Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid compared with pamidronate disodium in the treatment of skeletal complications in patients with advanced multiple myeloma or breast carcinoma

Approach to Bone Health in the Patient With Breast Cancer

Treatment for breast cancer, including endocrine therapies, can contribute to bone loss and increase the risk of osteoporosis and fractures. Management of bone health in patients with cancer is often coordinated between oncologists, endocrinologists, and primary care physicians. In this article, we discuss the approach to screening for fracture risk among patients initiating treatments for breast cancer and recommendations for lifestyle modifications to optimize bone health. We will review 3 indications for pharmacologic bone-targeted therapies: prevention of cancer treatment-induced bone loss, adjuvant therapy to reduce recurrence, and management of bone metastases.

Are bone targeted agents still useful in times of immunotherapy? The SAKK 80/19 BTA pilot study

Background

Patients with bone metastases from solid tumors often have additional treatment with bone targeted agents (BTAs) to avoid symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs) such as clinically significant pathological fracture leading toradiation therapy or surgery to the bone, spinal cord compression, or hypercalcemia. The absolute value of BTA treatment in the era of immunotherapy (IO) is unknown.

Methods

Patients with bone metastases treated with immunotherapy within the Alpine Tumor Immunology Registry were compared based on whether they received an additional BTA such as denosumab or zoledronic acid. The primary endpoint was time to first SSE. Continuous data were summarized as median and range, categorical data using frequency counts and percentages. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to describe and visualize the effect of categorical variables.

Results

One hundred and ninety-seven patients with bone metastases and treatment with immunotherapy such as nivolumab (48 %), pembrolizumab (40 %), atezolizumab (12 %), ipilimumab (9 %) and other immunotherapy (5 %) were included. The most frequent tumor types were lung cancer (50 %), malignant melanoma (11 %), renal cell cancer (10 %) and bladder cancer (9 %), respectively. One hundred and twenty-two patients (62 %) received a BTA treatment (91 % denosumab). The median treatment duration of a BTA was 178 days (min: 1 day, max: 2010 days). Out of the 197 patients, 47 (24 %) experienced at least one SSE, 100 (51 %) had bone pain. Ten of the 122 patients (8 %) receiving a BTA developed osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). The percentage of patients without an SSE at fixed time points was higher if treated with a BTA (e.g., at 6 months, 92 % [95 % CI: 84 % - 96 %] versus 88 % [95 % CI: 77 % - 94 %]), but no significant difference in time to first SSE (HR 0.69; 95 % CI 0.34-1.39, log-rank p = 0.29) or time to first bone pain (HR: 0.85; 95 % CI: 0.51-1.43, p = 0.54) between these two groups could be detected. There were differences in OS between patients treated with a BTA and patients not treated with a BTA (HR: 1.46; 95 % CI: 1.01-2.10, p = 0.043).

Conclusion

No significant difference in time to first SSE or bone pain was observed between patients who have received a BTA or not when treated with immunotherapy. Based on these retrospective results the indication of BTAs to reduce SSEs in cancer patients under treatment with immunotherapy needs further evaluation.

Treatment Patterns of Bone-targeting Agents Among Solid Tumor Patients With Bone Metastases: An Analysis of Electronic Health Record Data in the United States From 2014 to 2018

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated real-world treatment patterns of approved bone-targeting agents (BTAs) with various mechanisms of action-pamidronate, zoledronic acid, and denosumab-for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases (BM) from solid tumors.

METHODS

Adult patients with BM secondary to solid tumors between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018, were identified from the Flatiron Health Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records database and categorized by BTA use and therapy type. Time from diagnosis to initiation, persistence (mean time on treatment), and compliance (≥12 administrations/year) with BTA with up to 4 years of follow-up were examined.

RESULTS

This study included 27,268 patients with BM (breast cancer, 32.7%; lung cancer, 16.5%; prostate cancer, 17.2%; and other solid tumors, 33.6%); of these, 41.4% initiated denosumab after BM diagnosis; 21.3%, zoledronic acid; 0.6%, pamidronate; and 36.7% had no treatment record. Mean (SD) time to initiation for denosumab or zoledronic acid was 68.6 (157.0) days (denosumab, 70.3 (160.4) days; zoledronic acid, 65.2 [150.2] days). Mean persistence and compliance (first year of treatment) were significantly higher for denosumab than for zoledronic acid (22.0 vs. 14.9 mo [ P <0.0001] and 42.3% vs. 34.8% [ P <0.0001], respectively). Treatment compliance was the highest in patients with breast cancer (denosumab, 48.2%; zoledronic acid, 39.1%).

CONCLUSION

Real-world BTA treatment patterns in the United States suggest that over one-third of patients with BM secondary to solid tumors remain untreated and less than 50% of the patients received ≥12 administrations/year of BTA therapy.

Bone-Targeted Therapy Regimen and Skeletal-Related Events in Patients Surviving Longer Than 2 Years With Metastatic Breast Cancer and Bone Metastasis

BACKGROUND

Bone-targeted therapy (BTT) including zoledronic acid (ZA) and denosumab decreases the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and bone metastasis. The impacts from prolonged BTT on SREs and BTT-associated harms are unknown and are becoming important to understand as these patients survive for longer periods.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a retrospective study of 224 patients with MBC and bone metastasis who survived for more than 2 years after diagnosis and received treatment at our institution between 2016 and 2021. We defined 3 BTT patterns: (1) ZA only, (2) denosumab only, (3) both ZA and denosumab. The association between these BTT patterns and SREs and harms was assessed using Fisher exact test and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Rates of SREs overall were 21.2% of patients given ZA only, 8.8% of those given denosumab only, and 20% of those given both, without statistically significant differences (p = .32). However, those treated with denosumab only had significantly fewer compression fractures (0.7%) (p = .02). BTT-associated harm was observed in 5.8% of the ZA-only group, 11.7% of the denosumab-only group, and 14.3% of the group given both, without statistically significant differences (p = .37).

CONCLUSION

Oncologists may have increased flexibility regarding the frequency of administration of BTT along with their choice of agent. Our study showed no significant difference in the prevention of overall SRE or development of BTT-associated harms between the BTT regimens evaluated.

Multiple Myeloma and the Role of Bisphosphonates in Its Management

An aberrant growth of plasma cells in the bone marrow characterizes the hematological neoplasm known as multiple myeloma, which is typically accompanied by increased bone pain and skeletal-related events such as pathological fractures and/or spinal cord compression. Changes in the bone marrow microenvironment brought on by increased osteoclastic activity and/or decreased osteoblastic activity as a result of myeloma bone disease have a detrimental effect on quality of life. Bone-modifying medications such as bisphosphonates or denosumab are used to treat myeloma bone disease. These substances can lessen bone pain and the chance of pathological fracture, but they do not stimulate the growth of new bone or heal already damaged bone. In order to conduct this study, we searched the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases for complete free papers published in English and studied people over the previous five years, starting in 2018. The search covered randomized clinical trials (RCT), observational studies, meta-analyses, systemic reviews, and conventional reviews. Twenty-five publications are picked after using quality evaluation techniques to determine the type of study. These papers' full-text articles are investigated, examined, and tallied. We spoke about the various treatments for bone damage in multiple myeloma. It was discovered that bisphosphonates lessen the frequency and severity of bone problems. However, we are unsure of their contribution to survival. Although these medicines enhance life quality, it is unknown if they also increase overall survival. The focus of this study is on several kinds of bone-modifying drugs, their processes of action, the point at which therapy is started, how long it lasts, and any possible mortality advantages.

