1
|
Schroeder MC, Semprini J, Kahl AR, Lizarraga IM, Birken SA, Wahlen MM, Johnson EC, Gorzelitz J, Seaman AT, Charlton ME. Geographic distance to Commission on Cancer-accredited and nonaccredited hospitals in the United States. J Rural Health 2024. [PMID: 38963176 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Commission on Cancer (CoC) establishes standards to support multidisciplinary, comprehensive cancer care. CoC-accredited cancer programs diagnose and/or treat 73% of patients in the United States. However, rural patients may experience diminished access to CoC-accredited cancer programs. Our study evaluated distance to hospitals by CoC accreditation status, rurality, and Census Division. METHODS All US hospitals were identified from public-use Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Data, then merged with CoC-accreditation data. Rural-Urban Continuum Codes (RUCC) were used to categorize counties as metro (RUCC 1-3), large rural (RUCC 4-6), or small rural (RUCC 7-9). Distance from each county centroid to the nearest CoC and non-CoC hospital was calculated using the Great Circle Distance method in ArcGIS. FINDINGS Of 1,382 CoC-accredited hospitals, 89% were in metro counties. Small rural counties contained a total of 30 CoC and 794 non-CoC hospitals. CoC hospitals were located 4.0, 10.1, and 11.5 times farther away than non-CoC hospitals for residents of metro, large rural, and small rural counties, respectively, while the average distance to non-CoC hospitals was similar across groups (9.4-13.6 miles). Distance to CoC-accredited facilities was greatest west of the Mississippi River, in particular the Mountain Division (99.2 miles). CONCLUSIONS Despite similar proximity to non-CoC hospitals across groups, CoC hospitals are located farther from large and small rural counties than metro counties, suggesting rural patients have diminished access to multidisciplinary, comprehensive cancer care afforded by CoC-accredited hospitals. Addressing distance-based access barriers to high-quality, comprehensive cancer treatment in rural US communities will require a multisectoral approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary C Schroeder
- Division of Health Services Research, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Jason Semprini
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Amanda R Kahl
- Iowa Cancer Registry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | | | - Sarah A Birken
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Madison M Wahlen
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Erin C Johnson
- Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Jessica Gorzelitz
- Department of Health and Human Physiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Aaron T Seaman
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Mary E Charlton
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Iowa Cancer Registry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Choi DW, Kim S, Kim SJ, Kim DW, Ryu KS, Kim JH, Chang YJ, Han KT. Relationship between patient outcomes and patterns of fragmented cancer care in older adults with gastric cancer: A nationwide cohort study in South Korea. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101685. [PMID: 38104479 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fragmented cancer care, defined as receipt of care from multiple hospitals, has been shown to be associated with poor patient outcomes and high expense. However, evidence regarding the effects of hospital choice by patients with cancer on overall survival are lacking. Thus, we investigated the relationship between patterns of fragmented care and five-year mortality in patients with gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using the Korean National Health Insurance senior cohort of adults aged ≥60 years, we identified patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy during 2007-2014. We examined the distribution of the study population by five-year mortality, and used Kaplan-Meier survival curves/log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model to compare five-year mortality with fragmented cancer care. RESULTS Among the participants, 19.5% died within five years. There were more deaths among patients who received fragmented care, especially those who transferred to smaller hospitals (46.6%) than to larger ones (40.0%). The likelihood of five-year mortality was higher in patients who received fragmented cancer care upon moving from large to small hospitals than those who did not transfer hospitals (hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.48, P = .001). Moreover, mortality was higher among patients treated in large hospitals or in the capital area for initial treatment, and this association was greater for patients from rural areas. DISCUSSION Fragmentation of cancer care was associated with reduced survival, and the risk of mortality was higher among patients who moved from large to small hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Woo Choi
- Cancer Big Data Center, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Seungju Kim
- Department of Nursing, College of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Jung Kim
- Department of Health Administration and Management, College of Medical Science, Soonchunhyang University, Asan, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Wook Kim
- Department of Information and Statistics, RINS, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang Sun Ryu
- Cancer Big Data Center, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Ho Kim
- Cancer Big Data Center, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon-Jung Chang
- Cancer Big Data Center, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyu-Tae Han
- Division of Cancer Control & Policy, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vierra M, Bansal VV, Morgan RB, Witmer HDD, Reddy B, Dhiman A, Godley FA, Ong CT, Belmont E, Polite B, Shergill A, Turaga KK, Eng OS. Fragmentation of Care in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:645-654. [PMID: 37737968 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14318-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The delivery of multimodal treatment at a high-volume center is known to optimize the outcomes of gastrointestinal malignancies. However, patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for peritoneal metastases often must 'fragment' their surgical and systemic therapeutic care between different institutions. We hypothesized that this adversely affects outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS Adults undergoing CRS for colorectal or appendiceal adenocarcinoma at our institution between 2016 and 2022 were identified retrospectively and grouped by care network: 'coordinated care' patients received exclusively in-network systemic therapy, while 'fragmented care' patients received some systemic therapy from outside-network providers. Factors associated with fragmented care were also ascertained. Overall survival (OS) from CRS and systemic therapy-related serious adverse events (SAEs) were compared across the groups. RESULTS Among 85 (80%) patients, 47 (55%) had colorectal primaries and 51 (60%) received fragmented care. Greater travel distance [OR 1.01 (CI 1.00-1.02), p = 0.02] and educational status [OR 1.04 (CI 1.01-1.07), p = 0.01] were associated with receiving fragmented care. OS was comparable between patients who received fragmented and coordinated care in the colorectal [32.5 months versus 40.8 months, HR 0.95 (CI 0.43-2.10), p = 0.89] and appendiceal [31.0 months versus 27.4 months, HR 1.17 (CI 0.37-3.74), p = 0.55] subgroups. The frequency of SAEs (7.8% versus 17.6%, p = 0.19) was also similar. CONCLUSIONS There were no significant differences in survival or SAEs based on the networks of systemic therapy delivery. This suggests that patients undergoing CRS at a high-volume center may safely receive systemic therapy at outside-network facilities with comparable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mason Vierra
- University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Varun V Bansal
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Ryan B Morgan
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hunter D D Witmer
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Biren Reddy
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ankit Dhiman
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Frederick A Godley
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Cecilia T Ong
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Erika Belmont
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Blasé Polite
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ardaman Shergill
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kiran K Turaga
- University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Oliver S Eng
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Han KT, Kim S. The effect of fragmented cancer care and change in nurse staffing grade on cancer patient mortality. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2023; 20:610-620. [PMID: 37691136 DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuity of patient care ensures timely and appropriate care and is associated with better patient outcomes among cancer patients. However, the impact of nurse staffing grade changes on patient outcomes remains unknown. AIMS This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the effect of fragmented care and changes in nurse staffing grade on the survival of colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgery. METHODS This study included 2228 newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients. Fragmented care was defined as the receipt of treatment in multiple hospitals and was divided into three categories based on changes in nurse staffing grade. Five-year survival rates were used to evaluate the effect of fragmented care and nurse staffing grade on outcomes of cancer patients. Survival analysis was performed by adjusting for covariates using the Cox proportional hazards model for 5-year mortality. RESULTS Approximately 18.5% of patients died within 5 years; the mortality rate during cancer treatment was higher in patients who received fragmented care, especially in those transferred to hospitals with fewer nurses. Patients who received fragmented care had shorter survival times, and those transferred to hospitals with fewer nurses had higher risks of 5-year mortality (hazard ratio: 1.625; 95% CI: [1.095, 2.412]). Transfers to hospitals with fewer nurses were associated with increased mortality rates in low-income patients, hospitals located in metropolitan and rural areas, and high-severity groups. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION Receipt of fragmented care and change in nurse staffing grade due to patients' transfer to different hospitals were associated with increased mortality rates in cancer patients, thus underlining the importance of ensuring continuity and quality of care. Patients from rural areas, from low-income families, and with high disease severity may have better outcomes if they receive treatment in well-staffed hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyu-Tae Han
- Division of Cancer Control & Policy, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Seungju Kim
- Department of Health System, College of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
- Research Institute for Hospice/Palliative Care, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Barzi A, Kim AJ, Liang CK, West H, Wong D, Wright C, Nathwani N, Vasko CM, Chung V, Rubinson DA, Sachs T. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Real World Evidence of Care Delivery in AccessHope Data. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1377. [PMID: 37763145 PMCID: PMC10532778 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13091377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an aggressive disease and the delivery of comprehensive care to individuals with this cancer is critical to achieve appropriate outcomes. The identification of gaps in care delivery facilitates the design of interventions to optimize care delivery and improve outcomes in this population. METHODS AccessHope™ is a growing organization that connects oncology subspecialists with treating providers through contracts with self-insured employers. Data from 94 pancreatic adenocarcinoma cases (August 2019-December 2022) in the AccessHope dataset were used to describe gaps in care delivery. RESULTS In all but 6% of cases, the subspecialist provided guideline-concordant recommendations anticipated to improve outcomes. Gaps in care were more pronounced in patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer. There was a significant deficiency in germline testing regardless of the stage, with only 59% of cases having completed testing. Only 20% of cases were receiving palliative care or other allied support services. There was no difference in observed care gaps between patients receiving care in the community setting vs. those receiving care in the academic setting. CONCLUSIONS There are significant gaps in the care delivered to patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A concurrent subspecialist review has the opportunity to identify and address these gaps in a timely manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afsaneh Barzi
- AccessHope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (A.J.K.); (C.K.L.); (H.W.); (C.W.); (C.M.V.); (T.S.)
