Central projections of cochlear nerve fibers in the alligator lizard

Auditory pathway for detection of vibration in the tokay gecko

Otolithic endorgans such as the saccule were thought to be strictly vestibular in amniotes (reptiles, birds, and mammals), with little evidence supporting the auditory function found in fish and amphibians (frogs and salamanders). Here, we demonstrate an auditory role for the saccule in the tokay gecko (Gekko gecko). The nucleus vestibularis ovalis (VeO) in the hindbrain exclusively receives input from the saccule and projects to the auditory midbrain, the torus semicircularis, via an ascending pathway parallel to cochlear pathways. Single-unit recordings show that VeO is exquisitely sensitive to low-frequency vibrations. Moreover, VeO is present in other lepidosaurs, including snakes and Sphenodon. These findings indicate that the ancestral auditory function of the saccule is likely preserved at least in the lepidosaurian lineage of amniotes and mediates sensitive encoding of vibration. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Central projections of auditory nerve fibers in the western rat snake (Pantherophis obsoletus)

Despite the absence of tympanic middle ears, snakes can hear. They are thought to primarily detect substrate vibration via connections between the lower jaw and the inner ear. We used the western rat snake (Pantherophis obsoletus) to determine how vibration is processed in the brain. We measured vibration-evoked potential recordings to reveal sensitivity to low-frequency vibrations. We then used tract tracing combined with immunohistochemistry and Nissl staining to describe the central projections of the papillar branch of the VIIIth nerve. Applications of biotinylated dextran amine to the basilar papilla (homologous to the organ of Corti of mammals) labeled bouton-like terminals in two first-order cochlear nuclei, a rostrolateral nucleus angularis (NA) and a caudomedial nucleus magnocellularis (NM). NA formed a distinct dorsal eminence, consisted of heterogenous cell types, and was parvalbumin positive. NM was smaller and poorly separated from the surrounding vestibular nuclei. NM was distinguished by positive calbindin label and included fusiform and round cells. Thus, the atympanate western rat snake shares similar first-order projections to tympanate reptiles. Auditory pathways may be used for detecting vibration, not only in snakes but also potentially in atympanate early tetrapods.

Strongly directional responses to tones and conspecific calls in the auditory nerve of the Tokay gecko, Gekko gecko

The configuration of lizard ears, where sound can reach both surfaces of the eardrums, produces a strongly directional ear, but the subsequent processing of sound direction by the auditory pathway is unknown. We report here on directional responses from the first stage, the auditory nerve. We used laser vibrometry to measure eardrum responses in Tokay geckos and in the same animals recorded 117 auditory nerve single fiber responses to free-field sound from radially distributed speakers. Responses from all fibers showed strongly lateralized activity at all frequencies, with an ovoidal directivity that resembled the eardrum directivity. Geckos are vocal and showed pronounced nerve fiber directionality to components of the call. To estimate the accuracy with which a gecko could discriminate between sound sources, we computed the Fisher information (FI) for each neuron. FI was highest just contralateral to the midline, front and back. Thus, the auditory nerve could provide a population code for sound source direction, and geckos should have a high capacity to differentiate between midline sound sources. In brain, binaural comparisons, for example, by IE (ipsilateral excitatory, contralateral inhibitory) neurons, should sharpen the lateralized responses and extend the dynamic range of directionality.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In mammals, the two ears are unconnected pressure receivers, and sound direction is computed from binaural interactions in the brain, but in lizards, the eardrums interact acoustically, producing a strongly directional response. We show strongly lateralized responses from gecko auditory nerve fibers to directional sound stimulation and high Fisher information on either side of the midline. Thus, already the auditory nerve provides a population code for sound source direction in the gecko.

