The role of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with nodal peripheral T-cell lymphomas in first complete remission: Report from COMPLETE, a prospective, multicenter cohort study

Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Consolidation for First Response is Associated With Longer Survival Among Patients With Nodal Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma

Nodal peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are challenging subsets of non-Hodgkin lymphomas characterized by their heterogeneity and aggressive clinical behavior. Given the mixed outcomes reported in previous studies, the efficacy of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) as a consolidation strategy following initial chemotherapy response remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the impact of upfront auto-HCT consolidation on overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) among patients with nodal PTCL who achieved a complete or partial response to initial chemotherapy. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Moffitt Cancer Center, involving 123 patients with nodal PTCL treated between February 2005 and February 2021. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on whether they received auto-HCT as part of their initial treatment strategy. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models were used for statistical analysis to compare OS and EFS between groups. Patients undergoing auto-HCT after first response demonstrated significantly longer median OS (12.3 versus 4.3 yr; P = .035) and EFS (6.2 versus 2.2 yr; P = .003) compared to those who did not. Multivariate analyses indicated that auto-HCT at first response and younger age at diagnosis were favorable prognostic factors. The findings suggest that upfront auto-HCT consolidation can significantly improve long-term outcomes in patients with nodal PTCL, supporting the strategy of early auto-HCT consideration and referral following initial chemotherapy response. These results underscore the importance of integrating upfront auto-HCT into the treatment paradigm for nodal PTCL, emphasizing early referral to transplantation services to optimize patient outcomes.

Targeted agents plus CHOP compared with CHOP as the first-line treatment for newly diagnosed patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (GUIDANCE-03): an open-label, multicentre phase 2 clinical trial

Background

Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a heterogeneous disease with dismal outcomes. We conducted an open-label, phase 2 nonrandomised, externally controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of targeted agents plus CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) (CHOPX) for PTCL in the front-line setting.

Methods

Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age and newly diagnosed PTCL. Patients in the CHOPX group received standard CHOP at Cycle 1. Specific targeted agents were added from Cycle 2, decitabine if TP53 mut, azacytidine if TET2/KMT2D mut, tucidinostat if CREBBP/EP300 mut, and lenalidomide if without mutations above. Patients in the CHOP group received CHOP for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was the complete response rate (CRR) at the end of treatment (EOT). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04480099.

Findings

Between July 29, 2020, and Sep 22, 2022, 96 patients were enrolled and included for efficacy and safety analysis with 48 in each group. The study met its primary endpoint. CRR at EOT in the CHOPX group was superior to the CHOP group (64.6% vs. 33.3%, OR 0.27, 95%CI 0.12-0.64; p = 0.004). At a median follow-up of 24.3 months (IQR 12.0-26.7), improved median PFS was observed in the CHOPX group (25.5 vs. 9.0 months; HR 0.57, 95%CI 0.34-0.98; p = 0.041). The median OS was similar between two groups (not reached vs. 30.9 months; HR 0.55, 95%CI 0.28-1.10; p = 0.088). The most common grade 3-4 hematological and non-hematological adverse events in the CHOPX group were neutropenia (31, 65%) and infection (5, 10%).

Interpretation

Targeted agents combined with CHOP demonstrated effective and safe as first-line treatment in PTCL. Biomarker-driven therapeutic strategy is feasible and may lead to promising efficacy specifically toward molecular features in PTCL.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2022YFC2502600) and the General Program of the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (202040400).

Application patterns and outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients: a multicenter real-world study in China

The optimal timing and type of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for treating peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) remain controversial. This retrospective real-world study investigated the application pattern and outcomes of HSCT in China. The analysis encompassed 408 PTCL patients with a median age of 45.5 years, all of whom received initial adequate therapy at five hospitals. Among patients with nodal PTCL who responded effectively to first-line therapy (the "responders", n = 127) and subsequently underwent HSCT consolidation (n = 47, 37.0%), 93.6% received auto-HSCT, while 6.4% underwent allo-HSCT. Front-line auto-HSCT showed potential for long-term disease control in nodal PTCL responders. Among non-nodal PTCL responders (n = 80) with HSCT (n = 26, 32.5%), 46.2% underwent allo-HSCT and 53.8% received auto-HSCT. Upfront allo-HSCT provides longer progression-free survival (PFS) for non-nodal PTCL responders, with lower 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (16.7% vs. 56.0%) and comparable non-relapse mortality (NRM) (10.4% vs. 11.0%) compared to auto-HSCT. For patients who achieved remission with second-line salvage regimens, allo-HSCT was the primary choice (82.4%) for non-nodal PTCL, while auto-HSCT was more common (82.4%) in nodal PTCL. Nodal PTCL patients underwent auto-HSCT after ≥ 3 lines of treatment had a higher 3-year CIR (81.0%) compared to those treated in the first (26.0%) or second line (26.0%). Non-nodal PTCL patients underwent allo-HSCT after ≥ 3 lines had a higher 3-year NRM (37.5%) compared to after first (10.4%) or second line treatment (8.5%). These findings highlight distinct HSCT application patterns for PTCL in China, emphasizing the impact of early disease control and upfront consolidative HSCT.

Management of post-autologous transplant relapse in patients with T-cell lymphomas

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) is often used as a consolidation for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) due to the poor prognosis associated with this heterogenous group of disorders. However, a significant number of patients will experience post-AHCT disease relapse. Here, we report a retrospective study of consecutive 124 patients with PTCLs who underwent AHCT from 2008 to 2020. With a median follow-up of 6.01 years following AHCT, 49 patients (40%) experienced disease relapse. As expected, more patients who were not in first complete remission experienced post-AHCT relapse. Following relapse, majority of the patients (70%) receiving systemic therapies intended as bridging to curative allogeneic HCT. However, only 18 (53%) patients eventually underwent allogeneic HCT. The estimated 3-year OS among patients proceeding to allogeneic HCT was 72% (95% CI 46%-87%). Our report details the pattern of post-AHCT relapse and the management of relapsed disease using different therapeutic modalities.

Chidamide in combination with azacitidine for an elderly patient with peripheral T cell lymphoma‑not otherwise specified: A case report

Peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a type of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with poor prognosis. PTCL-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) is one of its most common pathological types. PTCL is not sensitive to conventional chemotherapy regimens and treatment is particularly limited in elderly patients due to their poor tolerance to chemotherapy. The present report shares the treatment experience of one elderly PTCL-NOS case, which achieved complete remission by reduced-intensity chemotherapy with chidamide in combination with azacitidine following the onset of organ failure and chemotherapy insensitivity. The 9-month follow-up showed sustained remission and the long-term efficacy of this regimen is also promising.

Novel clinical risk stratification and treatment strategies in relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma

Peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) represents a group of heterogeneous hematological malignancies, which are notoriously challenging to treat and outcomes are typically poor. Over the past two decades, clinical prognostic indices for patient risk stratification have evolved, while several targeted agents are now available to complement combination chemotherapy in the frontline setting or as a salvage strategy. With further understanding of the molecular pathobiology of PTCL, several innovative approaches incorporating immunomodulatory agents, epigenetic therapies, oncogenic kinase inhibitors and immunotherapeutics have come to the forefront. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the progress in developing clinical prognostic indices for PTCL and describe the broad therapeutic landscape, emphasizing novel targetable pathways that have entered early phase clinical studies.