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA;
| | - Angela J. Kim
- AccessHope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (A.J.K.); (C.K.L.); (H.W.); (C.W.); (C.M.V.); (T.S.)
| | - Crystal K. Liang
- AccessHope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (A.J.K.); (C.K.L.); (H.W.); (C.W.); (C.M.V.); (T.S.)
| | - Howard West
- AccessHope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (A.J.K.); (C.K.L.); (H.W.); (C.W.); (C.M.V.); (T.S.)
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA;
| | - D. Wong
- AccessHope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (A.J.K.); (C.K.L.); (H.W.); (C.W.); (C.M.V.); (T.S.)
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA;
| | - Carol Wright
- AccessHope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (A.J.K.); (C.K.L.); (H.W.); (C.W.); (C.M.V.); (T.S.)
| | - Nitya Nathwani
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91011, USA;
| | - Catherine M. Vasko
- AccessHope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (A.J.K.); (C.K.L.); (H.W.); (C.W.); (C.M.V.); (T.S.)
| | - Vincent Chung
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA;
| | | | - Todd Sachs
- AccessHope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (A.J.K.); (C.K.L.); (H.W.); (C.W.); (C.M.V.); (T.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Han KT, Kim SJ. Is Fragmented Cancer Care Associated With Medical Expenditure? Nationwide Evidence From Patients With Lung Cancer Using National Insurance Claim Data. Int J Public Health 2023; 68:1606000. [PMID: 37485048 PMCID: PMC10356958 DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1606000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to investigate the association between fragmented cancer care in the early phase after cancer diagnosis and patient outcomes using national insurance claim data. Methods: We identified National Health Insurance beneficiaries diagnosed with lung cancer in South Korea from 2010 to 2014. We included 1,364 lung cancer patients with reduced immortal time bias and heterogeneity. We performed multiple regression analysis using a generalized estimate equation with a gamma distribution for medical expenditures. Results: Among the 1,364 patients with lung cancer, 12.8% had fragmented cancer care. Healthcare costs were higher in fragmented cancer care for both during diagnosis to 365 days and diagnosis to 1,825 days. Linear regression results showed that fragmented cancer care was associated with 1.162 times higher costs during the period from diagnosis to 365 days and 1.163 times the cost for the period from diagnosis to 1,825 days. Conclusion: We found fragmented cancer care is associated with higher medical expenditure. Future health policy should consider the limitation of patients' free will when opting for fragmented cancer care, as there are currently no control mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyu-Tae Han
- Division of Cancer Control and Policy, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Jung Kim
- Department of Health Administration and Management, College of Medical Science, Soonchunhyang University, Asan, Republic of Korea
- Center for Healthcare Management Science, Soonchunhyang University, Asan, Republic of Korea
- Department of Software Convergence, Soonchunhyang University, Asan, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pu YC, Chou HC, Huang CT, Sheng WH. Readmission outcomes following infectious hospitalization: same-care unit performed better than different-care unit. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:236. [PMID: 36899370 PMCID: PMC10007781 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09220-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies showed that same-hospital readmission is associated with better outcomes than different-hospital readmission. However, little is known about whether readmission to the same care unit (same-care unit readmission) after infectious hospitalization performs better than readmission to a different care unit at the same hospital (different-care unit readmission). METHODS This retrospective study screened patients rehospitalized within 30 days following admission to two acute medical wards for infectious diseases from 2013 to 2015 and included only those readmitted for unplanned medical reasons. Outcomes of interest included hospital mortality and length of stay of readmitted patients. RESULTS Three hundred and fifteen patients were included; of those, 149(47%) and 166(53%) were classified as same-care unit and different-care unit readmissions, respectively. Same-care unit patients were more likely to be older(76 years vs. 70 years; P = 0.001), have comorbid chronic kidney disease(20% vs. 9%; P = 0.008), and have a shorter time to readmission(13 days vs. 16 days; P = 0.020) than different-care unit patients. Univariate analysis showed that same-care unit patients had a shorter length of stay than different-care unit patients(13 days vs. 18 days; P = 0.001), but had similar hospital mortality(20% vs. 24%; P = 0.385). The multivariable linear regression model indicated that same-care unit readmission was associated with a 5-day shorter hospital stay than different-care unit readmission(P = 0.002). CONCLUSION Among patients readmitted within 30 days after hospitalization for infectious diseases, same-care unit readmission was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay than different-care unit readmission. Whenever feasible, it is encouraged to allocate a readmitted patient to the same care unit in hope of pursuing continuity and quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Chin Pu
- Department of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Chen Chou
- Department of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Ta Huang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, Taiwan. .,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Wang-Huei Sheng
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rhodin KE, Raman V, Jensen CW, Kang L, Nussbaum DP, Tong BC, Blazer DG, D'Amico TA. Multi-institutional Care in Clinical Stage II and III Esophageal Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2023; 115:370-377. [PMID: 35872035 PMCID: PMC9851933 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.06.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of clinical stage II or III esophageal cancer requires multidisciplinary care. Multi-institutional care has been associated with worse survival in other malignant diseases. This study aimed to determine the impact of multi-institutional care on survival in patients with stage II or III esophageal cancer. METHODS The 2004 to 2016 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with clinical stage II or III esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy followed by surgical resection. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: multi-institutional or single-institution care. Survival between groups was compared using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards methods. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with multi-institutional care. RESULTS Overall, 11 399 patients met study criteria: 6569 (57.6%) received multi-institutional care and 4,830 (42.4%) received care at a single institution. In a multivariable analysis, factors associated with multi-institutional care were later year of diagnosis, greater distance from treating facility, residence in an urban or rural setting (vs metro), and residence in states without Medicaid expansion. Care at a single institution was associated with Black race, lack of insurance, and treatment at higher-volume or academic centers. Despite these differences, patients who received multi-institutional care had survival comparable to that in patients who received care at a single institution (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.92-1.03; P = .30). CONCLUSIONS In this National Cancer Database analysis, multi-institutional care was not associated with inferior overall survival. As complex cancer care becomes more regionalized, patients may consider receiving part of their cancer care closer to home, whereas traveling to surgical centers of excellence should be encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen E Rhodin
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Vignesh Raman
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Lillian Kang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel P Nussbaum
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Betty C Tong
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Dan G Blazer
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Thomas A D'Amico
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Choi DW, Kim SJ, Kim DJ, Chang YJ, Kim DW, Han KT. Does fragmented cancer care affect survival? Analysis of gastric cancer patients using national insurance claim data. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1566. [PMID: 36544140 PMCID: PMC9773508 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08988-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to investigate the association between fragmented cancer care in the early phase after cancer diagnosis and patient outcomes using national insurance claim data. METHODS From a nationwide sampled cohort database, we identified National Health Insurance beneficiaries diagnosed with gastric cancer (ICD-10: C16) in South Korea during 2005-2013. We analyzed the results of a multiple logistic regression analysis using the generalized estimated equation model to investigate which patient and institution characteristics affected fragmented cancer care during the first year after diagnosis. Then, survival analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model was conducted to investigate the association between fragmented cancer care and five-year mortality. RESULTS Of 2879 gastric cancer patients, 11.9% received fragmented cancer care by changing their most visited medical institution during the first year after diagnosis. We found that patients with fragmented cancer care had a higher risk of five-year mortality (HR: 1.310, 95% CI: 1.023-1.677). This association was evident among patients who only received chemotherapy or radiotherapy (HR: 1.633, 95% CI: 1.005-2.654). CONCLUSIONS Fragmented cancer care was associated with increased risk of five-year mortality. Additionally, changes in the most visited medical institution occurred more frequently in either patients with severe conditions or patients who mainly visited smaller medical institutions. Further study is warranted to confirm these findings and examine a causal relationship between fragmented cancer care and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Woo Choi
- grid.410914.90000 0004 0628 9810Cancer Big Data Center, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Goyang-Si, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Jung Kim
- grid.412674.20000 0004 1773 6524Department of Health Administration and Management, College of Medical Science, Soonchunhyang University, Asan-Si, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Jun Kim
- grid.411947.e0000 0004 0470 4224Graduate School of Public Health and Healthcare Management, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon-Jung Chang
- grid.410914.90000 0004 0628 9810Division of Cancer Control and Policy, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Goyang-Si, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Wook Kim
- grid.256681.e0000 0001 0661 1492Department of Information and Statistics, RINS, Gyeongsang National University, 501 Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do South Korea
| | - Kyu-Tae Han
- grid.410914.90000 0004 0628 9810Division of Cancer Control and Policy, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Goyang-Si, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fragmentation of Care in Pancreatic Cancer: Effects on Receipt of Care and Survival. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:2522-2533. [PMID: 36221020 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05478-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of fragmentation of care (FC), i.e., receipt of care at > 1 institution, on treatment of pancreatic cancer is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine factors associated with FC in curative-intent treatment of pancreatic cancer (PDAC) patients and evaluate how FC affects survival outcomes. METHODS Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), data on stage I-III PDAC patients diagnosed 2006-2016 were extracted. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors predictive of FC and survival. RESULTS Of the 20,013 patients identified, 24.1% had FC. Factors predictive of FC were stage-III tumors (odds ratio [OR] 1.36; p = 0.014), higher median-income [third quartile (OR 1.38; p = 0.006) and highest-quartile (OR 1.50; p = 0.003)], care at high-volume facility (OR 1.47; p < 0.001), and receipt of multi-modal therapy (OR 1.69; p < 0.001). In contrast, age > 80 years (OR 0.82; p = 0.018), Black (OR 0.85; p = 0.013) or Asian race (OR 0.76; p = 0.033), Charlson comorbidity-index 2 (OR 0.85; p = 0.033), treatment at non-academic facility (OR 0.87; p = 0.041), and non-private insurance were negatively predictive of FC. FC independently predicted decreased 30-day [OR 0.57; p < 0.001] and 90-day mortality [OR 0.61; p < 0.001] and improved overall survival [hazard ratio 0.91; p < 0.001]. DISCUSSION Sociodemographic factors are significantly associated with FC in curative-intent treatment of PDAC patients. FC was found to predict improved 30-day, 90-day, and overall survival outcomes.