Sound localization by the internally coupled ears of lizards: From biophysics to biorobotics

As they are generally small and only hear low frequencies, lizards have few cues for localizing sound. However, their ears show extreme directionality (up to 30 dB direction-dependent difference in eardrum vibrations) created by strong acoustical coupling of the eardrums, with almost perfect internal transmission from the contralateral ear over a broad frequency range. The activity of auditory nerve fibers reflects the eardrum directionality, so all auditory neurons are directional by default. This suggests that the ensuing neural processing of sound direction is simple in lizards. Even the simplest configuration of electrical analog models-two tympanic impedances connected via a central capacitor-produces directional patterns that are qualitatively similar to the experimental data on lizard ears. Several models, both analytical and (very recently) finite-element models, have been published. Robotic implementations using simplified models of the ear and of binaural comparison show that robust phonotaxic behavior can be generated with little additional processing and be performed by simple (and thus small and cheap) units. The authors review lizard directional processing and attempts at modeling and robotics with a twofold aim: to clarify the authors' understanding of central processing of sound localization in lizards, and to lead to technological developments of bioinspired robotics.

Evolution of Sound Source Localization Circuits in the Nonmammalian Vertebrate Brainstem

The earliest vertebrate ears likely subserved a gravistatic function for orientation in the aquatic environment. However, in addition to detecting acceleration created by the animal's own movements, the otolithic end organs that detect linear acceleration would have responded to particle movement created by external sources. The potential to identify and localize these external sources may have been a major selection force in the evolution of the early vertebrate ear and in the processing of sound in the central nervous system. The intrinsic physiological polarization of sensory hair cells on the otolith organs confers sensitivity to the direction of stimulation, including the direction of particle motion at auditory frequencies. In extant fishes, afferents from otolithic end organs encode the axis of particle motion, which is conveyed to the dorsal regions of first-order octaval nuclei. This directional information is further enhanced by bilateral computations in the medulla and the auditory midbrain. We propose that similar direction-sensitive neurons were present in the early aquatic tetrapods and that selection for sound localization in air acted upon preexisting brain stem circuits like those in fishes. With movement onto land, the early tetrapods may have retained some sensitivity to particle motion, transduced by bone conduction, and later acquired new auditory papillae and tympanic hearing. Tympanic hearing arose in parallel within each of the major tetrapod lineages and would have led to increased sensitivity to a broader frequency range and to modification of the preexisting circuitry for sound source localization.

Invaginating Presynaptic Terminals in Neuromuscular Junctions, Photoreceptor Terminals, and Other Synapses of Animals

Typically, presynaptic terminals form a synapse directly on the surface of postsynaptic processes such as dendrite shafts and spines. However, some presynaptic terminals invaginate-entirely or partially-into postsynaptic processes. We survey these invaginating presynaptic terminals in all animals and describe several examples from the central nervous system, including giant fiber systems in invertebrates, and cup-shaped spines, electroreceptor synapses, and some specialized auditory and vestibular nerve terminals in vertebrates. We then examine mechanoreceptors and photoreceptors, concentrating on the complex of pre- and postsynaptic processes found in basal invaginations of the cell. We discuss in detail the role of vertebrate invaginating horizontal cell processes in both chemical and electrical feedback mechanisms. We also discuss the common presence of indenting or invaginating terminals in neuromuscular junctions on muscles of most kinds of animals, and especially discuss those of Drosophila and vertebrates. Finally, we consider broad questions about the advantages of possessing invaginating presynaptic terminals and describe some effects of aging and disease, especially on neuromuscular junctions. We suggest that the invagination is a mechanism that can enhance both chemical and electrical interactions at the synapse.