Role of upfront autologous transplant for peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients achieving a complete remission with first-line therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

There is currently no consensus on the role of upfront autologous transplantation (ASCT) for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL), especially in patients achieving first complete remission (CR1) following chemotherapy, and data in the literature is conflicting. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to address this question. We searched key databases from January 2000 to February 2022. Six prospective and eleven retrospective studies were included among 2959 unique records. Median follow up in these studies ranged from 22 to 94 months. There was a trend towards benefit in PFS (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.62-1.05, p = 0.11) and OS (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.57-1.09, p = 0.15) in the ASCT compared to chemotherapy only group. Importantly, in transplant eligible patients in CR1, a significant benefit was demonstrated in both OS (HR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.36-0.95, p = 0.03) and PFS (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.47-0.81, p = 0.0004) in the ASCT group. Amongst the nodal PTCL subgroups, ASCT showed a significant PFS benefit for the AITL subgroup (HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.94, p < 0.03) but not PTCL-NOS or ALK-ve ALCL subgroups. Our findings support upfront ASCT for transplant eligible PTCL patients achieving CR1 post chemotherapy. In particular, patients with AITL exhibited a significantly better PFS after upfront ASCT.

Comparison of chemotherapy and chidamide combined with chemotherapy in patients with untreated angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma

Background

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) is characterized by high recurrence rates and poor prognosis, and effective first-line treatment is lacking. Recently, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi), such as chidamide, have been found to induce durable remissions in AITL patients.

Methods

Patients with untreated AITL from March 2015 to March 2023 were retrospectively collected and divided into chemotherapy (ChT) group and chidamide combined with chemotherapy (C-ChT) group based on the first-line treatment received. The comparison of efficacy and safety between the two groups was conducted.

Results

86 patients with newly diagnosed AITL were enrolled, in which 35 patients were in the ChT group and 51 in the C-ChT group. The objective response rate (ORR) of C-ChT group was significantly higher than that of ChT group (84.3% vs. 60%, P= 0.011), and had superior progression-free survival (PFS) (27 months vs. 12 months, P= 0.025). However, no significant difference in overall survival (OS) was observed between the two groups (P= 0.225). In addition, the responding patients who received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) had superior PFS compared to those who did not (P= 0.015).

Conclusions

Compared with ChT regimen, C-ChT regimen was well tolerated and had superior ORR and PFS in patients with untreated AITL. ASCT may contribute to longer PFS in remission patients.

Outcome of combined modality treatment in first-line for stage I(E) peripheral T-cell lymphoma; a nationwide population-based cohort study from the Netherlands

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) comprise a heterogeneous group of mature T-cell neoplasms with an unfavorable prognosis; presentation with stage I(E) disease is uncommon. In clinical practice, an abbreviated chemotherapy treatment regimen combined with radiotherapy (combined modality treatment [CMT]) is commonly used, although evidence from clinical trials is lacking. The aim of this nationwide population-based cohort study is to describe first-line treatment and outcome of patients with stage I(E) PTCL. All newly diagnosed patients ≥18 years with stage I(E) anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) and peripheral T-cell lymphoma NOS (PTCL not otherise specified [NOS]) in 1989-2020 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were categorized according to treatment regimen, i.e., chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), CMT, other therapy and no treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Patients with stage I(E) ALCL, AITL and PTCL NOS (n=576) were most commonly treated with CMT (28%) or CT (29%), 2% underwent SCT. RT only was given in 18%, and 8% received other therapy and 16% no treatment. Overall, the 5-year OS was 59%. According to subtype, 5-year OS was superior for ALCL as compared to PTCL NOS and AITL (68% vs. 55% and 52%, respectively; P=0.03). For patients treated with CMT, 5-year OS was significantly higher (72%) as compared to patients treated with either CT or RT alone (55% and 55%, respectively; P<0.01). In multivariable analysis, age per year increment (hazard ratio [HR] =1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.07), male sex (HR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.23-1.90), and CT, or no treatment (HR=1.64, 95% CI: 1.21-2.21, and HR=1.55, 95% CI: 1.10-2.17, respectively) were associated with a higher risk of mortality. For stage I(E) ALCL, AITL and PTCL NOS, 5-year OS is 59%, comparing favorably to historical outcome in advanced-stage disease. Superior outcome estimates were observed in patients treated with CMT.

Up-front autologous stem cell transplant in peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients achieving complete response after first-line treatment: A multicentre real-world analysis

We conducted a retrospective, multicentre study to compare consolidation therapy with or without first-line autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) patients in a real-world setting. We enrolled 347 PTCL patients who achieved complete response after first-line treatment. Of these, 257 received consolidation chemotherapy (non-ASCT group) and 90 received ASCT (ASCT group). Clinical outcomes were comparable between ASCT and non-ASCT groups. After propensity score matching, the 2-year cumulative incidence of treatment-related mortality and relapse remained similar between groups (1.9% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.985; 24.7% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.021). However, significant differences emerged in progression-free survival and overall survival probabilities. Within the T-cell lymphoma subgroup, ASCT patients exhibited favourable outcomes compared to non-ASCT patients: 2-year progression-free survival (73.4% vs. 50.8%, p = 0.024) and overall survival (92.1% vs. 73.5%, p = 0.021). Notably, no significant differences were observed for patients with NK/T-cell lymphoma. These real-world data suggest that up-front ASCT is a safe and effective consolidation option for PTCL patients in remission, particularly those with T-cell lymphoma.

Aggressive T-cell lymphomas: 2024: Updates on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

INTRODUCTION

Aggressive T-cell lymphomas continue to have a poor prognosis. There are over 30 different subtypes of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), and we are now beginning to understand the differences between the various subtypes beyond histologic variations.

MOLECULAR PATHOGENESIS OF VARIOUS SUBTYPES OF PTCL

Gene expression profiling and other molecular techniques have enabled deeper understanding of differences in various subtypes as reflected in the latest 5th WHO classification of PTCL. It is becoming increasingly clear that therapeutic approaches that target specific cellular pathways are needed to improve the clinical outcomes of PTCL.

TARGETED THERAPIES

There are many targeted agents currently in various stages of clinical trials for PTCL that take advantage of the differential expression of specific proteins or receptors in PTCL tumors. This includes the CD30 directed antibody drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin. Other notable targets are phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors, histone deacetylase inhibitors, CD25, and chemokine receptor 4. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors are promising for ALK expressing tumors.

IMMUNOTHERAPIES

Allogeneic stem cell transplant continues to be the curative therapy for most aggressive subtypes of PTCL. The use of checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of PTCL is still controversial, with best results seen in cases of extranodal natural killer cell/T-cell lymphoma. Bispecific antibody-based treatments and chimeric antigen receptor cell-based therapies are in clinical trials.

Clinical significance and predictive risk factors for event-free survival at 24 months in patients with PTCL, NOS

Peripheral T cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL, NOS), is a heterogeneous and aggressive type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with a bleak prognosis. This study was designed to assess the value of EFS24 as an alternative clinical endpoint and identify prognosis-related factors in PTCL, NOS. Patients diagnosed with PTCL, NOS were retrospectively collected and slides were reviewed by two hematopathologists. EFS was defined as the time from diagnosis to the occurrence of disease progression after initial treatment, retreatment, or death. Subsequent overall survival (OS) was defined from EFS24 or time of progression, if it occurred within 24 months, to the last follow-up or death. 97 cases with complete follow-up were selected. Approximately 66 patients (68.04%) failed to achieve ES24, with the median OS of 12.17 months, and 5-year OS rate of 15.17%. While patients who reached EFS24 had a median OS of 60.57 months and a 5-year OS rate of 68.77%. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that bone marrow involvement and elevated β2 Microglobulin (β2-MG) were associated with a poor prognosis. B symptoms, extranodal involvement more than one site, and a high Ki67 index were significant factors in predicting the failure of EFS24. EFS24 can help stratify the subsequent outcomes of PTCL, NOS. Patients who achieve EFS24 have a favorable prognosis, although it does not reach that of the general population. On the other hand, patients who do not achieve EFS24 have an extremely poor prognosis. Therefore, EFS24 can be used for patient risk stratification, patient counseling, and study design.