Collapse
|
11
|
Greenberg JA, Thiesmeyer JW, Egan CE, Lee YJ, Sivarajah M, Zarnegar R, Fahey TJ, Beninato T, Finnerty BM. Care Fragmentation in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. World J Surg 2022; 46:3007-3016. [PMID: 36038731 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06712-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among surgical patients, care fragmentation (CF) is associated with worse outcomes. However, oncologic literature documents an association between high surgical volume and improved outcomes, favoring centralized cancer-surgery centers and thus predisposing to CF in patients with surgically treated tumors. We aimed to identify features associated with CF and ascertain differences in overall survival (OS) among patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for DTC patients diagnosed from 2009 to 2017. Patients experienced CF if part of their treatment was performed outside of the reporting facility or an associated office. A multivariable logistic regression analysis identified independent features associated with CF. A Cox multivariable regression analysis assessed the impact of CF on OS. A Kaplan-Meier analysis compared survival differences between patients experiencing CF or unified care (UC). RESULTS A total of 131,620 patients were included. Among them, 70,204 (53.3%) experienced CF and 61,416 (46.7%) experienced UC. Age < 55, residing in high-income areas, and stage 3 and 4 tumors were features independently associated with CF, whereas uninsured patients were less likely to experience CF than the privately insured. The features most strongly associated with CF were treatment at highest thyroid cancer-surgery volume institutions and traveling in the top distance quartile. While patients with CF experienced minor delays in time from diagnosis to surgery, 5-year OS was improved among patients with CF compared to UC for those with Stage 1-3 disease. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with DTC, CF is associated with treatment at a highest thyroid cancer surgery volume facility and improved OS in a setting of minor treatment delays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacques A Greenberg
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, F-838, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Jessica W Thiesmeyer
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, F-838, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Caitlin E Egan
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, F-838, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Yeon Joo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, F-838, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Maheshwaran Sivarajah
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, F-838, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Rasa Zarnegar
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, F-838, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Thomas J Fahey
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, F-838, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Toni Beninato
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers-Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08903, USA
| | - Brendan M Finnerty
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, F-838, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rhodin KE, Raman V, Eckhoff A, Liu A, Creasy J, Nussbaum DP, Blazer DG. Patterns and Impact of Fragmented Care in Stage II and III Gastric Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:5422-5431. [PMID: 35723791 PMCID: PMC9378672 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12031-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal management of stage II/III gastric cancer requires multidisciplinary care, often necessitating treatment at more than one facility. We aimed to determine patterns of "fragmented" care and its impact on outcomes, including concordance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and overall survival. METHODS The 2006-2016 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with clinical stage II/III gastric adenocarcinoma who received preoperative therapy in addition to surgery. Patients were stratified based on whether surgery and chemotherapy/chemoradiation were performed at one versus multiple facilities (termed "coordinated" and "fragmented" care, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with fragmented care. Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods. RESULTS Overall, 2033 patients met study criteria: 1043 (51.3%) received coordinated care and 990 (48.7%) fragmented care. There was no significant difference in time to surgery or pathologic upstaging by care structure. On adjusted analysis, factors associated with receipt of fragmented care included increasing age and distance traveled to the treating facility. Factors associated with coordinated care included metropolitan residence and treatment at academic and high-volume centers. Fragmented care was associated with a reduction in guideline-preferred perioperative chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.97, p = 0.02) and increased mortality (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.00-1.34, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS For patients with stage II/III gastric cancer, fragmented care is associated with inferior outcomes, including a reduction in preferred perioperative treatment and survival. Further work is needed to ensure equitable outcomes among patients as complex cancer care becomes more regionalized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen E Rhodin
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Vignesh Raman
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Austin Eckhoff
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Annie Liu
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Daniel P Nussbaum
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Dan G Blazer
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Okado I, Pagano I, Cassel K, Su'esu'e A, Rhee J, Berenberg J, Holcombe RF. Clinical Research Professional Providing Care Coordination Support: A Study of Hawaii Minority/Underserved NCORP Community Site Trial Participants. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1114-e1121. [PMID: 35294261 PMCID: PMC10530402 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although effective care coordination (CC) is recognized as a vital component of a patient-centered, high-quality cancer care delivery system, CC experiences of patients who enroll and receive treatment through clinical trials (CTs) are relatively unknown. Using mixed methods, we examined perceptions of CC among patients enrolled onto therapeutic CTs through the Hawaii Minority/Underserved National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program. METHODS The Care Coordination Instrument, a validated instrument, was used to measure patients' perceptions of CC among CT participants (n = 45) and matched controls (n = 45). Paired t-tests were used to compare overall and three CC domain scores (Communication, Navigation, and Operational) between the groups. Semistructured focus group interviews were conducted virtually with 14 CT participants in 2020/2021. RESULTS CT participants reported significantly higher total CC scores than non-CT participants (P = .0008). Similar trends were found for Navigation and Operational domain scores (P = .007 and .001, respectively). Twenty-nine percent of CT participants reported receiving high-intensity CC assistance from their clinical research professionals (CRPs). Content analysis of focus group discussions revealed that nearly half of the focus group discussions centered on CRPs (47%), including CC support provided by CRPs (26%). Other key themes included general CT experiences (22%) and CRP involvement as an additional benefit to CT participation (15%). CONCLUSION Our results show that patients on CTs in this study had a more positive CC experience. This may be attributable in part to CC support provided by CRPs. These findings highlight both the improved experience of treatment for patients participating in a trial and the generally unrecognized yet integral role of CRPs as part of a cancer CT care team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izumi Okado
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI
| | - Ian Pagano
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI
| | - Kevin Cassel
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI
| | | | - Jessica Rhee
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI
| | | | - Randall F. Holcombe
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI
- Current Affiliation: University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Choi DW, Kim S, Kim DW, Han KT. Fragmentation of care and colorectal cancer survival in South Korea: comparisons according to treatment at multiple hospitals. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022; 148:2323-2333. [PMID: 35522291 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04035-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Fragmented cancer care (FC) means that patients visit multiple providers for treatment, which is common in cancer care. While FC is associated with poor health outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) worldwide, there is still a lack of evidence in South Korea. We investigated the association between FC and 5-year morality in patients with CRC using population-based claims data. METHODS The study population was followed up from 2002 to 2015. Data were collected from Korea National Health Insurance claims. Participants comprised patients with CRC diagnosed with International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 (C18.x-C20.x) and a special claim code for cancer (V193). Data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier curve with a log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model. The effect of FC on patients' 5-year survival was examined. RESULTS Of 3467 patients with CRC, 20.0% had experienced FC. FC was significantly associated with an increased risk of 5-year mortality (hazard ratio 1.516, 95% confidence interval 1.274-1.804). FC was prevalent in those who had a low income level, underwent chemotherapy, did not undergo radiation therapy, and did not visit a tertiary hospital for their first treatment. CONCLUSION Efforts to decrease FC and integrate complex cancer care within appropriate healthcare delivery systems may improve survivorship among patients with CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Woo Choi
- Cancer Big Data Center, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, 10408, Republic of Korea
| | - Seungju Kim
- Department of Nursing, College of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Wook Kim
- Department of Information and Statistics. RINS, Gyeongsang National University, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyu-Tae Han