Internally coupled ears: mathematical structures and mechanisms underlying ICE

In internally coupled ears (ICE), the displacement of one eardrum creates pressure waves that propagate through air-filled passages in the skull, causing a displacement of the opposing eardrum and vice versa. In this review, a thorough mathematical analysis of the membranes, passages, and propagating pressure waves reveals how internally coupled ears generate unique amplitude and temporal cues for sound localization. The magnitudes of both of these cues are directionally dependent. On the basis of the geometry of the interaural cavity and the elastic properties of the two eardrums confining it at both ends, the present paper reviews the mathematical theory underlying hearing through ICE and derives analytical expressions for eardrum vibrations as well as the pressures inside the internal passages, which ultimately lead to the emergence of highly directional hearing cues. The derived expressions enable one to explicitly see the influence of different parts of the system, e.g., the interaural cavity and the eardrum, on the internal coupling, and the frequency dependence of the coupling. The tympanic fundamental frequency segregates a low-frequency regime with constant time-difference magnification (time dilation factor) from a high-frequency domain with considerable amplitude magnification. By exploiting the physical properties of the coupling, we describe a concrete method to numerically estimate the eardrum's fundamental frequency and damping solely through measurements taken from a live animal.

How Internally Coupled Ears Generate Temporal and Amplitude Cues for Sound Localization

In internally coupled ears, displacement of one eardrum creates pressure waves that propagate through air-filled passages in the skull and cause displacement of the opposing eardrum, and conversely. By modeling the membrane, passages, and propagating pressure waves, we show that internally coupled ears generate unique amplitude and temporal cues for sound localization. The magnitudes of both these cues are directionally dependent. The tympanic fundamental frequency segregates a low-frequency regime with constant time-difference magnification from a high-frequency domain with considerable amplitude magnification.

Organization of the auditory brainstem in a lizard, Gekko gecko. I. Auditory nerve, cochlear nuclei, and superior olivary nuclei

We used tract tracing to reveal the connections of the auditory brainstem in the Tokay gecko (Gekko gecko). The auditory nerve has two divisions, a rostroventrally directed projection of mid- to high best-frequency fibers to the nucleus angularis (NA) and a more dorsal and caudal projection of low to middle best-frequency fibers that bifurcate to project to both the NA and the nucleus magnocellularis (NM). The projection to NM formed large somatic terminals and bouton terminals. NM projected bilaterally to the second-order nucleus laminaris (NL), such that the ipsilateral projection innervated the dorsal NL neuropil, whereas the contralateral projection crossed the midline and innervated the ventral dendrites of NL neurons. Neurons in NL were generally bitufted, with dorsoventrally oriented dendrites. NL projected to the contralateral torus semicircularis and to the contralateral ventral superior olive (SOv). NA projected to ipsilateral dorsal superior olive (SOd), sent a major projection to the contralateral SOv, and projected to torus semicircularis. The SOd projected to the contralateral SOv, which projected back to the ipsilateral NM, NL, and NA. These results suggest homologous patterns of auditory connections in lizards and archosaurs but also different processing of low- and high-frequency information in the brainstem.

Synaptic morphology and the influence of auditory experience

The auditory experience is crucial for the normal development and maturation of brain structure and the maintenance of the auditory pathways. The specific aims of this review are (i) to provide a brief background of the synaptic morphology of the endbulb of Held in hearing and deaf animals; (ii) to argue the importance of this large synaptic ending in linking neural activity along ascending pathways to environmental acoustic events; (iii) to describe how the re-introduction of electrical activity changes this synapse; and (iv) to examine how changes at the endbulb synapse initiate trans-synaptic changes in ascending auditory projections to the superior olivary complex, the inferior complex, and the auditory cortex.

Binaural processing by the gecko auditory periphery

Lizards have highly directional ears, owing to strong acoustical coupling of the eardrums and almost perfect sound transmission from the contralateral ear. To investigate the neural processing of this remarkable tympanic directionality, we combined biophysical measurements of eardrum motion in the Tokay gecko with neurophysiological recordings from the auditory nerve. Laser vibrometry shows that their ear is a two-input system with approximately unity interaural transmission gain at the peak frequency (∼ 1.6 kHz). Median interaural delays are 260 μs, almost three times larger than predicted from gecko head size, suggesting interaural transmission may be boosted by resonances in the large, open mouth cavity (Vossen et al. 2010). Auditory nerve recordings are sensitive to both interaural time differences (ITD) and interaural level differences (ILD), reflecting the acoustical interactions of direct and indirect sound components at the eardrum. Best ITD and click delays match interaural transmission delays, with a range of 200-500 μs. Inserting a mold in the mouth cavity blocks ITD and ILD sensitivity. Thus the neural response accurately reflects tympanic directionality, and most neurons in the auditory pathway should be directional.

