000
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lee HW, Seo HS, Yeom SY, Kim SN, Kim CR, Park DH, Park W, Choy YB, Park CG, Seo SI. Cabozantinib-Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles: A Potential Adjuvant Strategy for Surgically Resected High-Risk Non-Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:12634. [PMID: 36293494 PMCID: PMC9604013 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232012634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with high-risk non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are at risk of metastatic relapse following nephrectomy. Cabozantinib (CZ), a potent multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, interferes with angiogenesis and immunosuppression associated with surgery-induced metastasis. Here, we explored the therapeutic potential of CZ-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles (CZ-PLGA-NPs) as an adjuvant strategy for targeting post-nephrectomy metastasis. A clinically relevant subline recapitulating post-nephrectomy lung metastasis of high-risk human RCC, namely Renca-SRLu5-Luc, was established through in vivo serial selection of luciferase-expressing murine RCC Renca-Luc cells. CZ was encapsulated into PLGA-NPs via the conventional single emulsion technique. The multifaceted preclinical antimetastatic efficacy of CZ-PLGA-NPs was assessed in Renca-SRLu5-Luc cells. CZ-PLGA-NPs with a smooth surface displayed desirable physicochemical properties, good CZ encapsulation efficiency, as well as controlled and sustained CZ release. CZ-PLGA-NPs exhibited remarkable dose-dependent toxicity against Renca-SRLu5-Luc cells by inducing G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. CZ-PLGA-NPs attenuated in vitro colony formation, migration, and invasion by abrogating AKT and ERK1/2 activation. An intravenous injection of CZ-PLGA-NPs markedly reduced lung metastatic burden and prolonged lifespan with favorable safety in the Renca-SRLu5-Luc experimental lung metastasis model. The novel CZ-PLGA-NPs system with multifaceted antimetastatic effects and alleviating off-target toxicity potential is a promising adjunctive agent for patients with surgically resected high-risk RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye Won Lee
- Department of Urology, Center for Urologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Hee Seung Seo
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, SKKU Institute for Convergence, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea
- Department of Intelligent Precision Healthcare Convergence, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea
| | - Seon-Yong Yeom
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Se-Na Kim
- Institute of Medical & Biological Engineering, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea
| | - Cho Rim Kim
- Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, College of Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
| | - Dae-Hwan Park
- Department of Engineering Chemistry, College of Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
- Department of Industrial Cosmetic Science and Department of Synchrotron Radiation Science and Technology, College of Bio-Health University System, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
| | - Wooram Park
- Department of Integrative Biotechnology, College of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea
| | - Young Bin Choy
- Institute of Medical & Biological Engineering, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea
- Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, College of Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea
| | - Chun Gwon Park
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, SKKU Institute for Convergence, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea
- Department of Intelligent Precision Healthcare Convergence, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea
- Biomedical Institute for Convergence at SKKU (BICS), Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea
| | - Seong Il Seo
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Graham J, Vogel A, Cheng AL, Bjarnason GA, Neal JW. Cabozantinib after prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with solid tumors: A systematic literature review. Cancer Treat Rev 2022; 110:102453. [PMID: 36037792 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We conducted a systematic literature review to identify evidence for cabozantinib activity in patients with solid tumors after prior checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy. METHODS The review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021259873). MEDLINE®, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched on 19 May 2021 to identify publications reporting the efficacy/effectiveness and safety/tolerability of cabozantinib in patients with solid tumors who had received prior CPI-based therapy. Publications were screened by one reviewer with uncertainties resolved by a second and/or the full author group. Risk of bias was assessed using Gradingof Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) for clinical trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies. RESULTS Of 669 publications screened, 21 were eligible: 18 reported data on renal cell carcinoma, and one each for hepatocellular carcinoma, metastatic urothelial carcinoma, and non-small cell lung cancer. Of six trial publications, three reported moderate-quality evidence and three low-quality evidence. Of 15 observational studies, NOS scores ranged from 3 to 6, suggesting a high potential for uncertainty. The studies consistently reported clinical activity for cabozantinib after CPI therapy, across treatment lines and tumor types, with no new safety signals. The findings were limited by the quality and quantity of available data. CONCLUSION Cabozantinib appears to have anti-tumor activity after prior CPI therapy in patients with solid tumors. Our results are driven largely by studies in renal cell carcinoma. Evidence from ongoing phase 3 trials is required to establish further the role of cabozantinib after CPI therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Graham
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
| | - Arndt Vogel
- Clinic for Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Georg A Bjarnason