Prevalence of Precursory Signs of Atypical Femoral Fractures in Patients Receiving Bone-Modifying Agents for Bone Metastases: A Cross-Sectional Study

Patients on bone-modifying agents (BMAs) for bone metastases are at risk of atypical femoral fractures (AFFs), which can lead to a sudden deterioration in performance status. In this study, we sought to determine the prevalence of radiographic precursory signs of AFF in patients on oncologic BMAs. Forty-two patients (23 men, 19 women; mean age 68.8 ± 10.0 years) on oncologic BMAs (zoledronate for >3 years and/or denosumab for >1 year) and without clinical symptoms were enrolled between 2019 and 2021. All patients were receiving denosumab at enrollment and 5 had previously used zoledronate. The mean duration of BMA use was 31.2 ± 18.5 months. Radiographs of both femurs were screened for precursory signs of AFF (e.g., thickening of the lateral cortex). The patients were divided into two groups according to thickening status and compared by duration of BMA use. They were also divided into three groups by duration of BMA use (12-23 months, n = 18; 24-59 months, n = 19; ≥60 months, n = 5), and the prevalence of apparent thickenings was examined. As a result, 18 patients (42.9%) showed minute local or diffuse thickening and 10 (23.8%) showed apparent local thickening. The duration of BMA use was significantly longer in patients with apparent thickening than in those without (47.3 ± 23.6 months [n = 10] versus 26.2 ± 13.5 months [n = 32]; p < 0.05). The prevalence of apparent thickening increased with increasing duration of BMA use (12-23 months, 5.6%; 24-59 months, 31.6%; ≥60 months, 60.0%). In conclusion, radiographic precursory signs of AFF are common in patients on oncologic BMAs. Radiographic screening for AFF could be relevant in patients who have been on long-term oncologic BMAs, even if asymptomatic. © 2023 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Randomized phase II study of zoledronate dosing every four versus eight weeks in patients with bone metastasis from lung cancer (Hanshin Cancer Group0312)

BACKGROUND

Zoledronic acid (ZA) reduces the incidence of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. However, the optimal dosing interval of ZA for patients with lung cancer is uncertain.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, open-label, feasibility phase 2 trial at eight Japanese hospitals. Patients with bone metastases from lung cancer were randomly assigned to receive either 4 mg of ZA every four weeks (4wk-ZA) or every eight weeks (8wk-ZA). The primary endpoint was the time to the first SRE and the rate and types of SREs after one year. SREs were defined as pathologic bone fracture, bone radiation therapy or surgery, and spinal cord compression. Secondary endpoints were the SRE incidence at six months, pain assessment, changes in analgesic consumption, serum N-telopeptide, toxicity, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Between November 2012 and October 2018, 109 patients were randomly assigned to the 4wk-ZA group (54 patients) and the 8wk-ZA group (55 patients). The number of patients who received chemotherapy or molecular-targeted agents was 30 and 23 and 18 and 16 in the 4wk-ZA and 8wk-ZA groups, respectively. The median time to the first SRE could not be calculated because of a low SRE. The time to the first SRE of all patients did not differ between the groups (P = 0.715, HR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.48, 2.9). The SRE rate of all patients after 12 months was 17.6% (95% CI = 8.4, 30.9%) in the 4wk-ZA and 23.3% (95% CI = 11.8, 38.6%) in the 8wk-ZA group, without significant differences between the groups. There was no difference in any secondary endpoint between groups, and these endpoints did not differ among treatment modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

An eight-week ZA interval does not increase the SRE risk for patients with bone metastasis from lung cancer and could be considered clinically.

Zoledronic acid induces ferroptosis by upregulating POR in osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma, usually originating in the stroma, is the most common primary bone cancer in adolescents, and its prognosis is poor. Surgery, adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy are not satisfactory at the present time. Therefore, it is critical to develop novel therapeutic strategies to improve the quality of life and long-term survival rate of osteosarcoma patients. In this study, we discovered that zoledronic acid (ZOL) dramatically increased cell death in osteosarcoma cells, and this cytotoxicity was greatly reversed by liproxstatin-1 (a ferroptosis inhibitor). ZOL also had an obvious effect on lipid peroxidation and reactive oxygen species (ROS), which suggested that ZOL most certainly induces ferroptosis in osteosarcoma cells. In addition, we further found that ZOL increases cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase (POR) expression dose dependently in osteosarcoma cell lines. Knockdown of POR attenuated ZOL-induced cytotoxicity and attenuated the effect of ferroptosis in osteosarcoma cells, which indicated that POR plays an important role in ferroptosis. Moreover, we also found that ZOL inhibits osteosarcoma growth in vivo. Our findings suggest that ZOL induces ferroptosis by upregulating POR expression to increase ROS levels and upregulate lipid peroxidation levels in osteosarcoma cells. POR may be used as a therapeutic target to inhibit osteosarcoma.

Management of Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Advanced Therapies: Evidence-Based Recommendations for Routine Clinical Practice

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy in adults worldwide. Over the past few years, major therapeutic advances have improved progression-free and overall survival, as well as quality of life. Despite this recent progress, MM remains incurable in the vast majority of cases. Patients eventually relapse and become refractory to multiple drug classes, making long-term management challenging. In this review, we will focus on the treatment paradigm of relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) in the era of advanced therapies emphasizing the available novel modalities that have recently been incorporated into routine practice, such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, bispecific antibodies, and other promising approaches. We will also discuss major factors that influence the selection of appropriate drug combinations or cellular therapies, such as relapse characteristics, and other disease and patient related parameters. Our goal is to provide insight into the currently available and experimental therapies for RRMM in an effort to guide the therapeutic decision-making process.

Management of bone metastasis with zoledronic acid: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background

While considered the mainstay of treatment for specific bone metastases, ZA is used predominantly to treat osteolytic lesions. The purpose of this network meta-analysis is to compare ZA to other treatment options in its ability to improve specific clinical outcomes in patients with bone metastases secondary to any primary tumor.

Methods

PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception to May 5th, 2022. Keywords used were solid tumor, lung neoplasm, kidney neoplasm, breast neoplasm, prostate neoplasm, ZA and bone metastasis. Every randomized controlled trial and non-randomized quasi-experimental study of systemic ZA administration for patients with bone metastases and any comparator were included. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was done on the primary outcomes including number of SREs, time to developing a first on-study SRE, overall survival, and disease progression-free survival. Secondary outcome was pain at 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment.

Results

Our search yielded 3861 titles with 27 meeting inclusion criteria. For the number of SRE, ZA in combination with chemotherapy or hormone therapy was statistically superior to placebo (OR 0.079; 95 % CrI: 0.022-0.27). For the time to the first on study SRE, the relative effectiveness of ZA 4 mg was statistically superior to placebo (HR 0.58; 95 % CrI:0.48-0.77). At 3 and 6 months, ZA 4 mg was significantly superior to placebo for reducing pain with a SMD of -0.85 (95 % CrI:-1.6, -0.0025) and -2.6 (95 % CrI:-4.7, -0.52) respectively.

