Anamorelin (ONO-7643) for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and cachexia: Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of Japanese patients (ONO-7643-04)

CONUT score as a predictor for anamorelin efficacy in patients with cancer cachexia receiving chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Anamorelin is expected to improve cancer cachexia by increasing lean body mass (LBM) due to increased appetite and protein synthesis. However, the effect of anamorelin on cancer cachexia in real-world practice is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anamorelin and to identify predictors of efficacy on treatment with anamorelin.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with cancer cachexia treated with chemotherapy between May 2021 and August 2022. Efficacy of anamorelin was evaluated using LBM, with "12-week sustained effective response" to anamorelin treatment defined as maintenance or an increase in LBM for 12 weeks. We examined factors associated with "12-week sustained effective response" to anamorelin treatment using a multivariable logistic model that included controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, an objective assessment of nutritional disorders, and the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), which scores the cachexia status of cancer patients. To assess patient subjective quality of life (QOL) changes related to eating after starting anamorelin treatment, we used a questionnaire (QOL-ACD appetite-related items: Q8, 9, 11). Adverse events were evaluated in accordance with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0.

RESULTS

On analysis of data from 40 patients, 23 patients showed a 12-week sustained effective response to anamorelin (57.5%). At 12 weeks, LBM significantly increased by 1.63 ± 3.73 kg (mean ± SD). Multivariable logistic analysis revealed that a low CONUT score was significantly associated with "12-week sustained effective response" to anamorelin treatment (adjusted odds ratio: 13.5, 95% confidence intervals: 2.2-84.2, P = 0.004). QOL assessment showed a trend toward increased appetite and enjoyment of meals after anamorelin initiation. Five patients (12.5%) had an increase in HbA1c of more than 1.0% during the 12 weeks after the start of anamorelin. No patient had QT interval prolongation or grade 3 or higher hepatic transaminase elevation.

CONCLUSION

Anamorelin may maintain or increase LBM with tolerable safety in patients with cancer cachexia undergoing chemotherapy. A low CONUT score, despite meeting criteria for cancer cachexia, is suggested as a predictor for the efficacy of anamorelin, indicating that patients with a low CONUT score may benefit from early introduction of anamorelin.

Anamorelin for the Treatment of Cancer Anorexia-Cachexia Syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The following review will highlight the development of anamorelin to treat cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CACS) including the potential benefits, limitations, and future directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ghrelin, a 28-amino acid peptide hormone, is secreted by the stomach mucosa and regulates appetite, promotes lipogenesis, increases body weight, improves gastric motility, reduces catabolic wasting and inflammation. Several randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials evaluating anamorelin, a ghrelin agonist, for the treatment of CACS have reported improvement in appetite and body composition including both lean body and fat mass; however, most studies noted no improvement in physical function as assessed by measuring non-dominant hand-grip strength. Common adverse effects of anamorelin include the development of diabetes mellitus, hyperglycemia, and less frequently, hepatic abnormalities and cardiovascular events including conduction abnormalities, hypertension, and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Anamorelin has the potential to stimulate appetite, improve gastric movement, and may have anti-inflammatory effects on patients with CACS. In patients with cancer, studies involving anamorelin combined with other multimodal treatments including nutrition counseling (branched chain amino acids, omega 3 fatty acids, and other nutrients), exercise, treatment of hormonal abnormalities including hypogonadism and hypovitaminosis D, and anti-inflammatory agents are needed. Compliance with multimodality treatment has been a barrier and future studies may need to incorporate motivational counseling to promote adherence.

Prescription Pattern of Anamorelin; a Therapeutic Agent for Cancer Cachexia

Background: The commercial availability of anamorelin, Japan's first therapeutic agent for cancer cachexia in 2021, led to an investigation into its prescription patterns at Toyama University Hospital. Objective: We aimed to analyze anamorelin prescription trends and outcomes among cancer cachexia patients. Methods: A retrospective study from July 2021 to December 2022 examined 88 cases, assessing demographics, cancer types, prescription locations, and meal intake changes. Results: Anamorelin usage was predominant during chemotherapy, especially for pancreatic cancer in outpatient settings. Approximately 30% experienced increased meal intake. Chemotherapy-initiated cases had a longer median duration (55 days) compared with best supportive care only cases (12 days). Conclusion: Anamorelin demonstrated significant prescription patterns, particularly during chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer in outpatient settings, suggesting potential efficacy enhancements when administered with chemotherapy in cancer cachexia management. The study underscores the importance of tailored approaches to optimize anamorelin's therapeutic benefits.

Association of the modified Glasgow prognostic score and prognostic nutritional index with duration of oral anamorelin administration in patients with cancer cachexia: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) are indicators of nutritional status in cancer patients; however, the effects of baseline mGPS and PNI on the duration of administration of the ghrelin receptor agonist anamorelin, which is used to treat cachexia in patients with cancer, are unclear. This study aimed to clarify the association of mGPS and PNI with the duration of oral anamorelin administration for patients who did not have beneficial effects from anamorelin.

METHODS

The attending physician determined the duration of oral anamorelin administration based on discontinuation due to cancer progression, poor efficacy, adverse events, or death.

RESULTS

The 12-week continuation rate of oral anamorelin was 30.4%. Univariate analysis revealed that an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) of ≥2 (P < .001), concurrent chemotherapy (P = .002), albumin level (P = .005), C-reactive protein level (P = .013), and a mGPS of 2 (P = .014) were statistically significant predictors of the 12-week continuation rate of oral anamorelin. In the multivariate analysis, a mGPS of 2 remained a significant risk factor, and the ECOG-PS and concurrent chemotherapy had no effect on the association between the mGPS and 12-week continuation rate of oral anamorelin.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a mGPS of 2, compared with mGPS of 0 or 1, are less likely to maintain oral anamorelin therapy, regardless of the ECOG-PS or concurrent chemotherapy. Therefore, it is necessary to consider initiating anamorelin administration at mGPS 0 or 1.

Quality of life endpoints in cancer cachexia clinical trials: Systematic review 3 of the cachexia endpoints series

The use of patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) of quality of life (QOL) is common in cachexia trials. Patients' self-report on health, functioning, wellbeing, and perceptions of care, represent important measures of efficacy. This review describes the frequency, variety, and reporting of QOL endpoints used in cancer cachexia clinical trials. Electronic literature searches were performed in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane (1990-2023). Seven thousand four hundred thirty-five papers were retained for evaluation. Eligibility criteria included QOL as a study endpoint using validated measures, controlled design, adults (>18 years), ≥40 participants randomized, and intervention exceeding 2 weeks. The Covidence software was used for review procedures and data extractions. Four independent authors screened all records for consensus. Papers were screened by titles and abstracts, prior to full-text reading. PRISMA guidance for systematic reviews was followed. The protocol was prospectively registered via PROSPERO (CRD42022276710). Fifty papers focused on QOL. Twenty-four (48%) were double-blind randomized controlled trials. Sample sizes varied considerably (n = 42 to 469). Thirty-nine trials (78%) included multiple cancer types. Twenty-seven trials (54%) featured multimodal interventions with various drugs and dietary supplements, 11 (22%) used nutritional interventions alone and 12 (24%) used a single pharmacological intervention only. The median duration of the interventions was 12 weeks (4-96). The most frequent QOL measure was the EORTC QLQ-C30 (60%), followed by different FACIT questionnaires (34%). QOL was a primary, secondary, or exploratory endpoint in 15, 31 and 4 trials respectively, being the single primary in six. Statistically significant results on one or more QOL items favouring the intervention group were found in 18 trials. Eleven of these used a complete multidimensional measure. Adjustments for multiple testing when using multicomponent QOL measures were not reported. Nine trials (18%) defined a statistically or clinically significant difference for QOL, five with QOL as a primary outcome, and four with QOL as a secondary outcome. Correlation statistics with other study outcomes were rarely performed. PROMs including QOL are important endpoints in cachexia trials. We recommend using well-validated QOL measures, including cachexia-specific items such as weight history, appetite loss, and nutritional intake. Appropriate statistical methods with definitions of clinical significance, adjustment for multiple testing and few co-primary endpoints are encouraged, as is an understanding of how interventions may relate to changes in QOL endpoints. A strategic and scientific-based approach to PROM research in cachexia trials is warranted, to improve the research base in this field and avoid the use of QOL as supplementary measures.