- Division of Cancer Control & Policy, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, 10408, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Brown ZJ, Labiner HE, Shen C, Ejaz A, Pawlik TM, Cloyd JM. Impact of care fragmentation on the outcomes of patients receiving neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2022; 125:185-193. [PMID: 34599756 PMCID: PMC9113396 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) is increasingly used for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The impact of care fragmentation during NT on the outcomes of patients with PDAC is unknown. METHODS Adult patients with Stage I-III PDAC who received NT and patients who underwent surgery first followed by adjuvant therapy (AT) between 2004 and 2016 were queried from the National Cancer Database. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between patients who received fragmented care (FC; care provided at >1 hospital) versus integrated care (IC; care at a single institution). RESULTS Among 6522 patients who underwent NT before pancreatectomy, 3755 (57.6%) received FC and 2767 (42.4%) received IC. While patients who received FC had a longer time to initiation of treatment (33.2 vs. 29.7 days, p < 0.001), there was no difference in median overall survival (OS) (26.7 vs. 26.5 months, p = 0.6). Among patients who underwent upfront surgery followed by AT (n = 15 291), patients who received FC had a longer time from diagnosis to undergoing surgery but less time from surgery to AT and no difference in OS (24.0 vs. 24.0 months, p = 0.910). CONCLUSION Although care fragmentation was associated with slightly longer times to initiate and complete treatment among patients with localized PDAC, long-term survival outcomes were similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary J. Brown
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio USA
| | - Hanna E. Labiner
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio USA
| | - Chengli Shen
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio USA
| | - Aslam Ejaz
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio USA
| | - Timothy M. Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio USA
| | - Jordan M. Cloyd
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
French WW, Scales CD, Viprakasit DP, Sur RL, Friedlander DF. Predictors and Cost Comparison of Subsequent Urinary Stone Care at Index versus Non-Index Hospitals. Urology 2022; 164:124-132. [PMID: 35093397 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 11/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the effects of care fragmentation, or the engagement of different health care systems along the continuum of care, on patients with urinary stone disease. METHODS All-payer data from the 2016 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) State Databases from Florida (FL) and New York (NY) were used to identify a cohort of adult patients with an emergency department visit for a diagnosis of urolithiasis, who subsequently re-presented to an index or non-index hospital for renal colic and/or urological intervention. Patient demographics, regional data, and procedural information were collected and 30-day episode-based costs were calculated. Multivariable logistic and gamma generalized linear regression were utilized to identify predictors of receiving subsequent care at an index hospital and associated costs, respectively. RESULTS Of the 33,863 patients who experienced a subsequent encounter related to nephrolithiasis, 9,593 (28.3%) received care at a non-index hospital. Receiving subsequent care at the index hospital was associated with fewer acute care encounters prior to surgery (2.5 vs. 2.7; p <0.001) and less days to surgery (29 vs. 42; p < 0.001). Total episode-based costs were higher in the non-index setting, with a mean difference of $783 (Non-index: $13,672, 95% CI $13,292 - $14,053; Index: $12,889, 95% CI $12,677 - $13,102; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Re-presentation to a unique healthcare facility following an initial diagnosis of urolithiasis is associated with a greater number of episode-related health encounters, longer time to definitive surgery, and increased costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William W French
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Charles D Scales
- Departments of Surgery (Urology) and Population Health Science, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Davis P Viprakasit
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Roger L Sur
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, CA, USA.
| | - David F Friedlander
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bouchard-Fortier G, Gien LT, Sutradhar R, Chan WC, Krzyzanowska MK, Liu S(L, Ferguson SE. Impact of care by gynecologic oncologists on primary ovarian cancer survival: A population-based study. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 164:522-528. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
18
|
Tarnasky AM, Achey MA, Wachsmuth LP, Williamson H, Thomas SM, Commander SJ, Leraas H, Driscoll T, Tracy ET. Non-inferiority of fragmented care for high-risk pediatric neuroblastoma patients: a single institution analysis. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2021; 38:731-744. [PMID: 33970762 DOI: 10.1080/08880018.2021.1922557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Pediatric neuroblastoma (NB) patients receive multi-modal therapy and may experience care fragmented among multiple institutions with a significant travel burden, which has been associated with poor outcomes for some adult cancers. We hypothesized that fragmented care for pediatric NB patients is associated with inferior outcomes compared to treatment consolidated at one location. We reviewed paper and electronic records for pediatric NB patients who received ≥1 hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) at Duke from 1990-2017. Fragmented care was defined by treatment at >1 institution and grouped by 2 institutions vs. 3+ institutions. Distances were calculated using Google Maps. To compare all care groups, we used Fisher's Exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests for demographic and treatment characteristics, Kaplan-Meier for unadjusted overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards for factors associated with OS. Of 127 eligible patients, 102 (80.3%) patients experienced fragmented care, with 17 treated at 3+ facilities. Kaplan-Meier analysis did not associate fragmented care with increased mortality (log-rank p = 0.13). With multivariate analysis, only earlier diagnostic decade and greater distance to HSCT remained significantly associated with worsened OS. In this single institutional study, we found fragmented care did not impact overall survival. Worsened overall survival was associated with increased travel distance for HSCT and further research should aim to improve supportive processes for patients undergoing HSCT for high-risk neuroblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron M Tarnasky
- School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Meredith A Achey
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Luke P Wachsmuth
- School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Samantha M Thomas
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sarah Jane Commander
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Harold Leraas
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tim Driscoll
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Elisabeth T Tracy
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Peponis T, Stafford C, Cusack J, Cauley C, Goldstone R, Berger D, Bordeianou L, Kunitake H, Francone T, Ricciardi R. The growing trend for no primary surgery in colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:2659-2670. [PMID: 34288327 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Revised: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM In colorectal cancer (CRC), surgery of the primary site is commonly curative. Our aim was to determine estimates of 'no surgery' for primary CRC while identifying common reasons for no surgery. METHOD We identified all patients with a diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma from the National Cancer Database between January 2004 and December 2016. Then, we identified patients who did not undergo surgery on the primary tumour and their demographic, tumour and institutional characteristics. Kaplan-Meier and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate specific factors associated with overall survival as related to no surgery and recommendations against operative management. RESULTS A total of 1,208,878 patients with CRC were identified, 14.5% of whom had no surgery of the primary cancer. No surgery was more common in rectal cancer than in colon cancer. Despite a steady incidence of CRC diagnoses, the likelihood of no surgery grew by 170% over the study period. Metastatic disease was noted in 53.7% of the no surgery cohort. Nine per cent of the no surgery patient cohort received a recommendation against surgery despite the absence of metastatic disease, 7.5% refused surgery and only 2% underwent palliative surgery. On multivariable analysis, patients who were not recommended to have surgery were more likely to be older, uninsured, comorbid and receive care at a single hospital. The no surgery patients had significantly lower overall survival. CONCLUSION A substantial proportion of patients with CRC do not have surgery. Interventions aimed at expanding access and promoting second opinions at other cancer hospitals might reduce the growing rate of no surgery in CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Peponis
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Caitlin Stafford
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James Cusack
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christy Cauley
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Robert Goldstone
- Department of Surgery, Newton Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David Berger
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Liliana Bordeianou
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hiroko Kunitake
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Todd Francone
- Department of Surgery, Newton Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rocco Ricciardi
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Doose M, Sanchez JI, Cantor JC, Plascak JJ, Steinberg MB, Hong CC, Demissie K, Bandera EV, Tsui J. Fragmentation of Care Among Black Women With Breast Cancer and Comorbidities: The Role of Health Systems. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 17:e637-e644. [PMID: 33974834 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.01089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Black women are disproportionately burdened by comorbidities and breast cancer. The complexities of coordinating care for multiple health conditions can lead to adverse consequences. Care coordination may be exacerbated when care is received outside the same health system, defined as care fragmentation. We examine types of practice setting for primary and breast cancer care to assess care fragmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed data from a prospective cohort of Black women diagnosed with breast cancer in New Jersey who also had a prior diagnosis of diabetes and/or hypertension (N = 228). Following breast cancer diagnosis, we examined types of practice setting for first primary care visit and primary breast surgery, through medical chart abstraction, and identified whether care was used within or outside the same health system. We used multivariable logistic regression to explore sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with care fragmentation. RESULTS Diverse primary care settings were used: medical groups (32.0%), health systems (29.4%), solo practices (23.7%), Federally Qualified Health Centers (8.3%), and independent hospitals (6.1%). Surgical care predominately occurred in health systems (79.8%), with most hospitals being Commission on Cancer-accredited. Care fragmentation was experienced by 78.5% of Black women, and individual-level factors (age, health insurance, cancer stage, and comorbidity count) were not associated with care fragmentation (P > .05). CONCLUSION The majority of Black breast cancer survivors with comorbidities received primary care and surgical care in different health systems, illustrating care fragmentation. Strategies for care coordination and health care delivery across health systems and practice settings are needed for health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Doose
- Helthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.,Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ.,Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Janeth I Sanchez
- Helthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Joel C Cantor
- Rutgers Center for State Health Policy, New Brunswick, NJ.,Rutgers Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, New Brunswick, NJ
| | | | | | - Chi-Chen Hong
- University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.,Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | | | - Elisa V Bandera
- Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ.,Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Jennifer Tsui
- Rutgers Center for State Health Policy, New Brunswick, NJ.,Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cham S, Huang Y, Melamed A, Worley MJ, Hou JY, Tergas AI, Khoury-Collado F, Gockley A, Clair CMST, Hershman DL, Wright JD. Fragmentation of surgery and chemotherapy in the initial phase of ovarian cancer care and its association with overall survival. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 162:56-64. [PMID: 33965245 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.04.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fragmentation occurs when a patient receives care at more than one hospital, and the long-term effects in ovarian cancer are unknown. We examined the association between fragmentation of primary debulking surgery (PDS) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and overall survival (OS). METHODS The National Cancer Database was used to identify women with stage II-IV epithelial ovarian cancer between 2004 and 2016 who underwent PDS followed by AC. Fragmentation was defined as receipt of AC at a different institution than where PDS was performed. After propensity score weighting, proportional hazard models were developed to estimate the association between fragmented care and OS. RESULTS Of the 36,300 patients identified, 13,347 (36.8%) had fragmented care. Patient factors associated with fragmentation included older age, higher income, and longer travel distance for PDS; hospital factors included PDS performed at a community center or a facility with lower annual surgical volume (P < 0.05, all). Fragmentation was associated with a 15% risk of 30-day delay to AC (aRR 1.15, 95% CI 1.09-1.22). In a propensity scoring weighted analysis, mortality was reduced when AC was fragmented (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.97). Sensitivity analyses indicated fragmentation was associated with improved survival in metropolitan residents. Stratified analyses indicated patients who traveled 50 miles or more with PDS and AC at the same institution had the worst OS. CONCLUSION Fragmentation of PDS and AC has no adverse effects on long-term survival. Survival outcomes were worst for those who received care at the same institution 50 miles or more away.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Cham
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer Institute, United States of America
| | - Yongmei Huang
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States of America
| | - Alexander Melamed
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States of America; New York Presbyterian Hospital, United States of America; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America
| | - Michael J Worley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer Institute, United States of America
| | - June Y Hou
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States of America; New York Presbyterian Hospital, United States of America; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America
| | - Ana I Tergas
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States of America; New York Presbyterian Hospital, United States of America; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America
| | - Fady Khoury-Collado
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States of America; New York Presbyterian Hospital, United States of America; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America
| | - Allison Gockley
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States of America; New York Presbyterian Hospital, United States of America; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America
| | - Caryn M S T Clair
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States of America; New York Presbyterian Hospital, United States of America; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America
| | - Dawn L Hershman
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States of America; New York Presbyterian Hospital, United States of America; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America; Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, United States of America
| | - Jason D Wright
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States of America; New York Presbyterian Hospital, United States of America; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America; Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Freischlag K, Olivere L, Turner M, Adam M, Mantyh C, Migaly J. Does Fragmentation of Care in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Increase Patient Mortality? J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:1287-1296. [PMID: 32754789 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04760-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate health care fragmentation in patients with stage II and III rectal cancers. BACKGROUND Fragmentation of care among multiple hospitals may worsen outcomes for cancer patients. METHODS National Cancer Database was queried for adult patients who underwent radiation and surgery for locally advanced (stage II-III) rectal adenocarcinoma from 2006 to 2015. Fragmented care was defined as receiving radiation at a different hospital from surgery. Descriptive statistics characterized patients, and survival probability was plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS A total of 37,081 patients underwent surgery and radiation for stage II-III rectal cancer from 2006 to 2015 (24,102 integrated care vs. 12,979 fragmented care). Patients who received fragmented care (hazard ratio [HR] 1.105; 95% CI 1.045-1.169) had a higher risk of mortality. Patients who received at least surgery (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.77-0.92) at academic hospitals had a lower risk of mortality. Academic hospitals had a higher proportion of patients with fragmented care (38.0 vs. comprehensive community 32.8% vs. community 33.8%, p < 0.001). Within academic hospitals, fragmented care portended worse survival (integrated academic 80.0% vs. fragmented academic 76.7%, p = 0.0002). Fragmented care at academic hospitals had increased survival over integrated care at community hospitals (fragmented academic 76.7 vs. integrated community 72.2%, p = 0.00039). CONCLUSIONS In patients with stage II-III rectal cancer, patients who have integrated care at academic hospitals or at least surgery at academic centers had better survival. All efforts should be made to reduce care fragmentation and surgery at academic centers should be prioritized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle Freischlag
- Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
| | - L Olivere
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - M Turner
- Duke University Medical Center, Surgery, Durham, NC, USA
| | - M Adam
- Duke University Medical Center, Surgery, Durham, NC, USA
| | - C Mantyh
- Duke University Medical Center, Surgery, Durham, NC, USA
| | - J Migaly
- Duke University Medical Center, Surgery, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kaltenborn Z, Paul K, Kirsch JD, Aylward M, Rogers EA, Rhodes MT, Usher MG. Super fragmented: a nationally representative cross-sectional study exploring the fragmentation of inpatient care among super-utilizers. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:338. [PMID: 33853590 PMCID: PMC8045386 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06323-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Super-utilizers with 4 or more admissions per year frequently receive low-quality care and disproportionately contribute to healthcare costs. Inpatient care fragmentation (admission to multiple different hospitals) in this population has not been well described. Objective To determine the prevalence of super-utilizers who receive fragmented care across different hospitals and to describe associated risks, costs, and health outcomes. Research design We analyzed inpatient data from the Health Care Utilization Project’s State Inpatient and Emergency Department database from 6 states from 2013. After identifying hospital super-utilizers, we stratified by the number of different hospitals visited in a 1-year period. We determined how patient demographics, costs, and outcomes varied by degree of fragmentation. We then examined how fragmentation would influence a hospital’s ability to identify super-utilizers. Subjects Adult patients with 4 or more inpatient stays in 1 year. Measures Patient demographics, cost, 1-year hospital reported mortality, and probability that a single hospital could correctly identify a patient as a super-utilizer. Results Of the 167,515 hospital super-utilizers, 97,404 (58.1%) visited more than 1 hospital in a 1-year period. Fragmentation was more likely among younger, non-white, low-income, under-insured patients, in population-dense areas. Patients with fragmentation were more likely to be admitted for chronic disease management, psychiatric illness, and substance abuse. Inpatient fragmentation was associated with higher yearly costs and lower likelihood of being identified as a super-utilizer. Conclusions Inpatient care fragmentation is common among super-utilizers, disproportionately affects vulnerable populations. It is associated with high yearly costs and a decreased probability of correctly identifying super-utilizers. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06323-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zach Kaltenborn
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St. SE MMC 741, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Koushik Paul
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St. SE MMC 741, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Jonathan D Kirsch
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St. SE MMC 741, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Michael Aylward
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St. SE MMC 741, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Rogers
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St. SE MMC 741, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Michael T Rhodes
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St. SE MMC 741, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Michael G Usher