Conclusions

This systematic review shows the benefits of ZA in decreasing the incidence of SREs, increasing the time to the first on-study SRE, and reducing the pain level at 3 and 6 months.

Team Approach: Management of Pathologic Fractures

»

Optimal care for pathologic fractures centers on the use of a multidisciplinary team; thus, whenever there is a concern for pathologic fracture and proper workup is unable to be performed, prompt referral to a center equipped to manage these injuries should occur.

»

Fixation strategies for pathologic fractures must take into account patient characteristics, cancer subtypes, and overall goals of treatment.

»

As the treatments of cancers improve, patient life expectancy with disease will improve as well. This will lead to an increase in the incidence of impending or completed pathologic fractures. The broader subspecialties of orthopaedics must be aware of general principles in the diagnosis and management of these injuries.

Outcome of Surgical Treatment for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Objective  The spinal column is one of the most prevalent regions for metastasis, with an increasing frequency of spinal metastases. Spinal cord metastatic tumor damages the vertebral body, weakens the spinal support, and exerts mass effect on the spinal cord. Overzealous surgical intervention does not provide any additional benefit in most of the spinal metastasis due to shorter life expectancy. The principal goal of this study is to analyze the outcome of various surgical treatments offered to patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). Methods  Retrospective cohort study including all patients that underwent surgical intervention for MSCC from March 2013 to March 2020. Results  A total of 198 patients were included, 113 males and 85 females; the mean age was 62 years. The most common primary cancer was prostate (21.71%) followed by hematological (20.07%) and lung (16.66%). At 6-month postsurgery, 68.68% of patients were Frankel grade D or E (vs. 23.23% preoperatively), 16.6% were grade C (vs 57% preoperatively), and 14.64% were grade A or B (vs. 19.69% preoperatively). Pain on numeric rating scale was decreased from 6.38 ± 3.08 to 3.39 ± 0.73 at 24 hours postsurgery and 1.94 ± 0.67 at 6 months. Conclusion  This study found that the majority of patients, undergoing minimally invasive spinal stabilization and decompression for metastatic spinal tumors, have better quality of life, analgesia, and mobility. In conclusion, treatment for spinal metastases should be individualized and a multidisciplinary approach is needed.

Pathophysiology and therapeutic advances in myeloma bone disease

Bone disease is the most common complication in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), and it may lead to skeletal-related events (SREs) such as bone pain, pathological fractures, and spinal cord compression, which impair a patients' quality of life and survival. The pathogenesis of myeloma bone disease (MBD) involves disruption of bone reconstitution balance including excessive activation of osteoclasts, inhibition of osteoblasts, and participation of osteocytes and bone marrow stromal cells. Various factors, such as the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL)/osteoprotegerin (OPG), dickkopf-1 (DKK-1), sclerostin, and activin-A, are involved in the development of MBD. Bisphosphonates and the anti-RANKL antibody denosumab are currently the main treatment options for MBD, delaying the onset of SREs. Denosumab is preferred in patients with MM and renal dysfunction. Although effective drugs have been approved, antimyeloma therapy is the most important method for controlling bone disease.

Proceedings of the 2022 Santa Fe Bone Symposium: Current Concepts in the Care of Patients with Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases

The 22^nd Annual Santa Fe Bone Symposium (SFBS) was a hybrid meeting held August 5-6, 2022, with in-person and virtual attendees. Altogether, over 400 individuals registered, a majority of whom attended in-person, representing many states in the USA plus 7 other countries. The SFBS included 10 plenary presentations, 2 faculty panel discussions, satellite symposia, Bone Health & Osteoporosis Foundation Fracture Liaison Service Boot Camp, and a Project ECHO workshop, with lively interactive discussions for all events. Topics of interest included fracture prevention at different stages of life; how to treat and when to change therapy; skeletal health in cancer patients; advanced imaging to assess bone strength; the state of healthcare in the USA; osteosarcopenia; vitamin D update; perioperative bone health care; new guidelines for managing primary hyperparathyroidism; new concepts on bone modeling and remodeling; and an overview on the care of rare bone diseases, including hypophosphatasia, X-linked hypophosphatemia, tumor induced osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfecta, fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva, and osteopetrosis. The SFBS was preceded by the Santa Fe Fellows Workshop on Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases, a collaboration of the Endocrine Fellows Foundation and the Osteoporosis Foundation of New Mexico. From the Workshop, 4 participating fellows were selected to give oral presentations at the bone symposium. These proceedings represent the clinical highlights of 2022 SFBS presentations and the discussions that followed, all with the aim of optimizing skeletal health and minimizing the consequences of fragile bones.

Osteonecrosis of the jaw in primary dental care: Recognition and referral

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) are uncommon conditions, however when present they have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life and are notoriously difficult to treat. With medical advances resulting in improved survival rates and increased life expectancy, it is likely that general dental practitioners (GDPs) will more frequently be involved in the oral health management of patients at risk of both ORN and MRONJ. Though management of both diseases is beyond the scope of primary care dentistry, the GDP still has a key role in the patient's overall care. It is therefore important to have a good understanding of these conditions and their consequences for dental treatment in order to provide adequate patient support. Management requires a multidisciplinary approach to treatment and as part of this GDPs are integral in prevention, early recognition and maintenance of oral health following diagnosis. This article aims to refresh the reader's knowledge regarding MRONJ and ORN and support the GDP in managing this patient group.

The 100 most cited papers on bone metastasis: A bibliometric analysis

•

Citations per article in the most 100 top cited articles ranged from 357 to 2167.

•

The leading country was USA, Canada, and United Kingdom.

•

Clinical management of bone metastasis from different malignancy origins.

•

Intense collaborative activity between countries and institutions was obvious between the selected papers.

Background

Over the past few decades, a vast number of articles focused on bone metastasis have been published. Bibliometric analysis is helpful to determine the qualities and characteristics and to reveal the influential articles in this field.

Methods

All the databases in Web of Science were utilized to identify articles published from 1961 to 2020. The top 100 most cited articles on bone metastases were involved for degree centrality analysis and analyses on publication time and citations, journals, authors, geographical distribution, research institutions, and research keywords.

Results

The selected articles were published mainly from 1986 to 2015. The 100 most cited articles were selected from a total of 67,451 citations out of 90,502 publications with a density of 50.239 citations/year. Citations per article ranged from 357 to 2167. The leading country was USA, followed by Canada and United Kingdom. The most frequently studied themes were clinical management of bone metastasis from different malignancy origins. A co-authorship analysis revealed an intense collaborative activity between countries and institutions.

Conclusions

This study identified the top 100 most cited articles on bone metastasis. Publication time, area, and theme distribution were thoroughly analyzed. The present study highlighted some of the most influential contributions to the field. Clinical and academic communities have shown a sustained interest in the management of bone metastasis.