Biomarker endpoints in cancer cachexia clinical trials: Systematic Review 5 of the cachexia endpoint series

Regulatory agencies require evidence that endpoints correlate with clinical benefit before they can be used to approve drugs. Biomarkers are often considered surrogate endpoints. In cancer cachexia trials, the measurement of biomarkers features frequently. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the frequency and diversity of biomarker endpoints in cancer cachexia trials. A comprehensive electronic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane (1990-2023) was completed. Eligible trials met the following criteria: adults (≥18 years), prospective design, more than 40 participants, use of a cachexia intervention for more than 14 days and use of a biomarker(s) as an endpoint. Biomarkers were defined as any objective measure that was assayed from a body fluid, including scoring systems based on these assays. Routine haematology and biochemistry to monitor intervention toxicity were not considered. Data extraction was performed using Covidence, and reporting followed PRISMA guidance (PROSPERO: CRD42022276710). A total of 5975 studies were assessed, of which 52 trials (total participants = 6522) included biomarkers as endpoints. Most studies (n = 29, 55.7%) included a variety of cancer types. Pharmacological interventions (n = 27, 51.9%) were most evaluated, followed by nutritional interventions (n = 20, 38.4%). Ninety-nine different biomarkers were used across the trials, and of these, 96 were assayed from blood. Albumin (n = 29, 55.8%) was assessed most often, followed by C-reactive protein (n = 22, 42.3%), interleukin-6 (n = 16, 30.8%) and tumour necrosis factor-α (n = 14, 26.9%), the latter being the only biomarker that was used to guide sample size calculations. Biomarkers were explicitly listed as a primary outcome in six trials. In total, 12 biomarkers (12.1% of 99) were used in six trials or more. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels both increased significantly in all three trials in which they were both used. This corresponded with a primary outcome, lean body mass, and was related to the pharmacological mechanism. Biomarkers were predominately used as exploratory rather than primary endpoints. The most commonly used biomarker, albumin, was limited by its lack of responsiveness to nutritional intervention. For a biomarker to be responsive to change, it must be related to the mechanism of action of the intervention and/or the underlying cachexia process that is modified by the intervention, as seen with IGFBP-3, IGF-1 and anamorelin. To reach regulatory approval as an endpoint, the relationship between the biomarker and clinical benefit must be clarified.

The role of the nutrition in malnourished cancer patients: Revisiting an old dilemma

BACKGROUND & AIMS

GLIM definition of malnutrition is recognised all over the world and, when is referring to cancer, it specifies that weight or muscle loss are associated with an inflammatory status. However, the real-world practice shows that GLIM definition cannot encompass all the wide and heterogenous clinical presentations of cancer patients with malnutrition, which involves many other drivers beyond inflammation. Moreover, placing an excessive emphasis on the inflammation can overshadow, in the clinical practice, the role of the nutritional support in malnourished cancer patients. The aim of this paper is not to criticize the rationale of the GLIM definition of cancer cachexia, but to show the complexity and heterogeneity of malnutrition of cancer patients and reasons why nutritional support should deserve such a better consideration among the oncologists.

METHODS

Literature pertinent to pathophysiology of malnutrition of cancer patients is scrutinised and reasons for the frequent underuse of nutritional support are critically analysed.

RESULTS

The appraisal of the literature shows that there are various pathophysiological patterns of malnutrition among cancer patients and inflammatory markers are not universally present in weight-losing cancer patients. Inflammation alone does not account for weight loss in all cancer patients and factors other than inflammation can drive hypophagia and weight loss, and hypophagia appears to be a primary catalyst for weight loss. Furthermore, malnutrition may be the consequence of the presence of several Nutrition Impact Symptoms or of the oncologic therapy. The nutritional support may fail to show benefits in malnourished cancer patients because the golden standard to validate a therapy relies on RCT, but it is ethically impossible to have an unfed control group of malnourished patients. Furthermore, nutritional interventions often fell short of the optimal standards, adherence to treatment plans was often poor, nutritional support was mainly reserved for very advanced patients and the primary endpoints of the studies on nutritional support were sometimes unrealistic.

CONCLUSION

There is a gap between the suggestion of the guidelines which advocate the use of nutritional support to improve the compliance of patients facing intensive oncologic treatments or to prevent an early demise when patients enter a chronic phase of slow nutritional deterioration, and the poor use of nutrition in the real-world practice. This requires a higher level of awareness of the oncologists concerning the reasons for the lacking evidence of efficacy of the nutritional support and an understanding of its potential contribute to improve the outcome of the patients. Finally, this paper calls for a change of the oncologist's approach to the cancer patient, from only focusing on the cure of the tumour to taking care of the patient as a whole.

Body weight and composition endpoints in cancer cachexia clinical trials: Systematic Review 4 of the cachexia endpoints series

Significant variation exists in the outcomes used in cancer cachexia trials, including measures of body composition, which are often selected as primary or secondary endpoints. To date, there has been no review of the most commonly selected measures or their potential sensitivity to detect changes resulting from the interventions being examined. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the frequency and diversity of body composition measures that have been used in cancer cachexia trials. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched between January 1990 and June 2021. Eligible trials examined adults (≥18 years) who had received an intervention aiming to treat or attenuate the effects of cancer cachexia for >14 days. Trials were also of a prospective controlled design and included body weight or at least one anthropometric, bioelectrical or radiological endpoint pertaining to body composition, irrespective of the modality of intervention (e.g., pharmacological, nutritional, physical exercise and behavioural) or comparator. Trials with a sample size of <40 patients were excluded. Data extraction used Covidence software, and reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance. This review was prospectively registered (PROSPERO: CRD42022276710). A total of 84 clinical trials, comprising 13 016 patients, were eligible for inclusion. Non-small-cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer were studied most frequently. The majority of trial interventions were pharmacological (52%) or nutritional (34%) in nature. The most frequently reported endpoints were assessments of body weight (68 trials, n = 11 561) followed by bioimpedance analysis (BIA)-based estimates (23 trials, n = 3140). Sixteen trials (n = 3052) included dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)-based endpoints, and computed tomography (CT) body composition was included in eight trials (n = 841). Discrepancies were evident when comparing the efficacy of interventions using BIA-based estimates of lean tissue mass against radiological assessment modalities. Body weight, BIA and DEXA-based endpoints have been most frequently used in cancer cachexia trials. Although the optimal endpoints cannot be determined from this review, body weight, alongside measurements from radiological body composition analysis, would seem appropriate. The choice of radiological modality is likely to be dependent on the trial setting, population and intervention in question. CT and magnetic resonance imaging, which have the ability to accurately discriminate tissue types, are likely to be more sensitive and provide greater detail. Endpoints are of particular importance when aligned with the intervention's mechanism of action and/or intended patient benefit.

Real-world safety and effectiveness of anamorelin for cancer cachexia: Interim analysis of post-marketing surveillance in Japan

BACKGROUND

Anamorelin was approved in Japan in 2021 to treat cancer cachexia associated with non-small cell lung, gastric, pancreatic, or colorectal cancers. Post-marketing surveillance is being conducted to evaluate the real-world safety and effectiveness of anamorelin.

METHODS

This prospective, observational surveillance registered all patients who started treatment with anamorelin after April 21, 2021. Hyperglycemia, hepatic impairment, conduction disorders, and their associated adverse events related to treatment were defined as main safety specifications. Body weight (BW) and appetite were assessed as effectiveness specifications.

RESULTS

This analysis was based on data as of January 21, 2023. The safety and effectiveness analysis sets included 6016 and 4511 patients, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events in ≥1% of patients were hyperglycemia (3.9%) and nausea (2.6%). The incidences of hyperglycemia, hepatic impairment, conduction disorders, and their associated adverse events related to treatment were 4.8%, 1.2%, and 1.1%, respectively. The mean changes (standard error [SE]) in BW from baseline to weeks 3, 12, 24, and 52 were 0.64 (0.05) kg, 1.19 (0.12) kg, 1.40 (0.21) kg, and 1.42 (0.39) kg, respectively. The mean changes (SE) in Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Treatment 5-item Anorexia Symptom Scale total scores from baseline to weeks 3, 12, 24, and 52 were 3.2 (0.09), 4.8 (0.18), 5.2 (0.30), and 5.3 (0.47), respectively, exceeding the clinically meaningful improvement score (2.0 points).

CONCLUSION

The overall safety of anamorelin raised no new safety concerns, although continued caution may be required for hyperglycemia and nausea. Improvements in BW and appetite were also observed in real-world clinical settings.

Anamorelin Induced Acute Hyperglycemia in a Patient with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and Diabetes: A Case Report

Anamorelin (ANAM) is a novel ghrelin receptor agonist for the treatment of cancer cachexia. In clinical trials of ANAM, glucose metabolism disorders as adverse effects were relatively frequent, however, when and how they occur remains unclear. Moreover, the safety in patients with pancreatic cancer and/or diabetes has not been clarified because most previous studies focused on patients with non-small cell lung cancer and had excluded patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Herein, a 66-year-old man with advanced pancreatic cancer and diabetes was administered ANAM, and acute hyperglycemia was developed and could be monitored by the self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Increasing the insulin dose failed to control hyperglycemia adequately, but the hyperglycemia ameliorated quickly after ANAM discontinuation. The continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) revealed that the sensor glucose levels had remained in the high range throughout the day during ANAM administration despite using 1.5 times more insulin. Our report is one of the few that describe the details of ANAM-induced hyperglycemia and provides important information for the safe and effective use of ANAM.

Effect of cancer cachexia on first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a claims database study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome leading to progressive functional impairment. How cachexia affects the treatment course of chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer has not been well understood.