Calcium-binding protein immunoreactivity characterizes the auditory system of Gekko gecko

Geckos use vocalizations for intraspecific communication, but little is known about the organization of their central auditory system. We therefore used antibodies against the calcium-binding proteins calretinin (CR), parvalbumin (PV), and calbindin-D28k (CB) to characterize the gecko auditory system. We also examined expression of both glutamic acid decarboxlase (GAD) and synaptic vesicle protein (SV2). Western blots showed that these antibodies are specific to gecko brain. All three calcium-binding proteins were expressed in the auditory nerve, and CR immunoreactivity labeled the first-order nuclei and delineated the terminal fields associated with the ascending projections from the first-order auditory nuclei. PV expression characterized the superior olivary nuclei, whereas GAD immunoreactivity characterized many neurons in the nucleus of the lateral lemniscus and some neurons in the torus semicircularis. In the auditory midbrain, the distribution of CR, PV, and CB characterized divisions within the central nucleus of the torus semicircularis. All three calcium-binding proteins were expressed in nucleus medialis of the thalamus. These expression patterns are similar to those described for other vertebrates.

Vertebrate pressure-gradient receivers

The eardrums of all terrestrial vertebrates (tetrapods) are connected through Eustachian tubes or interaural canals. In some of the animals, these connections create pressure-gradient directionality, an enhanced directionality by interaction of sound arriving at both sides of the eardrum and strongly dependent on interaural transmission attenuation. Even though the tympanic middle ear has originated independently in the major tetrapod groups, in each group the ancestral condition probably was that the two middle ears were exposed in the mouth cavity with relatively high interaural transmission. Recent vertebrates form a continuum from perfect interaural transmission (0 dB in a certain frequency band) and pronounced eardrum directionality (30-40 dB) in the lizards, over somewhat attenuated transmission and limited directionality in birds and frogs, to the strongly attenuated interaural transmission and functionally isolated pressure receiver ears in the mammals. Since some of the binaural interaction already takes place at the eardrum in animals with strongly coupled ears, producing enhanced interaural time and level differences, the subsequent neural processing may be simpler. In robotic simulations of lizards, simple binaural subtraction (EI cells, found in brainstem nuclei of both frogs and lizards) produces strongly lateralized responses that are sufficient for steering the animal robustly to sound sources.

Evolution of a sensory novelty: tympanic ears and the associated neural processing

Tympanic hearing is a true evolutionary novelty that appears to have developed independently in at least five major tetrapod groups-the anurans, turtles, lepidosaurs, archosaurs and mammals. The emergence of a tympanic ear would have increased the frequency range and sensitivity of hearing. Furthermore, tympana were acoustically coupled through the mouth cavity and therefore inherently directional in a certain frequency range, acting as pressure difference receivers. In some lizard species, this acoustical coupling generates a 50-fold directional difference, usually at relatively high frequencies (2-4kHz). In ancestral atympanate tetrapods, we hypothesize that low-frequency sound may have been processed by non-tympanic mechanisms like those in extant amphibians. The subsequent emergence of tympanic hearing would have led to changes in the central auditory processing of both high-frequency sound and directional hearing. These changes should reflect the independent origin of the tympanic ears in the major tetrapod groups. The processing of low-frequency sound, however, may have been more conserved, since the acoustical coupling of the ancestral tympanate ear probably produced little sensitivity and directionality at low frequencies. Therefore, tetrapod auditory processing may originally have been organized into low- and high-frequency streams, where only the high-frequency processing was mediated by tympanic input. The closure of the middle ear cavity in mammals and some birds is a derived condition, and may have profoundly changed the operation of the ear by decoupling the tympana, improving the low-frequency response of the tympanum, and leading to a requirement for additional neural computation of directionality in the central nervous system. We propose that these specializations transformed the low- and high-frequency streams into time and intensity pathways, respectively.