Predictive model for treatment outcomes of peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified, in Taiwanese patients

PURPOSE

We aimed to explore the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for PTCL-NOS patients in the real world.

METHODS

Clinical data were retrospectively collected from adult patients with PTCL-NOS treated at a single center in Taiwan.

RESULTS

104 PTCL-NOS patients with a median age of 53.0 years were enrolled. Patients with the International Prognostic Index (IPI) or prognostic index for peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PIT) scores of zero had a longer overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS), while patients with IPI or PIT scores ≥1 did poorly. For patients who are eligible for transplantation, the use of pralatrexate as salvage chemotherapy has shown better OS (2-year OS 83.3% vs. 24.4%, P = 0.011) compared to patients who did not. By multivariate analysis, age >60 years, male, B symptoms, ECOG >1, lung involvement, and thrombocytopenia were independent adverse factors for OS. Incorporating factors in multivariate analysis, we established a novel predictive index for PTCL-NOS which efficiently stratifies patients into low (0-1 factor), intermediate-1 (2 factors), intermediate-2 (3 factors), and high risk (4-6 factors) groups with 2-year OS rates of 81.5%, 32.9%, 8.8%, and 0%, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PTCL-NOS patients have a dismal prognosis in Taiwan. Novel agents may improve the outcomes of PTCL-NOS patients. The usefulness of the novel prognostic index for PTCL-NOS needs further validation.

Case report: Good response to CMOP regimen containing mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome (PLM60) as induction chemotherapy in patients with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) is a highly aggressive subtype of peripheral T-cell lymphoma. The current prognosis with the first-line standard of care remains unsatisfactory, necessitating the exploration of more effective treatment options. We reported 5 cases of AITL receiving CMOP (mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone). Cases 1 and 2 initially received CHOP as first-line induction therapy but switched to CMOP due to inadequate efficacy and cardiac adverse events. Cases 3, 4, and 5 were newly diagnosed and received CMOP. All patients achieved complete remission with acceptable cardiotoxicities and hematologic toxicities. After study treatment discontinuation, Cases 1 and 3 underwent autologous stem cell transplantation, and Cases 4 and 5 received oral maintenance agents. At the last follow-up, 4 patients remained in remission and 1 (Case 2) exhibited tumor recurrence. CMOP showed promise as a potential treatment option for AITL patients. Further research is essential to identify its efficacy and safety.

Gemcitabine-based conditioning compared to BEAM/BEAC conditioning prior to autologous stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: No difference in outcomes

BACKGROUND

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains an effective treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The limited availability of carmustine has prompted the exploration of novel alternative conditioning regimens. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety profile of GBM/GBC (gemcitabine, busulfan, and melphalan or cyclophosphamide) conditioning compared with the standard BEAM/BEAC regimens (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan or cyclophosphamide) for ASCT in patients with NHL.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 231 NHL patients, who underwent ASCT from October 2010 to October 2021 at the Institute of Hematology & Blood Disease Hospital, including both first-line and salvage settings. This resulted in the inclusion of 112 patients in the GBM/GBC arm and 92 in the BEAM/BEAC arm. Propensity score matching was employed to validate the results.

RESULTS

Disease subtype distribution was similar between the GBM/GBC and BEAM/BEAC groups, with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma being the most common (58.9% vs. 58.7%), followed by PTCL (17.0% vs. 18.5%) and MCL (14.3% vs. 14.1%). At 3 months post-ASCT, complete response (CR) rates were comparable (GBM/GBC 93.5% vs. BEAM/BEAC 91.1%; p = 0.607). The 4-year progression-free survival (78.4% vs. 82.3%; p = 0.455) and 4-year overall survival (88.1% vs. 87.7%; p = 0.575) were also similar. Both groups exhibited low non-relapse mortality at 4 years (GBM/GBC 1.8% vs. BEAM/BEAC 3.5%; p = 0.790) with no transplant-related mortalities reported. The GBM/GBC cohort demonstrated a higher incidence of grade 3/4 oral mucositis and hepatic toxicity, whereas the BEAM/BEAC group had more frequent cases of bacteremia or sepsis (13 cases vs. 5 in GBM/GBC).

CONCLUSIONS

The GBM/GBC regimen is effective and well-tolerated, offering outcomes that are highly comparable to those in NHL patients conditioned with BEAM/BEAC, as demonstrated in a prognostically matched cohort.

Advances in the pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) is an aggressive subtype of peripheral T-cell lymphomas with its cell origin determined to be follicular helper T-cells. AITL is characterized by a prominent tumor microenvironment involving dysregulation of immune cells, signaling pathways, and extracellular matrix. Significant progress has been made in the molecular pathophysiology of AITL, including genetic mutations, immune metabolism, hematopoietic-derived microenvironment, and non-hematopoietic microenvironment cells. Early diagnosis, detection of severe complications, and timely effective treatment are crucial for managing AITL. Treatment typically involves various combination chemotherapies, but the prognosis is often poor, and relapsed and refractory AITL remains challenging, necessitating improved treatment strategies. Therefore, this article provides an overview of the pathogenesis and latest advances in the treatment of AITL, with a focus on potential therapeutic targets, novel treatment strategies, and emerging immunotherapeutic approaches.

Past, present and future therapeutic approaches in nodal peripheral T-cell lymphomas

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) encompass over 30 different entities and although they share post-thymic T- or NK-cell derivation, the disease biology and genomic landscape are very diverse across subtypes. In Western populations, nodal PTCL are the most frequently encountered entities in clinical practice and although important achievements have been made in deciphering the underlying biology and in therapeutic advances, there are still large gaps in disease understanding and clinical scenarios in which controversy over best practice continues. CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone)- based chemotherapy continues to be the 'standard' treatment, with the addition of brentuximab vedotin (BV) in the combination CHP (cyclosphosphamide, doxorubicin, prednisone)-BV representing a new treatment paradigm in CD30+ PTCL although its benefit is less certain in the non-anaplastic large cell lymphoma subtypes. Given the high risk of relapse, consolidative autologous stem cell transplant is considered in nodal PTCL, outside of ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma; however, in the absence of a randomized controlled trials, practices vary. Beyond CHP-BV, most study activity has focused on adding a novel agent to CHOP (i.e., CHOP + drug X). However, with high complete remission rates observed with some novel therapy combinations, these regimens are being tested in the front-line setting, with a particular rationale in follicular helper T-cell lymphomas which have a clear sensitivity to epigenetic modifying therapies. This is well exemplified in the relapsed/refractory setting in which rational combination therapies are being developed for specific subtypes or guided by underlying biology. Taken together, we have finally moved into an era of a more personalized approach to the management of nodal PTCL.

Efficacy of ex vivo purging with CD34+ selection to maximize the effects of autologous stem cell transplantation in peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients

BACKGROUND AIMS

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are rare and aggressive tumors with uncertain optimal treatment. This study investigated the clinical outcomes of high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after CD34+ selective purging in PTCL patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis included 67 PTCL patients who achieved remission and underwent HDT/ASCT. CD34+ selective purging was performed using CliniMACS® (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Survival outcomes, engraftment, lymphocyte subsets and viral infections were evaluated.