METHODS

This is an exploratory, retrospective, observational cohort study using the Japanese medical claims database from Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. The study population included patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in whom first-line FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) was initiated between October 1, 2018, and September 30, 2020. In this study, we defined patients with cancer cachexia as those who had a weight loss of ≥ 5% in the preceding 6 months. The primary outcome was time-to-treatment failure (TTF). The observation period was six months from the initiation of first-line FFX or GnP treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 1897 patients (421 patients into the cachexia group; 1476 patients into the non-cachexia group) were analyzed in this study. The median TTF was 121 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 94-146) in the cachexia group and 143 days (95% CI 134-152) in the non-cachexia group. The hazard ratio for TTF of the cachexia versus non-cachexia group was 1.136 (95% CI 0.979-1.319). The median number of doses was two doses fewer in the cachexia group than in the non-cachexia group for both FFX and GnP.

CONCLUSION

Cancer cachexia was suggested to be associated with shorter TTF and a reduced number of doses in patients with pancreatic cancer who received first-line FFX or GnP treatment. Clinical Trial Registration clinicaltrials.jp: UMIN000045820.

Appetite and dietary intake endpoints in cancer cachexia clinical trials: Systematic Review 2 of the cachexia endpoints series

There is no consensus on the optimal endpoint(s) in cancer cachexia trials. Endpoint variation is an obstacle when comparing interventions and their clinical value. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize and evaluate endpoints used to assess appetite and dietary intake in cancer cachexia clinical trials. A search for studies published from 1 January 1990 until 2 June 2021 was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Eligible studies examined cancer cachexia treatment versus a comparator in adults with assessments of appetite and/or dietary intake as study endpoints, a sample size ≥40 and an intervention lasting ≥14 days. Reporting was in line with PRISMA guidance, and a protocol was published in PROSPERO (2022 CRD42022276710). This review is part of a series of systematic reviews examining cachexia endpoints. Of the 5975 articles identified, 116 were eligible for the wider review series and 80 specifically examined endpoints of appetite (65 studies) and/or dietary intake (21 studies). Six trials assessed both appetite and dietary intake. Appetite was the primary outcome in 15 trials and dietary intake in 7 trials. Median sample size was 101 patients (range 40-628). Forty-nine studies included multiple primary tumour sites, while 31 studies involved single primary tumour sites (15 gastrointestinal, 7 lung, 7 head and neck and 2 female reproductive organs). The most frequently reported appetite endpoints were visual analogue scale (VAS) and numerical rating scale (NRS) (40%). The appetite item from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) C30/C15 PAL (38%) and the appetite question from North Central Cancer Treatment Group anorexia questionnaire (17%) were also frequently applied. Of the studies that assessed dietary intake, 13 (62%) used food records (prospective registrations) and 10 (48%) used retrospective methods (24-h recall or dietary history). For VAS/NRS, a mean change of 1.3 corresponded to Hedge's g of 0.5 and can be considered a moderate change. For food records, a mean change of 231 kcal/day or 11 g of protein/day corresponded to a moderate change. Choice of endpoint in cachexia trials will depend on factors pertinent to the trial to be conducted. Nevertheless, from trials assessed and available literature, NRS or EORTC QLQ C30/C15 PAL seems suitable for appetite assessments. Appetite and dietary intake endpoints are rarely used as primary outcomes in cancer cachexia. Dietary intake assessments were used mainly to monitor compliance and are not validated in cachexia populations. Given the importance to cachexia studies, dietary intake endpoints must be validated before they are used as endpoints in clinical trials.

Clinical Relevance of Physical Function Outcomes in Cancer Cachexia

Managing clinical manifestations of cancer/treatment burden on functional status and quality of life remains paramount across the cancer trajectory, particularly for patients with cachexia who display reduced functional capacity. However, clinically relevant criteria for classifying functional impairment at a single point in time or for classifying meaningful functional changes subsequent to disease and/or treatment progression are lacking. This unmet clinical need remains a major obstacle to the development of therapies for cancer cachexia. This review aims to describe current literature-based evidence for clinically meaningful criteria for (1) functional impairment at a single timepoint between cancer patients with or without cachexia and (2) changes in physical function over time across interventional studies conducted in patients with cancer cachexia. The most common functional assessment in cross-sectional and interventional studies was hand grip strength (HGS). We observed suggestive evidence that an HGS deficit between 3 and 6 kg in cancer cachexia may display clinical relevance. In interventional studies, we observed that long-duration multimodal therapies with a focus on skeletal muscle may benefit HGS in patients with considerable weight loss. Future studies should derive cohort-specific clinically relevant criteria to confirm these observations in addition to other functional outcomes and investigate appropriate patient-reported anchors.

Progressive, multi-organ, and multi-layered nature of cancer cachexia

Cancer cachexia is a complex, multifaceted condition that negatively impacts the health, treatment efficacy, and economic status of cancer patients. The management of cancer cachexia is an essential clinical need. Cancer cachexia is currently defined mainly according to the severity of weight loss and sarcopenia (i.e., macrosymptoms). However, such macrosymptoms may be insufficient to give clinicians clues on how to manage this condition as these symptoms appear at the late stage of cancer. We need to understand earlier events during the progression of cancer cachexia so as not to miss a clinical opportunity to control this complex syndrome. Recent research indicates that cancer-induced changes in the host are much wider than previously recognized, including disruption of liver function and the immune system. Furthermore, such changes are observed before the occurrence of visible distant metastases (i.e., in early, localized cancers). In light of these findings, we propose to expand the definition of cancer cachexia to include all cancer-induced changes to host physiology, including changes caused by early, localized cancers. This new definition of cancer cachexia can provide a new perspective on this topic, which can stimulate the research and development of novel cancer cachexia therapies.

Effect of Anamorelin, a Ghrelin Receptor Agonist, on Muscle and Bone in Adults With Osteosarcopenia

CONTEXT

Anamorelin, a ghrelin receptor agonist known to stimulate the pulsatile release of GH from the pituitary, has the potential to improve musculoskeletal health in adults with osteosarcopenia.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of anamorelin treatment for 1 year on muscle mass and strength and on biochemical markers of bone turnover in adults with osteosarcopenia (OS).

DESIGN

Randomized, placebo-controlled, 1-year anamorelin intervention trial.

SETTING

The Bone Metabolism Laboratory at the USDA Nutrition Center at Tufts University.

PARTICIPANTS

26 men and women, age 50 years and older, with OS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Muscle mass by D3-creatine dilution and lean body mass (LBM) and bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, muscle strength, serum IGF-1, and bone turnover markers, serum procollagen 1 intact N-terminal (P1NP), and C-terminal telopeptide (CTX).

RESULTS

Anamorelin did not have a significant effect on muscle mass or LBM; it significantly increased knee flexion torque at 240°/s by 20% (P = .013) and had a similar nonstatistically significant effect on change in knee extension; it increased bone formation (P1NP) by 75% (P = .006) and had no significant effect on bone resorption (CTX) or BMD. Serum IGF-1 increased by 50% in the anamorelin group and did not change in the placebo group (P = .0001 for group difference).

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, anamorelin did not significantly alter muscle mass; however, it may potentially improve lower extremity strength and bone formation in addition to increasing circulating IGF-1 levels in adults with OS. Further study of anamorelin in this population is warranted.

Effect of a GH Secretagogue, Anamorelin, on Serum Irisin and Inflammation Levels in Osteosarcopenic Adults

Background

Data suggest an association between GH secretion and circulating levels of the myokine irisin and inflammatory cytokinesIL-6 and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). The impact of GH secretagogues on these markers is unknown.

Objectives

To determine the effect of treatment with the GH secretagogue anamorelin on 12-month changes in serum irisin, IL-6, and hsCRP levels and to assess whether baseline irisin levels modulate the glycemic response to treatment with anamorelin.

Methods

This is an ancillary study in 26 older adults with osteosarcopenia who participated in a 12-month trial examining the effect of anamorelin 100 mg/day vs placebo on musculoskeletal outcomes. Serum irisin, IL-6, and hsCRP were measured at baseline and 12 months.

Results

Treatment with anamorelin, compared with placebo, did not significantly alter irisin levels [12-month change = 0.50 ± 1.2 (SD) ng/mL in anamorelin group and -0.08 ± 2.3 ng/mL in placebo; P = .191]. Baseline irisin levels were not significantly correlated with 2-month change in fasting glucose levels in the anamorelin group (r = -0.222, P = .46) or the placebo group (r = 0.30, P = .34); however, the slopes of the 2 regression lines describing the relationship by group tended to differ (P = .0547). Anamorelin treatment for 12 months had no significant effect on serum IL-6 or hsCRP levels.

Conclusion

In this small sample of older adults with osteosarcopenia, treatment with the GH secretagogue anamorelin did not significantly alter levels of irisin, IL-6, or hsCRP. Higher baseline irisin levels may attenuate the glycemic response to anamorelin treatment; however, a larger study is needed to confirm this possibility.