Directionality of the lizard ear

Lizards have highly sensitive ears, but most lizard heads are small (1-2 cm in diameter) compared to the wavelengths of sound of frequencies to which they are most sensitive (1-4 kHz, wavelengths 34-8.5 cm). Therefore, the main cues to sound direction that mammals use - binaural time and intensity cues due to arrival-time differences and sound shadowing by the head--will be very small in lizards. The present work shows that acoustical coupling of the two eardrums in lizards produces the largest directionality of any terrestrial vertebrate ear studied. Laser vibrometric studies of tympanic motion show pronounced directionality within a 1.8-2.4 kHz frequency band around the best frequency of hearing, caused by the interference of ipsi- and contralateral inputs. The results correspond qualitatively to the response of a simple middle ear model, assuming coupling of the tympana through a central cavity. Furthermore, observed directional responses are markedly asymmetrical, with a steep gradient of up to 50-fold (34 dB) response differences between ipsi- and contralateral frontal angles. Therefore, the directionality is easily exploitable by simple binaural subtraction in the brain. Lizard ears are the clearest vertebrate examples of directionality generated by tympanic coupling.

Coding interaural time differences at low best frequencies in the barn owl

In birds and mammals, precisely timed spikes encode the timing of acoustic stimuli, and interaural acoustic disparities propagate to binaural processing centers. The Jeffress model proposes that these projections act as delay lines to innervate an array of coincidence detectors, every element of which has a different relative delay between its ipsilateral and contralateral excitatory inputs. Thus, interaural time difference (ITD) is encoded into the position of the coincidence detector whose delay lines best cancel out the acoustic ITD. Neurons of the avian nucleus laminaris and mammalian MSO phase-lock to both monaural and binaural stimuli but respond maximally when phase-locked spikes from each side arrive simultaneously, i.e. when the difference in the conduction delays compensates for the ITD. McAlpine et al. [Nat. Neurosci. 4 (2001) 396] identified an apparent difference between avian and mammalian ITD coding. In the barn owl, the maximum firing rate appears to encode ITD. This may not be the case for the guinea pig, where the steepest region of the function relating discharge rate to interaural time delay (ITD) is close to midline for all neurons, irrespective of best frequency (BF). These data suggest that low BF ITD sensitivity in the guinea pig is mediated by detection of a change in slope of the ITD function, and not by maximum rate. We review coding of low best frequency ITDs in barn owls and mammals and discuss whether there may be differences in the code used to signal ITD in mammals and birds.

Primary innervation of the avian and mammalian cochlear nucleus

The auditory nerve of birds and mammals exhibits differences and similarities, but given the millions of years since the two classes diverged from a common ancestor, the similarities are much more impressive than the differences. The avian nerve is simpler than that of mammals, but share many fundamental features including principles of development, structure, and physiological properties. Moreover, the available evidence shows that the human auditory nerve follows this same general organizational plan. Equally impressive are reports that homologous genes in worms, flies, and mice exert the same heredity influences in man. The clear implication is that animal studies will produce knowledge that has a direct bearing on the human condition.

THE ROLE OF TIMING IN THE BRAIN STEM AUDITORY NUCLEI OF VERTEBRATES

Vertebrate animals gain biologically important information from environmental sounds. Localization of sound sources enables animals to detect and respond appropriately to danger, and it allows predators to detect and localize prey. In many species, rapidly fluctuating sounds are also the basis of communication between conspecifics. This information is not provided directly by the output of the ear but requires processing of the temporal pattern of firing in the tonotopic array of auditory nerve fibers. The auditory nerve feeds information through several parallel ascending pathways. Anatomical and electrophysiological specializations for conveying precise timing, including calyceal synaptic terminals and matching axonal conduction times, are evident in several of the major ascending auditory pathways through the ventral cochlear nucleus and its nonmammalian homologues. One pathway that is shared by all higher vertebrates makes an ongoing comparison of interaural phase for the localization of sound in the azimuth. Another pathway is specifically associated with higher frequency hearing in mammals and is thought to make use of interaural intensity differences for localizing high-frequency sounds. Balancing excitation from one ear with inhibition from the other in rapidly fluctuating signals requires that the timing of these synaptic inputs be matched and constant for widely varying sound stimuli in this pathway. The monaural nuclei of the lateral lemniscus, whose roles are not understood (although they are ubiquitous in higher vertebrates), receive input from multiple pathways that encode timing with precision, some through calyceal endings.