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joel W Neal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Real-World Treatment with Nivolumab or Cabozantinib for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) in the Veneto Region of Italy: Results of AMOUR Study. Target Oncol 2022; 17:467-474. [PMID: 35751733 PMCID: PMC9345814 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-022-00892-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background Second- or third-line treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have dramatically changed in the last few years. There are no criteria for the choice between nivolumab and cabozantinib, which both demonstrated overall survival (OS) gain in pivotal trials. Objective We conducted an analysis of oncological outcomes in patients treated in the Veneto Region (Italy), studying different sequences of TKI-nivolumab-cabozantinib or TKI-cabozantinib-nivolumab in a publicly funded healthcare system. Patients and Methods We conducted a retrospective, real-world analysis of all consecutive patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab or cabozantinib in 2017–2018 at 19 Oncology Units in the Veneto Region. Results We identified 170 patients, 73 % males, median age 68.4 years. All patients started second-line treatment, 59 % received a third-line therapy. Patients with NLR > 3 had a shorter OS (p < 0.0001). In the second-line treatment, nivolumab was administered to 108 patients (63 %), cabozantinib to 29 (17 %); in the third-line treatment nivolumab was administered to 42 patients (25 %), cabozantinib to 49 (29 %). Median OS and PFS in second line treatment were 28.4 and 6.6 months for nivolumab, 16.8 and 6.6 months for cabozantinib. Median OS and PFS in third-line treatment were 27 and 5.2 months for nivolumab, 16.6 and 7.5 months for cabozantinib. Median OS for nivolumab>cabozantinib sequence versus cabozantinib > nivolumab was 28.8 versus 19.9 months (p = 0.2); median PFS for both the sequences were similar at 5.7 months. A cost effectiveness per month of survival of the two sequences analysis was performed: the cost per month for the nivolumab > cabozantinib sequence was 1738.60whereas the cost for the other one was €1624.80. Conclusions In our real-world cohort, most patients received nivolumab as second-line treatment. Outcomes of single drugs are superimposable with those in the published literature. Both the sequences of nivolumab and cabozantinib appear to be viable, effective strategies from an OS and cost-effective perspective.
Collapse
|
23
|
Roviello G, Gambale E, Giorgione R, Santini D, Stellato M, Fornarini G, Rebuzzi SE, Basso U, Bimbatti D, Doni L, Nesi G, Bersanelli M, Buti S, De Giorgi U, Galli L, Sbrana A, Conca R, Carella C, Naglieri E, Pignata S, Procopio G, Antonuzzo L. Effect of systemic therapies or best supportive care after disease progression to both nivolumab and cabozantinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: The Meet-Uro 19BEYOND study. Cancer Med 2022; 11:3084-3092. [PMID: 35312175 PMCID: PMC9385587 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nivolumab and cabozantinib are currently approved agents in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) but there are no data available for patients progressing to both treatments. The aim of this study was to compare active therapeutic options and best supportive care (BSC) after progression to nivolumab and cabozantinib in mRCC. METHODS In this retrospective study, we selected 50 patients from eight Italian centers. The primary endpoint of the study was the overall survival (OS) of patients on active treatment versus BSC. Secondary endpoints were the progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). The efficacy of active therapy was also investigated. RESULTS After progression to both nivolumab and cabozantinib, 57.1% of patients were given active treatment (mainly everolimus and sorafenib) while 42.9% received BSC. The median OS was 13 months (95% CI: 4-NR) in actively treated patients and 3 months (95% CI: 2-4) in BSC patients (p = 0.001). Patients treated with sorafenib had better disease control than those treated with everolimus (stable disease: 71.4% vs. 16.7%, progression disease: 14.3% vs. 58.3%; p = 0.03), with no significant differences in PFS (5 and 3 months, 95% CI: 1-6 vs. 2-5; p = 0.6) and OS (12 and 4 months, 95% CI: 3-NR vs. 2-NR; p = 0.2). CONCLUSION After treatment with both nivolumab and cabozantinib, the choice of a safe active systemic therapy offered better outcomes than BSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Daniele Santini
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Stellato
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fornarini
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino di Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - Sara Elena Rebuzzi
- Medical Oncology Unit, San Paolo General Hospital, Savona, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (Di.M.I.), University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - Umberto Basso
- MedicalOncology Unit 1, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Davide Bimbatti
- MedicalOncology Unit 1, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Laura Doni
- Medical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Gabriella Nesi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Sebastiano Buti
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Italy
| | - Luca Galli
- Medical Oncology Unit 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Andrea Sbrana
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Raffaele Conca
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Onco-Hematology, IRCCS-CROB, Referral Cancer Center of Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, Italy
| | | | | | - Sandro Pignata
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Procopio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Antonuzzo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sharma A, Elias R, Christie A, Williams NS, Pedrosa I, Bjarnason GA, Brugarolas J. Extended disease control with unconventional cabozantinib dose increase in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. KIDNEY CANCER 2022; 6:69-79. [PMID: 36743424 PMCID: PMC9894028 DOI: 10.3233/kca-210117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Cabozantinib is among the most potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) FDA-approved for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Effective treatments after progression on cabozantinib salvage therapy are limited. Dose escalation for other TKIs has been shown to afford added disease control. Objective We sought to evaluate whether dose escalation of cabozantinib (Cabometyx®) from conventional doses in select patients with limited treatment options offered additional disease control. We asked how cabozantinib dose increases