Addressing cancer anorexia-cachexia in older patients: Potential therapeutic strategies and molecular pathways

Cancer cachexia (CC) syndrome, a feature of cancer-associated muscle wasting, is particularly pronounced in older patients, and is characterised by decreased energy intake and upregulated skeletal muscle catabolic pathways. To address CC, appetite stimulants, anabolic drugs, cytokine mediators, essential amino acid supplementation, nutritional counselling, cognitive behavioural therapy, and enteral nutrition have been utilised. However, pharmacological treatments that have also shown promising results, such as megestrol acetate, anamorelin, thalidomide, and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, have been associated with gastrointestinal and cardiovascular complications. Emerging evidence on the efficacy of probiotics in modulating gut microbiota also presents a promising adjunct to traditional therapies, potentially enhancing nutritional absorption and systemic inflammation control. Additionally, low-dose olanzapine has demonstrated improved appetite and weight management in older patients undergoing chemotherapy, offering a potential refinement to current therapeutic approaches. This review aims to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underpinning CC, with a particular focus on the role of anorexia in exacerbating muscle wasting, and to propose pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies to mitigate this syndrome, particularly emphasising the needs of an older demographic. Future research targeting CC should focus on refining appetite-stimulating drugs with fewer side-effects, specifically catering to the needs of older patients, and investigating nutritional factors that can either enhance appetite or minimise suppression of appetite in individuals with CC, especially within this vulnerable group.

Cancer cachexia: Focus on cachexia factors and inter-organ communication

ABSTRACT

Cancer cachexia is a multi-organ syndrome and closely related to changes in signal communication between organs, which is mediated by cancer cachexia factors. Cancer cachexia factors, being the general name of inflammatory factors, circulating proteins, metabolites, and microRNA secreted by tumor or host cells, play a role in secretory or other organs and mediate complex signal communication between organs during cancer cachexia. Cancer cachexia factors are also a potential target for the diagnosis and treatment. The pathogenesis of cachexia is unclear and no clear effective treatment is available. Thus, the treatment of cancer cachexia from the perspective of the tumor ecosystem rather than from the perspective of a single molecule and a single organ is urgently needed. From the point of signal communication between organs mediated by cancer cachexia factors, finding a deeper understanding of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer cachexia is of great significance to improve the level of diagnosis and treatment. This review begins with cancer cachexia factors released during the interaction between tumor and host cells, and provides a comprehensive summary of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment for cancer cachexia, along with a particular sight on multi-organ signal communication mediated by cancer cachexia factors. This summary aims to deepen medical community's understanding of cancer cachexia and may conduce to the discovery of new diagnostic and therapeutic targets for cancer cachexia.

Predictors of efficacy of anamorelin in patients with non‑small cell lung cancer and cachexia: A retrospective study

Anamorelin, a ghrelin receptor agonist, is approved in Japan for the treatment of cachexia in patients with lung and gastrointestinal cancer. However, there is limited research on the usefulness of anamorelin in clinical settings, therefore, the present study evaluated its efficacy using patient characteristics. A total of 40 patients with non-small cell lung cancer and cachexia who were prescribed anamorelin in the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine (Aomori, Japan) between July 2021 and November 2022, were retrospectively assessed. Anamorelin was prescribed at a dose of 100 mg once daily to patients who had lost >5% of their body weight within 6 months. All patients were weighed before treatment and those who continued anamorelin treatment for 12 weeks were also weighed at 12 weeks. A logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the association between background characteristics and early discontinuation of treatment with anamorelin (within 4 weeks). The median age was 67 years (range, 36-88), and 65% of the patients were male. There were 24 patients (60.0%) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) score 1, 11 patients (27.5%) with an ECOG-PS score 2 and five patients (12.5%) with an ECOG-PS score 3. The early discontinuation group included 11 patients (27.5%). An ECOG-PS score ≥2 (odds ratio, 7.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-43.21; P=0.018) was associated with early discontinuation. A total of 18/40 patients (45.0%) were able to continue anamorelin treatment for 12 weeks, and the mean change in body weight was +2.31 kg, which was a significant change from the weight recorded at baseline (P=0.027). The mean changes in lean body mass and soft lean mass between baseline and 12 weeks were +1.97 kg (P=0.14) and +1.26 kg (P=0.15), respectively. The results from the present study indicate that anamorelin is unlikely to be useful for patients with a poor general condition (ECOG-PS score ≥2).

The Relationship between Exercise Capacity and Muscle Strength, Physical Activity, Fatigue and Quality of Life in Patients with Cancer Cachexia

BACKGROUND

Exercise capacity is a significant determinant of mortality for cancer patients, so knowing the possible determinants of exercise capacity will produce physical and psychological benefits for individuals with cancer cachexia.

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between exercise capacity on peripheric and respiratory muscle strength, physical activity, fatigue and quality of life in subjects with cancer cachexia.

METHODS

The study included 31 patients diagnosed with cancer cachexia. Functional capacity was assessed by 6-Minute Walk Test, hand grip strength and proximal muscle mass by hand dynamometer, respiratory muscle strength by the Maximum Expiratory Pressure and Maximum Inspiratory Pressure measurements, physical activity by International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form, fatigue by Brief Fatigue Inventory, and quality of life by EORT-QLQ-C30. The relationship between functional capacity and continuous independent variables was determined using Spearman's or Pearson's tests.

RESULTS

A strong positive correlation was observed between exercise capacity and expiratory muscle strength (r = 0.75, p < 0.001), activity level (r = 0.68, p < 0.001), and quality of life global health status (r = 0.74, p < 0.001). Conversely, a strong negative correlation was found between exercise capacity and fatigue severity (r = -0.64, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Higher exercise capacity in cancer cachexia patients is linked to reduced fatigue, improved respiratory muscle strength, increased physical activity levels, and enhanced quality of life. When designing rehabilitation programs or exercise interventions for individuals with cancer cachexia, it is crucial to assess their exercise capacity and tailor the programs accordingly.

Medium-chain triglycerides (8:0 and 10:0) increase muscle mass and function in frail older adults: a combined data analysis of clinical trials

Background

Three clinical trials have examined the chronic effects of medium-chain triglycerides (MCTs) on muscle mass and function in frail older adults (mean age 85 years old). However, significant increases in muscle mass and some muscle function relative to long-chain triglycerides (LCTs) have yet to be shown, possibly due to the small number of participants in each trial.

Objective

We re-analyzed these previous clinical trials to clarify whether MCT supplementation can increase muscle mass and function.

Analysis

After adding post hoc tests to the original report, we compared changes in measurement between the MCT and LCT groups in the first 2 trials and conducted a combined data analysis.

Methods

In a combined data analysis, changes from baseline in measurements at the 3 months intervention in the MCTs- and LCTs-containing groups were assessed by analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline values of each measurement, age, sex, BMI, allocation to trial, habitual intakes in energy, protein, leucine, octanoic acid, decanoic acid, and vitamin D during the baseline period. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze data on right and left knee extension times.

Results

MCT supplementation for 3 months increased muscle function relative to LCT supplementation with and without an L-leucine (1.2 g) and vitamin D (cholecalciferol, 20 μg)-enriched supplement. In a combined data analysis (n = 29 in MCTs, n = 27 in LCTs), relative to supplementation with 6 g LCTs/day, supplementation with 6 g MCTs/day at dinner for 3 months significantly increased body weight (adjusted mean change from baseline: MCTs 1.2 vs. LCTs 0.2 kg, p = 0.023), right arm muscle area (MCTs 1.4 vs. LCTs-0.7 cm2, p = 0.002), left calf circumference (p = 0.015), right-hand grip strength (MCTs 1.6 vs. LCTs 0.3 kg, p = 0.017), right knee extension time (p = 0.021), left knee extension time (p = 0.034), walking speed (p = 0.002), and number of iterations in leg open and close test (p < 0.001) and decreased right triceps skinfold thickness (p = 0.016).

Conclusion

In frail older adults, supplementation for 3 months with a low dose (6 g/day) of MCTs (C8:0 and C10:0) increased muscle mass and function. These findings indicate the potential for the practical use of MCTs in daily life in treating sarcopenia.

Systemic inflammation adversely affects response to anamorelin in patients with pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

Anamorelin, a selective ghrelin receptor agonist, has been approved for pancreatic cancer treatment in Japan. We aimed to investigate whether systemic inflammation, represented by the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), and C-reactive protein (CRP)-albumin ratio (CAR), could predict the effect of anamorelin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

This study included 31 patients who had received anamorelin for advanced pancreatic cancer between 2021 and 2023. Patients' NLR, PLR, LMR, and CAR were evaluated before anamorelin administration. The patients were classified as responders and non-responders based on whether they gained body weight after 3 months of anamorelin administration. We investigated the association between systemic inflammation and anamorelin efficacy using a univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve (39%) patients were non-responders. A high serum CRP level (p = 0.007) and high CAR (p = 0.013) was associated with non-response to anamorelin. According to the receiver operating characteristics analysis, the CAR cutoff value was 0.06, and CAR ≥ 0.06 was a risk factor (odds ratio, 5.6 [95% confidence interval 1.2-27.1], p = 0.032) for non-response to anamorelin.

CONCLUSION

CAR can be a predictor of non-response to anamorelin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, suggesting the importance of a comprehensive assessment of the inflammatory status.