Neuronal architecture of the dorsal nucleus (cochlear nucleus) of the frog, Rana pipiens pipiens

The neuronal architecture of the dorsal nucleus of the Northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens pipiens), which is a homolog of the cochlear nucleus of mammals and birds, was investigated. Our study showed that the frog dorsal nucleus contains a number of morphologically distinct cell types that are discernible in terms of the cellular architecture as derived from Nissl-stained material and in terms of the dendritic profile as revealed by horseradish peroxidase-filled single neurons. These cell types are bushy cells, bipolar (or fusiform) cells, octopus cells, stellate cells, giant cells, radiate (or round) cells, and a variety of small cells. The different cell types occupy different regions of the nucleus. Therefore, our results suggest that the dorsal nucleus should no longer be considered to be a uniform nucleus containing a homogeneous population of neurons. Homologies of these cell types with those described in other vertebrate species, including mammals, are proposed.

Neuronal organization of the cochlear nuclei in alligator lizards: a light and electron microscopic investigation

The organization of neurons and fibers in the cochlear nuclei of the alligator lizard (Gerrhonotus multicarinatus) was examined with light and electron microscopy. In this species, much is known about the anatomy and physiology of the inner ear including the cochlear nerve, but little is known about the synaptic connections of cochlear fibers on second-order neurons. These data will help to develop general principles addressing the cellular organization of the vertebrate auditory system. Subdivisions of the cochlear nuclei were defined on the basis of their histologic appearance and neuronal composition. Neuron classes were proposed from their light microscopic and ultrastructural features. Nucleus magnocellularis medialis consists of a homogeneous population of neurons called "lesser ovoid" cells. Nucleus magnocellularis lateralis consists of "greater ovoid" and "small" cells. Nucleus angularis lateralis consists of "spindle" cells. Lastly, nucleus angularis medialis contains a population of large neurons called "duckhead" and "multipolar" cells, and a population of smaller neurons called "bulb" and "agranular" cells. These neuron populations are differentially innervated by tectorial and free-standing cochlear fibers that are associated with separate frequency ranges. All neuronal populations except agranular cells were observed to receive synaptic input from cochlear nerve fibers. In nucleus magnocellularis medialis and nucleus angularis medialis, primary afferents form both chemical and electrical synapses with resident neurons. These observations imply that acoustic information is synaptically processed in fundamentally distinct ways in the cochlear nuclei of alligator lizards and distributed along separate neural circuits. Thus, the characteristic structural and functional dichotomy of the alligator lizard inner ear is extended to central auditory pathways by way of cochlear nerve projections.

Auditory nerve terminals in the cochlear nucleus magnocellularis: differences between low and high frequencies

Primary auditory nerve fibers were labelled in the barn owl by localized horseradish peroxidase (HRP) injections into the cochlear nucleus angularis. They were followed to their terminal sites in the hearing organ (basilar papilla), confirming that they were auditory, and to the cochlear nucleus magnocellularis. The terminal sites of low-frequency fibers within nucleus magnocellularis always included an area previously described as the lagenar part, i.e., an area receiving primary input which is probably only vestibular. Furthermore, a number of differences were recognized between these low-frequency (up to 0.64 kHz) and the high-frequency (1.8 kHz and above) auditory nerve projections to nucleus magnocellularis. Most importantly, the collaterals given off by low-frequency fibers into the nucleus typically showed multiple terminal branching, with both en passant and terminal bouton-like swellings. High-frequency fiber collaterals, in contrast, terminated unbranched in a single endbulb of Held. Nucleus magnocellularis is the first station in a brainstem auditory pathway processing stimulus timing information, coded through neuronal phase locking. The prominent difference in terminal shape found between its low- and high-frequency input fibers is interpreted as reflecting different requirements of the absolute temporal precision for significant phase locking. Terminals in the shape of endbulbs of Held are probably a specialization to improve the temporal precision of synaptic transmission, allowing phase locking to higher frequencies.