may affect circulating drug levels. Methods We identified patients with mRCC at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center who were treated with cabozantinib dose escalation to 80 mg after progressing on conventional cabozantinib 60 mg. We then queried leading kidney cancer investigators across the world to identify additional patients. Finally, we reviewed pharmacokinetic (PK) data to assess how higher doses impacted circulating levels by comparison to other formulations (Cometriq® capsules). Results We report six patients treated at two different institutions with cabozantinib-responsive disease and good tolerability, where cabozantinib was dose escalated (typically to 80 mg, but as high as 120 mg) after progression on 60 mg, a strategy that resulted in added disease control (median duration, 14 months; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 8 - Not Estimable[NE]). Four patients (66.7%) had disease control lasting at least 1 year. No grade III/IV adverse events were identified in this small, select, cohort. A comparison of PK data to FDA-approved cabozantinib 140 mg capsules suggest that cabozantinib 80 mg tablets results in comparable exposures. Conclusions mRCC patients with cabozantinib responsive disease and reasonable tolerability may benefit from dose escalation at progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akanksha Sharma
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Roy Elias
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Alana Christie
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Noelle S. Williams
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ivan Pedrosa
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Deparment of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - James Brugarolas
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Krens SD, van Erp NP, Groenland SL, Moes DJAR, Mulder SF, Desar IME, van der Hulle T, Steeghs N, van Herpen CML. Exposure-response analyses of cabozantinib in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:228. [PMID: 35236333 PMCID: PMC8892746 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09338-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim In the registration trial, cabozantinib exposure ≥ 750 ng/mL correlated to improved tumor size reduction, response rate and progression free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). Because patients in routine care often differ from patients in clinical trials, we explored the cabozantinib exposure–response relationship in patients with mRCC treated in routine care. Methods Cabozantinib trough concentrations (Cmin) were collected and average exposure was calculated per individual. Exposure–response analyses were performed using the earlier identified target of Cmin > 750 ng/mL and median Cmin. In addition, the effect of dose reductions on response was explored. PFS was used as measure of response. Results In total, 59 patients were included:10% were classified as favourable, 61% as intermediate and 29% as poor IMDC risk group, respectively. Median number of prior treatment lines was 2 (0–5). Starting dose was 60 mg in 46%, 40 mg in 42% and 20 mg in 12% of patients. Dose reductions were needed in 58% of patients. Median Cmin was 572 ng/mL (IQR: 496–701). Only 17% of patients had an average Cmin ≥ 750 ng/mL. Median PFS was 52 weeks (95% CI: 40–64). No improved PFS was observed for patients with Cmin ≥ 750 ng/mL or ≥ 572 ng/ml. A longer PFS was observed for patients with a dose reduction vs. those without (65 vs. 31 weeks, p = .001). After incorporating known covariates (IMDC risk group and prior treatment lines (< 2 vs. ≥ 2)) in the multivariable analysis, the need for dose reduction remained significantly associated with improved PFS (HR 0.32, 95% CI:0.14–0.70, p = .004). Conclusion In these explorative analyses, no clear relationship between increased cabozantinib exposure and improved PFS was observed. Average cabozantinib exposure was below the previously proposed target in 83% of patients. Future studies should focus on validating the cabozantinib exposure required for long term efficacy. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09338-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie D Krens
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Nielka P van Erp
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Stefanie L Groenland
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk Jan A R Moes
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sasja F Mulder
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid M E Desar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tom van der Hulle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Neeltje Steeghs
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carla M L van Herpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Albiges L, Schmidinger M, Taguieva-Pioger N, Perol D, Grünwald V, Guemas E. CaboPoint: a phase II study of cabozantinib as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Future Oncol 2022; 18:915-926. [PMID: 34911359 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-1006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Cabozantinib is an inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinases, including AXL, MET and VEGF receptors. Here, we describe the rationale and design for the phase II CaboPoint trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03945773), which will evaluate the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib as a second-line treatment in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma whose disease has progressed despite checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Patients will be recruited into two cohorts: prior ipilimumab plus nivolumab (cohort A) or prior checkpoint inhibitor-VEGF-targeted therapy (cohort B). All patients will receive once-daily oral cabozantinib 60 mg for up to 18 months. The primary end point is objective response rate. Secondary end points include overall survival, progression-free survival and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurence Albiges
- Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif 94805, France
| | - Manuela Schmidinger
- Department of Medicine I, Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria
| | | | - David Perol
- Department of Clinical Research, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon 69008, France
| | - Viktor Grünwald
- Essen University Hospital, West German Cancer Center, Clinic for Medical Oncology & Clinic for Urology, Essen 45147, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|