The role of pharmacists in multimodal cancer cachexia care

Cancer cachexia is a complex syndrome, and multidisciplinary management has the potential to improve patient outcomes and efficiency of care. Multidisciplinary management consists primarily of exercise, nutrition, and pharmacotherapy. The pharmacist's role in cancer cachexia is to contribute to appropriate pharmacotherapy practices. For example, anamorelin is an oral drug with ghrelin-like effects that may improve the pathogenesis of cancer cachexia by stimulating appetite and increasing food intake and body weight. Many patients with cancer cachexia are under treatment with anticancer agents, and pharmacists need to determine whether symptoms such as anorexia and nausea are due to cancer cachexia or anticancer agents. Based on that determination, they are then expected to suggest supportive care to the physician. Provision of multidisciplinary care for cancer cachexia requires communication with not only physicians but also with nurses, dietitians, and other professionals so that nutritional therapy can be provided at the time cachexia is detected. However, the role of pharmacists in the management of cancer cachexia is not well established, and there is no evidence that pharmacist interventions are of benefit to patients. In this article, to contribute to the treatment of cancer cachexia by multidisciplinary care, we describe the role of pharmacists in cancer cachexia as currently practiced at our hospital. We also consider future challenges to this type of multidisciplinary care. Evidence concerning multidisciplinary treatment of cancer cachexia is scarce, including therapeutic agents, and there is a current lack of collaboration among medical professionals and education in cancer cachexia. Solving these problems will require efforts in the practice and evaluation of treatment for cancer cachexia.

Prognostic impact of the cross-sectional area of the erector spinae muscle in patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis

Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) progresses slowly but sometimes relatively quickly, leading to decreased activities of daily living (ADL) and muscle weakness. Skeletal muscle atrophy and muscle weakness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients may be caused by cachexia and are associated with reduced ADLs and increased risk of death. However, the association between skeletal muscle mass and the prognosis of PPFE patients remains unknown. We retrospectively analysed the clinical significance of the cross-sectional area of the erector spinae muscle (ESMCSA), a skeletal muscle index, and predictors of mortality within 3 years in PPFE 51 patients, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) 52 patients and COPD 62 patients. PPFE patients had significantly lower ESMCSA than IPF or COPD patients, and lower ESMCSA (< 22.57 cm2) was associated with prognosis within 3 years (log-rank test; p = 0.006), whereas lower body mass index (BMI) showed no association. Multivariate analysis showed that ESMCSA was an independent predictor of mortality within 3 years in PPFE patients (hazard ratio, 0.854; 95% confidence interval: 0.737-0.990, p = 0.036). These results suggest the importance of monitoring ESMCSA in PPFE patients and that assessing ESMCSA in PPFE patients could be a more useful prognostic indicator than BMI.

Factors associated with early discontinuation of anamorelin in patients with cancer-associated cachexia

PURPOSE

Cancer-associated cachexia, a multifactorial syndrome involving loss of muscle mass and anorexia, is an unremitting problem for cancer patients. Anamorelin has become available for cancer-associated cachexia, but early discontinuation is common in clinical practice. This study aimed to explore factors related to the early discontinuation of anamorelin and its relationship to survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective, observational study of multimodal clinical practice involved patients who took anamorelin (100 mg) for cancer-associated cachexia at Aichi Medical University Hospital between 14 May 2021 and 31 March 2022. In July 2022, clinical data were extracted from electronic clinical records. Patients who discontinued anamorelin less than 4 weeks after initiation were defined as the early discontinuation group, and their clinical data and survival time were compared with those of the continuation group. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the university (approval no. 2021-124).

RESULTS

Of the 42 patients treated with anamorelin, 40 (median age 72.5 years, median BMI 18.7 kg/m2) were analyzed, including 13 with non-small cell lung cancer, and 12 with pancreatic, 8 with colorectal, and 7 with gastric cancers. On univariate analysis, the early discontinuation group included more patients with worse performance status (PS) (p=0.028), low prognostic nutritional index (PNI) (p=0.001), and no concomitant anticancer drugs (p=0.003). On multivariate analysis, PS and PNI were related to anamorelin continuation. Survival time was significantly shorter in the early discontinuation group (p=0.039).

CONCLUSION

Worse PS and low PNI were associated with early discontinuation of anamorelin. Longer survival time was observed in the continuation group.

Implication of Skeletal Muscle Loss in the Prognosis of Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Receiving Chemotherapy

Objective The effect of sarcopenia on the prognosis of patients undergoing chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains largely unexplored. In this retrospective study, we investigated the relationship between sarcopenia and the prognosis of patients receiving first-line nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Methods We enrolled 251 patients with unresectable metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had received chemotherapy between January 2015 and December 2020 at Kitasato University Hospital. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the stratified Cox proportional hazards model to determine variables significantly associated with the progression-free and overall survival. Propensity score matching was performed to mitigate selection bias effects. Results In the propensity score-matched cohort, the progression-free and overall survival were not significantly different between the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups (p=0.335, and 0.679 respectively). The skeletal muscle index decreased by 4.4% and 6.5% in the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups, respectively, during the early treatment phase (p=0.084). There were no significant differences between groups with regard to major adverse events or drug toxicity occurrences. Both the progression-free and overall survival were significantly shorter in the skeletal muscle index loss group than in the non-skeletal muscle index loss group (p=0.026 and 0.045, respectively). Conclusion Skeletal muscle index loss during the initial treatment phase may be an early marker for the long-term prognosis of patients receiving nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line treatment for unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Physical function endpoints in cancer cachexia clinical trials: Systematic Review 1 of the cachexia endpoints series

In cancer cachexia trials, measures of physical function are commonly used as endpoints. For drug trials to obtain regulatory approval, efficacy in physical function endpoints may be needed alongside other measures. However, it is not clear which physical function endpoints should be used. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the frequency and diversity of physical function endpoints in cancer cachexia trials. Following a comprehensive electronic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane (1990-2021), records were retrieved. Eligible trials met the following criteria: adults (≥18 years), controlled design, more than 40 participants, use of a cachexia intervention for more than 14 days and use of a physical function endpoint. Physical function measures were classified as an objective measure (hand grip strength [HGS], stair climb power [SCP], timed up and go [TUG] test, 6-min walking test [6MWT] and short physical performance battery [SPPB]), clinician assessment of function (Karnofsky Performance Status [KPS] or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status [ECOG-PS]) or patient-reported outcomes (physical function subscale of the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires [EORTC QLQ-C30 or C15]). Data extraction was performed using Covidence and followed PRISMA guidance (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022276710). A total of 5975 potential studies were examined and 71 were eligible. Pharmacological interventions were assessed in 38 trials (54%). Of these, 11 (29%, n = 1184) examined megestrol and 5 (13%, n = 1928) examined anamorelin; nutritional interventions were assessed in 21 trials (30%); and exercise-based interventions were assessed in 6 trials (8%). The remaining six trials (8%) assessed multimodal interventions. Among the objective measures of physical function (assessed as primary or secondary endpoints), HGS was most commonly examined (33 trials, n = 5081) and demonstrated a statistically significant finding in 12 (36%) trials (n = 2091). The 6MWT was assessed in 12 trials (n = 1074) and was statistically significant in 4 (33%) trials (n = 403), whereas SCP, TUG and SPPB were each assessed in 3 trials. KPS was more commonly assessed than the newer ECOG-PS (16 vs. 9 trials), and patient-reported EORTC QLQ-C30 physical function was reported in 25 trials. HGS is the most commonly used physical function endpoint in cancer cachexia clinical trials. However, heterogeneity in study design, populations, intervention and endpoint selection make it difficult to comment on the optimal endpoint and how to measure this. We offer several recommendations/considerations to improve the design of future clinical trials in cancer cachexia.

Muscle wasting: emerging pathways and potential drug targets

Muscle wasting is a serious comorbidity associated with many disorders, including cancer, kidney disease, heart failure, and aging. Progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass negatively influences prognosis and survival, and is often accompanied by frailty and poor quality of life. Clinical trials testing therapeutics against muscle wasting have yielded limited success. Some therapies improved muscle mass in patients without appreciable differences in physical performance. This review article discusses emerging pathways that regulate muscle atrophy, including oncostatin M (OSM) and ectodysplasin A2 (EDA2) receptor (EDA2R) signaling, outcomes of recent clinical trials, and potential drug targets for future therapies.