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St. SE MMC 741, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wang KH, McAvay G, Warren A, Miller ML, Pho A, Blosnich JR, Brandt CA, Goulet JL. Examining Health Care Mobility of Transgender Veterans Across the Veterans Health Administration. LGBT Health 2021; 8:143-151. [PMID: 33512276 DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2020.0152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Transgender veterans are overrepresented in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) compared with in the general population. Utilization of multiple different health care systems, or health care mobility, can affect care coordination and potentially affect outcomes, either positively or negatively. This study examines whether transgender veterans are more or less health care mobile than nontransgender veterans and compares the patterns of geographic mobility in these groups. Methods: Using an established cohort (n = 5,414,109), we identified 2890 transgender veterans from VHA electronic health records from 2000 to 2012. We compared transgender and nontransgender veterans on sociodemographic, clinical, and health care system-level measures and conducted conditional logistic regression models of mobility. Results: Transgender veterans were more likely to be younger, White, homeless, have depressive disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and hepatitis C. Transgender veterans were more likely to have been health care mobile (9.9%) than nontransgender veterans (5.2%) (unadjusted odds ratio = 2.02, 95% confidence interval = 1.73-2.36). In a multivariable model, transgender status, being separated/divorced, receiving care in less-complex facilities, and diagnoses of depression, PTSD, or hepatitis C were associated with more mobility, whereas older age was associated with less mobility. For the top three health care systems utilized, a larger proportion of transgender veterans visited a second health care system in a different state (56.2%) than nontransgender veterans (37.5%). Conclusions: Transgender veterans were more likely to be health care mobile and more likely to travel out of state for health care services. They were also more likely to have complex chronic health conditions that require multidisciplinary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen H Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Equity Research and Innovation Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Gail McAvay
- Department of Internal Medicine, Equity Research and Innovation Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.,Pain Research, Informatics, Multi-morbidities, and Education Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Allison Warren
- Department of Internal Medicine, Equity Research and Innovation Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.,Pain Research, Informatics, Multi-morbidities, and Education Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Mary L Miller
- Department of Internal Medicine, Equity Research and Innovation Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Anthony Pho
- Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, USA
| | - John R Blosnich
- Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Cynthia A Brandt
- Department of Internal Medicine, Equity Research and Innovation Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.,Pain Research, Informatics, Multi-morbidities, and Education Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Joseph L Goulet
- Department of Internal Medicine, Equity Research and Innovation Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.,Pain Research, Informatics, Multi-morbidities, and Education Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Biju K, Zhang GQ, Stem M, Sahyoun R, Safar B, Atallah C, Efron JE, Rajput A. Impact of Treatment Coordination on Overall Survival in Rectal Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 20:187-196. [PMID: 33618972 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Revised: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rectal cancer treatment is often multimodal, comprising of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. However, the impact of coordination between these modalities is currently unknown. We aimed to assess whether delivery of nonsurgical therapy within same facility as surgery impacts survival in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS A patient cohort with rectal cancer stages II to IV who received multimodal treatment between 2004 and 2016 from National Cancer Database was retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into three groups: (A) surgery + chemotherapy + radiotherapy at same facility (surgery + 2); (B) surgery + chemotherapy or radiotherapy at same facility (surgery + 1); or (C) only surgery at reporting facility (chemotherapy + radiotherapy elsewhere; surgery + 0). The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS), analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional-hazards models. RESULTS A total of 44,716 patients (16,985 [37.98%] surgery + 2, 12,317 [27.54%] surgery + 1, and 15,414 [34.47%] surgery + 0) were included. In univariate analysis, we observed that surgery+2 patients had significantly greater 5-year OS compared to surgery + 1 or surgery + 0 patients (5-year OS: 63.46% vs 62.50% vs 61.41%, respectively; P= .002). We observed similar results in multivariable Cox proportional-hazards analysis, with surgery + 0 group demonstrating increased hazard of mortality when compared to surgery + 2 group (HR: 1.09; P< .001). These results held true after stratification by stage for stage II (HR 1.10; P= .022) and stage III (HR 1.12; P< .001) but not for stage IV (P= .474). CONCLUSION Greater degree of care coordination within the same facility is associated with greater OS in patients with stage II to III rectal cancer. This finding illustrates the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in multimodal rectal cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Biju
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - George Q Zhang
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Miloslawa Stem
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Rebecca Sahyoun
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Bashar Safar
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Chady Atallah
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jonathan E Efron
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ashwani Rajput
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lin Z, Han H, Qin Y, Zhang Y, Yin D, Wu C, Wei X, Cao Y, He J. Outcomes after readmission at the index or nonindex hospital following acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Clin Cardiol 2021; 44:200-209. [PMID: 33411357 PMCID: PMC7852161 DOI: 10.1002/clc.23526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Little is known about the prevalence and outcomes of readmission to nonindex hospitals after an admission for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI‐CS). We aimed to determine the rate of nonindex readmissions following AMI‐CS and to evaluate its association with clinical factors, hospitalization cost, length of stay (LOS), and in‐hospital mortality rates. Hypothesis Nonindex readmission may lead to worse in‐hospital outcomes. Methods We reviewed the data of inpatients with AMI‐CS between 2010 and 2017 using the National Readmission Database. The survey analytical methods recommended by the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project were used for national estimates. Multiple regression models were used to evaluate the predictors of nonindex readmission, and its association with hospitalization cost, LOS, and in‐hospital mortality rates. Results Of 238 349 patients with AMI‐CS, 28028 (11.76%) had an unplanned readmission within 30 days. Of these patients, 7423 (26.48%) were readmitted to nonindex hospitals. Compared with index readmission, nonindex readmission was associated with higher hospitalization costs (p < .0001), longer LOS (p < .0001), and increased in‐hospital mortality rates (p = .0016). Patients who had a history of percutaneous coronary intervention, received intubation/mechanical ventilation, or left against medical advice during the initial admission had greater odds of a nonindex readmission. Conclusions Over one‐fourth of readmissions following AMI‐CS were to nonindex hospitals. These admissions were associated with higher hospitalization costs, longer LOS, and higher in‐hospital mortality rates. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether a continuity of care plan in the acute hospital setting can improve outcomes after AMI‐CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Lin
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hedong Han
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Yingyi Qin
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuan Zhang
- The Fifth Subcenter of Air Force Health Care Center for Special Services Hangzhou, Wuxi, China
| | - Daqing Yin
- Department of Medical Management, General Hospital of Central Theater Command, Beijing, China
| | - Cheng Wu
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin Wei
- Department of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Yang Cao
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Jia He
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Health Statistics, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abelson JS, Bauer PS, Barron J, Bommireddy A, Chapman WC, Schad C, Ohman K, Hunt S, Mutch M, Silviera M. Fragmented Care in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer and Time to Definitive Therapy. J Am Coll Surg 2020; 232:27-33. [PMID: 33190785 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer (NAPRC) emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach for treating rectal cancer and has developed performance measures to ensure that patients receive standardized care. We hypothesized that rectal cancer patients receiving care at multiple centers would be less likely to receive timely and appropriate care. STUDY DESIGN A single institution retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed. All patients undergoing proctectomy and ≤1 other treatment modality (eg radiation and/or chemotherapy) for Stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma were included. Unified care was defined as receiving all modalities of care at our institution, and fragmented care was defined as having at least 1 treatment modality at another institution. RESULTS From 2009 to 2019, 415 patients met inclusion criteria, with 197 (47.5%) receiving fragmented care and 218 (52.5%) receiving unified care. The unified cohort patients were more likely to see a colorectal surgeon before starting treatment (89.0% vs 78.7%, p < 0.01) and start definitive treatment within 60 days of diagnosis (89.0% vs 79.7%, p = 0.01). On adjusted analysis, unified care patients were 2.78 times more likely to see a surgeon before starting treatment (95% CI 1.47-5.24) and 2.63 times more likely to start treatment within 60 days (95% CI 1.35-5.13). There was no difference in 90-day mortality or 5-year disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS This retrospective cohort study suggests patients with rectal cancer receiving fragmented care are at an increased risk of delays in care without any impact on disease-free survival. These findings need to be considered within the context of ongoing regionalization of rectal cancer care to ensure all patients receive optimal care, irrespective of whether care is delivered across multiple institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan S Abelson
- Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.