RESULTS

CD34+ selective purged autografts were associated with significantly improved overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) compared with unpurged autografts (5-year OS, 73.3% versus 37.8%, 5-year DFS, 73.8% versus 33.4%). The cumulative incidence of relapse was also lower in the purged group (31.5% versus 73.3%). Subgroup analysis revealed significant survival benefits in the high-risk group receiving purged autografts. Lymphocyte subset analysis showed increased natural killer (NK) cell counts in the purged group after ASCT. Higher post-ASCT lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) was associated with improved OS and DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

CD34+ selective purging in PTCL patients undergoing HDT/ASCT improved survival outcomes and reduced relapse risk. The procedure increased NK cell counts and post-ASCT LMR. CD34+ selective purging may minimize autograft tumor cell contamination and enhance efficacy in T-cell lymphomas.

Long-term Outcomes After Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma - The Oregon Health and Science University Experience

BACKGROUND

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a group of aggressive malignancies with inferior outcomes compared to B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Both allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are commonly employed for consolidation and salvage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-center review of all adult PTCL patients at OHSU who received HCT from 1991 to 2020 with responses assed by CIBMTR criteria.

RESULTS

88 patients (autoHCT = 52, alloHCT = 36) were identified from the internal registry of ∼3800 autoHCT & alloHCT recipients in that time period. Median OS after autoHCT and alloHCT were 7.0 and 2.6 years. Median PFS after autoHCT and alloHCT was 3.9 vs 1.1 years. Post-HCT median OS for ALCL, AITL, and PTCL NOS were 14.9, 3.9, and 3.4 years, respectively. Median PFS after autoHCT performed while in CR vs. not in CR was 3.4 vs 4.2 years (P = 0.86); for alloHCT in CR vs. not CR 2.4 vs 0.7 years (P = 0.28). 1-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) for autoHCT and alloHCT were 6.1% and 22.2% (P = 0.2). 10/88 patients developed secondary malignancies including 4 skin cancers, 3 new lymphomas, and 2 MDS.

CONCLUSION

Our experience with HCT for PTCL shows that HCT has acceptable toxicities and relatively long disease remissions. AutoHCT was most frequently utilized as planned remission consolidation while alloHCT was most often used late during salvage. Differences in response between autoHCT and alloHCT likely reflect differences in clinical setting and underlying disease natural history and biology.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation improves survival outcomes in peripheral T-cell lymphomas: a multicenter retrospective real-world study

The aim of this study is to evaluate the survival benefit of consolidative autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL). In this retrospective study, the ASCT group underwent consolidative ASCT after first-line therapy at 14 transplantation centers in China between January 2001 and December 2019. Data were collected over the same time frame for the non-ASCT group from the database of lymphoma patient records at Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute. A total of 120 and 317 patients were enrolled in the ASCT and non-ASCT groups, respectively, and their median ages were 43 years and 51 years, respectively. In the ASCT group, 101 patients had achieved complete remission (CR) and 19 patients had achieved partial remission at the time of ASCT. The median follow-up time was 40.2 months and 68 months, and the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 80.6% and 48.9% (p < 0.001) for the ASCT and non-ASCT groups, respectively. The beneficial effect of ASCT for OS remained even after propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis (81.6% vs 68.3%, p = 0.001). Among the 203 patients who were aged ≤ 65 years and achieved CR, ASCT conferred a significant survival benefit (3-year progression-free survival [PFS]: 67.4% vs 47.0%, p = 0.004; 3-year OS: 84.0% vs 74.1%, p = 0.010), and this was also maintained after PSM analysis (3-year PFS: 66.6% vs 48.4%, p = 0.042; 3-year OS: 84.8% vs 70.5%, p = 0.011). Consolidative ASCT improved the survival outcome of PTCL patients, even those who achieved CR after first-line therapy.

Case Report: A recurrent case of ALK-ALCL after autologous transplantation was successfully treated with BV + a modified CHEP chemotherapy containing mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome with the addition of chidamide maintenance therapy

Background

ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALK-ALCL) is a rare heterogeneous malignancy of T-cell origin.ALK- ALCL has a poor prognosis, with more patients experiencing relapses and refractory to treatment, and its treatment remains challenging. We report a case with bone involvement as the main clinical manifestation of recurrent, and the patient achieved significant partial remission after brentuximab vedotin(BV) combined with a modified CHEP chemotherapy containing mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome (PLM60) with the addition of chidamide maintenance therapy and received regular follow-up, with a disease-free survival of 16 months to date. A literature review of the clinical presentation and treatment of ALCL was also conducted to identify strategies for its diagnosis and management.

Conclusions

ALK-ALCL with bone involvement as the main manifestation of recurrent is relatively rare. Here, BV combined a modified CHEP chemotherapy containing mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome was applied for the first time in a patient with relapsed ALK-ALCL, inducing remission and extending survival. However, further prospective studies with many patients are needed to determine the biological characteristics of this rare type of ALK-ALCL and relevant treatment strategies.

The clinical features, treatment, and prognostic factors for peripheral T-cell lymphomas: A single-institution analysis of 240 Chinese patients

AIM

This study aimed to analyze the clinical features, treatment, survival, and prognostic factors of Chinese patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) excluding natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL).

METHODS

Data on patients with newly diagnosed PTCLs between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2017 at our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with NKTCL were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 240 patients were included. PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), was the most frequent subtype (42.5%), followed by angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) (21.3%), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-negative anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALK-ALCL) (16.7%), ALK-positive ALCL (ALK+ALCL) (10.8%) and others (8.8%). With a median follow-up of 81.1 months, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates for all patients were 30.4% (95% CI 25.0%-37.0%) and 48.8% (95% CI 42.6%-55.7%), respectively. On multivariate analysis, no consolidative autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and not achieving complete response after first-line chemotherapy retained independently prognostic value for inferior PFS and OS. Besides, bone marrow involvement and serum albumin level were independent factors for PFS, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2 was significantly predictive of inferior OS. Compared with PTCL-NOS, significantly superior PFS and OS were observed for ALK+ALCL and ALK-ALCL.

CONCLUSION

The survival outcomes with current treatment for most PTCL subtypes are still unsatisfactory. Prospective randomized studies are needed to establish the value of consolidative ASCT in PTCL, and novel therapeutic approaches should be explored.

TP53 mutations identify high-risk events for peripheral T-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP-based chemotherapy

Nodal peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL), the most common PTCLs, are generally treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP)-based curative-intent chemotherapy. Recent molecular data have assisted in prognosticating these PTCLs, but most reports lack detailed baseline clinical characteristics and treatment courses. We retrospectively evaluated cases of PTCL treated with CHOP-based chemotherapy that had tumors sequenced by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Integrated Mutational Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets next-generation sequencing panel to identify variables correlating with inferior survival. We identified 132 patients who met these criteria. Clinical factors correlating with an increased risk of progression (by multivariate analysis) included advanced-stage disease and bone marrow involvement. The only somatic genetic aberrancies correlating with inferior progression-free survival (PFS) were TP53 mutations and TP53/17p deletions. PFS remained inferior when stratifying by TP53 mutation status, with a median PFS of 4.5 months for PTCL with a TP53 mutation (n = 21) vs 10.5 months for PTCL without a TP53 mutation (n = 111). No TP53 aberrancy correlated with inferior overall survival (OS). Although rare (n = 9), CDKN2A-deleted PTCL correlated with inferior OS, with a median of 17.6 months vs 56.7 months for patients without CDKN2A deletions. This retrospective study suggests that patients with PTCL with TP53 mutations experience inferior PFS when treated with curative-intent chemotherapy, warranting prospective confirmation.

Autologous, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and CAR-T/NK therapy: what is their real importance in PTCL?

Peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a rare and aggressive type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that affects mature T cells. This type of cancer is characterized by the abnormal growth of T cells, which can accumulate in the lymph nodes, spleen, bone marrow, and other organs, leading to a variety of symptoms. PTCLs are often difficult to diagnose and treat, and they have a poorer prognosis than other types of lymphoma. However, recent advancements in treatment options, such as targeted therapies have shown promise in improving outcomes for patients with PTCL. Here, we discuss the use of autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) as a treatment strategy for patients with PTCL, as well as the recent treatment approaches based on advanced cellular therapy. The current evidence for the use of HCT in PTCL is mainly derived from registry data, retrospective studies, and expert opinion, as randomized trials are limited due to the low incidence and histological heterogeneity of PTCL subtypes.

Nodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma: Chemotherapy-free management, are we there yet?

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are a diverse and uncommon type of lymphoid malignancies with a dismal prognosis. Recent advances in genomic studies have shown recurring mutations that are changing our knowledge of the disease's molecular genetics and pathogenesis. As such, new targeted therapies and treatments to improve disease outcomes are currently being explored. In this review, we discussed the current understanding of the nodal PTCL biology with potential therapeutic implications and gave our insights on the promising novel therapies that are currently under study such as immunotherapy, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, and oncolytic virotherapy.

First-Line Therapy for Nodal T-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: an Unmet Need in Hematology

PURPOSEOF REVIEW

The main aim of this review is to summarize first-line therapy of nodal T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current treatment with CHOP chemotherapy results in poor outcomes in the majority of patients. However, there are advances within the field. First breakthrough is the ECHELON-2 trial which showed that the addition of brentuximab vedotin improves outcomes in anaplastic large cell lymphoma. However, other types of peripheral T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma were underrepresented with optimal treatment not known. Second breakthrough is an increase of autologous stem cell transplantation usage in the first complete metabolic remission, except in ALK + anaplastic large cell lymphoma, offering better disease control. Despite advances in the field, CHOP remains the standard treatment for the majority of these lymphomas, but multiple trials are underway with the aim to improve this unmet need in hematology and, hopefully, leading us to a new era in the treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphomas.

Complete hematologic response after belinostat treatment and allogeneic stem cell transplantation for multiple relapsed/refractory angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma: A case report

Key Clinical Message

This case report highlights the potential of belinostat for the treatment of relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphomas, for which effective therapies are still scarce.

Abstract

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas have an aggressive disease course associated with poor outcomes. We report a young patient with highly pretreated relapsed/refractory nodal follicular helper T-cell lymphoma (angioimmunoblastic-type [nTFHL-AI]), who successfully received an allogeneic stem cell transplantation following belinostat therapy. The complete hematologic response achieved has lasted more than 2 years.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas

The treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphomas is challenging, as they often display a severe prognosis and lack effective treatment strategies. We will try to answer three burning questions: can we differentiate the initial treatment based on the histotype and the clinical presentation of peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients? Do we require an autologous stem cell transplantation in all patients? Is there room for improvement in the setting of relapsed and refractory disease?

Frontline Management of Nodal Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) represent only 10%-15% of all non-Hodgkin lymphoma but encompass a diverse group of diseases with over 30 different subtypes. As a result of both disease heterogeneity and rarity, therapeutic progress of PTCLs has lagged behind B-cell lymphomas with very few randomized controlled studies to guide management. The most common subtypes are the so-called nodal PTCLs: PTCL-not otherwise specified (NOS), anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), and nodal T follicular helper cell lymphoma (TFHL) lymphoma, the latter of which includes angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. Anthracycline-based primary chemotherapy is still the mainstay of treatment for these common PTCL subtypes, but in recent years, we have moved into an era where more personalized therapy can be applied in some settings. Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, prednisone, and brentuximab vedotin CHP-BV is the first therapy in PTCL to show an overall survival benefit and represents a new standard for ALCL; however, there is less therapeutic certainty in other CD30-positive PTCLs. Recurrent mutations of epigenetic modifier genes typify TFHLs lymphomas, and collective studies demonstrate a heightened sensitivity to epigenetic therapies, leading to trials integrating these agents in the frontline setting. Molecular studies of PTCL-NOS have defined at least two subtypes, GATA3 and TBX21, the former having a poorer prognosis, but how this guides therapeutics remains unknown. Outside of ALCL, there is a growing debate as to whether trials should focus on adding a novel agent to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or whether combination novel therapies should be explored in the frontline therapy setting. Finally, the role of consolidative autologous stem-cell transplant in first remission remains an area of active debate.

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma and correlated neoplasms with T-cell follicular helper phenotype: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic advances

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) is the second most frequent subtype of mature T-cell lymphoma (MTCL) in the Western world. It derives from the monoclonal proliferation of T-follicular helper (TFH) cells and is characterized by an exacerbated inflammatory response and immune dysregulation, with predisposition to autoimmunity phenomena and recurrent infections. Its genesis is based on a multistep integrative model, where age-related and initiator mutations involve epigenetic regulatory genes, such as TET-2 and DNMT3A. Subsequently, driver-mutations, such as RhoA G17V and IDH-2 R172K/S promote the expansion of clonal TFH-cells ("second-hit"), that finally begin to secrete cytokines and chemokines, such as IL-6, IL-21, CXCL-13 and VEGF, modulating a network of complex relationships between TFH-cells and a defective tumor microenvironment (TME), characterized by expansion of follicular dendritic cells (FDC), vessels and EBV-positive immunoblasts. This unique pathogenesis leads to peculiar clinical manifestations, generating the so-called "immunodysplastic syndrome", typical of AITL. Its differential diagnosis is broad, involving viral infections, collagenosis and adverse drug reactions, which led many authors to use the term "many-faced lymphoma" when referring to AITL. Although great advances in its biological knowledge have been obtained in the last two decades, its treatment is still an unmet medical need, with highly reserved clinical outcomes. Outside the setting of clinical trials, AITL patients are still treated with multidrug therapy based on anthracyclines (CHOP-like), followed by up-front consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). In this setting, the estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) is around 30-40%. New drugs, such as hypomethylating agents (HMAs) and histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDAi), have been used for relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease with promising results. Such agents have their use based on a biological rationale, have significant potential to improve the outcomes of patients with AITL and may represent a paradigm shift in the therapeutic approach to this lymphoma in the near future.

Long-time follow-up of patients with untreated peripheral T cell lymphoma following chidamide combined with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vindesine, prednisone, and etoposide therapy: a single-center propensity score-matching study

PURPOSE

This is a retrospective, single-center PSM study evaluating the efficacy and safety of chidamide combined with the CHOEP (C-CHOEP) regimen versus the single CHOEP regimen in patients with untreated peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCL).

PATIENTS

Patients newly diagnosed with PTCL between January 2015 and June 2021 were recruited, and were 1:1 divided into C-CHOEP and CHOEP groups according to their first-line chemotherapy regimens. The PSM method was used to match the baseline variables to balance the confounding factors.

RESULTS

A cohort of 33 patients each in the C-CHOEP and CHOEP groups was generated after propensity score-matching (PSM). The complete remission (CR) rates of the C-CHOEP regimen were higher than that of the CHOEP regimen (56.3 vs. 25.8%, p = 0.014), whereas the duration of response of the C-CHOEP group was shorter (median DOR 30 vs. 57 months), resulting in roughly similar progression-free survival (PFS) and (overall survival) OS between the two groups. The responding patients who received chidamide maintenance therapy showed a trend of superior PFS and OS compared with patients who did not receive maintenance therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The C-CHOEP regimen was well tolerated but failed to show advantages over the CHOEP regimen in patients with untreated PTCL; however, the chidamide maintenance may contribute to a more durable response and stable long-term survival.