Diagnosis and outcomes of cachexia in Asia: Working Consensus Report from the Asian Working Group for Cachexia

Chronic diseases often lead to metabolic disorders, causing anabolic resistance and increased energy consumption, which result in cachexia. Cachexia, in turn, can lead to major clinical consequences such as impaired quality of life, shortened life expectancy, and increased healthcare expenditure. Existing international diagnostic criteria for cachexia employ thresholds derived from Western populations, which may not apply to Asians due to differing body compositions. To address this issue, the Asian Working Group for Cachexia (AWGC) was initiated. The AWGC comprises experts in cachexia research and clinical practice from various Asian countries and aims to develop a consensus on diagnostic criteria and significant clinical outcomes for cachexia in Asia. The AWGC, composed of experts in cachexia research and clinical practice from several Asian countries, undertook three-round Delphi surveys and five meetings to reach a consensus. Discussions were held on etiological diseases, essential diagnostic items for cachexia, including subjective and objective symptoms and biomarkers, and significant clinical outcomes. The consensus highlighted the importance of multiple diagnostic factors for cachexia, including chronic diseases, either or both weight loss or low body mass index, and at least one of the following: anorexia, decreased grip strength (<28 kg in men and <18 kg in women), or elevated C-reactive protein levels (>5 mg/L [0.5 mg/dL]). The AWGC proposed a significant weight change of 2% or more over a 3-6 month period and suggested a tentative cut-off value of 21 kg/m2 for low body mass index in diagnosing cachexia. Critical clinical outcomes were determined to be mortality, quality of life as assessed by tools such as EQ-5D or the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy, and functional status as measured by the Clinical Frailty Scale or Barthel Index, with significant emphasis on patient-reported outcomes. The AWGC consensus offers a comprehensive definition and user-friendly diagnostic criteria for cachexia, tailored specifically for Asian populations. This consensus is set to stimulate future research and enhance the multidisciplinary approach to managing cachexia. With plans to develop further guidelines for the optimal treatment, prevention, and care of cachexia in Asians, the AWGC criteria are expected to drive research across chronic co-morbidities and cancer in Asia, leading to future refinement of diagnostic criteria.

The effect of anamorelin (ONO-7643) on cachexia in cancer patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Cachexia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates in patients with cancer. This meta-analysis aims to explore the effect of anamorelin on cancer cachexia markers.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS, and WOS from their inception until 5 June 2022. A systematic search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We included trials investigating the effect of anamorelin on body weight, lean body mass, fat mass, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), handgrip, quality of life insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), and in patients with cancer. A random-effects model was run to pooled results.

RESULTS

Five articles providing 1331 participants were analyzed in this study. Pooled analysis revealed a significant increase in body weight (weighted mean difference (WMD): 1.56 kg, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20, 1.92; I2= 0%), lean body mass (WMD: 1.36 kg, 95% CI: 0.85, 1.86; I2= 53.1%), fat mass (WMD: 1.02 kg, 95% CI: 0.51, 1.53; I2= 60.7%), IGF-1 (WMD: 51.16 ng/mL, 95% CI: 41.42, 60.90, I2= 0%), and IGFBP-3 (WMD: 0.43 μg/mL, 95% CI: 0.17, 0.68, I2= 98.6%). Results showed no significant increase in appetite when analysis run on all studies without considering different doses 0.29 (95% CI: -0.30, 0.89, I2= 73.8%), however, there was a significant increase in appetite without heterogeneity and inconsistency 0.59 (95% CI: 0.32, 0.86; I2= 0%) in the 100 mg/day group compared to anamorelin non-user.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cancer who receive anamorelin as a treatment for cachexia showed a significant increase in body weight, lean body mass, fat mass, IGF-1, and IGFBP-3.

The Incidence and Management of Cancer-Related Anorexia During Treatment with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Cancer-related anorexia is a common complication and frequently occurs in cancer patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs). Anorexia contributes to malnutrition, body weight loss, and cachexia in affected patients. Furthermore, patients who experience anorexia have worse outcomes than those who maintain their appetite, highlighting the importance of managing anorexia and related symptoms. However, as the causes of anorexia are both diverse and interconnected, there have been challenges in evaluating and implementing effective interventions. In this review, we described the contributing factors to cancer-related anorexia and reviewed recent literature for the frequency of anorexia symptoms in patients treated with VEGFR-TKIs. Additionally, we evaluated the evidence for current interventions and the potential benefits of multimodal and multidisciplinary approaches to care. The frequency of anorexia symptoms in patients who received VEGFR-TKIs ranged from 14%-58% for all-grade anorexia and 0%-6% for grade 3 or 4 anorexia. While many of the interventions for cancer-related anorexia have minimal benefit or adverse events, recent advances in our understanding of cancer-related anorexia suggest that multimodal therapy with multidisciplinary care is a promising avenue of investigation. Several studies currently underway are anticipated to further assess the effectiveness of multimodal approaches.

Cancer Cachexia: Underlying Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutic Interventions

Cancer cachexia, a multifactorial metabolic syndrome developed during malignant tumor growth, is characterized by an accelerated loss of body weight accompanied by the depletion of skeletal muscle mass. This debilitating condition is associated with muscle degradation, impaired immune function, reduced functional capacity, compromised quality of life, and diminished survival in cancer patients. Despite the lack of the known capability of fully reversing or ameliorating this condition, ongoing research is shedding light on promising preclinical approaches that target the disrupted mechanisms in the pathophysiology of cancer cachexia. This comprehensive review delves into critical aspects of cancer cachexia, including its underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, preclinical models for studying the progression of cancer cachexia, methods for clinical assessment, relevant biomarkers, and potential therapeutic strategies. These discussions collectively aim to contribute to the evolving foundation for effective, multifaceted counteractive strategies against this challenging condition.

The efficacy and safety of anamorelin for patients with cancer-related anorexia/cachexia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cancer-related anorexia/cachexia syndrome (CACS) is characterized by anorexia and loss of body weight. Evidence is insufficient to strongly endorse any pharmacologic agent for the treatment of CACS. In this systematic review, we assessed the efficacy of oral anamorelin treatment for patients with CACS. On July 6, 2022, we systematically searched the following databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adults with CACS comparing oral anamorelin versus placebo: CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE, and ICHUSHI. The primary outcomes were total body weight (TBW), patient-reported quality of life (QOL), and adverse events (AEs). Secondary outcomes included lean body mass (LBM), overall survival (OS), non-dominant hand grip strength (HGS), and appetite. We included seven RCTs with a total of 1944 CACS patients. Anamorelin significantly increased TBW (mean difference (MD) 1.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.34-2.13, p < 0.00001), LBM (MD 1.06, 95% CI 0.30-1.81, p = 0.006), and QOL (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.27, p = 0.006) compared with placebo without a significant difference in all AEs, severe AEs, OS, HGS or appetite. Anamorelin may be an effective treatment for CACS patients; however, further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of this drug.

Update on the treatment of cancer cachexia

Cancer cachexia is a complex multifaceted syndrome involving functional impairment and changes in body composition that cannot be reversed by nutritional support. Cancer cachexia is characterized by decreased skeletal muscle mass, increased lipolysis, and decreased food intake. Cancer cachexia decreases chemotherapy tolerance as well as quality of life. However, because no fully effective interventions are available, cancer cachexia remains an unmet need in cancer treatment. In recent years, several discoveries and treatments for cancer cachexia have been studied, and guidelines have been published. We believe that the development of effective strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer cachexia will lead to breakthroughs in cancer treatment.

Severe hypertension development significantly improves progression-free survival in regorafenib treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Regorafenib is the first multikinase inhibitor used for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment. Reports regarding other multikinase inhibitors have suggested that the development of hypertension is associated with improved clinical benefits. We aimed to reveal the relationship between the development of severe hypertension and regorafenib efficacy in an mCRC real-world setting.

METHODS

Patients with mCRC (n = 100) who received regorafenib were assessed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was a comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with and without ≥ grade 3 hypertension. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Patients developing ≥ grade 3 hypertension accounted for 30%, and obtained significantly longer PFS than control patients (median PFS of 53 and 56 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] of 46-144 and 49-63 days, respectively; P = 0.04). In contrast, OS and DCR were not statistically different between the groups (P = 0.13 and P = 0.46, respectively). The incidence and severity of adverse effects were not significantly different, except for hypertension. Treatment interruption was significantly more frequent in patients with hypertension (P = 0.04). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis suggested that the development of ≥ grade 3 severe hypertension was an independent factor for improved PFS (adjusted hazard ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.35-0.93; P = 0.02). In contrast, baseline hypoalbuminemia was associated with a worse PFS (1.85, 1.14-3.01; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

We have revealed that patients who develop severe hypertension after regorafenib treatment for mCRC have improved PFS. Management of hypertension is important for effective treatment with less burden; therefore, further evaluation is needed.

Predictive Value of Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score and Persistent Inflammation among Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Durvalumab Consolidation after Chemoradiotherapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Durvalumab consolidation after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, studies on immunological and nutritional markers to predict progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) are inadequate. Systemic inflammation causes cancer cachexia and negatively affects immunotherapy efficacy, which also reflects survival outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 126 patients from seven institutes in Japan.

RESULTS

The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) values, before and after CRT, were the essential predictors among the evaluated indices. A systemic inflammation-based prognostic risk classification was created by combining mGPS values before CRT, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels after CRT, to distinguish tumor-derived inflammation from CRT-induced inflammation. Patients were classified into high-risk (n = 31) and low-risk (n = 95) groups, and the high-risk group had a significantly shorter median PFS of 7.2 months and an OS of 19.6 months compared with the low-risk group. The hazard ratios for PFS and OS were 2.47 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.46-4.19, p < 0.001) and 3.62 (95% CI: 1.79-7.33, p < 0.001), respectively. This association was also observed in the subgroup with programmed cell death ligand 1 expression of ≥50%, but not in the <50% subgroup. Furthermore, durvalumab discontinuation was observed more frequently in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group.