Bone Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Biologic and Clinical Implications

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy characterized by the proliferation of monoclonal plasma cells localized within the bone marrow. Bone disease with associated osteolytic lesions is a hallmark of MM and develops in the majority of MM patients. Approximately half of patients with bone disease will experience skeletal-related events (SREs), such as spinal cord compression and pathologic fractures, which increase the risk of mortality by 20–40%. At the cellular level, bone disease results from a tumor-cell-driven imbalance between osteoclast bone resorption and osteoblast bone formation, thereby creating a favorable cellular environment for bone resorption. The use of osteoclast inhibitory therapies with bisphosphonates, such as zoledronic acid and the RANKL inhibitor denosumab, have been shown to delay and lower the risk of SREs, as well as the need for surgery or radiation therapy to treat severe bone complications. This review outlines our current understanding of the molecular underpinnings of bone disease, available therapeutic options, and highlights recent advances in the management of MM-related bone disease.

Zoledronic Acid Targeting of the Mevalonate Pathway Causes Reduced Cell Recruitment and Attenuates Pulmonary Fibrosis

Background and aim: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive lung disease causing irreparable scarring of lung tissue, with most patients succumbing rapidly after diagnosis. The mevalonate pathway, which is involved in the regulation of cell proliferation, survival, and motility, is targeted by the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (ZA). The aim of this study was to assess the antifibrotic effects of ZA and to elucidate the mechanisms by which potential IPF treatment occurs.

Methods: A series of in vitro and in vivo models were employed to identify the therapeutic potential of ZA in treating IPF. In vitro transwell assays were used to assess the ability of ZA to reduce fibrotic-related immune cell recruitment. Farnesyl diphosphate synthase (FDPS) was screened as a potential antifibrotic target using a bleomycin mouse model. FDPS-targeting siRNA and ZA were administered to mice following the onset of experimentally-induced lung fibrosis. Downstream analyses were conducted on murine lung tissues and lung fluids including 23-plex cytokine array, flow cytometry, histology, Western blotting, immunofluorescent staining, and PCR analysis.

Results:In vitro administration of ZA reduced myofibroblast transition and blocked NF-κB signaling in macrophages leading to impaired immune cell recruitment in a transwell assay. FDPS-targeting siRNA administration significantly attenuated profibrotic cytokine production and lung damage in a murine lung fibrosis model. Furthermore, ZA treatment of mice with bleomycin-induced lung damage displayed decreased cytokine levels in the BALF, plasma, and lung tissue, resulting in less histologically visible fibrotic scarring. Bleomycin-induced upregulation of the ZA target, FDPS, was reduced in lung tissue and fibroblasts upon ZA treatment. Confirmatory increases in FDPS immunoreactivity was seen in human IPF resected lung samples compared to control tissue indicating potential translational value of the approach. Additionally, ZA polarized macrophages towards a less profibrotic phenotype contributing to decreased IPF pathogenesis.

Conclusion: This study highlights ZA as an expedient and efficacious treatment option against IPF in a clinical setting.

Pharmacologic management of metastatic bone disease

Bone is a common site of metastases, particularly in advanced breast and prostate cancer. Skeletal related events associated with bone metastases include pathologic fracture, need for surgery/radiation to bone and cord compression. These events cause significant morbidity and mortality. Bisphosphonates as well as denosumab act on the bone microenvironment and reduce the rate of skeletal related events by approximately 25%-40%. Hence, these therapies are an important adjunctive therapy in cancer care. Despite the established efficacy and recommendations for their use in many international guidelines, these bone modifying agents are underutilized. This review examines the currently available guidelines on bone modifying agents in metastatic bone disease and summarizes their efficacy, risk and comparative benefits.

Pharmacological Prevention and Management of Skeletal-Related Events and Bone Loss in Individuals with Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To provide a literature review of the clinical efficacy and safety data of various pharmacological agents used to manage bone health in people affected by cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Peer-reviewed articles and research publications identified from PubMed and relevant clinical guidelines were used in this evidence synthesis.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with cancers such as breast and prostate cancers, multiple myeloma, and other malignancies are at a high risk of developing skeletal-related events such as bone fracture, bone metastasis, and osteoporosis. Pharmacologic agents such as bisphosphonates and RANK-L inhibitor (denosumab) are the mainstay therapy options for managing bone health in this population.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nurses and nurse practitioners should be aware of the efficacy data of bisphosphonates and denosumab but also should be well-versed in the appropriate administration of these agents, potential side effect profiles, timely assessment, and interventions to optimize quality of life.

Osteonecrosis of the Jaw and Antiresorptive Agents in Benign and Malignant Diseases: A Critical Review Organized by the ECTS

CONTEXT

Antiresorptive therapy significantly reduces fracture risk in patients with benign bone disease and skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with bone metastases (BM). Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a rare but severe condition manifested as necrotic bone lesion or lesions of the jaws. ONJ has been linked to the use of potent antiresorptive agents, termed medication-related ONJ (MRONJ).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify the differences various aspects of MRONJ among distinct patient categories and provide recommendations on how to mitigate the risk and optimally manage MRONJ in each of them.

METHODS

A working group of the European Calcified Tissue Society (ECTS) and 2 experts performed an updated detailed review of existing literature on MRONJ incidence, characteristics, and treatment applied in bone diseases with variable severity of skeletal insult, ranging from osteoporosis to prevention of cancer treatment-induced bone loss and SREs in cancer patients with BM.

RESULTS

The risk for MRONJ is much higher in patients with advanced malignancies compared to those with benign bone diseases because of the higher doses and more frequent administration of antiresorptive agents in individuals with compromised general health, along with coadministration of other medications that predispose to MRONJ. The overall risk for MRONJ is considerably lower than the benefits in all categories of patients.

CONCLUSION

The risk for MRONJ largely depends on the underlying bone disease and the relevant antiresorptive regimen applied. Physicians and dentists should keep in mind that the benefits of antiresorptive therapy far outweigh the risk for MRONJ development.

Comparative Treatment Persistence with Bone-Targeting Agents Among Asian Patients with Bone Metastases from Solid Tumors: A Multinational Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of bone-targeting agents has been confirmed, but the generalizability of results to Asia is in question.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate and compare treatment persistence and re-initiation with different bone-targeting agents among patients with bone metastases from solid tumors.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study included patients with bone metastasis with breast, lung, or prostate cancer who initiated bone-targeting agents, including denosumab, zoledronic acid, and pamidronate in Taiwan (2013-17), Hong Kong (2013-17), and Korea (2012-16). We described the patients' persistence with bone-targeting agents, by evaluating the interruption probability, and compared risks of treatment interruption. The rates of re-initiation with index bone-targeting agents were evaluated.

RESULTS

We included 5127 patients (denosumab: 3440, zoledronic acid: 1210, pamidronate: 477) from Taiwan, 883 patients (denosumab: 458, zoledronic acid: 357, pamidronate: 68) from Hong Kong, and 4800 patients (zoledronic acid: 4068, pamidronate: 732) from Korea. Compared with zoledronic acid, denosumab had a lower risk of interruption in Taiwan (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.44; 95% confidence interval 0.40-0.48) and Hong Kong (0.36; 0.28-0.45). However, pamidronate was more likely to be interrupted than zoledronic acid in Taiwan (1.31; 1.11-1.54) and Korea (2.06; 1.83-2.32), but not in Hong Kong (1.13; 0.71-1.78). After discontinuation, original treatments with denosumab in Taiwan and zoledronic acid in Hong Kong were more likely to be resumed, while in Korea, the rates were similar among the bisphosphonates.