| | - Philip S Bauer
- Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - John Barron
- Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Ani Bommireddy
- Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - William C Chapman
- Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Christine Schad
- Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Kerri Ohman
- Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Steven Hunt
- Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Matthew Mutch
- Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Matthew Silviera
- Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Shannon AB, Mo J, Song Y, Paulson EC, Roses RE, Fraker DL, Kelz RR, Miura JT, Karakousis GC. Does multicenter care impact the outcomes of surgical patients with gastrointestinal malignancies requiring complex multimodality therapy? J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:729-738. [PMID: 32563196 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regionalization of oncologic care has increased, but less is known whether patient outcomes are influenced by receipt of multimodality care through multicenter care (MCC) or single-center care (SCC). METHODS Patients from 2004 to 2015 National Cancer Data Base diagnosed with stage II-III esophageal (EA), stage II-III pancreatic (PA), and stage II-IV rectal (RA) adenocarcinoma who underwent resection at a high volume center (HVC) and required radiation and/or chemotherapy were included. MCC (care at 2+ facilities) and SCC patients were propensity-score matched 1:2 and Cox proportional hazards regression used to analyze survival. RESULTS On multivariable regression analysis, MCC in RA patients (N = 325/2097, 15.5%) was more associated with residing ≥40 miles from the HVC (odds ratio [OR] = 2.37; P = .044) and receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (1.42, P = .040). In PA patients (N = 75/380, 19.7%), residing ≥40 miles from the HVC (OR = 3.22; P = .001), and in EA patients (N = 88/534, 16.5%), younger patients (<50 years: OR = 2.96; P = .011) were associated with MCC. Following propensity score matching, EA (N = 147), PA (N = 133), and RA (N = 661) patients had no difference in 1-year and 3-year overall survival when comparing MCC to SCC. CONCLUSIONS The use of MCC appears safe without a difference in survival and may offer significant advantages in convenience to patients as they undergo their complex oncologic care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrienne B Shannon
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Julia Mo
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Yun Song
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Emily C Paulson
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Surgery, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert E Roses
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Douglas L Fraker
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rachel R Kelz
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John T Miura
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Giorgos C Karakousis
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Qayed E, Mulki R. Frequency of Care Fragmentation and Its Impact on Outcomes in Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis in a Nationally Representative Sample. South Med J 2020; 113:254-260. [PMID: 32358621 DOI: 10.14423/smj.0000000000001094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Hospitalized patients with acute and chronic pancreatitis (AP and CP) are prone to frequent readmissions to different hospitals. The rate of care fragmentation and its impact on important outcomes are unknown. The aims of this study were to evaluate the rate and predictors of care fragmentation in patients hospitalized with AP and CP using a nationally representative sample, and to analyze the impact of care fragmentation on mortality, cost, and hospital readmissions. METHODS We identified all adult hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of AP or CP in the 2010-2014 National Readmissions Database, which captures statewide readmissions. We calculated 30- and 90-day readmission and care fragmentation rates. Readmission to a nonindex hospital was considered care fragmentation. Logistic regression was used to determine hospital and patient factors independently associated with 30-day care fragmentation. Patients readmitted within 30 days were followed for 60 days postdischarge from the first readmission. Mortality during the first readmission, hospitalization costs, and rates of 60-day readmission were compared between those with and without care fragmentation. RESULTS There were 479,427 admissions with AP and 25,513 with CP. The rates of 30- and 90-day readmissions were 13.5% and 22.9% for AP and 26.9% and 44.7%% for CP. The rates of 30- and 90-day care fragmentation were 28% and 32% for AP and 33% and 38% for CP. Younger age (younger than 45 y), male patients, length of stay <5 days, ≥4 Elixhauser comorbidities, and self-pay or Medicaid insurance were associated with increased risk of 30-day care fragmentation. Large hospital size, routine discharge, and metropolitan location were associated with lower risk. Patients who had the first readmission to a nonindex hospital had a higher mortality (2% vs 1.6%, P = 0.005), length of stay (6.5 vs 5.6 days, P < 0.0001), mean hospitalization cost ($16,731 vs $13,368, P < 0.0001), and 60-day readmission (48.4% vs 42.9%) compared with those readmitted to the index hospital. CONCLUSIONS In patients with AP and CP, one-third of 90-day readmissions occur at a nonindex hospital. Care fragmentation is associated with increased mortality, readmissions, and cost of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emad Qayed
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ramzi Mulki
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pinheiro LC, Reshetnyak E, Safford MM, Nanus D, Kern LM. Differences in ambulatory care fragmentation between cancer survivors and noncancer controls. Cancer 2020; 126:3094-3101. [PMID: 32286692 PMCID: PMC7275891 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Revised: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with chronic conditions are treated by many providers, which can increase the risk of communication gaps across providers and potential harm to patients. However, to the authors' knowledge, the extent of fragmented care among this population is unknown. In the current study, the authors sought to determine whether cancer survivors have more fragmented care than noncancer controls and to quantify the extent of fragmentation. METHODS Data from the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study linked to Medicare claims were used. The authors included beneficiaries with continuous Part A and B coverage for 12 months at the time of their baseline REGARDS survey. The primary outcome of the current study was claims-based fragmentation over 12 months, which was calculated using the reversed Bice-Boxerman Index so a higher score reflected greater fragmentation. Unadjusted differences in fragmentation were compared between cancer survivors and controls. Beta regression models were used to estimate associations between cancer status and fragmentation, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS The authors included 4922 participants aged ≥65 years at baseline. Of these patients, approximately 21% were cancer survivors. Survivors had a median of 11 visits (interquartile range, 7-15 visits) with 5 providers compared with controls, who had a median of 9 visits (interquartile range, 6-14 visits) with 4 providers (P < .0001). Cancer survivors had significantly more fragmented care compared with controls (median reversed Bice-Boxerman Index, 0.80 vs 0.76; P < .0001). After adjusting for confounders, cancer survivors had an increased odds of having fragmented care (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02-1.14). CONCLUSIONS Care fragmentation is more prevalent among cancer survivors compared with those without a history of cancer. Future studies should examine whether fragmentation puts survivors at risk of worse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura C Pinheiro
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Evgeniya Reshetnyak
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Monika M Safford
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - David Nanus
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Lisa M Kern
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Okado I, Cassel K, Pagano I, Holcombe RF. Development and psychometric evaluation of a questionnaire to measure cancer patients' perception of care coordination. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:52. [PMID: 31964391 PMCID: PMC6975072 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-4905-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the importance of care coordination (CC) is well-recognized, cancer patients often receive poorly coordinated care across varied care settings and different oncology providers. Efforts to improve cancer care are hampered by lack of adequate measures. In this two-part, mixed-method study, we describe the development, refinement, and validation of a new care coordination instrument (CCI) designed to assess cancer patients' perception of CC. METHODS In Study 1, an initial CCI was developed incorporating questions based on literature review. The items were then modified following four field tests conducted in a large academic hospital with oncology nurses (n = 20) and cancer patients (n = 120). This modified instrument was used to determine whether the CCI was able to distinguish CC between two practices (30 GI and 30 myeloma patients) within the same hospital setting. In Study 2, 68 patients receiving community-based care participated in seven focus groups. Based on these discussions, the CCI items were again refined, and psychometric evaluation was conducted to assess the quality of the instrument. RESULTS Based on field tests, 3 domains of the CCI, Communication, Navigation, and Operational, were defined as critical components of CC. The Operational domain evaluates efficiency of care and is unique to this CCI. The field test demonstrated that GI patients reported significantly better CC Overall and for the Communication and Navigation domains (all p < .05). In Study 2, patients expressed concordance with the CCI items and their CC experiences, establishing validity of the CCI. Qualitative analysis of the focus group discussions indicated that the items with the highest frequencies of participants' comments were related to the concepts of Navigator, Team, Survey, and Communication. Quantitative analysis identified items with a limited response range or high rates of "neutral" responses; accordingly, those items were removed. The final CCI survey is a 29 item, multiple-choice questionnaire with excellent reliability, Cronbach's α = .922. CONCLUSIONS We developed a novel, patient-centered tool with excellent psychometric properties that can be utilized across varied practice settings to assess patients' perception of cancer care coordination. TRIAL REGISTRATION Not required; retrospectively registered ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03594006 20 July 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izumi Okado
- University of Hawai'i Cancer Center, 701 Ilalo St. 6th Floor, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.
| | - Kevin Cassel
- University of Hawai'i Cancer Center, 701 Ilalo St. 6th Floor, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA
| | - Ian Pagano
- University of Hawai'i Cancer Center, 701 Ilalo St. 6th Floor, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA
| | - Randall F Holcombe
- University of Hawai'i Cancer Center, 701 Ilalo St. 6th Floor, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hester CA, Karbhari N, Rich NE, Augustine M, Mansour JC, Polanco PM, Porembka MR, Wang SC, Zeh HJ, Singal AG, Yopp AC. Effect of fragmentation of cancer care on treatment use and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 2019; 125:3428-3436. [PMID: 31299089 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Revised: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fragmented cancer care (FC), or care received from multiple institutions, increases systemic health care costs and potentiates cancer care disparities. There is a paucity of data on mechanisms contributing to FC and the resulting effect on patient outcomes. This study characterized patient- and hospital-level factors associated with FC, time to treatment (TTT), and overall survival (OS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Patients newly diagnosed with HCC from 2004 to 2015 and receiving treatment were identified in the Texas Cancer Registry. Patient- and hospital-level factors were compared across 2 cohorts: an FC treatment group and a nonfragmented cancer care (NFC) treatment group. Covariate-adjusted treatment use and OS were compared between the 2 treatment groups. RESULTS Among 4329 patients with HCC, 1185 (27.4%) received FC, and 3144 (72.6%) received NFC. Compared with NFC patients, FC patients had larger tumors (median size ≥4 cm, 52.6% vs 35.2%; P < .001), and a higher proportion had a regional/metastatic stage (35.9% vs 26.7%; P < .001). Among patients with localized disease, FC was associated with decreased odds of curative therapy (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-0.9). FC was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.24) and increased TTT (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.7-0.8). In the subset of patients with localized-stage HCC who received curative therapy, FC was associated with worse OS (median survival, 67 vs 43 months; HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4) and increased TTT (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.7-0.8). CONCLUSIONS FC patients were less likely to undergo curative therapy when they were diagnosed at an early stage. After covariate adjustment, newly diagnosed patients with HCC receiving FC had worse OS and increased TTT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin A Hester
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Nishika Karbhari
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Nicole E Rich
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Mathew Augustine
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - John C Mansour
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Patricio M Polanco
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Matthew R Porembka
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Sam C Wang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Herbert J Zeh
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Amit G Singal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Adam C Yopp
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a lack of data on the impact of readmission to the same vs a different hospital following an index hospital discharge in cirrhosis patients. METHODS We sought to describe rates and predictors of different-hospital readmissions (DHRs) among patients with cirrhosis and also determine the impact on cirrhosis outcomes including all-cause inpatient mortality and hospital costs. Using the national readmissions database, we identified cirrhosis hospitalizations in 2013. Regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of DHRs. A time-to-event analysis was performed to assess the impact on subsequent readmissions and all-cause inpatient mortality. RESULTS In 2013, there were 109,039 cirrhosis readmissions with 67% of these being same-hospital readmissions and 33% being DHRs (P < 0.001). Two percent of readmitted patients were treated at ≥4 different hospitals. The 30-day readmission rate was 29.1%. Predictors of DHR included Medicaid payer (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.01-1.14), age (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.978-0.982), elective admission (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17), hepatic encephalopathy (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.16-1.25), hepatorenal syndrome (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03-1.16), and low socioeconomic status (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.06-1.25). No difference was observed in 30-day readmission risk following a DHR (adjusted hazard ratio 1.044, 95% CI 0.975-1.118). In addition, there was no increased risk of inpatient death observed during a DHR within 30 days (adjusted hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI 0.94-1.23). However, patients with DHR had significantly higher hospital costs and length of stay. CONCLUSIONS Majority of cirrhosis readmissions are same-hospital readmissions. Different-hospital readmissions do not increase the risk of 30-day readmissions and inpatient mortality but are associated with higher hospital costs.