CONCLUSION

Combining pre-CRT mGPS values with post-CRT CRP levels in patients with locally advanced NSCLC helps to predict the PFS and OS of durvalumab consolidation after CRT.

Measuring What Is Meaningful in Cancer Cachexia Clinical Trials: A Path Forward With Digital Measures of Real-World Physical Behavior

PURPOSE

The burden of cancer cachexia on patients' health-related quality of life, specifically their physical functioning, is well documented, but clinical trials thus far have failed to show meaningful improvement in physical functioning. The purpose of this review is to summarize existing methods of assessing physical function in cancer cachexia, outline a path forward for measuring what is meaningful to patients using digital measures derived from digital health technologies (DHTs), and discuss the current landscape of digital measures from the clinical and regulatory standpoint.

DESIGN

For this narrative review, peer-reviewed articles were searched on PubMed, clinical trials records were searched on clinicaltrials.gov, and records of digital measures submitted for regulatory qualification were searched on the US Food and Drug Administration's Drug Development Tool Qualification Program database.

RESULTS

There are gaps in assessing aspects of physical function that matter to patients. Existing assessment methods such as patient-reported outcomes and objective performance outcomes have limitations, including their episodic nature and burden to patients. DHTs such as wearable sensors can capture real-world physical behavior continuously, passively, and remotely, and may provide a more comprehensive picture of patients' everyday functioning. Recent regulatory submissions showcase potential clinical implementation of digital measures in various therapeutic areas.

CONCLUSION

Digital measures of real-world physical behavior present an opportunity to detect and demonstrate improvements in physical functioning in cancer cachexia, but evidence-based development is critical. For their use in clinical and regulatory decision making, studies demonstrating meaningfulness to patients as well as feasibility and validation are necessary.

Adverse Metabolic Effects on Glucose in Patients Receiving Anamorelin Using a Japanese Claims Database

BACKGROUND

Anamorelin is the first drug approved for the treatment of cancer cachexia, a debilitating condition characterized by weight loss, anorexia, and muscle mass depletion. Cachexia negatively affects a patient's quality of life, survival, and response to chemotherapy. Studies describing anamorelin use are currently limited to a small number of pancreatic cancer cases.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to examine the incidence and risk factors of adverse metabolic effects on glucose levels in cachexia patients with various carcinomas treated with anamorelin.

METHOD

We used real-world data of patients who received anamorelin between August 2021 and July 2022 and were registered in the JMDC claims database. We investigated the impact of metabolic adverse effects on glucose in patients receiving anamorelin with respect to the following factors: sex (male), age (>75 years), types of carcinoma, history of diabetes mellitus (DM), and concomitant use of steroids.

RESULTS

The incidence of adverse metabolic effects on glucose was 12.3%, and pancreatic cancer and history of DM were associated with adverse metabolic effects on glucose. The median onset of adverse metabolic effects on glucose was 17 days after anamorelin treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the need to monitor and manage hyperglycemia in cachexia patients receiving anamorelin, especially in those with pancreatic cancer and a history of DM.

Can the new adipokine asprosin be a metabolic troublemaker for cardiovascular diseases? A state-of-the-art review

Adipokines play a significant role in cardiometabolic diseases. Asprosin, a newly discovered adipokine, was first identified as a glucose-raising protein hormone. Asprosin also stimulates appetite and regulates glucose and lipid metabolism. Its identified receptors so far include Olfr734 and Ptprd. Clinical studies have found that asprosin may be associated with cardiometabolic diseases. Asprosin may have diagnostic and therapeutic potential in obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Herein, the structure, receptors, and functions of asprosin and its relationship with cardiometabolic diseases are summarized based on recent findings.

Current Therapeutic Targets in Cancer Cachexia: A Pathophysiologic Approach

Significant progress in our understanding of cancer cachexia has occurred in recent years. Despite these advances, no pharmacologic agent has achieved US Food and Drug Administration approval for this common and highly morbid syndrome. Fortunately, improved understanding of the molecular basis of cancer cachexia has led to novel targeted approaches that are in varying stages of drug development. This article reviews two major thematic areas that are driving these pharmacologic strategies, including those targeting signal mediators at the level of the CNS and skeletal muscle. Additionally, pharmacologic strategies are being tested in combination with targeted nutrients, nutrition therapy, and exercise to treat cancer cachexia. To this end, we highlight recently published and ongoing trials evaluating cancer cachexia therapies in these specific areas.

Skeletal muscle mass recovery after oesophagectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) is an important biomarker for prognosis and health in older patients with cancer. Limited information is available on the recovery course of SMM after oesophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in older patients. This study was performed to investigate the recovery course of SMM after oesophagectomy following NAC and the preoperative predictors of delayed recovery in older patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer (LAEC).

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective cohort study involved older (≥65 years) and non-older (<65 years) patients with LAEC who underwent oesophagectomy following NAC. The SMM index (SMI) was calculated using CT images. One-way analysis of variance and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 110 older patients and 57 non-older patients were analysed. Loss of the SMI after NAC to 12 months postoperatively was significantly greater in older patients than in non-older patients (p<0.01). The significant preoperative predictor of delayed recovery of the SMI 12 months after surgery was loss of the SMI during NAC in older patients (per 1%: adjusted OR 1.249; 95% CI 1.131 to 1.403; p<0.001), but not in non-older patients (per 1%: OR 1.074; 95% CI 0.988 to 1.179; p=0.108).

CONCLUSIONS

There is an especially large unmet need for preventing the long-term sequelae of SMM loss in older patients with LAEC after oesophagectomy following NAC. In older patients, loss of SMM during NAC is an especially useful biomarker for prescribing postoperative rehabilitation to prevent postoperative loss of SMM.

Renal dysfunction, malignant neoplasms, atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases, and sarcopenia as key outcomes observed in a three-year follow-up study using the Werner Syndrome Registry

Werner syndrome is an adult-onset progeria syndrome that results in various complications. This study aimed to clarify the profile and secular variation of the disease. Fifty-one patients were enrolled and registered in the Werner Syndrome Registry. Their data were collected annually following registration. A cross-sectional analysis at registration and a longitudinal analysis between the baseline and each subsequent year was performed. Pearson's chi-squared and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used. Malignant neoplasms were observed from the fifth decade of life (mean onset: 49.7 years) and were observed in approximately 30% of patients during the 3-year survey period. Regarding renal function, the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated from serum creatinine (eGFRcre) and eGFRcys, which were calculated from cystatin C in the first year, were 98.3 and 83.2 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, and differed depending on the index used. In longitudinal analysis, the average eGFRcre for the first and fourth years was 74.8 and 63.4 mL/min/1.73 m2, showing a rapid decline. Secular changes in Werner syndrome in multiple patients were identified. The prevalence of malignant neoplasms is high, and renal function may decline rapidly. It is, therefore, necessary to carry out active and detailed examinations and pay attention to the type and dose of the drugs used.

Prognostic effect of cachexia in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The presence of cachexia in cancer patients negatively affects the quality of life and survival. However, the impact of cachexia on immunotherapy, such as PD-1/L1 inhibitors, is not fully understood. Therefore, we examined whether cancer cachexia affects the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

METHODS

We retrospectively screened patients with pathologically confirmed advanced or recurrent NSCLC who were treated with PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy at Kurume University Hospital. We defined cancer cachexia as weight loss of at least 5% during the past 6 months or any degree of weight loss more than 2% and BMI <20.

RESULTS

Among 182 patients, 74 had cancer cachexia. The presence of cachexia was significantly associated with females, poor performance status (PS), never-smokers, and driver mutations. Multivariate analysis revealed that poor PS and being a smoker were associated with the presence of cachexia. Patients with cancer cachexia had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In the multivariate analysis, PS and sex were significantly correlated with PFS, whereas PS and cachexia were significantly correlated with OS. Subanalysis revealed that patients in the PS0/without cachexia group had longer PFS and OS than those in the cachexia or PS1-3 group.

CONCLUSIONS

In NSCLC patients, cachexia was associated with a worse prognosis, irrespective of tumor PD-L1 expression, indicating that cachexia is a predictive factor for NSCLC patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Pilot clinical trial of macimorelin to assess safety and efficacy in patients with cancer cachexia

BACKGROUND

Cancer cachexia is associated with reduced body weight, appetite and quality of life (QOL) with no approved treatments. Growth hormone secretagogues like macimorelin have potential to mitigate these effects.

METHODS

This pilot study assessed the safety and efficacy of macimorelin for 1 week. Efficacy was defined a priori as 1-week change in body weight (≥0.8 kg), plasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 (≥50 ng/mL) or QOL (≥15%). Secondary outcomes included food intake, appetite, functional performance, energy expenditure and safety laboratory parameters. Patients with cancer cachexia were randomized to 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg macimorelin or placebo; outcomes were assessed non-parametrically.