CONCLUSIONS

Denosumab was associated with a lower risk of interruption than bisphosphonates in patients with bone metastases in Taiwan and Hong Kong. Further investigations may be required to verify patients' actual reasons for discontinuation.

Pathogenesis and Treatment of Myeloma-Related Bone Disease

Multiple myeloma is a hematologic malignancy of plasma cells that causes bone-destructive lesions and associated skeletal-related events (SREs). The pathogenesis of myeloma-related bone disease (MBD) is the imbalance of the bone-remodeling process, which results from osteoclast activation, osteoblast suppression, and the immunosuppressed bone marrow microenvironment. Many important signaling cascades, including the RANKL/RANK/OPG axis, Notch signaling, the Wnt/β-Catenin signaling pathways, and signaling molecules, such as DKK-1, sclerostin, osteopontin, activin A, chemokines, and interleukins are involved and play critical roles in MBD. Currently, bisphosphonate and denosumab are the gold standard for MBD prevention and treatment. As the molecular mechanisms of MBD become increasingly well understood, novel agents are being thoroughly explored in both preclinical and clinical settings. Herein, we will provide an updated overview of the pathogenesis of MBD, summarize the clinical management and guidelines, and discuss novel bone-modifying therapies for further management of MBD.

Advancing Treatment of Bone Metastases through Novel Translational Approaches Targeting the Bone Microenvironment

Bone metastases represent a lethal condition that frequently occurs in solid tumors such as prostate, breast, lung, and renal cell carcinomas, and increase the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs) including pain, pathologic fractures, and spinal cord compression. This unique metastatic niche consists of a multicellular complex that cancer cells co-opt to engender bone remodeling, immune suppression, and stromal-mediated therapeutic resistance. This review comprehensively discusses clinical challenges of bone metastases, novel preclinical models of the bone and bone marrow microenviroment, and crucial signaling pathways active in bone homeostasis and metastatic niche. These studies establish the context to summarize the current state of investigational agents targeting BM, and approaches to improve BM-targeting therapies. Finally, we discuss opportunities to advance research in bone and bone marrow microenvironments by increasing complexity of humanized preclinical models and fostering interdisciplinary collaborations to translational research in this challenging metastatic niche.

Supportive care in multiple myeloma: Current practices and advances

Supportive care in multiple myeloma (MM) can have a major impact on quality of life and the survival outcomes of MM patients. In this review, we will focus on disease and treatment related toxicities experienced by MM patients and what are the best approaches to date to help mitigate the effects. We will specifically focus on a practical approach to managing bone disease, thrombosis, infection risk, peripheral neuropathy, dermatologic complications, gastrointestinal and ocular toxicities, and fatigue in MM.

Pathogenesis and treatment of multiple myeloma bone disease

Multiple myeloma (Plasma cell myeloma), a malignancy of the plasma cells, exhibits tumor expansion preferentially in the bone marrow and the development of bone-destructive lesions. Multiple myeloma is still an incurable disease with changes in the bone marrow microenvironment in favor of the survival and proliferation of multiple myeloma cells and bone destruction. In this review, we described the recent findings on the regulators involved in the development of myeloma bone diseases, and succinctly summarize currently available therapeutic options and the development of novel bone modifying agents for myeloma treatment.

Individualized Bone-Protective Management in Long-Term Cancer Survivors With Bone Metastases

Antiresorptive therapy is an important component of a multimodal approach to treating patients with advanced malignancies and metastatic bone disease. Over the past decade, overall survival of affected patients has improved in most cancer entities, and long-term disease control is a realistic goal in many cases. There are emerging clinical studies showing the benefits of an initial antiresorptive therapy using bisphosphonates or denosumab. However, some adverse events of these therapies, such as osteonecrosis of the jaw, correlate with the cumulative doses given, and there is an increasing clinical need for new antiresorptive concepts to treat long-term survivors. This review summarizes the clinical evidence of antiresorptive therapies across different cancers with bone involvement and presents concepts of dose-reduction protocols for long-term survivors with established metastatic bone disease. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Exosomal miR-19a and IBSP cooperate to induce osteolytic bone metastasis of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

Bone metastasis is an incurable complication of breast cancer. In advanced stages, patients with estrogen-positive tumors experience a significantly higher incidence of bone metastasis (>87%) compared to estrogen-negative patients (<56%). To understand the mechanism of this bone-tropism of ER+ tumor, and to identify liquid biopsy biomarkers for patients with high risk of bone metastasis, the secreted extracellular vesicles and cytokines from bone-tropic breast cancer cells are examined in this study. Both exosomal miR-19a and Integrin-Binding Sialoprotein (IBSP) are found to be significantly upregulated and secreted from bone-tropic ER+ breast cancer cells, increasing their levels in the circulation of patients. IBSP is found to attract osteoclast cells and create an osteoclast-enriched environment in the bone, assisting the delivery of exosomal miR-19a to osteoclast to induce osteoclastogenesis. Our findings reveal a mechanism by which ER+ breast cancer cells create a microenvironment favorable for colonization in the bone. These two secreted factors can also serve as effective biomarkers for ER+ breast cancer to predict their risks of bone metastasis. Furthermore, our screening of a natural compound library identifies chlorogenic acid as a potent inhibitor for IBSP-receptor binding to suppress bone metastasis of ER+ tumor, suggesting its preventive use for bone recurrence in ER+ patients.

Special Considerations for Supportive Care and Management of Complications in Elderly Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma is a progressive and incurable hematologic malignancy. It is predominantly a disease of older individuals, with a third of these patients considered to be elderly. In recent years, there has been a focus and emphasis on identifying and stratifying patients based on their functional status and frailty. There are several hallmark complications of the disease-hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, bone pain-along with thromboembolism and compromised immunity that are common in patients with multiple myeloma. Due to the wide range of patient ages and functional status, there are, accordingly, different considerations for management of the above complications based on numerous factors, including frailty status. This review focuses on considerations and management of common complications of multiple myeloma in elderly patients. These include renal failure, skeletal complications, anemia, thromboembolism, and infectious complications.

The role of bone-modifying agents in myeloma bone disease

Bone disease is common in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), which manifests as bone pain and skeletal-related events (SREs) such as pathological fractures and spinal cord compression. Myeloma bone disease (MBD) can adversely affect the quality of life of patients and have negative effects on morbidity and mortality. The pathogenesis of MBD is complex, and several factors are involved in the dysregulation of bone metabolism and uncoupling of bone remodeling, which result in net bone loss and devastating SREs. Broadly speaking, elevated osteoclast activity, suppressed osteoblast activity, and an aberrant marrow microenvironment play a role in MBD. Interaction of MM cells with the main bone cell osteocytes also promote further bone destruction. This review focuses on the role of bone-modifying agents in the prevention and treatment of MBD. The mainstay of MBD prevention are antiresorptive agents, bisphosphonates and denosumab. However, these agents do not play a direct role in bone formation and repair of existing MBD. Newer agents with anabolic effects such as anti-sclerostin antibodies, parathyroid hormone, anti-Dickkopf-1 antibodies, and others have shown potential in repair of MBD lesions. With the development of several new agents, the treatment landscape of MBD is likely to evolve in the coming years. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

"The use of bisphosphonates to treat skeletal complications in solid tumours"