Specificity of VIIIth nerve regeneration in lower vertebrates

From the initial studies of Sperry (Am. J. Physiol, 144:735-741, 1945) to more recent investigations, the regenerative capacity of the VIIIth cranial nerve in nonmammalian vertebrates has been noted for its robust and accurate recovery of functional connections after transection. The VIIIth cranial nerve contains nerve fibers that link functionally distinct sensory epithelial to various areas within the central nervous system (CNS), yet after transection these multiple components of the nerve navigate back to their original central target areas, without innervating inappropriate nuclei. A number of factors may be required to establish and direct VIIIth nerve regeneration. Cellular interactions appear to be necessary for the initiation of outgrowth and the maintenance of neural connections. The release of chemotropic substances from target cells has been postulated as the most likely mechanism guiding the reinnervation of central targets. Furthermore, the growth characteristics of these neurons in tissue culture, without target cells present, indicates that intrinsically regulated growth features may also contribute to the process of VIIIth nerve regeneration.

Neurite regeneration from single primary-auditory neurons in vitro

Neurons of the VIIIth cranial nerve in lower vertebrates precisely reconnect with their targets after sustaining injury. It is not known, however, whether the regenerating neurites are guided entirely by external cues or may also be directed by intrinsic mechanisms. To address this issue, single adult primary-auditory neurons were dissected from goldfish and placed in an in vitro environment, devoid of the normal complement of satellite cells, neighboring neurons, and synaptic targets, to observe their patterns of growth. Because acutely isolated neurons showed little neurite outgrowth, neurite regeneration was enhanced by focally crushing the VIIIth cranial nerve 2 to 24 h prior to removal for tissue culture. Neurons that regenerated under identical culture conditions showed growth patterns that could be categorized into three separate groups based on both their morphology and growth patterns. They either 1) remained unbranched (54%), 2) bifurcated or trifurcated into major branches directly from the myelinated stump (V-shaped) (19%), or 3) bifurcated from a regenerated process (Y-shaped), sometimes with a third, smaller branch (27%). Unbranched and V-shaped neurites grew at a constant elongation rate, while Y-shaped neurites grew variably, with alternating retractions and elongations. Neurite elongation was completed in a uniform time period of approximately 15 days despite the differences in elongation rate, maximum length, and latency to growth onset. The neurite branching morphology and manner of growth revealed in this study indicated that adult regenerating neurons can reproduce some elements of the final branching patterns in the absence of extrinsic cues, a capability which may ultimately contribute to the fidelity of reconnection seen in vivo.

Central projections of auditory nerve fibers in the barn owl

The central projections of the auditory nerve were examined in the barn owl. Each auditory nerve fiber enters the brain and divides to terminate in both the cochlear nucleus angularis and the cochlear nucleus magnocellularis. This division parallels a functional division into intensity and time coding in the auditory system. The lateral branch of the auditory nerve innervates the nucleus angularis and gives rise to a major and a minor terminal field. The terminals range in size and shape from small boutons to large irregular boutons with thorn-like appendages. The medial branch of the auditory nerve conveys phase information to the cells of the nucleus magnocellularis via large axosomatic endings or end bulbs of Held. Each medial branch divides to form 3-6 end bulbs along the rostrocaudal orientation of a single tonotopic band, and each magnocellular neuron receives 1-4 end bulbs. The end bulb envelops the postsynaptic cell body and forms large numbers of synapses. The auditory nerve profiles contain round clear vesicles and form punctate asymmetric synapses on both somatic spines and the cell body.