Estimating long-term progression-free and overall survival in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma: A US population-based oncology simulation model based on 5-year results from the ECHELON-2 trial

BACKGROUND: The ECHELON-2 5-year update showed continued clinically meaningful improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival with frontline (1L) A+CHP (brentuximab vedotin in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, prednisone) vs CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) in CD30-expressing peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs). OBJECTIVE: To estimate PTCL annual prevalence in the United States in 2031 without and with A+CHP using data from the ECHELON-2 5-year update. METHODS: Population-level outcomes were estimated using a dynamic oncology simulation model. Utilization of 1L CHOP (65% utilization) and CHOP plus etoposide (35% utilization) were varied over time and compared with scenarios incorporating 1L A+CHP (20%-50% utilization; base case: 40% utilization) per expert clinicians' opinion. Additional inputs included PTCL incidence and PFS for consolidation and post-1L therapies from published sources. PFS (51.4% [95% CI = 42.8%-59.4%] vs 43.0% [35.8%-50.0%]) and overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.72 [0.53-0.99]) for A+CHP and CHOP came from ECHELON-2. RESULTS: In 2031, an estimated 2,082 patients will be diagnosed with PTCL. Approximately 1,412 additional patients will be alive and progression free, and 106 fewer patients will require second-line therapy with 40% A+CHP utilization vs no A+CHP utilization. Varying 1L A+CHP utilization from 20%-50% vs no 1L A+CHP utilization added 732 to 1,752 patients alive and progression free. CONCLUSIONS: In this oncology simulation model, the improvements in survival outcomes seen with A+CHP vs CHOP in the ECHELON-2 5-year results translated into more estimated patients with PTCL progression free and alive for at least 5 years following 1L A+CHP vs CHOP and a decreased need for post-1L therapy. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Seagen Inc. Dr Liu and Dr Yu are employees and shareholders of Seagen Inc. Mr Bloudek is and Dr Mordi was an employee of Curta Health, which received funding from Seagen Inc. for the conduct of this study. Dr Burke received consulting fees from Genentech/Roche, AbbVie, Seattle Genetics, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Verastem, MorphoSys, Kura, Epizyme, BeiGene, Kymera, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, TG Therapeutics, Lilly, and Nurix; and received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events in speakers bureaus for BeiGene and Seagen Inc. Dr Phillips received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, MorphoSys, Epizyme, Roche/Genentech, Epizyme Eli Lilly, AbbVie, BeiGene, Pharmacyclics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Xencor, Seagen Inc., TG Therapeutics, Bayer, Incyte, and Gilead; and received payment for honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Epizyme and Seagen Inc.

PTCL, NOS: An update on classification, risk-stratification, and treatment

The peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are relatively rare, heterogeneous, and therapeutically challenging. While significant therapeutic gains and improved understanding of disease pathogenesis have been realized for selected PTCL subtypes, the most common PTCL in North America remains "not otherwise specified (NOS)" and is an unmet need. However, improved understanding of the genetic landscape and ontogeny for the PTCL subtypes currently classified as PTCL, NOS have been realized, and have significant therapeutic implications, which will be reviewed here.

Clinicopathologic characteristics, outcomes, and prognostic factors of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma in China

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to better characterize the clinicopathologic characteristics, outcomes, and prognostic factors of AITL in China.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 312 patients with AITL enrolled between January 2011 and December 2020 from five institutions in China.

RESULTS

The median age was 65 years, with 92.6% advanced stage, 59.7% elevated LDH, 46.1% anemia, and 44.0% hypergammaglobulinemia. The majority of patients (84.9%) received anthracycline-based regimens with or without etoposide, and only 6.1% underwent autologous stem cell transplantation following first remission. The 5-year OS and PFS estimates were 43.4% and 25.0% with no significant improvement of survival between patients treated during 2011-2015 and 2016-2020, respectively. Both the International Prognostic Index (IPI) and the prognostic index for PTCL, not otherwise specified (PIT), were predictive for OS. In multivariate analysis, age >70 years, elevated LDH, and albumin level <35 g/L were independent prognostic factors for OS. Combining these three factors, a novel prognostic model (the Chinese AITL score) was constructed, which stratified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, with 5-year OS rates of 69.0%, 41.5%, and 23.7%, respectively. This new model was successfully validated in an independent cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with AITL were mainly treated with anthracycline-based regimens, and the outcomes were still unsatisfactory in China. Our novel prognostic model may improve our ability to identify patients at different risks for alternative therapies.

Emerging predictive biomarkers for novel therapeutics in peripheral T-cell and natural killer/T-cell lymphoma

Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) and natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL) are rare subtypes of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that are typically associated with poor treatment outcomes. Contemporary first-line treatment strategies generally involve the use of combination chemoimmunotherapy, radiation and/or stem cell transplant. Salvage options incorporate a number of novel agents including epigenetic therapies (e.g. HDAC inhibitors, DNMT inhibitors) as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, validated biomarkers to select patients for individualized precision therapy are presently lacking, resulting in high treatment failure rates, unnecessary exposure to drug toxicities, and missed treatment opportunities. Recent advances in research on the tumor and microenvironmental factors of PTCL and NKTCL, including alterations in specific molecular features and immune signatures, have improved our understanding of these diseases, though several issues continue to impede progress in clinical translation. In this Review, we summarize the progress and development of the current predictive biomarker landscape, highlight potential knowledge gaps, and discuss the implications on novel therapeutics development in PTCL and NKTCL.

Reverse strategy to locally advanced breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: A case report

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare T-cell lymphoma associated with textured breast implants. The most common presentation is a periprosthetic seroma that occurs at least 1 year after an aesthetic or reconstructive implantation, and in these cases, the surgical treatment seems to be successful. More rarely, BIA-ALCL presents with locally advanced mass-formed disease and a related regional lymph node involvement. In all these cases with worse prognosis, a multidisciplinary approach is required, including adjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. We present a clinical case of a 49-year-old woman who developed on the left side of the breast a mass-formed stage 3 BIA-ALCL 15 years after a bilateral breast augmentation with textured silicone implant. Our multidisciplinary team (MDT) scheduled the patient for a "reverse-strategy" sequential approach consisting of induction chemotherapy, hematopoietic stem cell mobilization, and harvest followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). After 100 days from the stem cell transplant, the patient showed a complete pathologic response and was a candidate for radical surgery. She underwent removal of both implants with total en bloc capsulectomy. On the left site, the periprosthetic mass was also en bloc removed. We did not perform any axillary dissection. Our surgical and hemato-oncological teams followed the patient every 3 months, and no local or systemic recurrences were observed 24 months after surgery. This case report has demonstrated the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy as part of a "reverse strategy" in selected cases of advanced-stage BIA-ALCL in which it was not possible to perform an immediate radical surgery. Furthermore, in our case, the de-escalation strategy adopted permitted a less demolitic surgery with good functional and aesthetic results.

Busulfan, Melphalan, and Etoposide (BuME) Showed an Equivalent Effect to Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide, and Etoposide (BuCE) as Conditioning Therapy for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed or High-Risk Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study bythe Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma (CISL)

PURPOSE

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard management for relapsed or high-risk non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). We reported the busulfan, melphalan, and etoposide (BuME) conditioning regimen was effective in patients with relapsed or high-risk NHL. Moreover, the busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (BuCE) conditioning regimen has been used widely in ASCT for NHL. Therefore, based on these encouraging results, this randomized phase II multicenter trial compared the outcomes of BuME and BuCE as conditioning therapies for ASCT in patients with NHL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive either BuME (n=36) or BuCE (n=39). The BuME regimen was comprised of busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/day, intravenously) administered on days -7, -6, and -5, etoposide (400 mg/m2 intravenously) on days -5 and -4, and melphalan (50 mg/m2/day intravenously) on days -3 and -2. The BuCE regimen was comprised of busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/day intravenously) on days -7, -6, and -5, etoposide (400 mg/m2/day intravenously) on days -5 and -4, and cyclophosphamide (50 mg/kg/day intravenously) on days -3 and -2. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients were enrolled. Eleven patients (30.5%) in the BuME group and 13 patients (33.3%) in the BuCE group had disease progression or died. The 2-year PFS rate was 65.4% in the BuME group and 60.6% in the BuCE group (p=0.746). There were no non-relapse mortalities within 100 days after transplantation.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in PFS between the two groups. Therefore, busulfan-based conditioning regimens, BuME and BuCE, may be important treatment substitutes for the BCNU-containing regimens.