The skeleton is the most common site of secondary disease in breast cancer and prostate cancer, with up to 80% of patients with advanced disease developing bone metastases (BM). The proportion is also substantial in advanced lung cancer (20%-40%). Because of the high prevalence of cancers of the breast, prostate and lung, these cancers account for more than 80% of cases of metastatic bone disease occurring in solid tumours. Metastatic bone disease is associated with greatly increased bone resorption by osteoclasts, leading to moderate to severe pain and other skeletal complications, with major impact on quality of life (QoL). Skeletal Related Events (SREs) have been defined as: pathological long bone or vertebral fractures; spinal cord compression; need for radiation for pain relief or to prevent fracture/spinal cord compression, need for surgery to bone and hypercalcaemia. More recently, Symptomatic Skeletal Events (SSEs) have been defined to monitor QoL. Although there are currently no curative treatments for metastatic bone disease, patients with breast or prostate cancer and BM are now surviving for several years and sometimes longer, and prevention of SREs is the key aim to optimization of QoL. Since their discovery 50 years ago and their introduction more than 30 years ago into the field of metastatic bone disease, a range of oral and intravenous bisphosphonate drugs have made a major contribution to prevention of SREs. Large trials have clearly demonstrated the clinical value of different bisphosphonate-based drugs (including the oral drugs ibandronate and clodronate and intravenous agents such as zoledronate and pamidronate), in treatment of hypercalcaemia of malignancy and the reduction of SREs and SSEs in a range of cancers. Despite the success of denosumab in reducing osteolysis, bisphosphonates also remain mainstay drugs for treatment of metastatic bone disease. Recognizing the 50th Anniversary of the discovery of bisphosphonates, this review focuses on their continuing value in BM treatment and their future potential, for example in providing a bone-targeting vehicle for cytotoxic drugs.

Uptake of bone modifying agents in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer with bone metastases - prospective data from a multi-site Australian registry

BACKGROUND AND AIM

International practice guidelines recommend administration of bone modifying agents (BMA) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with bone metastases to reduce skeletal related events (SRE). Optimal delivery of BMA in routine clinical practice including agent selection and prescribing intervals remains unclear. We aim to describe real-world practice of Australian breast oncologists.

METHODS

Prospective data from February 2015 to July 2020 on BMA delivery to MBC patients with bone metastases was analysed from TABITHA, a multi-site Australian HER2+ MBC registry.

RESULTS

Of 333 HER2+ MBC patients, 171 (51%) had bone metastases at diagnosis, with a mean age of 58.1 years [range 32-87]. 130 (76%) patients received a BMA, with 90 (69%) receiving denosumab and 40 (31%) receiving a bisphosphonate. Patients who received a BMA were more likely to have received concurrent first line systemic anti-HER2 therapy (95% vs 83%, p=0.04), to present with bone-only metastases at diagnosis (24% vs 7%, p=0.02) and less likely to have visceral metastases (51% vs 71%, p=0.03). Ten of 40 (25%) bisphosphonate patients and 45 of 90 (50%) denosumab patients received their BMA at the recommended 4-weekly interval. Prescribing intervals varied over time. Adverse events reported were consistent with clinical trial data.

CONCLUSION

Three-quarters of Australian HER2+ MBC patients with bone metastases receive a BMA, often at different schedules than guidelines recommend. Further studies, including of all MBC subtypes, are warranted to better understand clinicians' prescribing rationale and potential consequences of current prescribing practice on SRE incidence. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Bone-modifying Agents (BMAs) in Breast Cancer

Bone-modifying agents (BMAs) are mainstays in breast cancer and prevent and treat osteoporosis in early-stage disease and reduce skeletal metastases complications in advanced disease. There is some evidence to support that BMA also prevents skeletal metastases and improves overall survival. Bone loss occurs with chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, and aromatase inhibitors. In some women, the bone loss will be of sufficient magnitude to increase the risks of osteoporosis or fractures. Recommended steps in osteoporosis prevention or treatment include risk factor assessment, taking adequate amounts of calcium and vitamin D3, and periodic evaluations with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanning. If clinically indicated by the T-scores and fracture-risk prediction algorithms treat with oral, IV bisphosphonates or subcutaneous denosumab (DEN). Zoledronic acid (ZA) or DEN reduces skeletal metastases complications, including pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, or the necessity for radiation or surgery to bone. Also, both of these drugs have the side-effect of osteonecrosis at a similar incidence. Monthly administration of ZA or DEN is standard, but several recent randomized trials show noninferiority between ZA monthly and every 3-month ZA. Every 3-month ZA is a new standard of care. Similar trials of the schedule of DEN are ongoing. ZA anticancer effect is only in postmenopausal women or premenopausal women rendered postmenopausal by GnRH agonists or bilateral oopherectomy. High-risk women, either postmenopausal or premenopausal, receiving GnRH/oopherctomy should consider adjuvant ZA. There are insufficient data to support DEN in this setting. Herein, this narrative review covers the mechanism of action of BMA, randomized clinical trials, and adverse events, both common and rare.

Phase III Randomized Trial of Bisphosphonates as Adjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer: S0307

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant bisphosphonates, when given in a low-estrogen environment, can decrease breast cancer recurrence and death. Treatment guidelines include recommendations for adjuvant bisphosphonates in postmenopausal patients. SWOG/Alliance/Canadian Cancer Trials Group/ECOG-ACRIN/NRG Oncology study S0307 compared the efficacy of three bisphosphonates in early-stage breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients with stage I-III breast cancer were randomly assigned to 3 years of intravenous zoledronic acid, oral clodronate, or oral ibandronate. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) with overall survival as a secondary outcome. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

A total of 6097 patients enrolled. Median age was 52.7 years. Prior to being randomly assigned, 73.2% patients indicated preference for oral vs intravenous formulation. DFS did not differ across arms in a log-rank test (P = .49); 5-year DFS was 88.3% (zoledronic acid: 95% confidence interval [CI] = 86.9% to 89.6%), 87.6% (clodronate: 95% CI = 86.1% to 88.9%), and 87.4% (ibandronate: 95% CI = 85.6% to 88.9%). Additionally, 5-year overall survival did not differ between arms (log rank P = .50) and was 92.6% (zoledronic acid: 95% CI = 91.4% to 93.6%), 92.4% (clodronate: 95% CI = 91.2% to 93.5%), and 92.9% (ibandronate: 95% CI = 91.5% to 94.1%). Bone as first site of recurrence did not differ between arms (P = .93). Analyses based on age and tumor subtypes showed no treatment differences. Grade 3/4 toxicity was 8.8% (zoledronic acid), 8.3% (clodronate), and 10.5% (ibandronate). Osteonecrosis of the jaw was highest for zoledronic acid (1.26%) compared with clodronate (0.36%) and ibandronate (0.77%).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence of differences in efficacy by type of bisphosphonate, either in overall analysis or subgroups. Despite an increased rate of osteonecrosis of the jaw with zoledronic acid, overall toxicity grade differed little across arms. Given that patients expressed preference for oral formulation, efforts to make oral agents available in the United States should be considered.

Gene expression analysis of fresh extraction wounds prior to onset of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw-like lesions in mice: A preliminary animal study

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of chemotherapeutic/bisphosphonate combination therapy with tooth extraction on gene expression patterns of fresh extraction wounds during initial stages prior to their diagnosis as bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ)-like lesions in mice.