Collapse
|
34
|
Chen MM, Megwalu UC, Liew J, Sirjani D, Rosenthal EL, Divi V. Regionalization of head and neck cancer surgery may fragment care and impact overall survival. Laryngoscope 2018; 129:1413-1419. [DOI: 10.1002/lary.27440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2018] [Revised: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle M. Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryStanford University Palo Alto California
- Department of OtolaryngologyPalo Alto Veterans Administration Palo Alto California
| | - Uchechukwu C. Megwalu
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryStanford University Palo Alto California
| | - Jazmine Liew
- New York Medical College School of Medicine Valhalla New York U.S.A
| | - Davud Sirjani
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryStanford University Palo Alto California
- Department of OtolaryngologyPalo Alto Veterans Administration Palo Alto California
| | - Eben L. Rosenthal
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryStanford University Palo Alto California
| | - Vasu Divi
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryStanford University Palo Alto California
- Department of OtolaryngologyPalo Alto Veterans Administration Palo Alto California
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Grant S, Motala A, Chrystal JG, Shanman R, Zuchowski J, Zephyrin L, Cordasco KM. Describing care coordination of gynecologic oncology in western healthcare settings: a rapid review. Transl Behav Med 2018; 8:409-418. [DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibx074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Joya G Chrystal
- VA Center for The Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), North Hills, CA, USA
| | | | - Jessica Zuchowski
- VA Center for The Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), North Hills, CA, USA
| | - Laurie Zephyrin
- Women’s Health Services, Patient Care Services, Veterans Health Administration
- VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University Langone School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kristina M Cordasco
- VA Center for The Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), North Hills, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, The University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Weaver SJ, Jacobsen PB. Cancer care coordination: opportunities for healthcare delivery research. Transl Behav Med 2018; 8:503-508. [PMID: 29800404 PMCID: PMC6257019 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibx079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In this commentary, we discuss opportunities to explore issues related to care coordination at three points on the cancer care continuum: (1) screening, particularly coordinating follow-up for abnormal findings, (2) active treatment, particularly challenges for patients with multiple chronic conditions, and (3) survivorship, particularly issues related to facilitating shared care between oncology and primary care. For each point on the continuum, we briefly summarize some of the important coordination issues and discuss potential avenues for future research in the context of existing evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sallie J Weaver
- Health Systems and Interventions Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Paul B Jacobsen
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Weidner TK, Kidwell JT, Etzioni DA, Sangaralingham LR, Van Houten HK, Asante D, Jeffery MM, Shah N, Wasif N. Factors Associated with Emergency Department Utilization and Admission in Patients with Colorectal Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2018; 22:913-920. [PMID: 29435901 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3707-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2017] [Accepted: 01/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We assessed emergency department (ED) utilization in patients with colorectal cancer to identify factors associated with ED visits and subsequent admission, as well as identify a high-risk subset of patients that could be targeted to reduce ED visits. METHODS Data from Optum Labs Data Warehouse, a national administrative claims database, was retrospectively analyzed to identify patients with colorectal cancer from 2008 to 2014. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with ED visits and ED "super-users" (3+ visits). Repeated measures analysis was used to model ED visits resulting in hospitalization as a logistic regression based on treatments 30 days prior to ED visit. RESULTS Of 13,466 patients with colorectal cancer, 7440 (55.2%) had at least one ED visit within 12 months of diagnosis. Factors associated with having an ED visit included non-white race, advancing age, increased comorbidities, and receipt of chemotherapy or radiation. 69.2% of patients who visited the ED were admitted to the hospital. A group of 1834 "super-users" comprised 13.6% of our population yet accounted for 52.1% of the total number of ED visits and 32.3% of admissions. CONCLUSIONS Over half of privately insured patients undergoing treatment for colorectal cancer will visit the ED within 12 months of diagnosis. Within this group, we identify common factors for a high-risk subset of patients with three or more ED visits who account for over half of all ED visits and a third of all admissions. These patients could potentially be targeted with alternative management strategies in the outpatient setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany K Weidner
- Department of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - John T Kidwell
- Department of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - David A Etzioni
- Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Lindsey R Sangaralingham
- Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Holly K Van Houten
- Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Dennis Asante
- Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Molly Moore Jeffery
- Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Nilay Shah
- Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- OptumLabs, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Nabil Wasif
- Department of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.
- Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Coordinating Care Across Health Care Systems for Veterans With Gynecologic Malignancies. Med Care 2017; 55 Suppl 7 Suppl 1:S53-S60. [DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
39
|
Clarke CA, Glaser SL, Leung R, Davidson-Allen K, Gomez SL, Keegan THM. Prevalence and characteristics of cancer patients receiving care from single vs. multiple institutions. Cancer Epidemiol 2017; 46:27-33. [PMID: 27918907 PMCID: PMC5759969 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2016] [Revised: 10/31/2016] [Accepted: 11/02/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients may receive cancer care from multiple institutions. However, at the population level, such patterns of cancer care are poorly described, complicating clinical research. To determine the population-based prevalence and characteristics of patients seen by multiple institutions, we used operations data from a state-mandated cancer registry. METHODS AND MATERIALS 59,672 invasive cancers diagnosed in 1/1/2010-12/31/2011 in the Greater Bay Area of northern California were categorized as having been reported to the cancer registry within 365days of diagnosis by: 1) ≥1 institution within an integrated health system (IHS); 2) IHS institution(s) and ≥1 non-IHS institution (e.g., private hospital); 3) 1 non-IHS institution; or 4) ≥2 non-IHS institutions. Multivariable logistic regression was used to characterize patients reported by multiple vs. single institutions. RESULTS Overall in this region, 17% of cancers were reported by multiple institutions. Of the 33% reported by an IHS, 8% were also reported by a non-IHS. Of non-IHS patients, 21% were reported by multiple institutions, with 28% for breast and 27% for pancreatic cancer, but 19%% for lung and 18% for prostate cancer. Generally, patients more likely to be seen by multiple institutions were younger or had more severe disease at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Population-based data show that one in six newly diagnosed cancer patients received care from multiple institutions, and differed from patients seen only at a single institution. Cancer care data from single institutions may be incomplete and possibly biased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina A Clarke
- Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA, United States; Department of Health Research and Policy (Epidemiology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
| | - Sally L Glaser
- Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA, United States; Department of Health Research and Policy (Epidemiology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Rita Leung
- Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA, United States
| | | | - Scarlett L Gomez
- Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA, United States; Department of Health Research and Policy (Epidemiology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Theresa H M Keegan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hussain T, Chang HY, Luu NP, Pollack CE. The Value of Continuity between Primary Care and Surgical Care in Colon Cancer. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0155789. [PMID: 27219454 PMCID: PMC4878733 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2016] [Accepted: 04/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improving continuity between primary care and cancer care is critical for improving cancer outcomes and curbing cancer costs. A dimension of continuity, we investigated how regularly patients receive their primary care and surgical care for colon cancer from the same hospital and whether this affects mortality and costs. METHODS Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program Registry (SEER)-Medicare data, we performed a retrospective cohort study of stage I-III colon cancer patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2009. There were 23,305 stage I-III colon cancer patients who received primary care in the year prior to diagnosis and underwent operative care for colon cancer. Patients were assigned to the hospital where they had their surgery and to their primary care provider's main hospital, and then classified according to whether these two hospitals were same or different. Outcomes examined were hazards for all-cause mortality, subhazard for colon cancer specific mortality, and generalized linear estimate for costs at 12 months, from propensity score matched models. RESULTS Fifty-two percent of stage I-III colon patients received primary care and surgical care from the same hospital. Primary care and surgical care from the same hospital was not associated with reduced all-cause or colon cancer specific mortality, but was associated with lower inpatient, outpatient, and total costs of care. Total cost difference was $8,836 (95% CI $2,746-$14,577), a 20% reduction in total median cost of care at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS Receiving primary care and surgical care at the same hospital, compared to different hospitals, was associated with lower costs but still similar survival among stage I-III colon cancer patients. Nonetheless, health care policy which encourages further integration between primary care and cancer care in order to improve outcomes and decrease costs will need to address the significant proportion of patients receiving health care across more than one hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanvir Hussain
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Hsien-Yen Chang
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Ngoc-Phuong Luu
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Craig Evan Pollack
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Chang GJ, Kopetz S. Coordination of care in colon cancer. Cancer 2015; 121:3201-2. [PMID: 26043269 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2015] [Accepted: 04/30/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- George J Chang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Scott Kopetz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|