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant in patients with relapsed/refractory anaplastic large cell lymphoma

The prognosis of relapsed/refractory (R/R) anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is poor. Large studies evaluating outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in systemic R/R ALCL are not available. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database, we evaluated outcomes of 182 adults (aged ≥18 years) with R/R ALCL undergoing allo-HCT between 2008 and 2019. Non-relapse mortality (NRM), disease relapse/progression (REL), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were modelled using Cox proportional hazards models. The median (range) follow-up of survivors was 62 (3-148) months. The 1-year NRM was 18%. The 5-year REL, PFS and OS were 32%, 41% and 56% respectively. On multivariable regression analysis African American race (hazard ratio [HR] 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-4.8; p < 0.001) and refractory disease at allo-HCT (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.6-6.2; p < 0.001) were predictive of inferior OS. Similarly, African-American race (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.4; p = 0.003), other minority race (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.3; p = 0.02) and refractory disease (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.3; p = 0.01) were predictive of inferior PFS. These data, demonstrate that allo-HCT can result in durable disease control in a sizable proportion of patients with R/R ALCL. Refractory disease and racial minority status predicted inferior allo-HCT outcomes. Whether the inferior outcomes of racial minorities with R/R ALCL after allo-HCT are driven by differences in disease biology or disparities in post allo-HCT care, or both, requires further investigation.

Precise diagnosis and targeted therapy of nodal T-follicular helper cell lymphoma (T-FHCL)

Nodal T-follicular helper cell lymphoma (T-FHCL) derived from T-follicular helper (Tfh) cell falls into a heterogeneous category of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Due to the limited number of therapeutic regimens and limited first-line efficacy, T-FHCL has a poor prognosis, and there is an urgent need for effective targeted therapies. With advancements in sequencing technologies, especially single-cell sequencing and next-generation sequencing, more specific genetic aberrations characteristic of T-FHCL can be discovered, allowing for precise molecular diagnosis and specific research on novel agents. Many biomarker-targeting agents, used either alone or in combination, have been tested, and they have generally enhanced the therapeutic outcomes of T-FHCL. Histone deacetylase inhibitors achieve significant clinical benefits in the treatment of T-FHCL, especially in combination therapy. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T-cell) immunotherapies, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and other potential agents merit further study.

Controversies in the Front-Line Treatment of Systemic Peripheral T Cell Lymphomas

Systemic peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a rare and clinically and biologically heterogeneous group of disorders with scarce and generally low-quality evidence guiding their management. In this manuscript, we tackle the current controversies in the front-line treatment of systemic PTCL including (1) whether CNS prophylaxis should be administered; (2) whether CHOEP should be preferred over CHOP; (3) what role brentuximab vedotin should have; (4) whether stem cell transplant (SCT) consolidation should be used and whether autologous or allogeneic; (5) how should molecular subtypes (including DUSP22 or TP63-rearranged ALCL or GATA3 or TBX21 PTCL, NOS) impact therapeutic decisions; and (6) whether there is a role for targeted agents beyond brentuximab vedotin.

Moving towards biologically informed treatment strategies for T-cell lymphomas

The rarity and biological heterogeneity of the peripheral T-cell lymphomas has made subtype- and biomarker-driven approaches challenging to realize and even more challenging to evaluate in clinical practice. Out of necessity, treatment of T-cell lymphomas has historically been derivative of other aggressive lymphomas, utilizing intensive combination chemotherapy programs in the upfront setting and non-overlapping cytotoxic regimens upon relapse. However, due to tremendous work in understanding the oncogenic basis of these varied diseases, an increasing exploration of rational, targeted therapies is underway. Still, clinical successes have at times lagged behind pathobiological realizations, and there is an evolving need for biologically based, subtype-specific strategies in the clinic. Herein we propose a framework for future success that relies upon optimizing standard therapy in populations known to benefit from combination chemotherapy, building upon CHOP (or CHOP-like) induction with the CHOP + X model, exploring the use of targeted platforms in the relapsed and refractory setting, and designing biomarker-informed clinical trials that target-specific subhistologies and unique molecular subsets.

Characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma: Report from the prospective international T-cell lymphoma project

The T-cell Lymphoma Project is an international registry prospective study that enrolled patients with newly diagnosed peripheral T-cell and NK-cell lymphomas (PTCL). The main objective was to define the clinical features and outcomes, establishing a robust benchmark for future clinical trials. Seventy-four institutions from 14 countries in North America, South America, Europe, and Asia collected data on patients diagnosed and treated at their respective centers between September 2006 and February 2018. Among 1553 PTCL patients, 131 (8.4% of the total cohort) were confirmed to have anaplastic large cell lymphoma - kinase positive (ALCL, ALK+). The median age of the patients was 39 years (18-84). Sixty-five patients (66%) had advanced-stage disease, although majority (45 patients, 54%) had a low-risk International Prognostic Index (IPI) score (0-1). Of 97 patients treated with chemotherapy, 97% received anthracycline-containing regimens. The overall response rate was 81%, with 69 patients (70%) achieving complete remission. Estimated OS and PFS at 3 years were 77% (95% CI: 54%-99%) and 68% (95% CI: 46%-90%), respectively, and at 5 years were very similar, 77% of OS (95% CI: 62%-92%) and 64% of PFS (95% CI: 34%-94%). Multivariate analysis for PFS showed advanced stage (hazard ratios [HR]: 4.72, 95% CI: 1.43-23.9, p = 0.015), elevated lactate dehidrogenade (LDH) (HR 4.85; 95% CI: 1.73-13.60, p = 0.001), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status scale (ECOG-PS) ≥2 (HR: 5.25; 95% CI: 1.68-16.4, p = 0.024). For OS, elevated LDH (HR: 3.77; 95% CI: 1.98-14.17, p = 0.014) and ECOG-PS ≥2 (HR: 4.59; 95% CI: 1.46-14.39, p = 0.004) were identified. In summary, although the outcome of ALK+ ALCL is superior to that of other PTCLs, it remains sufficiently favorable, given the young median age of the patients. Our results confirm the usefulness of both IPI and Prognostic Index for T-cell Lymphoma (PIT) in identifying groups of patients with different outcomes. Clinical Trials ID: NCT01142674.