METHODS

Female C57BL/6J mice were used. To create a high-prevalence BRONJ mouse model, combination therapy with the chemotherapy drug cyclophosphamide (CY) and zoledronic acid (ZA) was performed (CY/ZA). Both maxillary first molars were extracted 3 weeks after drug therapy. Saline was used as the control (VC). Soft tissues near the fresh extraction wounds were dissected at 72 h postextraction to investigate the gene expression patterns. Maxillae and long bones at 2 and 4 weeks postextraction were also analyzed.

RESULTS

CY/ZA significantly increased the relative expression levels of IL-6 and decreased those of IL-10 and IGF-1 when compared with those in VC. Moreover, CY/ZA significantly reduced the relative expression levels of CCR-7, cxcl12, cxcr4, and CD105 when compared with those in VC, whereas the level of F4/80 was significantly increased by CY/ZA. Furthermore, CY/ZA significantly decreased the relative expression levels of VEGFA, VEGFB, and VEGFC at 72 h postextraction compared with those in VC.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering that the present study lacked adequate in vitro models, CY/ZA markedly changed the gene expression patterns associated with wound healing from the initial stages prior to onset of BRONJ-like lesions, which may help us to understand the pathophysiology of BRONJ in humans.

Healthcare resource utilization and associated cost of patients with bone metastases from solid tumors who are naïve to bone-targeting agents: a comparative analysis of patients with and without skeletal-related events

BACKGROUND

This study analyzes the impact of skeletal-related events (SRE) on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs incurred by patients with bone metastases (BM) from solid tumors (ST), who are therapy-naïve to bone targeting agents (BTAs).

METHODS

German claims data from 01/01/2010 to 30/06/2018 were used to conduct a retrospective comparative cohort analysis of BTA-naive patients with a BM diagnosis and preceding ST diagnosis. HCRU and treatment-related costs were compared in two matched cohorts of patients with and without a history of SREs, defined as pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, surgery to bone and radiation to bone. The first SRE was defined as the patient-individual index date. Conversely, for the non-SRE patients, index dates were assigned randomly.

RESULTS

In total, 45.20% of 9,832 patients reported experiencing at least one SRE (n = 4444) while 54.80% experienced none (n = 5388); 2,434 pairs of SRE and non-SRE patients were finally matched (mean age: 70.87/71.07 years; females: 39.07%/38.58%). Between SRE and non-SRE cohorts, significant differences in the average number of hospitalization days per patient-year (35.80/30.80) and associated inpatient-care costs (14,199.27€/10,787.31€) were observed. The total cost ratio was 1.16 (p < 0.001) with an average cost breakdown of 23,689.54€ and 20,403.27€ per patient-year in SRE and non-SRE patients.

CONCLUSION

The underutilization of BTAs within a clinical setting poses an ongoing challenge in the real-world treatment of BM patients throughout Germany. Ultimately, the economic burden of treating SREs in patients with BM from ST was found to be considerable, resulting in higher direct healthcare costs and increased utilization of inpatient care facilities.

Keeping an Eye on Bisphosphonate Therapy in Myeloma: A Case Report of Ocular Inflammation Postzoledronic Acid Infusion

Bisphosphonates have evolved over the past decades from oral to more potent intravenous preparations. Along with significant paradigm shift in the management of myeloma over the past years, stronger nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates, due to their antiresorptive action on the bones, have found their way as a key and integral part in the management of bone disease in myeloma. Multiple randomized controlled trials have established efficacy of bisphosphonates in reducing skeletal-related events in myeloma. Some well-documented adverse events include acute-phase reactions, esophageal irritation, and osteonecrosis of the jaw. Across all clinical indications, the incidence of inflammatory eye reactions after bisphosphonate infusion ranges from 0.046% to 1%. However, data from myeloma patients are extrapolated from few reported cases in literature with varying management strategies including discontinuation, switching to different forms, and rechallenging with steroid cover. Inflammatory eye reactions can vary from self-limiting conjunctivitis and episcleritis to serious uveitis and vision-threatening orbital inflammation. We present a similar case of a patient with IgG kappa myeloma who developed flu-like symptoms followed by severe orbital inflammation within 48–72 hours after receiving zoledronic acid infusion. The patient was successfully managed with intravenous methyl prednisolone followed by oral tapering dose of steroids and discontinuation of further bisphosphonate therapy. A complete recovery was noted in a week's time.

Review of Bone Modifying Agents in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Bone is the most common site for distant metastases in breast cancer and can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Bone modifying agents (BMAs) that include bisphosphonates (BPAs) and denosumab help in decreasing and delaying skeletal-related events (SREs) associated with metastatic breast cancer. BPAs approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in bone metastases (BM) in the United States are pamidronate and zolendronic acid, while clodronate and ibandronate are licensed for use in other countries. Current American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines recommend denosumab 120 mg subcutaneously every four weeks, or zolendronic acid 4 mg every four weeks or every 12 weeks, or intravenous pamidronate 90 mg every four weeks. Current guidelines do not recommend one BMA over another, however, zolendronic acid and denosumab were the most commonly used BMAs in population-based studies. Side effects of BMAs include acute phase reactions, hypocalcemia, nephrotoxicity, osteonecrosis of jaw, etc. While other side effects are common with both BPAs and denosumab, the latter has less nephrotoxic potential and is preferred for use in patients with renal failure. Current ASCO guidelines recommend continuing BMAs indefinitely, however, in clinical practice, this decision needs to be individualized, especially since there is no data on the impact of long-term use of BMAs. Further studies would need to be developed to develop an algorithm of SRE risk assessment and to determine which patients would benefit from BMAs.

Better pain control with 8-gray single fraction palliative radiotherapy for skeletal metastases: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) allows remarkable pain control in patients with skeletal metastases. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing the most commonly used radiotherapy regimens for palliative management in patients with skeletal metastases. The main online databases were accessed in October 2020. All randomized clinical trials evaluating the irradiation of painful bone metastases were considered. The following irradiation patterns were analysed and included in the present network meta-analysis: 8 Gy- and 10 Gy/single fraction, 20 Gy/5 fractions, 30 Gy/10 fractions. The Bayesian hierarchical random-effect model analysis was adopted in all comparisons. The Log Odds-Ratio (LOR) statistical method for dichotomic data was adopted for analysis. Data from 3595 patients were analysed. The mean follow-up was 9.5 (1 to 28) months. The cumulative mean age was 63.3 ± 2.9. 40.61% (1461 of 3595 patients) were female. The 8Gy/single fraction protocol detected reduced rate of “no pain response” (LOR 3.39), greater rate of “pain response” (LOR-5.88) and complete pain remission (LOR-7.05) compared to the other dose patterns. The 8Gy group detected a lower rate of pathological fractures (LOR 1.16), spinal cord compression (LOR 1.31) and re-irradiation (LOR 2.97) compared to the other dose patterns. Palliative 8Gy/single fraction radiotherapy for skeletal metastases shows outstanding results in terms of pain control, re-irradiations, pathological fractures and spinal cord compression, with no differences in terms of survivorship compared to the other multiple dose patterns.

Level of evidence: I, Bayesian network meta-analysis of RCTs.