RESULTS

Participants receiving at least one of either macimorelin dose were combined (N = 10; 100% male; median age = 65.50 ± 2.12) and compared with placebo (N = 5; 80% male; median age = 68.00 ± 6.19). Efficacy criteria achieved: body weight (macimorelin N = 2; placebo N = 0; P = 0.92); IGF-1 (macimorelin N = 0; placebo N = 0); QOL by Anderson Symptom Assessment Scale (macimorelin N = 4; placebo N = 1; P = 1.00) or Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F; macimorelin N = 3; placebo N = 0; P = 0.50). No related serious or non-serious adverse events were reported. In macimorelin recipients, change in FACIT-F was directly associated with change in body weight (r = 0.92, P = 0.001), IGF-1 (r = 0.80, P = 0.01), and caloric intake (r = 0.83, P = 0.005), and inversely associated with change in energy expenditure (r = -0.67, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Daily oral macimorelin for 1 week was safe and numerically improved body weight and QOL in patients with cancer cachexia compared with placebo. Longer term administration should be evaluated for mitigation of cancer-induced reductions in body weight, appetite and QOL in larger studies.

Surgical Prehabilitation in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancers: Impact of Unimodal and Multimodal Programs on Postoperative Outcomes and Prospects for New Therapeutic Strategies-A Systematic Review

The advantages of prehabilitation in surgical oncology are unclear. This systematic review aims to (1) evaluate the latest evidence of preoperative prehabilitation interventions on postoperative outcomes after gastrointestinal (GI) cancer surgery and (2) discuss new potential therapeutic targets as part of prehabilitation. Randomized controlled trials published between January 2017 and August 2022 were identified through Medline. The population of interest was oncological patients undergoing GI surgery. Trials were considered if they evaluated prehabilitation interventions (nutrition, physical activity, probiotics and symbiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and ghrelin receptor agonists), alone or combined, on postoperative outcomes. Out of 1180 records initially identified, 15 studies were retained. Evidence for the benefits of unimodal interventions was limited. Preoperative multimodal programs, including nutrition and physical activity with or without psychological support, showed improvement in postoperative physical performance, muscle strength, and quality of life in patients with esophagogastric and colorectal cancers. However, there was no benefit for postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, hospital readmissions, and mortality. No trial evaluated the impact of fecal microbiota transplantation or oral ghrelin receptor agonists. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings, identify patients who are more likely to benefit from surgical prehabilitation, and harmonize interventions.

Epidemiology, risk factors and impact of cachexia on patient outcome: Results from the Japanese Lung Cancer Registry Study

BACKGROUND

Cancer cachexia is a syndrome that does not fully recover with nutritional support and causes appetite loss and body weight loss. It worsens a patient's quality of life and prognosis. In this study, the epidemiology of cachexia in lung cancer, its risk factors and its impact on chemotherapy response rate and prognosis were examined using the national database of the Japan Lung Cancer Society. Understanding these things related to cancer cachexia is important as a starting point in overcoming cancer cachexia in patients with lung cancer.

METHODS

In 2012, 12 320 patients from 314 institutions in Japan were registered in a nationwide registry database (Japanese Lung Cancer Registry Study). Of these, data on body weight loss within 6 months were available for 8489 patients. We defined the patients with body weight loss ≥ 5% within 6 months, which is one of the three criteria listed in the 2011 international consensus definition of cancer cachexia, as cachectic in this study.

RESULTS

Approximately 20.4% of the 8489 patients had cancer cachexia. Sex, age, smoking history, emphysema, performance status, superior vena cava syndrome, clinical stage, site of metastasis, histology, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status, primary treatment method and serum albumin levels were significantly different between patients with and without cachexia. Logistic analyses showed that smoking history, emphysema, clinical stage, site of metastasis, histology, EGFR mutation, serum calcium and albumin levels were significantly associated with cancer cachexia. The response to initial therapy, including chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy, was significantly poorer in the patients with cachexia than in those without cachexia (response rate: 49.7% vs. 41.5%, P < 0.001). Overall survival was significantly shorter in the patients with cachexia than in those without cachexia in both univariate and multivariable analyses (1-year survival rate: 60.7% vs. 37.6%, Cox proportional hazards model, hazard ratio: 1.369, 95% confidence interval: 1.274-1.470, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer cachexia was seen in approximately one fifth of the lung cancer patients and was related to some baseline patient characteristics. It was also associated with a poor response to initial treatment, resulting in poor prognosis. The results of our study may be useful for early identification and intervention in patients with cachexia, which may improve their response to treatment and their prognosis.

Combined assessment of frailty and nutritional status can be a prognostic indicator after percutaneous coronary intervention

The cardiac prognosis of patients with frailty and malnutrition remains poorly investigated. This study aimed to investigate the impact of frailty and malnutrition on cardiac prognosis by combining the clinical frailty scale (CFS) and the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this study, 608 patients who underwent PCI for stable angina pectoris between January 2018 and December 2020 were included. CFS scores of ≥ 4 were defined as high CFS and patients with these scores were considered frail. GNRI scores of ≤ 98.0 were defined as low GNRI and patients with these scores were considered to have malnutrition. Patients were categorized into low-risk (n = 267, low CFS and high GNRI), intermediate-risk (n = 200, high CFS or low GNRI), and high-risk (n = 141, high CFS and low GNRI) groups. Major adverse clinical events (MACEs), including all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, revascularization, hospitalization for heart failure, and stroke, were assessed. The median follow-up period was 529 days. During the follow-up, MACEs were found in 135 patients. The high-risk group were older (77.0 ± 9.2 vs 71.4 ± 10.7 vs 65.0 ± 10.1 years, p < 0.001), had higher prevalence rates of chronic kidney disease [61.7% (87/141) vs 37.5% (75/200) vs 16.9% (45/267); p < 0.001] and heart failure [47.5% (67/141) vs 22.5% (45/200) vs 12.4% (33/267), p < 0.001], and had higher C-reactive protein levels (1.64 ± 2.66 vs 1.00 ± 2.02 vs 0.34 ± 0.90 mg/dL; p < 0.001) than the intermediate-risk and low-risk groups. The high-risk group [hazard ratio (HR), 4.39; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.87-6.72; p < 0.001] was an independent predictor of MACEs. In conclusion, patients with both frailty and malnutrition had a higher risk of MACEs after PCI than patients with frailty or malnutrition. Post-PCI patients should be evaluated for combined frailty and malnutrition.

Emerging Mechanisms of Skeletal Muscle Homeostasis and Cachexia: The SUMO Perspective

Mobility is an intrinsic feature of the animal kingdom that stimulates evolutionary processes and determines the biological success of animals. Skeletal muscle is the primary driver of voluntary movements. Besides, skeletal muscles have an immense impact on regulating glucose, amino acid, and lipid homeostasis. Muscle atrophy/wasting conditions are accompanied by a drastic effect on muscle function and disrupt steady-state muscle physiology. Cachexia is a complex multifactorial muscle wasting syndrome characterized by extreme loss of skeletal muscle mass, resulting in a dramatic decrease in life quality and reported mortality in more than 30% of patients with advanced cancers. The lack of directed treatments to prevent or relieve muscle loss indicates our inadequate knowledge of molecular mechanisms involved in muscle cell organization and the molecular etiology of cancer-induced cachexia (CIC). This review highlights the latest knowledge of regulatory mechanisms involved in maintaining muscle function and their deregulation in wasting syndromes, particularly in cachexia. Recently, protein posttranslational modification by the small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) has emerged as a key regulatory mechanism of protein function with implications for different aspects of cell physiology and diseases. We also review an atypical association of SUMO-mediated pathways in this context and deliberate on potential treatment strategies to alleviate muscle atrophy.

The landscape of cancer cachexia in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Cancer cachexia presents with weight loss, anorexia, and fatigue and worsens the prognosis and quality of life of cancer patients. We aimed to summarize the current relevant discourse in the literature about cancer cachexia in the setting of non-small cell lung carcinoma and the possible current and future treatments.

Methods

We conduct a narrative review of the literature on the landscape of cancer cachexia in the context of non-small cell lung cancer, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances.

Key Content and Findings

The need for appropriate intervention for cancer cachexia is increasing as the prognosis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer is improving with advances in treatment. Tumor cells play a role in the pathogenesis of cachexia, where they release factors that elicit the production of inflammatory cytokines by the immune system resulting in decreased appetite, abnormal energy metabolism, and skeletal muscle degeneration. Comorbid chronic lung diseases are associated with pulmonary cachexia and sarcopenia and commonly occur in the context of lung cancer, further contributing to the increased incidence of cachexia in patients with lung cancer. Currently, a ghrelin-like agonist, anamorelin, is approved for the treatment of cancer cachexia and is used in clinical practice in Japan. The role that nutritional and exercise therapies can play as added treatments must be further explored.

Conclusions

Cancer cachexia remains a poorly understood phenomenon, and awareness must be raised through educational activities for health care providers and patient family members. In addition, new therapeutics targeting cancer cachexia, such as GDF-15 antibodies, are in development, and further progress is expected.