Effect of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma in China: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of consolidation therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) in first complete remission (CR1) or partial remission (PR1) remains controversial. The existing data from China are limited. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of ASCT on the survival of Chinese patients with PTCL showing response to induction chemotherapy at our hospital.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with PTCL (excluding Natural killer/T cell lymphoma) in CR1 or PR1 treated at Peking University Hospital &Institute from 1996 to 2020. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance clinical characteristics between the ASCT and non-ASCT groups. The primary endpoints were event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of the 414 selected patients, 73 received ASCT consolidation and 341 did not. Over a median follow-up of 5.7 years, survival was significantly better in the ASCT group than in the non-ASCT group (median EFS, 8.1 years vs. 2.8 years, P = 0.002; median OS, 14.9 years vs. 10.2 years, P = 0.007). The 5-year EFS and OS rates were 68.4% and 77.0% in ASCT group, and 43.2% and 57.6% in non-ASCT group, respectively. The survival benefit was confirmed in the propensity score matched cohort (46 patients who received ASCT and 84 patients who did not receive ASCT): P = 0.007 for median EFS and P = 0.022 for the median OS. Cox regression analysis showed that ASCT was independently associated with better survival: hazard ratio (HR) for EFS, 0.46 (95% CI: 0.28-0.76); HR for OS, 0.50 (95% CI: 0.31-0.84). Subgroup analysis showed that ASCT was more likely to benefit higher-risk patients and those with advanced disease. Among the subtypes of PTCL, the benefit was significant in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (HR = 0.26 [95% CI: 0.10-0.66] for EFS and 0.29 [95% CI: 0.12-0.74] for OS), but not in the other subtypes.

CONCLUSION

ASCT may improve the long-term survival of patients with PTCL in first CR or PR, especially for patients with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. The specific groups most likely to benefit from upfront ASCT need to be clearly identified.

Management of Peripheral T-cell Lymphomas and the Role of Transplant

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Here, we review the management of peripheral T-cell lymphoma, particularly focusing on the role of autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplant.

RECENT FINDINGS

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas are a rare subset of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas that are treated with curative intent. While therapy has been based on other aggressive lymphoid malignancies, outcomes are generally poorer than B-cell lymphomas with 5-year overall and progression-free survival of 30-40% and 20-30%, respectively. In effort to improve outcomes, transplant has been used in both the frontline and salvage settings. Although not studied in randomized studies, consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant in first remission has been associated with an approximate 5-year overall survival of 50-60% and 5-year progression-free survival of 40-45%. Unfortunately, most patients relapse, and, in this setting, allogeneic transplant remains the only curative option for those who are transplant-eligible. Multiple series have now shown that 3-year overall survival with allogeneic transplant is approximately 60%. However, outcomes with transplant are associated with disease control at the time of transplant. In contrast to B-cell malignancies, treatment decisions for peripheral T-cell lymphomas are supported mostly by phase II studies, retrospective series, and expert opinion. For patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma able to achieve sufficient disease control, autologous stem cell transplantation in first remission and allogeneic stem cell transplantation in relapsed disease offer modest benefit over chemotherapy alone.

Comparison of CEAC, BEAM and IEAC conditioning regimens followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is an important treatment for peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) patients both during front and salvage therapy. In order to explore the appropriate conditioning regiments and seek ways to improve the efficacy and safety of PTCL, we retrospectively compared the outcomes of 52 PTCL patients treated with CEAC (lomustine, etoposide, cytarabine and cyclophosphamide; n = 28), BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan; n = 14) and IEAC (idarubicin, etoposide, cytarabine and cyclophosphamide; n = 10) regimens followed by ASCT at our center between 2012 and 2021. Although the time of neutrophil engraftment in CEAC group was earlier than that in IEAC group (P = 0.042) and platelet infusion in BEAM group was significantly more than CEAC group (P = 0.042), there were no significant difference in platelet engraftment, hematopoietic engraftment and red blood cells infusion among the 3 groups. The transplantation related mortality rate (TRM) and the early overall response rate (ORR) was 3.8% and 85.7% respectively. The 5-year OS and PFS was 62.8% (95% CI: 54.8-70.8%) and 61.0% (95% CI: 53.1-68.9%) respectively. There was no significant difference in TRM, ORR and survival among the 3 groups. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that high PIT score (the T cell lymphoma prognostic index, > 1) and failure to reach complete response (non-CR) at 3 months after ASCT were common risk factors for OS (P = 0.036 and 0.007) and PFS (P = 0.021 and 0.012). In conclusion, CEAC and IEAC regimen can be used as alternative conditioning regiments for ASCT in PTCL patients, and their efficacy and safety are comparable to BEAM regiment. Patients with high PIT score and non-CR early after ASCT had worse outcomes.

Chidamide Maintenance Therapy Following Induction Therapy in Patients With Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Who Are Ineligible for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: Case Series From China

Objective

To assess the potential benefit of chidamide maintenance therapy after induction treatment in peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL).

Materials and Methods

The clinical data of 48 transplantation-ineligible patients with different PTCL subtypes who received continuous chidamide treatment after first-line therapy were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety were analyzed.

Results

In total, 68.8% of patients were male (33/48), the median age was 59.5 years (22~80). The pathological subtypes were angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL, 43.8%), anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL, 16.6%), PTCL-not otherwise specified (NOS, 25%), NK/T-cell lymphoma (NKT, 14.6%). 35.4% (7/48) patients had intermediate or high risk (IPI=3~5). 20 patients (41.7%) received chidamide as a maintenance treatment after achieving a complete response (CR). 57.1% (16/28) exhibited a better response after chidamide (9 cases partial response [PR] to CR, 7 from stable disease [SD] to PR). The CR and overall response rate (ORR) were 60.4% and 93.8%, respectively. In addition, 21/21 AITL, 10/12 PTCL-NOS, and 8/8 ALCL, 6/7 NK/T exhibited CR/PR as the best response during the follow-up period. Meanwhile, the CR and ORR did not differ by age (<60 vs ≥60: 50.0% vs 70.8%, P = 0.091; and 91.7% vs 95.8%, P = 0.551). The median follow-up period was 12.8 months (3.0–66.6), 14 patients developed PD (29.2%), 10 of them died of lymphoma (20.8%). Totally, the 40 cases achieved CR/PR from 1st line regimen got better PFS as well as OS than the rest 8 cases (the 1-year PFS was 80.8% vs 46.9% and the 2-year PFS was 71.9% vs 46.9%, P=0.012. the 1-year OS was 89.9% vs 72.6% and the 2-year OS was 85.9% vs 48.6%, P=0.032). No patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. The most common toxicities were neutropenia (75.0%), anemia (79.2%), thrombocytopenia (58.3%), and anorexia (45.8%), and fatigue (43.8%).

Conclusion

Chidamide maintenance therapy led to improvements of PFS and OS with a manageable safety profile in patients with PTCL. Further randomized studies are required to examine the role of chidamide maintenance therapy in PTCL.

Impact of Etoposide and ASCT on Survival Among Patients <65 years With Stage II-IV PTCL; a Population-Based Cohort Study

Patients <65 years with peripheral T-cell lymphoma are treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP). While the addition of etoposide and consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are preferred in some countries, randomized trials are lacking. This nationwide population-based study assessed the impact of etoposide and ASCT on overall survival (OS) among patients aged 18-64 years with stage II-IV anaplastic large T-cell lymphoma (ALCL), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) and peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), diagnosed between 1989-2018, utilizing the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were categorized into two calendar periods, which represent the pre- and post-era of etoposide and ASCT implementation, respectively. A total of 1,427 patients were identified (35% ALCL, 21% AITL and 44% PTCL-NOS). OS increased from 39% in 1989-2009 to 49% in 2009-2018 (p<0·01). The 5-year OS was superior for patients treated with CHOEP, as compared to patients with CHOP (64% and 44%, respectively; p<0·01). When adjusted for subtype, IPI-score, and ASCT, the risk of mortality was similar between the two groups, except for ALK+ ALCL patients for whom risk of mortality was 6.3 times higher when treated with CHOP as compared to CHOEP. Patients consolidated with ASCT demonstrated a superior 5-year OS of 81% as compared to 39% for patients not receiving an ASCT (p<0·01), regardless of whether a complete remission was achieved. In patients <65 years with advanced stage ALK- ALCL, AITL and PTCL, the use of ASCT consolidation, but not the addition of etoposide, was associated with improved OS.