Treatment of multiple myeloma-related bone disease: recommendations from the Bone Working Group of the International Myeloma Working Group

In this Policy Review, the Bone Working Group of the International Myeloma Working Group updates its clinical practice recommendations for the management of multiple myeloma-related bone disease. After assessing the available literature and grading recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) method, experts from the working group recommend zoledronic acid as the preferred bone-targeted agent for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, with or without multiple myeloma-related bone disease. Once patients achieve a very good partial response or better, after receiving monthly zoledronic acid for at least 12 months, the treating physician can consider decreasing the frequency of or discontinuing zoledronic acid treatment. Denosumab can also be considered for the treatment of multiple myeloma-related bone disease, particularly in patients with renal impairment. Denosumab might prolong progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who have multiple myeloma-related bone disease and who are eligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation. Denosumab discontinuation is challenging due to the rebound effect. The Bone Working Group of the International Myeloma Working Group also found cement augmentation to be effective for painful vertebral compression fractures. Radiotherapy is recommended for uncontrolled pain, impeding or symptomatic spinal cord compression, or pathological fractures. Surgery should be used for the prevention and restoration of long-bone pathological fractures, vertebral column instability, and spinal cord compression with bone fragments within the spinal route.

Multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma is the second most common haematological malignancy in high-income countries, and typically starts as asymptomatic precursor conditions-either monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or smouldering multiple myeloma-in which initiating genetic abnormalities, such as hyperdiploidy and translocations involving the immunoglobulin heavy chain, are already present. The introduction of immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and CD38-targeting antibodies has extended survival, but ultimately the majority of patients will die from their disease, and some from treatment-related complications. Disease progression and subsequent relapses are characterised by subclonal evolution and increasingly resistant disease. Patients with multiple myeloma usually have hypercalcaemia, renal failure, anaemia, or osteolytic bone lesions-and a detailed diagnostic investigation is needed to differentiate between symptomatic multiple myeloma that requires treatment, and precursor states. Risk stratification using both patient-specific (eg, performance status) and disease-specific (eg, presence of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities) is important for prognosis and to define the best treatment strategy. Current research strategies include the use of minimal residual disease assays to guide therapy, refining immunotherapeutic approaches, and intercepting disease early in smouldering multiple myeloma.

Bone metastasis: mechanisms, therapies, and biomarkers

Skeletal metastases are frequent complications of many cancers, causing bone complications (fractures, bone pain, disability) that negatively affect the patient's quality of life. Here, we first discuss the burden of skeletal complications in cancer bone metastasis. We then describe the pathophysiology of bone metastasis. Bone metastasis is a multistage process: long before the development of clinically detectable metastases, circulating tumor cells settle and enter a dormant state in normal vascular and endosteal niches present in the bone marrow, which provide immediate attachment and shelter, and only become active years later as they proliferate and alter the functions of bone-resorbing (osteoclasts) and bone-forming (osteoblasts) cells, promoting skeletal destruction. The molecular mechanisms involved in mediating each of these steps are described, and we also explain how tumor cells interact with a myriad of interconnected cell populations in the bone marrow, including a rich vascular network, immune cells, adipocytes, and nerves. We discuss metabolic programs that tumor cells could engage with to specifically grow in bone. We also describe the progress and future directions of existing bone-targeted agents and report emerging therapies that have arisen from recent advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of bone metastases. Finally, we discuss the value of bone turnover biomarkers in detection and monitoring of progression and therapeutic effects in patients with bone metastasis.

Controversies in the use of new bone-modifying therapies in multiple myeloma

Bone-modifying therapies are essential in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. Zoledronic acid is preferred over other bisphosphonates due to its superiority in reducing the incidence of skeletal-related events and improving survival. The anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor-κΒ ligand (RANKL)-targeted agent denosumab has shown its non-inferiority compared to bisphosphonates in preventing skeletal-related events among newly diagnosed patients with myeloma bone disease. Denosumab may confer a survival benefit in patients eligible for autologous transplantation. Denosumab may present a safer profile for patients with renal impairment. Discontinuation of bone-directed therapies can be considered for patients with deep responses and after an adequate time period on treatment; however, a rebound effect may become evident especially in the case of denosumab. Three-monthly infusions of zoledronic acid or at-home denosumab administration should be considered during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Measures to prevent hypocalcaemia, renal toxicity and osteonecrosis of the jaw are important for all bone-modifying agents.

Bisphosphonates and breast cancer - From cautious palliation to saving lives

Bone metastases are common in breast cancer and may cause considerable morbidity including fractures, severe pain, nerve compression and hypercalcaemia. Alongside developments in the multidisciplinary management for patients with metastatic breast cancer, the use of bisphosphonates, and more recently denosumab, has transformed the course of advanced breast cancer for many patients resulting in a major reduction in skeletal complications, reduced bone pain and improved quality of life. Additionally, because the bone marrow microenvironment is so intimately involved in the metastatic processes required for cancer dissemination, the use of adjuvant bisphosphonates has been studied extensively over the past 25 years in many randomised trials. We now have clear evidence that bisphosphonates significantly reduce both metastasis to bone and mortality in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. Efficacy seems similar across different biological subgroups of postmenopausal breast cancer with the use of either a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate such as intravenous zoledronate or daily oral ibandronate as well as the non-nitrogen containing agent, daily oral clodronate. In this overview of evolving role of bisphosphonates in breast cancer, focussing particularly on pamidronate and zoledronate, the long winding development road from the 1970s through to the present day is described and some of the serendipitous findings, "lucky breaks" and regulatory decisions along the way outlined.

Study of Adverse Effect Profile of Zoledronic Acid Infusion Among Patients with Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

Background: Zoledronic acid (ZA) is widely used in the management of cancer-related bone events. It, however, might be associated with serious adverse effects. Objectives: To evaluate ZA adverse effects and changes in biochemical parameters related to ZA toxicities among patients with cancer. Methods: Ninety-eight oncology patients, who were prescribed ZA intravenous (IV) infusion, were interviewed to assess whether they experienced ZA related symptoms, including acute events and serious adverse effects. ZA’s effects on the serum levels of different biochemical parameters were retrospectively assessed by checking patients’ electronic medical records. Results: The most commonly reported adverse effects were: myalgia (48%), bone pain (36.7%), influenza-like symptoms (34.7%), headache (31.6%), and pyrexia (22.45%) with decreasing frequency of such adverse effects upon repeated infusions. Serious side effects including jaw osteonecrosis, cardiac, and renal problems were not reported. A small, but statistically significant reduction in serum calcium, creatinine, and total protein levels was observed upon comparing levels before and after the first IV infusion of ZA (P ≤ 0.031). No significant change was recorded with other serum electrolytes including phosphorus, sodium, potassium, and magnesium as well as urea levels (P ≥ 0.271). No significant difference was determined in terms of final serum levels of all parameters in comparison to pre-treatment (P ≥ 0.059), except for potassium, where a significant reduction was observed (P = 0.003). Notably, the mean values of all parameters were within the normal range. Conclusions: ZA acute events resolved with symptomatic treatment and reduced with repeated IV infusions. ZA appears as a safe treatment modality for skeletal-related events among patients with cancer and the reported adverse effects should not affect patients’ compliance.